Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP4878709B2 - Failure analysis method for semiconductor device - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP4878709B2 - Failure analysis method for semiconductor device - Google Patents

Failure analysis method for semiconductor device Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP4878709B2
JP4878709B2 JP2001258958A JP2001258958A JP4878709B2 JP 4878709 B2 JP4878709 B2 JP 4878709B2 JP 2001258958 A JP2001258958 A JP 2001258958A JP 2001258958 A JP2001258958 A JP 2001258958A JP 4878709 B2 JP4878709 B2 JP 4878709B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
contact portion
analysis method
semiconductor device
semiconductor chip
wiring
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP2001258958A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2003068814A (en
Inventor
守 金子
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
On Semiconductor Trading Ltd
Original Assignee
On Semiconductor Trading Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by On Semiconductor Trading Ltd filed Critical On Semiconductor Trading Ltd
Priority to JP2001258958A priority Critical patent/JP4878709B2/en
Publication of JP2003068814A publication Critical patent/JP2003068814A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4878709B2 publication Critical patent/JP4878709B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Testing Of Short-Circuits, Discontinuities, Leakage, Or Incorrect Line Connections (AREA)
  • Tests Of Electronic Circuits (AREA)
  • Testing Or Measuring Of Semiconductors Or The Like (AREA)

Description

【0001】
【発明の属する技術分野】
本発明は、半導体装置の故障解析方法に関し、更に言えば、偏光法によるコンタクト断線の故障解析技術に関する。
【0002】
【従来の技術】
一般的に、LSIの故障原因の多くは電気配線の断線ショートである。徹底的なクリーン活動が行われている現在でも欠陥の正体は異物であり、装置のチャンバー内で発生するダストが原因となることが多い。
【0003】
従来からLSIの故障解析は、LSIテスター等により故障箇所を特定した後、適当な方法で薄膜を一層ずつ除去し、故障箇所をSEMや光学顕微鏡で観察して欠陥を見つける観察方法が行われていた。
【0004】
【発明が解決しようとする課題】
LSIの金属配線におけるコンタクト部の開口欠陥をチップ表面から検出するのは、多くの場合絶望的である。
【0005】
即ち、断線では発光等の物理現象を伴わないため、電気的測定以外に明確に判別できる手段がないからである。
【0006】
金属配線のコンタクト形状不良による故障は、現象それ自体は単純であるが、故障箇所を可視化して、場所を特定するのは容易ではない。
【0007】
仮にできるとすれば、例えばトランジスタ1個というような単体デバイスやTEGパターンならば電気的測定から断線箇所を絞り込めるかもしれないが、集積回路ではLSIテスターによる電気的な測定から断線箇所を絞り込むことは現実的には不可能である。
【0008】
不良箇所が特定できれば、FIB(フォーカス・イオン・ビーム)で断面加工してコンタクト部の未開口部の形状を調べて断線の有無を判断できる場合もある。ただし、FIBは1次元的な解析手法である。チップ内で線上の加工であり、場所の特定という一般に行われている2次元的な解析はできない。
【0009】
しかも、FIBでは1箇所の断面加工だけで数時間を要するため、故障が疑わしいコンタクト部が仮に数百、数千個レベルに絞れたとしてもそれを1個1個、断面加工して形状を確認することは事実上不可能であり、努力の意味がない。
【0010】
結局、断線部の特定ができなければ、FIBによる解析手法の適用はできず、コンタクト断線の調査は、従来不可能な解析分野であった。
【0011】
【課題を解決するための手段】
そこで、上記課題に鑑み本発明の半導体装置の故障解析方法は、偏光顕微鏡を用いた偏光法により、コンタクト部における形状不良を当該コンタクト部に光を照射し、その反射光の方向成分を観察することで、コンタクト部の形状不良を検出することを特徴とするものである。
【0012】
【発明の実施の形態】
以下、本発明の半導体装置の故障解析方法に係る一実施形態について図面を参照しながら説明する。
【0013】
ここで、本発明の特徴は、FIBによる故障解析手法を適用することなく、断線しているコンタクト部を認識して断線箇所を検出する方法を提供するものでありる。以下、下層部と上層部とをコンタクトするコンタクト部を有する2層配線プロセスを一例にして説明する。
【0014】
図1はモールド樹脂11によりモールドされた半導体装置(チップ)12の斜視図である。
【0015】
図2に示す試料12Aにおいて、1は半導体基板で、当該基板1上に素子分離膜2が形成され、それ以外の領域にゲート絶縁膜3が形成されている。また、前記ゲート絶縁膜3を介してゲート電極4が形成され、当該ゲート電極4に隣接するようにソース・ドレイン領域5,6が形成されている。更に、前記ゲート電極4を被覆するように形成された層間絶縁膜7を介して前記ソース・ドレイン領域5,6にコンタクトする下層配線8が形成され、それらを被覆するように層間絶縁膜9が形成され、当該層間絶縁膜9を介して前記下層配線8にコンタクトする上層配線10が形成されている。そして、図示した説明は省略するがその上をパッシベーション膜で被覆されて半導体装置が構成される。
【0016】
また、図3に示す試料12Bは、前記半導体基板1上の素子分離膜2上にゲート配線4Aが形成され、当該ゲート配線4Aを被覆するように形成された層間絶縁膜7を介してゲート配線4Aにコンタクトする配線8Aが形成されている。そして、図示した説明は省略するがその上をパッシベーション膜等の保護膜で被覆されて半導体装置が構成される。
【0017】
そして、2層配線プロセスにおけるコンタクト部の断線故障には、(I)下層配線8と上層配線10間のコンタクト部、(II)下層配線8とソース・ドレイン拡散領域5,6間のコンタクト部(以上、図2参照)、そして(III)配線8Aとゲート配線4A間のコンタクト部(図3参照)の3通りがある。
【0018】
上記(II),(III)のコンタクト部の断線故障箇所を特定するために、以下の処理を試料に施す。
【0019】
先ず、図1に示すようにモールド樹脂11をオープナーを使って開封し、チップ12を露出させる。
【0020】
次に、チップ12上のシリコン窒化膜等の保護膜(図示省略)を除去する。
【0021】
続いて、図4に示すように前記上層配線10を除去する。尚、図4(a)はコンタクト形状が正常な場合を示し、図4(b)はコンタクト形状が異常な(断線箇所13を有する)場合を示している。
【0022】
更に、図5に示すように試料12Bを偏光顕微鏡20の作業台21上にセットして観察する。
【0023】
ここで、上記偏光顕微鏡20の構成について説明すると、接眼レンズ22の手前側(観察者側から見て(矢印A参照))に偏光子23,24が2枚挿入されて成り、この2枚の偏光子23,24の一方(本実施形態では、偏光子23側)を回転させることで、反射光の中から特定の成分だけを取り出すことができる。
【0024】
そして、形状が正常なコンタクト部は、明るく輝いて観察できるが、形状不良のコンタクト部では暗く観察されるため、両者の違いが識別できる。
【0025】
尚、このような偏光顕微鏡については、「偏光顕微鏡」坪井誠太郎著、岩波書店等に詳しく記載されている。
【0026】
このとき、光源から出た光((1))は、透明な層間絶縁膜9を貫通して下層配線8Bに到達する。そして、コンタクト部分が正常な形状をしている場合(図4(a))には、前記光((1))は下層配線8Bの表面で適正な方向((2))に反射するが、コンタクト部分の形状がゆがんでいるとか、下層配線8Bに微小な欠落(例えば、断線箇所13)が存在するとかの、コンタクト部分が異常な形状をしている場合(図4(b))には、光((1))がLSI内部に入り込んだりして、形状が正常な場合と異なる方向((3),(4))に反射することになる。
【0027】
通常の観察の場合、観察像には全く変化がない。これは、光の強度だけを観察しているからである。しかし、上述したように2つの反射光((2)と(3),(4))の方向成分は異なる。従って、両者の反射光の方向の違いから両者を識別することができる。
【0028】
このように本発明では、膨大な時間のかかるFIBを使用せずに、コンタクト部の形状不良箇所を検出できる。そして、コンタクト部の不良部分を2次元的に非常に広い領域で解析することができ、故障箇所の特定が容易になる。
【0029】
尚、上記(I)の場合には、前述したモールド樹脂11をオープナーを使って開封し、チップ12を露出させる処理のみで、断線部の可視化が可能になる。
【0030】
以上のように本発明では、光の波の性質を利用して反射光の方向成分の違いから形状不良のコンタクト部を輝度で識別するため、形状不良のコンタクト部の特定が容易になる。
【0031】
【発明の効果】
本発明によれば、偏光法を利用して反射光の方向成分の違いから形状不良のコンタクト部を輝度で識別するため、膨大な時間のかかるFIBを使用する必要がなくなり、故障解析の作業性が向上する。
【図面の簡単な説明】
【図1】本発明の一実施形態の半導体装置の故障解析方法を示す斜視図である。
【図2】本発明の一実施形態の半導体装置の故障解析方法を示す断面図である。
【図3】本発明の一実施形態の半導体装置の故障解析方法を示す断面図である。
【図4】本発明の一実施形態の半導体装置の故障解析方法を示す断面図である。
【図5】本発明の半導体装置の故障解析方法に用いる偏光顕微鏡を示す図である。
[0001]
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a failure analysis method for a semiconductor device, and more particularly to a failure analysis technique for contact disconnection by a polarization method.
[0002]
[Prior art]
In general, many of the causes of LSI failures are short-circuits in electrical wiring. Even today, when thorough clean-up activities are being carried out, the true identity of the defect is a foreign substance, often caused by dust generated in the chamber of the apparatus.
[0003]
Conventionally, LSI failure analysis has been performed by an observation method in which a failure point is identified by an LSI tester, the thin film is removed one by one by an appropriate method, and the failure point is observed with an SEM or an optical microscope. It was.
[0004]
[Problems to be solved by the invention]
It is often hopeless to detect an opening defect in a contact portion of an LSI metal wiring from the chip surface.
[0005]
That is, the disconnection does not involve a physical phenomenon such as light emission, and therefore there is no means that can be clearly discriminated other than electrical measurement.
[0006]
A failure due to a defective contact shape of the metal wiring is simple in itself, but it is not easy to visualize the failure location and specify the location.
[0007]
If possible, for example, a single device such as one transistor or a TEG pattern may narrow down the disconnection point from electrical measurement, but in an integrated circuit, narrow down the disconnection point from electrical measurement by an LSI tester. Is practically impossible.
[0008]
If the defective portion can be identified, it may be possible to determine whether or not there is a disconnection by processing the cross section with FIB (focus ion beam) and examining the shape of the unopened portion of the contact portion. However, FIB is a one-dimensional analysis method. This is processing on a line within the chip, and the two-dimensional analysis that is generally performed, that is, specifying the location, cannot be performed.
[0009]
Moreover, since FIB takes several hours to process only one section, even if the number of contact parts that are suspected of being broken are limited to the level of several hundreds or thousands, one by one, the section is processed and the shape is confirmed. It is virtually impossible to do, and there is no point in effort.
[0010]
After all, if the disconnection portion cannot be specified, the analysis method by FIB cannot be applied, and the contact disconnection investigation has been an impossible analysis field.
[0011]
[Means for Solving the Problems]
Therefore, in view of the above problems, the failure analysis method for a semiconductor device according to the present invention irradiates the contact portion with light for a shape defect in the contact portion by a polarization method using a polarization microscope, and observes the direction component of the reflected light. Thus, the shape defect of the contact portion is detected.
[0012]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Hereinafter, an embodiment according to a failure analysis method for a semiconductor device of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.
[0013]
Here, the feature of the present invention is to provide a method for recognizing a broken contact portion and detecting a broken portion without applying a failure analysis method using FIB. Hereinafter, a two-layer wiring process having a contact portion that contacts the lower layer portion and the upper layer portion will be described as an example.
[0014]
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a semiconductor device (chip) 12 molded with a mold resin 11.
[0015]
In the sample 12A shown in FIG. 2, reference numeral 1 denotes a semiconductor substrate, the element isolation film 2 is formed on the substrate 1, and the gate insulating film 3 is formed in other regions. A gate electrode 4 is formed through the gate insulating film 3, and source / drain regions 5 and 6 are formed adjacent to the gate electrode 4. Further, a lower layer wiring 8 is formed in contact with the source / drain regions 5 and 6 through an interlayer insulating film 7 formed so as to cover the gate electrode 4, and an interlayer insulating film 9 is formed so as to cover them. An upper layer wiring 10 that is formed and contacts the lower layer wiring 8 through the interlayer insulating film 9 is formed. Although not shown in the drawings, the semiconductor device is configured by covering the top with a passivation film.
[0016]
Further, in the sample 12B shown in FIG. 3, the gate wiring 4A is formed on the element isolation film 2 on the semiconductor substrate 1, and the gate wiring is interposed via the interlayer insulating film 7 formed so as to cover the gate wiring 4A. A wiring 8A that contacts 4A is formed. Although not shown in the drawings, the semiconductor device is configured by covering the top with a protective film such as a passivation film.
[0017]
The disconnection failure of the contact portion in the two-layer wiring process includes (I) a contact portion between the lower layer wiring 8 and the upper layer wiring 10, and (II) a contact portion between the lower layer wiring 8 and the source / drain diffusion regions 5 and 6 ( There are three types of contact portions (see FIG. 2) and (III) contact portions (see FIG. 3) between the wiring 8A and the gate wiring 4A.
[0018]
In order to identify the disconnection failure location of the contact portions (II) and (III), the following processing is performed on the sample.
[0019]
First, as shown in FIG. 1, the mold resin 11 is opened using an opener, and the chip 12 is exposed.
[0020]
Next, a protective film (not shown) such as a silicon nitride film on the chip 12 is removed.
[0021]
Subsequently, the upper layer wiring 10 is removed as shown in FIG. 4A shows a case where the contact shape is normal, and FIG. 4B shows a case where the contact shape is abnormal (has a broken portion 13).
[0022]
Further, as shown in FIG. 5, the sample 12B is set on the work table 21 of the polarizing microscope 20 and observed.
[0023]
Here, the configuration of the polarizing microscope 20 will be described. Two polarizers 23 and 24 are inserted on the front side of the eyepiece 22 (see from the observer side (see arrow A)). By rotating one of the polarizers 23 and 24 (in this embodiment, the polarizer 23 side), only a specific component can be extracted from the reflected light.
[0024]
The contact portion having a normal shape can be observed brightly and brightly, but the contact portion having a defective shape is observed darkly, so that the difference between the two can be identified.
[0025]
Such a polarizing microscope is described in detail in “Polarizing Microscope” written by Seitaro Tsuboi, Iwanami Shoten and others.
[0026]
At this time, the light ((1)) emitted from the light source passes through the transparent interlayer insulating film 9 and reaches the lower layer wiring 8B. When the contact portion has a normal shape (FIG. 4A), the light ((1)) is reflected in an appropriate direction ((2)) on the surface of the lower layer wiring 8B. When the contact portion has an abnormal shape, such as the shape of the contact portion is distorted or there is a minute missing portion (for example, a disconnection portion 13) in the lower layer wiring 8B (FIG. 4B). The light ((1)) enters the LSI and is reflected in a different direction ((3), (4)) from the case where the shape is normal.
[0027]
In normal observation, there is no change in the observed image. This is because only the intensity of light is observed. However, as described above, the direction components of the two reflected lights ((2), (3), (4)) are different. Therefore, it is possible to distinguish both from the difference in the direction of the reflected light.
[0028]
As described above, according to the present invention, it is possible to detect a defective shape portion of the contact portion without using a FIB that takes a long time. Then, the defective portion of the contact portion can be analyzed in a two-dimensionally very wide region, and the failure location can be easily identified.
[0029]
In the case of (I), the disconnection portion can be visualized only by opening the mold resin 11 described above using an opener and exposing the chip 12.
[0030]
As described above, according to the present invention, the defectively shaped contact portion is identified by the luminance based on the difference in the direction component of the reflected light by utilizing the property of the light wave, so that it is easy to identify the poorly shaped contact portion.
[0031]
【Effect of the invention】
According to the present invention, since the contact portion having a poor shape is identified by the luminance based on the difference in the direction component of the reflected light using the polarization method, it is not necessary to use the FIB which takes a long time, and the workability of failure analysis is improved. Will improve.
[Brief description of the drawings]
FIG. 1 is a perspective view showing a failure analysis method for a semiconductor device according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view illustrating a failure analysis method for a semiconductor device according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view showing a failure analysis method for a semiconductor device according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view showing a failure analysis method for a semiconductor device according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 5 is a diagram showing a polarization microscope used in the failure analysis method for a semiconductor device of the present invention.

Claims (3)

下層部と上層部とをコンタクトするコンタクト部の断線不良を解析する半導体装置の故障解析方法において、
偏光顕微鏡を用いて、前記コンタクト部に光を照射し、前記コンタクト部からの反射光の中から特定の偏光成分を取り出し、取り出された前記偏光成分による当該コンタクト部の観察像の輝度に基づいて、前記コンタクト部の断線不良を検出することを特徴とする半導体装置の故障解析方法。
In a failure analysis method of a semiconductor device that analyzes a disconnection failure of a contact portion that contacts a lower layer portion and an upper layer portion,
Using a polarizing microscope, irradiate the contact part with light , extract a specific polarization component from the reflected light from the contact part, and based on the brightness of the observation image of the contact part by the extracted polarization component A failure analysis method for a semiconductor device , comprising detecting a disconnection failure in the contact portion.
モールド樹脂によりモールドされた半導体チップの中に形成され、下層部と上層部とをコンタクトするコンタクト部の断線不良を解析する半導体装置の故障解析方法において、
前記コンタクト部は、ゲート配線又はソース・ドレイン拡散領域にコンタクトする下層配線を含む第1のコンタクト部と、前記下層配線にコンタクトする上層配線を含む第2のコンタクト部と、を備え、
モールドされた前記半導体チップを開封することで、前記半導体チップを露出し、
露出された前記半導体チップの前記上層配線を被覆する保護膜を除去し、
前記保護膜を除去した後に前記上層配線を除去し、
偏光顕微鏡を用いて、上層配線が除去された前記半導体チップの前記第1のコンタクト部に光を照射し、当該第1のコンタクト部からの反射光の中から特定の偏光成分を取り出し、取り出された前記偏光成分による当該第1のコンタクト部の観察像の輝度に基づいて、当該第1のコンタクト部の断線不良を検出することを特徴とする半導体装置の故障解析方法。
In a failure analysis method for a semiconductor device that is formed in a semiconductor chip molded with a mold resin and analyzes a disconnection failure of a contact portion that contacts a lower layer portion and an upper layer portion,
The contact portion includes a first contact portion including a lower layer wiring that contacts a gate wiring or a source / drain diffusion region, and a second contact portion including an upper layer wiring contacting the lower layer wiring,
By opening the molded semiconductor chip, the semiconductor chip is exposed,
Removing a protective film covering the upper layer wiring of the exposed semiconductor chip;
Removing the upper wiring after removing the protective film,
Using a polarization microscope, the first contact portion of the semiconductor chip from which the upper wiring is removed is irradiated with light, and a specific polarization component is extracted from the reflected light from the first contact portion and taken out. A failure analysis method for a semiconductor device, comprising: detecting a disconnection failure of the first contact portion based on a luminance of an observation image of the first contact portion due to the polarization component .
モールド樹脂によりモールドされた半導体チップの中に形成され、下層部と上層部とをコンタクトするコンタクト部の断線不良を解析する半導体装置の故障解析方法において、
前記コンタクト部は、ゲート配線又はソース・ドレイン拡散領域にコンタクトする下層配線を含む第1のコンタクト部と、前記下層配線にコンタクトする上層配線を含む第2のコンタクト部と、を備え、
モールドされた前記半導体チップを開封することで、前記半導体チップを露出し、
偏光顕微鏡を用いて、露出された前記半導体チップの前記第2のコンタクト部に光を照射し、当該第2のコンタクト部からの反射光の中から特定の偏光成分を取り出し、取り出された前記偏光成分による当該第2のコンタクト部の観察像の輝度に基づいて、当該第2のコンタクト部の断線不良を検出することを特徴とする半導体装置の故障解析方法。
In a failure analysis method for a semiconductor device that is formed in a semiconductor chip molded with a mold resin and analyzes a disconnection failure of a contact portion that contacts a lower layer portion and an upper layer portion,
The contact portion includes a first contact portion including a lower layer wiring that contacts a gate wiring or a source / drain diffusion region, and a second contact portion including an upper layer wiring contacting the lower layer wiring,
By opening the molded semiconductor chip, the semiconductor chip is exposed,
Using a polarizing microscope, the exposed second contact portion of the semiconductor chip is irradiated with light, a specific polarization component is extracted from the reflected light from the second contact portion, and the extracted polarized light is extracted. A failure analysis method for a semiconductor device, comprising: detecting a disconnection failure of the second contact portion based on luminance of an observation image of the second contact portion due to a component .
JP2001258958A 2001-08-29 2001-08-29 Failure analysis method for semiconductor device Expired - Fee Related JP4878709B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2001258958A JP4878709B2 (en) 2001-08-29 2001-08-29 Failure analysis method for semiconductor device

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2001258958A JP4878709B2 (en) 2001-08-29 2001-08-29 Failure analysis method for semiconductor device

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2003068814A JP2003068814A (en) 2003-03-07
JP4878709B2 true JP4878709B2 (en) 2012-02-15

Family

ID=19086392

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2001258958A Expired - Fee Related JP4878709B2 (en) 2001-08-29 2001-08-29 Failure analysis method for semiconductor device

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4878709B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR102086362B1 (en) 2013-03-08 2020-03-09 삼성전자주식회사 Apparatus of Monitoring a Process Using Poarized Light and Method Thereof
DE102021124504A1 (en) * 2021-09-22 2023-03-23 WICKON HIGHTECH GmbH Inspection system and procedures for failure analysis

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH01122515A (en) * 1987-11-06 1989-05-15 Oki Electric Ind Co Ltd Formation of electrode pattern
JPH08191185A (en) * 1995-01-10 1996-07-23 Hitachi Ltd Electronic circuit board manufacturing method, inspection method, through-hole inspection method, and through-hole inspection apparatus
JP3421522B2 (en) * 1996-12-25 2003-06-30 株式会社日立製作所 Pattern inspection apparatus, pattern inspection apparatus using electron beam, and method therefor
JP2003066117A (en) * 2001-08-29 2003-03-05 Sanyo Electric Co Ltd Failure analysis method of semiconductor device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2003068814A (en) 2003-03-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5715052A (en) Method of detecting the position and the content of fine foreign matter on substrates and analyzers used therefor
CN100465612C (en) Defect detection method
JP4759228B2 (en) Inspection of edge bead removal by reflectance measurement
TW201527744A (en) Test apparatus, test system and test method of defects in blind vias of printed circuit board
US6387715B1 (en) Integrated circuit defect detection via laser heat and IR thermography
JP3813336B2 (en) Integrated circuit failure location identification method and failure location identification device
JP2004022318A (en) Transmission electron microscope apparatus and sample analysis method
JP4878709B2 (en) Failure analysis method for semiconductor device
JPH11154695A5 (en)
JP4723399B2 (en) Inspection method and inspection apparatus
US6429452B1 (en) Test structure and methodology for characterizing ion implantation in an integrated circuit fabrication process
JP4679299B2 (en) INSPECTION METHOD, INSPECTION DEVICE, AND SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE MANUFACTURING METHOD
CN109946589A (en) A kind of undesirable method and device of detection display panel electricity
US7855088B2 (en) Method for manufacturing integrated circuits by guardbanding die regions
KR100769790B1 (en) Fault detection method in dark field equipment
JPH06216207A (en) Inspection of wafer
JPH05144901A (en) Detection of defective point of device having fine pattern
KR100591149B1 (en) Gate oxide defect inspection method of semiconductor device
JPS5921169B2 (en) Failure analysis method for semiconductor devices
KR20040005226A (en) Method of inspecting a semiconductor device
JP2003066118A (en) Failure analysis method of semiconductor device
JP2003066117A (en) Failure analysis method of semiconductor device
Song et al. P‐149: Late‐News Poster: Effective Approach to Failure Analysis of IC‐embedded OLED Display Device
JP2006093172A (en) Manufacturing method of semiconductor device
Ebel et al. Failure analysis of oxide defects

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20080729

A711 Notification of change in applicant

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A711

Effective date: 20110526

RD02 Notification of acceptance of power of attorney

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A7422

Effective date: 20110526

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20110608

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20110630

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20110823

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20111125

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20111129

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20141209

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20141209

Year of fee payment: 3

S111 Request for change of ownership or part of ownership

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313113

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20141209

Year of fee payment: 3

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees