Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP4716899B2 - Seismic improvement proposal device and seismic improvement proposal method - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP4716899B2 - Seismic improvement proposal device and seismic improvement proposal method - Google Patents

Seismic improvement proposal device and seismic improvement proposal method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP4716899B2
JP4716899B2 JP2006052478A JP2006052478A JP4716899B2 JP 4716899 B2 JP4716899 B2 JP 4716899B2 JP 2006052478 A JP2006052478 A JP 2006052478A JP 2006052478 A JP2006052478 A JP 2006052478A JP 4716899 B2 JP4716899 B2 JP 4716899B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
earthquake
earthquake resistance
building
plan
data
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP2006052478A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2007233553A (en
Inventor
忠昭 升田
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Chugoku Electric Power Co Inc
Original Assignee
Chugoku Electric Power Co Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Chugoku Electric Power Co Inc filed Critical Chugoku Electric Power Co Inc
Priority to JP2006052478A priority Critical patent/JP4716899B2/en
Publication of JP2007233553A publication Critical patent/JP2007233553A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4716899B2 publication Critical patent/JP4716899B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
  • Working Measures On Existing Buildindgs (AREA)

Description

本発明は、既存建築物の耐震性向上を提案するための装置および方法に関する。   The present invention relates to an apparatus and a method for proposing improvement of earthquake resistance of an existing building.

既存建築物の耐震性を高めるために、その既存建築物が現行の建築基準法その他の各種法令や基準に適合しているか否かについて耐震診断を行った後、法令や基準を満足するように耐震補強を施す方法が広く行われている。このような方法で既存建築物の耐震性を向上させる技術が、特許文献1に開示されている。
特開2004−110264号公報
In order to improve the earthquake resistance of existing buildings, after conducting an earthquake-resistant diagnosis on whether or not the existing buildings comply with the current Building Standards Act and other various laws and standards, so that the laws and standards are satisfied Methods for applying seismic reinforcement are widely used. Patent Document 1 discloses a technique for improving the earthquake resistance of an existing building by such a method.
JP 2004-110264 A

しかしながら、既存建築物の耐震性は、所定の規模以上の地震が発生した場合に効果を発揮するものであり、日常の使い勝手にはほとんど影響しない。そのため、耐震性向上の必要性が意識されることはあまりなく、わざわざ耐震診断や耐震補強が単独で行われることは少ない。   However, the earthquake resistance of existing buildings is effective when an earthquake of a predetermined magnitude or larger occurs, and has almost no influence on daily usability. Therefore, there is not much awareness of the necessity of improving seismic resistance, and there are few cases where seismic diagnosis and seismic reinforcement are performed independently.

また、従来の耐震性向上の方法は、建物が耐震基準を満足するか否かを診断し、満足しなければ、建物全体として耐震基準を満たすために補強を行うものである。それ故に、既存建築物の耐震性を現状より少しでも向上させるために、建物の一部や建物内の設備を補強する措置など、きめ細かい対応ができないという問題がある。   Moreover, the conventional method for improving earthquake resistance is to diagnose whether or not a building satisfies the earthquake resistance standard, and if not satisfied, the entire building is reinforced to satisfy the earthquake resistance standard. Therefore, in order to improve the earthquake resistance of existing buildings as much as possible, there is a problem that detailed measures such as measures to reinforce part of the building and facilities in the building cannot be taken.

さらに、建築基準法で定められる耐震基準は、全国一律に適用される最低限のものである。ところが、地震の発生には地域性があるため、耐震基準を満足するか否かだけでは、建築物が建てられている場所における地震のリスクを精確に判断することはできない。   Furthermore, the seismic standards defined by the Building Standards Law are the minimum that can be applied nationwide. However, since the occurrence of earthquakes is regional, it is not possible to accurately determine the risk of an earthquake at a place where a building is built only by satisfying the earthquake resistance standards.

そこで、本発明は、上記課題を鑑みてなされたものであり、通常の改修の機会を利用して、きめ細かく建物の耐震性向上を提案する手段を提供することを主たる目的とする。   Therefore, the present invention has been made in view of the above problems, and a main object thereof is to provide means for proposing a detailed improvement in the earthquake resistance of a building by utilizing a normal renovation opportunity.

上記課題を解決するために、本発明は、建物を改修する提案に付随して、その建物の耐震性向上を提案する耐震性向上提案装置であって、改修部位ごとに1以上の耐震化工法を示す改修部位別耐震化工法データ、耐震化工法ごとに耐震性向上の効果を示す耐震化工法別効果データ、建物の図面から建物の耐震性を計算するための建物耐震性データ、地域ごとに各震度の地震が発生する確率を示す地震発生リスクデータ、耐震化工法ごとにコストを示す耐震化工法別コストデータおよび基本改修プランからコストを計算するための改修コストデータを格納する記憶部と、改修部位、改修内容、建物の図面および建物の所在地を含む建物情報を入力する入力部と、入力部によって入力された改修部位、改修内容および建物の図面から基本改修プランを策定するとともに、その改修部位から、改修部位別耐震化工法データに基づいて1以上の耐震化工法を選択し、その耐震化工法および基本改修プランを合わせた耐震化改修プランを策定する改修プラン策定部と、建物の図面から、建物耐震性データに基づいて基本改修プランに係る建物の耐震性を評価するとともに、建物の図面および改修プラン策定部によって選択された耐震化工法から、建物耐震性データおよび耐震化工法別効果データに基づいて耐震化改修プランに係る建物の耐震性を評価する耐震性評価部と、前記基本改修プランおよび前記耐震化改修プランごとに、前記地震発生リスクデータから前記建物の所在地を含む地域で発生する地震の震度及びその発生確率を読み出し、前記建物の耐震性を超える震度の地震が発生する確率を算出し、その算出した確率を地震被災リスクとして評価する地震被災リスク評価部と、基本改修プランから、改修コストデータに基づいて基本改修プランに係る改修コストを評価するとともに、耐震化改修プランから、改修コストデータおよび耐震化工法別コストデータに基づいて耐震化改修プランに係る改修コストを評価する改修コスト評価部と、基本改修プランおよび耐震化改修プランごとに、耐震性評価部によって評価された建物の耐震性、地震被災リスク評価部によって評価された地震被災リスクおよび改修コスト評価部によって評価された改修コストを表示する表示部とを備えることを特徴とする。 In order to solve the above-described problems, the present invention is an earthquake resistance improvement proposing device that proposes an improvement in the earthquake resistance of a building accompanying a proposal to repair the building, and includes one or more seismic improvement methods for each repair site. Seismic method data by renovation site, effect data by seismic method showing the effect of improving seismic performance for each seismic method, building seismic data for calculating the seismic performance of buildings from building drawings, by region A storage unit for storing earthquake occurrence risk data indicating the probability of occurrence of an earthquake of each seismic intensity, cost data for each earthquake resistance method indicating the cost for each earthquake resistance method, and repair cost data for calculating the cost from the basic repair plan, An input section for entering building information including the repair site, repair content, building drawings and building location, and the basic repair program based on the repair site, repair content, and building drawings entered by the input section. Rehabilitation plan that selects one or more seismic construction methods based on the seismic construction method data for each repair site and formulates a seismic retrofit plan that combines the seismic construction method and the basic renovation plan. Based on the seismic data of the building and the building plan, the seismic performance of the building according to the basic renovation plan is evaluated, and the seismic construction method selected by the building drawing and the renovation plan formulating unit a seismic evaluation unit for evaluating the earthquake resistance of the building according to the earthquake resistance repair plan based on the data and seismic engineering process-specific effects data, for each of the basic repair plan and the earthquake resistance repair plan, before Symbol earthquake risk data Read the seismic intensity and probability of earthquakes that occur in the area including the location of the building, and an earthquake with a seismic intensity exceeding the earthquake resistance of the building will occur. Calculating the rate, and earthquake risk assessment unit which evaluates the calculated probabilities as earthquake risk, the basic repair plans, as well as evaluate the renovation costs of basic repair plan based on the repair cost data, earthquake resistance repair plan From the rehabilitation cost data and the seismic retrofitting method cost data, the rehabilitation cost evaluation unit that evaluates the rehabilitation cost related to the seismic renovation plan and the basic rehabilitation plan and the seismic renovation plan are evaluated by the seismic evaluation unit A display unit for displaying the earthquake resistance of the building, the earthquake damage risk evaluated by the earthquake damage risk evaluation unit, and the repair cost evaluated by the repair cost evaluation unit.

この構成によれば、改修部位ごとに1以上の耐震化工法のデータを有し、その耐震化工法ごとに耐震性向上の効果およびコストのデータを有するため、建物の基本改修プランに付随して耐震化改修プランを提示できるので、自然にスムーズに耐震性向上の提案が可能になる。また、基本改修プランおよび耐震化改修プランごとに、建物の耐震性、その耐震性に基づく地震被災リスクおよび改修コストが表示されるので、ユーザが地震対策の重要性および費用に関して理解しやすくなり、耐震化を含む改修の機会が増加すると考えられる。さらに、基本改修プランおよび1以上の耐震化改修プランを提示できるので、ユーザの要望や予算に応じたきめ細かい対応が可能になる。
さらに、この構成によれば、地域ごとに各震度の地震が発生する確率のデータを有し、地震被災リスクとして、改修の対象となる建物の所在地を含む地域で建物の耐震性を超える震度の地震が発生する確率を求めるので、地震によって災害を被る確率を提示することができ、ユーザに地震対策の重要性を実感させることができる。
According to this configuration, there is one or more seismic improvement method data for each renovation site, and each seismic improvement method has seismic improvement effect and cost data. Since it is possible to present a seismic retrofit plan, it is possible to make proposals for improving earthquake resistance naturally and smoothly. In addition, the earthquake resistance of the building, the earthquake damage risk based on the earthquake resistance and the repair cost are displayed for each basic repair plan and seismic retrofit plan, making it easier for users to understand the importance and cost of earthquake countermeasures, Opportunities for retrofitting including earthquake resistance will increase. Furthermore, since a basic repair plan and one or more seismic retrofit plans can be presented, it is possible to respond finely according to user requests and budgets.
Furthermore, according to this configuration, there is data on the probability of occurrence of earthquakes of each seismic intensity for each area, and the seismic intensity exceeds the earthquake resistance of the building in the area including the location of the building to be repaired. Since the probability of occurrence of an earthquake is obtained, the probability of suffering a disaster due to an earthquake can be presented, and the user can feel the importance of earthquake countermeasures.

また、本発明は、耐震性向上提案装置であって、設備および家具類の耐震評価を行う設備等評価部をさらに備え、記憶部が、設備および家具類の耐震化対策ならびにその効果およびコストを示す設備等耐震化データを格納し、入力部が、設備および家具類のレイアウト図をさらに入力し、設備等評価部が、入力部によって入力されたレイアウト図から、設備等耐震化データおよび地震発生リスクデータに基づいて、1以上の対策案を設定し、各対策案に係る設備および家具類の耐震性、地震被災リスクおよび対策コストを評価し、表示部が、設備等評価部によって設定された対策案ごとに、設備および家具類の耐震対策、耐震性、地震被災リスクおよび対策コストを表示することを特徴とする。   In addition, the present invention is an earthquake resistance improvement proposing device, further comprising an equipment evaluation section for performing an earthquake resistance evaluation of equipment and furniture, and a storage section that provides measures for earthquake resistance of the equipment and furniture and its effects and costs. Seismic data for equipment shown in the table is stored, and the input unit further inputs layout diagrams of equipment and furniture, and the evaluation unit for equipment etc. seismic data such as equipment and earthquake occurrence from the layout diagram input by the input unit. Based on the risk data, set up one or more measures, evaluate the earthquake resistance, earthquake damage risk and countermeasure costs of the equipment and furniture related to each measure, and set the display unit by the facility evaluation unit It is characterized by displaying the earthquake resistance measures, earthquake resistance, earthquake damage risk and countermeasure costs of facilities and furniture for each measure plan.

この構成によれば、建物だけでなく、設備および家具類の耐震対策について提示できるので、少ない予算でも耐震性向上が可能なことをユーザが知ることができ、地震対策に対する意識付け、きっかけにすることができる。   According to this configuration, it is possible to present earthquake resistance measures not only for buildings but also for equipment and furniture, so that the user can know that earthquake resistance can be improved even with a small budget, and it is possible to raise awareness of earthquake countermeasures. be able to.

なお、本発明は、耐震性向上提案方法を含む。その他、本願が開示する課題およびその解決方法は、発明を実施するための最良の形態の欄、及び図面により明らかにされる。   In addition, this invention includes the earthquake-proof improvement proposal method. In addition, the problems disclosed in the present application and the solutions thereof will be clarified by the description of the best mode for carrying out the invention and the drawings.

本発明によれば、通常の改修の機会を利用して、きめ細かく建物の耐震性向上を提案することができる。   According to the present invention, it is possible to propose a detailed improvement in the earthquake resistance of a building by utilizing a normal renovation opportunity.

以下、図面を参照しながら、本発明を実施するための最良の形態を説明する。本発明の実施の形態に係る耐震性向上提案装置は、既存建物の改修を要望するユーザによって、その改修に係る建物情報が入力されるのを受けて、ユーザが要望する基本的な改修プランおよびそれに耐震化を含めた改修プランを策定、評価し、ユーザ要望の改修プランに付随して、耐震化を含む改修プランをユーザに提示するものである。   Hereinafter, the best mode for carrying out the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. The earthquake resistance improvement proposing apparatus according to the embodiment of the present invention is a basic renovation plan requested by a user after a user requesting renovation of an existing building receives building information relating to the renovation, and In addition, a repair plan including earthquake resistance is developed and evaluated, and a repair plan including earthquake resistance is presented to the user in association with the repair plan requested by the user.

≪装置の構成と概要≫
図1は、耐震性向上提案装置の構成を示す図である。耐震性向上提案装置1は、入力部2、表示部3、処理部4および記憶部5を含んで構成される。入力部2は、ユーザの操作に伴って建物情報を入力したり、所定の選択結果を入力したりするものであり、例えばキーボードやマウスなどによって実現される。表示部3は、建物情報を入力するための画面や改修プランを提示するための画面などを表示するものであり、例えば液晶ディスプレイなどによって実現される。処理部4は、入力部2が入力した建物情報から、記憶部5に格納された各データに基づいて改修プランを策定、評価し、その改修プランを表示部3に表示させるものである。処理部4は、所定のメモリに格納されたプログラムをCPU(Central Processing Unit)が実行することによって実現される。記憶部5は、処理部4が改修プランを策定、評価するのに必要なデータを格納するものであり、ハードディスク装置などの不揮発性記憶装置によって実現される。
≪Device configuration and overview≫
FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a configuration of an earthquake resistance improvement proposing device. The earthquake resistance improvement proposing device 1 includes an input unit 2, a display unit 3, a processing unit 4, and a storage unit 5. The input unit 2 inputs building information or inputs a predetermined selection result in accordance with a user operation, and is realized by, for example, a keyboard or a mouse. The display unit 3 displays a screen for inputting building information, a screen for presenting a repair plan, and the like, and is realized by, for example, a liquid crystal display. The processing unit 4 formulates and evaluates a repair plan based on each data stored in the storage unit 5 from the building information input by the input unit 2 and causes the display unit 3 to display the repair plan. The processing unit 4 is realized by a CPU (Central Processing Unit) executing a program stored in a predetermined memory. The storage unit 5 stores data necessary for the processing unit 4 to formulate and evaluate a repair plan, and is realized by a nonvolatile storage device such as a hard disk device.

耐震性向上提案装置1は、PC(Personal Computer)やサーバによって構成されるものとする。なお、必ずしもスタンドアロンの構成である必要はなく、クライアント・サーバシステムによって構成されてもよい。   The earthquake resistance improvement proposing device 1 is assumed to be configured by a PC (Personal Computer) or a server. Note that the configuration is not necessarily a stand-alone configuration, and may be configured by a client / server system.

処理部4は、図1に示すように、改修プラン策定部41、耐震性評価部42、地震被災リスク評価部43および改修コスト評価部44を備える。改修プラン策定部41は、入力部2によって入力された建物情報から、記憶部5に格納された各データに基づいて改修プランを策定する。耐震性評価部42は、改修プラン策定部41によって策定された改修プランを実施した場合の建物の耐震性を評価する。耐震性とは、建物が耐えられる揺れの大きさ(例えば、震度など)をいう。地震被災リスク評価部43は、改修プラン策定部41によって策定された改修プランを実施した場合の建物の地震被災リスクを評価する。地震被災リスクとは、所定の期間に所定の震度の地震が発生し、何らかの災害を被る確率をいう。例えば、建物の耐震性が評価された場合に、その建物の所在地を含む地域で、その建物の耐震性を超える震度の地震が発生する確率をいう。これによれば、単なる地震の発生確率ではなく、改修プランごとの耐震性による建物の被災の確率が分かるので、ユーザの耐震化に対する意識を喚起することができる。改修コスト評価部44は、改修プラン策定部41によって策定された改修プランの改修コストを評価する。改修コストとは、建物の改修にかかる費用をいう。   As shown in FIG. 1, the processing unit 4 includes a repair plan formulation unit 41, an earthquake resistance evaluation unit 42, an earthquake damage risk evaluation unit 43, and a repair cost evaluation unit 44. The repair plan formulation unit 41 formulates a repair plan based on each data stored in the storage unit 5 from the building information input by the input unit 2. The earthquake resistance evaluation unit 42 evaluates the earthquake resistance of the building when the repair plan formulated by the repair plan formulation unit 41 is implemented. Seismic resistance refers to the magnitude of shaking (for example, seismic intensity) that a building can withstand. The earthquake damage risk evaluation unit 43 evaluates the earthquake damage risk of the building when the repair plan formulated by the repair plan formulation unit 41 is implemented. The earthquake damage risk refers to the probability that an earthquake having a predetermined seismic intensity will occur during a predetermined period and suffer some kind of disaster. For example, when the earthquake resistance of a building is evaluated, the probability that an earthquake having a seismic intensity exceeding the earthquake resistance of the building will occur in an area including the location of the building. According to this, since the probability of building damage due to earthquake resistance for each renovation plan is known, not just the probability of occurrence of an earthquake, the user can be conscious of earthquake resistance. The repair cost evaluation unit 44 evaluates the repair cost of the repair plan formulated by the repair plan formulation unit 41. The renovation cost is the cost for renovation of a building.

記憶部5は、図1に示すように、改修部位別耐震化工法データ51、耐震化工法別耐震性向上効果データ(以下、耐震化工法別効果データという)52、建物耐震性データ53、地震発生リスクデータ54、耐震化工法別コストデータ55および改修コストデータ56を格納する。   As shown in FIG. 1, the storage unit 5 includes a seismic improvement method data 51 for each repair site, a seismic improvement effect data for each seismic method (hereinafter referred to as effect data for each seismic method) 52, a building seismic data 53, an earthquake Occurrence risk data 54, seismic method-specific cost data 55, and repair cost data 56 are stored.

改修部位別耐震化工法データ51は、文字通り、建物の改修部位およびそれに関連した耐震化工法のデータであり、改修部位ごとに1以上の耐震化工法のデータがある。耐震化工法別効果データ52は、改修部位別耐震化工法データ51の各耐震化工法について、その耐震性向上に係る効果を評価したデータである。その効果とは、建物の水平耐力(強度、強靭性)を増大させる効果、建物への地震入力を低減させる効果、地震による建物の揺れを減衰させる効果などである。建物耐震性データ53は、建物の平面図や構造図(図面)から建物の耐震性を計算するのに必要なデータである。このデータは、通常の耐震診断の方法に基づくものである。   The earthquake-resistant construction method data 51 for each modified portion is literally data on the modified portion of the building and the earthquake-resistant construction method related thereto, and there is one or more earthquake-resistant construction method data for each modified portion. The seismic improvement method-specific effect data 52 is data obtained by evaluating the effect of improving the seismic resistance of each seismic improvement method 51 of the repair site-specific seismic improvement method data 51. The effects include an effect of increasing the horizontal proof stress (strength and toughness) of the building, an effect of reducing the earthquake input to the building, and an effect of attenuating the shaking of the building due to the earthquake. The building earthquake resistance data 53 is data necessary for calculating the earthquake resistance of a building from a plan view or a structural drawing (drawing) of the building. This data is based on normal seismic diagnostic methods.

地震発生リスクデータ54は、全国各地の地震による揺れの大きさおよびその発生確率を示すデータである。耐震化工法別効果データ52、建物耐震性データ53および地震発生リスクデータ54に基づいて、所定の震度以上の地震の発生確率である地震被災リスクや、改修部位に耐震化を施した場合の地震被災リスクを評価することができる。耐震化工法別コストデータ55は、文字通り、改修部位別耐震化工法データ51の各耐震化工法について、その耐震化工法を実施した場合のコストを示すデータである。改修コストデータ56は、改修部位、改修内容、建物の平面図および構造図により策定された基本プラン(基本改修プラン)からコストを計算するのに必要なデータである。耐震化工法別コストデータ55および改修コストデータ56に基づいて、建物の耐震化を含む改修のコストを評価することができる。   The earthquake occurrence risk data 54 is data indicating the magnitude of the shaking caused by earthquakes in various parts of the country and the probability of occurrence thereof. Based on the effect data 52, seismic performance data 53, and earthquake occurrence risk data 54, the earthquake damage risk that is the probability of occurrence of an earthquake of a predetermined seismic intensity or greater, and the earthquake when the repaired part is made earthquake resistant Can assess disaster risk. The earthquake-resistant construction method cost data 55 is literally data indicating the cost when the earthquake-proof construction method is implemented for each earthquake-resistant construction method of the repair site-specific earthquake resistance construction method data 51. The refurbishment cost data 56 is data necessary for calculating a cost from a basic plan (basic renovation plan) formulated based on a renovation site, renovation contents, a plan view of a building, and a structural diagram. Based on the seismic retrofit method cost data 55 and the repair cost data 56, the cost of repair including earthquake resistance of the building can be evaluated.

≪データの構成≫
図2は、改修部位別耐震化工法データの構成を示す図である。改修部位別耐震化工法データ51は、外壁改修関連データ511、床改修関連データ512、天井改修関連データ513、内壁改修関連データ514および屋根改修関連データ515を含む。なお、他の部位の改修関連データをさらに含んでもよい。一例として、外壁改修関連データ511は、軸組み接合部の補強金物取付け、柱脚部アンカの補強金物取付け、ブレース取付け、耐震パネル取付け、ダンパ取付け、基礎の補強、柱梁接合部補強、筋違補強などを含む。すなわち、例えば、「外壁」という1つの改修部位について、複数の耐震化工法があることを意味する。これによれば、ユーザから「外壁」の改修が要望された場合に、「外壁」の改修により可能な様々な耐震性向上の提案を行うことができる。他の改修部位についても同様である。そして、補強金物取付けやブレース取付けなどの耐震化工法ごとの耐震性向上効果およびコストが、それぞれ耐震化工法別効果データ52および耐震化工法別コストデータ55に格納されている。これによれば、様々な耐震性向上の提案ごとにその効果およびコストを提示することができる。他の改修部位についても同様である。
<< Data structure >>
FIG. 2 is a diagram showing the structure of the seismic retrofitting method data for each repair site. The earthquake-resistant construction method data 51 by repair site includes outer wall repair-related data 511, floor repair-related data 512, ceiling repair-related data 513, inner wall repair-related data 514, and roof repair-related data 515. In addition, you may further include the repair relevant data of another site | part. As an example, the data 511 related to the outer wall repair is the following: Reinforcement hardware installation of shaft joint, column base anchor reinforcement hardware installation, brace installation, seismic panel installation, damper installation, foundation reinforcement, column beam joint reinforcement, Includes reinforcement. That is, for example, it means that there is a plurality of seismic retrofitting methods for one repair site called “outer wall”. According to this, when the user requests the repair of the “outer wall”, it is possible to make various proposals for improving the earthquake resistance that can be achieved by the repair of the “outer wall”. The same applies to other repaired parts. Then, the seismic improvement effect and cost for each seismic construction method, such as reinforcement hardware attachment and brace attachment, are stored in the seismic construction method effect data 52 and seismic construction method cost data 55, respectively. According to this, the effect and cost can be shown for every proposal of various earthquake resistance improvement. The same applies to other repaired parts.

≪装置の処理≫
図3は、耐震性向上提案装置の処理を示すフローチャートである。まず、耐震性向上提案装置1の入力部2が、既存建物の改修要望に係る建物情報を入力する(ステップS301)。これは、既存建物の改修を要望するユーザが行う建物情報の入力操作に対応する処理である。建物情報とは、改修部位、改修内容、建物の平面図や構造図、建物の所在地などである。この場合、ユーザに対して、建物情報を一から入力させてもよいし、予め記憶部5に格納された改修部位や改修内容の候補データや既存建物に関する情報から選択させてもよい。
≪Device processing≫
FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing processing of the earthquake resistance improvement proposing device. First, the input unit 2 of the earthquake resistance improvement proposing device 1 inputs building information related to a repair request for an existing building (step S301). This is a process corresponding to an input operation of building information performed by a user who requests a repair of an existing building. The building information includes the repair site, the repair content, the floor plan and structure of the building, the location of the building, and the like. In this case, the user may be allowed to input the building information from scratch, or may be selected from the repair site, the repair content candidate data stored in the storage unit 5 in advance, or information on the existing building.

次に、改修プラン策定部41が、入力部2によって入力された建物情報から、建物改修の基本プランを策定する(ステップS302)。基本プランは、ユーザによって入力された改修内容だけを実施するプランであり、耐震化を目的とした改修を行わないプランである。具体的には、入力された改修部位および建物の平面図、構造図から改修すべき部分(改修規模)を特定し、入力された改修内容をその部分に施すプランを策定する。   Next, the renovation plan formulation unit 41 formulates a basic plan for building renovation from the building information input by the input unit 2 (step S302). The basic plan is a plan that implements only the content of repairs input by the user, and is a plan that does not perform repairs aimed at earthquake resistance. Specifically, a part to be repaired (renovation scale) is specified from the input repair site, the floor plan of the building, and the structure diagram, and a plan for applying the input repair content to the part is formulated.

そして、耐震性評価部42、地震被災リスク評価部43および改修コスト評価部44が、各部に係る指標に関して、ステップS302で策定された基本プランを評価する(ステップS303)。まず、耐震性評価部42は、入力された建物の平面図および構造図から、建物耐震性データ53を参照して基本プランに係る耐震性データを評価する。次に、地震被災リスク評価部43は、ステップS301で入力された建物の所在地および先に評価された建物の耐震性から、地震発生リスクデータ54に基づいて地震被災リスクを評価する。具体的には、地震発生リスクデータ54から建物の所在地を含む地域の地震による揺れの大きさと、その発生確率とを示すデータを読み出す。そして、その建物の耐震性を超える震度の地震が発生する確率を算出する。これにより、当該建物が地震によって被害を受ける確率が分かる。続いて、改修コスト評価部44は、ステップS302で策定された基本プランに係る改修コストを評価する。具体的には、その基本プランから、改修コストデータ56に基づいて、改修部位、改修内容および改修規模に応じた改修コストを評価する。   Then, the earthquake resistance evaluation unit 42, the earthquake damage risk evaluation unit 43, and the repair cost evaluation unit 44 evaluate the basic plan established in step S302 with respect to the indexes related to the respective units (step S303). First, the earthquake resistance evaluation unit 42 evaluates the earthquake resistance data according to the basic plan with reference to the building earthquake resistance data 53 from the input plan view and structure diagram of the building. Next, the earthquake damage risk evaluation unit 43 evaluates the earthquake damage risk based on the earthquake occurrence risk data 54 from the location of the building input in step S301 and the earthquake resistance of the building evaluated earlier. Specifically, data indicating the magnitude of the earthquake caused by the earthquake in the area including the location of the building and the probability of occurrence thereof is read from the earthquake occurrence risk data 54. Then, the probability of an earthquake having a seismic intensity exceeding the earthquake resistance of the building is calculated. As a result, the probability that the building will be damaged by the earthquake is known. Subsequently, the repair cost evaluation unit 44 evaluates the repair cost related to the basic plan formulated in step S302. Specifically, based on the repair cost data 56, the repair cost corresponding to the repair site, the repair content, and the repair scale is evaluated from the basic plan.

続いて、改修プラン策定部41が、入力部2によって入力された建物情報から、建物改修の耐震化プラン(耐震化改修プラン)を策定する(ステップS304)。耐震化プランは、入力された建物情報の改修内容と、その改修部位に関する耐震化とを合わせて実施するプランである。具体的には、入力された改修部位および建物の平面図、構造図から改修すべき部分を特定し、入力された改修内容をその部分に施すとともに、その部分を耐震化するプランを策定する。図2の外壁改修関連データ511で説明したように、1つの改修部位に係る耐震化工法が1つとは限らない。そこで、改修プラン策定部41は、様々な耐震化工法を含む改修プランを策定することができる。例えば、改修部位に係るすべての耐震化工法を含む改修プランであってもよいし、最も耐震性が向上する耐震化工法を数件含む改修プランであってもよい。   Subsequently, the repair plan formulation unit 41 formulates an earthquake resistance plan (earthquake resistance repair plan) for building repair from the building information input by the input unit 2 (step S304). The earthquake resistance plan is a plan that is implemented in accordance with the contents of the repair of the input building information and the earthquake resistance for the repaired part. Specifically, a part to be repaired is specified from the input repair site, the floor plan of the building, and the structural drawing, the input repair content is applied to the part, and a plan for making the part earthquake resistant is formulated. As described in the outer wall repair-related data 511 in FIG. 2, the number of earthquake-resistant construction methods related to one repair site is not necessarily one. Therefore, the repair plan formulation unit 41 can formulate a repair plan including various earthquake-resistant construction methods. For example, it may be a repair plan including all the earthquake resistant construction methods related to the repair site, or may be a repair plan including several earthquake resistant construction methods with the most improved earthquake resistance.

そして、耐震性評価部42、地震被災リスク評価部43および改修コスト評価部44が、各部に係る指標に関して、ステップS304で策定された耐震化プランを評価する(ステップS305)。まず、耐震性評価部42は、入力された建物の平面図および構造図から、建物耐震性データ53を参照して当該建物の耐震性を評価する。また、耐震化プランに含まれる耐震化工法による効果データを、耐震化工法別効果データ52から読み出す。そして、当該建物の耐震性データと、耐震化工法の効果データとから、耐震化プランを施した後の当該建物の耐震性を評価する。次に、地震被災リスク評価部43は、ステップS301で入力された建物の所在地および先に評価された建物の耐震性から、地震発生リスクデータ54に基づいて地震被災リスクを評価する。具体的な評価方法は、ステップS303と同様である。続いて、改修コスト評価部44は、ステップS304で策定された耐震化プランに係る改修コストを評価する。具体的には、その耐震化プランから、耐震化工法別コストデータ55および改修コストデータ56に基づいて、耐震化プランに含まれる耐震化工法に応じた耐震化工法コストならびに改修部位、改修内容および改修規模に応じた改修コストを算出する。そして、その耐震化工法コストおよび改修コストを合計して、全体の改修コストを評価する。   Then, the earthquake resistance evaluation unit 42, the earthquake damage risk evaluation unit 43, and the repair cost evaluation unit 44 evaluate the earthquake resistance plan established in step S304 with respect to the indexes related to the respective units (step S305). First, the earthquake resistance evaluation unit 42 evaluates the earthquake resistance of the building by referring to the building earthquake resistance data 53 from the input plan view and structural diagram of the building. Moreover, the effect data by the earthquake resistance construction method included in the earthquake resistance plan is read from the effect data 52 by the earthquake resistance construction method. And the earthquake resistance of the said building after giving an earthquake resistance plan is evaluated from the earthquake resistance data of the said building and the effect data of an earthquake resistance construction method. Next, the earthquake damage risk evaluation unit 43 evaluates the earthquake damage risk based on the earthquake occurrence risk data 54 from the location of the building input in step S301 and the earthquake resistance of the building evaluated earlier. A specific evaluation method is the same as that in step S303. Subsequently, the repair cost evaluation unit 44 evaluates the repair cost related to the earthquake resistance plan formulated in step S304. Specifically, based on the earthquake resistance plan cost data 55 and the repair cost data 56 from the earthquake resistance plan, the earthquake resistance construction method cost and the repair site, the contents of the repair, and the modification according to the earthquake resistance method included in the earthquake resistance plan The repair cost is calculated according to the repair scale. Then, the seismic retrofitting method cost and the repair cost are totaled to evaluate the total repair cost.

ここで、建物の耐震性を変化させたプランの追加があるか否かを判断する(ステップS306)。これは、ユーザから予め2以上の耐震化プランを提案してほしいといった要望があった場合、または耐震性向上提案装置1として推奨すべき2以上の耐震化プランを提示する場合などに対応するものである。プランの追加があれば(ステップS306のY)、再度ステップS304およびS305の処理を行う。   Here, it is determined whether there is an addition of a plan that changes the earthquake resistance of the building (step S306). This corresponds to a case where the user requests that two or more earthquake resistance plans be proposed in advance, or two or more earthquake resistance plans to be recommended as the earthquake resistance improvement proposing device 1 are presented. It is. If a plan is added (Y in step S306), the processes in steps S304 and S305 are performed again.

プランの追加がなければ(ステップS306のN)、表示部3が、基本プランおよび1以上の耐震化プランを改修プラン案として出力する(ステップS307)。その具体例は後記する。ここで、耐震性向上提案装置1は、ユーザに、表示部3に表示された改修プラン案を参照させて、自らの要望に合致した改修プランを選定させる(ステップS308)。なお、耐震性向上提案装置1が、予め入力されているユーザの要望や予算などに合致した改修プランを選定してもよいし、その選定したプランを表示してユーザに確認させてもよい。そして、耐震性向上提案装置1が、選定された改修プランを最終的な改修プランとして決定する(ステップS309)。なお、耐震性向上提案装置1は、その決定を受けて改修プランの具体化、詳細化を行ってもよい。   If no plan is added (N in Step S306), the display unit 3 outputs the basic plan and one or more earthquake resistance plans as a repair plan proposal (Step S307). Specific examples will be described later. Here, the earthquake resistance improvement proposing apparatus 1 causes the user to refer to the repair plan proposal displayed on the display unit 3 and to select a repair plan that matches his / her request (step S308). In addition, the earthquake resistance improvement proposing apparatus 1 may select a repair plan that matches a user's request or budget that is input in advance, or may display the selected plan and allow the user to confirm. And the earthquake-proof improvement proposal apparatus 1 determines the selected repair plan as a final repair plan (step S309). In addition, the earthquake-proof improvement proposal apparatus 1 may perform the specific and detailed renovation plan in response to the determination.

≪提案画面の例≫
図4は、改修プランを提案する画面の例を示す図である。改修プラン提案画面には、建物についての提案と、設備および家具類についての提案とが表示される。建物についての提案は、図3のステップS307で表示部3に表示される改修プラン案の例である。改修プラン案のうち、改修プラン案Aは、ステップS302で策定され、ステップS303で評価される基本プランに該当する。また、改修プラン案Bおよび改修プラン案Cは、ステップS304で策定され、ステップS305で評価される耐震化プランに該当する。
≪Example of proposal screen≫
FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating an example of a screen for proposing a repair plan. On the repair plan proposal screen, a proposal for a building and a proposal for equipment and furniture are displayed. The proposal for the building is an example of the repair plan proposal displayed on the display unit 3 in step S307 in FIG. Of the repair plan proposals, the repair plan proposal A corresponds to the basic plan that is formulated in step S302 and evaluated in step S303. Further, the repair plan draft B and the repair plan draft C correspond to the earthquake resistance plans that are formulated in step S304 and evaluated in step S305.

これによれば、ユーザは、各プランの耐震性、地震被災リスクおよび改修コストを参照比較しながら、地震対策について検討することができる。特に、建物の耐震性だけでなく、地震被災リスクとして建物が地震の被害を受ける確率も表示されるので、ユーザは、耐震化の必要性、重要性を認識することができ、建物の耐震性向上が促進されることになる。また、基本プランと、耐震化プランとが同時に表示されるので、基本プランから耐震化プランまでの提案を自然にスムーズに行うことができる。   According to this, the user can examine the earthquake countermeasure while referring to and comparing the earthquake resistance, the earthquake damage risk, and the repair cost of each plan. In particular, not only the earthquake resistance of the building but also the probability of the building being damaged by the earthquake is displayed as an earthquake damage risk, so the user can recognize the necessity and importance of earthquake resistance, and the earthquake resistance of the building Improvement will be promoted. In addition, since the basic plan and the earthquake resistance plan are displayed at the same time, proposals from the basic plan to the earthquake resistance plan can be made naturally and smoothly.

設備および家具類についての提案は、図3のフローチャートでは説明していないが、建物についての提案と同様である。その処理の流れを説明すると、まず、記憶部5は、設備および家具類の耐震化対策ならびにその効果およびコスト(設備等耐震化データ)を予め格納しておく。次に、入力部2は、建物情報を入力する場合に、設備および家具類のレイアウト図をさらに入力する。処理部4は、設備および家具類の耐震評価を行う設備等評価部(図示せず)をさらに備える。設備等評価部は、入力部2によって入力されたレイアウト図から、記憶部5の設備等耐震化データおよび地震発生リスクデータ54に基づいて、例えば、耐震化対策しない場合、振れ止めを施した場合、固定を施した場合などの対策案を設定し、各対策案の耐震性、地震被災リスクおよび対策コストを評価する。そして、表示部3は、対策案ごとに、耐震対策、耐震性、地震被災リスクおよび対策コストを表示する。   The proposal for equipment and furniture is not described in the flowchart of FIG. 3, but is the same as the proposal for a building. The flow of the processing will be described. First, the storage unit 5 stores in advance the earthquake resistance measures for equipment and furniture, and the effect and cost (equipment earthquake resistance data). Next, when inputting building information, the input unit 2 further inputs a layout diagram of equipment and furniture. The processing unit 4 further includes a facility evaluation unit (not shown) that performs seismic evaluation of facilities and furniture. The equipment evaluation section, for example, when the earthquake prevention measures are not taken or the steady rest is applied based on the equipment earthquake resistance data and the earthquake occurrence risk data 54 in the storage section 5 from the layout diagram input by the input section 2 Establish countermeasures for fixed cases, etc., and evaluate the earthquake resistance, earthquake damage risk and countermeasure cost of each countermeasure. And the display part 3 displays an earthquake resistance measure, earthquake resistance, an earthquake damage risk, and countermeasure cost for every countermeasure plan.

これによれば、設備および家具類についても耐震性向上の提案を受けることができるので、ユーザは、建物の改修だけでなく、その建物内の設備などの耐震補強も意外に有効であることを認識することができる。実際に地震が発生した場合に、家具類の転倒などによってけがをすることは多い。また、比較的安い対策コストであっても、建物の耐震性や地震被災リスクを改善できるので、耐震対策への動機付けになる。さらに、建物についての提案と、設備および家具類についての提案とを同時に表示することによって、地震被災リスクやコストを比較検討することができ、予算に応じた耐震化向上の計画を立てることができる。   According to this, since it is possible to receive proposals for improving seismic resistance for equipment and furniture, the user is surprised that not only renovation of the building but also seismic reinforcement of equipment in the building is effective. Can be recognized. When an earthquake actually occurs, there are many injuries caused by falling furniture. Moreover, even if the cost of countermeasures is relatively low, it can improve the earthquake resistance of the building and the risk of earthquake damage, which motivates the earthquake countermeasures. Furthermore, by simultaneously displaying proposals for buildings and proposals for equipment and furniture, it is possible to compare earthquake damage risks and costs, and to make plans for improving earthquake resistance according to budget. .

以上本発明の実施の形態について説明したが、図1に示す耐震性向上提案装置1内の各部を機能させるために、処理部4で実行されるプログラムをコンピュータにより読み取り可能な記録媒体に記録し、その記録したプログラムをコンピュータに読み込ませ、実行させることにより、本発明の実施の形態に係る耐震性向上提案装置が実現されるものとする。なお、プログラムをインターネットなどのネットワーク経由でコンピュータに提供してもよいし、プログラムが書き込まれた半導体チップなどをコンピュータに組み込んでもよい。   Although the embodiment of the present invention has been described above, the program executed by the processing unit 4 is recorded on a computer-readable recording medium so that each unit in the earthquake resistance improvement proposing device 1 shown in FIG. Then, the recorded program is read into a computer and executed, whereby the seismic improvement improvement device according to the embodiment of the present invention is realized. Note that the program may be provided to the computer via a network such as the Internet, or a semiconductor chip or the like in which the program is written may be incorporated in the computer.

以上説明した本発明の実施の形態によれば、改修部位ごとに1以上の耐震化工法のデータを有し、その耐震化工法ごとに耐震性向上の効果およびコストのデータを有するため、建物の基本プランに付随して耐震化プランを提示できるので、自然にスムーズに耐震性向上の提案が可能になる。また、基本プランおよび耐震化プランごとに、建物の耐震性、その耐震性に基づく地震被災リスクおよび改修コストが表示されるので、ユーザが地震対策の重要性および費用に関して理解しやすくなり、耐震化を含む改修の機会が増加すると考えられる。さらに、基本プランおよび1以上の耐震化プランを提示できるので、ユーザの要望や予算に応じたきめ細かい対応が可能になる。   According to the embodiment of the present invention described above, since there is one or more earthquake resistance construction method data for each refurbishment site, and each of the earthquake resistance construction methods has data on the effect of improving earthquake resistance and cost data, Since an earthquake resistance plan can be presented along with the basic plan, it is possible to make proposals for improving earthquake resistance naturally and smoothly. In addition, the earthquake resistance of the building, earthquake damage risk based on the earthquake resistance, and the repair cost are displayed for each basic plan and earthquake resistance plan, making it easier for users to understand the importance and cost of earthquake countermeasures and making earthquake resistance. Renovation opportunities including Furthermore, since a basic plan and one or more seismic plans can be presented, detailed response according to the user's request and budget becomes possible.

また、建物だけでなく、設備および家具類の耐震対策について提示できるので、少ない予算でも耐震性向上が可能なことをユーザが知ることができ、地震対策に対する意識付け、きっかけにすることができる。   In addition, since it is possible to present not only buildings but also earthquake resistance measures for equipment and furniture, the user can know that the earthquake resistance can be improved even with a small budget, and can raise awareness and trigger earthquake countermeasures.

さらに、地域ごとに各震度の地震が発生する確率のデータを有し、地震被災リスクとして、改修の対象となる建物の所在地を含む地域で建物の耐震性を超える震度の地震が発生する確率を求めるので、地震によって災害を被る確率を提示することができ、ユーザに地震対策の重要性を実感させることができる。   Furthermore, we have data on the probability of an earthquake of each seismic intensity for each region, and the probability of an earthquake with a seismic intensity exceeding the earthquake resistance of the building in the area including the location of the building subject to renovation as earthquake damage risk. Therefore, the probability of suffering a disaster due to an earthquake can be presented, and the user can feel the importance of earthquake countermeasures.

以上、本発明を実施するための最良の形態について説明したが、上記実施の形態は本発明の理解を容易にするためのものであり、本発明を限定して解釈するためのものではない。本発明はその趣旨を逸脱することなく変更、改良され得るとともに、本発明にはその等価物も含まれる。例えば、以下のような実施の形態が考えられる。   Although the best mode for carrying out the present invention has been described above, the above embodiment is intended to facilitate understanding of the present invention and is not intended to limit the present invention. The present invention can be changed and improved without departing from the gist thereof, and equivalents thereof are also included in the present invention. For example, the following embodiments can be considered.

(1)ユーザが要望する改修による基本プランによっても建物の耐震性が向上する場合があるので、それを建物の耐震性を評価するときに反映してもよい。 (1) Since the earthquake resistance of the building may be improved by the basic plan by the modification requested by the user, this may be reflected when evaluating the earthquake resistance of the building.

(2)前記実施の形態では、図4に示すように、改修プラン案Bや改修プラン案Cの改修内容の欄には、耐震化工法として「柱梁接合部補強」や「筋違補強」といった1つの工法が掲載されているが、各耐震性を満足するように2以上の耐震化工法を組み合わせた改修内容にしてもよい。 (2) In the above embodiment, as shown in FIG. 4, in the column of the repair contents of the repair plan draft B and the repair plan draft C, “column beam joint reinforcement” and “strengthening reinforcement” Although one construction method such as this is published, it may be modified contents that combine two or more seismic construction methods so as to satisfy each earthquake resistance.

本発明の実施の形態に係る耐震性向上提案装置の構成を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the structure of the earthquake-proof improvement proposal apparatus which concerns on embodiment of this invention. 改修部位別耐震化工法データの構成を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the structure of the earthquake-resistant construction method data classified by repair site | part. 耐震性向上提案装置の処理を示すフローチャートである。It is a flowchart which shows the process of an earthquake resistance improvement proposal apparatus. 改修プランを提案する画面の例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the example of the screen which proposes a repair plan.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

1 耐震性向上提案装置
2 入力部 3 表示部
4 処理部 5 記憶部
41 改修プラン策定部 42 耐震性評価部
43 地震被災リスク評価部 44 改修コスト評価部
51 改修部位別耐震化工法データ 52 耐震化工法別効果データ
53 建物耐震性データ 54 地震発生リスクデータ
55 耐震化工法別コストデータ 56 改修コストデータ
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Seismic improvement proposal apparatus 2 Input part 3 Display part 4 Processing part 5 Memory | storage part 41 Renovation plan formulation part 42 Earthquake resistance evaluation part 43 Earthquake damage risk evaluation part 44 Refurbishment cost evaluation part 51 Seismic improvement method data according to repair part 52 Seismic improvement work Effect data by law 53 Seismic data for buildings 54 Risk data for earthquake occurrence 55 Cost data by seismic construction method 56 Refurbishment cost data

Claims (4)

建物を改修する提案に付随して、その建物の耐震性向上を提案する耐震性向上提案装置であって、
改修部位ごとに1以上の耐震化工法を示す改修部位別耐震化工法データ、耐震化工法ごとに耐震性向上の効果を示す耐震化工法別効果データ、建物の図面から建物の耐震性を計算するための建物耐震性データ、地域ごとに各震度の地震が発生する確率を示す地震発生リスクデータ、耐震化工法ごとにコストを示す耐震化工法別コストデータおよび基本改修プランからコストを計算するための改修コストデータを格納する記憶部と、
改修部位、改修内容、建物の図面および建物の所在地を含む建物情報を入力する入力部と、
前記入力部によって入力された改修部位、改修内容および建物の図面から基本改修プランを策定するとともに、その改修部位から、前記改修部位別耐震化工法データに基づいて1以上の耐震化工法を選択し、その耐震化工法および前記基本改修プランを合わせた耐震化改修プランを策定する改修プラン策定部と、
前記建物の図面から、前記建物耐震性データに基づいて前記基本改修プランに係る建物の耐震性を評価するとともに、前記建物の図面および前記改修プラン策定部によって選択された耐震化工法から、前記建物耐震性データおよび前記耐震化工法別効果データに基づいて前記耐震化改修プランに係る建物の耐震性を評価する耐震性評価部と、
前記基本改修プランおよび前記耐震化改修プランごとに、前記地震発生リスクデータから前記建物の所在地を含む地域で発生する地震の震度及びその発生確率を読み出し、前記建物の耐震性を超える震度の地震が発生する確率を算出し、その算出した確率を地震被災リスクとして評価する地震被災リスク評価部と、
前記基本改修プランから、前記改修コストデータに基づいて前記基本改修プランに係る改修コストを評価するとともに、前記耐震化改修プランから、前記改修コストデータおよび前記耐震化工法別コストデータに基づいて前記耐震化改修プランに係る改修コストを評価する改修コスト評価部と、
前記基本改修プランおよび前記耐震化改修プランごとに、前記耐震性評価部によって評価された建物の耐震性、前記地震被災リスク評価部によって評価された地震被災リスクおよび前記改修コスト評価部によって評価された改修コストを表示する表示部と、
を備えることを特徴とする耐震性向上提案装置。
Along with a proposal to renovate a building, an earthquake resistance improvement proposing device that proposes an improvement in the earthquake resistance of the building,
Calculate the earthquake resistance of a building from the earthquake resistance method data for each repair site showing one or more earthquake resistance methods for each repair site, the effect data for each earthquake resistance method showing the effect of improving earthquake resistance for each earthquake resistance method, and the drawing of the building To calculate cost from building earthquake resistance data, earthquake risk data indicating the probability of occurrence of earthquakes of each seismic intensity for each region, cost data by earthquake resistance method indicating cost for each earthquake resistance method, and basic repair plan A storage unit for storing repair cost data;
An input section for entering building information including the repair site, repair details, building drawings and building location;
A basic renovation plan is formulated from the refurbishment site, renovation content and building drawings input by the input unit, and one or more seismic retrofitting methods are selected from the refurbishment site based on the seismic retrofit method data for each refurbishment site. A renovation plan formulation department that formulates a seismic retrofit plan that combines the seismic retrofit method and the basic renovation plan;
From the drawing of the building, the earthquake resistance of the building according to the basic renovation plan is evaluated based on the earthquake resistance data of the building, and from the earthquake resistance construction method selected by the drawing of the building and the renovation plan formulation unit, the building An earthquake resistance evaluation unit for evaluating the earthquake resistance of the building according to the earthquake resistance improvement plan based on the earthquake resistance data and the effect data by the earthquake resistance construction method,
For each of the basic renovation plan and the earthquake resistance renovation plan, before Symbol reading the seismic intensity and the probability of occurrence of earthquakes in the region, including the location of the building from the earthquake risk data, seismic intensity of the earthquake that exceeds the earthquake resistance of the building An earthquake damage risk evaluation unit that calculates the probability of occurrence of an earthquake and evaluates the calculated probability as an earthquake damage risk,
From the basic renovation plan, the renovation cost according to the basic renovation plan is evaluated based on the renovation cost data, and from the seismic retrofit plan, the seismic resistance A renovation cost evaluation unit that evaluates the renovation cost related to the renovation plan,
Each of the basic repair plan and the seismic retrofit plan was evaluated by the earthquake resistance of the building evaluated by the earthquake resistance evaluation unit, the earthquake damage risk evaluated by the earthquake damage risk evaluation unit, and the repair cost evaluation unit A display unit for displaying the repair cost;
A device for suggesting improvement in earthquake resistance, characterized by comprising:
設備および家具類の耐震評価を行う設備等評価部をさらに備え、
前記記憶部は、設備および家具類の耐震化対策ならびにその効果およびコストを示す設備等耐震化データを格納し、
前記入力部は、設備および家具類のレイアウト図をさらに入力し、
前記設備等評価部は、前記入力部によって入力されたレイアウト図から、前記設備等耐震化データおよび前記地震発生リスクデータに基づいて、1以上の対策案を設定し、各対策案に係る設備および家具類の耐震性、地震被災リスクおよび対策コストを評価し、
前記表示部は、前記設備等評価部によって設定された対策案ごとに、設備および家具類の耐震対策、耐震性、地震被災リスクおよび対策コストを表示する
ことを特徴とする請求項1に記載の耐震性向上提案装置
An equipment evaluation section that performs seismic evaluation of equipment and furniture
The storage unit stores earthquake resistance data such as facilities and furniture indicating earthquake resistance measures and the effects and costs thereof,
The input unit further inputs a layout diagram of equipment and furniture,
The facility etc. evaluation unit sets one or more countermeasure plans from the layout diagram input by the input unit based on the earthquake resistance data of the facilities and the earthquake occurrence risk data, Evaluate the earthquake resistance of furniture, earthquake damage risk and countermeasure costs,
2. The display unit according to claim 1, wherein the display unit displays seismic countermeasures, seismic resistance, earthquake damage risk, and countermeasure cost of facilities and furniture for each countermeasure plan set by the facility evaluation unit. Seismic improvement proposal device .
建物を改修する提案に付随して、その建物の耐震性向上を提案する耐震性向上提案方法であって、
改修部位ごとに1 以上の耐震化工法を示す改修部位別耐震化工法データ、耐震化工法ごとに耐震性向上の効果を示す耐震化工法別効果データ、建物の図面から建物の耐震性を計算するための建物耐震性データ、地域ごとに各震度の地震が発生する確率を示す地震発生リスクデータ、耐震化工法ごとにコストを示す耐震化工法別コストデータおよび基本改修プランからコストを計算するための改修コストデータを格納する記憶部を備えるコンピュータが、
改修部位、改修内容、建物の図面および建物の所在地を含む建物情報を入力する第1のステップと、
前記入力された改修部位、改修内容および建物の図面から基本改修プランを策定するとともに、その改修部位から、前記改修部位別耐震化工法データに基づいて1 以上の耐震化工法を選択し、その耐震化工法および前記基本改修プランを合わせた耐震化改修プランを策定する第2のステップと、
前記建物の図面から、前記建物耐震性データに基づいて前記基本改修プランに係る建物の耐震性を評価するとともに、前記建物の図面および前記選択された耐震化工法から、前記建物耐震性データおよび前記耐震化工法別効果データに基づいて前記耐震化改修プランに係る建物の耐震性を評価する第3のステップと、
前記基本改修プランおよび前記耐震化改修プランごとに、前記地震発生リスクデータから前記建物の所在地を含む地域で発生する地震の震度及びその発生確率を読み出し、前記建物の耐震性を超える震度の地震が発生する確率を算出し、その算出した確率を地震被災リスクとして評価する第4のステップと、
前記基本改修プランから、前記改修コストデータに基づいて前記基本改修プランに係る改修コストを評価するとともに、前記耐震化改修プランから、前記改修コストデータおよび前記耐震化工法別コストデータに基づいて前記耐震化改修プランに係る改修コストを評価する第5のステップと、
前記基本改修プランおよび前記耐震化改修プランごとに、前記評価された建物の耐震性、地震被災リスクおよび改修コストを表示する第6のステップと、
を含んで実行することを特徴とする耐震性向上提案方法。
Along with the proposal to renovate the building, there is an earthquake resistance improvement proposing method that proposes to improve the earthquake resistance of the building,
Calculate the earthquake resistance of a building from the earthquake resistance method data for each repair site showing one or more earthquake resistance methods for each repair site, the effect data for each earthquake resistance method showing the effect of improving earthquake resistance for each earthquake resistance method, and the drawing of the building To calculate cost from building earthquake resistance data, earthquake risk data indicating the probability of occurrence of earthquakes of each seismic intensity for each region, cost data by earthquake resistance method indicating cost for each earthquake resistance method, and basic repair plan A computer having a storage unit for storing renovation cost data,
A first step of entering building information including a refurbishment site, renovation content, building drawings and building location;
In addition to formulating a basic renovation plan from the input refurbishment site, renovation content, and building drawings, one or more seismic construction methods are selected from the refurbishment site based on the seismic construction method data for each refurbishment site. A second step of formulating an earthquake-resistant repair plan that combines the chemical method and the basic repair plan;
From the drawing of the building, evaluating the earthquake resistance of the building according to the basic renovation plan based on the building earthquake resistance data, and from the drawing of the building and the selected earthquake resistance construction method, the building earthquake resistance data and the A third step of evaluating the earthquake resistance of the building according to the earthquake resistance improvement plan based on the effect data by the earthquake resistance method;
For each of the basic renovation plan and the earthquake resistance renovation plan, before Symbol reading the seismic intensity and the probability of occurrence of earthquakes in the region, including the location of the building from the earthquake risk data, seismic intensity of the earthquake that exceeds the earthquake resistance of the building A fourth step of calculating a probability of occurrence of the earthquake and evaluating the calculated probability as an earthquake damage risk ;
From the basic renovation plan, the renovation cost according to the basic renovation plan is evaluated based on the renovation cost data, and from the seismic retrofit plan, the seismic resistance A fifth step of evaluating the renovation cost related to the renovation plan,
A sixth step of displaying, for each of the basic renovation plan and the seismic retrofit plan, the earthquake resistance, earthquake damage risk, and renovation cost of the evaluated building;
A method for proposing an improvement in earthquake resistance, characterized by comprising
前記記憶部は、設備および家具類の耐震化対策ならびにその効果およびコストを示す設備等耐震化データを格納し、
前記コンピュータは、
前記第1のステップでは、設備および家具類のレイアウト図をさらに入力し、
前記第1のステップと前記第6 のステップとの間に、前記入力されたレイアウト図から、前記設備等耐震化データおよび前記地震発生リスクデータに基づいて、1 以上の対策案を設定し、各対策案に係る設備および家具類の耐震性、地震被災リスクおよび対策コストを評価するステップをさらに実行し、
前記第6のステップでは、前記設定された対策案ごとに、設備および家具類の耐震対策、耐震性、地震被災リスクおよび対策コストをさらに表示する
ことを特徴とする請求項に記載の耐震性向上提案方法
The storage unit stores earthquake resistance data such as facilities and furniture indicating earthquake resistance measures and the effects and costs thereof,
The computer
In the first step, a layout diagram of equipment and furniture is further input,
Between the first step and the sixth step, one or more countermeasure plans are set based on the facility seismic data and the earthquake risk data from the input layout diagram, Further executing the step of evaluating the earthquake resistance, earthquake damage risk and countermeasure cost of equipment and furniture related to the countermeasure plan,
The earthquake resistance according to claim 3 , wherein in the sixth step, earthquake resistance measures, earthquake resistance, earthquake damage risk, and countermeasure costs of equipment and furniture are further displayed for each of the set countermeasure plans. Improvement proposal method .
JP2006052478A 2006-02-28 2006-02-28 Seismic improvement proposal device and seismic improvement proposal method Expired - Fee Related JP4716899B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2006052478A JP4716899B2 (en) 2006-02-28 2006-02-28 Seismic improvement proposal device and seismic improvement proposal method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2006052478A JP4716899B2 (en) 2006-02-28 2006-02-28 Seismic improvement proposal device and seismic improvement proposal method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2007233553A JP2007233553A (en) 2007-09-13
JP4716899B2 true JP4716899B2 (en) 2011-07-06

Family

ID=38554108

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2006052478A Expired - Fee Related JP4716899B2 (en) 2006-02-28 2006-02-28 Seismic improvement proposal device and seismic improvement proposal method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4716899B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP4681596B2 (en) * 2007-12-11 2011-05-11 東芝Itサービス株式会社 Rack seismic system
JP2009145995A (en) * 2007-12-11 2009-07-02 Toshiba It Service Kk Base-isolating device installation floor evaluation system
JP2010198099A (en) * 2009-02-23 2010-09-09 Toshiba It Service Kk Automatic diagnostic system for server room optimization

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP3765007B2 (en) * 2001-11-12 2006-04-12 株式会社竹中工務店 Renovation cost evaluation method based on building seismic performance evaluation value
JP2005346576A (en) * 2004-06-04 2005-12-15 Ohbayashi Corp Earthquake-proof service support system for building, and method, computer program and its media

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2007233553A (en) 2007-09-13

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Welch et al. Developing direct displacement-based procedures for simplified loss assessment in performance-based earthquake engineering
Gallo et al. Assessment of multi-criteria evaluation procedures for identification of optimal seismic retrofitting strategies for existing RC buildings
Bhosale et al. New seismic vulnerability index for vertically irregular buildings
Padalu et al. An overview of performance-based seismic design framework for reinforced concrete frame buildings
JP4005004B2 (en) Earthquake damage prediction apparatus, earthquake damage prediction method, and earthquake damage prediction program
JP2008276474A (en) Seismic performance diagnostic method and seismic performance diagnostic program for building
Forcellini et al. A framework to quantify the impact of deterioration on the seismic resilience of structures
Nanazawa et al. Development of partial factor design method on bearing capacity of pile foundations for Japanese specifications for highway bridges
Badal et al. A framework to incorporate probabilistic performance in force-based seismic design of RC buildings as per Indian standards
Kosič et al. Dispersions for the pushover‐based risk assessment of reinforced concrete frames and cantilever walls
Amirsardari et al. Seismic fragility assessment of non-ductile reinforced concrete buildings in Australia
Franke et al. Practical considerations regarding the probability of liquefaction in engineering design
JP4716899B2 (en) Seismic improvement proposal device and seismic improvement proposal method
Ji et al. Inelastic displacement ratios for SDOF structures subjected to earthquake-tsunami loadings
Derakhshan et al. Suitability of height amplification factors for seismic assessment of existing unreinforced masonry components
Esquivel et al. Earthquake resilience of spatially distributed building clusters: Methodology and application
Chiu et al. Analysis of lifetime losses of low-rise reinforced concrete buildings attacked by corrosion and earthquakes using a novel method
JP5725872B2 (en) Renovation method proposal system
Chiu et al. A novel lifetime cost-benefit analysis method for seismic retrofitting of low-rise reinforced concrete buildings
Hickey et al. Loss impact factors for lifetime seismic loss assessment of steel concentrically braced frames designed to EC8
Hart et al. An alternative procedure for seismic evaluation and strengthening of tall buildings
JP4533369B2 (en) Earthquake damage prediction device and earthquake damage prediction program
Shapiro et al. NEHRP guidelines and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings
Chiu Reliability-based service life assessment for deteriorating reinforced concrete buildings considering the effect of cumulative damage
Prakash et al. Towards damage-based design approach for RC bridge columns under combined loadings using damage index models

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20080905

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20101012

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20101202

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20110322

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20110329

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 4716899

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20140408

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20140408

Year of fee payment: 3

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees