Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP4952928B2 - Incineration ash stabilization method - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP4952928B2 - Incineration ash stabilization method - Google Patents

Incineration ash stabilization method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP4952928B2
JP4952928B2 JP2007201823A JP2007201823A JP4952928B2 JP 4952928 B2 JP4952928 B2 JP 4952928B2 JP 2007201823 A JP2007201823 A JP 2007201823A JP 2007201823 A JP2007201823 A JP 2007201823A JP 4952928 B2 JP4952928 B2 JP 4952928B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
incineration ash
elution
amount
ultraviolet
ash
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP2007201823A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2009034613A (en
Inventor
研一 佐藤
拓朗 藤川
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Fukuoka University
Original Assignee
Fukuoka University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Fukuoka University filed Critical Fukuoka University
Priority to JP2007201823A priority Critical patent/JP4952928B2/en
Publication of JP2009034613A publication Critical patent/JP2009034613A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4952928B2 publication Critical patent/JP4952928B2/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Landscapes

  • Processing Of Solid Wastes (AREA)

Description

この発明は、焼却灰安定化方法に関し、更に詳細には、光エネルギーを用いた一般廃棄物焼却灰の重金属類の安定化技術ならびに塩分濃度の低下による安定化技術に関連する焼却灰安定化方法に関する。   TECHNICAL FIELD The present invention relates to a method for stabilizing incineration ash, and more specifically, to a method for stabilizing heavy incineration ash using light energy, and a method for stabilizing incineration ash related to a stabilization technology by reducing salt concentration. About.

現在、日本国全体で年間合計約800万トン超の焼却残渣等の最終処分量が排出されている(非特許文献1)。焼却灰の有効利用は、法律による規制もあり未だ進んでおらず、埋立処分が中心である。しかし、埋立処分場にも限りがあり、今後焼却灰の有効利用が不可欠となってくるものと考えられる。焼却灰中には、重金属類が含有されているとともに、塩分濃度も高いことから、有効利用時にはその安定化と塩分濃度の低下が必要不可欠の課題となってくる。   Currently, a total amount of incineration residues, etc., totaling over 8 million tons per year is discharged throughout Japan (Non-patent Document 1). The effective use of incinerated ash has not progressed due to legal restrictions, and is mainly landfill disposal. However, landfill sites are limited, and effective use of incinerated ash is considered essential in the future. Incinerated ash contains heavy metals and has a high salinity. Therefore, stabilization and reduction of the salinity are indispensable issues for effective use.

現在のところ、焼却灰中の重金属類を安定化する技術としては、例えば、薬剤による安定化法(非特許文献2)、炭酸ガスによる安定化法(非特許文献3)、水洗いによる安定化法(非特許文献4)などが挙げられる。   At present, techniques for stabilizing heavy metals in incineration ash include, for example, a chemical stabilization method (Non-Patent Document 2), a carbon dioxide gas stabilization method (Non-Patent Document 3), and a water washing stabilization method. (Non-Patent Document 4).

一方、欧米では、焼却灰を一旦ストックヤードに3ヶ月程度仮置し、雨、風などの天候ならびに大気中の二酸化炭素を利用して安定化させるいわゆるウェザリングによる方法が主流になっている。しかしながら、このウエザリング法は、焼却灰を完全に安定化させることはできない。またこのウエザリング法には、雨水等による浸出水等の処理を必要とする問題点がある。   On the other hand, in Europe and the United States, the so-called weathering method in which incinerated ash is temporarily placed in a stock yard for about three months and then stabilized by using weather such as rain and wind and carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has become the mainstream. However, this weathering method cannot stabilize incineration ash completely. In addition, this weathering method has a problem that it requires treatment of leachate by rainwater or the like.

炭酸法ならびにウェザリング法では、焼却灰中に含まれる重金属のうち、特に両性金属であるPbの溶出量は、時間の経過に伴って減少している。つまり、炭酸法ならびにウェザリング法では、Pbの特性通り、Pbは、中性ではその溶出量が抑制され、酸性ならびにアルカリ性では溶出している。図1に示すように、pHの増減(土壌のアルカリ化や酸性化)により、Pbの溶出量が増加してしまうことが分かる。
したがつて、このPbの溶出量の低下は、炭酸法ではpHの中性化による安定化と考えられ、またウェザリング法ではpHの中性化、およびCl-との結合により PbCl2、CrCl2、BCl3が生成する(非特許文献5)などして安定化すると考えられる。このようにウェザリング法と炭酸法は効果的な安定化技術であるといえるが、焼却灰は高い緩衝能を示し、中性化した焼却灰がその後アルカリ化することも懸念されるため、pHの変化に伴う溶出抑制だけでは安定化技術としては不安定である。さらに、ウェザリング法は、浸出水の処理が必要となる。
In the carbonation method and the weathering method, the elution amount of Pb, which is an amphoteric metal among heavy metals contained in incineration ash, decreases with time. That is, in the carbonic acid method and the weathering method, according to the characteristics of Pb, the amount of elution of Pb is suppressed when it is neutral, and is eluted when it is acidic and alkaline. As shown in FIG. 1, it can be seen that the amount of Pb elution increases as the pH increases or decreases (salification or acidification of the soil).
Therefore, this decrease in Pb elution is considered to be stabilized by neutralization of pH in the carbonic acid method, and PbCl 2 , CrCl 2 due to neutralization of pH and binding to Cl − in the weathering method. , BCl 3 is produced (Non-patent Document 5), and is considered to be stabilized. In this way, the weathering method and the carbonic acid method can be said to be effective stabilization techniques, but incineration ash shows a high buffer capacity, and there is a concern that the neutralized incineration ash may subsequently become alkalinized. Suppression of elution associated with changes alone is unstable as a stabilization technique. Furthermore, the weathering method requires treatment of leachate.

また、焼却灰からの浸出水等には、重金属類や塩分が含まれているので、浸出水をそのまま排水することはできない。かかる浸出水を排水するためには、重金属類や塩分を除去したり、低減させる必要がある。浸出水中の重金属類や塩分を除去・低減させる方法としては、例えば、沈殿ならびに吸着処理方法(特許文献1)、水散布方法(特許文献2)、中和処理方法(特許文献3)などが使用できる。   Moreover, since leachate from incineration ash contains heavy metals and salt, leachate cannot be drained as it is. In order to drain such leachate, it is necessary to remove or reduce heavy metals and salt. Examples of methods for removing and reducing heavy metals and salt in leachate include precipitation and adsorption treatment methods (Patent Document 1), water spraying methods (Patent Document 2), and neutralization treatment methods (Patent Document 3). it can.

また、焼却灰を紫外線で処理する方法も知られていて、例えば、飛灰等に含まれる難分解清物質を紫外線で処理して酸化分解する方法(特許文献4、5)、焼却灰などの含む汚染水をオゾンを放出して紫外線で処理する方法(特許文献6)廃液中の有機塩素化合物を紫外線で分解する方法(特許文献7)などが使用できる。   In addition, a method of treating incineration ash with ultraviolet rays is also known. For example, a method of treating refractory clean substances contained in fly ash with ultraviolet rays to oxidatively decompose them (Patent Documents 4 and 5), incineration ash A method of treating the contaminated water containing ozone with ultraviolet rays (Patent Document 6) and a method of decomposing organochlorine compounds in waste liquid with ultraviolet rays (Patent Document 7) can be used.

上記したように、焼却灰の安定化には、光の持つエネルギーも影響を及ぼすものと考えられ、あらゆる光の中でも紫外線の波長が光触媒作用に有効であることが分かっている。光触媒で多く用いられている酸化チタンでは、電子を励起させるためのバンドギャップエネルギーが3.2eV必要で、紫外線の波長から換算されるエネルギーがこのバンドギャップエネルギーに当てはまる。焼却灰中には、酸化チタンと同等のバンドギャップエネルギーを必要とする重金属が含まれているところから、紫外線を用いた光触媒反応が焼却灰でも起こると考えられる。これらの影響から、紫外線及び太陽光に含まれる赤外線に着目し、光の波動エネルギーを用いた重金属類の安定化技術の有効性を検討する。   As described above, the energy of light is considered to affect the stabilization of incinerated ash, and it has been found that the wavelength of ultraviolet rays is effective for photocatalysis among all light. Titanium oxide often used in photocatalysts requires a band gap energy of 3.2 eV for exciting electrons, and the energy converted from the wavelength of ultraviolet rays is applied to this band gap energy. Since incinerated ash contains heavy metals that require the same band gap energy as titanium oxide, it is considered that photocatalytic reaction using ultraviolet rays also occurs in incinerated ash. From these influences, we focus on ultraviolet rays and infrared rays contained in sunlight, and examine the effectiveness of stabilization technology for heavy metals using the wave energy of light.

紫外線照射による焼却灰処理方法の他に、赤外線で焼却灰を処理する方法も知られていて、例えば、焼却灰を赤外線で処理してダイオキシン等の有害物質を分解する方法(特許文献8、9)などが提案されている。しかし、赤外線照射により、焼却灰の塩分濃度を低減することができるとの報告はない。   In addition to the incineration ash treatment method by ultraviolet irradiation, a method for treating incineration ash with infrared rays is also known. For example, a method for treating incineration ash with infrared rays to decompose harmful substances such as dioxins (Patent Documents 8 and 9). ) Etc. have been proposed. However, there is no report that the salt concentration of incineration ash can be reduced by infrared irradiation.

上記したような焼却灰や排水等を紫外線または赤外線で処理する先行技術はいずれも、この発明とは異なり、重金属等や塩分を除去したり、低減させる目的で紫外線または赤外線を照射して焼却灰や排水等を処理しているものではない。
環境省ホームページ http://www.env.go.jp/recycle/waste_tech/ippan/h16/index.html 山本ら:第11回廃棄物学会研究発表会講演論文集、pp. 892-894, 2000 清野ら:第10回廃棄物学会研究発表会講演論文集、pp. 497-499, 1999 上田ら:第15回廃棄物学会研究発表会講演論文集、pp. 1078-1080, 2004 中原ら:第11回廃棄物学会研究発表会講演論文集、pp. 895-897, 2000 特開2002−282875号公報 特開2003−334507号公報 特開平11−156370号公報 特開2003−190908号公報 特開2003−183514号公報 特開2003−136078号公報 特開2002−282875号公報 特開平11−314073号公報 特開2005−58979号公報
Unlike the present invention, any of the prior arts for treating incineration ash, waste water, and the like as described above is different from this invention, and incineration ash is irradiated with ultraviolet rays or infrared rays for the purpose of removing or reducing heavy metals and salt. It is not a wastewater treatment.
Ministry of the Environment website http://www.env.go.jp/recycle/waste_tech/ippan/h16/index.html Yamamoto et al .: Proceedings of the 11th Annual Meeting of Japan Society of Waste Management, pp. 892-894, 2000 Kiyono et al .: Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference of Japan Society of Waste Management, pp. 497-499, 1999 Ueda et al .: Proceedings of the 15th Annual Meeting of the Waste Society, pp. 1078-1080, 2004 Nakahara et al .: Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference of Japan Society for Waste Management, pp. 895-897, 2000 JP 2002-282875 A JP 2003-334507 A JP-A-11-156370 JP 2003-190908 A JP 2003-183514 A JP 2003-136078 A JP 2002-282875 A JP 11-314073 A JP 2005-58979 A

光の波動エネルギーを用いた重金属類の安定化技術の有効性を検討した結果、本発明者らは、光エネルギーのうち紫外線焼却灰に一定期間照射することにより焼却灰中に存在する重金属類濃度を低下させること、ならびに赤外線を一定期間照射することにより焼却灰の塩分濃度を低下させて、焼却灰を安定化することができることを見出して、この発明を完成するに至った。   As a result of examining the effectiveness of the stabilization technology of heavy metals using the wave energy of light, the present inventors have determined that the concentration of heavy metals present in the incineration ash by irradiating the ultraviolet incineration ash for a certain period of light energy. It was found that the incineration ash can be stabilized by reducing the salt concentration of the incineration ash by irradiating infrared rays for a certain period of time, and the incineration ash can be stabilized.

そこで、この発明は、紫外線を焼却灰に一定期間照射して焼却灰中に存在する重金属類の低下により焼却灰を安定化させることからなる焼却灰安定化方法を提供することを目的としている。   Then, this invention aims at providing the incineration ash stabilization method which irradiates an incineration ash with ultraviolet rays for a fixed period, and stabilizes incineration ash by the fall of the heavy metals which exist in incineration ash.

また、この発明の別の目的は、赤外線を焼却灰に一定期間照射することにより、焼却灰中の塩分濃度を低下させることにより焼却灰を安定化させることからなる焼却灰安定化方法を提供することである。   Another object of the present invention is to provide a method for stabilizing incineration ash comprising stabilizing incineration ash by irradiating incineration ash with infrared rays for a certain period of time, thereby reducing the salt concentration in the incineration ash. That is.

上記目的を達成するために、この発明は、紫外線を焼却灰に一定期間照射することにより、焼却灰中に存在する重金属類の濃度を低下させることにより焼却灰を安定化させることからなる焼却灰安定化方法を提供する。   In order to achieve the above object, the present invention provides incineration ash comprising stabilizing incineration ash by reducing the concentration of heavy metals present in the incineration ash by irradiating the incineration ash with ultraviolet light for a certain period of time. Provide a stabilization method.

この発明のより好ましい態様においては、紫外線を焼却灰に一定期間照射することにより、焼却灰中に存在する重金属類、特に鉛(Pb)、クロムならびにカドミウムを安定化させることからなる焼却灰安定化方法が提供される。   In a more preferred embodiment of the present invention, incineration ash stabilization comprising stabilizing heavy metals, particularly lead (Pb), chromium and cadmium, present in the incineration ash by irradiating the incineration ash with ultraviolet light for a certain period of time. A method is provided.

また、この発明は、赤外線を一定期間照射することにより焼却灰中の塩分濃度を低下させて焼却灰を安定化させることからなる焼却灰安定化方法を提供する。   Moreover, this invention provides the incineration ash stabilization method which lowers | hangs the salt concentration in incineration ash by irradiating infrared rays for a fixed period, and stabilizes incineration ash.

この発明の紫外線照射法は、養生に伴う副産物等の発生もなく、pHに関係なく特に鉛の溶出量を低下させるという効果を有している。また、この発明は、鉛だけでなくその他の重金属、例えばクロムやカドミウムなども安定化できることを示している。
また、この発明の別の態様である赤外線照射法は、焼却灰の塩分濃度を低下させるという効果も有している。
The ultraviolet irradiation method of the present invention has the effect of reducing the amount of lead elution, regardless of pH, without the generation of by-products associated with curing. The present invention also shows that not only lead but also other heavy metals such as chromium and cadmium can be stabilized.
Moreover, the infrared irradiation method which is another aspect of this invention also has the effect of reducing the salt concentration of incineration ash.

この発明に係る紫外線照射法では、両性金属であるPbの溶出量は、炭酸法やウェザリング法と同様に、時間の経過に伴って減少している。pHならびに塩分濃度の下がっていない紫外線照射法でPb溶出量が減少しているのは、光エネルギーにより光触媒作用などの何らかの影響が起こり、またPbのイオン化エネルギーが小さいためにヒドロキシラジカルとの結合が促進されたためと考えられる。しかし、紫外線照射法では養生に伴う副産物等の発生もなく、pHに関係なく溶出量を低下させることが分かった。   In the ultraviolet irradiation method according to the present invention, the amount of elution of Pb, which is an amphoteric metal, decreases with the passage of time, as in the carbonation method and the weathering method. The amount of Pb elution decreased in the UV irradiation method in which the pH and salinity did not decrease. Some effects, such as photocatalysis, occur due to light energy, and because the ionization energy of Pb is small, binding to hydroxy radicals is reduced. It is thought that it was promoted. However, it was found that the amount of elution was reduced regardless of pH by the UV irradiation method without the generation of by-products accompanying curing.

図2で示すように、紫外線を照射した場合、pH12でもPbの溶出が抑制されていることが分かる。図示するように、Pbは酸性側では溶出されているが、焼却灰はアルカリ分を多く含んでいるところから、また焼却灰は高い緩衝能を有していることから、pHが酸性になることは考えにくい。そのため、アルカリ側で溶出抑制効果が認められたことにより、紫外線には焼却灰を安定化させる効果があると言える。Pbだけでなくその他の重金属、例えばクロムやカドミウムなどに関しても同様の安定化効果があることが認められた。   As shown in FIG. 2, it can be seen that when ultraviolet light is irradiated, elution of Pb is suppressed even at pH 12. As shown in the figure, Pb is eluted on the acidic side, but the incineration ash contains a lot of alkali, and the incineration ash has a high buffer capacity, so the pH becomes acidic. Is hard to think. Therefore, it can be said that ultraviolet rays have an effect of stabilizing the incineration ash because the elution suppression effect is recognized on the alkali side. It was recognized that not only Pb but also other heavy metals such as chromium and cadmium had the same stabilizing effect.

この発明に使用することができる紫外線は、波長が352 nm (UVA) 程度であって、エネルギーが3.52 eV 程度であればよい。また、赤外線は、波長が600〜780 nmで、エネルギーが1.59〜2.07 eV 程度であればよい。いずれにしても、紫外線は、その波長とエネルギーが焼却灰中の重金属類の溶出を抑制する程度であるならば特に限定されるものではなく、また赤外線にしても、その波長とエネルギーが焼却灰中の塩分濃度を低下することができるのであれば特に限定されるものではない。   The ultraviolet light that can be used in the present invention has a wavelength of about 352 nm (UVA) and an energy of about 3.52 eV. Infrared rays may have a wavelength of 600 to 780 nm and an energy of about 1.59 to 2.07 eV. In any case, ultraviolet light is not particularly limited as long as its wavelength and energy are sufficient to suppress elution of heavy metals in the incineration ash. There is no particular limitation as long as the salt concentration in the medium can be reduced.

以下に、この発明を実施例により更に詳細に説明するが、この発明は下記実施例で一切限定されるものではなく、また下記実施例はこの発明を一切限定する意図で記載されるものではない。   The present invention will be described in more detail with reference to the following examples. However, the present invention is not limited to the following examples, and the following examples are not intended to limit the present invention. .

試料採取時の重金属類の溶出量について下記のようにして調べた。
(紫外線・赤外線照射装置)
図1は本実施例1で用いた紫外線・赤外線照射装置を示す概略図です。この装置で使用した紫外線は波長が352 nm (UVA)、赤外線は波長が600〜780 nm で、エネルギーは紫外線が3.52 eV、赤外線が1.59〜2.07 eV であった。焼却灰はA市焼却処理施設より発生した一般廃棄物を使用した。本実施例では。紫外線・赤外線による養生は、紫外線・赤外線を密閉暗室状態において焼却灰の一方向から照射距離2 cm と10 cm の2パターンで照射し、養生期間56日で行った。
いずれの養生においても、所定の時間経過後に、装置から一定量のサンプリングを行い、前処理を行った後、ICP発光分析装置を用いて重金属類の溶出量の計測を行った。溶出試験方法は環境告示46号法を用いた。その結果を表1に示す。
The amount of elution of heavy metals at the time of sampling was examined as follows.
(Ultraviolet and infrared irradiation equipment)
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram showing the ultraviolet / infrared irradiation device used in the first embodiment. The ultraviolet ray used in this apparatus had a wavelength of 352 nm (UVA), the infrared ray had a wavelength of 600 to 780 nm, and the energy was 3.52 eV for ultraviolet rays and 1.59 to 2.07 eV for infrared rays. Incineration ash used the general waste generated from the A city incineration facility. In this example. Curing with ultraviolet rays and infrared rays was performed in 56 days, with ultraviolet rays and infrared rays being irradiated in two patterns with irradiation distances of 2 cm and 10 cm from one direction of the incinerated ash in a sealed darkroom.
In any curing, after elapse of a predetermined time, a predetermined amount of sampling was performed from the apparatus, and after pretreatment, the elution amount of heavy metals was measured using an ICP emission spectrometer. As the dissolution test method, the Environmental Notification No. 46 method was used. The results are shown in Table 1.

(参考例1:ウェザリング装置)
比較のため屋外に焼却灰を放置するウェザリング法による養生を行った。図2は、ヨーロッパで行われている養生に使用されている模擬したウェザリング装置である。ウェザリング法では装置を野外に56日間静置して、重金属類の溶出量などについて計測した。この養生においても、所定の時間経過後に各装置から一定量のサンプリングをそれぞれ行い、前処理を行った後、ICP発光分析装置を用いて重金属類の溶出量の計測を行った。溶出試験方法は上記と同様に環境告示46号法を用いた。
(Reference Example 1: Weathering device)
For comparison, curing was performed by a weathering method in which incineration ash was left outdoors. FIG. 2 is a simulated weathering device used for curing in Europe. In the weathering method, the apparatus was left outdoors for 56 days, and the amount of elution of heavy metals was measured. In this curing as well, a predetermined amount of sampling was performed from each device after a predetermined time, and after pretreatment, the amount of elution of heavy metals was measured using an ICP emission analyzer. As the dissolution test method, the Environmental Notification No. 46 method was used as described above.

(参考例2:炭酸養生装置)
図3は、炭酸化による安定化に使用する炭酸養生装置を模擬したものである。一定期間炭酸ガスを透過させる炭酸法による養生を行った。
この炭酸法は、装置を換気の行える所で図に示した養生箱内に炭酸ガスを最初の4分間は20 ml/min、その後は4 ml/minで通して養生期間24時間で行った。いずれの養生においても所定の時間経過後に各装置から一定量のサンプリングをそれぞれ行い、前処理を行った後、ICP発光分析装置を用いて重金属類の溶出量の計測を行った。溶出試験方法は同様に環境告示46号法を用いた。
(Reference Example 2: Carbonation curing device)
FIG. 3 simulates a carbonic acid curing device used for stabilization by carbonation. Curing was performed by a carbonic acid method that allowed carbon dioxide to permeate for a certain period of time.
This carbonation method was carried out at a curing period of 24 hours by passing carbon dioxide through the curing box shown in the figure at a rate of 20 ml / min for the first 4 minutes and then 4 ml / min. In any curing, a predetermined amount of sampling was performed from each device after a predetermined time, and after pretreatment, the amount of elution of heavy metals was measured using an ICP emission spectrometer. Similarly, the Environmental Notification No. 46 method was used as the dissolution test method.

表1には、採取時の含有量及び溶出量の他に、ウェザリング法による養生時の浸出水に溶出した重金属の浸出量をも示す。   Table 1 also shows the leaching amount of heavy metals eluted in the leachate during curing by the weathering method, in addition to the content and elution amount at the time of collection.

この発明による紫外線・赤外線法と、従来法であるウェザリング法および炭酸法による安定化技術の違いによる含水比、塩分濃度、pHについて分析した。
表2〜6は、各養生法における試料サンプリング時に計測された含水比、塩分濃度およびpHの結果を示す。
このうち、pHに関しては、紫外線・赤外線法ではpH12付近で変化はなく高アルカリのままである。これに対して、ウェザリング法および炭酸法では、日数の増加に伴い徐々に減少し中性化されている。また、塩分濃度に関しては、赤外線照射法ではわずかではあるが、減少傾向にあることが分かる。これらに対して、ウェザリング法は、降雨により減っているが、炭酸法および紫外線照射法ではほとんど減少効果は見られなかった。
The water content ratio, salinity concentration, and pH were analyzed according to the difference in stabilization technology between the ultraviolet / infrared method according to the present invention and the conventional weathering method and carbonic acid method.
Tables 2 to 6 show the results of the water content ratio, salinity concentration, and pH measured during sample sampling in each curing method.
Among these, with respect to pH, in the ultraviolet / infrared method, there is no change around pH 12, and the alkali remains high. On the other hand, the weathering method and the carbonic acid method are gradually decreased and neutralized as the number of days increases. In addition, regarding the salt concentration, it can be seen that the infrared irradiation method has a slight tendency to decrease. In contrast, the weathering method decreased due to rainfall, but the carbonic acid method and the ultraviolet irradiation method showed almost no reduction effect.

この発明の紫外線/赤外線照射法、ウェザリング法ならびに炭酸化法によって、土壌環境基準の定められている重金属類である、例えば、クロム (Cr)、ホウ素 (B) および鉛 (Pb) の溶出量について調べた。その結果を図4に示す。図4(a)にはクロム (Cr)、図4(b)にはホウ素 (B) ならびに図4(c)には鉛 (Pb) の溶出量を示している。なお、Cdは、いずれの安定化技術についても溶出量が定量下限値以下だったため記載していない。
これらの結果、図4に示すように、両性金属であるPb溶出量については、紫外線法を始め、炭酸化法ならびにウェザリング法でも、時間の経過に伴って減少していることが分かった。このPb溶出量の低下は、炭酸法ではpHの中性化による安定化と考えられ、またウェザリング法ではpHの中性化ならびにCl-との結合により PbCl2、CrCl2ならびにBCl3が生成するなどして安定化すると考えられる。
これらの結果から、紫外線照射法では、pHや塩分濃度の低下は認められなかったが、Pb溶出量が低下しているのは、光エネルギーにより光触媒作用などの何らかの影響が起こり、またPbのイオン化エネルギーが小さいためにヒドロキシラジカルとの結合が促進されたためと考えられる。
Elution amount of heavy metals, such as chromium (Cr), boron (B) and lead (Pb), which are determined by soil environment standards, by the ultraviolet / infrared irradiation method, weathering method and carbonation method of this invention Examined. The result is shown in FIG. Fig. 4 (a) shows the elution amount of chromium (Cr), Fig. 4 (b) shows the elution amount of boron (B), and Fig. 4 (c) shows the elution amount of lead (Pb). Cd is not shown for any stabilization technique because the elution amount was below the lower limit of quantification.
As a result, as shown in FIG. 4, it was found that the amount of elution of Pb, which is an amphoteric metal, decreased with time even in the carbonization method and the weathering method, including the ultraviolet ray method. This decrease in the amount of dissolved Pb is considered to be stabilized by neutralization of pH in the carbonic acid method, and PbCl 2 , CrCl 2 and BCl 3 are generated by neutralization of pH and binding to Cl − in the weathering method. It is thought that it stabilizes.
From these results, the UV irradiation method did not show a decrease in pH or salinity, but the Pb elution amount decreased because of some effects such as photocatalysis due to light energy, and the ionization of Pb. This is probably because the bond with the hydroxy radical was promoted because of the low energy.

pH依存性試験における影響
焼却灰を各養生法によってpH 4、pH 7および pH 12で56日間養生してpH依存性試験を行った。その結果を図5〜7に各養生のpH依存性試験結果を示す。
その結果、特に両性金属であるPbに着目してみると、ウェザリング法および炭酸法では、Pbの特性通り中性ではその溶出量は抑制され、酸性およびアルカリ性では溶出していることが分かった。つまり、ウェザリングおよび炭酸法でのPbの溶出抑制は、pHの中性化によるものと考えられる。そのため、図に示すようにpHの増減(つまり、土壌のアルカリ化や酸性化)により、Pbの溶出量が増加することが分かった。焼却灰は、高い緩衝能を示し、一旦中性化した焼却灰でもその後アルカリ化することも懸念されるため、pHの変化に伴う溶出抑制だけでは安定化技術として不安定であるといえる。しかしながら、紫外線法では、pH12でもPb溶出が抑制されていることが分かった。なお、酸性側ではPbが溶出されているが、焼却灰はアルカリ分を多く含んでおり、また焼却灰の高い緩衝能により酸性になることは考えにくいから、アルカリ側でPb溶出抑制効果がみられたことにより、紫外線には焼却灰を安定化させる効果があると言える。Pbだけでなく、その他の重金属に関しても同様のことが見て取れる。
Effect on pH dependence test Incinerated ash was cured at pH 4, pH 7 and pH 12 for 56 days by each curing method, and a pH dependence test was conducted. The results are shown in FIGS. 5 to 7 for the pH dependence test results of each curing.
As a result, focusing on Pb, which is an amphoteric metal, it was found that, in the weathering method and the carbonic acid method, the elution amount was suppressed according to the characteristics of Pb, and the elution was acidic and alkaline. In other words, the suppression of Pb elution by weathering and carbonation is considered to be due to neutralization of pH. Therefore, as shown in the figure, it was found that the elution amount of Pb increases with the increase or decrease of pH (that is, soil alkalinization or acidification). Incineration ash shows a high buffering capacity, and even if the incineration ash is once neutralized, there is a concern that the incineration ash may become alkalinized later. Therefore, it can be said that instability alone is unstable as a stabilization technique only by suppressing elution associated with a change in pH. However, it was found that the Pb elution was suppressed even at pH 12 by the ultraviolet method. Although Pb is eluted on the acidic side, the incineration ash contains a large amount of alkali, and it is unlikely that it will become acidic due to the high buffering capacity of the incineration ash. Therefore, it can be said that ultraviolet rays have an effect of stabilizing incineration ash. The same can be seen for Pb as well as other heavy metals.

一般廃棄物焼却灰は発生時によって含まれるものが変わるため、焼却灰の採取時期によって含まれるPb濃度が異なると考えられる。したがって、17年度採取焼却灰と18年度採取焼却灰の採取時期の異なる焼却灰に対して紫外線養生によるPb溶出量の影響について検討を行った。その結果、図8ならびに表2および表3から分かるように、焼却灰の有する緩衝能によりpHは高アルカリを維持しているにもかかわらず、Pb溶出量は平成17年度ならびに平成18年度共に減少傾向を示している。養生開始のPb溶出量と、養生終了時のPb溶出量とは両年でほとんど差もなく同様に減少しているため、実験結果より光エネルギーは焼却灰の発生時期及び採取時期によらず、重金属の安定化に有効であることを示していると考えられる。   Since the amount of general waste incineration ash varies depending on when it is generated, the concentration of Pb contained in the incineration ash is considered to differ depending on the timing of collection. Therefore, the influence of the amount of Pb elution by UV curing was examined on the incinerated ash collected in FY2017 and the incinerated ash collected in FY18. As a result, as can be seen from FIG. 8 and Tables 2 and 3, the amount of Pb elution decreased in both 2005 and 2006 despite the fact that the pH maintained high alkalinity due to the buffer capacity of incineration ash. It shows a trend. Since the amount of Pb elution at the start of curing and the amount of Pb at the end of curing decreased in the same way with almost no difference between the two years, the light energy from the experimental results does not depend on the timing of incineration ash generation or collection, This is considered to be effective for stabilizing heavy metals.

本実施例では、紫外線の照射距離によるPb溶出量の影響について調べた。紫外線の照射距離を2 cmならびに10 cmの2パターンで実験を行いPbの溶出量を測定したが、図9、10に示すように、その実験結果より照射距離によらず、Pb溶出量は低下していることが分かった。Pb溶出抑制の時間は異なったものの、減少傾向は同様に示し、光触媒反応では照射距離は関係がないことが分かった。なお、使用した紫外線はエネルギーが3.52eVでZnOのバンドギャップエネルギーに近いため、光触媒反応などの光エネルギーによる何らかの影響が起こったものと考えられる。   In this example, the influence of the Pb elution amount on the irradiation distance of ultraviolet rays was examined. Experiments were conducted with 2 patterns of UV irradiation distance of 2 cm and 10 cm, and the amount of elution of Pb was measured. As shown in Figs. I found out that Although the time to suppress Pb elution was different, the decrease trend was similar, and it was found that the irradiation distance was not related in the photocatalytic reaction. In addition, since the ultraviolet rays used are 3.52 eV and close to the band gap energy of ZnO, it is considered that some influence by light energy such as photocatalytic reaction occurred.

本実施例では、照射条件の違いによるPb溶出量に対する影響について調べた。照射する光を紫外線と赤外線の2つの波長(エネルギー)で条件を変えて実験を行った。その結果を図11に示す。
照射条件は、総養生56日間で行い、56日間紫外線・赤外線をそれぞれ当て続けたものと、28日養生後に紫外線から赤外線に、また反対に赤外線から紫外線にエネルギーを変えたものの4つの実験パターンで実験を行った。図11からも分かるように、紫外線を照射した日からPb溶出抑制効果が表れている。
他方、赤外線を照射している焼却灰では、Pb溶出抑制ができておらず、28日間紫外線を照射した後、赤外線の照射を始めたところ、その時点でPb溶出抑制効果が止まっている。このことより、紫外線によって光エネルギーによる何らかの影響は起こっているが、赤外線では紫外線と同様の影響は起こらず、紫外線を照射した焼却灰でのみ溶出抑制効果が得られていることが分かった。
In this example, the influence on the Pb elution amount due to the difference in irradiation conditions was examined. The experiment was conducted by changing the conditions of the irradiation light with two wavelengths (energy) of ultraviolet rays and infrared rays. The result is shown in FIG.
Irradiation conditions consisted of four experimental patterns: 56 days of total curing, continuous irradiation of ultraviolet rays and infrared rays for 56 days, 28 days of curing from ultraviolet to infrared, and vice versa. The experiment was conducted. As can be seen from FIG. 11, the Pb elution suppression effect appears from the day of irradiation with ultraviolet rays.
On the other hand, incineration ash irradiated with infrared rays has not been able to suppress Pb elution, and after irradiating with ultraviolet rays for 28 days, the effect of suppressing Pb elution has stopped at that point. From this, it was found that although some influences of light energy are caused by ultraviolet rays, the infrared rays do not have the same influence as ultraviolet rays, and the elution suppression effect is obtained only with the incinerated ash irradiated with ultraviolet rays.

この発明によれば、各養生において、全クロム(T-Cr)とホウ素(B)では、土壌環境基準値以下の溶出量を示しているものが多いが、鉛(Pb)は土壌環境基準値を大きく上回っていることが明らかになった。光エネルギーを用いた紫外線照射法による安定化方法では、(1)焼却灰の採取時期・照射距離の違いに左右されない。(2)pHの中性化による溶出抑制ではない。(3)照射条件としては紫外線のみで安定化する。以上より紫外線照射によって、副次的な作業を必要とせず、Pbの溶出量を低下させ安定化を促進できると考えられる。
一方、ウェザリング法と炭酸法は効果的な安定化技術であるが、焼却灰の有する緩衝能により土壌のpHが変化した場合の溶出が懸念されるとともに、さらにウェザリング法は浸出水の処理が必要となる。このように状況の変化に伴い、溶出量の増減が起こることが分かった。しかし、この発明に係る紫外線照射法は養生に伴う副産物等の発生もなく、またpHに関係なく特にPbの溶出量を低下させることが分かった。さらに、赤外線の照射によって、焼却灰中の塩分濃度を低下させる効果も分かった。
According to this invention, in each curing, the total chromium (T-Cr) and boron (B), many of which shows an elution amount below the soil environmental standard value, lead (Pb) is the soil environmental standard value It became clear that it was greatly exceeded. In the stabilization method by the ultraviolet irradiation method using light energy, (1) it does not depend on the difference in the collection time and irradiation distance of the incinerated ash. (2) It is not suppression of elution by neutralization of pH. (3) The irradiation condition is stabilized only by ultraviolet rays. From the above, it is considered that the irradiation with ultraviolet rays does not require a secondary operation, and the amount of Pb elution can be reduced to promote stabilization.
On the other hand, the weathering method and the carbonation method are effective stabilization technologies, but there is concern about elution when the pH of the soil changes due to the buffer capacity of the incinerated ash, and the weathering method requires treatment of leachate. It becomes. Thus, it was found that the amount of elution increased and decreased with the change of the situation. However, it has been found that the ultraviolet irradiation method according to the present invention does not generate by-products or the like accompanying curing, and particularly reduces the elution amount of Pb regardless of pH. Furthermore, the effect of reducing the salt concentration in incineration ash by infrared irradiation was also found.

紫外線・赤外線照射装置を示す概略図(実施例1)。Schematic which shows an ultraviolet-ray and infrared irradiation apparatus (Example 1). ウェザリング装置を示す概略図(参考例1)。Schematic which shows a weathering apparatus (reference example 1). 炭酸養生装置を示す概略図(参考例2)。Schematic which shows a carbonic acid curing apparatus (reference example 2). (a)全クロム (T-Cr) の溶出量、(b)ホウ素 (B) の溶出量6および(c)鉛 (Pb) の溶出量をそれぞれ示すグラフ。(A) Elution amount of total chromium (T-Cr), (b) Elution amount of boron (B) 6 and (c) Elution amount of lead (Pb). 紫外線照射56日pH依存性試験結果を示すグラフ。The graph which shows an ultraviolet irradiation 56 day pH dependence test result. ウェザリング56日間pH依存性試験結果を示すグラフ。The graph which shows a weathering 56 day pH dependence test result. 炭酸化pH依存性試験結果を示すグラフ。The graph which shows a carbonation pH dependence test result. 採取時期の違いによる影響を示すグラフ。The graph which shows the influence by the difference in collection time. 照射距離の違いによる影響を示すグラフ。The graph which shows the influence by the difference in irradiation distance. 照射距離の違いによる影響(28日以降拡大)を示すグラフ。The graph which shows the influence (expansion after 28th) by the difference in irradiation distance. 照射条件の違いによる影響を示すグラフ。The graph which shows the influence by the difference in irradiation conditions.

Claims (1)

鉛を含む焼却灰に紫外線を一定期間照射することにより、前記焼却灰中に存在する酸化チタンと同等のバンドギャップエネルギーを必要とする重金属に前記紫外線による光触媒作用を起こさせ、前記鉛とヒドロキシラジカルとの結合を促進させて、前記鉛溶出量を低下させることにより焼却灰中のを安定化させることを特徴とする焼却灰安定化方法。 By certain period irradiated with ultraviolet rays ash containing lead, to cause a photocatalytic action of the ultraviolet heavy metals that are equally band gap energy and titanium oxide present in said incinerated ash, the lead and hydroxyl radicals The incineration ash stabilization method characterized by stabilizing the lead in incineration ash by accelerating | stimulating a coupling | bonding and reducing the said lead elution amount .
JP2007201823A 2007-08-02 2007-08-02 Incineration ash stabilization method Expired - Fee Related JP4952928B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2007201823A JP4952928B2 (en) 2007-08-02 2007-08-02 Incineration ash stabilization method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2007201823A JP4952928B2 (en) 2007-08-02 2007-08-02 Incineration ash stabilization method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2009034613A JP2009034613A (en) 2009-02-19
JP4952928B2 true JP4952928B2 (en) 2012-06-13

Family

ID=40437044

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2007201823A Expired - Fee Related JP4952928B2 (en) 2007-08-02 2007-08-02 Incineration ash stabilization method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4952928B2 (en)

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP4035246B2 (en) * 1998-12-14 2008-01-16 ミヨシ油脂株式会社 Waste disposal method
JP2002282875A (en) * 2001-03-27 2002-10-02 National Institute Of Advanced Industrial & Technology Waste liquid treatment apparatus and ash detoxification method using the waste liquid treatment apparatus
JP2003190908A (en) * 2001-12-25 2003-07-08 Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd Equipment for treatment of hardly decomposable substances using photocatalyst
JP4049656B2 (en) * 2002-11-13 2008-02-20 健二 神野 Hazardous substance removal method for removed seabed sludge containing organotin compounds
JP2008023492A (en) * 2006-07-25 2008-02-07 Univ Fukuoka Incineration ash stabilization device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2009034613A (en) 2009-02-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Zhang et al. Solidification/stabilization and risk assessment of heavy metals in municipal solid waste incineration fly ash: A review
Sarathy et al. The fate of natural organic matter during UV/H2O2 advanced oxidation of drinking water
Guan et al. Removal of arsenic from water: effect of calcium ions on As (III) removal in the KMnO4–Fe (II) process
Vela et al. Photocatalytic oxidation of six endocrine disruptor chemicals in wastewater using ZnO at pilot plant scale under natural sunlight
US20090223894A1 (en) Method for treatment of water containing hardly-degradable substance
Sun et al. The relationship between speciation and release ability of mercury in flue gas desulfurization (FGD) gypsum
Ogawa et al. Water repellents for the leaching control of heavy metals in municipal solid waste incineration fly ash
Kim et al. Evaluation of pre-treatment methods for landfill disposal of residues from municipal solid waste incineration
Yeo et al. Iodide-mediated photooxidation of arsenite under 254 nm irradiation
Jambeck et al. Landfill disposal of CCA-treated wood with construction and demolition (C&D) debris: arsenic, chromium, and copper concentrations in leachate
Wang et al. Insight into the efficient selective reduction of Cr (VI) in sulfite/UV process under near-neutral conditions: The critical role of in situ-generated sulfite radical
JP4952928B2 (en) Incineration ash stabilization method
Bansal et al. Optimizing MSW incineration bottom ash reuse: A study on treated wastewater washing and leaching control
US20070295669A1 (en) Method of Treating Strongly Acid Wastewater Containing Harmful Substance
Holmes et al. Tunable production of elemental Se vs. H 2 Se through photocatalytic reduction of selenate in synthetic mine impacted brine: engineering a recoverable Se product
Nakagawa et al. A study on the degradation of endocrine disruptors and dioxins by ozonation and advanced oxidation processes
JP2012239933A (en) Waste water treatment method
Ghaneian et al. The effect of nitrate as a radical scavenger for the removal of humic acid from aqueous solutions by electron beam irradiation
KR20180125347A (en) Treatment Method of Pollutants using Rice Straw Ash and Apparatus for Treatment of Pollutants
KR100653960B1 (en) Method of treating waste insulating oil containing polychlorinated biphenyl using electron beam
CN101955283A (en) Method for recycling waste liquid from alkaline zincate zinc plating process experiment tests in laboratory
Dass et al. Treatment strategies for the effluents of recycled waste paper mills of Punjab
JP4551723B2 (en) Waste treatment method and photocatalytic material
Alver et al. Integrated seasonal optimization of disinfection by-product control in a full-scale drinking water treatment plant in Turkey
CN102989102B (en) Device and method for degrading dioxin through electron beam irradiation of waste incineration power plant

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20100701

RD03 Notification of appointment of power of attorney

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A7423

Effective date: 20100701

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20110623

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20110705

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20110901

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20120214

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20120228

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 4952928

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20150323

Year of fee payment: 3

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees