Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP4982438B2 - Method for preventing mass outflow of defects in steel - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP4982438B2 - Method for preventing mass outflow of defects in steel - Google Patents

Method for preventing mass outflow of defects in steel Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP4982438B2
JP4982438B2 JP2008158043A JP2008158043A JP4982438B2 JP 4982438 B2 JP4982438 B2 JP 4982438B2 JP 2008158043 A JP2008158043 A JP 2008158043A JP 2008158043 A JP2008158043 A JP 2008158043A JP 4982438 B2 JP4982438 B2 JP 4982438B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
steel
defect
weight
inspection
depth
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2008158043A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2009297778A (en
Inventor
昌樹 宮本
隆 桑名
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Sanyo Special Steel Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Sanyo Special Steel Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sanyo Special Steel Co Ltd filed Critical Sanyo Special Steel Co Ltd
Priority to JP2008158043A priority Critical patent/JP4982438B2/en
Publication of JP2009297778A publication Critical patent/JP2009297778A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4982438B2 publication Critical patent/JP4982438B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/02Total factory control, e.g. smart factories, flexible manufacturing systems [FMS] or integrated manufacturing systems [IMS]

Landscapes

  • General Factory Administration (AREA)
  • Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Magnetic Means (AREA)

Description

本発明は、鋼材の疵不良の大量流出防止方法に関するものである。   The present invention relates to a method for preventing mass outflow of defects in steel materials.

特殊鋼からなる鋼材は、鋼片が圧延されることで得られる。通常は、タンデムに並べられた粗列圧延機、中間列圧延機及び仕上列圧延機による多段圧延が施される。この圧延によって鋼片は徐々に細径化し且つ長尺化して、鋼材が得られる。ユーザーの要求によっては、圧延によって得られた鋼材に、さらに、熱処理、ピーリング加工などを施して成品とする。   A steel material made of special steel is obtained by rolling a steel piece. Usually, multi-stage rolling is performed by a rough row rolling mill, a middle row rolling mill, and a finishing row rolling mill arranged in tandem. By this rolling, the steel slab is gradually reduced in diameter and lengthened to obtain a steel material. Depending on the user's request, the steel material obtained by rolling is further subjected to heat treatment, peeling processing, etc. to obtain a product.

このように製造される鋼材には表面疵が存在することがある。鋼片の疵に起因した表面疵の場合もあれば、圧延やそれより後の工程で発生する表面疵の場合もあるが、表面疵の形状・大きさによっては、鋼材の品質を損なう。そこで鋼材の用途にあわせた最終の製品検査を行い、高品質の鋼材のみを出荷する必要がある。   The steel material manufactured in this way may have surface flaws. There may be a surface flaw caused by a flaw of a steel slab, or it may be a surface flaw generated in rolling or a later process, but depending on the shape and size of the surface flaw, the quality of the steel material is impaired. Therefore, it is necessary to inspect the final product according to the use of the steel material and to ship only high-quality steel material.

製品検査の流れの一例としては、棒鋼圧延された鋼材について漏洩磁束探傷機により疵の有無及び深さを検知し、その後、湿式磁粉探傷法により疵の位置を明確化し、作業者がグラインダ等により疵一つ一つを研削する作業を行う。   An example of the product inspection flow is to detect the presence and depth of flaws in a steel bar rolled steel bar with a magnetic flux flaw detector, then clarify the position of the flaws by wet magnetic particle flaw detection, and the operator uses a grinder etc.研 削 Work to grind one by one.

漏洩磁束探傷機等の検査機器で検出した疵を磁粉探傷で確認して疵取り手直しする際に、疵が圧着状ほど磁粉探傷で見逃す危険性が高くなる。鋳造時にこのような疵が発生した場合には、連続鋳造製法では多数の鋼番(チャージナンバー、以下、C♯ともいう。)にまたがるため、危険対象範囲が激増する。   When the wrinkles detected by an inspection device such as a leakage magnetic flux flaw detector are confirmed by magnetic particle flaw detection and repaired, the risk of overlooking the flaw by the magnetic particle flaw detection increases as the wrinkle is crimped. If such flaws occur during casting, the continuous casting method spans a large number of steel numbers (charge number, hereinafter also referred to as C #), so the danger target range increases drastically.

特に、連続鋳造工程での連鋳モールドのメッキ剥がれによるモールドパウダーの噛み込みが発生した場合には、多数のC#に跨った不良の流出が発生することがある。   In particular, when mold powder bites due to peeling of the continuous casting mold in the continuous casting process, defective outflows across a large number of C # s may occur.

このような疵は、疵取り負荷大による工程止めにするほどでないにせよ、疵取り作業は通常の水準より多くなる。疵不良も同様に通常の水準より多くなる。この状態が多数鋼番にまたがる場合を危険対象として警告を発する仕組みが必要となる。   Even if such a wrinkle is not enough to stop the process due to a large wobbling load, the wringing operation becomes higher than a normal level. Wrinkle defects are also higher than normal. It is necessary to have a mechanism for issuing a warning as a danger object when this state extends over many steel numbers.

従来の疵を検知するシステムとしては、例えば、被探傷材情報取得手段がその被探傷材の種類や材質などに関する被探傷材情報を取得すると共に、合否基準情報取得手段がその被探傷材ごとに予め規定された内部疵の合否基準に関する情報を取得してから、超音波探傷手段が被探傷材の内部疵の有無を探傷し、合否判定手段がこれら各手段で得られた各情報に基づいてその被探傷材ごとの合否を判定することによって、検査員が介在することなく被探傷材ごとの合否判定を容易かつ正確に実施できるシステムがある(例えば、特許文献1参照)。
特開2007-2713750号公報
As a conventional system for detecting flaws, for example, the flaw detection material information acquisition means acquires flaw detection material information on the type and material of the flaw detection material, and the pass / fail criterion information acquisition means for each flaw detection material. After acquiring the information on the pass / fail criteria for the internal flaws defined in advance, the ultrasonic flaw detection means flaws the presence / absence of the internal flaw of the material to be detected, and the pass / fail judgment means is based on each information obtained by these means. There is a system that can easily and accurately carry out pass / fail determination for each flaw detection material by determining the pass / fail for each flaw detection material (for example, see Patent Document 1).
JP 2007-2713750

従来は、具体的な合否判定基準として、疵不良率(疵不良重量/検査重量)が50〜100%の場合に製造工程を止める処置を行っていた。しかしながら、検査段階では不良と認識されなかった製品についても、この基準ではクレームが多発したため、さらに基準を厳格化する必要が生じた。また、製品仕様にあわせた基準を設定する必要もある。   Conventionally, as a specific acceptance / rejection determination standard, the manufacturing process is stopped when the defect rate (defect weight / inspection weight) is 50 to 100%. However, even for products that were not recognized as defective at the inspection stage, there were many claims in this standard, so it was necessary to further tighten the standard. It is also necessary to set a standard that matches the product specifications.

本発明は、このような従来の問題を解決するためになされたもので、警告条件をより厳密化することにより、不良品の流出を効果的に防止することが可能となる方法を提供するものである。   The present invention has been made to solve such a conventional problem, and provides a method capable of effectively preventing the outflow of defective products by making warning conditions more strict. It is.

本発明の鋼材の疵不良の大量流出防止方法は、同一の鋼番から製造された複数の鋼材の各々について製品検査を行って疵の深さを検知し、製品検査を行う複数の鋼材の総重量を検査重量とし、製品検査を行う複数の鋼材の本数を検査本数とし、疵の深さが疵取り可能深さを超える複数の鋼材の総重量を疵不良重量とし、疵の深さが所定の疵許容深さを超えるが疵取り可能な深さ以内である鋼材の本数を疵取本数とし、疵不良重量を検査重量で除した値を疵不良率とし、疵取本数を検査本数で除した値を疵取率とした場合に、検査重量が所定の重量以上である場合において、疵不良率が所定の数値以上、および、疵取率が所定の数値以上、の少なくとも一方の条件に当てはまる鋼番を危険鋼番と認定し、危険鋼番から製造された鋼材について再検査又はピーリングを行うことを特徴とする。   The method for preventing large-scale leakage of defects in steel materials according to the present invention is a method of performing a product inspection on each of a plurality of steel materials manufactured from the same steel number to detect the depth of the defects, and a total of a plurality of steel materials subjected to product inspection. The weight is the inspection weight, the number of multiple steel products to be inspected is the number of inspections, the total weight of multiple steel materials whose depth exceeds the allowable depth is taken as the defect weight, and the depth of the defect is predetermined. The number of steel materials that exceed the allowable depth of steel, but is within the depth that can be cut, is the number of cuts, the value obtained by dividing the weight of the bad by the inspection weight is the defect rate, and the number of scraps is divided by the number of inspections. If the inspection value is equal to or greater than a predetermined weight, the defect rate is equal to or greater than a predetermined value, and the yield rate is equal to or greater than a predetermined value. Recognize steel numbers as dangerous steel numbers and re-use steel materials manufactured from dangerous steel numbers.査又 is characterized by performing peeling.

本発明の鋼材の疵不良の大量流出防止方法によれば、従来見逃していた不良を生じる可能性がある鋼材についても検知することが可能となり、疵不良の大量流出を防止することが可能となる。   According to the method for preventing large-scale outflow of defects in steel materials according to the present invention, it is possible to detect steel materials that may cause defects that have been missed in the past, and it is possible to prevent large-scale outflow of defects in defects. .

以下、本発明の実施形態である鋼材の疵不良の大量流出防止方法について、詳細に説明をする。   Hereinafter, a method for preventing mass outflow of defects in steel material that is an embodiment of the present invention will be described in detail.

まず、特殊鋼の製造工程について簡単に説明する。まず、電気炉でスクラップを溶解し、取り鍋に全量を移す、この取り鍋単位の区切りをチャージと呼び、各々ナンバー(C♯)が付加される。続いて、取鍋精錬工程、RH脱ガス工程を経て、連続鋳造により複数の鋼片に切断される。その後、鋼片圧延工程、鋼片検査工程、棒鋼圧延工程を経て、複数の鋼材が製造され、本実施形態の疵不良の大量流出防止方法を適用した製品検査工程が実施され、製品検査工程で合格した鋼材については出荷がなされる。   First, the manufacturing process of special steel will be briefly described. First, scraps are melted in an electric furnace, and the whole amount is transferred to a ladle. This division of the ladle unit is called a charge, and a number (C #) is added to each. Subsequently, it is cut into a plurality of steel pieces by continuous casting through a ladle refining step and an RH degassing step. After that, a steel slab rolling process, a steel slab inspection process, and a steel bar rolling process are performed to produce a plurality of steel materials, and a product inspection process to which the mass defect prevention method for defects in this embodiment is applied is performed. The steel materials that have passed are shipped.

次に、本実施形態の疵不良の大量流出防止方法を適用した製品検査工程について説明をする。   Next, a description will be given of a product inspection process to which the method for preventing a large amount of wrinkle leakage according to this embodiment is applied.

製品検査工程では、同一のC#から製造された複数の鋼材の各々について、漏洩磁束探傷機により、疵の存在及び深さを検知する。次に、湿式磁粉探傷により疵の位置を特定する。   In the product inspection process, the presence and depth of the flaw are detected by a leakage magnetic flux flaw detector for each of a plurality of steel materials manufactured from the same C #. Next, the position of the wrinkles is specified by wet magnetic particle inspection.

ここで、漏洩磁束探傷及び湿式磁粉探傷の結果、疵取り可能深さを超える疵材については、疵取り作業を行うことができないため、後工程で回収される。   Here, as a result of the leakage magnetic flux flaw detection and the wet magnetic particle flaw detection, the scissors that exceed the scooping depth cannot be scooped and are collected in a subsequent process.

また、疵の深さが製品仕様以内の深さ(疵許容深さ)である場合には、合格品として出荷される。なお、疵許容深さは、製品の仕様により適宜設定される値である。   In addition, when the depth of the ridge is within the product specifications (allowable heel depth), the product is shipped as an acceptable product. The wrinkle allowable depth is a value that is appropriately set according to product specifications.

また、疵の深さが疵許容深さを超えるが、疵取り可能な深さ以内である場合には、作業者が鋼材の一本一本について、湿式磁粉探傷により確認された疵をグラインダにより削除する疵取り作業を行い、疵の深さを製品仕様以内の深さに修正した後に出荷される。   In addition, when the depth of the ridge exceeds the allowable depth of the ridge but is within the depth that can be removed, the grinder confirms the ridge confirmed by the wet magnetic particle inspection for each steel material. Shipped after removing the wrinkle to be removed and correcting the wrinkle depth to within the product specifications.

ここで、疵の深さが、疵取り可能深さを超える鋼材の本数の総重量を、疵不良重量とし、疵不良重量を、検査した鋼材の本数の総重量である検査重量で除した値を「疵不良率(%)」とする。   Here, the total weight of the number of steel materials whose depth of iron exceeds the depth that can be trimmed is regarded as the defective weight, and the defective weight is divided by the inspection weight, which is the total weight of the inspected steel materials. Is defined as “defect rate (%)”.

また、疵の深さが、疵許容深さを超えるが疵取り可能な深さ以内である場合の、作業者が疵取りを行った本数を疵取本数とし、この疵取り本数を検査本数で除した値を「疵取率(%)」とする。   In addition, when the depth of the ridge exceeds the allowable depth of the ridge but is within the depth that can be trimmed, the number of trimmed by the operator is taken as the number of trimmed, and this number of scraped is the number of inspections. The value obtained by dividing is defined as “recovery rate (%)”.

以上の関係を数式に表すと以下のようになる
疵不良率(%) = 疵不良重量/検査重量
疵取率(%) = 疵取本数/検査本数
The above relationship is expressed in the following formula: 疵 Defect rate (%) = 疵 Defect weight / inspection weight 疵 Decision rate (%) = Number of defects acquired / Number of inspections

(製品検査量の設定)
ここで、本実施形態の疵不良の大量流出防止方法では、同一のC♯について検査重量を1チャージ当たりの重量の20%以上とすることが好ましい。例えば、1チャージあたりの重量が150tの場合には、30t以上とすることが好ましい。これは、1チャージ当たりの重量の100%とした場合には、大半が出荷されており、残鋼片もないためフィードバックできないためである。
(Setting of product inspection amount)
Here, in the method for preventing a large amount of wrinkle leakage of the present embodiment, it is preferable that the inspection weight for the same C # is 20% or more of the weight per charge. For example, when the weight per charge is 150 t, it is preferably 30 t or more. This is because when 100% of the weight per charge is set, most of the products are shipped and there is no remaining steel piece, so feedback cannot be made.

(疵不良率の設定)
また、本実施形態の疵不良の大量流出防止方法では、疵不良率が、1.0%以上の鋼材を危険対象C#として認定することが好ましい。これは、実際の製品において、クレームが発生した場合の疵不良率が1.4%程度であったため、また、パウダー噛み込み疵流出防止として、基準をさらに厳格化し1.0%としたものである。また、疵不良率はこれに限られず、実際の製品において、クレームが発生した場合の疵不良率に基づいて定めればよい。
(Setting defect rate)
Further, in the method for preventing a large amount of defects of defects in this embodiment, it is preferable that a steel material having a defect ratio of 1.0% or more is recognized as a risk target C #. This is because the defect rate in the case of complaints in actual products was about 1.4%, and the standard was further tightened to 1.0% as a prevention of powder bites. The defect rate is not limited to this, and may be determined based on the defect rate when a complaint occurs in an actual product.

(疵取率の設定)
また、本実施形態の疵不良の大量流出防止方法では、疵取率が、10.0%以上の鋼材を危険対象C#として認定することが好ましい。疵不良率が1.0%未満である場合でも、疵取率が10.0%以上である場合には、作業者の疵取り作業の負荷が増大していることを意味しているため、疵見逃し等の人的ミスの発生により不良品が見逃される可能性があるためである。
(Setting of take-off rate)
Moreover, in the method for preventing large-scale leakage of defects in the present embodiment, it is preferable that a steel material having a scraping rate of 10.0% or more is recognized as a risk target C #. Even if the defect rate is less than 1.0%, if the yield rate is 10.0% or more, it means that the load of the operator's scraping work is increasing. This is because defective products may be missed due to human error.

そして、本実施形態の疵不良の大量流出防止方法では、検査重量が30t以上である場合において、疵不良率が1.0%以上、および/または、疵取率が10.0%以上、の条件に当てはまる鋼番を危険C♯と認定し、危険C♯から製造された鋼材について再検査又はピーリングを行う。   And, in the method for preventing large-scale spillage of defects in this embodiment, when the inspection weight is 30 t or more, the steel that satisfies the conditions that the defect rate is 1.0% or more and / or the scraping rate is 10.0% or more. The number is recognized as dangerous C #, and the steel material manufactured from dangerous C # is re-inspected or peeled off.

(検査後の対応、出荷品、入庫品、工程中材、引当前鋼片)
本実施形態の疵不良の大量流出防止方法により、危険C♯が認定された場合には、同一のC#の製品について、出荷済みのものについては、買い戻しを行って再検査を行い、入庫品については、再検査を行い、工程中材については、検査基準をさらに厳格化して検査を行い、引き当て前鋼片については、再検査、または、丸鋼片に関してはピーリングを行う。
(Response after inspection, shipment, receipt, in-process material, pre-allocation billet)
When the risk C # is recognized by the method for preventing large defects from defects in the present embodiment, the same C # products that have already been shipped are repurchased and re-inspected. Is subjected to re-inspection, and in-process materials are inspected with stricter inspection standards. Re-inspection is performed on pre-alloyed steel slabs, or peeling is performed on round steel slabs.

以下、本発明の実施例について説明をする。ただし、本発明は以下の実施例に限定されるものではない。   Examples of the present invention will be described below. However, the present invention is not limited to the following examples.

表1及び表2は、C#1からC#70について、疵不良率及び疵取率を算出した結果を示す図である。なお、表中において、疵不良率が1.0%以上の箇所、及び、疵取率が10.0%以上の箇所については、数値を四角で囲っている。   Tables 1 and 2 are diagrams showing the results of calculating the defect rate and the defect rate for C # 1 to C # 70. In the table, the numerical values are enclosed in squares for portions where the defect rate is 1.0% or more and where the defect rate is 10.0% or more.

Figure 0004982438
Figure 0004982438

Figure 0004982438
Figure 0004982438

表1に示すように、疵不良率が1.0%を超えないC#でも、疵取率が10.0%以上のC#は、49、50、51、59、67、及び70の6つが存在する。このように、従来見逃していた不良を生じる可能性がある鋼材についても、本実施例の疵不良の大量流出防止方法により検知することが可能であることがわかる。   As shown in Table 1, there are six C # s 49, 50, 51, 59, 67, and 70 having a scraping rate of 10.0% or more even in C # where the defect rate does not exceed 1.0%. Thus, it can be seen that the steel material that may cause a defect that has been missed in the past can also be detected by the method for preventing a large amount of wrinkle leakage of the present embodiment.

また、疵不良率が0.3%くらいで推移していたのが、C#48シリーズから悪くなっており、危険C#と認定されたC#54の検査済み鋼材を磁粉探傷検査にて入念に再検査したところ、疵の残存が認められた。これは、疵取率10%を超えた作業負荷増により見逃しの要因が考えられる。残存する疵の断面ミクロを調査したところ、連続鋳造時にモールドパウダーの巻き込みによる疵幅が非常に狭い密着状の疵であった。磁粉探傷検査においてこのような密着状の疵は、蛍光磁粉が凝集しにくくインディケーションが薄くなるため、見逃したと推定される。本実施例の疵不良の大量流出防止方法によれば、疵取率10%以上のC#については、すべて再検査又はピーリングが行われるため、上記のごときパウダー噛み込みによる疵不良の見逃しが発生する可能性は非常に低い。よって、本発明の妥当性が証明された。   In addition, the defect rate has been around 0.3%, which is worse than the C # 48 series, and the inspected steel material of C # 54 certified as dangerous C # is carefully re-examined by magnetic particle inspection. Upon inspection, the presence of sputum was observed. This may be a factor of oversight due to an increase in workload exceeding 10% of the collection rate. When the cross-sectional microscopicity of the remaining wrinkles was investigated, it was found that the wrinkle width was very narrow due to the entrainment of mold powder during continuous casting. In the magnetic particle inspection, it is estimated that such close wrinkles were missed because the fluorescent magnetic powder hardly aggregates and the indication becomes thin. According to the method for preventing a large amount of wrinkle defects of this embodiment, all C # with a scraping rate of 10% or more are re-inspected or peeled, so that oversight of wrinkle defects due to powder biting as described above occurs. The possibility of doing is very low. Therefore, the validity of the present invention was proved.

Claims (4)

同一の鋼番から製造された複数の鋼材の各々について製品検査を行って疵の深さを検知し、
前記製品検査を行う前記複数の鋼材の総重量を検査重量とし、前記製品検査を行う前記複数の鋼材の本数を検査本数とし、前記疵の深さが、疵取り可能深さを超える前記複数の鋼材の総重量を疵不良重量とし、前記疵の深さが、所定の疵許容深さを超えるが前記疵取り可能な深さ以内である前記鋼材の本数を疵取本数とし、前記疵不良重量を前記検査重量で除した値を疵不良率とし、前記疵取本数を前記検査本数で除した値を疵取率とした場合に、
前記検査重量が所定の重量以上である場合において、
前記疵不良率が所定の数値以上、および、前記疵取率が所定の数値以上、の条件の少なくとも一方の条件に当てはまる鋼番を危険鋼番と認定し、
前記危険鋼番から製造された鋼材について再検査又はピーリングを行うことを特徴とする鋼材の疵不良の大量流出防止方法。
Product inspection is performed on each of a plurality of steel products manufactured from the same steel number to detect the depth of the flaw,
The total weight of the plurality of steel materials for performing the product inspection is set as an inspection weight, the number of the plurality of steel materials for performing the product inspection is set as the number of inspections, and the depth of the wrinkles exceeds the depth that can be cut off. The total weight of the steel material is the defect weight, and the depth of the defect exceeds a predetermined allowable defect depth, but the number of the steel materials that are within the depth that can be removed is the defect number, and the defect defect weight When the value divided by the inspection weight is the defect rate, and the value obtained by dividing the number of scraps by the number of inspections is the scrap rate,
In the case where the inspection weight is a predetermined weight or more,
The steel number that meets at least one of the conditions in which the defect rate is greater than or equal to a predetermined value and the scraping rate is greater than or equal to a predetermined value is recognized as a dangerous steel number,
A method for preventing large-scale outflow of flaws in steel materials, wherein reinspection or peeling is performed on steel materials manufactured from the dangerous steel numbers.
前記検査重量は、前記複数の鋼材の総重量の20%以上の重量であることを特徴とする請求項1に記載の鋼材の疵不良の大量流出防止方法。   The method of claim 1, wherein the inspection weight is 20% or more of the total weight of the plurality of steel materials. 前記疵不良率は、1.0%以上であることを特徴とする請求項1または2に記載の鋼材の疵不良の大量流出防止方法。   The method for preventing a large amount of defects in a steel material according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the defect rate is 1.0% or more. 前記疵取率は、10%以上であることを特徴とする請求項1から3のいずれかに記載の鋼材の疵不良の大量流出防止方法。

The method according to claim 1, wherein the scraping rate is 10% or more.

JP2008158043A 2008-06-17 2008-06-17 Method for preventing mass outflow of defects in steel Active JP4982438B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2008158043A JP4982438B2 (en) 2008-06-17 2008-06-17 Method for preventing mass outflow of defects in steel

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2008158043A JP4982438B2 (en) 2008-06-17 2008-06-17 Method for preventing mass outflow of defects in steel

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2009297778A JP2009297778A (en) 2009-12-24
JP4982438B2 true JP4982438B2 (en) 2012-07-25

Family

ID=41545219

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2008158043A Active JP4982438B2 (en) 2008-06-17 2008-06-17 Method for preventing mass outflow of defects in steel

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4982438B2 (en)

Family Cites Families (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH05298327A (en) * 1992-04-23 1993-11-12 Nippon Steel Corp Method for forming stock through history data base for iron and steel product
JP3740959B2 (en) * 2000-07-10 2006-02-01 Jfeスチール株式会社 Equipment for cleaning surface of round steel materials
JP2002283021A (en) * 2001-03-21 2002-10-02 Kawasaki Steel Corp Surface crack prediction method for continuous cast slab and continuous casting method
JP4017858B2 (en) * 2001-10-29 2007-12-05 株式会社住友金属小倉 Billet inspection and care
JP2003329600A (en) * 2002-05-09 2003-11-19 Nippon Steel Corp Quality control method for steel sheet
JP2004351467A (en) * 2003-05-29 2004-12-16 Sanyo Special Steel Co Ltd Manufacturing method of strip steel
JP2005138168A (en) * 2003-11-10 2005-06-02 Nippon Steel Corp Billet inspection and care equipment row and billet inspection and care method
JP4456450B2 (en) * 2004-09-29 2010-04-28 Jfe条鋼株式会社 Manufacturing method of polished steel bar with excellent surface properties
JP2006159260A (en) * 2004-12-08 2006-06-22 Sanyo Special Steel Co Ltd Manufacturing method of steel strip or steel pipe
JP2007271375A (en) * 2006-03-30 2007-10-18 Jfe Steel Kk PASS / FAIL Judgment System and PASS / FAIL Judgment Method for Flaw Detection Materials Using Ultrasonic Flaw Detection

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2009297778A (en) 2009-12-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN101389428B (en) Manufacturing method of continuous casting ingot of steel and surface defect cleaning system of ingot
US8353739B2 (en) Method for detecting and/or preventing grind burn
US11635389B2 (en) Methods and systems for the quantitative measurement of internal defects in as-cast steel products
US20160025647A1 (en) Method for detecting and/or preventing grind burn
JP2004314176A5 (en)
JP4982438B2 (en) Method for preventing mass outflow of defects in steel
JP4509833B2 (en) Surface defect inspection method for aluminum alloy bar
JP3616463B2 (en) Rapid discrimination method for inclusions in steel
JP5023477B2 (en) Pickling method of stainless hot rolled steel strip and stainless hot rolled steel strip
JP5397406B2 (en) Thick steel plate shearing method and shearing machine
CN102507621A (en) Method for judging source of foreign impurities in steel
JP2007178321A (en) Evaluation method of macrosegregation due to emission spectral analysis
TWI397445B (en) Monitoring method of cleanliness of flat steel embryo
JP2005153089A (en) Method for removing surface flaws on billets
JP4770274B2 (en) Thick steel plate shearing method
CN110070543A (en) The rating system of full-automatic continuous casting billet center segregation based on digitized image processing
JP7238836B2 (en) Steel pipe pass/fail judgment system and pass/fail judgment method, and steel pipe manufacturing method
JP2002282914A (en) Method for predicting residual flaws and inspecting residual flaws in thick products
JP6992898B2 (en) Grinding method of steel pieces, manufacturing method of steel bars and manufacturing method of wire rods
JP6790850B2 (en) Surface defect treatment method for continuously cast slabs
RU2227773C2 (en) Method for evaluating quality of metallic blank
JP2005074496A (en) Surface conditioning method for continuously cast slab
JP2009257896A (en) Method of evaluating surface flaw of steel material
JP5651434B2 (en) Sputtering target material inspection method and sputtering target manufacturing method
JP2008151545A (en) Judgment method for the presence or absence of subdermal defects in steel pieces

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20110530

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20120406

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20120417

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20120423

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20150427

Year of fee payment: 3

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 4982438

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250