JP4568243B2 - Method of kneading fine powder material - Google Patents
Method of kneading fine powder material Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP4568243B2 JP4568243B2 JP2006074758A JP2006074758A JP4568243B2 JP 4568243 B2 JP4568243 B2 JP 4568243B2 JP 2006074758 A JP2006074758 A JP 2006074758A JP 2006074758 A JP2006074758 A JP 2006074758A JP 4568243 B2 JP4568243 B2 JP 4568243B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- particle size
- kneaded
- raw material
- stirring
- kneading
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Manufacture And Refinement Of Metals (AREA)
Description
本発明は、微粉を主体とする鉄鉱石原料の造粒に適し、目標とする粒度分布を備えた造粒物を製造可能な微粉原料の混練方法に関する。 The present invention relates to a method for kneading a fine powder material that is suitable for granulation of an iron ore raw material mainly composed of fine powder and that can produce a granulated product having a target particle size distribution.
従来、焼結機に供給する鉄鉱石原料(製鉄用原料ともいう)として、例えば赤鉄鉱のような良質の鉄鉱石原料が使用されてきたが、近年その枯渇化が進んでおり、従来よりも微粉を多く含む鉄鉱石原料の使用量が増加する傾向にある。
このため、焼結機の操業において、これらの鉄鉱石原料を不具合なく使いこなす必要があり、鉄鉱石原料の新たな造粒強化技術が求められている。このような造粒方法として、例えば、特許文献1及び特許文献2には、高速撹拌型ミキサーを用いる方法が開示されており、これにより劣質な鉄鉱石原料の造粒強化を達成している。
Conventionally, high-quality iron ore raw materials such as hematite have been used as iron ore raw materials (also referred to as iron making raw materials) to be supplied to a sintering machine. There is a tendency for the amount of iron ore raw materials containing a lot of fine powder to increase.
For this reason, in the operation of the sintering machine, it is necessary to make full use of these iron ore raw materials without problems, and a new granulation strengthening technique for the iron ore raw materials is required. As such a granulation method, for example,
しかしながら、これらの従来技術は、粒度分布が数mmの粗粒から250μmの微粉までの鉄鉱石原料を混合した状態で造粒していることからも明らかなように、核粒子となる粗粒の表面に微粉を付着させる造粒方法を対象としたものである。
このため、微粉の割合が今後更に増大する鉄鉱石原料に従来技術を使用する場合、核粒子となる粗粒の表面への微粉の付着厚みが過剰となり、例えば燃料粒子の燃焼性悪化による造粒物の焼結性の低下が発生する。また、核粒子となる粗粒の数が微粉に対して極端に不足するため、従来技術では造粒が不完全となる問題もある。
このように、今後は、微粉を多量に含む鉄鉱石原料の造粒、又は鉄鉱石原料から微粉のみを分離して造粒する必要が生じており、こうした微粉を主体とする鉄鉱石原料を効率的に造粒する技術を確立する必要性が生じている。
However, these prior arts are granulated in a state in which iron ore raw materials ranging from a coarse particle having a particle size distribution of several mm to a fine powder having a particle size of 250 μm are mixed. It is intended for a granulation method in which fine powder is adhered to the surface.
For this reason, when the conventional technology is used for iron ore raw materials in which the proportion of fine powder will further increase in the future, the adhesion thickness of fine powder on the surface of coarse particles that become core particles becomes excessive, for example, granulation due to deterioration in combustibility of fuel particles Decrease in sinterability of objects occurs. In addition, since the number of coarse particles serving as core particles is extremely insufficient with respect to the fine powder, there is a problem that granulation is incomplete in the prior art.
In this way, in the future, it will be necessary to granulate iron ore raw materials containing a large amount of fine powder, or to separate and granulate only iron fines from iron ore raw materials. There is a need to establish a technology for automatic granulation.
本発明はかかる事情に鑑みてなされたもので、微粉を主体とする鉄鉱石原料の造粒に適しており、目標とする粒度分布を備えた造粒物を製造でき、しかもその収率(歩留り)を従来よりも向上できる微粉原料の混練方法を提供することを目的とする。 The present invention has been made in view of such circumstances, and is suitable for granulation of iron ore raw materials mainly composed of fine powder, and can produce a granulated product having a target particle size distribution, and its yield (yield). It is an object of the present invention to provide a method for kneading a fine powder raw material that can be improved over conventional methods.
前記目的に沿う本発明に係る微粉原料の混練方法は、粒度分布3mm以上10mm以下の造粒物を60質量%以上の収率で得るために、粒径250μm以下の粒子を60質量%以上含む鉄鉱石原料を入れる円筒型の容器と、該容器内で回転して前記鉄鉱石原料を混練する撹拌羽根とを有する混練機により、前記鉄鉱石原料を混練して、平均粒度が3mm以上7mm以下の混練物を製造し、該混練物をドラムミキサーに入れて前記造粒物を製造する微粉原料の混練方法であって、前記容器の内径をD(m)、前記撹拌羽根の周速をu(m/s)、及び前記混練物の重力加速度をg(m/s 2 )とした場合、前記撹拌羽根の撹拌加速度(u 2 /D+g)を、20m/s 2 以上70m/s 2 以下の範囲内に設定する。 In order to obtain a granulated product having a particle size distribution of 3 mm or more and 10 mm or less in a yield of 60% by mass or more, the kneading method of the fine powder raw material according to the present invention that meets the above-mentioned object includes 60% by mass or more of particles having a particle size of 250 μm or less The iron ore material is kneaded by a kneader having a cylindrical container containing the iron ore material and a stirring blade that rotates in the container to knead the iron ore material, and the average particle size is 3 mm or more and 7 mm or less. The kneaded material is kneaded, and the kneaded material is put into a drum mixer to produce the granulated material. The kneaded material is kneaded, and the inner diameter of the container is D (m), and the peripheral speed of the stirring blade is u. (M / s) and when the gravitational acceleration of the kneaded product is g (m / s 2 ), the stirring acceleration (u 2 / D + g) of the stirring blade is 20 m / s 2 or more and 70 m / s 2 or less. Set within the range .
本発明に係る微粉原料の混練方法において、前記鉄鉱石原料の混練時間を10秒以上とし、混練後の前記混練物の水分含有量を7質量%以上12質量%以下の範囲にすることが好ましい。 In the method for kneading the fine powder raw material according to the present invention, the kneading time of the iron ore raw material is preferably 10 seconds or more, and the water content of the kneaded material after kneading is preferably in the range of 7% by mass to 12% by mass. .
請求項1及び2記載の微粉原料の混練方法は、微粉を多く含む鉄鉱石原料から、平均粒度を所定範囲にした混練物を製造するので、ドラムミキサーでは、例えば、事前に製造した粒径の大きな混練物を核とし、その表面に鉄鉱石原料を付着させて、目標とする粒径を備えた造粒物を製造でき、目標とする粒度分布の造粒物の収率を向上できる。これにより、混練物の表面に付着した鉄鉱石原料の付着厚みを過剰にすることなく適正量にできるので、例えば、燃料粒子の燃焼性悪化による造粒物の焼結性の低下を防止できる。従って、製造した造粒物を焼結機に装入して焼結鉱を製造するに際し、焼結機の通気性を阻害することなく、品質が良好な焼結鉱を生産性良く製造できる。
The kneading method of the fine powder raw material according to
特に、請求項1記載の微粉原料の混練方法は、混練物の製造に撹拌羽根を備えた混練機を使用し、その撹拌羽根の撹拌加速度を適正範囲に設定するので、混練物に過剰な撹拌力を付与して混練物を破壊することなく、また撹拌不足に伴う各混練物の合体による粗大化を抑制できる。これにより、目標とする粒径となるまで混練物を粒成長させることができ、その結果、目標とする粒度分布の造粒物の収率を向上できる。
In particular, the method for kneading the fine powder raw material according to
請求項2記載の微粉原料の混練方法は、鉄鉱石原料の混練時間を適正範囲に設定するので、混練物を構成する各鉄鉱石原料の粒子間隔を詰め(密度を向上させ)、混練物内部から水分を染み出させることで混練物の必要水分含有量を低減でき、かつ鉄鉱石原料の混練時における滞留時間の変動の影響を小さくできる。このとき、混練後の混練物の水分含有量を適正範囲に設定することで、混練中の核となる混練物の表面への水分の染み出し量を制御でき、水分を介して付着する例えば鉄鉱石原料の量を制御できる。これにより、目標とする粒径となるまで混練物を粒成長させることができ、その結果、目標とする粒度分布の造粒物の収率を向上できる。
In the method for kneading the fine powder raw material according to
続いて、添付した図面を参照しつつ、本発明を具体化した実施の形態につき説明し、本発明の理解に供する。
ここで、図1は本発明の一実施の形態に係る微粉原料の混練方法の説明図、図2は混練物の平均粒度と目標とする粒度分布を備えた造粒物の収率との関係を示す説明図、図3は混練物の粒径が決定される機構の説明図、図4は撹拌羽根の撹拌加速度及び混練物の水分含有量と混練物の平均粒径との関係を示す説明図、図5は混練物の水分含有量と鉄鉱石原料の付着力との関係を示す説明図、図6は鉄鉱石原料に投入された撹拌エネルギーと鉄鉱石原料の付着力との関係を示す説明図、図7は混練機による混練時間と目標とする平均粒度を得るための混練物の必要水分含有量との関係を比較した説明図である。
Next, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings for understanding of the present invention.
Here, FIG. 1 is an explanatory diagram of a method for kneading a fine powder raw material according to an embodiment of the present invention, and FIG. 2 is a relationship between the average particle size of the kneaded product and the yield of the granulated product having a target particle size distribution. FIG. 3 is an explanatory diagram of a mechanism for determining the particle size of the kneaded product, and FIG. 4 is an explanatory diagram showing the relationship between the stirring acceleration of the stirring blade and the moisture content of the kneaded product and the average particle size of the kneaded product. FIG. 5 is an explanatory diagram showing the relationship between the water content of the kneaded material and the adhesion of the iron ore material, and FIG. 6 shows the relationship between the stirring energy input to the iron ore material and the adhesion of the iron ore material. FIG. 7 is an explanatory diagram comparing the relationship between the kneading time by the kneader and the necessary water content of the kneaded material for obtaining the target average particle size.
図1に示すように、本発明の一実施の形態に係る微粉原料の混練方法においては、粒径250μm以下の粒子を60質量%以上含む鉄鉱石原料(以下、単に原料ともいう)を混練機10で混練して、平均粒度が3mm以上7mm以下の混練物を製造し、該混練物をドラムミキサー(造粒機ともいう)11に入れて造粒物を製造する。以下、詳しく説明する。 As shown in FIG. 1, in the method for kneading fine powder raw material according to an embodiment of the present invention, an iron ore raw material (hereinafter also simply referred to as raw material) containing 60% by mass or more of particles having a particle size of 250 μm or less is kneaded. 10 to produce a kneaded product having an average particle size of 3 mm to 7 mm, and the kneaded product is put into a drum mixer (also referred to as a granulator) 11 to produce a granulated product. This will be described in detail below.
まず、混練機10に鉄鉱石原料を入れ、更に水とバインダーを入れて、これらを混練する。
ここで、鉄鉱石原料は、粒径250μm以下の粒子を60質量%以上含むものであり、例えば、微粉を多量に含む原料、篩選別により前記構成に調整した原料、微粉のみを篩選別により分離した原料、更には粉砕した原料を使用できる。この鉄鉱石原料は、例えば、褐鉄鉱(Fe2O3・nH2O)、磁鉄鉱(Fe3O4)、及び赤鉄鉱(Fe2O3)のいずれか1又は2以上である。なお、褐鉄鉱としては、例えば、マラマンバ鉱石(産地銘柄:ウエストアンジェラス)、ピソライト鉱石(産地銘柄:ヤンディー、ローブリバー)、及び高燐ブロックマン鉱石がある。
First, an iron ore raw material is put into the
Here, the iron ore raw material contains 60% by mass or more of particles having a particle size of 250 μm or less. For example, a raw material containing a large amount of fine powder, a raw material adjusted to the above-described configuration by screening, and only fine powder are separated by screening. Raw materials, and further pulverized raw materials can be used. This iron ore raw material is, for example, one or more of limonite (Fe 2 O 3 .nH 2 O), magnetite (Fe 3 O 4 ), and hematite (Fe 2 O 3 ). Examples of limonite include maramamba ore (local brand: West Angelus), pisolite ore (local brand: Yandhi, Loeb River), and high phosphorus block man ore.
鉄鉱石原料として、粒径が0μmを超え250μm以下の粒子を60質量%以上含む原料を対象としたのは、このような構成の原料を従来の方法で造粒する場合、前記したように、造粒物の焼結性の低下が生じたり、また造粒が不完全となるためであり、例え造粒できたとしても、必要な強度が得られないためである。
このことから、本実施の形態では、粒径250μm以下、好ましくは220μm以下、更に好ましくは200μm以下の粒子を、60質量%以上、好ましくは70質量%以上、更に好ましくは80質量%以上含む鉄鉱石原料を混練の対象とする。なお、微粉の粒子量の上限を規定していないのは、全て微粉であってもよいためである。
このように、本実施の形態では、微粉の鉄鉱石原料を対象としているため、鉄鉱石原料に更に微粉の含鉄原料を含ませることもできる。この含鉄原料は、例えば、ダスト(混練ダスト又は粉塵ダスト)及びペレット原料(ペレットフィードともいう)のいずれか1又は2を使用できる。このダストの粒径は100μm以下程度であり、ペレット原料の粒径は250μm以下程度である。
As the iron ore raw material, the raw material containing 60% by mass or more of particles having a particle size of more than 0 μm and not more than 250 μm is targeted when the raw material having such a structure is granulated by a conventional method, as described above. This is because the sinterability of the granulated product is deteriorated or the granulation becomes incomplete, and even if granulation is possible, the required strength cannot be obtained.
Therefore, in this embodiment, the iron ore containing particles having a particle size of 250 μm or less, preferably 220 μm or less, more preferably 200 μm or less, 60 mass% or more, preferably 70 mass% or more, more preferably 80 mass% or more. Stone raw materials are to be kneaded. The reason why the upper limit of the amount of fine powder is not specified is that all fine powder may be used.
Thus, in this Embodiment, since the iron ore raw material of a fine powder is made into object, a fine iron-containing raw material can also be further included in an iron ore raw material. As this iron-containing raw material, for example, any one or two of dust (kneaded dust or dust dust) and pellet raw material (also referred to as pellet feed) can be used. The particle size of the dust is about 100 μm or less, and the particle size of the pellet raw material is about 250 μm or less.
バインダーは、造粒物の強度向上に寄与させるため、従来から使用している例えば、生石灰又は石灰岩のような無機系バインダーを使用できる。また、バインダーとして、例えば、パルプ廃液又はコーンスターチ(水溶液又はコロイド状になったもの)を含む有機系バインダー、及び固体架橋を促進する分散剤(分散剤を添加した水溶液又はコロイドを含む)のいずれか1又は2を使用することが好ましいが、これと無機系バインダーを併用して使用してもよい。
なお、バインダーの添加量は、鉄鉱石原料量に対し外掛けで1質量%以下程度でよい。
Since the binder contributes to improving the strength of the granulated product, an inorganic binder such as quick lime or limestone that has been conventionally used can be used. In addition, as the binder, for example, any one of an organic binder containing pulp waste liquid or corn starch (aqueous solution or colloidal form) and a dispersing agent (including an aqueous solution or colloid added with a dispersing agent) that promotes solid crosslinking Although 1 or 2 is preferably used, it may be used in combination with an inorganic binder.
In addition, the addition amount of a binder may be about 1 mass% or less on the outside with respect to the iron ore raw material amount.
続いて、鉄鉱石原料を混練する混練機10について説明する。
原料の造粒を生産性よく行うには、原料を投入したドラムミキサー内に水とバインダーを混入させ、これらを均一に混合する必要がある。このとき、混練機をドラムミキサーの前に設置することは一般的に行われている。
しかしながら、混練機を使用して原料を単に混練しても、この混練物をドラムミキサーに入れて製造した場合、図2に示すように、焼結機への供給に適した目標とする粒度分布3mm以上10mm以下の造粒物を高い収率(本実施の形態では60質量%以上)で得ることができない。このため、目標とする粒度分布の造粒物を高い収率で得るには、混練物の平均粒度を3mm以上7mm以下の適正範囲に確保する必要がある。
そこで、本実施の形態では、混練物の平均粒度を適正範囲にするため、混練機10として、鉄鉱石原料を入れる円筒型の容器12と、容器12内で回転して鉄鉱石原料を混練する板状の撹拌羽根13とを有する装置を使用する。
Next, the
In order to perform the granulation of the raw material with high productivity, it is necessary to mix water and a binder in the drum mixer into which the raw material is charged and to mix them uniformly. At this time, it is common practice to install the kneader in front of the drum mixer.
However, even if the raw materials are simply kneaded using a kneader, if this kneaded product is put into a drum mixer and manufactured, as shown in FIG. 2, the target particle size distribution suitable for supply to the sintering machine A granulated product of 3 mm or more and 10 mm or less cannot be obtained with a high yield (60% by mass or more in the present embodiment). For this reason, in order to obtain a granulated product having a target particle size distribution with a high yield, it is necessary to ensure the average particle size of the kneaded material within an appropriate range of 3 mm to 7 mm.
Therefore, in the present embodiment, in order to bring the average particle size of the kneaded material into an appropriate range, as the
なお、混練物の平均粒度については、その下限値が3mm未満の場合、引き続き行うドラムミキサーの造粒の際に、生産性よく造粒物の製造を行うために必要な混練物の大きさを満足できず、造粒を十分に進行させることができないため、目的外の微粒粒子の割合が多くなる。一方、混練物の平均粒度の上限値が7mmを超える場合、ドラムミキサーで過剰な造粒が行われ、目的外の粗大粒子の割合が増加する。
以上のことから、混練物の平均粒度を3mm以上7mm以下に規定したが、目標粒度分布の造粒物の収率を、更に安定に得るためには、混練物の平均粒度の下限値を3.5mm、更には4mm、上限値を6mm、更には5.5mmに規定することが好ましい。
ここで、混練物の平均粒径は、混練機で製造した混練物を乾燥した後、10.0、8.0、6.7、4.75、2.8、2.0、及び1.0mmの各篩で篩分けし、各粒度区間の重量割合を求め、各粒度区間の代表径を、12.0、9.0、7.35、5.73、3.78、2.4、1.5、及び0.7mmとし、これを重量割合で加重平均して求めた。
As for the average particle size of the kneaded product, when the lower limit is less than 3 mm, the size of the kneaded product necessary for producing the granulated product with high productivity when the drum mixer is subsequently granulated is set. Since it is not satisfactory and granulation cannot proceed sufficiently, the proportion of undesired fine particles increases. On the other hand, when the upper limit of the average particle size of the kneaded product exceeds 7 mm, excessive granulation is performed by the drum mixer, and the proportion of undesired coarse particles increases.
From the above, the average particle size of the kneaded product was defined as 3 mm or more and 7 mm or less. However, in order to obtain the yield of the granulated product having the target particle size distribution more stably, the lower limit value of the average particle size of the kneaded product is set to 3 It is preferable that the upper limit value is set to 0.5 mm, further 4 mm, and the upper limit value to 6 mm, and more preferably 5.5 mm.
Here, the average particle diameter of the kneaded product is 10.0, 8.0, 6.7, 4.75, 2.8, 2.0, and 1. Sieving with each 0 mm sieve to determine the weight ratio of each particle size section, the representative diameter of each particle size section is 12.0, 9.0, 7.35, 5.73, 3.78, 2.4, It was set to 1.5 and 0.7 mm, and this was obtained by weighted averaging at a weight ratio.
次に、前記した構成を備える具体的な混練機の選定、及び混練機の操作条件を検討した結果について説明する。
本発明者らは、各種混練機を用いて混練実験を行った結果、混練物性状に混練機の形態と混練物の水分含有量(以下、水分値ともいう)の影響が大きいことを見出した。これらを系統的に説明するメカニズムを検討した結果、混練物の平均粒径は、撹拌力と原料の付着力のバランスで決定されることを見出した。
混練機による混練に際し、原料の撹拌により、原料同士は合体と分離を繰り返すが、最終的には、原料の体積に作用する撹拌による慣性力が、合体した原料を分離させる作用として働き、また原料の表面に作用する付着力が、分散した原料同士を合体させる作用として働くと考えられる。
Next, the selection of a specific kneader having the above-described configuration and the results of studying the operating conditions of the kneader will be described.
As a result of conducting kneading experiments using various kneaders, the present inventors have found that the influence of the kneader configuration and the water content of the kneaded material (hereinafter also referred to as the moisture value) on the kneaded material properties is large. . As a result of examining the mechanism for explaining these systematically, it was found that the average particle size of the kneaded product is determined by the balance between the stirring force and the adhesion force of the raw materials.
When kneading with a kneader, the raw materials are repeatedly coalesced and separated by stirring the raw materials. Ultimately, the inertial force due to stirring acting on the volume of the raw materials acts as an action for separating the combined raw materials, and the raw materials It is considered that the adhesive force acting on the surface of the material works as an action to unite the dispersed raw materials.
この現象イメージを示す図3は、基準となる原料Aと、この原料Aに対して比較的大きい原料B及び小さい原料Cの合体及び分離挙動を例示したものである。なお、細い矢印は慣性力による分離を、太い矢印は付着力による合体を、それぞれ示している。
原料Aの大きさを基準にした場合、原料Bは比較的大きいため、その表面積に対する体積の割合が大きく、体積力(慣性力)が勝って原料Aから分離してしまう。一方、原料Cは小さいため、その体積に対する表面積の割合が大きく、付着力が勝って原料Aに付着した状態を維持しようとする。
各原料A〜C間において、このような分離と合体が繰り返された結果、慣性力と付着力のバランスから、最終的に得られる混練物がある粒径に収斂すると考えられる。
FIG. 3 showing this phenomenon image illustrates the coalescence and separation behavior of the reference raw material A and the relatively large raw material B and small raw material C with respect to the raw material A. A thin arrow indicates separation by inertia force, and a thick arrow indicates coalescence by adhesion force.
When the size of the raw material A is used as a reference, since the raw material B is relatively large, the ratio of the volume to the surface area is large, and the body force (inertial force) wins and separates from the raw material A. On the other hand, since the raw material C is small, the ratio of the surface area to the volume is large, and the adhesive force is won and the state of adhering to the raw material A is maintained.
As a result of such separation and coalescence being repeated between the raw materials A to C, it is considered that the finally obtained kneaded product converges to a certain particle size from the balance of inertia force and adhesion force.
このことから、混練機の容器の内径をD(m)、容器内の撹拌羽根の周速をu(m/s)、混練物の重力加速度をg(m/s2)、混練物の密度をρ(kg/m3)、混練物の平均粒径をd(m)、鉄鉱石原料の付着力をF(kg・m/s2/m2)とした場合、撹拌力と付着力の釣り合いは、以下の式で現される。なお、撹拌羽根の撹拌加速度(以下、単に撹拌加速度ともいう)を、(u2/D+g)で現す。
d3×ρ×(u2/D+g)=d2×F
これにより、混練物の平均粒径は、以下の式で現される。
d=F/ρ/(u2/D+g)・・・(1)
From this, the inner diameter of the container of the kneading machine is D (m), the peripheral speed of the stirring blade in the container is u (m / s), the gravitational acceleration of the kneaded material is g (m / s 2 ), and the density of the kneaded material. Is ρ (kg / m 3 ), the average particle size of the kneaded product is d (m), and the iron ore raw material adhesion force is F (kg · m / s 2 / m 2 ). The balance is expressed by the following equation. The stirring acceleration of the stirring blade (hereinafter also simply referred to as stirring acceleration) is expressed as (u 2 / D + g).
d 3 × ρ × (u 2 / D + g) = d 2 × F
Thereby, the average particle diameter of a kneaded material is represented by the following formula | equation.
d = F / ρ / (u 2 / D + g) (1)
ここで、撹拌力に影響する因子を検討するため、各種混練機(パグミル、ピンミキサー、及びレディゲミキサー)の撹拌羽根の撹拌加速度(u2/D+g)と、各種混練機で得られた混練物の平均粒径との関係を示す図4を参照しながら説明する。なお、図4には、前記(1)式を使用し、混練物の水分含有量(以下、単に水分値ともいう)別に求めた理論線(撹拌エネルギー一定条件でのモデル計算値)を併記している。
図4に示すように、混練物の平均粒径が撹拌羽根の撹拌加速度に反比例しており、また混練物の水分値の影響も考慮すれば、目標とする混練物の平均粒度を安定に確保するためには、撹拌加速度を20(m/s2)以上70(m/s2)以下に規定する必要がある。これは、撹拌加速度が20(m/s2)未満の場合、原料同士の付着力が勝り、原料同士が合体し成長するため混練物が粗大となり、しかも混練物の水分値の変動の影響が大きくなる傾向が大きくなり、一方、撹拌加速度が70(m/s2)を超える場合、撹拌力が強過ぎて混練物が破壊されるため、混練物の平均粒径が過小となる傾向が大きくなるためである。
Here, in order to examine factors affecting the stirring force, the stirring acceleration (u 2 / D + g) of the stirring blades of various kneaders (pug mill, pin mixer, and readyge mixer) and kneading obtained by various kneaders This will be described with reference to FIG. 4 showing the relationship with the average particle size of the product. In FIG. 4, the theoretical line (model calculation value under a constant stirring energy) obtained by using the above formula (1) and separately for the moisture content of the kneaded product (hereinafter also simply referred to as the moisture value) is shown together. ing.
As shown in FIG. 4, the average particle size of the kneaded material is inversely proportional to the stirring acceleration of the stirring blades, and if the influence of the moisture value of the kneaded material is also taken into consideration, the target average particle size of the kneaded material is stably secured. In order to achieve this, the stirring acceleration must be regulated to 20 (m / s 2 ) or more and 70 (m / s 2 ) or less. This is because when the stirring acceleration is less than 20 (m / s 2 ), the adhesion between the raw materials is excellent, the raw materials are united and grow, so that the kneaded material becomes coarse, and the influence of the fluctuation of the moisture value of the kneaded material is also affected. On the other hand, when the stirring acceleration exceeds 70 (m / s 2 ), the stirring force is too strong and the kneaded product is destroyed, so that the average particle size of the kneaded product tends to be too small. It is to become.
このため、混練物の目標平均粒度を確保する範囲として、撹拌羽根の撹拌加速度を20(m/s2)以上70(m/s2)以下と規定したが、望ましくは20(m/s2)以上50(m/s2)以下に確保するとよい。
以上の検討結果に基づき、このような撹拌加速度を満たす混練機として、従来使用されている例えば、レディゲミキサー又はピンミキサーを使用できる。なお、高速撹拌ミキサーであるアイリッヒミキサーについても、そのアジテーター回転速度を低速に調整することで使用可能である。
For this reason, the stirring acceleration of the stirring blade is defined as 20 (m / s 2 ) or more and 70 (m / s 2 ) or less as a range to ensure the target average particle size of the kneaded material, but preferably 20 (m / s 2). ) To 50 (m / s 2 ) or less.
Based on the above examination results, for example, a Redige mixer or a pin mixer that has been conventionally used can be used as a kneader satisfying such a stirring acceleration. An Eirich mixer, which is a high-speed stirring mixer, can also be used by adjusting the agitator rotation speed to a low speed.
レディゲミキサーとピンミキサーは、撹拌羽根の回転軸が、地面に対して平行に配置されており、混練物は上下動しながら混練されるため、混練物の重力加速度gの影響が大きい。このため、撹拌羽根の撹拌加速度を、重力加速度gを考慮した前記範囲に確保するとよい。
しかし、アイリッヒミキサーを使用する場合は、撹拌羽根の回転軸が、地面に対して垂直方向に配置されており、混練物は水平方向で混練されるため、混練物の重力加速度gの影響が小さくなる。従って、この場合は、混練物の重力加速度gに影響を及ぼすアジテーター回転速度を考慮しながら、撹拌羽根の撹拌加速度を、前記した範囲から最大でも10(m/s2)差し引いた範囲、即ち10(m/s2)以上60(m/s2)、望ましくは10(m/s2)以上40(m/s2)以下に確保するとよい。
In the Redige mixer and the pin mixer, the rotating shafts of the stirring blades are arranged in parallel to the ground, and the kneaded product is kneaded while moving up and down, so the influence of the gravitational acceleration g of the kneaded product is large. For this reason, it is good to ensure the stirring acceleration of a stirring blade in the said range which considered the gravity acceleration g.
However, when the Eirich mixer is used, the rotating shaft of the stirring blade is arranged in the vertical direction with respect to the ground, and the kneaded product is kneaded in the horizontal direction. Get smaller. Accordingly, in this case, while taking into account the agitator rotation speed that affects the gravitational acceleration g of the kneaded product, the range obtained by subtracting the stirring acceleration of the stirring blade by 10 (m / s 2 ) at the maximum, that is, 10 (M / s 2 ) to 60 (m / s 2 ), preferably 10 (m / s 2 ) to 40 (m / s 2 ).
次に、原料の付着力について、これに影響する因子を検討した結果を、図5、図6を参照しながら説明する。
原料の付着力は、前記(1)式に基づき、以下の式で示される。
F=d×ρ×(u2/D+g)・・・(2)
図5は、前記した各種混練機について、(2)式で得られた原料の付着力を、混練物の水分値に対してプロットした結果であるが、原料の付着力は、水分値に比例する傾向にあるものの、同一水分値でも異なる場合があった。また、この関係について、更に検討した結果、撹拌エネルギーが大きいほど、原料の付着力が増大することを見出した。
図6は、撹拌エネルギー(u2/D+g)×u×t(tは混練時間:s)に対して、前記(2)式で得られた原料の付着力をプロットした結果であるが、撹拌エネルギーの増大と共に原料の付着力が増加する一方、ある撹拌エネルギー以上では、原料の付着力が次第に安定する(増加量が小さくなる)ことが判った。
Next, the results of studying factors affecting the adhesion force of raw materials will be described with reference to FIGS.
The adhesion force of the raw material is expressed by the following formula based on the formula (1).
F = d × ρ × (u 2 / D + g) (2)
FIG. 5 is a result of plotting the adhesion force of the raw material obtained by the equation (2) with respect to the moisture value of the kneaded product for the various kneaders described above. The adhesion force of the raw material is proportional to the moisture value. However, there were cases where the same moisture value was different. Further, as a result of further investigation on this relationship, it was found that the greater the stirring energy, the greater the adhesion of the raw material.
FIG. 6 is a result of plotting the adhesion force of the raw material obtained by the above equation (2) against stirring energy (u 2 / D + g) × u × t (t is kneading time: s). It was found that the adhesion force of the raw material increases as the energy increases, while the adhesion force of the raw material gradually becomes stable (the increase amount becomes smaller) above a certain stirring energy.
以上に示した図4〜図6の関係から、混練機としてレディゲミキサーを使用した場合の操業範囲を計算した結果を図7に示す。なお、図7は、混練時間に対し、混練物の平均粒度(以下、単に混練物粒度ともいう)を3mm以上7mm以下に確保するための適正な水分値の範囲を計算した結果であり、図7中の各撹拌加速度、即ち10、40、及び90(m/s2)において、混練物が3mmの平均粒径を得る水分値を点線で、また7mmの平均粒径を得る水分値を実線でそれぞれ示しており、その間が適正な水分値の範囲(網かけ部分)を示すものである。
図7から明らかなように、混練時間が短い範囲では、混練物が前記した平均粒度を得るために必要な水分値の変化が大きく、水分値の変動に対して混練物粒度の変動が大きいと考えられる。また、混練時間をある程度長くすることで、混練物の水分値を低減でき、その後に行う造粒物製造後の乾燥負荷の軽減が可能になる。
以上のことから、混練時間を10秒以上確保することを規定した。なお、図7から明らかなように、混練時間の長期化は、水分値の変動にあまり影響を及ぼさないため、上限値について規定していないが、生産性を考慮すれば5分以下、好ましくは3分以下とする。
FIG. 7 shows the result of calculating the operating range when a Redige mixer is used as the kneader from the relationship shown in FIGS. FIG. 7 shows the result of calculating an appropriate moisture value range for securing the average particle size of the kneaded material (hereinafter also simply referred to as the kneaded material particle size) to 3 mm to 7 mm with respect to the kneading time. 7, the moisture value at which the kneaded product obtains an average particle diameter of 3 mm is indicated by a dotted line, and the moisture value at which an average particle diameter of 7 mm is obtained is indicated by a solid line at each agitation acceleration of 7, ie, 40, 90 and 90 (m / s 2 ). In the figure, an appropriate range of moisture value (shaded part) is shown in between.
As is clear from FIG. 7, in the range where the kneading time is short, the kneaded product has a large change in the moisture value necessary for obtaining the above average particle size, and the kneaded product particle size varies greatly with respect to the variation in the moisture value. Conceivable. In addition, by increasing the kneading time to some extent, the moisture value of the kneaded product can be reduced, and the drying load after the granulated product produced thereafter can be reduced.
From the above, it was defined that the kneading time was secured for 10 seconds or more. As is clear from FIG. 7, the longer kneading time does not significantly affect the fluctuation of the moisture value, so the upper limit value is not specified, but considering productivity, it is 5 minutes or less, preferably 3 minutes or less.
また、撹拌羽根の撹拌加速度が10(m/s2)程度と小さい場合、目標とする水分値の範囲が狭く、水分値に変動が生じたときに、混練物粒度が目標範囲から外れることが懸念される。一方、撹拌羽根の撹拌加速度が90(m/s2)程度と大きい場合、水分値を12質量%以上に過剰に高くしなければならず、造粒後の乾燥負荷が増大することとなり好ましくない。
ここで、撹拌羽根の撹拌加速度を、前記した適正範囲内の40(m/s2)程度に確保した場合、混練物の水分値が8質量%以上10質量%以下となり、混練物の製造の際の作業性が良好になる。
これらのことから、混練物の水分含有量が7質量%未満の場合、結果的に制御する水分範囲が狭くなり、工業的に成り立たず、一方12質量%を超える場合は、その後に行う乾燥に大きな負荷がかかることになり好ましくないという結果が得られた。
When the stirring acceleration of the stirring blade is as small as about 10 (m / s 2 ), the target moisture value range is narrow, and when the moisture value fluctuates, the kneaded product particle size may deviate from the target range. Concerned. On the other hand, when the stirring acceleration of the stirring blade is as large as about 90 (m / s 2 ), the moisture value must be excessively increased to 12% by mass or more, which increases the drying load after granulation. .
Here, when the stirring acceleration of the stirring blade is secured to about 40 (m / s 2 ) within the above-described appropriate range, the moisture value of the kneaded product becomes 8% by mass or more and 10% by mass or less. Workability at the time becomes better.
From these facts, when the water content of the kneaded material is less than 7% by mass, the water range to be controlled is narrowed as a result, which does not hold industrially. On the other hand, when the water content exceeds 12% by mass, As a result, a large load was applied, which was not preferable.
従って、混練物の水分値の範囲を7質量%以上12質量%と規定したが、好ましくは、その下限値を8質量%とし、上限値を11質量%とする。
以上の結果に基づき、前記した混練機10において、撹拌羽根13の撹拌加速度、及び混練後の混練物の水分含有量(混練時間も含む)のいずれか1又は2を設定し、平均粒度が3mm以上7mm以下の混練物を製造する。
そして、この混練物をドラムミキサー11に入れることにより、図2に示すように、例えば、粒度分布3mm以上10mm以下の造粒物の収率が60質量%以上の造粒物を製造できる。製造した造粒物は、必要に応じて篩選別機で篩分けされた後、更に乾燥機14で乾燥処理され、焼結機(図示しない)へ供給される。
Therefore, although the range of the moisture value of the kneaded material is defined as 7% by mass or more and 12% by mass, the lower limit value is preferably 8% by mass and the upper limit value is 11% by mass.
Based on the above results, in the
And by putting this kneaded material into the
次に、本発明の作用効果を確認するために行った実施例について説明する。
ここでは、粒径250μm以下の粒子を80質量%含む鉄鉱石粉(鉄鉱石原料)をレディゲミキサー(容器の内径:2000mm)に入れ、これに水分と有機系バインダーを添加して混練し、得られた混練物の平均粒度を検討した。ここで、混練物の平均粒度は、各実施例及び比較例毎に、鉄鉱石粉の混練を5回ずつ実施し、各回毎に測定して、得られた粒度分布を以下の各表でそれぞれ示した。なお、混練物の平均粒度が3mm以上7mm以下の範囲に入った回数が5回の場合を○、2〜4回の場合を△、1回又は入らなかった場合を×とした。
この混練物をドラムミキサーに入れて造粒物を製造し、粒度3mm以上10mm以下の造粒物の収率についても調査した。なお、以下の検討においては、レディゲミキサーによる混練時間を120秒に固定して行った。
Next, examples carried out for confirming the effects of the present invention will be described.
Here, iron ore powder (iron ore raw material) containing 80% by mass of particles having a particle size of 250 μm or less is placed in a readyge mixer (inner diameter of container: 2000 mm), and water and an organic binder are added thereto and kneaded. The average particle size of the obtained kneaded material was examined. Here, the average particle size of the kneaded product was measured for each time by performing kneading of iron ore powder five times for each example and comparative example, and the obtained particle size distribution is shown in the following tables, respectively. It was. In addition, the case where the number of times that the average particle size of the kneaded material entered the range of 3 mm or more and 7 mm or less was 5 was evaluated as ◯, the case of 2 to 4 times as Δ, or the case where it did not enter as ×.
This kneaded product was put into a drum mixer to produce a granulated product, and the yield of the granulated product having a particle size of 3 mm or more and 10 mm or less was also investigated. In the following examination, the kneading time by the Redige mixer was fixed to 120 seconds.
まず、撹拌羽根の撹拌加速度の影響を検討した結果について説明する。
ここで、実施例1〜3は、撹拌羽根の撹拌加速度を、前記した20m/s2以上70m/s2以下の適正範囲に設定した結果であり、比較例1、2は、適正範囲外に設定した結果である。なお、混練物の水分値は、9.5質量%に設定した。
First, the result of examining the influence of the stirring acceleration of the stirring blade will be described.
Here, Examples 1 to 3 are the results of setting the stirring acceleration of the stirring blades to an appropriate range of 20 m / s 2 or more and 70 m / s 2 or less, and Comparative Examples 1 and 2 are outside the appropriate range. This is the result of setting. The moisture value of the kneaded product was set to 9.5% by mass.
表1から明らかなように、撹拌加速度の上昇に伴い、混練物が破壊されその平均粒度が小さくなる傾向が得られた。
ここで、実施例2は、撹拌加速度が適正範囲の最も良好な値であったため、混練物の平均粒度は○判定であり、その結果、適正粒度の造粒物の収率も60質量%以上を達成できた。また、実施例1、3は、その撹拌加速度が適正範囲の下限値と上限値にそれぞれ相当するものであったため、混練物の平均粒度は△判定であった。このため、適正粒度の造粒物の収率は、実施例2に及ばないものの良好な結果が得られた。
一方、比較例1のように、撹拌加速度が適正範囲の下限値より小さい場合は、混練物が粗大化し、一方比較例2のように、撹拌加速度が適正範囲の上限値より大きい場合は、混練物が破壊され、適正範囲内の平均粒度の混練物を得られなかった(判定:×)。このため、適正粒度の造粒物の収率も悪化した。
以上のことから、撹拌羽根の撹拌加速度を20m/s2以上70m/s2以下に設定し、混練物の平均粒度を適正範囲内にすることで、適正粒度の造粒物の収率が高められることを確認できた。
As is apparent from Table 1, as the stirring acceleration increased, the kneaded material tended to be broken and its average particle size tended to be small.
Here, in Example 2, since the stirring acceleration was the best value in the appropriate range, the average particle size of the kneaded product was judged as ◯, and as a result, the yield of the granulated product of the appropriate particle size was also 60% by mass or more. Was achieved. In Examples 1 and 3, since the stirring acceleration corresponded to the lower limit value and the upper limit value of the appropriate range, the average particle size of the kneaded material was Δ. For this reason, although the yield of the granulated material of an appropriate particle size did not reach Example 2, the favorable result was obtained.
On the other hand, when the stirring acceleration is smaller than the lower limit value of the appropriate range as in Comparative Example 1, the kneaded material is coarsened. On the other hand, when the stirring acceleration is higher than the upper limit value of the appropriate range as in Comparative Example 2, kneading is performed. The product was destroyed, and a kneaded product having an average particle size within an appropriate range could not be obtained (judgment: x). For this reason, the yield of the granulated product with an appropriate particle size also deteriorated.
From the above, the stirring acceleration of the stirring blade is set to 20 m / s 2 or more and 70 m / s 2 or less, and the average particle size of the kneaded product is set within an appropriate range, thereby increasing the yield of the granulated product with the appropriate particle size. I was able to confirm that
次に、撹拌羽根の撹拌加速度を、適正範囲の下限値である20m/s2に設定した場合の混練物の水分値を検討した結果について説明する。
ここで、実施例1、4は、混練物の水分値を、前記した7質量%以上12質量%以下の適正範囲に設定した結果であり、比較例3は、適正範囲の下限値未満に設定した結果である。
Next, the result of examining the moisture value of the kneaded material when the stirring acceleration of the stirring blade is set to 20 m / s 2 which is the lower limit value of the appropriate range will be described.
Here, Examples 1 and 4 are the results of setting the moisture value of the kneaded material to an appropriate range of 7% by mass or more and 12% by mass or less, and Comparative Example 3 is set to be less than the lower limit value of the appropriate range. It is the result.
表2から明らかなように、混練物の水分値の増加に伴い、混練物が粗大化する傾向が得られた。このため、実施例4に示すように、混練物の水分値を適正範囲の下限値に設定することで、混練物の平均粒度は○判定であり、その結果、適正粒度の造粒物の収率も60質量%以上を達成できた。
一方、比較例3のように、混練物の水分値が不足して混練物の粒成長を促進できず、平均粒度が×判定の場合は、適正粒度の造粒物の収率も悪化した。
As is clear from Table 2, there was a tendency for the kneaded product to become coarser as the moisture value of the kneaded product increased. For this reason, as shown in Example 4, by setting the moisture value of the kneaded product to the lower limit value of the appropriate range, the average particle size of the kneaded product is judged as ◯, and as a result, the granulated product of the appropriate particle size is collected. The rate was also able to achieve 60 mass% or more.
On the other hand, as in Comparative Example 3, when the moisture value of the kneaded product was insufficient and the grain growth of the kneaded product could not be promoted, and the average particle size was x, the yield of the granulated product having an appropriate particle size was also deteriorated.
また、撹拌羽根の撹拌加速度を、適正範囲の上限値である70m/s2に設定した場合の混練物の水分値を検討した結果について説明する。
ここで、実施例3、5は、混練物の水分値を、前記した7質量%以上12質量%以下の適正範囲に設定した結果であり、比較例4は、適正範囲の上限値を超えた値に設定した結果である。
Moreover, the result of having examined the moisture value of the kneaded material when the stirring acceleration of the stirring blade is set to 70 m / s 2 which is the upper limit value of the appropriate range will be described.
Here, Examples 3 and 5 are the results of setting the moisture value of the kneaded material to an appropriate range of 7% by mass or more and 12% by mass or less, and Comparative Example 4 exceeded the upper limit value of the appropriate range. This is the result of setting the value.
表3から明らかなように、混練物の水分値の増加に伴い、混練物の粒成長が促進する傾向が得られた。このため、実施例5に示すように、混練物の水分値を適正範囲の上限値に設定することで、混練物の平均粒度は○判定であり、その結果、適正粒度の造粒物の収率も60質量%以上を達成できた。
一方、比較例4のように、混練物の水分値が過剰になって混練物が粗大化し、平均粒度が×判定である場合は、適正粒度の造粒物の収率も悪化した。
以上に示した表2、表3の結果から、混練物の水分値を7質量%以上12質量%以下に設定し、混練物の平均粒度を適正範囲内にすることで、適正粒度の造粒物の収率が高められることを確認できた。
As is apparent from Table 3, with the increase of the moisture value of the kneaded product, a tendency to promote grain growth of the kneaded product was obtained. For this reason, as shown in Example 5, by setting the moisture value of the kneaded product to the upper limit value of the proper range, the average particle size of the kneaded product is judged as ◯, and as a result, the granulated product of the appropriate particle size is collected. The rate was also able to achieve 60 mass% or more.
On the other hand, as in Comparative Example 4, when the water content of the kneaded product was excessive and the kneaded product was coarsened, and the average particle size was x, the yield of the granulated product having an appropriate particle size was also deteriorated.
From the results of Tables 2 and 3 shown above, the moisture value of the kneaded product is set to 7% by mass or more and 12% by mass or less, and the average particle size of the kneaded product is set within an appropriate range, thereby granulating the appropriate particle size. It was confirmed that the yield of the product was increased.
続いて、混練物の水分値を、適正範囲の下限値である7質量%に設定した場合の撹拌羽根の撹拌加速度を検討した結果について説明する。
ここで、参考例1と比較例5は、撹拌羽根の撹拌加速度を、適正範囲の下限値未満に設定した結果である。
Then, the result of having examined the stirring acceleration of the stirring blade at the time of setting the moisture value of a kneaded material to 7 mass% which is the lower limit of an appropriate range is demonstrated.
Here, Reference Example 1 and Comparative Example 5 are the results of setting the stirring acceleration of the stirring blades to be less than the lower limit value of the appropriate range.
表4から明らかなように、撹拌羽根の撹拌加速度の低下に伴い、混練物の粒成長が促進する傾向が得られた。参考例1は、撹拌羽根の撹拌加速度が下限値未満であったが、混練物の水分値が適正範囲内であったため、混練物の平均粒度が△判定であった。このため、適正粒度の造粒物の収率は、実施例4に及ばないものの良好な結果が得られた。
一方、比較例5のように、撹拌加速度が不足し過ぎて混練物が粗大化し、平均粒度が×判定の場合は、適正粒度の造粒物の収率も悪化した。
As is apparent from Table 4, with the decrease in the stirring acceleration of the stirring blades, a tendency to promote grain growth of the kneaded product was obtained. In Reference Example 1 , although the stirring acceleration of the stirring blade was less than the lower limit value, the average particle size of the kneaded material was Δ because the moisture value of the kneaded material was within the appropriate range. For this reason, although the yield of the granulated material of an appropriate particle size did not reach Example 4, the favorable result was obtained.
On the other hand, as in Comparative Example 5, when the stirring acceleration was insufficient and the kneaded product was coarsened, and the average particle size was x, the yield of the granulated product having an appropriate particle size was also deteriorated.
また、混練物の水分値を、適正範囲の上限値である12質量%に設定した場合の撹拌羽根の撹拌加速度を検討した結果について説明する。
ここで、参考例2と比較例6は、撹拌羽根の撹拌加速度を、適正範囲の上限値を超えた値に設定した結果である。
Moreover, the result of having examined the stirring acceleration of the stirring blade when the moisture value of the kneaded product is set to 12% by mass which is the upper limit value of the appropriate range will be described.
Here, the reference example 2 and the comparative example 6 are the results of setting the stirring acceleration of the stirring blade to a value exceeding the upper limit value of the appropriate range.
表5から明らかなように、撹拌羽根の撹拌加速度の上昇に伴い、混練物が破壊されその平均粒度が小さくなる傾向が得られた。参考例2は、撹拌羽根の撹拌加速度が上限値を超えたものであったが、混練物の水分値が適正範囲内であったため、混練物の平均粒度が△判定であった。このため、適正粒度の造粒物の収率は、実施例5に及ばないものの良好な結果が得られた。
一方、比較例6のように、撹拌加速度が上昇し過ぎて混練物が破壊され、平均粒度が×判定の場合は、適正粒度の造粒物の収率も悪化した。
以上に示した表4、表5の結果から、撹拌加速度が適正範囲外であったとしても、その程度によっては、混練物の水分値を適正範囲内に設定し、混練物の平均粒度を適正範囲内にすることで、適正粒度の造粒物の収率が高められることを確認できた。
As is apparent from Table 5, as the stirring acceleration of the stirring blades increased, the kneaded material was broken and its average particle size tended to be small. In Reference Example 2 , the stirring acceleration of the stirring blade exceeded the upper limit value, but the moisture value of the kneaded material was within an appropriate range, so the average particle size of the kneaded material was Δ. For this reason, although the yield of the granulated material of an appropriate particle size did not reach Example 5, the favorable result was obtained.
On the other hand, as in Comparative Example 6, when the stirring acceleration was excessively increased and the kneaded product was destroyed, and the average particle size was x, the yield of the granulated product having an appropriate particle size was also deteriorated.
From the results of Tables 4 and 5 shown above, even if the stirring acceleration is outside the proper range, depending on the degree, the moisture value of the kneaded product is set within the proper range, and the average particle size of the kneaded product is appropriate. It was confirmed that the yield of the granulated product having an appropriate particle size was increased by setting the content within the range.
以上、本発明を、実施の形態を参照して説明してきたが、本発明は何ら上記した実施の形態に記載の構成に限定されるものではなく、特許請求の範囲に記載されている事項の範囲内で考えられるその他の実施の形態や変形例も含むものである。例えば、前記したそれぞれの実施の形態や変形例の一部又は全部を組合せて本発明の微粉原料の混練方法を構成する場合も本発明の権利範囲に含まれる。
また、前記実施の形態においては、微粉の鉄鉱石原料の混練の際にバインダーを使用した場合について説明したが、混練物が十分な強度を得ることができるならば、バインダーを使用することなく混練物を製造することもできる。
As described above, the present invention has been described with reference to the embodiment. However, the present invention is not limited to the configuration described in the above embodiment, and the matters described in the scope of claims. Other embodiments and modifications conceivable within the scope are also included. For example, a case where the method for kneading a fine powder material of the present invention is configured by combining a part or all of the above-described embodiments and modifications is also included in the scope of the right of the present invention.
Further, in the above embodiment, the case where a binder is used when kneading the fine iron ore raw material has been described. However, if the kneaded material can obtain a sufficient strength, kneading without using the binder. A thing can also be manufactured.
10:混練機、11:ドラムミキサー、12:容器、13:撹拌羽根、14:乾燥機 10: kneading machine, 11: drum mixer, 12: container, 13: stirring blade, 14: dryer
Claims (2)
前記容器の内径をD(m)、前記撹拌羽根の周速をu(m/s)、及び前記混練物の重力加速度をg(m/s 2 )とした場合、前記撹拌羽根の撹拌加速度(u 2 /D+g)を、20m/s 2 以上70m/s 2 以下の範囲内に設定することを特徴とする微粉原料の混練方法。 In order to obtain a granulated product having a particle size distribution of 3 mm or more and 10 mm or less with a yield of 60% by mass or more, a cylindrical container containing an iron ore raw material containing 60% by mass or more of particles having a particle size of 250 μm or less, The iron ore raw material is kneaded by a kneader having a stirring blade for rotating and kneading the iron ore raw material to produce a kneaded product having an average particle size of 3 mm to 7 mm, and the kneaded product is put in a drum mixer A method of kneading the fine raw material for producing the granulated product ,
When the inner diameter of the container is D (m), the peripheral speed of the stirring blade is u (m / s), and the gravitational acceleration of the kneaded material is g (m / s 2 ), the stirring acceleration ( u 2 / D + g) is set within a range of 20 m / s 2 or more and 70 m / s 2 or less .
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2006074758A JP4568243B2 (en) | 2006-03-17 | 2006-03-17 | Method of kneading fine powder material |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2006074758A JP4568243B2 (en) | 2006-03-17 | 2006-03-17 | Method of kneading fine powder material |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JP2007247020A JP2007247020A (en) | 2007-09-27 |
| JP4568243B2 true JP4568243B2 (en) | 2010-10-27 |
Family
ID=38591637
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2006074758A Expired - Lifetime JP4568243B2 (en) | 2006-03-17 | 2006-03-17 | Method of kneading fine powder material |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP4568243B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (12)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP5326592B2 (en) * | 2008-03-11 | 2013-10-30 | 新日鐵住金株式会社 | Granulation method of sintering raw material |
| JP5817643B2 (en) * | 2012-05-23 | 2015-11-18 | 新日鐵住金株式会社 | Pretreatment method of sintering raw material |
| JP5821778B2 (en) * | 2012-05-23 | 2015-11-24 | 新日鐵住金株式会社 | Pretreatment method of sintering raw material |
| JP5817644B2 (en) * | 2012-05-24 | 2015-11-18 | 新日鐵住金株式会社 | Method of adding binder to sintering raw material |
| JP5811066B2 (en) * | 2012-09-06 | 2015-11-11 | 新日鐵住金株式会社 | Pretreatment method of sintering raw material |
| JP6036295B2 (en) * | 2012-12-28 | 2016-11-30 | 新日鐵住金株式会社 | Pretreatment method of sintering raw materials |
| JP6287511B2 (en) * | 2014-04-10 | 2018-03-07 | 新日鐵住金株式会社 | Pretreatment method of sintering raw materials |
| JP6260491B2 (en) * | 2014-08-07 | 2018-01-17 | Jfeスチール株式会社 | Adjustment method of steel raw material mixer |
| JP5987958B2 (en) * | 2015-07-31 | 2016-09-07 | 新日鐵住金株式会社 | Method of adding binder to sintering raw material |
| KR102189069B1 (en) | 2016-03-04 | 2020-12-09 | 제이에프이 스틸 가부시키가이샤 | Method for manufacturing sintered ore |
| JP6493305B2 (en) * | 2016-05-27 | 2019-04-03 | Jfeスチール株式会社 | Method for producing sintered ore |
| WO2023233871A1 (en) | 2022-06-03 | 2023-12-07 | Jfeスチール株式会社 | Method for producing granulated starting material for sintering, and method for producing sintered ore |
Family Cites Families (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPH03166321A (en) * | 1988-10-27 | 1991-07-18 | Kawasaki Steel Corp | Method and device for pelletizing sintering raw material |
| JPH0742522B2 (en) * | 1989-06-26 | 1995-05-10 | 川崎製鉄株式会社 | Pretreatment method for sintering raw material |
| JP3902629B2 (en) * | 2004-05-13 | 2007-04-11 | 新日本製鐵株式会社 | Pretreatment method of sintering raw materials |
-
2006
- 2006-03-17 JP JP2006074758A patent/JP4568243B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP2007247020A (en) | 2007-09-27 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| JP4568243B2 (en) | Method of kneading fine powder material | |
| JP5326592B2 (en) | Granulation method of sintering raw material | |
| JP3902629B2 (en) | Pretreatment method of sintering raw materials | |
| WO2017150428A1 (en) | Sintered ore manufacturing method | |
| JP6519005B2 (en) | Method of producing sintered ore | |
| JP6468367B2 (en) | Method for producing sintered ore | |
| JP3820132B2 (en) | Pretreatment method of sintering raw material | |
| CN102378821B (en) | Method of crushing iron ore material | |
| JP4786760B2 (en) | Pretreatment method of sintering raw material | |
| JP5058715B2 (en) | Pretreatment method for sintering raw materials | |
| JP6369113B2 (en) | Method for producing sintered ore | |
| JP4677040B2 (en) | Granulation method of fine powder raw material | |
| JP6036295B2 (en) | Pretreatment method of sintering raw materials | |
| JP5828305B2 (en) | Pretreatment method of sintering raw material | |
| JP4786508B2 (en) | Pretreatment method of sintering raw material | |
| JP6256728B2 (en) | Production equipment for granulating raw materials for sintering | |
| JP5846402B1 (en) | Production equipment for granulating raw materials for sintering | |
| JP2020111817A (en) | Granulation method of agglomerate | |
| JP4497419B2 (en) | Granulation method of fine powder raw material | |
| JP4022018B2 (en) | Raw material granulation method to improve productivity of sintering machine | |
| JP7024649B2 (en) | Granulation method of raw material for sintering | |
| JP2006312786A (en) | Pretreatment method of sintering raw material | |
| JP6102826B2 (en) | Sinter ore granulation equipment | |
| JP2005194616A (en) | Method of producing sintered ore | |
| JP2023043367A (en) | Method for processing raw materials for sintering and method for producing sintered ore |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20080306 |
|
| A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20090714 |
|
| A521 | Request for written amendment filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20090831 |
|
| A02 | Decision of refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02 Effective date: 20100309 |
|
| A521 | Request for written amendment filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20100531 |
|
| A911 | Transfer to examiner for re-examination before appeal (zenchi) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A911 Effective date: 20100701 |
|
| TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20100727 |
|
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 |
|
| A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20100806 |
|
| R151 | Written notification of patent or utility model registration |
Ref document number: 4568243 Country of ref document: JP Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R151 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130813 Year of fee payment: 3 |
|
| S533 | Written request for registration of change of name |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130813 Year of fee payment: 3 |
|
| R350 | Written notification of registration of transfer |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350 |
|
| S533 | Written request for registration of change of name |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533 |
|
| R350 | Written notification of registration of transfer |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350 |