Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP5700679B2 - Method for investigating aging deterioration of chemical injection ground - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP5700679B2 - Method for investigating aging deterioration of chemical injection ground - Google Patents

Method for investigating aging deterioration of chemical injection ground Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP5700679B2
JP5700679B2 JP2011231368A JP2011231368A JP5700679B2 JP 5700679 B2 JP5700679 B2 JP 5700679B2 JP 2011231368 A JP2011231368 A JP 2011231368A JP 2011231368 A JP2011231368 A JP 2011231368A JP 5700679 B2 JP5700679 B2 JP 5700679B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
specimen
chemical
ground
injection ground
characteristic value
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP2011231368A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2013087570A (en
Inventor
澤田 亮
亮 澤田
貴司 仲山
貴司 仲山
寛一 赤木
寛一 赤木
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Railway Technical Research Institute
Original Assignee
Railway Technical Research Institute
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Railway Technical Research Institute filed Critical Railway Technical Research Institute
Priority to JP2011231368A priority Critical patent/JP5700679B2/en
Publication of JP2013087570A publication Critical patent/JP2013087570A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP5700679B2 publication Critical patent/JP5700679B2/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Consolidation Of Soil By Introduction Of Solidifying Substances Into Soil (AREA)
  • Investigation Of Foundation Soil And Reinforcement Of Foundation Soil By Compacting Or Drainage (AREA)

Description

本発明は、薬液注入地盤の経年劣化調査方法に関するものである。   The present invention relates to a method for investigating aged deterioration of a chemical solution injection ground.

従来、軟弱地盤等において、工事を行なう際に地盤を安定化させるための補助工法や、地震動による液状化を防止するための対策工法として、薬液注入工法が用いられている。薬液注入工法では、地盤中にシリカ系の薬液などの注入材を注入することにより、透水係数を小さくしたり、強度を高めたりして軟弱な地盤を改良する。
また、このような薬液注入工法による地盤改良の効果を確認するための従来技術としては、標準貫入試験等が知られている。標準貫入試験については、特許文献1などにその例が記載されている。
Conventionally, in soft ground or the like, a chemical injection method has been used as an auxiliary method for stabilizing the ground during construction and a countermeasure method for preventing liquefaction due to earthquake motion. In the chemical injection method, by injecting an injection material such as a silica-based chemical into the ground, the soft ground is improved by reducing the hydraulic conductivity or increasing the strength.
Moreover, a standard penetration test etc. are known as a prior art for confirming the effect of the ground improvement by such a chemical | medical solution injection construction method. An example of the standard penetration test is described in Patent Document 1 and the like.

特開2010−024717号公報JP 2010-024717 A

薬液等の注入材を用いた改良地盤については、薬液が地下水によって溶脱し、強度が維持されずに劣化する場合がある。そのため、改良地盤を短期的でなく長期的に使用する場合には、劣化の程度を予測し把握する必要がある。しかしながら、従来実施されてきた各種の試験は、薬液の溶脱による地盤の経年劣化の調査に必ずしも適したものとはいえなかった。   About the improvement ground using injection materials, such as a chemical | medical solution, a chemical | medical solution may be leached by groundwater and may deteriorate without maintaining intensity | strength. Therefore, when the improved ground is used for a long period rather than a short period, it is necessary to predict and grasp the degree of deterioration. However, the various tests that have been carried out in the past have not necessarily been suitable for investigating the aging of the ground due to chemical leaching.

本発明は、前述した問題点に鑑みてなされたもので、その目的とすることは、地下水による薬液の溶脱をモデル化し、これを反映した地盤の経年劣化を調査できる薬液注入地盤の経年劣化調査方法を提供することである。   The present invention has been made in view of the above-mentioned problems, and its purpose is to model chemical leaching by groundwater, and to investigate the aging degradation of the chemical injection ground that reflects this aging degradation. Is to provide a method.

前述した目的を達成するための第1の発明は、薬液注入した薬液注入地盤を模して供試体を作製する工程(a)と、前記供試体を、薬液の溶脱を促進するための促進倍率を用いて定められる所定の流速の流体中に、前記流体が前記供試体の周囲を流れるように設置し、所定の試験期間が経過した後に、前記供試体の特性値を測定する工程(b)と、を具備し、前記供試体の特性値を、前記促進倍率および前記試験期間により定まる換算経過期間の経過後における薬液注入地盤の特性値とすることにより、換算経過期間の経過後の薬液注入地盤の特性値を求めることを特徴とする薬液注入地盤の経年劣化調査方法である。 1st invention for achieving the objective mentioned above is the process (a) which produces the test body imitating the chemical | medical solution injection | pouring ground which inject | poured the chemical | medical solution, and the acceleration magnification for accelerating | stimulating leaching of a chemical | medical solution for the said test body (B) a step of measuring the characteristic value of the specimen after the predetermined test period has elapsed after being installed in a fluid having a predetermined flow velocity determined by using the fluid; And the characteristic value of the specimen is a characteristic value of the chemical injection ground after the conversion elapsed period determined by the acceleration magnification and the test period, whereby the chemical injection after the conversion elapsed period has elapsed This is a method for investigating aging deterioration of a chemical-injected ground characterized by obtaining characteristic values of the ground.

前記流体の流速は層流条件を満たすように定められることが望ましい。
また、前記特性値は、薬液濃度を含むことが望ましい。
第2の発明は、薬液注入した薬液注入地盤を模して供試体を作製する工程(a)と、前記供試体を、薬液の溶脱を促進するための促進倍率を用いて定められる所定の流速の流体中に、前記流体が前記供試体の周囲を流れるように設置し、所定の試験期間が経過した後に、前記供試体の特性値を測定する工程(b)と、を具備し、前記供試体の特性値を、前記促進倍率および前記試験期間により定まる換算経過期間の経過後における薬液注入地盤の特性値とすることにより、換算経過期間の経過後の薬液注入地盤の特性値を求め、前記流体の流速を、薬液注入地盤内に想定される固結体の周囲を通過する地下水の質量と固結体の質量の比と、前記供試体の質量との積を、前記供試体の表面積と前記流体の密度との積で割った値に、前記促進倍率を掛けた値とすることを特徴とする薬液注入地盤の経年劣化調査方法である
It is desirable that the flow rate of the fluid is determined so as to satisfy a laminar flow condition.
The characteristic value preferably includes a chemical concentration.
The second invention is a step (a) in which a specimen is prepared by imitating a medicinal liquid injection ground into which a medicinal liquid has been injected, and a predetermined flow rate that is determined using an acceleration factor for accelerating the leaching of the chemical liquid. And (b) measuring the characteristic value of the specimen after a predetermined test period has elapsed, the fluid being installed in the fluid such that the fluid flows around the specimen. By determining the characteristic value of the specimen as the characteristic value of the chemical injection ground after the conversion elapsed period determined by the acceleration magnification and the test period, the characteristic value of the chemical injection ground after the conversion elapsed period is obtained, The flow rate of the fluid is defined as the product of the ratio of the mass of groundwater passing through the periphery of the solidified body assumed in the chemical injection ground and the mass of the solidified body, and the mass of the specimen, and the surface area of the specimen. The acceleration magnification is divided by the product of the fluid density and the product. Is aging research methods of liquid injection ground, characterized in that a value obtained by multiplying.

本発明では、薬液注入した地盤を模して供試体を作製し、所定の流速の流体中に供試体を設置して劣化を促進させる。そして、所定の試験期間が経過した後、供試体の劣化程度を測定して、促進倍率と試験期間により定まる換算経過期間が経過した後の実際の薬液注入地盤の劣化程度を求める。これにより、地下水による薬液の溶脱に伴う薬液注入地盤の経年変化がモデル化され、これを反映した劣化の程度を予測し把握することができる。
また、流速を層流条件を満たすように定めることにより、地盤中の地下水の状態をよりよく模擬した試験を行うことができ、劣化の程度が精度よく把握できる。さらに、特性値として薬液濃度を測定することにより、地盤の様々な特性に影響する薬液濃度の経年変化を予測できる。加えて、流体の流速を、薬液注入地盤内に想定される固結体の周囲を通過する地下水の質量と固結体の質量の比と、供試体の質量との積を、供試体の表面積と流体の密度との積で割った値に、促進倍率を掛けた値とすることにより、流体の流速が、実際の薬液注入地盤と相似な現象を起こす流速を基準とし、これに促進倍率をかけたものとなるので、劣化の程度がより精度よく把握できる。
In the present invention, a specimen is prepared by imitating the ground into which the chemical solution has been injected, and the specimen is placed in a fluid having a predetermined flow velocity to promote deterioration. Then, after the predetermined test period has elapsed, the degree of deterioration of the specimen is measured, and the degree of deterioration of the actual chemical injection ground after the conversion elapsed period determined by the acceleration magnification and the test period has been obtained. Thereby, the secular change of the chemical | medical solution injection | pouring ground accompanying the leaching of the chemical | medical solution by groundwater is modeled, and the degree of degradation reflecting this can be predicted and grasped.
Further, by determining the flow velocity so as to satisfy the laminar flow condition, it is possible to perform a test that better simulates the state of groundwater in the ground, and to accurately grasp the degree of deterioration. Furthermore, by measuring the chemical concentration as the characteristic value, it is possible to predict the secular change of the chemical concentration that affects various characteristics of the ground. In addition, the flow rate of the fluid is determined by the product of the ratio of the mass of groundwater passing through the periphery of the solidified body assumed in the chemical injection ground and the mass of the solidified body and the mass of the test body, and the surface area of the test body. The value obtained by dividing the product by the product of the fluid density and the acceleration magnification is multiplied by the acceleration magnification, so that the fluid flow velocity is based on the flow velocity that causes a phenomenon similar to the actual chemical injection ground, and this is the acceleration magnification. Therefore, the degree of deterioration can be grasped more accurately.

本発明によれば、地下水による薬液の溶脱をモデル化し、これを反映した地盤の経年劣化を調査できる薬液注入地盤の経年劣化調査方法が提供される。   ADVANTAGE OF THE INVENTION According to this invention, the aging deterioration investigation method of the chemical | medical solution injection | pouring ground which can model the leaching of the chemical | medical solution by groundwater and can investigate the aging deterioration of the ground reflecting this is provided.

小型の供試体3を用いた実験の概要を示す図The figure which shows the outline of the experiment using the small specimen 3 固結体11の周囲を通過する地下水のイメージを示す図The figure which shows the image of the groundwater which passes the circumference | surroundings of the solidified body 11 一軸圧縮強度、シリカ濃度と換算経過期間との関係を示す図Diagram showing the relationship between uniaxial compressive strength, silica concentration and conversion elapsed time 大型の供試体27を用いた実験の概要を示す図The figure which shows the outline | summary of the experiment using the large-sized specimen 27

以下、図面に基づいて、本発明の実施の形態について詳細に説明する。本発明の実施の形態として、小型の供試体3を用いた実験の例と、大型の供試体27を用いた実験の例について説明する。   Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings. As an embodiment of the present invention, an example of an experiment using a small specimen 3 and an example of an experiment using a large specimen 27 will be described.

まず、本発明の第1の実施の形態について、図1〜図3を参照して説明する。第1の実施の形態は、小型の供試体3を用いた実験を行う例である。   First, a first embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to FIGS. The first embodiment is an example in which an experiment using a small specimen 3 is performed.

図1は、小型の供試体3を用いた実験の概要を示す図である。図1の(a)図は、供試体3が設置された水槽1の斜視図である。図1の(b)図は、供試体3の斜視図である。   FIG. 1 is a diagram showing an outline of an experiment using a small specimen 3. FIG. 1A is a perspective view of a water tank 1 in which a specimen 3 is installed. FIG. 1B is a perspective view of the specimen 3.

供試体3を用いた実験では、まず、図1の(a)図に示すような水槽1を準備する。水槽1は、例えば、縦53cm、横75cmのサイズの平面の非金属性のものとする。また、注水管5が水槽1の上方に設けられ、排水管7が水槽1の下部に設けられる。水槽1には、注水管5から矢印Aに示すように流体である水9が注水される。水9は、水槽1内を所定の流速で流れ、排水管7から矢印Bに示すように排水される。水槽1内の水9の流速は、注水・排水量の制御により制御される。当該流速は層流条件下とするとともに、促進倍率を用いて定められる。流速の決定方法については後述する。また、水9は適当な温度に定めておく。例えば水温を20℃とする。   In the experiment using the specimen 3, first, a water tank 1 as shown in FIG. 1A is prepared. The water tank 1 is, for example, a flat non-metallic one having a size of 53 cm in length and 75 cm in width. A water injection pipe 5 is provided above the water tank 1, and a drain pipe 7 is provided at the lower part of the water tank 1. Water 9, which is a fluid, is injected into the water tank 1 as indicated by an arrow A from the water injection pipe 5. The water 9 flows through the water tank 1 at a predetermined flow velocity and is drained from the drain pipe 7 as indicated by an arrow B. The flow rate of the water 9 in the water tank 1 is controlled by controlling the water injection / drainage amount. The flow velocity is determined using laminar flow conditions and the acceleration magnification. A method for determining the flow rate will be described later. The water 9 is set at an appropriate temperature. For example, the water temperature is 20 ° C.

また、図1の(b)図に示すような供試体3を作製する。供試体3は、薬液注入した地盤を模してシリカ系の薬液を注入し作製する。供試体3は、例えば、半径r=2.5cm、高さh=10cmの円柱形の小型モールドを用いて作製される。供試体3の相対密度(間隙比)は、例えば、対象とする地盤の間隙比に合わせて定められる。なお、供試体3の作製の際には薬液注入した実際の地盤から採取したものを用いてもよい。試験前の供試体3の薬液濃度や一軸圧縮強度などの特性値は、予め測定等して把握しておく。   Further, a specimen 3 as shown in FIG. The specimen 3 is prepared by injecting a silica-based chemical solution, imitating the ground into which the chemical solution has been injected. The specimen 3 is manufactured using, for example, a cylindrical small mold having a radius r = 2.5 cm and a height h = 10 cm. The relative density (gap ratio) of the specimen 3 is determined according to the gap ratio of the target ground, for example. Note that when the specimen 3 is manufactured, a sample collected from the actual ground into which the chemical solution has been injected may be used. The characteristic values such as the chemical concentration and the uniaxial compressive strength of the specimen 3 before the test are previously measured and grasped.

以下に、水9の流速の求め方を説明する。図2は、実際の薬液注入地盤内に想定される、薬液による固結体11の周囲を通過する地下水のイメージを示す図である。固結体11は球形とする。固結体11の体積をV、表面積をS、質量をMとし、想定される地下水の流速をvとすると、図2の矢印Dに示すように固結体11の周囲を通過する地下水の流量Q=S×vとなる。通過流量の質量換算値Q×ρ(固結体11の周囲を通過する地下水の質量)と固結体11の質量Mとの比を無次元値Rとすると、R=Q×ρ/Mとなる。ρは水の密度である。 Below, the method of calculating | requiring the flow velocity of the water 9 is demonstrated. FIG. 2 is a diagram showing an image of groundwater passing through the periphery of the solidified body 11 with a chemical solution, assumed in an actual chemical solution injection ground. The solidified body 11 is spherical. Assuming that the volume of the consolidated body 11 is V, the surface area is S, the mass is M, and the assumed flow velocity of groundwater is v, the flow rate of groundwater passing around the consolidated body 11 as shown by the arrow D in FIG. Q = S × v. Assuming that the ratio between the mass converted value Q × ρ w of the passing flow rate (the mass of groundwater passing around the consolidated body 11) and the mass M of the consolidated body 11 is a dimensionless value R, R = Q × ρ w / M. ρ w is the density of water.

図1の(b)図に示す供試体3の体積をV’、表面積をS’、質量をM’とする。供試体3の周囲を通過する水9の通過流量の質量換算値Q’× ρと供試体質量M’の比を、前記無次元値Rと同一とする相似則を適用すると、Q’=R×M’/ρとなり、供試体3を用いた実験で実際の地盤と相似な現象を起こすのに必要な流速v’=Q’/S’=R×M’/(S’× ρ)となる。 The volume of the specimen 3 shown in FIG. 1B is V ′, the surface area is S ′, and the mass is M ′. The ratio of passes around the specimen 3 '× [rho w specimen mass M' mass conversion value Q of the passing flow rate of water 9, applying the similarity law to the same as the dimensionless value R, Q '= R × M 'next / [rho w, flow velocity v required to cause a similar to the actual ground behavior experiments using specimens 3' = Q '/ S' = R × M '/ (S' × ρ w ).

供試体3を用いた実験では、薬液の溶脱を促進するために、水9の流速を、現場と相似な現象を起こすのに必要な流速v’のn倍として、劣化促進実験を行なう。nは薬液の溶脱を促進するための促進倍率である。
即ち、水9の流速は、固結体11の周囲を通過する地下水の質量と固結体11の質量の比Rと、供試体3の質量M’との積を、供試体3の表面積S’と水9の密度ρとの積で割った値v’に、促進倍率nを掛けた値と定められる。
In the experiment using the specimen 3, in order to promote the leaching of the chemical solution, the deterioration promotion experiment is performed by setting the flow rate of the water 9 to n times the flow rate v ′ necessary to cause a phenomenon similar to that in the field. n is an acceleration magnification for promoting leaching of the chemical solution.
That is, the flow rate of the water 9 is the product of the ratio R of the mass of ground water passing through the periphery of the consolidated body 11 to the mass of the consolidated body 11 and the mass M ′ of the test body 3, and the surface area S of the test body 3. It is determined to be a value obtained by multiplying the value v 'divided by the product of' and the density ρ w of water 9 by the acceleration magnification n.

劣化促進実験では、上記作製された供試体3を、流速v’×nの水9が流れる水槽1内に、供試体3の全体が水9の中に没するように水浸させ、供試体3の薬液の溶脱を促進させる。そして、所定の試験期間が経過した後に、供試体3の特性値を測定する。特性値は、一軸圧縮強度、薬液濃度等である。測定した供試体3の特性値を、促進倍率nおよび試験期間によりn×(試験期間)で定まる換算経過期間の経過後における、実際の薬液注入地盤の特性値とすることにより、換算経過期間経過後の実際の薬液注入地盤の特性値を求める。   In the deterioration promotion experiment, the prepared specimen 3 is immersed in the water tank 1 in which the water 9 having a flow velocity v ′ × n flows, so that the entire specimen 3 is immersed in the water 9. The leaching of the chemical solution 3 is promoted. Then, after a predetermined test period has elapsed, the characteristic value of the specimen 3 is measured. The characteristic values are uniaxial compressive strength, chemical concentration, and the like. By using the measured characteristic value of the specimen 3 as the characteristic value of the actual medicinal solution injection ground after the conversion elapsed period determined by n × (test period) according to the acceleration magnification n and the test period, the conversion elapsed period elapsed The characteristic value of the actual chemical solution injection ground is obtained later.

図3は、供試体3の特性値として得られた、一軸圧縮強度、薬液濃度(シリカ濃度)と換算経過期間(換算経過日数)との関係を示す図である。供試体3を用いて所定の促進倍率で行なった実験により把握した、換算経過期間と供試体3の特性値との関係は、例えば図3に示すようなグラフに整理される。   FIG. 3 is a diagram showing the relationship between the uniaxial compressive strength, the chemical concentration (silica concentration), and the conversion elapsed period (converted elapsed days) obtained as the characteristic values of the specimen 3. The relationship between the conversion elapsed period and the characteristic value of the specimen 3 obtained by an experiment conducted at a predetermined acceleration magnification using the specimen 3 is arranged in a graph as shown in FIG. 3, for example.

図3の(a)図は、供試体3の一軸圧縮強度と、換算経過期間との関係を模式的に示す図である。データ13は相対密度80%の、データ15は相対密度60%の、データ17は相対密度40%の供試体3の劣化促進試験結果から得られた値を示す。各一軸圧縮強度は、換算経過期間経過した時点における実際の薬液注入地盤の一軸圧縮強度を推定した値になる。   FIG. 3A is a diagram schematically showing the relationship between the uniaxial compressive strength of the specimen 3 and the conversion elapsed period. Data 13 shows a value obtained from the deterioration promotion test result of the specimen 3 having a relative density of 80%, data 15 having a relative density of 60%, and data 17 having a relative density of 40%. Each uniaxial compressive strength is a value obtained by estimating the uniaxial compressive strength of the actual chemical solution injection ground when the conversion elapsed period has elapsed.

図3の(b)図は、供試体3のシリカ濃度と、換算経過期間との関係を模式的に示す図である。データ19は相対密度80%の、データ21は相対密度60%の、データ23は相対密度40%の供試体3の劣化促進試験結果から得られた値を示す。各シリカ濃度は、換算経過期間経過した時点における実際の薬液注入地盤のシリカ濃度を推定した値になる。   FIG. 3B is a diagram schematically showing the relationship between the silica concentration of the specimen 3 and the conversion elapsed period. Data 19 is a relative density of 80%, data 21 is a relative density of 60%, and data 23 is a value obtained from a result of the accelerated acceleration test of the specimen 3 having a relative density of 40%. Each silica density | concentration becomes the value which estimated the silica density | concentration of the actual chemical | medical solution injection | pouring ground at the time of conversion elapsed time passing.

図3からは、換算経過期間が大きくなるにつれて、シリカ濃度および一軸圧縮強度が低下する傾向が見られる。このように、シリカ濃度の低下と、一軸圧縮強度の低下との関連性が示唆される。上述した実験方法は、薬液の溶脱により地盤の強度等が変化する状態がモデル化されており、薬液注入地盤の経年変化の把握に有効であると考えられる。   FIG. 3 shows that the silica concentration and the uniaxial compressive strength tend to decrease as the conversion elapsed period increases. Thus, the relationship between the decrease in silica concentration and the decrease in uniaxial compressive strength is suggested. The above-described experimental method models the state in which the strength of the ground changes due to leaching of the chemical solution, and is considered to be effective for grasping the secular change of the chemical injection ground.

このように、本実施の形態によれば、薬液注入した地盤を模して供試体を作製し、促進倍率を用いて定めた流速の流水中に供試体を設置して劣化を促進させる。そして、所定の試験期間が経過した後、供試体の劣化程度を測定して、促進倍率と試験期間により定まる換算経過期間が経過した後の実際の薬液注入地盤の劣化程度を求める。これにより、地下水による薬液の溶脱に伴う薬液注入地盤の経年変化の程度を予測し、把握することができる。また、流速を層流条件を満たすように定めることにより、地盤中の地下水の状態をよく模擬したものとなるので、精度よく劣化の程度を把握でき、特性値として薬液濃度を測定することにより、地盤の様々な特性に影響する薬液濃度の経年変化を予測できる。さらに、流体の流速を、薬液注入地盤内に想定される固結体の周囲を通過する地下水の質量と固結体の質量の比と、供試体の質量との積を、供試体の表面積と流体の密度との積で割った値に、促進倍率を掛けた値とすることにより、流体の流速が、実際の薬液注入地盤と相似な現象を起こす流速を基準とし、これに促進倍率をかけたものとなるので、劣化の程度がより精度よく把握できる。   As described above, according to the present embodiment, a specimen is prepared by imitating the ground into which the chemical solution has been injected, and the specimen is placed in running water at a flow rate determined using the acceleration magnification to promote deterioration. Then, after the predetermined test period has elapsed, the degree of deterioration of the specimen is measured, and the degree of deterioration of the actual chemical injection ground after the conversion elapsed period determined by the acceleration magnification and the test period has been obtained. Thereby, the grade of the secular change of the chemical | medical solution injection | pouring ground accompanying the leaching of the chemical | medical solution by groundwater can be estimated and grasped | ascertained. In addition, by setting the flow velocity so as to satisfy the laminar flow condition, it becomes a good simulation of the state of groundwater in the ground, so the degree of deterioration can be accurately grasped, and by measuring the chemical concentration as a characteristic value, Predict changes over time in chemical concentrations that affect various characteristics of the ground. Furthermore, the flow rate of the fluid is determined by the product of the ratio of the mass of groundwater passing through the periphery of the solidified body assumed in the chemical injection ground and the mass of the solidified body and the mass of the test body, and the surface area of the test body. By dividing the product by the product of the fluid density and multiplying by the acceleration factor, the fluid flow rate is based on the flow rate that causes a phenomenon similar to the actual chemical injection ground, and multiplied by the acceleration factor. Therefore, the degree of deterioration can be grasped more accurately.

なお、本実施の形態では、供試体の特性値として、一軸圧縮強度、薬液濃度等を測定したが、特性値はこれらに限らない。例えば透水係数や供試体の体積などでもよい。また、供試体の薬液濃度ならびに排水等の水中の薬液濃度を測定することにより、薬液が水中に溶脱した溶脱率を測定してもよい。さらに、必要に応じて、水浸直後や所定の試験期間経過後に、供試体の状況を写真やスケッチにより記録し、薬液の溶脱範囲などを観測してもよい。   In the present embodiment, the uniaxial compressive strength, the chemical concentration, and the like are measured as the characteristic values of the specimen, but the characteristic values are not limited to these. For example, the water permeability coefficient or the volume of the specimen may be used. Moreover, you may measure the leaching rate which the chemical | medical solution leached in water by measuring the chemical | medical solution density | concentration of a test piece and the chemical | medical solution density | concentration in water, such as a waste_water | drain. Further, if necessary, the state of the specimen may be recorded with a photograph or sketch immediately after the water immersion or after a predetermined test period, and the leaching range of the chemical solution may be observed.

さらに、本実施の形態では、上面が開口した箱型の水槽中に所定の流速の層流を形成して供試体を設置したが、これに限らず、例えば、管状体の内部に所定の流速の層流を形成して供試体を設置してもよい。また、供試体の形状や大きさは上述したものに限らない。   Furthermore, in the present embodiment, the specimen is installed by forming a laminar flow with a predetermined flow velocity in a box-shaped water tank whose upper surface is open. However, the present invention is not limited to this, and for example, a predetermined flow velocity is provided inside the tubular body. The laminar flow may be formed and the specimen may be installed. Further, the shape and size of the specimen are not limited to those described above.

次に、本発明の第2の実施の形態について、図4を参照して説明する。第2の実施の形態は、大型の供試体27を用いた実験を行う例である。
図4は、大型の供試体27を用いた実験の概要を示す図である。図4は、供試体27が設置された水槽25の斜視図である。
Next, a second embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to FIG. The second embodiment is an example in which an experiment using a large specimen 27 is performed.
FIG. 4 is a diagram showing an outline of an experiment using the large specimen 27. FIG. 4 is a perspective view of the water tank 25 in which the specimen 27 is installed.

供試体27を用いた実験では、まず、図4に示すような水槽25を準備する。水槽25は、例えば、縦115cm、横135cmのサイズの平面の非金属性のものとする。また、注水管5、排水管7と同様の注水管29、排水管31が設けられる。第1の実施の形態と同様、水33は、水槽25内を層流条件下かつ促進倍率nを用いて定められる所定の流速で流れるように調節される。   In an experiment using the specimen 27, first, a water tank 25 as shown in FIG. 4 is prepared. The water tank 25 is, for example, a non-metallic plane having a size of 115 cm in length and 135 cm in width. Further, a water injection pipe 29 and a drain pipe 31 similar to the water injection pipe 5 and the drain pipe 7 are provided. As in the first embodiment, the water 33 is adjusted to flow in the water tank 25 under a laminar flow condition and at a predetermined flow rate determined using the acceleration magnification n.

また、図4に示すような供試体27を作製する。供試体27は、供試体3と同様に、薬液注入した地盤を模して作製される。本実施形態では、供試体27は、球状の薬液固結土であり、半径を、例えば20cm程度とする。   Further, a specimen 27 as shown in FIG. 4 is produced. Like the specimen 3, the specimen 27 is produced by imitating the ground into which the chemical solution has been injected. In the present embodiment, the specimen 27 is a spherical chemical solution consolidated soil and has a radius of, for example, about 20 cm.

水33の流速については、前述したものと同様、図4に示す供試体27の体積をV’’、表面積をS’’、質量をM’’とし、供試体27の周囲を通過する水33の通過流量の質量換算値Q’’×ρと供試体質量M’’の比を、前述の比Rと同一とする相似則を適用すると、Q’’=R×M’’/ρとなり、供試体27を用いた模型実験で実際の薬液注入地盤と相似な現象を起こすのに必要な流速v’’=Q’’/S’’=R×M’’/(S’’×ρ)となる。 Regarding the flow rate of the water 33, the volume of the specimen 27 shown in FIG. 4 is V ″, the surface area is S ″, the mass is M ″, and the water 33 passing around the specimen 27 is the same as described above. the ratio of 'the × [rho w specimen mass M' passing flow of mass conversion value Q '' of, applying the similarity law to the same as the ratio R described above, Q '' = R × M '' / ρ w Thus, the flow velocity v ″ = Q ″ / S ″ = R × M ″ / (S ″ × necessary for causing a phenomenon similar to the actual chemical injection ground in the model experiment using the specimen 27 ρ w ).

供試体27を用いた実験でも、薬液の溶脱を促進するために、水33の流速を、現場と相似な現象を起こすのに必要な流速v’’のn倍として、劣化促進実験を行なう。   Even in the experiment using the specimen 27, in order to promote the leaching of the chemical solution, the deterioration promotion experiment is performed by setting the flow rate of the water 33 to n times the flow rate v ″ necessary to cause a phenomenon similar to that in the field.

供試体27を用いた実験も第1の実施の形態と同様の手順で行われる。即ち、供試体27を、流速v’’×nの水33が流れる水槽25内に、供試体27の全体が水33の中に没するように水浸させて、薬液の溶脱を促進させる。そして、所定の試験期間が経過した後に、供試体27の特性値を測定する。測定した供試体27の特性値を、促進倍率nおよび試験期間によりn×(試験期間)で定まる換算経過期間の経過後における、実際の薬液注入地盤の特性値とすることにより、換算経過期間経過後の実際の薬液注入地盤の特性値が求められる。これにより、第1の実施の形態と同様の効果が得られる。   The experiment using the specimen 27 is also performed in the same procedure as in the first embodiment. That is, the specimen 27 is immersed in the water tank 25 in which the water 33 having the flow velocity v ″ × n flows, so that the whole specimen 27 is submerged in the water 33 to promote the leaching of the chemical solution. Then, after a predetermined test period has elapsed, the characteristic value of the specimen 27 is measured. By using the measured characteristic value of the specimen 27 as the characteristic value of the actual chemical injection ground after the conversion elapsed period determined by n × (test period) according to the acceleration magnification n and the test period, the conversion elapsed period elapsed The characteristic value of the actual chemical injection ground later is obtained. Thereby, the same effect as that of the first embodiment can be obtained.

なお、小型の供試体3を用いた前述の実験により適当な促進倍率を選定し、選定した促進倍率にて大型の供試体27を用いた上記の実験を行ってもよい。この場合、複数の水槽1にて、異なる促進倍率に応じた異なる流速にて前述と同様の実験を行い、実験結果に対する検討を行い、供試体の劣化を促進させるために適切な促進倍率nを選定する。その後に、選定した促進倍率nに応じた流速にて大型の供試体27を用いた上記と同様の実験を行う。なお、促進倍率nは、発明者らの知見によれば、n=10程度が望ましく、この場合、より精度よく実際の薬液注入地盤の経年劣化を予測できる。   Note that an appropriate acceleration magnification may be selected by the above-described experiment using the small specimen 3, and the above experiment using the large specimen 27 may be performed at the selected acceleration magnification. In this case, in the plurality of water tanks 1, the same experiment as described above is performed at different flow rates corresponding to different acceleration magnifications, the experimental results are examined, and an appropriate acceleration magnification n is set to promote the deterioration of the specimen. Select. Thereafter, an experiment similar to the above is performed using the large specimen 27 at a flow rate corresponding to the selected acceleration magnification n. According to the knowledge of the inventors, the acceleration magnification n is preferably about n = 10. In this case, it is possible to predict the deterioration over time of the actual chemical injection ground more accurately.

以上、添付図を参照しながら、本発明の実施の形態を説明したが、本発明の技術的範囲は、前述した実施の形態に左右されない。当業者であれば、特許請求の範囲に記載された技術的思想の範疇内において各種の変更例または修正例に想到し得ることは明らかであり、それらについても当然に本発明の技術的範囲に属するものと了解される。   As mentioned above, although embodiment of this invention was described referring an accompanying drawing, the technical scope of this invention is not influenced by embodiment mentioned above. It is obvious for those skilled in the art that various modifications or modifications can be conceived within the scope of the technical idea described in the claims. It is understood that it belongs.

1、25………水槽
3、27………供試体
5、29………注水管
7、31………排水管
9、33………水
11………固結体
1, 25 ......... Water tank 3, 27 ......... Specimen 5, 29 ......... Water injection pipe 7, 31 ...... Drain pipe 9, 33 ......... Water 11 ......... Consolidated body

Claims (4)

薬液注入した薬液注入地盤を模して供試体を作製する工程(a)と、
前記供試体を、薬液の溶脱を促進するための促進倍率を用いて定められる所定の流速の流体中に、前記流体が前記供試体の周囲を流れるように設置し、所定の試験期間が経過した後に、前記供試体の特性値を測定する工程(b)と、
を具備し、前記供試体の特性値を、前記促進倍率および前記試験期間により定まる換算経過期間の経過後における薬液注入地盤の特性値とすることにより、換算経過期間の経過後の薬液注入地盤の特性値を求めることを特徴とする薬液注入地盤の経年劣化調査方法。
A step (a) of producing a specimen imitating the chemical injection ground into which the chemical was injected;
The specimen was placed in a fluid at a predetermined flow rate determined using an acceleration magnification for promoting leaching of the chemical solution so that the fluid flows around the specimen, and a predetermined test period had elapsed. And (b) measuring the characteristic value of the specimen afterwards,
The characteristic value of the specimen is a characteristic value of the chemical solution injection ground after the conversion elapsed period determined by the acceleration magnification and the test period, so that the chemical injection ground after the conversion elapsed period has elapsed. A method for investigating aging deterioration of chemical injection ground characterized by obtaining characteristic values.
前記流体の流速は層流条件を満たすように定められることを特徴とする請求項1記載の薬液注入地盤の経年劣化調査方法。   The method for investigating aged deterioration of a chemical injection ground according to claim 1, wherein the flow velocity of the fluid is determined so as to satisfy a laminar flow condition. 前記特性値が、薬液濃度を含むことを特徴とする請求項1または請求項2記載の薬液注入地盤の経年劣化調査方法。   The method for investigating aged deterioration of a chemical solution injection ground according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the characteristic value includes a chemical solution concentration. 薬液注入した薬液注入地盤を模して供試体を作製する工程(a)と、
前記供試体を、薬液の溶脱を促進するための促進倍率を用いて定められる所定の流速の流体中に設置し、所定の試験期間が経過した後に、前記供試体の特性値を測定する工程(b)と、
を具備し、前記供試体の特性値を、前記促進倍率および前記試験期間により定まる換算経過期間の経過後における薬液注入地盤の特性値とすることにより、換算経過期間の経過後の薬液注入地盤の特性値を求め、
前記流体の流速を、薬液注入地盤内に想定される固結体の周囲を通過する地下水の質量と固結体の質量の比と、前記供試体の質量との積を、前記供試体の表面積と前記流体の密度との積で割った値に、前記促進倍率を掛けた値とすることを特徴とする液注入地盤の経年劣化調査方法。
A step (a) of producing a specimen imitating the chemical injection ground into which the chemical was injected;
A step of installing the specimen in a fluid having a predetermined flow rate determined using an acceleration magnification for promoting leaching of a chemical solution, and measuring a characteristic value of the specimen after a predetermined test period has elapsed ( b) and
The characteristic value of the specimen is a characteristic value of the chemical solution injection ground after the conversion elapsed period determined by the acceleration magnification and the test period, so that the chemical injection ground after the conversion elapsed period has elapsed. Find the characteristic value
The flow rate of the fluid is the product of the ratio of the mass of groundwater passing through the periphery of the solidified body assumed in the chemical injection ground and the mass of the solidified body, and the mass of the specimen, and the surface area of the specimen. wherein the value obtained by dividing the product of the density of the fluid, aging searching method for drug injection ground, characterized in that a value obtained by multiplying the accelerator magnification.
JP2011231368A 2011-10-21 2011-10-21 Method for investigating aging deterioration of chemical injection ground Expired - Fee Related JP5700679B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2011231368A JP5700679B2 (en) 2011-10-21 2011-10-21 Method for investigating aging deterioration of chemical injection ground

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2011231368A JP5700679B2 (en) 2011-10-21 2011-10-21 Method for investigating aging deterioration of chemical injection ground

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2013087570A JP2013087570A (en) 2013-05-13
JP5700679B2 true JP5700679B2 (en) 2015-04-15

Family

ID=48531761

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2011231368A Expired - Fee Related JP5700679B2 (en) 2011-10-21 2011-10-21 Method for investigating aging deterioration of chemical injection ground

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP5700679B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2021116520A (en) * 2020-01-21 2021-08-10 E&P国際商事株式会社 Durability evaluation method and equipment for improved bodies or porous rocks under fluid infiltration conditions

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2000346768A (en) * 1999-06-03 2000-12-15 Tenox Corp Quality control method of ground improvement method and hot water curing device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2013087570A (en) 2013-05-13

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Pandey et al. Evaluation of existing equations for temporal scour depth around circular bridge piers
CN107727679A (en) One kind characterizes Deep Carbonate Rocks petrophysics characterization method
WO2021244185A1 (en) Testing apparatus and testing method for simulating influence of cavity existing on pile end on bearing performance of pile foundation
Daliri et al. Shear and dewatering behaviour of densified gold tailings in a laboratory simulation of multi-layer deposition
Rodriguez et al. Effects of principal stress directions and mean normal stress on failure criterion for cross-anisotropic sand
CN105136648B (en) Soil effective aperture and its method for testing of distributed constant
Ekeleme et al. Experimental determination of dispersion coefficient in soil
Sun et al. Computational investigation of pore permeability and connectivity from transmission X-ray microscope images of a cement paste specimen
Wen et al. Effect of hysteresis on hydraulic properties of soils under multiple drying and wetting cycles
CN107328909A (en) Structural differences unsaturated soil hydrodynamic dispersion coefficient on-site measurement method
Bagarello et al. A laboratory analysis of falling head infiltration procedures for estimating the hydraulic conductivity of soils
JP5700679B2 (en) Method for investigating aging deterioration of chemical injection ground
Cordero et al. Patterns of cracking in soils due to drying and wetting cycles
CN107808049A (en) DNAPL migration method for numerical simulation based on porous media three-dimensional microstructures model
Esposito et al. Centrifuge modeling of LNAPL transport in partially saturated sand
Azoor et al. Corrosion of cast iron pipelines buried in Fraser River silt subject to climate-induced moisture variations
Dong et al. Modeling soil solute release into runoff and transport with runoff on a loess slope
Gan et al. Experimental analysis on permeability characteristics of iron tailings
Tami et al. Characteristics of scanning curves of two soils
CN111220792A (en) Method for calculating infiltration depth of unsaturated loess water
Goharrokhi Effect of hydraulic shear stress on the banks of the Red River
Al-Madhhachi et al. Measuring erodibility of cohesive soils using laboratory jet erosion tests
Ebrahimi-Birang The hydraulic behaviour of sand and silt soils around the residual-state condition
Hussain et al. Computer-aided oxygen transport model of mass and energy simulation for corrosion of reinforced steel
JP4500231B2 (en) Method for determining strength and thickness of improved layer of backfill sand by chemical injection and experimental apparatus used therefor

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20140217

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20141008

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20141111

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20141225

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20150210

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20150213

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 5700679

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees