Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP5653370B2 - Method for inspecting cracks in solar cells - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP5653370B2 - Method for inspecting cracks in solar cells - Google Patents

Method for inspecting cracks in solar cells Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP5653370B2
JP5653370B2 JP2012000108A JP2012000108A JP5653370B2 JP 5653370 B2 JP5653370 B2 JP 5653370B2 JP 2012000108 A JP2012000108 A JP 2012000108A JP 2012000108 A JP2012000108 A JP 2012000108A JP 5653370 B2 JP5653370 B2 JP 5653370B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
length
battery cell
solar battery
equivalent ellipse
grid line
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP2012000108A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2013140066A (en
Inventor
高木 誠司
誠司 高木
玲子 佐々木
玲子 佐々木
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Mitsubishi Electric Corp
Original Assignee
Mitsubishi Electric Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Mitsubishi Electric Corp filed Critical Mitsubishi Electric Corp
Priority to JP2012000108A priority Critical patent/JP5653370B2/en
Publication of JP2013140066A publication Critical patent/JP2013140066A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP5653370B2 publication Critical patent/JP5653370B2/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02EREDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E10/00Energy generation through renewable energy sources
    • Y02E10/50Photovoltaic [PV] energy

Landscapes

  • Investigating Materials By The Use Of Optical Means Adapted For Particular Applications (AREA)
  • Photovoltaic Devices (AREA)

Description

本発明は、太陽電池セル、特に単結晶セルのクラック欠陥の検査方法に関するものである。   The present invention relates to a method for inspecting a crack defect of a solar battery cell, particularly a single crystal cell.

従来、太陽電池セルのクラック欠陥の検査方法では、太陽電池セル表面に真上から光を照射した時に撮像した画像と、斜方から照射したときの画像を減算し、2値化処理を実施していた。例えば、特許文献1に開示された技術では、得られた画素の数(面積値)でクラックの有無を判定している。   Conventionally, in a method for inspecting a crack defect of a solar battery cell, a binarization process is carried out by subtracting an image taken when light is irradiated from directly above the surface of the solar battery cell and an image when irradiated from an oblique direction. It was. For example, in the technique disclosed in Patent Document 1, the presence or absence of a crack is determined by the number of pixels (area value) obtained.

特開平3−218045号公報JP-A-3-218045

太陽電池セルの表面では、グリッド線の剥がれ(以下、グリッド線剥がれともいう)が生じる場合がある。グリッド線剥がれについては、一定量以下の剥がれであれば、不良品ではなく、良品として判定してもよい。   On the surface of the solar cell, peeling of the grid line (hereinafter also referred to as grid line peeling) may occur. As for grid line peeling, as long as it is peeled by a certain amount or less, it may be determined not as a defective product but as a non-defective product.

しかしながら、上述したような検査方法では、差分画像の2値化によって、グリッド線剥がれもクラックとして抽出される場合があり、本来良品として扱われるべき太陽電池セルが不良品と判定されてしまうという問題があった。良品として扱われるべき太陽電池セルが不良品と判定されてしまうことで、例えば歩留まりの低下や、さらなる検査コストの増大が生じてしまうという問題があった。   However, in the inspection method as described above, due to the binarization of the difference image, the grid line peeling may be extracted as a crack, and the solar cell that should be treated as a non-defective product is determined as a defective product. was there. When a solar cell to be treated as a non-defective product is determined to be a defective product, there is a problem that, for example, yield decreases and further inspection costs increase.

本発明は、上記に鑑みてなされたものであって、グリッド線剥がれと区別してクラック欠陥を検出することのできる太陽電池セルの検査方法を得ることを目的とする。   This invention is made | formed in view of the above, Comprising: It aims at obtaining the inspection method of the photovoltaic cell which can detect a crack defect distinguished from grid line peeling.

上述した課題を解決し、目的を達成するために、本発明は、太陽電池セルが撮影された入力画像に対してエッジ強調処理を実施するステップと、エッジ強調処理が実施されたエッジ強調画像に2値化処理を実施するステップと、2値化処理された2値化画像に対しラベリングを実施するステップと、ラベリングによって得られたブロブに対し、等価楕円近似を実施して等価楕円を得るステップと、等価楕円の長軸と所定の軸とがなす角度である主軸角度が、一定の範囲内である場合に、ブロブ部分がクラック欠陥であると判定するステップと、を備えることを特徴とする。   In order to solve the above-described problems and achieve the object, the present invention provides a step of performing edge enhancement processing on an input image in which solar cells are photographed, and an edge enhanced image subjected to edge enhancement processing. A step of performing binarization processing, a step of performing labeling on the binarized image that has been binarized, and a step of performing equivalent ellipse approximation on a blob obtained by labeling to obtain an equivalent ellipse And a step of determining that the blob portion is a crack defect when a principal axis angle, which is an angle formed between the major axis of the equivalent ellipse and a predetermined axis, is within a certain range. .

本発明によれば、グリッド線剥がれをなるべく含めずにクラック欠陥を検出することができ、歩留まりの向上やコストの抑制を図ることができるという効果を奏する。   According to the present invention, it is possible to detect a crack defect without including grid line peeling as much as possible, and it is possible to improve the yield and reduce the cost.

図1は、本発明の実施の形態にかかる太陽電池セルの検査方法の手順を示すフローチャートである。FIG. 1 is a flowchart showing a procedure of a solar cell inspection method according to an embodiment of the present invention. 図2−1は、太陽電池セルを撮影した入力画像にクラック欠陥が含まれた例を示す図である。FIG. 2-1 is a diagram illustrating an example in which a crack defect is included in an input image obtained by photographing a solar battery cell. 図2−2は、太陽電池セルを撮影した入力画像にグリッド線剥がれが含まれた例を示す図である。FIG. 2-2 is a diagram illustrating an example in which grid line peeling is included in an input image obtained by photographing solar cells. 図3は、ラベリングによって得られたブロブを例示する図であって、等価楕円の主軸長と主軸角度について説明するための図である。FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating a blob obtained by labeling, and is a diagram for explaining the principal axis length and the principal axis angle of an equivalent ellipse. 図4−1は、クラック欠陥の主軸角度の検出例を示す図であって、主軸角度と主軸長の関係を示す図である。FIG. 4A is a diagram illustrating a detection example of a main axis angle of a crack defect, and is a diagram illustrating a relationship between the main axis angle and the main axis length. 図4−2は、グリッド線剥がれの主軸角度の検出例を示す図であって、主軸角度と主軸長の関係を示す図である。FIG. 4B is a diagram illustrating a detection example of the main axis angle of the grid line peeling, and is a diagram illustrating a relationship between the main axis angle and the main axis length.

以下に、本発明の実施の形態にかかる太陽電池セルのクラック検査方法を図面に基づいて詳細に説明する。なお、この実施の形態によりこの発明が限定されるものではない。   Below, the crack inspection method of the photovoltaic cell concerning embodiment of this invention is demonstrated in detail based on drawing. Note that the present invention is not limited to the embodiments.

実施の形態1.
図1は、本発明の実施の形態にかかる太陽電池セルの検査方法の手順を示すフローチャートである。図2−1は、太陽電池セルを撮影した入力画像にクラック欠陥が含まれた例を示す図である。図2−2は、太陽電池セルを撮影した入力画像にグリッド線剥がれが含まれた例を示す図である。
Embodiment 1 FIG.
FIG. 1 is a flowchart showing a procedure of a solar cell inspection method according to an embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 2-1 is a diagram illustrating an example in which a crack defect is included in an input image obtained by photographing a solar battery cell. FIG. 2-2 is a diagram illustrating an example in which grid line peeling is included in an input image obtained by photographing solar cells.

図2−1、図2−2に示すように太陽電池セルを撮影した入力画像1には、クラック欠陥3が含まれる場合や、グリッド線剥がれ4が含まれる場合がある。本実施の形態にかかる太陽電池セルのクラック検査方法では、入力画像1に含まれるクラック欠陥3とグリッド線剥がれ4を区別して検出する。一般的に、太陽電池セルの表面には、グリッド線2と呼ばれる線が存在し、このグリッド線が剥がれることでグリッド線剥がれが生じる。   As shown in FIGS. 2A and 2B, the input image 1 obtained by photographing the solar battery cell may include a crack defect 3 or a grid line peeling 4. In the solar cell crack inspection method according to the present embodiment, the crack defect 3 and the grid line peeling 4 included in the input image 1 are distinguished and detected. Generally, there is a line called grid line 2 on the surface of the solar battery cell, and the grid line is peeled off when the grid line is peeled off.

図1に示すように、本実施の形態にかかる太陽電池セルのクラック検査方法では、太陽電池セルを撮影した画像を入力画像1として入力する(ステップS1)。次に、入力画像1にエッジ強調処理を実施する(ステップS2)。次に、エッジ強調処理が実施されたエッジ強調画像に対し、2値化処理を実施する(ステップS3)。次に、得られた2値化画像に対しラベリングを実施し(ステップS4)、画素の塊(以下、ブロブと呼ぶ)を生成する。   As shown in FIG. 1, in the crack inspection method for a solar battery cell according to the present embodiment, an image obtained by photographing the solar battery cell is input as an input image 1 (step S1). Next, edge enhancement processing is performed on the input image 1 (step S2). Next, binarization processing is performed on the edge-enhanced image that has been subjected to edge enhancement processing (step S3). Next, labeling is performed on the obtained binarized image (step S4), and a block of pixels (hereinafter referred to as a blob) is generated.

図3は、ラベリングによって得られたブロブを例示する図であって、等価楕円の主軸長と主軸角度について説明するための図である。ラベリングによって得られたブロブ5毎に、等価楕円近似を実施して等価楕円6を得る(ステップS5)。なお、入力画像1によっては、複数のブロブ5が存在する場合がある。   FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating a blob obtained by labeling, and is a diagram for explaining the principal axis length and the principal axis angle of an equivalent ellipse. For each blob 5 obtained by labeling, an equivalent ellipse approximation is performed to obtain an equivalent ellipse 6 (step S5). Depending on the input image 1, there may be a plurality of blobs 5.

次に、等価楕円6の長軸を主軸10とし、主軸10の長さである主軸長7と、主軸10と所定の軸11とがなす角度である主軸角度8をブロブ5の特徴量として抽出する(ステップS6)。ここで、主軸角度8が一定の範囲内である場合には(ステップS7,Yes)、そのブロブ5部分がクラック欠陥であると判定する(ステップS8)。   Next, the major axis of the equivalent ellipse 6 is the major axis 10, and the major axis length 7 that is the length of the major axis 10 and the major axis angle 8 that is the angle formed by the major axis 10 and the predetermined axis 11 are extracted as feature quantities of the blob 5. (Step S6). Here, when the spindle angle 8 is within a certain range (step S7, Yes), it is determined that the blob 5 portion is a crack defect (step S8).

さらに、主軸長7が所定の長さ以上である場合には(ステップS9,Yes)、製品上許容できないクラック欠陥3であるとして、その太陽電池セルは不良品であると判定する(ステップS10)。一方、主軸長7が所定の長さより小さい場合には(ステップS9,No)、クラック欠陥3が十分に小さく許容できるとして、その太陽電池セルは良品であると判定する(ステップS11)。   Furthermore, when the main shaft length 7 is equal to or longer than the predetermined length (step S9, Yes), it is determined that the solar cell is a defective product as being a crack defect 3 that is unacceptable on the product (step S10). . On the other hand, when the main shaft length 7 is smaller than the predetermined length (step S9, No), it is determined that the crack defect 3 is sufficiently small and acceptable, and the solar battery cell is determined to be a good product (step S11).

ステップS7において、主軸角度8が一定の範囲から外れている場合には(ステップS7,No)、そのブロブ5部分はグリッド線剥がれであると判定する(ステップS12)。そして、主軸長7が所定の長さ以上であれば(ステップS13,Yes)、その太陽電池セルは不良品であると判定し(ステップS10)、主軸長7が所定の長さより小さければ(ステップS13,No)、その太陽電池セルは良品であると判定する(ステップS11)。なお、ステップS9での所定の長さと、ステップS13での所定の長さとは、異なる長さとなるのが一般的である。   In step S7, when the main shaft angle 8 is out of a certain range (step S7, No), it is determined that the blob 5 portion is grid line peeling (step S12). If the main shaft length 7 is equal to or longer than the predetermined length (step S13, Yes), it is determined that the solar cell is a defective product (step S10), and if the main shaft length 7 is smaller than the predetermined length (step S10). S13, No), it is determined that the solar battery cell is a non-defective product (step S11). Note that the predetermined length in step S9 and the predetermined length in step S13 are generally different lengths.

太陽電池セル、特に単結晶セルでは、クラック欠陥3の進展方向は結晶方位に強く依存しやすい。つまり、クラック欠陥3の主軸角度8は、所定の軸11に対して一定の範囲内に収まりやすいため、主軸角度8でクラック欠陥3であるか否かを判断することができる。   In a solar battery cell, particularly a single crystal cell, the progress direction of the crack defect 3 tends to strongly depend on the crystal orientation. That is, since the main axis angle 8 of the crack defect 3 is likely to be within a certain range with respect to the predetermined axis 11, it can be determined whether or not the main axis angle 8 is the crack defect 3.

図4−1は、クラック欠陥3の主軸角度8の検出例を示す図であって、主軸角度8と主軸長7の関係を示す図である。図4−2は、グリッド線剥がれ4の主軸角度8の検出例を示す図であって、主軸角度8と主軸長7の関係を示す図である。   FIG. 4A is a diagram illustrating a detection example of the main shaft angle 8 of the crack defect 3, and is a diagram illustrating a relationship between the main shaft angle 8 and the main shaft length 7. FIG. 4B is a diagram illustrating a detection example of the main shaft angle 8 of the grid line peeling 4 and is a diagram illustrating a relationship between the main shaft angle 8 and the main shaft length 7.

図4−1、図4−2では、様々なクラック欠陥3、グリッド線剥がれ4に対し、主軸角度8をプロットしている。なお、図4−1、図4−2では、±90度を絶対値換算した主軸角度8をプロットしている。図4−1、図4−2に示すように、クラック欠陥3であれば主軸角度8が一定の範囲に収まりやすく、グリッド線剥がれ4であれば、主軸角度8が一定の範囲から外れやすくなっている。例えば、クラック欠陥3と判定される主軸角度8の一定の範囲を、30〜60度とすればよい。   4A and 4B, the principal axis angle 8 is plotted against various crack defects 3 and grid line peeling 4. In FIGS. 4A and 4B, the spindle angle 8 obtained by converting ± 90 degrees into an absolute value is plotted. As shown in FIGS. 4A and 4B, if the crack defect is 3, the main shaft angle 8 is likely to be within a certain range, and if the grid line peeling is 4, the main shaft angle 8 is likely to be out of the certain range. ing. For example, a certain range of the main shaft angle 8 determined as the crack defect 3 may be 30 to 60 degrees.

なお、所定の軸11は、任意に設定すればよく、本実施の形態では、剥がれのないグリッド線2と略平行な軸を所定の軸11としている。これとは異なる軸を所定の軸11とする場合には、それに合わせてクラック欠陥と判定する主軸角度8の範囲を変更すればよい。   The predetermined axis 11 may be set arbitrarily. In the present embodiment, the predetermined axis 11 is an axis substantially parallel to the grid line 2 without peeling. When a different axis is used as the predetermined axis 11, the range of the main shaft angle 8 for determining a crack defect may be changed accordingly.

以上のように、本発明にかかる太陽電池セルのクラック検査方法は、グリッド線剥がれと区別してクラック欠陥を検出するのに有用である。   As described above, the method for inspecting a crack of a solar battery cell according to the present invention is useful for detecting a crack defect in distinction from grid line peeling.

1 入力画像
2 グリッド線
3 クラック欠陥
4 グリッド線剥がれ
5 ブロブ
6 等価楕円
7 主軸長
8 主軸角度
10 主軸
11 所定の軸
1 Input Image 2 Grid Line 3 Crack Defect 4 Grid Line Peeling 5 Blob 6 Equivalent Ellipse 7 Spindle Length 8 Spindle Angle 10 Spindle 11 Predetermined Axis

Claims (4)

太陽電池セルが撮影された入力画像に対してエッジ強調処理を実施するステップと、
前記エッジ強調処理が実施されたエッジ強調画像に2値化処理を実施するステップと、
前記2値化処理された2値化画像に対しラベリングを実施するステップと、
前記ラベリングによって得られたブロブに対し、等価楕円近似を実施して等価楕円を得るステップと、
前記等価楕円の長軸と所定の軸とがなす角度である主軸角度が、前記太陽電池セルの結晶方向に依存した一定の範囲内である場合に、前記ブロブ部分がクラック欠陥であると判定するステップと、を備えることを特徴とする太陽電池セルのクラック検査方法。
Performing an edge enhancement process on an input image in which solar cells are photographed;
Performing binarization processing on the edge enhanced image on which the edge enhancement processing has been performed;
Labeling the binarized image that has been binarized;
Performing an equivalent ellipse approximation on the blob obtained by the labeling to obtain an equivalent ellipse;
When the principal axis angle, which is the angle formed between the major axis of the equivalent ellipse and a predetermined axis, is within a certain range depending on the crystal direction of the solar battery cell , it is determined that the blob portion is a crack defect. A crack inspection method for a solar battery cell, comprising: a step.
前記クラック欠陥であると判定された前記等価楕円の長軸の長さである主軸長が、所定の長さ以上である場合に前記太陽電池セルが不良品であると判定するステップをさらに備えることを特徴とする請求項1に記載の太陽電池セルのクラック検査方法。   The method further includes the step of determining that the solar battery cell is defective when a principal axis length, which is a length of a major axis of the equivalent ellipse determined to be the crack defect, is equal to or longer than a predetermined length. The method for inspecting cracks in a solar battery cell according to claim 1. 前記太陽電池セルは、グリッド線を有しており、
前記等価楕円の前記主軸角度が、前記一定の範囲を外れる場合に、前記ブロブ部分がグリッド線剥がれであると判定するステップをさらに備えることを特徴とする請求項1または2に記載の太陽電池セルのクラック検査方法。
The solar cell has grid lines,
The solar cell according to claim 1, further comprising a step of determining that the blob portion is stripped of a grid line when the principal axis angle of the equivalent ellipse is out of the certain range. Crack inspection method.
前記グリッド線剥がれと判定された前記等価楕円の長軸の長さである主軸長が、所定の長さ以上である場合に、前記太陽電池セルが不良品であると判定するステップをさらに備えることを特徴とする請求項3に記載の太陽電池セルのクラック検査方法。   The method further includes the step of determining that the solar battery cell is defective when a principal axis length, which is a length of a major axis of the equivalent ellipse determined to be the grid line peeling, is equal to or longer than a predetermined length. The crack inspection method of the photovoltaic cell of Claim 3 characterized by these.
JP2012000108A 2012-01-04 2012-01-04 Method for inspecting cracks in solar cells Expired - Fee Related JP5653370B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2012000108A JP5653370B2 (en) 2012-01-04 2012-01-04 Method for inspecting cracks in solar cells

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2012000108A JP5653370B2 (en) 2012-01-04 2012-01-04 Method for inspecting cracks in solar cells

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2013140066A JP2013140066A (en) 2013-07-18
JP5653370B2 true JP5653370B2 (en) 2015-01-14

Family

ID=49037620

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2012000108A Expired - Fee Related JP5653370B2 (en) 2012-01-04 2012-01-04 Method for inspecting cracks in solar cells

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP5653370B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103528527A (en) * 2013-10-15 2014-01-22 北京交通大学长三角研究院 Area selection-based automatic crack size measurement method
KR101510855B1 (en) * 2014-08-22 2015-04-09 삼성전자 주식회사 Mold frames and optical sheets and backlight units and liquid crystal displays including the same
JP6511410B2 (en) * 2016-03-22 2019-05-15 東芝プラントシステム株式会社 Inspection apparatus for solar panel, inspection method and inspection program
CN114663388A (en) * 2022-03-21 2022-06-24 东南大学 Grid line completion-based subfissure detection method for monocrystalline silicon solar cell

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2006058253A (en) * 2004-08-24 2006-03-02 Hitachi Zosen Corp Article visual inspection method and visual inspection program
JP2010034133A (en) * 2008-07-25 2010-02-12 Just:Kk Crack detecting device for polycrystalline silicon wafer
JP5085573B2 (en) * 2009-01-13 2012-11-28 新日本製鐵株式会社 Defect inspection method and defect inspection apparatus
JP2011058939A (en) * 2009-09-09 2011-03-24 Panasonic Electric Works Co Ltd Apparatus and method for visual inspection

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2013140066A (en) 2013-07-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8750596B2 (en) System and method for identifying defects in a material
CN103311146B (en) Defect detecting method
US20150254827A1 (en) Image inspection apparatus and image inspection method
CN103646899B (en) Wafer defect detection method
JP5653370B2 (en) Method for inspecting cracks in solar cells
CN115713524B (en) A method for detecting wood damage defects based on point cloud data
JP2007149055A5 (en)
CN112213314B (en) Detection method and detection system for wafer side surface defects
JP2010135446A (en) Apparatus and method for inspecting solar battery cell, and recording medium having program of the method recorded thereon
CN105891231A (en) A Carrot Surface Defect Detection Method Based on Image Processing
JP2020085774A (en) Method for inspecting tube glass, method for learning, and tube glass inspection device
CN110426395B (en) A kind of solar EL battery silicon wafer surface detection method and device
CN112038248A (en) Method and system for establishing semiconductor defect scanning program
CN104319246A (en) Detection method and system for surface of silicon slice in product manufacturing process
JP6861092B2 (en) Visual inspection method and visual inspection equipment for electronic components
JP5435904B2 (en) How to detect fatal wounds
JP7157380B2 (en) Appearance inspection method and electronic component manufacturing method
CN107980094A (en) A kind of vision detection system and method
JP6168834B2 (en) Optical film defect determination method
JP2013200157A (en) Method and apparatus for inspecting end face
CN104198495A (en) Method for detecting step evolution abnormality of semiconductor substrate
CN106198567A (en) Optical detecting method, optical detection apparatus and Systems for optical inspection
CN103779444B (en) The grid line Falling-off Cause Analysis method of defective cell piece and reuse method
JP2020083671A5 (en)
JP6248819B2 (en) Inspection apparatus and inspection method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20130930

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20140228

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20140805

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20140929

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20141021

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20141118

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 5653370

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees