Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP5881218B2 - Hydrocarbon oil cracking catalyst and hydrocarbon oil cracking method - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP5881218B2 - Hydrocarbon oil cracking catalyst and hydrocarbon oil cracking method - Google Patents

Hydrocarbon oil cracking catalyst and hydrocarbon oil cracking method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP5881218B2
JP5881218B2 JP2013507148A JP2013507148A JP5881218B2 JP 5881218 B2 JP5881218 B2 JP 5881218B2 JP 2013507148 A JP2013507148 A JP 2013507148A JP 2013507148 A JP2013507148 A JP 2013507148A JP 5881218 B2 JP5881218 B2 JP 5881218B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
hydrocarbon oil
catalyst
elements
abundance
cracking
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP2013507148A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPWO2012132322A1 (en
Inventor
智史 古田
智史 古田
朋之 平尾
朋之 平尾
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Japan Petroleum Energy Center JPEC
Eneos Corp
Original Assignee
Japan Petroleum Energy Center JPEC
JX Nippon Oil and Energy Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Japan Petroleum Energy Center JPEC, JX Nippon Oil and Energy Corp filed Critical Japan Petroleum Energy Center JPEC
Priority to JP2013507148A priority Critical patent/JP5881218B2/en
Publication of JPWO2012132322A1 publication Critical patent/JPWO2012132322A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP5881218B2 publication Critical patent/JP5881218B2/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G11/00Catalytic cracking, in the absence of hydrogen, of hydrocarbon oils
    • C10G11/02Catalytic cracking, in the absence of hydrogen, of hydrocarbon oils characterised by the catalyst used
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J23/00Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00
    • B01J23/16Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of arsenic, antimony, bismuth, vanadium, niobium, tantalum, polonium, chromium, molybdenum, tungsten, manganese, technetium or rhenium
    • B01J23/24Chromium, molybdenum or tungsten
    • B01J23/30Tungsten
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J23/00Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00
    • B01J23/16Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of arsenic, antimony, bismuth, vanadium, niobium, tantalum, polonium, chromium, molybdenum, tungsten, manganese, technetium or rhenium
    • B01J23/32Manganese, technetium or rhenium
    • B01J23/34Manganese
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J23/00Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00
    • B01J23/70Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of the iron group metals or copper
    • B01J23/76Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of the iron group metals or copper combined with metals, oxides or hydroxides provided for in groups B01J23/02 - B01J23/36
    • B01J23/83Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of the iron group metals or copper combined with metals, oxides or hydroxides provided for in groups B01J23/02 - B01J23/36 with rare earths or actinides
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G11/00Catalytic cracking, in the absence of hydrogen, of hydrocarbon oils
    • C10G11/02Catalytic cracking, in the absence of hydrogen, of hydrocarbon oils characterised by the catalyst used
    • C10G11/04Oxides
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J2523/00Constitutive chemical elements of heterogeneous catalysts

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)
  • Catalysts (AREA)

Description

本発明は、炭化水素油分解用触媒および炭化水素油の分解方法に関し、特に、系外から水素を供給することなく炭化水素油を分解して軽質化する際に用いられる触媒および該触媒を用いて炭化水素油を分解する方法に関するものである。   The present invention relates to a hydrocarbon oil cracking catalyst and a hydrocarbon oil cracking method, and in particular, a catalyst used for cracking and lightening a hydrocarbon oil without supplying hydrogen from outside the system, and the catalyst. The present invention relates to a method for cracking hydrocarbon oil.

従来、重質炭化水素油を分解して軽質化することにより、石油化学製品の原料や燃料油等として有用な軽質炭化水素油と、燃料ガス等として有用な軽質炭化水素ガスとを得る方法として、水素化分解法、熱分解法および流動接触分解法が知られている。   Conventionally, as a method of obtaining light hydrocarbon oil useful as a raw material for petrochemical products, fuel oil, etc. and light hydrocarbon gas useful as fuel gas, etc. by decomposing and lightening heavy hydrocarbon oil Hydrocracking, thermal cracking and fluid catalytic cracking are known.

ここで、水素化分解法とは、高温・高圧の水素雰囲気中で重質炭化水素油と水素化触媒とを接触させることにより、重質炭化水素油を軽質化する方法である(例えば、特許文献1参照)。また、熱分解法とは、高温条件下で炭化水素分子を熱分解することにより、触媒を用いることなく重質炭化水素油を軽質化する方法である(例えば、特許文献2参照)。更に、流動接触分解法とは、流動している触媒と重質炭化水素油とを接触させることにより、重質炭化水素油を軽質化する方法である(例えば、特許文献3参照)。   Here, the hydrocracking method is a method for lightening a heavy hydrocarbon oil by bringing the heavy hydrocarbon oil into contact with a hydrogenation catalyst in a high-temperature, high-pressure hydrogen atmosphere (for example, patents). Reference 1). The thermal decomposition method is a method for lightening a heavy hydrocarbon oil without using a catalyst by thermally decomposing hydrocarbon molecules under high temperature conditions (see, for example, Patent Document 2). Furthermore, the fluid catalytic cracking method is a method of reducing the weight of heavy hydrocarbon oil by bringing a flowing catalyst and heavy hydrocarbon oil into contact with each other (see, for example, Patent Document 3).

特開2008−297452号公報JP 2008-297452 A 特開2009−102471号公報JP 2009-102471 A 特開平8−269464号公報JP-A-8-269464

しかし、水素化分解法には、分解反応に大量の高圧水素ガスを使用するため、大規模な水素ガス製造設備が必要であり、コストが増大するという問題があった。また、熱分解法には、大量のコークスが発生すると共に、芳香環の開裂が殆ど起こらないために軽質炭化水素油の製造効率が悪く、重質炭化水素油を十分に分解し得ないという問題があった。更に、流動接触分解法には、装置の運転コストが高いという問題があった。   However, in the hydrocracking method, a large amount of high-pressure hydrogen gas is used for the cracking reaction, so that a large-scale hydrogen gas production facility is required and the cost increases. In addition, in the pyrolysis method, a large amount of coke is generated and the aromatic ring is hardly cleaved, so that the production efficiency of light hydrocarbon oil is poor and the heavy hydrocarbon oil cannot be decomposed sufficiently. was there. Furthermore, the fluid catalytic cracking method has a problem that the operating cost of the apparatus is high.

また、水素化分解法では、水素化触媒の劣化(被毒)を防止するために重質炭化水素油を予め脱硫および脱窒素しておく必要があった。更に、熱分解法および流動接触分解法では、炭化水素油の脱硫反応および脱窒素反応が殆ど起こらないため、水素化分解法と同様に重質炭化水素油を予め脱硫および脱窒素しておく必要があった。即ち、水素化分解法、熱分解法および流動接触分解法には、重質炭化水素油の前処理が必要であるという問題があった。   Further, in the hydrocracking method, it has been necessary to desulfurize and denitrogenate the heavy hydrocarbon oil in advance in order to prevent deterioration (poisoning) of the hydrogenation catalyst. Furthermore, in the thermal cracking method and fluid catalytic cracking method, there is almost no desulfurization reaction or denitrogenation reaction of hydrocarbon oil, so it is necessary to desulfurize and denitrogenate heavy hydrocarbon oil in advance as in the hydrocracking method. was there. That is, the hydrocracking method, the thermal cracking method, and the fluid catalytic cracking method have a problem that a pretreatment of heavy hydrocarbon oil is required.

そこで、本発明は、炭化水素油を予め脱硫および脱窒素することなく、且つ、高圧水素ガスを使用することなく、低コストで効率的に炭化水素油を軽質化することができる炭化水素油分解用触媒および炭化水素油の分解方法を提供することを目的とする。   Therefore, the present invention provides a hydrocarbon oil cracking that can efficiently lighten a hydrocarbon oil at low cost without desulfurizing and denitrifying the hydrocarbon oil in advance and without using high-pressure hydrogen gas. It is an object to provide a catalyst for hydrocarbons and a method for cracking hydrocarbon oil.

本発明者らは、上記課題を解決すべく鋭意検討を行い、特定の元素を特定の割合で含有する触媒を使用することで、水素ガスを使用することなく、水の存在下で炭化水素油を効率的に分解し得ることを見出し、本発明を完成させた。   The present inventors have intensively studied to solve the above problems, and by using a catalyst containing a specific element in a specific ratio, a hydrocarbon oil can be used in the presence of water without using hydrogen gas. The present invention has been completed.

即ち、この発明は、上記課題を有利に解決することを目的とするものであり、本発明の炭化水素油分解用触媒は、水の存在下で炭化水素油を分解する際に用いられ、IVA族元素から選択される1種の元素Xと、IIIA族元素から選択される1種の元素Y1
VIA族元素VIIA族元素および第4周期のVIII族元素からなる群より選択され1種の元素Y2とを含有し、元素Y1の存在量(y1)と元素Y2の存在量(y2)との合計(y1+y2)に対する元素Xの存在量(x)の比(x/(y1+y2))が、0.5以上2.0以下であり、元素Y1の存在量(y1)に対する元素Y2の存在量(y2)の比(y2/y1)が、0.02以上0.25以下であることを特徴とする。
なお、本発明において、「元素の存在量」は、触媒を溶解して得た溶液をICP発光分光分析法で分析し、得られた測定値から触媒中の各元素の金属単体換算でのモル濃度を算出することにより求めることができる。そして、「元素の存在量の比(モル比)」は、算出した各元素のモル濃度の比を算出することにより求めることができる(以下、元素の存在量の比の算出方法を「融解/ICP−AES法」と称する場合がある。)。
That is, the present invention aims to advantageously solve the above-mentioned problems, and the hydrocarbon oil cracking catalyst of the present invention is used when cracking hydrocarbon oil in the presence of water. One element X selected from group elements and one element Y 1 selected from group IIIA elements
If, VIA group elements, contain one of the elements Y 2 that will be selected from the group consisting of VIII group elements of group VIIA elements, and the fourth period, the abundance of the elements Y 1 (y 1) and the element Y 2 the amount of presence (y 2) the sum of the (y 1 + y 2) presence of the element X with respect to the ratio of (x) (x / (y 1 + y 2)) is, is 0.5 to 2.0, abundance of elements Y 1 is the presence of the element Y 2 with respect to (y 1) the ratio of (y 2) (y 2 / y 1), characterized in that 0.02 to 0.25.
In the present invention, the “element abundance” refers to a solution obtained by dissolving the catalyst by ICP emission spectroscopic analysis, and from the obtained measurement value, the molar amount of each element in the catalyst in terms of simple metal. It can be obtained by calculating the concentration. The “element abundance ratio (molar ratio)” can be obtained by calculating the calculated molar concentration ratio of each element (hereinafter, the element abundance ratio calculation method is “melt / It may be referred to as “ICP-AES method”).

ここで、本発明の炭化水素油分解用触媒は、前記元素Xと、前記元素Y1と、前記元素Y2とを含む複合酸化物からなることが好ましい。Here, the hydrocarbon oil cracking catalyst of the present invention is preferably composed of a complex oxide containing the element X, the element Y 1, and the element Y 2 .

また、本発明の炭化水素油分解用触媒は、前記元素Xがジルコニウムであることが好ましい。
そして、本発明の炭化水素油分解用触媒は、前記元素Y1がセリウムであり、前記元素Y2が、タングステン、マンガンおよび鉄からなる群より選択される1種であることが更に好ましい。
In the hydrocarbon oil cracking catalyst of the present invention, the element X is preferably zirconium.
In the hydrocarbon oil cracking catalyst of the present invention, it is more preferable that the element Y 1 is cerium and the element Y 2 is one selected from the group consisting of tungsten, manganese and iron.

また、この発明は、上記課題を有利に解決することを目的とするものであり、本発明の炭化水素油の分解方法は、水の存在下で、炭化水素油と、上記炭化水素油分解用触媒の何れかとを接触させて、炭化水素油を分解することを特徴とする。   Further, the present invention aims to advantageously solve the above-described problems, and the hydrocarbon oil cracking method of the present invention comprises a hydrocarbon oil and the above-mentioned hydrocarbon oil cracking in the presence of water. Hydrocarbon oil is decomposed by contacting with any of the catalysts.

本発明の炭化水素油分解用触媒および炭化水素油の分解方法によれば、炭化水素油を予め脱硫および脱窒素することなく、且つ、高圧水素ガスを使用することなく、低コストで効率的に炭化水素油を軽質化することができる。   According to the hydrocarbon oil cracking catalyst and hydrocarbon oil cracking method of the present invention, the hydrocarbon oil can be efficiently produced at low cost without desulfurizing and denitrifying the hydrocarbon oil in advance and without using high-pressure hydrogen gas. The hydrocarbon oil can be lightened.

以下、本発明の実施の形態を詳細に説明する。ここで、本発明の炭化水素油分解用触媒は、炭化水素油を分解して軽質化する際に用いられる。そして、本発明の炭化水素油の分解方法では、反応系外から水素を供給することなく、水の存在下で炭化水素油と炭化水素油分解用触媒とを接触させることにより、炭化水素油を分解して軽質炭化水素油を製造する。   Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail. Here, the hydrocarbon oil cracking catalyst of the present invention is used when cracking and lightening hydrocarbon oil. In the hydrocarbon oil cracking method of the present invention, the hydrocarbon oil is brought into contact with the hydrocarbon oil cracking catalyst in the presence of water without supplying hydrogen from outside the reaction system. Decomposes to produce light hydrocarbon oil.

ここで、本発明の炭化水素油分解用触媒を用いて分解(軽質化)する炭化水素油としては、特に限定されることなく、石油精製時に得られる常圧蒸留残油や減圧蒸留残油などの重質炭化水素油を挙げることができる。具体的には、炭化水素油分解用触媒を用いて軽質化する炭化水素油としては、常圧蒸留における50容量%留出温度(T50)が150℃以上550℃以下の炭化水素油や、T50が200℃以上550℃以下の炭化水素油や、T50が250℃以上550℃以下の炭化水素油を挙げることができる。   Here, the hydrocarbon oil to be decomposed (lightened) using the hydrocarbon oil cracking catalyst of the present invention is not particularly limited, and is an atmospheric distillation residue or a vacuum distillation residue obtained during petroleum refining. Of heavy hydrocarbon oils. Specifically, as hydrocarbon oil lightened using a hydrocarbon oil cracking catalyst, hydrocarbon oil having a 50 vol% distillation temperature (T50) in atmospheric distillation of 150 ° C. or higher and 550 ° C. or lower, or T50 Can be exemplified by hydrocarbon oils having a temperature of 200 ° C. or more and 550 ° C. or less, and hydrocarbon oils having a T50 of 250 ° C. or more and 550 ° C. or less.

そして、本発明の炭化水素油分解用触媒は、
(1)周期表のIVA族元素から選択される1種の元素Xと、
(2)周期表の、IIIA族元素から選択される1種の元素Y1と、
(3)周期表のVIA族元素VIIA族元素および第4周期のVIII族元素からなる群より選択される1種の元素Y2
の3種の金属元素を所定の比率で含有していることを特徴とする。
ここで、触媒に含有させる金属元素として上記(1)〜(3)に記載の元素群から選択される元素を採用したのは、上記元素群から選択される元素を含む化合物、特に酸化物は、高温高圧の水蒸気雰囲気下でも安定であり、且つ、硫黄化合物や窒素化合物による被毒に対する耐性が高いという特徴を有するからである。また、3種の金属元素を所定の比率で含有させたのは、3種の金属元素を所定の比率で含有させることにより、炭化水素油の分解反応を促進することができるからである。
And the hydrocarbon oil cracking catalyst of the present invention comprises:
(1) one element X selected from group IVA elements of the periodic table;
(2) one element Y 1 selected from group IIIA elements in the periodic table;
(3) of the periodic table, VIA group elements, and one element Y 2 is selected from the group consisting of VIII group elements of group VIIA elements, and the fourth period,
These three metal elements are contained in a predetermined ratio.
Here, the element selected from the element group described in the above (1) to (3) as the metal element to be included in the catalyst is adopted because the compound, particularly the oxide, containing the element selected from the element group is used. This is because it is stable in a high-temperature and high-pressure steam atmosphere and has high resistance to poisoning by sulfur compounds and nitrogen compounds. The reason why the three metal elements are contained in a predetermined ratio is that the decomposition reaction of the hydrocarbon oil can be promoted by containing the three metal elements in the predetermined ratio.

また、本発明の炭化水素油分解用触媒は、融解/ICP−AES法により求めた触媒中の各元素X,Y1,Y2の存在量の比(モル比)が、以下の関係を満たすことを特徴とする。
(4)元素Y1の存在量y1と元素Y2の存在量y2との合計(y1+y2)に対する元素Xの存在量xの比が、0.5以上2.0以下(0.5≦x/(y1+y2)≦2.0)
(5)元素Y1の存在量y1に対する元素Y2の存在量y2の比が、0.02以上0.25以下(0.02≦y2/y1≦0.25)
Further, in the hydrocarbon oil cracking catalyst of the present invention, the ratio (molar ratio) of each element X, Y 1 , Y 2 in the catalyst determined by melting / ICP-AES method satisfies the following relationship. It is characterized by that.
(4) a ratio of abundance x of the element X to the total (y 1 + y 2) between the abundance y 2 abundance y 1 and the element Y 2 elements Y 1 is 0.5 to 2.0 (0 .5 ≦ x / (y 1 + y 2 ) ≦ 2.0)
(5) a ratio of abundance y 2 abundance y 1 element Y 2 with respect to the element Y 1 is 0.02 to 0.25 (0.02 ≦ y 2 / y 1 ≦ 0.25)

ここで、触媒中の元素Xの存在量xを、元素Y1の存在量y1と元素Y2の存在量y2との合計(y1+y2)の0.5倍未満にすると、炭化水素油の分解反応を十分に促進することができない。また、元素Xの存在量xを、元素Y1の存在量と元素Y2の存在量との合計(y1+y2)の2.0倍超にした場合も同様に炭化水素油の分解反応を十分に促進することができない。従って、本発明の炭化水素油分解用触媒では、0.5≦x/(y1+y2)≦2.0とすることが必要である。なお、x/(y1+y2)は、0.7≦x/(y1+y2)≦1.5とすることが好ましく、0.8≦x/(y1+y2)≦1.0とすることが更に好ましい。Here, the abundance x of the element X in the catalyst, when less than 0.5 times the sum of the abundance y 2 abundance y 1 and the element Y 2 elements Y 1 (y 1 + y 2), carbide The decomposition reaction of hydrogen oil cannot be accelerated sufficiently. Similarly, when the abundance x of the element X exceeds 2.0 times the total of the abundance of the element Y 1 and the abundance of the element Y 2 (y 1 + y 2 ), the hydrocarbon oil decomposition reaction is similarly performed. Cannot be promoted sufficiently. Therefore, in the hydrocarbon oil cracking catalyst of the present invention, it is necessary to satisfy 0.5 ≦ x / (y 1 + y 2 ) ≦ 2.0. Note that x / (y 1 + y 2 ) is preferably 0.7 ≦ x / (y 1 + y 2 ) ≦ 1.5, and 0.8 ≦ x / (y 1 + y 2 ) ≦ 1.0. More preferably.

また、元素Y2の存在量y2を、元素Y1の存在量y1の0.25倍超にすると、触媒の活性が低下する。更に、元素Y2の存在量y2を、元素Y1の存在量y1の0.02倍未満にすると、触媒中に元素Y2を含ませたことにより得られる触媒活性の向上効果が十分でない。従って、本発明の炭化水素油分解用触媒では、0.02≦y2/y1≦0.25とすることが必要である。なお、y2/y1は、0.04≦y2/y1≦0.25とすることが好ましく、0.06≦y2/y1≦0.24とすることが更に好ましい。Moreover, the abundance y 2 elements Y 2, when the 0.25-fold of the abundance y 1 of the elements Y 1, activity of the catalyst decreases. Furthermore, sufficient abundance y 2 elements Y 2, when less than 0.02 times the abundance y 1 of the elements Y 1, the effect of improving the catalytic activity obtained by moistened an element Y 2 in the catalyst Not. Therefore, in the catalyst for cracking hydrocarbon oil of the present invention, it is necessary to satisfy 0.02 ≦ y 2 / y 1 ≦ 0.25. Note that y 2 / y 1 is preferably 0.04 ≦ y 2 / y 1 ≦ 0.25, and more preferably 0.06 ≦ y 2 / y 1 ≦ 0.24.

なお、本発明の炭化水素油分解用触媒では、触媒中の全ての金属元素の存在量mに対する、元素Xの存在量xと、元素Y1の存在量y1と、元素Y2の存在量y2との合計(x+y1+y2)の比が、0.70以上(0.70≦(x+y1+y2)/m)であることが好ましく、0.80以上(0.80≦(x+y1+y2)/m)であることが更に好ましい。触媒に含まれている金属元素中の元素X、元素Y1および元素Y2の割合が少ないと、触媒活性を十分に向上することができず、炭化水素油の分解効率が低下するからである。In the hydrocarbon oil cracking catalysts of the present invention, with respect to abundance m of all the metal elements in the catalyst, and the abundance x of the element X, the abundance y 1 of the elements Y 1, the presence of the element Y 2 the ratio of the sum of the y 2 (x + y 1 + y 2) is preferably a 0.70 (0.70 ≦ (x + y 1 + y 2) / m), 0.80 or more (0.80 ≦ (x + y More preferably, it is 1 + y 2 ) / m). This is because if the ratio of the element X, the element Y 1 and the element Y 2 in the metal element contained in the catalyst is small, the catalytic activity cannot be sufficiently improved and the decomposition efficiency of the hydrocarbon oil is lowered. .

ここで、本発明の炭化水素油分解用触媒の一例について、以下に詳細に説明する。本発明の炭化水素油分解用触媒の一例は、上記(1)〜(3)の元素X,Y1,Y2を含む酸化物、より詳細には、元素X,Y1,Y2を含む複合酸化物からなる。Here, an example of the hydrocarbon oil cracking catalyst of the present invention will be described in detail below. An example of the hydrocarbon oil cracking catalyst of the present invention includes the oxides containing the elements X, Y 1 and Y 2 of the above (1) to (3), more specifically, the elements X, Y 1 and Y 2 . It consists of a complex oxide.

即ち、この一例の炭化水素油分解用触媒は、元素Xを含む酸化物と、元素Y1を含む酸化物と、Y2を含む酸化物との3種の酸化物が複合して生じた複合酸化物からなる。そして、この複合酸化物は、各元素X,Y1,Y2の存在量の比(モル比)が、上記(4),(5)の関係を満たしている。That is, the hydrocarbon oil cracking catalyst of this example is a composite produced by combining three types of oxides, an oxide containing element X, an oxide containing element Y 1, and an oxide containing Y 2. Made of oxide. In this composite oxide, the ratio (molar ratio) of the abundances of the respective elements X, Y 1 and Y 2 satisfies the relationships (4) and (5).

ここで、この一例の炭化水素油分解用触媒では、元素Xが、ジルコニウム(Zr)またはチタン(Ti)であることが好ましく、Zrであることが特に好ましい。元素XをZrまたはTiとすれば、高温高圧の条件下で触媒を使用した場合であっても、触媒が結晶構造を維持することができるからである。即ち、元素XがZrまたはTiからなる炭化水素油分解用触媒では、炭化水素油の水素化分解に使用される、水熱合成されたゼオライトや、シリカや、γ−アルミナからなる水素化触媒のように、高温高圧の水蒸気により触媒の結晶構造が大きく変化して触媒が使用不能となることがない。また、炭化水素油を前処理(脱硫および脱窒素)する必要がない。なお、複合酸化物の構造を確実に維持する観点からは、触媒中の全ての金属元素の存在量mに対する元素Xの存在量xの比(x/m)が、0.30以上であることが好ましい。   Here, in this example hydrocarbon oil cracking catalyst, the element X is preferably zirconium (Zr) or titanium (Ti), and particularly preferably Zr. This is because if the element X is Zr or Ti, the catalyst can maintain a crystal structure even when the catalyst is used under high temperature and high pressure conditions. That is, in the hydrocarbon oil cracking catalyst in which the element X is made of Zr or Ti, hydrothermally synthesized zeolite, silica, or hydrogenation catalyst made of γ-alumina used for hydrocracking of hydrocarbon oil is used. In this way, the crystal structure of the catalyst is not significantly changed by high-temperature and high-pressure steam so that the catalyst cannot be used. Moreover, it is not necessary to pre-process (desulfurization and denitrogenation) hydrocarbon oil. From the viewpoint of reliably maintaining the structure of the composite oxide, the ratio (x / m) of the abundance x of element X to the abundance m of all metal elements in the catalyst is 0.30 or more. Is preferred.

また、この一例の炭化水素油分解用触媒では元素Y1 、イットリウム(Y)、ランタン(La)およびセリウム(Ce)からなる群より選択される1種であることが好ましく、元素Y 2 、モリブデン(Mo)、タングステン(W)、マンガン(Mn)、鉄(Fe)、コバルト(Co)およびニッケル(Ni)からなる群より選択される1種であることが好まし。なお、元素Y1はセリウムであることが特に好ましい。また、元素Y2はタングステン、マンガンおよび鉄からなる群より選択される1種であることが特に好ましい。 Further, the hydrocarbon oil cracking catalyst of this example, the element Y 1 is, yttrium (Y), is preferably one selected from the group consisting of lanthanum (La) and cerium (Ce), the element Y 2 but, molybdenum (Mo), tungsten (W), manganese (Mn), iron (Fe), cobalt (Co), and it is not preferable one selected from the group nickel (Ni). The element Y 1 is particularly preferably cerium. The element Y 2 is particularly preferably one selected from the group consisting of tungsten, manganese and iron.

ここで、この複合酸化物からなる炭化水素油分解用触媒では、元素Y1の存在量y1と元素Y2の存在量y2との合計(y1+y2)に対する元素Xの存在量xの比(x/(y1+y2))が、0.5以上であることが好ましい。x/(y1+y2)を0.5以上とすれば、元素Xの酸化物と、元素Y1の酸化物または元素Y2の酸化物との距離が近くなり、触媒中での酸素移動(格子酸素の移動)が妨げられないので、炭化水素油の分解反応を促進することができるからである。また、x/(y1+y2)は、2.0以下であることが好ましい。x/(y1+y2)を2.0以下とすれば、触媒中での酸素移動を促進することができ、炭化水素油の分解反応を促進することができるからである。Here, in this hydrocarbon oil cracking catalyst comprising a composite oxide, the abundance of the element X to the sum of abundance y 2 abundance y 1 and the element Y 2 elements Y 1 (y 1 + y 2 ) x The ratio (x / (y 1 + y 2 )) is preferably 0.5 or more. When x / (y 1 + y 2 ) is 0.5 or more, the distance between the oxide of the element X and the oxide of the element Y 1 or the oxide of the element Y 2 becomes close, and oxygen transfer in the catalyst This is because (the movement of lattice oxygen) is not hindered, so that the decomposition reaction of the hydrocarbon oil can be promoted. X / (y 1 + y 2 ) is preferably 2.0 or less. This is because when x / (y 1 + y 2 ) is 2.0 or less, oxygen transfer in the catalyst can be promoted, and the hydrocarbon oil decomposition reaction can be promoted.

なお、触媒中での酸素移動を促進することにより炭化水素油の分解反応を促進することができる理由は、明らかではないが、本発明の炭化水素油分解用触媒を用いた炭化水素油の分解反応は、水を分解して酸素および水素を放出することにより進むためであると推察される。即ち、触媒の、格子酸素、或いは、吸蔵した酸素の供給速度を高め、水を分解して酸素および水素を放出する能力を高めれば、水を水素源や酸素源として利用して重質炭化水素化合物を分解する際に、炭化水素化合物の一部と水とが下記反応式に示すように反応して水素源となる水素を生成するのを促進することができるためであると推察される。
nm+2nH2O→nCO2+(2n+(m/2))H2
The reason why the hydrocarbon oil cracking reaction can be promoted by promoting the oxygen transfer in the catalyst is not clear, but the hydrocarbon oil cracking using the hydrocarbon oil cracking catalyst of the present invention is not clear. The reaction is presumed to proceed by decomposing water and releasing oxygen and hydrogen. That is, if the catalyst's supply rate of lattice oxygen or occluded oxygen is increased and the ability to decompose water and release oxygen and hydrogen is increased, water can be used as a hydrogen source or oxygen source to produce heavy hydrocarbons. This is presumably because, when the compound is decomposed, it is possible to promote generation of hydrogen as a hydrogen source by reacting a part of the hydrocarbon compound with water as shown in the following reaction formula.
C n H m + 2nH 2 O → nCO 2 + (2n + (m / 2)) H 2

更に、この複合酸化物からなる炭化水素油分解用触媒では、元素Y1の存在量y1に対する元素Y2の存在量y2の比(y2/y1)が、0.25以下であることが好ましく、y2/y1が0.02以上であることが更に好ましい。y2/y1を0.02未満とした場合、元素Y2を含有することによる触媒活性の向上効果を十分に得られない場合があるからである。また、y2/y1を0.25超とした場合、元素Y2を含有することによる触媒活性の向上効果が少なくなる一方で、複合酸化物を形成し難くなるからである。なお、y2/y1を0.25超とした場合に触媒活性の向上効果が少なくなるのは、明らかではないが、以下の理由によると推察される。即ち、元素Xを含む酸化物と元素Y1を含む酸化物とを含有する系に対して更に元素Y2を含む酸化物を含有させた場合、元素Y2を含む酸化物の量が微量であっても、系のギブスエネルギーが大きく変化するので、元素Xを含む酸化物と元素Y1を含む酸化物とを含有する系の性質をある程度維持しつつ触媒の活性が大きく向上し得る。しかしながら、元素Y2を含む酸化物の量が多くなり過ぎると、系の性質が元素Y2を含む酸化物に近づき、元素Xを含む酸化物と元素Y1を含む酸化物の性質が失われてしまう。従って、y2/y1を0.25超とする(元素Y2の量を多くする)と、触媒活性の向上効果が少なくなると推察される。Moreover, the hydrocarbon oil cracking catalyst comprising the composite oxide, the abundance ratio of y 2 elements Y 2 relative abundance y 1 element Y 1 (y 2 / y 1) is, is 0.25 or less It is preferable that y 2 / y 1 is 0.02 or more. This is because when y 2 / y 1 is less than 0.02, the effect of improving the catalytic activity due to the inclusion of the element Y 2 may not be sufficiently obtained. Further, when y 2 / y 1 exceeds 0.25, the effect of improving the catalytic activity due to the inclusion of the element Y 2 is reduced, but it is difficult to form a composite oxide. In addition, when y 2 / y 1 exceeds 0.25, it is not clear that the effect of improving the catalytic activity is reduced, but it is presumed that it is due to the following reason. That is, when an oxide containing the element Y 2 is further added to the system containing the oxide containing the element X and the oxide containing the element Y 1 , the amount of the oxide containing the element Y 2 is very small. Even in such a case, the Gibbs energy of the system greatly changes, so that the activity of the catalyst can be greatly improved while maintaining the properties of the system containing the oxide containing the element X and the oxide containing the element Y 1 to some extent. However, if the amount of the oxide containing the element Y 2 becomes too large, the properties of the system approach that of the oxide containing the element Y 2, and the properties of the oxide containing the element X and the oxide containing the element Y 1 are lost. End up. Therefore, when y 2 / y 1 exceeds 0.25 (the amount of element Y 2 is increased), it is presumed that the effect of improving the catalytic activity is reduced.

なお、上述したような炭化水素油分解用触媒としての複合酸化物は、特に限定されることなく例えば以下のようにして共沈法で調製することができる。
(i)まず、元素Xを含む化合物と、元素Y1を含む化合物と、元素Y2を含む化合物とを、例えばX/(Y1+Y2)が0.5〜2.0(モル比)となり、且つ、Y2/Y1が0.02〜0.25(モル比)となるような量でイオン交換水に溶解させて、元素X,Y1,Y2を含む水溶液を調製する。
(ii)次に、調製した水溶液に対し、アンモニア水や、炭酸ナトリウム水溶液などの共沈剤を、水溶液のpHがアルカリ側に偏らないように(例えばpHが5〜8の範囲となるように)調整しながら滴下し、元素X,Y1,Y2を含む共沈殿物を生成させる。
(iii)そして最後に、得られた沈殿をろ過および乾燥した後、乾燥した沈殿を焼成して複合酸化物とする。
ここで、上記(iii)において沈殿を乾燥する温度は、水分を効率的に蒸発させる観点からは、100℃以上であることが好ましい。更に、沈殿を乾燥する温度は、急激な乾燥を防止する観点からは、160℃以下であることが好ましい。また、乾燥した沈殿を焼成する温度は、生成する複合酸化物(触媒)の構造安定性(即ち、触媒として使用して炭化水素油を分解した際の複合酸化物の構造変化の抑制)の観点からは、500℃以上であることが好ましい。更に、沈殿を焼成する温度は、生成する複合酸化物の表面積の減少を抑制する観点からは、900℃以下であることが好ましい。
The composite oxide as the hydrocarbon oil cracking catalyst as described above can be prepared by a coprecipitation method, for example, as follows without any particular limitation.
(I) First, a compound containing the element X, a compound containing the element Y 1, and a compound containing the element Y 2 , for example, X / (Y 1 + Y 2 ) is 0.5 to 2.0 (molar ratio). And an aqueous solution containing the elements X, Y 1 and Y 2 is prepared by dissolving in ion exchange water in such an amount that Y 2 / Y 1 is 0.02 to 0.25 (molar ratio).
(Ii) Next, a coprecipitation agent such as aqueous ammonia or sodium carbonate solution is added to the prepared aqueous solution so that the pH of the aqueous solution does not deviate toward the alkali side (for example, the pH is in the range of 5 to 8). ) Add dropwise while adjusting to produce a coprecipitate containing the elements X, Y 1 , Y 2 .
(Iii) Finally, the obtained precipitate is filtered and dried, and then the dried precipitate is calcined to obtain a composite oxide.
Here, the temperature at which the precipitate is dried in the above (iii) is preferably 100 ° C. or higher from the viewpoint of efficiently evaporating moisture. Further, the temperature for drying the precipitate is preferably 160 ° C. or less from the viewpoint of preventing rapid drying. The temperature at which the dried precipitate is calcined is determined from the viewpoint of the structural stability of the resulting composite oxide (catalyst) (that is, suppression of structural change of the composite oxide when hydrocarbon oil is decomposed by using it as a catalyst). Is preferably 500 ° C. or higher. Furthermore, it is preferable that the temperature which bakes a precipitate is 900 degrees C or less from a viewpoint of suppressing the reduction | decrease in the surface area of the complex oxide to produce | generate.

因みに、炭化水素油分解用触媒としての複合酸化物は、共沈法以外に、ゾル−ゲル法等の既知の手法を用いても調製することができる。   Incidentally, the composite oxide as the hydrocarbon oil cracking catalyst can be prepared by using a known method such as a sol-gel method in addition to the coprecipitation method.

そして、本発明の炭化水素油の分解方法では、水の存在下で、炭化水素油と、上述した炭化水素油分解用触媒とを接触させることにより、炭化水素油を分解する。具体的には、本発明の炭化水素油の分解方法では、例えば、内部に触媒を充填した反応器に炭化水素油と水との混合物を流通することにより、触媒と、炭化水素油と、水とを接触させ、炭化水素油を分解する。   In the hydrocarbon oil cracking method of the present invention, the hydrocarbon oil is cracked by bringing the hydrocarbon oil into contact with the above-described hydrocarbon oil cracking catalyst in the presence of water. Specifically, in the hydrocarbon oil cracking method of the present invention, for example, a mixture of a hydrocarbon oil and water is circulated in a reactor filled with the catalyst, whereby a catalyst, a hydrocarbon oil, To contact hydrocarbons and decompose hydrocarbon oil.

ここで、炭化水素油の分解に使用する水は、炭化水素油中に含まれる高分子量の炭化水素化合物を分解してより低分子量の炭化水素化合物にする際、即ち、炭化水素油を軽質化する際の水素源等として用いられるものである。従って、使用する水の量は、炭化水素油を軽質化させるのに十分な量であれば良く、例えば、炭化水素油100質量部に対して、水を5〜2000質量部、好ましくは10〜1000質量部、更に好ましくは10〜500質量部の割合で添加するのが望ましい。炭化水素油100質量部に対する水の添加量が5質量部未満の場合、水素源が不足して炭化水素油が十分に軽質化されない場合があるからである。一方、水の添加量が2000質量部を超えると、炭化水素油の軽質化に寄与しない水の量が増大することとなり、コストが増加したり、炭化水素油の分解効率(即ち軽質炭化水素油の製造効率)が低下したりする場合があるからである。   Here, the water used for the decomposition of the hydrocarbon oil is to decompose the high molecular weight hydrocarbon compound contained in the hydrocarbon oil into a lower molecular weight hydrocarbon compound, that is, to lighten the hydrocarbon oil. It is used as a hydrogen source or the like when Therefore, the amount of water to be used may be an amount sufficient to lighten the hydrocarbon oil. For example, the amount of water is 5 to 2000 parts by mass, preferably 10 to 10 parts by mass with respect to 100 parts by mass of the hydrocarbon oil. It is desirable to add 1000 parts by mass, more preferably 10 to 500 parts by mass. This is because when the amount of water added to 100 parts by mass of the hydrocarbon oil is less than 5 parts by mass, the hydrogen source may be insufficient and the hydrocarbon oil may not be sufficiently lightened. On the other hand, when the amount of water added exceeds 2000 parts by mass, the amount of water that does not contribute to the lightening of the hydrocarbon oil increases, which increases the cost and the decomposition efficiency of the hydrocarbon oil (that is, the light hydrocarbon oil). This is because there is a case where the production efficiency of the product is reduced.

そして、本発明の炭化水素油の分解方法では、炭化水素油と水との混合物と、触媒とを反応器内で接触させる条件は、適宜変更することができる。
具体的には、混合物と触媒とを接触させる温度は、比較的低い温度、例えば300〜600℃、好ましくは350〜550℃、更に好ましくは400〜500℃とすることができる。温度が300℃未満の場合、反応に必要な活性化エネルギーが得られずに炭化水素油の分解が十分に進行しない場合があるからである。また、温度が600℃超の場合、不要なガス(メタン、エタン等)が大量に発生し、炭化水素油の分解効率が低下するおそれがあるからである。
また、混合物と触媒とを接触させる際の圧力は、例えば0.1〜40MPa、好ましくは0.1〜35MPa、更に好ましくは0.1〜30MPaとすることができる。圧力が0.1MPa未満の場合、炭化水素油と水とを反応器へスムーズに流入させることが困難になる場合があるからである。また、圧力が40MPa超の場合、反応器の製造コストが高くなる場合があるからである。
更に、触媒を充填した反応器に混合物を流通する際の液空間速度(LHSV)は、例えば0.01〜10h-1、好ましくは0.05〜5h-1、更に好ましくは0.1〜2h-1とすることができる。液空間速度が0.01h-1未満の場合、不要なガスの発生が支配的となり、炭化水素油の分解効率が低下する場合があるからである。また、液空間速度が10h-1超の場合、反応時間が短すぎて炭化水素油の分解反応が十分に進行しない場合があるからである。
In the hydrocarbon oil cracking method of the present invention, the conditions for bringing the mixture of the hydrocarbon oil and water into contact with the catalyst in the reactor can be appropriately changed.
Specifically, the temperature at which the mixture and the catalyst are brought into contact with each other can be relatively low, for example, 300 to 600 ° C, preferably 350 to 550 ° C, and more preferably 400 to 500 ° C. This is because when the temperature is lower than 300 ° C., the activation energy necessary for the reaction cannot be obtained, and the hydrocarbon oil may not be sufficiently decomposed. Further, when the temperature is higher than 600 ° C., a large amount of unnecessary gas (methane, ethane, etc.) is generated, and the decomposition efficiency of the hydrocarbon oil may be lowered.
Moreover, the pressure at the time of making a mixture and a catalyst contact is 0.1-40 Mpa, for example, Preferably it is 0.1-35 Mpa, More preferably, it can be 0.1-30 Mpa. This is because when the pressure is less than 0.1 MPa, it may be difficult to smoothly flow the hydrocarbon oil and water into the reactor. Moreover, it is because the manufacturing cost of a reactor may become high when a pressure exceeds 40 Mpa.
Additionally, liquid hourly space velocity when flowing the mixture into a reactor filled with a catalyst (LHSV) is, for example 0.01~10H -1, preferably 0.05~5H -1, more preferably 0.1~2h It can be -1 . This is because when the liquid space velocity is less than 0.01 h −1 , generation of unnecessary gas becomes dominant and the decomposition efficiency of the hydrocarbon oil may decrease. Further, when the liquid space velocity is more than 10 h −1 , the reaction time is too short, and the hydrocarbon oil decomposition reaction may not sufficiently proceed.

ここで、上述したように、本発明の炭化水素油の分解方法によれば、炭化水素油の分解反応に必要な水素等を、系内に存在する水から供給することができる。従って、本発明の炭化水素油の分解方法では、系外から水素を添加する必要はなく、系外からの水素の添加量と、分解される炭化水素油の供給量とのモル比(水素添加量/炭化水素油供給量)は、0.1以下、好ましくは0とすることができる。よって、本発明の炭化水素油分解用触媒を用いた本発明の炭化水素油の分解方法によれば、高圧水素ガスを使用することなく、炭化水素油を低コストで効率的に分解して、軽質炭化水素を得ることができる。   Here, as described above, according to the hydrocarbon oil cracking method of the present invention, hydrogen or the like necessary for the hydrocarbon oil cracking reaction can be supplied from the water present in the system. Accordingly, in the hydrocarbon oil cracking method of the present invention, it is not necessary to add hydrogen from outside the system, but the molar ratio between the amount of hydrogen added from outside the system and the amount of hydrocarbon oil to be cracked (hydrogen addition) Amount / hydrocarbon oil supply amount) can be 0.1 or less, preferably 0. Therefore, according to the hydrocarbon oil cracking method of the present invention using the hydrocarbon oil cracking catalyst of the present invention, without using high-pressure hydrogen gas, the hydrocarbon oil is efficiently cracked at low cost, Light hydrocarbons can be obtained.

具体的には、本発明の炭化水素油の分解方法によれば、例えば、1−メチルナフタレン、キノリン、アントラセン、フェナントレンなどの縮合多環芳香族化合物や、ジベンゾチオフェン、ビフェニルなどの非縮合多環芳香族化合物等の種々の炭化水素化合物の混合物からなる重質炭化水素油を分解して、重量平均分子量が重質炭化水素油の半分以下、好ましくは1/3以下の軽質炭化水素油を得ることができる。即ち、重質炭化水素油中の炭化水素化合物の芳香環を非常に高い確率で開裂させて単環芳香族化合物を得ることによって、軽質炭化水素油を製造することができる。なお、重量平均分子量とは、ゲル浸透クロマトグラフィー(GPC)を用いて測定した、ポリスチレン換算値を意味する。   Specifically, according to the hydrocarbon oil cracking method of the present invention, for example, condensed polycyclic aromatic compounds such as 1-methylnaphthalene, quinoline, anthracene, phenanthrene, and non-condensed polycycles such as dibenzothiophene and biphenyl. A heavy hydrocarbon oil comprising a mixture of various hydrocarbon compounds such as aromatic compounds is decomposed to obtain a light hydrocarbon oil having a weight average molecular weight of not more than half that of the heavy hydrocarbon oil, preferably not more than 1/3. be able to. That is, a light hydrocarbon oil can be produced by cleaving an aromatic ring of a hydrocarbon compound in a heavy hydrocarbon oil with a very high probability to obtain a monocyclic aromatic compound. In addition, a weight average molecular weight means the polystyrene conversion value measured using gel permeation chromatography (GPC).

また、本発明の炭化水素油分解用触媒を用いた本発明の炭化水素油の分解方法によれば、分解する原料炭化水素油を予め脱硫および脱窒素する必要がない。   Moreover, according to the hydrocarbon oil cracking method of the present invention using the hydrocarbon oil cracking catalyst of the present invention, it is not necessary to desulfurize and denitrify the raw hydrocarbon oil to be cracked in advance.

以上、一例を用いて本発明の実施形態を説明したが、本発明の炭化水素油分解用触媒および炭化水素油の分解方法は上記一例に限定されることはなく、本発明の炭化水素油分解用触媒および炭化水素油の分解方法には適宜変更を加えることができる。   As mentioned above, although embodiment of this invention was described using an example, the catalyst for hydrocarbon oil decomposition | disassembly of this invention and the decomposition | disassembly method of hydrocarbon oil are not limited to the said example, The hydrocarbon oil decomposition | disassembly of this invention The cracking method for the catalyst for use and the hydrocarbon oil can be appropriately changed.

以下、実施例により本発明を更に詳細に説明するが、本発明は下記の実施例に何ら限定されるものではない。   EXAMPLES Hereinafter, although an Example demonstrates this invention further in detail, this invention is not limited to the following Example at all.

(実施例1)
元素Xがジルコニウムであり、元素Y1がセリウムであり、元素Y2が鉄である触媒を調製した。具体的には、まず、硝酸ジルコニルと硝酸セリウムとを、Zr:Ce=1:1(モル比)となるようにイオン交換水中に溶解して水溶液を得た。次に、得られた水溶液に対し、硝酸鉄をCe:Fe=1:0.06(モル比)となるように加え撹拌した。そして、Zr,Ce,Feを含有する水溶液に対し、水溶液のpHが8超とならないように調整しながらアンモニア水を滴下し、沈殿を生成させた。そして最後に、得られた沈殿を熟成(室温にて一昼夜静置)、ろ過および乾燥(130℃、16時間)した後、乾燥した沈殿を温度600℃で焼成して、Zr,Ce,Feを含有する複合酸化物からなる触媒を調製した。
なお、得られた触媒中のZr,Ce,Feの存在比を融解/ICP−AES法で確認したところ、Zr:Ce:Fe=49:48:3であった。
そして、調製した触媒5.3gを超合金(インコネル625)製の反応器(内容積10mL)に充填した。次いで、触媒を充填した反応器にイオン交換水を流量0.1mL/minで通水しつつ、反応器内を温度470℃、圧力15MPaまで加熱および加圧した。その後、水素を供給することなく、表1に示すような性状の重質炭化水素油(熱分解装置から留出した油)と、イオン交換水とを反応器内に連続的に流通させた(イオン交換水、重質炭化水素油共に流量は0.1mL/minであり、LHSVは0.75h-1である。)。そして、通油開始から6時間経過後に、反応器からの流出物(分解反応生成物)を1時間採取し、以下のようにして重質炭化水素油の分解率を算出した。結果を表2に示す。
Example 1
A catalyst was prepared in which element X was zirconium, element Y 1 was cerium, and element Y 2 was iron. Specifically, first, zirconyl nitrate and cerium nitrate were dissolved in ion-exchanged water such that Zr: Ce = 1: 1 (molar ratio) to obtain an aqueous solution. Next, to the obtained aqueous solution, iron nitrate was added and stirred so that Ce: Fe = 1: 0.06 (molar ratio). And ammonia water was dripped with respect to the aqueous solution containing Zr, Ce, and Fe, adjusting so that pH of aqueous solution might not exceed 8, and the precipitation was produced | generated. Finally, the obtained precipitate was aged (still at room temperature for a whole day and night), filtered and dried (130 ° C., 16 hours), and then the dried precipitate was calcined at a temperature of 600 ° C. to obtain Zr, Ce, Fe. A catalyst composed of the composite oxide contained was prepared.
In addition, when the abundance ratio of Zr, Ce, and Fe in the obtained catalyst was confirmed by melting / ICP-AES method, it was Zr: Ce: Fe = 49: 48: 3.
Then, 5.3 g of the prepared catalyst was charged into a superalloy (Inconel 625) reactor (internal volume 10 mL). Next, the inside of the reactor was heated and pressurized to a temperature of 470 ° C. and a pressure of 15 MPa while passing ion exchange water through the reactor filled with the catalyst at a flow rate of 0.1 mL / min. Then, without supplying hydrogen, heavy hydrocarbon oil having properties as shown in Table 1 (oil distilled from the thermal cracking apparatus) and ion-exchanged water were continuously circulated in the reactor ( The flow rate of both ion-exchanged water and heavy hydrocarbon oil is 0.1 mL / min, and LHSV is 0.75 h −1 ). Then, after 6 hours from the start of oil passing, the effluent (decomposition reaction product) from the reactor was collected for 1 hour, and the decomposition rate of heavy hydrocarbon oil was calculated as follows. The results are shown in Table 2.

Figure 0005881218
Figure 0005881218

<分解率の算出方法>
下記式を用いて、供給した重質炭化水素油中の沸点380℃以上の留分の分解率Cvを算出した。なお、Cokeは燃焼紫外蛍光法により測定した。

Figure 0005881218
Cv:重質炭化水素油中の沸点380℃以上の留分の分解率[質量%]
F:供給した重質炭化水素油中の沸点380℃以上の留分の量[g/h]
R:分解反応生成物中の沸点380℃以上の留分の量[g/h]
Coke:触媒上に堆積した炭素質の量[g/h]<Calculation method of decomposition rate>
The decomposition rate Cv of the fraction having a boiling point of 380 ° C. or higher in the supplied heavy hydrocarbon oil was calculated using the following formula. Coke was measured by a combustion ultraviolet fluorescence method.
Figure 0005881218
Cv: Decomposition ratio [mass%] of a fraction having a boiling point of 380 ° C. or higher in heavy hydrocarbon oil
F: Amount [g / h] of a fraction having a boiling point of 380 ° C. or higher in the supplied heavy hydrocarbon oil
R: The amount of the fraction having a boiling point of 380 ° C. or higher in the decomposition reaction product [g / h]
Coke: amount of carbonaceous matter deposited on the catalyst [g / h]

(実施例2)
元素Xがジルコニウムであり、元素Y1がセリウムであり、元素Y2がタングステンである触媒を調製した。具体的には、硝酸ジルコニルと硝酸セリウムとを、Zr:Ce=1:1(モル比)となるようにイオン交換水中に溶解してZr,Ceを含有する水溶液を得た。次に、メタタングステン酸アンモニウムをイオン交換水中に溶解して所定の濃度のメタタングステン酸アンモニウム水溶液を得た。そして、Zr,Ceを含有する水溶液に対し、水溶液のpHが8超とならないように調整しながらメタタングステン酸アンモニウム水溶液を滴下し、沈殿を生成させた。そして最後に、得られた沈殿を熟成(室温にて一昼夜静置)、ろ過および乾燥(130℃、16時間)した後、乾燥した沈殿を温度600℃で焼成して、Zr,Ce,Wを含有する複合酸化物からなる触媒を調製した。
そして、実施例1と同様にして重質炭化水素油を分解し、重質炭化水素油の分解率を算出した。結果を表2に示す。
なお、得られた触媒中のZr,Ce,Wの存在比を実施例1と同様にして確認したところ、Zr:Ce:W=49:48:3であった。
(実施例3)
元素Y2をマンガンとし、硝酸鉄の代わりに硝酸マンガンをCe:Mn=1:0.06(モル比)となるように加えた以外は、実施例1と同様にして触媒を調製した。そして、実施例1と同様にして重質炭化水素油を分解し、重質炭化水素油の分解率を算出した。結果を表2に示す。
なお、得られた触媒中のZr,Ce,Mnの存在比を実施例1と同様にして確認したところ、Zr:Ce:Mn=49:48:3であった。
(実施例4)
硝酸ジルコニル、硝酸セリウムおよび硝酸鉄をZr:Ce:Fe=46:46:8となるように加えた以外は、実施例1と同様にして触媒を調製した。そして、実施例1と同様にして重質炭化水素油を分解し、重質炭化水素油の分解率を算出した。結果を表2に示す。
なお、得られた触媒中のZr,Ce,Feの存在比を実施例1と同様にして確認したところ、Zr:Ce:Fe=46:46:8であった。
(Example 2)
A catalyst was prepared in which element X was zirconium, element Y 1 was cerium, and element Y 2 was tungsten. Specifically, zirconyl nitrate and cerium nitrate were dissolved in ion-exchanged water such that Zr: Ce = 1: 1 (molar ratio) to obtain an aqueous solution containing Zr and Ce. Next, ammonium metatungstate was dissolved in ion-exchanged water to obtain an aqueous solution of ammonium metatungstate having a predetermined concentration. Then, an aqueous ammonium metatungstate solution was added dropwise to the aqueous solution containing Zr, Ce while adjusting the aqueous solution so that the pH of the aqueous solution did not exceed 8, thereby generating a precipitate. Finally, the obtained precipitate was aged (still at room temperature for a whole day and night), filtered and dried (130 ° C., 16 hours), and then the dried precipitate was calcined at a temperature of 600 ° C. to obtain Zr, Ce, W. A catalyst composed of the composite oxide contained was prepared.
And the heavy hydrocarbon oil was decomposed | disassembled like Example 1, and the decomposition rate of heavy hydrocarbon oil was computed. The results are shown in Table 2.
In addition, when the abundance ratio of Zr, Ce, and W in the obtained catalyst was confirmed in the same manner as in Example 1, it was Zr: Ce: W = 49: 48: 3.
(Example 3)
A catalyst was prepared in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the element Y 2 was manganese and manganese nitrate was added instead of iron nitrate so that Ce: Mn = 1: 0.06 (molar ratio). And the heavy hydrocarbon oil was decomposed | disassembled like Example 1, and the decomposition rate of heavy hydrocarbon oil was computed. The results are shown in Table 2.
In addition, when the abundance ratio of Zr, Ce, and Mn in the obtained catalyst was confirmed in the same manner as in Example 1, it was Zr: Ce: Mn = 49: 48: 3.
Example 4
A catalyst was prepared in the same manner as in Example 1 except that zirconyl nitrate, cerium nitrate and iron nitrate were added so that Zr: Ce: Fe = 46: 46: 8. And the heavy hydrocarbon oil was decomposed | disassembled like Example 1, and the decomposition rate of heavy hydrocarbon oil was computed. The results are shown in Table 2.
When the abundance ratio of Zr, Ce, and Fe in the obtained catalyst was confirmed in the same manner as in Example 1, it was Zr: Ce: Fe = 46: 46: 8.

(比較例1)
硝酸鉄を添加しなかった以外は実施例1と同様にして、元素Y2を含まない触媒を調製した。そして、実施例1と同様にして重質炭化水素油を分解し、重質炭化水素油の分解率を算出した。結果を表2に示す。
なお、得られた触媒中のZr,Ceの存在比を実施例1と同様にして確認したところ、Zr:Ce=54:46であった。
(比較例2)
硝酸ジルコニル、硝酸セリウムおよび硝酸鉄をZr:Ce:Fe=44:43:13となるように加えた以外は、実施例1と同様にして触媒を調製した。そして、実施例1と同様にして重質炭化水素油を分解し、重質炭化水素油の分解率を算出した。結果を表2に示す。
なお、得られた触媒中のZr,Ce,Feの存在比を実施例1と同様にして確認したところ、Zr:Ce:Fe=44:43:13であった。
(Comparative Example 1)
A catalyst containing no element Y 2 was prepared in the same manner as in Example 1 except that iron nitrate was not added. And the heavy hydrocarbon oil was decomposed | disassembled like Example 1, and the decomposition rate of heavy hydrocarbon oil was computed. The results are shown in Table 2.
When the abundance ratio of Zr and Ce in the obtained catalyst was confirmed in the same manner as in Example 1, it was Zr: Ce = 54: 46.
(Comparative Example 2)
A catalyst was prepared in the same manner as in Example 1 except that zirconyl nitrate, cerium nitrate and iron nitrate were added so that Zr: Ce: Fe = 44: 43: 13. And the heavy hydrocarbon oil was decomposed | disassembled like Example 1, and the decomposition rate of heavy hydrocarbon oil was computed. The results are shown in Table 2.
In addition, when the abundance ratio of Zr, Ce, and Fe in the obtained catalyst was confirmed in the same manner as in Example 1, it was Zr: Ce: Fe = 44: 43: 13.

(実施例5)
元素Xがチタンであり、元素Y1がセリウムであり、元素Y2が鉄である触媒を調製した。具体的には、まず、四塩化チタンと硝酸セリウムとを、Ti:Ce=1:1(モル比)となるようにイオン交換水中に溶解して水溶液を得た。次に、得られた水溶液に対し、硝酸鉄をCe:Fe=1:0.25(モル比)となるように加え撹拌した。そして、Ti,Ce,Feを含有する水溶液に対し、水溶液のpHが8超とならないように調整しながらアンモニア水を滴下し、沈殿を生成させた。そして最後に、得られた沈殿を熟成(室温にて一昼夜静置)、ろ過および乾燥(130℃、16時間)した後、乾燥した沈殿を温度600℃で焼成して、Ti,Ce,Feを含有する複合酸化物からなる触媒を調製した。
そして、実施例1と同様にして重質炭化水素油を分解し、重質炭化水素油の分解率を算出した。結果を表3に示す。
なお、得られた触媒中のTi,Ce,Feの存在比を融解/ICP−AES法で確認したところ、Ti:Ce:Fe=44:45:11であった。
(Example 5)
A catalyst was prepared in which element X was titanium, element Y 1 was cerium, and element Y 2 was iron. Specifically, first, titanium tetrachloride and cerium nitrate were dissolved in ion-exchanged water so that Ti: Ce = 1: 1 (molar ratio) to obtain an aqueous solution. Next, to the obtained aqueous solution, iron nitrate was added and stirred so that Ce: Fe = 1: 0.25 (molar ratio). And aqueous ammonia was dripped with respect to the aqueous solution containing Ti, Ce, and Fe, adjusting so that the pH of aqueous solution might not exceed 8, and the precipitation was produced | generated. Finally, the obtained precipitate was aged (still at room temperature for a whole day and night), filtered and dried (130 ° C., 16 hours), and then the dried precipitate was baked at a temperature of 600 ° C. to obtain Ti, Ce, Fe. A catalyst composed of the composite oxide contained was prepared.
And the heavy hydrocarbon oil was decomposed | disassembled like Example 1, and the decomposition rate of heavy hydrocarbon oil was computed. The results are shown in Table 3.
In addition, when the abundance ratio of Ti, Ce, and Fe in the obtained catalyst was confirmed by a melting / ICP-AES method, it was Ti: Ce: Fe = 44: 45: 11.

(比較例3)
硝酸セリウムの代わりに硝酸ジルコニルをTi:Zr:Fe=1:1:1(モル比)となるように加えた以外は、実施例5と同様にして触媒を調製した。そして、実施例5と同様にして重質炭化水素油を分解し、重質炭化水素油の分解率を算出した。結果を表3に示す。
なお、得られた触媒中のTi,Zr,Feの存在比を実施例5と同様にして確認したところ、Ti:Zr:Fe=33:34:33であった。
(Comparative Example 3)
A catalyst was prepared in the same manner as in Example 5 except that zirconyl nitrate was added instead of cerium nitrate so that Ti: Zr: Fe = 1: 1: 1 (molar ratio). And heavy hydrocarbon oil was decomposed | disassembled like Example 5 and the decomposition rate of heavy hydrocarbon oil was computed. The results are shown in Table 3.
In addition, when the abundance ratio of Ti, Zr, and Fe in the obtained catalyst was confirmed in the same manner as in Example 5, it was Ti: Zr: Fe = 33: 34: 33.

Figure 0005881218
Figure 0005881218

Figure 0005881218
Figure 0005881218

表2〜3より、実施例1〜5の触媒は、比較例1〜3の触媒と比較して分解率が高いことが分かる。また、実施例1〜5の触媒では、炭化水素油を予め脱硫および脱窒素することなく炭化水素油を分解して軽質化し得ることが分かる。更に、y2/y1を0.30とした比較例2の触媒、および、x/(y1+y2)を0.49とし、y2/y1を0.97とした比較例3の触媒は、比較例1の触媒よりも分解率が低下していることが分かる。From Tables 2-3, it turns out that the catalyst of Examples 1-5 has a high decomposition rate compared with the catalyst of Comparative Examples 1-3. Moreover, in the catalysts of Examples 1 to 5, it is understood that the hydrocarbon oil can be decomposed and lightened without desulfurizing and denitrifying the hydrocarbon oil in advance. Furthermore, the catalyst of Comparative Example 2 in which y 2 / y 1 was set to 0.30, and Comparative Example 3 in which x / (y 1 + y 2 ) was set to 0.49 and y 2 / y 1 was set to 0.97. It can be seen that the decomposition rate of the catalyst is lower than that of the catalyst of Comparative Example 1.

触媒の耐劣化性を評価するため、実施例2および比較例2において、重質炭化水素油の分解を14日間以上継続した。そして、通油開始から14日間経過後に、反応器からの流出物を2時間採取し、重質炭化水素油の分解率を実施例1と同様にして算出した。通油開始から6時間経過後の重質炭化水素油の分解率と、通油開始から14日間経過後の重質炭化水素油の分解率とを表4に示す。   In order to evaluate the deterioration resistance of the catalyst, in Example 2 and Comparative Example 2, the decomposition of the heavy hydrocarbon oil was continued for 14 days or more. Then, after 14 days from the start of oil passing, the effluent from the reactor was collected for 2 hours, and the decomposition rate of the heavy hydrocarbon oil was calculated in the same manner as in Example 1. Table 4 shows the decomposition rate of heavy hydrocarbon oil after 6 hours from the start of oil passing and the decomposition rate of heavy hydrocarbon oil after 14 days from the start of oil passing.

Figure 0005881218
Figure 0005881218

表4より、通油開始6時間経過後の分解率と、通油開始14日間経過後の分解率とは、実施例2ではあまり変化していないのに対し、比較例2では通油開始14日間経過後の分解率が大きく低下していることが分かる。従って、実施例2では触媒の劣化が抑制されていることが分かる。   From Table 4, the decomposition rate after 6 hours from the start of oil passage and the decomposition rate after 14 days from the start of oil passage did not change much in Example 2, whereas in Comparative Example 2, the start of oil passage 14 It can be seen that the degradation rate after the passage of days has greatly decreased. Therefore, in Example 2, it turns out that deterioration of a catalyst is suppressed.

本発明によれば、炭化水素油を予め脱硫および脱窒素することなく、且つ、高圧水素ガスを使用することなく、低コストで効率的に炭化水素油を軽質化することができる炭化水素油分解用触媒を提供することができる。また、その炭化水素油分解用触媒を用いた炭化水素油の分解方法を提供することができる。   According to the present invention, hydrocarbon oil cracking that can efficiently lighten hydrocarbon oil at low cost without desulfurization and denitrification of hydrocarbon oil in advance and without using high-pressure hydrogen gas. A catalyst can be provided. Moreover, the hydrocarbon oil cracking method using the hydrocarbon oil cracking catalyst can be provided.

Claims (5)

水の存在下で炭化水素油を分解する際に用いられ、
IVA族元素から選択される1種の元素Xと、
IIIA族元素から選択される1種の元素Y1と、
VIA族元素VIIA族元素および第4周期のVIII族元素からなる群より選択され1種の元素Y2と、
を含有し、
元素Y1の存在量(y1)と元素Y2の存在量(y2)との合計(y1+y2)に対する元素Xの存在量(x)の比(x/(y1+y2))が、0.5以上2.0以下であり、
元素Y1の存在量(y1)に対する元素Y2の存在量(y2)の比(y2/y1)が、0.02以上0.25以下であることを特徴とする、炭化水素油分解用触媒。
Used in cracking hydrocarbon oils in the presence of water,
One element X selected from group IVA elements;
One element Y 1 selected from group IIIA elements;
Group VIA elements, VIIA group elements, and the one element Y 2 that will be selected from the group consisting of VIII group elements of the 4th period,
Containing
Abundance of elements Y 1 (y 1) and abundance of the elements Y 2 sum of (y 2) presence of the element X with respect to (y 1 + y 2) ratio (x) (x / (y 1 + y 2) ) Is 0.5 or more and 2.0 or less,
Abundance of elements Y 1 is the presence of the element Y 2 with respect to (y 1) the ratio of (y 2) (y 2 / y 1), characterized in that 0.02 to 0.25, hydrocarbons Oil cracking catalyst.
前記元素Xと、前記元素Y1と、前記元素Y2とを含む複合酸化物からなることを特徴とする、請求項1に記載の炭化水素油分解用触媒。 2. The hydrocarbon oil cracking catalyst according to claim 1, comprising a composite oxide containing the element X, the element Y 1, and the element Y 2 . 前記元素Xがジルコニウムであることを特徴とする、請求項1または2に記載の炭化水素油分解用触媒。   The hydrocarbon oil cracking catalyst according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the element X is zirconium. 前記元素Y1がセリウムであり、前記元素Y2が、タングステン、マンガンおよび鉄からなる群より選択される1種であることを特徴とする、請求項1〜3の何れかに記載の炭化水素油分解用触媒。 4. The hydrocarbon according to claim 1, wherein the element Y 1 is cerium, and the element Y 2 is one selected from the group consisting of tungsten, manganese, and iron. Oil cracking catalyst. 水の存在下で、炭化水素油と、請求項1〜4の何れかに記載の炭化水素油分解用触媒とを接触させて、炭化水素油を分解することを特徴とする、炭化水素油の分解方法。   A hydrocarbon oil characterized by decomposing a hydrocarbon oil by contacting the hydrocarbon oil with the hydrocarbon oil cracking catalyst according to any one of claims 1 to 4 in the presence of water. Disassembly method.
JP2013507148A 2011-03-31 2012-03-21 Hydrocarbon oil cracking catalyst and hydrocarbon oil cracking method Expired - Fee Related JP5881218B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2013507148A JP5881218B2 (en) 2011-03-31 2012-03-21 Hydrocarbon oil cracking catalyst and hydrocarbon oil cracking method

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2011080552 2011-03-31
JP2011080552 2011-03-31
PCT/JP2012/001925 WO2012132322A1 (en) 2011-03-31 2012-03-21 Hydrocarbon oil cracking catalyst and method for cracking hydrocarbon oil
JP2013507148A JP5881218B2 (en) 2011-03-31 2012-03-21 Hydrocarbon oil cracking catalyst and hydrocarbon oil cracking method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPWO2012132322A1 JPWO2012132322A1 (en) 2014-07-24
JP5881218B2 true JP5881218B2 (en) 2016-03-09

Family

ID=46930110

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2013507148A Expired - Fee Related JP5881218B2 (en) 2011-03-31 2012-03-21 Hydrocarbon oil cracking catalyst and hydrocarbon oil cracking method

Country Status (3)

Country Link
JP (1) JP5881218B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2831545A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2012132322A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN108889306A (en) * 2018-07-11 2018-11-27 济南开发区星火科学技术研究院 A kind of desulphurization catalyst

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS6345124A (en) * 1986-08-12 1988-02-26 Res Assoc Util Of Light Oil Solid acid substance, production thereof and decomposition of hydrocarbon using said solid acid substance
JPH08269464A (en) * 1995-04-03 1996-10-15 Japan Energy Corp Method for catalytic cracking of hydrocarbon oil
JP2006007151A (en) * 2004-06-29 2006-01-12 Ngk Insulators Ltd Catalyst for cracking heavy oil into light oil and manufacturing method for it
JP2008297452A (en) * 2007-05-31 2008-12-11 Japan Energy Corp Method for producing alkylbenzenes
JP2009102471A (en) * 2007-10-22 2009-05-14 Japan Energy Corp Method for pyrolysis of heavy oil
JP2009242467A (en) * 2008-03-28 2009-10-22 Japan Energy Corp Method for cracking hydrocarbon oil

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS6345124A (en) * 1986-08-12 1988-02-26 Res Assoc Util Of Light Oil Solid acid substance, production thereof and decomposition of hydrocarbon using said solid acid substance
JPH08269464A (en) * 1995-04-03 1996-10-15 Japan Energy Corp Method for catalytic cracking of hydrocarbon oil
JP2006007151A (en) * 2004-06-29 2006-01-12 Ngk Insulators Ltd Catalyst for cracking heavy oil into light oil and manufacturing method for it
JP2008297452A (en) * 2007-05-31 2008-12-11 Japan Energy Corp Method for producing alkylbenzenes
JP2009102471A (en) * 2007-10-22 2009-05-14 Japan Energy Corp Method for pyrolysis of heavy oil
JP2009242467A (en) * 2008-03-28 2009-10-22 Japan Energy Corp Method for cracking hydrocarbon oil

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2012132322A1 (en) 2012-10-04
JPWO2012132322A1 (en) 2014-07-24
CA2831545A1 (en) 2012-10-04

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN101733104B (en) Catalyst for methanation of carbon dioxide-containing synthesis gas, preparation method and application
Korlann et al. Synthesis of bulk and alumina-supported bimetallic carbide and nitride catalysts
Yang et al. From understanding of catalyst functioning toward controlling selectivity in CO2 hydrogenation to higher hydrocarbons over Fe-based catalysts
JP5881218B2 (en) Hydrocarbon oil cracking catalyst and hydrocarbon oil cracking method
Li et al. Promoting effect of TiO2 on the hydrodenitrogenation performance of nickel phosphide
JP5539755B2 (en) Decomposition method of heavy hydrocarbon oil
JP5687941B2 (en) Hydrocarbon oil cracking catalyst and hydrocarbon oil cracking method
JP5284361B2 (en) Desulfurizing agent, method for producing the same, and method for desulfurizing hydrocarbon oil
JP5943906B2 (en) Method and apparatus for producing light hydrocarbon oil
JP5901061B2 (en) Method for producing hydrocarbon oil cracking catalyst and hydrocarbon oil cracking method
JP5807005B2 (en) Desulfurization agent and method for producing the same
WO2011114670A1 (en) Heavy hydrocarbon oil cracking catalyst and heavy hydrocarbon oil cracking method
JP5449383B2 (en) Method for producing monocyclic aromatic compound
JP5631612B2 (en) Heavy hydrocarbon oil cracking catalyst
JP5948657B2 (en) Hydrogen production method
JP5530774B2 (en) Decomposition method of heavy hydrocarbon oil
KR20190088252A (en) Selective hydrotreating method for preparing light aromatic hydrocarbons from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons with high nitrogen content
Tazkia et al. Microwave-Assisted Synthesized Ni/ZSM-5 Nanocatalysts for High-Efficiency Atmospheric Hydrotreatment of Palm Oil Based Bio-Jet Fuel
JP5901062B2 (en) Method for producing hydrocarbon oil cracking catalyst and hydrocarbon oil cracking method
JP5411762B2 (en) Hydrocarbon oil desulfurization method
JP5394272B2 (en) Desulfurizing agent, method for producing the same, and method for desulfurizing hydrocarbon oil using the same
JP5467885B2 (en) Desulfurizing agent, method for producing the same, and method for desulfurizing hydrocarbon oil using the same
JP2001279275A (en) Method for producing fuel oil for fuel cell and hydrogen for fuel cell
Hamid et al. CATALYTIC CONVERSION OF CO2: A MINI-REVIEW
JPS60255142A (en) Heavy oil reforming catalyst

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20150113

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20151110

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20160108

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20160126

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20160129

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 5881218

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

S531 Written request for registration of change of domicile

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313531

S533 Written request for registration of change of name

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

S533 Written request for registration of change of name

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

S533 Written request for registration of change of name

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees