JP5690170B2 - Copper alloy - Google Patents
Copper alloy Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP5690170B2 JP5690170B2 JP2011040394A JP2011040394A JP5690170B2 JP 5690170 B2 JP5690170 B2 JP 5690170B2 JP 2011040394 A JP2011040394 A JP 2011040394A JP 2011040394 A JP2011040394 A JP 2011040394A JP 5690170 B2 JP5690170 B2 JP 5690170B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- copper alloy
- orientation
- bending workability
- rolling
- crystal grain
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
- 229910000881 Cu alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 title claims description 85
- 239000013078 crystal Substances 0.000 claims description 72
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 32
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims description 15
- RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Copper Chemical compound [Cu] RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 14
- 229910052802 copper Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 14
- 239000010949 copper Substances 0.000 claims description 14
- 229910052804 chromium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 4
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 4
- 229910052749 magnesium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 4
- 229910052748 manganese Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 4
- 229910052719 titanium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 4
- 229910052726 zirconium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000012535 impurity Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000005452 bending Methods 0.000 description 54
- 230000035882 stress Effects 0.000 description 38
- 238000005096 rolling process Methods 0.000 description 36
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 17
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 16
- 239000000956 alloy Substances 0.000 description 13
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 11
- 229910045601 alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 description 10
- 238000005097 cold rolling Methods 0.000 description 10
- 229910001369 Brass Inorganic materials 0.000 description 9
- 239000010951 brass Substances 0.000 description 9
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 8
- UREBDLICKHMUKA-CXSFZGCWSA-N dexamethasone Chemical compound C1CC2=CC(=O)C=C[C@]2(C)[C@]2(F)[C@@H]1[C@@H]1C[C@@H](C)[C@@](C(=O)CO)(O)[C@@]1(C)C[C@@H]2O UREBDLICKHMUKA-CXSFZGCWSA-N 0.000 description 7
- 230000002829 reductive effect Effects 0.000 description 7
- 238000005496 tempering Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000032683 aging Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000000137 annealing Methods 0.000 description 4
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 4
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000002244 precipitate Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000000630 rising effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000009864 tensile test Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000000052 comparative effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000001816 cooling Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000010894 electron beam technology Methods 0.000 description 3
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N iron Substances [Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 3
- 150000003839 salts Chemical class 0.000 description 3
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 3
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 238000002441 X-ray diffraction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000875 corresponding effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 229910052759 nickel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001376 precipitating effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000001556 precipitation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229910000679 solder Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 238000010998 test method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229910001018 Cast iron Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910017876 Cu—Ni—Si Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910018098 Ni-Si Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910018529 Ni—Si Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910006680 Si—Zn—Sn Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000009825 accumulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003610 charcoal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011248 coating agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008094 contradictory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001276 controlling effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007796 conventional method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002596 correlated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002003 electron diffraction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005098 hot rolling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001771 impaired effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001678 irradiating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005304 joining Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000670 limiting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003801 milling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007747 plating Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005498 polishing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000843 powder Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000007670 refining Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000717 retained effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229920006395 saturated elastomer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003892 spreading Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 description 1
Landscapes
- Conductive Materials (AREA)
Description
本発明は、導電性が良好であることは勿論のこと、高強度、優れた曲げ加工性、および優れた耐応力緩和特性を兼ね備えた銅合金に関し、特に、電気・電子部品を構成するコネクター、リードフレーム、リレー、スイッチなどの通電部品に好適に用いることができる電気・電子部品用の銅合金に関するものである。 The present invention relates to a copper alloy having not only good conductivity but also high strength, excellent bending workability, and excellent stress relaxation resistance, in particular, a connector constituting an electric / electronic component, The present invention relates to a copper alloy for electrical and electronic parts that can be suitably used for energized parts such as lead frames, relays, and switches.
電気・電子部品を構成するコネクター、リードフレーム、リレー、スイッチなどの通電部品に使用される銅合金材料には、通電によるジュール熱の発生を抑制するために良好な導電性が要求されると共に、電気・電子部品の組立時や作動時に付与される応力に耐え得るだけの高い強度が要求される。また、電気・電子部品は曲げ加工により成形されることが一般的であり、この曲げ加工される電気・電子部品用の材料には優れた曲げ加工性も要求される。更には、電気・電子部品の接触信頼性を確保するためには、接触圧力が時間を経るに伴い低下する現象、すなわち応力緩和に対する耐久性である耐応力緩和特性に優れることも要求される。 Copper alloy materials used for current-carrying parts such as connectors, lead frames, relays, and switches that make up electrical and electronic parts are required to have good conductivity in order to suppress the generation of Joule heat due to current flow. High strength is required to withstand the stress applied during assembly and operation of electrical / electronic components. Further, electric / electronic parts are generally formed by bending, and excellent bending workability is required for the material for electric / electronic parts to be bent. Furthermore, in order to ensure the contact reliability of electric / electronic parts, it is also required that the contact pressure is reduced with time, that is, it is excellent in stress relaxation resistance which is durability against stress relaxation.
これら通電部品に使用される材料を高強度化する方法としては、Ni、Siなどの溶質元素を多量に添加する方法や、製造時に焼鈍と圧延を繰り返す方法、時効処理後の仕上げ圧延(調質処理)率を増大させる方法などが、一般的に知られている。しかしながら、Ni、Siなどの溶質元素の多量添加は、Ni−Si系介在物量の増大を招き、曲げ加工性を低下させるという問題を発生してしまう。また、仕上げ圧延(調質処理)率を増大させる方法では、Cube方位面積率が低下し、同じく曲げ加工性を低下させるという問題を発生してしまう。 Methods for increasing the strength of materials used in these current-carrying parts include adding a large amount of solute elements such as Ni and Si, repeating annealing and rolling during manufacturing, and finishing rolling after aging treatment (tempering) A method for increasing the processing rate is generally known. However, the addition of a large amount of solute elements such as Ni and Si causes an increase in the amount of Ni-Si inclusions, resulting in a problem that bending workability is lowered. Further, in the method of increasing the finish rolling (tempering treatment) rate, the Cube azimuth area rate is lowered, and the problem that the bending workability is similarly lowered occurs.
また、通電部品に使用される材料の曲げ加工性を向上させる方法としては、仕上げ圧延(調質処理)率を低下させる方法や、結晶粒径を微細化させる方法、Cube方位面積率を増加させる方法などが一般的に知られている。しかしながら、結晶粒径を微細化させると、耐応力緩和特性が低下するという問題を発生してしまう。 Moreover, as a method of improving the bending workability of the material used for the current-carrying parts, a method of decreasing the finish rolling (tempering treatment) rate, a method of refining the crystal grain size, or increasing the Cube orientation area ratio Methods are generally known. However, when the crystal grain size is made finer, the problem that the stress relaxation resistance is lowered occurs.
更には、通電部品に使用される材料の耐応力緩和特性を向上させる方法としては、仕上げ圧延(調質処理)率を低下させる方法や、結晶粒径を粗大化させる方法が一般的に知られている。 Furthermore, as a method of improving the stress relaxation resistance of the material used for the current-carrying parts, a method of reducing the finish rolling (tempering treatment) rate and a method of increasing the crystal grain size are generally known. ing.
そのため、従来からの各種技術を用いても、電気・電子部品を構成する通電部品に使用される材料の高強度化、曲げ加工性の向上、耐応力緩和特性の向上を、同時に実現させることは非常に困難であるということができる。従って、従来は作製する個々の通電部品に要求される特性に鑑み、これら夫々の特性に適宜バランスをもたせることで対応するという方法をとらざるを得なかった。特に、銅合金の中でもコルソン合金(Cu−Ni−Si系銅合金)はこれら種々の特性に優れ、且つ安価なことから、電気・電子部品を構成する通電部品に好適な銅合金材料であるとして、近年広く採用されている。 Therefore, even with various conventional technologies, it is possible to simultaneously increase the strength of materials used for current-carrying parts that make up electrical and electronic parts, improve bending workability, and improve stress relaxation characteristics. It can be said that it is very difficult. Therefore, in the past, in view of the characteristics required for each current-carrying part to be manufactured, it has been necessary to take a method of responding by appropriately balancing these characteristics. In particular, among the copper alloys, the Corson alloy (Cu—Ni—Si based copper alloy) is excellent in various characteristics and is inexpensive, and therefore is a copper alloy material suitable for energizing parts constituting electric / electronic parts. In recent years, it has been widely adopted.
また、近年は電子機器の小型化および軽量化が進んでおり、端子・コネクター用に用いられる銅合金材料には、特に高強度薄肉化の要求が高くなる傾向がある。従って、強度の中においても接圧強度という観点から圧延直角方向(T.D.方向)の0.2%耐力(YP)が高いことが特に求められる傾向にある。 In recent years, electronic devices have been reduced in size and weight, and there is a tendency for copper alloy materials used for terminals and connectors to have a particularly high demand for high strength and thinness. Accordingly, among the strengths, a high 0.2% proof stress (YP) in the direction perpendicular to the rolling direction (TD direction) tends to be particularly required from the viewpoint of the contact pressure strength.
しかしながら、特にコルソン合金は、圧延平行方向(L.D.方向)と圧延直角方向(T.D.方向)の強度差が大きいという特徴、すなわち、圧延平行方向の強度より圧延直角方向の強度の方が相対的に低いという特徴がある。また、引張強度(TS)と0.2%耐力(YP)の差が大きいという特徴もある。そのため、このコルソン合金を、端子・コネクターに用いた場合は、圧延直角方向の耐力が低くなり、接圧強度が不足するなどの問題が発生している。 However, in particular, the Corson alloy has a feature that the difference in strength between the rolling parallel direction (LD direction) and the rolling perpendicular direction (TD direction) is large, that is, the strength in the direction perpendicular to the rolling is higher than the strength in the rolling parallel direction. The characteristic is that it is relatively low. Moreover, there is also a feature that the difference between the tensile strength (TS) and the 0.2% proof stress (YP) is large. For this reason, when this Corson alloy is used for a terminal / connector, the proof stress in the direction perpendicular to the rolling becomes low and the contact pressure strength is insufficient.
近年、このコルソン合金の曲げ加工性を改善する方法が種々提案されている。例えば、特許文献1により、コルソン合金の曲げ加工性を向上させる有効な方法として、結晶粒の集合組織を制御する技術が提案されている。その特許文献1には、Niを2.0〜6.0質量%、SiをNi/Siの質量比で4〜5の範囲で各々含むコルソン合金の、平均結晶粒径を10μm以下とすると共に、SEM−EBSP法による測定結果で、Cube方位{001}<100>の割合が50%以上である集合組織を有し、且つ、300倍の光学顕微鏡による組織観察によって観察しうる層状境界を有さない銅合金板が開示されている。 In recent years, various methods for improving the bending workability of this Corson alloy have been proposed. For example, Patent Document 1 proposes a technique for controlling the texture of crystal grains as an effective method for improving the bending workability of a Corson alloy. In Patent Document 1, an average crystal grain size of a Corson alloy containing Ni in a range of 2.0 to 6.0% by mass and Si in a range of 4 to 5 by mass ratio of Ni / Si is set to 10 μm or less. The measurement result by the SEM-EBSP method has a texture where the ratio of the Cube orientation {001} <100> is 50% or more, and has a layered boundary that can be observed by a structure observation with a 300 times optical microscope. A copper alloy plate is disclosed.
また、特許文献2により、Niを0.5〜4.0質量%、Coを0.5〜2.0質量%、Siを0.3〜1.5質量%を含有する銅合金の材料表面における{111}面からの回析強度をI{111}、{200}面からの回析強度をI{200}、{220}面からの回析強度をI{220}、{311}面からの回析強度をI{311}、これらの回析強度の中の{200}面からの回析強度の割合をR{200}=I{200}/(I{111}+I{200}+I{311})とした場合に、R{200}が0.3以上である電気・電子機器用銅合金に関する提案がなされている。 Further, according to Patent Document 2, the material surface of a copper alloy containing 0.5 to 4.0% by mass of Ni, 0.5 to 2.0% by mass of Co, and 0.3 to 1.5% by mass of Si. The diffraction intensity from the {111} plane is I {111}, the diffraction intensity from the {200} plane is I {200}, and the diffraction intensity from the {220} plane is I {220}, {311} plane Is the diffraction intensity from {200} plane, and the ratio of the diffraction intensity from {200} plane in these diffraction intensities is R {200} = I {200} / (I {111} + I {200} + I {311}), a proposal has been made regarding a copper alloy for electrical and electronic equipment in which R {200} is 0.3 or more.
更には、特許文献3により、0.7〜4.0質量%のNiと0.2〜1.5質量%のSiを含有する銅合金の板面における{200}結晶面のX線回析強度をI{200}、純銅標準粉末の{200}結晶面のX線回析強度をI0{200}としたとき、I{200}/I0{200}≧1.0を満たす結晶配向を有することで、高強度を保持しつつ、異方性が少なく且つ優れた曲げ加工性を有すると共に、優れた耐応力緩和特性を有するとした銅合金板材に関する提案がなされている。 Furthermore, according to Patent Document 3, X-ray diffraction of {200} crystal planes on a plate surface of a copper alloy containing 0.7 to 4.0% by mass of Ni and 0.2 to 1.5% by mass of Si. Crystal orientation satisfying I {200} / I 0 {200} ≧ 1.0, where I {200} and X-ray diffraction intensity of the {200} crystal plane of pure copper standard powder are I 0 {200} Thus, a proposal has been made regarding a copper alloy sheet material that maintains high strength, has little anisotropy, has excellent bending workability, and has excellent stress relaxation resistance.
また、特許文献4により、質量%で、Ni:0.7〜2.5%、Si:0.2〜0.7%を含有する銅合金板材において、3.0≦I{220}/I0{220}≦6.0、1.5≦I{200}/I0{200}≦2.5を満足させることで、コルソン合金の高強度と優れた曲げ加工性を維持しながら、それらの特性についての異方性を改善した銅合金板材に関する提案がなされている。 Moreover, according to Patent Document 4, in a copper alloy sheet containing Ni: 0.7 to 2.5% and Si: 0.2 to 0.7% by mass, 3.0 ≦ I {220} / I Satisfying 0 {220} ≦ 6.0, 1.5 ≦ I {200} / I 0 {200} ≦ 2.5, while maintaining the high strength and excellent bending workability of the Corson alloy Proposals have been made on copper alloy sheet materials with improved anisotropy regarding the characteristics of the above.
更には、特許文献5により、質量%で、Ni:0.7〜4.2%、Si:0.2〜1.0%を含有する銅合金板材において、I{420}/I0{420}>1.0を満足させることで、高強度および高導電性を維持しながら、優れた曲げ加工性と耐応力緩和特性を呈するとした銅合金板材に関する提案がなされている。 Furthermore, according to Patent Document 5, in a copper alloy sheet material containing Ni: 0.7 to 4.2% and Si: 0.2 to 1.0% by mass%, I {420} / I 0 {420 }> 1.0 has been proposed with respect to a copper alloy sheet that exhibits excellent bending workability and stress relaxation resistance while maintaining high strength and high conductivity.
本発明は、上記従来の実情に鑑みてなされたもので、導電性が良好であることは勿論のこと、高強度、優れた曲げ加工性、および優れた耐応力緩和特性を兼ね備えた銅合金を提供することを課題とするものである。 The present invention has been made in view of the above-described conventional situation, and it is a copper alloy having not only good conductivity but also high strength, excellent bending workability, and excellent stress relaxation resistance. The issue is to provide.
請求項1記載の発明は、質量%で、Ni:1.5〜3.6%、Si:0.3〜1.0%を含有し、残部が銅および不可避的不純物からなる銅合金であって、この銅合金の平均結晶粒径が15〜40μmであり、且つ、SEM−EBSP法による測定結果で、Cube方位{001}<100>の平均面積率が45%以上70%未満であると共に、KAM値が1.0〜3.0であることを特徴とするである。 The invention according to claim 1 is a copper alloy containing Ni: 1.5 to 3.6% and Si: 0.3 to 1.0% by mass, with the balance being made of copper and inevitable impurities. In addition, the average crystal grain size of this copper alloy is 15 to 40 μm, and the average area ratio of the Cube orientation {001} <100> is 45% or more and less than 70% as measured by the SEM-EBSP method. The KAM value is 1.0 to 3.0.
請求項2記載の発明は、更に、質量%で、Sn:0.05〜3.0%および/またはZn:0.05〜3.0%を含有する請求項1記載の銅合金である。 Invention of Claim 2 is a copper alloy of Claim 1 which contains Sn: 0.05-3.0% and / or Zn: 0.05-3.0% by the mass% further.
請求項3記載の発明は、質量%で、Fe、Mn、Mg、Co、Ti、Cr、Zrのうち一種または二種以上を、合計で0.01〜3.0%含有する請求項1または2記載の銅合金である。 The invention according to claim 3 contains, in mass%, one or more of Fe, Mn, Mg, Co, Ti, Cr, and Zr in a total of 0.01 to 3.0%. 2. The copper alloy according to 2.
本発明によると、銅合金の特性である導電性が良好であることは勿論のこと、高強度、優れた曲げ加工性、および優れた耐応力緩和特性を兼ね備えた、すなわち、曲げ加工性および耐応力緩和特性に優れた高強度銅合金とすることができる。 According to the present invention, the copper alloy has not only good conductivity, but also high strength, excellent bending workability, and excellent stress relaxation resistance, that is, bending workability and resistance. A high-strength copper alloy having excellent stress relaxation characteristics can be obtained.
銅合金を高強度化する方法として最も有効な方法は、仕上げ圧延(調質処理)率を増大させる方法である。しかしながら、仕上げ圧延(調質処理)率を増大させると、銅合金の曲げ加工性および耐応力緩和特性を逆に低下させることになってしまう。また、耐応力緩和特性を向上させる最も有効な手段は、銅合金の結晶粒径を大きくすることである。しかしながら、結晶粒径を大きくすると、銅合金の曲げ加工性を逆に低下させることになってしまう。そのため、従来からの技術で、強度、曲げ加工性、耐応力緩和特性という諸特性を兼ねた銅合金を得ようとすると、仕上げ圧延(調質処理)率や結晶粒径を制御して、強度、曲げ加工性、耐応力緩和特性を、適当にバランスする方法を採用するしかなく、高強度、優れた曲げ加工性、優れた耐応力緩和特性という相矛盾する特性を兼ね備えた銅合金を得ることは不可能であった。 The most effective method for increasing the strength of a copper alloy is to increase the finish rolling (tempering treatment) rate. However, if the finish rolling (tempering treatment) rate is increased, the bending workability and stress relaxation resistance of the copper alloy will be reduced. Moreover, the most effective means for improving the stress relaxation resistance is to increase the crystal grain size of the copper alloy. However, when the crystal grain size is increased, the bending workability of the copper alloy is reduced. Therefore, when trying to obtain a copper alloy that combines strength, bending workability, and stress relaxation resistance with conventional techniques, the finish rolling (tempering treatment) rate and crystal grain size are controlled to achieve strength. , To obtain a copper alloy that has the contradictory properties of high strength, excellent bending workability, and excellent stress relaxation properties, by adopting a method that appropriately balances bending workability and stress relaxation resistance. Was impossible.
本発明者らは、このような従来からの課題に鑑み、高強度、優れた曲げ加工性、優れた耐応力緩和特性を兼ね備えた銅合金を得るために、鋭意、実験、研究を進めた。 In view of such conventional problems, the present inventors have intensively conducted experiments and research in order to obtain a copper alloy having high strength, excellent bending workability, and excellent stress relaxation resistance.
まず、本発明者らは転位密度と相関のあるKAM(Kerner Average Misorientation)値に注目し、そのKAM値をSEM−EBSPにて詳細に調査することで、銅合金を高強度化するために必要な最終の冷間圧延の圧下率を見積もることができることを知見した。 First, the present inventors pay attention to a KAM (Kerner Average Misoration) value correlated with the dislocation density, and by examining the KAM value in detail with SEM-EBSP, it is necessary to increase the strength of the copper alloy. It was found that the reduction ratio of the final cold rolling can be estimated.
また、本発明者らは銅合金の製造工程のうち、最終の冷間圧延前後の集合組織をSEM−EBSPにて詳細に調査して、銅合金に圧延を施しても圧延前の結晶方位を保ったままの結晶粒が多く残存することを知見した。つまり、最終の冷間圧延前のCube方位{001}<100>の面積率が高ければ、最終の冷間圧延後のCube方位の面積率を高い状態で保つことができることを確認した。先に示した特許文献1および特許文献2に記載の技術では、集合組織を制御するために最終圧延率を低く制御しているが、本発明者らは、銅合金の製造工程において、溶体化処理を2度繰り返して実施したうえで、且つ溶体化処理方法に工夫を施すことで、最終圧延率を高くしてもCube方位の面積率を高めることができることを見出した。 In addition, the present inventors investigated in detail the texture before and after the final cold rolling in the manufacturing process of the copper alloy by SEM-EBSP, and the crystal orientation before rolling was determined even when the copper alloy was rolled. It was found that many crystal grains remained retained. That is, it was confirmed that if the area ratio of the Cube orientation {001} <100> before the final cold rolling is high, the area ratio of the Cube orientation after the final cold rolling can be kept high. In the techniques described in Patent Document 1 and Patent Document 2 described above, the final rolling rate is controlled to be low in order to control the texture. It has been found that the area ratio of the Cube orientation can be increased even if the final rolling rate is increased by repeating the treatment twice and by devising the solution treatment method.
また、結晶粒径が大きいほどCube方位の面積率を高くできることも知見した。特に結晶粒径が40μm以下の場合は、Cube方位の面積率が増大することによる曲げ加工性の向上への寄与が、結晶粒の粗大化による曲げ加工性の低下への寄与を上回ることを確認することができた。そのため、耐応力緩和特性を向上させるために、一定の大きさ(40μm)までに結晶粒径を大きくしたとても、曲げ加工性は十分に維持できることを見出した。尚、結晶粒径を大きくすることは溶体化処理方法を工夫することで可能である。 It was also found that the larger the crystal grain size, the higher the area ratio of the Cube orientation. In particular, when the crystal grain size is 40 μm or less, it is confirmed that the contribution to the improvement in bending workability due to the increase in the area ratio of the Cube orientation exceeds the contribution to the reduction in bending workability due to the coarsening of the crystal grains. We were able to. Therefore, it has been found that the bending workability can be sufficiently maintained by increasing the crystal grain size up to a certain size (40 μm) in order to improve the stress relaxation resistance. It is possible to increase the crystal grain size by devising a solution treatment method.
以上の実験、研究による知見の結果、銅合金の平均結晶粒径を15〜40μmとし、且つ、SEM−EBSP法による測定結果で、Cube方位{001}<100>の平均面積率を45%以上とし、更に、KAM値を1.0〜3.0とすることで、本発明が課題としている高強度、優れた曲げ加工性、および優れた耐応力緩和特性を兼ね備えた銅合金を得ることができることを、本発明者らは見出した。 As a result of the above experiment and research, the average crystal grain size of the copper alloy is 15 to 40 μm, and the average area ratio of the Cube orientation {001} <100> is 45% or more in the measurement result by the SEM-EBSP method. In addition, by setting the KAM value to 1.0 to 3.0, it is possible to obtain a copper alloy having high strength, excellent bending workability, and excellent stress relaxation resistance, which are the problems of the present invention. The inventors have found that this is possible.
以下、本発明の実施の形態について、各要件ごとに具体的に説明するが、まず、本発明の銅合金の組織に関する要件について順に説明する。尚、以下の説明において、平均結晶粒径、集合組織における平均面積率を記載する場合は、「平均」を省略し、単に、結晶粒径、面積率と記載する場合もある。 Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be specifically described for each requirement. First, requirements regarding the structure of the copper alloy of the present invention will be described in order. In the following description, when the average crystal grain size and the average area ratio in the texture are described, “average” may be omitted and the crystal grain diameter and the area ratio may be simply described.
(平均結晶粒径)
銅合金の平均結晶粒径は15〜40μmとする。結晶粒径が40μm以下では、Cube方位の面積率が増大することによる曲げ加工性の向上への寄与の度合いが、結晶粒の粗大化による曲げ加工性の低下への寄与の度合いを上回り、銅合金の曲げ加工性は向上する。しかし、結晶粒径が40μmを超えると結晶粒の粗大化による寄与の方が優勢になり曲げ加工性が低下してしまう。よって、結晶粒径の上限を40μmとする。より好ましい結晶粒径は30μm以下である。一方、結晶粒径が15μm未満になると、耐応力緩和特性が悪くなる。
(Average crystal grain size)
The average crystal grain size of the copper alloy is 15 to 40 μm. When the crystal grain size is 40 μm or less, the degree of contribution to the improvement of bending workability due to the increase in the area ratio of the Cube orientation exceeds the degree of contribution to the reduction of bending workability due to the coarsening of the crystal grains. The bending workability of the alloy is improved. However, if the crystal grain size exceeds 40 μm, the contribution due to the coarsening of the crystal grains becomes dominant and the bending workability is lowered. Therefore, the upper limit of the crystal grain size is 40 μm. A more preferable crystal grain size is 30 μm or less. On the other hand, when the crystal grain size is less than 15 μm, the stress relaxation resistance is deteriorated.
(Cube方位の平均面積率)
Cube方位{001}<100>は、より多くのすべり系が活動できる方位である。このCube方位を面積率で45%以上集積させることにより、局所的な変形の発達を抑制し、銅合金の曲げ加工性を向上させることが可能となる。このCube方位粒の集積率(面積率)が低すぎると、前記した局所的な変形の発達を抑制することができなくなり、銅合金の曲げ加工性が低下してしまう。従って、本発明では、Cube方位{001}<100>の平均面積率を45%以上、より好ましくは50%以上とする。一方、銅合金の結晶粒径が大きいほどCube方位の面積率が高くなる傾向がある。このため、優れた曲げ加工性を得ることができる結晶粒径が40μm以下の範囲では、Cube方位の面積率を70%以上とすることは困難であると考えられる。よって、実質的なCube方位の面積率の範囲は45〜70%である。
(Average area ratio of Cube orientation)
The Cube orientation {001} <100> is an orientation in which more slip systems can be active. By accumulating 45% or more of the Cube orientation by area ratio, it becomes possible to suppress the development of local deformation and improve the bending workability of the copper alloy. If the accumulation rate (area ratio) of the Cube-oriented grains is too low, the development of the local deformation described above cannot be suppressed, and the bending workability of the copper alloy is lowered. Therefore, in the present invention, the average area ratio of the Cube orientation {001} <100> is set to 45% or more, more preferably 50% or more. On the other hand, the larger the crystal grain size of the copper alloy, the higher the area ratio of the Cube orientation. For this reason, it is considered that it is difficult to set the area ratio of the Cube orientation to 70% or more when the crystal grain size capable of obtaining excellent bending workability is 40 μm or less. Therefore, the range of the area ratio of the substantial Cube orientation is 45 to 70%.
(KAM値)
KAM値は1.0〜3.0とする。KAM値が1.0未満であると、転位密度が不十分であり、このため引張強度に比べて耐力がかなり小さくなってしまい、その結果、圧延方向に直角方向の耐力が小さくなってしまう。また、KAM値が3.0よりも大きいと、転移密度が高くなりすぎて曲げ加工性が劣化してしまう。
(KAM value)
The KAM value is 1.0 to 3.0. If the KAM value is less than 1.0, the dislocation density is insufficient, so that the yield strength is considerably smaller than the tensile strength, and as a result, the yield strength in the direction perpendicular to the rolling direction is reduced. On the other hand, if the KAM value is larger than 3.0, the transition density becomes too high and the bending workability deteriorates.
(平均結晶粒径、集合組織、KAM値の測定方法)
電界放出型走査電子顕微鏡(Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope:FESEM)に、後方散乱電子回折像[EBSP:ElectronBack Scattering(Scattered)Pattern]システムを搭載した結晶方位解析法を用いて、本発明では、製品銅合金の板厚方向の表面部の集合組織を測定し、平均結晶粒径の測定を行う。
(Measuring method of average grain size, texture, KAM value)
The present invention uses a crystal orientation analysis method in which a field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) is mounted on a field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM). The texture of the surface portion of the alloy in the plate thickness direction is measured, and the average crystal grain size is measured.
EBSP法では、FESEMの鏡筒内にセットした試料に、電子線を照射してスクリーン上にEBSPを投影する。これを高感度カメラで撮影して、コンピュータに画像として取り込む。コンピュータでは、この画像を解析して、既知の結晶系を用いたシミュレーションによるパターンとの比較によって、結晶の方位が決定される。算出された結晶の方位は3次元オイラー角として、位置座標(x、y)などと共に記録される。このプロセスが全測定点に対して自動的に行われるので、測定終了時には数万〜数十万点の結晶方位データを得ることができる。 In the EBSP method, an EBSP is projected onto a screen by irradiating an electron beam onto a sample set in a FESEM column. This is taken with a high-sensitivity camera and captured as an image on a computer. In the computer, the orientation of the crystal is determined by analyzing this image and comparing it with a pattern obtained by simulation using a known crystal system. The calculated crystal orientation is recorded as a three-dimensional Euler angle together with position coordinates (x, y) and the like. Since this process is automatically performed for all measurement points, tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of crystal orientation data can be obtained at the end of measurement.
ここで、通常の銅合金板の場合、主に、以下に示すようなCube方位、Goss方位、Brass方位、Copper方位、S方位等と呼ばれる多くの方位因子からなる集合組織を形成し、それらに応じた結晶面が存在する。これらの事実は、例えば、長島晋一編著、「集合組織」(丸善株式会社刊)や軽金属学会「軽金属」解説Vol.43、1993、P285−293などに記載されている。これらの集合組織の形成は同じ結晶系の場合でも加工、熱処理方法によって異なる。圧延による板材の集合組織の場合は、圧延面と圧延方向で表されており、圧延面は{ABC}で表現され、圧延方向は<DEF>で表現される(ABCDEFは整数を示す)。その表現に基づき、各方位は下記のように表現される。 Here, in the case of a normal copper alloy sheet, mainly formed a texture composed of many orientation factors called Cube orientation, Goss orientation, Brass orientation, Copper orientation, S orientation, etc. as shown below. There is a corresponding crystal plane. These facts are described in, for example, “Cross Texture” (published by Maruzen Co., Ltd.) edited by Shinichi Nagashima and “Light Metal” commentary Vol. 43, 1993, P285-293, and the like. The formation of these textures differs depending on the processing and heat treatment methods even in the case of the same crystal system. In the case of a texture of a plate material by rolling, it is expressed by a rolling surface and a rolling direction, the rolling surface is expressed by {ABC}, and the rolling direction is expressed by <DEF> (ABCDEF indicates an integer). Based on the expression, each direction is expressed as follows.
Cube方位{001}<100>
Goss方位{011}<100>
Rotated−Goss方位{011}<011>
Brass方位{011}<211>
Copper方位{112}<111>
(若しくはD方位{4411}<11118>)
S方位{123}<634>
B/G方位{011}<511>
B/S方位{168}<211>
P方位{011}<111>
Cube orientation {001} <100>
Goss orientation {011} <100>
Rotated-Goss orientation {011} <011>
Brass orientation {011} <211>
Copper orientation {112} <111>
(Or D direction {4411} <11118>)
S orientation {123} <634>
B / G direction {011} <511>
B / S orientation {168} <211>
P direction {011} <111>
本発明においては、基本的にこれらの結晶面から±15°以内の方位のずれのものは、同一の結晶面(方位因子)に属するものとする。また、隣り合う結晶粒の方位差が5°以上の結晶粒の境界を結晶粒界と定義する。 In the present invention, basically, those whose orientations deviate within ± 15 ° from these crystal planes belong to the same crystal plane (orientation factor). Further, a boundary between crystal grains in which the orientation difference between adjacent crystal grains is 5 ° or more is defined as a crystal grain boundary.
そのうえで、本発明においては、測定エリア300×300μmに対して0.5μmピッチで電子線を照射し、上記結晶方位解析法により測定した結晶粒の数をn、それぞれの測定した結晶粒径をxとした時、上記平均結晶粒径を(Σx)/nで算出する。 In addition, in the present invention, the measurement area 300 × 300 μm is irradiated with an electron beam at a pitch of 0.5 μm, the number of crystal grains measured by the crystal orientation analysis method is n, and each measured crystal grain size is x The average crystal grain size is calculated as (Σx) / n.
また、本発明においては、測定エリア300×300μmに対して0.5μmピッチで電子線を照射し、上記結晶方位解析法により測定した結晶方位の面積をそれぞれ測定し、測定エリアに対する各方位の平均面積率を求めた。 In the present invention, the measurement area 300 × 300 μm is irradiated with an electron beam at a pitch of 0.5 μm, the crystal orientation area measured by the crystal orientation analysis method is measured, and the average of each orientation relative to the measurement area is measured. The area ratio was determined.
ここで、結晶方位分布は板厚方向に分布がある可能性がある。従って、板厚方向に何点か任意にとって平均を得ることによって求める方が好ましい。 Here, the crystal orientation distribution may be distributed in the thickness direction. Therefore, it is preferable to obtain some points arbitrarily in the thickness direction by obtaining an average.
また、EBSPを用いて、結晶粒内の方位差を測定することで、KAM値を求めた。このKAM値は、結晶粒の数をn、夫々の測定した各結晶粒の方位差をyとしたとき、(Σy)/nで定義した。このKAM値は転位密度と相関があることが報告されており、その事実は、例えば、「材料」(Journal of the Society of Materials Science,Japan)Vol.58、No.7,P568−574,July 2009などに報告されている。 Moreover, KAM value was calculated | required by measuring the orientation difference in a crystal grain using EBSP. This KAM value was defined as (Σy) / n, where n is the number of crystal grains and y is the orientation difference of each measured crystal grain. This KAM value has been reported to correlate with the dislocation density, which is described in, for example, “Materials” (Journal of the Society of Materials Science, Japan) Vol. 58, no. 7, P568-574, July 2009, and the like.
(銅合金の化学成分組成)
次に、本発明の銅合金の成分限定理由について説明する。以下、各元素の含有率については単に%と記載するが、全て質量%を示す。
(Chemical composition of copper alloy)
Next, the reasons for limiting the components of the copper alloy of the present invention will be described. Hereinafter, the content of each element is simply described as%, but all indicate mass%.
Ni:1.5〜3.6%
Niは、Siとの化合物を晶出または析出させることにより、銅合金の強度および導電率を確保する作用がある。Niの含有量が1.5%未満であると、析出物の生成量が不十分となり、所望の強度が得られなくなり、また、銅合金組織の結晶粒が粗大化してしまう。一方、Niの含有量が3.6%を超えると、導電率が低下することに加えて、粗大な析出物の数が多くなりすぎ、曲げ加工性が低下してしまう。従って、Niの含有量は1.5〜3.6%の範囲とする。
Ni: 1.5-3.6%
Ni has the effect of securing the strength and conductivity of the copper alloy by crystallizing or precipitating a compound with Si. If the Ni content is less than 1.5%, the amount of precipitates generated becomes insufficient, the desired strength cannot be obtained, and the crystal grains of the copper alloy structure become coarse. On the other hand, if the Ni content exceeds 3.6%, the electrical conductivity is lowered, and the number of coarse precipitates is excessively increased, so that the bending workability is lowered. Therefore, the Ni content is in the range of 1.5 to 3.6%.
尚、Niの含有量により銅合金の強度レベルが異なってくる。Niの含有量が1.5%以上2.0%未満の場合は、圧延直角方向(T.D.方向)の0.2%耐力(YP)が650MPa以上となる。このとき、曲げ加工性は日本伸銅協会技術標準JBMA−T307に記載された評価基準A〜Bとなる。また、Niの含有量が2.0〜3.6%の場合は、圧延直角方向(T.D.方向)の0.2%耐力(YP)が700MPa以上となる。このとき、曲げ加工性は日本伸銅協会技術標準JBMA−T307に記載された評価基準A〜Cとなる。 Note that the strength level of the copper alloy varies depending on the Ni content. When the Ni content is 1.5% or more and less than 2.0%, the 0.2% proof stress (YP) in the direction perpendicular to the rolling direction (TD direction) is 650 MPa or more. At this time, bending workability becomes evaluation criteria A-B indicated in Japan Copper and Brass Association technical standard JBMA-T307. Further, when the Ni content is 2.0 to 3.6%, the 0.2% yield strength (YP) in the direction perpendicular to the rolling direction (TD direction) is 700 MPa or more. At this time, bending workability becomes evaluation criteria AC described in Japan Copper and Brass Association technical standard JBMA-T307.
Si:0.3〜1.0%
Siは、Niとの化合物を晶出または析出させることにより、銅合金の強度および導電率を向上させる。Siの含有量が0.3%未満であると、析出物の生成が不十分となり、所望の強度が得られなくなり、また、銅合金組織の結晶粒が粗大化してしまう。一方、Siの含有量が1.0%を超えると、粗大な析出物の数が多くなりすぎ、曲げ加工性が低下してしまう。従って、Siの含有量は0.3〜1.0%の範囲とする。
Si: 0.3 to 1.0%
Si improves the strength and electrical conductivity of the copper alloy by crystallizing or precipitating a compound with Ni. If the Si content is less than 0.3%, the formation of precipitates becomes insufficient, the desired strength cannot be obtained, and the crystal grains of the copper alloy structure become coarse. On the other hand, when the content of Si exceeds 1.0%, the number of coarse precipitates is excessively increased and bending workability is deteriorated. Therefore, the Si content is in the range of 0.3 to 1.0%.
尚、Siの含有量によっても銅合金の強度レベルが異なってくる。Siの含有量が0.3%以上0.5%未満の場合は、圧延直角方向(T.D.方向)の0.2%耐力(YP)が650MPa以上となる。このとき、曲げ加工性は日本伸銅協会技術標準JBMA−T307に記載された評価基準A〜Bとなる。また、Siの含有量が0.5〜1.0%の場合は、圧延直角方向(T.D.方向)の0.2%耐力(YP)が700MPa以上となる。このとき、曲げ加工性は日本伸銅協会技術標準JBMA−T307に記載された評価基準A〜Cとなる。 The strength level of the copper alloy varies depending on the Si content. When the Si content is 0.3% or more and less than 0.5%, the 0.2% yield strength (YP) in the direction perpendicular to the rolling direction (TD direction) is 650 MPa or more. At this time, bending workability becomes evaluation criteria A-B indicated in Japan Copper and Brass Association technical standard JBMA-T307. When the Si content is 0.5 to 1.0%, the 0.2% proof stress (YP) in the direction perpendicular to the rolling direction (TD direction) is 700 MPa or more. At this time, bending workability becomes evaluation criteria AC described in Japan Copper and Brass Association technical standard JBMA-T307.
本発明の銅合金は、以上の元素のほかは、銅と不可避的不純物で構成されるが、以下の元素を単独で、或いは複合して含有しても良い。 The copper alloy of the present invention is composed of copper and unavoidable impurities in addition to the above elements, but may contain the following elements alone or in combination.
Zn:0.05〜3.0%
Znは、電子部品の接合に用いるSnめっきやハンダの耐熱剥離性を改善し、熱剥離を抑制するのに有効な元素である。このような効果を有効に発揮させるためには、0.05%以上含有させる必要がある。しかし、Znの含有量が3.0%を超えると、却って溶融Snやハンダの濡れ広がり性を劣化させ、また、導電率も大きく低下してしまう。従って、Znは、耐熱剥離性向上効果と導電率低下作用とを考慮したうえで、0.05〜3.0%の範囲とする。
Zn: 0.05-3.0%
Zn is an element effective for improving the heat-resistant peelability of Sn plating and solder used for joining electronic components and suppressing thermal peeling. In order to exhibit such an effect effectively, it is necessary to contain 0.05% or more. However, if the Zn content exceeds 3.0%, the wet-spreading property of molten Sn and solder is deteriorated, and the electrical conductivity is greatly reduced. Therefore, Zn takes the range of 0.05 to 3.0% in consideration of the heat resistant peelability improving effect and the conductivity lowering effect.
Sn:0.05〜3.0%
Snは、銅合金中に固溶して強度向上に寄与する。この効果を有効に発揮させるためには、0.05%以上含有させる必要がある。しかし、Snの含有量が3.0%を超えると、その効果が飽和すると共に、導電率を大きく低下させてしまう。従って、Snは、強度向上効果と導電率低下作用とを考慮したうえで、0.05〜3.0%の範囲とする。
Sn: 0.05-3.0%
Sn dissolves in the copper alloy and contributes to strength improvement. In order to exhibit this effect effectively, it is necessary to contain 0.05% or more. However, if the Sn content exceeds 3.0%, the effect is saturated and the conductivity is greatly reduced. Therefore, Sn is taken in the range of 0.05 to 3.0% in consideration of the strength improvement effect and the conductivity lowering effect.
Fe、Mn、Mg、Co、Ti、Cr、Zrのうち一種または二種以上を合計で0.01〜3.0%
これらの元素は、結晶粒の微細化に効果がある。また、Siとの間に化合物を形成させることで、強度、導電率が向上する。これらの効果を有効に発揮させる場合には、選択的に、Fe、Mn、Mg、Co、Ti、Cr、Zrのうち一種または二種以上を、合計で0.01%以上含有させる必要がある。しかし、これらの元素の合計含有量が3.0%を超えると、化合物が粗大になり、曲げ加工性を損なう。従って、選択的に含有させる場合のこれら元素の含有量は、合計で0.01〜3.0%の範囲とする。尚、後述する実施例では、これらの元素が一種の例のみを挙げているが、これらの元素は上記共通の効果を発現させるものであり、これらの元素を上記所定の合計含有量で二種以上含有させても同様の効果を発現する。
0.01 to 3.0% of one or more of Fe, Mn, Mg, Co, Ti, Cr and Zr in total
These elements are effective in reducing the crystal grains. Further, by forming a compound with Si, the strength and conductivity are improved. In order to effectively exhibit these effects, it is necessary to selectively contain one or more of Fe, Mn, Mg, Co, Ti, Cr, and Zr in a total of 0.01% or more. . However, if the total content of these elements exceeds 3.0%, the compound becomes coarse and the bending workability is impaired. Therefore, the content of these elements when selectively contained is in the range of 0.01 to 3.0% in total. In the examples to be described later, these elements are only examples of one kind, but these elements express the above-mentioned common effect, and these elements are classified into two kinds with the predetermined total content. Even if it contains above, the same effect is expressed.
(製造条件)
本発明の銅合金(銅合金板)を製造するためには、銅合金の一連の製造工程において、溶体化処理を2度繰り返して施したうえで、且つ溶体化処理方法に工夫を凝らす必要がある。その一連の製造工程を工程順に説明すると、熱間圧延、冷間圧延、溶体化処理(1回目)、冷間圧延、溶体化処理(2回目)、時効処理、冷間圧延の順序となる。この際、溶体化処理は2回以上繰り返してもよい。本発明の銅合金を製造するには、これら一連の工程のうち、溶体化処理(1回目、2回目)は工夫を凝らし、詳細制御する必要がある。
(Production conditions)
In order to produce the copper alloy (copper alloy plate) of the present invention, it is necessary to repeat the solution treatment twice in a series of production processes of the copper alloy and to devise a solution treatment method. is there. The series of manufacturing steps will be described in the order of processes: hot rolling, cold rolling, solution treatment (first time), cold rolling, solution treatment (second time), aging treatment, and cold rolling. At this time, the solution treatment may be repeated twice or more. In order to produce the copper alloy of the present invention, the solution treatment (first and second times) out of these series of steps needs to be devised and controlled in detail.
溶体化処理(1回目)、溶体化処理(2回目)共に、昇温速度を0.1℃/s以下とし、降温速度を100℃/s以上とする。昇温速度が0.1℃/sより速くなると、銅合金のCube方位の面積率を45%以上とすることが困難となり、曲げ加工性が日本伸銅協会技術標準JBMA−T307に記載された評価基準D以下に低下してしまう。一方、100℃/sより遅くなると、冷却中に析出が発生し、続く時効処理で十分な析出が得られなくなり銅合金の強度が低下してしまう。 In both the solution treatment (first time) and the solution treatment (second time), the temperature increase rate is set to 0.1 ° C./s or less, and the temperature decrease rate is set to 100 ° C./s or more. When the rate of temperature increase is higher than 0.1 ° C./s, it becomes difficult to set the area ratio of the Cube orientation of the copper alloy to 45% or more, and the bending workability is described in the Japan Copper and Brass Association Technical Standard JBMA-T307. It will fall below evaluation standard D. On the other hand, when it becomes slower than 100 ° C./s, precipitation occurs during cooling, and sufficient precipitation cannot be obtained by the subsequent aging treatment, and the strength of the copper alloy is lowered.
また、溶体化処理(1回目)の処理温度は、750〜850℃とし、溶体化処理(2回目)の処理温度は、溶体化処理(1回目)の処理温度以上900℃未満とする。溶体化処理(1回目、2回目)の処理温度の少なくとも一方が前記した最低温度より低い場合は、銅合金のCube方位の面積率を45%以上とすることが困難となり、曲げ加工性が劣化してしまう。一方、溶体化処理(1回目、2回目)の処理温度の少なくとも一方が前記した最高温度より高い場合は、銅合金の平均結晶粒径が40μm以上になる可能性が高くなり、曲げ加工性が劣化してしまう。 The treatment temperature for the solution treatment (first time) is 750 to 850 ° C., and the treatment temperature for the solution treatment (second time) is not less than 900 ° C. and not less than the treatment temperature of the solution treatment (first time). When at least one of the solution treatment temperatures (first and second times) is lower than the above-mentioned minimum temperature, it becomes difficult to make the area ratio of the Cube orientation of the copper alloy 45% or more, and the bending workability deteriorates. Resulting in. On the other hand, when at least one of the solution treatment temperatures (first and second times) is higher than the above-described maximum temperature, the average crystal grain size of the copper alloy is likely to be 40 μm or more, and the bending workability is increased. It will deteriorate.
溶体化処理後は、一般的な銅合金を製造する場合と同じく、時効処理−最終冷間圧延−低温焼鈍を施すことで、本発明の銅合金を製造する。尚、時効処理温度は400〜500℃とすることが望ましい。また、最終冷間圧延の圧下率は25〜60%とする。この圧下率が25%より小さい場合は、KAM値が小さくなってしまい強度が低下する。一方、圧下率が60%より大きくなると、KAM値が3.0を超えることが多くなり、十分な曲げ加工性を得ることができなくなる。 After the solution treatment, the copper alloy of the present invention is produced by performing aging treatment-final cold rolling-low temperature annealing as in the case of producing a general copper alloy. The aging treatment temperature is preferably 400 to 500 ° C. Moreover, the rolling reduction of final cold rolling shall be 25 to 60%. When the rolling reduction is less than 25%, the KAM value becomes small and the strength is lowered. On the other hand, when the rolling reduction exceeds 60%, the KAM value often exceeds 3.0, and sufficient bending workability cannot be obtained.
以下、実施例を挙げて本発明をより具体的に説明するが、本発明はもとより下記実施例によって制限を受けるものではなく、本発明の趣旨に適合し得る範囲で適宜変更を加えて実施することも可能であり、それらは何れも本発明の技術的範囲に含まれる。 EXAMPLES Hereinafter, the present invention will be described more specifically with reference to examples. However, the present invention is not limited by the following examples, and the present invention is implemented with appropriate modifications within a range that can meet the gist of the present invention. These are all included in the technical scope of the present invention.
以下、本発明の実施例について説明する。表1に示す種々の化学成分組成のCu−Ni−Si−Zn−Sn系銅合金の銅合金薄板を、表1に示す種々の条件で製造し、平均結晶粒径や集合組織、KAM値などの板組織、強度や導電率、曲げ加工性、耐応力緩和特性などの板特性を各々調査して評価した。それらの結果を表2および表3に示す。 Examples of the present invention will be described below. Copper alloy thin plates of Cu—Ni—Si—Zn—Sn based copper alloys having various chemical composition shown in Table 1 were produced under various conditions shown in Table 1, and average crystal grain size, texture, KAM value, etc. The plate properties, such as the plate structure, strength and conductivity, bending workability, and stress relaxation resistance were investigated and evaluated. The results are shown in Table 2 and Table 3.
具体的な銅合金板の製造方法は、クリプトル炉において、大気中、木炭被覆下で溶解し、鋳鉄製ブックモールドに鋳造し、表1に記載する化学組成を有する厚さ50mmの鋳塊を得た。そして、その鋳塊の表面を面削した後、950℃の温度で、厚さが20〜30mmになるまで熱間圧延し、750℃以上の温度から水中で急冷した。次に、表面の酸化スケールを除去した後、厚さが0.25〜0.45mmになるまで冷間圧延を行った。 A specific method for producing a copper alloy plate is as follows: a kryptor furnace is melted in the atmosphere under charcoal coating, cast into a cast iron book mold, and a 50 mm thick ingot having the chemical composition shown in Table 1 is obtained. It was. And after chamfering the surface of the ingot, it was hot-rolled at a temperature of 950 ° C. until the thickness became 20 to 30 mm, and rapidly cooled in water from a temperature of 750 ° C. or higher. Next, after removing the oxide scale on the surface, cold rolling was performed until the thickness became 0.25 to 0.45 mm.
次いで、昇温速度が0.03〜0.05℃/sのバッチ炉、および昇温速度が10〜50℃/sの塩浴炉、または通電加熱機を使用し、表1に記載する種々の条件で、溶体化処理(1回目)を行い、その後、水冷を行った。 Then, using a batch furnace with a temperature rising rate of 0.03 to 0.05 ° C./s, a salt bath furnace with a temperature rising rate of 10 to 50 ° C./s, or an electric heater, various types described in Table 1 Under the conditions, solution treatment (first time) was performed, followed by water cooling.
引き続き、銅合金板に冷間圧延を施し、銅合金板の厚さを0.2〜0.35mmとした。次いで、昇温速度が0.03〜0.05℃/sのバッチ炉、および昇温速度が10〜50℃/sの塩浴炉、または通電加熱機を使用し、表1に記載する種々の条件で、溶体化処理(2回目)を行い、その後、水冷を行った。 Subsequently, the copper alloy plate was cold-rolled to make the thickness of the copper alloy plate 0.2 to 0.35 mm. Then, using a batch furnace with a temperature rising rate of 0.03 to 0.05 ° C./s, a salt bath furnace with a temperature rising rate of 10 to 50 ° C./s, or an electric heater, various types described in Table 1 Under the conditions, solution treatment (second time) was performed, and then water cooling was performed.
これら溶体化処理(焼鈍)後の試料について、時効処理−最終冷間圧延を経て、厚さが0.15mmの銅合金板とした。この銅合金板冷延板に対し、塩浴炉において、480℃×30sの低温焼鈍処理を施して最終の銅合金板とした。 The samples after solution treatment (annealing) were subjected to aging treatment-final cold rolling to obtain a copper alloy plate having a thickness of 0.15 mm. The copper alloy sheet cold-rolled sheet was subjected to a low-temperature annealing treatment of 480 ° C. × 30 s in a salt bath furnace to obtain a final copper alloy sheet.
(金属組織)
平均結晶粒径、各方位の平均面積率およびKAM値:
得られた各銅合金薄板から組織観察片を採取し、上述した要領で、平均結晶粒径および各方位の平均面積率を、電界放出型走査電子顕微鏡に後方散乱電子回折像システムを搭載した結晶方位解析法により測定した。具体的には、銅合金薄板の圧延面表面を機械研磨し、更に、バフ研磨に次いで電解研磨して、表面を調整した試料を準備した。その後、日本電子社製FESEM(JEOL JSM 5410)を用いて、EBSPによる結晶方位測定並びに結晶粒径測定を行った。測定領域は300μm×300μmの領域であり、測定ステップ間隔を0.5μmとした。
(Metal structure)
Average crystal grain size, average area ratio in each orientation, and KAM value:
A structure observation piece was collected from each obtained copper alloy thin plate, and in the manner described above, the average crystal grain size and the average area ratio of each orientation were measured, and a crystal mounted with a backscattered electron diffraction image system on a field emission scanning electron microscope. Measured by orientation analysis. Specifically, the surface of the rolled surface of the copper alloy thin plate was mechanically polished, and further subjected to electrolytic polishing after buffing to prepare a sample whose surface was adjusted. Thereafter, crystal orientation measurement and crystal grain size measurement by EBSP were performed using FESEM (JEOL JSM 5410) manufactured by JEOL Ltd. The measurement area was an area of 300 μm × 300 μm, and the measurement step interval was 0.5 μm.
また、KAM値は、EBSPを用いて結晶粒内の方位差測定することで求めた。このKAM値は、結晶粒の数をn、夫々の測定した各結晶粒の方位差をyとしたときに、(Σy)/nで定義した。 The KAM value was obtained by measuring the orientation difference in the crystal grains using EBSP. This KAM value was defined as (Σy) / n, where n is the number of crystal grains and y is the orientation difference of each measured crystal grain.
引張試験:
引張試験は、試験片の長手方向を圧延方向としたJIS13号B試験片を用いて、5882型インストロン社製万能試験機により、室温、試験速度10.0mm/min、GL=50mmの条件で実施し、0.2%耐力(MPa)を測定した。尚、この引張試験では、同一条件の試験片を3本試験し、それらの平均値を採用した。
Tensile test:
The tensile test was performed using a JIS No. 13 B test piece in which the longitudinal direction of the test piece was the rolling direction, at a room temperature, a test speed of 10.0 mm / min, and GL = 50 mm using a 5882 type Instron universal testing machine And 0.2% proof stress (MPa) was measured. In this tensile test, three test pieces under the same conditions were tested, and the average value thereof was adopted.
この引張試験では、Niの含有量が1.5〜3.6%、Siの含有量が0.3〜1.0%であって、Niの含有量が1.5%以上2.0%未満、或いは、Siの含有量が0.3%以上0.5%未満、という条件に一方でも該当する場合は、圧延直角方向(T.D.方向)の0.2%耐力(YP)が650MPa以上のものを、高強度であると評価する。また、それ以外のものは、圧延直角方向(T.D.方向)の0.2%耐力(YP)が700MPa以上のものを、高強度であると評価する。 In this tensile test, the Ni content is 1.5 to 3.6%, the Si content is 0.3 to 1.0%, and the Ni content is 1.5% or more and 2.0%. Or 0.2% proof stress (YP) in the direction perpendicular to the rolling direction (TD direction) when the condition that the Si content is 0.3% or more and less than 0.5% is also satisfied. A thing of 650 MPa or more is evaluated as having high strength. Other than that, a 0.2% yield strength (YP) in the direction perpendicular to the rolling direction (TD direction) of 700 MPa or more is evaluated as having high strength.
導電率:
導電率は、試験片の長手方向を圧延方向として、ミーリングにより、幅10mm×長さ300mmの短冊状の試験片を加工し、ダブルブリッジ式抵抗測定装置により電気抵抗を測定して、平均断面積法により算出した。尚、この測定でも、同一条件の試験片を3本測定し、それらの平均値を採用した。この測定で、導電率が30%IACS以上のものを、高導電性を有していると評価する。
conductivity:
Conductivity is measured by measuring the electrical resistance with a double-bridge resistance measuring device by processing a strip-shaped test piece having a width of 10 mm and a length of 300 mm by milling with the longitudinal direction of the test piece as the rolling direction. Calculated by the method. In this measurement as well, three test pieces under the same conditions were measured and the average value thereof was adopted. In this measurement, one having an electrical conductivity of 30% IACS or higher is evaluated as having high conductivity.
曲げ加工性:
銅合金板試料の曲げ試験は、以下の方法により実施した。銅合金板試料より幅10mm、長さ30mmの板材を切出し、1000kgf(約9800N)の荷重をかけて曲げ半径0.10mmという条件で、GoodWay(曲げ軸が圧延方向に直角)に90°曲げを行った。その後、1000kgf(約9800N)の荷重をかけて180°密着曲げを実施し、曲げ部における割れの発生の有無を、50倍の光学顕微鏡で目視観察した。その際に、割れの評価は日本伸銅協会技術標準JBMA−T307に記載のA〜Eにより評価した。
Bending workability:
The bending test of the copper alloy plate sample was performed by the following method. A plate material having a width of 10 mm and a length of 30 mm is cut out from a copper alloy plate sample, and is bent 90 ° to Good Way (the bending axis is perpendicular to the rolling direction) under a condition of a bending radius of 0.10 mm under a load of 1000 kgf (about 9800 N). went. Thereafter, 180 ° contact bending was performed with a load of 1000 kgf (about 9800 N), and the presence or absence of cracks in the bent portion was visually observed with a 50 × optical microscope. In that case, the evaluation of the crack was evaluated by A to E described in the Japan Copper and Brass Association Technical Standard JBMA-T307.
この曲げ試験では、Niの含有量が1.5〜3.6%、Siの含有量が0.3〜1.0%であって、Niの含有量が1.5%以上2.0%未満、或いは、Siの含有量が0.3%以上0.5%未満、という条件に一方でも該当する場合は、日本伸銅協会技術標準JBMA−T307に記載された評価基準がB以上のものを、曲げ加工性が優れているとする。また、それ以外のものにおいては、日本伸銅協会技術標準JBMA−T307に記載された評価基準がC以上のものを、曲げ加工性が優れているとする。 In this bending test, the Ni content is 1.5 to 3.6%, the Si content is 0.3 to 1.0%, and the Ni content is 1.5% or more and 2.0%. Less than or less than 0.5% or less than 0.5% of the condition, if the evaluation criteria described in JBMA-T307, the Japan Copper and Brass Association Technical Standard is B or more Suppose that bending workability is excellent. In addition, it is assumed that bending workability is excellent when the evaluation standard described in the Japan Copper Bending Association Technical Standard JBMA-T307 is C or higher.
耐応力緩和特性:
耐応力緩和特性(応力緩和率)は、銅合金板試料より試験片を採取し、図1および図2に示す片持ち梁方式を用いて測定した。具体的には、まず、銅合金板試料より、長さ方向が板材の圧延方向に対して直角方向になるようにして幅10mmの短冊状試験片1を切り出した。続いて、その短冊状試験片1の一端を剛体試験台2に固定した後、その短冊状試験片1のスパン長Lの部位に、図1に示すように、d(=10mm)の大きさのたわみ量を与えた。尚、前記スパン長Lは、材料耐力の80%に相当する表面応力が材料に負荷されるようにして決定する。この状態で、180℃のオーブン中に短冊状試験片1を24時間保持した後に取り出し、たわみ量dを取り去ったときの永久歪みδ(図2に示す)を測定し、RS=(δ/d)×100という計算式から応力緩和率(RS:%)を求めた。この測定で、応力緩和率が20%以下のものを、耐応力緩和特性が優れているとする。
Stress relaxation resistance:
The stress relaxation resistance (stress relaxation rate) was measured using a cantilever method shown in FIGS. 1 and 2 by collecting a test piece from a copper alloy plate sample. Specifically, first, a strip-shaped test piece 1 having a width of 10 mm was cut out from a copper alloy plate sample so that the length direction was a direction perpendicular to the rolling direction of the plate material. Subsequently, after fixing one end of the strip-shaped test piece 1 to the rigid body test stand 2, a size of d (= 10 mm) as shown in FIG. The amount of deflection was given. The span length L is determined such that a surface stress corresponding to 80% of the material yield strength is applied to the material. In this state, the strip-shaped test piece 1 is kept in an oven at 180 ° C. for 24 hours and then taken out, and the permanent strain δ (shown in FIG. 2) when the deflection amount d is removed is measured, and RS = (δ / d ) × 100, the stress relaxation rate (RS:%) was obtained. In this measurement, a stress relaxation rate of 20% or less is considered excellent in stress relaxation resistance.
表1に示す発明例1〜15は、表2に示すように、平均結晶粒径、Cube方位の平均面積率、およびKAM値が、各々規定の範囲内に制御されている。 In Invention Examples 1 to 15 shown in Table 1, as shown in Table 2, the average crystal grain size, the average area ratio of the Cube orientation, and the KAM value are controlled within specified ranges.
その結果、これら発明例では、表3に示すように、前記した本発明の銅合金の合格判定基準を満足する結果となった。 As a result, in these inventive examples, as shown in Table 3, the above-described acceptance criteria for the copper alloy of the present invention were satisfied.
一方、比較例16〜19は、何れかの合金元素の含有量が本発明で規定する範囲を満たしていない。また、比較例20〜29では、平均結晶粒径、Cube方位の平均面積率、およびKAM値の何れか1つ以上を、本発明で規定する範囲内に制御することができなかった。 On the other hand, in Comparative Examples 16 to 19, the content of any alloy element does not satisfy the range defined in the present invention. In Comparative Examples 20 to 29, any one or more of the average crystal grain size, the average area ratio of the Cube orientation, and the KAM value could not be controlled within the range defined by the present invention.
その結果、これら比較例では、表3に示すように、前記した本発明の銅合金の合格判定基準のうち、少なくとも1項目を満足できないという結果となった。 As a result, as shown in Table 3, in these comparative examples, at least one item was not satisfied among the acceptance criteria of the copper alloy of the present invention described above.
1…短冊状試験片
2…剛体試験台
1 ... Strip-shaped specimen 2 ... Rigid body test stand
Claims (3)
この銅合金の平均結晶粒径が15〜40μmであり、
且つ、SEM−EBSP法による測定結果で、Cube方位{001}<100>の平均面積率が45%以上70%未満であると共に、
KAM値が1.0〜3.0であることを特徴とする銅合金。 It is a copper alloy containing Ni: 1.5-3.6%, Si: 0.3-1.0%, and the balance consisting of copper and inevitable impurities,
The average crystal grain size of this copper alloy is 15-40 μm,
And as a result of measurement by the SEM-EBSP method, the average area ratio of the Cube orientation {001} <100> is 45% or more and less than 70% ,
A copper alloy having a KAM value of 1.0 to 3.0.
Priority Applications (8)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2011040394A JP5690170B2 (en) | 2011-02-25 | 2011-02-25 | Copper alloy |
| US13/299,828 US9845521B2 (en) | 2010-12-13 | 2011-11-18 | Copper alloy |
| EP12007912A EP2562280A1 (en) | 2010-12-13 | 2011-11-23 | Copper alloy |
| EP11009294A EP2463393A1 (en) | 2010-12-13 | 2011-11-23 | Copper alloy |
| CN201110408401.7A CN102534298B (en) | 2010-12-13 | 2011-12-09 | Copper alloy |
| KR1020110132859A KR101387263B1 (en) | 2010-12-13 | 2011-12-12 | Copper alloy |
| KR1020130122579A KR101396766B1 (en) | 2010-12-13 | 2013-10-15 | Copper alloy |
| KR1020130122577A KR101396616B1 (en) | 2010-12-13 | 2013-10-15 | Copper alloy |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2011040394A JP5690170B2 (en) | 2011-02-25 | 2011-02-25 | Copper alloy |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JP2012177153A JP2012177153A (en) | 2012-09-13 |
| JP5690170B2 true JP5690170B2 (en) | 2015-03-25 |
Family
ID=46979186
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2011040394A Expired - Fee Related JP5690170B2 (en) | 2010-12-13 | 2011-02-25 | Copper alloy |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP5690170B2 (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP4653562A1 (en) | 2023-02-24 | 2025-11-26 | Kabushiki Kaisha Kobe Seiko Sho (Kobe Steel, Ltd.) | Copper alloy sheet |
Families Citing this family (10)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP5876995B2 (en) * | 2011-05-30 | 2016-03-02 | 古河電気工業株式会社 | Copper alloy sheet with excellent strength, bending workability, stress relaxation characteristics, and fatigue characteristics |
| WO2015099097A1 (en) * | 2013-12-27 | 2015-07-02 | 古河電気工業株式会社 | Copper alloy sheet material, connector, and production method for copper alloy sheet material |
| KR102346254B1 (en) * | 2013-12-27 | 2022-01-03 | 후루카와 덴키 고교 가부시키가이샤 | Copper alloy sheet material, connector, and production method for copper alloy sheet material |
| JP6366298B2 (en) * | 2014-02-28 | 2018-08-01 | Dowaメタルテック株式会社 | High-strength copper alloy sheet material and manufacturing method thereof |
| CN109072341B (en) * | 2016-03-31 | 2021-07-27 | 同和金属技术有限公司 | Cu-Ni-Si-based copper alloy sheet and manufacturing method |
| JP6807211B2 (en) * | 2016-10-24 | 2021-01-06 | Dowaメタルテック株式会社 | Cu-Zr-Sn-Al-based copper alloy plate material, manufacturing method, and energizing member |
| JP6494681B2 (en) * | 2017-03-27 | 2019-04-03 | Jx金属株式会社 | Copper alloy and electronic parts for electronic materials |
| WO2021140915A1 (en) | 2020-01-09 | 2021-07-15 | Dowaメタルテック株式会社 | Cu-Ni-Si-BASED COPPER ALLOY SHEET MATERIAL, METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME, AND CURRENT-CARRYING COMPONENT |
| CN115516122B (en) * | 2020-05-29 | 2023-12-19 | 古河电气工业株式会社 | Copper alloy strip and manufacturing method thereof, resistance material for resistor using copper alloy strip, and resistor |
| WO2021241502A1 (en) * | 2020-05-29 | 2021-12-02 | 古河電気工業株式会社 | Copper alloy bar material, method for producing same, resistive material for resistors using same, and resistor |
Family Cites Families (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP4041452B2 (en) * | 2003-11-05 | 2008-01-30 | 株式会社神戸製鋼所 | Manufacturing method of copper alloy with excellent heat resistance |
| EP2048251B1 (en) * | 2006-05-26 | 2012-01-25 | Kabushiki Kaisha Kobe Seiko Sho | Copper alloy having high strength, high electric conductivity and excellent bending workability |
| EP2221391B1 (en) * | 2007-11-05 | 2014-04-30 | The Furukawa Electric Co., Ltd. | Copper alloy sheet |
| JP5520533B2 (en) * | 2009-07-03 | 2014-06-11 | 古河電気工業株式会社 | Copper alloy material and method for producing the same |
| JP5476149B2 (en) * | 2010-02-10 | 2014-04-23 | 株式会社神戸製鋼所 | Copper alloy with low strength anisotropy and excellent bending workability |
-
2011
- 2011-02-25 JP JP2011040394A patent/JP5690170B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP4653562A1 (en) | 2023-02-24 | 2025-11-26 | Kabushiki Kaisha Kobe Seiko Sho (Kobe Steel, Ltd.) | Copper alloy sheet |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP2012177153A (en) | 2012-09-13 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| JP5690170B2 (en) | Copper alloy | |
| KR101396766B1 (en) | Copper alloy | |
| JP5476149B2 (en) | Copper alloy with low strength anisotropy and excellent bending workability | |
| TWI433939B (en) | Cu-Mg-P copper alloy strip material and manufacturing method thereof | |
| JP4809935B2 (en) | Copper alloy sheet having low Young's modulus and method for producing the same | |
| TWI480394B (en) | Cu-Mg-P copper alloy strip and its manufacturing method | |
| CN103703154B (en) | Copper alloy | |
| CN102985572B (en) | Cu-Ni-Si-based copper alloy sheet excellent in deep drawing workability and manufacturing method thereof | |
| JP5503791B2 (en) | Copper alloy sheet and manufacturing method thereof | |
| TWI752208B (en) | Cu-co-si copper alloy plate material and manufacturing method, and parts using the plate material | |
| JP2012046810A (en) | Copper alloy sheet material and manufacturing method thereof | |
| JP2011052316A (en) | Copper alloy having high strength and excellent bending workability | |
| JP2007177274A (en) | Copper alloy having high strength and excellent bending workability and method for producing the same | |
| JPWO2015099097A1 (en) | Copper alloy sheet, connector, and method for producing copper alloy sheet | |
| JP6696770B2 (en) | Copper alloy plate and connector | |
| JP5314663B2 (en) | Copper alloy | |
| JP2021046590A (en) | Copper alloys, copper products and electronic equipment parts | |
| JP6835638B2 (en) | Copper alloy plate with excellent strength and conductivity | |
| JP5690169B2 (en) | Copper alloy | |
| JP6265651B2 (en) | Copper alloy sheet, connector using the same, and method for producing the copper alloy sheet | |
| JP2013104082A (en) | Cu-Co-Si-BASED ALLOY AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING THE SAME | |
| JP5981866B2 (en) | Copper alloy | |
| JP4987155B1 (en) | Cu-Ni-Si alloy and method for producing the same | |
| TWI541366B (en) | Cu-Ni-Si type copper alloy sheet excellent in deep drawing workability and a method for producing the same | |
| JP2021046589A (en) | Copper alloys, copper products and electronic equipment parts |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20130902 |
|
| A977 | Report on retrieval |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007 Effective date: 20140414 |
|
| A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20140422 |
|
| A521 | Written amendment |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20140619 |
|
| TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20150127 |
|
| A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20150130 |
|
| R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Ref document number: 5690170 Country of ref document: JP Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |
|
| LAPS | Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees |