JP5019136B2 - Establishing a safety support system for aircraft takeoff - Google Patents
Establishing a safety support system for aircraft takeoff Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP5019136B2 JP5019136B2 JP2009104783A JP2009104783A JP5019136B2 JP 5019136 B2 JP5019136 B2 JP 5019136B2 JP 2009104783 A JP2009104783 A JP 2009104783A JP 2009104783 A JP2009104783 A JP 2009104783A JP 5019136 B2 JP5019136 B2 JP 5019136B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- aircraft
- takeoff
- information
- radio
- pilot
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
Description
本発明は、航空機の離陸直前における、管制官とパイロット間の情報連絡のミスを防止し、安全離陸の実現を目的とするものである。 An object of the present invention is to prevent an error in information communication between a controller and a pilot immediately before take-off of an aircraft, and to realize a safe take-off.
現在の航空機の空港における離着陸の指示は、今も航空管制官とパイッロトの耳に頼っている。 Current aircraft airport take-off and landing instructions still rely on the air traffic controllers and pilot's ears.
そのため、平成20年2月16日の新千歳空港における、管制官指示聞き違いに基づく誤離陸滑走、直後の平成20年2月22日、福岡空港でのアシアナ機による、ヘリコプターへの指示を、無線混信が原因による自己への指示との聞き違いによる勘違い離陸が発生した。また、平成21年3月20日、大阪(伊丹)空港での、離陸が同時刻頃の便名がよく似た機への離陸指示を、自己への指示と取り違えたと思われるパイッロトの勘違いによる滑走路への誤進入と、ひとつ間違えば大惨事となる状況が続発した。 Therefore, an error takeoff run based on a misunderstanding of the controller's instructions at the New Chitose Airport on February 16, 2008, immediately after February 22, 2008, instructions to the helicopter by Asiana aircraft at Fukuoka Airport, A misunderstanding takeoff occurred due to misinterpretation of instructions to self due to radio interference. Also, on March 20, 2009, due to a pilot's misunderstanding that the take-off instruction at the Osaka (Itami) airport was mistaking the take-off instruction to the aircraft whose flight number was similar at the same time. There were a series of accidents on the runway and catastrophic events if one was mistaken.
前述のごとく、離陸時における管制官とパイッロト間の情報連絡を、今までどおりの聴覚による無線方式のみに頼っておれば、これまでのトラブル等が、また、いつどこで発生するかは保障の限りではない。人につきまとう、聞き違い、勘違い等の人間の属性に起因する問題は、完全に解決することは困難である。平成20年4月4日、日本航空発表の、パイッロトへの離陸指示内容を四用語に限定するという決定がなされたが、それをまた聞き違えては、絶対安全とも言い切れない。ヒューマンエラー対策は永遠の課題である。 As mentioned above, if the information communication between the controller and pilot at takeoff depends only on the wireless system using the sound as before, it is guaranteed that when the trouble will occur and when and where it occurs. is not. Problems caused by human attributes such as misplacement, misunderstanding, and misunderstanding are difficult to solve completely. On April 4, 2008, Japan Airlines announced that it was decided to limit the takeoff instructions to the pilot to four terms, but it would not be absolutely safe to misunderstand it. Human error countermeasures are an eternal issue.
また、誘導路等のライトによる指示方法は、無線の指示とライトの点灯との間にタイムラグが発生することが考えられ、パイッロトが、自己への間違いのない指示かどうかと、判断に迷うことも想定され。さらに、複数の航空機のパイッロトの目に入ることも考えられ、指示対象以外の他の航空機が自己への指示と見誤り、事故を誘発する危険性も完全には払拭できない。 In addition, it is considered that there is a time lag between the wireless instructions and the lighting of the lights, so the pilot may be confused as to whether or not the instructions are correct. Also assumed. In addition, it is conceivable that the pilots of a plurality of aircraft may enter the eyes, and it is impossible to completely eliminate the danger that other aircraft other than the instruction target will misunderstand the instructions to the aircraft and cause an accident.
そこで本発明によれば、指示コントロールする航空機を狙い打ちすることが出来、しかも、無線の指示とランプの点灯との間には、ほとんどタイムラグが発生せず、聴覚と視覚との指示間の時間的同時性が保障され、他の航空機には影響を与えないので、安全性において優れている。このように、航空機の離陸点までの誘導等の安全施策も各種構じられてはいるが、離陸までのその判断を、前述のとおりパイッロトが聞き違いや勘違いを起こしてしまっては、それまでの努力はすべて水泡に帰し、大きな事故になりかねない。 Therefore, according to the present invention, it is possible to aim at an aircraft to be controlled by instruction, and there is almost no time lag between the wireless instruction and the lighting of the lamp, and the time between the auditory and visual instructions is temporal. Since simultaneity is guaranteed and other aircraft are not affected, it is excellent in safety. In this way, there are various safety measures such as guidance to the takeoff point of the aircraft, but if the pilot has misunderstood or misunderstood as described above, All of these efforts can be attributed to water bubbles, which can lead to major accidents.
本発明はこのような点に鑑みて成されたものであり、現在の聴覚のみに頼る無線連絡方式に加えて、視覚による情報連絡方式を併用することにより、管制官とパイッロト間を1対1で結び、情報伝達精度の向上を図り、離陸の瞬間における安全性を飛躍的に向上させることにある。 The present invention has been made in view of such points, and in addition to the wireless communication method that relies only on the current hearing, in addition to the visual information communication method, the controller and the pilot are one-to-one. The goal is to improve information transmission accuracy and dramatically improve safety at the moment of takeoff.
聴覚による情報連絡のみでは、上述のように、勘違い、聞き違い、思い込み等による間違いがつきまとう。しかし、視覚による確認方法であれば、赤、黄、青色等の色を見間違うことは通常考えられない。そのため、聴覚による方式と、視覚による方式とを併用することにより、安全性は極めて高まることが期待できる。メインの連絡方法は無線方式とするが、これを視覚の情報連絡方法でバックアップすることにより、無線(聴覚)のみに頼る方式の不備をカバーすることが可能となる。 As described above, mistakes due to misunderstandings, misunderstandings, and misunderstandings are likely to be caused only by auditory information communication. However, if it is a visual confirmation method, it is usually not possible to mistake colors such as red, yellow, and blue. Therefore, safety can be expected to be extremely enhanced by using both the auditory method and the visual method. The main contact method is a wireless method, but by backing up this with a visual information contact method, it is possible to cover deficiencies in a method that relies solely on wireless (auditory).
航空機ごとに固定的に割り付けるやりかたは、航空機固有の機体番号等の情報をこのシステムに事前にデーターベース化しておく。そこで画面に表示する具体的な内容としては、「停止」、「徐行滑走」、「離陸」の三つとし、それに対応する航空機側の受信装置もこれに対応させて、「停止=赤ランプ」、「徐行滑走=黄ランプ」、「離陸=青ランプ」としておく。つまり、道路の交差点の信号機の、赤、黄、青のランプ表示をコックピットに取り込む発想である。 For information on how to assign fixedly for each aircraft, information such as the aircraft number unique to the aircraft is made into a database in advance in this system. Therefore, the specific contents to be displayed on the screen are “stop”, “slow-speed run”, and “take-off”, and the corresponding aircraft side receiving device also responds to this, “stop = red lamp” , "Slow run = Yellow lamp", "Take off = Blue lamp". In other words, the idea is to capture the red, yellow and blue lamp displays of traffic lights at the intersection of roads into the cockpit.
現在、離陸航空機への指示等は、一人の管制官が複数機を担当し、すなわち、マルチ処理がなされており、その内容はメモ書き等で各自処理されているとのことである。そこで、本システムによれば、パネルタッチした部分を色付き反転するようにすれば、直前に指示した内容が画面に残ることとなり、メモ代わりともなる。 At present, instructions to take-off aircraft are handled by a single controller in charge of multiple aircraft, that is, multi-processing is performed, and the content is processed by memos and the like. Therefore, according to the present system, if the part touched on the panel is reversed with a color, the contents instructed immediately before remain on the screen, which can be used as a memo.
以上説明したように、本発明によれば、現在の聴覚による方法に視覚による情報連絡方法を補完させることにより、従来より一段と安全性の向上が期待できる。また、管制官の指示ミスがあれば、この二つの情報のアンマッチにより、パイッロト側でも発見でき、このように、双方のミスもお互いにチェックし合うことができる。 As described above, according to the present invention, the current auditory method is supplemented with the visual information communication method, so that further improvement in safety can be expected. In addition, if there is a mistake in the controller's instructions, the pilot can discover it by unmatching these two pieces of information. In this way, both mistakes can be checked against each other.
国内の飛行場にこのシステムを導入することにより、仮に航空機が日本国内のみで発着するのであれば、離陸時はどこの飛行場でもこのやり方が反復使用できることとなる。さらに、この方式が技術的に開発可能であれば、日本のみならず、世界各国の飛行場へも展開が期待できる。 By introducing this system at domestic airfields, if the aircraft arrives and departs only in Japan, this method can be used repeatedly at any airfield during takeoff. Furthermore, if this method can be technically developed, it can be expected to be deployed not only in Japan but also in airports around the world.
従来の無線(聴覚)方式にランプ表示(視覚)方式を併用することにより、情報伝達の精度を飛躍的に向上させる。 By using a lamp display (visual) system together with a conventional wireless (auditory) system, the accuracy of information transmission is greatly improved.
図1は本システムの概念図を示している。すなわち、各機体ごとの情報を、データーベース部より指示主装置の画面に表示させ、これを、管制官が、無線通話で指示した同じ内容に対応する部分を同時にタッチして、無線で航空機のコックピット内の受信装置の対応するランプを点灯させ、聴覚、視覚による情報連絡の確認を取るものである。 Fig. 1 shows a conceptual diagram of this system. That is, the information for each aircraft is displayed on the screen of the instruction main unit from the database unit, and the controller simultaneously touches the part corresponding to the same content instructed by the wireless call, and wirelessly The corresponding lamp of the receiving device in the cockpit is turned on to confirm hearing and visual information communication.
図2は管制官席指示主装置の構成を示している。パイッロトが操縦席に着いたとの連絡があったなら、フライトプランに従った機体番号等の情報をキーボードより入力して、対応する個別情報を出力させる。そして、事前テストとして、赤、黄、青のボタンをタッチして、パイッロトに正常に点灯するかの確認をしておく。 FIG. 2 shows the configuration of the controller seat instruction main apparatus. If there is a notification that the pilot has arrived at the cockpit, information such as the aircraft number according to the flight plan is input from the keyboard, and the corresponding individual information is output. Then, as a preliminary test, touch the red, yellow, and blue buttons to check whether the pilot lights normally.
図3の受信装置は、ストラップ等で前面の支障のないところに掛けておく。離陸終了後は電源を切り、次の着陸空港での離陸時に使用するため、適宜な場所に保管しておく。 The receiver in FIG. 3 is hung on a front surface with a strap or the like where there is no hindrance. After take-off, turn off the power and store it in an appropriate place for use at the next landing airport.
本発明は、離陸を中心とした、航空機の安全誘導に関する、航空管制技術の産業分野で利用することが出来る。 INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY The present invention can be used in the industrial field of air traffic control technology related to aircraft safety guidance, focusing on takeoff.
Claims (2)
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2009104783A JP5019136B2 (en) | 2009-04-23 | 2009-04-23 | Establishing a safety support system for aircraft takeoff |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2009104783A JP5019136B2 (en) | 2009-04-23 | 2009-04-23 | Establishing a safety support system for aircraft takeoff |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JP2010254060A JP2010254060A (en) | 2010-11-11 |
| JP5019136B2 true JP5019136B2 (en) | 2012-09-05 |
Family
ID=43315506
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2009104783A Expired - Fee Related JP5019136B2 (en) | 2009-04-23 | 2009-04-23 | Establishing a safety support system for aircraft takeoff |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP5019136B2 (en) |
Family Cites Families (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2675752B2 (en) * | 1994-05-18 | 1997-11-12 | 運輸省船舶技術研究所長 | User interface device for airfield flight ticket management system |
| US6789010B2 (en) * | 2001-12-04 | 2004-09-07 | Smiths Aerospace, Inc. | Airport map display system and data interchange method |
| JP3758632B2 (en) * | 2002-10-23 | 2006-03-22 | 日本電気株式会社 | Air traffic control instruction error correction device and air traffic control instruction error correction method |
| JP2010195075A (en) * | 2009-02-23 | 2010-09-09 | Toyota Motor Corp | Operation support device |
-
2009
- 2009-04-23 JP JP2009104783A patent/JP5019136B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP2010254060A (en) | 2010-11-11 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| JP6294976B1 (en) | Unmanned aircraft control system, unmanned aircraft control method, and unmanned aircraft control program | |
| CN106292711A (en) | A kind of unmanned vehicle major-minor control system and control method thereof | |
| JP2012513933A5 (en) | ||
| CN105243878A (en) | Electronic boundary apparatus, unmanned flight system, unmanned aerial vehicle monitoring method | |
| GR20130100620A (en) | System and method for the electronic guidance of drones (take-off/ landing on the ground or on a ship) | |
| CN105308525A (en) | Aircraft sidestick priority and dual input control logic | |
| CN105620733A (en) | Position alarm device for amphibious aircraft undercarriage folding and unfolding mechanism | |
| CA2791600A1 (en) | Systems and methods for managing controller pilot data link communication (cpdlc) systems | |
| CN105511491A (en) | Unmanned aerial vehicle driving device and method | |
| JP5019136B2 (en) | Establishing a safety support system for aircraft takeoff | |
| EP2388711A2 (en) | System and method for translating an english language message into another language | |
| Hobbs | Remotely piloted aircraft systems | |
| CN105700349A (en) | Unmanned aerial vehicle system used for night crowd evacuation commanding and escape guiding | |
| CN205334237U (en) | Unmanned aerial vehicle drives device | |
| Hobbs | Remotely piloted aircraft | |
| CN105204329B (en) | Fly preceding acoustic control inspection method and system for unmanned plane | |
| CN201795804U (en) | Helicopter emergency positioning device | |
| CN103407576B (en) | Method for triggering engine backup control mode and engine backup control system | |
| CN105654784A (en) | Novel helideck guide system | |
| Nunes et al. | Identifying the factors that contributed to the Überlingen Midair Collision | |
| US20150274279A1 (en) | Method and system for control input detection | |
| Shively et al. | Human performance considerations for Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS) | |
| JP2001126200A (en) | Airfield light monitoring and control device | |
| WO2024009166A1 (en) | Electronic system for managing emergencies and contingencies occurring in flight infrastructures | |
| CN104867259A (en) | Unmanned aircraft remote controller light warning system |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20120130 |
|
| A871 | Explanation of circumstances concerning accelerated examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A871 Effective date: 20120130 |
|
| A975 | Report on accelerated examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971005 Effective date: 20120220 |
|
| A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20120228 |
|
| A521 | Request for written amendment filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20120423 |
|
| TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20120522 |
|
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 |
|
| A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20120530 |
|
| R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Ref document number: 5019136 Country of ref document: JP Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20150622 Year of fee payment: 3 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| LAPS | Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees |