Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP5077960B2 - Method for forming coating film on outdoor steel structure - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP5077960B2 - Method for forming coating film on outdoor steel structure - Google Patents

Method for forming coating film on outdoor steel structure Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP5077960B2
JP5077960B2 JP2008226456A JP2008226456A JP5077960B2 JP 5077960 B2 JP5077960 B2 JP 5077960B2 JP 2008226456 A JP2008226456 A JP 2008226456A JP 2008226456 A JP2008226456 A JP 2008226456A JP 5077960 B2 JP5077960 B2 JP 5077960B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
coating film
coating
area
steel structure
diagnosis
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2008226456A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2010058051A (en
Inventor
昌憲 永井
隆幸 里
徹 多記
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Dai Nippon Toryo Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Dai Nippon Toryo Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Dai Nippon Toryo Co Ltd filed Critical Dai Nippon Toryo Co Ltd
Priority to JP2008226456A priority Critical patent/JP5077960B2/en
Publication of JP2010058051A publication Critical patent/JP2010058051A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP5077960B2 publication Critical patent/JP5077960B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Application Of Or Painting With Fluid Materials (AREA)
  • Bridges Or Land Bridges (AREA)

Description

本発明は屋外鋼構造物の塗膜形成方法に関し、特に屋外鋼構造物に塗装された塗膜及び塗膜下素地の状態を診断し、再塗装する場合に適用して有用なものである。   The present invention relates to a method for forming a coating film on an outdoor steel structure, and is particularly useful when applied to diagnose and repaint a coating film and an undercoat base material coated on an outdoor steel structure.

屋外に配設された各種構造物の外壁は、美観的な観点だけではなく、例えば石油タンクなどの金属製の構造物の場合には外壁素材を保護するという観点からも、塗装が重要な役割を果たしている。外壁に塗装された塗膜は、時間の経過とともに劣化する。この結果、構造物の美観が損なわれるだけではなく、塗膜を通して腐食因子が浸透することにより構造物の素地金属が腐食し、更に腐食が進行すると、塗膜が剥離する。このような状態を放置すると、美観上の問題だけではなく、構造物の寿命を短くすることにもなるので、塗膜及び塗膜下素地の劣化が進行しないうちに補修や再塗装を行う必要がある。   The exterior walls of various structures installed outdoors are not only an aesthetic point of view, but in the case of metal structures such as oil tanks, painting is an important role from the viewpoint of protecting the exterior wall materials. Plays. The coating film applied to the outer wall deteriorates over time. As a result, not only the aesthetics of the structure are impaired, but also the base metal of the structure is corroded by the penetration of the corrosion factor through the coating film, and the coating peels off as the corrosion further proceeds. If this condition is left unattended, not only will it cause aesthetic problems, but it will also shorten the life of the structure, so it is necessary to repair and repaint before the deterioration of the coating film and the substrate under the coating progresses. There is.

一方、実際に塗膜の補修や再塗装が必要であるか否かの判断は難しく、経験豊富な塗装業者に判断を仰がなければならない場合が多かった。そこで、構造物の塗膜面を撮像して得た画像データを画像処理して塗膜の劣化状態を評価し、その劣化状態から得られた診断結果を出力する技術がある(例えば、特許文献1参照)。このような技術によれば、予め定めた評価基準により劣化状態の評価が行われるため、バラツキなく診断することができる。   On the other hand, it is difficult to judge whether or not the coating film needs to be repaired or repainted, and it has often been necessary to consult an experienced painter. Therefore, there is a technique for evaluating the deterioration state of the coating film by image processing the image data obtained by imaging the coating surface of the structure, and outputting a diagnosis result obtained from the deterioration state (for example, Patent Documents). 1). According to such a technique, since the deterioration state is evaluated according to a predetermined evaluation criterion, diagnosis can be performed without variation.

また、上述したような技術による塗膜の劣化状態の診断は、構造物の所定の基準面積に占める塗膜面の剥がれやさび部分の合計面積の比率に基づいている。すなわち、構造物から一つの画像データを得て、その画像データ中の剥がれ部分等の比率を元に塗膜の劣化状態を診断している。   Further, the diagnosis of the deterioration state of the coating film by the technique as described above is based on the ratio of the total area of the peeling and rust portions of the coating film surface to the predetermined reference area of the structure. That is, one piece of image data is obtained from the structure, and the deterioration state of the coating film is diagnosed based on the ratio of the peeled portion or the like in the image data.

ここで、屋外に配設された構造物の塗膜は、現実には、全体的に均一な条件の下で劣化しているわけではない。例えば、構造物には、雨水があたり易い部分、水が溜まり易い部分、直射日光に晒され劣化し易い部分等があり、部分毎に環境的な条件が異なっている。また、もともとの素地が不均一であることにより構造物に不均一な劣化が生じることもある。これらのことから、構造物の全面が均一に劣化することは殆どない。   Here, the coating film of the structure disposed outdoors is not actually deteriorated under uniform conditions as a whole. For example, the structure includes a portion where rainwater is likely to hit, a portion where water is likely to accumulate, a portion which is easily exposed to direct sunlight and deteriorates, and the environmental conditions are different for each portion. In addition, non-uniform degradation may occur in the structure due to non-uniformity of the original substrate. For these reasons, the entire surface of the structure is hardly deteriorated uniformly.

上述した技術では、一つの画像データに構造物全体を撮像して診断するため各部分の正確な診断を行い得ないという問題がある。例えば、部分的には補修が必要であるにもかかわらず、全体的にみれば塗膜は良好である、という診断がなされる場合もある。   The above-described technique has a problem that accurate diagnosis of each part cannot be performed because the entire structure is imaged and diagnosed with one image data. For example, there is a case where a diagnosis that the coating film is good overall is made despite partial repair.

また、厚膜のエポキシ樹脂塗料やガラスフレークを配合したビニルエステル樹脂系塗料のような、強靱で厚膜型の塗装系に時々見受けられるように、外観上は健全に見えても塗膜下で劣化が開始している場合がある。そのような場合に画像データに基づく診断のみ行うと、このような劣化を発見できず、塗膜下で劣化が進行し、その結果構造物の強度低下を招き、危険な事態となりかねない。   In addition, even if it looks sound to the outside, sometimes it appears to be healthy, such as a thick-film epoxy resin paint or a vinyl ester resin-based paint containing glass flakes. Deterioration may have begun. In such a case, if only the diagnosis based on the image data is performed, such deterioration cannot be found, and the deterioration proceeds under the coating film. As a result, the strength of the structure is reduced, which may be a dangerous situation.

さらには、不適切な塗膜診断を行い、補修・塗り替えを行えば再劣化を招き、無駄なコストがかかることになる。   Furthermore, if an inappropriate coating film diagnosis is performed, and repair and repainting are performed, re-deterioration is caused, resulting in unnecessary costs.

特開2005−283519号公報JP 2005-283519 A

本発明は、かかる事情に鑑み、屋外鋼構造物の塗膜及び塗膜下素地の状態を正確に診断し、劣化した箇所を適切に補修や塗り替えを行うことができる屋外鋼構造物の塗膜形成方法を提供することを目的とする。   In view of such circumstances, the present invention accurately diagnoses the state of the coating film and the base material of the outdoor steel structure, and can appropriately repair or repaint the deteriorated portion. An object is to provide a forming method.

上記目的を達成するための本発明の第1の態様は、屋外鋼構造物の塗膜が設けられた領域を区分したものである複数の診断領域ごとに、塗膜及び塗膜下素地の状態を数値化する複数の調査手段を実施することにより塗膜及び塗膜下素地の状態を数値化したものである調査結果を取得する第1工程と、塗膜及び塗膜下素地の劣化状態を判定する判定基準に前記調査結果が適合するか否かに基づいて、前記調査手段ごとの前記劣化状態を判定することを前記各診断領域について行う第2工程と、前記診断領域ごとについて、前記調査手段ごとの劣化状態に所定の重み付け係数をそれぞれ乗じ、加算したものである総合点を算出し、当該総合点が所定の閾値を超えているか否かに基づいて、前記診断領域の塗膜及び塗膜下素地の劣化状態を表す総合判定を算出する第3工程と、前記総合判定により補修を必要とする程度に劣化しているとされた前記診断領域に対して素地調整を行い、下塗り塗料を塗装し、前記診断領域又は屋外鋼構造物の塗膜が設けられた領域全体に上塗り塗料を塗装する第4工程とを備えることを特徴とする屋外鋼構造物の塗膜形成方法にある。   In order to achieve the above object, the first aspect of the present invention is the state of the coating film and the substrate under the coating for each of a plurality of diagnostic areas which are obtained by dividing the area where the coating film of the outdoor steel structure is provided. The first step of obtaining a survey result, which is a numerical value of the state of the coating film and the base material of the coating film, and a deterioration state of the coating film and the base material of the coating film, by performing a plurality of survey means for quantifying A second step of determining, for each of the diagnostic areas, the determination of the deterioration state for each of the inspection means based on whether or not the inspection results meet a determination criterion for determination; A comprehensive point that is obtained by multiplying the deterioration state of each means by a predetermined weighting coefficient and adding the calculated weights is calculated, and based on whether the total point exceeds a predetermined threshold value, the coating film and the coating in the diagnostic region are calculated. Comprehensive representation of the degradation state of the submembrane substrate The third step of calculating the constant value and the diagnosis area that has been deteriorated to the extent that repair is required due to the comprehensive determination, base coating is applied, and the diagnosis area or outdoor steel is applied. A method for forming a coating film on an outdoor steel structure, comprising: a fourth step of applying a top coating to the entire region where the coating film of the structure is provided.

かかる第1の態様では、複数の診断領域に区分したことで、各診断領域に適した調査手段を実施することができるので、屋外鋼構造物の設置場所や他の構造物との位置関係等の要因に左右されずに塗膜及び塗膜下素地の劣化状態を正確に診断できる。そして、この劣化状態に基づいた総合判定から診断領域に塗装を行うので、劣化した箇所を適切に補修できる。特に、外壁面の塗膜及び塗膜下素地は全体的には良好であるが、或る診断領域は劣化しているような場合に有用である。   In such a first aspect, by dividing into a plurality of diagnosis areas, it is possible to carry out investigation means suitable for each diagnosis area, so the installation location of the outdoor steel structure, the positional relationship with other structures, etc. The deterioration state of the coating film and the substrate under the coating film can be accurately diagnosed without being influenced by the above factors. And since it paints to a diagnostic area | region from the comprehensive determination based on this degradation state, the degraded location can be repaired appropriately. In particular, the coating on the outer wall surface and the substrate under the coating are good overall, but it is useful when a certain diagnostic area is deteriorated.

本発明の第2の態様は、第1の態様に記載する屋外鋼構造物の塗膜形成方法において、前記複数の調査手段は、診断領域のうち劣化した面積の比率である劣化面積率の目視による測定、前記劣化面積率の画像処理による解析、塗膜下金属腐食診断装置による電気化学的測定、塗膜の化学分析、塗膜の膜厚測定、及び塗膜の付着性測定からなる群から選択される少なくとも2種以上であることを特徴とする屋外鋼構造物の塗膜形成方法にある。   According to a second aspect of the present invention, in the method for forming a coating film on an outdoor steel structure according to the first aspect, the plurality of investigating units are configured to visually check a deteriorated area ratio, which is a ratio of a deteriorated area in a diagnostic region. From the group consisting of measurement by measurement, analysis by image processing of the deterioration area ratio, electrochemical measurement by a metal corrosion diagnostic apparatus under coating film, chemical analysis of coating film, film thickness measurement of coating film, and adhesion measurement of coating film The present invention resides in a method for forming a coating film on an outdoor steel structure, which is at least two or more selected.

かかる第2の態様では、光学的、電気化学的、機械的な観点から塗膜の状態を調査できる。   In the second embodiment, the state of the coating film can be investigated from the optical, electrochemical, and mechanical viewpoints.

本発明の第3の態様は、第1又は第2の態様に記載する屋外鋼構造物の塗膜形成方法において、前記第4工程では、前記総合判定により補修を必要とする程度に劣化しているとされた前記診断領域に対して素地調整を行い、下塗り塗料を塗装した後、屋外鋼構造物の塗膜が設けられた領域全体に中塗り塗料を塗装し、上塗り塗料を塗装することを特徴とする屋外鋼構造物の塗膜形成方法にある。   According to a third aspect of the present invention, in the method for forming a coating film of an outdoor steel structure described in the first or second aspect, in the fourth step, the comprehensive judgment is deteriorated to the extent that repair is required. The base area is adjusted for the diagnosis area, and the undercoat paint is applied. Then, the intermediate coat paint is applied to the entire area where the coating film of the outdoor steel structure is provided, and the top coat paint is applied. It is in the coating film formation method of the outdoor steel structure characterized.

かかる第3の態様では、中塗り塗料を塗装することにより、下塗り塗装部及び下塗り塗料を塗装しない部分に対する上塗り塗料の付着性を向上させるとともに、上塗りの隠蔽力、平滑性を向上させることができる。   In the third aspect, by applying the intermediate coating, it is possible to improve the adhesion of the top coating to the base coating portion and the portion where the base coating is not applied, and to improve the hiding power and smoothness of the top coating. .

本発明の第4の態様は、第1〜第3の何れか一つの態様に記載する屋外鋼構造物の塗膜形成方法において、前記第4工程では、前記総合判定により補修を必要とする程度に劣化しているとされた前記診断領域に対して素地調整を行い、この素地調整を行った診断領域以外の診断領域を面あらしして、素地調整を行った部分に下塗り塗料を塗装した後、屋外鋼構造物の塗膜が設けられた領域全体に中塗り塗料を塗装し、上塗り塗料を塗装することを特徴とする屋外鋼構造物の塗膜形成方法にある。   According to a fourth aspect of the present invention, in the method for forming a coating film of an outdoor steel structure according to any one of the first to third aspects, in the fourth step, the repair is required by the comprehensive determination. After adjusting the base for the diagnosis area that has been deteriorated to the surface, surface the diagnosis area other than the diagnosis area that has been subjected to the base adjustment, and paint the base coat on the part that has been subjected to the base adjustment The method for forming a coating film on an outdoor steel structure is characterized in that an intermediate coating is applied to the entire area where the coating film of the outdoor steel structure is provided and a top coating is applied.

かかる第4の態様では、旧塗膜に対する中塗り塗料の付着性をさらに向上させることができる。   In the fourth aspect, the adhesion of the intermediate coating material to the old coating film can be further improved.

なお、本発明の第1及び第3、第4の態様における下塗り塗料は必要な膜厚をつけるため、複数回塗装してもよい。   The undercoat paint in the first, third, and fourth aspects of the present invention may be applied a plurality of times in order to give a necessary film thickness.

本発明の第5の態様は、第1〜第4の何れか一つの態様に記載する屋外鋼構造物の塗膜形成方法において、前記屋外鋼構造物は、タンク、橋梁、送電鉄塔、船舶及び建設用鉄骨からなる群から選択される少なくとも1つであることを特徴とする屋外鋼構造物の塗膜形成方法にある。   According to a fifth aspect of the present invention, in the coating method for coating an outdoor steel structure according to any one of the first to fourth aspects, the outdoor steel structure includes a tank, a bridge, a power transmission tower, a ship, and The coating film forming method for an outdoor steel structure is characterized in that it is at least one selected from the group consisting of steel frames for construction.

かかる第5の態様では、タンク、橋梁、送電鉄塔、船舶及び建設用鉄骨に対して良好に再塗装、補修することができる。   In the fifth aspect, it is possible to satisfactorily repaint and repair tanks, bridges, power transmission towers, ships, and construction steel frames.

本発明によれば、屋外鋼構造物の塗膜及び塗膜下素地の状態を正確に診断し、劣化した箇所を適切に補修や塗り替えを行うことができる屋外鋼構造物の塗膜形成方法が提供される。   According to the present invention, there is provided an outdoor steel structure coating film forming method capable of accurately diagnosing the state of an outdoor steel structure coating film and an undercoat film substrate, and appropriately repairing and repainting a deteriorated portion. Provided.

以下、本発明を実施するための最良の形態について説明する。なお、本実施形態の説明は例示であり、本発明は以下の説明に限定されない。   Hereinafter, the best mode for carrying out the present invention will be described. The description of the present embodiment is an exemplification, and the present invention is not limited to the following description.

〈実施形態1〉
図1は、実施形態1に係る屋外鋼構造物の塗膜形成方法のフローを示す図である。
図1に示すように、まず、屋外鋼構造物の塗膜が設けられた領域を区分したものである複数の診断領域ごとに、塗膜及び塗膜下素地の状態を数値化する複数の調査手段を実施して、その調査結果を取得する(ステップS1)。
<Embodiment 1>
FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a flow of a method for forming a coating film on an outdoor steel structure according to the first embodiment.
As shown in FIG. 1, first, a plurality of investigations for quantifying the state of the coating film and the substrate under the coating film for each of a plurality of diagnosis areas that are obtained by dividing the area where the coating film of the outdoor steel structure is provided. The means is implemented and the survey result is acquired (step S1).

屋外鋼構造物とは、屋外に設置され、塗膜が塗布される被塗布部が鋼製である構造物のことをいう。また、ここでいう鋼とは、耐候性鋼などの低合金鋼も含むものである。図2は、本実施形態に係る屋外鋼構造物の一例である貯蔵タンクの概略図である。図示するように、貯蔵タンク1は、円柱状に形成され、その外壁面には塗装により塗膜が形成されている。貯蔵タンク1の外壁面には、診断領域が決められている。診断領域とは、貯蔵タンク1の塗膜が設けられた領域を複数に区分したものである。本実施形態では、貯蔵タンク1は9つの診断領域に区分され、各診断領域には「1」〜「9」の番号が付されている。   An outdoor steel structure refers to a structure that is installed outdoors and the coated portion to which a coating film is applied is made of steel. Moreover, the steel here includes low alloy steels such as weather resistant steel. FIG. 2 is a schematic view of a storage tank which is an example of an outdoor steel structure according to the present embodiment. As shown in the figure, the storage tank 1 is formed in a columnar shape, and a coating film is formed on its outer wall surface by painting. A diagnosis area is determined on the outer wall surface of the storage tank 1. The diagnosis region is a region obtained by dividing the region of the storage tank 1 where the coating film is provided. In the present embodiment, the storage tank 1 is divided into nine diagnosis areas, and numbers “1” to “9” are assigned to the diagnosis areas.

調査手段は、屋外鋼構造物の塗膜及び塗膜下素地の状態を数値化するものであり、この数値を調査結果という。塗膜の状態を数値化するとは、塗膜の各種特性、例えば、剥がれ、ふくれ、さびの程度、塗膜の膜厚、塗膜の組成、付着性など物理的性質や、塗膜の抵抗や容量など電気的性質の測定値を得ることをいい、塗膜下素地の状態を数値化するとは、塗膜と素地界面の分極抵抗あるいは分極容量など電気化学的性質の測定値を得ることをいう。調査手段としては、塗膜及び塗膜下素地の状態の程度を数値化することができるものであれば特に限定されないが、例えば次の調査手段を用いることができる。   The investigation means quantifies the state of the coating film of the outdoor steel structure and the substrate under the coating film, and this numerical value is referred to as the investigation result. Quantifying the state of the coating means various properties of the coating such as physical properties such as peeling, blistering, rust, coating thickness, coating composition, adhesion, It refers to obtaining measured values of electrical properties such as capacitance, and quantifying the state of the substrate under the coating means obtaining measured values of electrochemical properties such as polarization resistance or polarization capacity at the interface between the coating and the substrate. . The investigation means is not particularly limited as long as the degree of the state of the coating film and the substrate under the coating film can be quantified. For example, the following investigation means can be used.

(1)目視:塗装業者が、目視により塗膜のさびた部分、ふくれた部分又は剥がれた部分を調査し、これらの部分の合計面積が診断領域の面積に占める比率を見積もる。この比率を劣化面積率という。
(2)画像処理解析:例えばデジタルカメラなどの撮像手段により貯蔵タンク1を撮像し、これにより得られた貯蔵タンクの画像データを情報処理装置に画像処理解析させて劣化面積率を算出する。
(3)塗膜下腐食測定:腐食診断装置を用いて診断領域の塗膜抵抗、塗膜容量、塗膜下素地の分極抵抗、塗膜下素地の分極容量のデータを取得する。腐食診断装置としては、例えば特許第3051153号でいう塗膜下腐食測定装置を用いる。これらのデータから塗膜の劣化状況及び塗膜下素地の腐食状況が分かる。
(4)塗膜の化学分析:診断領域の塗膜断面の観察を行うことで、塗装履歴を得る。塗装履歴とは、塗膜の種類や回数などである。また、FT−IR(赤外線吸収スペクトル法)により塗膜の樹脂系を特定する。
(5)塗膜の膜厚測定:電磁式膜厚測定器を用いて、塗膜の膜厚を測定する。
(6)塗膜の付着性調査:アドヒージョンテスタ(JIS K 5600-5-7に準じる方法)又はクロスカット試験(JIS K 5600-5-6に準じる方法)により付着性を調査する。
(1) Visual inspection: A painter visually examines a rusty portion, a blistered portion or a peeled portion of the coating film, and estimates the ratio of the total area of these portions to the area of the diagnostic region. This ratio is called the deterioration area rate.
(2) Image processing analysis: For example, the storage tank 1 is imaged by an imaging means such as a digital camera, and the image data of the storage tank obtained thereby is processed by the information processing device to calculate the deterioration area ratio.
(3) Under-coating corrosion measurement: Using a corrosion diagnostic apparatus, data on the coating area resistance, coating film capacity, polarization resistance of the under-coating substrate, and polarization capacity of the under-coating substrate is obtained. As the corrosion diagnosis apparatus, for example, an undercoat corrosion measurement apparatus as described in Japanese Patent No. 3051153 is used. From these data, the deterioration condition of the coating film and the corrosion condition of the substrate under the coating film can be understood.
(4) Chemical analysis of the coating film: A coating history is obtained by observing the cross section of the coating film in the diagnostic region. The painting history is the type and number of times of the coating film. Moreover, the resin system of a coating film is specified by FT-IR (infrared absorption spectrum method).
(5) Film thickness measurement of coating film: The film thickness of the coating film is measured using an electromagnetic film thickness measuring instrument.
(6) Adhesion investigation of coating film: Adhesion is investigated by adhesion tester (method according to JIS K 5600-5-7) or cross-cut test (method according to JIS K 5600-5-6).

このような複数の調査手段を、診断領域ごとに実施し、その調査結果を取得する。なお、必ずしも全ての診断領域に対して、上記(1)〜(6)の調査手段の全てを実施する必要はなく、各診断領域に対して、少なくとも2つ以上の調査手段を実施すればよい。   A plurality of such investigation means are implemented for each diagnosis area, and the investigation results are acquired. Note that it is not always necessary to carry out all of the investigation means (1) to (6) for all diagnosis areas, and at least two or more investigation means may be carried out for each diagnosis area. .

図1に戻り、次に、塗膜及び塗膜下素地の劣化状態を判定する判定基準に調査結果が適合するか否かに基づいて、各診断領域について調査手段ごとの劣化状態を判定する(ステップS2)。   Returning to FIG. 1, next, the deterioration state for each investigation means is determined for each diagnostic region based on whether or not the investigation result is compatible with the determination criterion for determining the deterioration state of the coating film and the substrate under the coating film ( Step S2).

劣化状態とは、塗膜がさびや剥がれなどにより補修や再補修が必要となるほどに劣化しているか否かを示す情報であり、判定基準とは、調査結果に対して定められた塗膜の劣化状態と調査結果との対応関係のことをいう。判定基準に調査結果が適合するか否かに基づいて劣化状態を判定するとは、調査結果に対応する劣化状態を判定基準から導き出すことをいう。   Degraded state is information indicating whether the coating film has deteriorated enough to require repair or re-repair due to rust or peeling, and the criterion is the coating film defined for the survey results. This refers to the correspondence between the deterioration state and the survey results. Determining the deterioration state based on whether or not the investigation result matches the determination criterion means deriving the deterioration state corresponding to the investigation result from the determination criterion.

例えば、前記調査手段(1)の目視に関する判定基準としては、「劣化面積率が15%以上」という調査結果と、「1(劣化している)」という劣化状態との対応を挙げることができる。このような判定基準を調査手段ごとに定めておく。そして、実際に目視による調査を行って得られた調査結果が「劣化面積率20%」であったとすると、上記判定基準に対応するので、目視による調査によれば塗膜は「1(劣化している)」という判定をすることになる。   For example, as a criterion for visual inspection of the investigation means (1), there can be cited a correspondence between the investigation result “deterioration area ratio is 15% or more” and the deterioration state “1 (deteriorated)”. . Such a criterion is determined for each investigation means. And, if the result of the actual visual inspection is “deterioration area ratio 20%”, it corresponds to the above-mentioned criterion. Will be judged).

このような劣化状態の判定を実施した調査手段ごとに行う。すなわち、一つの診断領域について6つの調査手段を実施すれば、6つの劣化状態が得られることになる。そして、この劣化状態の判定を、全ての診断領域について実施する。   This is performed for each investigation means that has performed such a deterioration state determination. That is, if six investigation means are implemented for one diagnostic region, six deterioration states can be obtained. Then, this deterioration state determination is performed for all diagnosis regions.

なお、劣化状態は、「1(劣化した状態)」と「0(劣化していない状態)」という二値であってもよいし、「0.8(やや劣化した状態)」や「0.3(あまり劣化していない状態)」など複数段階であってもよい。また、判定基準としては、例えば、調査結果が或る閾値を超えたか否かにより劣化状態を判定するものであってもよいし、調査結果が或る数値範囲に属しているか否かにより劣化状態を判定するものであってもよい。   The deterioration state may be a binary value of “1 (deteriorated state)” and “0 (non-deteriorated state)”, or “0.8 (slightly deteriorated state)” or “0. It may be a plurality of stages such as “3 (a state that is not deteriorated so much)”. In addition, as a determination criterion, for example, the deterioration state may be determined based on whether or not the investigation result exceeds a certain threshold, or the deterioration state depends on whether or not the investigation result belongs to a certain numerical range. May be determined.

次に、診断領域ごとについて、調査手段ごとの劣化状態に所定の重み付け係数をそれぞれ乗じ、加算したものである総合点を算出し、当該総合点が所定の閾値を超えているか否かに基づいて、診断領域の塗膜及び塗膜下素地の劣化状態を表す総合判定を算出する(ステップS3)。   Next, for each diagnosis region, a deterioration point for each investigation means is multiplied by a predetermined weighting factor and added to calculate a total point. Based on whether the total point exceeds a predetermined threshold Then, a comprehensive determination representing the deterioration state of the coating film in the diagnostic region and the substrate under the coating film is calculated (step S3).

詳言すると、第2工程で判定した調査手段ごとの各劣化状態に、所定の重み付け係数を乗じ、これらを加算して総合点を算出する。総合点が所定の閾値を超えている場合、総合判定は「診断領域は劣化している」となり、閾値を超えていない場合、総合判定は「診断領域は劣化していない」となる。すなわち、第2工程では調査手段ごとの劣化状態を判定したが、第3工程では、診断領域の総合的な塗膜及び塗膜下素地の劣化状態を判定する。   More specifically, each deterioration state determined in the second step is multiplied by a predetermined weighting coefficient, and these are added to calculate a total score. When the total score exceeds a predetermined threshold, the comprehensive determination is “diagnostic region is deteriorated”, and when the total point is not exceeded, the comprehensive determination is “diagnostic region is not deteriorated”. That is, in the second step, the deterioration state for each investigation means is determined, but in the third step, the overall deterioration state of the coating film and the substrate under the coating film in the diagnosis region is determined.

なお、所定の閾値は1つに限られず、複数設定してもよい。例えば「総合点が2を超えたら劣化度大」、「総合点が1を超え2以下ならば劣化度中」、「総合点が1以下ならば劣化していない」となるよう閾値を用いてもよい。   The predetermined threshold value is not limited to one, and a plurality of threshold values may be set. For example, the threshold value is used so that “the deterioration level is large when the total score exceeds 2”, “the deterioration level is medium when the total score exceeds 1 and 2 or less”, and “no deterioration is generated when the total score is 1 or less”. Also good.

次に、総合判定により補修を必要とする程度に劣化しているとされた診断領域に対して素地調整を行い、下塗り塗料を塗装し、貯蔵タンク1全体を上塗り塗料で塗装する(ステップS4)。またこのとき必要に応じて、面あらし、中塗り塗装を行う。   Next, the substrate is adjusted for the diagnosis area that has been deteriorated to the extent that repair is required by comprehensive judgment, the undercoat paint is applied, and the entire storage tank 1 is applied with the overcoat paint (step S4). . At this time, surface finishing and intermediate coating are performed as necessary.

素地調整とは、塗装に先立ち、貯蔵タンク1の鋼面が現れるように旧塗膜を除去したり、旧塗膜の付着物を除去する工程をいう。素地調整後は、診断領域に下塗り塗料を塗装する。下塗り塗料としては、防錆性を有し、鋼材に対する付着性が高い塗料を用いる。これにより、貯蔵タンク1の鋼面をさびから保護することができる。   Substrate adjustment refers to a process of removing the old paint film so that the steel surface of the storage tank 1 appears prior to painting, or removing deposits on the old paint film. After preparing the substrate, apply a primer to the diagnostic area. As the undercoat paint, a paint having rust prevention and high adhesion to steel is used. Thereby, the steel surface of the storage tank 1 can be protected from rust.

その後、貯蔵タンク1全体を、上塗り塗料で塗装する。これにより、素地調整を施した診断領域とそれ以外の診断領域との境目で色調が異なることが生じず、貯蔵タンク1の美観を保てる。また、上塗り塗料としては、耐候性を有する塗料を用いる。これにより長期間に亘り保護機能を維持することができる。   Thereafter, the entire storage tank 1 is painted with a top coat. As a result, the color tone does not differ at the boundary between the diagnosis area subjected to the substrate adjustment and the other diagnosis areas, and the aesthetic appearance of the storage tank 1 can be maintained. In addition, as the top coating material, a coating material having weather resistance is used. Thereby, a protective function can be maintained over a long period of time.

また、下塗り塗料塗装部以外の塗膜が設けられた領域、すなわち、素地調整を行った診断領域以外の診断領域に面あらしを行う。面あらしの方法としては、ワイヤブラシ、サンドペーパー、スチールたわしなどによる方法が挙げられる。これにより、旧塗膜に対する上塗り塗料の付着性が向上する。   Further, the surface is applied to a region where a coating film other than the undercoat paint coating portion is provided, that is, a diagnostic region other than the diagnostic region where the substrate adjustment is performed. Examples of the surface treatment method include a method using a wire brush, sandpaper, and steel scrubber. Thereby, the adhesiveness of the top-coat paint with respect to an old coating film improves.

また、下塗り塗料の塗装後に、塗膜が設けられた領域全体、すなわち貯蔵タンク1の塗膜が設けられた領域全体に中塗り塗料を塗装し、その後上塗り塗料を塗装してもよい。この中塗り塗料により、下塗り塗料あるいは旧塗膜と上塗り塗料との付着性をさらに向上させることができる。   In addition, after the undercoat paint is applied, the intermediate coat paint may be applied to the entire area where the paint film is provided, that is, the entire area where the paint film of the storage tank 1 is provided, and then the top coat paint may be applied. This intermediate coating can further improve the adhesion between the undercoat or the old coating and the top coating.

なお、下塗り塗料、中塗り塗料及び上塗り塗料の塗装方法は、スプレー塗装が好ましいが、特に限定されない。例えば、診断領域が狭隘部などの場合には、ハケやローラーによる塗装を用いることができる。   In addition, spray coating is preferable as a method for applying the undercoat paint, the intermediate coat paint, and the top coat paint, but is not particularly limited. For example, when the diagnosis area is a narrow area, painting by brush or roller can be used.

以下、上記に説明した屋外鋼構造物の塗膜形成方法の具体例を示す。表1に、第1工程を行って得られた調査結果を示す。   Hereinafter, the specific example of the coating-film formation method of the outdoor steel structure demonstrated above is shown. Table 1 shows the survey results obtained by performing the first step.

[表1]

Figure 0005077960
[Table 1]
Figure 0005077960

表1に示すように、診断領域ごとに、「目視による劣化面積率」(前記調査手段(1)により得られたもの)、「画像処理による劣化面積率」(前記調査手段(2)により得られたもの)、「分極抵抗」(前記調査手段(3)の塗膜下腐食測定により得られたもの)、「付着性」(前記調査手段(6)の塗膜の付着性調査により得られたもの)、及び「膜厚」(前記調査手段(5)の塗膜の膜厚測定により得られたもの)の調査結果が示されている。   As shown in Table 1, for each diagnosis area, “visually deteriorated area rate” (obtained by the investigation means (1)) and “deterioration area ratio by image processing” (obtained by the investigation means (2)). ), “Polarization resistance” (obtained by the under-coating corrosion measurement of the investigation means (3)), “adhesion” (obtained by the adhesion investigation of the coating film of the investigation means (6)) ) And “film thickness” (obtained by measuring the film thickness of the coating film of the investigation means (5)).

なお、表1の空欄が示すように、必ずしも全ての診断領域で全ての調査手段を実施する必要はない。   As indicated by the blanks in Table 1, it is not always necessary to carry out all investigation means in all diagnosis areas.

次に、第2工程を行う。表2に、劣化状態を判定する判定基準を示す。   Next, the second step is performed. Table 2 shows criteria for determining the deterioration state.

[表2]

Figure 0005077960
[Table 2]
Figure 0005077960

表2に示すように、調査手段毎に、判定基準が設定されている。例えば「目視による劣化面積率」の場合、その調査結果が「15%以上」であるならば、その調査手段の対象の診断領域の塗膜は「劣化している」と判定されることになる。   As shown in Table 2, a determination criterion is set for each investigation means. For example, in the case of “visually deteriorated area ratio”, if the result of the investigation is “15% or more”, the coating film in the diagnostic region targeted by the investigation means is judged to be “deteriorated”. .

表2の判定基準に表1の調査結果が適合するか否かに基づいて、調査手段ごとの劣化状態を判定することを、各診断領域について行う。表3に各診断領域における調査手段ごとの劣化状態を示す。表中の劣化状態の「1」は劣化していることを意味しており、「0」は劣化していないことを意味している。   Based on whether or not the investigation results in Table 1 conform to the determination criteria in Table 2, the deterioration state for each investigation means is determined for each diagnostic region. Table 3 shows a deterioration state for each investigation means in each diagnosis area. In the table, the deterioration state “1” means that the deterioration has occurred, and “0” means that the deterioration has not occurred.

[表3]

Figure 0005077960
[Table 3]
Figure 0005077960

次に、第3工程を行う。ここで、「目視による劣化面積率から得られた劣化状態」をX、「画像処理による劣化面積率から得られた劣化状態」をX、「分極抵抗から得られた劣化状態」をX、「付着性から得られた劣化状態」をX、「膜厚から得られた劣化状態」をXとすると、総合点Yは次の式で求まる。なお下記式中a〜eは所定の重み付け係数である。 Next, the third step is performed. Here, “deterioration state obtained from visual degradation area ratio” is X 1 , “degradation state obtained from degradation area ratio by image processing” is X 2 , and “degradation state obtained from polarization resistance” is X 3. If the “degraded state obtained from adhesion” is X 4 and the “degraded state obtained from film thickness” is X 5 , the total point Y is obtained by the following equation. In the following formulas, a to e are predetermined weighting coefficients.

Figure 0005077960
Figure 0005077960

ここでは、目視・画像処理による劣化面積率及び分極抵抗について比重を大きくすべく、所定の重み付け係数は「a、b及びcについては2」、「d及びeについては1」とする。その結果、各診断領域「1」〜「9」の総合点Y〜Yは次の通りとなる。 Here, in order to increase the specific gravity with respect to the deterioration area ratio and the polarization resistance by visual and image processing, the predetermined weighting coefficients are “2 for a, b and c” and “1 for d and e”. As a result, the overall point Y 1 ~Y 9 of each diagnostic area "1" to "9" is as follows.

Figure 0005077960
Figure 0005077960

これらの総合点Y〜Yから総合判定を算出するための所定の閾値として複数の閾値t〜tを用いる。すなわち、総合点が0以上t未満であるならば総合判定は「健全」、t以上t未満であるならば総合判定は「劣化度小」、t以上t未満であるならば総合判定は「劣化度中」、t以上であるならば総合判定は「劣化度大」とする。tは「1.5」、tは「3」、tは「4.5」とした。 A plurality of threshold values t 0 to t 2 are used as predetermined threshold values for calculating a comprehensive determination from these total points Y 1 to Y 9 . That is, if the overall score is 0 or more and less than t 0 , the overall judgment is “sound”, if t 0 or more and less than t 1 , the overall judgment is “low degradation”, and if t 1 or more and less than t 2 The overall judgment is “medium degradation level”, and if it is t 2 or more, the overall judgment is “high degradation level”. t 0 was “1.5”, t 1 was “3”, and t 2 was “4.5”.

表4に、これらの閾値に基づいてY〜Yから算出した総合判定を示す。同表に示すように、診断領域「1」、「2」、「9」が劣化している。 Table 4 shows the comprehensive determination calculated from Y 1 to Y 9 based on these threshold values. As shown in the table, the diagnosis areas “1”, “2”, and “9” are deteriorated.

[表4]

Figure 0005077960
[Table 4]
Figure 0005077960

なお、所定の重み付け係数は、前記診断領域に塗布された塗膜の種類に応じて決定してもよい。例えば、アルキド系のような弱い塗膜では、表面にさびなどの劣化が出易いため、劣化面積率に係る係数を大きく設定する。一方、エポキシ系のような強い塗膜や厚膜の塗装系では表面に劣化が表れず、塗膜下で剥離が進行することがあるので、分極抵抗に係る係数を大きく設定する。これにより、塗膜に合わせて適切な総合判定をすることができる。   Note that the predetermined weighting coefficient may be determined according to the type of coating applied to the diagnostic region. For example, in a weak coating film such as an alkyd system, deterioration such as rust is likely to occur on the surface, and therefore a coefficient related to the deterioration area ratio is set large. On the other hand, in a strong coating film such as an epoxy system or a thick coating system, the surface does not deteriorate, and peeling may proceed under the coating film, so the coefficient related to polarization resistance is set large. Thereby, an appropriate comprehensive determination can be made according to the coating film.

次に、第4工程を行う。すなわち、総合判定で「劣化度大」と判定された診断領域「1」と、総合判定で「劣化度小」と判定された診断領域「2」と、「劣化度中」と判定された診断領域「9」とについて、素地調整を実施し、該素地調整を行った診断領域に対して下塗り塗料の塗装を、それ以外の診断領域に面あらしを実施し、貯蔵タンク1全体に中塗り塗料の塗装、及び上塗り塗料の塗装を行う。表5〜表10に、塗装系を例示する。   Next, the fourth step is performed. That is, the diagnosis area “1” determined as “high deterioration degree” in the comprehensive determination, the diagnosis area “2” determined as “low deterioration degree” in the comprehensive determination, and the diagnosis determined as “medium deterioration degree”. For the area “9”, the base is adjusted, the undercoat paint is applied to the diagnosis area where the base is adjusted, and the surface area is applied to the other diagnosis areas. The top coat paint is applied. Tables 5 to 10 illustrate coating systems.

[表5]塗装系1

Figure 0005077960
[Table 5] Paint system 1
Figure 0005077960

[表6]塗装系2

Figure 0005077960
[Table 6] Paint system 2
Figure 0005077960

[表7]塗装系3

Figure 0005077960
[Table 7] Paint system 3
Figure 0005077960

[表8]塗装系4

Figure 0005077960
[Table 8] Paint system 4
Figure 0005077960

[表9]塗装系5

Figure 0005077960
[Table 9] Paint system 5
Figure 0005077960

[表10]塗装系6

Figure 0005077960
[Table 10] Paint system 6
Figure 0005077960

例示した塗装系のうち診断領域に適用するものを選択する際には、既に塗装された塗膜(旧塗膜)の塗装系と、素地調整の種別により、(社)日本道路協会編「鋼道路橋塗装便覧」、「鋼道路橋塗装・防食便覧」などを参考にする。なお、旧塗膜の塗装系は、前記調査手段(4)の塗膜の化学分析により知ることができる。   When selecting the coating system to be applied to the diagnosis area from the exemplified coating systems, depending on the coating system of the already painted coating film (old coating film) and the type of substrate adjustment, “Japan Steel Association” Refer to the “Handbook of road bridge painting” and “Handbook of steel road bridge painting / corrosion prevention”. In addition, the coating system of an old coating film can be known by the chemical analysis of the coating film of the said investigation means (4).

表11に示すように、素地調整の種別は、その作業内容及び作業方法の違いにより4種類に分類されている。   As shown in Table 11, the base adjustment types are classified into four types depending on the work contents and work methods.

[表11]

Figure 0005077960
[Table 11]
Figure 0005077960

これらの素地調整は、診断領域の塗膜の劣化の程度に応じて選択される。すなわち、第3工程で算出した総合判定に基づいて適用する素地調整の種別が定まる。表12に、総合判定と素地調整の種別との対応を例示する。   These substrate adjustments are selected according to the degree of deterioration of the coating film in the diagnostic region. That is, the type of substrate adjustment to be applied is determined based on the comprehensive determination calculated in the third step. Table 12 illustrates the correspondence between the comprehensive determination and the type of substrate adjustment.

[表12]

Figure 0005077960
[Table 12]
Figure 0005077960

表4に示すように、診断領域「1」は、第3工程で算出した総合判定が「劣化度大」であったので、表12に示す素地調整「1種」又は「2種」が対応し、診断領域「9」は、総合判定が「劣化度中」であったので、素地調整「3種」が対応し、診断領域「2」は、「劣化度小」であったので素地調整「4種」が対応する。   As shown in Table 4, the diagnosis area “1” corresponds to “1 type” or “2 types” of the substrate adjustment shown in Table 12 because the comprehensive judgment calculated in the third step was “high degree of degradation”. In the diagnosis area “9”, since the overall judgment is “medium degree of deterioration”, the base adjustment “3 types” corresponds, and the diagnosis area “2” has “low degree of deterioration”. "4 types" correspond.

したがって、診断領域「1」、「9」、「2」にそれぞれ適した素地調整を施し、それ以外の診断領域全面に面あらしを施した後、診断領域「1」、「9」、「2」に下塗りを塗装した後、中塗り、上塗りを全面に塗装する。   Accordingly, the base areas suitable for the diagnostic areas “1”, “9”, and “2” are respectively adjusted, and the entire surface of the other diagnostic areas is subjected to surface adjustment, and then the diagnostic areas “1”, “9”, “2” After the undercoat is applied, the intermediate coat and top coat are applied to the entire surface.

このような屋外鋼構造物の塗膜形成方法によれば、補修が必要とされた診断領域は、素地調整によりさびや旧塗膜が除去され、防錆性や耐候性を有する塗膜が形成されるため、貯蔵タンク1の外壁素材である鋼面が保護される。そして貯蔵タンク1全体に同一の中塗り塗料及び上塗り塗料を塗装するので、診断領域の色調が貯蔵タンク1全体の色調と異なってしまうことが無く、貯蔵タンク1の美観が保たれる。   According to such a coating method for outdoor steel structures, the rust and old coating film is removed by adjusting the substrate in the diagnostic area where repair is required, and a coating film having rust prevention and weather resistance is formed. Therefore, the steel surface which is the outer wall material of the storage tank 1 is protected. Since the same intermediate coating and top coating are applied to the entire storage tank 1, the color tone of the diagnostic area does not differ from the color tone of the entire storage tank 1, and the aesthetic appearance of the storage tank 1 is maintained.

本発明に係る屋外鋼構造物の塗膜形成方法では、診断対象の貯蔵タンク1の外壁面を診断領域に区分し、診断領域毎に調査手段を実施して調査結果を取得し、この調査結果が判定基準に適合するか否かにより当該診断領域の塗膜の劣化状態を判定し、劣化状態から診断領域毎に総合判定を算出し、この総合判定に基づいた塗装系を用いて貯蔵タンク1を再塗装・補修する。   In the method for forming a coating film of an outdoor steel structure according to the present invention, the outer wall surface of the storage tank 1 to be diagnosed is divided into diagnostic areas, and a survey means is performed for each diagnostic area to obtain a survey result. The deterioration state of the coating film in the diagnosis region is determined depending on whether or not the determination criteria are met, a comprehensive determination is calculated for each diagnosis region from the deterioration state, and the storage tank 1 is used using a coating system based on the comprehensive determination. Repaint and repair.

一方、構造物は、部分毎に環境的な条件が異なることから、全体的には良好な塗膜であっても、部分的には劣化しているということがあり得る。このような場合でも、構造物の外壁面を区分した診断領域の塗膜及び塗膜下素地の劣化状態を判定するので、部分的にさびや剥がれ等が生じた塗膜を見逃すことなく劣化状態を判定することができる。ちなみに、例えばデジタルカメラで貯蔵タンク1の外壁面全体を撮像した画像データを画像処理して劣化面積率を得る場合、劣化した部分が存在しても、外壁面の全体が良好であると判断してしまうが、本発明の屋外鋼構造物の塗膜形成方法ではこのようなことはない。   On the other hand, since the environmental conditions differ from part to part, the structure may be partially degraded even if it is a good overall film. Even in such a case, since the deterioration state of the coating film in the diagnostic area and the base material under the coating area that distinguishes the outer wall surface of the structure is judged, the deterioration state without missing the rust or peeling partially coated film Can be determined. Incidentally, for example, when image data obtained by imaging the entire outer wall surface of the storage tank 1 with a digital camera is subjected to image processing to obtain a deteriorated area rate, it is determined that the entire outer wall surface is good even if a deteriorated portion exists. However, this is not the case with the method for forming a coating film on an outdoor steel structure according to the present invention.

また、各診断領域に複数の調査手段を実施して得られた調査結果から各診断領域の総合判定を算出した。これにより、例えば、構造物の設置場所や他の構造物との位置関係、構造物の形状により、或る調査手段は実施し難い診断領域であったとしても、他の調査手段を実施することで当該診断領域の調査結果を取得し、劣化状態を判定することができる。例えば、貯蔵タンク1の診断領域「4」「7」の前に遮蔽物があるため、当該診断領域は、デジタルカメラでは調査し難くても、塗膜下腐食測定のように電気化学的な測定手段塗膜診断ならば容易に調査できる場合等である。要するに、本実施形態に係る屋外鋼構造物の塗膜形成方法は、複数の診断領域に区分したことで、各診断領域に適した調査手段を実施することができるので、構造物の設置場所や他の構造物との位置関係等の要因に左右されずに塗膜の劣化状態を判定し、適切な塗装を行えるという柔軟性を有している。   Moreover, the comprehensive judgment of each diagnostic area | region was computed from the investigation result obtained by implementing several investigation means in each diagnostic area | region. Thus, for example, even if a certain investigation means is difficult to implement due to the location of the structure, the positional relationship with other structures, and the shape of the structure, other investigation means should be implemented. Thus, the investigation result of the diagnosis area can be acquired and the deterioration state can be determined. For example, since there is a shield in front of the diagnostic area “4” and “7” of the storage tank 1, the diagnostic area is electrochemically measured like under-coating corrosion measurement even though it is difficult to investigate with a digital camera. If it is possible to investigate easily by means of coating film diagnosis. In short, since the coating method of the outdoor steel structure according to the present embodiment is divided into a plurality of diagnosis areas, it is possible to carry out investigation means suitable for each diagnosis area. It has the flexibility to determine the state of deterioration of the coating film without being influenced by factors such as the positional relationship with other structures, and to perform appropriate coating.

〈実施形態2〉
実施形態1では、旧塗膜の塗装系と、素地調整の種別とに基づいて塗装系を選択したが、これに限定されず、種々の基準を用いて塗装系を選択するようにしてもよい。このような基準としては、新たな塗装に用いる塗料の性質や、塗装工程の種別などである。このように、種々の基準に対応して塗装系を選択できるようにしておくと、顧客の塗装に対する要望に柔軟に対応することができる。
<Embodiment 2>
In the first embodiment, the coating system is selected based on the coating system of the old coating film and the type of substrate adjustment. However, the present invention is not limited to this, and the coating system may be selected using various criteria. . Such criteria include the nature of the paint used for the new painting and the type of painting process. In this way, if the coating system can be selected according to various standards, it is possible to flexibly respond to the customer's desire for painting.

表13に、素地調整の種別と旧塗膜の塗装系に、「過去に既に塗装された旧塗膜の種類」、「旧塗膜と同じものが補修塗装されるか否か」、「環境対応の塗装であるか否か」、「省工程の塗装工法であるか否か」及び「高耐久の塗装であるか否か」を加え、これらに対応する塗装系を例示する。   Table 13 shows the types of substrate adjustment and the coating system of the old paint film, "type of old paint film already painted in the past", "whether the same paint as the old paint film is repaired", "environment" “Whether it is a corresponding coating”, “Whether it is a paint process with a reduced process”, and “Whether it is a highly durable coating”, and illustrate a coating system corresponding to these.

[表13]

Figure 0005077960
[Table 13]
Figure 0005077960

表13に示すように、旧塗膜の塗装系として「フタル酸系」、「塩化ゴム系」がある。同様に、「旧塗膜と同じものが補修塗装されるか否か」、「環境対応の塗装であるか否か」、「省工程の塗装工法であるか否か」及び「高耐久の塗装であるか否か」については、「○」「×」の何れかである。また、塗装系の「1−1−1」のような表記は、表5〜表11に例示したような塗装系を特定するための番号である。   As shown in Table 13, there are “phthalic acid type” and “chlorinated rubber type” as the coating system of the old coating film. Similarly, "Whether the same coating as the old paint film is repaired or not", "Whether it is an environmentally-friendly coating", "Whether it is a coating method with a reduced process" and "High durability coating" Whether or not is “o” or “x”. In addition, the notation such as “1-1-1” of the paint system is a number for specifying the paint system as exemplified in Tables 5 to 11.

例えば、実施形態1に説明したように、或る診断領域の総合判定が「劣化度大」であることから素地調整の種別を「1種」とし、旧塗膜の塗装系が「フタル酸系」であるとする。そして、例えば、顧客が、旧塗膜と同じ補修を希望せず、環境対応の塗装を希望し、省工程の塗装を希望し、高耐久の塗装を希望したとする。この場合、表13から、「1−1−7」で特定される塗装系を選択することとなる。   For example, as described in the first embodiment, since the overall judgment of a certain diagnosis region is “high degradation level”, the base adjustment type is “1 type”, and the coating system of the old paint film is “phthalic acid type” ”. For example, suppose that the customer does not desire the same repair as the old paint film, desires an environmentally-friendly paint, desires a paint-saving process, and desires a highly durable paint. In this case, the coating system specified by “1-1-7” is selected from Table 13.

このように、種々の基準で塗装系を選択することにより、顧客の要望を加味した塗装を行うことができる。   As described above, by selecting a coating system based on various criteria, it is possible to perform coating in consideration of the customer's request.

〈実施形態3〉
実施形態1、実施形態2に係る屋外鋼構造物の塗膜形成方法では、9個の診断領域に区分し、その数、大きさ、位置、形状は固定的であったが、これに限定されず、劣化状態に応じて変更してもよい。
<Embodiment 3>
In the method for forming a coating film of an outdoor steel structure according to Embodiment 1 and Embodiment 2, it was divided into nine diagnostic areas, and the number, size, position, and shape were fixed, but it was limited to this. Instead, it may be changed according to the deterioration state.

例えば、最初に9つの診断領域(初期診断領域)に区分し、それぞれの劣化面積率を取得する。そして、劣化面積率が所定値以上である初期診断領域について再度区分する。そして、再区分後の診断領域について、実施形態1と同様に、第1〜第4工程を行う。再区分の仕方は、数、位置、大きさ、形状について適宜設定すればよいが、特に、劣化面積率が所定値以上である初期診断領域を他の初期診断領域よりも相対的に細かく区分することが好ましい。これにより、劣化の程度が大きい箇所は、細かい診断領域が設定され、劣化の程度が小さい箇所は、大きな診断領域が設定される。このため、劣化の程度が大きい箇所は、各調査手段により重点的に調査され、劣化の程度が小さい箇所は簡略的に調査できる。これにより、塗膜及び塗膜下素地の劣化状態を精度よく判断できる。   For example, first, the diagnosis area is divided into nine diagnosis areas (initial diagnosis areas), and respective deterioration area ratios are acquired. Then, the initial diagnosis region whose deterioration area rate is equal to or greater than a predetermined value is divided again. And about the diagnostic area | region after a re-segmentation, the 1st-4th process is performed similarly to Embodiment 1. FIG. The method of re-segmentation may be set as appropriate for the number, position, size, and shape, but in particular, the initial diagnosis area where the deterioration area rate is a predetermined value or more is classified more finely than other initial diagnosis areas. It is preferable. As a result, a fine diagnostic region is set for a portion where the degree of deterioration is large, and a large diagnostic region is set for a portion where the degree of deterioration is small. For this reason, places where the degree of deterioration is large are intensively investigated by each investigation means, and places where the degree of deterioration is small can be simply investigated. Thereby, the deterioration state of a coating film and a base material under a coating film can be judged accurately.

〈他の実施形態〉
上述した実施形態1〜実施形態3では、各診断領域に調査手段を1回実施して得られた1つの調査結果について、劣化状態等を判定していたが、各診断領域に調査手段を複数回実施して得られた複数の調査結果に基づいて、劣化状態等を判定してもよい。表14に、診断領域「1」について調査手段を2回実施して得られた調査結果を例示する。
<Other embodiments>
In the first to third embodiments described above, the deterioration state or the like is determined for one investigation result obtained by performing the investigation means once in each diagnosis area. However, a plurality of investigation means are provided in each diagnosis area. The deterioration state or the like may be determined based on a plurality of survey results obtained by performing the test once. Table 14 exemplifies the investigation results obtained by carrying out the investigation means twice for the diagnosis region “1”.

[表14]

Figure 0005077960
[Table 14]
Figure 0005077960

このような場合は、調査結果毎に劣化状態を算出し、調査結果毎に劣化状態から総合点を算出する。その後、例えば、調査結果毎の総合点の平均を取る。そして、この平均が所定の閾値を超えるか否かに基づいて総合判定を算出することができる。   In such a case, the deterioration state is calculated for each investigation result, and the total score is calculated from the deterioration state for each investigation result. Thereafter, for example, the average of the total points for each survey result is taken. Then, a comprehensive determination can be calculated based on whether this average exceeds a predetermined threshold.

また、鋼構造物として円柱状の貯蔵タンク1を例に説明したが、もちろん貯蔵タンクに限定されるものではなく、本発明に係る屋外鋼構造物の塗膜形成方法は、タンク、橋梁、送電鉄塔、船舶及び建設用鉄骨など種々の屋外に設置された鋼構造物に広く適用し得るものである。   Moreover, although the cylindrical storage tank 1 was demonstrated to the example as a steel structure, of course, it is not limited to a storage tank, The coating-film formation method of the outdoor steel structure which concerns on this invention is a tank, a bridge, power transmission The present invention can be widely applied to various steel structures installed outdoors such as steel towers, ships and construction steel frames.

なお、本発明に係る屋外鋼構造物の塗膜形成方法の第1工程〜第3工程は、コンピュータを用いて実現してもよい。すなわち、診断領域ごとに、各調査手段を実行して表1に示した調査結果をコンピュータに入力し、電子データとしてコンピュータに記憶させる。そして、コンピュータに、表2に示したような判定基準を予め記憶させておき、調査結果と判定基準とを比較演算させ、表3に示したような調査手段ごとの劣化状態を判定させる。次に、コンピュータに、診断領域ごとに、表4に示したように、劣化状態と所定の重み付け係数とから総合点を算出させ、総合点と所定の閾値とから総合判定を算出させる。   In addition, you may implement | achieve the 1st process-the 3rd process of the coating-film formation method of the outdoor steel structure concerning this invention using a computer. That is, for each diagnosis area, each investigation means is executed and the investigation results shown in Table 1 are input to the computer and stored as electronic data in the computer. Then, the judgment criteria as shown in Table 2 are stored in advance in the computer, and the investigation result and the judgment criteria are compared and calculated, and the deterioration state for each research means as shown in Table 3 is judged. Next, as shown in Table 4, the computer is caused to calculate a total score from the deterioration state and a predetermined weighting coefficient, and to calculate a total determination from the total score and a predetermined threshold for each diagnosis area.

従来、経験豊富な塗装業者であっても、塗装業者によって判断の基準はまちまちになることがあり、客観的な判定がなされない場合もあった。しかしながら、このようなコンピュータによる処理により、塗装業者の恣意によらない客観的な判定が迅速に行えるようになり、更に、総合判定に基づいて診断領域に適切な塗装、補修を行うことができるので、一定の品質を維持した塗装作業が可能となる。   Conventionally, even an experienced painter may have different criteria for judgment depending on the painter, and sometimes an objective judgment is not made. However, this kind of computer processing makes it possible to quickly make objective judgments that do not depend on the allegation of the painter, and furthermore, appropriate painting and repair can be performed in the diagnostic area based on the overall judgment. This makes it possible to perform painting work while maintaining a certain quality.

実施形態1に係る屋外鋼構造物の塗膜形成方法のフローを示す図である。It is a figure which shows the flow of the coating-film formation method of the outdoor steel structure which concerns on Embodiment 1. FIG. 実施形態1に係る屋外鋼構造物の一例である貯蔵タンクを例示する図である。It is a figure which illustrates the storage tank which is an example of the outdoor steel structure concerning Embodiment 1. FIG.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

1 貯蔵タンク 1 Storage tank

Claims (5)

屋外鋼構造物の塗膜が設けられた領域を区分したものである複数の診断領域ごとに、塗膜及び塗膜下素地の状態を数値化する複数の調査手段を実施することにより塗膜及び塗膜下素地の状態を数値化したものである調査結果を取得する第1工程と、
塗膜及び塗膜下素地の劣化状態を判定する判定基準に前記調査結果が適合するか否かに基づいて、前記調査手段ごとの前記劣化状態を判定することを前記各診断領域について行う第2工程と、
前記診断領域ごとについて、前記調査手段ごとの劣化状態に所定の重み付け係数をそれぞれ乗じ、加算したものである総合点を算出し、当該総合点が所定の閾値を超えているか否かに基づいて、前記診断領域の塗膜及び塗膜下素地の劣化状態を表す総合判定を算出する第3工程と、
前記総合判定により補修を必要とする程度に劣化しているとされた前記診断領域に対して素地調整を行い、下塗り塗料を塗装し、前記診断領域又は屋外鋼構造物の塗膜が設けられた領域全体に上塗り塗料を塗装する第4工程とを備える
ことを特徴とする屋外鋼構造物の塗膜形成方法。
For each of a plurality of diagnosis areas, which are obtained by dividing the area where the coating film of the outdoor steel structure is provided, the coating film and the coating film by performing a plurality of investigation means for quantifying the state of the coating film and the substrate under the coating film A first step of obtaining a survey result obtained by quantifying the state of the substrate under the coating;
Secondly, the determination of the deterioration state for each of the investigation means is performed for each of the diagnostic areas based on whether or not the investigation result matches a determination criterion for determining the deterioration state of the coating film and the substrate under the coating film. Process,
For each diagnostic area, multiply the deterioration state for each of the investigation means by a predetermined weighting factor, calculate an overall point, and based on whether the overall point exceeds a predetermined threshold, A third step of calculating a comprehensive judgment representing the deterioration state of the coating film and the substrate under the coating in the diagnostic area;
The base area was adjusted for the diagnosis area that was judged to have deteriorated to the extent that repair was required by the comprehensive judgment, and a primer coating was applied, and a coating film for the diagnosis area or an outdoor steel structure was provided. A coating film forming method for an outdoor steel structure, comprising: a fourth step of applying a top coating to the entire region.
請求項1に記載する屋外鋼構造物の塗膜形成方法において、
前記複数の調査手段は、診断領域のうち劣化した面積の比率である劣化面積率の目視による測定、前記劣化面積率の画像処理による解析、塗膜下金属腐食診断装置による電気化学的測定、塗膜の化学分析、塗膜の膜厚測定、及び塗膜の付着性測定からなる群から選択される少なくとも2種以上である
ことを特徴とする屋外鋼構造物の塗膜形成方法。
In the coating method of the outdoor steel structure according to claim 1,
The plurality of investigation means include visual measurement of a deteriorated area rate, which is a ratio of a deteriorated area in a diagnostic region, analysis by image processing of the deteriorated area rate, electrochemical measurement by an undercoat metal corrosion diagnostic device, coating A method of forming a coating film on an outdoor steel structure, comprising at least two or more selected from the group consisting of chemical analysis of a film, measurement of a coating film thickness, and measurement of adhesion of a coating film.
請求項1又は請求項2に記載する屋外鋼構造物の塗膜形成方法において、
前記第4工程では、前記総合判定により補修を必要とする程度に劣化しているとされた前記診断領域に対して素地調整を行い、下塗り塗料を塗装した後、屋外鋼構造物の塗膜が設けられた領域全体に中塗り塗料を塗装し、上塗り塗料を塗装する
ことを特徴とする屋外鋼構造物の塗膜形成方法。
In the method of forming a coating film on an outdoor steel structure according to claim 1 or claim 2,
In the fourth step, the base area is adjusted for the diagnosis area which has been deteriorated to the extent that repair is required by the comprehensive determination, and after the undercoat paint is applied, the coating film of the outdoor steel structure is applied. A method for forming a coating film on an outdoor steel structure, characterized in that an intermediate coating is applied to the entire provided area and a top coating is applied.
請求項1〜請求項3の何れか一項に記載する屋外鋼構造物の塗膜形成方法において、
前記第4工程では、前記総合判定により補修を必要とする程度に劣化しているとされた前記診断領域に対して素地調整を行い、この素地調整を行った診断領域以外の診断領域を面あらしして、素地調整を行った部分に下塗り塗料を塗装した後、屋外鋼構造物の塗膜が設けられた領域全体に中塗り塗料を塗装し、上塗り塗料を塗装する
ことを特徴とする屋外鋼構造物の塗膜形成方法。
In the outdoor steel structure coating film forming method according to any one of claims 1 to 3,
In the fourth step, a base adjustment is performed on the diagnosis area that has been deteriorated to the extent that repair is required by the comprehensive determination, and a diagnosis area other than the diagnosis area on which the base adjustment has been performed is displayed. Then, after applying the undercoat paint to the part where the substrate has been adjusted, the outdoor paint is applied to the entire area where the coating film of the outdoor steel structure is provided, and then the overcoat paint is applied. A method for forming a coating film on a structure.
請求項1〜請求項4の何れか一項に記載する屋外鋼構造物の塗膜形成方法において、
前記屋外鋼構造物は、タンク、橋梁、送電鉄塔、船舶及び建設用鉄骨からなる群から選択される少なくとも1つである
ことを特徴とする屋外鋼構造物の塗膜形成方法。
In the outdoor steel structure coating film forming method according to any one of claims 1 to 4,
The outdoor steel structure is at least one selected from the group consisting of tanks, bridges, power transmission towers, ships, and construction steel frames.
JP2008226456A 2008-09-03 2008-09-03 Method for forming coating film on outdoor steel structure Active JP5077960B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2008226456A JP5077960B2 (en) 2008-09-03 2008-09-03 Method for forming coating film on outdoor steel structure

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2008226456A JP5077960B2 (en) 2008-09-03 2008-09-03 Method for forming coating film on outdoor steel structure

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2010058051A JP2010058051A (en) 2010-03-18
JP5077960B2 true JP5077960B2 (en) 2012-11-21

Family

ID=42185467

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2008226456A Active JP5077960B2 (en) 2008-09-03 2008-09-03 Method for forming coating film on outdoor steel structure

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP5077960B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2012072580A (en) * 2010-09-28 2012-04-12 Nippon Sharyo Seizo Kaisha Ltd Recoating method of steel bridge
JP5183726B2 (en) * 2010-12-15 2013-04-17 中国電力株式会社 Paint management system
JP6209645B2 (en) * 2016-01-08 2017-10-04 株式会社横河ブリッジ Steel repainting method
CN109477786A (en) * 2016-07-19 2019-03-15 艺康美国股份有限公司 Controlling Industrial Water Treatment with Digital Imaging
CN109477802A (en) 2016-07-19 2019-03-15 艺康美国股份有限公司 Controlling Industrial Water Treatment with Digital Imaging
JP2024176816A (en) * 2023-06-09 2024-12-19 東正 神田 Maintenance method and maintenance device
CN117772564B (en) * 2023-12-28 2024-08-06 微峰科技有限公司 Automobile paint surface local point repair interface solution and repair method thereof

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS62229056A (en) * 1986-03-31 1987-10-07 Nippon Steel Corp Quantitative diagnosis of deterioration degree of coating of painted metal and device therefor
JP4015928B2 (en) * 2002-11-19 2007-11-28 新日本製鐵株式会社 Method for improving paint adhesion of metal products

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2010058051A (en) 2010-03-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP5077960B2 (en) Method for forming coating film on outdoor steel structure
Razin et al. Detecting and estimating the extent of automotive coating delamination and damage indexes after stone chipping using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy
Yuan et al. Corrosion features and time-dependent corrosion model of Galfan coating of high strength steel wires
JP5206386B2 (en) Corrosion promotion test method and corrosion amount prediction method for organic coated steel for civil engineering
Pereira et al. Probabilistic analysis of the durability of architectural concrete surfaces
CN113553784A (en) Method for evaluating service life of organic coating in seawater full-immersion environment
Bigdeli et al. Risk assessment of the corrosion resistance performances for epoxy coatings under drilling environments using AHP method
JP5510352B2 (en) Pre-corrosion cross-section prediction method for heavy anti-corrosion coated steel materials, strength deterioration prediction method for heavy anti-corrosion coating structures, management method for heavy anti-corrosion coating structures
Bensalah et al. Assessment of automotive coatings used on different metallic substrates
Best et al. An industrial perspective on challenges in the lifetime prediction of organic coatings: a century retrospective review
JP7084344B2 (en) Corrosion rate estimation device, corrosion rate estimation method and program
Yong et al. Damage assessment of the corrosion-resistant performances for organic coating systems after accelerated tests using analytic hierarchy process
CN114018832B (en) A method for evaluating the protection level of steel surface coatings
Zhang et al. Probabilistic model of the pre-corrosion fatigue life of epoxy-coated aluminum alloys based on the single point-group model of the maximum likelihood method
Barbucci et al. Study of chromate-free pretreatments and primers for the protection of galvanised steel sheets
Hao et al. Research progress on protective performance evaluation and lifetime prediction of organic coatings
Tam et al. Development of bridge corrosion cost model for coating maintenance
JP2011227004A (en) Method for testing corrosion acceleration of double anticorrosive coating steel material
Argyropoulos et al. The role of standards in conservation methods for metals in cultural heritage
JP2017167598A (en) Steel road bridge painting plan diagnosis system, steel road bridge painting plan diagnosis program and steel road bridge painting plan diagnosis method
JP5550058B2 (en) Coating film diagnosis system
Tiong et al. The structural environment as a factor affecting coating failure in aircraft joints
JP5725588B2 (en) Coating film diagnosis system
CN118023211B (en) Non-destructive laser paint removal method, apparatus, equipment and medium for cold-rolled color-coated steel sheet substrates
Mrema et al. Galvanic corrosion study of aluminium alloy plates mounted to stainless and mild steel bolts by accelerated exposure test

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A625 Written request for application examination (by other person)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A625

Effective date: 20110830

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20120803

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20120822

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20120822

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20150907

Year of fee payment: 3

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 5077960

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150