JP4969173B2 - Degradation diagnostic device for elastic-plastic energy absorber - Google Patents
Degradation diagnostic device for elastic-plastic energy absorber Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP4969173B2 JP4969173B2 JP2006207317A JP2006207317A JP4969173B2 JP 4969173 B2 JP4969173 B2 JP 4969173B2 JP 2006207317 A JP2006207317 A JP 2006207317A JP 2006207317 A JP2006207317 A JP 2006207317A JP 4969173 B2 JP4969173 B2 JP 4969173B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- energy absorber
- earthquake
- standard deviation
- elastic
- phase difference
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 239000006096 absorbing agent Substances 0.000 title claims description 128
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 title claims description 6
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 title claims description 6
- 238000006073 displacement reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 82
- 230000006378 damage Effects 0.000 claims description 76
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 claims description 74
- 230000001186 cumulative effect Effects 0.000 claims description 64
- 230000006866 deterioration Effects 0.000 claims description 33
- 238000003745 diagnosis Methods 0.000 claims description 22
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims description 18
- 230000001133 acceleration Effects 0.000 claims description 10
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 26
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 description 26
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 17
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 9
- 239000011229 interlayer Substances 0.000 description 9
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 7
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 6
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N Iron Chemical compound [Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000002265 prevention Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 3
- 229910001209 Low-carbon steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- PXHVJJICTQNCMI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Nickel Chemical compound [Ni] PXHVJJICTQNCMI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000010521 absorption reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000010440 gypsum Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052602 gypsum Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000010955 niobium Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000003973 paint Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000001131 transforming effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical compound [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- OAICVXFJPJFONN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Phosphorus Chemical compound [P] OAICVXFJPJFONN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- NINIDFKCEFEMDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulfur Chemical compound [S] NINIDFKCEFEMDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910045601 alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000000956 alloy Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052799 carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000013078 crystal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 125000004122 cyclic group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001066 destructive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000004744 fabric Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011381 foam concrete Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 description 1
- WPBNNNQJVZRUHP-UHFFFAOYSA-L manganese(2+);methyl n-[[2-(methoxycarbonylcarbamothioylamino)phenyl]carbamothioyl]carbamate;n-[2-(sulfidocarbothioylamino)ethyl]carbamodithioate Chemical compound [Mn+2].[S-]C(=S)NCCNC([S-])=S.COC(=O)NC(=S)NC1=CC=CC=C1NC(=S)NC(=O)OC WPBNNNQJVZRUHP-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000002739 metals Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 229910052759 nickel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910052758 niobium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- GUCVJGMIXFAOAE-UHFFFAOYSA-N niobium atom Chemical compound [Nb] GUCVJGMIXFAOAE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910052698 phosphorus Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011574 phosphorus Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000003825 pressing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007639 printing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000452 restraining effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011435 rock Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003566 sealing material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052717 sulfur Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011593 sulfur Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001502 supplementing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003466 welding Methods 0.000 description 1
Landscapes
- Testing Of Devices, Machine Parts, Or Other Structures Thereof (AREA)
Description
本発明は、例えばプレファブ化された建物用の規格化された弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の劣化診断装置に関するものである。 The present invention relates to a deterioration diagnosis apparatus for a standardized elastic-plastic energy absorber for a prefabricated building, for example.
建物の地震による被害予測、或いは建物の地震発生時の被害推定について、特に弾塑性エネルギー吸収体を有する弾塑性エネルギー架構体が耐力要素として装備される建物における弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の累積損傷値の予測、推定を的確に且つ早急に行うことにより弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の劣化を診断する技術が望まれている。 Regarding damage prediction due to earthquakes in buildings, or damage estimation at the time of earthquakes in buildings, the cumulative damage value of elasto-plastic energy absorbers in buildings equipped with elasto-plastic energy frames with elasto-plastic energy absorbers as load-bearing elements A technique for diagnosing deterioration of an elastoplastic energy absorber by accurately and promptly performing prediction and estimation is desired.
例えば、特開2005−351742号公報(特許文献1)には、弾塑性エネルギー吸収体に塗布された塗料の剥離状態で弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の累積損傷値を推定出来ることが記載されている。 For example, Japanese Patent Laying-Open No. 2005-351742 (Patent Document 1) describes that the cumulative damage value of an elastoplastic energy absorber can be estimated in a peeled state of a paint applied to the elastoplastic energy absorber.
また、日本建築学会構造系論文集No562、p159〜p166(非特許文献1)には、弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の損傷評価方法の記載が有り、地震による荷重変形履歴が影響することが記載されている。 In addition, the Architectural Institute of Japan, No. 562, p159-p166 (Non-patent Document 1) describes a damage evaluation method for an elastoplastic energy absorber, and describes that load deformation history due to an earthquake affects it. Yes.
しかしながら、前述の特許文献1の技術では、地震発生後に塗装の剥離状態を調べ、弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の損傷を推定するには、該弾塑性エネルギー吸収体が埋設された建物の内壁を破壊しなければならないという問題がある。 However, in the technique of the above-mentioned Patent Document 1, in order to investigate the peeling state of the paint after the earthquake and estimate the damage of the elastic-plastic energy absorber, the inner wall of the building in which the elastic-plastic energy absorber is embedded is destroyed. There is a problem of having to.
また、非特許文献1の技術では、想定する地震に対しての時刻歴応答解析が必要となるが、時刻歴応答解析は解析に用いた地震波に対する個別解であり、そのばらつきの影響を除去するためには多数の地震波による解析が必要となるという問題があった。 Further, the technique of Non-Patent Document 1 requires time history response analysis for an assumed earthquake, but the time history response analysis is an individual solution for the seismic wave used for the analysis, and removes the influence of the variation. For this purpose, there is a problem that analysis by a large number of seismic waves is required.
本発明は前記課題を解決するものであり、その目的とするところは、地震が発生したとき、地震波の波形、建物強度によらずに、いち早く住宅等の建物に装備された弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の累積損傷値を推定し、建物の劣化診断を行うと共に、地震発生時にその地震のタイプをいち早くより正確に特定出来る弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の劣化診断装置を提供せんとするものである。 The present invention solves the above-mentioned problems, and its object is to provide an elastoplastic energy absorber that is quickly installed in a building such as a house, regardless of the waveform of the seismic wave or the strength of the building when an earthquake occurs. In addition to estimating the cumulative damage value of the building and diagnosing the deterioration of the building, it is intended to provide an elastoplastic energy absorber deterioration diagnosis device that can quickly and accurately identify the type of earthquake when an earthquake occurs.
前記目的を達成するための本発明に係る弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の劣化診断装置の第1の構成は、建物用の規格化された弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の劣化診断装置であって、地震発生後にその実地震波を位相差分分布に変換して標準偏差を算出する標準偏差算出手段と、前記実地震により発生した前記弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の最大変位量を算出する最大変位量算出手段と、地震により発生した前記弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の最大変位量と、該地震に起因する前記弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の累積損傷値との相関関係情報を予め記憶する相関関係情報記憶手段と、前記標準偏差算出手段により算出された実地震波の標準偏差と、前記最大変位量算出手段により算出された前記弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の最大変位量と、前記相関関係情報記憶手段に記憶された弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の最大変位量と累積損傷値との相関関係情報と、から前記弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の累積損傷値を演算する累積損傷値演算手段とを有することを特徴とする。 In order to achieve the above object, a first configuration of a degradation diagnostic apparatus for an elastic-plastic energy absorber according to the present invention is a degradation diagnostic apparatus for a standardized elastic-plastic energy absorber for a building, and after the occurrence of an earthquake Standard deviation calculation means for calculating the standard deviation by converting the actual seismic wave into a phase difference distribution, maximum displacement calculation means for calculating the maximum displacement amount of the elastic-plastic energy absorber generated by the actual earthquake, and generated by the earthquake Correlation information storage means for preliminarily storing correlation information between the maximum amount of displacement of the elastoplastic energy absorber and the cumulative damage value of the elastoplastic energy absorber resulting from the earthquake, and the standard deviation calculation means The calculated standard deviation of the actual seismic wave, the maximum displacement amount of the elastic-plastic energy absorber calculated by the maximum displacement amount calculating means, and the correlation information storage means And a cumulative damage value calculating means for calculating the cumulative damage value of the elastic-plastic energy absorber from the correlation information between the stored maximum displacement amount of the elastic-plastic energy absorber and the cumulative damage value. .
また、本発明に係る弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の劣化診断装置の第2の構成は、前記第1の構成において、前記標準偏差算出手段は、前記位相差分分布に変換する前の実地震の加速度データについて、該実地震波の最大加速度発生時刻を所定時間経過した後に移動することを特徴とする。 The second configuration of the elastoplastic energy absorber deterioration diagnosis apparatus according to the present invention is the first configuration, wherein the standard deviation calculation means is an acceleration data of an actual earthquake before being converted into the phase difference distribution. Is moved after a predetermined time has elapsed from the maximum acceleration occurrence time of the actual seismic wave.
また、本発明に係る弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の劣化診断装置の第3の構成は、前記第1の構成において、前記標準偏差算出手段は、前記位相差分分布の標準偏差を求めるために該位相差分分布の度数分布の最大値付近の位相差分とその度数とから度数分布の包絡線の最大値を変更することを特徴とする。 The third configuration of the elastoplastic energy absorber deterioration diagnosis apparatus according to the present invention is the first configuration, wherein the standard deviation calculation means is configured to obtain the phase difference in order to obtain a standard deviation of the phase difference distribution. The maximum value of the envelope of the frequency distribution is changed from the phase difference near the maximum value of the frequency distribution of the distribution and the frequency.
また、本発明に係る弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の劣化診断方法は、建物用の規格化された弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の劣化診断方法であって、地震発生後にその実地震波を位相差分分布に変換して標準偏差を算出し、前記実地震により発生した前記弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の最大変位量を算出し、前記実地震波の標準偏差と、前記実地震により発生する前記弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の最大変位量と、予め作成した地震により発生した前記弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の最大変位量と、該地震に起因する前記弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の累積損傷値との相関関係情報と、から前記弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の累積損傷値を演算することを特徴とする。 The elastoplastic energy absorber deterioration diagnosis method according to the present invention is a standardized elastoplastic energy absorber deterioration diagnosis method for buildings, which converts the actual seismic wave into a phase difference distribution after an earthquake occurs. Calculate the standard deviation, calculate the maximum displacement of the elasto-plastic energy absorber generated by the actual earthquake, calculate the standard deviation of the actual seismic wave and the maximum displacement of the elasto-plastic energy absorber generated by the actual earthquake And the information on the correlation between the maximum amount of displacement of the elastoplastic energy absorber caused by the earthquake created in advance and the cumulative damage value of the elastoplastic energy absorber caused by the earthquake, from the elastoplastic energy absorber The cumulative damage value is calculated.
ここで、弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の劣化の診断を行なうために用いる累積損傷値とは、疲労破壊や延性破壊による金属の疲労寿命を評価する線形累積損傷則(Miner則)に基づいて求められた値であり、「累積損傷値=1」を限界値とする。 Here, the cumulative damage value used for diagnosing the deterioration of the elastoplastic energy absorber was determined based on the linear cumulative damage law (Miner law) that evaluates the fatigue life of metals due to fatigue fracture and ductile fracture. This value is “cumulative damage value = 1” as a limit value.
ここで、地震により発生する最大変位量とは、例えば、建物躯体の下階梁と上階梁との間の水平方向の変位量等の最大層間変位量(cm)、柱と梁との間の角度等の最大変位角(rad)、弾塑性エネルギー吸収体等の最大せん断変形量(cm)等が適用出来る。 Here, the maximum displacement generated by an earthquake is, for example, the maximum interlayer displacement (cm) such as the horizontal displacement between the lower floor beam and the upper floor beam of the building frame, between the column and the beam. The maximum displacement angle (rad) of the angle, the maximum shear deformation (cm) of the elastic-plastic energy absorber, etc. can be applied.
ここで、規格化された弾塑性エネルギー吸収体とは、その形状、材料が規格化されており、更にはその疲労寿命特性から累積損傷値を求めることが出来る弾塑性エネルギー吸収体を言う。 Here, the standardized elastoplastic energy absorber means an elastoplastic energy absorber whose shape and material are standardized and further, the cumulative damage value can be obtained from its fatigue life characteristics.
本発明に係る弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の劣化診断装置の第1の構成によれば、最大変位量算出手段により地震発生時に実地震により発生する弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の最大変位量を算出することが出来、標準偏差算出手段により地震発生後にその実地震波を位相差分分布に変換して標準偏差を算出することで地震のタイプを特定することが出来る。 According to the first configuration of the elastoplastic energy absorber deterioration diagnosis apparatus according to the present invention, the maximum displacement amount calculating means can calculate the maximum displacement amount of the elastoplastic energy absorber generated by an actual earthquake when the earthquake occurs. The earthquake type can be specified by converting the actual seismic wave into a phase difference distribution and calculating the standard deviation after the occurrence of the earthquake by the standard deviation calculating means.
そして、累積損傷値演算手段により、標準偏差算出手段により算出された実地震波の標準偏差と、最大変位量算出手段により算出された弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の最大変位量と、相関関係情報記憶手段に記憶された弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の最大変位量と累積損傷値との相関関係情報と、から弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の累積損傷値を演算して劣化を診断することが出来、これにより直ちに建物の劣化判定が非破壊で容易に出来る。 Then, the cumulative damage value calculating means stores the standard deviation of the actual seismic wave calculated by the standard deviation calculating means, the maximum displacement amount of the elastic-plastic energy absorber calculated by the maximum displacement amount calculating means, and the correlation information storage means. From the stored correlation information between the maximum displacement of the elastoplastic energy absorber and the accumulated damage value, it is possible to calculate the accumulated damage value of the elastoplastic energy absorber and diagnose the deterioration immediately. Degradation can be easily determined without destruction.
また、本発明に係る弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の劣化診断装置の第2の構成によれば、実地震の地震波から位相差分分布を得るにあたり、リンク効果による不正データが分布の末尾に残存があった場合でも、正確な地震波の位相差分の標準偏差を得ることが出来、より正確な弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の劣化判断が出来る。 Further, according to the second configuration of the elastoplastic energy absorber deterioration diagnosis device according to the present invention, in obtaining the phase difference distribution from the seismic wave of the actual earthquake, there is incorrect data due to the link effect remaining at the end of the distribution. Even in this case, it is possible to obtain an accurate standard deviation of the phase difference of the seismic wave, and more accurately determine the deterioration of the elastic-plastic energy absorber.
また、本発明に係る弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の劣化診断装置の第3の構成によれば、実地震波の位相差分分布と正規分布の分布形状に差が生じた場合でも、正確な地震波の位相差分の標準偏差を得ることが出来、より正確な弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の劣化判断が出来る。 Further, according to the third configuration of the elastoplastic energy absorber deterioration diagnosis device according to the present invention, even when a difference occurs between the phase difference distribution of the actual seismic wave and the distribution shape of the normal distribution, the accurate phase difference of the seismic wave is obtained. Standard deviation can be obtained, and deterioration of the elastoplastic energy absorber can be judged more accurately.
また、システムに本発明に係る弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の劣化診断装置の第2、第3の構成をツールとして搭載しておくことで、実地震発生後、直ちに、より正確な弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の劣化診断が出来る。 Further, by mounting the second and third configurations of the elastoplastic energy absorber deterioration diagnosis device according to the present invention as a tool in the system, a more accurate elastoplastic energy absorber can be immediately obtained after an actual earthquake occurs. Degradation diagnosis can be performed.
図により本発明に係る弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の劣化診断装置の一実施形態を具体的に説明する。図1は本発明に係る弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の劣化診断装置の構成を示す制御系のブロック図、図2は弾塑性エネルギー吸収体を有する弾塑性エネルギー架構体を耐力要素として装備した耐力壁の構成を示す図、図3は弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の一例を示す図、図4は地震のタイプ別に作成した模擬地震波の一例を示す図、図5及び図6は位相差分分布の標準偏差毎に作成された模擬地震のタイプ毎に、異なる複数の地震波の波形及び異なる複数の建物強度に応じてプロットされた最大変位量に対する累積損傷値群を包絡する上限曲線を、該地震により発生する最大変位量と、該地震に起因する弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の累積損傷値との相関関係として設定する様子を示す図、図7は実地震の波形を修正した後にフーリエ変換して求めた位相差分分布を示す図、図8は位相差分分布の極値の求め方を説明する図、図9は各地震波の位相差分分布と正規分布との関係を示す図、図10及び図11は弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の最大変位量と累積損傷値との相関関係を活用するフローチャートである。 An embodiment of the deterioration diagnosis apparatus for an elastic-plastic energy absorber according to the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings. FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a control system showing the configuration of an elastoplastic energy absorber deterioration diagnosis apparatus according to the present invention, and FIG. 2 is a diagram of a bearing wall equipped with an elastoplastic energy frame having an elastoplastic energy absorber as a bearing element. FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating an example of an elastic-plastic energy absorber, FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating an example of a simulated seismic wave created for each earthquake type, and FIGS. 5 and 6 are for each standard deviation of the phase difference distribution. For each type of simulated earthquake created, the maximum displacement generated by the earthquake is an upper limit curve that envelops the cumulative damage value group with respect to the maximum displacement amount plotted according to different waveforms of multiple seismic waves and different building strengths. The figure which shows a mode that it sets as a correlation with the quantity and the cumulative damage value of the elastoplastic energy absorber resulting from the earthquake, FIG. 7 shows the phase obtained by Fourier transform after correcting the waveform of the actual earthquake Shows a partial distribution, Figure 8 is a diagram illustrating how to obtain the extreme value of the phase difference distribution, Figure 9 showing the relationship between the phase difference distribution and normal distribution of each seismic waves 10 and 11 elastoplastic It is a flowchart using the correlation between the maximum amount of displacement of an energy absorber and a cumulative damage value.
図1において、11は建物の規格化された弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6の劣化診断装置であり、パーソナルコンピュータ等により構成される。12はキーボードやマウス等により構成される入力部であり、所定の入力画面を利用して実地震波情報及び建物被害情報を入力する。13はCPU(中央演算処理装置)等により構成される制御部である。14はデイスプレイや印刷装置等により構成される出力部である。20はインターネット21に接続されたインターフェイスである。 In FIG. 1, reference numeral 11 denotes a deterioration diagnosis device for a standardized elastic-plastic energy absorber 6 of a building, which is constituted by a personal computer or the like. Reference numeral 12 denotes an input unit composed of a keyboard, a mouse, and the like, and inputs actual seismic wave information and building damage information using a predetermined input screen. Reference numeral 13 denotes a control unit composed of a CPU (Central Processing Unit) and the like. An output unit 14 includes a display, a printing device, and the like. Reference numeral 20 denotes an interface connected to the Internet 21.
本実施形態では地震発生後に公共機関からインターネット21を介してウエブサイト(ホームページ)上に提供される実地震波情報を取得する実地震波情報取得手段をインターフェイス20及び制御部13等が兼ねる。インターフェイス20及び制御部13等により構成された実地震波情報取得手段により取得された実地震波情報は図示しないメモリに一時記憶される。 In this embodiment, the interface 20 and the control unit 13 or the like also serve as actual seismic wave information acquisition means for acquiring actual seismic wave information provided on a website (homepage) from a public institution via the Internet 21 after an earthquake occurs. The actual seismic wave information acquired by the actual seismic wave information acquiring means configured by the interface 20 and the control unit 13 is temporarily stored in a memory (not shown).
15は地震発生後にその実地震の地震波データをフーリエ変換により位相差分分布に変換して標準偏差をσを算出する標準偏差算出手段となる標準偏差算出部である。16は実地震により発生する弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6の最大変位量を算出する最大変位量算出手段となる最大変位量算出部であり、弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6の最大変位量情報記憶手段となる最大変位量情報データベース(以下、「最大変位量情報DB」という)19に記憶して格納された個々の弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6の最大変位量情報に基づいて弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6の最大変位量を算出する。 Reference numeral 15 denotes a standard deviation calculating unit that serves as a standard deviation calculating means for calculating the standard deviation by converting the seismic wave data of the actual earthquake into a phase difference distribution by Fourier transform after the occurrence of the earthquake. Reference numeral 16 denotes a maximum displacement amount calculation unit serving as a maximum displacement amount calculation means for calculating the maximum displacement amount of the elastoplastic energy absorber 6 generated by an actual earthquake, and serves as a maximum displacement amount information storage means of the elastoplastic energy absorber 6. The maximum displacement of the elastic-plastic energy absorber 6 based on the maximum displacement information of each elastic-plastic energy absorber 6 stored and stored in the maximum displacement information database (hereinafter referred to as “maximum displacement information DB”) 19. Calculate the amount.
17は地震により発生する弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6の最大変位量と、該地震に起因する弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6の累積損傷値との相関関係情報を記憶する相関関係情報記憶手段となる相関関係情報データベース(以下、「相関関係情報DB」という)である。 17 is a correlation information storage means for storing correlation information between the maximum amount of displacement of the elastic-plastic energy absorber 6 caused by the earthquake and the cumulative damage value of the elastic-plastic energy absorber 6 caused by the earthquake. It is an information database (hereinafter referred to as “correlation information DB”).
18は標準偏差算出部15により算出された実地震波の標準偏差σと、最大変位量算出部16により算出された弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6の最大変位量と、相関関係情報DB17に記憶された弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6の最大変位量と累積損傷値との相関関係情報と、から弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6の累積損傷値を演算する累積損傷値演算手段となる累積損傷値演算部である。 18 is the standard deviation σ of the actual seismic wave calculated by the standard deviation calculator 15, the maximum displacement of the elastic-plastic energy absorber 6 calculated by the maximum displacement calculator 16, and the elasticity stored in the correlation information DB 17. It is a cumulative damage value calculation unit that is a cumulative damage value calculation means for calculating the cumulative damage value of the elastic-plastic energy absorber 6 from the correlation information between the maximum displacement amount of the plastic energy absorber 6 and the cumulative damage value.
図2及び図3において、Aは建物の構造体に装備される耐力要素の一例として、中低層住宅の鉄骨建物に取り付けられる耐震要素である。1は上下梁であり、2は上下梁1間に立て付けられた左右柱である。3は上下梁1間に左右柱2に添え付けて立て付けられた主枠体であり、4は主枠体3間の中央部に水平に設置された連結枠材である。 2 and 3, A is an earthquake-resistant element attached to a steel building of a medium to low-rise housing as an example of a load-bearing element equipped in a building structure. Reference numeral 1 denotes an up-and-down beam, and 2 denotes left and right pillars erected between the upper and lower beams 1. Reference numeral 3 denotes a main frame body attached to the left and right columns 2 between the upper and lower beams 1, and reference numeral 4 denotes a connecting frame member installed horizontally at the center between the main frame bodies 3.
耐震要素Aは主枠体3、連結枠体5、弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6、連結部材7、及び斜め枠体8からなり、連結枠材4は、主枠体3に接続される左右の連結枠体5と、中央に配置される建物用の規格化された弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6とが連結部材7によって連結されており、該連結部材7には、前記左右の主枠体3に一端が接続されて斜めに設置される複数の斜め枠体8が接続されている。 The seismic element A includes a main frame 3, a connecting frame 5, an elastic-plastic energy absorber 6, a connecting member 7, and an oblique frame 8, and the connecting frame member 4 is connected to the main frame 3 on the left and right sides. A frame body 5 and a standardized elastic-plastic energy absorber 6 for a building arranged in the center are connected by a connecting member 7, and the connecting member 7 is connected to the left and right main frame bodies 3 at one end. Are connected to each other, and a plurality of oblique frames 8 that are installed obliquely are connected.
本実施形態では、例えば、上下梁1及び主枠体3をH形鋼(例えば、SS400)、左右柱2を角形鋼管、連結枠体5を角形鋼管(例えば、STKR400)、弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6を低降伏点鋼板(高延性熱延軟鋼板)、連結部材7を鋼板(例えば、SS400)、斜め枠体8を丸形鋼管(例えば、STK400)等により構成されており、弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6と連結部材7とは、図3に示すように、トルシア型高力ボルト9(例えば、M16(S10T))等により固定され、他の部材は互いに溶接によって一体的に組み立てられている。 In the present embodiment, for example, the upper and lower beams 1 and the main frame 3 are H-shaped steel (for example, SS400), the left and right columns 2 are rectangular steel pipes, the connecting frame 5 is a rectangular steel pipe (for example, STKR400), and an elastic-plastic energy absorber. 6 is a low yield point steel plate (highly ductile hot rolled mild steel plate), the connecting member 7 is a steel plate (for example, SS400), the slanted frame body 8 is a round steel pipe (for example, STK400), etc. As shown in FIG. 3, the body 6 and the connecting member 7 are fixed by a torcia type high strength bolt 9 (for example, M16 (S10T)) or the like, and the other members are integrally assembled with each other by welding.
図3に示す実施形態では、例えば、弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6を高延性熱延軟鋼板を断面コ字形状で図3に示す形状にプレス加工して成形されており、板厚4.2mm、全長200mm、両端部の幅110mm、中央部のくびれの幅33.4mm、起立片の高さ14mmで構成されている。またくびれの両端拡張部には拘束部材10がトルシア型高力ボルト9等により固定されており、弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6のくびれの中央部に集中して塑性変形が起きるように構成されている。 In the embodiment shown in FIG. 3, for example, the elastoplastic energy absorber 6 is formed by pressing a highly ductile hot-rolled mild steel plate into a shape shown in FIG. It consists of a total length of 200 mm, a width of 110 mm at both ends, a width of the constriction of 33.4 mm at the center, and a height of the standing piece of 14 mm. In addition, a constraining member 10 is fixed to both ends of the constriction by a torcia type high-strength bolt 9 or the like, and is configured so that plastic deformation is concentrated on the central portion of the constriction of the elastic-plastic energy absorber 6. .
弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6の素材となる低降伏点鋼材は、一般には、鉄と炭素、その他の微量のマンガン、ニッケル、リン、イオウ等の元素の合金で構成され、炭素を始め、鉄以外の元素の含有量を減らし、純鉄に近づけたり、結晶の粒子を大きくしたり、ニオブ(Nb)等の特殊な元素を微量添加することで、低降伏点鋼材を作ることが出来る。 The low-yield point steel material that is the material of the elastoplastic energy absorber 6 is generally composed of an alloy of elements such as iron and carbon and other trace amounts of manganese, nickel, phosphorus, sulfur, etc. Low yield point steel can be made by reducing the element content, bringing it closer to pure iron, increasing the crystal grains, or adding a small amount of special elements such as niobium (Nb).
一般の鋼材と比較した低降伏点鋼材の機械的性質は、降伏点が半分程度低められ、伸び能力を高めて、引っ張り強さを低めている。そして、一般の鋼材と同じ高い剛性を有しながら、降伏点が低いので同じ力に対して少ない変形段階から降伏するので、一般の鋼材が弾性変形にとどまる変形量において、塑性歪みエネルギーで振動エネルギーを吸収することが出来る。従って、低降伏点鋼材は、小変形時のエネルギー吸収量が一般の鋼材よりも大きくなる。 The mechanical properties of low yield point steel materials compared to general steel materials are such that the yield point is lowered by about half, the elongation capacity is increased, and the tensile strength is lowered. And since it has the same high rigidity as a general steel material, it yields from a small deformation stage for the same force because the yield point is low. Can be absorbed. Therefore, the low yield point steel material has a larger amount of energy absorption at the time of small deformation than a general steel material.
一方、一般の鋼材を用いた構造と同じ強度になるだけ鋼材の使用量を増して、低降伏点鋼材を用いて構造体を作ると、伸び能力の高い分だけ破壊までの塑性歪みエネルギーが増すので大地震時の耐震性が向上する。 On the other hand, increasing the amount of steel used to achieve the same strength as a structure using ordinary steel, and making a structure using steel with a low yield point increases the plastic strain energy up to fracture by the amount of high elongation capacity. Therefore, the earthquake resistance at the time of a large earthquake is improved.
従って、連結枠材4を左右の連結枠体5と、中央の弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6とを接続して構成することで、力学的性質の大きく異なる一般の鋼材と、低降伏点鋼材を組み合わせて使い分けることで構造物としての力学的挙動を設計者の意図通りコントロールすることが可能となる。 Therefore, by connecting the left and right connecting frame bodies 5 and the central elastic-plastic energy absorber 6 to form the connecting frame material 4, a general steel material having greatly different mechanical properties and a low yield point steel material are combined. By using them properly, it is possible to control the mechanical behavior as a structure as designed by the designer.
連結枠材4の中央部に配置された弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6は、地震等により鉄骨軸組に作用する所定値を越える外力を受けると、他の部位よりも先に降伏し、塑性変形するように設計された塑性体で構成されている。そして、この弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6の材質,長さ,形状等を適当に変える等してエネルギー吸収量が明確になるように降伏耐力が設計されている。 When the elastic-plastic energy absorber 6 disposed in the central portion of the connecting frame member 4 receives an external force exceeding a predetermined value acting on the steel frame due to an earthquake or the like, it yields before other parts and plastically deforms. It is composed of a plastic body designed as follows. The yield strength is designed so that the amount of energy absorption becomes clear by appropriately changing the material, length, shape, etc. of the elastic-plastic energy absorber 6.
弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6は、図6に示すように、地震により発生する該弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6の最大変位量(本実施形態では「最大層間変位量」を採用している)と、該地震に起因する該弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6の累積損傷値との相関関係が予め設定されており、相関関係情報DB17に記憶して格納されている。その相関関係は地震のタイプをパラメータとしている。そして、その地震のタイプのパラメータは、地震波データをフーリエ変換して得られた位相差分分布の標準偏差σとしている。 As shown in FIG. 6, the elasto-plastic energy absorber 6 has a maximum displacement amount of the elasto-plastic energy absorber 6 caused by an earthquake (in this embodiment, “maximum interlayer displacement amount”), The correlation with the cumulative damage value of the elasto-plastic energy absorber 6 caused by the earthquake is set in advance and stored and stored in the correlation information DB 17. The correlation takes the type of earthquake as a parameter. The earthquake type parameter is the standard deviation σ of the phase difference distribution obtained by Fourier transforming the seismic wave data.
図5に示すように、地震のタイプ毎に該地震により発生する弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6の最大変位量(最大層間変位量)と、該地震に起因する弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6の累積損傷値との関係を異なる複数の地震波の波形毎及び異なる複数の建物強度毎に時刻暦応答解析しそれぞれについてプロットし、そのプロットされた最大変位量(最大層間変位量)に対する累積損傷値群を包絡する上限曲線Lを、地震により発生する最大変位量と、該地震に起因する弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6の累積損傷値との相関関係として設定する。 As shown in FIG. 5, the maximum displacement amount (maximum interlayer displacement amount) of the elastic-plastic energy absorber 6 generated by the earthquake for each type of earthquake, and the cumulative damage value of the elastic-plastic energy absorber 6 caused by the earthquake Analyze the time calendar response analysis for each waveform of different seismic waves and different building strengths and plot each of them, and envelop the cumulative damage value group for the plotted maximum displacement (maximum interlayer displacement) The upper limit curve L is set as a correlation between the maximum amount of displacement caused by an earthquake and the cumulative damage value of the elastic-plastic energy absorber 6 caused by the earthquake.
そして、図5で求めた地震のタイプ毎の上限曲線Lを図6に示すように地震により発生する弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6の最大変位量(最大層間変位量)と、該地震に起因する弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6の累積損傷値との相関曲線データとして作成して相関関係情報DB17に格納しており、これを利用して、累積損傷値演算部18により建物用の規格化された弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6の累積損傷値を演算することにより劣化診断を行うことが出来る。 Then, as shown in FIG. 6, the upper limit curve L for each type of earthquake obtained in FIG. 5 shows the maximum displacement amount (maximum interlayer displacement amount) of the elastic-plastic energy absorber 6 caused by the earthquake, and the elasticity caused by the earthquake. It is created as correlation curve data with the cumulative damage value of the plastic energy absorber 6 and stored in the correlation information DB 17, and by using this, the standardized elasto-plasticity for buildings by the cumulative damage value calculation unit 18 is used. The deterioration diagnosis can be performed by calculating the cumulative damage value of the energy absorber 6.
即ち、相関関係情報DB17に格納された図6の相関曲線データに基づいて、最大変位量算出部16により算出した実地震により発生する弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6の最大変位量(最大層間変位量)に基づいて、累積損傷値演算部18により該実地震に起因する弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6の累積損傷値を演算し、弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6の劣化を診断する。 That is, based on the correlation curve data of FIG. 6 stored in the correlation information DB 17, the maximum displacement amount (maximum interlayer displacement amount) of the elastic-plastic energy absorber 6 generated by the actual earthquake calculated by the maximum displacement amount calculation unit 16. Based on the above, the cumulative damage value calculation unit 18 calculates the cumulative damage value of the elastic-plastic energy absorber 6 caused by the actual earthquake, and diagnoses the deterioration of the elastic-plastic energy absorber 6.
このような構成において、鉄骨建物が大きな地震力を受けると、先ず、弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6が降伏点に達して塑性変形し、他は殆ど損傷されないで済む。交換する場合には、図2に示す塑性変形等した弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6を有する耐震要素Aを左右柱2から取り外し、新しい弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6を取り付けた耐震要素Aを左右柱2に固定するだけで鉄骨軸組を当初の状態に容易に復元させることが出来る。 In such a configuration, when the steel building is subjected to a large seismic force, the elastic-plastic energy absorber 6 first reaches the yield point and undergoes plastic deformation, and the rest is hardly damaged. When exchanging, the seismic element A having the elastoplastic energy absorber 6 plastically deformed as shown in FIG. 2 is removed from the left and right columns 2, and the seismic element A to which the new elastoplastic energy absorber 6 is attached is changed to the left and right columns 2. The steel frame can be easily restored to its original state simply by fixing.
また、この弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6のみを新しいものに交換する場合には、図3に示す高力ボルト9を外して地震等の外力により塑性変形し、或いは破断した弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6を連結部材7から取り外し、新しい弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6を高力ボルト9によって連結部材7に固定するだけで耐震要素A及び鉄骨軸組を当初の状態に容易に復元させることが出来る。 When only the elasto-plastic energy absorber 6 is replaced with a new one, the elasto-plastic energy absorber 6 which is plastically deformed or broken by an external force such as an earthquake by removing the high-strength bolt 9 shown in FIG. The seismic element A and the steel frame can be easily restored to the original state by simply removing the elastic member 6 from the connecting member 7 and fixing the new elastic-plastic energy absorber 6 to the connecting member 7 with high-strength bolts 9.
耐震要素Aは主枠体3、連結枠体5、弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6、連結部材7、及び斜め枠体8、拘束部材10を含んで一体的に組み立てられる。 The seismic element A is integrally assembled including the main frame 3, the connecting frame 5, the elastic-plastic energy absorber 6, the connecting member 7, the oblique frame 8, and the restraining member 10.
共立出版により発行された「鋼構造の性能と設計(桑村仁・著)」によると、疲労寿命の推定にはマイナー則に基づき、式:D=Σ(n/N)で定義される累積損傷値で評価し、D=1で破断とすることが記載されている。累積損傷値を求めるためには累積損傷値を求める弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6の試料を数本用意し、予め、異なる振幅での定振幅載荷を行って調べておく。 According to the “Performance and Design of Steel Structures (Author Hitoshi Kuwamura)” published by Kyoritsu Shuppan, the fatigue life is estimated based on the minor rule, and the cumulative damage defined by the formula: D = Σ (n / N) The evaluation is based on the value, and it is described that the fracture occurs when D = 1. In order to obtain the cumulative damage value, several samples of the elastoplastic energy absorber 6 for which the cumulative damage value is to be obtained are prepared, and inspected in advance by performing constant amplitude loading with different amplitudes.
また地震等で耐震要素Aが損傷を受けた場合には、クロス、石膏ボード等の内装材やシーリング材、外壁等の外装材も損傷を受ける。その損傷の程度は建物が変形した振幅の大きさと相関があることが分かっている。よって、内装材や外装材の位置ズレや変形、損傷状態から弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6の最大変位量を推定して入力部12により入力し、最大変位量算出部16は建物を非破壊で弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6の最大変位量を算出することが出来、その最大変位量に基づいて、累積損傷値演算部18により実地震に起因する弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6の累積損傷値を求めることにより耐力要素として建物に装備された弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6の累積損傷値を演算して劣化を診断することが出来る。 When the earthquake-resistant element A is damaged due to an earthquake or the like, interior materials such as cloth and gypsum board, sealing materials, and exterior materials such as outer walls are also damaged. It has been found that the degree of damage correlates with the amplitude of the deformation of the building. Therefore, the maximum displacement amount of the elastic-plastic energy absorber 6 is estimated from the positional deviation, deformation, and damage state of the interior material and exterior material, and is input by the input unit 12, and the maximum displacement amount calculation unit 16 performs non-destructive elasticity of the building. The maximum displacement amount of the plastic energy absorber 6 can be calculated, and the cumulative damage value of the elastoplastic energy absorber 6 caused by the actual earthquake is obtained by the cumulative damage value calculation unit 18 based on the maximum displacement amount. Deterioration can be diagnosed by calculating the cumulative damage value of the elasto-plastic energy absorber 6 installed in the building as a load bearing element.
最近では防災技術研究所が提供する「K−net」等を中心に強震動観測網が充実しており、地震発生直後から図7に示す地震波観測データの入手が容易に出来る。また、中央防災会議や防災技術研究所(J−SHIS)等ではシナリオ地震動の波形等も公開されており、図7に示す地震波データを容易に取得することが出来る。 Recently, the strong ground motion observation network has been enhanced centering on “K-net” provided by the National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention, making it easy to obtain the seismic observation data shown in FIG. 7 immediately after the occurrence of the earthquake. Moreover, the scenario earthquake ground motion waveform etc. are open | released by the Central Disaster Prevention Council, Disaster Prevention Technology Research Institute (J-SHIS), etc., and the seismic wave data shown in FIG. 7 can be easily acquired.
本実施形態では、活断層の変動によって断層が相互にズレる震源の浅い内陸直下型地震、或いは海洋にある巨大なプレート(岩板)が陸側のプレートの下に沈み込む海溝の近くでプレート境界で滑りが生じて起きる海溝型地震等の地震のタイプの分類方法として図7に示す位相差分分布を用いている。 In this embodiment, the plate boundary is close to the trench where the earthquake is a shallow inland earthquake where the faults deviate from each other due to active fault variations, or a huge plate (rock plate) in the ocean sinks under the plate on the land side. The phase difference distribution shown in FIG. 7 is used as a method for classifying the type of earthquake such as a trench-type earthquake caused by slippage.
ここで、模擬地震の位相差分分布を正規分布と仮定し、模擬地震の地震のタイプをその標準偏差σをパラメータとして設定する。模擬地震のパラメータとしては、例えば、図4に示すように、地震波の全データ時間を163.84秒、位相差分分布の平均値を81.92秒、位相差分を0〜2πとした時、直下型地震の地震波の標準偏差σは図4(a)に示すように0.04π、中間型1地震の地震波の標準偏差σは図4(b)に示すように0.15π、中間型2地震の地震波の標準偏差σは図4(c)に示すように0.25π、海溝型地震の地震波の標準偏差σは図4(d)に示すように0.40πである。 Here, assuming that the phase difference distribution of the simulated earthquake is a normal distribution, the type of earthquake of the simulated earthquake is set with its standard deviation σ as a parameter. As parameters of the simulated earthquake, for example, as shown in FIG. 4, when the total data time of the seismic wave is 163.84 seconds, the average value of the phase difference distribution is 81.92 seconds, and the phase difference is 0 to 2π, The standard deviation σ of the seismic wave of the type 1 earthquake is 0.04π as shown in FIG. 4A, the standard deviation σ of the seismic wave of the intermediate type 1 earthquake is 0.15π as shown in FIG. 4B, and the intermediate type 2 earthquake. The standard deviation σ of the seismic wave is 0.25π as shown in FIG. 4 (c), and the standard deviation σ of the seismic wave of the trench-type earthquake is 0.40π as shown in FIG. 4 (d).
このように設定した地震のタイプのそれぞれについて、地震波の位相差分の標準偏差σがそれぞれの値になるように異なる模擬地震波を30波ずつ作成する。 For each of the earthquake types set in this way, 30 different simulated seismic waves are created so that the standard deviation σ of the phase difference of the seismic wave becomes the respective value.
また、模擬地震波を用いた解析では、中低層鉄骨造建物の1階〜3階の各階層に対応して3質点系のせん断ばねモデルを用いて時刻歴応答解析を行う。せん断ばねには、耐力パネル、軽量気泡コンクリート(ALC)帳壁、石膏ボード等を考慮する。 In the analysis using simulated seismic waves, a time history response analysis is performed using a three-mass system shear spring model corresponding to each of the first to third floors of a medium- and low-rise steel building. For shear springs, load-bearing panels, lightweight cellular concrete (ALC) wall, gypsum board, etc. are considered.
地震のタイプ毎にその位相差分分布に対応して作成した振動の加速度波形からなる各地震波を入力した応答解析の一例を図5に示す。解析では累積損傷値が0.05以上1.0以下の範囲(累積損傷値の最大値を「1.0」とする)で複数の結果が得られるように降伏せん断力係数をパラメータとしている。また、地震のタイプが図5(b)に示すような海溝型地震になるに従い、設定した模擬地震では累積損傷値が1.0に至らない場合が生じるが、この場合には入力振幅の割り増しにより結果を得た。 FIG. 5 shows an example of a response analysis in which each seismic wave composed of a vibration acceleration waveform created corresponding to the phase difference distribution is input for each type of earthquake. In the analysis, the yield shear force coefficient is used as a parameter so that a plurality of results can be obtained when the cumulative damage value is in the range of 0.05 to 1.0 (the maximum value of the cumulative damage value is “1.0”). In addition, as the earthquake type becomes a trench type earthquake as shown in FIG. 5B, the cumulative damage value may not reach 1.0 in the set simulated earthquake. In this case, the input amplitude is increased. The result was obtained.
図5(a),(b)において、任意の1地震波について強度を変化させて時刻暦応答解析して得られた弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6の最大変位量(最大層間変位量)と累積損傷値との相関関係を求めると略同一曲線上に分布する。 5 (a) and 5 (b), the maximum displacement amount (maximum interlayer displacement amount) and cumulative damage value of the elastic-plastic energy absorber 6 obtained by analyzing the time calendar response by changing the intensity for any one seismic wave. When the correlation is obtained, they are distributed on substantially the same curve.
図6は相関関係情報DB17に格納された、弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6の最大変位量(最大層間変位量)と累積損傷値との相関関係情報であり、図5に示す地震のタイプ毎の弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6の最大変位量(最大層間変位量)と累積損傷値との相関関係において複数プロットした上限値の近似曲線である上限曲線Lを用いて地震のタイプ毎の弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6の最大変位量(最大層間変位量)と累積損傷値との相関関係を地震波の位相差分分布の標準偏差σ(図の左側からσ=0.40π,0.25π,0.15π,0.04π)毎に示したものである。 FIG. 6 shows correlation information between the maximum displacement amount (maximum interlayer displacement amount) of the elastic-plastic energy absorber 6 and the accumulated damage value stored in the correlation information DB 17. An elastic-plastic energy absorber for each earthquake type using an upper limit curve L, which is an approximate curve of the upper limit values plotted in the correlation between the maximum displacement amount (maximum interlayer displacement amount) of the plastic energy absorber 6 and the cumulative damage value. 6 is the standard deviation σ of the phase difference distribution of the seismic wave (σ = 0.40π, 0.25π, 0.15π,. 04π).
一方、実地震データから地震のタイプを判別し図6の最大変位量と累積損傷値の相関関係から、実地震の地震のタイプに応じた相関関係を選択するためには、実地震波の位相差分分布の標準偏差をより正確に計算するために、実地震データを次のように修正することが好ましい。 On the other hand, in order to determine the type of earthquake from the actual earthquake data and select the correlation according to the type of earthquake of the actual earthquake from the correlation between the maximum displacement and the cumulative damage value in FIG. In order to calculate the standard deviation of the distribution more accurately, it is preferable to correct the actual earthquake data as follows.
図7(a),図9(a)は1995年に発生した兵庫県南部地震の地震波の位相差分分布の一例であり、図7(b),図9(b)は1952年に発生したKern County地震の地震波の位相差分分布の一例であり、図7(c),図9(c)は1968年に発生した十勝沖地震の地震波の位相差分分布の一例である。 7 (a) and 9 (a) are examples of the phase difference distribution of the seismic wave of the 1995 Hyogoken-Nanbu Earthquake. FIGS. 7 (b) and 9 (b) show the Kern that occurred in 1952. FIGS. 7C and 9C are examples of the phase difference distribution of the Tokachi-oki earthquake that occurred in 1968. FIG.
図7(a)〜(c)に示すように、修正前の実地震の地震波をそのままフーリエ変換して求めた位相差分分布で、リンク効果による不正データが位相差分分布の末尾に残存する場合には正確な標準偏差σが得られない。そのため、標準偏差算出部15は、位相差分分布に変換する前の実地震の地震波について、該実地震波の最大加速度発生時刻を所定時間経過した後に移動する。即ち、本実施形態では、加速度「0」を一定時間補足修正して得られた地震波の加速度データをフーリエ変換して位相差分分布を求める。この様に、位相差分分布のピーク値が、位相差分の2πの略中央部であるπの位置になる様に地震波の加速度データを修正する。 As shown in FIGS. 7A to 7C, when the phase difference distribution obtained by directly performing the Fourier transform on the seismic wave of the actual earthquake before the correction, the incorrect data due to the link effect remains at the end of the phase difference distribution. Cannot obtain an accurate standard deviation σ. Therefore, the standard deviation calculation unit 15 moves the seismic wave of the actual earthquake before being converted into the phase difference distribution after the maximum acceleration occurrence time of the actual seismic wave has elapsed for a predetermined time. That is, in this embodiment, the phase difference distribution is obtained by Fourier transforming the acceleration data of the seismic wave obtained by supplementing and correcting the acceleration “0” for a certain time. In this way, the acceleration data of the seismic wave is corrected so that the peak value of the phase difference distribution is at a position π that is approximately the center of 2π of the phase difference.
ここで、図9(a)〜(c)に示すように、実地震波の位相差分分布は正規分布に似た形状となることが知られているが、位相差分分布から標準偏差σを求める時には正規分布との分布の違いにより、実地震波の位相差分分布と正規分布の分布形状に差が生じることが考えられる。 Here, as shown in FIGS. 9A to 9C, it is known that the phase difference distribution of the actual seismic wave has a shape similar to the normal distribution, but when obtaining the standard deviation σ from the phase difference distribution Due to the difference in distribution from the normal distribution, it can be considered that there is a difference between the phase difference distribution of the actual seismic wave and the distribution shape of the normal distribution.
そこで、本実施形態では、実地震波の位相差分分布と、正規分布との対応を以下の数1式に示すように設定する。即ち、(1)位相差分分布を確立密度に基準化する。そして、(2)標準偏差算出部15は、位相差分分布の標準偏差を適正化するために該位相差分分布の度数分布の最大値付近の位相差分とその度数とから度数分布の包絡線の最大値を変更する。即ち、図8に示すように、実地震波の位相差分分布の最頻値(Pi)と、該最頻値(Pi)の前後のデータ値(Pi-1),(Pi+1)との計3つのデータ値を通る二次曲線aを求め、その二次曲線aの極値座標(xopt,Popt)を求める。(3)正規分布の平均値をxoptとし、正規分布の確率密度の極値が(Popt)と同じになる時の標準偏差σを以下の数1式に示すように設定する。ここで、正規分布の標準偏差をσ、度数分布の間隔(2π/32)をdxとする。 Therefore, in the present embodiment, the correspondence between the phase difference distribution of the actual seismic wave and the normal distribution is set as shown in the following equation (1). (1) The phase difference distribution is normalized to the probability density. Then, (2) the standard deviation calculation unit 15 calculates the maximum of the envelope of the frequency distribution from the phase difference near the maximum value of the frequency distribution of the phase difference distribution and the frequency in order to optimize the standard deviation of the phase difference distribution. Change the value. That is, as shown in FIG. 8, the mode value (P i ) of the phase difference distribution of the actual seismic wave and the data values (P i-1 ) and (P i + 1 ) before and after the mode value (P i ). ) And a quadratic curve a passing through the three data values, and the extreme value coordinates (x opt , P opt ) of the quadratic curve a are obtained. (3) The average value of the normal distribution is set to x opt, and the standard deviation σ when the extreme value of the probability density of the normal distribution becomes the same as (P opt ) is set as shown in the following equation (1). Here, the standard deviation of the normal distribution is σ, and the frequency distribution interval (2π / 32) is dx.
上記数1式から分かるように、地震の地震波の位相差分分布が作成されれば、正規分布の標準偏差σを求めることが出来る。 As can be seen from the equation (1), the standard deviation σ of the normal distribution can be obtained when the phase difference distribution of the seismic wave of the earthquake is created.
図9(a)〜(c)に地震の地震波の位相差分分布から直接標準偏差を求めた場合をσ0、上記数1式により標準偏差を求めた場合をσとして、各標準偏差に対応した確率密度分布を示した。 9A to 9C correspond to each standard deviation, where σ 0 is the standard deviation obtained directly from the phase difference distribution of the seismic wave of the earthquake, and σ is the standard deviation obtained from the above equation 1. The probability density distribution is shown.
上記各実地震波の位相差分布は共に上記数1式による確率密度と位相差分分布と良く一致している。また、上記数1式により求められる標準偏差σの値は、図9の例では地震波の位相差分分布から直接求めた標準偏差σ0の値の半分ほどである。 Both the phase difference distributions of the actual seismic waves are in good agreement with the probability density and the phase difference distribution according to the above equation (1). Further, the value of the standard deviation σ obtained by the above equation 1 is about half of the value of the standard deviation σ 0 directly obtained from the phase difference distribution of the seismic wave in the example of FIG.
前述のように説明した手法を用いて、より正確に計算された標準偏差σを本発明でいう実地震の波形の標準偏差σと見做して実地震の地震のタイプを決めるのである。 Using the method described above, the standard deviation σ calculated more accurately is regarded as the standard deviation σ of the actual earthquake waveform in the present invention to determine the type of earthquake of the actual earthquake.
上記のような弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6の最大変位量と累積損傷値との相関関係を活用するに当り、図10のステップS1において、先ず、地震のタイプ毎に該地震により発生する弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6の最大変位量を求め、ステップS2において、地震のタイプを想定し、ステップS3において、前記ステップS2で想定した地震の地震のタイプに対応する最大変位量−累積損傷値曲線から累積損傷値を求める。 Per To take advantage of the correlation between the maximum displacement and the cumulative damage value elastoplastic energy absorber 6 as described above, at step S 1 in FIG. 10, first, elastic-plastic generated by the earthquake for each type of Seismic determine the maximum displacement of the energy absorber 6, in step S 2, assuming the type of seismic, in step S 3, the maximum displacement amount corresponding to the type of earthquake seismic assumed in the step S 2 - cumulative damage value Determine the cumulative damage value from the curve.
そして、前記ステップS1で求めた最大変位量と、前記ステップS2で求めた地震タイプにより、ステップS3において、地震のタイプをパラメータとする最大変位量と累積損傷値との相関関係から弾塑性エネルギー吸収体6の累積損傷値を求める。 Then, the the maximum displacement amount determined in Step S 1, the seismic type which has been determined by the step S 2, in step S 3, the bullet from the correlation between the maximum displacement and the cumulative damage value for the type of seismic parameters The cumulative damage value of the plastic energy absorber 6 is obtained.
次に地震後の劣化診断においては、実地震が発生した後、図11のステップS11において、目的の劣化診断建物が実際に応答した最大変位量(最大層間変位量)を内外装被害調査や予め建物に設置した加速度センサの履歴データ等により推定する。 Next, in the deterioration diagnosis after the earthquake, after the actual earthquake has occurred, in step S 11 of FIG. 11, the maximum displacement amount of deterioration diagnosis building of purpose was actually response (maximum story displacement amount) Ya the interior and exterior damage investigation It is estimated from history data of an acceleration sensor installed in a building in advance.
同時にステップS12において、観測された実地震波から地震のタイプを判別し、前記ステップS11で求めた最大変位量と、前記ステップS12で求めた地震タイプにより、ステップS13において、地震のタイプをパラメータとする最大層間変位量と累積損傷値との相関関係から累積損傷値を推定する。 In step S 12 at the same time, to determine the type of earthquakes observed real seismic waves, the maximum displacement amount determined in step S 11, an earthquake type determined in step S 12, in step S 13, the seismic type The cumulative damage value is estimated from the correlation between the maximum interlaminar displacement and the cumulative damage value.
本発明の活用例として、建物用の規格化された弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の劣化診断装置に適用出来、特に部材が規格化され、予め地震により被害を受ける階を想定して設計された建物に装備された弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の劣化診断装置に好適である。 As an example of use of the present invention, it can be applied to a deterioration diagnosis device for a standardized elastic-plastic energy absorber for buildings, and in particular, a building that is designed assuming a floor that is damaged by an earthquake in advance. It is suitable for the deterioration diagnosis device of the equipped elastoplastic energy absorber.
A…耐震要素
L…上限曲線
1…上下梁
2…左右柱
3…主枠体
4…連結枠材
5…連結枠体
6…弾塑性エネルギー吸収体
7…連結部材
8…斜め枠体
11…劣化診断装置
12…入力部
13…制御部
14…出力部
15…標準偏差算出部
16…最大変位量算出部
17…相関関係情報DB
18…累積損傷値演算部
19…弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の最大変位量情報DB
20…インターフェイス
21…インターネット
A ... seismic element L ... upper curve 1 ... upper and lower beams 2 ... left and right columns 3 ... main frame 4 ... connection frame material 5 ... connection frame 6 ... elastoplastic energy absorber 7 ... connection member 8 ... diagonal frame
11… Deterioration diagnosis device
12 ... Input section
13 ... Control part
14 ... Output section
15 ... Standard deviation calculator
16… Maximum displacement calculator
17 ... correlation information DB
18 ... Cumulative damage value calculator
19 ... Maximum displacement information DB of elastic-plastic energy absorber
20… Interface
21 ... Internet
Claims (4)
実地震の地震波を位相差分分布に変換して標準偏差を算出する標準偏差算出手段と、
前記実地震により発生した前記弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の最大変位量を算出する最大変位量算出手段と、
地震により発生した前記弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の最大変位量と、該地震に起因する前記弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の累積損傷値との相関関係情報を予め記憶する相関関係情報記憶手段と、
前記標準偏差算出手段により算出された実地震波の標準偏差と、前記最大変位量算出手段により算出された前記弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の最大変位量と、前記相関関係情報記憶手段に記憶された弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の最大変位量と累積損傷値との相関関係情報と、から前記弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の累積損傷値を演算する累積損傷値演算手段と、
を有することを特徴とする弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の劣化診断装置。 A standardized elastoplastic energy absorber deterioration diagnostic device for buildings,
A standard deviation calculating means for converting a seismic wave of an actual earthquake into a phase difference distribution and calculating a standard deviation;
Maximum displacement amount calculating means for calculating the maximum displacement amount of the elastoplastic energy absorber generated by the actual earthquake;
Correlation information storage means for storing in advance correlation information between the maximum amount of displacement of the elastoplastic energy absorber caused by an earthquake and the cumulative damage value of the elastoplastic energy absorber caused by the earthquake;
The standard deviation of the actual seismic wave calculated by the standard deviation calculator, the maximum displacement of the elastic-plastic energy absorber calculated by the maximum displacement calculator, and the elastoplasticity stored in the correlation information storage unit Cumulative damage value calculation means for calculating the cumulative damage value of the elastic-plastic energy absorber from the correlation information between the maximum displacement amount of the energy absorber and the cumulative damage value;
An apparatus for diagnosing deterioration of an elasto-plastic energy absorber, comprising:
実地震の地震波を位相差分分布に変換して標準偏差を算出し、
前記実地震により発生した前記弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の最大変位量を算出し、
前記実地震波の標準偏差と、前記実地震により発生した前記弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の最大変位量と、予め作成した地震により発生する前記弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の最大変位量と、該地震に起因する前記弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の累積損傷値との相関関係情報と、から前記弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の累積損傷値を演算することを特徴とする弾塑性エネルギー吸収体の劣化診断方法。 A method for diagnosing deterioration of a standardized elastic-plastic energy absorber for buildings,
The standard deviation is calculated by converting the seismic wave of the actual earthquake into a phase difference distribution,
Calculate the maximum displacement of the elastoplastic energy absorber generated by the actual earthquake,
The standard deviation of the actual seismic wave, the maximum displacement amount of the elasto-plastic energy absorber generated by the actual earthquake, the maximum displacement amount of the elasto-plastic energy absorber generated by a previously prepared earthquake, and the attributed to the earthquake A method of diagnosing deterioration of an elastoplastic energy absorber, comprising: calculating a cumulative damage value of the elastoplastic energy absorber from correlation information with a cumulative damage value of the elastoplastic energy absorber.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2006207317A JP4969173B2 (en) | 2006-07-31 | 2006-07-31 | Degradation diagnostic device for elastic-plastic energy absorber |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2006207317A JP4969173B2 (en) | 2006-07-31 | 2006-07-31 | Degradation diagnostic device for elastic-plastic energy absorber |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JP2008032578A JP2008032578A (en) | 2008-02-14 |
| JP4969173B2 true JP4969173B2 (en) | 2012-07-04 |
Family
ID=39122159
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2006207317A Active JP4969173B2 (en) | 2006-07-31 | 2006-07-31 | Degradation diagnostic device for elastic-plastic energy absorber |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP4969173B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP5586890B2 (en) * | 2009-07-29 | 2014-09-10 | トヨタホーム株式会社 | Method for adjusting damping device |
Family Cites Families (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP3181201B2 (en) * | 1995-07-10 | 2001-07-03 | 名古屋電機工業株式会社 | Moving object detection method |
| JPH10177085A (en) * | 1996-12-19 | 1998-06-30 | Hitachi Ltd | Load history and cumulative damage monitoring system |
| JPH11201703A (en) * | 1998-01-14 | 1999-07-30 | Kajima Corp | Interlayer displacement detection device for multi-story structures during earthquake |
| JP2001083047A (en) * | 1999-09-16 | 2001-03-30 | Hitachi Ltd | Elasto-plastic support device, fatigue evaluation method and maintenance method using the same |
| JP2003296396A (en) * | 2002-03-29 | 2003-10-17 | Yuji Takahashi | Expected life cycle cost evaluation system for building and recording medium storing expected life cycle cost evaluation program |
| JP3837099B2 (en) * | 2002-08-08 | 2006-10-25 | ヤマト設計株式会社 | Structure damage estimation system and program |
-
2006
- 2006-07-31 JP JP2006207317A patent/JP4969173B2/en active Active
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP2008032578A (en) | 2008-02-14 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Lignos et al. | Development and utilization of structural component databases for performance-based earthquake engineering | |
| Sharma et al. | Seismic fragility evaluation of semi-rigid frames subjected to near-field earthquakes | |
| Erazo et al. | Bayesian seismic strong-motion response and damage estimation with application to a full-scale seven story shear wall structure | |
| Patil et al. | Structural performance of a parked wind turbine tower subjected to strong ground motions | |
| Uriz et al. | Seismic performance assessment of concentrically braced steel frames | |
| Broderick et al. | Earthquake testing and response analysis of concentrically-braced sub-frames | |
| Lignos et al. | Numerical and experimental evaluation of seismic capacity of high-rise steel buildings subjected to long duration earthquakes | |
| JP6509094B2 (en) | Damage assessment device | |
| Kazemi et al. | Development of fragility curves by incorporating new spectral shape indicators and a weighted damage index: case study of steel braced frames in the city of Mashhad, Iran | |
| Hernandez et al. | Estimation of element‐by‐element demand‐to‐capacity ratios in instrumented SMRF buildings using measured seismic response | |
| Kunnath et al. | Modeling and response prediction in performance-based seismic evaluation: Case studies of instrumented steel moment-frame buildings | |
| Feinstein et al. | Seismic response of floor‐anchored nonstructural components fastened with yielding elements | |
| JP5131673B2 (en) | Deterioration prediction method and deterioration diagnosis method of elastoplastic energy absorber | |
| Miranda et al. | Assessment of the probability of collapse of structures under earthquakes | |
| JP4771465B2 (en) | Reliability evaluation method for aged structures | |
| Yim et al. | Load–impulse characterization for steel connection | |
| JP4749268B2 (en) | Degradation diagnostic device for elastic-plastic energy absorber | |
| JP4969173B2 (en) | Degradation diagnostic device for elastic-plastic energy absorber | |
| Chen et al. | Evaluation of loading sequences on testing capacity of concentrically braced frame structures | |
| CN115169151A (en) | A seismic reliability analysis method for double-groove aqueduct structures under strong earthquakes | |
| JP4969172B2 (en) | Degradation diagnostic device for elastic-plastic energy absorber | |
| JP4215686B2 (en) | Strength element and its deterioration diagnosis method | |
| JP4969174B2 (en) | Degradation simulation equipment for elastic-plastic energy absorber | |
| Kunnath et al. | IDA capacity curves: the need for alternative intensity factors | |
| Benavent-Climent | A seismic index method for vulnerability assessment of existing frames: application to RC structures with wide beams in Spain |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| RD02 | Notification of acceptance of power of attorney |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A7422 Effective date: 20080131 |
|
| A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20090709 |
|
| A977 | Report on retrieval |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007 Effective date: 20111221 |
|
| A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20111227 |
|
| TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20120403 |
|
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 |
|
| A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20120403 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20150413 Year of fee payment: 3 |
|
| R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Ref document number: 4969173 Country of ref document: JP Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |
|
| S531 | Written request for registration of change of domicile |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313531 |
|
| R350 | Written notification of registration of transfer |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350 |