Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP5455813B2 - Method for evaluating reduced powder properties of sintered ore - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP5455813B2 - Method for evaluating reduced powder properties of sintered ore - Google Patents

Method for evaluating reduced powder properties of sintered ore Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP5455813B2
JP5455813B2 JP2010143429A JP2010143429A JP5455813B2 JP 5455813 B2 JP5455813 B2 JP 5455813B2 JP 2010143429 A JP2010143429 A JP 2010143429A JP 2010143429 A JP2010143429 A JP 2010143429A JP 5455813 B2 JP5455813 B2 JP 5455813B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
reduction
blast furnace
sintered ore
temperature
test
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2010143429A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2012007204A (en
Inventor
圭佑 吉田
晃一 主代
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
JFE Steel Corp
Kobe Steel Ltd
Nippon Steel Corp
Nippon Steel Nisshin Co Ltd
Original Assignee
JFE Steel Corp
Kobe Steel Ltd
Nippon Steel and Sumitomo Metal Corp
Nisshin Steel Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by JFE Steel Corp, Kobe Steel Ltd, Nippon Steel and Sumitomo Metal Corp, Nisshin Steel Co Ltd filed Critical JFE Steel Corp
Priority to JP2010143429A priority Critical patent/JP5455813B2/en
Publication of JP2012007204A publication Critical patent/JP2012007204A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP5455813B2 publication Critical patent/JP5455813B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Manufacture And Refinement Of Metals (AREA)

Description

本発明は、焼結鉱の還元粉化性状の評価方法に関し、具体的には、高炉に装入した焼結鉱が高炉内を降下していく際の還元条件の変化による還元粉化性状の経時変化を精度良く評価する方法に関するものであり、特に、羽口から水素吹込みを行うなど、高炉操業条件を変更したときの焼結鉱の還元粉化性状の変化を精度よく評価することができる還元粉化性状の評価方法に関するものである。   The present invention relates to a method for evaluating reduced powdering properties of sintered ore, and more specifically, reduced powdering properties due to changes in reducing conditions when the sintered ore charged in the blast furnace descends in the blast furnace. It relates to a method for accurately evaluating changes over time, and in particular, to accurately evaluate changes in the reduced powdering properties of sintered ore when changing the blast furnace operating conditions, such as hydrogen injection from the tuyere. The present invention relates to a method for evaluating reduced powdering properties.

高炉に装入された焼結鉱は、還元される初期の低温段階で、焼結鉱中のヘマタイトが還元されてマグネタイトが生成する際に生ずる体積膨張によって粉化を起こすことが知られている。この粉化現象は、高炉内の通風を著しく阻害し、荷下がりの不調や棚吊りを引き起こすため、高炉の操業を安定して行う上で、高炉に装入された焼結鉱の還元粉化性状、特に還元粉化率や還元率の経時変化を正確に把握しておくことは極めて重要である。   It is known that the sinter charged in the blast furnace is pulverized by the volume expansion that occurs when the hematite in the sinter is reduced and magnetite is produced at the initial low temperature stage of reduction. . This pulverization phenomenon significantly hinders ventilation in the blast furnace, causing unloading failure and shelves. Therefore, the stable operation of the blast furnace can reduce the pulverization of the sintered ore charged in the blast furnace. It is extremely important to accurately grasp the properties, particularly the reduction powder rate and the change with time of the reduction rate.

ところで、焼結鉱の還元粉化性状を評価する方法としては、JIS M8720に規定された「鉄鉱石−低温還元粉化試験方法」が知られている。この評価方法は、10〜15mmの大きさに調整した鉄鉱石を550℃の温度に昇温し、CO:30vol%、N:70vol%の混合ガスで等温還元して冷却後、室温で回転ドラムを用いて転動させた後、篩い分けして3mm以下の割合(%)を求めることで、高炉の低温還元帯を模した条件での粉化の度合い(還元粉化率:RDI)を評価するものである。 By the way, as a method for evaluating the reduced powdering property of sintered ore, an “iron ore-low temperature reduced powdering test method” defined in JIS M8720 is known. In this evaluation method, iron ore adjusted to a size of 10 to 15 mm is heated to a temperature of 550 ° C., isotherm reduced with a mixed gas of CO: 30 vol% and N 2 : 70 vol%, cooled, and then rotated at room temperature. After rolling using a drum, sieving and obtaining a ratio (%) of 3 mm or less, the degree of pulverization (reduction pulverization rate: RDI) under conditions simulating a low temperature reduction zone of a blast furnace It is something to evaluate.

しかし、このJIS M8720に規定された方法は、550℃の一定温度でかつ一定の成分組成の混合ガスを用いて還元試験を行っているため、実操業時の高炉内、特に550℃以上の高温における焼結鉱の還元粉化性状を正しく評価できていないという問題がある。   However, since the method defined in JIS M8720 performs a reduction test using a mixed gas having a constant temperature of 550 ° C. and a constant component composition, it is used in a blast furnace during actual operation, particularly at a high temperature of 550 ° C. or higher. There is a problem that the reduced powdering properties of sintered ore cannot be evaluated correctly.

そこで、実操業時における高炉内の条件を考慮した焼結鉱の還元粉化性状の評価方法が幾つか提案されている。
たとえば、特許文献1には、高炉に供給される原料焼結鉱の還元粉化性の評価方法において、予め一定値に定められた焼結鉱の定還元時間および定還元ポテンシャルのそれぞれに対して、実操業条件に応じた補正を行い、具体的には、定還元時間については、高炉内装入物およびガスに関する気体・固体間の熱移動を評価する「熱移動モデル」を設定し、実操業条件を用いて高炉内温度分布を推定し、原料焼結鉱が炉内の500〜600℃の温度領域を通過するのに要する焼結鉱滞留時間を算出し、この結果に応じて上記定還元時間を補正して標準還元時間を算出し、また、定還元ポテンシャルについては、実操業時の高炉シャフト部における「総括物質収支モデル」を設定し、実操業条件を用いてシャフトガス組成およびシャフトガス流量を推定して、シャフト内還元ポテンシャルを算出し、この結果に応じて上記定還元ポテンシャルを補正して標準還元ポテンシャルを算出し、その後、上記適正に補正された標準還元時間および標準還元ポテンシャルの条件下で還元試験を行い、焼結鉱の還元粉化性状を評価する試験方法が開示されている。
In view of this, several methods have been proposed for evaluating the reduced powdering properties of sintered ore in consideration of the conditions in the blast furnace during actual operation.
For example, in Patent Document 1, in the method for evaluating the reduction powdering property of raw material sintered ore supplied to a blast furnace, each of the constant reduction time and constant reduction potential of the sintered ore set to a predetermined value in advance is described. For the constant reduction time, a `` heat transfer model '' is set to evaluate the heat transfer between gas and solids in the blast furnace interior and gas. The temperature distribution in the blast furnace is estimated using the conditions, and the sinter retention time required for the raw material sintered ore to pass through the temperature range of 500 to 600 ° C. in the furnace is calculated. The standard reduction time is calculated by correcting the time, and for the constant reduction potential, a “general material balance model” for the blast furnace shaft during actual operation is set, and the shaft gas composition and shaft gas are calculated using the actual operation conditions. Flow rate Estimate and calculate the reduction potential in the shaft, correct the constant reduction potential according to this result, calculate the standard reduction potential, and then calculate the conditions for the properly corrected standard reduction time and standard reduction potential. A test method is disclosed in which a reduction test is performed to evaluate reduced powdering properties of sintered ore.

また、高炉シャフト部を模擬した試験炉を用いて、高炉内における焼結鉱の高温性状や軟化溶融挙動を調べることが行われている。例えば、非特許文献1には、高炉内条件近似を基本とする荷重還元試験法において、試験結果に及ぼす荷重、ガス流量、試料粒度および充填層高の影響およびそれらの適正組み合わせについて、総合的に検討した結果が報告されている。具体的には、ガス混合・供給装置により所定の組成および流量に制御されたN−CO−COの混合ガスを、ガス予熱炉を経てタンマン炉内に導入し、タンマン炉内の黒鉛ルツボに充填された試料を所定の荷重および温度条件(1100℃、1300℃、1400℃)の下で還元することで、高炉装入物の高温性状を測定することが記載されている。 In addition, high temperature properties and softening and melting behavior of sintered ore in a blast furnace are examined using a test furnace that simulates a blast furnace shaft portion. For example, in Non-Patent Document 1, in the load reduction test method based on approximate blast furnace conditions, the effects of load, gas flow rate, sample particle size and packed bed height on the test results and their appropriate combinations are comprehensively described. The results of the study are reported. Specifically, a mixed gas of N 2 —CO—CO 2 controlled to a predetermined composition and flow rate by a gas mixing / supplying device is introduced into a Tamman furnace through a gas preheating furnace, and a graphite crucible in the Tamman furnace is introduced. It describes that the high temperature property of the blast furnace charge is measured by reducing the sample filled in the sample under a predetermined load and temperature condition (1100 ° C., 1300 ° C., 1400 ° C.).

また、非特許文献2には、高炉近似条件下における焼結鉱の還元挙動を調べるために、高炉の炉高方向に沿って還元、軟化、溶融などの反応を総合的にシミュレートできる実験装置(高炉内反応シミュレーター(BIS))を開発し、その実験装置を用いて高炉内条件を模擬した焼結鉱の還元挙動を調査した事例が報告されている。   Also, Non-Patent Document 2 describes an experimental apparatus that can comprehensively simulate reactions such as reduction, softening, and melting along the blast furnace height direction in order to investigate the reduction behavior of sintered ore under blast furnace approximate conditions. (Blast furnace reaction simulator (BIS)) has been developed, and an example of investigating the reduction behavior of sintered ore simulating the conditions in the blast furnace using the experimental equipment has been reported.

上記BISは、上部炉と下部炉より構成されており、上部炉は、高炉の塊状帯をシミュレートしており、ステンレス製の反応管とこれに沿って上下可動でかつ4ゾーンに分割され、ゾーン毎に独立に温度制御が可能な電気炉からなり、また、下部炉は、塊状帯下端から融着、滴下帯までの荷重軟化試験装置に相当する炉であり、黒鉛製試料るつぼと電気炉、荷重装置および滴下物探取装置からなる。
このBISでは、反応管内に試料として焼結鉱とコークスを充填した後、Nガスを流しながら電気炉に高炉の塊状帯に相当する温度分布を与え、その後、還元ガスに切り替えるとともに電気炉を一定速度で降下させることで、上記下部炉の試料に炉頂部からの塊状帯下端までの還元履歴を付与し、さらにその後、下部炉に設定した任意の昇温速度で軟化・溶融・滴下までの試験を進めることで、高炉の炉頂から溶融滴下までの炉内反応をシミュレートすることができるようになっている。
The BIS is composed of an upper furnace and a lower furnace, and the upper furnace simulates a blast furnace block, which is vertically movable along a stainless steel reaction tube and divided into four zones. It consists of an electric furnace capable of temperature control independently for each zone, and the lower furnace is a furnace corresponding to a load softening test device from the lower end of the massive band to the fusion and dripping zone. A graphite sample crucible and an electric furnace , Consisting of a load device and a drop finder.
In this BIS, after charging sintered ore and coke as a sample in a reaction tube, a temperature distribution corresponding to the blast furnace lumps is given to the electric furnace while flowing N 2 gas. By lowering at a constant rate, the lower furnace sample is given a reduction history from the top of the furnace to the bottom of the massive band, and then softening, melting, and dripping at any heating rate set in the lower furnace. By proceeding with the test, it is possible to simulate the in-furnace reaction from the top of the blast furnace to the molten dripping.

そして、非特許文献2には、上記BISを用いて、N:55vol%、CO:41vol%、H:4vol%の混合ガスを装置内に導入して、炉頂から1000℃まで急速に昇温し、1000℃において比較的長い熱保存帯を有する分布と、600℃の低温熱保存帯と、1000℃の高温熱保存帯の2段の熱保存帯を有する分布の2種類の温度分布において、塊状帯の還元挙動、還元粉化挙動および気孔構造変化を調査したことが報告されている。 In Non-Patent Document 2, a mixed gas of N 2 : 55 vol%, CO: 41 vol%, H 2 : 4 vol% is introduced into the apparatus using the BIS, and rapidly from the furnace top to 1000 ° C. Two types of temperature distribution: a distribution having a relatively long heat storage zone at 1000 ° C., a distribution having a low temperature heat storage zone of 600 ° C., and a distribution having two stages of heat storage zones of 1000 ° C. Reported that the reduction behavior, reduced powdering behavior and pore structure change of the massive band were investigated.

特開平11−61284号公報JP-A-11-61284

山岡洋次郎・堀田裕久・梶川脩二,「高炉装入物の高温性状測定法」,鉄と鋼,日本鉄鋼協会,第66年(1980),p.1850−1859Yojiro Yamaoka, Hirohisa Horita, Shinji Kajikawa, “Method of measuring high temperature properties of blast furnace charge”, Iron and Steel, Japan Iron and Steel Institute, 66th (1980), p. 1850-1859 岡本晃・内藤誠章・斧勝也・林洋一・井上義弘,「高炉内近似条件下における焼結鉱の還元挙動」,鉄と鋼,日本鉄鋼協会,第72年(1986),p.1529−1536Okamoto, Satoshi Naito, Katsuya Ax, Yoichi Hayashi, Yoshihiro Inoue, "Reduction behavior of sintered ore under approximate conditions in blast furnace", Iron and Steel, Japan Iron and Steel Institute, 72nd (1986), p. 1529-1536

上述した特許文献1の評価方法は、高炉内の条件を考慮して焼結鉱の還元粉化性状を評価してはいるものの、一定組成のN−CO−CO−H混合ガスを用いて550℃の温度でのみ還元試験を行っている。しかしながら、還元温度やガス組成を一定に固定すると、550℃以上の温度における還元粉化性状の変化やガス組成が変動した場合における還元粉化性状の変化、すなわち、高炉に装入された焼結鉱が高炉内を降下していく過程で、炉内の温度や炉内の還元雰囲気の変化によって還元率や還元粉化率がどのように変化していくかを十分に把握することができない。 Although the evaluation method of Patent Document 1 described above evaluates the reduced powder properties of sintered ore in consideration of the conditions in the blast furnace, the N 2 —CO—CO 2 —H 2 mixed gas having a constant composition is used. The reduction test is conducted only at a temperature of 550 ° C. However, when the reduction temperature and gas composition are fixed, the reduction powder property changes at a temperature of 550 ° C. or higher, or the reduction powder property change when the gas composition fluctuates, that is, the sintering charged in the blast furnace. In the process of ore descending in the blast furnace, it is not possible to fully grasp how the reduction rate and reduction powdering rate change due to changes in the temperature in the furnace and the reducing atmosphere in the furnace.

また、非特許文献1の評価方法は、550℃以外の温度で還元試験を行っているものの、1000℃以上の高温であり、しかも、一定の温度、一定のガス組成でのみ還元試験を行っているため、やはり、高炉に装入された焼結鉱が高炉内を降下していく過程での還元条件の変化を反映した評価方法とはなっていない。   Further, although the evaluation method of Non-Patent Document 1 performs a reduction test at a temperature other than 550 ° C., the reduction test is performed at a high temperature of 1000 ° C. or higher and only at a constant temperature and a constant gas composition. Therefore, it is still not an evaluation method reflecting the change of the reduction conditions in the process of the sintered ore charged in the blast furnace descending the blast furnace.

また、非特許文献2の評価方法は、高炉内の状況を模擬した条件で試験を行ってはいるものの、やはり還元ガスの組成が一定であるため、例えば、水素吹込みを行う等の高炉操業条件の変更時における焼結鉱の還元粉化性状の変化を十分に評価できるものにはなっていない。
したがって、従来の焼結鉱の還元粉化性状の評価方法では、高炉内で起こる還元粉化性状の変化を十分に把握できないため、還元粉化性状の変化に起因した高炉トラブルを未然に防止することは不可能である。
In addition, although the evaluation method of Non-Patent Document 2 conducts tests under conditions simulating the conditions in the blast furnace, since the composition of the reducing gas is still constant, for example, blast furnace operation such as hydrogen injection is performed. It is not possible to sufficiently evaluate the change in reduced powder properties of sintered ore when the conditions are changed.
Therefore, since the conventional method for evaluating the reduced powdering property of sintered ore cannot fully grasp the change in the reduced powdering property that occurs in the blast furnace, the blast furnace trouble due to the change in the reduced powdering property is prevented in advance. It is impossible.

本発明は、従来の還元粉化性状の評価方法が抱える上記問題点に鑑みてなされたものであり、その目的は、焼結鉱が高炉内を降下する際の還元条件の経時変化による焼結鉱の還元粉化性状の変化や、高炉操業条件の変更による焼結鉱の還元粉化性状の変化を精度よく評価することができる焼結鉱の還元粉化性状の評価方法を提案することにある。   The present invention has been made in view of the above-described problems of the conventional evaluation method for reducing powder properties, and the purpose thereof is sintering by changing the reduction conditions over time when the sintered ore descends in the blast furnace. To propose a method for evaluating the reduced powdering properties of sintered ore that can accurately evaluate changes in the reduced powdering properties of ores and changes in reduced powdered properties of sintered ores due to changes in blast furnace operating conditions. is there.

発明者らは、上記課題の解決に向けて鋭意研究を重ねた。その結果、高炉に装入された焼結鉱が高炉内を降下していく際の還元条件の経時変化、すなわち、装入後経過時間とともに変化する還元ガス組成および還元温度を、総括熱物質収支モデルおよび部分収支モデル等を用いて正確に推定し、その還元条件の経時変化を模擬した条件下で焼結鉱の還元試験を行えば、高炉内に装入した焼結鉱の還元粉化性状の経時変化のみならず、高炉操業条件の変更による焼結鉱の還元粉化性状の変化を正確に評価できることを見出し、本発明を完成するに至った。   The inventors have intensively studied to solve the above problems. As a result, the time-dependent change in the reduction conditions when the sinter charged in the blast furnace descends in the blast furnace, that is, the reducing gas composition and the reduction temperature that change with the elapsed time after charging, are summarized in the overall heat mass balance. If the sinter ore reduction test is performed under conditions that accurately estimate the model and partial balance model, etc., and simulate the time-dependent changes in the reduction conditions, the reduced powder properties of the sinter charged in the blast furnace As a result, it was found that not only the change with time but also the change in reduced powdering properties of sintered ore due to changes in blast furnace operating conditions can be accurately evaluated, and the present invention has been completed.

すなわち、本発明は、高炉操業に使用される焼結鉱の還元粉化性状を評価するに当たり、焼結鉱が高炉内を降下する際の還元条件の経時変化を推定し、その推定した還元条件の経時変化を模擬した焼結鉱の還元試験を行い、還元後の焼結鉱の還元粉化率を測定して評価することを特徴とする焼結鉱の還元粉化性状の評価方法である。   That is, the present invention estimates the time-dependent change of the reduction condition when the sintered ore descends in the blast furnace in evaluating the reduced powdering properties of the sintered ore used for blast furnace operation, and the estimated reduction condition This is a method for evaluating the reduced powder properties of sintered ore, characterized by performing a reduction test of sintered ore simulating the time-dependent change of sinter and measuring and evaluating the reduced powder rate of sintered ore after reduction. .

本発明の焼結鉱の還元粉化性状の評価方法は、下記(A)〜(C)の処理によって、焼結鉱が高炉内を降下する際の還元条件の経時変化を模擬した焼結鉱の還元試験条件を設定し、下記(D)の焼結鉱の還元試験を行うことを特徴とする。

(A)高炉操業を物質バランスと熱バランスの両面から解析する総括熱物質収支モデルを設定し、この総括熱物質収支モデルに高炉操業条件を入力して高炉操業諸元を算出する。
(B)高炉内部をメッシュに分割し、その各々のメッシュに物質収支と熱収支を計算する部分収支モデルを設定し、その部分収支モデルに上記(A)で入力した高炉操業条件と算出した高炉操業諸元を入力して高炉内部の温度分布とガス組成分布および装入物炉内降下速度を算出する。
(C)上記(B)で算出した高炉内部の温度分布とガス組成分布および装入物炉内降下速度から、高炉内を降下する焼結鉱の還元条件の経時変化を推定し、推定した焼結鉱の還元条件の経時変化を模擬して、焼結鉱の還元試験における還元時間に対する還元ガス組成および還元温度を設定する。
(D)上記(C)で設定した条件下で、高炉炉頂温度から昇温しながら900℃以下の温度まで焼結鉱の還元試験を行う。
The evaluation method of the reduced pulverization property of the sintered ore of the present invention is a sintered ore that simulates the change over time of the reducing conditions when the sintered ore descends in the blast furnace by the following treatments (A) to (C). The reduction test conditions are set, and the reduction test of the sintered ore (D) below is performed.
(A) A general heat mass balance model for analyzing the blast furnace operation from both the material balance and the heat balance is set, and the blast furnace operation conditions are calculated by inputting the blast furnace operation conditions into the general heat mass balance model.
(B) The inside of the blast furnace is divided into meshes, partial balance models for calculating the mass balance and heat balance are set for each mesh, and the blast furnace operating conditions calculated in (A) above are calculated for the partial balance model. Input the operation specifications and calculate the temperature distribution and gas composition distribution inside the blast furnace and the descending speed in the charging furnace.
(C) Based on the temperature distribution and gas composition distribution inside the blast furnace calculated in (B) above, and the descending speed in the charging furnace, the time-dependent change in the reduction condition of the sintered ore descending in the blast furnace is estimated, and the estimated firing Simulating the time-dependent change of the reduction condition of the ore, the reduction gas composition and the reduction temperature are set with respect to the reduction time in the reduction test of the sintered ore.
(D) Under the conditions set in (C) above, the sintered ore reduction test is performed to a temperature of 900 ° C. or lower while the temperature is raised from the blast furnace top temperature.

また、本発明の評価方法は、上記焼結鉱の還元試験を、焼結鉱に荷重を負荷しつつ行うことを特徴とする。   Moreover, the evaluation method of the present invention is characterized in that the reduction test of the sintered ore is performed while applying a load to the sintered ore.

本発明によれば、高炉に装入された焼結鉱が高炉内を降下していく際の還元条件の経時変化を精度良く把握し、その条件を模擬して焼結鉱の還元試験を行い、還元粉化率を測定することで、高炉に装入された還元粉化性状の経時変化を正確に評価・予測することができる。特に、本発明によれば、従来の高炉への一般的な還元材供給方法であった炉頂からのコークス装入、羽口からの微粉炭の吹き込みに加えて、羽口からの水素吹き込みを行うような高炉操業条件の変更がなされた場合でも、高炉内の還元条件の変化を精度よく予測することができるので、高炉操業条件の変更に伴う還元粉化性状の変化を正確に評価・予測することができる。
さらに、本発明の評価方法を高炉の実操業に適用することで、高炉に装入する焼結鉱の還元粉化性状に合わせて高炉操業条件を最適化したり、あるいは、高炉操業条件に合わせて最適な還元粉化性状の焼結鉱を用いたりすることが可能となるので、高炉の操業トラブルを事前に予測したり、防止することが可能となり、高炉操業の安定化に大きく寄与することができる。
According to the present invention, the change over time of the reduction condition when the sintered ore charged in the blast furnace descends in the blast furnace is accurately grasped, and the reduction test of the sintered ore is performed by simulating the condition. By measuring the reduced powdering rate, it is possible to accurately evaluate and predict the change over time of the reduced powdered property charged in the blast furnace. In particular, according to the present invention, in addition to the introduction of coke from the top of the furnace, the blowing of pulverized coal from the tuyere, which was a common method for supplying reducing material to a conventional blast furnace, the blowing of hydrogen from the tuyere was performed. Even if the blast furnace operating conditions are changed as expected, it is possible to accurately predict changes in the reduction conditions within the blast furnace, so the changes in reduced pulverization properties accompanying changes in the blast furnace operating conditions can be accurately evaluated and predicted. can do.
Furthermore, by applying the evaluation method of the present invention to the actual operation of the blast furnace, the blast furnace operating conditions are optimized according to the reduced powdering properties of the sintered ore charged in the blast furnace, or in accordance with the blast furnace operating conditions. Since it is possible to use sintered ore with the optimal reduced powdering properties, it is possible to predict and prevent blast furnace operation troubles in advance, which can greatly contribute to the stabilization of blast furnace operation. it can.

本発明に係る焼結鉱の還元粉化性状の評価方法を説明する図である。It is a figure explaining the evaluation method of the reduced powdering property of the sintered ore concerning this invention. 部分収支モデルの計算に用いたメッシュを説明する図である。It is a figure explaining the mesh used for calculation of the partial balance model. 還元試験に用いる高炉シャフト部模擬試験装置の模式図である。It is a schematic diagram of the blast furnace shaft part simulation test apparatus used for a reduction test. 部分収支モデルを用いて得られた高炉内の温度分布を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the temperature distribution in the blast furnace obtained using the partial balance model. 実施例の還元試験に用いた昇温パターンを示すグラフである。It is a graph which shows the temperature rising pattern used for the reduction test of an Example. 実施例の還元試験において焼結鉱に負荷した荷重パターンを示すグラフである。It is a graph which shows the load pattern loaded on the sintered ore in the reduction test of an Example. CO還元とCO+H還元における還元上限温度と還元率との関係を示すグラフである。Reducing the maximum temperature in the CO reduction and CO + H 2 reduction and is a graph showing the relationship between reduction rate. CO還元とCO+H還元における還元上限温度と還元粉化率との関係を示すグラフである。It is a graph showing the relationship between reducing the upper limit temperature and the reduction degradation rate of CO reduction and CO + H 2 reduction.

本発明は、高炉実操業における高炉内の還元条件を模擬し、昇温しながら焼結鉱の還元試験を行うことにより、高炉内における焼結鉱の還元粉化性状の経時変化を正確に評価する技術であり、その評価した結果を実高炉操業に適用することで、高炉内の還元状況の変化を精度よく予測したり、高炉内で起こるトラブルを未然に防止したりすることを可能とする技術である。特に、本発明は、高炉への一般的な還元材供給方式であった従来の炉頂からのコークス装入、羽口からの微粉炭吹込みに加えて、羽口から水素吹込みを行うような高炉操業条件の変更がなされた場合における焼結鉱の還元粉化性状の変化を評価するのに極めて有効な技術である。   The present invention accurately evaluates the change over time of the reduced powdering property of the sinter in the blast furnace by simulating the reduction conditions in the blast furnace in the actual operation of the blast furnace and conducting the reduction test of the sintered ore while raising the temperature. By applying the evaluated results to actual blast furnace operation, it is possible to accurately predict changes in the reduction status in the blast furnace and to prevent problems that occur in the blast furnace. Technology. In particular, in the present invention, hydrogen is blown from the tuyere in addition to conventional coke charging from the top of the furnace and pulverized coal blowing from the tuyere, which was a general reducing material supply system to the blast furnace. This is an extremely effective technique for evaluating changes in the reduced powdering properties of sintered ore when the blast furnace operating conditions are changed.

上記の特徴を有する本発明は、図1にその概要を示したように、まず、高炉操業を物質バランスと熱バランスの両面から解析する総括熱物質収支モデルを設定し、この総括熱物質収支モデルに高炉操業条件を入力して高炉操業諸元を算出し、次いで、高炉にメッシュを切って分割し、各々のメッシュの物質収支および熱収支を計算する部分収支モデルを設定し、この部分収支モデルに、上記総括熱物質収支モデルで入力した高炉操業条件と、算出した高炉操業諸元を入力して高炉内の各位置におけるガス組成分布と温度分布および装入物炉内降下速度を算出する。次いで、先に算出した高炉内の各位置の温度分布とガス組成分布および装入物炉内降下速度から、高炉内を降下する焼結鉱の還元条件の経時変化、すなわち、焼結鉱が高炉に装入された後の経過時間と還元ガス組成および還元温度との関係を推定し、この推定した還元条件の経時変化を模擬して焼結鉱の還元試験条件、すなわち、還元時間に対する還元ガス組成および反応温度を設定し、その設定した条件下で昇温しながら焼結鉱の還元試験を行い、還元後の焼結鉱の還元粉化率や還元率を測定し、評価することで、高炉内における焼結鉱の還元粉化性状を正確に評価しようとするものである。   In the present invention having the above features, as shown in FIG. 1, the general heat mass balance model for analyzing the blast furnace operation from both the material balance and the heat balance is first set. Enter the blast furnace operating conditions to calculate the blast furnace operating specifications, then cut and divide the mesh into blast furnaces, and set the partial balance model to calculate the mass balance and heat balance of each mesh, this partial balance model In addition, the blast furnace operating conditions input in the above general thermal mass balance model and the calculated blast furnace operating specifications are input to calculate the gas composition distribution and temperature distribution at each position in the blast furnace and the descending rate in the charging furnace. Next, from the temperature distribution and gas composition distribution of each position in the blast furnace calculated previously and the descending speed in the charging furnace, the time-dependent change in the reduction condition of the sintered ore descending in the blast furnace, that is, the sintered ore is the blast furnace. Estimate the relationship between the elapsed time after charging and the reducing gas composition and the reducing temperature, and simulate the time course of the estimated reducing conditions to reduce the sinter ore reduction test conditions, that is, the reducing gas with respect to the reducing time. By setting the composition and reaction temperature, performing a reduction test of the sintered ore while raising the temperature under the set conditions, measuring and evaluating the reduced powdering rate and reduction rate of the sintered ore after reduction, It is intended to accurately evaluate the reduced powder properties of sintered ore in a blast furnace.

以下、本発明を、図1に沿って具体的に説明する。
(A)総括熱物質収支モデル解析
本発明は、まず、高炉操業を物質バランスと熱バランスの両面から解析する総括熱物質収支モデルを設定し、この総括熱物質収支モデルに、評価しようとしている高炉の操業条件を入力し、出力として、炉頂ガス成分や送風量、送風温度、送風湿分、酸素富化量、出滓量ならびに出滓成分、鉱石原単位、コークス比、還元材比、送風原単位、酸素原単位、スラグ比、ソルーションロス反応量、排出ガス量等の高炉操業諸元を算出する。上記計算に用いる総括熱物質収支モデルとしては、特に制限はないが、「リストモデル」と呼ばれるモデルが好ましく用いることができる。
Hereinafter, the present invention will be specifically described with reference to FIG.
(A) General heat mass balance model analysis The present invention first sets a general heat mass balance model for analyzing the blast furnace operation from both the material balance and the heat balance. As the output, the furnace top gas component, the air flow rate, the air temperature, the air flow moisture, the oxygen enrichment amount, the output amount and the output component, ore unit, coke ratio, reducing material ratio, air supply Calculate the blast furnace operation specifications such as basic unit, oxygen basic unit, slag ratio, solution loss reaction amount, exhaust gas amount. Although there is no restriction | limiting in particular as a general heat mass balance model used for the said calculation, The model called a "list model" can be used preferably.

ここで、上記「総括熱物質収支モデル」に入力する高炉操業条件は、出銑量、羽口吹込物質の種類、量、組成および焼結鉱とコークスの装入重量比(焼結鉱/コークス比)である。そして、上記「総括熱物質収支モデル」では、物質収支については、高炉内に装入される焼結鉱、コークス、羽口吹き込み物質などの全装入物質中に含まれるFe,C,H,O,SおよびAsh成分と、高炉から排出される溶銑やスラグ、排出ガス中に含まれるFe,C,H,O,SおよびAsh成分の収支を計算する。一方、熱収支については、供給熱量をコークスの燃焼熱、空気の顕熱、酸化鉄から鉄への還元熱等とし、所要熱量をソルーションロス反応熱、不純物として含まれる酸化物の還元熱、Cの鉄への溶解熱、溶銑の顕熱、スラグの顕熱、炉壁からの熱損失、送風湿分等が関与する反応における吸熱、羽口からの添加物が関与する反応における吸熱とし、それら供給熱量と所要熱量との収支を計算する。このようにして、高炉全体での物質収支と熱収支を計算し、すなわち、高炉装入物、送風量と、出銑滓量、排ガス量とに関する物質精算、さらにそれらの装入物質の入熱と排出物質の出熱との差をとる熱精算を用いて、炉頂ガス成分や送風量、送風温度、送風湿分、酸素富化量、出滓量ならびに出滓成分、鉱石原単位、コークス比、還元材比、送風原単位、酸素原単位、スラグ比、ソルーションロス反応量、排出ガス量等の高炉操業諸元を算出する。   Here, the blast furnace operating conditions to be input to the above-mentioned “general heat mass balance model” are the amount of tapping, the type, amount, composition of the tuyere-injected material, and the charging weight ratio of sinter and coke (sintered or coke). Ratio). And in the above-mentioned "general heat mass balance model", the mass balance is about Fe, C, H, contained in all the charged materials such as sintered ore, coke and tuyere blown material charged in the blast furnace. The balance of the Fe, C, H, O, S, and Ash components contained in the O, S, and Ash components and the hot metal and slag discharged from the blast furnace and the exhaust gas is calculated. On the other hand, regarding the heat balance, the amount of heat supplied is the combustion heat of coke, the sensible heat of air, the heat of reduction from iron oxide to iron, etc., and the required amount of heat is the heat of solution of reaction loss, the heat of reduction of oxides contained as impurities, C Heat absorption in iron, sensible heat of molten iron, sensible heat of slag, heat loss from the furnace wall, heat absorption in reactions involving blast moisture, heat absorption in reactions involving additives from tuyere, etc. Calculate the balance between the amount of heat supplied and the amount of heat required. In this way, the mass balance and heat balance of the entire blast furnace are calculated, that is, the blast furnace charge, the amount of air blown, the amount of discharge, the amount of exhaust gas, and the heat input of those charge materials. Using the heat adjustment that takes the difference between the heat output of the exhaust gas and the exhaust gas, the furnace top gas component, the air flow rate, the air temperature, the air humidity, the oxygen enrichment amount, the output amount, the output component, ore unit, coke Calculate the blast furnace operation parameters such as ratio, reducing material ratio, blast unit, oxygen unit, slag ratio, solution loss reaction amount, exhaust gas amount.

(B)部分収支モデル解析
次いで、高炉の内部を、図2に示したように、一定の基準に従ってメッシュを切って分割し、各々のメッシュ部分における物質収支および熱収支を計算する部分収支モデルを設定し、その部分収支モデルに、前述した総括熱物質収支モデルに入力した高炉操業条件および算出した操業諸元を入力して、高炉内の温度分布とガス組成分布および装入物炉内降下速度を算出する。
この「部分収支モデル」では、総括熱物質収支モデルで算出した高炉操業諸元を高炉全体として満足し、かつ、高炉内部の各々のメッシュが連成して変化している状態を計算することにより、高炉内の温度分布やガス組成分布を算出する。具体的には、まず、高炉の軸方向(炉高方向)に、間隔が炉内の層状構造の層厚に近くなるように分割し、また、高炉の半径方向には、軸方向と同程度の大きさに分割してメッシュを切り、それらのまわりに境界用のメッシュを設ける。メッシュの最小単位である三角メッシュは、上記の方法で得られる四角メッシュを鈍角が出にくい方向に分割して得る。ガス流れや固体流れ、液体流れは三角メッシュで計算し、伝熱(温度)や反応(ガス組成)は四角メッシュで計算する。そして、各々のメッシュごとに、ガス、固体、液体の各相についての部分物質収支と部分熱収支を計算する。その他計算方法の詳細については、桑原らの技術文献(「高炉プロセスの数学的二次元モデル」,鉄と鋼,日本鉄鋼協会,Vol.77(1991)No.10,p.1593〜1600)が参考となる
(B) Partial balance model analysis Next, as shown in FIG. 2, the inside of the blast furnace is divided by dividing the mesh according to a certain standard, and the partial balance model for calculating the mass balance and heat balance in each mesh portion is calculated. Set the blast furnace operating conditions and the calculated operating specifications that were input to the above-mentioned general thermal mass balance model as the partial balance model, and the temperature distribution, gas composition distribution, and charging furnace descent rate in the blast furnace Is calculated.
In this "partial balance model", the blast furnace operating specifications calculated by the overall thermal mass balance model are satisfied as a whole blast furnace, and the meshes inside the blast furnace are coupled and changed. Calculate the temperature distribution and gas composition distribution in the blast furnace. Specifically, first, it is divided in the axial direction of the blast furnace (furnace height direction) so that the interval is close to the layer thickness of the layered structure in the furnace, and the radial direction of the blast furnace is about the same as the axial direction. The mesh is cut into the size of, and the boundary mesh is provided around them. The triangular mesh which is the minimum unit of the mesh is obtained by dividing the quadrilateral mesh obtained by the above method in a direction in which an obtuse angle is difficult to occur. Gas flow, solid flow, and liquid flow are calculated using a triangular mesh, and heat transfer (temperature) and reaction (gas composition) are calculated using a square mesh. Then, for each mesh, a partial material balance and a partial heat balance for each phase of gas, solid, and liquid are calculated. For details of other calculation methods, refer to the technical document of Kuwahara et al. ("Mathematical two-dimensional model of blast furnace process", Iron and Steel, Japan Iron and Steel Institute, Vol. 77 (1991) No. 10, pp. 1593 to 1600). Be helpful

(C)還元試験条件の設定
次いで、本発明では、先に算出した高炉内の温度分布とガス組成分布および装入物炉内降下速度から、焼結鉱が高炉内を降下していく際の還元条件の経時変化、すなわち、焼結鉱の装入後経過時間に対する還元ガス組成および還元温度の変化を推定し、その推定した還元条件を模擬して、焼結鉱の還元試験における還元条件、すなわち、還元時間とともに変化させる還元ガス組成および還元温度を設定する。
(C) Setting of reduction test conditions Next, in the present invention, the sintered ore descends in the blast furnace from the previously calculated temperature distribution and gas composition distribution in the blast furnace and the descending speed in the charging furnace. Estimated change in reduction conditions over time, that is, changes in reducing gas composition and reduction temperature with respect to the elapsed time after charging the sintered ore, simulated the estimated reducing conditions, reducing conditions in the reduction test of sintered ore, That is, the reducing gas composition and the reduction temperature that are changed with the reduction time are set.

具体的には、還元試験における昇温速度は、先に算定した高炉内の温度分布を半径方向に平均化して高炉の炉高方向における平均温度分布を求め、この炉高方向の平均温度分布と、先に(B)の部分収支モデルで算定した装入物炉内降下速度とから、焼結鉱が炉内を降下していく際の装入後経過時間に対する平均温度の変化を求め、この平均温度の経時変化を、還元試験における温度条件として設定してやればよい。   Specifically, the temperature increase rate in the reduction test is obtained by averaging the previously calculated temperature distribution in the blast furnace in the radial direction to obtain the average temperature distribution in the furnace height direction of the blast furnace. The change in average temperature with respect to the elapsed time after charging when the ore descends in the furnace is calculated from the rate of descent in the charging furnace calculated by the partial balance model of (B). What is necessary is just to set the time-dependent change of average temperature as a temperature condition in a reduction test.

また、還元試験におけるガス組成は、先に算定した高炉内のガス組成分布を半径方向に平均化して高炉の炉高方向における平均ガス組成分布を求め、この炉高方向の平均ガス組成分布と、先に(B)の部分収支モデルで算定した装入物炉内降下速度とから、焼結鉱が炉内を降下していく際の装入後経過時間に対する平均ガス組成の変化を求め、この平均ガス組成の経時変化を、還元試験における還元ガス組成条件として設定してやればよい。
なお、上記設定した還元時間とガス組成との関係は連続的であるが、還元試験を簡略化するために、還元温度を数段階に分けて、還元ガスの組成を変更するようにしてもよい。ただし、ガス組成を自動制御できる場合には、さらに細かく組成を変更し、あるいは、連続的に変化させる方がよいことは勿論である。
Further, the gas composition in the reduction test is obtained by averaging the gas composition distribution in the blast furnace calculated previously in the radial direction to obtain the average gas composition distribution in the furnace height direction of the blast furnace, and the average gas composition distribution in the furnace height direction, The change in the average gas composition with respect to the elapsed time after charging when the sintered ore descends in the furnace is obtained from the rate of descent in the charging furnace previously calculated by the partial balance model of (B). What is necessary is just to set the time-dependent change of an average gas composition as a reducing gas composition condition in a reduction test.
In addition, although the relationship between the set reduction time and the gas composition is continuous, in order to simplify the reduction test, the reduction temperature may be divided into several stages and the composition of the reducing gas may be changed. . However, when the gas composition can be automatically controlled, it is of course better to change the composition more finely or to change it continuously.

(D)焼結鉱の還元試験
次いで、上記の処理を経て設定された、焼結鉱が高炉内を降下していく際の還元条件の経時変化を模擬した条件下において、高炉炉頂温度から昇温しながら900℃以下の任意の温度まで、焼結鉱の還元試験を行う。この還元試験に用いる装置としては、図3に示したような、昇温しながら還元試験が行える高炉シャフト部模擬試験装置を用いるのが好ましい。
なお、上記焼結鉱の還元試験は、高炉炉頂温度から昇温しながら900℃以下の任意の温度までの範囲で実施するが、上記高炉炉頂温度は、一般に、200〜240℃程度である。また、還元試験を行う温度の上限を900℃とする理由は、還元温度が900℃を超えると、焼結鉱の軟化が起こるようになるので、還元粉化性状を評価する意味が失われてしまうからである。したがって、還元試験は、高炉炉頂温度から900℃以下の任意の温度範囲であれば、焼結鉱の還元粉化性状の評価には十分である。ただし、上限温度が低すぎても、還元粉化が起こらないため、還元試験は少なくとも500℃以上まで実施するのが好ましい。
(D) Reduction test of sintered ore Next, from the blast furnace top temperature, under the conditions that simulated the time-dependent change of the reduction conditions when the sintered ore descended in the blast furnace, set through the above treatment While reducing the temperature, the reduction test of the sintered ore is performed to an arbitrary temperature of 900 ° C. or lower. As an apparatus used for this reduction test, it is preferable to use a blast furnace shaft portion simulation test apparatus capable of performing a reduction test while raising the temperature as shown in FIG.
In addition, although the reduction test of the said sintered ore is implemented in the range to 900 degrees C or less arbitrary temperature rising from blast furnace top temperature, the said blast furnace top temperature is generally about 200-240 degreeC. is there. In addition, the reason for setting the upper limit of the temperature at which the reduction test is performed to 900 ° C. is that when the reduction temperature exceeds 900 ° C., the softening of the sintered ore occurs, so the meaning of evaluating the reduced powder properties is lost. Because it ends up. Therefore, if the reduction test is in an arbitrary temperature range of 900 ° C. or less from the blast furnace top temperature, it is sufficient for evaluating the reduced powder property of the sintered ore. However, since reduction powdering does not occur even if the upper limit temperature is too low, the reduction test is preferably carried out at least up to 500 ° C or higher.

本発明では、還元試験を行う上限温度を900℃以下の任意の温度とすることができるが、例えば、800℃で還元試験を終了した場合には、高炉内で800℃まで昇温、還元された焼結鉱の還元粉化性状が得られることになる。したがって、還元試験の上限温度を種々に変化させて還元粉化性状を測定・評価することで、高炉に装入された焼結鉱が高炉内を降下していく際の還元条件の経時変化による焼結鉱の還元粉化性状の変化を正確に把握することができる。このように、本発明においては、焼結鉱の還元粉化性状の評価を、還元試験温度を1つの特定の温度に固定して行うのではなく、幅広い温度領域において行うことにより、実際の高炉内における還元粉化性状の変化を正確に把握し、予測することが可能となる。   In the present invention, the upper limit temperature at which the reduction test is performed can be set to an arbitrary temperature of 900 ° C. or less. For example, when the reduction test is completed at 800 ° C., the temperature is raised and reduced to 800 ° C. in the blast furnace. Thus, reduced powder properties of the sintered ore can be obtained. Therefore, by varying the upper limit temperature of the reduction test and measuring and evaluating the reduced pulverization properties, the sinter ore charged into the blast furnace is caused by the change over time in the reduction conditions when the ore is descending the blast furnace. It is possible to accurately grasp the change in the reduced powdering property of the sinter. As described above, in the present invention, the evaluation of the reduced pulverization property of the sintered ore is not performed by fixing the reduction test temperature at one specific temperature, but in a wide temperature range. It is possible to accurately grasp and predict the change in the reduced powdering property in the interior.

なお、上記焼結鉱の還元試験においては、高炉内の状況を正確に模擬する意味から、試料に荷重を負荷しながら行うことが好ましい。この点、図3に示した高炉シャフト部模擬試験装置は、荷重を負荷しつつ昇温しながら試験を行うことができるので、好ましく用いることができる。試料(焼結鉱)に負荷する荷重は、高炉の炉頂部側、即ち、装入後経過時間が短いときには低くし、時間の経過とともに、即ち、装入物が降下し、静圧が高まるのに合わせて、負荷荷重を高めていくことが好ましい。負荷する荷重は、例えば、非特許文献1に記載された実高炉内の荷重分布の推定値を用いることができる。   In addition, it is preferable to perform in the reduction | restoration test of the said sintered ore, applying a load to a sample from the meaning which simulates the condition in a blast furnace correctly. In this regard, the blast furnace shaft portion simulation test apparatus shown in FIG. 3 can be preferably used because the test can be performed while raising the temperature while applying a load. The load applied to the sample (sintered ore) is reduced when the blast furnace top side, that is, when the elapsed time after charging is short, with the passage of time, that is, the charged material drops and the static pressure increases. It is preferable to increase the load in accordance with the above. As the load to be applied, for example, an estimated value of the load distribution in the actual blast furnace described in Non-Patent Document 1 can be used.

(E)還元粉化性状等の評価
上記のようにして還元試験に供した焼結鉱は、その後、JIS M8712「鉄鉱石−回転強度試験方法」に準拠してタンブラー試験を実施し、還元粉化率を測定し、還元粉化性状を評価する。あるいは、さらに、JIS M8713「鉄鉱石−被還元性試験方法」に準じて、還元率を測定してもよい。
(E) Evaluation of reduced powdering properties, etc. The sintered ore subjected to the reduction test as described above is then subjected to a tumbler test in accordance with JIS M8712 “Iron Ore-Rotational Strength Test Method”. Measure the rate of conversion and evaluate the reduced powder properties. Alternatively, the reduction rate may be measured according to JIS M8713 “Iron Ore—Reducibility Test Method”.

本実施例では、コークスと羽口から吹込む還元材として、微粉炭の炭素系還元材のみを用いる「CO還元」と、コークスと微粉炭の炭素系還元材に加えて水素系還元材を用いる「CO+H還元」(H濃度:6.1vol%)の2つのケースにおける高炉内の焼結鉱の還元粉化性状を評価し、比較した。
まず、炉内容積が5153mで、出銑能力が10500t/日の高炉に対して、高炉シャフト部における物質移動を評価する総括熱物質収支モデルとして「リストモデル」を設定し、このリストモデルに高炉操業条件として、表1に示した項目(出銑量、羽口吹込み物質の種類、量および元素組成、焼結鉱/コークス比)を入力し、出力として、高炉内に装入される物質量と排出される物質量が等しいという収支バランスの下に、表2に示した高炉操業諸元(炉頂ガス成分(N,CO,CO,H,HO)、送風量、送風温度、送風湿分、酸素富化量、出滓量および出滓成分、鉱石原単位、コークス比、還元材比、送風原単位、酸素原単位、スラグ比、ソルーションロス反応量、排出ガス量)を算出した。なお、表1に記載した吹き込み物質の元素組成とは、微粉炭とCOGを改質処理してH濃度を高めたガス(改質COG)をあわせた平均組成のことである。
In this example, as a reducing material blown from coke and tuyere, “CO reduction” using only a carbon-based reducing material of pulverized coal, and a hydrogen-based reducing material in addition to a carbon-based reducing material of coke and pulverized coal are used. The reduced powdering properties of sintered ore in the blast furnace in two cases of “CO + H 2 reduction” (H 2 concentration: 6.1 vol%) were evaluated and compared.
First, for the blast furnace with a furnace volume of 5153 m 3 and a tapping capacity of 10500 t / day, a “list model” is set as a general thermal mass balance model for evaluating mass transfer in the blast furnace shaft section. As the blast furnace operating conditions, the items shown in Table 1 (the amount of tapping, the type and amount of tuyere blown material, the element composition, the sintered ore / coke ratio) are input, and the blast furnace is charged into the blast furnace as output. Under the balance of balance that the amount of material and the amount of discharged material are equal, the blast furnace operation specifications shown in Table 2 (furnace top gas components (N 2 , CO, CO 2 , H 2 , H 2 O), air flow rate) , Ventilation temperature, ventilation moisture, oxygen enrichment amount, output amount and output component, ore intensity, coke ratio, reducing material ratio, ventilation intensity, oxygen intensity, slag ratio, solution loss reaction amount, exhaust gas Amount) was calculated. Note that the elemental composition of the blowing agent listed in Table 1, is that the average composition together pulverized coal and COG the modification treatment with a gas having an increased concentration of H 2 (modified COG).

Figure 0005455813
Figure 0005455813

Figure 0005455813
Figure 0005455813

次いで、図2に示したように高炉内部にメッシュを切って分割し、各々のメッシュごとに物質収支と熱収支を計算する部分収支モデルを設定し、このモデルに、上記表1に示した高炉操業条件と、上記表2に示した高炉操業諸元を入力し、出力として高炉内の温度分布とガス組成分布および装入物炉内降下速度を算出した。なお、参考例として、図4に、CO還元のケースと、CO+H還元のケースにおける高炉内温度分布を比較して示した。この解析の結果では、いずれの場合も、高炉炉頂温度は237℃であった。 Next, as shown in FIG. 2, a mesh is cut into the blast furnace and divided, and a partial balance model for calculating the mass balance and the heat balance is set for each mesh, and the blast furnace shown in Table 1 above is set in this model. The operating conditions and the blast furnace operation specifications shown in Table 2 above were input, and the temperature distribution, gas composition distribution, and charging furnace descent rate in the blast furnace were calculated as outputs. As a reference example, FIG. 4 shows a comparison of the temperature distribution in the blast furnace in the case of CO reduction and the case of CO + H 2 reduction. As a result of this analysis, the blast furnace top temperature was 237 ° C. in all cases.

次いで、先述した(C)の手順で、先に算定した高炉内の温度分布とガス組成分布および装入物炉内降下速度から、焼結鉱が高炉内を降下していく際の還元条件の経時変化、すなわち、焼結鉱の装入後経過時間に対する還元ガス組成および還元温度の変化を推定し、その推定した還元条件の経時変化を模擬して、焼結鉱の還元試験における還元条件、すなわち、還元時間とともに変化させる還元ガス組成および還元温度を設定した。   Next, according to the procedure of (C) described above, from the previously calculated temperature distribution and gas composition distribution in the blast furnace and the descending speed in the charging furnace, the reduction condition when the sintered ore descends in the blast furnace. Estimating the change over time, that is, the change of the reducing gas composition and the reduction temperature with respect to the elapsed time after the charging of the sintered ore, simulating the time-dependent change of the estimated reduction conditions, reducing conditions in the reduction test of the sintered ore, That is, the reducing gas composition and the reducing temperature that change with the reducing time were set.

図5は、上記のようにして設定した還元試験における還元時間と還元温度との関係を、CO還元の場合と、CO+H還元の場合とを比較して示したものである。図5から、吹き込む還元材が変わることで、高炉に装入された焼結鉱の昇温速度が変化し、CO還元(5.0℃/min)よりCO+H還元(3.6℃/min)の方が低速昇温となることが分かる。この理由は、水素による焼結鉱の還元反応が吸熱反応であるためと考えられる。 FIG. 5 shows the relationship between the reduction time and the reduction temperature in the reduction test set as described above in the case of CO reduction and the case of CO + H 2 reduction. From FIG. 5, by changing the reducing material to be blown, the heating rate of the sintered ore charged in the blast furnace is changed, and CO + H 2 reduction (3.6 ° C./min) from CO reduction (5.0 ° C./min). ) Shows that the temperature rises at a lower speed. The reason for this is considered that the reduction reaction of sintered ore with hydrogen is an endothermic reaction.

また、表3は、上記のようにして設定した還元試験における還元ガス組成を、CO還元の場合とCO+H還元の場合とを比較して示したものである。ただし、上記計算により求まる還元時間とガス組成との関係は連続的に変化するが、表3では、還元試験を簡略化するため、還元温度を室温〜237℃、237〜649℃、649〜958℃の3段階に分けて還元ガスの組成を変更するようにした。ここで、表3中の237℃の温度は、本計算による得られた高炉炉頂温度であり、この温度以下は高炉装入前に相当するため、還元試験における供給ガスは窒素100vol%とし、237℃以上で還元ガスを供給するようにした。 Table 3 shows the reduction gas composition in the reduction test set as described above, comparing the case of CO reduction with the case of CO + H 2 reduction. However, although the relationship between the reduction time and the gas composition obtained by the above calculation changes continuously, in Table 3, the reduction temperatures are room temperature to 237 ° C., 237 to 649 ° C., and 649 to 958 to simplify the reduction test. The composition of the reducing gas was changed in three stages of ° C. Here, the temperature of 237 ° C. in Table 3 is the blast furnace top temperature obtained by this calculation, and below this temperature corresponds to before the blast furnace charging, the supply gas in the reduction test is 100 vol% nitrogen, The reducing gas was supplied at 237 ° C. or higher.

Figure 0005455813
Figure 0005455813

次いで、上記のようにして設定した、CO還元と、CO+H還元の2ケースにおける還元試験条件に基づいて、JIS M8720に準じて調製した焼結鉱を試料とし、図3に示した高炉シャフト部模擬試験装置を用いて、還元試験を行った。この際、上記還元試験に用いた試料(焼結鉱)には、実操業時の炉内状況を模擬するため、図6に示した荷重負荷パターンのように、還元時間とともに負荷する荷重を増加させた。
そして、上記還元試験においては、還元温度による還元粉化性状の変化を調べるため、高炉炉頂温度から500〜900℃の温度範囲で100℃ごとに設定した上限温度まで昇温、還元した後、冷却し、それぞれの上限温度における還元粉化率および還元率を測定した。なお、上記還元粉化率は、上記還元後の焼結鉱を、JIS M8712「鉄鉱石−回転強度試験方法」に規定された方法でタンブラー試験を行い、評価した。また、還元率は、上記還元後の焼結鉱について、JIS M8713「鉄鉱石−被還元性試験方法」に準じて測定を行った。
Next, based on the reduction test conditions in two cases of CO reduction and CO + H 2 reduction set as described above, a sintered ore prepared according to JIS M8720 was used as a sample, and the blast furnace shaft portion shown in FIG. A reduction test was conducted using a simulation test apparatus. At this time, the sample (sintered ore) used in the reduction test increased the load applied with the reduction time as shown in the load pattern shown in FIG. I let you.
And in the above reduction test, in order to investigate the change of the reduced powdering properties depending on the reduction temperature, after raising the temperature from the blast furnace top temperature to the upper limit temperature set every 100 ° C. in the temperature range of 500 to 900 ° C., reduction, It cooled and measured the reduction | restoration powdering rate and reduction rate in each upper limit temperature. In addition, the said reduction | restoration powdering rate evaluated the sintered ore after the said reduction | restoration by performing the tumbler test by the method prescribed | regulated to JISM8712 "Iron ore-rotational strength test method". Moreover, the reduction rate was measured according to JIS M8713 “Iron Ore—Reducibility Test Method” for the sintered ore after the reduction.

図7は、上記の試験結果について、還元温度と還元率との関係を、CO還元とCO+H還元とで比較して示したものである。この図から、還元材としてコークスと微粉炭の炭素系還元材のみを用いるCO還元と比較して、コークスと微粉炭の炭素系還元材に加えて水素系還元材を用いるCO+H還元の方が、600℃以上の温度領域において、還元率が上昇していることがわかる。このような還元材による差は、従来の550℃程度で行っていた試験では検出されていなかったものである。 FIG. 7 shows the relationship between the reduction temperature and the reduction rate in the above test results by comparing CO reduction with CO + H 2 reduction. From this figure, CO + H 2 reduction using a hydrogen-based reducing material in addition to a carbon-based reducing material of coke and pulverized coal compared to CO reduction using only a carbon-based reducing material of coke and pulverized coal as a reducing material. It can be seen that the reduction rate increases in a temperature region of 600 ° C. or higher. Such a difference due to the reducing material has not been detected in a conventional test performed at about 550 ° C.

また、図8は、上記の試験結果について、還元温度と還元粉化率との関係をCO還元とCO+H還元とで比較して示したものである。この図から、還元材としてコークスと微粉炭の炭素系還元材のみを用いるCO還元と比較して、コークスと微粉炭の炭素系還元材に加えて水素系還元材を用いるCO+H還元の方が、500℃以上の還元温度での還元粉化率が高くなっており、図7と同様、還元材による差が明確に表れている。
なお、図8中には、参考として特許文献1に記載された、Hガスを6.2vol%含有する還元ガスを用いて550℃の温度で還元試験したときの還元粉化率を併記したが、本発明の評価方法では、特許文献1の評価方法では把握できなかった焼結鉱の還元粉化性状が得られている。
Further, FIG. 8 shows the relationship between the reduction temperature and the reduced powdering rate in the above test results by comparing CO reduction with CO + H 2 reduction. From this figure, CO + H 2 reduction using a hydrogen-based reducing material in addition to a carbon-based reducing material of coke and pulverized coal compared to CO reduction using only a carbon-based reducing material of coke and pulverized coal as a reducing material. The reduction powdering rate at a reduction temperature of 500 ° C. or higher is high, and the difference due to the reducing material is clearly shown as in FIG.
Note that in FIG. 8, described in Patent Document 1 as a reference, was also shown reduction degradation rate when the reduction test at a temperature of 550 ° C. using a reducing gas and H 2 gas containing 6.2Vol% However, in the evaluation method of the present invention, reduced powder properties of the sintered ore that could not be grasped by the evaluation method of Patent Document 1 are obtained.

上記のように、本発明の還元粉化性状の評価方法を用いることにより、高炉に装入した焼結鉱の幅広い温度領域における還元粉化性状を正確に評価・把握できるだけでなく、還元材として炭素系還元材に水素系還元材を加える等の高炉操業条件を変更する場合における焼結鉱の還元粉化性状の変化も正確に評価・把握することができる。   As described above, by using the method for evaluating reduced powdering properties of the present invention, it is possible not only to accurately evaluate and grasp the reduced powdering properties in a wide temperature range of sintered ore charged into a blast furnace, but also as a reducing material. Changes in the reduced powdering properties of sintered ore when changing the blast furnace operating conditions such as adding a hydrogen-based reducing material to a carbon-based reducing material can also be accurately evaluated and grasped.

さらに、本発明の還元粉化性状の評価方法を高炉の実操業に適用することによって、例えば、焼結鉱の還元粉化率が高くなるような条件で高炉操業を行う場合には、通常よりも強度の高い焼結鉱を使用したり、あるいは、還元粉化性の高い焼結鉱を用いる場合には、それに合わせて焼結鉱の還元粉化率を低下させるような高炉操業条件に変更したりすることが可能となるので、高炉の操業トラブルを事前に予知したり、防止したりすることが可能となる。
上記本発明特有の効果は、高炉操業シミュレーションを活用して求めた高炉内の還元条件の経時的な変化を模擬して還元試験を行うことによって、初めて得られるものである。
Furthermore, by applying the method for evaluating reduced powdering properties of the present invention to actual operation of a blast furnace, for example, when performing blast furnace operation under conditions such that the reduced powdering rate of sintered ore is high, However, when using high-strength sintered ore, or when using sintered ore with a high reduction powdering property, the blast furnace operating conditions are changed to reduce the reduction powdering rate of the sintered ore accordingly. Therefore, it becomes possible to foresee or prevent a blast furnace operation trouble in advance.
The effect peculiar to the present invention can be obtained for the first time by conducting a reduction test by simulating the change over time of the reduction conditions in the blast furnace obtained by utilizing a blast furnace operation simulation.

1:荷重
2:炉心管
3:ヒーター
4:焼結鉱(試料)
5:黒鉛るつぼ
6:還元ガス
7:還元処理後排出ガス
8:ガス分析装置
9:還元後の焼結鉱
10:タンブラー試験機
1: Load 2: Core tube 3: Heater 4: Sinter (sample)
5: Graphite crucible 6: Reducing gas 7: Exhaust gas after reduction treatment 8: Gas analyzer 9: Sintered ore after reduction 10: Tumbler tester

Claims (3)

高炉操業に使用される焼結鉱の還元粉化性状を評価するに当たり、焼結鉱が高炉内を降下する際の還元条件の経時変化を推定し、その推定した還元条件の経時変化を模擬した焼結鉱の還元試験を行い、還元後の焼結鉱の還元粉化率を測定して評価することを特徴とする焼結鉱の還元粉化性状の評価方法。 In evaluating the reduced powdering properties of sinter used in blast furnace operation, we estimated the time-dependent change of the reduction condition when the sinter descends in the blast furnace, and simulated the time-dependent change of the estimated reduction condition. A method for evaluating a reduced powdering property of a sintered ore, comprising performing a reduction test of the sintered ore and measuring and evaluating a reduced powdering rate of the sintered ore after reduction. 下記(A)〜(C)の処理によって、焼結鉱が高炉内を降下する際の還元条件の経時変化を模擬した焼結鉱の還元試験条件を設定し、下記(D)の焼結鉱の還元試験を行うことを特徴とする請求項1に記載の焼結鉱の還元粉化性状の評価方法。

(A)高炉操業を物質バランスと熱バランスの両面から解析する総括熱物質収支モデルを設定し、この総括熱物質収支モデルに高炉操業条件を入力して高炉操業諸元を算出する。
(B)高炉内部をメッシュに分割し、その各々のメッシュに物質収支と熱収支を計算する部分収支モデルを設定し、その部分収支モデルに上記(A)で入力した高炉操業条件と算出した高炉操業諸元を入力して高炉内部の温度分布とガス組成分布および装入物炉内降下速度を算出する。
(C)上記(B)で算出した高炉内部の温度分布とガス組成分布および装入物炉内降下速度から、高炉内を降下する焼結鉱の還元条件の経時変化を推定し、推定した焼結鉱の還元条件の経時変化を模擬して、焼結鉱の還元試験における還元時間に対する還元ガス組成および還元温度を設定する。
(D)上記(C)で設定した条件下で、高炉炉頂温度から昇温しながら900℃以下の温度まで焼結鉱の還元試験を行う。
By the following treatments (A) to (C), the reduction test conditions of the sintered ore were simulated to simulate the change over time of the reduction conditions when the ore descends in the blast furnace. The method for evaluating reduced powdering properties of sintered ore according to claim 1, wherein the reduction test is performed.
(A) A general heat mass balance model for analyzing the blast furnace operation from both the material balance and the heat balance is set, and the blast furnace operation conditions are calculated by inputting the blast furnace operation conditions into the general heat mass balance model.
(B) The inside of the blast furnace is divided into meshes, partial balance models for calculating the mass balance and heat balance are set for each mesh, and the blast furnace operating conditions calculated in (A) above are calculated for the partial balance model. Input the operation specifications and calculate the temperature distribution and gas composition distribution inside the blast furnace and the descending speed in the charging furnace.
(C) Based on the temperature distribution and gas composition distribution inside the blast furnace calculated in (B) above, and the descending speed in the charging furnace, the time-dependent change in the reduction condition of the sintered ore descending in the blast furnace is estimated, and the estimated firing Simulating the time-dependent change of the reduction condition of the ore, the reduction gas composition and the reduction temperature are set with respect to the reduction time in the reduction test of the sintered ore.
(D) Under the conditions set in (C) above, the sintered ore reduction test is performed to a temperature of 900 ° C. or lower while the temperature is raised from the blast furnace top temperature.
上記焼結鉱の還元試験を、焼結鉱に荷重を負荷しつつ行うことを特徴とする請求項1または2に記載の焼結鉱の還元粉化性状の評価方法。 3. The method for evaluating reduced powder properties of sintered ore according to claim 1, wherein the reduction test of the sintered ore is performed while applying a load to the sintered ore.
JP2010143429A 2010-06-24 2010-06-24 Method for evaluating reduced powder properties of sintered ore Active JP5455813B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2010143429A JP5455813B2 (en) 2010-06-24 2010-06-24 Method for evaluating reduced powder properties of sintered ore

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2010143429A JP5455813B2 (en) 2010-06-24 2010-06-24 Method for evaluating reduced powder properties of sintered ore

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2012007204A JP2012007204A (en) 2012-01-12
JP5455813B2 true JP5455813B2 (en) 2014-03-26

Family

ID=45538069

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2010143429A Active JP5455813B2 (en) 2010-06-24 2010-06-24 Method for evaluating reduced powder properties of sintered ore

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP5455813B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5734745B2 (en) * 2011-05-27 2015-06-17 Jfeスチール株式会社 Measuring method of reduced powdering rate of ore
KR101368562B1 (en) * 2012-06-28 2014-02-28 현대제철 주식회사 Ri calculating method for using rdi in blast furnace
KR101443448B1 (en) * 2012-07-30 2014-09-19 현대제철 주식회사 Prediction method for sinter ore with rdi
JP5546675B1 (en) * 2012-12-07 2014-07-09 新日鉄住金エンジニアリング株式会社 Blast furnace operating method and hot metal manufacturing method
JP6372271B2 (en) * 2014-09-16 2018-08-15 新日鐵住金株式会社 Estimation method of reduced powder index of steel pellets.
JP7003782B2 (en) * 2018-03-27 2022-02-04 日本製鉄株式会社 Reduced pulverization property management device, reduced pulverization property management program, and reduced pulverization property management method
CN113025769B (en) * 2021-03-09 2022-03-15 东北大学 Method for measuring molten drop performance of iron ore by simulating reduction conditions of blast furnace
JP7111284B1 (en) * 2021-06-18 2022-08-02 Jfeスチール株式会社 Evaluation method of agglomerate ore and agglomerate ore
JP7790476B2 (en) * 2024-05-23 2025-12-23 Jfeスチール株式会社 Blast furnace operational status evaluation method and operation method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2012007204A (en) 2012-01-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP5455813B2 (en) Method for evaluating reduced powder properties of sintered ore
Da Costa et al. Modelling a new, low CO2 emissions, hydrogen steelmaking process
Iljana et al. Effect of adding limestone on the metallurgical properties of iron ore pellets
CN101597659B (en) Experimental method and device for simulating the circulation and enrichment law of alkali metal in blast furnace
CN103645114A (en) Iron-containing raw material gas-based reduction and slagging process experiment method and iron-containing raw material gas-based reduction and slagging device
JP7485199B2 (en) Method for creating model for estimating post-reaction strength of coke, method for estimating post-reaction strength of coke, and method for manufacturing coke
Hessels et al. Sintering behavior of combusted iron powder in a packed bed reactor with nitrogen and hydrogen
JP2016057149A (en) High-temperature property evaluation test device for ore
Kowitwarangkul et al. Reduction kinetics of self-reducing pellets of iron ore
JP2013147692A (en) Method of operating blast furnace at high tapping ratio of pig iron
Lu et al. Direct reduction of iron ore pellets by using CO/CO2 and CO gases
KR102491194B1 (en) Method for Estimating the Reduction Degree in Furnace Depending
JP5786810B2 (en) Blast furnace operation method
JP6627469B2 (en) Reduction method of iron oxide raw material using shaft furnace
JP5803839B2 (en) Blast furnace operation method
Nisioka et al. Development of Mathematical Models for Blast Furnaces
JP6673114B2 (en) Estimation method of heat storage zone temperature of blast furnace
Carvalho et al. Review on mathematical models for travelling-grate iron oxide pellet induration furnaces
JP7203680B2 (en) Method for setting gas blowing conditions and program for setting method for gas blowing conditions
JP7832465B2 (en) Method for manufacturing reduced pellets
EP2495339B1 (en) Method for operating blast furnace
CN105651407A (en) Metallurgical coke initial reaction temperature measurement method and device
JP7644352B2 (en) Methods for estimating the amount of slag in the cohesive zone of a blast furnace and methods for its operation
JP6376095B2 (en) Blast furnace operation method
JP6350101B2 (en) Charge determination method for carbon highly reactive charge and blast furnace operation method using the same

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20121011

A711 Notification of change in applicant

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A712

Effective date: 20121011

A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20130221

RD02 Notification of acceptance of power of attorney

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A7422

Effective date: 20130221

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A821

Effective date: 20130222

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20131210

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20140107

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 5455813

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

S533 Written request for registration of change of name

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

S111 Request for change of ownership or part of ownership

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313115

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250