JP5882273B2 - Document evaluation program and document evaluation apparatus - Google Patents

Description

  The present invention relates to a data evaluation program and a data evaluation apparatus for evaluating data.

  2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, a method for quantitatively evaluating the visual visibility of the position of an object included in a page included in a document and displaying the evaluation result is known (see Patent Document 1).

JP-A-8-180037

  However, in the conventional method, the user can recognize the visual visibility of the position of the object on the page, but the user can objectively recognize which object has a strong impression on the page. There is a problem that can not be.

  Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to provide a material evaluation program and a material evaluation device that allow a user to objectively recognize which object has a strong impression on a page included in the material.

  The material evaluation program according to the present invention includes an object impression degree evaluation unit that evaluates an object impression degree indicating an intensity of an impression of an object included in a page included in the material with respect to each of all the objects included in the page, In addition, the computer is caused to function as an evaluation display unit that displays an evaluation result by the object impression degree evaluation unit.

  With this configuration, the document evaluation program of the present invention evaluates the object impression level for each of all the objects included in the page and displays the evaluation result, so that any object impression is displayed on the page included in the document. It is possible to make the user objectively recognize whether it is strong.

  In the document evaluation program of the present invention, the object impression degree evaluation means includes the type of the object, the position of the object on the page, the size of the object, the color difference between the objects, and the object. And the background color of the page, the character size of the character string when the object type is a character string, and the number of characters of the character string when the object type is a character string. The object impression degree may be evaluated based on at least one.

  With this configuration, the document evaluation program of the present invention enables the object type, the position of the object on the page, the size of the object, the color difference between the objects, the color difference between the object color and the background of the page, To allow the user to recognize an appropriate evaluation result based on at least one of the character size of the character string when the object type is a character string and the number of characters of the character string when the object type is a character string Can do.

  In the document evaluation program of the present invention, the object impression degree evaluation means increases the object impression degree of the object according to the magnitude of the difference between the color of the object and the background color of the page. May be.

  An object having a large color difference with respect to the background of the page usually has a strong impression. Since the material evaluation program of the present invention highly evaluates the object impression degree of an object having a large color difference with respect to the background of the page, the user can recognize an appropriate evaluation result.

  In the document evaluation program of the present invention, the object impression degree evaluation means may increase the object impression degree of at least one of these objects according to the magnitude of the color difference between the objects.

  An object having a large color difference with respect to other objects included in the page usually has a strong impression. Since the material evaluation program of the present invention highly evaluates the object impression degree of an object having a large color difference with respect to other objects included in the page, the user can recognize an appropriate evaluation result.

  In the document evaluation program of the present invention, the object impression degree evaluation means may be configured such that when the object type is an image, the object of the image object is compared with a case where the object type is a character string. The impression degree may be increased.

  An image object usually has a stronger impression than a character string object. Since the material evaluation program of the present invention evaluates the object impression degree of the image object higher than the object impression degree of the character string object, the user can recognize an appropriate evaluation result.

  The material evaluation apparatus according to the present invention includes an object impression degree evaluation unit that evaluates an object impression degree indicating an impression strength of an object included in a page included in the material with respect to each of all the objects included in the page. And an evaluation display means for displaying an evaluation result by the object impression degree evaluation means.

  With this configuration, the material evaluation apparatus of the present invention evaluates the object impression level for each of all objects included in the page included in the material and displays the evaluation result. It is possible to make the user objectively recognize whether it is strong.

  The material evaluation program and the material evaluation device of the present invention can make a user objectively recognize which object has a strong impression on a page included in the material.

It is a block diagram of the material evaluation apparatus which concerns on one embodiment of this invention. It is a figure which shows an example of the material shown in FIG. It is a flowchart of operation | movement of the material evaluation apparatus shown in FIG. 1 in the case of evaluating the uniformity of the slide in a material. It is a figure which shows an example of the evaluation result of the uniformity displayed on the display part shown in FIG. It is a flowchart of operation | movement of the material evaluation apparatus shown in FIG. 1 in the case of evaluating an object impression degree. It is a figure which shows an example of the evaluation result of the object impression degree displayed on the display part shown in FIG. It is a flowchart of operation | movement of the material evaluation apparatus shown in FIG. 1 in the case of evaluating a slide impression degree. It is a figure which shows an example of the evaluation result of the slide impression degree displayed on the display part shown in FIG.

  Hereinafter, an embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.

  First, the configuration of the document evaluation apparatus 10 according to the present embodiment will be described.

  FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a document evaluation apparatus 10 according to the present embodiment.

  As shown in FIG. 1, a document evaluation apparatus 10 includes an operation unit 11 that is an input device such as a mouse and a keyboard for inputting various operations, and a display device such as an LCD (Liquid Crystal Display) that displays various information. A display unit 12, a storage unit 13 that is a nonvolatile storage device such as an HDD (Hard Disk Drive) that stores programs and various data, and a control unit 14 that controls the entire document evaluation apparatus 10. I have. The material evaluation apparatus 10 is configured by a computer such as a PC (Personal Computer).

  The storage unit 13 can store the material 20 created by the control unit 14.

  FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating an example of the material 20.

  As shown in FIG. 2, the document 20 can include a plurality of slides as pages. For example, the material 20 can include a slide 21, a slide 22, and a slide 23. The slide 21 includes an object 21a and an object 21b. The slide 22 includes an object 22a, an object 22b, and an object 22c. The slide 23 includes an object 23a and an object 23b. The objects 21a, 21b, 22a, 22b, 23a, and 23b are character string objects. The object 22c is an image object.

  Note that materials 20 having various contents are created according to the purpose. As an example of the document 20, there is a presentation material used at the time of presentation, for example.

  As shown in FIG. 1, the storage unit 13 stores a material creation program 13 a for creating the material 20 and a material evaluation program 13 b for evaluating the material 20. The material creation program 13a and the material evaluation program 13b may be installed in the material evaluation device 10 at the manufacturing stage of the material evaluation device 10, or may be stored from a storage medium such as a CD (Compact Disk) or a DVD (Digital Versatile Disk). It may be additionally installed in the evaluation apparatus 10 or may be additionally installed in the material evaluation apparatus 10 from the network.

  The control unit 14 includes, for example, a CPU (Central Processing Unit), a ROM (Read Only Memory) storing programs and various data, and a RAM (Random Access Memory) used as a work area of the CPU. Yes. The CPU executes a program stored in the ROM or the storage unit 13.

  The control unit 14 executes the material evaluation program 13b stored in the storage unit 13, thereby evaluating the object impression degree indicating the strength of the object impression for each of all the objects included in the slide. It functions as the impression degree evaluation means 14a and the evaluation display means 14b for displaying the evaluation result on the display unit 12.

  Next, the operation of the material evaluation apparatus 10 will be described.

  First, the operation of the material evaluation apparatus 10 when creating the material 20 will be described.

  The control unit 14 of the material evaluation apparatus 10 creates the material 20 corresponding to the operation input to the operation unit 11 by executing the material creation program 13 a stored in the storage unit 13.

  Next, the operation of the material evaluation apparatus 10 when evaluating the material 20 will be described.

  The control unit 14 of the document evaluation apparatus 10 executes the document evaluation program 13b stored in the storage unit 13, thereby evaluating the uniformity of the slide in the document 20, the evaluation of the object impression degree, and the impression of the slide. Three evaluations, ie, evaluation of a slide impression degree indicating strength, are executed.

  First, the operation of the material evaluation apparatus 10 when evaluating the uniformity of slides in the material 20 will be described.

  The control unit 14 executes the operation shown in FIG. 3 according to the operation input to the operation unit 11.

  FIG. 3 is a flowchart of the operation of the material evaluation apparatus 10 when evaluating the uniformity of the slides in the material 20.

  As shown in FIG. 3, the control unit 14 determines whether or not there are a plurality of slides in which the same kind of table is detected in the target material 20 (S101). Here, the control unit 14 determines that these tables are the same type when the headings of the plurality of tables match.

  If the control unit 14 determines in S101 that a plurality of slides from which the same type of table is detected does not exist in the target material 20, the operation illustrated in FIG.

  If the control unit 14 determines in S101 that a plurality of slides from which the same type of table is detected exists in the target material 20, the control unit 14 detects the plurality of slides as the same series of slides (S102).

  Next, the control unit 14 evaluates the uniformity of a plurality of slides of the same series detected in S102 (S103).

  For example, in S103, the control unit 14 evaluates the uniformity of these slides from the viewpoint of the position in each slide of the same kind of table included in each of the plurality of slides of the same series detected in S102. That is, for each of a plurality of slides in the same series, the control unit 14 quantifies the difference in position in each slide of the same type of table according to a specific rule, thereby evaluating the uniformity of these slides by numerical values. Addition of

  In S103, the control unit 14 evaluates the uniformity of these slides from the viewpoint of the size of the same kind of table included in each of the plurality of slides of the same series detected in S102. That is, for each of a plurality of slides in the same series, the control unit 14 quantifies the difference in the size of the same type of table according to a specific rule, thereby adding the evaluation based on the numerical value of the uniformity of these slides Minutes.

  In S103, the control unit 14 evaluates the uniformity of these slides from the viewpoint of the same type of table color included in each of the plurality of slides of the same series detected in S102. That is, the control unit 14 quantifies the color difference of the same type of table for each of a plurality of slides of the same series according to a specific rule, thereby adding the evaluation value based on the numerical value of the uniformity of these slides. And

  In S103, the control unit 14 evaluates the uniformity of these slides from the viewpoint of the background color of each of the plurality of slides of the same series detected in S102. That is, for each of a plurality of slides of the same series, the control unit 14 quantifies the difference in the background color of these slides according to a specific rule, thereby evaluating the uniformity of these slides. Addition.

  The control unit 14 comprehensively evaluates the uniformity of a plurality of slides of the same series from various viewpoints as described above. That is, the control unit 14 evaluates the uniformity of a plurality of slides in the same series numerically by summing up the above additions.

  After the process of S103, the evaluation display unit 14b determines whether the numerical value comprehensively evaluated in S103 is equal to or greater than a specific value (S104).

  If the evaluation display means 14b determines in S104 that the value is not greater than the specific value, the operation shown in FIG. 3 is terminated.

  If the evaluation display unit 14b determines in S104 that the value is equal to or greater than the specific value, the evaluation display unit 14b classifies the plurality of slides of the same series detected in S102 into a plurality of types based on unity (S105). For example, the evaluation display unit 14b, among the plurality of slides of the same series detected in S102, the position in each slide of the same kind of table, the size of the same kind of table, the color of the same kind of table, and the background of each slide. For each of a plurality of viewpoints of color, a plurality of slides of the same series are classified into a plurality of types based on unity.

  Next, the evaluation display unit 14b determines whether the difference in the number of slides of the plurality of types classified in S105 is greater than a specific level for each of the plurality of viewpoints (S106).

  If the evaluation display means 14b determines in S106 that all of the plurality of viewpoints are not larger than a specific level in S106, the operation shown in FIG.

  If the evaluation display unit 14b determines in S106 that any one of the plurality of viewpoints is greater than a specific level, the difference in the number of slides of the plurality of types classified in S105 among the plurality of viewpoints is specified. The evaluation result in S103 regarding the viewpoint larger than the degree is displayed on the display unit 12 (S107), and the operation shown in FIG.

  FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating an example of a unity evaluation result displayed on the display unit 12.

  The evaluation result shown in FIG. 4 is an evaluation result for the material 20 different from the material 20 shown in FIG. In the evaluation result shown in FIG. 4, the image 31 drawn on the upper part of the letters “first sheet” schematically shows the first slide of the material 20. Further, the image 32 drawn on the upper part of the characters “2, 3,...” Schematically shows the slides of the second, third, etc. of the material 20. The image 31 shows a type with a small number of slides among a plurality of types classified in S105, that is, a slide of a minority type. The image 32 shows a type having a large number of slides among a plurality of types classified in S105, that is, a majority type slide.

  The message 33 indicates that the positions of the slides of the same type included in each of the plurality of slides of the same series are not unified. The message 34 indicates that the background colors of the plurality of slides of the same series are not unified.

  Next, the operation of the material evaluation apparatus 10 when evaluating the object impression level will be described.

  The control unit 14 performs the operation shown in FIG. 5 according to the operation input to the operation unit 11.

  FIG. 5 is a flowchart of the operation of the material evaluation device 10 when the object impression degree is evaluated.

  As shown in FIG. 5, the object impression degree evaluation means 14a targets one slide in the target material 20 (S131).

  Next, the object impression degree evaluation unit 14a evaluates the object impression degree for each of all the objects included in the target slide (S132).

  For example, the object impression level evaluation unit 14a evaluates the object impression level based on the type of the object in S132. In other words, the object impression degree evaluation means 14a quantifies the object type according to a specific rule, and uses it as an addition of the object impression degree. For example, when the object type is an image, the object impression degree evaluation unit 14a increases the object impression degree of the object of this image as compared with the case where the object type is a character string.

  Further, the object impression degree evaluation unit 14a evaluates the object impression degree based on the position of the object on the slide in S132. That is, the object impression degree evaluation unit 14a digitizes the position of the object on the slide according to a specific rule, and uses it as an addition of the object impression degree. For example, the object impression degree evaluation unit 14a increases the object impression degree of the object as the position of the object on the slide is higher and as the center is in the left-right direction.

  Further, the object impression degree evaluation unit 14a evaluates the object impression degree based on the size of the object in S132. That is, the object impression degree evaluation unit 14a digitizes the size of the object according to a specific rule, and sets it as an addition of the object impression degree. For example, the object impression degree evaluation unit 14a increases the object impression degree of the object as the object is larger.

  In step S132, the object impression level evaluation unit 14a evaluates the object impression level based on the difference between the object color and the slide background color. In other words, the object impression degree evaluation means 14a quantifies the difference between the object color and the slide background color according to a specific rule, and sets it as an addition of the object impression degree. For example, the object impression degree evaluation unit 14a increases the object impression degree of the object as the difference between the object color and the slide background color increases.

  In step S132, the object impression level evaluation unit 14a evaluates the object impression level based on the magnitude of the color difference between the objects included in the target slide. That is, the object impression degree evaluation means 14a quantifies the magnitude of the color difference between the objects included in the target slide according to a specific rule, and sets it as the addition of the object impression degree. For example, the object impression degree evaluation unit 14a increases the object impression degree of these objects as the color difference between the objects included in the target slide increases. Here, the object impression degree evaluation unit 14a may increase the object impression degree of only those objects having a larger difference from the color of the slide background.

  In step S132, the object impression level evaluation unit 14a evaluates the object impression level based on the character size of the character string when the object type is a character string. That is, the object impression degree evaluation means 14a quantifies the character size of the character string when the object type is a character string according to a specific rule, and sets it as an addition of the object impression degree. For example, the object impression degree evaluation unit 14a increases the object impression degree of the object as the character size of the character string is larger when the type of the object is a character string.

  In step S132, the object impression level evaluation unit 14a evaluates the object impression level based on the number of characters in the character string when the object type is a character string. That is, the object impression degree evaluation means 14a quantifies the number of characters in the character string when the type of the object is a character string according to a specific rule, and sets it as an addition of the object impression degree. For example, when the object type is a character string, the object impression degree evaluation unit 14a increases the object impression degree of the object as the number of characters in the character string decreases.

  The object impression degree evaluation means 14a comprehensively evaluates the object impression degree with respect to each of all the objects included in the target slide from various viewpoints as described above. In other words, the object impression degree evaluation unit 14a evaluates the object impression degree numerically for each of all the objects included in the target slide by summing the additions of the above object impression degrees.

  Next, the evaluation display unit 14b displays the evaluation result in S132 on the display unit 12 (S133), and ends the operation shown in FIG.

  FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating an example of the evaluation result of the object impression degree displayed on the display unit 12.

  In the evaluation result shown in FIG. 6, the image 41 shows the slide 21 (see FIG. 2). The message 41a indicates the degree of object impression of the object 21a (see FIG. 2) as a degree of attention of 70%. The message 41b indicates the object impression degree of the object 21b (see FIG. 2) as the attention degree 30%.

  An image 42 shows the slide 22 (see FIG. 2). The message 42a indicates the degree of object impression of the object 22a (see FIG. 2) as a degree of attention of 30%. The message 42b indicates the object impression degree of the object 22b (see FIG. 2) as a degree of attention of 20%. The message 42c indicates the object impression degree of the object 22c (see FIG. 2) as the attention degree 50%.

  The image 43 shows the slide 23 (see FIG. 2). The message 43a indicates the object impression level of the object 23a (see FIG. 2) as the attention level of 15%. The message 43b indicates the object impression level of the object 23b (see FIG. 2) as an attention level of 85%.

  The evaluation results in FIG. 6 indicate the object impressions as a percentage so that the total object impressions of all the objects included in each slide is 100%. However, the evaluation result may not be a percentage as long as the relative relationship between the impression strengths of all the objects included in one slide is expressed. For example, the numerical value of the object impression obtained in S132 may be shown as it is.

  In FIG. 6, the evaluation result of three slides is displayed on the display unit 12 at the same time. However, the number of slides whose evaluation results are displayed on the display unit 12 is not limited to three. For example, slides may be displayed one by one.

  Next, the operation of the material evaluation apparatus 10 when evaluating the slide impression degree will be described.

  The control unit 14 performs the operation illustrated in FIG. 7 in accordance with the operation input to the operation unit 11.

  FIG. 7 is a flowchart of the operation of the material evaluation apparatus 10 when evaluating the slide impression degree.

  As shown in FIG. 7, the control unit 14 evaluates the slide impression degree for each of all the slides included in the target material 20 (S161).

  For example, in S161, the control unit 14 evaluates the slide impression degree based on the degree of difference of the target slide from the tendency of the appearance of the slide in the entire material 20. That is, the control unit 14 quantifies the degree of difference of the target slide from the tendency of the appearance of the slide in the entire material 20 according to a specific rule, and sets it as an addition of the slide impression degree. For example, the control unit 14 increases the slide impression degree of the target slide as the degree of difference of the target slide from the tendency of the appearance of the slide in the entire material 20 is larger.

  In particular, in S161, the control unit 14 evaluates the slide impression degree based on the degree of difference of the target slide from the tendency of the appearance of the slide in the entire material 20 and the maximum object impression degree of the target slide. Good. That is, the control unit 14 quantifies the degree of difference of the target slide from the tendency of the appearance of the slide in the entire material 20 according to a specific rule, and adds the slide impression degree as well as the object impression on the target slide. The maximum value of the degree may be converted into a numerical value according to a specific rule and added to the slide impression degree. For example, the control unit 14 determines that the degree of difference in the target slide from the tendency of the appearance of the slide in the entire material 20 is large, and that the slide impression degree of the target slide is larger as the maximum object impression degree in the target slide is larger. Increase.

  Note that the tendency of the appearance of the slide in the entire document 20 can be determined by, for example, the ratio of the types of objects in the slide. The ratio of the object type in the slide is, for example, the ratio of the total number of image objects and table objects to the number of character string objects.

  In addition, the tendency of the appearance of the slide in the entire material 20 can be determined by, for example, how to use the color in the slide.

  In addition, the tendency of the appearance of the slide in the entire material 20 can be determined by, for example, the arrangement of objects on the slide.

  In S161, the control unit 14 evaluates the slide impression level based on the degree of simplicity of the appearance of the slide. That is, the control unit 14 quantifies the degree of simplicity of the appearance of the slide according to a specific rule, and sets it as an addition of the slide impression degree. For example, the control unit 14 increases the slide impression degree of the slide as the degree of simplicity of the appearance of the slide is higher.

  Note that the degree of simplicity of the appearance of the slide can be determined by, for example, the number of objects included in the slide. That is, the smaller the number of objects included in the slide, the higher the degree of simplicity of the appearance of the slide.

  Further, the degree of simplicity of the appearance of the slide can be determined by, for example, the total number of characters of all character strings included as objects in the slide. That is, the smaller the total number of characters in all character strings included as objects in the slide, the higher the degree of simplicity of the appearance of the slide.

  Also, the degree of simplicity of the appearance of the slide can be determined based on, for example, the arrangement of objects on the slide. For example, a slide in which objects are arranged symmetrically has a higher degree of simplicity of the appearance of the slide than a slide in which objects are arranged asymmetrically. Also, the slide in which the image object is arranged at the center has a higher degree of simplicity of the appearance of the slide than the slide in which the image object is arranged at a position other than the center. In addition, a slide in which objects of a plurality of images are arranged at regular positions has a higher degree of simplicity of the appearance of the slide than a slide in which objects of the plurality of images are arranged at irregular positions.

  In step S161, the control unit 14 evaluates the slide impression level based on the degree of glare of the slide color. That is, the control unit 14 quantifies the degree of glare of the slide color according to a specific rule, and sets it as an addition of the slide impression degree. For example, the control unit 14 increases the slide impression degree of the slide as the degree of the appearance of the slide is higher.

  Note that the degree of the appearance of the slide can be determined based on, for example, at least one of the saturation and brightness of the color of the object included in the slide. That is, the higher the color saturation of the object included in the slide, the higher the degree of glare of the slide color. In addition, the higher the brightness of the color of the object included in the slide, the higher the degree of glare of the slide color.

  In addition, the degree of glare of the appearance of the slide can be determined based on, for example, at least one of the saturation and brightness of the background color of the slide. That is, the higher the saturation of the background color of the slide, the higher the degree of glare of the slide color. Also, the higher the brightness of the slide background color, the higher the degree of glare of the slide color.

  The control unit 14 comprehensively evaluates the slide impression degree with respect to each of all the slides included in the target material 20 from various viewpoints as described above. In other words, the control unit 14 evaluates the slide impression degree numerically for each of all the slides included in the target material 20 by summing the additions of the above slide impression degree.

  Next, the evaluation display unit 14b displays the evaluation result in S161 on the display unit 12 (S162), and ends the operation shown in FIG.

  FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating an example of a slide impression degree evaluation result displayed on the display unit 12.

  In the evaluation result shown in FIG. 8, an image 51 shows the slide 21 (see FIG. 2). The message 51a indicates the slide impression degree (20%) of the slide 21.

  An image 52 shows the slide 22 (see FIG. 2). The message 52a indicates the slide impression degree (30%) of the slide 22.

  An image 53 shows the slide 23 (see FIG. 2). The message 53a indicates the slide impression degree (50%) of the slide 23.

  The evaluation results in FIG. 8 indicate the slide impressions in percentage so that the total slide impressions of all the slides included in the material 20 are 100%. However, if the relative relationship between the strengths of the impressions of all the slides included in the material 20 is expressed, the evaluation result may not be a percentage. For example, the numerical value of the slide impression degree obtained in S161 may be shown as it is.

  In FIG. 8, the evaluation result of three slides is displayed on the display unit 12 at the same time. However, the number of slides whose evaluation results are displayed on the display unit 12 is not limited to three. For example, slides may be displayed one by one.

  As described above, the material evaluation apparatus 10 evaluates the object impression degree for each of all the objects included in the slide (S132) and displays the evaluation result (S133), and thus is included in the material 20. The user can objectively recognize which object has a strong impression on the slide.

  For example, in the example illustrated in FIG. 6, an object of an image is added to the slide 22 as compared with the slide 21. As described above, an image object is often embedded in order to eliminate a margin portion. However, as shown in FIG. 6, when the object impression degree of the object 22c is highly evaluated, for example, the color of the object 22c (see FIG. 2) of the image is a flashy color, the character is relatively The object impression degree of the row object 22b is evaluated low. If the content of the object 22b is important, the slide 22 shown in FIG. 6 is preferably corrected.

  The document evaluation apparatus 10 determines whether the object type, the position of the object on the slide, the size of the object, the color difference between the objects, the difference between the object color and the slide background color, and the object type are character strings. It is possible to allow the user to recognize an appropriate object impression degree evaluation result based on at least one of the character size of the character string when the object type is and the number of characters of the character string when the object type is the character string. .

  An object having a large color difference with respect to the slide background usually has a strong impression. Since the document evaluation apparatus 10 highly evaluates the object impression degree of an object having a large color difference with respect to the slide background, the user can recognize an appropriate evaluation result.

  An object having a large color difference with respect to other objects included in the slide usually has a strong impression. Since the document evaluation apparatus 10 highly evaluates the object impression degree of an object having a large color difference with respect to other objects included in the slide, the user can recognize an appropriate evaluation result.

  An image object usually has a stronger impression than a character string object. Since the document evaluation device 10 evaluates the object impression degree of the image object higher than the object impression degree of the character string object, the user can recognize an appropriate evaluation result.

  For example, when a plurality of image objects are overlapped on a slide and the object impression degree of these objects is evaluated to be low, the user of the material evaluation device 10 displays the object by the material evaluation device 10. By confirming the object impression level, it is possible to immediately recognize a portion where a plurality of images are overlapped and difficult to visually recognize on the slide.

  The creator of the document 20 confirms the objective evaluation result of the object impression level displayed by the document evaluation apparatus 10 to objectively check whether the impression of the portion where the impression is desired in the slide is strengthened as desired. Can be recognized. Therefore, the creator of the material 20 can appropriately correct the material 20 in a short time.

10 Document evaluation device (computer)
13b Material evaluation program 14a Object impression degree evaluation means 14b Evaluation display means 20 Material 21 Slide (page)
21a, 21b Object 22 Slide (page)
22a, 22b, 22c Object 23 Slide (page)
23a, 23b object

Claims (10)

An object impression level evaluation means for evaluating an object impression level indicating the strength of impression of an object included in a page included in the document for each of all the objects included in the page ;
Evaluation display means for displaying an evaluation result by the object impression degree evaluation means ;
Same-series page detection means for detecting a plurality of pages of the same series from the material,
Uniformity evaluating means for evaluating the unification of a plurality of the same series of pages detected by the same series page detecting means, and
Allowed a computer to function as a unified evaluation display means for displaying the evaluation result of the uniformity evaluation unit,
The same series page detection means determines a plurality of pages in which the same kind of table as the object is detected as the same series,
The unity evaluation display means classifies the plurality of pages of the same series into a plurality of types based on unity, and the difference in the number of the pages of each of the plurality of types is greater than a specific level. Only, the evaluation result by said unity evaluation means is displayed .   An object impression level evaluation means for evaluating an object impression level indicating the strength of impression of an object included in a page included in the document for each of all the objects included in the page;
  Evaluation display means for displaying an evaluation result by the object impression degree evaluation means;
  Page impression degree evaluation means for evaluating the page impression degree indicating the strength of the impression of the page included in the material for each of all the pages included in the material; and
  Causing the computer to function as a page impression degree evaluation display means for displaying an evaluation result by the page impression degree evaluation means;
  The page impression degree evaluation means increases the page impression degree of the target page according to the degree of difference of the target page from the tendency of the appearance of the page in the entire material.   The material evaluation program according to claim 2, wherein the page impression degree evaluation unit increases the page impression degree according to a maximum value of the object impression degree in the page.   The object impression degree evaluation means includes the type of the object, the position of the object on the page, the size of the object, the color difference between the objects, the color of the object, and the background color of the page. The object impression based on at least one of the difference, the character size of the character string when the object type is a character string, and the number of characters of the character string when the object type is a character string. The material evaluation program according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the degree is evaluated.   The object impression degree evaluation unit increases the object impression degree of the object according to a magnitude of a difference between a color of the object and a background color of the page. Material evaluation program.   The said object impression degree evaluation means increases the said object impression degree of at least 1 of these objects according to the magnitude | size of the color difference of the said objects, The Claim 4 or Claim 5 characterized by the above-mentioned. Material evaluation program.   The object impression level evaluation means increases the object impression level of the object of the image when the type of the object is an image, compared to a case where the type of the object is a character string. The material evaluation program according to any one of claims 4 to 6.   An object impression level evaluation means for evaluating an object impression level indicating the strength of impression of an object included in a page included in the document for each of all the objects included in the page;
  Evaluation display means for displaying an evaluation result by the object impression degree evaluation means;
  Same-series page detection means for detecting a plurality of pages of the same series from the material,
  Uniformity evaluation means for evaluating the uniformity of a plurality of the same series of pages detected by the same series page detection means;
  Uniformity evaluation display means for displaying the evaluation result by the uniformity evaluation means,
  The same series page detection means determines a plurality of pages in which the same kind of table as the object is detected as the same series,
  The unity evaluation display means classifies the plurality of pages of the same series into a plurality of types based on unity, and the difference in the number of the pages of each of the plurality of types is greater than a specific level. Only, the evaluation result by the said uniformity evaluation means is displayed, The material evaluation apparatus characterized by the above-mentioned.   An object impression level evaluation means for evaluating an object impression level indicating the strength of impression of an object included in a page included in the document for each of all the objects included in the page;
  Evaluation display means for displaying an evaluation result by the object impression degree evaluation means;
  Page impression degree evaluation means for evaluating the page impression degree indicating the strength of the impression of the page included in the material for each of all the pages included in the material;
  Page impression degree evaluation display means for displaying an evaluation result by the page impression degree evaluation means,
  The said page impression degree evaluation means increases the said page impression degree of the said target page according to the grade of the difference of the target page from the tendency of the external appearance of the said page in the said whole document, The material evaluation apparatus characterized by the above-mentioned.   The material evaluation apparatus according to claim 9, wherein the page impression degree evaluation unit increases the page impression degree according to a maximum value of the object impression degree in the page.

Images