Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP5900083B2 - Coal bond strength measurement method - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP5900083B2 - Coal bond strength measurement method - Google Patents

Coal bond strength measurement method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP5900083B2
JP5900083B2 JP2012068823A JP2012068823A JP5900083B2 JP 5900083 B2 JP5900083 B2 JP 5900083B2 JP 2012068823 A JP2012068823 A JP 2012068823A JP 2012068823 A JP2012068823 A JP 2012068823A JP 5900083 B2 JP5900083 B2 JP 5900083B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
coal
strength
sample
coke
adhesive strength
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP2012068823A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2013199589A (en
Inventor
広行 角
広行 角
下山 泉
泉 下山
孝思 庵屋敷
孝思 庵屋敷
深田 喜代志
喜代志 深田
藤本 英和
英和 藤本
山本 哲也
哲也 山本
勇介 土肥
勇介 土肥
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
JFE Steel Corp
Original Assignee
JFE Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by JFE Steel Corp filed Critical JFE Steel Corp
Priority to JP2012068823A priority Critical patent/JP5900083B2/en
Publication of JP2013199589A publication Critical patent/JP2013199589A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP5900083B2 publication Critical patent/JP5900083B2/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Landscapes

  • Coke Industry (AREA)

Description

コークス製造用石炭にとって、軟化溶融時の石炭粒子間の接着特性は非常に重要な性質である。高炉用コークスにおいては、高炉内通気性を維持するため、堅牢なコークスの製造が求められている。石炭は乾留により、軟化溶融して互いに接着し、コークスとなる。従って、石炭の接着特性の違いがコークス強度に大きな影響を及ぼしているといえる。   For coal for coke production, the adhesion property between coal particles during softening and melting is a very important property. In the blast furnace coke, in order to maintain the air permeability in the blast furnace, it is required to produce a robust coke. Coal is softened and melted by dry distillation and adheres to each other to form coke. Therefore, it can be said that the difference in coal adhesive properties has a great influence on coke strength.

石炭の接着特性を評価する方法として、JIS M 8801に規定されるギーセラープラストメーター法による石炭流動性試験方法が挙げられる。ギーセラープラストメーター法は、425μm以下に粉砕した石炭を所定のるつぼに入れ、規定の昇温速度で加熱し、規定のトルクをかけた撹拌棒の回転速度を測定し、1分ごとの目盛分割をもって試料の流動特性を表す方法である。石炭粒子充填層を乾留した場合、350℃から500℃にかけて石炭は軟化溶融し、隣接する粒子同士が接触し合い、その後固化してコークス化する。より流動性の高い石炭のほうが隣接する粒子との接触面積が広がるため、接着強度も大きいと考えられる。したがって、ギーセラープラストメーター法により石炭の接着特性を示すことができると考えられている。   As a method for evaluating the adhesive property of coal, there is a coal fluidity test method by the Gisela plastometer method defined in JIS M8801. In the Gisela plastometer method, coal pulverized to 425 μm or less is placed in a specified crucible, heated at a specified temperature rise rate, measured for the rotation speed of a stir bar applied with a specified torque, and divided every minute. This is a method for expressing the flow characteristics of a sample. When the coal particle packed bed is dry-distilled, the coal softens and melts from 350 ° C. to 500 ° C., the adjacent particles come into contact with each other, and then solidify to coke. Coal with higher fluidity is considered to have a higher adhesive strength because the contact area with adjacent particles increases. Therefore, it is considered that the adhesion properties of coal can be shown by the Gieseler plastometer method.

また、石炭の接着特性を評価する他の方法として、JIS M 8801に規定されるジラトメーター法による石炭膨張性試験方法が挙げられる。石炭は軟化溶融時に膨張挙動を示す。石炭粒子充填層を乾留した場合、膨張により石炭粒子は隣接する粒子と接触し、接着するため、流動性以外に膨張性も重要視されている。   Further, as another method for evaluating the adhesion property of coal, a coal expansibility test method by a dilatometer method defined in JIS M8801 can be cited. Coal exhibits expansion behavior when softened and melted. When the coal particle packed bed is dry-distilled, the coal particles come into contact with and adhere to the adjacent particles due to expansion, and therefore expansibility is regarded as important in addition to fluidity.

他にも石炭の接着強度測定方法として、間接引張強度と気孔率より接着強度を求める方法が挙げられる(例えば、特許文献1参照)。間接引張強度とは圧縮荷重から間接的に引張強度を求める方法で、コンクリートの引張強度試験法としてJIS化されており、具体的には、円筒型試料の直径方向に圧縮荷重をかけ、破断したときの強度より数式を用いて引張強度を導出する方法である。コークスの場合、コークスから円筒型にくり抜いたものをサンプルとして測定されている(例えば、非特許文献1参照)。また、石炭を円筒型の容器に充填して乾留したものをサンプルとして測定した例も報告されており(例えば、非特許文献2参照)、非特許文献2においては、直径20mmのステンレス製の円筒容器に0.15mm以下に粉砕された石炭を嵩密度0.8g/cmとなるように装入し、乾留後、厚さ5mmに切り出したものをサンプルとしている。特許文献1では、間接引張強度の対数値と気孔率のグラフの傾きより接着強度を算出している。 In addition, as a method for measuring the adhesive strength of coal, there is a method for obtaining the adhesive strength from the indirect tensile strength and the porosity (see, for example, Patent Document 1). Indirect tensile strength is a method to obtain the tensile strength indirectly from the compressive load, and is JIS standardized as a tensile strength test method for concrete. This is a method for deriving the tensile strength from the strength of the time using a mathematical formula. In the case of coke, a sample obtained by hollowing out coke into a cylindrical shape is measured as a sample (see, for example, Non-Patent Document 1). In addition, an example in which a sample obtained by filling coal in a cylindrical container and measuring it as a sample has been reported (for example, see Non-Patent Document 2). In Non-Patent Document 2, a stainless steel cylinder having a diameter of 20 mm is reported. Coal pulverized to 0.15 mm or less is charged into a container so as to have a bulk density of 0.8 g / cm 3, and after dry distillation, cut into a thickness of 5 mm is used as a sample. In Patent Document 1, the adhesive strength is calculated from the logarithm of indirect tensile strength and the slope of the porosity graph.

特開平6−330048JP-A-6-330048

宮川亜夫:燃料協会誌,Vol.54(1975),p983Aya Miyagawa: Fuel Association, Vol. 54 (1975), p983 Toshimasa Takanohashi, Takahiro Shishido, and Ikuo Saito:Energy&Fuels,Vol.22(2008),p1779Toshimasa Takanohashi, Takahiro Shishio, and Ikuo Saito: Energy & Fuels, Vol. 22 (2008), p1799

石炭軟化溶融時の接着強度を測定するためには、実際に石炭粒子界面の接着強度を測定することが重要である。その点で、ギーセラープラストメーター法やジラトメーター法は、接着に大きく関与すると考えられる流動性と膨張性を測定しているに過ぎず、これらを接着強度と定義することはできない。   In order to measure the bond strength during coal softening and melting, it is important to actually measure the bond strength at the coal particle interface. In that respect, the Gieseler plastometer method and the dilatometer method merely measure the fluidity and expansibility considered to be greatly involved in adhesion, and these cannot be defined as adhesion strength.

間接引張強度と気孔率から接着強度を導出する方法については、実際に強度を測定しているが、間接引張強度と接着強度は同一の特性とは言えない。すなわち、間接引張強度の測定においては、試料の破壊が接着面で起こるとは限らない点が問題となる。特にコークスのような多孔材料の間接引張強度は気孔率に大きく依存することが知られているが、これは、コークスの破壊が粗大な気孔や、連結した気孔、気孔が接近して気孔壁が薄くなった部位で発生することによる。このような気孔は乾留過程における石炭の脱ガスにより生成するものであり、石炭粒子界面の接着性と気孔生成は直接の関係はなく、また、破壊する点も接着面に限られるものでないため、間接引張強度は接着強度評価には不十分である。接着強度を間接引張強度と気孔率より推定する試みも行なわれているが、この方法も実際に強度測定上の問題を回避できているとは言えない。また評価方法の汎用性という点では、間接引張強度試験はコークス化性が不十分で測定のためのサンプルが得られない場合の評価ができない、という問題点も有する。以上のように、従来の技術では、石炭の接着強度を評価するための好適な技術は知られていなかった。   Regarding the method of deriving the adhesive strength from the indirect tensile strength and the porosity, the strength is actually measured, but the indirect tensile strength and the adhesive strength are not the same characteristics. That is, in the measurement of the indirect tensile strength, there is a problem that the sample does not always break on the adhesion surface. In particular, it is known that the indirect tensile strength of a porous material such as coke depends greatly on the porosity. By occurring in the thinned part. Such pores are generated by coal degassing during the carbonization process, and there is no direct relationship between coal particle interface adhesion and pore generation, and the point of failure is not limited to the adhesive surface, Indirect tensile strength is insufficient for evaluating adhesive strength. Attempts have been made to estimate the adhesive strength from the indirect tensile strength and the porosity, but it cannot be said that this method can actually avoid the problem of strength measurement. Moreover, in terms of the versatility of the evaluation method, the indirect tensile strength test also has a problem that it cannot be evaluated when the coking property is insufficient and a sample for measurement cannot be obtained. As described above, in the conventional technique, a suitable technique for evaluating the adhesive strength of coal has not been known.

このような課題を解決するための本発明の特徴は以下の通りである。
(1)所定の粒径以下に微粉砕した石炭を、圧縮成形後に形状を保つことが可能な程度の荷重で圧縮成型し、不活性雰囲気下で乾留してコークス化したものを測定試料として、該測定試料の圧縮強度を測定し、破壊時の圧力を接着強度とすることを特徴とするコークス製造用石炭の接着強度測定方法。
(2)75μm以下に微粉砕した石炭を、20MPa以下の圧力で圧縮成型し、不活性雰囲気下で乾留してコークス化したものを測定試料とする(1)に記載の接着強度測定方法。
The features of the present invention for solving such problems are as follows.
(1) Coal finely pulverized to a predetermined particle size or less, compression molded with a load capable of maintaining the shape after compression molding, and subjected to dry distillation in an inert atmosphere and coke as a measurement sample, A method for measuring the adhesive strength of coal for coke production, wherein the compressive strength of the measurement sample is measured, and the pressure at the time of fracture is taken as the adhesive strength.
(2) The adhesive strength measuring method according to (1), wherein the coal pulverized to 75 μm or less is compression-molded at a pressure of 20 MPa or less, and dry-distilled in an inert atmosphere to form coke.

本発明を用いることにより、コークス製造用石炭の接着強度を、実測値として測定することが可能となる。本発明により、様々な産地で採掘、生産される石炭に対し、接着強度という新たな視点からの評価が可能になり、接着強度の高い石炭を用いることで、高強度のコークスを製造することが可能となる。   By using the present invention, it is possible to measure the bond strength of coal for coke production as an actual measurement value. According to the present invention, it is possible to evaluate from a new viewpoint of adhesive strength for coal mined and produced in various production areas. By using coal with high adhesive strength, high strength coke can be produced. It becomes possible.

実施例で使用した乾留装置を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the carbonization apparatus used in the Example. 実施例における成形物の配置図である。It is an arrangement plan of a molding in an example. 実施例で測定した接着強度とMFの関係を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the relationship between the adhesive strength measured in the Example, and MF. 実施例で測定した接着強度とTDの関係を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the relationship between the adhesive strength measured in the Example, and TD.

本発明では上記の課題を解決するため、気孔生成を抑制したサンプルを作成し、そのサンプルの強度を測定する方法を見出した。気孔生成を抑制することによって、強度測定試験における気孔の影響を排除し、接着強度の評価を効果的に実施できるようになる。石炭粒子内に生成した気孔は、石炭粒子内より徐々に発生するガスが粒子内に留まりつづけるほど成長するため、気孔の成長を止めるには石炭粒子の径を小さくし、石炭粒子内に生成したガスを迅速に粒子外に放出させることが重要である。また、粒子の径を小さくすることは、単位質量あたりの測定試料に存在する石炭粒子表面積を増加させることにもつながり、測定強度に及ぼす接着強度の影響を高める効果もある。しかし、粒子の径を小さくすると、粒子の比表面積が増大してしまい、ある程度圧縮しないと粒子同士がまったく接着しない。これに対し、高密度に圧縮すると粒子間距離が非常に小さくなり、圧縮物内部にガスが留まることにより圧縮物自体が膨張し、圧縮物内部に気孔率が高く強度が著しく弱い鬆ができる。よって、接着しうる程度の弱い圧縮力を加えて成形した測定試料を強度測定に用いることが好ましく、種々の試料作成条件を調査した結果、好適な条件を見出し本発明が完成された。   In order to solve the above-described problems, the present invention has found a method for preparing a sample in which pore formation is suppressed and measuring the strength of the sample. By suppressing the formation of pores, it is possible to eliminate the influence of pores in the strength measurement test and to effectively evaluate the adhesive strength. The pores generated in the coal particles grow as the gas generated gradually from the coal particles continues to stay in the particles. Therefore, to stop the growth of the pores, the diameter of the coal particles is reduced and the pores are generated in the coal particles. It is important to release the gas quickly out of the particles. Further, reducing the particle diameter leads to an increase in the surface area of the coal particles present in the measurement sample per unit mass, and has the effect of increasing the influence of the adhesive strength on the measurement strength. However, if the particle diameter is reduced, the specific surface area of the particles increases, and the particles do not adhere at all unless compressed to some extent. On the other hand, when the compression is performed at a high density, the distance between particles becomes very small, and the gas stays inside the compressed product, whereby the compressed product itself expands, and a void with high porosity and extremely low strength can be formed inside the compressed product. Therefore, it is preferable to use a measurement sample formed by applying a compressive force weak enough to be bonded for strength measurement. As a result of investigating various sample preparation conditions, the present invention has been found by finding suitable conditions.

本発明に供する測定試料は、粉砕、成形、乾留の3プロセスを経て作成される。以下にそれぞれのプロセスの詳細を記述する。   A measurement sample used in the present invention is prepared through three processes of pulverization, molding, and dry distillation. Details of each process are described below.

粉砕については、石炭粒子内部のガス放散を促進するため、可能な限り微細にすることが重要である。石炭粒子が大きい場合には、乾留時に膨張して均一な試料が得られないことが多く、発明者らが検討した結果、75μm以下に石炭を粉砕することが望ましい。   As for pulverization, it is important to make it as fine as possible in order to promote gas diffusion inside the coal particles. When the coal particles are large, they often expand during dry distillation and a uniform sample cannot be obtained. As a result of investigations by the inventors, it is desirable to pulverize the coal to 75 μm or less.

成形について、成形物の大きさは径10mm以下、厚さ2.5mm以下の円筒型が望ましい。径、厚さが大きい場合、乾留後の測定試料内部に鬆が生成する可能性が高いため、上記のような大きさとした。また、試料を大きくした場合、乾留時の試料表面と内部の温度勾配が大きくなり、亀裂の影響が無視できなくなるためである。成形条件については、14MPa以上20MPa以下の圧力をかけて一定時間保持するのが好適である。14MPa以上とした理由は、それ以下の圧力では成形後の測定試料の強度が小さく、圧縮成形後に形状を保つことができずハンドリング時に壊れてしまう可能性が高いためである。また、20MPa以下とした理由は、これ以上の圧力で成形した場合、成形物を乾留した後、内部に鬆が生成する可能性が高いためである。   For molding, the size of the molded product is preferably a cylindrical shape having a diameter of 10 mm or less and a thickness of 2.5 mm or less. When the diameter and thickness are large, there is a high possibility that voids are generated inside the measurement sample after dry distillation. In addition, when the sample is enlarged, the temperature gradient inside and inside the sample during dry distillation increases, and the influence of cracks cannot be ignored. As for the molding conditions, it is preferable to hold the pressure for a certain period of time by applying a pressure of 14 MPa or more and 20 MPa or less. The reason why the pressure is set to 14 MPa or more is that when the pressure is less than that, the strength of the measurement sample after molding is small, the shape cannot be maintained after compression molding, and the possibility of breakage during handling is high. The reason why the pressure is set to 20 MPa or less is that, when molding is performed at a pressure higher than this, there is a high possibility that voids are generated inside after dry-molding the molded product.

乾留については、乾留速度は通常のコークス炉での乾留条件を模擬することが重要である。不活性ガス雰囲気下で、3℃/minで1000℃まで乾留することが望ましい。ここで、不活性ガスとは、アルゴンガス等の希ガスのみではなく窒素ガスを含み、通常は窒素ガスを使用するのが実用的である。また、測定試料は熱伝達を均一にすることが重要である。望ましい形態として、粉コークス中に埋め込まれた状態で乾留することが挙げられる。   For carbonization, it is important that the carbonization rate simulates carbonization conditions in a normal coke oven. It is desirable to dry-distill up to 1000 ° C. at 3 ° C./min in an inert gas atmosphere. Here, the inert gas includes not only a rare gas such as argon gas but also nitrogen gas, and it is practical to use nitrogen gas. In addition, it is important that the measurement sample has uniform heat transfer. A desirable form is dry distillation in an embedded state in the powder coke.

測定試料の接着強度測定は、圧縮強度測定により行う。成形物の厚さ方向に圧力を付加して破壊した時の圧力をもって接着強度の指標とした。厚さ方向に圧力を付加して強度を測定する理由は圧縮破壊後の測定試料が粉々になるためである。圧縮により試料が少数の部分に割れる場合(例えば2分割される場合など)、圧縮中には試料の亀裂発生部位に応力集中が発生し、亀裂伝播が生じている可能性がある。このような場合には、試料中の欠陥が起点となって破壊が生ずる可能性があるが、本発明は、多くの石炭粒子間の接着の程度を評価することが目的であるため、試料中の欠陥に基づく破壊の影響は極力除外し、圧縮により石炭粒子の多くの結合部分をせん断破壊して粉々になる破壊形態となることが望ましく、厚さ方向からの圧力付与を採用した。コークスの強度測定では円筒型試料の直径方向に加重を付加した間接引張強度がよく採用されているが、直径方向の荷重付加の場合には少数の部分に割れる破壊形態をとることが多く、本発明の目的のためには好ましくなく、石炭粉砕条件、成形条件とともに圧縮試験における荷重載荷方向を制御することで、従来にない物性を評価できる点が本発明が優れている点である。   The adhesive strength of the measurement sample is measured by compressive strength measurement. The pressure when pressure was applied in the thickness direction of the molded product to break it was used as an index of adhesive strength. The reason for measuring the strength by applying pressure in the thickness direction is that the measurement sample after compression fracture is shattered. When the sample is divided into a small number of parts due to compression (for example, when the sample is divided into two parts), stress concentration may occur at the crack generation site of the sample during compression, and crack propagation may occur. In such a case, a defect in the sample may be a starting point and breakage may occur. However, since the present invention is intended to evaluate the degree of adhesion between many coal particles, It was desirable to eliminate the influence of fracture based on the defects of this as much as possible, and it was desirable to form a fracture form in which many joint parts of coal particles were sheared and fractured by compression, and pressure application from the thickness direction was adopted. For the strength measurement of coke, indirect tensile strength with a load applied in the diameter direction of a cylindrical sample is often adopted. It is not preferable for the purpose of the invention, and the present invention is superior in that it can evaluate unprecedented physical properties by controlling the load loading direction in the compression test together with coal pulverization conditions and molding conditions.

測定試料を作成し、接着強度を測定した例を以下に示す。9種類の石炭を測定に使用した。使用した石炭の性状を表1に示す。また、2種類の石炭間の接着強度を測定するため、2種類の石炭を1:1で配合した配合炭の強度を測定することとした。配合の組み合わせと平均性状を表1にあわせて示す。石炭を75μm以下に粉砕し、直径6.6mmの孔を持つモールドへ石炭を装入し、成形後の寸法が直径6.6mm、厚さ2.5mmとなるよう石炭量を調整し、14MPaの圧力を10秒間付加して成形物を作成した。1種類の石炭、配合炭あたり10個の成形物を作成した。成形物の嵩密度は石炭銘柄により異なっており、それらの値は860〜920kg/mの範囲にあった。成形物は、1mm以下に調整された粉コークス充填層に10個配置し、乾留した。粉コークスは200mm×200mm×H500mmの鉄製容器に充填した。乾留装置を図1、成形物配置図を図2に示す。乾留条件は、窒素雰囲気下で、3℃/minで1000℃まで乾留し、乾留後は窒素雰囲気下で冷却した。 An example of preparing a measurement sample and measuring the adhesive strength is shown below. Nine types of coal were used for the measurement. Table 1 shows the properties of the coal used. Moreover, in order to measure the adhesive strength between two types of coal, the strength of the blended coal obtained by blending two types of coal at 1: 1 was determined. Combinations and average properties of the blends are shown in Table 1. Coal is pulverized to 75 μm or less, coal is charged into a mold having a hole with a diameter of 6.6 mm, and the amount of coal is adjusted so that the dimension after molding is 6.6 mm in diameter and 2.5 mm in thickness. A molding was prepared by applying pressure for 10 seconds. Ten molded products were prepared for each type of coal and blended coal. The bulk density of the molded product was different depending on the coal brand, and those values were in the range of 860 to 920 kg / m 3 . Ten molded articles were placed in a powder coke packed bed adjusted to 1 mm or less and subjected to dry distillation. The powder coke was filled in an iron container of 200 mm × 200 mm × H 500 mm. Fig. 1 shows the dry distillation apparatus and Fig. 2 shows the arrangement of the molded product. The dry distillation conditions were dry distillation to 1000 ° C. at 3 ° C./min in a nitrogen atmosphere, and cooling in a nitrogen atmosphere after dry distillation.

圧縮強度の測定は島津製作所製のオートグラフを用いて行った。測定試料の厚さ方向に荷重をかけ、破壊時の荷重を測定した。荷重を測定試料の荷重付加面の面積で除した圧力を接着強度とした。1水準10個の測定試料の圧縮強度、荷重付加面の面積を測定し、それぞれの接着強度の平均をその水準の接着強度とした。測定結果を表2に示す。   The compressive strength was measured using an autograph manufactured by Shimadzu Corporation. A load was applied in the thickness direction of the measurement sample, and the load at break was measured. The pressure obtained by dividing the load by the area of the load application surface of the measurement sample was defined as the adhesive strength. The compressive strength and the area of the load application surface of 10 measurement samples of one level were measured, and the average of the respective adhesive strengths was defined as the adhesive strength at that level. The measurement results are shown in Table 2.

接着強度とギーセラープラストメーターの最高流動度(MF)との関係を図3、ジラトメーターで測定した全膨張率(TD)との関係を図4に示す。図中で凡例の「石炭」は単銘柄の石炭をコークス化した試料、「配合炭」は複数銘柄の石炭を配合してコークス化した試料を使用したことを示す。図3、図4より、接着強度とMF、TDにある程度相関はあるものの、全く同じ指標ではないことが読み取れる。   FIG. 3 shows the relationship between the adhesive strength and the maximum fluidity (MF) of the Gisela plastometer, and FIG. 4 shows the relationship between the total expansion rate (TD) measured with a dilatometer. In the figure, the legend “coal” indicates that a sample of coke from a single brand of coal is used, and “mixed coal” indicates that a sample of coke prepared by mixing multiple brands of coal is used. 3 and 4, it can be seen that although there is some correlation between the adhesive strength and MF and TD, they are not exactly the same index.

結果に示したとおり、本発明の方法は、単一銘柄の石炭の接着性のみならず、複数銘柄の接着性の評価にも適用可能である。例えば、表2においてB炭の接着強度が105MPa、I炭の接着強度が107MPaであるのに、B炭−I炭の接着強度が35MPaとなっているのは、B炭とI炭の界面における接着強度が低いことを示しており、異炭種間の接着性も評価可能であることがわかる。   As shown in the results, the method of the present invention is applicable not only to the adhesion of a single brand of coal but also to the evaluation of the adhesion of multiple brands. For example, in Table 2, although the bond strength of B coal is 105 MPa and the bond strength of I coal is 107 MPa, the bond strength of B coal-I coal is 35 MPa at the interface between B coal and I coal. It shows that the adhesive strength is low, and it can be seen that the adhesion between different carbon types can also be evaluated.

また、表1、2中のA炭、B炭、C炭は、通常の方法による乾留では良好なコークスを得ることができない粘結性に劣る石炭であって、従来法の間接引張試験用のサンプルをコークスから切り出して調製することができなかった。本発明の方法は、そのような低粘結性の石炭であっても評価が可能であるという優れた点を有している。   In addition, coals A, B, and C in Tables 1 and 2 are coals with poor caking properties that cannot obtain good coke by dry distillation by a normal method, and are used for indirect tensile tests of conventional methods. The sample could not be prepared by cutting it from coke. The method of this invention has the outstanding point that evaluation is possible even if it is such a low caking coal.

1 耐火物
2 発熱体
3 乾留用容器
4 粉コークス
5 測定試料
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Refractory 2 Heating body 3 Container for dry distillation 4 Powder coke 5 Measurement sample

Claims (1)

75μm以下に微粉砕した石炭を、14MPa以上20MPa以下の圧力で円筒形状に圧縮成型し、不活性雰囲気下で乾留してコークス化したものを測定試料として、該測定試料の厚さ方向に圧力を付加して破壊時の圧力を接着強度とすることを特徴とするコークス製造用石炭の接着強度測定方法。 Coal that has been finely pulverized to 75 μm or less is compression-molded into a cylindrical shape at a pressure of 14 MPa or more and 20 MPa or less, subjected to dry distillation under an inert atmosphere and coked, and the pressure is applied in the thickness direction of the measurement sample. A method for measuring the adhesive strength of coal for coke production, characterized in that the adhesive pressure is the pressure at the time of destruction.
JP2012068823A 2012-03-26 2012-03-26 Coal bond strength measurement method Expired - Fee Related JP5900083B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2012068823A JP5900083B2 (en) 2012-03-26 2012-03-26 Coal bond strength measurement method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2012068823A JP5900083B2 (en) 2012-03-26 2012-03-26 Coal bond strength measurement method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2013199589A JP2013199589A (en) 2013-10-03
JP5900083B2 true JP5900083B2 (en) 2016-04-06

Family

ID=49520066

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2012068823A Expired - Fee Related JP5900083B2 (en) 2012-03-26 2012-03-26 Coal bond strength measurement method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP5900083B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104910943B (en) * 2015-05-25 2017-07-21 武汉钢铁(集团)公司 Task-size Controlling method under anhydrous loading condition
CN105778961B (en) * 2016-05-16 2019-01-01 武汉钢铁有限公司 The control method of charred coal porosity
CN110411795B (en) * 2019-06-21 2020-06-30 中国矿业大学 A method for simulating equivalent field soft coal in the laboratory
CN111257220B (en) * 2020-02-26 2023-06-06 上海景瑞阳实业有限公司 Method for judging bonding strength of putty powder

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5699287A (en) * 1980-01-10 1981-08-10 Kawasaki Steel Corp Manufacture of molded coal for manufacture of coke for blast furnace
JPH06299159A (en) * 1993-04-14 1994-10-25 Kawasaki Steel Corp Formed coke and its production
JP3364053B2 (en) * 1995-05-24 2003-01-08 関西熱化学株式会社 Evaluation method of strength of porous body
JP4805592B2 (en) * 2005-03-23 2011-11-02 日新製鋼株式会社 Coke briquette manufacturing method and coke briquette manufactured by the method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2013199589A (en) 2013-10-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN104710999B (en) Method for evaluating softening and melting properties of coal and caking material, and method for producing coke
JP5582271B2 (en) Evaluation method of adhesion between coals
CN104145181B (en) Coal preparation method for coke production
JP5900083B2 (en) Coal bond strength measurement method
CN103168224B (en) Coal preparation method for coke production
CN103180414B (en) Metallurgical coke production method
JP6056157B2 (en) Coke blending coal composition determination method and coke manufacturing method
TWI450954B (en) Metallurgical coke manufacturing methods and metallurgical coke for the manufacture of bonding materials
JP5888539B2 (en) Method for producing metallurgical coke
CN103180413B (en) Method for producing metallurgical coke
JP5045039B2 (en) Manufacturing method of high strength coke
JP5590071B2 (en) Manufacturing method of high strength coke
JP6075354B2 (en) Coke production method
JP5895646B2 (en) Coal bond strength evaluation method
TW201217768A (en) to manufacture high strength coke by setting novel formulation standard for coal
JP2016069463A (en) Coking coal for coke production
KR101879553B1 (en) Metallurgical coke and method for producing the same
JP2016222790A (en) Ferro-coke raw material molding method and ferro-coke manufacturing method
JP6720827B2 (en) Carbon material for producing coke, method for producing the same, and method for producing coke
JP6413614B2 (en) Coke oven operation method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20150223

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20151110

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20151111

RD13 Notification of appointment of power of sub attorney

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A7433

Effective date: 20151225

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20160106

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A821

Effective date: 20151225

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20160209

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20160222

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 5900083

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees