Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP5555950B2 - Heavy metal removing apparatus and heavy metal removing method - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP5555950B2 - Heavy metal removing apparatus and heavy metal removing method - Google Patents

Heavy metal removing apparatus and heavy metal removing method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP5555950B2
JP5555950B2 JP2009205342A JP2009205342A JP5555950B2 JP 5555950 B2 JP5555950 B2 JP 5555950B2 JP 2009205342 A JP2009205342 A JP 2009205342A JP 2009205342 A JP2009205342 A JP 2009205342A JP 5555950 B2 JP5555950 B2 JP 5555950B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
cadmium
subcritical water
water treatment
scallop
processing
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2009205342A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2011056330A (en
Inventor
千真 梅木
盛詞 吉井
真敏 齋藤
典子 今間
昌則 徳田
Original Assignee
株式会社共生資源研究所
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 株式会社共生資源研究所 filed Critical 株式会社共生資源研究所
Priority to JP2009205342A priority Critical patent/JP5555950B2/en
Publication of JP2011056330A publication Critical patent/JP2011056330A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP5555950B2 publication Critical patent/JP5555950B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Processing Of Solid Wastes (AREA)

Description

本発明は、ホタテ貝のウロ、イカゴロ、タコの腑(以下「ウロ等」という)に含まれる重金属、特に、カドミウム(以下「Cd」と略す)を分離除去する重金属除去装置及び重金属除去方法に関する。   The present invention relates to a heavy metal removal apparatus and a heavy metal removal method for separating and removing heavy metals, particularly cadmium (hereinafter abbreviated as “Cd”), contained in scallop shells, shellfish, and octopus cocoons (hereinafter referred to as “uro”, etc.). .

従来の技術について以下ウロを例にとって説明するがイカゴロ、タコの腑についても同様である。
ウロには、数十ppm(最大で70ppm程度)もの有毒物質であるCdが含まれている。貝柱等の有用部分を取り去った後の残留物であるウロの処分が水産加工業者にとって重要な問題であった。
The prior art will be described below using uro as an example, but the same applies to squid and octopus kites.
Uro contains Cd, which is a toxic substance of several tens of ppm (about 70 ppm at the maximum). Disposal of Uro, the residue after removing useful parts such as scallops, was an important issue for fishery processors.

図11は、ホタテ貝の内容物を示し、1は貝柱、2は貝柱1の外層に位置するエラ、3はエラ2の外層に位置する生殖巣、4は最外周のヒモ、5はウロである。貝柱1、エラ2、ヒモ4が有用部分であり、有用部分を加工除去した残りが加工残渣となる。   FIG. 11 shows the contents of a scallop, where 1 is a scallop, 2 is an ella located in the outer layer of the scallop 1, 3 is a gonad located in the outer layer of ella 2, 4 is an outermost string, and 5 is an urine is there. The scallop 1, the gill 2, and the string 4 are useful parts, and the remainder obtained by processing and removing the useful parts is a processing residue.

このような加工残渣の処分方法としては、加工残渣を地中に埋設投棄する等の処分を行っていたが、Cdの流出による環境汚染の恐れもあり、根本的な処分方法とはいえなかった。
なお、ウロのみを処分する場合もあるがその場合はウロを加工残渣とする。
As a disposal method of such processing residues, disposal such as disposal of processing residues buried in the ground was performed, but there was a risk of environmental pollution due to the outflow of Cd, and it could not be said to be a fundamental disposal method. .
In some cases, only uro is disposed of, but in that case, uro is used as a processing residue.

そこで、このような加工残渣の処理法として、魚介類の内臓を希硫酸に浸漬してから攪拌して液中に重金属を溶出させた後、その溶出液をイオン交換樹脂に接触させて重金属を溶出液から除去する重金属の分離除去方法が知られている(例えば、特許文献1参照)。   Therefore, as a method for treating such processing residues, after immersing the internal organs of seafood in dilute sulfuric acid and stirring to elute heavy metals in the liquid, the eluate is brought into contact with an ion exchange resin to remove heavy metals. A method for separating and removing heavy metals to be removed from an eluate is known (for example, see Patent Document 1).

超臨界流体は臨界温度および臨界圧力以上の非凝縮性高密度流体と定義されている。オートクレーブ等で密閉された系内の水の温度を上昇させていくと、臨界点(水の場合は374℃,22.1MPa)において気相と液相の密度が等しくなり、それ以上の温度ではどちらの相とも区別のつかない状態となる。   A supercritical fluid is defined as a noncondensable dense fluid above the critical temperature and pressure. When the temperature of the water in the system sealed with an autoclave or the like is increased, the density of the gas phase and the liquid phase becomes equal at the critical point (374 ° C, 22.1 MPa for water). Both phases are indistinguishable.

この状態の水は液体と気体の中間的な物性を示し、これを「超臨界水」と呼んでいる。つまり、超臨界水は水蒸気と同等の大きな運動エネルギー(拡散性)を持ち、かつ液体の水に匹敵する高い分子密度(溶解力)を兼ね備えた流体といえる。   Water in this state exhibits intermediate physical properties between liquid and gas and is called “supercritical water”. That is, it can be said that supercritical water has a large kinetic energy (diffusibility) equivalent to that of water vapor and a high molecular density (solving power) comparable to liquid water.

図10に水の状態図および水の誘電率とイオン積の温度依存性を示す。水の温度・圧力を374℃・22.1MPa(218気圧)まで上げると、液体でも気体でもない状態となる。この時の温度・圧力を臨界点Cと言い、臨界点C以上の状態の水を超臨界水、臨界点Cよりやや低い温度の水は亜臨界水と称される。超臨界水や亜臨界水は、有機物が格段に溶けやすくなり、有機物をすばやく低分子まで分解することができる。しかも、超臨界水処理や亜臨界水処理は水と熱のみを利用したクリーンな反応であり、環境に配慮した技術として注目されている。   FIG. 10 shows the water phase diagram and the temperature dependence of the dielectric constant and ion product of water. When the temperature / pressure of water is increased to 374 ° C. and 22.1 MPa (218 atm), the liquid becomes neither liquid nor gas. The temperature and pressure at this time are referred to as critical point C, water at a temperature above critical point C is referred to as supercritical water, and water at a temperature slightly lower than critical point C is referred to as subcritical water. With supercritical water and subcritical water, organic substances are much more soluble, and organic substances can be quickly decomposed into low molecules. Moreover, supercritical water treatment and subcritical water treatment are clean reactions using only water and heat, and are attracting attention as environmentally friendly technologies.

このように、亜臨界水は、優れた成分抽出作用と強い加水分解作用を有している。さらに、亜臨界水では、水のイオン積は250℃付近で最大値を示し、HおよびOH濃度は常温の約30倍となるため、この温度付近で加水分解力は最大となる。また、温度上昇に伴って誘電率は低下するため、亜臨界水は有機溶剤の性質を有する。この亜臨界水処理では水自体を反応に用いており、特に化学薬品を必要とせず環境負荷も生じ難いため、廃棄物処理やその資源化プロセスへの応用が期待されている。 Thus, subcritical water has an excellent component extraction action and a strong hydrolysis action. Further, in subcritical water, the water ion product has a maximum value near 250 ° C., and the H + and OH concentrations are about 30 times the normal temperature, so that the hydrolysis power is maximum near this temperature. Moreover, since the dielectric constant decreases with increasing temperature, subcritical water has the properties of an organic solvent. In this subcritical water treatment, water itself is used for the reaction, and it does not require chemicals and is unlikely to cause an environmental burden. Therefore, it is expected to be applied to waste treatment and its resource recycling process.

そこで、上述したウロ5からの重金属除去についても、この亜臨界水を利用する研究がなされている(特許文献2参照)。   Thus, research on the use of this subcritical water has also been made for the removal of heavy metals from the above-described scale 5 (see Patent Document 2).

特許第3323392号公報Japanese Patent No. 3323392 特許第4066259号公報Japanese Patent No. 4066259

しかしながら、上述した重金属除去装置にあっては、膨大な電力を必要とするうえ(特に特許文献1)、電極に脂肪が付着するなど、高額な装置であるにも拘わらず、その耐久性が低いという問題が生じていた。   However, the heavy metal removing device described above requires a large amount of electric power (particularly, Patent Document 1) and has low durability despite being an expensive device such as fat attached to electrodes. There was a problem.

そこで、本発明は、小型でエネルギー効率に優れ、連続的な処理を可能とし得て、大量の試料を処理することができ、しかも、確実に重金属を除去することができる重金属除去装置及び重金属除去方法を提供することを目的とする。   Therefore, the present invention is small, energy efficient, can enable continuous processing, can process a large amount of samples, and can remove heavy metals with certainty, and heavy metal removal It aims to provide a method.

本発明は、カドミウムを含むホタテ、イカゴロあるいはタコの加工残渣(以下「ホタテ加工残渣」という。)が供給された反応槽へ高温高圧水蒸気を吹き込んでホタテ加工残渣に相変化潜熱を利用した加熱によって前記反応槽内にて150℃以上200℃以下での亜臨界水処理を所定時間行うホタテ加工残渣からのカドミウム除去方法であり、前記反応槽での亜臨界水処理前又は亜臨界水処理後にpHのモニタリングを行い、モニタリング結果に応じてpH4.0〜.0の範囲でpH調整を行い、亜臨界水処理後のpH4.0〜5.0の範囲の懸濁液からカドミウムが濃縮された固相を分離することを特徴とするホタテ加工残渣からのカドミウム除去方法である。
これにより、小型でエネルギー効率に優れ、連続的な処理を可能とし得て、大量の試料
を処理することができ、しかも、確実に重金属を固相に凝縮させて除去することができる。
In the present invention, high-temperature and high-pressure steam is blown into a reaction vessel to which scallop, squidgoro or octopus processing residue containing cadmium (hereinafter referred to as “scallop processing residue”) is supplied, and the scallop processing residue is heated using phase change latent heat. A method for removing cadmium from a scallop processing residue in which a subcritical water treatment at 150 ° C. or higher and 200 ° C. or lower is performed for a predetermined time in the reaction vessel, and the pH before or after the subcritical water treatment in the reaction vessel Of pH 4.0 to 5. depending on the monitoring result. Adjust pH in the range of 0, cadmium from scallop processing residue cadmium from a suspension liquid in the range of pH4.0~5.0 after subcritical water treatment and separating the solid phase enriched It is a removal method.
Thereby, it is small and excellent in energy efficiency, can be continuously processed, a large amount of sample can be processed, and the heavy metal can be reliably condensed to the solid phase and removed.

記反応槽での亜臨界水処理前又は亜臨界水処理後のpHをモニタリングするための手段を設けている。
モニタリング結果に応じて、pH調整剤を適宜供給すればより精度よくpHの調整を行
うことができる。
It is provided with a means for monitoring the sub pH after critical water before or subcritical water treatment in the previous SL reactor.
Depending on the monitoring result, the pH can be adjusted with higher accuracy by appropriately supplying a pH adjusting agent.

本方法によれば、比較的低温域の亜臨界水処理で、しかも、確実に重金属を除去することができる。 According to the how, relatively subcritical water treatment under low temperature, moreover, it is possible to reliably remove heavy metals.

また、前記反応槽に供給されるホタテ加工残渣には、塩分低減処理及び粉砕処理の少なくとも一方を含む前処理が施されてもよい Also, the scallops processing residue to be supplied before Symbol reactor, pretreatment containing at least one of the salinity reduction process and grinding process may be performed.

処理を行うことにより、装置本体の耐久性の向上や処理時間の短縮化といった相乗効果を発揮することができる。 By performing the pretreatment, it is possible to exert a synergistic effect that reduction of the durability of the improved and processing time of the apparatus main body.

請求項に記載の方法は、前記pH調整には、クエン酸、リンゴ酸又は塩酸が用いられていることを特徴とする。 Way of claim 3, the pH adjustment, characterized in that citric acid, malic acid or hydrochloric acid is used.

請求項に記載の方法によれば、後処理の容易化に貢献することができる。 According to how according to claim 3, can contribute to facilitation of after-treatment.

請求項に記載の方法は、前記pH調整は、pH4.5〜5.0の範囲で行うことを特徴とする。 Way of claim 4, wherein the pH adjustment is characterized in that in a range of PH4.5~5.0.

請求項に記載の方法によれば、より確実に処理後の液相のCd濃度を低減させることができる。 According to how according to claim 4, it is possible to reduce the Cd concentration of more reliably processed liquid phase.

本発明の重金属除去装置は、エネルギー消費が少なく、しかも、安価で耐久性を向上することができる。   The heavy metal removing apparatus of the present invention consumes less energy, and is inexpensive and can improve durability.

本発明の一実施形態に係る重金属除去装置の説明図である。It is explanatory drawing of the heavy metal removal apparatus which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. (A)は90〜190℃で5〜30分間の亜臨界水処理を行った場合の水相におけるカドミウム濃度を示すグラフ図、(B)は試験管内における固相と液相との関係を示す説明図である。(A) is a graph showing the cadmium concentration in the aqueous phase when subcritical water treatment is performed at 90 to 190 ° C. for 5 to 30 minutes, and (B) shows the relationship between the solid phase and the liquid phase in the test tube. It is explanatory drawing. 固相へのカドミウム濃縮の測定結果を示すグラフ図である。It is a graph which shows the measurement result of cadmium concentration to a solid phase. pH6(無調整)/170℃の亜臨界水処理を行った後にpHを調整した場合の測定結果のグラフ図である。It is a graph of a measurement result at the time of adjusting pH after performing subcritical water treatment of pH6 (non-adjustment) / 170 degreeC. 亜臨界水処理前にpH3.0〜pH10にpH調整して24時間以上静置した試料を観察した結果の各pH値における固相と液相との分離状態並びに液相の懸濁度を示す説明図である。It shows the separation state of the solid phase and the liquid phase and the degree of suspension of the liquid phase at each pH value as a result of observing a sample that was adjusted to pH 3.0 to pH 10 and left to stand for 24 hours or more before the subcritical water treatment It is explanatory drawing. 180℃の亜臨界水処理の前後にpH調整を行った場合の実験結果のグラフ図である。It is a graph of an experimental result at the time of adjusting pH before and after subcritical water treatment of 180 degreeC. 亜臨界水処理の前後にpHを調整し、200℃の亜臨界水処理を行った場合の実験結果のグラフ図である。It is a graph of an experimental result at the time of adjusting pH before and after subcritical water treatment, and performing 200 degreeC subcritical water treatment. pH6(無調整)における200℃までの亜臨界水処理の実験結果のグラフ図である。It is a graph of the experimental result of the subcritical water treatment to 200 degreeC in pH6 (non-adjustment). 試料湿重量に対する固相の重量(wt%)をpHに対して、処理温度ごとで亜臨界水処理を行った場合の固相の減容度を示すグラフ図である。It is a graph which shows the volume reduction of a solid phase at the time of performing a subcritical water process for every process temperature with respect to pH by the weight (wt%) of the solid phase with respect to sample wet weight. 亜臨界水の説明図である。It is explanatory drawing of subcritical water. ホタテ貝の内容物の説明図である。It is explanatory drawing of the contents of a scallop.

次に、本発明の一実施形態に係る重金属除去装置について、図面を参照して説明する。尚、以下に示す実施例は本発明の重金属除去装置における好適な具体例であり、技術的に好ましい種々の限定を付している場合もあるが、本発明の技術範囲は、特に本発明を限定する記載がない限り、これらの態様に限定されるものではない。   Next, a heavy metal removing apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. In addition, although the Example shown below is a suitable specific example in the heavy metal removal apparatus of this invention, and there may be various technically preferable restrictions, the technical scope of this invention is the present invention especially. As long as there is no description which limits, it is not limited to these aspects.

図1は本発明の一実施形態に係る重金属除去装置の説明図である。   FIG. 1 is an explanatory view of a heavy metal removing apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention.

図1において、10は真水洗浄により塩分を低減させた状態でウロ5を含むホタテ加工残渣を収容するホッパ、11はホッパ10内のホタテ加工残渣を加熱(余熱)する上段ヒータ、12はホッパ10からホタテ加工残渣が供給されて亜臨界水処理を行う反応槽、13は反応槽12へ亜臨界水領域の高温高圧水蒸気を吹き込んで反応槽12内のホタテ加工残渣に相変化潜熱を利用した急速加熱による亜臨界水処理を行うための高温高圧蒸気発生器、14は亜臨界水処理後のホタテ加工残渣の熱回収を行うバッファータンク、15はバッファータンク14の内部に配置された下段ヒータ、16は熱回収後のホタテ加工残渣がバッファータンク14から配管17を介して供給されて脱水処理を行う遠心脱水機である。
反応槽12での亜臨界水処理前又は亜臨界処理後のpHを調整するための手段を設けておくことが好ましい。この手段を介して所定のpH値となるようにpH調整剤を供給することができる。設ける位置としては、ホッパまたはバッファータンクより後ろが好ましい。
さらに、pH値を常に監視するためのモニタリングを設けておくことが好ましい。例えば、pHメーターをホッパに設けておけばよい。
In FIG. 1, reference numeral 10 denotes a hopper that stores scallop processing residues including the uro 5 in a state where salt content is reduced by washing with fresh water, 11 an upper heater that heats (resists) the scallop processing residues in the hopper 10, and 12 a hopper 10. The reaction tank 13 is supplied with scallop processing residue from the scallop to perform subcritical water treatment, and 13 rapidly blows high-temperature and high-pressure steam in the subcritical water region into the reaction tank 12 and uses phase change latent heat for the scallop processing residue in the reaction tank 12. A high-temperature and high-pressure steam generator for performing subcritical water treatment by heating, 14 is a buffer tank for recovering heat of scallop processing residue after subcritical water treatment, 15 is a lower heater disposed in the buffer tank 14, 16 Is a centrifugal dehydrator that performs dehydration processing by supplying scallop processing residue after heat recovery from the buffer tank 14 via a pipe 17.
It is preferable to provide means for adjusting the pH before or after the subcritical water treatment in the reaction tank 12. Through this means, the pH adjusting agent can be supplied so as to have a predetermined pH value. The position to be provided is preferably behind the hopper or the buffer tank.
Furthermore, it is preferable to provide monitoring for constantly monitoring the pH value. For example, a pH meter may be provided in the hopper.

(予備実験)
まず、本発明の亜臨界水処理の有効性、即ち、ウロ5からのカドミウム分離に対する亜臨界水処理の有効性の確認を行った。
(Preliminary experiment)
First, the effectiveness of the subcritical water treatment of the present invention, that is, the effectiveness of the subcritical water treatment for cadmium separation from the uro5 was confirmed.

なお、この確認では、ウロ5を亜臨界水処理することによってウロ中のカドミウムが、油相と水相との間にできる固形脂肪相(通称:Fat相)に濃縮して固定化されるとの報告を参考に、亜臨界水処理効果の確認を行った。   In this confirmation, when uro5 is treated with subcritical water, cadmium in uro is concentrated and immobilized in a solid fat phase (common name: Fat phase) formed between the oil phase and the aqueous phase. The effect of subcritical water treatment was confirmed with reference to the report.

そこで、ウロ5を含む加工残渣を粉砕し水と混合(ホタテ1:水3)した試料を、各条件で亜臨界水処理し、試験管にて24時間以上静置した。   Then, the processing residue containing uro 5 was pulverized and mixed with water (scallop 1: water 3), subcritical water treatment was performed under each condition, and the sample was allowed to stand in a test tube for 24 hours or more.

その結果、「上層」は、油相を含んだ上部からサンプリングしたもので、「中層」は水相からサンプリングしたものである。もし、「Fat相」にカドミウムが固定化されるのであれば、「上層」のカドミウム濃度が高くなるはずであるが、測定の結果はむしろ逆であった。   As a result, the “upper layer” is sampled from the upper part including the oil phase, and the “middle layer” is sampled from the aqueous phase. If cadmium is immobilized in the “Fat phase”, the cadmium concentration in the “upper layer” should be high, but the measurement results were rather reversed.

未処理時には、液相に約1ppmのカドミウムが存在しているのに対して、90〜130℃の処理を行うことにより液相のカドミウム濃度は高くなる。   When untreated, about 1 ppm of cadmium is present in the liquid phase, whereas the cadmium concentration in the liquid phase is increased by performing the treatment at 90 to 130 ° C.

それに対して150℃以上の亜臨界水処理を行った場合は、液相のカドミウム濃度は急激に低下することが判明した。   On the other hand, it was found that when the subcritical water treatment at 150 ° C. or higher was performed, the cadmium concentration in the liquid phase rapidly decreased.

亜臨界水処理を行った場合、測定を行った油相を含む層および水相の両相においてカドミウム濃度が低下していることから、試料中のカドミウムは固相へ濃縮されるものと推察される。   When subcritical water treatment is performed, the cadmium concentration in both the layer containing the measured oil phase and the aqueous phase decreases, so it is assumed that the cadmium in the sample is concentrated to the solid phase. The

そして、これら10以上の予備実験結果より、ホタテ加工残渣の亜臨界水処理によってカドミウムの分離濃縮ができる可能性が示唆された。   And from these 10 or more preliminary experimental results, it was suggested that cadmium could be separated and concentrated by subcritical water treatment of scallop processing residue.

(亜臨界水処理温度及び反応時間)
図2(A)は、90〜190℃で5〜30分間の亜臨界水処理を行った場合の、水相におけるカドミウム濃度の変化を示す。
(Subcritical water treatment temperature and reaction time)
FIG. 2 (A) shows the change in cadmium concentration in the aqueous phase when the subcritical water treatment is performed at 90 to 190 ° C. for 5 to 30 minutes.

この際、図2(B)に示すように、試験管20の下端に沈殿している固相21にカドミウムが主として濃縮して存在しているものと考えられるため、この固相21よりも上相の水相22に含まれるカドミウムの濃度を測定することによりカドミウム濃度を測定・評価することができると考える。従って、以後の実験においては、特に断りがない限り、水相22の中心部からサンプリングした溶液中に含まれるカドミウム濃度の測定を行ったものとする。尚、ここでのカドミウム濃度は4倍希釈試料中のものとする。   At this time, as shown in FIG. 2 (B), it is considered that cadmium is mainly concentrated in the solid phase 21 precipitated at the lower end of the test tube 20, so that it is higher than the solid phase 21. It is considered that the cadmium concentration can be measured and evaluated by measuring the concentration of cadmium contained in the aqueous phase 22 of the phase. Therefore, in subsequent experiments, unless otherwise specified, it is assumed that the concentration of cadmium contained in the solution sampled from the central portion of the aqueous phase 22 was measured. Here, the cadmium concentration is in a 4-fold diluted sample.

また、ここで用いた試料はホタテ:水の質量比を1:3の割合で調整し、試料のpHは無調整の6.2(±0.1)である。   Moreover, the sample used here adjusts the mass ratio of scallop: water at a ratio of 1: 3, and the pH of the sample is 6.2 (± 0.1) without adjustment.

この実験では、それぞれ別の日に3回にわたって行っており、測定日の違いをポイントマーカー種と線種とにより区別している。尚、測定日を異ならせることによってカドミウム濃度には、若干の差異が生じる。従って、このデータのみから単純に絶対値の比較をすることはできない。   In this experiment, it is performed three times on different days, and the difference in measurement date is distinguished by the point marker type and the line type. Note that there are some differences in the cadmium concentration due to different measurement dates. Therefore, it is not possible to simply compare absolute values from this data alone.

ここで、未処理において1.1〜1.2ppmであったカドミウム濃度が、90〜110℃という比較的低温域で処理を行った場合には1.5〜2ppm程度と高濃度となった。また、150℃以上の温度域での処理で明確にカドミウム濃度の低下が認められ、処理温度が高くなるほど、また処理時間が長くなるほど、その傾向が顕著になる。一方、130℃、150℃処理においては、処理時間との整合が不明確である。   Here, the cadmium concentration which was 1.1 to 1.2 ppm in the untreated was as high as about 1.5 to 2 ppm when the treatment was performed at a relatively low temperature range of 90 to 110 ° C. In addition, a cadmium concentration is clearly reduced in the treatment at a temperature range of 150 ° C. or higher, and the tendency becomes more prominent as the treatment temperature becomes higher and the treatment time becomes longer. On the other hand, in the processing at 130 ° C. and 150 ° C., matching with the processing time is unclear.

ところで、ウロ5中のカドミウムは多種のタンパク質と配位結合して存在していると考えられている。その主たるカドミウム結合物質は、分子量65万および10万の物質であることが明らかになっている。このカドミウム結合物質からカドミウムを解離させる方法として、水素イオンの競合による解離とタンパク質の分解による解離が上げられるが、上記の実験においてpH調整は行っておらず、処理前後のpH値の変化も認められない。従って、本実験結果については以下の解釈をすることができる。   By the way, cadmium in uro5 is considered to exist in coordination with various proteins. Its main cadmium-binding substance has been found to be a substance with molecular weights of 650,000 and 100,000. As a method for dissociating cadmium from this cadmium-binding substance, dissociation due to hydrogen ion competition and dissociation due to protein degradation can be raised, but pH adjustment was not performed in the above experiment, and changes in pH value before and after treatment were also observed. I can't. Therefore, the following interpretation can be made about the result of this experiment.

即ち、未処理においては大半のカドミウムがカドミウム結合物質に束縛された状態にあるが、これを加熱することによりタンパク質の構造が壊れ、カドミウムが液中に溶出する。但し、未処理および低温域処理における水相中のカドミウムが、イオンの状態であるか、結合状態のまま懸濁しているかを特定することはできていない。また、150℃以上での亜臨界水処理では、液相中のカドミウムが何らかの物質と結合して固相へ沈殿したものと推定される。   That is, in the untreated state, most of the cadmium is bound to the cadmium-binding substance, but when heated, the protein structure is broken and cadmium is eluted in the liquid. However, it is not possible to specify whether cadmium in the aqueous phase in untreated and low-temperature treatment is in an ionic state or suspended in a bound state. Further, in the subcritical water treatment at 150 ° C. or higher, it is presumed that cadmium in the liquid phase is combined with some substance and precipitated into the solid phase.

図3は、固相へのカドミウム濃縮を確認するため、固相よりサンプリングを行いカドミウム濃度の測定を行った結果を示す。但し、固相からのサンプリングは目視で、体積ベースでほぼ同一となるように行ったものであり、定量性については参考値に留まる。   FIG. 3 shows the results of sampling from the solid phase and measuring the cadmium concentration to confirm cadmium concentration in the solid phase. However, the sampling from the solid phase was performed by visual observation so as to be almost the same on a volume basis, and the quantitative property remains as a reference value.

本実験結果から、処理温度が高温になるに従って固相へのカドミウム濃度が高くなる傾向が確認された。   From this experimental result, it was confirmed that the cadmium concentration in the solid phase tends to increase as the processing temperature increases.

(pH依存性)
ウロ5からのカドミウム脱離はタンパク質の分解の他、溶液中の水素イオン濃度が密接に関係する。また、ウロ5を水溶液中に浸漬し、水素イオン濃度を増大させると、水素イオンが金属イオンと競合して金属イオンを追い出す。50%のカドミウムが解離してくる水素イオン濃度はpH3〜3.5程度であり、水素イオン濃度がpH1程度になるとほとんどのカドミウムが解離することが知られている。
(PH dependence)
Cadmium desorption from uro5 is closely related to the concentration of hydrogen ions in the solution in addition to protein degradation. Moreover, when the uro 5 is immersed in an aqueous solution and the hydrogen ion concentration is increased, the hydrogen ions compete with the metal ions to drive out the metal ions. The hydrogen ion concentration at which 50% of cadmium is dissociated is about pH 3 to 3.5, and it is known that most cadmium is dissociated when the hydrogen ion concentration is about pH 1.

また、亜臨界水処理後に何らかの物質がカドミウムを吸着し固相へ沈殿すると考察しているが、現時点においては、この吸着媒は低分子化されたタンパク質またはアミノ酸の一種であろうと推察する。これらの有機物による金属イオン吸着において、主に結合に寄与するのはカルボキシル基またはチオール基であると考えられるが、これらの結合も水素イオンと競合し、溶液のpHの影響を強く受ける。pH6と比較してpH4では水素イオン濃度は100倍となり、吸着されたカドミウムイオンはある程度脱離して水相へ溶出するものと推定される。   In addition, although it is considered that some substance adsorbs cadmium and precipitates in the solid phase after the subcritical water treatment, it is assumed that this adsorbent is a kind of low molecular weight protein or amino acid. In metal ion adsorption by these organic substances, it is considered that a carboxyl group or a thiol group mainly contributes to bonding, but these bonds also compete with hydrogen ions and are strongly influenced by the pH of the solution. The hydrogen ion concentration is 100 times higher at pH 4 than at pH 6, and it is estimated that the adsorbed cadmium ions are desorbed to some extent and eluted into the aqueous phase.

試料のpHを調整した後、亜臨界水処理を行った場合、高pH域で亜臨界水処理を行うほど水相中のカドミウム濃度は高くなり、またpH4で亜臨界水処理を行った場合にも、pHを調整しない場合よりもカドミウム濃度が高くなる傾向が認められた。   When subcritical water treatment is performed after adjusting the pH of the sample, the cadmium concentration in the aqueous phase increases as the subcritical water treatment is performed in a high pH range, and when the subcritical water treatment is performed at pH 4. However, a tendency for the cadmium concentration to be higher than when the pH was not adjusted was observed.

次に、pH6(無調整)/170℃の亜臨界水処理を行った後にpHを調整した場合の測定結果を図4に示す。   Next, FIG. 4 shows the measurement results when the pH was adjusted after the subcritical water treatment at pH 6 (no adjustment) / 170 ° C.

pH2において、カドミウム濃度が顕著に高くなっていることから、やはり水素イオンの競合によるカドミウムイオンの脱離が生じていると考えるのが妥当である。また、pH8及びpH10においてはpH調整の影響がほとんどないことが判る。   Since the cadmium concentration is remarkably high at pH 2, it is appropriate to consider that cadmium ions are desorbed due to competition of hydrogen ions. It can also be seen that there is almost no influence of pH adjustment at pH 8 and pH 10.

亜臨界水処理の結果、タンパク質等に吸着し固相へ沈殿したカドミウムについては、処理後に高pH側へ調整してもカドミウムの吸着に対しては影響しないため変化が見られないものと考えられる。   As a result of subcritical water treatment, cadmium adsorbed on proteins and precipitated in the solid phase is considered to have no change because it does not affect cadmium adsorption even after adjustment to high pH after treatment. .

ここで、図5に示すように、pH4の場合、明らかにカドミウム濃度の低下が認められる。亜臨界水処理前にpH8,pH6(無調整)、pH4に調整し、24時間以上静置した試料を観察した結果、pH8における液相の懸濁度は強く、pH6では若干濁度が弱くなった。また、pH4では、液相はほぼ透明になっており、明らかに浮遊物質が凝集沈殿していることが判明した。これは、亜臨界水処理後の懸濁物質の等電点がpH4付近にあることを示唆している。   Here, as shown in FIG. 5, in the case of pH 4, the fall of a cadmium density | concentration is recognized clearly. As a result of observing a sample that was adjusted to pH 8, pH 6 (no adjustment) and pH 4 and allowed to stand for 24 hours or more before the subcritical water treatment, the suspension of the liquid phase at pH 8 was strong, and the turbidity was slightly weak at pH 6. It was. Further, at pH 4, the liquid phase was almost transparent, and it was clearly found that suspended substances were coagulated and precipitated. This suggests that the isoelectric point of the suspended matter after the subcritical water treatment is around pH 4.

次に、180℃の亜臨界水処理の前後にpH調整を行った場合の実験結果を図6に示す。「前」「後」の実験結果とも、先に図4に示した実験結果とよく一致しており、試料とも整合する。本実験結果より、カドミウム吸着媒の等電点がpH4.5付近にあることが判明した。   Next, FIG. 6 shows the experimental results when pH adjustment was performed before and after the subcritical water treatment at 180 ° C. The “previous” and “rear” experimental results are in good agreement with the experimental results shown in FIG. 4, and are consistent with the sample. From this experimental result, it was found that the isoelectric point of the cadmium adsorbent is around pH 4.5.

上述した試料のうち、pH10に調整した後に、亜臨界水処理を行った試料について、処理後にpH4に滴定を行うと、液相のカドミウム濃度は0.026ppmまで低下する。この結果から、高pHにおける懸濁層のほとんどのカドミウムが、イオンの状態ではなく吸着媒に吸着した状態で存在していることが判る。   Among the samples described above, when the sample subjected to the subcritical water treatment after being adjusted to pH 10 is titrated to pH 4 after the treatment, the cadmium concentration in the liquid phase is reduced to 0.026 ppm. From this result, it can be seen that most of the cadmium in the suspension layer at high pH is present in an adsorbed state rather than an ionic state.

以上の実験結果より、亜臨界水処理によるホタテ試料からのカドミウム分離のメカニズムは次の通りと推察する。   From the above experimental results, it is assumed that the mechanism of cadmium separation from scallop samples by subcritical water treatment is as follows.

試料を加熱することによりタンパク質が分解され、ウロ中のカドミウムが液相へ溶出する。150℃以上の亜臨界水処理を行った場合、低分子化されたタンパク質もしくはアミノ酸が生成し、この物質がカドミウムを吸着した状態で溶液中に懸濁する。この物質の等電点はpH4.5付近であるので、pHを調整することで懸濁した吸着媒が凝集沈殿しカドミウムが固相へ分離凝縮される。但し、低pHになってくると、カドミウムイオンと水素イオンとの競合が生じ、凝集沈殿とカドミウムの脱離が同時に起こり得るため、その分岐点であるpH4付近では現象が複雑になっているものと推定される。   By heating the sample, the protein is decomposed, and cadmium in the urine is eluted into the liquid phase. When the subcritical water treatment at 150 ° C. or higher is performed, a low molecular weight protein or amino acid is produced, and this substance is suspended in the solution while adsorbing cadmium. Since the isoelectric point of this substance is around pH 4.5, the suspended adsorbent is agglomerated and precipitated by adjusting the pH, and cadmium is separated and condensed into the solid phase. However, when the pH is lowered, competition between cadmium ions and hydrogen ions occurs, and coagulation precipitation and cadmium desorption may occur at the same time. Therefore, the phenomenon is complicated near pH 4, which is the branching point. It is estimated to be.

(200℃亜臨界水処理)
従来技術では、ウロ5を200℃の亜臨界水処理を行った場合、ウロ5中のカドミウムは「Fat相」と称する固体の脂肪相に濃縮するとしている。
(200 ° C subcritical water treatment)
According to the prior art, when the uro 5 is subjected to a subcritical water treatment at 200 ° C., the cadmium in the uro 5 is concentrated to a solid fat phase called “Fat phase”.

しかしながら、上述した実験では、Ar雰囲気中で行っているが、亜臨界水処理の結果として固体の脂肪相が生成されるという事実は確認されていない。また、これまでの実験からは、図2に示したように、高温の処理を行うほどカドミウムの分離効果が顕著になることが判明している。
なお、特許文献2における実験では、反応管をArガスで置換してから亜臨界水処理を行なっているのに対して、本形態例では、大気雰囲気のまま処理を行なっている。
However, in the above-described experiment, although it is performed in an Ar atmosphere, the fact that a solid fatty phase is generated as a result of the subcritical water treatment has not been confirmed. Further, from the experiments so far, as shown in FIG. 2, it has been found that the effect of separating cadmium becomes more prominent as the temperature is increased.
In the experiment in Patent Document 2, subcritical water treatment is performed after replacing the reaction tube with Ar gas, whereas in the present embodiment, the treatment is performed in an air atmosphere.

図7に亜臨界水処理の前後にpHを調整し、200℃の処理を行った場合の実験結果を示す。比較のため、図6に示した180℃の実験結果を破線で示している。   FIG. 7 shows the experimental results when the pH is adjusted before and after the subcritical water treatment and the treatment at 200 ° C. is performed. For comparison, the experimental result at 180 ° C. shown in FIG. 6 is indicated by a broken line.

低pH側でカドミウム濃度が高くなるという、これまでの実験結果とよく一致した傾向が再現され、更にpH4以上においては、いずれの場合も測定限界値以下となることが判明した。   The tendency that the cadmium concentration increases on the low pH side, which coincides well with the previous experimental results, was reproduced, and it was also found that at pH 4 and above, in all cases, it was below the measurement limit value.

この処理に対応する試料を観察した結果、200℃の亜臨界水処理を行っても「Fat相」に相当する固体相が生成していない公算が大きいことが読み取れた。また、180℃の場合と比較して、明らかに液相の透明度が高く、懸濁物質が沈殿していることが判明した。   As a result of observing a sample corresponding to this treatment, it was found that there was a high probability that a solid phase corresponding to the “Fat phase” was not generated even when the subcritical water treatment at 200 ° C. was performed. Further, it was found that the liquid phase was clearly more transparent than the case of 180 ° C., and the suspended solids were precipitated.

以上の実験結果から、200℃の亜臨界水処理を行った場合、試料中のカドミウムは、より確実に固相へ濃縮されるものと結論する。また、少なくとも実操業を念頭に置いた場合、大気雰囲気中で処理を行う方が、実用上のメリットは大きい。   From the above experimental results, it is concluded that cadmium in the sample is more reliably concentrated to the solid phase when subcritical water treatment at 200 ° C. is performed. In addition, at least with actual operation in mind, the practical merit is greater when the treatment is performed in an air atmosphere.

(希釈倍率)
亜臨界水処理によってウロの処理を行う場合、処理時の水分が少ないほどエネルギーの節約ができ、ランニングコストの低減を図ることができる。そこで、試料調整時に精製水を用い質量比で4倍から無希釈まで水分比を変えて、その影響を調査した。
(Dilution ratio)
When processing uro by subcritical water processing, energy can be saved and the running cost can be reduced as the water content during processing decreases. Therefore, when the sample was prepared, purified water was used and the water ratio was changed from 4 times by mass to no dilution, and the effect was investigated.

試料のpHは、無調整のpH6とpH4である。130℃の処理では、希釈倍率が低下する割合とほぼ比例してカドミウム濃度が高くなっている。150℃,170℃の処理を行なうとこれまでの実験結果同様にカドミウム濃度の低下が認められ、希釈倍率を低下させても2倍希釈までは上記の比例関係が保たれる。   The pH of the sample is unadjusted pH 6 and pH 4. In the treatment at 130 ° C., the cadmium concentration increases in proportion to the rate at which the dilution factor decreases. When the treatments at 150 ° C. and 170 ° C. are performed, a decrease in cadmium concentration is recognized as in the previous experimental results, and the above proportionality is maintained up to 2-fold dilution even if the dilution factor is reduced.

試料を希釈せずに処理した場合にはこの関係が崩れ、また処理温度との整合も取れていない。しかし、試料を生のままサンプリングする場合、マイクロピペットの先端に試料が詰まることが多くなるため正確な定量が難しく、またサンプリングする試料の部位によってもカドミウム濃度の勾配が生じてしまう。   When the sample is processed without dilution, this relationship is lost, and the processing temperature is not consistent. However, when the sample is sampled raw, the sample is often clogged at the tip of the micropipette, so that accurate quantification is difficult, and a cadmium concentration gradient also occurs depending on the portion of the sample to be sampled.

pH4における130℃及び150℃で処理した場合、概して希釈倍率が低いほど亜臨界水処理によるカドミウムの濃縮度が高くなる。但し、無希釈処理の場合にはカドミウム濃度が高くなっていることから、2倍希釈程度の水分比率で処理が可能であることが読み取れる。   When processing at 130 ° C. and 150 ° C. at pH 4, the concentration of cadmium by the subcritical water treatment generally increases as the dilution factor decreases. However, since the cadmium concentration is high in the case of non-dilution treatment, it can be read that the treatment can be performed at a moisture ratio of about 2-fold dilution.

次に、pH6(無調整)における200℃までの同実験結果を図8に示す。なお、本実験では、190℃/2倍希釈で0.168ppm、200℃/2倍希釈で0.048ppmという高いカドミウム分離効果が確認された。以上より、カドミウム分離効果に関する限り、等倍以下の希釈倍率でも充分な効果が期待できるものと結論する。実操業条件は、バルブの耐久性等の機械的要因により決定されるものと推察する。   Next, FIG. 8 shows the results of the same experiment up to 200 ° C. at pH 6 (no adjustment). In this experiment, high cadmium separation effects of 0.168 ppm at 190 ° C./2 times dilution and 0.048 ppm at 200 ° C./2 times dilution were confirmed. From the above, as far as the cadmium separation effect is concerned, it is concluded that a sufficient effect can be expected even at a dilution ratio equal to or less than 1. The actual operating conditions are assumed to be determined by mechanical factors such as the durability of the valve.

(脱水実験)
このように、ホタテ加工残渣の亜臨界水処理を行うことにより、ウロ中のカドミウムは固相へ濃縮することが判明した。このカドミウムが濃縮した固相の処分は、廃棄物処理業者へ有償で引き渡すことになるが、処理費用の低減を図るためには、この固相をできる限り減容化することが必要である。
(Dehydration experiment)
Thus, it was found that cadmium in uro was concentrated to a solid phase by performing subcritical water treatment of scallop processing residue. The disposal of the solid phase enriched with cadmium is handed over to a waste disposal company for a fee, but it is necessary to reduce the volume of the solid phase as much as possible in order to reduce the processing cost.

そこで、亜臨界水処理後の脱水実験を行った。ここでは、pH4.5,pH6(無調整)、pH10において、固形分の脱水を試みた。   Therefore, dehydration experiments after subcritical water treatment were conducted. Here, dehydration of solid content was attempted at pH 4.5, pH 6 (no adjustment), and pH 10.

尚、脱水には、未処理の場合、180℃の亜臨界水処理の間で、粗い布(コットン)で固めに絞っただけのもの、市販の茶こし網で固形分を除去した後に段階的に濾過したもので行った。   In addition, for dehydration, when untreated, it is a step of substituting with a coarse cloth (cotton) between 180 ° C subcritical water treatment, after removing solids with a commercially available tea strainer. Performed with the filtered one.

未処理の場合、脱水処理を行うとカドミウムはほとんど液中に流出してしまう。次に、上の試料について亜臨界水処理を行い、これまでの実験同様に24時間程度静置した後に脱水処理を行った場合、pH4.5,pH6(無調整)においては、液中のカドミウム濃度が大幅に低下するが、pH10においては、未処理の場合と変わらず、ほとんどのカドミウムが懸濁液中に流出した。   In the case of untreated, when cadmium is dehydrated, most of the cadmium flows out into the liquid. Next, when the above sample was subjected to subcritical water treatment and left to stand for about 24 hours as in the previous experiments, dehydration treatment was performed. At pH 4.5 and pH 6 (unadjusted), cadmium in the liquid was used. Although the concentration was greatly reduced, at pH 10, most of the cadmium flowed out into the suspension, unchanged from the untreated case.

尚、今回行った脱水処理は簡便なもので、濾過作業等は行っていない。また、ある程度の力を入れて脱水を行っているにも関わらず、低pH域では液中へのカドミウムの流出が大きく抑制されている。   In addition, the dehydration process performed this time is simple and does not perform filtration work or the like. Moreover, although dehydration is performed with a certain amount of force, the outflow of cadmium into the liquid is greatly suppressed in the low pH range.

これは亜臨界水処理の結果、何らかの物質に吸着されたカドミウムが、簡単な物理操作のみでは脱離しないこと、更には、このカドミウム吸着物質がpH4.5〜6程度では布目をくぐり抜けない程度の大きさになっていることを示している。   This is because cadmium adsorbed by some substance as a result of subcritical water treatment does not desorb by simple physical operation alone, and furthermore, this cadmium adsorbing substance does not pass through the fabric at pH 4.5-6. It shows that it is a size.

これに対し、pH10においては、ほとんどのカドミウムが液中に流出していることから、高pH域ではこのカドミウム吸着物質の分散性が高く、布目を容易にくぐり抜けてしまうことが判明した。   On the other hand, since most cadmium flows out in the liquid at pH 10, it has been found that the dispersibility of the cadmium adsorbing substance is high in the high pH range, and the cloth easily passes through.

また、亜臨界水処理直後に脱水を行った場合(これまで効果が高かったpH4.5で行っている)、亜臨界水処理直後に脱水処理を行っても、充分なカドミウム分離効果があることが確認された。   In addition, when dehydration is performed immediately after subcritical water treatment (having been performed at pH 4.5, which has been highly effective until now), even if dehydration treatment is performed immediately after subcritical water treatment, there is sufficient cadmium separation effect. Was confirmed.

以上より、亜臨界水処理により固相へ濃縮したカドミウムは脱水処理等の物理的操作では簡単に脱離しないこと、また吸着は亜臨界水処理時もしくは処理後数分以内に完了していることが明らかとなった。   From the above, cadmium concentrated to the solid phase by subcritical water treatment is not easily desorbed by physical operations such as dehydration, and adsorption is completed during subcritical water treatment or within a few minutes after treatment. Became clear.

実操業時には、処理後特に沈殿工程等は不要であり、懸濁状態のまま脱水機に投入できるものと考える。   At the time of actual operation, it is considered that there is no need for a precipitation step or the like after the treatment, and it can be put into a dehydrator in a suspended state.

(減容度)
ウロ5の亜臨界水処理においては、カドミウムが濃縮した固相は廃棄物処理業者へ有償で引き渡すものと考えられる。よって処理費用の低減を図るためには、固相の減容化が肝要である。
(Volume reduction)
In the subcritical water treatment of Uro 5, it is considered that the solid phase enriched with cadmium is delivered to a waste disposal contractor for a fee. Therefore, in order to reduce processing costs, it is important to reduce the volume of the solid phase.

そこで、亜臨界水処理後に遠心分離を行い、固相の減容度を調査した。亜臨界水処理後の試料をファルコンに入れ、遠心分離機(久保田商事株式会社製・卓上小型遠心機2410)で2600rpm/10分間の遠心分離を行った後、ファルコン底部の固相の重量を測定した。亜臨界水処理は160℃,180℃,200℃で行い、pHは処理前にpH4.5,pH6(無調整)、pH8,pH10に調整した。   Therefore, centrifugation was performed after subcritical water treatment, and the volume reduction of the solid phase was investigated. The sample after the subcritical water treatment is put in a falcon, centrifuged at 2600 rpm / 10 minutes with a centrifuge (manufactured by Kubota Corporation, tabletop small centrifuge 2410), and the weight of the solid phase at the bottom of the falcon is measured. did. The subcritical water treatment was performed at 160 ° C., 180 ° C., and 200 ° C., and the pH was adjusted to pH 4.5, pH 6 (no adjustment), pH 8, and pH 10 before the treatment.

試料湿重量に対する固相の重量(wt%)をpHに対して、処理温度ごとにプロットしたグラフを図9に示す。   FIG. 9 shows a graph in which the weight (wt%) of the solid phase with respect to the sample wet weight is plotted for each treatment temperature with respect to the pH.

概して、高温になるほど減容度が大きくなる傾向がみられ、200℃処理の場合は20%以下にまで減容化している。但し、pH10においては、このグラフからは減容度が大きいように見えるが、遠心分離を行っても懸濁物質が沈殿(図5参照)していないことによるものであろう。   In general, the volume reduction tends to increase as the temperature increases, and the volume is reduced to 20% or less in the case of 200 ° C. treatment. However, at pH 10, the volume reduction seems to be large from this graph, but this is probably due to the fact that suspended solids are not precipitated (see FIG. 5) even after centrifugation.

尚、これまでの試料はウロ5を含むホタテ加工残渣をミキサーで粉砕したものを用いていたが、未粉砕のウロ5のみの試料について実験を行った結果、未粉砕試料を用いた場合でも充分なカドミウム分離効果があることが判明した。また、亜臨界水処理後の試料観察の結果、未粉砕試料をそのまま亜臨界水処理した場合でもウロ5の原型は完全に無くなっていることが判明した。   In addition, although the sample so far used what grind | pulverized the scallop processing residue containing the uro5 with the mixer, as a result of experimenting on the sample of only the unground uro5, even when the unground sample is used, it is enough It was found that there is a good cadmium separation effect. In addition, as a result of observation of the sample after the subcritical water treatment, it was found that the prototype of uro 5 was completely lost even when the unground sample was treated with the subcritical water as it was.

従って、実操業における前処理としての粉砕工程は、試料投入バルブの耐久性のみに依存し、場合によっては省略することができる可能性がある。   Therefore, the pulverization step as a pretreatment in actual operation depends only on the durability of the sample input valve, and may be omitted in some cases.

(基礎実験まとめ)
これまでの実験結果から、ホタテ加工残渣の亜臨界水処理が、カドミウム分離およびカドミウムを含む廃棄物の減容化の両面から有益な技術と成り得る可能性が示された。処理温度は、実験を行った範囲では、最も高温条件である200℃が最適である。また、処理時間は、数分程度で充分であろうが、実際には処理装置の特性により異なると思われる。
(Summary of basic experiments)
From the experimental results so far, it has been shown that subcritical water treatment of scallop processing residue can be a useful technique in terms of both cadmium separation and volume reduction of waste containing cadmium. The processing temperature is optimally 200 ° C., which is the highest temperature condition, within the range in which the experiment was performed. Further, the processing time may be about several minutes, but in reality, it seems to vary depending on the characteristics of the processing apparatus.

本実験結果においては、200℃処理を行った場合、特にpH調整を行わなくても充分なカドミウム分離効果が得られているが、実操業においては、処理後の液相の凝集沈殿を考慮してpHの調整またはモニタリングは不可欠であろう。   In this experimental result, when 200 ° C. treatment is performed, a sufficient cadmium separation effect is obtained without particularly adjusting the pH. However, in actual operation, the coagulation sedimentation of the liquid phase after treatment is taken into consideration. Therefore, pH adjustment or monitoring will be essential.

また、亜臨界水処理の結果として生じていると思われるカドミウム吸着物質の等電点はpH4.5付近であることが明らかになった。   In addition, it has been clarified that the isoelectric point of the cadmium adsorbing substance that appears to be generated as a result of the subcritical water treatment is around pH 4.5.

亜臨界水処理の結果として生じたカドミウムの吸着は、脱水等の物理的操作によってはほとんど脱離しないことが確認され、処理後の懸濁液を遠心機等で脱水し減容化できる可能性が高いことが示された。   The adsorption of cadmium generated as a result of subcritical water treatment is confirmed to be almost not desorbed by physical operations such as dehydration, and the suspension after treatment may be dehydrated and reduced in volume using a centrifuge. Was shown to be high.

遠心分離による脱水を行った場合、200℃処理では原料湿重量の20%以下にまで減容できることが確認された。実操業においては、脱水工程において凝集剤等を投与したと仮定しても、少なくとも1/5以下程度までには減容できるものと思われる。これはユーザーのコストメリットに直結する。試料の希釈倍率や粉砕については、カドミウム分離効果に関する限り、さほど気にする必要がないことが判った。よって、これらは主に処理装置の機械的特性から決定することになると思われる。   When dehydration by centrifugation was performed, it was confirmed that the volume could be reduced to 20% or less of the raw material wet weight by the 200 ° C. treatment. In actual operation, even if it is assumed that an aggregating agent or the like is administered in the dehydration step, the volume can be reduced to at least about 1/5 or less. This is directly linked to the user's cost merit. As far as the cadmium separation effect is concerned, it has been found that there is no need to worry about the dilution factor and pulverization of the sample. Thus, these are likely to be determined mainly from the mechanical properties of the processing equipment.

また、亜臨界水処理時の水分として、あるいは処理後の希釈に海水(人工海水)を用いてもカドミウム分離に影響がないことも確認されている。亜臨界水処理時に海水を使用することは、装置の腐蝕が予想されるため好ましくないが、処理後の希釈に関しては海水使用も選択肢に入る。   It has also been confirmed that cadmium separation is not affected even when seawater (artificial seawater) is used as water during subcritical water treatment or for dilution after treatment. Use of seawater during subcritical water treatment is not preferred because corrosion of the apparatus is expected, but use of seawater is also an option for dilution after treatment.

(処理手順)
以上のことから、本発明においては、以下に示す処理手順により、良好な結果を得ることができる。尚、海水に含まれる塩分による装置の腐蝕を抑えるため、ホッパ10にホタテ加工残渣を投入する前に、真水に浸すか洗浄処理を行ってホタテ加工残渣内の塩分を低減させても良い。
(1)原料を亜臨界水処理反応管の受入口(ホッパ10)に投入する。この際、可能であれば、ホッパ10において、後段から回収した熱(上段ヒータ11)を用いて余熱する。また、必要であれば原料の粉砕を行う。
(2)亜臨界水処理(200℃/10分間程度)を行う。
(3)試料をバッファータンク14に移送する。この際、バッファータンク14において熱を回収(下段ヒータ15)し、上段ヒータ11の加熱源として利用する。尚、バッファータンク14への加工残渣の移送には、反応槽12の圧力が残っている状態で排出弁等を開放して試料を取り出すことにより、反応槽のジャケットの熱を保ったまま次処理用試料を順次投入し得て、熱エネルギーの効率的な利用が可能となるが、重力(自重)またはポンプを用いた移送でも良い。
(4)バッファータンク14から連続的に下水処理用の遠心脱水機16に試料を移送する。この際、遠心脱水機16にはpH調整剤を投与する。
(5)遠心分離された固体部分は含カドミウム廃棄物として処理業者へ搬送し、カドミウムが除去された液体部分は肥料やメタン発酵、あるいは磯焼け対策としての施肥等への有効活用を図る。
(Processing procedure)
From the above, in the present invention, good results can be obtained by the following processing procedure. In addition, in order to suppress the corrosion of the apparatus due to salt contained in seawater, the salt content in the scallop processing residue may be reduced by immersing in fresh water or performing a cleaning process before introducing the scallop processing residue into the hopper 10.
(1) The raw material is charged into the inlet (hopper 10) of the subcritical water treatment reaction tube. At this time, if possible, the hopper 10 preheats using heat recovered from the subsequent stage (upper heater 11). If necessary, the raw material is pulverized.
(2) A subcritical water treatment (about 200 ° C./10 minutes) is performed.
(3) The sample is transferred to the buffer tank 14. At this time, heat is recovered in the buffer tank 14 (lower heater 15) and used as a heating source for the upper heater 11. The processing residue is transferred to the buffer tank 14 by removing the sample by opening the discharge valve and the like while the pressure in the reaction tank 12 remains, so that the heat of the jacket of the reaction tank is maintained. Samples for use can be sequentially added, and heat energy can be used efficiently, but it may be transferred by gravity (self-weight) or a pump.
(4) The sample is continuously transferred from the buffer tank 14 to the centrifugal dehydrator 16 for sewage treatment. At this time, a pH adjuster is administered to the centrifugal dehydrator 16.
(5) The centrifuged solid part is transported to a processing company as cadmium-containing waste, and the liquid part from which cadmium has been removed is effectively used for fertilizer, methane fermentation, or fertilization as a measure against burning.

10…ホッパ
11…上段ヒータ
12…反応槽
13…高温高圧蒸気発生器
14…バッファータンク
15…下段ヒータ
16…遠心脱水機
17…配管
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 10 ... Hopper 11 ... Upper stage heater 12 ... Reaction tank 13 ... High temperature / high pressure steam generator 14 ... Buffer tank 15 ... Lower stage heater 16 ... Centrifugal dehydrator 17 ... Piping

Claims (4)

カドミウムを含むホタテ、イカゴロあるいはタコの加工残渣(以下「ホタテ加工残渣」という。)が供給された反応槽へ高温高圧水蒸気を吹き込んでホタテ加工残渣に相変化潜熱を利用した加熱によって前記反応槽内にて150℃以上200℃以下での亜臨界水処理を所定時間行うホタテ加工残渣からのカドミウム除去方法であり、
前記反応槽での亜臨界水処理前又は亜臨界水処理後にpHのモニタリングを行い、モニタリング結果に応じてpH4.0〜.0の範囲でpH調整を行い、
亜臨界水処理後のpH4.0〜5.0の範囲の懸濁液からカドミウムが濃縮された固相を分離することを特徴とするホタテ加工残渣からのカドミウム除去方法。
High-temperature, high-pressure steam is blown into a reaction vessel supplied with processing residues of scallop, squid slag or octopus containing cadmium (hereinafter referred to as “scallop processing residue”), and the scallop processing residue is heated in the reaction vessel using phase change latent heat. A cadmium removal method from scallop processing residue for performing a subcritical water treatment at 150 ° C. or more and 200 ° C. or less for a predetermined time at
PH is monitored before or after subcritical water treatment in the reaction vessel, and pH is 4.0 to 5. depending on the monitoring result. PH adjustment in the range of 0,
Cadmium removal method from scallop processing residue cadmium from a suspension liquid in the range of pH4.0~5.0 after subcritical water treatment and separating the solid phase enriched.
前記反応槽に供給されるホタテ加工残渣には、塩分低減処理及び粉砕処理の少なくとも一方を含む前処理が施されていることを特徴とする請求項1に記載のホタテ加工残渣からのカドミウム除去方法。 The method for removing cadmium from scallop processing residue according to claim 1, wherein the scallop processing residue supplied to the reaction vessel is subjected to pretreatment including at least one of salt reduction processing and pulverization processing. . 前記pH調整には、クエン酸、リンゴ酸又は塩酸が用いられていることを特徴とする請求項1又は2記載のホタテ加工残渣からのカドミウム除去方法。 The method for removing cadmium from scallop processing residues according to claim 1 or 2, wherein citric acid, malic acid or hydrochloric acid is used for the pH adjustment. 前記pH調整は、pH4.5〜5.0の範囲で行うことを特徴とする請求項1乃至3の何れか1項に記載のホタテ加工残渣からのカドミウム除去方法 The method for removing cadmium from scallop processing residues according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the pH adjustment is performed in a range of pH 4.5 to 5.0 .
JP2009205342A 2009-09-04 2009-09-04 Heavy metal removing apparatus and heavy metal removing method Active JP5555950B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2009205342A JP5555950B2 (en) 2009-09-04 2009-09-04 Heavy metal removing apparatus and heavy metal removing method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2009205342A JP5555950B2 (en) 2009-09-04 2009-09-04 Heavy metal removing apparatus and heavy metal removing method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2011056330A JP2011056330A (en) 2011-03-24
JP5555950B2 true JP5555950B2 (en) 2014-07-23

Family

ID=43944625

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2009205342A Active JP5555950B2 (en) 2009-09-04 2009-09-04 Heavy metal removing apparatus and heavy metal removing method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP5555950B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR101235570B1 (en) 2012-06-07 2013-02-21 주식회사 대일이앤씨 Purification method for explosives and heavy metal contaminated soil
JP6327993B2 (en) * 2014-07-24 2018-05-23 株式会社ピーシーエス Subcritical water treatment method and apparatus
CN108445140A (en) * 2018-06-26 2018-08-24 河南师范大学 It is a kind of to utilize high pressure CO2The experimental provision that absorption heavy metal residue is continuously desorbed

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2557015B2 (en) * 1993-06-30 1996-11-27 北海道 Method for producing fish and shellfish extract
JP4405139B2 (en) * 2002-09-09 2010-01-27 マリン・サイエンス株式会社 Processing method of scallop internal organs
JP4092252B2 (en) * 2003-05-23 2008-05-28 マリン・サイエンス株式会社 Method for obtaining useful substance from scallop visceral tissue and plant therefor
JP4066259B2 (en) * 2003-09-11 2008-03-26 財団法人大阪産業振興機構 Treatment method of mollusk-derived waste
JP2006028272A (en) * 2004-07-13 2006-02-02 Nishimuragumi:Kk Fuel production method and fuel production apparatus

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2011056330A (en) 2011-03-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Ofomaja et al. Removal of copper (II) from aqueous solution by pine and base modified pine cone powder as biosorbent
Malcolm Factors to be considered in the isolation and characterization of aquatic humic substances
HRP920601A2 (en) Process for the production of precious metals
JP5555950B2 (en) Heavy metal removing apparatus and heavy metal removing method
CN103521513A (en) Leaching method of soil polluted by hexavalent chromium
Lu et al. Separation and determination of colloidal trace metals in seawater by cross-flow ultrafiltration, liquid-liquid extraction and ICP-MS
CN113070026B (en) A kind of preparation method of KOH-modified Southeast Sedum hydrothermal carbon and its application
Ye et al. Efficiently combined technology of precipitation, bipolar membrane electrodialysis, and adsorption for salt-containing soil washing wastewater treatment
CN101712506B (en) Method for reducing hexavalent chromium in water by biological waste
CN102869614B (en) Method for removing metals from a metal-containing solution by using legume plants
Altaf et al. Phosphorus removal and recovery from livestock wastewater by using modified zirconium‑lanthanum magnetite
Liang et al. Nickel chloride removal and insights into heavy metal removal by hydrate-based method
Ziyang et al. Characterization of refuse landfill leachates of three different stages in landfill stabilization process
Habila et al. 1-nitroso-2-naphthol impregnated multiwalled carbon nanotubes (NNMWCNTs) for the separation-enrichment and flame atomic absorption spectrometric detection of copper and lead in hair, water, and food samples
CN103482798B (en) A kind of device and method eliminating Algae toxins in water body
CN101182062A (en) Treatment method of wastewater containing sericin protein
CN107884299B (en) Method for measuring high zinc slag and organic matters in solution in zinc hydrometallurgy system
CN110981156B (en) Oil sludge three-phase separation method based on alkali modification
CN104148023B (en) High-efficiency adsorbent of a kind of heavy metal lead ion and preparation method thereof and application
CN106799391A (en) A kind of method and processing equipment repaired pollution of vanadium soil and reclaim vanadium
Sadiq et al. Effect of distribution network pipe material on drinking water quality
JP6950893B2 (en) Treatment method of boron-containing water
Xu et al. The fate of heavy metal during subcritical and supercritical water gasification of sewage sludge
Hassouna et al. Evaluation of green clover leaves as green and economic sorbent for removal of high levels of iron from different water sources
CN106701130B (en) A kind of method that fulvic acid is extracted in low temperature distillation

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20120903

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20130207

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20130220

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20130422

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20130807

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20140129

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20140331

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20140416

A711 Notification of change in applicant

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A711

Effective date: 20140514

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20140516

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A821

Effective date: 20140514

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 5555950

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

S111 Request for change of ownership or part of ownership

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313113

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250