Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP4706061B2 - Roundness measurement method - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP4706061B2 - Roundness measurement method - Google Patents

Roundness measurement method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP4706061B2
JP4706061B2 JP2005303094A JP2005303094A JP4706061B2 JP 4706061 B2 JP4706061 B2 JP 4706061B2 JP 2005303094 A JP2005303094 A JP 2005303094A JP 2005303094 A JP2005303094 A JP 2005303094A JP 4706061 B2 JP4706061 B2 JP 4706061B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
measurement
roundness
measuring
data
detector
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP2005303094A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2007113947A (en
Inventor
司 渡部
弘之 藤本
一也 直井
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology AIST
Original Assignee
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology AIST
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology AIST filed Critical National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology AIST
Priority to JP2005303094A priority Critical patent/JP4706061B2/en
Publication of JP2007113947A publication Critical patent/JP2007113947A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4706061B2 publication Critical patent/JP4706061B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • A Measuring Device Byusing Mechanical Method (AREA)
  • Measurement Of Length, Angles, Or The Like Using Electric Or Magnetic Means (AREA)

Description

本発明は物体の真円度を測定する真円度測定に際し、解析方法を高度化することによって、少ないステップ数の測定データから正確に真円度を測定することができる真円度測定方法に関する。   The present invention relates to a roundness measurement method capable of accurately measuring roundness from measurement data with a small number of steps by enhancing the analysis method in measuring roundness of measuring the roundness of an object. .

図1に従来から用いられている真円度測定機の概観図を示し、図2にはこの真円度測定機における真円度測定システムの模式図を示す。真円度測定の解析に広く使われている方法にマルチステップ法がある。図1、2は、測定器物としてガラス球の場合を示している。その真円度の測定に際してはガラス球を真円度測定機の載物台に載せ、上部の測定部回転機構に取り付けられた触針などの検出器を用いてガラス球の表面をなぞりながら半径方向の凸凹を検出し、一回転の走査をすることにより1回の測定データを取得する。しかし、この測定だけでは球の形状成分だけでなく、検出器(触針)の回転誤差成分が足しあわされたものが観測されることとなる。   FIG. 1 shows an overview of a conventional roundness measuring machine, and FIG. 2 shows a schematic diagram of a roundness measuring system in this roundness measuring machine. A multi-step method is widely used for analysis of roundness measurement. 1 and 2 show the case of a glass sphere as a measuring instrument. When measuring the roundness, place the glass sphere on the mounting table of the roundness measuring machine and use a detector such as a stylus attached to the rotation mechanism of the upper measurement unit to trace the radius of the glass sphere while tracing it. One measurement data is acquired by detecting unevenness in the direction and scanning once. However, with this measurement alone, not only the spherical shape component but also the addition of the rotation error component of the detector (stylus) is observed.

そこで、マルチステップ法ではさらに、図2に示す載物台上の回転テーブルを用いて異なった角度に測定器物を回転させ、検出器の測定開始位置に対する測定器物の測定開始位置をずらし相対的な角度位相を変化させた測定データを取得する。図3は触針の回転開始位置と測定器物の角度位置関係を模式的に示している。角度位相を変えたこれらの測定データから、解析を行うことにより真円度測定機の検出器が持つ回転誤差成分と測定器物(ガラス球など)の形状成分を同時に入手することが可能な方法が実現される。  Therefore, in the multi-step method, the measuring instrument is rotated at different angles using the rotary table on the stage shown in FIG. 2, and the measurement starting position of the measuring instrument is shifted relative to the measurement starting position of the detector. Acquire measurement data with the angle phase changed. FIG. 3 schematically shows the relationship between the rotation start position of the stylus and the angular position of the measuring instrument. There is a method that can simultaneously obtain the rotation error component of the roundness detector and the shape component of the measuring object (glass sphere, etc.) by performing analysis from these measurement data with different angular phases. Realized.

以下に、従来の真円度測定におけるマルチステップ法を数式とグラフを用いて説明し、その問題点を提示する。
(真円度測定におけるマルチステップ法について)
真円度測定機の検出器の回転誤差成分をZ(θ)、測定器物の形状成分をG(θ)とする。理想的に求められた場合の検出器の回転誤差成分Z(θ)、測定器物の形状成分G(θ)を図4に示す。
In the following, the conventional multi-step method in roundness measurement will be described using mathematical expressions and graphs, and the problems will be presented.
(About the multi-step method in roundness measurement)
Let Z (θ) be the rotation error component of the detector of the roundness measuring machine, and G (θ) be the shape component of the measuring object. FIG. 4 shows the rotational error component Z (θ) of the detector and the shape component G (θ) of the measuring instrument when ideally obtained.

検出器の測定開始位置に対する測定器物の測定開始位置をずらした相対的な位相角度をφiとする。マルチステップ法では角度位相φiを、一周360度を等角度に分割した角度に設定する。ステップ数をmとすると角度位相φiは次式で表せる。
(1)
A relative phase angle obtained by shifting the measurement start position of the measurement object with respect to the measurement start position of the detector is defined as φ i . In the multi-step method, the angle phase φ i is set to an angle obtained by dividing one round of 360 degrees into equal angles. If the number of steps is m, the angle phase φ i can be expressed by the following equation.
(1)

測定データは真円度測定機の検出器の回転誤差成分Z(θ)と検出器が検出する測定器物の形状成分G(θ)との合成として検出するため、測定データT(θi)は次式で表すことが出来る。
(2)
ただし、jは検出器が一回転の走査で測定する測定点番号、Nは測定点総数を表す。(例:N=2000とすると、各測定ピッチ角度は360°/2000となる。)なお、図5にはm=5におけるマルチステップ法の測定データ例を示している。
Since the measurement data is detected as a combination of the rotation error component Z (θ) of the detector of the roundness measuring machine and the shape component G (θ) of the measuring object detected by the detector, the measurement data T (θ j , φ i ) can be expressed by the following equation.
(2)
Here, j represents the number of measurement points measured by the detector in one rotation scan, and N represents the total number of measurement points. (Example: When N = 2000, each measurement pitch angle is 360 ° / 2000.) FIG. 5 shows an example of measurement data of the multi-step method at m = 5.

Z(θ)、G(θ)は試料円周の一周を基準周期として、(3)、(4)式のようにフーリエ級数でそれぞれ表すことが出来るとする。
(3)
(4)
ただし、実験データが既に偏心成分を除去してある場合は、n=1ではなくn=2からの和となる。
It is assumed that Z (θ) and G (θ) can be expressed by Fourier series as shown in equations (3) and (4), respectively, with one round of the sample circumference as a reference cycle.
(3)
(4)
However, when the experimental data has already removed the eccentric component, the sum is not n = 1 but n = 2.

ここで、(2)式を用いて相対的な角度位相を、φiを、i=1,2,・・・,mまで変えたm個の測定データT(θi)の平均値μ(θ)を計算する。
(5)
Here, an average of m pieces of measurement data T (θ j , φ i ) obtained by changing the relative angular phase using the equation (2) and changing φ i to i = 1, 2,. The value μ (θ j ) is calculated.
(5)

(5)式の右辺最終行の第2項は、n≠kmの時は0であり、n=kmの項だけが残る。ただし、整数k=1,2,3,…,N/mである。したがって、(5)式より次式が求まる。
(6)
The second term in the last line on the right side of equation (5) is 0 when n ≠ km, and only the term n = km remains. However, the integer k = 1, 2, 3,..., N / m. Therefore, the following equation is obtained from equation (5).
(6)

上式の右辺第2項G(m)(θ)は、測定器物の形状成分G(θ)が持つフーリエ成分のうちステップ数mの整数倍のフーリエ成分の和によって表される曲線に対応している。したがって、平均値μ(θ)はZ(θ)にG(m)(θ)が混ざったまま除去できないで残ることを示している。従来のマルチステップ法の解析方法は、平均値μ(θ)を真円度測定機の検出器の回転誤差成分Z(θ)の最終解析結果とし、この除去できない測定器物の形状成分G(θ)のmの整数倍のフーリエ成分G(m)(θ)を含んだままの不十分な近似値を採用している。 The second term G (m) (θ) on the right-hand side of the above equation corresponds to a curve represented by the sum of Fourier components that are integral multiples of the number of steps m among the Fourier components of the shape component G (θ j ) of the measuring instrument. is doing. Accordingly, the average value μ (θ j ) indicates that Z (θ) is mixed with G (m) (θ) and cannot be removed. In the analysis method of the conventional multi-step method, the average value μ (θ j ) is used as the final analysis result of the rotational error component Z (θ j ) of the detector of the roundness measuring machine, and the shape component G of the measuring object that cannot be removed. An inadequate approximate value that includes a Fourier component G (m) (θ) that is an integral multiple of m of (θ) is employed.

図6は、図5に示すようなステップ数m=5の実験データから(6)式の解析を行って求めた真円度測定機の回転誤差成分である。図4に示す真の検出器の回転誤差成分Z(θ)に比べ、G(m)(θ)が混在している分だけ値がわずかながら異なっている。 FIG. 6 shows the rotation error component of the roundness measuring machine obtained by analyzing the equation (6) from the experimental data with the number of steps m = 5 as shown in FIG. Compared with the rotational error component Z (θ) of the true detector shown in FIG. 4, the value is slightly different because G (m) (θ) is mixed.

次に、マルチステップ法において測定器物の形状成分G(θ)を求める解析手順を説明する。(2)式から(6)式を引いて(7)式を得る。
(7)
Next, an analysis procedure for obtaining the shape component G (θ) of the measuring instrument in the multi-step method will be described. Subtract (6) from (2) to obtain (7).
(7)

つまり図7に示すように、この’T(θji )−μ(θ)’は測定器物の形状成分G(θ)が角度位相φiだけ異なるG(θj−φi )からG(m)(θ)を引いた値を意味している。従来のマルチステップ法の解析方法では、(7)式の左辺第1項のφ0=0を用いて、
(8)
としている場合が多い。これは図7のひとつ(R線)に相当する。このT(θj,0)−μ(θj)の値を測定器物の形状成分G(θ)の近似値として求めている。しかし、この場合は逆にG(m)(θ)の持つフーリエ成分だけ足りないという意味で不十分な値となる。
That is, as shown in FIG. 7, this 'T (θ j , φ i ) -μ (θ j )' is G (θ ji ) in which the shape component G (θ) of the measuring object differs by the angular phase φ i. This is the value obtained by subtracting G (m) (θ) from. In the analysis method of the conventional multi-step method, φ 0 = 0 in the first term on the left side of Equation (7) is used.
(8)
In many cases. This corresponds to one (R line) in FIG. The value of T (θ j , 0) −μ (θ j ) is obtained as an approximate value of the shape component G (θ) of the measuring instrument. However, in this case, the value is insufficient in the sense that only the Fourier component of G (m) (θ) is insufficient.

図8は、ステップ数m=5の実験データから(8)式の解析を行って求めた測定器物の形状成分である。図4に示す真の測定器物の形状成分G(θ)に比べ、G(m)(θ)が引かれている分だけ値がわずかながら異なっている。 FIG. 8 shows the shape components of the measuring instrument obtained by analyzing the equation (8) from the experimental data of the number of steps m = 5. Compared to the shape component G (θ) of the true measuring instrument shown in FIG. 4, the value is slightly different because G (m) (θ) is subtracted.

なお、下記非特許文献1には、形状計測に関するデータ解析技術の紹介。測定データに含まれる測定装置の系統誤差(運動誤差)成分と形状成分を分離する手法を紹介している。また、下記非特許文献2には、真円度に関するデータ解析技術の紹介、マルチステップ法とリバーサル法(反転法)を示し、その効果を紹介している。また、下記非特許文献3では、真円度測定時のステップ数や測定データ点数など、マルチステップ法を適用時の各条件に関して考察している。また、非特許文献4には、マルチステップ法では、ステップ数の整数倍にあたるフーリエ成分が除去できないことを説明するために、数種類ステップ数の異なった実験データから、それぞれのフーリエ成分を求め比較検討した結果を紹介している。
D.J.Whitehouse, “Some theoretical aspects of error separation techniques in surface metrology”, J.Phys.E:Sci.Instrum, 9, 531-536(1976) D.G.Chetwynd, “Hight-precision measurement of small balls”, J.Phys.E:Sci.Instrum, 20, 1179-1187(1987) Cao Linxiang, “The measuring accuracy of the multistep method in the error separation technique”, J.Phys.E:Sci.Instrum, 22, 903-906(1989) Cao Linxiang etal, “Full-harmonic error separation technique”, Meas.Sci.Technol., 3, 1129-1132(1992)
The following Non-Patent Document 1 introduces data analysis technology related to shape measurement. Introduces a method to separate the systematic error (motion error) component and shape component of the measurement device included in the measurement data. Non-Patent Document 2 shown below introduces data analysis technology related to roundness, shows a multi-step method and a reversal method (inversion method), and introduces the effects thereof. Non-Patent Document 3 below considers each condition when applying the multi-step method, such as the number of steps and the number of measurement data points when measuring roundness. Further, in Non-Patent Document 4, in order to explain that the multi-step method cannot remove a Fourier component corresponding to an integral multiple of the number of steps, each Fourier component is obtained from experimental data having different numbers of steps and is compared. The results are introduced.
DJWhitehouse, “Some theoretical aspects of error separation techniques in surface metrology”, J.Phys.E: Sci.Instrum, 9, 531-536 (1976) DGChetwynd, “Hight-precision measurement of small balls”, J.Phys.E: Sci.Instrum, 20, 1179-1187 (1987) Cao Linxiang, “The measuring accuracy of the multistep method in the error separation technique”, J.Phys.E: Sci.Instrum, 22, 903-906 (1989) Cao Linxiang etal, “Full-harmonic error separation technique”, Meas. Sci. Technol., 3, 1129-1132 (1992)

以上述べたように従来の真円度測定の解析手法では、検出器の回転誤差成分Z(θ)を(6)式で、測定器物の形状成分G(θ)を(8)式でそれぞれ評価している。また、先に述べたように、このマルチステップ法の解析方法ではG(m)(θ)の項が含まれるため検出器側の成分と測定器物側の成分が十分に分離できないか、または不完全な成分評価しか出来ない。更に(8)式は(7)式で定義されるm個の解析データの中で、特定の測定データ、つまりi=0の条件で求めた測定データに大きく依存している、という問題点がある。そこで本発明は、従来のマルチステップ法の解析方法を改良し、厳密に成分分離できる方法を提案する。 As described above, in the conventional roundness measurement analysis method, the rotational error component Z (θ) of the detector is evaluated by equation (6), and the shape component G (θ) of the measuring object is evaluated by equation (8). is doing. In addition, as described above, this multi-step analysis method includes the term G (m) (θ), so that the component on the detector side and the component on the measurement object side cannot be separated sufficiently or are not Only complete component evaluation is possible. Furthermore, there is a problem that the equation (8) largely depends on the specific measurement data among the m pieces of analysis data defined by the equation (7), that is, the measurement data obtained under the condition of i = 0. is there. Therefore, the present invention proposes a method capable of strictly separating components by improving the analysis method of the conventional multi-step method.

したがって本発明は、従来の真円度測定手法の問題点を解決するため、以下の方法を提案するものである。
1.前記(8)式では、m回の測定データの中で特定の1回の測定データを用いて計算している。これをm回の測定データを均等に処理することにより信頼性の高い測定結果を求めることが出来る方法を提案する。
2.前記(6)式で示された測定器物側の形状成分Z(θ)の解にフーリエ成分G(m)(θ)が含まれないように分離できる方法を提案する。
3.mステップの実験の場合、mの整数倍にあたるフーリエ成分が求まらない。ステップ数が小さい場合、低次のフーリエ成分が求まらず、真値に対して誤差が大きくなる。これを解消するために、これを異なったステップ数の測定データと組み合わせることにより、mの整数倍よりも高次のフーリエ成分まで求める方法を提案する。
Therefore, the present invention proposes the following method in order to solve the problems of the conventional roundness measurement method.
1. In the equation (8), calculation is performed using specific measurement data among m measurement data. We propose a method that can obtain highly reliable measurement results by processing m measurement data equally.
2. A method is proposed that can be separated so that the solution of the shape component Z (θ) on the measuring instrument side expressed by the equation (6) does not include the Fourier component G (m) (θ).
3. In the case of an m-step experiment, a Fourier component corresponding to an integer multiple of m cannot be obtained. When the number of steps is small, a low-order Fourier component cannot be obtained, and the error increases with respect to the true value. In order to solve this problem, a method is proposed in which this is combined with measurement data having a different number of steps to obtain a higher order Fourier component than an integer multiple of m.

本発明による真円度測定方法は上記課題を解決するため、測定器物の表面に対して検出器を接触させて、測定器物の表面の半径方向凹凸を検出しながら1回転走査することにより1回の測定器物表面の真円度測定データを取得し、前記検出器の測定開始位置に対する測定器物の測定開始位置を、一周360°を等角度にm個に分割した角度位相だけずらして、円周上等間隔に複数m回の前記測定器物表面の真円度測定によりm個の測定データを取得し、前記m個の測定データにより真円度測定機の検出器の回転誤差成分を求める解析を行う真円度測定方法において、前記m個の各測定データとその平均値の差のデータを、前記m個の各測定データをそれぞれの前記角度位相だけずらして、原点位置を合わせる操作を行い、これらの平均をとることにより、全測定データを用いた解析を行うことを特徴とする。
In order to solve the above-described problems, the roundness measurement method according to the present invention makes one rotation by scanning a single rotation while detecting the radial unevenness of the surface of the measuring instrument by bringing the detector into contact with the surface of the measuring instrument. The roundness measurement data of the measuring instrument surface is acquired, and the measurement start position of the measurement instrument with respect to the measurement start position of the detector is shifted by an angular phase obtained by dividing the circumference 360 degrees into equal angles and divided into m pieces. Analysis of obtaining m measurement data by measuring the roundness of the surface of the measuring instrument a plurality of times at equal intervals, and obtaining the rotation error component of the detector of the roundness measuring machine from the m measurement data. in the roundness measuring method of performing the data of the difference between the average value and the m of each measurement data, said staggered m pieces of each measurement data only each of the angular phase, do to adjust the origin position, take the average of these And by, and performs analysis using all measured data.

また、本発明による他の真円度測定方法は、測定器物の表面に対して検出器を接触させて、測定器物の表面の半径方向凹凸を検出しながら1回転走査することにより1回の測定器物表面の真円度測定データを取得し、前記検出器の測定開始位置に対する測定器物の測定開始位置を一周360°を等角度にm個に分割した角度位相だけずらして、円周上等間隔に複数m回の前記測定器物表面の真円度測定によるm個の測定データを取得し、前記m個の測定データにより前記測定器物の形状成分を求める解析を行う真円度測定方法において、前記角度位相が異なるそれぞれの測定データを角度位相だけ位相を戻し、前記測定器物の形状成分の原点位置を一致させることにより、前記検出器の回転誤差成分の位相をずらす位相操作を行い、該位相操作を行った値を前記m個の測定データに代替して解析を行うことを特徴とする。
Also, other roundness measuring method according to the present invention comprises contacting a detector relative to the surface of the measuring vessels, one measurement by one revolution scanning while detecting the radial irregularities of the surface of the measuring vessels Obtain roundness measurement data on the surface of the object, shift the measurement start position of the measurement object relative to the measurement start position of the detector by an angular phase obtained by dividing 360 degrees around the circumference into equal angles , and equidistant on the circumference a plurality m of times the get the m pieces of measurement data obtained by the roundness measuring measurement vessels the surface of the roundness measuring method for analyzing for determining the shape component of the measurement vessels by said m measurement data, the each measured data angle different phases returns the angle phase by phase, by matching the position of the origin of the shape component of the measurement vessels, performs phase operation to shifting the phase of the rotation error components of the detector, the phase The value obtained by work alternative to the m pieces of the measurement data and performs analysis.

また、本発明による他の真円度測定方法は、測定器物の表面に対して検出器を接触させて、測定器物の表面の半径方向凹凸を検出しながら1回転走査することにより1回の測定器物表面の真円度測定データを取得し、前記検出器の測定開始位置に対する測定器物の測定開始位置を一周360°を等角度にm個に分割した角度位相だけずらして、円周上等間隔に複数m回の前記測定器物表面の真円度測定によりm個の測定データを取得し、前記検出器の測定開始位置に対する前記測定器物の測定開始位置を一周360°を等角度にn個(n≠m)に分割した角度位相だけずらして、円周上等間隔に複数n回の前記測定器物表面の真円度測定によりn個の測定データを取得し、前記m個の各測定データとその平均値の差のデータを求め、真円度の解析を行うときのmの整数倍のフーリエ成分の和のデータと、前記n個の各測定データとその平均値の差のデータを求め真円度の解析を行うときのnの整数倍のフーリエ成分の和のデータとを用いて、各々のデータの不足分を抽出して相互に補完することを特徴とする。 Also, other roundness measuring method according to the present invention comprises contacting a detector relative to the surface of the measuring vessels, one measurement by one revolution scanning while detecting the radial irregularities of the surface of the measuring vessels Obtain the roundness measurement data on the surface of the object, shift the measurement start position of the measurement object with respect to the measurement start position of the detector by an angle phase divided into m at 360 ° round , and equidistant on the circumference M measurement data is obtained by measuring the roundness of the surface of the measuring instrument a plurality of m times, and the measurement starting position of the measuring instrument with respect to the measurement starting position of the detector is n pieces at an equal angle of 360 ° in a circle ( n measurement data are obtained by measuring the roundness of the surface of the measuring instrument a plurality of n times at equal intervals on the circumference by shifting the angular phase divided by n ≠ m). Find the difference data of the average values, and calculate the roundness solution. The sum of Fourier components of integer multiples of m when performing analysis, and the Fourier of the multiples of n when analyzing roundness by obtaining data of the difference between each of the n measurement data and the average value thereof Using the sum data of the components, the shortage of each data is extracted and complemented with each other.

本発明は、ステップ数を少なくした測定で真円度を高精度に測定することが可能となるため測定時間の短縮が可能とし、長時間の環境の安定した条件を有しないところにおいても高精度の測定・評価を可能とする目的を、測定器物の表面に対して検出器を接触させて、測定器物の表面の半径方法凹凸を検出しながら1回転走査することにより1回の測定器物表面の真円度測定データを取得し、前記検出器の測定開始位置に対する測定器物の測定開始位置をずらして、円周上等間隔に複数m回の前記測定器物表面の真円度測定によりm個の測定データを取得し、前記検出器の測定開始位置に対する測定器物の測定開始位置をずらして、円周上等間隔に複数n(n≠m)回の前記測定器物表面の真円度測定によりn個の測定データを取得し、前記m個の各測定値とその平均値の差のデータを求め真円度の解析を行うと、測定器物の形状成分、または真円度測定機の検出器の回転誤差成分のmの整数倍のフーリエ成分の和が求まらない。前記n個の測定データとその平均値の差のデータを求め真円度の解析をした結果にはnの整数倍のフーリエ成分の和が求まらないが、mの整数倍のフーリエ成分の和を含むため、これを抽出し前記m個の各測定データとその平均値の差のデータを求め真円度の解析の結果を補完する、等によって実現した。
(発明の効果)
The present invention makes it possible to measure the roundness with high accuracy by measuring with a small number of steps, thereby enabling a reduction in measurement time and high accuracy even in places where long-term environmental conditions are not stable. The purpose of enabling measurement / evaluation of the surface of the measuring object is to make one rotation scan by making the detector contact with the surface of the measuring object and scanning for one rotation while detecting the unevenness of the radius of the measuring object surface. The roundness measurement data is acquired, the measurement start position of the measurement object is shifted with respect to the measurement start position of the detector, and m rounds of the measurement object surface are measured m times at equal intervals on the circumference. The measurement data is obtained, and the measurement start position of the measurement object is shifted from the measurement start position of the detector, and n is obtained by measuring the roundness of the measurement object surface a plurality of n (n ≠ m) at equal intervals on the circumference. Acquired measurement data, When the difference between each measured value and its average value is obtained and roundness is analyzed, the shape component of the measuring instrument or the rotation error component of the detector of the roundness measuring instrument is an integer multiple of m. The sum of ingredients cannot be obtained. The sum of Fourier components of an integer multiple of n cannot be obtained from the result of analyzing the roundness by obtaining data of the difference between the n measurement data and the average value thereof. Since the sum is included, this is extracted and the difference between the m measurement data and the average value is obtained, and the result of the roundness analysis is complemented.
(The invention's effect)

従来の技術では、ステップ数の整数倍にあたるフーリエ成分が除去できない状態で、真円度測定機の検出器が持つ回転誤差成分や測定器物の評価を行っていた。本発明によりこの成分の除去が可能となるため、真円度測定機及び測定器物の高精度な評価が可能となる。
また、従来技術では高次のフーリエ成分まで抜けの無い解析を行うためにはそれだけステップ数を多くして測定することが必要である。しかし、これは長い測定時間が必要となるため、気温などの測定環境の安定が必要とされる真円度測定においては非常に問題である。本発明の「位相組み合わせ法」を用いることにより、少ないステップ数の実験データから高ステップ数の実験と同等の結果を導くことが出来るため、高精度な評価が短時間の測定で可能となる。
In the conventional technique, the rotation error component and the measuring instrument included in the detector of the roundness measuring machine are evaluated in a state where the Fourier component corresponding to an integral multiple of the number of steps cannot be removed. Since this component can be removed by the present invention, the roundness measuring instrument and the measuring instrument can be evaluated with high accuracy.
Further, in the prior art, in order to perform an analysis without missing even higher-order Fourier components, it is necessary to increase the number of steps accordingly. However, since this requires a long measurement time, it is a serious problem in roundness measurement in which the measurement environment such as temperature is required to be stable. By using the “phase combination method” of the present invention, a result equivalent to that of an experiment with a high number of steps can be derived from experimental data with a small number of steps, so that highly accurate evaluation can be performed in a short time.

前記本発明の上記課題1を解決するため、本発明では以下のような方法を提案する。即ち、前記(8)式で求めた値T(θj,0)−μ(θj)は先に述べたように、従来の解析方法では、(7)式の左辺T(θji)−μ(θj)でφ0=0とした値を用いているため、m回の測定の中のひとつに過大な重みが付いた計算を行っている。 In order to solve the above-mentioned problem 1 of the present invention, the present invention proposes the following method. That is, as described above, the value T (θ j , 0) −μ (θ j ) obtained by the above equation (8) is the left side T (θ j , φ of equation (7) in the conventional analysis method as described above. Since i ) −μ (θ j ) is set to φ 0 = 0, one of m measurements is performed with an excessively weighted calculation.

しかし、(7)式は(1)式で定義された角度位相φiの分だけずれているだけであるから、この値を位相シフトすれば、(7)式の右辺第1項G(θ−φi)をG(θ)に統一することが出来る。
(9)
However, since the equation (7) is only shifted by the angle phase φ i defined in the equation (1), if this value is phase-shifted, the first term G (θ on the right side of the equation (7) j −φ i ) can be unified with G (θ j ).
(9)

つまり、(7)式のm個の解析値をそれぞれ角度位相φiだけずらし原点位置を合わせる操作後に平均を取ることにより、全測定データを用いた統計を上げた解析を行うことが出来る。その解析データをgmj)とする。gmj)は簡易的に下記の式で表す。
(10)
That is, the analysis using all the measurement data can be performed by averaging the m analysis values of the expression (7) by the angle phase φ i and adjusting the origin position. The analysis data is g mj ). g mj ) is simply expressed by the following equation.
(10)

この操作をm=5ステップ実験を例に説明する。
図9は図7を個々に表示した図である。
(7)式で表される各ステップの測定データは、角度位相φiの分だけ位相がずれているため、これを逆に位相シフトして戻してやりG(θ)の原点に一致させる。図10はその操作を示したものである。これらを平均した値が図11の黒太線で示してある。従来の解析方法では、図9の最上部のデータのみを使っていたため、一回目の測定データに過大な重みが付いていたことになる。
しかし、本発明による前記方法は、全ての測定データを均等に使用することにより、より統計を上げた信頼性の高い結果を求めることが出来る。
This operation will be described using an m = 5 step experiment as an example.
FIG. 9 is a diagram showing FIG. 7 individually.
Since the measurement data of each step expressed by the equation (7) is out of phase by the angle phase φ i , the phase is shifted back to match the origin of G (θ j ). FIG. 10 shows the operation. A value obtained by averaging these is indicated by a thick black line in FIG. In the conventional analysis method, only the uppermost data in FIG. 9 is used, so that the first measurement data is excessively weighted.
However, the method according to the present invention can obtain more reliable results with higher statistics by using all measurement data equally.

次に前記本発明の上記課題2について、その解決する手法を説明する。
前記(2)式では図5で示すように、真円度測定機の検出器の回転誤差成分Z(θ)は原点位置が一致しているが、測定器物の形状成分G(θ)は各ステップの角度位相φiだけ位相がずれている。そこで、まず先に、角度位相φiが異なるそれぞれの測定データT(θi)を角度位相φiだけ位相を戻し、測定器物の形状成分G(θ)の原点位置を一致させ、検出器の回転誤差成分Z(θ)の位相をずらす。位相操作をした値をT’(θi)とすると、
(2)式からT’(θi)は(11)式で表される。
(11)
なお、図12は上記のような手法に基づき、T(θi)を角度位相φiだけ位相をずらした例を示している。
Next, a technique for solving the problem 2 of the present invention will be described.
In the equation (2), as shown in FIG. 5, the rotation error component Z (θ) of the detector of the roundness measuring machine has the same origin position, but the shape component G (θ) of the measuring object is different from each other. The phase is shifted by the angle phase φ i of the step. Therefore, first previously, angular phase phi i are different measurement data T (θ j, φ i) returns only the phase angle the phase phi i, to match the original position of the measurement vessels shaped component G (theta), The phase of the rotation error component Z (θ) of the detector is shifted. If the phase manipulated value is T ′ (θ j , φ i ),
From the formula (2), T ′ (θ j , φ i ) is represented by the formula (11).
(11)
FIG. 12 shows an example in which the phase of T (θ j , φ i ) is shifted by the angle phase φ i based on the above method.

これは、測定器物の形状成分G(θ)の原点位置が一致しているため、以後、(7)、(8)式でZ(θ)とG(θ)を入れ替えて同等な計算を進めることにより、(10)式に相当する(12)式を得ることが出来る。
(12)
このように、検出器の回転誤差成分Z(θ)と測定器物の形状成分G(θ)はお互いの成分を含まない形で分離することが可能となる。
This is because the origin position of the shape component G (θ) of the measuring object is the same, and thereafter, equivalent calculations are performed by exchanging Z (θ) and G (θ) in equations (7) and (8). Thus, the equation (12) corresponding to the equation (10) can be obtained.
(12)
As described above, the rotation error component Z (θ) of the detector and the shape component G (θ) of the measuring instrument can be separated without including each other.

次に前記本発明の課題3について、その解決する手法を説明する。
このgmj)には、求めたいG(θ j )に対してmの整数倍の高次のフーリエ成分の和G (m) j )が含まれていない。そこで、新たに位相差法で異なるステップ数の実験(ここではn回とする)を行い、それらのデータから同様な処理を行い求めた結果をgnj)とする。これは、n次の高次のフーリエ成分が含まれてはいない解析データとなる。
Next, a technique for solving the problem 3 of the present invention will be described.
This g mj ) does not include the sum G ( m) j ) of higher-order Fourier components that are integral multiples of m with respect to G (θ j ) to be obtained. Therefore, an experiment with a different number of steps (here, n times) is newly performed by the phase difference method, and a result obtained by performing similar processing from these data is defined as g nj ). This is analysis data that does not include an nth-order higher-order Fourier component.

例として、5ステップの実験と9ステップの実験から得られたg(θj)とそのフーリエ成分を図13〜16に示す。図14,16で明らかなように、5ステップ実験では5の倍数次のフーリエ成分が0となり、9ステップ実験では9の倍数次のフーリエ成分が0となっている。しかし、図14を見ると5ステップ実験では9の倍数次のフーリエ成分(太線)を含み、図16では9ステップ実験では5の倍数次のフーリエ成分(太線)を含んでいることから、相補的に補い合うことが出来る。補い合えないフーリエ成分は5と9の最小公倍数45の倍数のフーリエ成分だけとなる。 As an example, g (θ j ) obtained from a 5-step experiment and a 9-step experiment and its Fourier component are shown in FIGS. As apparent from FIGS. 14 and 16, the multiple-order Fourier component of 5 is 0 in the 5-step experiment, and the multiple-order Fourier component of 9 is 0 in the 9-step experiment. However, since FIG. 14 includes a Fourier component (thick line) of a multiple of 9 in the 5-step experiment and FIG. 16 includes a Fourier component (thick line) of a multiple of 5 in the 9-step experiment. Can make up for each other. The only Fourier components that cannot be complemented are the Fourier components that are multiples of the least common multiple 45 of 5 and 9.

ここで、その補う方法の一手法を提案する。この手法を「位相組み合わせ法」と名付け、真円度測定の解析方法の高度化の手法として提案する。
(「位相組み合わせ法」について)
nj)にはm次の成分が含まれているため、これからmの整数倍の高次フーリエ成分のみを抽出する。抽出するためには、(6)式で説明したようにgnj)を
Here, we propose a method to compensate for this. This method is called “phase combination method” and is proposed as a method for improving the analysis method of roundness measurement.
(About “Phase Combination Method”)
Since g nj ) includes m-order components, only high-order Fourier components that are integer multiples of m are extracted from this. In order to extract, g nj ) is set as described in equation (6).

位相シフトしたm個のデータを作成する。このm個のデータの平均値μn,mj)とすると次式で示される。
(13)
M pieces of phase-shifted data are created. When the average value μ n, mj ) of these m pieces of data is expressed by the following equation.
(13)

平均値μn,mj)は、gnj)から選択的にmの整数倍のフーリエ成分のみを抽出する操作になる。したがって、この値を単純にgmj)に加えることにより、mの整数倍のフーリエ成分を補った解析値gmxnj)を求めることが出来る。ただし、m×nの整数倍のフーリエ成分は求まらない。
(14)
このようにm回シフト実験とn回シフト実験から、m×n回シフト実験と同様の解析
結果を導くことが出来る。
The average value μ n, mj ) is an operation for selectively extracting only the Fourier component of an integer multiple of m from g nj ). Therefore, by simply adding this value to g mj ), an analysis value g mxnj ) supplemented with a Fourier component that is an integral multiple of m can be obtained. However, a Fourier component of an integer multiple of m × n cannot be obtained.
(14)
Thus, the same analysis result as the m × n shift experiment can be derived from the m shift experiment and the n shift experiment.

9ステップ実験(図15の測定器物の形状成分(R線)参照)を、(1)式でm=5とした時の角度だけシフトした5本の曲線を作る。図17はシフトした5本の曲線を示している。これらを平均すると図18に示す平均値μ9,5j)が得られる。この平均値μ9,5j)のフーリエ成分は、図19に示すように5の倍数フーリエ成分のみを持ち、図16が示す9ステップ実験のフーリエ成分から、5の倍数のフーリエ成分が選択的に抽出されていることがわかる。 Five curves are produced by shifting the 9-step experiment (see the shape component (R line) of the measuring instrument in FIG. 15) by an angle when m = 5 in the equation (1). FIG. 17 shows five shifted curves. When these are averaged, an average value μ 9,5j ) shown in FIG. 18 is obtained. The Fourier component of the average value μ 9,5j ) has only a multiple Fourier component of 5 as shown in FIG. 19, and the Fourier component of a multiple of 5 is obtained from the Fourier component of the 9-step experiment shown in FIG. It can be seen that they are selectively extracted.

したがって、図20に示すように、この平均値μ9,5j)をgj)に加えることにより、図22に示すように、組み合わされた曲線gmj)+μn,mj)=gmxnj)はフーリエ成分が44次まで抜けが無い曲線を得ることが出来る。つまり、異なる2つのステップ数(例としてmステップとnステップ)で行ったマルチステップ法の実験データから、高ステップ数(m×nステップ)の実験結果と同等な結果を導き出すことが出来る。この操作を検出器の回転誤差成分に対しても同様にZmxnj)を求めることが出来る。この結果を図22に示す。 Therefore, as shown in FIG. 20, by adding this average value μ 9,5j ) to g 5j ), as shown in FIG. 22, the combined curve g mj ) + μ n, mj ) = g mxnj ) can obtain a curve having no missing components up to the 44th order of the Fourier component. That is, a result equivalent to the experimental result of the high step number (m × n steps) can be derived from the experimental data of the multi-step method performed at two different number of steps (for example, m step and n step). With this operation, Z mxnj ) can be similarly obtained for the rotation error component of the detector. The result is shown in FIG.

現在、磁気記憶装置の主軸、nmオーダーでの加工を行う工作機械の主軸などでは、より高精度な軸の回転運動精度評価が求められている。そこで、本発明を用いることにより高精度に校正された回転精度検出用標準器を提供することが可能となるため、さらに高精度に評価が可能となる。   At present, more accurate evaluation of the rotational motion accuracy of the spindle of a magnetic storage device and the spindle of a machine tool that performs machining on the order of nm is required. Therefore, by using the present invention, it is possible to provide a rotation accuracy detection standard calibrated with high accuracy, and therefore it becomes possible to evaluate with higher accuracy.

また、本技術によりステップ数を少なくした測定で回転精度検出用標準器を高精度に評価することが可能となるため測定時間の短縮が可能となる。このため測定環境を長時間に安定する必要なくなる。よってこの技術により、そのような長時間の環境の安定した条件を有しないところにおいても高精度の測定・評価が可能となる。   In addition, the present technology makes it possible to evaluate the rotation accuracy detection standard device with high accuracy by measurement with a reduced number of steps, so that the measurement time can be shortened. This eliminates the need to stabilize the measurement environment for a long time. Therefore, this technique enables high-precision measurement and evaluation even in a place that does not have such long-term stable conditions.

真円度測定機の概観図である。It is an outline figure of a roundness measuring machine. 真円度測定機システムの模式図である。It is a schematic diagram of a roundness measuring machine system. マルチステップ法における検出器(触針)と測定器物の角度関係を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the angle relationship of the detector (stylus) and measuring instrument in a multistep method. 回転誤差成分と測定器物の形状成分の例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the example of a rotation error component and the shape component of a measuring device. マルチステップ法(m=5)の測定データ例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the example of measurement data of a multistep method (m = 5). (6)式を用いて測定データから真円度測定機の検出器の回転誤差成分を求めた例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the example which calculated | required the rotation error component of the detector of a roundness measuring device from measurement data using (6) Formula. ステップ数m=5の場合の’T(θ,φ)−μ(θ)’データの例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the example of 'T ((theta) j , (phi) i )-(mu) j ) "data in case the number of steps m = 5. ステップ数m=5の実験データから(8)式を用いて測定器物の形状成分G(θ)を求めた例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the example which calculated | required the shape component G ((theta)) of the measuring instrument from the experimental data of step number m = 5 using (8) Formula. m=5ステップ実験例を示す図であり、(7)式から求められる各ステップの位相角度位置による形状成分各測定データは角度位相φiの分だけ位相がずれている状態を示す説明図である。It is a figure which shows a m = 5 step experiment example, It is explanatory drawing which shows the state from which the phase of the shape component measurement data by the phase angle position of each step calculated | required from (7) Formula has shifted | deviated by the angle phase (phi) i . is there. 各ステップの角度位置による形状成分をシフトした例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the example which shifted the shape component by the angular position of each step. m=5ステップ実験による形状成分T(θ,0)−μ(θ)とその平均値g(θ)を示す図である。m = 5 Step experiments by the shape component T (θ j, 0) is a diagram showing a -μ (θ j) and the average value g mj). 図5に示す5ステップ実験の測定データT(θ,φ)を角度位相φiだけ位相をずらした例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the example which shifted the phase of measurement data T ((theta) j , (phi) i ) of 5 step experiment shown in FIG. 5 by angle phase (phi) i . 5ステップの実験におけるz及びgの例を示す図である。5 is a diagram showing an example of z 5 and g 5 in experimental steps. 5ステップの実験における測定器物の形状成分のフーリエ成分の例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the example of the Fourier component of the shape component of the measuring instrument in 5 step experiment. 9ステップの実験におけるz及びgの例を示す図である。Is a diagram illustrating an example of z 9 and g 9 at 9 steps of the experiment. 9ステップの実験における測定器物の形状成分のフーリエ成分の例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the example of the Fourier component of the shape component of the measuring instrument in 9 step experiment. 9ステップの実験における測定器物の形状成分gを(1)式でm=5としたときの角度だけシフトして5本の曲線を作製した例を示す図である。Is a diagram illustrating an example of manufacturing an angle shifted to five curve when the m = 5 in the shape component g 9 of the measuring vessels (1) at 9 steps of the experiment. 図17の5本の曲線の平均を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the average of five curves of FIG. 図18の平均のフーリエ成分を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the average Fourier component of FIG. 5ステップの実験結果と、9ステップの実験から抽出された5の倍数のフーリエ成分をもつ曲線の例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the example of the curve which has the Fourier component of the multiple of 5 extracted from the experimental result of 5 steps, and the experiment of 9 steps. 5ステップと9ステップの実験における測定器物の形状成分のフーリエ成分を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the Fourier component of the shape component of the measuring instrument in experiment of 5 steps and 9 steps. 5ステップと9ステップの位相組み合わせ法の解析結果を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the analysis result of the phase combination method of 5 steps and 9 steps.

Claims (3)

測定器物の表面に対して検出器を接触させて、測定器物の表面の半径方向凹凸を検出しながら1回転走査することにより1回の測定器物表面の真円度測定データを取得し、
前記検出器の測定開始位置に対する測定器物の測定開始位置を、一周360°を等角度にm個に分割した角度位相だけずらして、円周上等間隔に複数m回の前記測定器物表面の真円度測定によりm個の測定データを取得し、
前記m個の測定データにより真円度測定機の検出器の回転誤差成分を求める解析を行う真円度測定方法において、
前記m個の各測定データとその平均値の差のデータを、前記m個の各測定データをそれぞれの前記角度位相だけずらして、原点位置を合わせる操作を行い、これらの平均をとることにより、全測定データを用いた解析を行うことを特徴とする真円度測定方法。
By bringing the detector into contact with the surface of the measuring object and scanning one revolution while detecting the radial unevenness on the surface of the measuring object, the roundness measurement data of the measuring object surface is acquired once.
The measurement start position of the measurement object with respect to the measurement start position of the detector is shifted by an angular phase obtained by dividing 360 degrees around the circumference into m at equal angles, and the true surface of the measurement object surface is measured a plurality of m times at equal intervals on the circumference. Acquire m measurement data by circularity measurement,
In the roundness measurement method for analyzing the rotation error component of the detector of the roundness measuring machine from the m measurement data,
The data of the difference between the average value and the m of each measurement data, said shifted by m-number of each of the angular phase of each measurement data, do to adjust the origin position, by taking the average of these, A roundness measurement method characterized by performing analysis using all measurement data.
測定器物の表面に対して検出器を接触させて、測定器物の表面の半径方向凹凸を検出しながら1回転走査することにより1回の測定器物表面の真円度測定データを取得し、
前記検出器の測定開始位置に対する測定器物の測定開始位置を一周360°を等角度にm個に分割した角度位相だけずらして、円周上等間隔に複数m回の前記測定器物表面の真円度測定によるm個の測定データを取得し、
前記m個の測定データにより前記測定器物の形状成分を求める解析を行う真円度測定方法において、
前記角度位相が異なるそれぞれの測定データを角度位相だけ位相を戻し、前記測定器物の形状成分の原点位置を一致させることにより、前記検出器の回転誤差成分の位相をずらす位相操作を行い、
該位相操作を行った値を前記m個の測定データに代替して解析を行うことを特徴とする真円度測定方法。
Contacting the detector relative to the surface of the measuring vessels, it obtains the roundness measurement data in the radial direction uneven detected while one revolution scanning one measurement vessels surface by the surface of the measuring vessels,
The measurement start position of the measurement object with respect to the measurement start position of the detector is shifted by an angular phase obtained by dividing m at 360 ° around the circumference, and a perfect circle on the surface of the measurement object at a plurality of m times at equal intervals on the circumference. Get m measurement data by degree measurement,
In the roundness measuring method for analyzing seeking the m measured data by the shape component of the measurement vessels,
Wherein the angular phase are different from each measurement data returns the angle phase by phase, by matching the position of the origin of the shape component of the measurement vessels, it performs phase operation to shifting the phase of the rotation error components of the detector,
A roundness measurement method characterized in that an analysis is performed by substituting the phase measurement value with the m pieces of measurement data.
測定器物の表面に対して検出器を接触させて、測定器物の表面の半径方向凹凸を検出しながら1回転走査することにより1回の測定器物表面の真円度測定データを取得し、
前記検出器の測定開始位置に対する測定器物の測定開始位置を一周360°を等角度にm個に分割した角度位相だけずらして、円周上等間隔に複数m回の前記測定器物表面の真円度測定によりm個の測定データを取得し、
前記検出器の測定開始位置に対する前記測定器物の測定開始位置を一周360°を等角度にn個(n≠m)に分割した角度位相だけずらして、円周上等間隔に複数n回の前記測定器物表面の真円度測定によりn個の測定データを取得し、
前記m個の各測定データとその平均値の差のデータを求め、真円度の解析を行うときのmの整数倍のフーリエ成分の和のデータと、前記n個の各測定データとその平均値の差のデータを求め真円度の解析を行うときのnの整数倍のフーリエ成分の和のデータとを用いて、各々のデータの不足分を抽出して相互に補完することを特徴とする真円度測定方法。
Contacting the detector relative to the surface of the measuring vessels, it obtains the roundness measurement data in the radial direction uneven detected while one revolution scanning one measurement vessels surface by the surface of the measuring vessels,
The measurement start position of the measurement object with respect to the measurement start position of the detector is shifted by an angular phase obtained by dividing the circumference 360 ° into m at equal angles, and a perfect circle on the surface of the measurement object a plurality of m times at equal intervals on the circumference. M measurement data is acquired by measuring the degree,
The measurement start position of the measurement object with respect to the measurement start position of the detector is shifted by an angular phase obtained by dividing 360 ° of a circle into n pieces (n ≠ m) at an equal angle , and a plurality of n times of the measurement start positions at equal intervals on the circumference. Acquire n measurement data by measuring the roundness of the measuring object surface,
The difference between the m measurement data and the average value is obtained, and the sum of Fourier components of an integer multiple of m when analyzing roundness, the n measurement data and the average Using the sum of Fourier components of integer multiples of n when obtaining the difference data and analyzing the roundness, the deficiency of each data is extracted and complemented with each other How to measure roundness.
JP2005303094A 2005-10-18 2005-10-18 Roundness measurement method Expired - Fee Related JP4706061B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2005303094A JP4706061B2 (en) 2005-10-18 2005-10-18 Roundness measurement method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2005303094A JP4706061B2 (en) 2005-10-18 2005-10-18 Roundness measurement method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2007113947A JP2007113947A (en) 2007-05-10
JP4706061B2 true JP4706061B2 (en) 2011-06-22

Family

ID=38096286

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2005303094A Expired - Fee Related JP4706061B2 (en) 2005-10-18 2005-10-18 Roundness measurement method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4706061B2 (en)

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP3900234B2 (en) * 1999-09-10 2007-04-04 日本精工株式会社 Shape measuring apparatus and method
JP3628951B2 (en) * 2000-09-26 2005-03-16 株式会社ミツトヨ Method for estimating uncertainty in rotational accuracy of machine and method for correcting rotational accuracy

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2007113947A (en) 2007-05-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8629902B2 (en) Coordinate fusion and thickness calibration for semiconductor wafer edge inspection
Cappa et al. A sub-nanometre spindle error motion separation technique
JP5908102B2 (en) Preparation for operation of contact scanning coordinate measuring instrument
CN111445438B (en) A dual-neighborhood automatic detection method for wear scar angle
KR20000068713A (en) Method for correcting measurement errors in a machine measuring co-ordinates
WO2011055662A1 (en) Axial deviation measurement method and angle detecting device with auto-correct function comprising axial deviation measurement function
CN106168464A (en) A kind of main shaft dynamic rotation method for testing precision based on machine vision
Tiainen et al. Effect of positional errors on the accuracy of multi-probe roundness measurement methods
JP2017161252A (en) Surface shape measuring method and surface shape measuring apparatus
JP5270138B2 (en) Calibration jig and calibration method
Huang et al. Development of a novel laser-based measuring system for the thread profile of ballscrew
Nafi et al. Novel CMM-based implementation of the multi-step method for the separation of machine and probe errors
EP3839421B1 (en) Method, computer-readable medium and apparatus for determining the two-point size of a workpiece
JP4667186B2 (en) Rotational accuracy measurement method
JP4706061B2 (en) Roundness measurement method
CN107727023B (en) Calculation method of rotation error and roundness error of hybrid four-point method based on three-point method
Li et al. Non-contact ultra-precision metrology of superfine cylinders with a developed two-dimensional coordinate measuring device
US7433047B1 (en) Runout characterization
CN106289027B (en) Roundness measuring device and roundness measuring method
JP3628951B2 (en) Method for estimating uncertainty in rotational accuracy of machine and method for correcting rotational accuracy
CN209961177U (en) Device for measuring inner bore cylindricity
JP3788231B2 (en) Evaluation method for radial vibration of rotating body and evaluation apparatus for radial vibration of rotating body
JP4922905B2 (en) Method and apparatus for measuring position variation of rotation center line
CN107907062B (en) Bearing bore diameter measurement method based on the sensitive lever principle of double optics
CN112762819A (en) Detection device and measurement method for precision detection of visual sensor

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20080327

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20101118

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20101130

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20110127

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20110222

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20110223

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 4706061

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20140325

Year of fee payment: 3

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

S533 Written request for registration of change of name

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees