Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP4660474B2 - Non-oriented electrical steel sheet with excellent punching workability and magnetic properties after strain relief annealing and its manufacturing method - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP4660474B2 - Non-oriented electrical steel sheet with excellent punching workability and magnetic properties after strain relief annealing and its manufacturing method - Google Patents

Non-oriented electrical steel sheet with excellent punching workability and magnetic properties after strain relief annealing and its manufacturing method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP4660474B2
JP4660474B2 JP2006512410A JP2006512410A JP4660474B2 JP 4660474 B2 JP4660474 B2 JP 4660474B2 JP 2006512410 A JP2006512410 A JP 2006512410A JP 2006512410 A JP2006512410 A JP 2006512410A JP 4660474 B2 JP4660474 B2 JP 4660474B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
less
steel sheet
oriented electrical
precipitates
relief annealing
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP2006512410A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPWO2005100627A1 (en
Inventor
吉宏 有田
英邦 村上
幸一 切敷
穣 松本
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Nippon Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nippon Steel Corp filed Critical Nippon Steel Corp
Publication of JPWO2005100627A1 publication Critical patent/JPWO2005100627A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4660474B2 publication Critical patent/JP4660474B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21DMODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D8/00Modifying the physical properties of ferrous metals or ferrous alloys by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment
    • C21D8/12Modifying the physical properties of ferrous metals or ferrous alloys by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment during manufacturing of articles with special electromagnetic properties
    • C21D8/1205Modifying the physical properties of ferrous metals or ferrous alloys by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment during manufacturing of articles with special electromagnetic properties involving particular fabrication steps or treatments of ingots or slabs
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21DMODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D8/00Modifying the physical properties of ferrous metals or ferrous alloys by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment
    • C21D8/12Modifying the physical properties of ferrous metals or ferrous alloys by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment during manufacturing of articles with special electromagnetic properties
    • C21D8/1216Modifying the physical properties of ferrous metals or ferrous alloys by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment during manufacturing of articles with special electromagnetic properties characterised by the working steps
    • C21D8/1222Hot rolling
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/02Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing silicon
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/04Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing manganese
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01FMAGNETS; INDUCTANCES; TRANSFORMERS; SELECTION OF MATERIALS FOR THEIR MAGNETIC PROPERTIES
    • H01F1/00Magnets or magnetic bodies characterised by the magnetic materials therefor; Selection of materials for their magnetic properties
    • H01F1/01Magnets or magnetic bodies characterised by the magnetic materials therefor; Selection of materials for their magnetic properties of inorganic materials
    • H01F1/03Magnets or magnetic bodies characterised by the magnetic materials therefor; Selection of materials for their magnetic properties of inorganic materials characterised by their coercivity
    • H01F1/12Magnets or magnetic bodies characterised by the magnetic materials therefor; Selection of materials for their magnetic properties of inorganic materials characterised by their coercivity of soft-magnetic materials
    • H01F1/14Magnets or magnetic bodies characterised by the magnetic materials therefor; Selection of materials for their magnetic properties of inorganic materials characterised by their coercivity of soft-magnetic materials metals or alloys
    • H01F1/147Alloys characterised by their composition
    • H01F1/14766Fe-Si based alloys
    • H01F1/14775Fe-Si based alloys in the form of sheets

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Electromagnetism (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Crystallography & Structural Chemistry (AREA)
  • Thermal Sciences (AREA)
  • Dispersion Chemistry (AREA)
  • Power Engineering (AREA)
  • Manufacturing Of Steel Electrode Plates (AREA)
  • Soft Magnetic Materials (AREA)

Description

本発明は、電気機器の鉄心材料として使用される無方向性電磁鋼板およびその製造方法に関するものであり、特に打抜き加工性と歪取焼鈍後の磁気特性に優れた無方向性電磁鋼板およびその製造方法に関する。   TECHNICAL FIELD The present invention relates to a non-oriented electrical steel sheet used as an iron core material for electrical equipment and a method for producing the non-oriented electrical steel sheet, and particularly to a non-oriented electrical steel sheet excellent in punching workability and magnetic properties after strain relief annealing and the production thereof. Regarding the method.

近年、世界的な電気機器の省エネルギー化の高まりにより、回転機の鉄心材料として用いられる無方向性電磁鋼板においてもより高性能な特性が要求され、高効率機種と言われる電気製品のモータについては、SiやAl含有量を増加させて固有抵抗を高め、かつ結晶粒径を大きくした高級素材が使用されるようになってきた。一方、汎用機種のモータについても性能向上が要求されるようになってきているが、コスト制約が厳しいため、高効率機種のように高級素材に切替えることは難しいのが実情である。   In recent years, due to the increasing energy savings in electrical equipment worldwide, non-oriented electrical steel sheets used as the core material of rotating machines are required to have higher performance characteristics. Higher grade materials with increased Si and Al content to increase specific resistance and larger crystal grain size have come to be used. On the other hand, performance improvement is also required for general-purpose motors, but it is difficult to switch to high-grade materials like high-efficiency models due to severe cost constraints.

汎用機種に要求される鋼板としては、Siが1.5%以下でかつモータコア打抜き加工後に施される歪取焼鈍時の結晶粒成長が促進されることで、鉄損が飛躍的に改善する素材である。さらに最近ではコア打抜き時に発生するスクラップを鋳物の原料に活用する需要家が増えてきており、スクラップの鋳造性確保の観点から鋼板のAl含有量を0.05%未満とする必要が生じてきた。   As a steel sheet required for general-purpose models, Si is 1.5% or less, and it is a material that dramatically improves iron loss by promoting crystal grain growth during strain relief annealing performed after motor core punching. . Furthermore, recently, an increasing number of consumers use scrap generated during core punching as a raw material for casting, and it has become necessary to make the Al content of steel sheets less than 0.05% from the viewpoint of securing the castability of scrap.

歪取焼鈍時の結晶粒成長を改善するためには、鋼中に不可避混入している析出物を低減あるいは無害化が重要であるが、Al:0.05%未満における無方向性電磁鋼板の材質設計は大きく二分され、その一つは特許文献1にみられるように、Al脱酸した鋼(Sol.Al:0.02%程度)にBを0.002%程度添加して窒化物としてBNを生成し、結晶粒成長に有害なAlNの析出を抑制する方法である。
他方は特許文献2にみられるように、Si脱酸した鋼(Sol.Al≦0.001%)に含まれる酸化物のSiO2とMnO比率を制御し、結晶粒成長に有害な延伸性介在物を抑制する方法で、その方策として特許文献3では鋼成分のMn/Siを0.2〜1.0に制御することが開示されている。
In order to improve grain growth during strain relief annealing, it is important to reduce or detoxify the precipitates inevitably mixed in the steel, but the material design of non-oriented electrical steel sheets with Al: less than 0.05% As is seen in Patent Document 1, one of them is Al deoxidized steel (Sol. Al: about 0.02%), and about 0.002% of B is added to produce BN as a nitride. This is a method for suppressing precipitation of AlN, which is harmful to grain growth.
On the other hand, as seen in Patent Document 2, the SiO 2 and MnO ratio of the oxide contained in the Si-deoxidized steel (Sol.Al ≦ 0.001%) is controlled, and stretchable inclusions harmful to crystal grain growth are added. As a countermeasure, Patent Document 3 discloses that the Mn / Si of the steel component is controlled to 0.2 to 1.0.

このように脱酸に伴なって生成する窒化物あるいは酸化物を適正に制御した上で、さらに硫化物の低減あるいは無害化して磁性改善する方法としては、例えば特許文献4では磁性改善効果を得るためにSを0.005%以下に規定する方法、特許文献5ではS:0.01〜0.02%を含有する場合にCaあるいは希土類元素を添加してSを固定する方法、また特許文献6ではSを0.0050%以下とし、スラブの加熱温度を1100℃以下とすることによって、MnSの熱延中の微細析出を防止する方法が開示されている。   As a method for improving the magnetism by further reducing or detoxifying sulfides after appropriately controlling the nitride or oxide generated by deoxidation in this way, for example, Patent Document 4 obtains a magnetic improvement effect. Therefore, S is defined as 0.005% or less. In Patent Document 5, when S: 0.01 to 0.02% is contained, Ca or rare earth element is added to fix S. In Patent Document 6, S is 0.0050%. A method for preventing fine precipitation during hot rolling of MnS by setting the heating temperature of the slab to 1100 ° C. or lower is disclosed below.

特開昭54−163720号公報JP 54-163720 A 特開平7−150248号公報Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 7-150248 特開平6−73510号公報JP-A-6-73510 特開昭58−117828号公報JP 58-117828 A 特開昭58−164724号公報JP 58-164724 A 特開平4−63228号公報JP-A-4-63228

更なる鉄損の低減が要求される状況において、上記手法では十分かつ安定的に製造することが難しくなってきている。本発明はこのような問題を鑑みてなされたものであり、AlNの析出抑制を目的に添加されるBと、鋼中の不可避混入元素であるSに着目した改善方策によって、歪取焼鈍後の結晶粒成長が良好で鉄損の低く、かつ磁束密度の高い鋼板を提供しようとするものである。   In a situation where further reduction of iron loss is required, it has become difficult to manufacture sufficiently and stably by the above method. The present invention has been made in view of such problems, and B is added for the purpose of suppressing precipitation of AlN, and an improvement measure focusing on S, which is an unavoidable mixed element in steel, is obtained after strain relief annealing. An object of the present invention is to provide a steel sheet having good crystal grain growth, low iron loss, and high magnetic flux density.

本発明は上記課題を解決するためになされたものであり、その要旨は次のとおりである。
(1)質量%で、Si:1.5%以下、Mn:0.4%以上1.5%以下、Sol.Al:0.01%以上0.04%以下、Ti:0.0015%以下、N:0.0030%以下、S:0.0010%以上0.0040%以下、BをB/Nで0.5以上1.5以下含有し、残部Fe及び不可避不純物からなり、Mnを含む硫化物のうち個数割合で10%以上がB析出物と複合析出し、MnS、Cu S及びその複合硫化物を合計した分布密度が3.0×10 個/mm 以下であり、直径0.1μmに満たないTi析出物の分布密度が1.0×10 個/mm 以下であることを特徴とする無方向性電磁鋼板。
(2)板の結晶粒径が30μm以下でかつ、750℃×2時間の歪取焼鈍後の結晶粒径が50μm以上であることを特徴とする(1)に記載の無方向性電磁鋼板。
)更に、Sn、Cu、Niの1種または2種以上を質量%の合計で0.01%以上0.50%以下、および/またはREM、Ca、Mgの1種または2種以上を0.001〜0.1%含有することを特徴とする(1)または(2)に記載の無方向性電磁鋼板。
)(1)〜()のいずれかの項に記載の鋼板を製造する方法として、製鋼、熱延、酸洗、冷延に引き続いて仕上焼鈍を施すにあたり、熱延のスラブ加熱について、1150℃以上1250℃以下の範囲で5分以上滞留させ、それに連続して1050℃以上1150℃未満の範囲で15分以上滞留後、直ちに熱延することを特徴とする無方向性電磁鋼板の製造方法。
前記熱延の仕上圧延の出口温度を800℃以上とすることを特徴とする(4)に記載の無方向性電磁鋼板の製造方法。
)前記熱延の仕上圧延の出口温度T(℃)を、Snを含有する鋼板においてはT≧900−1000×Sn[質量%]とすることを特徴とする()に記載の無方向性電磁鋼板の製造方法。
The present invention has been made to solve the above problems, and the gist thereof is as follows.
(1) By mass%, Si: 1.5% or less, Mn: 0.4% or more and 1.5% or less, Sol. Al: 0.01% or more and 0.04% or less; Ti: 0.0015% or less; N: 0.0030% or less; S: 0.0010% or more and 0.0040% or less; 5 or more and 1.5 or less, consisting of the balance Fe and inevitable impurities, and 10% or more of the sulfides containing Mn are combined and precipitated with B precipitates, and MnS, Cu 2 S and the composite sulfides are mixed. total distribution density is at 3.0 × 10 5 cells / mm 2 or less, wherein the distribution density of 1.0 × 10 3 cells / mm 2 or less der Rukoto of Ti precipitates of less than the diameter 0.1μm Non-oriented electrical steel sheet.
(2) and not more than 30μm grain size of the steel plate, non-oriented electrical steel sheet according to the grain size after stress relief annealing of 750 ° C. × 2 hours and wherein the at 50μm or more (1) .
( 3 ) Furthermore, Sn or Cu or Ni is used in a total of 0.01% or more and 0.50% or less of Sn, Cu or Ni, and / or one or more of REM, Ca or Mg. The non-oriented electrical steel sheet according to (1) or (2) , characterized by containing 0.001 to 0.1%.
( 4 ) As a method for producing the steel sheet according to any one of (1) to ( 3 ), in the case of finishing annealing following steelmaking, hot rolling, pickling, and cold rolling, hot slab heating is performed. A non-oriented electrical steel sheet characterized by being retained for 5 minutes or more in the range of 1150 ° C. or more and 1250 ° C. or less, and continuously hot rolling after 15 minutes or more in the range of 1050 ° C. or more and less than 1150 ° C. Production method.
( 5 ) The method for producing a non-oriented electrical steel sheet according to (4), wherein an exit temperature of the hot rolling finish rolling is set to 800 ° C. or higher.
(6) the hot-rolled finishing rolling exit temperature T (° C.), no set forth in, characterized in that the T ≧ 900-1000 × Sn [mass%] in steel sheet containing Sn (4) A method for producing grain-oriented electrical steel sheets.

本発明によれば、歪取焼鈍後の結晶粒成長が良好で鉄損の低く、かつ磁束密度の高い無方向性電磁鋼板を提供することができる。According to the present invention, it is possible to provide a non-oriented electrical steel sheet having good crystal grain growth after strain relief annealing, low iron loss, and high magnetic flux density.

本発明者らはSiが1.5%以下である鋼において、不可避混入元素であるSを0.0010%程度にまで低減し、かつ特開平4-63228号公報にあるようにスラブ加熱温度を1100℃以下に低温化しても、歪取焼鈍後の鉄損がばらついて安定化しない問題に直面した。その原因を調査したところ、S量およびスラブ加熱温度が低いにもかかわらず、鋼中にはMnS、Cu2Sおよびその複合硫化物が微細かつ多量に分散しており、歪取焼鈍後の結晶粒成長を著しく抑制していることが判った。さらに詳しく観察したところ、これらの硫化物は直径0.1〜0.3μm程度の球状をしているが、その中心部に直径相当で0.05μm前後のTi析出物を包含していることが判った。硫化物がこのような析出形態をとる理由については、鋳造後〜熱延スラブ加熱で最初に析出するTiNが微細に分散し、それを核に硫化物が析出するためであることが判った。 In the steel having Si of 1.5% or less, the present inventors reduced S, which is an unavoidable element, to about 0.0010%, and the slab heating temperature to 1100 ° C. or less as described in JP-A-4-632228. We faced the problem that iron loss after strain relief annealing does not stabilize even at low temperatures. When the cause was investigated, MnS, Cu 2 S and its composite sulfide were finely dispersed in the steel in spite of the low S content and slab heating temperature. It was found that grain growth was remarkably suppressed. When observed in more detail, it was found that these sulfides were spherical with a diameter of about 0.1 to 0.3 μm, but contained Ti precipitates with a diameter equivalent to about 0.05 μm at the center. It has been found that the reason why the sulfide takes such a precipitation form is that TiN initially precipitated after casting to hot rolling slab heating is finely dispersed and the sulfide is precipitated in the core.

この状況を打開すべく、本発明者らはTiNに比べて成長速度が速く、粗大化しやすい硫化物に着目した。すなわちTiNを核に硫化物が複合析出する現状とは反対に、硫化物を核にTiNを複合析出させることを試みた結果、安定して低い鉄損の得られることを知見した。さらに、後述する余剰Nの固定として生成するBNについても硫化物を複合析出させることで安定して低鉄損が得られることを知見して本発明を完成させた。以下、本発明に至った実験結果について述べる。   In order to overcome this situation, the present inventors have focused on sulfides that have a higher growth rate than TiN and tend to coarsen. That is, contrary to the current situation where sulfides are precipitated together with TiN as a nucleus, it was found that as a result of attempting to precipitate TiN as a nucleus with sulfide as a nucleus, stable and low iron loss can be obtained. Further, the present invention has been completed based on the knowledge that a low iron loss can be stably obtained by compositely depositing sulfides for BN produced as the fixing of surplus N described later. Hereinafter, the experimental results that led to the present invention will be described.

(実験1)
実験室の真空溶解炉にて、質量%で、C:0.003%、Si:0.6%、Mn:0.1〜0.8%、Sol.Al:0.03%、Ti:0.0012%、N:0.0021%、S:0.0005〜0.0025%、B:0.0020%、Sn:0.08%を含有する鋼片を作製した。これらの鋼片を1200℃で20分保定し、10分かけて1100℃まで降温して30分保定した後、熱延して板厚2.5mmとし、酸洗を経て板厚0.50mmまで冷延した。
こうして得られた冷延板について800℃で10秒の仕上焼鈍を行なった後、750℃で2時間の歪取焼鈍を施し、結晶粒径と鉄損を測定した。その結果、表1に示す通り、Mnが0.4%以上でかつSが0.0012,0.0025%の試料8,9,11,12において、歪取焼鈍後の結晶粒径50μm以上で良好な鉄損が得られた。
(Experiment 1)
In a laboratory vacuum melting furnace, by mass%, C: 0.003%, Si: 0.6%, Mn: 0.1-0.8%, Sol.Al: 0.03%, Ti: 0.0012%, N: 0.0021%, S: 0.0005 Steel pieces containing ˜0.0025%, B: 0.0020%, Sn: 0.08% were prepared. These steel slabs are held at 1200 ° C for 20 minutes, cooled to 1100 ° C over 10 minutes, held for 30 minutes, then hot rolled to a sheet thickness of 2.5 mm, and then cold-rolled to 0.50 mm after pickling. did.
The cold-rolled sheet thus obtained was subjected to finish annealing at 800 ° C. for 10 seconds and then subjected to strain relief annealing at 750 ° C. for 2 hours, and the crystal grain size and iron loss were measured. As a result, as shown in Table 1, in samples 8, 9, 11, and 12 with Mn of 0.4% or more and S of 0.0012, 0.0025%, a good iron loss was obtained when the crystal grain size after strain relief annealing was 50 μm or more. It was.

次に歪取焼鈍後の試料について析出物観察を行なったところ、良好な鉄損の得られた8,9,11,12の試料ではMnを含む硫化物の10%以上の個数割合で、B析出物と複合析出していることが観察された。一方、鉄損の悪かった他のサンプルではBの析出物と思われる直径0.1μmに満たない微細析出物が多数観察された。
このようにMn:0.4%以上でかつ、S:0.0012,0.0025%で発現した歪取焼鈍後の結晶粒成長、および鉄損改善効果については次のように考えている。まずMnを高めたことでMnSの析出開始温度が上昇する。これによってMnSはBNに先行して熱延の加熱時に析出するようになり、さらにその後析出するBNはMnSを核に複合析出するようになる。これによりBの微細析出物の生成を抑制することができ、良好な歪取焼鈍後の結晶粒成長と鉄損が得られるものと考えられる。
一方、Mnが0.4%未満ではBNが析出する段階でMnSの析出が十分ではなく、またSが0.0005%ではMnSの析出量そのものが少ないことから、いずれもBNの析出核が不足し、Bの単独かつ微細な析出によって歪取焼鈍後の特性が改善しないものと考えられる。
Next, when the precipitates were observed for the samples after strain relief annealing, in the samples of 9, 9, 11, and 12, where good iron loss was obtained, the number ratio of sulfides containing Mn was 10% or more. It was observed that precipitates and composite precipitation occurred. On the other hand, in other samples having poor iron loss, a large number of fine precipitates less than 0.1 μm in diameter, which are considered to be B precipitates, were observed.
As described above, the crystal grain growth after the stress relief annealing and the iron loss improvement effect which are expressed by Mn: 0.4% or more and S: 0.0012, 0.0025% are considered as follows. First, the MnS precipitation start temperature rises by increasing Mn. As a result, MnS precipitates during the hot rolling prior to BN, and the BN that precipitates thereafter precipitates with MnS as a nucleus. Thereby, it is considered that the formation of fine precipitates of B can be suppressed, and crystal grain growth and iron loss after good strain relief annealing can be obtained.
On the other hand, if Mn is less than 0.4%, MnS is not sufficiently precipitated at the stage where BN precipitates. It is considered that the characteristics after strain relief annealing do not improve due to single and fine precipitation.

Figure 0004660474
Figure 0004660474

(実験2)
実験室の真空溶解炉にて、質量%で、C:0.0034%、Si:0.75%、Mn:0.15〜0.72%、Sol.Al:0.019%、Ti:0.0008〜0.0017%、N:0.0018%、S:0.0023%、B:0.0025%、Sn:0.03%、Cu:0.01%、Ni:0.02%を含有する鋼片を作製した。これらの鋼片を1200℃で5分保定し、1100℃まで降温して30分保定した後、熱延して板厚2.7mmとし、酸洗を経て板厚0.50mmまで冷延した。こうして得られた冷延板について800℃で10秒の仕上焼鈍を行なった後、750℃で2時間の歪取焼鈍を施し、鋼板の析出物と結晶粒径を観察するとともに鉄損を測定した。
(Experiment 2)
In a laboratory vacuum melting furnace, by mass%, C: 0.0034%, Si: 0.75%, Mn: 0.15-0.72%, Sol.Al: 0.019%, Ti: 0.0008-0.0017%, N: 0.0018%, S A steel slab containing 0.0023%, B: 0.0025%, Sn: 0.03%, Cu: 0.01%, and Ni: 0.02% was produced. These steel slabs were held at 1200 ° C. for 5 minutes, lowered to 1100 ° C. and held for 30 minutes, then hot rolled to a sheet thickness of 2.7 mm, and cold-rolled to 0.50 mm after pickling. The cold-rolled sheet thus obtained was subjected to finish annealing at 800 ° C. for 10 seconds and then subjected to stress relief annealing at 750 ° C. for 2 hours, and the iron loss was measured while observing precipitates and crystal grain sizes of the steel sheet. .

その結果、表2に示す通り、Mnが0.4%以上でかつTiが0.0015%以下であるサンプル4,5,7,8において、歪取焼鈍後の硫化物密度が3.0×105以下、平均結晶粒径が50μm以上となり、良好な鉄損が得られた。これらのサンプルでは直径0.2〜0.3μmの球状の硫化物が多く、その外周に直径相当で0.1μmに満たない微細なTi析出物が複数個析出しているものが多数確認された。一方、Mnが0.15%と低いサンプル1〜3では、歪取焼鈍後の硫化物密度が4.5×105個/mm2以上と高く、平均結晶粒径も35μm以下と小さくて鉄損が悪かった。これらのサンプルに見られる硫化物は直径0.1μm以下と小さく、かつ多数の硫化物において、その中心にTi析出物を包含しているのが確認できた。またMnは0.4%以上であるが、Tiが0.0015%を超えているサンプル6,9についても歪取焼鈍後の硫化物密度は3.8×105個/mm2以上と高く、平均結晶粒径も45μm以下で鉄損も比較的悪かった。これらのサンプルでは硫化物は直径0.05〜0.3μm以下の広い範囲にばらついており、Ti析出物との複合形態もその外周あるいは中心部と様々であった。なお直径相当で0.1μmに満たないTi析出物の分布密度はいずれのサンプルでも1.0×103個/mm2未満と低かった。 As a result, as shown in Table 2, in samples 4, 5, 7, and 8 where Mn is 0.4% or more and Ti is 0.0015% or less, the sulfide density after strain relief annealing is 3.0 × 10 5 or less, the average crystal The particle size was 50 μm or more, and good iron loss was obtained. In these samples, there were many spherical sulfides having a diameter of 0.2 to 0.3 μm, and a large number of fine Ti precipitates having a diameter of less than 0.1 μm on the outer periphery were confirmed. On the other hand, in Samples 1 to 3 with a low Mn of 0.15%, the sulfide density after strain relief annealing was high as 4.5 × 10 5 pieces / mm 2 or more, the average crystal grain size was as small as 35 μm or less, and the iron loss was bad. . The sulfides found in these samples were as small as 0.1 μm or less in diameter, and many sulfides were confirmed to contain Ti precipitates at the center. In addition, Mn is 0.4% or more, but for Samples 6 and 9 where Ti exceeds 0.0015%, the sulfide density after strain relief annealing is as high as 3.8 × 10 5 pieces / mm 2 or more, and the average grain size is also The iron loss was relatively bad at 45 μm or less. In these samples, sulfides varied in a wide range of diameters of 0.05 to 0.3 μm or less, and composite forms with Ti precipitates varied from the outer periphery or the center. Note that the distribution density of Ti precipitates corresponding to the diameter and less than 0.1 μm was as low as less than 1.0 × 10 3 pieces / mm 2 in all samples.

このようにMnを0.4%以上に高め、かつTiを0.0015%以下とすることで発現した効果については次のように考えている。まずMnを高めたことでMnSの析出開始温度が上昇し、一方でTiを低減したことでTiNの析出開始温度が低下する。これによって通常とは析出順序が逆転し、MnSがTiNより先に析出するようになる。次に析出開始温度の上昇したMnSは熱延加熱前段の1200℃で析出および成長する。一方、析出開始温度の低下したTiNは熱延加熱後段の1100℃で、既に粗大化したMnSを核に析出したものと考えられる。   Thus, the effect expressed by increasing Mn to 0.4% or more and Ti to 0.0015% or less is considered as follows. First, increasing Mn raises the MnS precipitation start temperature, while reducing Ti lowers the TiN precipitation start temperature. This reverses the order of precipitation from normal, and MnS is deposited before TiN. Next, MnS whose precipitation start temperature has increased precipitates and grows at 1200 ° C. before the hot rolling heating. On the other hand, it is considered that TiN having a reduced precipitation start temperature was precipitated at 1100 ° C. after the hot rolling and had already coarsened MnS.

Figure 0004660474
Figure 0004660474

(実験3)
次に熱延の加熱条件の影響を調査するため、実験1のMn:0.4%、S:0.0025%の鋼片を用い、熱延加熱を1200℃で60分保定、1100℃で60分保定の2水準を付け加え、酸洗以降は実験1と同一工程にて試料作製し比較評価した。その結果、表3に示す通り、結果が良好であった試料1(実験1における試料9)に対し、1200℃で保定した試料2では複合析出の割合はほぼゼロで単独かつ微細なB析出物が多数観察され、歪取焼鈍後の結晶粒径および鉄損は最も悪かった。一方、1100℃で保定した試料3では、1200℃加熱材(試料2)ほどではないが、複合析出の割合は5%と低く、結晶粒径、鉄損とも今一つ優れなかった。この結果は次のように考えられる。まず1200℃で保定した場合、Mnが0.42%と高いこととあいまってMnSは析出しているが、Bは未析出のままで熱延されるため、熱延途中や歪取焼鈍時に単独かつ微細なB析出物を生成し、結晶粒成長および鉄損は著しく悪化する。次に1100℃で保定した場合、MnSの分布が粗になってBNが複合析出する核の個数が不足するため、一部のBが単独かつ微細析出してしまい、良好な結晶粒径および鉄損が得られなったものと考えられる。
(Experiment 3)
Next, in order to investigate the influence of heating conditions on hot rolling, using the steel pieces of Mn: 0.4% and S: 0.0025% in Experiment 1, hot rolling heating was held at 1200 ° C for 60 minutes and held at 1100 ° C for 60 minutes. Two levels were added, and after pickling, samples were prepared in the same process as in Experiment 1 for comparative evaluation. As a result, as shown in Table 3, Sample 1 (Sample 9 in Experiment 1), which had good results, had a composite precipitation ratio of almost zero in Sample 2 held at 1200 ° C, with a single and fine B precipitate. Were observed, and the crystal grain size and iron loss after strain relief annealing were the worst. On the other hand, in the sample 3 held at 1100 ° C., although not as high as the 1200 ° C. heating material (sample 2), the composite precipitation rate was as low as 5%, and neither the crystal grain size nor the iron loss was excellent. This result is considered as follows. First, when held at 1200 ° C, MnS is precipitated in combination with Mn being as high as 0.42%, but B is unprecipitated and is hot rolled, so it is single and fine during hot rolling and during strain relief annealing. B precipitates are formed, and grain growth and iron loss are remarkably deteriorated. Next, when it is held at 1100 ° C, the distribution of MnS becomes coarse and the number of nuclei from which BN precipitates is insufficient, so some B precipitates alone and finely, resulting in good crystal grain size and iron It is thought that the loss was not obtained.

Figure 0004660474
Figure 0004660474

(実験4)
次に熱延の加熱サイクルの影響を調査するため、実験2のMn:0.42%、Ti:0.0013%の鋼片を用い、熱延加熱を1200℃で60分保定、1100℃で60分保定の2水準を付け加えて熱延し、酸洗以降は実験2と同一工程にてサンプル作製し比較評価した。その結果、表4に示す通り、結果が良好であったサンプル1(実験2におけるサンプル5)に対し、1200℃で保定したサンプル2では硫化物密度は低いもののTi析出物の分布密度が高く、歪取焼鈍後の結晶粒径および鉄損は最も悪かった。一方、1100℃で保定したサンプル3ではTi析出物密度は低いものの硫化物密度が高く、結晶粒径、鉄損ともに優れなかった。この結果は次のように考えている。まず1200℃で保定した場合、Mnが0.42%と高いこととあいまってMnSの粗大化は進行するが、TiNは未析出のままで熱延されるため、熱延途中や歪取焼鈍時に単独かつ微細なTi析出物を生成し、結晶粒成長および鉄損は著しく悪化する。次に1100℃で保定した場合、MnSの成長が不十分であるため、硫化物の個数が増えて良好な結晶粒径および鉄損が得られなったものと考えられる。
(Experiment 4)
Next, in order to investigate the influence of the heating cycle of hot rolling, using the steel pieces of Mn: 0.42% and Ti: 0.0013% of Experiment 2, hot rolling heating was held at 1200 ° C for 60 minutes and held at 1100 ° C for 60 minutes. Two levels were added and hot-rolled, and after pickling, samples were prepared in the same process as in Experiment 2 for comparative evaluation. As a result, as shown in Table 4, sample 1 (sample 5 in experiment 2), which had good results, sample 2 held at 1200 ° C. had a high distribution density of Ti precipitates although the sulfide density was low, The crystal grain size and iron loss after strain relief annealing were the worst. On the other hand, Sample 3 maintained at 1100 ° C. had a low Ti precipitate density but a high sulfide density, and neither crystal grain size nor iron loss was excellent. This result is considered as follows. First, when held at 1200 ° C, the MnS coarsening progresses due to the high Mn of 0.42%. Fine Ti precipitates are produced, and grain growth and iron loss are significantly worsened. Next, when held at 1100 ° C., the growth of MnS is insufficient, and it is considered that the number of sulfides increased and good crystal grain size and iron loss were not obtained.

Figure 0004660474
Figure 0004660474

以上を総括すると、本発明はMn量と熱延の加熱サイクルの最適化により、MnSを優先かつ最適に析出させると同時に、微細なBNを複合析出させることでMnSおよびBNの双方を同時に無害化し、結晶粒成長および鉄損を改善する方策を知見したものである。これを実現するためにはMn量を高めると同時にAl量を低減させなければならない。なぜならAlはAlNとしてNを消費するとともに、AlN自身によって結晶粒成長が妨げられるからである。一方、Alを全く添加しない製法ではAl量は極めて低く抑えられるため、BNの生成には好都合であるが、鋼中に多数残存するSiO2・MnOの介在物がMn量の増加に伴なって延伸化し、かえって粒成長を悪化させてしまう。そこで本発明では介在物の改質による延伸抑制と、BNの析出が優先するAlの最適範囲として0.01%〜0.04%を見出したのである。 To summarize the above, the present invention preferentially and optimally precipitates MnS by optimizing the heating cycle of the amount of Mn and hot rolling, and simultaneously detoxifies both MnS and BN by compound precipitation of fine BN. The present inventors have found out measures for improving crystal grain growth and iron loss. In order to realize this, the amount of Al must be reduced while increasing the amount of Mn. This is because Al consumes N as AlN, and AlN itself hinders crystal grain growth. On the other hand, in the production method in which no Al is added, the amount of Al can be kept very low, which is convenient for the generation of BN. However, the inclusion of many SiO 2 and MnO remaining in the steel is accompanied by an increase in the amount of Mn. Stretching, on the contrary, deteriorates grain growth. Accordingly, in the present invention, 0.01% to 0.04% was found as the optimum range of Al in which stretching is suppressed by modification of inclusions and BN precipitation is prioritized.

また、本発明はMnSとTiNの析出温度の最適化、熱延の加熱サイクルの最適化により、まずMnSを粗大に析出させ、次に微細なTiNを複合析出させることで、双方の析出物を無害化し、結晶粒成長および鉄損を改善する方策を知見したのである。
これを実現するためには、Mn量を高くしてMnSの析出温度を上昇させ、さらにAl量を低くしてAlNの生成を抑制し、TiNの析出を促進させる必要がある。Al量を極めて低く抑える方法としては製鋼における脱酸にSiを用いる方法が挙げられるが、この場合にMn量を増加させると介在物が延伸化し、かえって鉄損を悪化させることが判った。そこで本発明ではAl量を0.01〜0.04%の比較的少ない範囲に制御することで、TiNの析出を維持しつつ、介在物の改質によってMn量を高めることを可能にした。さらに、このAl量範囲ではTiN析出後の余剰Nが粒成長に有害なAlNの微細析出を生じやすいことから、Bを微量添加してBNとすることでこれを回避した。
In addition, the present invention optimizes the deposition temperature of MnS and TiN, optimizes the hot rolling heating cycle, first precipitates MnS coarsely, and then compositely precipitates fine TiN. They found ways to detoxify and improve grain growth and iron loss.
In order to realize this, it is necessary to increase the Mn content to increase the MnS precipitation temperature, and further reduce the Al content to suppress the formation of AlN and promote the TiN precipitation. As a method for keeping the amount of Al extremely low, there is a method of using Si for deoxidation in steelmaking. In this case, it was found that inclusions are elongated when the Mn amount is increased, and the iron loss is worsened. Therefore, in the present invention, by controlling the Al amount within a relatively small range of 0.01 to 0.04%, it is possible to increase the Mn amount by modifying the inclusions while maintaining the precipitation of TiN. Further, in this Al content range, excess N after TiN precipitation tends to cause fine precipitation of AlN that is harmful to grain growth, so this was avoided by adding a small amount of B to form BN.

このような技術発想は本発明にて初めて知見したもので、例えば特開昭58-117828号公報ではSi:0.1〜1.0%、Al:0.1%未満、Mnを0.75〜1.5%、N/B:0.7〜1.2のB含有を規定しているが、MnSとBNとの複合析出および、それを実現するSol.Al量や熱延の加熱温度等については規定がなされていないことから、本発明とは技術思想が全く異なるものであって、本発明を類推し得るものではない。また特開2000-248344号公報ではSi:1.8%以下、Sol.Al:0.05〜0.20%、Mn:0.05〜1.5%と規定しているが、Sol.Al:0.04%を超えるとBNよりもむしろAlNが優先して析出してしまうため、MnSを核にBNを析出させるという本発明の技術思想が成り立たない。   Such a technical idea was first discovered in the present invention.For example, in Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 58-117828, Si: 0.1 to 1.0%, Al: less than 0.1%, Mn: 0.75 to 1.5%, N / B: Although the content of B in the range of 0.7 to 1.2 is specified, there is no specification for the composite precipitation of MnS and BN, and the amount of Sol.Al to realize it and the heating temperature of hot rolling. The technical ideas are completely different, and the present invention cannot be analogized. In addition, in Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2000-248344, Si: 1.8% or less, Sol.Al: 0.05-0.20%, Mn: 0.05-1.5% are specified, but if Sol.Al: 0.04% is exceeded, rather than BN Since AlN is preferentially precipitated, the technical idea of the present invention of precipitating BN with MnS as a nucleus does not hold.

次に、本発明における成分および製品の数値限定理由について述べる。
Siは電気抵抗を増加させるために有効な元素であるが、1.5%を超えて添加すると硬度上昇や磁束密度の低下、コスト増が生じるために1.5%を上限とした。
Mnは本発明を発現するための重要な元素である。本発明ではMnSを含む硫化物を核にBNおよび/またはTiNを析出させることを主旨としており、そのためにはBNおよび/またはTiNの析出温度以前にMnSを十分に析出させておかなければならない。Ti:0.0015%以下、N:0.0030%以下で、かつB/Nで0.5以上1.5以下のBを含有させる本発明においては、Mnを0.4%以上にすることで本目的は達成される。また1.5%を超えて添加すると飽和磁束密度の低下が著しくなるのに加え、γ→α変態温度が下がって熱延板の組織制御が困難になることから1.5%を上限とした。
Next, the reasons for limiting the numerical values of the components and products in the present invention will be described.
Si is an effective element for increasing the electrical resistance, but if added over 1.5%, the hardness is increased, the magnetic flux density is decreased, and the cost is increased.
Mn is an important element for expressing the present invention. The main purpose of the present invention is to deposit BN and / or TiN with a sulfide containing MnS as a nucleus. For this purpose, MnS must be sufficiently precipitated before the precipitation temperature of BN and / or TiN. In the present invention containing Ti: 0.0015% or less, N: 0.0030% or less, and B / N of 0.5 or more and 1.5 or less, this object is achieved by making Mn 0.4% or more. If the addition exceeds 1.5%, the saturation magnetic flux density is significantly lowered, and the γ → α transformation temperature is lowered to make it difficult to control the structure of the hot-rolled sheet, so 1.5% was made the upper limit.

Alは鋼の脱酸に必要な元素である。Sol.0.01%に満たないと未脱酸の酸素が鋼中に残存してSiO2・MnOの酸化物を生成し、これが0.4%以上添加されたMnの影響とあいまって延伸化して結晶粒成長を阻害するため、Sol.Alの下限を0.01%とした。またSol.Alが0.04%を超えるとBNに代わってAlNが析出することになり、本発明の発現が困難になること、さらに、TiNの析出の確保、需要家でのスクラップ活用の観点から、Sol.Alの上限を0.04%とした。 Al is an element necessary for deoxidation of steel. If less than 0.01% Sol, undeoxidized oxygen remains in the steel to form SiO 2 · MnO oxide, which is combined with the effect of Mn added at 0.4% or more to stretch and grow grains Therefore, the lower limit of Sol.Al was set to 0.01%. In addition, if Sol.Al exceeds 0.04%, AlN will be deposited instead of BN, and the expression of the present invention will be difficult.In addition, from the viewpoint of securing TiN precipitation and scrap utilization at the consumer, The upper limit of Sol.Al was 0.04%.

TiはTiNを生成して粒成長を著しく悪化させるが、不可避混入元素であるため、ゼロにすることは工業的には難しい。本発明ではMnS、Cu2Sおよびその複合硫化物等と複合析出による無害化が可能な許容量として、上限を0.0015%に規定した。Tiが0.0015%を超えるとTiNの析出開始温度が高くなりMnSの優先析出を制御できなくなる。 Ti produces TiN and remarkably deteriorates the grain growth, but it is an unavoidable element, so it is industrially difficult to make it zero. In the present invention, the upper limit is defined as 0.0015% as an allowable amount that can be rendered harmless by composite precipitation with MnS, Cu 2 S, and composite sulfides thereof. If Ti exceeds 0.0015%, the TiN precipitation start temperature rises and the preferential precipitation of MnS cannot be controlled.

NはBNの他にTiNやAlNを生成する。Sol.Al:0.01〜0.04%を含有させる本発明においては、AlNが生成すると結晶粒成長が著しく悪化するため、Bを添加してAlNの生成を抑制する必要がある。したがってNが高くなると添加するB量を増やさなければならないが、過剰のB添加は鋼板の脆化を招き、生産性を悪化させるので、Nの上限を0.0030%とした。   N generates TiN and AlN in addition to BN. In the present invention containing Sol. Al: 0.01 to 0.04%, when AlN is generated, crystal grain growth is remarkably deteriorated. Therefore, it is necessary to add B to suppress the generation of AlN. Therefore, the amount of B to be added must be increased as N increases. However, excessive addition of B causes embrittlement of the steel sheet and deteriorates productivity, so the upper limit of N was set to 0.0030%.

SはBNおよび/またはTiNの析出核となる硫化物を生成するために必要で、0.0010%以上含有させることで本発明の目的は達成される。ただし0.0040%を超えると硫化物の析出量そのものが増え、結晶粒成長が阻害されるので0.0040%を上限とした。
Bは結晶粒成長に有害なAlNの生成を抑制するために添加が必須の元素であるが、その目的のためにはB/Nで0.5以上添加する必要がある。Nに対し過剰に添加しても効果は飽和するので、上限をB/Nで1.5とした。
S is necessary for producing a sulfide which becomes a precipitation nucleus of BN and / or TiN, and the object of the present invention can be achieved by containing 0.0010% or more. However, if it exceeds 0.0040%, the amount of sulfide precipitates itself increases and the grain growth is inhibited, so 0.0040% was made the upper limit.
B is an element that must be added in order to suppress the formation of AlN that is harmful to crystal grain growth, but for that purpose, it is necessary to add 0.5 or more as B / N. Even if it is added excessively with respect to N, the effect is saturated, so the upper limit was made 1.5 for B / N.

Sn、Cu、Niは焼鈍、特に歪取焼鈍中における鋼板表面の窒化や酸化の抑制に効果があり、Sol.Al:0.01〜0.04%を含有する本発明の鋼においては、特に窒化されやすいため、添加することが好ましい。添加量としては0.01%未満では効果なく、また0.50%を超えて添加しても効果が飽和する上にコスト増となるので、添加量の範囲を0.01%以上0.50%以下とした。なおSn、Cu、Niの窒化・酸化抑制効果は同等であることから、単一または複合によって上記の添加量範囲を満たせばよい。その他、REM、Ca、Mgの1種または2種以上を0.001〜0.5%添加することも可能である。
特に、Snは本発明における磁束密度向上に極めて有効な元素である。なぜなら本発明ではMnを高めていることから必然的にγ→α変態温度が低くなり、熱延板の粒成長を十分に促進することができないため、これを補う必要があるからである。添加量としては0.01%未満では効果なく、0.50%を超えて添加しても効果が飽和する上にコスト増となるので、添加量の範囲を0.01%以上0.50%以下とした。さらにSnには歪取焼鈍中の鋼板表面の窒化や酸化を抑制する効果もあり、その観点からも添加が望ましい。
Sn, Cu, and Ni are effective in suppressing nitriding and oxidation of the steel sheet surface during annealing, especially strain relief annealing, and in the steel of the present invention containing Sol. It is preferable to add. If the amount added is less than 0.01%, there is no effect, and even if added over 0.50%, the effect is saturated and the cost is increased, so the range of the amount added is set to 0.01% to 0.50%. In addition, since the nitriding / oxidation suppressing effects of Sn, Cu, and Ni are the same, the above addition range may be satisfied by a single or a composite. In addition, it is also possible to add 0.001 to 0.5% of one or more of REM, Ca, and Mg.
In particular, Sn is an extremely effective element for improving the magnetic flux density in the present invention. This is because in the present invention, since the Mn is increased, the γ → α transformation temperature is inevitably lowered, and the grain growth of the hot-rolled sheet cannot be sufficiently promoted, and this needs to be compensated. If the amount added is less than 0.01%, there is no effect. If the amount added exceeds 0.50%, the effect is saturated and the cost increases. Therefore, the range of the amount added is set to 0.01% to 0.50%. Furthermore, Sn also has an effect of suppressing nitriding and oxidation of the steel sheet surface during strain relief annealing, and addition from the viewpoint is also desirable.

本発明が特徴とする複合析出については、B析出物が複合析出しているMnを含む硫化物の個数割合を10%以上と規定した。これは単独かつ微細なB析出物がほとんどない試料における観察結果に基づいたものである。
結晶粒径は打抜き加工性と磁性を両立させるために重要な因子である。打抜き加工に供される鋼板では粒径が30μmを超えると打抜き加工性が悪化するため、結晶粒径は30μm以下とした。また電気製品においては粒径が50μmに満たないと要求鉄損が満たされないため、一般的に行われている750℃×2時間の歪取焼鈍後の結晶粒径を50μm以上と規定した。
For the composite precipitation characterized by the present invention, the number ratio of the sulfide containing Mn in which the B precipitate is compositely precipitated is defined as 10% or more. This is based on the observation result in a sample having no single and fine B precipitate.
The crystal grain size is an important factor for achieving both punching workability and magnetism. In the steel sheet to be subjected to punching, the grain size is set to 30 μm or less because the punching processability deteriorates when the particle size exceeds 30 μm. Moreover, since the required iron loss is not satisfied unless the grain size is less than 50 μm in electrical products, the crystal grain size after 750 ° C. × 2 hours of strain relief annealing, which is generally performed, is defined as 50 μm or more.

MnS、Cu2S及びその複合硫化物は多すぎると結晶粒成長を阻害する。歪取焼鈍後に50μm以上の結晶粒径を得るためは、その分布密度を3.0×105個/mm2以下にしなければならない。ここに述べる分布密度とは、鏡面研磨後に化学研磨した試料を走査型あるいは透過型の電子顕微鏡によって観察し、Mn,SあるいはCu,S、またはMn,Cu,Sを検出した析出物の計数を観察視野面積(複数の視野を観察した場合はその合計面積)で除したものである。 If there is too much MnS, Cu 2 S and its composite sulfide, the grain growth is inhibited. In order to obtain a crystal grain size of 50 μm or more after strain relief annealing, the distribution density must be 3.0 × 10 5 pieces / mm 2 or less. The distribution density described here refers to the number of precipitates in which Mn, S or Cu, S, or Mn, Cu, S is detected by observing a chemically polished sample after mirror polishing with a scanning or transmission electron microscope. It is divided by the observation visual field area (the total area when a plurality of visual fields are observed).

Ti析出物は硫化物を核に複合析出することで、直径換算で0.1μmに満たないほど微細であるにもかかわらず無害化が可能となる。歪取焼鈍後に50μm以上の結晶粒径が得られ、鉄損良好であったものは、直径相当で0.1μm未満のTi析出物の分布密度が1.0×103個/mm2以下であったことから、これを上限とした。 Ti precipitates can be rendered harmless even though they are fine enough to be less than 0.1 μm in diameter by compound precipitation of sulfides in the nucleus. The crystal grain size of 50 μm or more was obtained after strain relief annealing, and the iron loss was good when the distribution density of Ti precipitates with diameter equivalent to less than 0.1 μm was 1.0 × 10 3 pieces / mm 2 or less Therefore, this was made the upper limit.

次に本発明における製造条件の限定理由について述べる。
熱延のスラブ加熱は、MnS、Cu2S及びその複合硫化物を含む硫化物を核にBNおよび/またはTiNを析出させて無害化するため、二段の連続サイクルにする必要がある。Mnを0.4%以上に高めた本発明の鋼においては、1150℃以上の温度範囲でMnSの析出と成長が顕著になるが、1250℃を超えると固溶が進んでしまうことから、前段の加熱温度は1150℃以上1250℃以下とした。なおMnSを成長速度は速いため、この温度範囲における滞留時間は5分以上あれば十分である。次に、TiNおよびBNは1150℃未満の温度でMnS上への複合析出が進むことから後段の加熱温度は1150℃未満とし、かつ圧延性確保等の観点から下限温度を1050℃とした。なお、後段の加熱温度が1050℃未満ではTiNの析出は進行するものの、硫化物との複合化が不十分であるため熱延途中で単独かつ微細な析出物が増える。後段の加熱時間はTiNおよびBNの析出時間を考慮して15分以上とした。さらに好ましくは30分以上である。
Next, the reasons for limiting the manufacturing conditions in the present invention will be described.
Hot rolling slab heating needs to be a two-stage continuous cycle because BN and / or TiN is deposited and harmed by using sulfides containing MnS, Cu 2 S and their composite sulfides as nuclei. In the steel of the present invention in which Mn is increased to 0.4% or more, precipitation and growth of MnS become prominent in the temperature range of 1150 ° C or higher, but solid solution proceeds when the temperature exceeds 1250 ° C. The temperature was 1150 ° C or higher and 1250 ° C or lower. Since the growth rate of MnS is fast, it is sufficient that the residence time in this temperature range is 5 minutes or more. Next, since TiN and BN proceeded with compound precipitation on MnS at a temperature of less than 1150 ° C., the subsequent heating temperature was set to less than 1150 ° C., and the lower limit temperature was set to 1050 ° C. from the viewpoint of securing rollability. In addition, although the precipitation of TiN proceeds when the subsequent heating temperature is lower than 1050 ° C., the compounding with sulfides is insufficient, so that single and fine precipitates increase during hot rolling. The latter heating time was set to 15 minutes or more in consideration of the precipitation time of TiN and BN. More preferably, it is 30 minutes or more.

熱延の仕上圧延の出口温度は、γ→α変態以下の温度でできる限り800℃以上と高温化した方が高磁束密度となるが、Snの添加量によってその温度は緩和されるので、Snが添加された場合にはその緩和度合いを勘案し、T≧900-1000×Sn[質量%]と規定した。   The exit temperature of hot rolling finish rolling is higher at 800 ° C or higher as much as possible at a temperature of γ → α transformation or less, but the magnetic flux density becomes higher, but the temperature is relaxed by the amount of Sn added, so Sn When T was added, it was specified that T ≧ 900-1000 × Sn [mass%] in consideration of the degree of relaxation.

実験室の真空溶解炉にて、質量%で、C:0.003%、Si:0.55%、Mn:0.12〜0.96%、Sol.Al:0.033%、Ti:0.0008%、N:0.0025%、S:0.0032%、B:0.0017%、Sn:0.02〜0.09%を含有する鋼片を作製した。これらの鋼片を1230℃まで昇温後に10分保定し、その後1120℃まで降温して30分保定した後、熱延して板厚2.5mmとした。なお仕上圧延の出口温度は855℃であった。この熱延板について酸洗を経て板厚0.50mmまで冷延後、825℃で10秒の仕上焼鈍を経て、750℃で2時間の歪取焼鈍を施した。こうして得られた試料について結晶粒径と鉄損、磁束密度を測定し、透過型電子顕微鏡によって析出物を観察した。その結果、表5に示す通り、Mnが0.4%以上の試料7〜12において、歪取焼鈍後の平均結晶粒径が50μm以上で良好な鉄損が得られ、複合析出の個数割合も10%以上であった。さらに855≧900-1000×Snを満たす試料8,9,11,12では約0.02T高い磁束密度が得られた。   In a laboratory vacuum melting furnace, by mass%, C: 0.003%, Si: 0.55%, Mn: 0.12-0.96%, Sol.Al: 0.033%, Ti: 0.0008%, N: 0.0025%, S: 0.0032 Steel pieces containing%, B: 0.0017%, Sn: 0.02 to 0.09% were produced. These steel pieces were heated to 1230 ° C. and held for 10 minutes, then cooled to 1120 ° C. and held for 30 minutes, and then hot rolled to a thickness of 2.5 mm. The exit temperature of finish rolling was 855 ° C. The hot-rolled sheet was pickled and cold-rolled to a thickness of 0.50 mm, then subjected to finish annealing at 825 ° C. for 10 seconds, and then subjected to strain relief annealing at 750 ° C. for 2 hours. The thus obtained sample was measured for crystal grain size, iron loss, and magnetic flux density, and the precipitate was observed with a transmission electron microscope. As a result, as shown in Table 5, in samples 7 to 12 where Mn is 0.4% or more, good iron loss is obtained when the average crystal grain size after strain relief annealing is 50 μm or more, and the number ratio of composite precipitation is also 10%. That was all. Furthermore, samples 8, 9, 11, and 12 satisfying 855 ≧ 900-1000 × Sn gave a high magnetic flux density of about 0.02T.

Figure 0004660474
Figure 0004660474

実験室の真空溶解炉にて、質量%で、C:0.003%、Si:1.3%、Mn:0.29〜1.08%、Al:0.027%、Ti:0.0013%、N:0.0019%、S:0.0026%、B:0.0024%、Sn:0.07%を含有する鋼片を作製した。これらの鋼片を1230℃まで昇温後、直ちに1090℃まで降温して30分保定してから熱延した。この加熱において鋼片が1150℃以上の温度に滞留した時間は15分であり、仕上圧延の出口温度は840℃であった。この他に1230℃あるいは1090℃の一定温度で60分間加熱後、直ちに熱延する試験も行なった。こうして得られた熱延板について酸洗を経て板厚0.50mmまで冷延後、850℃で10秒の仕上焼鈍を経て、750℃で2時間の歪取焼鈍を施した後、結晶粒径と鉄損、磁束密度を測定し、透過型電子顕微鏡によって析出物を観察した。その結果、表6に示す通り、Mnが0.4%以上でかつ、熱延温度を1230→1090℃の二段サイクルとした試料10〜12において、歪取焼鈍後の平均結晶粒径が50μm以上で良好な鉄損が得られ、複合析出の個数割合も10%以上であった。さらにいずれも840≧900-1000×Sn(=0.07%)を満たしており、高い磁束密度が得られた。   In a laboratory vacuum melting furnace, in mass%, C: 0.003%, Si: 1.3%, Mn: 0.29 to 1.08%, Al: 0.027%, Ti: 0.0013%, N: 0.0019%, S: 0.0026%, Steel pieces containing B: 0.0024% and Sn: 0.07% were produced. These steel slabs were heated to 1230 ° C, immediately cooled to 1090 ° C, held for 30 minutes, and then hot rolled. In this heating, the steel slab stayed at a temperature of 1150 ° C. or higher for 15 minutes, and the finish rolling exit temperature was 840 ° C. In addition, a test was also conducted in which hot rolling was performed immediately after heating at a constant temperature of 1230 ° C. or 1090 ° C. for 60 minutes. The hot-rolled sheet thus obtained was pickled, cold-rolled to a thickness of 0.50 mm, subjected to finish annealing at 850 ° C. for 10 seconds, subjected to stress relief annealing at 750 ° C. for 2 hours, The iron loss and magnetic flux density were measured, and the precipitate was observed with a transmission electron microscope. As a result, as shown in Table 6, in Samples 10 to 12 in which the Mn is 0.4% or more and the hot rolling temperature is 1230 → 1090 ° C. in a two-stage cycle, the average grain size after strain relief annealing is 50 μm or more. Good iron loss was obtained, and the number ratio of composite precipitates was 10% or more. Furthermore, all satisfied 840 ≧ 900-1000 × Sn (= 0.07%), and a high magnetic flux density was obtained.

Figure 0004660474
Figure 0004660474

実験室の真空溶解炉にて、質量%で、C:0.0038%、Si:0.51%、Mn:0.12〜0.84%、Sol.Al:0.025%、Ti:0.0008〜0.0024%、N:0.0025%、S:0.0035%、B:0.0016%を含有する鋼片を作製した。これらの鋼片を1240℃まで昇温後直ちに1120℃まで降温して30分保定した後、熱延して板厚2.7mmとした。この加熱において鋼片が1150℃以上の温度に滞留した時間は22分であり、また仕上圧延の出口温度は820℃であった。この熱延板について酸洗を経て板厚0.50mmまで冷延後、825℃で10秒の仕上焼鈍を経て、750℃で2時間の歪取焼鈍を施し、鋼板の析出物と結晶粒径を観察するとともに鉄損を測定した。   In a laboratory vacuum melting furnace, by mass%, C: 0.0038%, Si: 0.51%, Mn: 0.12-0.84%, Sol.Al: 0.025%, Ti: 0.0008-0.0024%, N: 0.0025%, S A steel slab containing 0.0035% and 0.0016% B was produced. These steel slabs were heated to 1240 ° C, immediately cooled to 1120 ° C, held for 30 minutes, and then hot rolled to a thickness of 2.7 mm. In this heating, the steel slab stayed at a temperature of 1150 ° C or higher was 22 minutes, and the finish rolling exit temperature was 820 ° C. This hot-rolled sheet is pickled and cold-rolled to a thickness of 0.50 mm, then subjected to finish annealing at 825 ° C for 10 seconds, and then subjected to strain-relief annealing at 750 ° C for 2 hours. The iron loss was measured while observing.

その結果、表7に示す通り、Mnが0.4%以上でかつTiが0.0015%以下であるサンプル7,8,10,11において、歪取焼鈍後の硫化物密度が3.0×105以下、平均結晶粒径が50μm以上で良好な鉄損が得られた。これらのサンプルでは直径0.2〜0.3μmの球状の硫化物が多く、硫化物の外周に複数のTi析出物が析出しているものが多数確認された。一方、Mnが0.12,0.25%と低いサンプル1〜6では、歪取焼鈍後の硫化物密度が高く、平均結晶粒径も小さくて鉄損が悪かった。これらのサンプルに見られる硫化物は直径0.1μm以下と小さく、かつ多数の硫化物において、微細なTi析出物を包含しているのが確認できた。またMnは0.4%以上であるが、Tiが0.0015%を超えているサンプル9,12についても歪取焼鈍後の硫化物密度は高く、平均結晶粒径も小さく鉄損も比較的悪かった。これらのサンプルでは硫化物は直径0.05〜0.3μm以下の広い範囲にばらついており、Ti析出物との複合形態も硫化物の外周あるいは中心部と様々であった。なお直径0.1μmに満たないTi析出物の分布密度はいずれのサンプルでも1.0×103個/mm2未満と低かった。 As a result, as shown in Table 7, in Samples 7, 8, 10, and 11 where Mn is 0.4% or more and Ti is 0.0015% or less, the sulfide density after strain relief annealing is 3.0 × 10 5 or less, the average crystal Good iron loss was obtained when the particle size was 50 μm or more. In these samples, there were many spherical sulfides having a diameter of 0.2 to 0.3 μm, and a large number of Ti precipitates were observed on the outer periphery of the sulfide. On the other hand, in Samples 1 to 6 having a low Mn of 0.12 and 0.25%, the sulfide density after strain relief annealing was high, the average crystal grain size was small, and the iron loss was poor. The sulfides found in these samples were as small as 0.1 μm or less in diameter, and it was confirmed that a large number of sulfides contained fine Ti precipitates. In addition, Mn was 0.4% or more, but Samples 9 and 12 in which Ti exceeded 0.0015% also had a high sulfide density after strain relief annealing, a small average crystal grain size, and a relatively low iron loss. In these samples, sulfides varied in a wide range of 0.05 to 0.3 μm or less in diameter, and composite forms with Ti precipitates varied from the periphery or the center of the sulfides. The distribution density of Ti precipitates with a diameter of less than 0.1 μm was as low as less than 1.0 × 10 3 pieces / mm 2 in all samples.

Figure 0004660474
Figure 0004660474

実験室の真空溶解炉にて、質量%で、C:0.0022%、Si:1.2%、Mn:0.31〜1.44%、Sol.Al:0.03%、Ti:0.0013%、N:0.0016%、S:0.0031%、B:0.0021%、Sn:0.02%を含有する鋼片を作製した。これらの鋼片を1220℃まで昇温後、直ちに1070℃まで降温して20分保定してから熱延した。この加熱において鋼片が1150℃以上の温度に滞留した時間は15分であった。この他に1220℃あるいは1070℃の一定温度で45分間加熱後、直ちに熱延する試験も行なった。こうして得られた熱延板について酸洗を経て板厚0.50mmまで冷延後、850℃で5秒の仕上焼鈍を経て、750℃で2時間の歪取焼鈍を施し、鋼板の析出物と結晶粒径を観察するとともに鉄損を測定した。その結果、表8に示す通り、Mnが0.4%以上でかつ熱延の加熱温度を1220→1070℃としたサンプル12〜15において、歪取焼鈍後の硫化物密度が3.0×105以下、平均結晶粒径が50μm以上となり、良好な鉄損が得られた。これらのサンプルでは直径0.2〜0.3μmの球状の硫化物が多く、硫化物の外周に複数のTi析出物が析出しているものが多数確認された。その他のサンプルでは、歪取焼鈍後の硫化物密度が高いか、あるいはTi析出物密度が高く、平均結晶粒径も小さくて鉄損が悪かった。 In a laboratory vacuum melting furnace, by mass%, C: 0.0022%, Si: 1.2%, Mn: 0.31-1.44%, Sol.Al: 0.03%, Ti: 0.0013%, N: 0.0016%, S: 0.0031 Steel pieces containing%, B: 0.0021%, Sn: 0.02% were produced. These steel slabs were heated to 1220 ° C, immediately cooled to 1070 ° C, held for 20 minutes, and then hot rolled. In this heating, the time during which the steel slab stayed at a temperature of 1150 ° C. or higher was 15 minutes. In addition to this, a test was also conducted in which hot rolling was performed immediately after heating at a constant temperature of 1220 ° C. or 1070 ° C. for 45 minutes. The hot-rolled sheet thus obtained is pickled, cold-rolled to a thickness of 0.50 mm, then subjected to finish annealing at 850 ° C. for 5 seconds, and then subjected to strain relief annealing at 750 ° C. for 2 hours. The iron loss was measured while observing the particle size. As a result, as shown in Table 8, in samples 12 to 15 where Mn is 0.4% or more and the heating temperature of hot rolling is 1220 → 1070 ° C., the sulfide density after strain relief annealing is 3.0 × 10 5 or less, the average The crystal grain size was 50 μm or more, and good iron loss was obtained. In these samples, there were many spherical sulfides having a diameter of 0.2 to 0.3 μm, and a large number of Ti precipitates were observed on the outer periphery of the sulfide. In other samples, the sulfide density after strain relief annealing was high, or the Ti precipitate density was high, the average crystal grain size was small, and the iron loss was bad.

Figure 0004660474
Figure 0004660474

Claims (6)

質量%で、Si:1.5%以下、Mn:0.4%以上1.5%以下、Sol.Al:0.01%以上0.04%以下、Ti:0.0015%以下、N:0.0030%以下、S:0.0010%以上0.0040%以下、BをB/Nで0.5以上1.5以下含有し、残部Fe及び不可避不純物からなり、Mnを含む硫化物のうち個数割合で10%以上がB析出物と複合析出し、MnS、Cu S及びその複合硫化物を合計した分布密度が3.0×10 個/mm 以下であり、直径0.1μmに満たないTi析出物の分布密度が1.0×10 個/mm 以下であることを特徴とする無方向性電磁鋼板。In terms of mass%, Si: 1.5% or less, Mn: 0.4% or more and 1.5% or less, Sol. Al: 0.01% or more and 0.04% or less; Ti: 0.0015% or less; N: 0.0030% or less; S: 0.0010% or more and 0.0040% or less; 5 or more and 1.5 or less, consisting of the balance Fe and inevitable impurities, and 10% or more of the sulfides containing Mn are combined and precipitated with B precipitates, and MnS, Cu 2 S and the composite sulfides are mixed. total distribution density is at 3.0 × 10 5 cells / mm 2 or less, wherein the distribution density of 1.0 × 10 3 cells / mm 2 or less der Rukoto of Ti precipitates of less than the diameter 0.1μm Non-oriented electrical steel sheet. 鋼板の結晶粒径が30μm以下でかつ、750℃×2時間の歪取焼鈍後の結晶粒径が50μm以上であることを特徴とする請求項1に記載の無方向性電磁鋼板。 The non-oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 1, wherein the crystal grain size of the steel sheet is 30 μm or less and the crystal grain size after strain relief annealing at 750 ° C. × 2 hours is 50 μm or more. 更に、Sn、Cu、Niの1種または2種以上を質量%の合計で0.01%以上0.50%以下、および/またはREM、Ca、Mgの1種または2種以上を0.001〜0.1%含有することを特徴とする請求項1または2に記載の無方向性電磁鋼板。Further, one or more of Sn, Cu, and Ni are added in a total mass of 0.01% to 0.50%, and / or one or more of REM, Ca, and Mg are 0.001. The non-oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 1 or 2 , characterized by comprising ~ 0.1%. 請求項1〜のいずれかの項に記載の鋼板を製造する方法として、製鋼、熱延、酸洗、冷延に引き続いて仕上焼鈍を施すにあたり、熱延のスラブ加熱について、1150℃以上1250℃以下の範囲で5分以上滞留させ、それに連続して1050℃以上1150℃未満の範囲で15分以上滞留後、直ちに熱延することを特徴とする無方向性電磁鋼板の製造方法。As a method for producing the steel sheet according to any one of claims 1 to 3 , the hot-rolling slab heating is performed at 1150 ° C. or more and 1250 at the time of finishing annealing subsequent to steelmaking, hot rolling, pickling and cold rolling. A method for producing a non-oriented electrical steel sheet, wherein the steel sheet is retained for 5 minutes or more in a range of ℃ or less, and continuously hot rolled for 15 minutes or more in a range of 1050 ° C. or more and less than 1150 ° C. 前記熱延の仕上圧延の出口温度を800℃以上とすることを特徴とする請求項4に記載の無方向性電磁鋼板の製造方法。 The method for producing a non-oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 4, wherein an outlet temperature of the hot rolling finish rolling is set to 800 ° C. or more. 前記熱延の仕上圧延の出口温度T(℃)を、Snを含有する鋼板においてはT≧900−1000×Sn[質量%]とすることを特徴とする請求項に記載の無方向性電磁鋼板の製造方法。The non-directional electromagnetic according to claim 4 , wherein an exit temperature T (° C.) of the hot rolling finish rolling is T ≧ 900−1000 × Sn [mass%] in a steel plate containing Sn. A method of manufacturing a steel sheet.
JP2006512410A 2004-04-16 2005-04-15 Non-oriented electrical steel sheet with excellent punching workability and magnetic properties after strain relief annealing and its manufacturing method Expired - Fee Related JP4660474B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2004121446 2004-04-16
JP2004121446 2004-04-16
JP2005045222 2005-02-22
JP2005045222 2005-02-22
PCT/JP2005/007653 WO2005100627A1 (en) 2004-04-16 2005-04-15 Nonoriented electromagnetic steel sheet excellent in blankability and magnetic characteristics after strain removal annealing, and method for production thereof

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPWO2005100627A1 JPWO2005100627A1 (en) 2008-03-06
JP4660474B2 true JP4660474B2 (en) 2011-03-30

Family

ID=35150023

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2006512410A Expired - Fee Related JP4660474B2 (en) 2004-04-16 2005-04-15 Non-oriented electrical steel sheet with excellent punching workability and magnetic properties after strain relief annealing and its manufacturing method

Country Status (4)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4660474B2 (en)
KR (1) KR100872607B1 (en)
TW (1) TWI290958B (en)
WO (1) WO2005100627A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP6044504B2 (en) * 2012-10-23 2016-12-14 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Rare earth magnet manufacturing method
TWI751812B (en) * 2020-11-27 2022-01-01 日商日本製鐵股份有限公司 Non-oriented electromagnetic steel sheet, manufacturing method thereof, and hot-rolled steel sheet
KR102871272B1 (en) 2020-11-27 2025-10-15 닛폰세이테츠 가부시키가이샤 Non-oriented electrical steel sheet and method for manufacturing the same, and hot-rolled steel sheet
EP4253574A4 (en) 2020-11-27 2024-01-24 Nippon Steel Corporation NON-ORIENTED ELECTROMAGNETIC STEEL SHEET AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME, AND HOT-ROLLED STEEL SHEET
BR112023019179A2 (en) * 2021-04-02 2023-10-17 Nippon Steel Corp NON-ORIENTED ELECTRIC STEEL SHEET
JP7594213B2 (en) 2021-04-14 2024-12-04 日本製鉄株式会社 Hot-rolled steel sheet for non-oriented electrical steel sheet and its manufacturing method
EP4592412A4 (en) 2022-10-14 2025-12-24 Jfe Steel Corp NON-ORIENTED ELECTROMAGNETIC STEEL SHEET AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING IT
JP7552952B1 (en) 2022-12-27 2024-09-18 Jfeスチール株式会社 Non-oriented electrical steel sheet with excellent punching workability

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0387313A (en) * 1989-08-30 1991-04-12 Kawasaki Steel Corp Production of high permeability steel sheet
JPH05140649A (en) * 1991-07-25 1993-06-08 Nippon Steel Corp Manufacturing method of non-oriented electrical steel sheet with excellent magnetic properties
JPH1088298A (en) * 1996-09-19 1998-04-07 Nkk Corp Non-oriented electrical steel sheet
JP2003064456A (en) * 2001-08-27 2003-03-05 Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd Non-oriented electrical steel sheet for semi-process and its manufacturing method

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0387313A (en) * 1989-08-30 1991-04-12 Kawasaki Steel Corp Production of high permeability steel sheet
JPH05140649A (en) * 1991-07-25 1993-06-08 Nippon Steel Corp Manufacturing method of non-oriented electrical steel sheet with excellent magnetic properties
JPH1088298A (en) * 1996-09-19 1998-04-07 Nkk Corp Non-oriented electrical steel sheet
JP2003064456A (en) * 2001-08-27 2003-03-05 Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd Non-oriented electrical steel sheet for semi-process and its manufacturing method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
TWI290958B (en) 2007-12-11
TW200538557A (en) 2005-12-01
JPWO2005100627A1 (en) 2008-03-06
KR100872607B1 (en) 2008-12-09
KR20060134154A (en) 2006-12-27
WO2005100627A1 (en) 2005-10-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
KR102095142B1 (en) Non-oriented electrical steel sheet and production method thereof
US11279985B2 (en) Non-oriented electrical steel sheet
CN115003843A (en) Non-oriented electrical steel sheet and method for producing the same
JP7159311B2 (en) Non-oriented electrical steel sheet with excellent magnetic properties and its manufacturing method
CN111527218B (en) Non-oriented electrical steel sheet and method for producing the same
KR102175064B1 (en) Non-orientied electrical steel sheet and method for manufacturing the same
CN110114489B (en) Non-oriented electrical steel sheet and preparation method thereof
EP3184660B1 (en) Non-oriented electrical steel sheet and manufacturing method thereof
US11142813B2 (en) Non-oriented electrical steel sheet and manufacturing method therefor
US11946123B2 (en) Method of producing a non-oriented electrical steel sheet
WO2012029621A1 (en) Method for producing non-oriented magnetic steel sheet
CN116867915A (en) Non-oriented electrical steel plate and manufacturing method thereof
JP2012132070A (en) Method for manufacturing non-oriented electromagnetic steel plate
EP4001450A1 (en) 600mpa grade non-oriented electrical steel sheet and manufacturing method thereof
US20230416883A1 (en) Non-oriented electrical steel plate and manufacturing method therefor
WO2013121924A1 (en) Non-oriented electromagnetic steel sheet
JP5263012B2 (en) Non-oriented electrical steel sheet and manufacturing method thereof
JP7328597B2 (en) Non-oriented electrical steel sheet and manufacturing method thereof
CN110114488A (en) The excellent non orientation electromagnetic steel plate of recycling property
JP4660474B2 (en) Non-oriented electrical steel sheet with excellent punching workability and magnetic properties after strain relief annealing and its manufacturing method
JP7445651B2 (en) Non-oriented electrical steel sheet and its manufacturing method
JP2024517690A (en) Non-oriented electrical steel sheet and its manufacturing method
JPH1088298A (en) Non-oriented electrical steel sheet
JP4790151B2 (en) Non-oriented electrical steel sheet with extremely excellent iron loss and magnetic flux density and method for producing the same
KR20250140086A (en) High-strength and low-iron-loss non-oriented electrical steel plates and methods for manufacturing the same

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20101005

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20101201

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20101221

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20101228

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20140107

Year of fee payment: 3

R151 Written notification of patent or utility model registration

Ref document number: 4660474

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R151

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20140107

Year of fee payment: 3

S533 Written request for registration of change of name

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20140107

Year of fee payment: 3

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

S533 Written request for registration of change of name

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees