JP4676906B2 - Heat-resistant aluminum alloy for drawing - Google Patents
Heat-resistant aluminum alloy for drawing Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP4676906B2 JP4676906B2 JP2006063585A JP2006063585A JP4676906B2 JP 4676906 B2 JP4676906 B2 JP 4676906B2 JP 2006063585 A JP2006063585 A JP 2006063585A JP 2006063585 A JP2006063585 A JP 2006063585A JP 4676906 B2 JP4676906 B2 JP 4676906B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- toughness
- strength
- alloy
- aging
- effect
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
Landscapes
- Continuous Casting (AREA)
Description
この発明は航空機や宇宙機材の部品や構造材あるいは自動車等の内燃機関や過給機等の部品などとして、100℃を越える高温度域において高強度および高靭性を要求される用途に用いられる展伸加工用耐熱アルミニウム合金に関するものである。 The present invention is used for applications that require high strength and high toughness in a high temperature range exceeding 100 ° C., as parts of aircraft and space equipment, structural materials, parts of internal combustion engines such as automobiles, turbochargers, etc. The present invention relates to a heat-resistant aluminum alloy for drawing.
アルミニウム合金材料の高強度化を図るための手法としては、従来から時効硬化現象が広く利用されている。しかしながら一般にこのようなアルミニウム合金時効硬化材について、100℃を越える高温度域に長時間曝した場合、時効析出物の粗大化によって著しい軟化が生じることが多い。そこでこのような軟化を抑えるため、各種元素の添加および成分組成の最適化を図って、高温強度を向上させた合金として、Al−Cu系合金のJIS A2618合金やA2219合金などが一般的な耐熱アルミニウム合金として実用化されている。 As a method for increasing the strength of an aluminum alloy material, an age hardening phenomenon has been widely used. However, in general, when such an aluminum alloy age hardened material is exposed to a high temperature range exceeding 100 ° C. for a long time, the softening is often caused by the coarsening of the age precipitate. Therefore, in order to suppress such softening, JIS A2618 alloy and A2219 alloy, which are Al-Cu based alloys, are generally used as heat-resistant alloys by adding various elements and optimizing component compositions to improve high temperature strength. It is put into practical use as an aluminum alloy.
またこのようなAl−Cu系合金の高温強度を一層向上させるために、例えば特許文献1、特許文献2に示されるように、MgとともにAgを添加することも試みられている。 In order to further improve the high-temperature strength of such an Al—Cu alloy, it has been attempted to add Ag together with Mg as disclosed in, for example, Patent Document 1 and Patent Document 2.
しかしながら高温特性(耐熱性および高温耐力)と、靭性とは両立し難いのが一般的であり、上記提案の従来技術でも、高温特性と靭性との両者を同時に向上させるに至っていないのが実情であった。すなわち、上記提案の技術の場合、高温での強度を向上させるために靭性値を犠牲にしており、そのため特に破壊を伴なう高応力が加わる部材や構造物については信頼性が低くならざるを得なかったのである。 However, high-temperature characteristics (heat resistance and high-temperature proof stress) and toughness are generally difficult to achieve at the same time, and even the conventional technology proposed above has not improved both high-temperature characteristics and toughness at the same time. there were. That is, in the case of the proposed technique, the toughness value is sacrificed in order to improve the strength at high temperature, and therefore, the reliability is particularly low for members and structures subjected to high stress accompanied by fracture. I didn't get it.
一方、本発明者等は、Al−Cu系合金にMg、Agを添加すると同時にZnを添加することによって、高温特性と同時に靭性の向上を図る方法を特許文献3において提案している。この特許文献3の技術によれば、優れた高温特性を得ると同時に、ある程度の靭性の向上を図ることが可能となったが、高温材料に対する近年のより高度な要求には未だ充分に応えられない状況にあった。 On the other hand, the present inventors have proposed a method for improving toughness at the same time as high temperature characteristics by adding Mg and Ag to an Al—Cu alloy and simultaneously adding Zn in Patent Document 3. According to the technique of Patent Document 3, it has become possible to obtain excellent high temperature characteristics and at the same time improve toughness to some extent, but it can still sufficiently meet the recent higher demand for high temperature materials. There was no situation.
この発明は前述のような従来技術の問題点を一掃し、高温特性と靭性がともに充分に優れた展伸加工用耐熱アルミニウム合金を提供することを課題としている。 An object of the present invention is to provide a heat-resistant aluminum alloy for stretch processing that has eliminated the above-described problems of the prior art and has sufficiently high temperature characteristics and toughness.
本発明者等は前述の課題を解決するべく、Al−Cu系にMg、Agを添加した合金、すなわちAl−Cu−Mg−Ag系合金について、種々実験・研究を重ねた結果、添加成分元素として、さらにTiとMnとを適切な量だけ同時に添加することによって、高温強度と高靭性とを同時に著しく改善し得ることを見出し、またその場合において、TiとMnの添加量の比(Mn/Ti比)を適切な範囲内とすることも必要であることを見出し、この発明をなすに至った。さらに、TiとMnに加えて、VもしくはZnを添加することも有効であり、かつその場合にMn量とTi、Vの合計量との比Mn/(Ti+V)比を適切な範囲内とすることが、高温強度と高靭性を得るために有効であることを見出したのである。 In order to solve the above-mentioned problems, the present inventors have conducted various experiments and studies on an alloy in which Mg and Ag are added to an Al—Cu system, that is, an Al—Cu— Mg— Ag system alloy. Further, it has been found that high temperature strength and high toughness can be improved at the same time by simultaneously adding appropriate amounts of Ti and Mn, and in that case, the ratio of the addition amount of Ti and Mn (Mn / The present inventors have found that it is also necessary to set the Ti ratio within an appropriate range, and have reached the present invention. Furthermore, it is also effective to add V or Zn in addition to Ti and Mn. In that case, the ratio Mn / (Ti + V) ratio between the amount of Mn and the total amount of Ti and V is within an appropriate range. Has been found to be effective for obtaining high-temperature strength and high toughness.
具体的には、請求項1の発明の展伸加工用耐熱アルミニウム合金は、Cu5.1〜6.5%、Mg0.10〜0.7%、Ag0.10〜1.0%、Mn0.10〜0.50%、Ti0.22〜0.50%を含有し、しかもMn量とTi量との比Mn/Tiが0.5〜2.5の範囲内にあり、残部がAlおよび不可避的不純物よりなることを特徴とするものである。 Specifically, the heat-resistant aluminum alloy for extension work of the invention of claim 1 is Cu 5.1-6.5%, Mg 0.10-0.7%, Ag 0.10-1.0%, Mn 0.10. ~ 0.50%, Ti 0.22 ~ 0.50%, Mn / Ti ratio Mn / Ti is in the range of 0.5 ~ 2.5, the balance is Al and inevitable It is characterized by comprising an impurity.
さらに請求項2の発明の展伸加工用耐熱アルミニウム合金は、Cu5.1〜6.5%、Mg0.10〜0.7%、Ag0.10〜1.0%、Mn0.10〜0.50%、Ti0.06〜0.50%を含有し、かつV0.02〜0.25%、Zn0.06〜0.35%のうちの1種または2種を含み、残部がAlおよび不可避的不純物よりなり、しかもTiおよびVの合計量(Ti+V)が0.17%以上であり、かつMn量とTiおよびVの合計量との比Mn/(Ti+V)が0.5〜2.5の範囲内にあることを特徴とするものである。 Further, the heat-resistant aluminum alloy for stretch processing according to the invention of claim 2 is Cu 5.1 to 6.5%, Mg 0.10 to 0.7%, Ag 0.10 to 1.0%, Mn 0.10 to 0.50. %, Ti 0.06 to 0.50%, and V 0.02 to 0.25%, Zn 0.06 to 0.35%, or one or two of them, the balance being Al and inevitable Ri Na from impurities, yet the total amount of Ti and V (Ti + V) is not less 0.17% or more, and the ratio Mn / (Ti + V) of the total amount of Mn amount and Ti and V are 0.5 to 2.5 It is characterized by being within the range .
この発明の展伸加工用耐熱アルミニウム合金は、一般には両立し難いと言われている高温強度と靭性との両者を従来合金よりも向上させることができ、そのためより高温、高負荷の環境においても信頼性を損なうことなく好適に使用することができる。すなわちこの発明の展伸加工用アルミニウム合金は、100℃を越える高温域において高強度および高靭性が要求される部品や構造部材として、圧延や鍛造、押出等の展伸加工を施して使用することができ、例えばロケット、あるいは航空機等の高速移動体の外壁や、内燃機関あるいは過給機用部材などに好適に使用することができる。そのためこの発明によれば、アルミニウム合金の長所を生かせる用途を大きく拡大させるという優れた効果を奏することができる。 The heat-resistant aluminum alloy for stretch processing according to the present invention can improve both the high-temperature strength and toughness, which are generally said to be difficult to achieve, compared to conventional alloys, and therefore, even in higher temperature and higher load environments. It can be suitably used without impairing reliability. In other words, the aluminum alloy for extension work of the present invention is used after being subjected to extension processes such as rolling, forging, and extrusion as parts and structural members that require high strength and high toughness in a high temperature range exceeding 100 ° C. For example, it can be suitably used for an outer wall of a high-speed moving body such as a rocket or an aircraft, an internal combustion engine or a supercharger member. Therefore, according to this invention, the outstanding effect that the use which can make use of the advantage of an aluminum alloy is expanded greatly can be produced.
この発明の展伸加工用耐熱アルミニウム合金は、基本的には、Al−Cu系のいわゆる2000番系の時効硬化型の耐熱合金にMg、Agを添加したAl−Cu−Mg−Ag系合金をベースとし、これにさらにMnとTiを適量だけ同時に添加したものである。 The heat-resistant aluminum alloy for stretch processing of the present invention is basically an Al-Cu-Mg-Ag alloy obtained by adding Mg and Ag to an Al-Cu-based age 2000 heat-resistant alloy. A base is added , and Mn and Ti are further added at the same time.
ここで、この発明の合金の前提となるAl−Cu−Mg−Ag系合金では、時効処理によりAl−Cu系のいわゆるθ’相あるいはAl−Cu−Mg−Ag系のいわゆるΩ相が析出し、これらの時効析出物が硬化に寄与して、高強度を得ることが可能となるが、この発明では、さらにMnおよびTiを適切な量だけ同時添加することによって、時効析出物の微細化を図るとともに、高温に長時間曝されたとき(高温暴露時)に生じる時効析出物の粗大化を抑制することが可能となって、靭性の向上と、より一掃の高温強度の改善を図ることが可能となる。そしてこの発明の展伸加工用耐熱アルミニウム合金の成分組成も、これらの作用を充分に発揮して、高い高温強度と優れた靭性を得る点から定められる。そこで以下にこの発明の耐熱アルミニウム合金における成分組成の限定理由について説明する。 Here, in the Al—Cu—Mg—Ag based alloy which is the premise of the alloy of the present invention, an Al—Cu based so-called θ ′ phase or an Al—Cu—Mg—Ag based so-called Ω phase is precipitated by aging treatment. In addition, these aging precipitates contribute to the hardening, and it is possible to obtain high strength. In this invention, however, the aging precipitates can be further refined by simultaneously adding Mn and Ti in appropriate amounts. It is possible to suppress the coarsening of aging precipitates that occur when exposed to high temperatures for a long time (during high-temperature exposure), thereby improving toughness and further improving high-temperature strength. It becomes possible. The component composition of the heat-resistant aluminum alloy for stretch processing according to the present invention is also determined from the viewpoint of sufficiently exhibiting these actions and obtaining high high-temperature strength and excellent toughness. Therefore, the reason for limiting the component composition in the heat-resistant aluminum alloy of the present invention will be described below.
Cu:
Cuを添加することによって、前述のように時効処理によってAl−Cu系のθ’相もしくはAl−Cu−Mg−Ag系のΩ相が析出し、硬化に寄与する。Cu量が5.1%未満ではその効果が充分に得られず、6.5%を越えれば溶体化処理によっても溶け切れない安定相θが形成されてしまって、靭性の低下を招く。したがってCu量は5.1〜6.5%の範囲内とした。なおより高い強度を必要とする場合は、Cu量は5.3%以上とすることが望ましい。
Cu:
By adding Cu, an Al—Cu-based θ ′ phase or an Al—Cu—Mg—Ag-based Ω phase is precipitated by aging treatment as described above, and contributes to curing. If the amount of Cu is less than 5.1%, the effect cannot be sufficiently obtained, and if it exceeds 6.5%, a stable phase θ that cannot be completely melted by the solution treatment is formed, leading to a decrease in toughness. Therefore, the amount of Cu is set within the range of 5.1 to 6.5%. In addition, when higher intensity | strength is required, it is desirable to make Cu amount into 5.3% or more.
Mg:
Mgも時効処理によってAl−Cu−Mg−Ag系のΩ相を析出し、硬化に寄与する。Mg量が0.10%未満ではその効果が充分に得られず、一方0.7%を越えてMgを添加しても、更なる強度の向上が望めないばかりか、延性および靭性の低下が顕著となってしまう。したがってMg量は0.10〜0.7%の範囲内とした。なお特に高強度を必要とする場合には、Mg量は0.2%以上とすることが望ましい。
Mg:
Mg also precipitates an Al—Cu—Mg—Ag Ω phase by aging treatment and contributes to hardening. If the amount of Mg is less than 0.10%, the effect cannot be sufficiently obtained. On the other hand, addition of Mg exceeding 0.7% cannot be expected to further improve the strength, but also decreases ductility and toughness. It becomes remarkable. Therefore, the amount of Mg is set within the range of 0.10 to 0.7%. In particular, when high strength is required, the Mg content is desirably 0.2% or more.
Ag:
Agも時効処理によってΩ相を析出し、硬化に寄与する。Ag量が0.10%未満ではその効果が充分に得られず、一方1.0%を越えてAgを添加しても更なる強度の向上は望めず、高価なAgの使用量が増して経済性が低下するだけである。したがってAg量は0.10〜1.0%の範囲内とした。なお特に高強度を必要とする場合は、Ag量は0.2%以上とすることが望ましい。
Ag:
Ag also contributes to hardening by precipitating an Ω phase by aging treatment. If the amount of Ag is less than 0.10%, the effect cannot be sufficiently obtained. On the other hand, even if Ag exceeds 1.0%, further improvement in strength cannot be expected, and the amount of expensive Ag used increases. It only reduces the economy. Therefore, the Ag content is set in the range of 0.10 to 1.0%. In particular, when high strength is required, the Ag content is desirably 0.2% or more.
Mn、Ti:
Mnを添加した場合には、時効析出物を微細化する効果、および高温暴露時に生じる時効析出物の粗大化を抑制する効果が認められる。しかしながらMnは、鋳造凝固時において凝固セルの外周部に強制固溶されて濃縮しやすいことに加え、アルミニウム合金中での拡散が遅いため、鋳造後に均質化処理や溶体化処理などの高温での熱処理や、圧延、押出、鍛造などの展伸加工を行っても、Mnの偏析を完全には解消できず、そのためMn添加による時効析出物の微細化効果、高温暴露時の時効析出物粗大化抑制効果は、合金組織中のMn濃縮領域に限られる。
Mn, Ti:
When Mn is added, the effect of refining the aging precipitates and the effect of suppressing the coarsening of the aging precipitates that occur during high temperature exposure are recognized. However, Mn is forcibly solidified at the outer periphery of the solidification cell during casting solidification and tends to concentrate, and since it diffuses slowly in the aluminum alloy, it can be used at high temperatures such as homogenization and solution treatment after casting. Even when heat treatment, rolling, extrusion, forging, and other spreading processes are performed, segregation of Mn cannot be completely eliminated. The suppression effect is limited to the Mn enriched region in the alloy structure.
一方Tiを添加した場合も、Mnを添加した場合と同様に、時効析出物を微細化する効果、および高温暴露時に生じる時効析出物の粗大化を抑制する効果が認められる。しかしながらTiは、鋳造凝固時において凝固セルの中央部に強制固溶されて濃縮しやすいことに加え、アルミニウム合金中での拡散が遅いため、鋳造後に均質化処理や溶体化処理などの高温での熱処理や、鍛造、押出、圧延などの展伸加工を行ってもTiの偏析を完全に解消することはできない。そのためTi添加による時効析出物の微細化効果、高温暴露時の時効析出物粗大化抑制効果は、合金組織中のTi濃縮領域に限られる。 On the other hand, when Ti is added, as in the case of adding Mn, the effect of refining the aging precipitate and the effect of suppressing the coarsening of the aging precipitate that occurs during high temperature exposure are recognized. However, Ti is forced to dissolve in the center of the solidification cell during casting solidification and concentrates easily. In addition, since Ti diffuses slowly in the aluminum alloy, it can be used at high temperatures such as homogenization and solution treatment after casting. Ti segregation cannot be completely eliminated even by performing heat treatment, forging, extrusion, rolling, or other extension processing. Therefore, the effect of refining aging precipitates by addition of Ti and the effect of suppressing aging precipitate coarsening during high temperature exposure are limited to the Ti-enriched region in the alloy structure.
したがってMnまたはTiのいずれか一方のみを単独で添加した場合には、MnまたはTiの偏析に起因して、合金組織中における時効析出物の析出状態が不均一となるため、強度および靭性の向上効果を充分に図ることは困難である。一方、MnとTiとを同時に添加すれば、Mn希薄領域にはTiが濃縮し、逆にTi希薄領域にはMnが濃縮したミクロ組織が得られる。そしてこの場合には、Mn濃縮領域およびTi濃縮領域のそれぞれにおいて、時効析出物が微細となると同時に、高温暴露時の時効析出物の粗大化も抑制される。その結果、時効析出組織が全体的に微細かつ均一となり、合金全体として強度および靭性が著しく向上する。すなわち、MnとTiとを同時に添加することによって、単に時効析出物の微細化効果、高温曝露時の時効析出物粗大化抑制効果が得られるばかりでなく、組織全体としての均一性の改善を図って、高温強度および靭性の顕著な向上をもたらすことができるのであり、この発明ではこのような作用効果を基本原理としている。 Therefore, when only one of Mn and Ti is added alone, the precipitation state of aging precipitates in the alloy structure becomes non-uniform due to segregation of Mn or Ti, so that the strength and toughness are improved. It is difficult to achieve sufficient effects. On the other hand, if Mn and Ti are added at the same time, a microstructure in which Ti is concentrated in the Mn-diluted region and conversely Mn is concentrated in the Ti-diluted region is obtained. In this case, the aging precipitates become fine in each of the Mn enriched region and the Ti enriched region, and at the same time, coarsening of the aging precipitates during high temperature exposure is suppressed. As a result, the aging precipitation structure becomes fine and uniform as a whole, and the strength and toughness of the entire alloy are remarkably improved. That is, by simultaneously adding Mn and Ti, not only can the effect of refining the aging precipitates and the effect of suppressing the coarsening of the aging precipitates when exposed to high temperatures be obtained, but the uniformity of the entire structure can be improved. Therefore, the high temperature strength and toughness can be remarkably improved, and the present invention has such a function and effect as a basic principle.
ここで、Mnの添加量が0.10%未満では上記の効果が不充分であり、一方0.5%を越えてMnを添加すれば、粗大なAl−Mn系化合物が多量に形成されて靭性低下の原因となるため、好ましくない。したがってMnの添加量は0.10〜0.5%の範囲とした。なおMn添加量は、この範囲内でも特に0.15〜0.40%の範囲内が最適である。 Here, if the amount of Mn added is less than 0.10%, the above effect is insufficient. On the other hand, if Mn is added in excess of 0.5%, a large amount of coarse Al-Mn compounds are formed. This is not preferable because it causes a decrease in toughness. Therefore, the amount of Mn added is in the range of 0.10 to 0.5%. In addition, the Mn addition amount is optimal within the range of 0.15 to 0.40% even within this range.
またTiの添加量が0.22%未満でも上記の効果が不充分であり、一方0.5%を越えてTiを添加すれば、鋳造時に粗大なAl−Ti系化合物が多量に形成されやすく、靭性低下の要因となるため好ましくない。したがってTi添加量は0.22〜0.50%の範囲内とした。なお、後に改めて説明するように、Tiと同時にVを添加する場合、すなわち請求項2の発明の展伸加工用耐熱アルミニウム合金の場合は、Tiの添加量は0.06〜0.50%の範囲内とする。 Moreover, even if the addition amount of Ti is less than 0.22% , the above effect is insufficient. On the other hand, if Ti is added in excess of 0.5%, a large amount of coarse Al-Ti compounds are easily formed during casting. This is not preferable because it causes a decrease in toughness. Therefore, the amount of Ti added is set in the range of 0.22 to 0.50%. As will be described later, in the case where V is added simultaneously with Ti, that is, in the case of the heat-resistant aluminum alloy for stretch processing of the invention of claim 2, the amount of Ti added is 0.06 to 0.50%. Within range.
なお従来、一般的なアルミニウム合金において微細化成分として考えられているTiは、Bを同時に添加することによりTi−B系化合物を形成させて、鋳塊結晶粒を微細化する目的で使用されている。しかしながら強度および靭性の向上のためには、TiとともにBがアルミニウム合金中に存在することは必要ではなく、むしろTiがTi−B系化合物として完全に固定されてしまえば、強度および靭性は向上しなくなってしまう。またTi−B系化合物粒子は、Al−Ti系化合物の析出核として作用するため、Bを多量に添加すれば、Tiの強制固溶量を低下させて、結果的に時効析出物微細化効果および高温暴露時の時効析出物粗大化抑制効果を阻害する傾向が強くなってしまう。そのためこの発明のアルミニウム合金の場合は、Bは全く添加しないか、あるいは結晶粒微細化のためにBを添加するとしてもその添加量を15ppm以下の極微量とすることが望ましい。 Conventionally, Ti, which is considered as a refining component in a general aluminum alloy, is used for the purpose of refining ingot crystal grains by simultaneously forming B to form a Ti-B-based compound. Yes. However, in order to improve strength and toughness, it is not necessary that B is present in the aluminum alloy together with Ti. Rather, if Ti is completely fixed as a Ti-B compound, the strength and toughness are improved. It will disappear. Moreover, since Ti-B compound particles act as precipitation nuclei for Al-Ti compounds, if a large amount of B is added, the forced solid solution amount of Ti is reduced, resulting in the effect of refinement of aging precipitates. In addition, the tendency to inhibit the effect of suppressing aging precipitate coarsening during high temperature exposure becomes strong. Therefore, in the case of the aluminum alloy of the present invention, it is desirable that B is not added at all, or even if B is added for the purpose of crystal grain refinement, the addition amount is set to a very small amount of 15 ppm or less.
以上のように、適切な添加量範囲内でMnおよびTiを同時に添加することにより、時効析出物微細化効果、および高温暴露時における時効析出物粗大化抑制効果が充分に発揮されるとともに、組織が均一化されて、高靭性を得ることができるが、さらにMn添加量とTi添加量との比(Mn/Ti比)を0.5〜2.5の範囲内に制御することにより、より一層組織の均一性を向上させて、高温特性と靭性の向上を図ることができ、これを請求項2において規定した。 As described above, by simultaneously adding Mn and Ti within an appropriate addition amount range, the effect of refining aging precipitates and the effect of suppressing aging precipitate coarsening during high temperature exposure are sufficiently exhibited, and the structure Can be obtained and high toughness can be obtained, but by controlling the ratio of Mn addition amount and Ti addition amount (Mn / Ti ratio) within the range of 0.5 to 2.5, The uniformity of the structure can be further improved to improve the high temperature characteristics and toughness, which is defined in claim 2.
すなわち、Mn/Ti比を0.5〜2.5の範囲内に規制することによって、時効析出物の微細化効果と高温曝露時における時効析出物粗大化抑制効果が合金の全体にわたって確実かつ均一に向上し、結果的に高温特性と靭性のより一層の向上を図ることができる。ここで、Mn/Ti比が0.5未満では、Ti濃縮領域における時効析出物の微細化効果、および高温暴露時の時効析出物粗大化抑制効果が、Mn濃縮領域におけるそれと比較して相対的に強くなるため、材料全体としての組織の均一性が崩れて、強度および靭性レベルが若干劣化し、またMn/Ti比が2.5を越えれば逆にMn濃縮領域における時効析出物の微細化効果、および高温暴露時の時効析出物粗大化抑制効果が、Ti濃縮領域におけるそれと比較して相対的に強くなるため、材料全体としての組織の均一性が崩れて、強度および靭性レベルが若干劣化する。 That is, by regulating the Mn / Ti ratio within the range of 0.5 to 2.5, the effect of refining the aging precipitates and the effect of suppressing the aging precipitate coarsening during high temperature exposure are assured and uniform throughout the alloy. As a result, it is possible to further improve the high temperature characteristics and toughness. Here, when the Mn / Ti ratio is less than 0.5, the effect of refining the aging precipitates in the Ti-enriched region and the effect of suppressing the coarsening of aging precipitates at the time of high-temperature exposure are relative to those in the Mn-enriched region. Therefore, if the Mn / Ti ratio exceeds 2.5, the aging precipitates in the Mn-concentrated region become finer. The effect and the effect of suppressing aging precipitate coarsening when exposed to high temperatures are relatively stronger than those in the Ti-enriched region, so the uniformity of the structure of the entire material is disrupted and the strength and toughness levels are slightly degraded. To do.
以上のような請求項1、請求項2において規定する合金成分組成によってもこの発明の目的を達成するために充分な特性を得ることが可能であるが、さらに次に述べるように、VもしくはZnを添加することにより、より一層の特性の向上を図ることができ、これを請求項3、請求項4において規定した。 It is possible to obtain sufficient characteristics to achieve the object of the present invention even by the alloy component composition defined in claims 1 and 2 as described above. However, as described below, V or Zn The characteristics can be further improved by adding, which is defined in claims 3 and 4.
V:
Vは、Tiと同様に鋳造凝固時に凝固セルの中央部に濃縮しやすく、またその拡散も遅い。そしてまたV濃縮領域では、時効析出物が微細析出し、また高温暴露時には時効析出物の粗大化抑制効果が認められる。したがって、VをTiとともに添加することによって、さらに強度と靭性を向上させることができる。ここで、Vの添加量が0.02%未満では上記の効果が不充分であり、一方V添加量が0.25%を越えれば、鋳造時に粗大なAl−V系化合物が形成されて、靭性低下の原因となるため好ましくない。したがってVの添加量は0.02〜0.25%の範囲内とする。なおVの好ましい添加量範囲は0.05〜0.15%である。またVは、Tiと同様の効果を奏するため、Tiと同時にVを添加する場合にはTi添加量を低くすることができ、TiとVの合計の添加量(Ti+V)は0.17%以上とし、0.19%以上がより好ましい。
V:
V, like Ti, tends to concentrate at the center of the solidification cell during casting solidification, and its diffusion is slow. In addition, in the V-concentrated region, aging precipitates are finely precipitated, and the effect of suppressing aging precipitate coarsening is observed when exposed to high temperatures. Therefore, the strength and toughness can be further improved by adding V together with Ti. Here, if the addition amount of V is less than 0.02%, the above effect is insufficient. On the other hand, if the addition amount of V exceeds 0.25%, a coarse Al-V compound is formed during casting, This is not preferable because it causes a decrease in toughness. Therefore, the amount of V added is in the range of 0.02 to 0.25%. In addition, the preferable addition amount range of V is 0.05 to 0.15%. Further, V has the same effect as Ti. Therefore, when V is added simultaneously with Ti, the amount of Ti added can be lowered, and the total amount of addition of Ti and V (Ti + V) is 0.17% or more. And 0.19% or more is more preferable.
さらに、上記の範囲でV添加量を調整すると同時に、Mn添加量とTiおよびVの合計添加量との比、すなわちMn/(Ti+V)比を0.5〜2.5の範囲に制御することにより、高温特性と靭性の向上を確実に図ることができる。なおMn/(Ti+V)比を0.5〜2.5の範囲内に規定した理由は、既に述べたMn/Ti比の規定理由と同様である。 Further, the V addition amount is adjusted in the above range, and at the same time, the ratio of the Mn addition amount to the total addition amount of Ti and V, that is, the Mn / (Ti + V) ratio is controlled to the range of 0.5 to 2.5. Thus, it is possible to reliably improve the high temperature characteristics and toughness. The reason for defining the Mn / (Ti + V) ratio within the range of 0.5 to 2.5 is the same as the reason for the Mn / Ti ratio already described.
すなわち、Mn/(Ti+V)比を0.5〜2.5の範囲内に規制することによって、時効析出物の微細化効果と高温曝露時における時効析出物粗大化抑制効果が合金の全体にわたって確実かつ均一に向上し、結果的に高温特性と靭性のより一層の向上を図ることができる。ここで、Mn/(Ti+V)比が0.5未満では、TiおよびV濃縮領域における時効析出物の微細化効果、および高温暴露時の時効析出物粗大化抑制効果が、Mn濃縮領域におけるそれと比較して相対的に強くなるため、材料全体としての組織の均一性が崩れて、強度および靭性レベルが若干劣化し、またMn/(Ti+V)比が2.5を越えれば逆にMn濃縮領域における時効析出物の微細化効果、および高温暴露時の時効析出物粗大化抑制効果が、TiおよびV濃縮領域におけるそれと比較して相対的に強くなるため、材料全体としての組織の均一性が崩れて、強度および靭性レベルが若干劣化する。 That is, by regulating the Mn / (Ti + V) ratio within the range of 0.5 to 2.5, the effect of refining the aging precipitates and the effect of suppressing the aging precipitate coarsening during high temperature exposure are ensured over the entire alloy. And it can improve uniformly and can aim at the further improvement of a high temperature characteristic and toughness as a result. Here, when the Mn / (Ti + V) ratio is less than 0.5, the effect of refining the aging precipitates in the Ti and V concentration regions and the effect of suppressing the coarsening of the aging precipitates during high temperature exposure are compared with those in the Mn concentration region. Therefore, the uniformity of the structure as a whole material is lost, the strength and the toughness level are slightly deteriorated, and if the Mn / (Ti + V) ratio exceeds 2.5, conversely in the Mn concentration region The effect of refinement of aging precipitates and the effect of suppressing aging precipitate coarsening at high temperature exposure are relatively stronger than those in the Ti and V-enriched regions, so the uniformity of the structure of the entire material is lost. , Strength and toughness levels are slightly degraded.
Zn:
Znを添加することによっても、強度と延性の向上を図ることができる。ここで、Znが0.06%未満では顕著な強度と延性の向上は得られず、一方0.35%を越えれば耐食性の低下が認められるため好ましくない。但し、Znの過剰添加による耐食性の劣化はさほど大きなものではなく、良好な使用環境では0.5%程度までは特に支障はない。そこでZnの添加量は0.06〜0.35%の範囲内とした。なおZnの添加量の好ましい範囲は0.10〜0.30%である。
Zn:
By adding Zn, the strength and ductility can be improved. Here, if the Zn content is less than 0.06% , a remarkable improvement in strength and ductility cannot be obtained. On the other hand, if it exceeds 0.35%, a decrease in corrosion resistance is observed, which is not preferable. However, the deterioration of the corrosion resistance due to the excessive addition of Zn is not so great, and there is no particular problem up to about 0.5% in a good use environment. Therefore, the addition amount of Zn is set in the range of 0.06 to 0.35%. In addition, the preferable range of the addition amount of Zn is 0.10 to 0.30%.
以上で説明した各元素のほかは、基本的にはAlおよび不可避的不純物とすれば良いが、前記各成分元素のほかの元素についても、この発明に係る展伸加工用アルミニウム合金の靭性や高温特性、その他の特性を阻害しない範囲内での含有は許容される。 In addition to the elements described above, basically, Al and unavoidable impurities may be used. However, the other elements other than the above-described component elements also have the toughness and high temperature of the aluminum alloy for extension work according to the present invention. Inclusion within the range that does not inhibit the properties and other properties is allowed.
例えば、Cr、Zrは、Al−Cr系、Al−Zr系の微細な分散粒子を形成することにより強度向上に寄与する。この場合の分散粒子は、この発明で主な用途としている部品、部材の使用温度域(100〜250℃)においては、前述のCu系化合物よりも安定であるため、高強度を維持することが可能となる。しかしながら、CrやZrの添加量がそれぞれ0.10%を越えれば、溶体化処理後の焼入れ速度が遅くなった場合に、人工時効処理後に充分な強度を得ることが困難となり、また鋳造性の低下による割れ発生頻度が増すこととなるため、好ましくない。そのため、Cr、Zrは各々0.10%以下が好ましく、0.07%以下に規制することがさらに好ましい。 For example, Cr and Zr contribute to strength improvement by forming fine dispersed particles of Al—Cr and Al—Zr. The dispersed particles in this case are more stable than the above Cu-based compounds in the use temperature range (100 to 250 ° C.) of the parts and members which are the main applications in the present invention, and therefore can maintain high strength. It becomes possible. However, if the addition amount of Cr and Zr exceeds 0.10%, respectively, it becomes difficult to obtain sufficient strength after artificial aging treatment when the quenching speed after solution treatment is slow, and castability is reduced. This is not preferable because the frequency of occurrence of cracks due to the reduction increases. Therefore, Cr and Zr are each preferably 0.10% or less, and more preferably 0.07% or less.
そのほかアルミニウム地金に不可避的不純物として含まれるSiは、他の遷移金属等とともに晶出物を形成しやすく、材料の延性および靭性の低下をもたらす。Siの含有量が0.15%を越えた場合、明らかな靭性低下が生じるため好ましくない。Siの許容含有量は、原料地金の価格に基づく経済的観点と用途に適合した要求特性との兼ね合いにかかわる部分が大きく、また一方では、Siはアルミニウム合金の強度を向上させる効果も認められ、これらから総合的に判断して、Siの含有量は0.05〜0.15%の範囲内とすることが望ましい。 In addition, Si contained as an inevitable impurity in the aluminum ingot easily forms a crystallized substance together with other transition metals and the like, resulting in a decrease in ductility and toughness of the material. When the Si content exceeds 0.15%, a significant decrease in toughness occurs, which is not preferable. The allowable content of Si is largely related to the balance between the economic viewpoint based on the price of the raw metal and the required characteristics suitable for the application. On the other hand, Si has an effect of improving the strength of the aluminum alloy. Judging from these, it is desirable that the Si content is in the range of 0.05 to 0.15%.
またSiと同様にアルミニウム地金に不可避的不純物として含まれるFeは、他の遷移金属等とともに晶出物を形成しやすく、材料の延性および靭性の低下をもたらす。Feの含有量が0.20%を越えた場合には、明らかな靭性低下が生じるため好ましくない。Feの許容含有量も、原料地金の価格に基づく経済的観点と用途に適合した要求特性との兼ね合いにかかわる部分が大きく、また一方ではFeは高温特性を向上させる効果もあり、これらから総合的に判断して、Feの含有量は0.10〜0.20%の範囲内とすることが望ましい。 Further, similarly to Si, Fe contained as an inevitable impurity in an aluminum ingot easily forms a crystallized substance together with other transition metals and the like, resulting in a decrease in material ductility and toughness. If the Fe content exceeds 0.20%, the toughness is clearly lowered, which is not preferable. The allowable content of Fe is also largely related to the balance between the economic viewpoint based on the price of the raw metal and the required properties suitable for the application. On the other hand, Fe has the effect of improving the high-temperature properties, and from these, Therefore, it is desirable that the Fe content is in the range of 0.10 to 0.20%.
以上のようなこの本発明の展伸加工用アルミニウム合金を製造するための方法は、特に限定されるものではないが、好ましい製造方法について以下に説明する。 Although the method for manufacturing the aluminum alloy for extending | stretching of this invention as mentioned above is not specifically limited, A preferable manufacturing method is demonstrated below.
先ずこの発明の成分範囲内に溶解調整されたアルミニウム合金溶湯を、鋳造して鋳塊を製作する。なおこの発明の必須成分であるTiを含む化合物が鋳造時に初晶として多量に晶出する場合、Al地中の固溶Ti量が少なくなり、Ti濃縮領域でのTi固溶量(Ti濃縮量)が少なくなり、時効析出物に対する微細化効果、高温曝露時における時効析出物粗大化抑制効果が充分に得られなくなるおそれがある。したがってTi濃縮領域を積極的に生成させるために、連続鋳造法、半連続鋳造法などの冷却速度の速い鋳造法、すなわち凝固時平均冷却速度0.1℃/min以上の鋳造法を適用することが好ましい。 First, an ingot is produced by casting an aluminum alloy melt adjusted to be within the component range of the present invention. In addition, when a compound containing Ti, which is an essential component of the present invention, crystallizes in a large amount as an initial crystal during casting, the amount of solid solution Ti in the Al ground decreases, and the amount of Ti solid solution in the Ti concentration region (Ti concentration) ) Is reduced, and there is a possibility that the effect of refining the aging precipitates and the effect of suppressing the coarsening of the aging precipitates at the time of high temperature exposure cannot be obtained sufficiently. Therefore, in order to actively generate a Ti-enriched region, a casting method having a high cooling rate, such as a continuous casting method or a semi-continuous casting method, that is, a casting method having an average cooling rate during solidification of 0.1 ° C./min or more should be applied. Is preferred.
鋳造された鋳塊は、次いで均質化処理される。なお、必要に応じて均質化処理前に鋳塊を切断加工する場合、残留応力に起因して鋳塊が割れるおそれがある。そのため、鋳塊を300℃〜450℃の温度で20時間未満熱処理することによって鋳塊の残留応力を緩和してから切断加工しても、この発明の目的達成には影響しない。ここで、均質化処理温度は490〜530℃で25時間未満が望ましい。均質化処理温度が490℃未満では時効析出強化に寄与する主要合金元素であるCu、Mg、Agの均質化が不充分となり、強度の向上が望めなくなる。一方均質化処理温度が530℃を越えればバーニングが生じる可能性が高くなる。また均質化処理時間が長ければ、均質化処理中に強制固溶されていたMnやTiがAl−Mn系、Al−Ti系化合物として析出を開始する。そしてMnやTiが有するθ’相あるいはΩ相などの時効析出物を微細化させる効果、また高温暴露時に生じる時効析出物の粗大化を抑制する効果は、Al地中にMn、Tiが固溶している状態で最も強く発揮されるため、均質化処理時に必要以上にAl−Mn系、Al−Ti系化合物が析出すれば、この発明で目的とする効果が得られ難くなる。そのため均質化処理時間は、好ましくは25時間未満、さらに好ましくは15時間未満とすることが適切である。 The cast ingot is then homogenized. In addition, when cutting an ingot before a homogenization process as needed, there is a possibility that the ingot may break due to residual stress. Therefore, even if the ingot is subjected to heat treatment at a temperature of 300 ° C. to 450 ° C. for less than 20 hours to relieve the residual stress of the ingot and then cut, it does not affect the achievement of the object of the present invention. Here, the homogenization temperature is preferably 490 to 530 ° C. and less than 25 hours. If the homogenization temperature is less than 490 ° C., the homogenization of Cu, Mg, and Ag, which are the main alloy elements contributing to aging precipitation strengthening, is insufficient, and it is impossible to improve the strength. On the other hand, if the homogenization temperature exceeds 530 ° C., the possibility of burning increases. Further, if the homogenization treatment time is long, Mn and Ti that have been forcibly dissolved during the homogenization treatment start to precipitate as Al—Mn and Al—Ti compounds. The effect of minimizing the aging precipitates such as the θ ′ phase or the Ω phase of Mn and Ti, and the effect of suppressing the coarsening of the aging precipitates that occur during high-temperature exposure are that Mn and Ti are dissolved in Al. Therefore, if an Al-Mn-based or Al-Ti-based compound is deposited more than necessary during the homogenization process, the intended effect of the present invention is hardly obtained. Therefore, the homogenization treatment time is preferably less than 25 hours, more preferably less than 15 hours.
均質化処理後の鋳塊は、用途により定まる所望の形状のアルミニウム展伸材に展伸加工される。より具体的には、展伸加工として、板材については圧延加工を、鍛造材については鍛造加工を、形材については押出加工が施される。この発明で対象としているAl−Cu−Mg−Ag系の合金は、鋳造時にミクロポロシティが発生しやすく、このミクロポロシティは破壊の起点となって靭性を害するため、ミクロポロシティを潰す工程が必要となる。また一般に鋳塊組織には、凝固セル境界に多数の晶出物が集団で存在し、この場合個々の晶出物が微細であっても、密集して存在する場合には靭性が阻害されるため、晶出物の密集した状態を破壊する必要がある。さらに、靭性を確保するためには、最終製品の結晶粒を500μm以下に微細化することも重要である。ここでいう結晶粒とは等軸粒、扁平した粒、どちらも含まれるが、扁平粒の場合の結晶粒径は長軸方向の長さとして定義される。そして上述のようなミクロ組織の改善のためには、圧延、押出、鍛造などの展伸加工が必須である。ミクロ組織の状態は加工率にも影響されるが、靭性向上のためには、圧延加工の場合は圧下率50%以上、押出加工の場合は押出比2以上、鍛造加工の場合は鍛錬比2以上とすることが好ましい。また、鍛造品の場合、鍛錬の方向を1方向だけではなく、少なくとも異なる2方向で行い、各方向での鍛錬比を2以上とすることがさらに望ましい。 The ingot after the homogenization treatment is drawn into an aluminum wrought material having a desired shape determined by the application. More specifically, as the expansion process, a rolling process is performed on the plate material, a forging process is performed on the forging material, and an extrusion process is performed on the shape material. The Al-Cu-Mg-Ag alloy that is the subject of the present invention is likely to generate microporosity during casting, and this microporosity is a starting point of fracture and impairs toughness. Become. In general, a large number of crystallized substances exist in the ingot structure at the boundary of the solidification cell. In this case, even if the individual crystallized substances are fine, the toughness is hindered if they are densely present. Therefore, it is necessary to destroy the dense state of crystallized substances. Furthermore, in order to ensure toughness, it is also important to refine the crystal grains of the final product to 500 μm or less. The crystal grains here include both equiaxed grains and flat grains, but the crystal grain size in the case of flat grains is defined as the length in the major axis direction. In order to improve the microstructure as described above, a drawing process such as rolling, extrusion, forging, or the like is essential. Although the microstructure is affected by the processing rate, in order to improve toughness, the rolling reduction is 50% or more in the case of rolling, the extrusion ratio is 2 or more in the case of extrusion, and the forging ratio is 2 in the case of forging. The above is preferable. Further, in the case of a forged product, it is more desirable that the forging direction is performed not only in one direction but in at least two different directions, and the forging ratio in each direction is 2 or more.
このような展伸加工後のアルミニウム合金素材については、さらに溶体化処理および焼入れ処理を施した後、高温の人工時効処理を施す。この溶体化処理において、時効硬化に寄与する合金成分であるCu、Mg、Agを可能な限り固溶させるため、溶体化処理は495〜535℃の範囲で行なうことが望ましい。しかし、前述した均質化処理の場合と同様に、強制固溶されていたTiやMnがAl−Ti系、Al−Mn系の化合物として溶体化処理時に必要以上に析出すれば、本発明で目的とする効果が得られ難くなるため、溶体化処理時間は、好ましくは15時間未満、更に好ましくは8時間未満とすることが適切である。また、焼入れ処理は、時効硬化に寄与する合金成分であるCu、Mg、Agの再析出をできる限り抑制するため、280〜480℃の温度範囲における焼入れ冷却速度を10℃/min以上とすることが望ましく、特に高強度が要求される場合には60℃以下の温度まで、一方残留応力が問題となる場合には75℃以上の温度まで冷却することが望ましい。また人工時効処理は、160〜200℃で2〜60時間程度行なうことが望ましい。なお焼入れによる残留応力が特に問題となる場合には、焼入れ処理後に冷間圧延、冷間鍛造、ストレッチなどの冷間加工を行った後に人工時効処理を施す、いわゆるT8処理を行なうことがより望ましい。 The aluminum alloy material after such extension processing is further subjected to solution treatment and quenching treatment, and then subjected to high-temperature artificial aging treatment. In this solution treatment, the solution treatment is desirably performed in the range of 495 to 535 ° C. in order to make Cu, Mg, and Ag, which are alloy components that contribute to age hardening, dissolve as much as possible. However, as in the case of the above-mentioned homogenization treatment, if Ti or Mn that has been forcibly dissolved is precipitated as an Al-Ti-based or Al-Mn-based compound more than necessary during the solution treatment, the object of the present invention is achieved. Therefore, the solution treatment time is preferably less than 15 hours, more preferably less than 8 hours. In addition, in the quenching treatment, the quenching cooling rate in the temperature range of 280 to 480 ° C. is set to 10 ° C./min or more in order to suppress reprecipitation of Cu, Mg, and Ag as alloy components contributing to age hardening as much as possible. It is desirable to cool to a temperature of 60 ° C. or lower when high strength is required, and to a temperature of 75 ° C. or higher when residual stress is a problem. The artificial aging treatment is desirably performed at 160 to 200 ° C. for about 2 to 60 hours. If residual stress due to quenching is particularly problematic, it is more desirable to perform a so-called T8 treatment in which an artificial aging treatment is performed after cold working such as cold rolling, cold forging, and stretching after the quenching treatment. .
以下にこの発明を実施例に基づいてさらに詳細に説明する。但し、この発明はこれらの実施例に限定されないことはもちろんである。 Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in more detail based on examples. However, it goes without saying that the present invention is not limited to these examples.
表1、表2の合金符号A〜Uに示す化学成分を有する各アルミニウム合金を溶解して半連続鋳造し、厚み80mm、幅200mm、長さ1500mmの鋳塊を得た。この鋳塊の両面を片面5mmずつ面削した後、520℃で8時間の均質化処理を施してから、開始温度を450℃とした熱間圧延を板厚5mmまで行い、その後冷間圧延により板厚2mmの圧延板とした。これらの圧延板から、圧延方向に対して直角方向が引張方向となるJIS−5号引張試験片を採取し、その引張試験片に520℃で2時間の溶体化処理、約80℃の熱水焼入れを施し、その後190℃で5時間の時効処理を行い、供試材とした。供試材の機械的特性を評価するため、室温で引張試験を行った。また高温特性を評価する目的で、供試材を190℃で300時間暴露した後に、室温で引張試験を行った。 Each aluminum alloy having chemical components indicated by alloy codes A to U in Tables 1 and 2 was melted and semi-continuously cast to obtain an ingot having a thickness of 80 mm, a width of 200 mm, and a length of 1500 mm. After chamfering both sides of this ingot by 5 mm on each side, it was homogenized at 520 ° C. for 8 hours, and then hot rolled at a starting temperature of 450 ° C. to a plate thickness of 5 mm, and then cold rolled. A rolled plate having a thickness of 2 mm was used. From these rolled sheets, a JIS-5 tensile test piece having a tensile direction perpendicular to the rolling direction was taken, and the tensile test piece was subjected to a solution treatment at 520 ° C. for 2 hours, hot water at about 80 ° C. Quenching was performed, followed by aging treatment at 190 ° C. for 5 hours to obtain a test material. In order to evaluate the mechanical properties of the specimen, a tensile test was performed at room temperature. Further, for the purpose of evaluating the high temperature characteristics, the specimen was exposed at 190 ° C. for 300 hours and then subjected to a tensile test at room temperature.
なお耐熱性の評価基準としては、展伸加工材として高強度を有するとされる現行の耐熱アルミニウム合金、例えばJIS A2519合金等の性能を考慮して、時効状態で耐力390N/mm2、引張り強さ440N/mm2以上、また高温暴露後において耐力300N/mm2、引張り強さ380N/mm2以上の場合を耐熱強度に優れると判断した。また靭性については、引張試験により得られた破断伸びにより簡易的に評価した。その靭性の評価基準としては、時効直後で7.0%以上、高温暴露後において9.0%以上の伸びの場合を靭性に優れると判断した。表3に時効処理後および高温暴露処理後(190℃で300時間保持後)の引張試験結果を示す。 In addition, as evaluation criteria for heat resistance, considering the performance of the current heat-resistant aluminum alloy, for example, JIS A2519 alloy, which is considered to have high strength as a wrought material, the proof stress is 390 N / mm 2 and the tensile strength is high. It was judged that the heat resistance strength was excellent when the strength was 440 N / mm 2 or more, the proof stress was 300 N / mm 2 and the tensile strength was 380 N / mm 2 or more after high temperature exposure. The toughness was simply evaluated by the elongation at break obtained by a tensile test. As an evaluation standard of the toughness, it was judged that the case of elongation of 7.0% or more immediately after aging and 9.0% or more after high temperature exposure was excellent in toughness. Table 3 shows the tensile test results after aging treatment and after high-temperature exposure treatment (after holding at 190 ° C. for 300 hours).
表3から明らかなように、Cu、Mg、Ag、Mn、Tiの合金組成が請求項1もしくは請求項2に係る発明の範囲外である比較例の合金N〜Uでは、耐熱強度と靭性のいずれかが優れていても両特性を併せ持つものはなかった。特に合金組成がMn、Tiについて請求項1もしくは請求項2に係る発明の範囲外である比較例の合金N〜PおよびUでは、靭性の低下が著しい。これに対して本発明例の合金A、C〜Kは、時効処理後および高温暴露後のいずれにおいても高い強度が得られ、かつ靭性についても優れることがわかった。 As is apparent from Table 3, in the alloys N to U of comparative examples in which the alloy composition of Cu, Mg, Ag, Mn, and Ti is outside the scope of the invention according to claim 1 or claim 2 , the heat resistance strength and toughness are Even if either one was excellent, none had both characteristics. In particular, in the alloys N to P and U of the comparative examples where the alloy composition is outside the scope of the invention according to claim 1 for Mn and Ti, the toughness is remarkably reduced. On the other hand , it was found that the alloys A and C to K of the present invention obtained high strength and excellent toughness both after aging treatment and after high temperature exposure.
なお、請求項1で規定するMn/Ti比の条件を外れた参考例合金Bの場合は、Mn/Ti比が請求項1の条件を満たす本発明例Aよりも時効処理後、高温暴露後の強度が若干低くなるとともに、靭性も若干低くなり、また請求項2で規定するMn/Ti+V比の条件を外れる参考例L、Mでは、Mn/Ti+V比が請求項2の条件を満たす本発明例C〜Kよりも時効処理後、高温暴露後の強度が若干低く、靭性も若干低くなった。 In addition, in the case of the reference example alloy B that deviates from the Mn / Ti ratio defined in claim 1 , after the aging treatment and after the high temperature exposure, the Mn / Ti ratio satisfies the condition of claim 1 than the invention example A. the strength of the slightly lowered, toughness slightly lower, also example L departing conditions Mn / Ti + V ratio defined in claim 2, in M, satisfying Mn / Ti + V ratio of claim 2 invention After aging treatment, the strength after high temperature exposure was slightly lower and the toughness was slightly lower than in Examples C to K.
またここで、請求項2に係る発明の本発明例である合金C〜Kは、請求項1に係る発明の本発明例である合金Aに比べて同等以上の特性を有することが分かった。例えば、Cu、Mg、Agの添加量が近い組成の合金Aと合金Cとを比較すれば、Cu、Mg、Agの元素はいずれも強度に大きく影響する元素であるが、請求項2に記載した範囲内で選択成分Znを含有する合金Cの方が高温強度に優れ、また靭性も優れることがわかった。また、Cu、Mg、Agの添加量が近い組成の合金Aと合金Dとを比較すれば、Cu、Mg、Agの元素はいずれも強度に大きく影響する元素であるが、請求項2に記載した範囲内で選択成分Vを含有する合金Dの方が高温強度に優れ、また靭性も優れることがわかった。 Further, it was found that the alloys C to K , which are examples of the present invention according to claim 2 , have characteristics equal to or higher than those of the alloy A , which is an example of the present invention according to claim 1. For example, Cu, Mg, from the comparison between alloys A and alloy C of the added amount is closer composition of Ag, Cu, Mg, although elements of the Ag is an element which greatly affects the both strength, according to claim 2 It was found that the alloy C containing the selective component Zn was excellent in high temperature strength and toughness within the range. Further, Cu, Mg, from the comparison between alloys A and alloy D of the added amount is closer composition of Ag, Cu, Mg, although elements of the Ag is an element which greatly affects the both strength, according to claim 2 It was found that the alloy D containing the selective component V within the above range is superior in high-temperature strength and excellent in toughness.
さらに合金EではMnとTiの添加量が、合金F〜HではTiの添加量が、それぞれ他の合金と比べて低めであるが、いずれの合金も時効処理後および高温暴露後において高い強度が得られ、かつ靭性に優れていることがわかった。これは、選択成分として追加されたV、Znを請求項2に記載した範囲内で添加したことにより、他の合金とほぼ同等の高温強度および靭性を維持することができたことを示している。 Further, the addition amount of Mn and Ti in alloy E and the addition amount of Ti in alloys F to H are respectively lower than those of other alloys, but both alloys have high strength after aging treatment and after high temperature exposure. It was obtained and was found to be excellent in toughness. This indicates that by adding V and Zn added as selective components within the range described in claim 2 , high temperature strength and toughness equivalent to other alloys could be maintained. .
一方、CrもしくはZrの添加量が他の合金よりも多い合金I、合金Jは、時効状態の強度について若干の低下が認められた。さらに、FeおよびSiの含有量が他の合金よりも多い合金Kは、靭性について若干の低下が認められた。 On the other hand, in Alloy I and Alloy J in which the amount of Cr or Zr added is larger than that of other alloys, a slight decrease in the strength in the aging state was observed. Further, the alloy K having a higher content of Fe and Si than other alloys was found to have a slight decrease in toughness.
Claims (2)
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2006063585A JP4676906B2 (en) | 2006-03-09 | 2006-03-09 | Heat-resistant aluminum alloy for drawing |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2006063585A JP4676906B2 (en) | 2006-03-09 | 2006-03-09 | Heat-resistant aluminum alloy for drawing |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JP2007239029A JP2007239029A (en) | 2007-09-20 |
| JP4676906B2 true JP4676906B2 (en) | 2011-04-27 |
Family
ID=38584851
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2006063585A Expired - Fee Related JP4676906B2 (en) | 2006-03-09 | 2006-03-09 | Heat-resistant aluminum alloy for drawing |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP4676906B2 (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP3009525A1 (en) | 2014-10-16 | 2016-04-20 | Kabushiki Kaisha Kobe Seiko Sho (Kobe Steel, Ltd.) | Aluminium alloy forging and method for producing the same |
Families Citing this family (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP5879181B2 (en) * | 2011-06-10 | 2016-03-08 | 株式会社神戸製鋼所 | Aluminum alloy with excellent high temperature characteristics |
| JP2013142168A (en) * | 2012-01-11 | 2013-07-22 | Furukawa-Sky Aluminum Corp | Aluminum alloy excellent in creep resistance |
| CN108251724B (en) * | 2018-02-27 | 2019-12-13 | 中南大学 | High-strength heat-resistant aluminum alloy suitable for large-size complex-structure castings and preparation process thereof |
| KR102487222B1 (en) * | 2021-03-18 | 2023-01-12 | (주) 동양에이.케이코리아 | High-strength aluminum rolled plate manufacturing method and high-strength aluminum rolled plate using the same |
Family Cites Families (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US26907A (en) * | 1860-01-24 | Improvement in preserve-can covers | ||
| JPS6283445A (en) * | 1985-10-07 | 1987-04-16 | Kobe Steel Ltd | High strength aluminum alloy for casting |
| JP2001181771A (en) * | 1999-12-20 | 2001-07-03 | Kobe Steel Ltd | High strength and heat resistant aluminum alloy material |
-
2006
- 2006-03-09 JP JP2006063585A patent/JP4676906B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP3009525A1 (en) | 2014-10-16 | 2016-04-20 | Kabushiki Kaisha Kobe Seiko Sho (Kobe Steel, Ltd.) | Aluminium alloy forging and method for producing the same |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP2007239029A (en) | 2007-09-20 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| JP3194742B2 (en) | Improved lithium aluminum alloy system | |
| JP2697400B2 (en) | Aluminum alloy for forging | |
| US20080000561A1 (en) | Cast aluminum alloy excellent in relaxation resistance property and method of heat-treating the same | |
| JP3335732B2 (en) | Hypoeutectic Al-Si alloy and casting method thereof | |
| JP2013142168A (en) | Aluminum alloy excellent in creep resistance | |
| KR101333915B1 (en) | Aluminum-zinc-magnesium-scandium alloys and methods of fabricating same | |
| JP2014208865A (en) | Heat treatment type aluminum alloy for cold plastic working and manufacturing method therefor | |
| JP4201434B2 (en) | Method for producing high-strength aluminum alloy extruded material with excellent corrosion resistance | |
| JPH11310841A (en) | Extruded aluminum alloy material excellent in fatigue strength and method for producing the same | |
| JP4676906B2 (en) | Heat-resistant aluminum alloy for drawing | |
| JP2001181771A (en) | High strength and heat resistant aluminum alloy material | |
| KR102880466B1 (en) | aluminum alloy material | |
| JP2004002987A (en) | Aluminum alloy material for forging superior in high-temperature property | |
| JPH10219413A (en) | Manufacturing method of high strength aluminum alloy with excellent intergranular corrosion resistance | |
| KR102312430B1 (en) | Aluminum alloy and method of manufacturing the same | |
| JP7841588B2 (en) | Al-Mg-Si-Ni alloys and Al-Mg-Si-Ni alloy materials | |
| JP2007070686A (en) | Good workability magnesium alloy and method for producing the same | |
| JP2007070685A (en) | Good workability magnesium alloy and method for producing the same | |
| KR102885433B1 (en) | aluminum alloy material | |
| KR100703130B1 (en) | Non-heat treatment type high ductility aluminum main alloy and its manufacturing method | |
| KR102012952B1 (en) | Aluminium alloy and manufacturing method thereof | |
| CN116065067A (en) | A kind of high-strength corrosion-resistant Al-Zn-Mg aluminum alloy and its preparation method | |
| JP3248263B2 (en) | Al-Mn alloy for cryogenic forming | |
| JP7073068B2 (en) | Al-Cu-Mg-based aluminum alloy and Al-Cu-Mg-based aluminum alloy material | |
| JP7126915B2 (en) | Aluminum alloy extruded material and its manufacturing method |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20080624 |
|
| RD01 | Notification of change of attorney |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A7426 Effective date: 20100507 |
|
| RD02 | Notification of acceptance of power of attorney |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A7422 Effective date: 20100507 |
|
| A977 | Report on retrieval |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007 Effective date: 20101025 |
|
| A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20101102 |
|
| A521 | Request for written amendment filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20110104 |
|
| TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20110125 |
|
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 |
|
| A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20110128 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20140204 Year of fee payment: 3 |
|
| R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Ref document number: 4676906 Country of ref document: JP Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |
|
| S531 | Written request for registration of change of domicile |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313531 |
|
| S533 | Written request for registration of change of name |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533 |
|
| R350 | Written notification of registration of transfer |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| LAPS | Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees |