Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP5855964B2 - Optimal control method and optimal control device for plant equipment - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP5855964B2 - Optimal control method and optimal control device for plant equipment - Google Patents

Optimal control method and optimal control device for plant equipment Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP5855964B2
JP5855964B2 JP2012023982A JP2012023982A JP5855964B2 JP 5855964 B2 JP5855964 B2 JP 5855964B2 JP 2012023982 A JP2012023982 A JP 2012023982A JP 2012023982 A JP2012023982 A JP 2012023982A JP 5855964 B2 JP5855964 B2 JP 5855964B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
plant equipment
demand
power
power supply
supply
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2012023982A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2013161337A (en
Inventor
南部 耕
耕 南部
清水 浩
浩 清水
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Metawater Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Metawater Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Metawater Co Ltd filed Critical Metawater Co Ltd
Priority to JP2012023982A priority Critical patent/JP5855964B2/en
Publication of JP2013161337A publication Critical patent/JP2013161337A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP5855964B2 publication Critical patent/JP5855964B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02WCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT OR WASTE MANAGEMENT
    • Y02W10/00Technologies for wastewater treatment
    • Y02W10/30Wastewater or sewage treatment systems using renewable energies
    • Y02W10/37Wastewater or sewage treatment systems using renewable energies using solar energy

Landscapes

  • Feedback Control In General (AREA)

Description

本発明は、水処理設備等のプラント設備の運転状態を最適に制御するプラント設備の最適制御方法及び最適制御装置に関する。   The present invention relates to an optimum control method and an optimum control device for plant equipment that optimally controls the operating state of plant equipment such as water treatment equipment.

一般に、汚水処理(下水道)、浄水処理(上水道)、及び産業用工業用水・排水処理等を行う水処理設備では、最適化計算によって水処理設備の最適な運転状態を求め、求められた最適な運転状態を実現するための設備や機器類の操作指令手順を生成し、生成された操作指令手順に従って設備や機器類を操作することが行われている(例えば特許文献1参照)。   In general, in water treatment facilities that perform sewage treatment (sewage), water purification (water supply), industrial industrial water and wastewater treatment, etc., the optimum operation state of the water treatment facility is obtained by optimization calculation. An operation command procedure for equipment and devices for realizing an operation state is generated, and the equipment and devices are operated in accordance with the generated operation command procedure (see, for example, Patent Document 1).

特開2010−231457号公報JP 2010-231457 A

従来の最適制御方法では、固定的な設備が一定の規則に基づき動作する水処理設備の最適な運転状態を求めて制御することが主体であるために、対象とする水処理設備に適した1つの最適化手法を用いた1つの最適制御モデルを利用して水処理設備の制御が行われている。しかしながら、実際の水処理設備の状態は時々刻々と変化しているために、固定した1つの最適制御モデルを用いる従来の最適制御方法では、最適制御を実行するタイミングに応じて最適制御の精度が変化し、水処理設備を精度高く最適制御することが困難である。このため、最適制御を実行するタイミングに関係なく、水処理設備を精度高く最適制御可能な技術の提供が期待されていた。   In the conventional optimum control method, the fixed equipment is mainly determined and controlled for the optimum operating state of the water treatment equipment that operates based on a certain rule, so that it is suitable for the target water treatment equipment. Water treatment facilities are controlled using one optimal control model using two optimization methods. However, since the actual state of the water treatment facility changes from moment to moment, the conventional optimum control method using one fixed optimum control model has the accuracy of the optimum control according to the timing of executing the optimum control. It is difficult to control the water treatment equipment with high precision and accuracy. For this reason, it has been expected to provide a technique capable of accurately and optimally controlling the water treatment facility regardless of the timing of executing the optimal control.

本発明は、上記課題に鑑みてなされたものであって、その目的は、最適制御を実行するタイミングに関係なく、プラント設備を精度高く最適制御可能なプラント設備の最適制御方法及び最適制御装置を提供することにある。   The present invention has been made in view of the above problems, and an object of the present invention is to provide an optimal control method and an optimal control device for plant equipment capable of accurately controlling the plant equipment with high accuracy regardless of the timing for executing the optimal control. It is to provide.

上記課題を解決し、目的を達成するために、本発明に係るプラント設備の最適制御方法は、プラント設備における電力の需給予測に基づいて調整されたプラント設備における電力の需要量及び供給力に関するデータを用いて、プラント設備の電力供給予備力、運転コスト、運転効率、及びCO2排出量の目標値に対する偏差を算出する算出ステップと、最適化処理の実行タイミングにおけるプラント設備の稼働状況に関するデータと直前の最適化処理の実行タイミングにおける前記プラント設備の需給計画に関するデータとを比較し、差異が所定値以上である場合に、前記偏差を変数として含む評価関数を、前記評価関数を構成する変数の調整によって補正する補正ステップと、補正された評価関数の最適解を前記プラント設備の最適化モデルとして算出する最適化ステップと、前記最適化モデルに従って前記プラント設備の運転を制御する制御ステップと、を含むことを特徴とする。 In order to solve the above-mentioned problems and achieve the object, the optimal control method for plant equipment according to the present invention is data relating to the amount of power demand and supply capacity in plant equipment adjusted based on the supply and demand prediction of power in plant equipment. A calculation step for calculating a power supply reserve capacity, an operating cost, an operating efficiency, and a CO 2 emission amount with respect to a target value of the plant equipment, and data on the operation status of the plant equipment at the execution timing of the optimization process ; comparing the data relating to supply and demand planning of the plant equipment in the execution timing of the optimization process of the immediately preceding, when the difference is equal to or greater than a predetermined value, the evaluation function including the difference as a variable, constituting the evaluation function a correction step of correcting the adjustment variables, model optimization of the optimal solutions plant equipment of the corrected evaluation function And optimization step of calculating as, characterized in that it comprises a control step of controlling the operation of the plant equipment in accordance with the optimization model.

本発明に係るプラント設備の最適制御方法は、上記発明において、過去及び現在のプラント設備の稼働状況に関する情報と該プラント設備の稼働計画に関する情報とを表示するステップを含むことを特徴とする。   The optimum control method for plant equipment according to the present invention is characterized in that, in the above invention, the method includes a step of displaying information relating to the operation status of past and current plant equipment and information relating to an operation plan of the plant equipment.

上記課題を解決し、目的を達成するために、本発明に係るプラント設備の最適制御装置は、プラント設備における電力の需給予測に基づいて調整されたプラント設備における電力の需要量及び供給力に関するデータを用いて、プラント設備の電力供給予備力、運転コスト、運転効率、及びCO2排出量の目標値に対する偏差を算出する算出手段と、適化処理の実行タイミングにおけるプラント設備の稼働状況に関するデータと直前の最適化処理の実行タイミングにおける前記プラント設備の需給計画に関するデータとを比較し、差異が所定値以上である場合に、前記偏差を変数として含む評価関数を、前記評価関数を構成する変数の調整によって補正する補正手段と、補正された評価関数の最適解を前記プラント設備の最適化モデルとして算出する最適化手段と、前記最適化モデルに従って前記プラント設備の運転を制御する制御手段と、を備えることを特徴とする。 In order to solve the above-mentioned problems and achieve the object, the optimum control device for plant equipment according to the present invention is a data relating to the demand and supply capacity of power in the plant equipment adjusted based on the supply and demand prediction of power in the plant equipment. using the power supply reserve of plant equipment, operating costs, operating efficiency, and a calculating means for calculating a deviation from the target value of the CO 2 emissions, the data related to the operation status of the plant equipment in the execution timing of the optimization process comparing the data relating to supply and demand planning of the plant equipment in the execution timing of the optimization process of the immediately preceding and, if the difference is greater than a predetermined value, the evaluation function including the difference as a variable, constituting the evaluation function and correction means for correcting the adjustment of the variable to the optimal solution of the corrected evaluation function as an optimization model of the plant equipment And optimization means for output, characterized in that it comprises a control means for controlling the operation of the plant equipment in accordance with the optimization model.

本発明に係るプラント設備の最適制御方法及び最適制御装置によれば、最適制御を実行するタイミングに関係なく、プラント設備を精度高く最適制御できる。   According to the optimal control method and the optimal control device for plant equipment according to the present invention, the plant equipment can be optimally controlled with high accuracy regardless of the timing for executing the optimal control.

図1は、本発明の一実施形態である最適制御システムが適用される下水処理場の一構成例を示す模式図である。FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating a configuration example of a sewage treatment plant to which an optimum control system according to an embodiment of the present invention is applied. 図2は、本発明の一実施形態である最適制御システムの構成を示すブロック図である。FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing a configuration of an optimal control system according to an embodiment of the present invention. 図3は、本発明の一実施形態である最適制御処理の流れを示すフローチャートである。FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing the flow of optimal control processing according to an embodiment of the present invention. 図4は、図3に示すステップS1の処理を説明するための概念図である。FIG. 4 is a conceptual diagram for explaining the processing in step S1 shown in FIG.

以下、図面を参照して、本発明の一実施形態である下水処理場を最適制御システムについて説明する。なお、本実施形態は、本発明を下水処理場の最適制御に適用したものであるが、本発明は、本実施形態に限定されることはなく、汚水処理(下水道)、浄水処理(上水道)、及び産業用工業用水・排水処理を行う水処理設備等の下水処理場以外のプラント設備の最適制御にも適用できる。   Hereinafter, an optimal control system for a sewage treatment plant according to an embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. In addition, although this embodiment applies this invention to the optimal control of a sewage treatment plant, this invention is not limited to this embodiment, Sewage treatment (sewer), purified water treatment (waterworks) It can also be applied to optimal control of plant facilities other than sewage treatment plants such as water treatment facilities for industrial industrial water / wastewater treatment.

〔下水処理場の構成〕
始めに、図1を参照して、本発明の一実施形態である最適制御システムが適用される下水処理場の構成について説明する。但し、下水処理場の構成は図1に示す構成に限定されることはない。
[Configuration of sewage treatment plant]
First, the configuration of a sewage treatment plant to which an optimum control system according to an embodiment of the present invention is applied will be described with reference to FIG. However, the configuration of the sewage treatment plant is not limited to the configuration shown in FIG.

図1は、本発明の一実施形態である最適制御システムが適用される下水処理場の一構成例を示す模式図である。図1に示すように、本発明の一実施形態である最適制御システムが適用される下水処理場は、下水を処理する下水処理設備1と、下水処理設備1で発生した余剰汚泥を処理する汚泥処理設備2と、を備えている。   FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating a configuration example of a sewage treatment plant to which an optimum control system according to an embodiment of the present invention is applied. As shown in FIG. 1, a sewage treatment plant to which an optimum control system according to an embodiment of the present invention is applied includes a sewage treatment facility 1 for treating sewage and sludge for treating excess sludge generated in the sewage treatment facility 1. And a processing facility 2.

下水処理設備1は、沈砂池11と、最初沈殿池12と、反応槽13と、最終沈殿池14と、薬注槽15と、を備えている。沈砂池11は、下水中の土砂等の非腐敗性無機物質を沈殿除去するための設備であり、非腐敗性無機物質が除去された下水は汚水ポンプ16によって最初沈殿池12に供給される。最初沈殿池12は、下水を緩やかに流して重力沈降によって下水中の沈殿性有機物を沈殿除去するための設備である。最初沈殿池12の上澄み水は反応槽13に供給される。最初沈殿池12内の沈殿物は、汚泥掻寄機17aによって集められ、汚泥引き抜きポンプ18によって余剰汚泥として汚泥処理設備2に供給される。   The sewage treatment facility 1 includes a sand basin 11, a first sedimentation basin 12, a reaction tank 13, a final sedimentation basin 14, and a chemical injection tank 15. The sedimentation basin 11 is equipment for precipitating and removing non-septic inorganic substances such as earth and sand in sewage, and the sewage from which the non-septic inorganic substances have been removed is supplied to the first sedimentation basin 12 by a sewage pump 16. The first settling basin 12 is a facility for removing sedimentary organic substances in the sewage by sedimentation by gently flowing the sewage. First, the supernatant water of the sedimentation tank 12 is supplied to the reaction tank 13. The sediment in the initial sedimentation basin 12 is collected by the sludge scraper 17a and supplied to the sludge treatment facility 2 as excess sludge by the sludge extraction pump 18.

反応槽13は、DO(溶存酸素濃度),MLSS(槽内の活性汚泥濃度),下水流量,ORP(酸化還元電位)等の指標に従って送風機19から反応槽13に供給される空気量を制御することによって、微生物を利用して下水中の有機物、窒素、リンを中心とする汚濁物質を処理する設備である。反応槽13に供給される空気量は圧力計20を利用して検出される。汚濁物質が除去された下水は最終沈殿池14に供給され、反応槽13内の沈殿物の一部は汚泥引き抜きポンプ18によって余剰汚泥として汚泥処理設備2に供給される。   The reaction tank 13 controls the amount of air supplied from the blower 19 to the reaction tank 13 according to indices such as DO (dissolved oxygen concentration), MLSS (active sludge concentration in the tank), sewage flow rate, ORP (oxidation reduction potential). This is a facility that uses microorganisms to treat pollutants, mainly organic matter, nitrogen and phosphorus in sewage. The amount of air supplied to the reaction tank 13 is detected using a pressure gauge 20. The sewage from which the pollutants are removed is supplied to the final sedimentation basin 14, and a part of the sediment in the reaction tank 13 is supplied to the sludge treatment facility 2 as excess sludge by the sludge extraction pump 18.

最終沈殿池14は、反応槽13から供給された下水を処理水と活性汚泥とに分離する設備である。処理水は薬注槽15に供給される。活性汚泥は、汚泥掻寄機17bによって集められ、反応槽13に返送又は汚泥引き抜きポンプ18によって余剰汚泥として汚泥処理設備2に供給される。薬注槽15は、薬注ポンプ21を利用して最終沈殿池14から供給された処理水に薬品を注入することによって処理水を消毒した後、消毒された処理水を河川等に放流する設備である。   The final sedimentation basin 14 is a facility that separates the sewage supplied from the reaction tank 13 into treated water and activated sludge. The treated water is supplied to the chemical injection tank 15. The activated sludge is collected by the sludge scraper 17b and returned to the reaction tank 13 or supplied to the sludge treatment facility 2 as excess sludge by the sludge extraction pump 18. The chemical injection tank 15 is a facility for disinfecting the treated water by injecting chemicals into the treated water supplied from the final sedimentation basin 14 using the chemical injection pump 21 and then discharging the disinfected treated water to a river or the like. It is.

汚泥処理設備2は、濃縮タンク31と、消化タンク32と、脱水機33と、焼却炉34と、を備えている。濃縮タンク31は、汚泥引き抜きポンプ18から供給された余剰汚泥中の水分を除去することによって余剰汚泥を濃縮する設備である。濃縮タンク31内で濃縮された余剰汚泥は、図示しない汚泥掻寄機によって集められ、消化タンク32に供給される。   The sludge treatment facility 2 includes a concentration tank 31, a digestion tank 32, a dehydrator 33, and an incinerator 34. The concentration tank 31 is a facility that concentrates excess sludge by removing moisture in the excess sludge supplied from the sludge extraction pump 18. Excess sludge concentrated in the concentration tank 31 is collected by a sludge scraper (not shown) and supplied to the digestion tank 32.

消化タンク32は、余剰汚泥内の有機物を分解して消化汚泥とする設備である。消化タンク32において生成された消化汚泥は脱水機33に供給される。脱水機33は、消化タンク32から供給された消化汚泥を脱水することによって消化汚泥の含水率を低下させる設備である。焼却炉34は、脱水機33によって含水率が低下した消化汚泥を焼却する設備である。   The digestion tank 32 is a facility for decomposing organic matter in excess sludge to obtain digested sludge. Digested sludge generated in the digestion tank 32 is supplied to a dehydrator 33. The dehydrator 33 is a facility that reduces the moisture content of the digested sludge by dehydrating the digested sludge supplied from the digestion tank 32. The incinerator 34 is a facility that incinerates digested sludge whose water content has been reduced by the dehydrator 33.

〔最適制御システムの構成〕
次に、図2を参照して、本発明の一実施形態である最適制御システムの構成について説明する。
[Configuration of optimal control system]
Next, with reference to FIG. 2, the structure of the optimal control system which is one Embodiment of this invention is demonstrated.

図2は、本発明の一実施形態である最適制御システムの構成を示すブロック図である。図2に示すように、本発明の一実施形態である最適制御システム100は、実績データデータベース101、需給計画データベース102、入力装置103、最適制御装置104、及び出力装置105を備えている。   FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing a configuration of an optimal control system according to an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 2, the optimal control system 100 according to an embodiment of the present invention includes a performance data database 101, a supply and demand plan database 102, an input device 103, an optimal control device 104, and an output device 105.

実績データデータベース101は、下水処理場における過去の電力需要及び需要量と過去の電力供給力及び供給量とのデータを稼働実績データとして格納している。需給計画データベース102は、実績データデータベース10内に格納されている稼働実績データを用いて作成された所定期間における下水処理場の電力の需給計画に関するデータを格納している。入力装置103は、キーボードやマウスポインタ等の公知の入力装置によって構成され、最適制御装置104に各種情報を入力する際に操作される。 The performance data database 101 stores data of past power demand and demand and past power supply capacity and amount at the sewage treatment plant as operation result data. Supply plan database 102 stores data relating to supply and demand planning of power sewage treatment in a predetermined period that is created by using the operation result data stored in the actual data database 10 1. The input device 103 is configured by a known input device such as a keyboard and a mouse pointer, and is operated when various information is input to the optimum control device 104.

最適制御装置104は、パーソナルコンピュータ等のワークステーションや、プロセスコンピュータ等の情報処理装置によって構成されている。最適制御装置104は、情報処理装置内部のCPU等の演算処理装置がコンピュータプログラムを実行することによって、需給調整部104a、需給制御部104b、及び評価関数補正部104cとして機能する。これら各部の機能については後述する。出力装置105は、最適制御装置104からの各種情報を下水処理場の制御装置、表示装置、及び印刷装置等に出力するためのものである。   The optimum control device 104 includes a workstation such as a personal computer and an information processing device such as a process computer. The optimal control device 104 functions as a supply and demand adjustment unit 104a, a supply and demand control unit 104b, and an evaluation function correction unit 104c when an arithmetic processing device such as a CPU in the information processing apparatus executes a computer program. The functions of these units will be described later. The output device 105 is for outputting various information from the optimum control device 104 to a control device, a display device, a printing device, and the like of the sewage treatment plant.

〔最適制御処理〕
このような構成を有する最適制御システム100では、最適制御装置104が以下に示す最適制御処理を実行することによって、図1に示す下水処理場を最適制御する。以下、図3に示すフローチャートを参照して、この最適制御処理を実行する際の最適制御装置104の動作について説明する。
[Optimum control processing]
In the optimal control system 100 having such a configuration, the optimal control device 104 performs the optimal control processing shown below, thereby optimally controlling the sewage treatment plant shown in FIG. Hereinafter, with reference to the flowchart shown in FIG. 3, the operation of the optimum control device 104 when executing this optimum control process will be described.

図3は、本発明の一実施形態である最適制御処理の流れを示すフローチャートである。図3に示すフローチャートは、所定の制御周期毎に開始され、最適制御処理はステップS1の処理に進む。   FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing the flow of optimal control processing according to an embodiment of the present invention. The flowchart shown in FIG. 3 is started every predetermined control cycle, and the optimum control process proceeds to the process of step S1.

ステップS1の処理では、需給調整部104aが、需給計画データベース102内に格納されている所定期間内における下水処理場の電力の需給計画のデータに基づいて電力供給力の過不足を判定する。具体的には、始めに、需給調整部104aは、図4に示すように、需給計画で想定されている電力供給力(想定供給力)をプラス要因、需給計画で想定されている需要量(想定需要)をマイナス要因として想定値を合成し、想定値がプラスとなった場合は供給力過剰、想定値がマイナスとなった場合には供給力不足と判定する。なお、この処理の際、需給調整部104aは、電力供給力に電力需要の所定%に相当する予備力が残っているか否かを考慮して電力供給力の過不足を判定してもよい。これにより、ステップS1の処理は完了し、最適制御処理はステップS2の処理に進む。   In the process of step S <b> 1, the supply and demand adjustment unit 104 a determines whether the power supply capacity is excessive or insufficient based on the power supply and demand plan data of the sewage treatment plant within a predetermined period stored in the supply and demand plan database 102. Specifically, first, as shown in FIG. 4, the supply and demand adjustment unit 104a has a positive factor for the power supply capacity (assumed supply capacity) assumed in the supply and demand plan, and the demand amount ( Assuming demand is a negative factor, the assumed value is synthesized. If the assumed value is positive, it is determined that the supply capacity is excessive, and if the estimated value is negative, it is determined that the supply capacity is insufficient. In this process, the supply and demand adjustment unit 104a may determine whether the power supply capacity is excessive or insufficient in consideration of whether or not reserve power corresponding to a predetermined percentage of the power demand remains in the power supply capacity. Thereby, the process of step S1 is completed and the optimal control process proceeds to the process of step S2.

ステップS2の処理では、需給調整部104aが、入力装置103から予め入力されている設定情報及びステップSの判定結果に従って、下水処理場に設けられている発電設備及び発電設備から供給される電力により動作する負荷設備の操作手順を決定する。なお、発電設備としては、太陽光発電設備、太陽熱発電設備、風力発電設備、マイクロ水力発電設備、ガスエンジン発電設備、マイクロガスタービン発電設備、燃料電池、内燃機関、二次電池(放電)、電力融通・託送(受電)、及び商用受電設備等を例示できる。また、負荷設備としては、図1に示す汚水ポンプ16、汚泥掻寄機17a,17b、汚泥引き抜きポンプ18、送風機19、薬注ポンプ21、及び焼却炉34等を例示できる。 In the process of step S2, the supply and demand adjustment portion 104a is in accordance with the determination result of the input device 103 preset are the input information and step S 1 from being supplied from the power generation equipment and power generation equipment is provided in the sewage treatment plant power The operation procedure of the load equipment that operates is determined. Power generation facilities include solar power generation facilities, solar thermal power generation facilities, wind power generation facilities, micro hydroelectric power generation facilities, gas engine power generation facilities, micro gas turbine power generation facilities, fuel cells, internal combustion engines, secondary batteries (discharges), power Examples include interchange / consignment (power reception) and commercial power reception facilities. Examples of the load equipment include the sewage pump 16, sludge scrapers 17a and 17b, the sludge extraction pump 18, the blower 19, the chemical injection pump 21, and the incinerator 34 shown in FIG.

具体的には、電力需要よりも電力供給力を優先する設定がなされている場合であって、電力供給力が過剰である場合、需給調整部104aは、負荷設備が有する二次電池を充電する、負荷設備の稼働量を大きくする、託送(送電)、売電(余剰買取)等の調整手順を行うことによって、電力需要を増加させる。一方、電力需要よりも電力供給力を優先する設定がなされている場合であって、電力供給力が不足している場合には、需給調整部104aは、負荷設備が有する二次電池を放電させる、負荷設備の稼働量を小さくする、託送(受電)、商用電力の利用等の調整手順を行うことによって、電力需要を減少させる。   Specifically, when the power supply capacity is set to be prioritized over the power demand, and the power supply capacity is excessive, the supply and demand adjustment unit 104a charges the secondary battery included in the load facility. Increase the demand for power by increasing the operating capacity of the load equipment, and performing adjustment procedures such as consignment (power transmission) and power sales (surplus purchase). On the other hand, when the setting is made to give priority to the power supply capacity over the power demand and the power supply capacity is insufficient, the supply and demand adjustment unit 104a discharges the secondary battery included in the load facility. Demand for electric power is reduced by performing adjustment procedures such as reducing the operation amount of load equipment, consignment (power reception), and use of commercial power.

また、電力供給力よりも電力需要を優先する設定がなされている場合であって、電力供給力が過剰である場合、需給調整部104aは、負荷設備が有する二次電池を充電する、発電設備の出力を抑制する、託送(送電)、売電(余剰買取)等の調整手順を行うことによって、電力供給力を減少させる。一方、電力供給力よりも電力需要を優先する設定がなされている場合であって、電力供給力が不足している場合には、需給調整部104aは、負荷設備が有する二次電池を放電させる、発電設備の出力を大きくする、託送(受電)、商用電力の利用等の調整手順を行うことによって、電力供給力を増加させる。   Further, when the setting is made so that the power demand is prioritized over the power supply capacity, and the power supply capacity is excessive, the supply and demand adjustment unit 104a charges the secondary battery included in the load facility. The power supply capacity is reduced by performing adjustment procedures such as consignment (power transmission) and power sales (surplus purchase) that suppress the output of power. On the other hand, when the setting is made so that the power demand is prioritized over the power supply capacity, and the power supply capacity is insufficient, the supply and demand adjustment unit 104a discharges the secondary battery included in the load facility. The power supply capacity is increased by performing adjustment procedures such as enlarging the output of the power generation facility, consignment (power reception), and use of commercial power.

また、電力需要と電力供給力とのバランスを優先する設定がなされている場合であって、電力供給力が過剰である場合、需給調整部104aは、発電設備の出力を抑制する、託送(送電)、売電(余剰買取)等の調整手順によって電力供給力を減少させると共に、負荷設備が有する二次電池を充電する、負荷設備の稼働量を大きくする等の調整手順によって電力需要を増加させる。また、電力需要と電力供給力とのバランスを優先する設定がなされている場合であって、電力供給力が不足している場合には、需給調整部104aは、負荷設備が有する二次電池を放電させる、発電設備の出力を大きくする、託送(受電)、商用電力の利用等の調整手順によって電力供給力を増加させると共に、負荷設備の稼働量を小さくすることにより電力需要を減少させる。   Moreover, when the setting which gives priority to the balance between the power demand and the power supply capacity is made, and the power supply capacity is excessive, the supply and demand adjustment unit 104a suppresses the output of the power generation facility. ), Power supply capacity is reduced by adjusting procedures such as selling power (surplus purchase), etc., and power demand is increased by adjusting procedures such as charging the secondary battery of the load equipment and increasing the operating capacity of the load equipment. . In addition, when the setting for giving priority to the balance between the power demand and the power supply capacity is made and the power supply capacity is insufficient, the supply and demand adjustment unit 104a selects the secondary battery included in the load facility. The power supply capacity is increased by adjustment procedures such as discharging, increasing the output of the power generation equipment, consignment (power reception), and the use of commercial power, and the power demand is reduced by reducing the operation amount of the load equipment.

なお、本実施形態では、需給調整部104aは、以下の数式(1)に示すような評価関数Hの最適解を算出することによって、各場合における調整手順の内容を決定する。   In the present embodiment, the supply and demand adjustment unit 104a determines the content of the adjustment procedure in each case by calculating the optimum solution of the evaluation function H as shown in the following formula (1).

Figure 0005855964
Figure 0005855964

ここで、数式(1)中、 rpow は調整手順実行後の電力供給力の目標値(運転の数値目標)に対する偏差、 costは調整手順実行後の発電コスト(イニシャルコスト、ランニングコスト、燃料費等、コストに関係する全ての事項を考慮したもの)の目標値に対する偏差、 effiは調整手順実行後の下水処理場の効率(入力/エネルギー消費量に対する出力/仕事量の比率)の目標値に対する偏差、 co2は調整手順実行後の下水処理場のCO 2 排出量(設備等の製造時の排出量、運転時のエネルギーによる排出量等、CO 2 の排出量換算に関係する全ての項目を考慮したもの)の目標値に対する偏差を示している。また、PFは罰関数を示し、下水処理場を構成する設備や機器等の運転条件や制限条件(設備や機器と運転条件や制限条件との対応関係を示す条件設定テーブルから抽出されたもの)を表している。p,g,r,sは各偏差に付与された重み係数を示し、重み係数の総和は1に設定されている。所望の偏差の重み係数を他の重み係数より大きくすることによって、所望の偏差を重視した最適化モデルを生成することができる。 Here, in Equation (1), H rpow is a deviation from the target value of power supply capacity (operational numerical target) after execution of the adjustment procedure, and H cost is power generation cost (initial cost, running cost, fuel) after execution of the adjustment procedure. expenses, the target deviation from the target value of those considering all matters relating to the cost), H effi the sewage treatment plant after the adjustment procedure execution efficiency (ratio of output / workload for the input / energy consumption) deviation for the values, H of co2 adjustment procedure CO 2 emissions sewage treatment plant after the execution (emissions during manufacture of the equipment, etc., emissions due energy during operation, all related to the emissions in terms of CO 2 This shows the deviation from the target value). In addition, PF indicates a punishment function, and operating conditions and restriction conditions (extracted from the condition setting table indicating the correspondence between the equipment and equipment and the operation conditions and restriction conditions) that constitute the sewage treatment plant. Represents. p, g, r, and s indicate weighting coefficients assigned to each deviation, and the sum of the weighting coefficients is set to 1. By making the weighting factor of the desired deviation larger than the other weighting factors, an optimization model in which the desired deviation is emphasized can be generated.

数式(1)から明らかなように、需給調整部104aは、各偏差の和が最小になるように、換言すれば、目標値との差異をゼロに近付けるように、評価関数Hの最小解(即ち、最適解)を求めることによって、調整手順の内容(設備の運転の組み合わせ)を下水処理場の最適化モデルとして決定する。なお、評価関数Hの最小解(最適解)を求める演算方式としては、一例として粒子群最適化(Particle Swarm Optimization : PSO)方式を用いることができる。また、最適制御処理に基づいて機器類の起動停止が行われた時、季節の変わり目、及び異常気象(例えばゲリラ豪雨等)発生時には、下水処理場を構成する設備の稼動状態が急変することがある。このため、需給調整部104aは、時々刻々と変化する下水処理場の状態を直前の最適制御処理実行時の状態と比較し、差異が規定値を超えた場合、電力供給予備力、運転コスト、運転効率、及びCO排出量の各目標値、罰関数(制御条件等)、及び重み係数を補正してもよい。これにより、ステップS2の処理は完了し、最適制御処理はステップS3の処理に進む。 As is clear from Equation (1), the supply and demand adjustment unit 104a minimizes the sum of the deviations, in other words, the minimum solution (evaluation function H) so that the difference from the target value approaches zero. That is, by obtaining an optimal solution, the contents of the adjustment procedure (combination of operation of the equipment) are determined as an optimization model of the sewage treatment plant. As an example of the calculation method for obtaining the minimum solution (optimum solution) of the evaluation function H, a particle swarm optimization (PSO) method can be used. In addition, when the equipment is started and stopped based on the optimal control process, the operating state of the facilities constituting the sewage treatment plant may change suddenly at the turn of the season and the occurrence of abnormal weather (for example, guerrilla heavy rain). is there. For this reason, the supply and demand adjustment unit 104a compares the state of the sewage treatment plant that changes from moment to moment with the state at the time of execution of the most recent optimal control process, and if the difference exceeds a specified value, the power supply reserve capacity, the operating cost, operating efficiency, and CO 2 emission amount of each target value, punishment function (control conditions), and the weight coefficient may be corrected. Thereby, the process of step S2 is completed and the optimal control process proceeds to the process of step S3.

ステップS3の処理では、需給調整部104aが、ステップS2の処理によって決定された調整手順に基づいて、ステップS1の処理と同様の方法によって所定期間内における電力供給力の過不足を判定する。なお、この処理の際、需給調整部104aは、電力供給力に電力需要の所定%に相当する予備力があるか否かを考慮して電力供給力の過不足を判定してもよい。また、この処理の結果、予め決められた閾値以上の電力供給力の過不足が発生した場合、需給調整部104aは再度ステップS3の処理を実行することによって、電力供給力の過不足が閾値未満になるように電力の需給計画を調整する。これにより、ステップS3の処理は完了し、最適制御処理はステップS4の処理に進む。   In the process of step S3, the supply and demand adjustment unit 104a determines the excess or deficiency of the power supply capacity within a predetermined period by the same method as the process of step S1, based on the adjustment procedure determined by the process of step S2. In this process, the supply and demand adjustment unit 104a may determine whether the power supply capacity is excessive or insufficient in consideration of whether the power supply capacity has a reserve capacity corresponding to a predetermined percentage of the power demand. In addition, as a result of this process, when an excess or deficiency in power supply capacity that exceeds a predetermined threshold value occurs, the supply and demand adjustment unit 104a executes the process of step S3 again, so that the excess or deficiency in power supply capacity is less than the threshold value. Adjust the power supply and demand plan so that Thereby, the process of step S3 is completed, and the optimal control process proceeds to the process of step S4.

ステップS4の処理では、需給制御部104bが、ステップS3の処理によって決定された調整手順に従って負荷設備及び発電設備を制御することによって、下水処理場の電力需要量及び電力供給力を制御する。以後、評価関数補正部104cは、需給制御部104bによって制御された電力需要量及び電力供給力と実際の電力需要量及び電力供給力との差分値を算出し、算出された差分値に基づいて評価関数Hや電力の需給計画を予測するモデルを補正する。なお、この処理の際、需給制御部104bは、過去及び現在の下水処理場の稼働状況に関する情報と下水処理場の運転計画に関する情報とをGUI画面に表示してもよい。これにより、ステップS4の処理は完了し、一連の最適制御処理は終了する。   In the process of step S4, the supply and demand control unit 104b controls the power demand and the power supply capacity of the sewage treatment plant by controlling the load facility and the power generation facility according to the adjustment procedure determined by the process of step S3. Thereafter, the evaluation function correction unit 104c calculates a difference value between the power demand and power supply capacity controlled by the supply and demand control unit 104b and the actual power demand and power supply power, and based on the calculated difference value. The model for predicting the evaluation function H and the power supply / demand plan is corrected. In this process, the supply and demand control unit 104b may display information on the past and present operation status of the sewage treatment plant and information on the operation plan of the sewage treatment plant on the GUI screen. Thereby, the process of step S4 is completed and a series of optimal control processes are complete | finished.

以上の説明から明らかなように、本発明の一連の最適制御処理によれば、需給調整部104aが、下水処理場における電力の需給予測に基づいて調整された下水処理場における電力の需要量及び供給力に関するデータを用いて、下水処理場の電力供給予備力、運転コスト、運転効率、及びCO排出量の目標値に対する偏差を算出し、算出された偏差及び罰関数を変数として含む評価関数の最適解を下水処理場の最適化モデルとして算出する。そして、需給制御部140bが、算出された最適化モデルに従って下水処理場の運転を制御する。これにより、最適制御を実行するタイミングに関係なく、下水処理場を精度高く最適制御できる。 As is clear from the above description, according to the series of optimal control processes of the present invention, the supply and demand adjustment unit 104a has the power demand amount in the sewage treatment plant adjusted based on the power supply and demand prediction in the sewage treatment plant and An evaluation function that uses the data on supply capacity to calculate the power supply reserve capacity of the sewage treatment plant, operating costs, operating efficiency, and CO 2 emissions relative to the target values, and includes the calculated deviation and penalty function as variables. Is calculated as an optimization model of a sewage treatment plant. Then, the supply and demand control unit 140b controls the operation of the sewage treatment plant according to the calculated optimization model. As a result, the sewage treatment plant can be optimally controlled with high accuracy regardless of the timing of executing the optimal control.

以上、本発明者によってなされた発明を適用した実施の形態について説明したが、本実施形態による本発明の開示の一部をなす記述及び図面によって本発明は限定されることはない。すなわち、本実施形態に基づいて当業者等によってなされる他の実施の形態、実施例、及び運用技術等は全て本発明の範疇に含まれる。   Although the embodiment to which the invention made by the present inventor is applied has been described above, the present invention is not limited by the description and the drawings that form part of the disclosure of the present invention according to this embodiment. That is, other embodiments, examples, operational techniques, and the like made by those skilled in the art based on the present embodiment are all included in the scope of the present invention.

1 下水処理設備
2 汚泥処理設備
11 沈砂池
12 最初沈殿池
13 反応槽
14 最終沈殿池
15 薬注槽
16 汚水ポンプ
17a,17b 汚泥掻寄機
18 汚泥引き抜きポンプ
19 送風機
20 圧力計
21 薬注ポンプ
31 濃縮タンク
32 消化タンク
33 脱水機
34 焼却炉
100 最適制御システム
101 実績データデータベース
102 需給計画データベース
103 入力装置
104 最適制御装置
104a 需給調整部
104b 需給制御部
104c 評価関数補正部
105 出力装置
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Sewage treatment equipment 2 Sludge treatment equipment 11 Sedimentation basin 12 First sedimentation basin 13 Reaction tank 14 Final sedimentation basin 15 Chemical injection tank 16 Sewage pump 17a, 17b Sludge scraping machine 18 Sludge extraction pump 19 Blower 20 Pressure gauge 21 Chemical injection pump 31 Concentration tank 32 Digestion tank 33 Dehydrator 34 Incinerator 100 Optimal control system 101 Actual data database 102 Supply and demand plan database 103 Input device 104 Optimal control device 104a Supply and demand adjustment unit 104b Supply and demand control unit 104c Evaluation function correction unit 105 Output device

Claims (3)

プラント設備における電力の需給予測に基づいて調整されたプラント設備における電力の需要量及び供給力に関するデータを用いて、プラント設備の電力供給予備力、運転コスト、運転効率、及びCO2排出量の目標値に対する偏差を算出する算出ステップと、
最適化処理の実行タイミングにおけるプラント設備の稼働状況に関するデータと直前の最適化処理の実行タイミングにおける前記プラント設備の需給計画に関するデータとを比較し、差異が所定値以上である場合に、前記偏差を変数として含む評価関数を、前記評価関数を構成する変数の調整によって補正する補正ステップと、
補正された評価関数の最適解を前記プラント設備の最適化モデルとして算出する最適化ステップと、
前記最適化モデルに従って前記プラント設備の運転を制御する制御ステップと、
を含むことを特徴とするプラント設備の最適制御方法。
Targets for power supply reserve capacity, operating cost, operating efficiency, and CO 2 emissions of plant equipment using data on demand and supply capacity of power in plant equipment adjusted based on power supply and demand forecast in plant equipment A calculating step for calculating a deviation from the value;
The data regarding the operation status of the plant equipment at the execution timing of the optimization process is compared with the data regarding the supply and demand plan of the plant equipment at the execution timing of the immediately previous optimization process, and when the difference is a predetermined value or more, the deviation is an evaluation function including as a variable, a correction step of correcting the adjustment of the variable constituting the evaluation function,
An optimization step of calculating an optimal solution of the corrected evaluation function as an optimization model of the plant equipment;
A control step for controlling operation of the plant equipment according to the optimization model;
An optimal control method for plant equipment, comprising:
過去及び現在のプラント設備の稼働状況に関する情報と該プラント設備の稼働計画に関する情報とを表示するステップを含むことを特徴とする請求項1に記載のプラント設備の最適制御方法。 The method for optimal control of plant equipment according to claim 1, further comprising the step of displaying information relating to the operation status of past and present plant equipment and information relating to an operation plan of the plant equipment. プラント設備における電力の需給予測に基づいて調整されたプラント設備における電力の需要量及び供給力に関するデータを用いて、プラント設備の電力供給予備力、運転コスト、運転効率、及びCO2排出量の目標値に対する偏差を算出する算出手段と、
適化処理の実行タイミングにおけるプラント設備の稼働状況に関するデータと直前の最適化処理の実行タイミングにおける前記プラント設備の需給計画に関するデータとを比較し、差異が所定値以上である場合に、前記偏差を変数として含む評価関数を、前記評価関数を構成する変数の調整によって補正する補正手段と、
補正された評価関数の最適解を前記プラント設備の最適化モデルとして算出する最適化手段と、
前記最適化モデルに従って前記プラント設備の運転を制御する制御手段と、
を備えることを特徴とするプラント設備の最適制御装置。
Targets for power supply reserve capacity, operating cost, operating efficiency, and CO 2 emissions of plant equipment using data on demand and supply capacity of power in plant equipment adjusted based on power supply and demand forecast in plant equipment A calculation means for calculating a deviation from the value;
When comparing the data relating to supply and demand planning of the plant equipment in the execution timing of the optimization process of the immediately preceding data related to the operation status of the plant equipment in the execution timing of the optimization process, the difference is a predetermined value or more, the deviation an evaluation function of containing as a variable, and correction means for correcting the adjustment of the variable constituting the evaluation function,
An optimization means for calculating an optimal solution of the corrected evaluation function as an optimization model of the plant equipment;
Control means for controlling operation of the plant equipment according to the optimization model;
An optimum control device for plant equipment, comprising:
JP2012023982A 2012-02-07 2012-02-07 Optimal control method and optimal control device for plant equipment Active JP5855964B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2012023982A JP5855964B2 (en) 2012-02-07 2012-02-07 Optimal control method and optimal control device for plant equipment

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2012023982A JP5855964B2 (en) 2012-02-07 2012-02-07 Optimal control method and optimal control device for plant equipment

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2013161337A JP2013161337A (en) 2013-08-19
JP5855964B2 true JP5855964B2 (en) 2016-02-09

Family

ID=49173514

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2012023982A Active JP5855964B2 (en) 2012-02-07 2012-02-07 Optimal control method and optimal control device for plant equipment

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP5855964B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP6373629B2 (en) * 2014-04-25 2018-08-15 株式会社日立製作所 Water treatment monitoring and control system, water treatment system having the same, and water treatment method
JP6813416B2 (en) * 2017-04-10 2021-01-13 株式会社日立製作所 Plant control device and its control method, rolling mill control device and its control method and program
CN110032755B (en) * 2019-02-27 2022-11-01 石家庄铁道大学 Multi-objective optimization method for urban sewage treatment process under multiple working conditions
CN112678937A (en) * 2020-01-16 2021-04-20 海南信天源科技开发有限公司 Automatic monitoring method for dissolved oxygen in river
JP7630296B2 (en) * 2021-02-17 2025-02-17 三菱重工業株式会社 Operation support method and operation support device for thermal power plant
CN117114372B (en) * 2023-10-24 2024-01-26 明洋(山东)环境科技有限公司 A real-time management system for sludge treatment progress based on the Internet of Things

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH07295626A (en) * 1994-04-25 1995-11-10 Tokyo Gas Co Ltd Start-up system for equipment during emergency generator operation
JP4488592B2 (en) * 2000-02-15 2010-06-23 三菱電機株式会社 Equipment management device, equipment management method
JP4327325B2 (en) * 2000-03-27 2009-09-09 大阪瓦斯株式会社 Optimal operation control system for combined heat and power plant
JP2002278603A (en) * 2001-03-16 2002-09-27 Toshiba Corp Optimal water operation planning device and optimal water operation planning method
JP2004173342A (en) * 2002-11-18 2004-06-17 Hitachi Ltd Driving support system and driving support computer program
JP4338610B2 (en) * 2004-09-14 2009-10-07 東京瓦斯株式会社 Plant optimum operation plan creation system
JP2008199825A (en) * 2007-02-14 2008-08-28 Mitsubishi Chemicals Corp Power plant operation optimization method and apparatus

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2013161337A (en) 2013-08-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP5855964B2 (en) Optimal control method and optimal control device for plant equipment
Barbu et al. On the evaluation of the global impact of control strategies applied to wastewater treatment plants
JP5859866B2 (en) Monitoring target amount prediction method and monitoring target amount prediction apparatus
Vanrolleghem et al. Integration of wastewater treatment plant design and operation—a systematic approach using cost functions
Su et al. Water–energy–carbon nexus: greenhouse gas emissions from integrated urban drainage systems in China
Lobato et al. Estimates of methane loss and energy recovery potential in anaerobic reactors treating domestic wastewater
EP2414901B1 (en) System and method for monitoring an integrated system
Nopens et al. Benchmark Simulation Model No 2: finalisation of plant layout and default control strategy
Corominas et al. Including Life Cycle Assessment for decision-making in controlling wastewater nutrient removal systems
JP5918672B2 (en) Water and sewage management system and method
CN118886325B (en) A method and system for joint control of urban drainage system
JP2017109170A (en) Aeration control apparatus, and aeration control method
JP5981156B2 (en) Operation control device and operation control method for load equipment installed in water treatment plant
JP2004171531A (en) Plant-wide optimal process controller
CN119612652B (en) Control method, system and terminal for multi-stage purification of wastewater suitable for green factories
Hongyang et al. Decentralized model predictive control for N and P removal in wastewater treatment plants
JP4929125B2 (en) Water interchange operation equipment
Hirsch et al. Supervisory control system for adaptive phase and work cycle management of sequencing wastewater treatment plant
Muzaffar et al. Energy efficiency and nutrient removal performance: comparison between several types of activated sludge process
Swarnalatha Simulation and Analysis of Ammonium-Based Aeration Control Strategies to Enhance Efficiency in Wastewater Treatment Plant
Benedetti et al. Probabilistic modelling and evaluation of wastewater treatment plant upgrades in a water quality based evaluation context
JP4327013B2 (en) Plant-wide optimum process controller
JP2017100092A (en) Sewage treatment controller
WO2013136503A1 (en) System for operating water treatment plant and method for planning amount of water supply
Luca et al. Fuzzy-optimal control strategies for a wastewater treatment plant

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20141022

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20150722

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20150728

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20150925

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20151124

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20151210

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 5855964

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250