JP5773411B2 - Novel microorganism and microbial pesticide using the same - Google Patents
Novel microorganism and microbial pesticide using the same Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP5773411B2 JP5773411B2 JP2011059491A JP2011059491A JP5773411B2 JP 5773411 B2 JP5773411 B2 JP 5773411B2 JP 2011059491 A JP2011059491 A JP 2011059491A JP 2011059491 A JP2011059491 A JP 2011059491A JP 5773411 B2 JP5773411 B2 JP 5773411B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- strain
- bacillus subtilis
- present
- insects
- microbial
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)
- Agricultural Chemicals And Associated Chemicals (AREA)
Description
本発明は優れた害虫防除効果を有する新規微生物、及びそれを用いた微生物農薬に関する。 The present invention relates to a novel microorganism having an excellent pest control effect, and a microbial pesticide using the same.
従来、害虫防除の重要な手段として、低コストで顕著な効果が得られる有機リン系殺虫剤などの化学合成殺虫剤が広く用いられている。しかし、化学合成殺虫剤には、環境残留性、非対象生物への毒性、農薬耐性害虫の発現などの問題があることから、近年では使用量の低減が求められている。 Conventionally, as an important means for controlling pests, chemically synthesized insecticides such as organophosphorus insecticides that can provide remarkable effects at low cost have been widely used. However, chemical synthetic pesticides have problems such as environmental persistence, toxicity to non-target organisms, and the development of pesticide-resistant pests.
そこで、こうした化学合成殺虫剤に代わるものとして、生物本来の性質を応用したフェロモン誘引剤や生物農薬などの生物学的害虫防除技術の開発が進められており、環境負荷の少ない次世代の害虫防除技術として期待されている。 Therefore, as an alternative to these chemically synthesized insecticides, biological pest control technologies such as pheromone attractants and biological pesticides that apply the inherent properties of living organisms are being developed, and next-generation pest control with a low environmental impact is being promoted. Expected as a technology.
フェロモン誘引剤を用いた害虫防除技術とは、昆虫の性フェロモン剤をビニールハウス内の天井などに吊すことで雌雄交信を攪乱して作物への産卵を防止する手法であり、種特異性が強いことから非対象生物に対して高い安全性を確保することができる。しかし、その反面、複数の作物害虫群を対象とした防除が困難であり、被害発生時期よりもかなり前に発生する害虫の種類を予測し、それに応じたフェロモン誘引剤を設置しなければならないという短所がある。 Pest control technology using a pheromone attractant is a technique that prevents spawning on crops by disrupting male and female communication by suspending insect sex pheromone on the ceiling of a greenhouse, etc., and has strong species specificity Therefore, it is possible to ensure high safety against non-target organisms. However, on the other hand, it is difficult to control multiple crop pest groups, and it is necessary to predict the type of pests that occur well before the time of the damage and to install a pheromone attractant accordingly. There are disadvantages.
一方、生物農薬を用いた害虫防除技術とは、害虫や作物病原性微生物に対して天敵生物を施用することで、これらを殺滅又は行動抑制する手法であり、前記天敵生物として昆虫や線虫を用いる手法と微生物を用いる手法に大別される。 On the other hand, pest control technology using biological pesticides is a technique for killing or suppressing behavior by applying natural enemy organisms against pests and crop pathogenic microorganisms, and insects and nematodes as the natural enemy organisms. The method is roughly divided into the method using microorganisms and the method using microorganisms.
このうち、天敵生物として昆虫や線虫を用いる手法としては、例えば、作物害虫を捕食するコレマンアブラバチなどの昆虫をビニールハウス内に施用する方法や、昆虫に寄生する又は病原性を示すスタイナーネマ・グラセライ (Steinernema glaseri)等の線虫を施用する方法などが知られている。しかし、これらの方法では、天敵生物による害虫の捕食又は害虫への寄生によって殺虫効果が発揮されるため、安定した効果が得られにくいといった短所がある。 Among these methods, insects and nematodes used as natural enemies include, for example, a method of applying insects such as the coleman abalone that prey on crop pests in a greenhouse, a steiner nematode that is parasitic on insects or exhibits pathogenicity. A method of applying a nematode such as Graserai ( Steinernema glaseri ) is known. However, these methods have a disadvantage that a stable effect is difficult to obtain because the insecticidal effect is exhibited by predation or parasitism of the pest by natural enemy organisms.
以上のように、フェロモン誘引剤や、昆虫・線虫を利用した生物農薬では、安定した害虫防除効果が得られにくいことから、近年では細菌や真菌などの微生物を利用した生物農薬(いわゆる微生物農薬)が注目されている。微生物農薬は、化学合成殺虫剤と比べ、ヒトを含めた非対象生物及び環境に対する安全性が高く、効果に持続性があるといった長所を有する。また、フェロモン誘引剤と違い、害虫発生状況に応じて施用することも可能であり、更に、微生物は昆虫や線虫に比べて生育が早いことから農薬の生産性も高いと考えられる。 As described above, biological insecticides that use pheromone attractants and insects and nematodes are difficult to achieve a stable pest control effect. ) Is attracting attention. Microbial pesticides have advantages in that they are highly safe against non-target organisms including humans and the environment and have long-lasting effects compared to chemically synthesized insecticides. In addition, unlike pheromone attractants, it can be applied depending on the state of pest occurrence, and since microorganisms grow faster than insects and nematodes, it is considered that the productivity of agricultural chemicals is high.
ところで、現在我が国で登録されている微生物農薬は、作物病原性微生物を対象にしたものが多く、害虫を対象とした微生物農薬は少数である。その中で、害虫を対象とした微生物農薬として代表的なものは、昆虫病原性細菌であるバチルス・チューリンゲンシス(Bacillus thuringiensis)を利用したBT剤であり、特にハエ目、チョウ目、甲虫目等の昆虫を対象に適用されている(例えば、特許文献1を参照)。また、他に害虫防除用の微生物農薬としては、糸状菌の一種であるバーティシリウム・レカニ(Verticillium lecanii (Zimm.) Viegas)やボーベリア・バシアーナ(Beauveria bassiana Vuillemin)を利用したものが知られており、主にアブラムシ類の防除に利用されている。 By the way, many microbial pesticides currently registered in Japan target crop pathogenic microorganisms, and a few pesticidal pesticides target pests. Among them, typical microbial pesticides for insect pests are BT agents using an entomopathogenic bacterium, Bacillus thuringiensis , especially fly eyes, butterfly eyes, beetles, etc. (See, for example, Patent Document 1). Other pesticidal pesticides that use pest control are Verticillium lecanii ( Zimm. ) Viegas and Beauveria bassiana Vuillemin. It is mainly used to control aphids.
しかしながら、近年ではBT剤に対し耐性を示す害虫の出現報告例があり、また、上記のような糸状菌を用いた微生物農薬は防除対象となり得る昆虫が限られているという問題がある。こうしたことから、現在、害虫防除を目的とした微生物農薬の改善が求められており、改善策の一つとして、新たな微生物農薬として利用可能な昆虫病原性微生物の探索が必要とされている。 However, in recent years, there have been reports of the appearance of pests that are resistant to BT agents, and the microbial pesticides using the above-mentioned filamentous fungi have a problem that insects that can be controlled are limited. For these reasons, improvement of microbial pesticides for the purpose of pest control is now required, and as one of the improvement measures, search for entomopathogenic microorganisms that can be used as new microbial pesticides is required.
本発明は、上記課題に鑑みて成されたものであり、その目的とするところは、害虫を対象とした微生物農薬として利用可能な新規微生物、及びそれを用いた微生物農薬を提供することにある。 The present invention has been made in view of the above problems, and an object thereof is to provide a novel microorganism that can be used as a microbial pesticide for pests, and a microbial pesticide using the same. .
本発明者らは上記課題を解決するために鋭意検討を行った結果、肉食性昆虫であるクロコウスバカゲロウの幼虫から単離した新規菌株が害虫に対する防除効果を有することを見出し、本発明を完成するに至った。 As a result of intensive studies to solve the above problems, the present inventors have found that a novel strain isolated from larvae of the carnivorous insect, Crocopus quercivorus, has a pest control effect and completes the present invention. It came to.
すなわち、本発明は、新規微生物であるバチルス・サブティリス(Bacillus subtilis)An11−1菌株(NITE P−997)を提供する。 That is, the present invention provides a novel microorganism, Bacillus subtilis An11-1 strain (NITE P-997).
また、本発明は、バチルス・サブティリス(Bacillus subtilis)An11−1菌株(NITE P−997)を有効成分として含有する微生物農薬を提供する。 Moreover, this invention provides the microbial pesticide containing the Bacillus subtilis ( Bacillus subtilis ) An11-1 strain (NITE P-997) as an active ingredient.
上記の通り、本発明によれば、害虫に対して優れた防除効果を有する新規な微生物、及び該微生物を用いた微生物農薬を提供することができる。 As described above, according to the present invention, a novel microorganism having an excellent control effect against pests and a microbial pesticide using the microorganism can be provided.
以下、本発明を実施するための形態について説明する。 Hereinafter, modes for carrying out the present invention will be described.
本発明に係る微生物は、肉食性昆虫であるクロコウスバカゲロウの幼虫から収集された細菌から、チョウ目害虫であるハスモンヨトウに対する殺虫活性試験による選抜の結果得られた菌株である。 The microorganism according to the present invention is a strain obtained as a result of selection by an insecticidal activity test against a moth Lepidoptera which is a lepidopteran pest, from bacteria collected from a larva of a carnivorous insect, Crocopus quercius.
アリジゴクとして知られるクロコウスバカゲロウの幼虫は、昆虫を捕食する際に消化酵素や麻痺成分を含む吐き戻し液をその体内に注入し、捕食対象昆虫を麻痺させることが知られている。このとき、吐き戻し液を注入された昆虫には、昆虫病原性微生物が感染した際に観察される黒変現象が認められる。このことから、本発明者は、クロコウスバカゲロウ幼虫期の消化管内に昆虫病原性微生物群及びその毒素が存在し、これが捕食する昆虫の麻痺に関与するものと予測し、クロコウスバカゲロウ幼虫のそ嚢内液中の細菌を単離培養した。そして単離した菌株の中から農業害虫のうち比較的高い割合を占めるチョウ目昆虫の幼虫に対して殺虫効果を示す微生物を探索すべく、各菌株を練り込んだ人工飼料を作成してチョウ目昆虫であるハスモンヨトウの3齢幼虫に経口投与を試みた。その結果、顕著な殺虫活性を示す1菌株を単離し、これをAn11−1株と命名した。 It is known that a crocodile moth larva known as Aridigok injects exhalation solution containing digestive enzymes and paralytic components into its body when it prey on insects, and paralyzes the insects to be eaten. At this time, the blackened phenomenon observed when the insect pathogenic microorganisms are infected is observed in the insects injected with the repellent solution. Based on this, the present inventor predicts that an entomopathogenic microorganism group and its toxin are present in the gastrointestinal tract of the crocodile moth larvae, and that this is involved in the paralysis of insects that prey, and The bacteria inside were isolated and cultured. In order to search for microorganisms that have an insecticidal effect against the larvae of Lepidoptera insects that account for a relatively high proportion of the agricultural pests among the isolated strains, artificial diets containing each strain were prepared and Lepidoptera We tried oral administration to the third-instar larvae of the insect, Spodoptera litura. As a result, one strain showing a remarkable insecticidal activity was isolated and named An11-1 strain.
上記An11−1株の菌学的性質は、以下に示す通りである。なお、菌学的性質の試験はNCIMBの試験方法および下記既報1〜3に基づいて行った。
既報1:Barrow GI and Feltham RKA, Cowan and Steel's Manual for the identification of Medical Bacteria. 3rd edition, 1993, Cambridge University Press
既報2:坂崎利一、吉崎悦郎、三木寛二:新 細菌培養学講座・下(第二版)、1988、近大出版、東京
既報3:長谷川武治編著、微生物の分類と同定 (下)、1995、学会出版センター
The mycological properties of the An11-1 strain are as follows. The bacteriological properties were tested based on the NCIMB test method and the following reports 1-3.
Previous report 1: Barrow GI and Feltham RKA, Cowan and Steel's Manual for the identification of Medical Bacteria. 3rd edition, 1993, Cambridge University Press
Previously reported: Toshikazu Sakazaki, Goro Yoshizaki, Kanji Miki: New Bacteriological Studies Course, 2nd edition, 1988, Kinkadai Publishing, Tokyo Previously published 3: edited by Takeharu Hasegawa, Classification and identification of microorganisms (2), 1995 , Academic Publishing Center
上記An11−1株に関する分子系統樹解析の結果を図1、2に示す。なお、図1は近接結合法(MEGA ver. 4.0、塩基置換モデル:Tamura-Nei distance、ガンマ補正距離の計算:DAMBE ver. 5.2.5)により作成した系統樹を、図2は、最尤法(GARLI ver. 0.96、コンセンサス系統樹の計算:Phyutility ver. 2.2)により作成した系統樹を示している。分子系統解析は、Rooneyらの報告(Rooney, AP, et al., Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol., 2009, 59, 2429-2436.)に基づき、6つのハウスキーピング遺伝子(DNA gyrase α-subunit gene (gyrA)、RNA polymerase β-subunit gene (rpoB)、phosphoribosylaminoimidazole carboxamide formyltransferase gene (purH)、DNA polymerase III α-subunit gene (polC)、60 kDa heat-shock protein groEL gene (groEL)、16S rRNA gene (16S rRNA))の部分配列(gyrA 928 bp、rpoB 964 bp、purH 875 bp、polC 777 bp、groEL 835 bp、16S rRNA 1169 bp)を連結して行った。BLAST相同性検索はアポロン2.0 (テクノスルガ・ラボ、静岡)により行い、データベースとしては国際塩基配列データベースGenBank/DDBJ/EMBLを用いた。その結果、An11−1株はバチルス・サブティリス(Bacillus subtilis)に属しているものと考えられた。 The results of the molecular phylogenetic tree analysis for the An11-1 strain are shown in FIGS. Fig. 1 shows the phylogenetic tree created by the proximity coupling method (MEGA ver. 4.0, base substitution model: Tamura-Nei distance, calculation of gamma correction distance: DAMBE ver. 5.2.5), and Fig. 2 shows the maximum likelihood method. (GARLI ver. 0.96, calculation of consensus tree: Phyutility ver. 2.2) shows the phylogenetic tree created. Molecular phylogenetic analysis is based on a report by Rooney et al. (Rooney, AP, et al., Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol., 2009, 59, 2429-2436.), And six housekeeping genes (DNA gyrase α -subunit gene ( gyrA ), RNA polymerase β-subunit gene ( rpoB ), phosphoribosylaminoimidazole carboxamide formyltransferase gene ( purH ), DNA polymerase III α-subunit gene ( polC ), 60 kDa heat-shock protein groEL gene ( groEL ), 16S rRNA gene ( 16S rRNA )) partial sequences ( gyrA 928 bp, rpoB 964 bp, purH 875 bp, polC 777 bp, groEL 835 bp, 16S rRNA 1169 bp). BLAST homology search was performed with Apollon 2.0 (Techno Suruga Lab, Shizuoka), and the international base sequence database GenBank / DDBJ / EMBL was used as the database. As a result, the An11-1 strain was considered to belong to Bacillus subtilis .
そこで、An−11株とバチルス・サブティリスの基準株(B. subtilis NBRC13719)とのDNA−DNAハイブリッド形成試験を行った。その結果、以下の表に示す通り、An11−1株とB. subtilis NBRC13719株は互いに79%の相同性を示した。なお、DNA−DNAハイブリッド形成試験において70%以上の相同性を示す菌株同士は同一種と考えられる。 Therefore, a DNA-DNA hybrid formation test was performed between the An-11 strain and a Bacillus subtilis reference strain ( B. subtilis NBRC13719). As a result, as shown in the following table, the An11-1 strain and the B. subtilis NBRC13719 strain showed 79% homology with each other. It should be noted that strains showing homology of 70% or more in the DNA-DNA hybridization test are considered to be the same species.
以上の菌学的性質、分子系統樹解析、及びDNA−DNAハイブリッド形成試験の結果から、An11−1株は、バチルス・サブティリス(Bacillus subtilis)に属する微生物と同定された。しかしながら、バチルス・サブティリスの標準株(Bacillus subtilis 168trpC2)にはハスモンヨトウへの殺虫活性が認められないことから、An11−1株を新菌株と判断した(後述の[試験例2]を参照)。この菌株は、独立行政法人製品評価技術基盤機構特許微生物寄託センターに受託番号NITE P−997として寄託されている。 From the results of the above mycological properties, molecular phylogenetic tree analysis, and DNA-DNA hybridization test, the An11-1 strain was identified as a microorganism belonging to Bacillus subtilis . However, since an insecticidal activity against Spodoptera litura was not observed in the standard strain of Bacillus subtilis ( Bacillus subtilis 168trpC2), the An11-1 strain was judged to be a new strain (see [Test Example 2] described later). This strain is deposited under the accession number NITE P-997 at the Patent Microorganism Deposit Center, National Institute of Technology and Evaluation.
本発明に係る微生物農薬(害虫防除剤)は、上記の菌株を有効菌として含有するものである。 The microbial pesticide (pest control agent) according to the present invention contains the above strain as an effective bacterium.
上記菌株は、液体培地を使用し、20〜50℃、pH5〜9で24時間以上の振盪培養を行うことによって調整することが望ましいが、これに限定されるものではなく、例えば、静置培養や固体培地を用いた培養によって調整してもよい。培地の種類は菌が増殖できるものであれば特に限定しないが、例えば、SCD液体培地(ソイビーン・カゼイン・ダイジェスト・ブロス培地)等を好適に用いることができる。
The strain is preferably prepared by using a liquid medium and performing shaking culture at 20 to 50 ° C. and
本発明に係る微生物農薬は、上記菌体を含む培養液や培養液を除いた菌体の形で使用されるものとしてもよいが、所定の固体から成る担体に保持させて粒剤や粉剤などの剤型とすることが望ましい。また、所定の液体に分散させて液体製剤としてもよい。なお、菌体を液体培養で調整した場合、該菌体は遠心分離や濾過によって回収され、固体培養で調整した場合、該菌体は培地から掻き取ることによって回収される。 The microbial pesticide according to the present invention may be used in the form of a microbial cell containing the above microbial cell or a microbial cell excluding the cultivated cell, but may be held on a carrier made of a predetermined solid, granule, powder, etc. It is desirable to use the dosage form. Moreover, it is good also as a liquid formulation by disperse | distributing to a predetermined liquid. In addition, when a microbial cell is prepared by liquid culture, this microbial cell is collect | recovered by centrifugation or filtration, and when adjusted by solid culture, this microbial cell is collect | recovered by scraping off from a culture medium.
上記微生物農薬は、害虫の生息場所に散布し、害虫に摂食させることによりその効果を発揮させることができる。なお、使用量は防除対象とする害虫の種類、使用場所や使用時期、被害の程度などに応じて適宜調整する。 The above-mentioned microbial pesticide can be exerted by spraying it on the pest habitat and feeding the pest. In addition, the amount used is appropriately adjusted according to the type of pests to be controlled, the place and period of use, the degree of damage, and the like.
また、上記本発明に係る微生物農薬は、種々の害虫、特にチョウ目昆虫やハエ目昆虫を始めとする昆虫の防除に好適に使用することができる。なお、該チョウ目昆虫としては、例えば、ハスモンヨトウなどのヨトウムシ類を始めとするガ又はチョウなどが挙げられ、ハエ目昆虫としては、例えば、カなどが挙げられるが、これらに限定されるものではない。 The microbial pesticide according to the present invention can be suitably used for controlling various insect pests, particularly insects including butterfly insects and fly insects. Examples of the Lepidoptera insects include moths and butterflies such as weevil such as Lotus moth, and fly insects include, for example, mosquitoes, but are not limited thereto. Absent.
[試験例1]
本発明に係る微生物(Bacillus subtilis An11-1株)を含有する人工餌を作成し、これをチョウ目昆虫であるハスモンヨトウの3齢幼虫に経口投与して殺虫活性の評価を行った。
[Test Example 1]
An artificial bait containing the microorganism according to the present invention ( Bacillus subtilis An11-1 strain) was prepared, and this was orally administered to the third-instar larvae of the moth Lepidoptera, which was evaluated for insecticidal activity.
具体的には、まず、500 mLの三角フラスコにSCD液体培地100 mLを加え、そこに本発明に係る微生物を添加して、pH6、37℃で振盪培養を行い、培養開始から48時間後に培地の一部を採取した。採取した培養液を、生菌数が108cell/mLとなるように調整し、調整後の培養液500 μLに乾燥酵母60 mg、アルギン酸ナトリウム10 mg、シュークロース20 mg、アスコルビン酸ナトリウム4 mgを含む300 μL水溶液を添加してからよく混合し、そこに4% CaCl2 200 μLを添加して混合・固化させ、これを1つの人工餌とした。
Specifically, first, 100 mL of an SCD liquid medium is added to a 500 mL Erlenmeyer flask, and the microorganism according to the present invention is added thereto, followed by shaking culture at
9cmシャーレに上記で作成した人工餌(本発明における微生物農薬に相当)を2つ置き、そこに24時間絶食させたハスモンヨトウ3齢幼虫10匹を載せ、25℃で5日間静置して該人工餌による殺虫効果を評価した。なお、対照として、上記菌液の代わりに滅菌蒸留水500 μLを用いて作成した人工餌と、上記菌液の代わりにSCD液体培地500 μLを用いて作成した人工餌を作成し、上記同様にしてハスモンヨトウの3齢幼虫10匹に経口投与した。 Two artificial baits prepared as described above (corresponding to the microbial pesticide in the present invention) were placed in a 9 cm petri dish, and 10 third-instar larvae fasted for 24 hours were placed there and allowed to stand at 25 ° C. for 5 days. The insecticidal effect by food was evaluated. As controls, an artificial bait prepared using 500 μL of sterile distilled water instead of the above bacterial solution and an artificial bait prepared using 500 μL of SCD liquid medium instead of the above bacterial solution were prepared in the same manner as described above. Then, it was orally administered to 10 3rd instar larvae of Spodoptera.
以上の結果、図3に示す通り、菌液の代わりに滅菌蒸留水を用いて作成した人工餌を与えた区(比較例1)、及び菌液の代わりにSCD液体培地を用いて作成した人工餌を与えた区(比較例2)では、人工餌の投与後5日目における幼虫の斃死率が5%以下であったのに対し、本発明に係る微生物を含有する人工餌を投与した区(実施例1)では、人工餌の投与後1日目の斃死率が約15%であり、投与後5日目の斃死率は約90%であった(なお、図3のグラフは同一試験を3回行って得られた結果の平均を示したものである)。これにより、本発明に係る微生物がハスモンヨトウに対して顕著な殺虫効果を有することが確認された。 As a result of the above, as shown in FIG. 3, the section (Comparative Example 1) fed with artificial food prepared using sterilized distilled water instead of the bacterial solution, and the artificial material prepared using the SCD liquid medium instead of the bacterial solution In the group fed with food (Comparative Example 2), the mortality rate of the larvae on the fifth day after administration of the artificial food was 5% or less, whereas the group fed with the artificial food containing the microorganism according to the present invention In Example 1, the mortality rate on the first day after administration of the artificial diet was about 15%, and the mortality rate on the fifth day after administration was about 90% (Note that the graph in FIG. 3 is the same test). Is the average of the results obtained by performing 3 times). Thereby, it was confirmed that the microorganisms according to the present invention have a remarkable insecticidal effect against Spodoptera litura.
[試験例2]
上記試験例1と同様の方法により、本発明に係る微生物を含有する人工餌と、バチルス・サブティリスの標準株(Bacillus subtilis 168trpC2)を含有する人工餌、及び上記菌液の代わりに滅菌蒸留水を使用した人工餌を作成し、それぞれ上記と同様にしてハスモンヨトウの3齢幼虫10匹に経口投与した。
[Test Example 2]
In the same manner as in Test Example 1, an artificial bait containing the microorganism according to the present invention, an artificial bait containing a standard strain of Bacillus subtilis ( Bacillus subtilis 168trpC2), and sterilized distilled water instead of the above bacterial solution An artificial bait was prepared and was orally administered to 10 third-instar larvae of Spodoptera litura in the same manner as above.
その結果、図4に示すとおり、本発明に係る微生物を含有する人工餌を投与した区(実施例2)では投与後6日目における幼虫の斃死率が約85%と高い殺虫効果が認められたのに対し、前記バチルス・サブティリスの標準株を含有する人工餌を投与した区(比較例4)では、投与後6日目における幼虫の斃死率は滅菌蒸溜水を使用した人工餌を投与した区(比較例3)と同程度であり、殺虫効果は認められなかった(なお、図4のグラフは同一試験を3回行って得られた結果の平均を示したものである)。 As a result, as shown in FIG. 4, in the group (Example 2) to which the artificial bait containing the microorganisms according to the present invention was administered, the larval mortality on the 6th day after administration was about 85%, and a high insecticidal effect was observed. On the other hand, in the group (Comparative Example 4) to which the artificial bait containing the standard strain of Bacillus subtilis was administered, the mortality of the larvae on the 6th day after the administration was administered with the artificial bait using sterile distilled water. And the insecticidal effect was not recognized (the graph of FIG. 4 shows the average of the results obtained by performing the same test three times).
[試験例3]
上記試験例1と同様の方法で培養した本発明に係る微生物を含有する培養液、Bacillus subtilis subtilisの標準株を含有する培養液、Bacillus subtilis spizizeniiの標準菌株を含む培養液、及びBacillus subtilis inaquosorumの標準株を含有する培養液を作成し、ハエ目昆虫であるアカイエカの幼虫10匹が入った水に、108cell/mLに調整した培養液を濁度が0.03になるように添加した。その結果、図5に示すような結果が得られた。具体的には、本発明に係る微生物を含有する培養液ではアカイエカに対して80%以上の高い殺虫効果が認められたのに対し、上記の各標準株を含有する培養液では、Bacillus subtilis subtilisが20%、Bacillus subtilis spizizenii及びBacillus subtilis inaquosorumでは0%と殆ど殺虫効果が認められなかった。
[Test Example 3]
Culture medium containing a microorganism according to the present invention was cultured in the same manner as in Test Example 1, the culture solution containing the standard strain of Bacillus subtilis subtilis, culture medium containing standard strains of Bacillus subtilis spizizenii, and Bacillus subtilis inaquosorum A culture solution containing a standard strain was prepared, and a culture solution adjusted to 10 8 cells / mL was added to water containing 10 larvae of the fly mosquito, a fly insect, so that the turbidity was 0.03. . As a result, a result as shown in FIG. 5 was obtained. Specifically, in the culture solution containing the microorganism according to the present invention, a high insecticidal effect of 80% or more against Culex pipiens was observed, whereas in the culture solution containing each of the above standard strains, Bacillus subtilis subtilis However, 20%, Bacillus subtilis spizizenii and Bacillus subtilis inaquosorum showed almost no insecticidal effect at 0%.
Claims (2)
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2011059491A JP5773411B2 (en) | 2011-03-17 | 2011-03-17 | Novel microorganism and microbial pesticide using the same |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2011059491A JP5773411B2 (en) | 2011-03-17 | 2011-03-17 | Novel microorganism and microbial pesticide using the same |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JP2012191906A JP2012191906A (en) | 2012-10-11 |
| JP5773411B2 true JP5773411B2 (en) | 2015-09-02 |
Family
ID=47084448
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2011059491A Active JP5773411B2 (en) | 2011-03-17 | 2011-03-17 | Novel microorganism and microbial pesticide using the same |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP5773411B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP5862520B2 (en) | 2012-08-31 | 2016-02-16 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Inverse level shift circuit |
-
2011
- 2011-03-17 JP JP2011059491A patent/JP5773411B2/en active Active
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP2012191906A (en) | 2012-10-11 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US9399050B2 (en) | Controlling insects and arthropods using preconidial mycelium and extracts of preconidial mycelium from entomopathogenic fungi | |
| Maurya et al. | Biological control: A global perspective | |
| Pell et al. | Conservation biological control using fungal entomopathogens | |
| Kuhlmann et al. | Possibilities for biological control of the western corn rootworm, Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte, in Central Europe | |
| US8753656B2 (en) | Controlling zoonotic disease vectors from insects and arthropods using preconidial mycelium and extracts of preconidial mycelium from entomopathogenic fungi | |
| US20120070414A1 (en) | Controlling disease vectors from insects and arthropods using preconidial mycelium and extracts of preconidial mycelium from entomopathogenic fungi | |
| Kwenti | Biological control of parasites | |
| CA3045505A1 (en) | Compositions and related methods for agriculture | |
| KR101570776B1 (en) | New microorganism Metarhizium anisopliae FT83 and Microbial control agent for the prevention of Spodoptera exigua larva | |
| CN112739214A (en) | Compositions for use in agriculture and related methods | |
| KR101680638B1 (en) | New microorganism Beauveria bassiana FG274 and Microbial control agent for the prevention of Spodoptera exigua larva | |
| WO2007142543A2 (en) | Novel bacteria and uses thereof | |
| Al-Ani | Entomopathogenic fungi in IP landscape | |
| CN116333892B (en) | Metarhizium anisopliae and its granules and use in preventing and controlling fall armyworm | |
| KR102894519B1 (en) | Novel Beauveria bassiana 331R strain with control activities to both insect and plant pathogens and uses thereof | |
| KR101896932B1 (en) | New microorganism Beauveria bassiana FG317 or microbial control agent comprising for the prevention of Spodoptera litura larva | |
| JP5773411B2 (en) | Novel microorganism and microbial pesticide using the same | |
| US20220152128A1 (en) | Bee gut microbial formulation for use as a probiotic for improved bee health and pathogen resistance | |
| US10617121B2 (en) | Chromobacterium species with insecticidal activity | |
| KR20220068663A (en) | Novel Metarhizium anisopliae SDTu1 strain with simultaneous control activities to insect and plant pathogens and uses thereof | |
| CN114306391B (en) | Novel antimalarial Serratia and its application in blocking malaria transmission | |
| KR101680639B1 (en) | New microorganism Isaria fumosorosea FG340 and Microbial control agent for the prevention of Spodoptera exigua larva | |
| WO2008052391A1 (en) | Metarhizium anisopliae var. dcjhyium and uses thereof | |
| US10334857B2 (en) | Chromobacterium species with insecticidal activity | |
| KR101762542B1 (en) | Entomopathogenic bacterium, Xenorhabdus hominickii ANU1 and pest-controlling agent using it |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20140314 |
|
| A521 | Request for written amendment filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A821 Effective date: 20140317 |
|
| A521 | Request for written amendment filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20140514 |
|
| TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20150526 |
|
| A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20150625 |
|
| R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Ref document number: 5773411 Country of ref document: JP Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |