JP5924638B2 - Analysis system, analysis method, and analysis program - Google Patents

Description

  The present invention relates to a technique for analyzing a game operator based on a history of game progress.

  2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, with the development and popularization of information processing devices, not only those who have specialized knowledge about information processing devices but also general people can freely use the information processing devices. For this reason, various applications for general persons are provided. Among them, there is an application (hereinafter referred to as “analysis application”) that analyzes an operator based on various input information. For example, Patent Literature 1 discloses a technique for diagnosing compatibility between respective operators by inputting information on three operators.

JP 2003-325977 A

  However, the accuracy of the analysis result is not sufficient in the conventional analysis application. For this reason, for example, even if education based on analysis results is to be provided to the operator, the relationship between the content of the education to be provided and the person (operator) receiving it may become inconsistent. It was difficult to provide proper education.

  In view of the above circumstances, an object of the present invention is to provide a technique for improving the accuracy of analysis related to an operator of an information processing apparatus.

  One aspect of the present invention is a history information storage device that stores history information related to the progress of a game when an operator of the game device operates the game, evaluation information obtained based on the history information, An evaluation information storage device that stores a predetermined evaluation result in association with evaluation information, and the history information is read from the history information storage device, and the evaluation information is based on the history information. And an analysis unit that acquires the evaluation result associated with the acquired evaluation information in the evaluation information storage device, and an output unit that outputs the evaluation result.

  One aspect of the present invention is the above-described analysis system, further including an analysis information storage device that stores analysis information in which information included in the history information is associated with an evaluation index, and the analysis unit includes the history Based on the information and the analysis information, the value of the evaluation index is acquired as the evaluation information.

  One aspect of the present invention is a history information storage device that stores history information related to the progress of a game when an operator of the game device operates the game, evaluation information obtained based on the history information, A system comprising: an evaluation information storage device that stores a predetermined evaluation result in association with the evaluation information, reads the history information from the history information storage device, and based on the history information An analysis step of acquiring the evaluation information and acquiring the evaluation result associated with the acquired evaluation information in the evaluation information storage device; and an output step of outputting the evaluation result Is the method.

  One aspect of the present invention is a history information storage device that stores history information related to the progress of a game when an operator of the game device operates the game, evaluation information obtained based on the history information, The history information is read out from the history information storage device for an information processing device comprising an evaluation information storage device that stores a predetermined evaluation result in association with the evaluation information, and the history An analysis step of acquiring the evaluation information based on information, acquiring the evaluation result associated with the acquired evaluation information in the evaluation information storage device, and an output step of outputting the evaluation result; Is an analysis program for executing

  According to the present invention, it is possible to improve the accuracy of analysis related to an operator of an information processing apparatus.

It is a system configuration figure showing the system configuration of an analysis system. It is a figure which shows the specific example of a coordinate log | history table. It is a figure which shows the specific example of a scenario history table. It is a figure which shows the specific example of a command history table. It is a figure which shows the specific example of a coordinate analysis table. It is a figure which shows the specific example of a scenario analysis table. It is a figure which shows the specific example of a command analysis table. It is a figure which shows the specific example of a classification table. It is a figure which shows the specific example of a classification | category analysis table. It is a figure which shows the specific example of a 1st evaluation table. It is a figure which shows the specific example of a 2nd evaluation table. It is a figure which shows the specific example of the advice table memorize | stored in the advice memory | storage part. It is a flowchart showing the operation example of a log | history recording part. It is a flowchart showing the operation example of an analyzer. It is a figure which shows the system configuration | structure of the 1st modification (analysis system 1a). It is a figure which shows the system configuration | structure of the 2nd modification (analysis system 1b). It is a figure which shows the system configuration | structure of the 3rd modification (analysis system 1c).

  FIG. 1 is a system configuration diagram showing a system configuration of the analysis system 1. The analysis system 1 includes a game device 10 and an analysis device 20. The game apparatus 10 and the analysis apparatus 20 are connected to be communicable. Communication between the game apparatus 10 and the analysis apparatus 20 may be wireless communication or wired communication.

  The game apparatus 10 is configured using an information processing apparatus such as a mainframe, a workstation, a personal computer, or a game dedicated device. The game apparatus 10 includes a CPU (Central Processing Unit), a memory, an auxiliary storage device, and the like connected by a bus, and by executing a game program, the input unit 11, the game execution unit 12, the output unit 13, and the history recording unit 14. It functions as a device including the history information storage device 15.

  Note that all or part of the functions of the game apparatus 10 may be realized using hardware such as an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a programmable logic device (PLD), or a field programmable gate array (FPGA). The game program may be recorded on a computer-readable recording medium. The computer-readable recording medium is, for example, a portable medium such as a flexible disk, a magneto-optical disk, a ROM, a CD-ROM, or a storage device such as a hard disk built in the computer system. The game program may be transmitted via a telecommunication line.

  The input unit 11 is connected to an existing input device such as a keyboard, a pointing device (mouse, tablet, etc.), a button, and a touch panel. The input unit 11 receives an input of a command related to a game via an input device operated by an operator.

  The game execution unit 12 executes a game program. The game execution unit 12 generates a screen according to the game program in response to a command input via the input unit 11 and outputs the screen to the output unit 13.

  Further, the game execution unit 12 outputs all or part of information related to the progress of the game (hereinafter referred to as “progress information”) to the history recording unit 14. The progress information may be, for example, information indicating the position or state of an object operated by the operator in the game, or information indicating the progress of the game.

  For example, when the game executed by the game execution unit 12 is a role playing game, the following information is given as a specific example of the progress information. A value (level: LV) indicating the degree of evolution of an object operated by the operator (hereinafter referred to as “operation character”), a value indicating physical strength (hit point: HP), and a value indicating magic power (magic point: MP), a value representing the degree of experience (experience value: EXP), and a value representing money (G). Position coordinates of the operation character in the space set for the game. The type and quantity of items (items) possessed by the operation character. Identification information for the scenario currently in progress. The contents of the command entered by the operator. In the following description, an example in which the game executed by the game execution unit 12 is a role playing game will be described. However, the type of game executed by the game execution unit 12 is not necessarily limited to the role playing game.

  The output unit 13 is connected to an image display device such as a CRT (Cathode Ray Tube) display, a liquid crystal display, or an organic EL (Electro Luminescence) display. The output unit 13 displays the screen of the game being executed by the game execution unit 12 on the image display device.

  The history recording unit 14 updates the history information stored in the history information storage device 15 at a predetermined timing based on the contents of the progress information received from the game execution unit 12. Specific examples of the predetermined timing include the following timing. Timing at which a change occurs in the level, hit point, magic point, experience value, and value representing money (hereinafter these values are collectively referred to as “status value”). Timing when the status value of the operation character satisfies a predetermined condition (for example, the level has increased by a predetermined number from the previous timing, the hit point has fallen below the threshold, etc.). Timing when the position coordinates of the operation character become the predetermined position coordinates. Timing when scenario identification information changes. Timing when the scenario identification information changes to the predetermined identification information.

  The history information storage device 15 is configured using a storage device such as a magnetic hard disk device or a semiconductor storage device. The history information storage device 15 stores history information regarding the progress of the game when the operator of the game device 10 operates the game. The history information storage device 15 functions as a coordinate history storage unit 151, a scenario history storage unit 152, and a command history storage unit 153. The coordinate history storage unit 151 stores a coordinate history table. The scenario history storage unit 152 stores a scenario history table. The command history storage unit 153 stores a command history table. In the description of the present embodiment, the above tables are collectively referred to as history information.

  FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating a specific example of the coordinate history table. The coordinate history table has a plurality of records 51. Each record 51 includes the position coordinate of the operation character, the date and time when the position coordinate is reached, the status value when the position coordinate is reached, and the item possessed by the operation character when the position coordinate is reached. The list is associated. For example, among the two records 51 specifically shown in FIG. 2, the upper record 51 is the position of the coordinate (x1, y1) where the operation character is at 23:24:15 on May 5, 2011. At that time, the status of the operation character was “8”, the hit point was “101”, the magic point was “89”, the experience value was “10398”, and possessed The item is a record in which three torches, five medicinal herbs, and one key of a safe are recorded.

  FIG. 3 is a diagram showing a specific example of the scenario history table. The scenario history table has a plurality of records 52. Each record 52 includes identification information of a scenario in progress in the game, the date and time when the record 52 was recorded, the status value at the time when the record 52 was recorded, and the operation character at the time when the record 52 was recorded. Is associated with a list of items owned by. For example, among the two records 52 specifically shown in FIG. 3, the upper record 52 has the identifier of the scenario in progress at 19:24:32 on May 4, 2011, at that time. The status of the operation character is “6”, hit point is “31”, magic point is “49”, experience value is “6137”, possessed one torch This is a record that recorded two medicinal herbs.

  FIG. 4 is a diagram showing a specific example of the command history table. The command history table has a plurality of records 53. Each record 53 includes the contents of the command executed by the operator, the date and time when the command was executed, the status value at the time when the command was executed, and the operation character at the time when the command was executed. Is associated with a list of items. For example, among the two records 53 specifically shown in FIG. 4, in the upper record 53, a command for investing 300G is executed at 19:24:32 on May 4, 2011, and at that time The status of the operation character is “6”, the experience value is “6137”, the amount of money is “4032”, and the items possessed were 1 torch and 2 herbs. Is a recorded record.

  The analysis apparatus 20 is configured using an information processing apparatus such as a mainframe, a workstation, or a personal computer. The analysis device 20 includes a CPU, a memory, an auxiliary storage device, and the like connected by a bus, and by executing an analysis program, an analysis information storage device 21, an evaluation information storage unit 22, an advice storage unit 23, an analysis unit 24, and an output It functions as a device including the unit 25.

  Note that all or some of the functions of the analysis apparatus 20 may be realized using hardware such as an ASIC, PLD, or FPGA. The analysis program may be recorded on a computer-readable recording medium. The computer-readable recording medium is, for example, a portable medium such as a flexible disk, a magneto-optical disk, a ROM, a CD-ROM, or a storage device such as a hard disk built in the computer system. The analysis program may be transmitted via a telecommunication line.

  The analysis information storage device 21 is configured using a storage device such as a magnetic hard disk device or a semiconductor storage device. The analysis information storage device 21 stores analysis information in which information included in history information is associated with an evaluation index. The evaluation index is a value given in advance for each predetermined combination of values of items included in the history information. In this embodiment, the evaluation information can be acquired by calculating the integrated value of the evaluation index. Regarding the relationship between the information included in the history information stored in the analysis information storage unit 21 and the evaluation index, certain accuracy and reliability are confirmed in advance by performing experiments and statistics. The analysis information storage device 21 functions as, for example, a coordinate analysis information storage unit 211, a scenario analysis information storage unit 212, a command analysis information storage unit 213, a classification information storage unit 214, and a classification analysis information storage unit 215.

  The coordinate analysis information storage unit 211 stores a coordinate analysis table. The scenario analysis information storage unit 212 stores a scenario analysis table. The command analysis information storage unit 213 stores a command analysis table. The classification information storage unit 214 stores a classification table. The classification analysis information storage unit 215 stores a classification analysis table.

  In the description of the present embodiment, the above tables are collectively referred to as analysis information. In the analysis information, a plurality of records are defined in which at least one kind of score (evaluation index) is associated with one or a plurality of combinations of values included in the history information. In this embodiment, two types of scores (first score and second score) are defined as scores. Each score represents a value for obtaining an evaluation result corresponding to a specific evaluation axis. For example, an interval scale may be set for each evaluation axis, and an evaluation result may be set according to the interval scale.

  In the present embodiment, the first score is a score for evaluating the risk tolerance of the operator, and an evaluation result representing the risk tolerance is set along the first evaluation axis. Specifically, an evaluation result indicating that the risk tends to be avoided as the accumulated value of the first score is lower is set, and an evaluation result indicating that the higher the accumulated value of the first score is, the more liable the risk is. May be set.

  In the present embodiment, the second score is a score for evaluating the operator's intention toward the object, and an evaluation result representing the intention is set along the second evaluation axis. Specifically, the lower the cumulative value of the second score is, the stronger the tendency to collect objects is, and the evaluation result (collection orientation) is set. The cumulative value of the second score is an intermediate value (intermediate value). An evaluation result (production-oriented) indicating that the tendency to produce goods is stronger as the value is closer to) is set, and the higher the accumulated value of the second score is, the stronger the tendency to sell goods is. A result (sales-oriented) may be set.

  The evaluation information storage unit 22 is configured using a storage device such as a magnetic hard disk device or a semiconductor storage device. The evaluation information storage unit 22 stores the evaluation information obtained based on the history information and the evaluation result predetermined for the evaluation information in association with each other. Regarding the relationship between the evaluation information stored in the evaluation information storage unit 22 and the evaluation result, certain accuracy and reliability are confirmed in advance by performing experiments and statistics in advance.

  The evaluation information storage unit 22, for example, for each type of score (evaluation index) used in the analysis device 20, an evaluation table in which a cumulative score value (evaluation information) is associated with an evaluation result corresponding to the cumulative value. Remember. For example, when the first score and the second score are used in the analyzer 20, the evaluation information storage unit 22 stores an evaluation table related to the first score and an evaluation table related to the second score.

  The advice storage unit 23 is exercised using a storage device such as a magnetic hard disk device or a semiconductor storage device. The advice storage unit 23 stores an advice table in which scores used in the analyzer 20 are associated with the content of advice. When there are a plurality of types of scores used in the analysis device 20, combinations of a plurality of types of scores and the contents of advice are associated with each other in the advice table. The contents of the advice include advice on career formation and career design for the operator.

  The analysis unit 24 searches the history storage device 15 for history information that matches one or more combinations of values included in the progress information of the record defined in the analysis information. If there is matching history information, the analysis unit 24 acquires a score defined in the record. The analysis unit 24 collates all the history information and the analysis information, acquires the score, and calculates the cumulative value of the acquired score for each of the same type of scores. The analysis unit 24 reads the evaluation result corresponding to the accumulated value of the acquired score from the evaluation information storage unit 22. Further, the analysis unit 24 reads out advice according to the accumulated value of the acquired score from the advice storage unit 23. The analysis unit 24 outputs the read evaluation result and advice to the output unit 25.

  The output unit 25 outputs the evaluation result and advice received from the analysis unit 24 in a predetermined format. The output unit 25 may output any evaluation result and advice. For example, the output unit 25 may be connected to an image display device such as a CRT display, a liquid crystal display, or an organic EL display, and may output an evaluation result and advice by causing the image display device to display images and characters. For example, the output unit 25 may be connected to a printer and output an evaluation result and advice by causing the printer to print images and characters. For example, the output unit 25 may be connected to another information processing apparatus by wireless or wired communication, and may output evaluation results and advice by transmitting data representing images and characters.

  FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating a specific example of the coordinate analysis table. The coordinate analysis table has a plurality of records 61. Each record 61 has a first score corresponding to the state of the operation character when the operation character reaches a predetermined position coordinate.

  The first score is set higher as the state of the operation character at the time when the predetermined position coordinates are reached is closer to the state at the start of the game (that is, the weaker state (disadvantaged state)). On the other hand, the first score is set lower as the state of the operation character at the time of reaching the predetermined position coordinate is more distant from the state at the start of the game (that is, the stronger the state (the more advantageous state)). . By performing the analysis according to such a coordinate analysis table, the operator who has advanced the position of the operation character more carefully to the unreachable position has a tendency to lower the first score and avoid risk. It is analyzed that there is. On the other hand, it is analyzed that the more the operator is more aggressively moving the position of the operation character to the unreachable position, the higher the first score is and the tendency to prefer the risk.

  In the example of FIG. 5, each record 61 includes a position coordinate of the operation character, a level of the operation character when the position coordinate is reached, and a list of items possessed by the operation character when the position coordinate is reached. And the first score are associated with each other. For example, the uppermost record 61 among the plurality of records 61 specifically shown in FIG. 5 is level 1 when the operation character reaches the position of the coordinate (x1, y1), and the item is torches. If it has only, it indicates that the first score is 10.

  FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating a specific example of the scenario analysis table. The scenario analysis table has a plurality of records 62. Each record 62 has a first score corresponding to the state of the operating character at the time when the predetermined scenario starts.

  The first score is set higher as the state of the operation character at the start of the predetermined scenario is closer to the state at the start of the game (that is, the weaker state (unfavorable state)). On the other hand, the first score is set to be lower as the state of the operation character at the time when the predetermined scenario is started deviates from the state at the start of the game (that is, the stronger the state (advantageous state)). By performing the analysis according to such a scenario analysis table, it is analyzed that the more the operator who is proceeding with the game scenario more carefully, the lower the first score is and the tendency to avoid the risk. On the other hand, it is analyzed that the operator who is more aggressive in the game scenario has a higher first score and tends to prefer risk.

  In the example of FIG. 6, each record 62 includes a scenario that has started, a level of the operation character at the start of the scenario, a list of items possessed by the operation character at the start of the scenario, The score is associated. For example, the uppermost record 62 among the plurality of records 62 specifically shown in FIG. 6 has a level of 1 at the time when the scenario of S11 is started, and the item has only torches. It shows that 1 score is 10.

  FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating a specific example of the command analysis table. The command analysis table has a plurality of records 63. Each record 63 has a second score corresponding to the total number of times a predetermined command has been executed.

  For each command, it is possible to analyze the tendency of the operator who likes to execute the command. For example, the second score is set high for a command that produces or develops something in a game. On the other hand, the second score is set low for commands that do not produce or develop anything in the game. By performing the analysis according to such a command analysis table, it is analyzed that the operator who prefers production or development has a higher second score, and the tendency toward production orientation and sales orientation is higher. On the other hand, it is analyzed that the operator who prefers less production or development has a lower second score and is more likely to be gathering-oriented than production-oriented and sales-oriented.

  In the example of FIG. 7, each record 63 associates the executed command, the total number of times the command has been executed, and the second score. For example, the top record 63 among the plurality of records 63 specifically shown in FIG. 7 has a second score of 2 when the command of negotiation is performed only once. Is shown.

  FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating a specific example of the classification table. The classification table has a plurality of records 64. Each record 64 has an item that can be possessed by the operating character and a classification name of the item. For example, the uppermost record 64 among the plurality of records 64 specifically shown in FIG. 8 indicates that the classification name of the item “Torch” is a consumable item.

  FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating a specific example of the classification analysis table. The classification analysis table has a plurality of records 65. Each record 65 has a second score corresponding to the classification of items that the operating character possessed at the end of the game.

  It is possible to analyze the tendency of the operator based on the classification of the items possessed by the operation character at the end of the game. For example, the second score is set high for items of the kind used to produce or develop something in a game. On the other hand, the second score is set low for items such as final products obtained by production or development in the game. By performing the analysis according to such a classification analysis table, the operator who has more items (for example, raw materials) used for production or development until the end has a higher second score and is more productive. Furthermore, it is analyzed that the sales orientation tends to be high. On the other hand, the operator who has more items (for example, the final product) obtained by production or development until the end has a lower second score and tends to be more collection-oriented than production-oriented and sales-oriented. It is analyzed that there is.

  In the example of FIG. 9, each record 65 indicates that the second score is accumulated by 0.5 every time there is one item classified as a consumable item among the items finally possessed by the operation character. Show.

  FIG. 10 is a diagram showing a specific example of an evaluation table related to the first score (hereinafter referred to as “first evaluation table”) among the evaluation tables stored in the evaluation information storage unit 22. The first evaluation table has a plurality of records 71. Each record 71 has a cumulative value of the first score and an evaluation result (first evaluation result) corresponding to the cumulative value. In the example of FIG. 10, when the cumulative value of the first score is a value of 30 or less, an evaluation result of risk avoidance type is obtained, and when the cumulative value of the first score is a value of 31 to 100 Gives an evaluation result of risk-neutral type, and if the cumulative value of the first score is 101 or more, an evaluation result of risk-preference type is obtained.

  FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating a specific example of an evaluation table related to the second score (hereinafter referred to as “second evaluation table”) among the evaluation tables stored in the evaluation information storage unit 22. The second evaluation table has a plurality of records 72. Each record 72 has a cumulative value of the second score and an evaluation result (second evaluation result) corresponding to the cumulative value. In the example of FIG. 11, when the cumulative value of the second score is 55 or less, an evaluation result of the collection-oriented type is obtained, and when the cumulative value of the second score is 56 or more and 110 or less. The evaluation result of the production-oriented type is obtained, and when the accumulated value of the second score is 111 or more, the evaluation result of the sales-oriented type is obtained.

  FIG. 12 is a diagram illustrating a specific example of the advice table stored in the advice storage unit 23. The advice table has a plurality of records 81. Each record 81 has a combination of the accumulated value of the first score and the accumulated value of the second score, and advice.

  In the example of FIG. 12, when the cumulative value of the first score is 60 or less and the cumulative value of the second score is 70 or less, the low-risk / manufacturing type advice Advice) is output. When the cumulative value of the first score is 60 or less and the cumulative value of the second score is 71 or more, low risk / commercial advice (advice to SOHO business trend) is output. If the cumulative value of the first score is 61 or more and the cumulative value of the second score is 70 or less, high-risk / production-type advice (advice for high-tech secondary industry-type trends) Is output. When the accumulated value of the first score is 61 or more and the accumulated value of the second score is 71 or more, high-risk / sales-type advice (advice for the third industry trend) is output Is done.

  FIG. 13 is a flowchart illustrating an operation example of the history recording unit 14. In the flowchart shown in FIG. 13, the timing at which the position coordinate of the operation character becomes the predetermined position coordinate, the timing at which a new scenario is started, and the timing at which a predetermined command is executed are set as the predetermined timing. . The contents of the history recorded at each timing are different. Hereinafter, the flowchart shown in FIG. 13 will be described.

  The history recording unit 14 refers to the progress information output from the game execution unit 12 and determines whether or not the position coordinate of the operation character has become a predetermined position coordinate (step S101). When it is a predetermined position coordinate (Step S101-YES), history record part 14 generates a new record of a coordinate history table based on progress information, and registers it in a coordinate history table (Step S102).

  When the predetermined position coordinates are not reached (step S101—NO), the history recording unit 14 refers to the progress information output from the game execution unit 12 and determines whether or not a new scenario has started (step S103). ). For example, the history recording unit 14 compares the scenario identification information included in the progress information output immediately before and the scenario identification information included in the newly obtained progress information. It may be determined that the scenario has started.

  When a new scenario is started (YES in step S103), the history recording unit 14 generates a new record in the scenario history table based on the progress information and registers it in the scenario history table (step S104).

  When a new scenario has not started (step S103-NO), the history recording unit 14 refers to the progress information output from the game execution unit 12 and determines whether a predetermined command has been executed (step S105). ). When the predetermined command is executed (step S105-YES), the history recording unit 14 generates a new record in the command history table based on the progress information and registers it in the command history table (step S106).

  When the predetermined command is not executed (step S105—NO), the history recording unit 14 refers to the progress information output from the game execution unit 12 and determines whether or not the game is over (step S107). For example, the history recording unit 14 may determine the end of the game based on whether or not the scenario identification information included in the progress information is an identifier indicating the end of the game. If the game has not ended (step S107—NO), the history recording unit 14 returns to the process of step S101 and repeatedly executes the subsequent processes. On the other hand, when the game is over (step S107: YES), the history recording unit 14 finishes the process.

  FIG. 14 is a flowchart illustrating an operation example of the analysis apparatus 20. First, the analysis unit 24 calculates the cumulative value of the first score based on the coordinate analysis table (step S201). Specifically, it is as follows. First, the analysis unit 24 refers to the combination of position coordinates, levels, and items in the record 51 of the coordinate history table, and matches the position coordinates, levels, and item combinations of all the records 61 recorded in the coordinate analysis table. Compare whether or not.

  If they match, the analysis unit 24 reads the first score recorded in the record 61 of the matched coordinate analysis table and adds it to the accumulated value of the first score. Note that the initial value of the cumulative value of the first score is zero (0). The analysis unit 24 performs such processing for each record 51 of the coordinate history table, and when the processing is completed for all the records 51, the processing in step S201 is terminated.

  Next, the analysis unit 24 calculates a cumulative value of the first score based on the scenario analysis table (step S202). Specifically, it is as follows. First, the analysis unit 24 refers to the record 52 of the scenario history table, and detects the record 52 (hereinafter referred to as “scenario start record”) recorded when each scenario is started. For example, when each record 52 of the scenario history table is recorded in accordance with the flowchart shown in FIG. 13, all the records 52 are recorded only when a new scenario starts, and all the records 52 are recorded in the scenario. This is the start record. Therefore, there is no need to perform such processing.

  On the other hand, when each record 52 of the scenario history table is recorded at a timing different from the timing at which a new scenario starts, it is necessary to perform the detection as described above. In this case, for example, the analysis unit 24 may refer to the scenario identifier of the record 52 of the scenario history table along the time series, and detect the record 52 as the scenario start record when the identifier changes.

  Next, the analysis unit 24 refers to the combination of the scenario, level, and item in the scenario start record, and whether or not the combination matches the start scenario, level, and item combination of all records 62 recorded in the scenario analysis table. Or compare. If they match, the analysis unit 24 reads the first score recorded in the record 62 of the matched scenario analysis table and adds it to the accumulated value of the first score. Note that the initial value of the cumulative value of the first score in the process of step S202 is the cumulative value obtained in step S201. The analysis unit 24 performs such a process for each scenario start record, and ends the process of step S202 when the processes are completed for all scenario start records.

  Next, the analysis unit 24 calculates a cumulative value of the second score based on the command analysis table (step S203). Specifically, it is as follows. First, the analysis unit 24 refers to all the records 53 in the command history table, and counts the number of times each command is executed during the game. Next, the analysis unit 24 reads the second score corresponding to the combination of the command and the number of executions with reference to the record 63 of the command analysis table. Then, the analysis unit 24 adds the read second score to the cumulative value of the second score. Note that the initial value of the accumulated value of the second score in the process of step S203 is zero (0). The analysis part 24 will complete | finish the process of step S203, if the 2nd score is accumulate | stored about all the commands.

  Next, the analysis unit 24 calculates a cumulative value of the second score based on the classification analysis table (step S204). Specifically, it is as follows. First, the analysis unit 24 refers to the scenario history table and detects the record 52 at the end of the game (that is, the last recorded record 52: hereinafter referred to as “final record”). Next, the analysis unit 24 refers to the classification table and detects the classification of each item recorded in the last record. And the analysis part 24 reads the 2nd score according to each detected classification with reference to a classification | category analysis table, and adds it to the accumulated value of a 2nd score. At this time, the read second score may be multiplied by the number of items held and then added to the accumulated value. Note that the initial value of the cumulative value of the second score in the process of step S204 is the cumulative value obtained in step S203. The analysis unit 24 performs such a process for each item recorded in the final record, and ends the process of step S204 when the process is completed for all items.

  Next, the analysis unit 24 acquires a first evaluation result corresponding to the first evaluation axis based on the accumulated value of the first score (step S205). Specifically, the analysis unit 24 refers to the first evaluation table stored in the evaluation information storage unit 22 and reads the evaluation result corresponding to the cumulative value of the first score calculated in step S202.

  Next, the analysis unit 24 acquires a second evaluation result corresponding to the second evaluation axis based on the accumulated value of the second score (step S206). Specifically, the analysis unit 24 refers to the second evaluation table stored in the evaluation information storage unit 22, and reads the evaluation result corresponding to the accumulated value of the second score calculated in step S204.

Next, the analysis unit 24 acquires advice based on the accumulated value of the first score and the accumulated value of the second score (step S207). Specifically, the analysis unit 24 refers to the advice table stored in the advice storage unit 23, and the cumulative value of the first score calculated in step S202 and the cumulative value of the second score calculated in step S204. The advice corresponding to the combination of is read.
Next, the output unit 25 outputs the evaluation result and advice acquired by the analysis unit 24 (step S208).

  According to the analysis system 1 configured as described above, when an operator operates the game apparatus 10 to play a game, a history regarding the progress of the game is accumulated. Then, based on the history regarding the progress of the game, analysis results and advice regarding the operator are output. These analysis results and advice are not involved in the story development of the game itself executed in the game apparatus 10 and are output purely as analysis results and advice for the operator. For this reason, the operator does not have an erroneous motive for obtaining an analysis result advantageous to the progress of the game, and the operator's intention and way of thinking are accumulated as a history as it is. Therefore, it is possible to obtain a more accurate analysis result (evaluation result). Therefore, it is possible to provide advice according to the analysis result with higher accuracy.

For example, according to the above-described embodiment, it is possible to obtain an analysis result with high accuracy with respect to an operator's business feeling and risk tolerance.
Further, according to the analysis system 1, the analysis result is not used for the progress of the game. Therefore, any game can be used by appropriately designing the history recording unit 14 and the analysis device 20 according to the game. Therefore, it is not necessary to create a dedicated game for analysis by the analysis system 1, and it is possible to reduce development cost and development period. However, a dedicated game may be created and applied to this system.

<Modification>
The history recording unit 14 and the history information storage device 15 provided in the game device 10 of the analysis system 1 may be provided as devices different from the game device 10. For example, it may be configured as follows.

  FIG. 15 is a diagram illustrating a system configuration of a first modification (analysis system 1a). The analysis system 1a includes a game device 10a, an analysis device 20a, and a history recording device 30. The game apparatus 10 a includes an input unit 11, a game execution unit 12, and an output unit 13. The history recording device 30 and the game device 10a communicate with each other by wire or wireless. The history recording device 30 includes a history recording unit 14 and a history information storage device 15. The analysis device 20a communicates with the history recording device 30 in a wired or wireless manner, and reads information on each history stored in the history information storage device 15.

  FIG. 16 is a diagram illustrating a system configuration of a second modification (analysis system 1b). The analysis system 1b includes a game device 10b, an analysis device 20b, and a history information storage device 15. The game apparatus 10 b includes an input unit 11, a game execution unit 12, an output unit 13, and a history recording unit 14. The history information storage device 15 is configured as a removable storage medium for the game device 10b and the analysis device 20b. The history information storage device 15 may be configured as a storage device such as a magnetic hard disk device or a semiconductor storage device. The history information storage device 15 may be configured as a recording medium such as a CD-ROM or a DVD-ROM. However, when the history information storage device 15 is configured as a recording medium, information of each history (coordinate history table, scenario history table, command history table) is stored in the storage device (magnetic hard disk device or semiconductor storage device) of the game device 10b. It is desirable that information of each history that is once stored and finally completed is recorded on a recording medium. When the history is recorded, the history information storage device 15 is attached to the game device 10b. On the other hand, when the analysis is performed, the history information storage device 15 is detached from the game device 10b and attached to the analysis device 20b.

FIG. 17 is a diagram showing a system configuration of a third modification (analysis system 1c). The analysis system 1c includes a game device 10c and an analysis device 20c. The game device 10 c includes an input unit 11, a game execution unit 12, an output unit 13, and a history recording unit 14. The analysis device 20c includes a history information storage device 15, an analysis information storage device 21, an evaluation information storage unit 22, an advice storage unit 23, an analysis unit 24, and an output unit 25. The game apparatus 10c and the analysis apparatus 20c communicate with each other by wire or wireless. The history recording unit 14 of the game device 10c records a history in the history information storage device 15 included in the analysis device 20c by communicating with the analysis device 20c.
The first to third modifications described above are only specific examples of modifications of the analysis system 1. The configuration of the analysis system 1 may be further modified in a different manner.

  The operation character is not necessarily a character appearing in the game. For example, when the game executed by the game execution unit 12 is a strategy simulation game, the operation target country, army, or soldier may be handled as an operation character. For example, when the game executed by the game execution unit 12 is a company management simulation game, a company, a director, an employee, or the like to be operated may be treated as an operation character.

  The game execution unit 12 may output progress information to the history recording unit 14 at a predetermined timing. The predetermined timing may be the same as the timing at which the game execution unit 12 described above updates the history information. In this case, the game execution unit 12 may update the history information at a timing when the progress information is received from the game execution unit 12 without determining whether the predetermined timing is reached.

  The scenario analysis table may further record a first score given when there is scenario identification information that has not been detected from the history information. In a game such as a role-playing game, there are generally a main scenario that cannot be cleared unless it always passes, and a sub-scenario that can be cleared without necessarily passing. In the sub-scenario, a new item can be obtained, and the status of the operation character can be improved. Some people go ahead with the main scenario without going through such sub-scenarios, while others go through all sub-scenarios. Therefore, it is determined that an operator who has cleared without passing through the sub-scenario has a higher first score and tends to prefer risk.

  The embodiment of the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the drawings. However, the specific configuration is not limited to this embodiment, and includes designs and the like that do not depart from the gist of the present invention.

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 ... Analysis system, 10 ... Game device, 20 ... Analysis device, 11 ... Input part, 12 ... Game execution part, 13 ... Output part, 14 ... History recording part, 15 ... History information storage device, 151 ... Coordinate history storage part , 152 ... Scenario history storage unit, 153 ... Command history storage unit, 21 ... Analysis information storage device, 211 ... Coordinate analysis information storage unit, 212 ... Scenario analysis information storage unit, 213 ... Command analysis information storage unit, 214 ... Classification information Storage unit, 215 ... Classification analysis information storage unit, 22 ... Evaluation information storage unit, 23 ... Advice storage unit, 24 ... Analysis unit, 25 ... Output unit

Claims (4)

A history information storage device that stores history information related to the progress of the game when an operator of the game device operates the game;
An evaluation information storage device that stores the evaluation information obtained based on the history information and the evaluation result for the operator's orientation and risk that are predetermined for the evaluation information;
An advice storage device that stores the evaluation information in association with advice not related to the progress of the game for the operator, which is predetermined for the evaluation information;
Wherein reading the history information from the history information storage unit, based on said history information to acquire the evaluation information, its associated said evaluation to get the results are on the obtained evaluation information in the evaluation information storage unit An analysis unit that acquires the advice associated with the acquired evaluation information in the advice storage device ;
An output unit for outputting the evaluation result and the advice ;
An analysis system comprising: An analysis information storage device that stores analysis information in which the information included in the history information and the evaluation index are associated with each other;
The analysis system according to claim 1, wherein the analysis unit acquires the value of the evaluation index as the evaluation information based on the history information and the analysis information. A history information storage device that stores history information related to the progress of a game when an operator of the game device operates the game, evaluation information obtained based on the history information, and the evaluation information in advance An evaluation information storage device for storing the predetermined operator orientation and risk evaluation results in association with each other, the evaluation information, and the operator predetermined for the evaluation information An advice storage device that stores and associates advice that is not involved in the progress of the game with respect to
Wherein reading the history information from the history information storage unit, based on said history information to acquire the evaluation information, its associated said evaluation to get the results are on the obtained evaluation information in the evaluation information storage unit An analysis step of acquiring the advice associated with the acquired evaluation information in the advice storage device ;
An output step for outputting the evaluation result and the advice ;
Analysis method. A history information storage device that stores history information related to the progress of a game when an operator of the game device operates the game, evaluation information obtained based on the history information, and the evaluation information in advance An evaluation information storage device for storing the predetermined operator orientation and risk evaluation results in association with each other, the evaluation information, and the operator predetermined for the evaluation information For an information processing device comprising an advice storage device that stores an advice that is not related to the progress of the game in association with
Wherein reading the history information from the history information storage unit, based on said history information to acquire the evaluation information, its associated said evaluation to get the results are on the obtained evaluation information in the evaluation information storage unit An analysis step of acquiring the advice associated with the acquired evaluation information in the advice storage device ;
An output step for outputting the evaluation result and the advice ;
Analysis program for running

Images