Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP5042870B2 - Degradation evaluation method for coating material layer - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP5042870B2 - Degradation evaluation method for coating material layer - Google Patents

Degradation evaluation method for coating material layer Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP5042870B2
JP5042870B2 JP2008010569A JP2008010569A JP5042870B2 JP 5042870 B2 JP5042870 B2 JP 5042870B2 JP 2008010569 A JP2008010569 A JP 2008010569A JP 2008010569 A JP2008010569 A JP 2008010569A JP 5042870 B2 JP5042870 B2 JP 5042870B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
deterioration
material layer
covering material
evaluation method
rod
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP2008010569A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2009174858A (en
Inventor
耕輔 古市
邦彦 滝本
敏美 森口
田中  勉
悟志 町屋
一雄 関野
進 内山
光人 奥田
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Kajima Corp
Original Assignee
Kajima Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Kajima Corp filed Critical Kajima Corp
Priority to JP2008010569A priority Critical patent/JP5042870B2/en
Publication of JP2009174858A publication Critical patent/JP2009174858A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP5042870B2 publication Critical patent/JP5042870B2/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Lining And Supports For Tunnels (AREA)
  • Testing Resistance To Weather, Investigating Materials By Mechanical Methods (AREA)
  • Investigating Strength Of Materials By Application Of Mechanical Stress (AREA)

Description

本発明は、トンネル内壁面等に施工される耐火被覆材層等の被覆材層の劣化評価方法に関するものである。   The present invention relates to a method for evaluating deterioration of a covering material layer such as a fireproof covering material layer applied to a tunnel inner wall surface or the like.

シールドトンネルや山岳トンネル等においては、トンネル内壁面に施工された耐火被覆材層の経時的劣化やトンネル火災後の劣化の程度等を診断することが行われており、例えば特許文献1では、貫入針を有する貫入抵抗測定具(プッシュプルゲージ)によって湿式耐火被覆材層の貫入抵抗値を測定し、この貫入抵抗値に基づいて、(a)湿式耐火被覆材層が健全な場合の貫入抵抗値を基準値とする貫入抵抗値比、および/または、(b) 予め求めておいた貫入抵抗値と圧縮強度との相関関係から定められる圧縮強度の推定値を求め、これら貫入抵抗値比および/または圧縮強度の推定値から健全度を診断する方法が提案されている。   In shield tunnels, mountain tunnels, etc., diagnosis of the deterioration over time of the fireproof coating layer applied to the inner wall surface of the tunnel, the degree of deterioration after tunnel fire, etc. is performed. The penetration resistance value of the wet fireproof coating layer is measured with a penetration resistance measuring instrument (push-pull gauge) having a needle, and based on this penetration resistance value, (a) the penetration resistance value when the wet fireproof coating layer is healthy And / or (b) an estimated value of compressive strength determined from the correlation between the previously determined penetration resistance value and the compressive strength, and the penetration resistance value ratio and / or Or the method of diagnosing soundness from the estimated value of compressive strength is proposed.

また、コンクリートの劣化度の診断に関する先行技術文献として、例えば特許文献2、3がある。特許文献2の発明は、コンクリート表層部の耐凍害性評価手法に関するものであり、コンクリート表層部にボーリングしたコアに引張試験機を接続して引張試験を実施し、任意深さの引張強度より凍害劣化度を評価するものである。   Moreover, there exist patent document 2, 3 as a prior art document regarding the diagnosis of the deterioration degree of concrete, for example. The invention of Patent Document 2 relates to a method for evaluating the frost damage resistance of a concrete surface layer portion. A tensile tester is connected to a core bored on a concrete surface layer portion to conduct a tensile test. The degree of deterioration is evaluated.

特許文献3の発明は、現場におけるALCパネルの劣化度推定方法に関するものであり、ALCパネル自体にビスを打設し、ビス引抜き試験方法(建研式の引張試験機)により当該ビスの引抜き強度を測定し、該ビス引抜き強度と炭酸化度の関係より当該ALCパネルの劣化度を推定するものである。   The invention of Patent Document 3 relates to a method for estimating the deterioration level of an ALC panel in the field. A screw is placed on the ALC panel itself, and the pull-out strength of the screw is measured by a screw pull-out test method (Kenken-type tensile tester). And the degree of deterioration of the ALC panel is estimated from the relationship between the screw drawing strength and the carbonation degree.

特開2004−294154号公報JP 2004-294154 A 特開2007−47133号公報JP 2007-47133 A 特開2003−177083号公報JP 2003-177083 A

従来の貫入抵抗値または圧縮強度を用いる湿式耐火被覆材層の健全度診断の場合、小規模火災による被災状況において例えば300℃と400℃とで圧縮強度の差があまりなく、健全度の評価を明確に行うことができないなどの課題があった。また、小規模火災後、現場において簡易に短時間に被災状況を確認できる手法が望まれている。   In the case of soundness diagnosis of wet fireproof coating layers using conventional penetration resistance value or compressive strength, there is not much difference in compressive strength between, for example, 300 ° C and 400 ° C in the damage situation due to small-scale fire, and the soundness evaluation is performed. There were issues such as being unable to do it clearly. In addition, after a small-scale fire, a technique that can easily check the damage situation in a short time in the field is desired.

本発明は、トンネル内壁面等に施工される耐火被覆材層等の劣化度を明確に判定することができると共に、現場において比較的簡単な測定治具を用いて簡易に短時間に劣化度を判定することができる被覆材層の劣化評価方法を提供することにある。   The present invention can clearly determine the degree of deterioration of a fireproof coating layer or the like applied to the inner wall surface of a tunnel, etc., and can easily and quickly determine the degree of deterioration using a relatively simple measurement jig on site. An object of the present invention is to provide a method for evaluating deterioration of a covering material layer that can be determined.

本発明は、トンネル内壁面に施工される湿式や乾式の耐火被覆材層やその他の被覆材層の劣化度の判定に適用される。引抜強度と被覆材層の劣化度との関係を予め求めておき、計測された引抜強度と比較照合することにより被覆材層の劣化度が判定される。引抜強度は圧縮強度と比べて被覆材層の劣化の度合いに応じて大きな差があり、被覆材層の劣化度を明確に判定することができる(表1参照)。また、棒状体と引き抜き荷重計による比較的簡単な測定治具により現場において簡易に短時間に劣化度を判定することができる。   The present invention is applied to the determination of the degree of deterioration of a wet or dry fireproof coating layer or other coating layer applied to the inner wall surface of a tunnel. A relationship between the drawing strength and the degree of deterioration of the covering material layer is obtained in advance, and the degree of deterioration of the covering material layer is determined by comparing with the measured drawing strength. The pulling strength has a large difference depending on the degree of deterioration of the covering material layer as compared with the compressive strength, and the degree of deterioration of the covering material layer can be clearly determined (see Table 1). Further, the degree of deterioration can be easily determined in a short time in the field by a relatively simple measuring jig using a rod-shaped body and a pull-out load meter.

本発明の請求項に係る発明は、構造物の被覆材層の劣化度を評価する方法であって、前記被覆材層に表面から所定深さまで棒状体の先端部を埋入し、前記棒状体の頭部に引き抜き冶具を接続して引き抜き、前記頭部の変形の有無により引抜強度を推定し、前記引抜強度から被覆材層の劣化度を判定することを特徴とする被覆材層の劣化評価方法である。 The invention according to claim 1 of the present invention is a method of evaluating the degree of deterioration of the coating material layer of the structure, and embedded the tip of the rod-like member from the surface to the coating material layer to a predetermined depth, the rod-shaped Deterioration of the covering material layer, characterized in that a pulling jig is connected to the head of the body and pulled out, the pulling strength is estimated by the presence or absence of deformation of the head, and the degree of deterioration of the covering material layer is determined from the pulling strength It is an evaluation method.

本発明の請求項1に係る発明は、棒状体の頭部の変形を利用する場合である。棒状体には真鍮などの変形しやすい材料を用い、設定した引抜荷重(引抜強度)で棒状体の頭部が変形するように構成する。頭部の変形の有無により劣化度を判定することができる。頭部が変形する場合は、引抜強度が大きいため健全と判定することができ、頭部が変形しない場合は、引抜強度が小さいため劣化度が大きいと判定することができる(表1参照)。この場合も、引抜強度は圧縮強度と比べて被覆材層の劣化の度合いに応じて大きな差があり、被覆材層の劣化度を明確に判定することができる。また、棒状体を工具で引き抜くだけでよく、比較的簡単な測定治具により簡易に短時間に劣化度を判定することができる。 The invention according to claim 1 of the present invention is a case where the deformation of the head of the rod-shaped body is utilized. The rod-shaped body is made of an easily deformable material such as brass, and is configured such that the head of the rod-shaped body is deformed with a set pulling load (pullout strength). The degree of deterioration can be determined by the presence or absence of head deformation. When the head is deformed, it can be determined that the pulling strength is high, so that the head is healthy. When the head is not deformed, it can be determined that the degree of deterioration is large because the pulling strength is small (see Table 1). Also in this case, the pullout strength has a large difference depending on the degree of deterioration of the covering material layer as compared with the compressive strength, and the degree of deterioration of the covering material layer can be clearly determined. Further, it is only necessary to pull out the rod-like body with a tool, and the degree of deterioration can be easily determined in a short time with a relatively simple measuring jig.

本発明の請求項に係る発明は、請求項1に記載の劣化評価方法において、被覆材層に表面から所定深さまで下孔を穿設し、前記下孔に下孔の径より径の大きい棒状体の先端部を押し込むことを特徴とする被覆材層の劣化評価方法である。 The invention according to claim 2 of the present invention is the deterioration evaluating process according to claim 1, drilled the pilot holes from the surface to the coating material layer to a predetermined depth, greater diameter than the diameter of the lower hole in the lower hole This is a method for evaluating deterioration of a covering material layer, wherein the tip of the rod-like body is pushed in.

円柱状等の棒状体の先端部を下孔に押し込み、引き抜き抵抗が得られるようにした場合であり、被覆材層の劣化度に応じた引抜荷重(引抜強度)が得られる。   This is a case where the leading end of a cylindrical rod or the like is pushed into the prepared hole so as to obtain a pulling resistance, and a pulling load (pulling strength) corresponding to the degree of deterioration of the coating material layer can be obtained.

本発明の請求項に係る発明は、請求項1または2に記載の劣化評価方法において、棒状体の先端部には雄ねじが設けられており、回転させてねじ込むことを特徴とする被覆材層の劣化評価方法である。 The invention according to claim 3 of the present invention is the degradation evaluation method according to claim 1 or 2 , wherein the rod-like body is provided with a male screw at the tip, and is screwed by being rotated. This is a degradation evaluation method.

ねじで引き抜き抵抗が得られるようにした場合であり、被覆材層の劣化度に応じた引抜荷重(引抜強度)が得られる。雄ねじの外径よりも若干小さい径の下孔にねじ込んでもよいし、下孔を設けず直接タッピングねじ方式でねじ込んでもよい。   This is a case where a pulling resistance is obtained with a screw, and a pulling load (pulling strength) corresponding to the degree of deterioration of the covering material layer is obtained. It may be screwed into a pilot hole having a diameter slightly smaller than the outer diameter of the male screw, or may be screwed directly by a tapping screw method without providing a pilot hole.

本発明の請求項に係る発明は、請求項1から請求項までのいずれか1つに記載の劣化評価方法において、被覆材層は耐火被覆材層であり、引抜強度から火災による被災の程度を判定することを特徴とする被覆材層の劣化評価方法である。 The invention according to claim 4 of the present invention is the degradation evaluation method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the covering material layer is a fireproof covering material layer, and the damage caused by fire is determined from the pullout strength. This is a method for evaluating deterioration of a covering material layer, characterized by determining the degree.

トンネル内の小規模火災等による被災の程度を判定する場合である。引抜強度と火災温度との関係を予め求めておき、計測された引抜強度と比較照合することにより被覆材層表層部の火災温度を判定することができる。これにより被覆材層の交換の有無を現場において簡易に短時間に判断することができる。   In this case, the extent of damage caused by a small fire in the tunnel is judged. The relationship between the drawing strength and the fire temperature is obtained in advance, and the fire temperature of the surface layer of the covering material layer can be determined by comparing with the measured drawing strength. Thereby, the presence or absence of replacement | exchange of a covering material layer can be judged easily in the field in a short time.

なお、被覆材層の表層部の劣化度の判定であり、また健全部に損傷を与えないようにするため、棒状体の埋入深さは浅い方が好ましい。   In addition, it is a determination of the deterioration degree of the surface layer part of a coating | covering material layer, and in order not to damage a healthy part, the one where the embedding depth of a rod-shaped body is shallow is preferable.

本発明の請求項に係る発明は、請求項1から請求項までのいずれか1つに記載の劣化評価方法において、棒状体の先端部の径が3mm以下であることを特徴とする被覆材層の劣化評価方法である。 The invention according to claim 5 of the present invention is the degradation evaluation method according to any one of claims 1 to 4 , wherein the diameter of the tip of the rod-shaped body is 3 mm or less. This is a method for evaluating deterioration of a material layer.

被覆材層が健全と判断された場合、棒状体を引き抜いた後に形成される孔の径が3mm以下であれば、孔を埋める補修を要しないため、より簡易で短時間の判定が可能となる。   When the covering material layer is judged to be healthy, if the diameter of the hole formed after pulling out the rod-like body is 3 mm or less, it is not necessary to repair the hole, so that a simpler and shorter determination can be made. .

本発明の請求項に係る発明は、請求項1から請求項までのいずれか1つに記載の劣化評価方法において、棒状体の頭部はフックであり、前記フックに引き抜き荷重計または引き抜き治具の先端を接続することを特徴とする被覆材層の劣化評価方法である。 The invention according to claim 6 of the present invention is the deterioration evaluation method according to any one of claims 1 to 5 , wherein the head of the rod-shaped body is a hook, and a pull-out load meter or a pull-out is attached to the hook. A method for evaluating deterioration of a covering material layer, characterized in that the tip of a jig is connected.

棒状体のフックに引っ掛けるだけで引き抜きを行うことができ、より簡易で短時間の判定作業が可能となる。ねじ式の場合、市販の吊りフックを用いることができ、低コストの判定作業が可能となる。   By simply hooking it on the hook of the rod-shaped body, it can be pulled out, and a simpler and shorter determination operation can be performed. In the case of the screw type, a commercially available hanging hook can be used, and a low-cost determination operation can be performed.

本発明は、以上のような構成からなるので、次のような効果が得られる。   Since the present invention is configured as described above, the following effects can be obtained.

(1) 棒状体による引抜強度により被覆材層の劣化度を判定し、引抜強度は圧縮強度と比べて被覆材層の劣化の度合いに応じて大きな差があるため、被覆材層の劣化度を明確に判定することができる。 (1) The degree of deterioration of the covering material layer is determined by the pulling strength of the rod-shaped body, and the pulling strength is greatly different depending on the degree of deterioration of the covering material layer compared to the compressive strength. It can be clearly determined.

(2) 比較的簡単な測定治具により現場において簡易に短時間に劣化度を判定することができる。 (2) The degree of deterioration can be easily determined in a short time at the site using a relatively simple measurement jig.

(3) トンネル内の小規模火災に適用した場合には、火災温度を現場において明確に簡易に短時間に判定することができ、耐火被覆材の交換の有無を即座に判断できる。 (3) When applied to a small-scale fire in a tunnel, the fire temperature can be determined clearly and simply in a short time, and the presence or absence of replacement of the fireproof coating can be immediately determined.

以下、本発明を図示する実施の形態に基づいて説明する。図1は本発明の被覆材層の劣化評価方法とこれに用いる測定装置の一例を示す鉛直断面図である。   Hereinafter, the present invention will be described based on the illustrated embodiment. FIG. 1 is a vertical cross-sectional view showing an example of a method for evaluating deterioration of a coating material layer according to the present invention and an example of a measuring apparatus used therefor.

図1の実施形態において、トンネル等のコンクリート1の内面には、湿式耐火被覆材層2が例えば層厚30mm程度で吹き付けにより施工されており、このような湿式耐火被覆材層2の小規模火災後の表層部の劣化度を本発明の劣化評価方法により現場において簡易に短時間に判定する。なお、湿式に限らず、乾式の耐火被覆材層にも適用できる。   In the embodiment shown in FIG. 1, a wet fireproof coating layer 2 is applied to the inner surface of concrete 1 such as a tunnel by spraying with a layer thickness of about 30 mm, for example. The degree of deterioration of the subsequent surface layer portion is easily determined in a short time on site by the deterioration evaluation method of the present invention. In addition, it is applicable not only to a wet type but also to a dry type fireproof covering material layer.

先ず、耐火被覆材層2に表面から所定深さまでドリル等により下孔10を穿設する。耐火被覆材層2の表層部の劣化度の測定であり、また耐火被覆材層2の健全部に損傷を与えないように、雄ねじ11aのねじ孔深さ(脚長)は、層厚tの1/2以下とするのが好ましい。   First, the pilot hole 10 is drilled in the fireproof covering material layer 2 from the surface to a predetermined depth by a drill or the like. The thread hole depth (leg length) of the male screw 11a is 1 of the layer thickness t so as to measure the degree of deterioration of the surface layer portion of the fireproof covering material layer 2 and not to damage the healthy portion of the fireproof covering material layer 2. / 2 or less is preferable.

この下孔10に埋入する測定端子としての棒状体には吊りフック11を用いる。吊りフック11は、先端部の雄ねじ11aと頭部のフック11bからなる。雄ねじ11aの外径は下孔10の径よりも若干大きいものを用い、下孔10に人力や電動工具等で回転させてねじ込み、引き抜き抵抗が得られるようにする。   A hanging hook 11 is used for a rod-like body as a measurement terminal embedded in the prepared hole 10. The hanging hook 11 includes a male screw 11a at the tip and a hook 11b at the head. The outer diameter of the male screw 11a is slightly larger than the diameter of the lower hole 10, and the lower hole 10 is rotated by human power or an electric tool to be screwed so that a pulling resistance is obtained.

この吊りフック11のフック11bに引き抜き荷重計12の先端部を接続して引き抜くことにより引抜荷重すなわち耐火被覆材層2の引抜強度を計測する。引き抜き荷重計12には市販の荷重計(デジタルフォースゲージ等)を用いることができ、先端軸部にフック13を取り付け、このフック13を吊りフック11のフック11bに引っ掛けるようにする。   The pulling load, that is, the pulling strength of the fireproof covering material layer 2 is measured by connecting the tip of the pulling load meter 12 to the hook 11b of the hanging hook 11 and pulling it out. A commercially available load meter (digital force gauge or the like) can be used as the pull-out load meter 12, and a hook 13 is attached to the tip shaft portion so that the hook 13 is hooked on the hook 11 b of the suspension hook 11.

耐火被覆材層の引抜強度と劣化度の関係を予め実験等で求めておき、引き抜き荷重計12の計測値と劣化度を比較照合し、耐火被覆材層2の劣化度を判定する(表1参照)。トンネル内等の小規模火災による被災においては、火災温度と引抜強度の関係を用いることができ、火災温度を判定することができる。これにより、耐火被覆材層2の交換の目安とすることができる。   The relationship between the drawing strength and the degree of deterioration of the fireproof coating layer is obtained in advance through experiments or the like, and the measured value of the pulling load meter 12 and the degree of deterioration are compared and checked to determine the degree of deterioration of the fireproof coating layer 2 (Table 1). reference). In disasters caused by small-scale fires such as in tunnels, the relationship between fire temperature and pullout strength can be used, and the fire temperature can be determined. Thereby, it can be set as a standard of exchange of the fireproof covering material layer 2.

上記のように引抜強度を計測する場合に限らず、吊りフック11のフック11bの変形を利用することができる。引き抜きには、フック11bに引っ掛けて引っ張ることのできる工具を用いることができる。前者の計測の場合、吊りフック11にはステンレス鋼等が用いるのが好ましいが、後者の変形利用の場合には真鍮などの比較的変形しやすい材料を用い、所定の引抜荷重(引抜強度)でフック11bが変形するようにする。フック11bの変形の有無により劣化度を判定することができる。フック11bが変形する場合は、引抜強度が大きいため健全と判定することができ、フック11bが変形しない場合は、引抜強度が小さいため劣化度が大きいと判定することができる(表1参照)。   The deformation of the hook 11b of the hanging hook 11 can be used not only when the pullout strength is measured as described above. For drawing, a tool that can be pulled by being hooked on the hook 11b can be used. In the case of the former measurement, it is preferable to use stainless steel or the like for the hanging hook 11. However, in the case of the latter modification, a relatively easily deformable material such as brass is used and a predetermined pulling load (pulling strength) is used. The hook 11b is deformed. The degree of deterioration can be determined based on whether or not the hook 11b is deformed. When the hook 11b is deformed, it can be determined that the pulling strength is high, so that it can be determined to be healthy. When the hook 11b is not deformed, it can be determined that the pulling strength is small, so that the degree of deterioration is large (see Table 1).

棒状体11の先端部は、図示例の雄ねじに限らず、円柱状の軸などとすることができる。この場合、棒状体11の先端部の外径は下孔10の径より若干大きくし、下孔10に押し込み、引き抜き抵抗が得られるようにする。また、雄ねじの場合、下孔10を設けずに、タッピングねじ方式で直接ねじ込むこともできる。   The tip of the rod-shaped body 11 is not limited to the male screw in the illustrated example, and may be a cylindrical shaft or the like. In this case, the outer diameter of the tip of the rod-shaped body 11 is made slightly larger than the diameter of the lower hole 10 and is pushed into the lower hole 10 so as to obtain a pulling resistance. Further, in the case of a male screw, it can be directly screwed by a tapping screw method without providing the prepared hole 10.

吊りフック11を引き抜いた後には、耐火被覆材層2に孔が残る。耐火被覆材層2が上記の判定で健全と判断された場合、孔の径が大きいと、この孔を埋める補修が必要となる。しかし、この孔の径が3mm以下の場合は、前記のような補修は不要とすることができる。即ち、トンネル内面にパネルを貼る場合、パネル間の隙間は3mm以下であれば許容されるため、同様に径3mm以下の孔も許容される。   After the suspension hook 11 is pulled out, a hole remains in the fireproof covering material layer 2. When the fireproof covering material layer 2 is determined to be healthy by the above determination, if the diameter of the hole is large, it is necessary to repair the hole. However, when the diameter of the hole is 3 mm or less, the above-described repair can be unnecessary. That is, when a panel is pasted on the inner surface of the tunnel, since a gap between the panels is allowed to be 3 mm or less, a hole having a diameter of 3 mm or less is also allowed.

次に、耐火被覆材の試験体を用い加熱温度を変えて加熱し、それぞれ加熱後の圧縮強度を測定し、加熱温度の差による強度の劣化状況を確認し、また実際のトンネル内での小規模火災を想定した、現場で即応可能な簡便な本発明に係る強度判定方法を実施した例について説明する。   Next, the test piece of fireproof coating material was used for heating at different heating temperatures, the compressive strength after each heating was measured, the deterioration of strength due to the difference in heating temperature was confirmed, and a small amount in the actual tunnel was also measured. An example of carrying out a simple strength determination method according to the present invention that can be immediately applied on the site assuming a scale fire will be described.

(1)耐火被覆材
結合材:ポルトランドセメント・アルミナセメント(強度維持と耐火性)
骨材:アルミナ系骨材・シリカ系骨材・有機骨材等(耐火性と強度維持)
微粉骨材:水酸化アルミニウム・炭酸カルシュウム等(吸熱効果等)
(1) Fireproof coating material Binder: Portland cement / alumina cement (strength maintenance and fire resistance)
Aggregate: Alumina-based aggregate, silica-based aggregate, organic aggregate, etc. (fire resistance and strength maintenance)
Fine aggregate: Aluminum hydroxide, calcium carbonate, etc. (endothermic effect, etc.)

(2)試験体
40×40×160mmのJIS型枠と500×500×30mmの型枠に上記被覆材を鋳込み成型し、材齢14日まで20℃60%RHの環境で養生を行った。
(2) Specimen
The above-mentioned coating material was cast and molded into a 40 × 40 × 160 mm JIS formwork and a 500 × 500 × 30 mm formwork, and cured in an environment of 20 ° C. and 60% RH until the age of 14 days.

(3)試験方法
500×500×30mm品は250×100mm程度に切断加工し、JIS成型供試体と共に電気炉にて所定の温度で2時間加熱する。加熱温度は、200℃、300℃、400℃、500℃、600℃とし、110℃で24時間乾燥した絶乾品との圧縮強度比較をJIS型枠品で行った。
所定の温度で加熱した250×100×30mm切断加工供試体にφ2.5mmの鋼製ドリルで下孔を深さ20mm開け、φ2.8mm、脚長12mmの吊りフックを3箇所取り付け、引抜強度を測定した。
(3) Test method
A 500 × 500 × 30 mm product is cut to about 250 × 100 mm and heated at a predetermined temperature in an electric furnace together with a JIS molded specimen for 2 hours. The heating temperature was 200 ° C., 300 ° C., 400 ° C., 500 ° C., 600 ° C., and the compression strength comparison with the absolutely dry product dried at 110 ° C. for 24 hours was performed on the JIS mold product.
A 250 x 100 x 30 mm cutting specimen heated at a specified temperature was drilled with a φ2.5 mm steel drill to a depth of 20 mm, three suspension hooks with a diameter of 2.8 mm and a leg length of 12 mm were attached, and the pulling strength was measured. did.

(4)試験結果
次表に試験結果を示す。
(4) Test results The test results are shown in the following table.

Figure 0005042870
Figure 0005042870

表1から明らかなように、平均圧縮強度は各温度で差があまりなく、例えば、被覆材交換の目安となる300℃と400℃で明確に判別することができない。これに対して、本発明の引抜強度の場合、比較的大きな差があり、明確に判別できることがわかる。   As is clear from Table 1, the average compressive strength is not significantly different at each temperature, and cannot be clearly discriminated at, for example, 300 ° C. and 400 ° C., which serve as a guide for changing the coating material. On the other hand, in the case of the pullout strength of the present invention, it can be seen that there is a relatively large difference and it can be clearly distinguished.

なお、上記耐火被覆材の有機系原料および吸熱材の温度による変性は260℃頃から開始されるため本確認試験における300℃および400℃近辺の値が交換の目安として参考になると考えられる。   In addition, since the modification of the above-mentioned refractory coating material due to the temperature of the organic raw material and the endothermic material starts around 260 ° C., the values near 300 ° C. and 400 ° C. in this confirmation test are considered to be references for replacement.

なお、フックの脚長(ねじ長さ)と下孔の径を変えて上記と同様の引抜試験を行った結果を表2に示す。   Table 2 shows the results of a pull-out test similar to that described above with the hook leg length (screw length) and the diameter of the pilot hole changed.

Figure 0005042870
Figure 0005042870

フックの脚長や下孔の径を変えても、本発明では明確に判別できることがわかる。   It can be seen that even if the leg length of the hook or the diameter of the pilot hole is changed, the present invention can be clearly distinguished.

なお、以上はトンネル内壁面の耐火被覆材の小規模火災による被災の程度に適用した場合について説明したが、その他の被覆材の劣化度の判定にも本発明を適用することができる。   Although the above has described the case where the fireproof coating material on the inner wall surface of the tunnel is applied to the degree of damage caused by a small-scale fire, the present invention can also be applied to the determination of the degree of deterioration of other coating materials.

本発明の被覆材層の劣化評価方法とこれに用いる測定装置の一例を示す鉛直断面図である。It is a vertical sectional view which shows an example of the degradation evaluation method of a coating material layer of this invention, and a measuring apparatus used for this.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

1…コンクリート
2…耐火被覆材層
10…下孔
11…吊りフック(棒状体)
11a…雄ねじ(先端部)
11b…フック(頭部)
12…引き抜き荷重計
13…フック
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 ... Concrete 2 ... Fireproof coating material layer 10 ... Pilot hole 11 ... Hanging hook (bar-shaped body)
11a ... Male screw (tip)
11b ... Hook (head)
12 ... Pull-out load meter 13 ... Hook

Claims (6)

構造物の被覆材層の劣化度を評価する方法であって、前記被覆材層に表面から所定深さまで棒状体の先端部を埋入し、前記棒状体の頭部に引き抜き冶具を接続して引き抜き、前記頭部の変形の有無により引抜強度を推定し、前記引抜強度から被覆材層の劣化度を判定することを特徴とする被覆材層の劣化評価方法。   A method of evaluating the degree of deterioration of a covering material layer of a structure, wherein a tip of a rod-like body is embedded in the covering material layer from a surface to a predetermined depth, and a drawing jig is connected to the head of the rod-like body. A method for evaluating deterioration of a covering material layer, wherein pulling strength is estimated based on whether or not the head is deformed and the degree of deterioration of the covering material layer is determined from the pulling strength. 請求項1に記載の劣化評価方法において、被覆材層に表面から所定深さまで下孔を穿設し、前記下孔に下孔の径より径の大きい棒状体の先端部を押し込むことを特徴とする被覆材層の劣化評価方法。 The deterioration evaluation method according to claim 1 , wherein a hole is drilled in the coating material layer from the surface to a predetermined depth, and a tip of a rod-like body having a diameter larger than the diameter of the hole is pushed into the hole. Evaluation method for deterioration of covering material layer. 請求項1または2に記載の劣化評価方法において、棒状体の先端部には雄ねじが設けられており、回転させてねじ込むことを特徴とする被覆材層の劣化評価方法。 The deterioration evaluation method according to claim 1 or 2 , wherein a male thread is provided at a tip of the rod-shaped body, and the rod member is rotated and screwed. 請求項1から請求項までのいずれか1つに記載の劣化評価方法において、被覆材層は耐火被覆材層であり、引抜強度から火災による被災の程度を判定することを特徴とする被覆材層の劣化評価方法。 The deterioration evaluation method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the covering material layer is a fireproof covering material layer, and the degree of damage caused by a fire is determined from the pullout strength. Layer degradation evaluation method. 請求項1から請求項までのいずれか1つに記載の劣化評価方法において、棒状体の先端部の径が3mm以下であることを特徴とする被覆材層の劣化評価方法。 The deterioration evaluation method according to any one of claims 1 to 4 , wherein the diameter of the tip of the rod-shaped body is 3 mm or less. 請求項1から請求項までのいずれか1つに記載の劣化評価方法において、棒状体の頭部はフックであり、前記フックに引き抜き荷重計または引き抜き治具の先端を接続することを特徴とする被覆材層の劣化評価方法。 The deterioration evaluation method according to any one of claims 1 to 5 , wherein the head of the rod-shaped body is a hook, and a leading end of a pulling load meter or a pulling jig is connected to the hook. Evaluation method for deterioration of covering material layer.
JP2008010569A 2008-01-21 2008-01-21 Degradation evaluation method for coating material layer Expired - Fee Related JP5042870B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2008010569A JP5042870B2 (en) 2008-01-21 2008-01-21 Degradation evaluation method for coating material layer

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2008010569A JP5042870B2 (en) 2008-01-21 2008-01-21 Degradation evaluation method for coating material layer

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2009174858A JP2009174858A (en) 2009-08-06
JP5042870B2 true JP5042870B2 (en) 2012-10-03

Family

ID=41030119

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2008010569A Expired - Fee Related JP5042870B2 (en) 2008-01-21 2008-01-21 Degradation evaluation method for coating material layer

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP5042870B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5275822B2 (en) * 2009-01-08 2013-08-28 鹿島建設株式会社 Apparatus and method for measuring tensile stress of sealing material
JP5719165B2 (en) * 2010-12-21 2015-05-13 太平洋マテリアル株式会社 Coating method
JP6341560B2 (en) * 2013-12-19 2018-06-13 太平洋マテリアル株式会社 Coating structure, peeling prevention performance confirmation tool, peeling prevention performance confirmation method, and coating material fall prevention method
CN105675478B (en) * 2016-04-11 2018-10-02 西安石油大学 Anti-corrosion ultrahigh-pressure online hanging piece taking and hanging device and using method thereof

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5920661Y2 (en) * 1979-03-08 1984-06-15 株式会社クボタ Load measuring device for nail pulling test machine
JP2003177083A (en) * 2001-12-11 2003-06-27 Sumitomo Kinzoku Kozan Siporex Kk Method for estimating degree of deterioration of ALC panel
JP2004093315A (en) * 2002-08-30 2004-03-25 Chiyoda Maintenance Kk Apparatus for testing strength of member
JP2004294154A (en) * 2003-03-26 2004-10-21 Taiheiyo Cement Corp Method for diagnosing soundness of wet type fire-resistant coating material layer
JP2005241260A (en) * 2004-02-24 2005-09-08 Fujita Corp Method for estimating residual strength or heat receiving temperature of heated concrete
JP3859655B2 (en) * 2004-03-29 2006-12-20 大和ハウス工業株式会社 testing machine
JP2006234801A (en) * 2005-01-31 2006-09-07 Mitsuboshi Belting Ltd Instrument and method for measuring fixing strength
JP2006275898A (en) * 2005-03-30 2006-10-12 Japan Drive-It Co Ltd Inspecting apparatus for tension load of anchoring tool
JP4829663B2 (en) * 2006-04-13 2011-12-07 学校法人 中央大学 In-situ shear strength measuring device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2009174858A (en) 2009-08-06

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Rosa et al. Influence of elevated temperatures on the bond behaviour of ribbed GFRP bars in concrete
Liu et al. Influence of microcrack self-healing behavior on the permeability of Engineered Cementitious Composites
Cusson et al. An experimental approach for the analysis of early-age behaviour of high-performance concrete structures under restrained shrinkage
Beushausen et al. Bond strength development between concretes of different ages
JP5042870B2 (en) Degradation evaluation method for coating material layer
Xu et al. Dynamic tensile behaviour of fibre reinforced concrete with spiral fibres
CN109856143B (en) A method for testing the grouting quality of prefabricated concrete structure sleeves
Craeye et al. On-site strength assessment of limestone based concrete slabs by combining non-destructive techniques
JP2009236757A (en) High temperature tensile testing method of bar steel material, fire-proof performance predicting method of non-fire-proof coated steel material, and steel material superior in high temperature strength
Mohyeddin et al. Tensile load capacity of screw anchors in early age concrete
Slowik et al. Capillary pressure monitoring in plastic concrete for controlling early-age shrinkage cracking
Torić et al. Reduction of postfire properties of high‐strength concrete
Brozovsky et al. Contribution to the issue of evaluating the compressive strength of concrete exposed to high temperatures using the Schmidt rebound hammer
Cabané et al. Laboratory and in-situ mechanical characterisation of masonry components by comparing destructive and minor destructive testing techniques
Liu et al. Uniaxial tensile behavior of half-grouted sleeve connections with concrete cover after exposure to elevated temperatures
JP6071085B2 (en) Covering part of corrosive environment detection sensor for concrete structures
Peng et al. Characteristic stress and strain precursor information for fine-grained granite during failure process under triaxial loading and unloading conditions
JP5719165B2 (en) Coating method
KR101313736B1 (en) Apparatus for measuring internal water vapor pressure of concrete
Łątka et al. Assessment of the compressive strength of lime mortar in the joints of brick walls-case study
JP7257797B2 (en) Concrete setting time determination device, determination method and concrete construction method
CN105067517A (en) In-situ presumption method for shearing strength of masonry mortar
Pelà et al. Comparison of MDT techniques for mechanical characterization of historical masonry
JP2004294154A (en) Method for diagnosing soundness of wet type fire-resistant coating material layer
JP6097664B2 (en) Degradation state analysis method for hardened cement

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20100927

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20120124

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20120131

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20120326

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20120703

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20120711

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20150720

Year of fee payment: 3

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees