Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP4867932B2 - Embedded pipe damage monitoring method and buried pipe damage monitoring apparatus - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP4867932B2 - Embedded pipe damage monitoring method and buried pipe damage monitoring apparatus - Google Patents

Embedded pipe damage monitoring method and buried pipe damage monitoring apparatus Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP4867932B2
JP4867932B2 JP2008048361A JP2008048361A JP4867932B2 JP 4867932 B2 JP4867932 B2 JP 4867932B2 JP 2008048361 A JP2008048361 A JP 2008048361A JP 2008048361 A JP2008048361 A JP 2008048361A JP 4867932 B2 JP4867932 B2 JP 4867932B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
signal
monitoring
buried pipe
confirmation
damage
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP2008048361A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2009204522A (en
Inventor
健一 原賀
守男 炭山
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
JFE Engineering Corp
Original Assignee
JFE Engineering Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by JFE Engineering Corp filed Critical JFE Engineering Corp
Priority to JP2008048361A priority Critical patent/JP4867932B2/en
Publication of JP2009204522A publication Critical patent/JP2009204522A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4867932B2 publication Critical patent/JP4867932B2/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Electric Means (AREA)

Description

本発明は埋設管損傷監視方法および埋設管損傷監視装置に関する。   The present invention relates to a buried pipe damage monitoring method and a buried pipe damage monitoring apparatus.

地中に埋設される埋設管は、掘削工事における掘削機械により損傷を受ける場合があり、埋設管が損傷を受けると土壌との接触等により埋設管の腐食が進行してしまう。このため埋設管の損傷をいち早く検出する必要があり、埋設管の損傷を監視するための各種方法が検討されている。   The buried pipe buried in the ground may be damaged by a drilling machine in excavation work, and when the buried pipe is damaged, the buried pipe is corroded by contact with soil or the like. For this reason, it is necessary to quickly detect damage to the buried pipe, and various methods for monitoring the damage to the buried pipe have been studied.

このような埋設管の損傷を監視する一般的な方法としては、埋設管の送信部から監視用交流信号を常時印加し、これを送信部から離れた受信部において常時受信して、その抵抗値が基準値より低下した場合には警報を出す方法が挙げられる。しかしながら受信部において得られる抵抗値は防食設備や交流誘導のノイズによる変動が大きく、埋設管に損傷がない場合であっても、ノイズの影響による抵抗値の変動が基準値よりも低下してしまうことがあり、これにより誤報が発生する問題が生じている。   As a general method for monitoring the damage of the buried pipe, a monitoring AC signal is always applied from the transmitting section of the buried pipe, and this is always received by the receiving section away from the transmitting section, and its resistance value There is a method of issuing an alarm when the value falls below the reference value. However, the resistance value obtained at the receiver is greatly fluctuated due to anticorrosion equipment and AC induction noise, and even if the buried pipe is not damaged, the fluctuation of the resistance value due to the noise is lower than the reference value. In some cases, this causes a problem of false alarms.

このような誤報を防止する方法として、特許文献1には商用交流信号と監視用交流信号を同期化することでノイズ信号との分別をする技術について開示がされている。特許文献2には監視用交流信号の受信部を2箇所設けることにより測定精度を向上する技術について開示がされている。特許文献3には埋設管に接続している排流器と並列に通過フィルタを接続することでノイズを低減する技術について開示がされている。また特許文献4には
受信電圧をディジタル量に変換し移動平均処理を行った後に、現在と過去の時点との値を比較することで受信電圧の変化を検出する技術について開示されている。
特開平7-128189号公報 特開平7-128272号公報 特開平7-55751号公報 特開平9-33474号公報
As a method for preventing such misreporting, Patent Document 1 discloses a technique for separating a noise signal by synchronizing a commercial AC signal and a monitoring AC signal. Patent Document 2 discloses a technique for improving measurement accuracy by providing two monitoring AC signal receivers. Patent Document 3 discloses a technique for reducing noise by connecting a pass filter in parallel with a drain that is connected to a buried pipe. Patent Document 4 discloses a technique for detecting a change in received voltage by converting a received voltage into a digital quantity and performing a moving average process, and then comparing a current value with a past time point.
JP-A-7-128189 JP-A-7-128272 JP 7-55751 A Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 9-33474

しかしながら、特許文献1に開示された技術によれば交流信号を同期化することにより、交流信号とノイズ信号との分別はできるがノイズにより計測値は変動しやすく、計測値が基準値より低下することで誤報を出す恐れがある。また、特許文献2に開示された技術によれば交流信号の受信箇所を2箇所とすることで受信精度は向上するが、いまだノイズによる変動は生じ得るため前述した誤報を出す恐れがある。特許文献3に開示された技術によれば排流器にフィルタを挿入することでノイズ低減を図ることはできるが、排流器は回路抵抗を大きくすることはできないことから完全なフィルタができず、ノイズ低減の観点からは十分とはいえない。特許文献4に開示された技術によれば受信電圧の移動平均の現在値と過去値を比較することでノイズの影響を小さくすることができるが、埋設管の損傷が短時間の場合には、損傷を見落とす恐れがある。   However, according to the technique disclosed in Patent Document 1, by synchronizing the AC signal, the AC signal and the noise signal can be distinguished, but the measurement value is likely to fluctuate due to noise, and the measurement value is lower than the reference value. There is a risk of misreporting. Further, according to the technique disclosed in Patent Document 2, the reception accuracy is improved by using two AC signal reception points. However, since fluctuations due to noise may still occur, there is a possibility that the above-mentioned false alarm is issued. According to the technique disclosed in Patent Document 3, noise can be reduced by inserting a filter into the drain, but since the drain cannot increase the circuit resistance, a complete filter cannot be obtained. From the viewpoint of noise reduction, it is not sufficient. According to the technique disclosed in Patent Document 4, the influence of noise can be reduced by comparing the current value and the past value of the moving average of the received voltage, but when the damage of the buried pipe is short, Damage may be overlooked.

本発明はこのような状況に鑑みてなされたものであり、ノイズの影響により埋設管に損傷が無い場合であっても生じ得る誤報を防止し、また、埋設管の損傷が短時間であっても損傷を正確に検知することができる埋設管損傷監視方法および埋設管損傷監視装置を提供することを主たる課題とする。   The present invention has been made in view of such a situation, and prevents erroneous reports that may occur even when the buried pipe is not damaged due to the influence of noise, and the buried pipe is damaged in a short time. It is a main object to provide a buried pipe damage monitoring method and a buried pipe damage monitoring apparatus capable of accurately detecting damage.

前記課題を解決するための本願発明の埋設管損傷監視方法は、監視用送信部において埋設管に常時印加する監視用交流信号を、監視用受信部において常時受信し、受信した監視用交流信号と埋設管に損傷がない場合における基準値とを比較し、その変動により埋設管の損傷を監視する埋設管損傷監視方法において、監視用受信部において受信した前記監視用交流信号が埋設管に損傷がない場合における基準値から変動した場合には、確認用送信部から該埋設管に確認用直流信号を一定電圧で印加し、確認用受信部において得られる出力電流値または回路抵抗値と、埋設管に損傷がない場合における出力電流値または回路抵抗値と、の比較を行うことで埋設管の損傷の有無を判定することを特徴とする。   In the buried pipe damage monitoring method of the present invention for solving the above-mentioned problem, the monitoring AC signal to be constantly applied to the buried pipe in the monitoring transmitter is always received by the monitoring receiver, and the received monitoring AC signal is In the buried pipe damage monitoring method that compares the reference value when there is no damage to the buried pipe and monitors the damage of the buried pipe due to the fluctuation, the monitoring AC signal received by the monitoring receiver is damaged in the buried pipe. If there is a fluctuation from the reference value in the case where there is not, a confirmation DC signal is applied to the buried pipe from the confirmation transmitting section at a constant voltage, and the output current value or circuit resistance value obtained in the confirmation receiving section, and the buried pipe The presence or absence of damage to the buried pipe is determined by comparing the output current value or the circuit resistance value when there is no damage.

また、前記確認用送信部から印加される確認用直流信号が、60V以下の直流電圧であってもよい。   Further, the confirmation DC signal applied from the confirmation transmission unit may be a DC voltage of 60 V or less.

前記課題を解決するための本願発明の埋設管損傷監視装置は、埋設管の送信点から監視用交流信号を常時印加する第一の送信手段と、前記監視用交流信号を常時受信する第一の受信手段と、受信した監視用交流信号と損傷がない場合における基準値との変動を比較する第一の比較手段と、前記第一の比較手段における比較結果に応じて確認用直流信号を印加する第二の送信手段と、前記確認用直流信号を受信する第二の受信手段と、前記第二の受信手段で得られる情報と埋設管に損傷がない場合における基準値との変動を比較する第二の比較手段と、を含むことを特徴とする。   The buried pipe damage monitoring device of the present invention for solving the above-mentioned problem is a first transmission means for constantly applying a monitoring AC signal from a transmission point of the buried pipe, and a first transmission means for constantly receiving the monitoring AC signal. A receiving means, a first comparing means for comparing fluctuations between the received monitoring AC signal and a reference value when there is no damage, and a confirmation DC signal is applied according to the comparison result of the first comparing means. A second transmitting means, a second receiving means for receiving the confirmation DC signal, a second comparison means for comparing fluctuations between information obtained by the second receiving means and a reference value when the buried pipe is not damaged. And a second comparison means.

また、前記埋設管損傷監視装置は、前記確認用直流信号印加時に監視用交流信号の送信と確認用直流信号の送信、及び監視用交流信号の受信と確認用直流信号の受信とを切替える切替え手段を含んでいてもよい。   Further, the buried pipe damage monitoring device is a switching means for switching between transmission of the monitoring AC signal and transmission of the confirmation DC signal, and reception of the monitoring AC signal and reception of the confirmation DC signal when the confirmation DC signal is applied. May be included.

また、前記確認用直流信号が、60V以下の直流電圧であってもよい。   Further, the confirmation DC signal may be a DC voltage of 60V or less.

本発明によれば、従来から用いられている監視用交流信号のみならず、確認用直流信号を用い、監視用交流信号の受信により損傷があると判断された場合であっても、直ちにこれを信用するのではなく、確認用直流信号を発信し、これを受信することにより、損傷の真偽を確認することができるため、従来生じていた誤報を防止することができる。換言すれば、本発明は、確認用直流信号によりいわゆるダブルチェックを行うことを特徴とし、これにより損傷の有無の判断をより正確に行うことができる。   According to the present invention, not only the conventional monitoring AC signal but also the confirmation DC signal is used, and even if it is determined that there is damage due to the reception of the monitoring AC signal, this is immediately performed. Since it is possible to confirm the authenticity of damage by transmitting and receiving a DC signal for confirmation rather than relying on it, it is possible to prevent false alarms that have conventionally occurred. In other words, the present invention is characterized in that a so-called double check is performed by a confirmation DC signal, and thereby it is possible to more accurately determine the presence or absence of damage.

また、本発明は確認用の信号に、電気防食直流電圧より高電圧の直流信号を用いているため、当該確認用信号がノイズの影響を受けることがなく、正確な判断をすることが可能である。   In addition, since the present invention uses a DC signal having a voltage higher than the cathodic protection DC voltage as the confirmation signal, the confirmation signal is not affected by noise and can be accurately determined. is there.

なお、本発明においては、当該直流信号はあくまで「確認用」であり、常時監視は交流信号を用いているため、埋設管が過防食となることもない。   In the present invention, the DC signal is only for “confirmation”, and the constant monitoring uses an AC signal, so that the buried pipe is not over-corroded.

まずはじめに、本願の埋設管損傷監視装置100について、図面を用いて具体的に説明する。   First, the buried pipe damage monitoring apparatus 100 of the present application will be specifically described with reference to the drawings.

図1(a)は本願発明の埋設管損傷監視装置100を概念的に示したもので、埋設管10に沿って損傷監視ユニット20を設置すると共に、損傷監視ユニット20に隣接する箇所に切替え装置13を介して損傷確認ユニット23が設置されている。   FIG. 1A conceptually shows a buried pipe damage monitoring apparatus 100 according to the present invention, in which a damage monitoring unit 20 is installed along the buried pipe 10, and a switching device is arranged at a location adjacent to the damage monitoring unit 20. A damage confirmation unit 23 is installed via 13.

損傷監視ユニット20内には監視用送信部21と監視用受信部22が設けられており、監視用送信部21は通電電極11と損傷監視交流信号を埋設管10に発信するための発信電極14とを備えている。また監視用受信部22は埋設管10から発信電極14を通じて監視用送信部から発信された損傷監視交流信号を受信するように受信電極15が埋設管10に接続され、照合電極12が監視用受信部22に接続されている。監視用受信部22にて得られた情報は処理装置26へと送信される。処理装置26は、得られた情報に基づいて確認用送信部24にその情報を送信する。   In the damage monitoring unit 20, a monitoring transmitter 21 and a monitoring receiver 22 are provided. The monitoring transmitter 21 transmits the energizing electrode 11 and a damage monitoring AC signal to the buried pipe 10. And. The monitoring receiver 22 is connected to the buried pipe 10 so as to receive the damage monitoring AC signal transmitted from the monitoring transmitter through the transmitting electrode 14 from the buried pipe 10, and the verification electrode 12 is received for monitoring. Connected to the unit 22. Information obtained by the monitoring receiver 22 is transmitted to the processing device 26. The processing device 26 transmits the information to the confirmation transmitter 24 based on the obtained information.

損傷確認ユニット23内には、確認用送信部24と確認用受信部25が設けられており、確認用送信部24は通電電極11と、確認用直流信号を埋設管10に発信するための発信電極14とを切替え装置13を介して備えている。また確認用受信部25は埋設管10から発信電極14を通じて確認用送信部24から発信された確認用直流信号を受信するように切替え装置13を介して受信電極15が埋設管10に接続され、照合電極12が切替え装置13を介して監視用受信部25に接続されている。確認用受信部25にて得られた情報は処理装置26へと送信される。   In the damage confirmation unit 23, a confirmation transmission unit 24 and a confirmation reception unit 25 are provided. The confirmation transmission unit 24 transmits the conduction electrode 11 and a confirmation DC signal to the embedded pipe 10. An electrode 14 is provided via a switching device 13. Further, the receiving electrode 15 is connected to the buried tube 10 via the switching device 13 so that the confirmation receiving unit 25 receives the confirmation DC signal transmitted from the confirmation transmitting unit 24 through the transmitting electrode 14 from the buried tube 10, The verification electrode 12 is connected to the monitoring receiver 25 via the switching device 13. Information obtained by the confirmation receiving unit 25 is transmitted to the processing device 26.

確認用受信部25にて得られた情報を処理装置26で判定した結果、損傷があると判断した場合には処理装置26は警報装置27にその情報を送信し、警報装置27は警報を発生する。   If the processing device 26 determines that the information obtained in the confirmation receiving unit 25 is determined to be damaged, the processing device 26 transmits the information to the alarm device 27, and the alarm device 27 generates an alarm. To do.

本願発明は、監視用送信部21から埋設管10に監視用交流信号を常時印加し、監視用受信部22で前記信号を常時受信する際に、受信した監視用交流信号と埋設管に損傷がない場合の基準値とを比較し、受信信号が基準値から変動した場合には、確認用送信部24から埋設管10に確認用直流信号を印加し、確認用受信部25で得られた出力電流値または回路抵抗値と、埋設管に損傷がない場合におけるこれらの値とを比較することで埋設管10の損傷の有無を判断することに特徴を有している。従って、埋設管10に監視用交流信号を常時印加し、これを常時受信する機能について、具体的には、監視用交流信号を送信し、監視用交流信号を受信し、監視用交流信号から接地抵抗値等を演算し、接地抵抗等と埋設管に損傷がない場合における基準値とを比較し、基準値からの変動を計測し、その結果を確認用送信部24に送信する際に用いられる各種の手段や装置については、特に限定されることはなく、従来公知のそれを適宜用いることができる。   In the present invention, when a monitoring AC signal is constantly applied from the monitoring transmitter 21 to the buried pipe 10 and the monitoring receiver 22 always receives the signal, the received monitoring AC signal and the buried pipe are damaged. When the received signal fluctuates from the reference value, a confirmation DC signal is applied to the buried pipe 10 from the confirmation transmission unit 24, and the output obtained by the confirmation reception unit 25 is compared. It is characterized in that the presence or absence of damage to the buried pipe 10 is determined by comparing the current value or the circuit resistance value with these values when the buried pipe is not damaged. Therefore, with regard to the function of constantly applying the monitoring AC signal to the buried pipe 10 and receiving it constantly, specifically, the monitoring AC signal is transmitted, the monitoring AC signal is received, and the monitoring AC signal is grounded. Used to calculate the resistance value, etc., compare the ground resistance and the like with the reference value when there is no damage to the buried pipe, measure the fluctuation from the reference value, and transmit the result to the confirmation transmitter 24 Various means and devices are not particularly limited, and conventionally known ones can be appropriately used.

例えば、監視用送信部21、監視用受信部22は図示するように損傷監視ユニット20内に設置してもよいし、監視用送信部21から適宜離れた位置に監視用受信部22を設けてよい。一般的にはこれらはアナログ回路やデジタル回路により構成することができる。また、受信した信号から、接地抵抗値等を演算し、図示するように基準値からの変動を計測し判定を行う処理装置26を設けてもよい。このような処理装置としてはコンピューターなどが一般的である。さらにまた、監視用受信部22において受信した監視用交流信号を処理装置に伝送するための伝送装置(図示しない)を設けてもよく、判定した結果を確認用送信部24に伝送する伝送装置を設けてもよい。   For example, the monitoring transmission unit 21 and the monitoring reception unit 22 may be installed in the damage monitoring unit 20 as illustrated, or the monitoring reception unit 22 is provided at a position appropriately separated from the monitoring transmission unit 21. Good. In general, these can be constituted by analog circuits or digital circuits. Further, a processing device 26 may be provided that calculates a ground resistance value or the like from the received signal, measures a change from a reference value, and makes a determination as illustrated. A computer or the like is generally used as such a processing apparatus. Furthermore, a transmission device (not shown) for transmitting the monitoring AC signal received by the monitoring receiver 22 to the processing device may be provided, and a transmission device for transmitting the determination result to the confirmation transmitter 24 is provided. It may be provided.

監視用交流信号については、10Hz〜1000Hzの周波数を選択し、0.1V〜5Vの範囲で適宜設定して埋設管に常時印加する擬似ランダム信号が一般的である。   As for the monitoring AC signal, a pseudo-random signal that selects a frequency of 10 Hz to 1000 Hz, is appropriately set in the range of 0.1 V to 5 V, and is constantly applied to the buried pipe is generally used.

確認用送信部24および確認用受信部25の設置箇所についても特に限定されるものではなく、例えば、前述した損傷監視ユニット20と同様に確認用送信部24と確認用受信部25は図示するように損傷確認ユニット23内に設けられていてもよいし、損傷監視ユニット20と損傷確認ユニット23は切替え装置13を介さず夫々単独で設けてもよい。また確認用受信部25は確認用送信部24から離れた位置に設けられていてもよい。   The installation locations of the confirmation transmitter 24 and the confirmation receiver 25 are not particularly limited. For example, the confirmation transmitter 24 and the confirmation receiver 25 are illustrated in the same manner as the damage monitoring unit 20 described above. May be provided in the damage confirmation unit 23, or the damage monitoring unit 20 and the damage confirmation unit 23 may be provided independently without using the switching device 13. The confirmation receiving unit 25 may be provided at a position away from the confirmation transmission unit 24.

確認用送信部24は、前記監視用受信部22において受信した監視用交流信号が基準値から変動した場合、具体的には、確認用受信部22で受信した監視用交流信号の接地抵抗値等を処理装置26で演算し、埋設管10に損傷がない場合における基準値と受信した信号とを比較し、受信した信号が基準値から変動した場合には、処理装置26はその結果を確認用送信部24に送信し、処理装置26から結果を受信した確認用送信部24は、その比較結果に応じて埋設管10に確認用直流信号を印加するために設けられる。   When the monitoring AC signal received by the monitoring receiver 22 fluctuates from a reference value, the confirmation transmitter 24 specifically includes the ground resistance value of the monitoring AC signal received by the confirmation receiver 22 and the like. Is calculated by the processing device 26, the reference value when the embedded pipe 10 is not damaged is compared with the received signal, and if the received signal fluctuates from the reference value, the processing device 26 confirms the result. The confirmation transmission unit 24 that has transmitted to the transmission unit 24 and received the result from the processing device 26 is provided to apply a confirmation DC signal to the embedded tube 10 according to the comparison result.

前記監視用信号は直流電鉄の漏れ電流などに起因する迷走電流などのノイズと弁別できるよう、一般的に交流信号が用いられている。交流成分に対して埋設管の塗覆装はコンデンサに等価するため、周波数が高いほど埋設管の接地抵抗(交流インピーダンス)は小さくなり、塗覆装が健全であっても、交流で測定される接地抵抗(交流インピーダンス)は直流に比べて小さくなる。よって塗覆装損傷が発生したときの接地抵抗の変化量は直流に比べて小さく、塗覆装損傷による基準値からの変動と、測定ノイズによる基準値からの変動の判定が困難となる。   In general, an AC signal is used as the monitoring signal so that it can be distinguished from noise such as stray current caused by leakage current of DC railway. Since the coating of the buried pipe is equivalent to a capacitor for AC components, the higher the frequency, the smaller the grounding resistance (AC impedance) of the buried pipe, and even if the coating is sound, it is measured with an alternating current. The ground resistance (AC impedance) is smaller than DC. Therefore, when the coating damage occurs, the change amount of the ground resistance is small compared to the direct current, and it is difficult to determine the fluctuation from the reference value due to the coating damage and the fluctuation from the reference value due to measurement noise.

このような点を考慮すると、確認用の信号としては周波数成分を有せず、塗覆装が絶縁となる直流信号を用いることが好ましい。このように確認用の信号として直流信号を用いることで、健全時と塗覆装損傷時の接地抵抗または出力電流の比較が交流に比べ容易に行えることから監視用交流信号よって得られる接地抵抗値等が基準値から変動した場合であっても直ちに警報を発生せずに、確認用直流信号を埋設管10に印加することで、ノイズの影響がない確認用直流信号値、具体的には出力電流値および回路抵抗値を得ることができる。   In consideration of such points, it is preferable to use a DC signal that does not have a frequency component and is insulated from the coating as the confirmation signal. By using a DC signal as a confirmation signal in this way, it is possible to easily compare the ground resistance or output current when sound and coating are damaged, compared to AC, so the ground resistance value obtained by the monitoring AC signal Even if the value fluctuates from the reference value, a confirmation DC signal value that is not affected by noise, more specifically, is output by applying a confirmation DC signal to the buried pipe 10 without generating an alarm immediately. Current values and circuit resistance values can be obtained.

ここで、確認用直流信号を発生するための直流電圧が小さい場合にはノイズとの分別が困難となるため、ノイズとの分別を明確にするためには直流電圧は高電圧であることが好ましく、60V以下の直流電圧であることがより好ましい。直流電圧が5Vよりも小さいとノイズとの分別が困難であり、また電気設備基準により電気防食装置の最大電圧は60V以下と定められている。   Here, when the DC voltage for generating the confirmation DC signal is small, it is difficult to separate from noise. Therefore, in order to clarify the separation from noise, the DC voltage is preferably a high voltage. More preferably, the direct current voltage is 60 V or less. If the DC voltage is less than 5V, it is difficult to separate from noise, and the maximum voltage of the cathodic protection device is determined to be 60V or less according to electrical equipment standards.

また、埋設管に常時高電圧の直流電圧を印加すると埋設管の過防食が生じ、埋設管が腐食しやすくなることから、直流電圧の印加時間は短時間であることが好ましく1分〜5分であることがより好ましい。   In addition, when a high DC voltage is constantly applied to the buried pipe, the buried pipe is over-corroded and the buried pipe is easily corroded. Therefore, the DC voltage is preferably applied for a short time, preferably 1 minute to 5 minutes. It is more preferable that

確認用受信部25は、確認用送信部24から埋設管10に一定の直流電圧を印加した場合に得られる信号を受信し、得られた信号から出力電流値及び回路抵抗値を演算し、これらの値と埋設管10に損傷がない場合における出力電流値または回路抵抗値と比較することで損傷の判定するために用いられる。確認用受信部25は上記効果を奏することができることができれば、その演算方法や判定方法については特に限定されることはなく従来公知の技術を適宜選択して用いることができる。   The confirmation receiving unit 25 receives a signal obtained when a constant DC voltage is applied to the buried pipe 10 from the confirmation transmitting unit 24, calculates an output current value and a circuit resistance value from the obtained signal, This value is used to determine damage by comparing the value of this value with the output current value or the circuit resistance value when the buried pipe 10 is not damaged. As long as the confirmation receiving unit 25 can achieve the above-described effects, the calculation method and determination method are not particularly limited, and a conventionally known technique can be appropriately selected and used.

例えば、確認用受信部25において受信した信号から出力電流値及び回路抵抗値を演算し、これらの値と埋設管10に損傷がない場合における出力電流値または回路抵抗値と比較することで損傷の判定をするための処理装置26を別途設けてもよい。また確認用受信部25から処理装置26へその情報を伝送するための伝送装置を用いても良い。   For example, the output current value and the circuit resistance value are calculated from the signal received by the confirmation receiving unit 25, and these values are compared with the output current value or the circuit resistance value when the embedded pipe 10 is not damaged. A processing device 26 for making the determination may be provided separately. Further, a transmission device for transmitting the information from the confirmation receiving unit 25 to the processing device 26 may be used.

より具体的には図1(b)に示すような切替え装置13によって、監視用送信部21と確認用送信部24とを切替える場合には、通電電極11は、スイッチ50とスイッチ51との切替えが行われることでスイッチ58にスイッチ51が接続され、発信電極14はスイッチ52とスイッチ53との切替えが行われることでスイッチ59にスイッチ53が接続されることにより監視用送信部21と確認用送信部22との切替えが行われる。また、監視用受信部22と確認用受信部25との切替えにおいても、受信電極は、スイッチ54とスイッチ55の切替えが行われることでスイッチ55にスイッチ60が接続され、照合電極12は、スイッチ56とスイッチ57の切替えが行われることで、スイッチ57にスイッチ61が接続されることにより監視用受信部22と確認用受信部25との切替えが行われる。なお、監視用送信部21の通電電極11はスイッチ50とスイッチ58とが接続したものであり、発信電極14はスイッチ52とスイッチ59が接続したものである。また監視用受信部22の受信電極15はスイッチ54とスイッチ60とが接続したものであり、照合電極12はスイッチ56とスイッチ61とが接続したものである。このように各送信部同士及び各受信部同士は切替え装置13を用いて適宜切替えられる構成としてもよいし、切替え装置を用いずに、夫々単独で設ける構成としてもよい。   More specifically, when the monitoring transmission unit 21 and the confirmation transmission unit 24 are switched by the switching device 13 as shown in FIG. 1B, the energizing electrode 11 is switched between the switch 50 and the switch 51. The switch 51 is connected to the switch 58 and the transmitter electrode 14 is connected to the switch 59 by switching between the switch 52 and the switch 53. Switching to the transmission unit 22 is performed. In the switching between the monitoring receiver 22 and the confirmation receiver 25, the switch 60 is connected to the switch 55 by switching the switch 54 and the switch 55, and the verification electrode 12 is By switching between the switch 56 and the switch 57, the switch 61 is connected to the switch 57, thereby switching between the monitoring receiver 22 and the confirmation receiver 25. The energizing electrode 11 of the monitoring transmission unit 21 is connected to the switch 50 and the switch 58, and the transmitting electrode 14 is connected to the switch 52 and the switch 59. The receiving electrode 15 of the monitoring receiving unit 22 is connected to the switch 54 and the switch 60, and the verification electrode 12 is connected to the switch 56 and the switch 61. As described above, the transmission units and the reception units may be appropriately switched using the switching device 13 or may be configured independently without using the switching device.

確認用受信部で受信した直流電圧信号から、直流電流値または回路抵抗値を演算し、埋設管に損傷がない場合におけるこれらとを比較した結果、損傷があるものと判定した場合には警報を発生することができる。警報の発生は、確認用受信部で得られた信号と基準値とを前記処理装置26で比較し損傷の有無を判定し、損傷があると判定した場合には前記処理装置26から警報装置27へ信号を送る構成としても良い。   The DC current value or circuit resistance value is calculated from the DC voltage signal received by the receiving unit for confirmation, and compared with these when there is no damage to the buried pipe. Can be generated. When the alarm is generated, the processing device 26 compares the signal obtained by the receiving unit for confirmation with the reference value to determine the presence or absence of damage. When it is determined that there is damage, the processing device 26 issues an alarm device 27. It is good also as a structure which sends a signal to.

上記のように構成した損傷監視装置100で埋設管の損傷が発生したかどうかを監視する動作の一例を図2のフローチャートを用いて説明する。   An example of an operation for monitoring whether or not the buried pipe has been damaged by the damage monitoring apparatus 100 configured as described above will be described with reference to the flowchart of FIG.

監視用送信部21からは埋設管10に監視用交流信号を常時印加し(S1)、監視用受信部22にて監視用交流信号を常時受信する(S2)。監視用受信部13は得られた前記信号を処理装置26へ送信し、処理装置26は前記信号から接地抵抗値等を演算し(S3)、接地抵抗等と、基準値から埋設管に損傷がない場合におけるこれらの値とを比較し、基準値から変動しているか否かを判定する(S4)。前記接地抵抗が基準値から変動していると判定した場合には、その情報を確認用送信部24に送信し、切替え装置13にて監視用送信部21と確認用送信部24、及び監視用受信部22と確認用受信部25の切替えが行われ(S5)、確認用送信部24から埋設管に確認用直流信号が印加される(S6)。確認用受信部25は確認用直流信号を受信し(S7)、得られた前記信号を処理装置26に送信し、処理装置26は前記信号から出力電流値及び回路抵抗値を演算し(S8)、得られた出力電流値及び回路抵抗値と埋設管10に損傷がない場合におけるこれらの値とを比較し損傷の有無を判定する(S9)。埋設管10の損傷があると判定した場合にはその情報を警報装置27に送信し、情報を受けた警報装置27は警報を発生する(S10)。   A monitoring AC signal is constantly applied from the monitoring transmitter 21 to the buried pipe 10 (S1), and the monitoring receiver 22 always receives the monitoring AC signal (S2). The monitoring receiver 13 transmits the obtained signal to the processing device 26, and the processing device 26 calculates a ground resistance value and the like from the signal (S3), and the buried pipe is damaged from the ground resistance and the reference value. These values are compared with those in the case where there is not, and it is determined whether or not there is a fluctuation from the reference value (S4). If it is determined that the grounding resistance has fluctuated from the reference value, the information is transmitted to the confirmation transmission unit 24, and the switching device 13 uses the monitoring transmission unit 21, the confirmation transmission unit 24, and the monitoring unit. Switching between the reception unit 22 and the confirmation reception unit 25 is performed (S5), and a confirmation DC signal is applied from the confirmation transmission unit 24 to the buried pipe (S6). The confirmation receiving unit 25 receives the confirmation DC signal (S7), transmits the obtained signal to the processing device 26, and the processing device 26 calculates an output current value and a circuit resistance value from the signal (S8). Then, the obtained output current value and circuit resistance value are compared with these values when the buried pipe 10 is not damaged, and the presence or absence of damage is determined (S9). When it is determined that the buried pipe 10 is damaged, the information is transmitted to the alarm device 27, and the alarm device 27 that receives the information generates an alarm (S10).

このように、監視用交流信号を印加した場合において接地抵抗等が基準値から変動した場合であっても直ちに警報を発生させず、確認用直流信号を印加することで得られるノイズの影響のない出力電流値および回路抵抗値と、埋設管に損傷がない場合におけるこれらの値とを比較判定し、損傷があると判定した場合にはじめて警報を発生することで、監視用交流信号印加時において生じていた埋設管に損傷がない場合に起こる誤報の発生を防止し、埋設管の損傷を正確に検知することが可能となる。   Thus, even when the monitoring AC signal is applied, even if the ground resistance or the like fluctuates from the reference value, an alarm is not immediately generated, and there is no influence of noise obtained by applying the confirmation DC signal. This occurs when a monitoring AC signal is applied by comparing the output current value and circuit resistance value with these values when there is no damage to the buried pipe and generating an alarm only when it is determined that there is damage. It is possible to prevent the occurrence of a false alarm that occurs when the buried pipe is not damaged, and to accurately detect the damage of the buried pipe.

本発明の埋設管監視方法を実施例を用いてさらに具体的に説明する。   The buried pipe monitoring method of the present invention will be described more specifically with reference to examples.

図3(a)は埋設管を模擬した水槽における模擬損傷監視試験回路を示す図である。図3(b)は図3(a)のY部拡大図である。   FIG. 3A is a diagram showing a simulated damage monitoring test circuit in a water tank simulating a buried pipe. FIG. 3B is an enlarged view of the Y part in FIG.

接地抵抗10Ωの被覆鋼管100に擬似ランダム信号発信・受信ユニット収納盤101より−2000V(飽和硫酸銅電極基準)となるような電気防食電流と、交流信号0.14Vの正弦波20Hz、符号長127の損傷監視用擬似ランダム信号を印加し、任意波形発生装置102及び定電流電源装置103よりノイズ電流を発生させ、接地抵抗100Ωの電極棒111を被覆装欠損部114(#01〜#10)に接触させ、接地抵抗の低下を確認した。なお、被覆鋼管100は、被覆装部113と、被覆装部を欠損させた被覆装欠損部114から構成されている。   An anti-corrosion current that is -2000 V (saturated copper sulfate electrode reference) from the pseudo-random signal transmission / reception unit storage board 101 to the coated steel pipe 100 having a ground resistance of 10 Ω, a sine wave of AC signal 0.14 V, 20 Hz, code length 127 A pseudo-random signal for damage monitoring is applied to generate a noise current from the arbitrary waveform generator 102 and the constant current power supply device 103, and the electrode rod 111 having a ground resistance of 100Ω is applied to the covering defect portion 114 (# 01 to # 10). It was made to contact and the fall of grounding resistance was confirmed. Note that the coated steel pipe 100 includes a coated portion 113 and a coated missing portion 114 in which the coated portion is missing.

次に10Ωの接地抵抗の被覆鋼管100に、接地抵抗100Ωの電極棒111を被覆装欠損部114(#01〜#10)に接触させた状態で直流電源装置104から直流電圧12Vを印加したときの直流管対地電位及び出力電流を測定した。高電圧印加時には擬似ランダム信号発信・受信機101への直流電流回り込みや装置保護のため、リレー回路105の操作により一旦擬似ランダム信号受信・受信機101を切り離した。   Next, when DC voltage 12V is applied from the DC power supply device 104 to the coated steel pipe 100 having a ground resistance of 10Ω with the electrode rod 111 having a ground resistance of 100Ω being in contact with the covering defect portion 114 (# 01 to # 10). The DC tube ground potential and output current were measured. When a high voltage is applied, the pseudo-random signal receiver / receiver 101 is temporarily disconnected by operating the relay circuit 105 in order to circulate the pseudo-random signal and circulate DC current to the receiver 101 and protect the device.

このとき収集した管対地電位変動を元に任意波形発生装置102でノイズ信号を発生し、水槽内の電極間に定電流通電した。   A noise signal was generated by the arbitrary waveform generator 102 based on the collected tube-to-ground potential fluctuation, and a constant current was applied between the electrodes in the water tank.

模擬損傷接触の有無における直流電圧印加前後の出力電流および回路抵抗のチャートを図4に示す。損傷接触がない場合の高電圧印加前の回路抵抗値をX(i)に、高電圧印加
後の回路抵抗値をY(i)に、損傷接触がある場合の高電圧印加前の回路抵抗値をX(ii)に、高電圧印加後の回路抵抗値をY(ii)に示す。X(i)からも明らかなように損傷接触がない場合であっても直流電圧印加前は、ノイズの影響により出力電流が変動するため回路抵抗は大きく変動し、回路抵抗が基準値である基準値Aより低下する場合が生ずる。また、模擬損傷接触により回路抵抗は低下するが、模擬損傷接触後における回路抵抗の低下は模擬損傷接触なしの場合におけるチャート変動幅X(ii)の範囲内となり損傷の判定を行うことができない。一方、直流電圧印加後の回路抵抗値は、Y(i)、Y(ii)からも明らかなようにノイズの影響を受けないことから、損傷の有無に係わらず一定値となっており、損傷がない場合には基準値である基準値B(i)より低下する現象は生じない。さらに高電圧印加後の模擬損傷接触がない場合における回路抵抗値と、模擬損傷接触がある場合の回路抵抗値とを比較すると、損傷がない場合に対して損傷がある場合に回路抵抗値は基準値B(i)より低下していることがわかる。
FIG. 4 shows a chart of output current and circuit resistance before and after application of a DC voltage with and without simulated damage contact. When there is no damaged contact, the circuit resistance value before high voltage application is X (i), the circuit resistance value after high voltage application is Y (i), and when there is damage contact, the circuit resistance value before high voltage application Is represented by X (ii), and the circuit resistance value after application of the high voltage is represented by Y (ii). As is clear from X (i), even when there is no damaged contact, before the DC voltage is applied, the output current fluctuates due to the influence of noise, so the circuit resistance fluctuates greatly. In some cases, the value drops below A. In addition, the circuit resistance decreases due to the simulated damage contact, but the decrease in the circuit resistance after the simulated damage contact falls within the range of the chart fluctuation width X (ii) when there is no simulated damage contact, so that the determination of damage cannot be made. On the other hand, the circuit resistance value after application of the DC voltage is not affected by noise, as is apparent from Y (i) and Y (ii). In the absence of the phenomenon, the phenomenon of lowering the reference value B (i) which is the reference value does not occur. Furthermore, comparing the circuit resistance value when there is no simulated damaged contact after high voltage application and the circuit resistance value when there is a simulated damaged contact, the circuit resistance value is the reference when there is damage compared to when there is no damage. It can be seen that the value is lower than the value B (i).

また、高電圧印加後の模擬損傷接触がない場合における出力電流値(Y(iii))と、
模擬損傷接触がある場合の出力電流値(Y(iv))とを比較すると、損傷がない場合に対
して損傷がある場合に出力電流値は基準値B(ii)より上昇していることがわかる。
Also, the output current value (Y (iii)) when there is no simulated damage contact after high voltage application,
When compared with the output current value (Y (iv)) when there is a simulated damaged contact, the output current value is higher than the reference value B (ii) when there is damage compared to when there is no damage. Recognize.

このように、高電圧を印加することにより損傷がある場合には回路抵抗値は低下し、出力電流値は上昇することから、回路抵抗値及び出力電流値と損傷がない場合におけるこれらとを比較することで損傷を監視することができる。   In this way, when there is damage by applying a high voltage, the circuit resistance value decreases and the output current value increases, so compare the circuit resistance value and output current value with those when there is no damage. You can monitor for damage.

次に、模擬損傷がない場合と、塗覆装欠損部114である#01、#05、#10に損傷接触を行った場合の、直流電圧印加時の管対地電位(オン電位)、直流電圧印加時の出力電流(オン電流)、及び回路抵抗(直流電圧印加時の管対地電位/直流電圧印加時の出力電流)を図5に示す。損傷接触は各塗覆装欠損部114について2回ずつ行った。   Next, when there is no simulated damage and when damaged contact is made on the coating defect portions 114, # 01, # 05, and # 10, the tube-to-ground potential (on potential) and DC voltage when a DC voltage is applied FIG. 5 shows the output current (ON current) at the time of application and the circuit resistance (tube-to-ground potential when DC voltage is applied / output current when DC voltage is applied). Damage contact was performed twice for each coating defect 114.

図5からも明らかなように、模擬損傷接触のある場合の出力電流値及び回路抵抗値は、損傷がない場合に対して電流値で1.06〜1.1倍の変動を示し、回路抵抗値は0.925〜0.9倍の変動を示しており顕著な変動が確認でき、直流電圧印加前後の直流電流値または回路抵抗値の変動を計測することで、容易に損傷の有無を判定することができる。   As is clear from FIG. 5, the output current value and the circuit resistance value in the case of the simulated damaged contact show fluctuations of 1.06 to 1.1 times in the current value with respect to the case of no damage, and the circuit resistance The value shows a fluctuation of 0.925 to 0.9 times, and a remarkable fluctuation can be confirmed. By measuring the fluctuation of the DC current value or the circuit resistance value before and after the DC voltage application, the presence or absence of damage can be easily determined. can do.

(a)は埋設管損傷監視装置を概念的に示した図であり、(b)は図1(a)におけるX部の拡大図である。(A) is the figure which showed the buried pipe damage monitoring apparatus notionally, (b) is the enlarged view of the X section in FIG. 1 (a). 埋設管損傷監視処理を示すフローチャートである。It is a flowchart which shows a buried pipe damage monitoring process. (a)は模擬損傷試験回路を示す図である。(b)は図3(a)におけるY部の拡大図である。(A) is a figure which shows the simulation damage test circuit. FIG. 3B is an enlarged view of a Y portion in FIG. 模擬損傷接触の有無における直流電圧印加前後の出力電流および回路抵抗のチャートである。It is a chart of the output current and circuit resistance before and after the DC voltage application in the presence or absence of simulated damage contact. 直流電圧印加時の管対地電位、出力電流、回路抵抗を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the tube ground potential at the time of DC voltage application, an output current, and circuit resistance.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

10…埋設管
11…通電電極
12…照合電極
13…切替え装置
14…発信電極
15…受信電極
20…損傷監視ユニット
21…監視用送信部
22…監視用受信部
23…損傷確認ユニット
24…確認用送信部
25…確認用受信部
26…処理装置
27…警報装置
100…接地抵抗10Ωの被覆針金
101…擬似ランダム信号発信・受信ユニット収納盤
102…任意波形発生装置
103…定電流電源装置
104…直流電源装置
105…リレー回路
111…接地抵抗100Ωの電極棒
112…ノイズ通電電極
113…塗覆装部
114…塗覆装欠陥部
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 10 ... Embedded pipe 11 ... Current supply electrode 12 ... Collation electrode 13 ... Switching device 14 ... Transmitting electrode 15 ... Reception electrode 20 ... Damage monitoring unit 21 ... Monitoring transmission part 22 ... Monitoring receiving part 23 ... Damage confirmation unit 24 ... Confirmation Transmitter 25 ... Confirmation receiver 26 ... Processing device 27 ... Alarm device 100 ... Covering wire 101 with ground resistance of 10 Ω ... Pseudo random signal transmission / reception unit storage panel 102 ... Arbitrary waveform generator 103 ... Constant current power supply device 104 ... DC Power supply device 105 ... Relay circuit 111 ... Electrode rod 112 with ground resistance of 100Ω ... Noise conducting electrode 113 ... Coating part 114 ... Coating defect part

Claims (5)

監視用送信部において埋設管に常時印加する監視用交流信号を、監視用受信部において常時受信し、受信した監視用交流信号と埋設管に損傷がない場合における基準値とを比較し、その変動により埋設管の損傷を監視する埋設管損傷監視方法において、
監視用受信部において受信した前記監視用交流信号が埋設管に損傷がない場合における基準値から変動した場合には、確認用送信部から該埋設管に確認用直流信号を一定電圧で印加し、確認用受信部において得られる出力電流値または回路抵抗値と、埋設管に損傷がない場合における出力電流値または回路抵抗値と、の比較を行うことで埋設管の損傷の有無を判定することを特徴とする埋設管損傷監視方法。
A monitoring AC signal that is constantly applied to the buried pipe in the monitoring transmitter is constantly received by the monitoring receiver, and the received monitoring AC signal is compared with the reference value when the buried pipe is not damaged, and the fluctuation In the buried pipe damage monitoring method for monitoring the buried pipe damage by
When the monitoring AC signal received by the monitoring receiver varies from a reference value when the buried pipe is not damaged, a confirmation DC signal is applied to the buried pipe from the confirmation transmitter at a constant voltage, It is determined whether the buried pipe is damaged by comparing the output current value or circuit resistance value obtained in the receiving unit for confirmation with the output current value or circuit resistance value when the buried pipe is not damaged. Characterized buried pipe damage monitoring method.
前記確認用送信部から印加される確認用直流信号が、60V以下の直流電圧であることを特徴とする請求項1に記載の埋設管損傷監視方法。   2. The buried pipe damage monitoring method according to claim 1, wherein the confirmation DC signal applied from the confirmation transmission unit is a DC voltage of 60 V or less. 埋設管の送信点から監視用交流信号を常時印加する第一の送信手段と、前記監視用交流信号を常時受信する第一の受信手段と、受信した監視用交流信号と損傷がない場合における基準値との変動を比較する第一の比較手段と、前記第一の比較手段における比較結果に応じて確認用直流信号を印加する第二の送信手段と、前記確認用直流信号を受信する第二の受信手段と、前記第二の受信手段で得られる情報と埋設管に損傷がない場合における基準値との変動を比較する第二の比較手段と、を含むことを特徴とする埋設管損傷監視装置。   A first transmission means for constantly applying a monitoring AC signal from a transmission point of the buried pipe, a first receiving means for constantly receiving the monitoring AC signal, and a reference when the received monitoring AC signal is not damaged First comparison means for comparing fluctuations with the value, second transmission means for applying a confirmation DC signal according to the comparison result in the first comparison means, and second reception means for receiving the confirmation DC signal Embedded pipe damage monitoring, comprising: a receiving means; and a second comparing means for comparing information obtained by the second receiving means with a reference value when the buried pipe is not damaged. apparatus. 前記埋設管損傷監視装置は、前記確認用直流信号印加時に監視用交流信号の送信と確認用直流信号の送信、及び監視用交流信号の受信と確認用直流信号の受信と、を切替える切替え手段を含むことを特徴とする請求項3に記載の埋設管損傷監視装置。   The buried pipe damage monitoring device includes switching means for switching between transmission of a monitoring AC signal and transmission of a confirmation DC signal, and reception of a monitoring AC signal and reception of a confirmation DC signal when the confirmation DC signal is applied. The buried pipe damage monitoring apparatus according to claim 3, comprising: 前記確認用直流信号が、60V以下の直流電圧であることを特徴とする請求項3または4に記載の埋設管損傷監視装置。   The buried pipe damage monitoring apparatus according to claim 3 or 4, wherein the confirmation DC signal is a DC voltage of 60V or less.
JP2008048361A 2008-02-28 2008-02-28 Embedded pipe damage monitoring method and buried pipe damage monitoring apparatus Expired - Fee Related JP4867932B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2008048361A JP4867932B2 (en) 2008-02-28 2008-02-28 Embedded pipe damage monitoring method and buried pipe damage monitoring apparatus

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2008048361A JP4867932B2 (en) 2008-02-28 2008-02-28 Embedded pipe damage monitoring method and buried pipe damage monitoring apparatus

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2009204522A JP2009204522A (en) 2009-09-10
JP4867932B2 true JP4867932B2 (en) 2012-02-01

Family

ID=41146942

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2008048361A Expired - Fee Related JP4867932B2 (en) 2008-02-28 2008-02-28 Embedded pipe damage monitoring method and buried pipe damage monitoring apparatus

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4867932B2 (en)

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH02203263A (en) * 1989-02-01 1990-08-13 Osaka Gas Co Ltd Method for detecting damage of buried body having electric insulating coating layer
JPH08145934A (en) * 1994-11-24 1996-06-07 Tokyo Gas Co Ltd Method and apparatus for monitoring damage degree of coated steel pipe
JP2004198410A (en) * 2002-12-02 2004-07-15 Osaka Gas Co Ltd Method for inspecting defect in coated pipe, and method for diagnosing corrosion

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2009204522A (en) 2009-09-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6779761B2 (en) Broken rail detection
KR102918958B1 (en) Partial discharge monitoring device and partial discharge monitoring method
JP4812687B2 (en) Method and apparatus for measuring and evaluating cathodic protection of buried pipelines
US10605853B2 (en) Method and device for extended insulation fault location in an ungrounded power supply system and method for status monitoring of the power supply system
US7782062B2 (en) Method for locating leaks in pipes
JP4343090B2 (en) Method and apparatus for measuring and evaluating stray current corrosion risk for buried metal body cathodic protected
JP2004250779A (en) Security method and security device for buried structure
JP5719970B2 (en) Scintillation estimation method
JP4867932B2 (en) Embedded pipe damage monitoring method and buried pipe damage monitoring apparatus
EP3391064B1 (en) A method of locating a fault in a power transmission medium
JP2004176103A (en) Electric corrosion control system and method for buried structure
JP2009244123A (en) Method and apparatus for monitoring damage on coating of underground pipe
CN109989066B (en) Method and device for processing cathodic protection data
JP6045524B2 (en) AC corrosion risk measurement evaluation method and measurement evaluation system for buried metal bodies
JP6030518B2 (en) Method for measuring cathodic protection of buried pipelines
JP3670241B2 (en) Damage monitoring device and damage monitoring method for underground pipe
KR20090078515A (en) Leakage current occurrence position detection method and detection device
JP5012573B2 (en) Buried pipe monitoring device
JP2011220788A (en) Insulation level monitoring device and method for calculating insulation resistance
JP4050433B2 (en) Damage determination apparatus and damage determination method for coated buried metal conductor
JP4698318B2 (en) Anticorrosion state monitoring method and system
CN107727970B (en) Detection method and system for alternating current drainage device of buried steel pipeline
JP4951014B2 (en) Cable status judging apparatus and method
JP3737203B2 (en) Method and apparatus for detecting coating damage in buried pipeline
JP4962379B2 (en) Buried pipe cathodic protection system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20100303

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20111013

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20111018

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20111031

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20141125

Year of fee payment: 3

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees