Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP4850657B2 - β-type titanium alloy - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP4850657B2 - β-type titanium alloy - Google Patents

β-type titanium alloy Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP4850657B2
JP4850657B2 JP2006291136A JP2006291136A JP4850657B2 JP 4850657 B2 JP4850657 B2 JP 4850657B2 JP 2006291136 A JP2006291136 A JP 2006291136A JP 2006291136 A JP2006291136 A JP 2006291136A JP 4850657 B2 JP4850657 B2 JP 4850657B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
mass
titanium alloy
type titanium
heat treatment
aging heat
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP2006291136A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2008106317A (en
Inventor
一浩 高橋
秀樹 藤井
健一 森
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Nippon Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nippon Steel Corp filed Critical Nippon Steel Corp
Priority to JP2006291136A priority Critical patent/JP4850657B2/en
Publication of JP2008106317A publication Critical patent/JP2008106317A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4850657B2 publication Critical patent/JP4850657B2/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Landscapes

  • Golf Clubs (AREA)
  • Heat Treatment Of Steel (AREA)

Description

本発明は、β型チタン合金に関する。   The present invention relates to a β-type titanium alloy.

β型チタン合金は、V,Moなどのβ型安定化元素を添加して、室温で安定なβ相を残留させたチタン合金である。β型チタン合金は、冷間加工性に優れており、かつ時効熱処理によってα相が微細析出し、引張強度で約1400MPaの高強度が得られるとともに、比較的ヤング率が低いことから、ばね、ゴルフクラブヘッド、ファスナーなど様々な用途に適用されている。   The β-type titanium alloy is a titanium alloy in which a β-type stabilizing element such as V or Mo is added to leave a β phase that is stable at room temperature. The β-type titanium alloy is excellent in cold workability, and the α phase is finely precipitated by aging heat treatment, a high strength of about 1400 MPa is obtained in tensile strength, and the Young's modulus is relatively low. It is applied to various uses such as golf club heads and fasteners.

従来からのβ型チタン合金は、Ti−15質量%V−3質量%Cr−3質量%Sn−3質量%Al(以降、質量%の記載は省略する)、Ti−13V−11Cr−3Al、Ti−3Al−8V−6Cr−4Mo−4Zrが代表的なものである。   The conventional β-type titanium alloys are Ti-15 mass% V-3 mass% Cr-3 mass% Sn-3 mass% Al (hereinafter, description of mass% is omitted), Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al, Ti-3Al-8V-6Cr-4Mo-4Zr is a typical one.

これに対して、比較的安価なβ型安定化元素であるFeを添加したβ型チタン合金が提案されている。   On the other hand, a β-type titanium alloy to which Fe, which is a relatively inexpensive β-type stabilizing element, has been proposed.

特許文献1に記載の発明は、Ti−Al−Fe−Mo系のβ型チタン合金で、Moeq(Mo当量)を16より大きくしたもので、その代表的な組成は、Alが1〜2質量%、Feが4〜5質量%、Moが4〜7質量%、Oが0.25質量%以下である。   The invention described in Patent Document 1 is a Ti-Al-Fe-Mo-based β-type titanium alloy having a Moeq (Mo equivalent) larger than 16, and a typical composition thereof is that Al is 1 to 2 mass. %, Fe is 4 to 5% by mass, Mo is 4 to 7% by mass, and O is 0.25% by mass or less.

特許文献2、特許文献3、特許文献4に記載の発明は、Ti−Al−Fe−Cr系のβ型チタン合金で、VやMoが添加されておらず、質量%で、Feが各々、1〜4%、8.8%以下(但し、Fe+0.6Crが6〜10)、5%以下、Crが各々、6〜13%、2〜12%(但し、Fe+0.6Crが6〜10)、10〜20%の範囲である。   The inventions described in Patent Document 2, Patent Document 3, and Patent Document 4 are Ti-Al-Fe-Cr-based β-type titanium alloys, to which V and Mo are not added, and in mass%, Fe is 1-4%, 8.8% or less (However, Fe + 0.6Cr is 6 to 10), 5% or less, Cr is 6-13%, 2-12% respectively (Fe + 0.6Cr is 6-10) 10 to 20% of range.

特許文献5、特許文献6、特許文献7に記載の発明は、各々、Ti−Al−Fe−Cr−V−Mo−Zr系、Ti−Al−Fe−Cr−V−Sn系、Ti−Al−Fe−Cr−V−Mo系のβ型チタン合金である。いずれも、FeとCrがともに添加されており、かつV、Moの両者あるいはどちらか一方が含有されている。さらに、特許文献5、特許文献6では、各々、2〜6質量%のZr,2〜5質量%のSnが添加されている。   The inventions described in Patent Document 5, Patent Document 6, and Patent Document 7 are respectively Ti-Al-Fe-Cr-V-Mo-Zr system, Ti-Al-Fe-Cr-V-Sn system, Ti-Al system. -Fe-Cr-V-Mo based β-type titanium alloy. In both cases, Fe and Cr are both added, and both or one of V and Mo is contained. Furthermore, in patent document 5 and patent document 6, 2-6 mass% Zr and 2-5 mass% Sn are added, respectively.

特許第2859102号公報Japanese Patent No. 2859102 特開平03−61341号公報Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 03-61341 特開2002−235133号公報JP 2002-235133 A 特開2005−60821号公報JP 2005-60821 A 特開2005−154850号公報JP 2005-154850 A 特開2004−270009号公報JP 2004-270009 A 特開2006−111934号公報JP 2006-111934 A

上述したように、特許文献1〜7は、比較的安価なβ型安定化元素であるFeやCrを添加したβ型チタン合金である。   As described above, Patent Documents 1 to 7 are β-type titanium alloys to which Fe and Cr, which are relatively inexpensive β-type stabilizing elements, are added.

しかしながら、安価なβ安定化元素であるFeは、溶解工程の凝固時に偏析しやすいことから、特許文献1(Ti−Al−Fe−Mo系)ではFeを4〜5質量%も含んでおり、4質量%を超えて多量に添加すると成分偏析によって、材質特性や時効硬化特性にばらつきが発生する可能性が高まってしまう。また、特許文献1は、Vを含有していない。   However, since Fe, which is an inexpensive β-stabilizing element, easily segregates during solidification in the dissolution process, Patent Document 1 (Ti—Al—Fe—Mo system) contains 4 to 5% by mass of Fe, If it is added in a large amount exceeding 4% by mass, the possibility of variation in material properties and age-hardening properties increases due to component segregation. Moreover, patent document 1 does not contain V.

特許文献2,特許文献3,特許文献4では、Feの他に比較的安価なβ安定化元素であるCrが多量に使用されており、V,Moともに添加されていない。CrはFeと同様な傾向に成分偏析することから、β安定化元素がFeとCrのみで、かつこれらが多量に添加されているこれらのβ型チタン合金でも、成分偏析によって材質特性や時効硬化特性にばらつきが発生し、強度の高い領域と低い領域が生じて、それら領域間での強度の差が大きい場合、その材料をコイル状スプリングなどのばねに適用した場合、強度の低い領域が、疲労破壊の起点となって寿命が低くなる可能性が高まる。特許文献5、特許文献6、特許文献7は、Ti−Al−Fe−Cr−V−Mo系をベースとしており、VとMoが単独あるいは両者とも添加されている。特許文献5、特許文献6、特許文献7ともに、偏析しやすいFeとCrがともに添加されており、その合計した量に対して、Moが6質量%以下と低く、成分偏析の低減効果が十分ではない。なお、特許文献6にはMoが添加されていない。   In Patent Document 2, Patent Document 3, and Patent Document 4, a relatively inexpensive β-stabilizing element Cr is used in addition to Fe, and neither V nor Mo is added. Since Cr segregates in the same tendency as Fe, even in these β-type titanium alloys in which the β-stabilizing elements are only Fe and Cr and a large amount of these are added, the material properties and age hardening are caused by component segregation. When variations occur in the characteristics, a region with high strength and a region with low strength are generated, and the difference in strength between these regions is large, when the material is applied to a spring such as a coil spring, the region with low strength is The possibility that the fatigue life becomes the starting point of the fatigue failure is increased. Patent Literature 5, Patent Literature 6, and Patent Literature 7 are based on a Ti—Al—Fe—Cr—V—Mo system, and V and Mo are added alone or both. In both Patent Document 5, Patent Document 6, and Patent Document 7, both Fe and Cr that are easily segregated are added, and Mo is as low as 6% by mass or less with respect to the total amount, and the effect of reducing component segregation is sufficient. is not. In Patent Document 6, Mo is not added.

加えて、β型チタン合金は時効熱処理によって高強度化できるが、8〜24時間の時効熱処理では、引張強度が必ずしも1400MPa以上にならないものもあり、1400MPa以上の強度でも延性が低いといった課題がある。   In addition, the β-type titanium alloy can be strengthened by aging heat treatment, but the aging heat treatment for 8 to 24 hours does not always have a tensile strength of 1400 MPa or more, and there is a problem that ductility is low even at a strength of 1400 MPa or more. .

また、特許文献6には中性元素(α安定化でもβ安定化でもない元素)であるSnが2〜5質量%も含有されている。このSnは周期律表からわかるように原子量が118.69と、同じ中性元素であるZrが91.22であるのに対して大きく、チタン合金の密度をより高めてしまう。軽量化(高比強度化)を目的としてチタン合金が適用されている用途(ばね、ゴルフクラブヘッド、ファスナーなど)では、Snの添加を避ける方が有利である。   Patent Document 6 also contains 2 to 5% by mass of Sn, which is a neutral element (an element that is neither α-stabilized nor β-stabilized). As can be seen from the periodic table, Sn has a large atomic weight of 118.69, whereas Zr, which is the same neutral element, is 91.22, and it further increases the density of the titanium alloy. In applications where a titanium alloy is applied for the purpose of weight reduction (high specific strength) (springs, golf club heads, fasteners, etc.), it is advantageous to avoid the addition of Sn.

さらに、β型チタン合金は強度を高めるために時効熱処理によってα相を析出させると、ヤング率が高まってしまい、β型チタン合金の特徴である低いヤング率を十分に活かすことができなくなる。これは、β相に比べて、α相の方が20〜30%程度、ヤング率が大きいことが原因である。比較的低いヤング率を維持しながら、高い強度を得るためには、ベースとなる時効熱処理前の強度を高めて時効熱処理によるα相の析出量を少なく抑えることが必要である。   Further, when the α-phase is precipitated by aging heat treatment to increase the strength of the β-type titanium alloy, the Young's modulus increases, and the low Young's modulus, which is a feature of the β-type titanium alloy, cannot be fully utilized. This is because the α phase is about 20 to 30% and the Young's modulus is larger than the β phase. In order to obtain a high strength while maintaining a relatively low Young's modulus, it is necessary to increase the strength before the aging heat treatment as a base to suppress the precipitation amount of the α phase by the aging heat treatment.

以上のことから、本発明は、添加元素とその組成を制御することによって、比較的安価なβ安定化元素であるFeを多く添加した場合に生じる成分偏析の影響を抑制して、安定した時効材質特性を有するTi−Al−Fe−V−Mo系とTi−Al−Fe−V−Mo−Zr系のβ型チタン合金を提供することを目的とするものである。本発明のβ型チタン合金を、自動車や二輪車のコイル状スプリングなどのばね、ゴルフクラブヘッド、ボルトやナットなどのファスナー類等の素材として適用することによって、安定した材質特性を有する製品を提供することを目的とするものである。   From the above, the present invention controls the additive element and its composition to suppress the influence of component segregation that occurs when a large amount of Fe, which is a relatively inexpensive β-stabilizing element, is added. An object of the present invention is to provide Ti-Al-Fe-V-Mo and Ti-Al-Fe-V-Mo-Zr-based β-type titanium alloys having material properties. By applying the β-type titanium alloy of the present invention as a material for a spring such as a coiled spring of an automobile or a motorcycle, a golf club head, or a fastener such as a bolt or nut, a product having stable material characteristics is provided. It is for the purpose.

さらには、高強度でありながら低いヤング率を得やすくするために、本発明のβ型チタン合金において、時効熱処理前の強度を高めたTi−Al−Fe−V−Mo系とTi−Al−Fe−V−Mo−Zr系のβ型チタン合金を提供することを目的とするものである。   Furthermore, in order to make it easy to obtain a low Young's modulus while having high strength, in the β-type titanium alloy of the present invention, the Ti—Al—Fe—V—Mo system and Ti—Al— with increased strength before aging heat treatment are used. An object of the present invention is to provide a Fe-V-Mo-Zr-based β-type titanium alloy.

上記課題を解決するための本発明の要旨は、以下のとおりである。
(1)質量%で、Alを2〜5%、Feを2.5〜4.5%、Vを6〜10%、Moを6.5〜10%となる範囲で含有し、〔1〕式の酸素等量Qが0.15〜0.30であり、残部がTiおよび不可避的不純物からなるβ型チタン合金。
酸素等量Q=[O]+2.77[N] ・・・〔1〕式
ここで、[O]はO含有量(質量%)、[N]はN含有量(質量%)である。
(2)さらに、質量%でZrを2〜6%となる範囲で含有することを特徴とする前記(1)記載のβ型チタン合金。
)前記(1)又は(2)に記載のβ型チタン合金を加工硬化させたままの加工品。
(4)質量%で、Alを2〜5%、Feを2.5〜4.5%、Vを6〜10%、Moを6.5〜10%となる範囲で含有し、残部がTiおよび不可避的不純物からなるβ型チタン合金を加工硬化させたままの加工品。
(5)さらに前記β型チタン合金が、質量%でZrを2〜6%となる範囲で含有する前記(4)記載のβ型チタン合金を加工硬化させたままの加工品。
The gist of the present invention for solving the above problems is as follows.
(1) By mass%, Al is contained in a range of 2 to 5%, Fe is 2.5 to 4.5%, V is 6 to 10%, and Mo is 6.5 to 10%. [1] A β-type titanium alloy having an oxygen equivalent Q in the formula of 0.15 to 0.30 and the balance of Ti and inevitable impurities.
Equivalent oxygen Q = [O] +2.77 [N] (1) formula
Here, [O] is the O content (mass%), and [N] is the N content (mass%).
(2) The β-type titanium alloy according to (1), further containing Zr in a range of 2 to 6% by mass.
( 3 ) A processed product obtained by work-hardening the β-type titanium alloy according to (1) or (2) .
(4) By mass%, Al is contained in a range of 2 to 5%, Fe is 2.5 to 4.5%, V is 6 to 10%, Mo is 6.5 to 10%, and the balance is Ti. And a processed product that has been work-hardened β-type titanium alloy composed of inevitable impurities.
(5) Further, the processed product of the β-type titanium alloy according to (4), wherein the β-type titanium alloy contains Zr in a range of 2 to 6% by mass.

ここで、(4)の「加工硬化させたままの加工品」とは、圧延や伸線、鍛造、プレス成形などの加工が加わったままの状態の板、棒線、その他成形加工品のことであり、焼鈍ままの状態に比べて高強度となっている。   Here, (4) “work-hardened product” refers to plates, rods, and other molded products that have been subjected to processing such as rolling, wire drawing, forging, and press molding. The strength is higher than that in the annealed state.

本発明によって、比較的安価なβ安定化元素であるFeを多く添加した場合に生じる成分偏析の影響を抑制したTi−Al−Fe−V−Mo系とTi−Al−Fe−V−Mo−Zr系のβ型チタン合金を提供できる。これによって、ばね、ゴルフクラブヘッド、ファスナー等に代表される種々用途において、比較的に安価な添加元素であるFeを活用したβ型チタン合金においても安定した製品材質特性を得ることができる。さらには、高強度でありながら低いヤング率を得やすくするために、本発明のβ型チタン合金において、時効熱処理前の強度を高めたβ型チタン合金を提供できる。   According to the present invention, the Ti—Al—Fe—V—Mo system and the Ti—Al—Fe—V—Mo— which suppress the influence of component segregation that occurs when a large amount of Fe, which is a relatively inexpensive β-stabilizing element, is added. A Zr-based β-type titanium alloy can be provided. This makes it possible to obtain stable product material characteristics even in a β-type titanium alloy utilizing Fe, which is a relatively inexpensive additive element, in various applications represented by springs, golf club heads, fasteners and the like. Furthermore, in order to make it easy to obtain a low Young's modulus while having high strength, it is possible to provide a β-type titanium alloy having increased strength before aging heat treatment in the β-type titanium alloy of the present invention.

本発明者らは、β安定化元素として、比較的安価なFeを多く含有させても、かつV,Moの両者を各々所定量〜10質量%含有させることによって、成分偏析の影響を抑制し安定した時効材質特性を達成できることを見出し、本発明に至った。さらには、〔1〕式の酸素当量Q(=[O]+2.77[N])を0.15〜0.30にすること、或いは加工硬化ままの状態にすること、またはその両方を施すことによって、時効熱処理前の引張強度をさらに高めることができることを見出した。このように、時効熱処理前の引張強度を高めることによって、比較的低いヤング率を維持しながら時効熱処理によって高い引張強度を達成できる。   The present inventors suppress the influence of component segregation by containing a relatively low amount of Fe as a β-stabilizing element and by containing both V and Mo in a predetermined amount to 10% by mass. The present inventors have found that stable aging material characteristics can be achieved, leading to the present invention. Further, the oxygen equivalent Q (= [O] +2.77 [N]) of the formula [1] is set to 0.15 to 0.30, or the work hardening state is left, or both. It has been found that the tensile strength before aging heat treatment can be further increased. Thus, by increasing the tensile strength before aging heat treatment, high tensile strength can be achieved by aging heat treatment while maintaining a relatively low Young's modulus.

以下に本発明の各要素の設定根拠について説明する。   The basis for setting each element of the present invention will be described below.

Alはα安定化元素であり、時効熱処理時のα相の析出を促進させることから、析出強化に寄与する。Alが2質量%未満ではα相の析出強化への寄与が過小であり、一方で5質量%を超えると優れた冷間加工性が得られなくなる。そのため、本発明ではAlを2〜5質量%の範囲とする。冷間加工性を重視した場合、2〜4質量%のAlが好ましい。   Al is an α-stabilizing element and promotes precipitation of α-phase during aging heat treatment, thus contributing to precipitation strengthening. If the Al content is less than 2% by mass, the contribution to the precipitation strengthening of the α phase is too small, while if it exceeds 5% by mass, excellent cold workability cannot be obtained. Therefore, in this invention, Al is made into the range of 2-5 mass%. When emphasizing cold workability, 2 to 4% by mass of Al is preferable.

β安定化元素として、Feの他に、VとMoの両方を所定量添加することよって、成分偏析の影響を緩和できる。Vは凝固時の偏析が小さくほぼ均一に分布し、MoはFeと逆な傾向に濃度分配する。つまり、Mo濃度が高い部位ではFeの濃度が低く、Mo濃度が低い部位ではその逆となる。このように、均一に分布するVをベースとしてβ相の安定度を担保し、且つMoによってFeの偏析の影響を緩和することができる。これによって、成分偏析の影響は抑制されて比較的安価なFeを多く添加することが可能になる。   By adding a predetermined amount of both V and Mo in addition to Fe as a β-stabilizing element, the influence of component segregation can be mitigated. V has a small segregation during solidification and is distributed almost uniformly, and Mo is concentration-distributed in a tendency opposite to that of Fe. In other words, the Fe concentration is low at the site where the Mo concentration is high, and vice versa at the site where the Mo concentration is low. In this way, the stability of the β phase can be ensured based on the uniformly distributed V, and the influence of Fe segregation can be mitigated by Mo. Thereby, the influence of component segregation is suppressed, and it becomes possible to add much relatively inexpensive Fe.

ここで、成分偏析の程度は、α相を析出させる時効熱処理後の断面をエッチングした組織を観察することによって、判定できる。β安定化元素の偏析によって、α相の析出速度やその量が異なるため、偏析部位によって金属組織に差異が現れる。図1は、β型チタン合金において、β相安定化元素の一方的な偏析によって微細なα相析出量分布の偏在が著しく生じた例であり、図2は、β型チタン合金において、β相安定化元素の配合の工夫によって微細なα相析出量分布の偏在を抑えた例を示す。図1、2共に、熱間圧延したβ型チタン合金製の棒をβ単相域で溶体化焼鈍した後、500℃で24時間の時効熱処理を施した場合の例である。図1、図2とも、棒のL断面(棒の長手方向に平行な断面)を研磨した後に、チタン用のエッチング液(フッ化水素酸と硝酸を含有)に浸漬して、組織を観察しやすくしている。図1は、成分偏析の影響が大きく現れ、α相の析出量が少ない部分(暗灰色の領域に挟まれた明灰色のバンド)と多い部分(暗灰色の領域)が目視でも明瞭に識別できる。この暗灰色の領域はα相が多く微細に析出していることから硬く、一方で明灰色の領域はこれに比べて柔らかく、図1の例では暗灰色の領域のビッカース硬さが約440であるのに対して明灰色のバンド内は約105ポイントも低い値である。これは、上述したようにβ安定化元素の偏析に起因した現象であり、当然ながら材質へも多大に影響する。一方、図2((a),(b),(c))は、図1のような明灰色の粗大な領域は見えず、ほぼ均一にα相が析出している例である。なお、図2の(a),(b),(c)の各断面内で、ビッカース硬さをランダムに6点測定すると、その値の幅は10〜20程度で図1の例に比べて非常に小さい。本発明では、この判定方法を用いており、以降、「偏析判定法」と呼ぶ。なお、上記のビッカース硬さは荷重9.8Nで測定した。   Here, the degree of component segregation can be determined by observing the structure obtained by etching the cross section after the aging heat treatment for precipitating the α phase. Due to the segregation of the β-stabilizing element, the precipitation rate and amount of the α-phase are different, and therefore a difference appears in the metal structure depending on the segregation site. FIG. 1 is an example in which the uneven distribution of the fine α-phase precipitation amount is significantly caused by unilateral segregation of the β-phase stabilizing element in the β-type titanium alloy, and FIG. 2 shows the β-phase in the β-type titanium alloy. An example in which the uneven distribution of the fine α-phase precipitation distribution is suppressed by devising the composition of the stabilizing element will be shown. FIGS. 1 and 2 both show examples in which a hot-rolled β-type titanium alloy bar is solution annealed in the β single phase region and then subjected to aging heat treatment at 500 ° C. for 24 hours. 1 and 2, after polishing the L cross section of the rod (cross section parallel to the longitudinal direction of the rod), the rod was immersed in an etching solution for titanium (containing hydrofluoric acid and nitric acid), and the structure was observed. It is easy. In FIG. 1, the effect of component segregation appears greatly, and a portion where the precipitation amount of α phase is small (a light gray band sandwiched between dark gray regions) and a portion where a large amount (dark gray region) can be clearly identified visually. . This dark gray region is hard because there is a lot of α phase and finely precipitated, while the light gray region is softer than this, and in the example of FIG. 1, the Vickers hardness of the dark gray region is about 440. On the other hand, the value in the light gray band is as low as about 105 points. This is a phenomenon caused by the segregation of the β-stabilizing element as described above, and naturally has a great influence on the material. On the other hand, FIG. 2 ((a), (b), (c)) is an example in which the light gray coarse area as shown in FIG. In addition, when 6 points of Vickers hardness are measured at random within each cross section of (a), (b), and (c) of FIG. 2, the width of the value is about 10 to 20, compared with the example of FIG. Very small. In the present invention, this determination method is used, and is hereinafter referred to as “segregation determination method”. The Vickers hardness was measured with a load of 9.8N.

偏析判定法で評価した結果、質量%で、Alが2〜5%のとき、Feが1〜4.5%,Vが6〜10%,Moが6.5〜10%の範囲で、成分偏析の影響を非常に小さくすることができる。一方で、時効熱処理後の引張特性において、良好な強度−延性バランスとするために、Feを2.5質量%以上添加する必要がある。Fe濃度が2.5質量%未満と低い場合には、成分偏析の影響は低減される傾向にあるものの、時効熱処理後の強度−延性バランスにおいて、24時間以下の時効熱処理では引張強度が1400MPa以上にならず、伸びも10%に及ばない。Feを2.5質量%以上添加することによって、時効材質を向上させることができ、1400MPa以上の引張強度と10%以上の伸びが得られる。   As a result of evaluation by the segregation judgment method, when Al is 2 to 5% by mass, Fe is 1 to 4.5%, V is 6 to 10%, Mo is 6.5 to 10%. The effect of segregation can be greatly reduced. On the other hand, in order to obtain a good strength-ductility balance in the tensile properties after aging heat treatment, it is necessary to add 2.5% by mass or more of Fe. When the Fe concentration is less than 2.5% by mass, the influence of component segregation tends to be reduced. However, in the strength-ductility balance after the aging heat treatment, the tensile strength is 1400 MPa or more in the aging heat treatment for 24 hours or less. The growth is not as high as 10%. By adding 2.5 mass% or more of Fe, an aging material can be improved, and a tensile strength of 1400 MPa or more and an elongation of 10% or more can be obtained.

したがって、本発明の請求項1では、質量%で、Alが2〜5%、Feが2.5〜4.5%,Vが6〜10%、Moが6.5〜10%の範囲とした。なお、Fe,Mo,Vが上記下限未満の場合には、安定したβ相が得られない場合がある。一方、比較的高価なV,Moは上限を超えて過度に添加する必要はなく、Feはその上限を超えると成分偏析の影響が顕在化する場合がある。   Therefore, in claim 1 of the present invention, the mass ranges from 2 to 5%, Fe from 2.5 to 4.5%, V from 6 to 10%, and Mo from 6.5 to 10%. did. In addition, when Fe, Mo, and V are less than the lower limit, a stable β phase may not be obtained. On the other hand, comparatively expensive V and Mo do not need to be added excessively beyond the upper limit, and if Fe exceeds the upper limit, the influence of component segregation may become obvious.

本発明において、好ましくは、質量%で、Alが2〜4%、Feが2.8〜4.2%、Vが8.6〜10%、Moが8.6〜10%の範囲とする。この好ましい範囲において、VとMoの下限を高めにしており、成分偏析の影響を抑制する効果が、より高まる方向になる。   In the present invention, preferably, by mass%, Al is 2 to 4%, Fe is 2.8 to 4.2%, V is 8.6 to 10%, and Mo is 8.6 to 10%. . In this preferable range, the lower limits of V and Mo are increased, and the effect of suppressing the influence of component segregation is further enhanced.

Zrは、Snと同様に中性元素であり高強度化に寄与し、Snに比べて密度を増加させる傾向が小さい。Zrが2〜6質量%の範囲で時効熱処理後の引張強度が向上し、かつ全伸びの低下が非常に小さいことから、本発明の請求項2は、請求項1のβ型チタン合金に、さらにZrを2〜6質量%含んだものとする。なお、好ましくは、質量%で、Alが2〜3.5%、Feが2.5〜4.5%、Vが7〜9%、Moが7〜9%、Zrが2〜5%の範囲とする。Zr添加による密度増加を考慮して、V,Mo,Zrの上限を低く、また、Zr添加による強度増加に呼応して延性が低下する傾向になることから、Al量の上限を低くしている。   Zr is a neutral element like Sn and contributes to increasing the strength, and has a smaller tendency to increase the density than Sn. Since Zr is in the range of 2 to 6% by mass, the tensile strength after aging heat treatment is improved, and the decrease in total elongation is very small. Therefore, Claim 2 of the present invention provides the β-type titanium alloy of Claim 1, Furthermore, it shall contain 2-6 mass% of Zr. Preferably, by mass, Al is 2 to 3.5%, Fe is 2.5 to 4.5%, V is 7 to 9%, Mo is 7 to 9%, and Zr is 2 to 5%. Range. Considering the increase in density due to the addition of Zr, the upper limit of V, Mo, Zr is lowered, and the ductility tends to decrease in response to the increase in strength due to the addition of Zr, so the upper limit of the Al amount is lowered. .

上記組成のβ型チタン合金は、O,Nによって時効熱処理前の強度を高めることができる。一方で、O,Nの量が高すぎると優れた冷間加工性を維持できなくなる場合がある。O,Nの強度への寄与は、〔1〕式の酸素等量Q(=[O]+2.77×[N])で評価することができる。このQは、酸素濃度1質量%当たりのβ型チタン合金の固溶強化能すなわち引張強度増加への寄与を1としたとき、窒素の固溶強化能への寄与は酸素の2.77倍であることから、窒素濃度に2.77を乗じて酸素濃度に換算して取り扱ったものである。本発明の請求項では、強度の向上と優れた冷間加工を両立できることから、請求項1のβ型チタン合金において、酸素等量Qを0.15〜0.30の範囲とする。 The β-type titanium alloy having the above composition can increase the strength before aging heat treatment by O and N. On the other hand, if the amounts of O and N are too high, it may be impossible to maintain excellent cold workability. The contribution of O and N to the strength can be evaluated by the oxygen equivalent Q in the formula [1] (= [O] + 2.77 × [N]). This Q is 1.77 when the contribution to the solid solution strengthening ability of the β-type titanium alloy per 1% by mass of oxygen concentration, that is, the contribution to the increase in tensile strength, is 2.77 times that of oxygen. Therefore, the nitrogen concentration is multiplied by 2.77 to be converted into an oxygen concentration. According to claim 1 of the present invention, because it can achieve both excellent cold working and improving the strength, the β-type titanium alloy according to claim 1, the oxygen equivalent Q in the range of 0.15 to 0.30.

また、化学組成以外に加工硬化によっても、時効熱処理前の強度を高めることができることから、本発明の請求項3〜5は、圧延(冷間圧延など)や伸線(冷間伸線など)およびプレスや鍛造などの加工によって加工硬化させたままの状態であることを特徴とする。その形状は、板や棒線、およびこれらを成形した種々成形品である。 Further, even by work hardening in addition to the chemical composition, since it is possible to increase the strength before aging heat treatment, in the claims 3 to 5 of the present invention, rolling (including cold rolling) and drawing (cold drawing etc. ) And a work-hardened state by processing such as pressing or forging. The shape is a board, a bar wire, and various molded products obtained by molding these.

なお、本発明のチタン合金は通常の純チタンまたはチタン合金と同様に、H,C,Ni,Cr,Mn,Si,S等を不可避的に含有するが、その含有量は一般的には各々0.05質量%未満である。但し、本発明の効果を損なわない限り、その含有量は0.05質量%未満の限りではない。Hはβ安定化元素であり、時効熱処理時のα相の析出を遅延させる傾向にあることから、H濃度は0.02質量%以下が好ましい。   The titanium alloy of the present invention inevitably contains H, C, Ni, Cr, Mn, Si, S, etc., as in the case of ordinary pure titanium or titanium alloy. It is less than 0.05% by mass. However, as long as the effects of the present invention are not impaired, the content is not limited to less than 0.05% by mass. Since H is a β-stabilizing element and tends to delay the precipitation of the α phase during aging heat treatment, the H concentration is preferably 0.02% by mass or less.

上記で説明した本発明のβ型チタン合金は、その組成から、Feの金属単体の他に、比較的廉価な原料として、フェロモリブデン、フェロバナジウム、低級スポンジチタン、純チタンや種々チタン合金のスクラップ等を使用することができる。   The β-type titanium alloy of the present invention described above is composed of ferromolybdenum, ferrovanadium, low-grade sponge titanium, pure titanium, and various titanium alloy scraps as a relatively inexpensive raw material in addition to the Fe metal simple substance. Etc. can be used.

本発明の請求項1について、以下の実施例を用いて更に詳細に説明する。   Claim 1 of the present invention will be described in more detail using the following examples.

真空溶解したインゴットを、1100〜1150℃で加熱し熱間鍛造して中間材を作製した後、900℃で加熱して直径約15mmの棒に熱間鍛造した。その後、850℃で溶体化焼鈍し、空冷した。   The ingot melted in vacuum was heated at 1100 to 1150 ° C. and hot forged to produce an intermediate material, and then heated at 900 ° C. and hot forged into a rod having a diameter of about 15 mm. Thereafter, solution annealing was performed at 850 ° C. and air cooling was performed.

この溶体化焼鈍材を、冷間加工性を評価するため、脱スケール(ショットブラスト後に硝フッ酸浸漬)した後、潤滑処理を施してダイスによる冷間伸線を断面減少率で50%まで実施した。冷間伸線の各パス間で表面の割れや破断がないかを肉眼で観察した。断面減少率が50%に達するまでに破断や割れが発生したものを「×」、発生しなかったものを「○」と評価した。また、上述した偏析判定法にて成分偏析の影響を評価した。その方法は、溶体化焼鈍材にさらに500℃24時間の時効熱処理を施した後、L断面を研磨しチタン用エッチング液でエッチングし、その金属組織を目視観察し、図1、図2の例にならって、その様相が図1のような場合には「×」、図2のような場合には「○」と判定した。また、500℃24時間の時効熱処理を施した材料は、その時効材質を評価するため、平行部が直径6.25mmで長さ32mmの引張試験片に加工して室温で引張試験を実施した。   In order to evaluate the cold workability of this solution annealed material, descaling (soaking with nitric hydrofluoric acid after shot blasting) was performed, followed by lubrication and cold drawing with dies up to 50% in cross-section reduction rate. did. It was observed with the naked eye whether there were cracks or breaks in the surface between each cold drawing. The case where breakage or cracking occurred until the cross-section reduction rate reached 50% was evaluated as “X”, and the case where no cross-section reduction occurred was evaluated as “◯”. Further, the influence of component segregation was evaluated by the segregation determination method described above. In the method shown in FIG. 1 and FIG. 2, the solution annealed material is further subjected to an aging heat treatment at 500 ° C. for 24 hours, the L section is polished and etched with an etching solution for titanium, and the metal structure is visually observed. Accordingly, when the aspect is as shown in FIG. 1, it is judged as “X”, and when it is as shown in FIG. Further, the material subjected to aging heat treatment at 500 ° C. for 24 hours was processed into a tensile test piece having a parallel part of 6.25 mm in diameter and 32 mm in length in order to evaluate the aging material, and a tensile test was performed at room temperature.

表1に、その成分、冷間伸線の可否、偏析判定法の評価結果、時効熱処理後の引張特性などを示す。なお、酸素等量Qは約0.175で、H濃度はいずれも0.02質量%以下であった。   Table 1 shows the components, the possibility of cold drawing, the evaluation results of the segregation determination method, the tensile properties after aging heat treatment, and the like. The oxygen equivalent Q was about 0.175, and the H concentration was 0.02% by mass or less.

成分が、本発明の請求項1(Al,Fe,V,Mo、及び酸素当量Q)の範囲にある表1のNo.1〜19は、断面減少率50%の冷間伸線でも割れなどの欠陥はなく、偏析判定法の結果も均一なマクロ組織を呈しており「○」の判定である。 No. 1 in Table 1 in which the components are in the range of claim 1 of the present invention (Al, Fe, V, Mo , and oxygen equivalent Q ). Nos. 1 to 19 are “◯” because there is no defect such as a crack even in cold drawing with a cross-section reduction rate of 50%, and the result of the segregation determination method also shows a uniform macro structure.

これに対して、Al濃度が下限から外れているNo.21は、500℃で24時間の時効熱処理を施しても、マクロ組織が明灰色で断面硬さの増加も小さく、引張強度も低く、従来のβ型チタン合金に比べてα相の析出が遅い。Al量が上限から外れているNo.22は、冷間伸線の途中で割れが発生し、優れた冷間加工性を有するとは言えない。なお、No.22は、冷間伸線時に割れが発生したため、時効熱処理後の評価を実施していない。   On the other hand, No. in which the Al concentration deviates from the lower limit. No. 21, even when subjected to aging heat treatment at 500 ° C. for 24 hours, the macro structure is light gray, the increase in cross-sectional hardness is small, the tensile strength is low, and the precipitation of α phase is slower than that of the conventional β-type titanium alloy. . No. in which the amount of Al deviates from the upper limit. No. 22 cannot be said to have excellent cold workability because cracks occur during cold drawing. In addition, No. No. 22 was not evaluated after aging heat treatment because cracking occurred during cold drawing.

Fe濃度が下限から外れているNo.20は、時効熱処理後の引張特性において、強度が1400MPa未満であり伸びも7%と小さい。一方、Fe濃度が上限を超えているNo.25、VやMoの量が下限から外れているNo.23、No.24は、成分偏析の影響が顕著であり、偏析判定法の評価結果が「×」である。なお、偏析判定法の結果が「×」であった試料は、材質のばらつきが大きいことから、時効熱処理後の引張試験を実施していない。   No. in which the Fe concentration deviates from the lower limit. No. 20 has a tensile strength after aging heat treatment, the strength is less than 1400 MPa, and the elongation is as small as 7%. On the other hand, the Fe concentration exceeded the upper limit. 25, No. in which the amount of V or Mo deviates from the lower limit. 23, no. No. 24 is markedly affected by component segregation, and the evaluation result of the segregation determination method is “x”. In addition, the sample whose result of the segregation judgment method was “x” was not subjected to the tensile test after the aging heat treatment because of the large variation in material.

表1の試料において、No.5,6,9,11,13,16,18は、請求項1の好ましい範囲である、質量%で、Alが2〜4%、Feが2.8〜4.2%、Vが8.6〜10%、Moが8.6〜10%の範囲内にあり、時効熱処理が24時間に満たない10時間の時点で既に偏析判定法の評価が「○」の状態であり、成分偏析の影響がより小さかった。   In the samples of Table 1, No. 5,6,9,11,13,16,18 are the preferred ranges of claim 1 in mass%, Al 2-4%, Fe 2.8-4.2%, and V 8. 6 to 10%, Mo is in the range of 8.6 to 10%, and the aging heat treatment is already in the state of “○” at 10 hours when the aging heat treatment is less than 24 hours, and the component segregation The impact was smaller.

本発明の請求項2について、以下の実施例を用いて更に詳細に説明する。   Claim 2 of the present invention will be described in further detail using the following examples.

表2に、Zrを加えた請求項2の実施例を示す。なお、製造方法、評価方法などは上述した[実施例1]と同一である。表2のいずれの試料も、酸素等量Qは0.175程度で、H濃度は0.02質量%以下であった。   Table 2 shows an embodiment of claim 2 to which Zr is added. The manufacturing method, evaluation method, and the like are the same as those in the above-mentioned [Example 1]. In all samples in Table 2, the oxygen equivalent Q was about 0.175, and the H concentration was 0.02% by mass or less.

表2より、Zrが請求項2の範囲内にあるNo.2−1〜2−14は、いずれも断面減少率50%の冷間伸線でも割れなどの欠陥はなく、偏析判定法の結果も均一なマクロ組織を呈しており「○」の判定であり、時効熱処理後の引張特性も良好である。Zrが2〜6質量%の範囲において優れた冷間加工性を有し偏析が抑制されている。Zrを添加していない表1の発明例と比較して、表2の発明例は時効熱処理の引張強度が高く、全伸びの低下がほとんどない。   From Table 2, it can be seen from No. 2 that Zr is within the range of claim 2. As for 2-1 to 2-14, there is no defect, such as a crack, even in cold drawing with a cross-section reduction rate of 50%, and the result of the segregation judgment method also shows a uniform macro structure, which is a judgment of “◯”. The tensile properties after aging heat treatment are also good. When Zr is in the range of 2 to 6% by mass, it has excellent cold workability and segregation is suppressed. Compared with the invention example of Table 1 to which Zr is not added, the invention example of Table 2 has a high tensile strength of aging heat treatment, and there is almost no decrease in total elongation.

一方、Zrが0.9質量%と低いNo.2−15は、Zrを添加していない表1のNo.1と時効熱処理後の引張強度から、ほとんど増加していない。Zrが6質量%を超えて7.3質量%と多いNo.2−16は、時効熱処理後の全伸びが10%未満と低い。   On the other hand, no. No. 2-15 is No. 2 in Table 1 where Zr was not added. 1 and the tensile strength after the aging heat treatment hardly increased. No. Zr exceeding 6 mass% and as large as 7.3 mass%. No. 2-16 has a low total elongation of less than 10% after aging heat treatment.

VやMoの量が下限から外れているNo.2−17,2−18は、成分偏析の影響が顕著であり、偏析判定法の評価結果が「×」である。なお、偏析判定法の結果が「×」であった試料は、材質のばらつきが大きいことから、時効熱処理後の引張試験を実施していない。   No. in which the amount of V or Mo deviates from the lower limit. In 2-17 and 2-18, the influence of component segregation is significant, and the evaluation result of the segregation determination method is “x”. In addition, the sample whose result of the segregation judgment method was “x” was not subjected to the tensile test after the aging heat treatment because of the large variation in material.

本発明の請求項1、2について、以下の実施例を用いて更に詳細に説明する。 Claims 1 and 2 of the present invention will be described in more detail using the following examples.

表3に、O,Nの濃度を種々変えた例を示す。なお、製造方法、評価方法などは上述した[実施例1]と同一である。表3のいずれの試料も、H濃度は0.02質量%以下であった。なお、表1、表2の発明例も、酸素等量Qの値は請求項の範囲内にある。 Table 3 shows examples in which the O and N concentrations are variously changed. The manufacturing method, evaluation method, and the like are the same as those in the above-mentioned [Example 1]. In all the samples in Table 3, the H concentration was 0.02% by mass or less. In the examples of Table 1 and Table 2, the value of oxygen equivalent Q is within the scope of claim 1 .

酸素等量Q以外の成分が同等な試料同士を比較すると、酸素等量Qが大きいほど溶体化焼鈍材の引張強度が高い値を示している。Qが約0.114〜0.121と0.15よりも小さい表3のNo.3−1,3−6,3−9,3−14,3−18に比べて、Qが0.15以上の試料は明らかに溶体化焼鈍材の引張強度が高い。一方、Qが0.3を超えている表3のNo.3−5,3−13,3−17,3−22は、冷間伸線の断面減少率(伸線率)が50%までは割れなどの欠陥なく冷間伸線が可能であるが、限界の冷間伸線率(割れなどの欠陥なく冷間伸線ができる断面減少率)が69%,65%と小さい。   When samples having equivalent components other than the oxygen equivalent Q are compared, the larger the oxygen equivalent Q, the higher the tensile strength of the solution annealed material. No. in Table 3 where Q is about 0.114 to 0.121 and smaller than 0.15. Compared with 3-1, 3-6, 3-9, 3-14, and 3-18, the sample with Q of 0.15 or more clearly has a higher tensile strength of the solution annealed material. On the other hand, No. in Table 3 where Q exceeds 0.3. 3-5, 3-13, 3-17, 3-22, cold drawing is possible without defects such as cracks until the cross-sectional reduction rate (drawing rate) of cold drawing is 50%. The critical cold drawing rate (cross-sectional reduction rate that enables cold drawing without defects such as cracks) is as small as 69% and 65%.

Qが0.15〜0.3の範囲では、溶体化焼鈍材の引張強度が比較的高く、冷間伸線率が80%を超えても割れなどの欠陥は発生せず限界の冷間伸線率が80%を越えおり、非常に良好な冷間加工性を有している。加えて、偏析判定法の結果も均一なマクロ組織を呈しており「○」の判定で、時効熱処理後の引張特性も全伸びが10%以上あり良好である。また、表3より、時効熱処理後の引張強度も酸素等量Qに呼応して高くなっており、α相の析出量を少なくしても、高い強度が得られることがわかる。その点で、時効熱処理後の強度が同等な場合には、析出α相の量を少なくできることから、低いヤング率が得やすくなる。   When Q is in the range of 0.15 to 0.3, the tensile strength of the solution-annealed material is relatively high, and even if the cold drawing rate exceeds 80%, defects such as cracks do not occur and the limit cold drawing The linearity exceeds 80% and has very good cold workability. In addition, the results of the segregation determination method also show a uniform macro structure, and the determination of “◯” indicates that the tensile properties after aging heat treatment are good with a total elongation of 10% or more. Table 3 also shows that the tensile strength after the aging heat treatment is increased in response to the oxygen equivalent Q, and a high strength can be obtained even if the amount of precipitation of the α phase is reduced. In that respect, when the strength after the aging heat treatment is equal, the amount of the precipitated α phase can be reduced, so that a low Young's modulus is easily obtained.

なお、Qが約0.114〜0.121と0.15よりも小さい表3のNo.3−1,3−6,3−9,3−14,3−18は、Qが0.15〜0.3の本発明例に比べて、溶体化焼鈍材の引張強度は938〜969MPaと若干低い。 In addition, No. of Table 3 where Q is smaller than about 0.114 to 0.121 and 0.15. 3-1, 3-6, 3-9, 3-14, 3-18, the tensile strength of the solution heat-treated material is 938 to 969 MPa, compared with the invention example in which Q is 0.15 to 0.3. Slightly low.

表3に示したように、伸線率50%の冷間伸線ままの引張強度は、時効熱処理前の溶体化焼鈍材に対して30〜40%程度高いことがわかる。このように、冷間加工ままで加工硬化している材料の方が、時効熱処理前の強度が高く、より高強度でより低ヤング率な材質が得やすくなる。これは、本発明の請求項3乃至5のいずれかの発明例に相当する。なお、表1、表2の発明例においても、伸線率50%後の冷間伸線ままの材料は、時効熱処理前の溶体化焼鈍材よりも引張強度が30〜40%高く、加工硬化している。 As shown in Table 3, it can be seen that the tensile strength as cold drawn with a drawing rate of 50% is about 30 to 40% higher than that of the solution annealed material before aging heat treatment. As described above, a material that is work-hardened while being cold worked has a higher strength before aging heat treatment, and a material having higher strength and lower Young's modulus can be easily obtained. This corresponds to the invention of any one of claims 3 to 5 of the present invention. In the examples of Tables 1 and 2, the material as cold-drawn after a drawing rate of 50% is 30-40% higher in tensile strength than the solution annealed material before aging heat treatment, and is work-hardened. is doing.

表1〜3の試料において、本発明の好ましい範囲である、質量%で、「Alが2〜4%、Feが2.8〜4.2%、Vが8.6〜10%、Moが8.6〜10%」のものは、時効熱処理が24時間に満たない10時間の時点で既に偏析判定法の評価が「○」の状態であり、成分偏析の影響がより小さかった。   In the samples of Tables 1 to 3, the preferred range of the present invention is mass%, “Al is 2 to 4%, Fe is 2.8 to 4.2%, V is 8.6 to 10%, and Mo is In the case of “8.6 to 10%”, the evaluation of the segregation judgment method was already in the state of “◯” at the time of 10 hours when the aging heat treatment was less than 24 hours, and the influence of the component segregation was smaller.

以上の実施例では、棒形状の材料について詳細に説明してきたが、熱間鍛造の中間材から約10mm厚さの板形状に熱間圧延した材料でも、上述した棒と同様の本発明の効果が得られている。   In the above embodiment, the rod-shaped material has been described in detail. However, the effect of the present invention similar to that of the above-described rod can be obtained even with a material that is hot-rolled from an intermediate material for hot forging into a plate shape having a thickness of about 10 mm. Is obtained.

時効熱処理した棒のL断面のマクロ組織を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the macro structure of the L cross section of the rod heat-treated. 時効熱処理した棒のL断面のマクロ組織を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the macro structure of the L cross section of the rod heat-treated.

Claims (5)

質量%で、Alを2〜5%、Feを2.5〜4.5%、Vを6〜10%、Moを6.5〜10%となる範囲で含有し、〔1〕式の酸素等量Qが0.15〜0.30であり、残部がTiおよび不可避的不純物からなるβ型チタン合金。
酸素等量Q=[O]+2.77[N] ・・・〔1〕式
ここで、[O]はO含有量(質量%)、[N]はN含有量(質量%)である。
By mass%, 2-5% of Al, 2.5 to 4.5% of Fe, the V 6 to 10%, containing within an amount of 6.5 to 10% of Mo, (1) type of oxygen A β-type titanium alloy having an equivalent Q of 0.15 to 0.30 and the balance of Ti and inevitable impurities.
Equivalent oxygen Q = [O] +2.77 [N] (1) formula
Here, [O] is the O content (mass%), and [N] is the N content (mass%).
さらに、質量%でZrを2〜6%となる範囲で含有することを特徴とする請求項1記載のβ型チタン合金。   The β-type titanium alloy according to claim 1, further comprising Zr in a range of 2 to 6% by mass. 請求項1又は2に記載のβ型チタン合金を加工硬化させたままの加工品。 Claim 1 or 2 remains workpiece obtained by work hardening a β-type titanium alloy according to. 質量%で、Alを2〜5%、Feを2.5〜4.5%、Vを6〜10%、Moを6.5〜10%となる範囲で含有し、残部がTiおよび不可避的不純物からなるβ型チタン合金を加工硬化させたままの加工品。It contains 2 to 5% of Al, 2.5 to 4.5% of Fe, 6 to 10% of V, and 6.5 to 10% of Mo with the balance being Ti and inevitable. Processed product with work hardened β-type titanium alloy consisting of impurities. さらに前記β型チタン合金が、質量%でZrを2〜6%となる範囲で含有する請求項4記載のβ型チタン合金を加工硬化させたままの加工品。Further, the β-type titanium alloy according to claim 4, wherein the β-type titanium alloy contains Zr in a range of 2% to 6% by mass%.
JP2006291136A 2006-10-26 2006-10-26 β-type titanium alloy Expired - Fee Related JP4850657B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2006291136A JP4850657B2 (en) 2006-10-26 2006-10-26 β-type titanium alloy

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2006291136A JP4850657B2 (en) 2006-10-26 2006-10-26 β-type titanium alloy

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2008106317A JP2008106317A (en) 2008-05-08
JP4850657B2 true JP4850657B2 (en) 2012-01-11

Family

ID=39439927

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2006291136A Expired - Fee Related JP4850657B2 (en) 2006-10-26 2006-10-26 β-type titanium alloy

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4850657B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5196083B2 (en) 2011-02-24 2013-05-15 新日鐵住金株式会社 High-strength α + β-type titanium alloy hot-rolled sheet excellent in cold coil handling and manufacturing method thereof
CN106319283B (en) * 2016-09-14 2018-07-24 沈阳泰恒通用技术有限公司 Low-cost titanium alloy plate applied to titanium dinner plate and preparation method thereof
CN115011895B (en) * 2022-06-17 2023-03-14 中国航发北京航空材料研究院 TB6 titanium alloy ingot casting homogenization treatment method
CN115449665B (en) * 2022-07-08 2024-08-27 重庆大学 Titanium alloy and preparation method thereof

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS62267438A (en) * 1986-05-13 1987-11-20 Mitsubishi Metal Corp High-strength ti alloy material excellent in workability and its production
JPH06108187A (en) * 1992-09-29 1994-04-19 Nkk Corp Nitrogen added high strength titanium alloy
JPH09316572A (en) * 1996-06-03 1997-12-09 Mitsubishi Materials Corp Heat treatment method for Ti alloy castings
JP2001029518A (en) * 1999-07-21 2001-02-06 Nippon Mining & Metals Co Ltd Titanium alloy material for golf club head
JP2006097115A (en) * 2004-09-30 2006-04-13 Teigu:Kk METHOD FOR STRENGTHENING beta TYPE TITANIUM ALLOY AND betaTYPE TITANIUM ALLOY PRODUCT OBTAINED THEREBY

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2008106317A (en) 2008-05-08

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP5130850B2 (en) β-type titanium alloy
US20030168138A1 (en) Method for processing beta titanium alloys
JP4666271B2 (en) Titanium plate
JP5201202B2 (en) Titanium alloy for golf club face
US9884229B2 (en) Titanium alloy for golf club face
CN104136639B (en) Golf club face titanium alloy
JP4493028B2 (en) Α-β type titanium alloy with excellent machinability and hot workability
JP2006034414A (en) Spikes for shoes
JP2005076098A (en) HIGH-STRENGTH alpha-beta TITANIUM ALLOY
JP2007520630A (en) Beta titanium composition and method for producing the same
JP4850657B2 (en) β-type titanium alloy
JP5605273B2 (en) High strength α + β type titanium alloy having excellent hot and cold workability, production method thereof, and titanium alloy product
JP4371201B2 (en) β-type titanium alloy and method for producing the same
JP5119488B2 (en) Titanium alloy for golf club face
JP2005154850A (en) High-strength β-type titanium alloy
TWI450979B (en) The golf club face is made of titanium alloy (2)
JP2009515047A (en) Cold workable titanium alloy
JP4987640B2 (en) Titanium alloy bar wire for machine parts or decorative parts suitable for manufacturing cold-worked parts and method for manufacturing the same
JP2000256769A (en) High strength β-type Ti alloy with excellent cold workability

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20090217

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20110125

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20111011

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20111019

R151 Written notification of patent or utility model registration

Ref document number: 4850657

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R151

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20141028

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20141028

Year of fee payment: 3

S533 Written request for registration of change of name

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20141028

Year of fee payment: 3

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

S533 Written request for registration of change of name

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees