JP5220823B2 - Module evaluation method and apparatus - Google Patents

Description

  The present invention relates to a module evaluation method and apparatus in a module method, which is one of construction methods for plants and the like.

  The module construction method refers to the construction and installation of plant construction, by transporting the prefabricated modules of constructions such as adjacent piping and equipment to the installation location in the plant as a unitary assembly. This is a method of installation.

  By using this module method, installation work is performed in a factory where the environment is better than on-site and the work cost is low, thereby reducing costs by reducing installation costs, etc. The construction period can be shortened.

  Depending on the arrangement of the construction, the module method has a high effect part, a low part, and a negative effect part depending on the application in the plant and the area that is a section in the plant. It is important to select Further, the design work required for the module construction method is an operation that is not performed when the module construction method is not adopted, and therefore, it is necessary to effectively perform the design work and reduce the additional cost.

  As a technique for determining the effectiveness of the modularization range of the plant, there is a method described in Patent Document 1. This is a method for determining the effectiveness of a module based on the assembly workability of components within the module range.

  As a technique for automatically performing general product assembly and disassembly processes, there is a method disclosed in Patent Document 2. This is a method of determining assembly and disassembly costs by robot simulation of product assembly and disassembly processes, and determining the quality of the assembly and disassembly processes based on the size.

Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 10-143236 JP 2002-355724 A

  The module construction method in the plant is not merely a replacement of assembly processes and procedures, but is characterized in that a module manufactured in a place different from the final installation position is transported to the installation position and installed.

  For this reason, considering the cost related to transportation, the reinforcement member during transportation, the temporary placement state, which is different from the final installation state, and the workability and economic impact on the area other than the module at the installation destination, It is necessary to conduct a comprehensive economic evaluation by modularization.

  However, in the conventional technology, the effectiveness of the comprehensive module construction method has not been determined in consideration of transportation costs, etc., and it has not been possible to automatically and promptly determine whether the module construction method has been adopted. .

  An object of the present invention is to realize a module evaluation method and apparatus capable of automatically and quickly determining the effectiveness of a comprehensive module construction method in consideration of transportation costs and the like.

  According to the present invention, construction layout data including construction placement planned data in a construction planned placement area, modular operation data, placement data during transportation to the module placement planned area, construction work According to the construction quantity data indicating the quantity data indicating the quantity, size, and weight of the construction, the basic unit reduction amount when modularizing the construction, and the transportation cost for transporting the modular construction to the planned layout area, Temporary expenses including the cost of reinforcing materials for transporting modularized construction to the planned placement area, local quantity reduction costs that reduce the quantity required to assemble construction in the planned placement area by modularization, and modules The cost required for the conversion and the reduction cost due to the modularization are calculated, and the modularization is evaluated based on the calculated cost.

  According to the present invention, it is possible to realize a module evaluation method and apparatus capable of automatically and promptly determining the effectiveness of a comprehensive module method in consideration of transportation costs and the like.

It is a schematic block diagram of the module determination apparatus to which the 1st Embodiment of this invention is applied. It is a figure which shows the data storage format of the construction arrangement | positioning data stored in the enforcement article layout data storage apparatus. It is a figure which shows an example of component shape library data. It is a figure which shows an example of a component library table. It is a figure which shows an example of 3D-CAD display based on construction arrangement data. It is a figure which shows an example of the data storage format of construction object construction data. It is a figure which shows the data storage format of construction transport arrangement data. It is a figure which shows the data storage format of construction amount data. It is a process flowchart of a module evaluation means. It is a figure which shows an example of a basic unit table. It is a figure which shows the data storage format of a transportation cost table. It is a figure which shows an example of the module evaluation result displayed on a display apparatus. It is a processing flow of module validity determination in the 2nd Embodiment of this invention. It is a figure which shows an example of the screen display used for the setting of a module frame. It is a processing flow of module validity determination in the 3rd Embodiment of this invention. It is a figure which shows an example of a user display and an operation screen.

  Embodiments of the present invention will be described below with reference to the accompanying drawings.

  FIG. 1 is a schematic configuration diagram of a module evaluation apparatus to which the first embodiment of the present invention is applied.

  In FIG. 1, the module evaluation apparatus includes construction layout data (planned placement data for a construction in a construction planned placement area, modularization work data for the construction, and the placement schedule for the modularized construction. Storage device 101 having arrangement data during transportation to an area), work amount data (material data indicating the quantity, size, and weight of the work) storage device 102, module evaluation means 103, and display device 104.

  The module evaluation means 103 includes a physical distribution data creation unit 103A, a module internal unit reduction effect determination unit 103B, a transportation cost effect determination unit 103C, a temporary cost effect determination unit 103D, and a density reduction effect determination unit 103E. A local quantity reduction effect determination unit 103F.

  The construction layout data storage device 101 stores construction layout data for storing construction shape and layout data, construction data for storing construction information for the construction, and layout information for transporting the construction modules. Store construction transport data.

  FIG. 2 is a diagram showing a data storage format of construction arrangement data stored in the enforcement article layout data storage device 101.

  In FIG. 2, each piece of construction arrangement data is stored in units of minimum components or shape elements of parts. In the construction part ID column, an identification ID of a construction unit in terms of a part unit or a management unit such as a system is stored. Since parts and systems may be composed of a plurality of construction element elements, the same data may be stored in the construction part ID. In this case, the identification number in the component is stored in the ID column in the component, and each construction element is identified by a combination of the construction component ID and the in-component ID.

  In the example shown in FIG. 2, for example, the part whose construction part ID is PFORM005 is composed of two element parts. If the part is composed of a single construction element, the in-part ID column can be blank.

  Next, in the part type column and the element type column, a management type as a construction part and a part type in element units are stored. In the plant and area column, the plant and area name, which is the final construction destination of the construction, is stored.

  Further, the module number column stores the module number of the installation destination when the work is set as a module built-in product. If the construction part is a temporary object, 1 is stored in the temporary column as flag data. In the shape type column, the shape type and dimension data of the construction are stored. And the arrangement column stores arrangement attribute data of the arrangement positions and dimensions of the construction parts.

  The data content stored in the arrangement column differs depending on the data in the shape type column. In addition, the data storage contents of the shape attribute data corresponding to the data value of the shape type data and the drawing shape of the component corresponding to the data value of the shape attribute data are defined as component shape library data. FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating an example of component shape library data.

  Further, the unit length or weight per unit area and volume value corresponding to the data value of each shape type data are stored in the component library table, and FIG. 4 shows an example of the component library table. FIG.

  These pieces of construction arrangement data shown in FIG. 2 are created by user input using an input device such as 3D-CAD. FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating an example of 3D-CAD display based on the construction arrangement data by 3D-CAD.

FIG. 6 is a diagram showing a data storage format of construction work construction data for storing construction information for constructions.
In FIG. 6, the construction ID column stores an ID value for identifying the construction work. In addition, in the target construction part ID1 and the target construction part ID2 column, a construction part ID or a module number that is a target of the construction work is stored. In the case of the module number, all parts incorporated in the module are targeted.

  The type column stores the type of construction work. And the work place name which performs construction work is stored in the construction place column. The construction work data shown in FIG. 6 is created by user input using 3D-CAD or 2D-CAD projected and displayed on two dimensions based on the construction placement data.

Next, FIG. 7 is a diagram showing a data storage format of construction transport arrangement data for storing arrangement state information at the time of transporting or carrying in the construction.
In FIG. 7, an identification ID of a construction component is stored in the construction component ID, and arrangement attribute data of the construction component at the time of transportation or loading is stored in the arrangement column. The storage format of the arrangement attribute data conforms to the arrangement column data of the construction arrangement data.
This construction arrangement data during transportation is created by user input using 3D-CAD.

  In FIG. 1, a construction material quantity data storage device 102 stores construction material quantity data having physical quantity information such as the quantity, volume, weight, work amount, and the like of the construction material. FIG. 8 is a diagram showing a data storage format of the work amount data.

  In FIG. 8, the construction part ID or construction construction ID is stored in the construction quantity ID column. The type column stores a part type or a construction type. The area column stores the name of the area where the work is installed. In addition, the module number column stores the module number to be incorporated when the work is a module built-in article.

  In the construction place column, the construction place name of the construction is stored. When the construction part is a temporary object, 1 is stored in the temporary column as flag data. In the area, weight, and volume column, the flat area or length, weight, and volume values of the construction are stored.

  The construction object quantity data shown in FIG. 8 can store not only the data for each part of each construction object but also the type or module number of the construction object and the average or total value of the quantity for each construction place. In this case, the average value or the total value is stored in the diameter, length, weight, and volume columns, and the identifier indicating the average value and the total value and the number of data are stored in the construction object quantity ID column.

  In FIG. 1, the module evaluation unit 103 determines the validity of a module with respect to the module having the module number designated by the user, and outputs the result. The processing flow of the module evaluation unit 103 is shown in FIG.

  In step 901 in FIG. 9, construction quantity data is created from construction layout data. In this step 901, the data of the construction quantity ID column, the type column, the module number column, the construction place column, and the temporary column are inputted from the construction arrangement data and the construction construction data. For each piece of construction placement data, the unit weight and volume of the corresponding shape type are searched from the part library table, and this is multiplied by the unit length or area obtained from the shape type of the construction placement data. Then, the weight and volume are obtained and input to the work amount data.

  Next, evaluation and determination are performed for each effect item by modularization using the amount data of the construction material.

  First, the effect of reducing the basic unit in the module is determined by performing the construction work of the construction work in the module at a factory having a higher work efficiency than the site (step 902).

The site installation per unit of u _y, module installation thereof, when the prefabricated factory installed intensity and u _p, intensity reducing effect by modularity in construction material unit is a u _y -u _p, effects man-hour , this was multiplied by the amount q of construction _products, and _{(u y -u p) * q} .

  The effect per module is a value of the following formula (1) obtained by summing up the module-installed work other than the temporary structure and the work in the module.

_{Σ (u y -u p) *} q --- (1)
However, in the above formula (1), Σ means the sum in the module.

  An example of the value of the work basic unit at the site (installation site) and each prefab factory for each module type is stored in the basic unit table shown in FIG. In FIG. 10, the section name of data is stored in the construction item quantity type column, and the target construction part or work and the classification condition are stored in the target part, work type column, and condition column. Then, the unit of quantity is stored in the unit column, and the unit of work at the site and each prefab factory is stored in the local and prefab factories A to N. The stored value of this table can be edited by the user.

  The above formula for calculating the basic unit reduction effect obtains the physical quantity information of the construction in the module from the construction quantity data, and from this the basic unit reduction value of each construction is obtained from the basic unit table. Obtained based on the construction location, multiplied by these, and then added up for the components in the module.

Next, in step 903 of FIG. 9, the module transportation cost effect is determined.
For this, first, the outer size of the module is determined. The external size of the module is obtained from the difference between the maximum and minimum coordinate values in the X, Y, and Z directions during transportation of the parts incorporated in the module. This is based on the shape type data for all construction parts corresponding to the target module number in the construction placement data and construction transport placement data, in the X, Y, and Z directions of each construction part. Find the maximum and minimum coordinate values. Then, based on the obtained maximum and minimum coordinate values in the X, Y, and Z directions, the maximum and minimum values of X, Y, and Z of all construction parts in the module are obtained.

  In order to reflect the arrangement state at the time of transportation, when the data of the same construction part ID is stored in the construction placement data and the construction transportation placement data, the placement data of the construction placement data is used.

Next, the transportation cost is determined based on the module outer size. For this purpose, a transportation cost table storing transportation costs corresponding to the module size is used. FIG. 11 is a diagram showing a data storage format of the transportation cost table.
In FIG. 11, the X and Y length columns and the Z length column store the X and Y direction lengths of the outer shape and the maximum size in the Z direction. The fixed transportation cost column and the radix ratio transportation cost column store a fixed cost necessary for transportation and a cost distributed according to the radix. The transportation cost table shown in FIG. 11 is sorted in ascending order of fixed transportation cost and radix ratio transportation cost.

  With respect to the module transport size obtained above, the first data whose module outer size is within the transport maximum size is determined from the transport cost table shown in FIG. Regarding the X and Y lengths, the values of X and Y can be interchanged. When the module occupancy is β with respect to the transportation cost data of the determination result, the module transportation cost is calculated by the following equation (2).

Fixed transportation cost + β * Radix cost Transportation cost ---- (2)
In the above formula (2), the module occupancy ratio β is the ratio of the area of the X and Y lengths of the module to the area calculated from the X and Y lengths of the module transportation cost, or the value in the longitudinal direction of X and Y Is obtained from the ratio of the module dimensions to

  Further, the module transportation cost effect is obtained by subtracting the transportation cost when not modularized from the module transportation cost. The transportation cost when not modularized is calculated in the same way as above based on the size in the X, Y, Z direction for the data of the equipment type is equipment that can not be transported flatly in the work placement data. To do.

Next, in step 904 of FIG. 9, the module temporary cost effect is determined.
The quantity of temporary parts in the target module is obtained from the construction quantity data shown in FIG. Furthermore, the basic unit table shown in FIG. 10 stores the basic unit that is the sum of the installation cost of the temporary object and the material cost, with the condition column as temporary. The amount of temporary objects in the module is multiplied by the value of the temporary structure installation cost in the basic unit table to obtain the temporary cost.

  Next, in step 906 of FIG. 9, the module application reduces the density by reducing the density outside the module (the area other than the part where the module is to be installed in the area where the work is to be placed) and improving the installation workability. Determine the effect. Assuming that there are N modules in the area, the density reduction effect of the module k therein is obtained by the following equation (3).

In the above formula (3), the area, the module i each outer volume, construction product volume sum of the internal, internal steps sum, and _{V A, v A, W A} , V i, v i, W i.

  The sum of the volume of the work in the area and the module is obtained by summing the volume of the work in the target area and the module from the work volume data. Man-hour sum uses construction quantity data, and for each construction in the target area and module, multiplies the quantity, area, and weight quantity values by the corresponding quantity type and work place values in the basic unit table. Obtained by accumulating.

  Next, in step 907 of FIG. 9, by applying the module, the local quantity is reduced and various indirect costs are reduced, thereby determining the local quantity reduction effect.

Indirect costs are reduced by reducing temporary work, supervisors, workers' offices, dormitories, construction materials, etc., by reducing local work by applying modules. The reduction effect is approximated by a linear equation k * W _M using local terms man with drilling in the module construction thereof. W _M is the local conversion installation man-hours in the module, relative to the amount in the module construction thereof quantity data, from the intensity table, the corresponding construction material quantity type is calculated by multiplying by multiplying the local intensity . k is calculated by calculating the contribution of each parameter based on the approximate expression created by using the construction period, local man-hours, local quantity, and peak personnel as parameters, and further approximating that each parameter is proportional to the local man-hours. This value is obtained by the above, and allows the user to input the value.

  The module evaluation means 103 shown in FIG. 1 adds the module evaluation result of each item obtained in steps 902 to 907 in FIG. 9 to the basic unit reduction effect, density reduction effect, and local quantity reduction effect, plus the transportation cost. The effect and temporary cost effect are calculated as negative effects and displayed numerically, and the user can objectively evaluate the effectiveness of the module.

  Furthermore, by displaying the numerical value for each item individually, it becomes easy for the user to determine the advantages of each module and the points that need improvement. FIG. 12 is a diagram illustrating an example of a module evaluation result displayed on the display device 104. In FIG. 12, the merit by the module and the cost required for the module are displayed, and the value of the module effect value is displayed.

  In the example shown in FIG. 12, the module merit includes an effect of reducing the amount of local objects, an effect of reducing the density (an effect of expanding the area in other locations by modularization), and an effect of reducing the basic unit. The costs for modularization include temporary costs and transportation costs. The module effect value is calculated by subtracting the cost required for modularization from the module merit.

  As shown in FIG. 12, if the module effect value is displayed on the display device 104, the effectiveness of the overall module construction method can be determined in consideration of transportation costs and the like. it can.

  As described above, according to the first embodiment of the present invention, the modularization is evaluated by calculating the transportation cost and temporary cost related to the transportation of the module and comparing the benefits with the modularization. Therefore, it is possible to realize a module evaluation method and apparatus capable of automatically and quickly determining the effectiveness of the comprehensive module construction method in consideration of transportation costs and the like.

  The module determination apparatus shown in FIG. 1 can be realized by a personal computer, and is not shown in FIG. 1, but includes a data input device (keyboard, mouse, etc.).

Next, a second embodiment of the present invention will be described.
In the second embodiment of the present invention, when there is no module definition information in the construction layout data, the validity of the designated virtual module range is determined, or the effective module range is automatically determined. That is possible.

  The schematic configuration of the module evaluation apparatus according to the second embodiment is the same as that of the first embodiment shown in FIG.

FIG. 13 is a processing flow of module validity determination in the second exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
First, in step 1201 of FIG. 13, a module frame range is set.
Here, the module frame is a virtual rectangular parallelepiped surrounding the construction, which is input by the user or set by the system, and is defined by six numerical values of the minimum and maximum coordinate values in the X, Y and Z directions. It is what is done.

  The construction parts in the module frame are determined from the construction arrangement data. Of each piece of construction placement data, the construction type parts in the module frame are determined from the shape type and the placement position data, and the module numbers are set as those built-in products in the module. At this time, if module construction parts exist across the module frame, or if the component type is other than piping, the module frame is expanded to the smallest rectangular parallelepiped containing the relevant part, or the largest part that excludes the relevant part The module frame adjustment screen is displayed using a rectangular parallelepiped as an option.

  When the component type is piping, a welding point is generated at the intersection of the module frame and the piping component and added to the construction work data.

  Note that the processing in steps 1202 to 1204, 1206, and 1207 in FIG. 13 is the same as the processing contents in steps 901 to 903, 906, and 907 shown in FIG. Is omitted.

  In the determination of the temporary cost effect in step 1205 of FIG. 13, when setting the module range by the module frame, since the detailed design of the module is not performed at the present time, the temporary structure information is input to the construction arrangement data. However, it is necessary to make a judgment by estimating the effect of temporary costs.

  In order to maintain strength during transportation and carry-in, it is necessary to fix the structural parts in the module with steel frames such as a gantry, structure and support. For this reason, the amount of additional members required is small in the range covered by the steel frame and structure, which are the basic framework of the module, and on the contrary, the amount of additional members increases in the range without the framework.

A plane diagram viewed modules from the top, frame, construction material parts within the installation range of the steel members of the structure, etc., construction material parts with the local conversion installation steps W _F, the installation range of the steel member Assuming that the local conversion installation man-hour is W ₀ , the effect of the module temporary construction cost can be calculated by the following formula (4).

_{k 1 * W F + k 2} * W 0 --- (4)
However, in the above equation (4), k ₁ and k ₂ are values that can be pre-registered or specified by the user, and k ₂ > k ₁ .

  FIG. 14 is a diagram illustrating an example of a screen display used for setting a module frame. The outer frame 105 is the range of the module, and the hatched portion 106 is the installation range of the frame material. The work on the frame material is determined by comparing the X and Y coordinates of the structure, the frame product, and the work based on the shape type and the arrangement data of the work arrangement data. When the construction object straddles the boundary of the frame material, it is determined as being on the frame material.

  The number of man-hours in the module is calculated from the construction object quantity data and the data of the basic unit table for the construction parts in the module on the frame material determined in this way or other than that, and the above formula (4 ).

  As described above, by performing the processing of steps 1201 to 1207 shown in FIG. 13, in the case where there is no module definition information, a virtual module range is set, and the effect of the temporary cost is estimated. The effect can be determined, and a suitable module range can be selected at the initial design stage.

  Furthermore, as a third embodiment of the present invention, there is an example in which a suitable modularization range is automatically selected or easily selected and supported. This is because the module reduces the increase in size that leads to an increase in transportation costs, and improves the work efficiency by performing necessary work such as on-site equipment assembly at equipment manufacturing factories, etc. The fact that increasing and suppressing the temporary cost is a requirement for enhancing the module effect is utilized.

  The schematic configuration of the module evaluation apparatus according to the third embodiment is the same as that of the first embodiment shown in FIG.

  FIG. 15 is a processing flow of module validity determination in the third exemplary embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 16 is a diagram illustrating an example of a user display and an operation screen.

  In FIG. 15, first, in the height direction, the target area is divided for each upper limit size of module transportation, and then divided frames are created in a grid pattern at regular intervals in the horizontal plane (step 1501, FIG. 16). A finer interval between horizontal planes can be evaluated with higher accuracy, but the user can set a value.

  Next, in step 1502, the man-hour density in each division frame is determined. This is done by judging all the constructions present in the frame from the coordinate values of each construction in the construction placement data, and calculating the work values of the parts obtained from the construction work data and basic unit data in the frame. Add as the engineering value. At this time, when the construction works spans a plurality of frames, the distribution is performed to each frame according to the ratio of the volume overlapping each frame.

  Next, in step 1503, the position of a steel material (steel material of the construction itself) that can be used as a reinforcing material during transportation is determined. In step 1503, as in step 1205 of FIG. 13 described above, the coordinates of the steel material in the X and Y horizontal planes are determined from the work arrangement data. In order to easily obtain the modularization range, it is effective to select a steel material installation range having a high man-hour density and a small amount of temporary material. Therefore, the process proceeds from step 1503 to step 1505 to display module effectiveness distribution.

  This is performed by performing color-coded display in accordance with the man-hour density for each grid-like area in the area, and further displaying the steel material position superimposed thereon. Thereby, the user can easily select an effective module range in which the man-hour density is high and the steel material exists.

  Furthermore, since the transport size is reduced by limiting the module transport size to the upper limit size of the cheaper transport method, the transport upper limit size in the horizontal plane of the module is displayed on top of this, and the user moves By making the module range selectable, more effective module selection is facilitated.

  Furthermore, by adding the processing of step 1504 between step 1503 and step 1505, the effective range of the module can be selected more easily.

In step 1504, the effectiveness of man-hour density and temporary cost is determined.
That is, if the volume of each frame is V, the man-hour density for each frame obtained in step 1502 is ρ _M , and the ratio of the steel material in the horizontal plane of each frame is α, the module for each frame The effectiveness is expressed by the following equation (5).

_{k w ρ M V-k W} ρ M V (k 1 α + k 2 (1-α)) --- (5)
In the above equation (5), k _w is a coefficient based on the ratio between the effect of taking the man-hour to the module and the temporary cost effect, and can be set by the user. Using the above equation (5), the module effectiveness value is calculated for each frame, the numerical values are displayed in shades as in the display screen shown in FIG. 16, and the total value within the frame specified by the user is displayed. This makes it possible to select the module effective range directly.

  Furthermore, in addition to step 1504, the module effective range can be automatically selected by scanning and determining the effective range of the module in step 1506. For the distribution data of the module validity value in the horizontal plane obtained in step 1505, the rectangular shape corresponding to the module transportation restriction size frame in the horizontal plane is converted into a lower limit value of X and Y in the area horizontal plane. To the upper limit value in order. Then, the module validity values of the overlapping frames in the overlapping range are added to obtain a module validity value.

  After calculating the module effectiveness values at all positions, the modularization range candidates can be automatically selected by displaying them on the screen as modularization candidate ranges in descending order of effect value.

  It is also possible to automatically select candidates for the modularized range, display the ones with high effect values in order, and display the effect values, and then the operator can select the modularized range to be actually adopted.

  Also in the second and third embodiments of the present invention described above, the same effects as in the first embodiment can be obtained.

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 101 Construction object layout data storage apparatus 102 Construction object quantity data storage apparatus 103 Module evaluation means 103A Physical distribution data creation part 103B Module present unit reduction effect judgment part 103C Transportation cost effect judgment part 103D Temporary cost effect judgment part 103E Density reduction effect judgment part 103F Local quantity reduction effect judgment part 104 Display device

Claims (8)

The storage means stores the planned arrangement data having the coordinate values in the planned arrangement area of the modularized construction, and the construction quantity data indicating the quantity data indicating the size of the construction ,
A module evaluation unit, which is a computer, creates a division frame in which the planned placement area of the construction indicated by the planned placement data stored in the storage means is divided at regular intervals, and each of the constructions indicated by the planned placement data Calculate the man-hour density of the parts placed in the divided frame created from the coordinate values, and set the module effectiveness value in each divided frame,
The module evaluation means causes the display means to display a module effectiveness distribution display in which each of the divided frames is displayed in shades or colors according to the effectiveness values for the planned arrangement area of the construction object. Evaluation method. The module evaluation method according to claim 1,
The division frame is created by dividing the planned arrangement area of the modularized construction work in the height direction by the upper limit size and dividing the horizontal division at regular intervals by the module evaluation means. A module evaluation method characterized in that In the module evaluation method of Claim 2,
The module evaluation means calculates a temporary cost including a cost of a reinforcing material for reinforcing the modularized construction, a volume of each divided frame, a man-hour density of each divided frame, and each divided The module effectiveness value is calculated using the ratio of the reinforcement coverage in the horizontal plane of the frame and the ratio of the man-hour effect of the modularized construction and the hypothetical cost effect. Feature module evaluation method. In the module evaluation method according to claim 3,
By the module evaluation means, module evaluation method characterized by causing display the module efficacy value calculated above on the display means. Storage means for storing arrangement plan data having coordinate values in the arrangement plan area of the modularized construction and construction quantity data indicating quantity data indicating the size of the construction;
The steps the density of components in which the planned placement region of the construction material indicated stored planned placement data in the storage means is disposed in the divided split frames at regular intervals calculated from the coordinate position of each construction product, each Module evaluation means, which is a computer for calculating the module validity value in the divided frame;
Display means for displaying a module effectiveness distribution display indicating each of the divided frames according to the effectiveness value in the shade or color according to the planned arrangement area of the construction,
A module evaluation apparatus comprising: In the module evaluation apparatus according to claim 5,
The module evaluation means is
Dividing the planned arrangement area of the modularized construction into the upper limit size of the module in the height direction and dividing the module in the horizontal direction at regular intervals to create the division frame. Module evaluation device. In the module evaluation apparatus according to claim 6,
The module evaluation means calculates a temporary cost including a cost of a reinforcing material for reinforcing the modularized construction, a volume of each divided frame, a man-hour density of each divided frame, and each divided The module effectiveness value is calculated using the ratio of the reinforcement coverage in the horizontal plane of the frame and the ratio of the man-hour effect of the modularized construction and the hypothetical cost effect. A module evaluation device. In the module evaluation apparatus according to claim 7,
The module evaluation unit displays the calculated module validity value on the display unit.

Images