JP5988794B2 - Copper alloy sheet and manufacturing method thereof - Google Patents
Copper alloy sheet and manufacturing method thereof Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP5988794B2 JP5988794B2 JP2012202292A JP2012202292A JP5988794B2 JP 5988794 B2 JP5988794 B2 JP 5988794B2 JP 2012202292 A JP2012202292 A JP 2012202292A JP 2012202292 A JP2012202292 A JP 2012202292A JP 5988794 B2 JP5988794 B2 JP 5988794B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- copper alloy
- particles
- mass
- alloy sheet
- density
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Landscapes
- Conductive Materials (AREA)
- Non-Insulated Conductors (AREA)
Description
本発明は、銅合金板材およびその製造方法に関し、特に、リードフレームなどに使用するCu−Fe−P系銅合金板材およびその製造方法に関する。 The present invention relates to a copper alloy sheet and a method for manufacturing the same, and more particularly to a Cu—Fe—P copper alloy sheet used for a lead frame and the method for manufacturing the same.
リードフレームなどの電気電子部品に使用される材料は、高強度で、導電性および耐熱性に優れていることが要求され、このような材料として、C1940合金などのCu−Fe−P系銅合金が使用されている。 Materials used for electrical and electronic parts such as lead frames are required to have high strength and excellent electrical conductivity and heat resistance. As such materials, Cu-Fe-P-based copper alloys such as C1940 alloy are required. Is used.
近年、リードフレームなどを使用する半導体装置の大容量化、小型化および高機能化に伴い、リードフレームなどに使用される材料には、さらに高い強度および導電率を有することが要求されている。また、リードフレームは、一般にスタンピング加工(プレス打ち抜き加工)によって多数のピンを有する形状に加工され、スタンピング加工時の歪を除去するために高温で加熱処理されるので、耐熱性に優れていることが要求されている。特に、リードフレームなどに使用される材料では、生産性を向上させるために、さらに高温で短時間加熱処理する場合が増加する傾向にあるため、500℃以上の高温の加熱処理に対する耐熱性が要求されている。 In recent years, with the increase in capacity, miniaturization, and high functionality of semiconductor devices that use lead frames and the like, materials used for lead frames and the like are required to have higher strength and conductivity. In addition, the lead frame is generally processed into a shape having a large number of pins by stamping (press punching), and is heat-treated at a high temperature in order to remove distortion at the time of stamping, and therefore has excellent heat resistance. Is required. In particular, in materials used for lead frames and the like, there is a tendency to increase the number of cases where heat treatment is performed at a high temperature for a short time in order to improve productivity, and thus heat resistance to heat treatment at a high temperature of 500 ° C. or higher is required. Has been.
しかし、Cu−Fe−P系銅合金板材では、導電率と強度と耐熱性の間にはトレードオフの関係があるため、これらを同時に向上させるのは容易ではない。すなわち、Cu−Fe−P系銅合金板材では、導電率、強度および耐熱性は、Fe析出物(少量のFe−P)の量や大きさに依存する。Fe析出物の大きさ(直径)は均一ではなく、一般に数nmから数μmの範囲内に分布している。また、Fe析出物は、大きさによって種類が異なり、数nmのFe析出物は主にγFe粒子、数十〜数百nmのFe析出物は主にαFe粒子、1μm以上のFe析出物は主にFe−P粒子である。また、導電率は、Fe析出物の大きさによらず、ほぼ析出物の量のみに依存し、Fe析出物の量が多いほど高くなる。一方、強度と耐熱性は、整合のγFe粒子の量が多いほど高くなり、非整合のαFe粒子とFe−P粒子の影響は小さい。また、粗大なFe−P粒子付近で再結晶の起点になり易く、耐熱性が著しく低下する可能性がある。 However, in the Cu-Fe-P-based copper alloy sheet, there is a trade-off relationship between electrical conductivity, strength, and heat resistance, and it is not easy to improve these simultaneously. That is, in the Cu—Fe—P based copper alloy sheet, the electrical conductivity, strength, and heat resistance depend on the amount and size of Fe precipitates (a small amount of Fe—P). The size (diameter) of the Fe precipitate is not uniform and is generally distributed within a range of several nm to several μm. The types of Fe precipitates differ depending on the size. Fe deposits of several nm are mainly γFe particles, Fe precipitates of several tens to several hundreds of nm are mainly αFe particles, and Fe precipitates of 1 μm or more are mainly used. Fe-P particles. In addition, the electrical conductivity almost depends only on the amount of precipitates, regardless of the size of the Fe precipitates, and increases as the amount of Fe precipitates increases. On the other hand, the strength and heat resistance increase as the amount of matched γFe particles increases, and the influence of non-matched αFe particles and Fe—P particles is small. In addition, recrystallization near the coarse Fe—P particles tends to occur, and the heat resistance may be significantly reduced.
したがって、Cu−Fe−P系銅合金板材では、導電率と強度と耐熱性を同時に向上させるために、多量のγFe粒子を生成させることが必要である。しかし、Cu−Fe−P系銅合金板材では、より高強度(例えば、硬さHV160以上)にするためには、析出物(γFe粒子の量と大きさ)を制御するだけではなく、転位強化(すなわち、時効処理後の仕上げ圧延による加工硬化)を行うことが必要である。しかし、転位強化を行うと、仕上げ圧延中に一部のγFe粒子が転位により切断され、再固溶することにより、導電率が著しく低下することが知られている。 Therefore, in the Cu—Fe—P-based copper alloy sheet, it is necessary to generate a large amount of γFe particles in order to improve conductivity, strength, and heat resistance at the same time. However, in order to obtain higher strength (for example, hardness HV160 or more) in the Cu—Fe—P-based copper alloy sheet, not only the precipitate (the amount and size of γFe particles) but also dislocation strengthening. (That is, work hardening by finish rolling after aging treatment) is necessary. However, when dislocation strengthening is performed, it is known that some γFe particles are cut by dislocation during finish rolling and re-dissolved, whereby the electrical conductivity is significantly reduced.
そのため、Cu−Fe−P系銅合金に、時効処理前に溶体化処理と中間の冷間圧延を行って、強度と耐熱性を向上させることが提案されている(例えば、特許文献1参照)。また、Cu−Fe−P系銅合金に、熱間加工後で冷間加工前に高温時効処理と低温時効処理の2段階時効処理を行って、高い強度を損なうことなく、導電性と耐熱性を向上させることが提案されている(例えば、特許文献2および3参照)。 Therefore, it has been proposed to improve the strength and heat resistance of the Cu—Fe—P-based copper alloy by performing solution treatment and intermediate cold rolling before aging treatment (see, for example, Patent Document 1). . In addition, Cu-Fe-P-based copper alloys are subjected to two-stage aging treatment, high temperature aging treatment and low temperature aging treatment after hot working and before cold working, without impairing high strength and conductivity and heat resistance. Has been proposed (see, for example, Patent Documents 2 and 3).
しかし、特許文献1の方法のように、時効処理前に溶体化処理を行うと、析出物をより微細に制御することができるが、時効処理後の仕上げ圧延による導電率の低下を防止することができなくなる。また、一定の仕上げ圧延率を確保するためには、溶体化処理後の板材を比較的厚くする必要があり、一般的な連続溶体化装置では対応できない(専用の厚板溶体化設備が必要である)ので、現在Cu−Fe−P系銅合金の製造では、一般に溶体化処理を行っていない。 However, when the solution treatment is performed before the aging treatment as in the method of Patent Document 1, the precipitate can be controlled more finely, but the decrease in the conductivity due to the finish rolling after the aging treatment is prevented. Can not be. In addition, in order to ensure a constant finish rolling ratio, it is necessary to make the plate material after the solution treatment relatively thick, which cannot be handled by a general continuous solution forming apparatus (a dedicated plate solution forming facility is required). Therefore, currently, in the production of Cu-Fe-P-based copper alloys, solution treatment is generally not performed.
また、特許文献2や特許文献3の方法のように、熱間加工後で冷間加工前に高温時効処理と低温時効処理の2段階時効処理を行うと、一般に不均一に析出する(粒界や変形帯などで優先的に析出する)ため、γFe粒子とαFe粒子の密度の良好なバランスを得るのが困難になる。また、鋳造時に析出したFe−P粒子が残っているため、十分な耐熱性を得ることができない。 In addition, when the two-stage aging treatment of high temperature aging treatment and low temperature aging treatment is performed after hot working and before cold working as in the methods of Patent Document 2 and Patent Document 3, generally, non-uniform precipitation occurs (grain boundaries). Therefore, it is difficult to obtain a good balance between the density of γFe particles and αFe particles. In addition, since Fe—P particles precipitated during casting remain, sufficient heat resistance cannot be obtained.
このように、従来のCu−Fe−P系銅合金の製造方法では、導電率と強度と耐熱性の間のトレードオフ関係を十分に解消できないため、現存のC1940合金などの銅合金は一部の用途で対応できなくなる場合もある。 As described above, since the conventional Cu—Fe—P copper alloy manufacturing method cannot sufficiently eliminate the trade-off relationship between conductivity, strength, and heat resistance, some of the existing copper alloys such as C1940 alloy are partially used. In some cases, it may not be possible to deal with.
したがって、本発明は、このような従来の問題点に鑑み、高い強度で、導電性および耐熱性に優れたCu−Fe−P系銅合金板材およびその製造方法を提供することを目的とする。 Therefore, in view of such a conventional problem, an object of the present invention is to provide a Cu—Fe—P-based copper alloy sheet having high strength and excellent conductivity and heat resistance, and a method for producing the same.
本発明者らは、上記課題を解決するために鋭意研究した結果、1.5〜3.0質量%のFeと、0.01〜0.2質量%のPを含み、残部がCuおよび不可避不純物からなる銅合金の原料を溶融して鋳造した鋳塊を1020〜1080℃まで加熱して2時間以上保持した後、1080〜750℃の温度域で圧延率60%以上、600〜450℃の温度域で圧延率30%以上になるように1080〜450℃で熱間圧延を行い、次いで、圧延率0〜80%で冷間圧延を行い、次いで、520〜600℃で30分〜6時間の高温時効処理を行った後に400〜500℃で3〜20時間の低温時効処理を行うことにより、高い強度で、導電性および耐熱性に優れたCu−Fe−P系銅合金板材およびその製造方法を提供することができることを見出し、本発明を完成するに至った。 As a result of intensive studies to solve the above-mentioned problems, the inventors of the present invention contain 1.5 to 3.0% by mass of Fe and 0.01 to 0.2% by mass of P, with the balance being Cu and inevitable. An ingot obtained by melting and casting a raw material of a copper alloy composed of impurities is heated to 1020 to 1080 ° C. and held for 2 hours or more, and then a rolling rate of 60% or more and 600 to 450 ° C. in a temperature range of 1800 to 750 ° C. Hot rolling is performed at 1080 to 450 ° C. so that the rolling rate becomes 30% or more in the temperature range, then cold rolling is performed at a rolling rate of 0 to 80%, and then at 520 to 600 ° C. for 30 minutes to 6 hours. Cu-Fe-P-based copper alloy sheet having high strength and excellent electrical conductivity and heat resistance by performing low-temperature aging treatment at 400 to 500 ° C. for 3 to 20 hours after the high-temperature aging treatment and manufacturing thereof Found that can provide a method This has led to the completion of the present invention.
すなわち、本発明による銅合金板材は、1.5〜3.0質量%のFeと、0.01〜0.2質量%のPを含み、残部がCuおよび不可避不純物からなる銅合金の原料を溶融して鋳造した鋳塊を1020〜1080℃まで加熱して2時間以上保持した後、1080〜750℃の温度域で圧延率60%以上、600〜450℃の温度域で圧延率30%以上になるように1080〜450℃で熱間圧延を行い、次いで、圧延率0〜80%で冷間圧延を行い、次いで、520〜600℃で30分〜6時間の高温時効処理を行った後に400〜500℃で3〜20時間の低温時効処理を行うことを特徴とする。 That is, the copper alloy sheet according to the present invention is a copper alloy raw material containing 1.5 to 3.0 mass% Fe and 0.01 to 0.2 mass% P, with the balance being Cu and inevitable impurities. After the molten and cast ingot is heated to 1020 to 1080 ° C. and held for 2 hours or more, the rolling rate is 60% or more in the temperature range of 1,080 to 750 ° C., and the rolling rate is 30% or more in the temperature range of 600 to 450 ° C. After performing hot rolling at 1080 to 450 ° C., followed by cold rolling at a rolling rate of 0 to 80%, and then performing high temperature aging treatment at 520 to 600 ° C. for 30 minutes to 6 hours. A low temperature aging treatment is performed at 400 to 500 ° C. for 3 to 20 hours.
この銅合金板材の製造方法において、低温時効処理を行った後に圧延率70%以上で仕上げ冷間圧延を行うのが好ましく、この仕上げ冷間圧延を行った後に250〜600℃で低温焼鈍を行うのが好ましい。また、銅合金の原料が、0.2質量%以下のSn、0.15質量%以下のMgおよび0.3質量%以下のZnからなる群から選ばれる1種以上の元素をさらに含む組成を有してもよい。さらに、銅合金の原料が、Ni、Ca、Al、Si、Cr、Mn、Zr、Ag、Cd、Be、Ti、Co、S、Au、Pt、Pb、BiおよびSbからなる群から選ばれる1種以上の元素を合計0.4質量%以下の範囲でさらに含む組成を有してもよい。 In this method for producing a copper alloy sheet, it is preferable to perform finish cold rolling at a rolling rate of 70% or more after performing low temperature aging treatment, and perform low temperature annealing at 250 to 600 ° C. after performing this finish cold rolling. Is preferred. The composition of the copper alloy further includes one or more elements selected from the group consisting of 0.2 mass% or less of Sn, 0.15 mass% or less of Mg, and 0.3 mass% or less of Zn. You may have. Further, the raw material of the copper alloy is selected from the group consisting of Ni, Ca, Al, Si, Cr, Mn, Zr, Ag, Cd, Be, Ti, Co, S, Au, Pt, Pb, Bi and Sb. You may have the composition which further contains an element more than a seed | species in the range of a total of 0.4 mass% or less.
また、本発明による銅合金板材は、1.5〜3.0質量%のFeと、0.01〜0.2質量%のPを含み、残部がCuおよび不可避不純物である組成を有し、導電率が60%IACS以上、ビッカース硬さHVが150以上であり、500℃で30分間保持した後のビッカース硬さHVが140以上であることを特徴とする。 Further, the copper alloy sheet according to the present invention has a composition containing 1.5 to 3.0% by mass of Fe and 0.01 to 0.2% by mass of P, with the balance being Cu and inevitable impurities, The electrical conductivity is 60% IACS or more, the Vickers hardness HV is 150 or more, and the Vickers hardness HV after holding at 500 ° C. for 30 minutes is 140 or more.
この銅合金板材において、粒径1μm以上のFe−P粒子の密度が30個/mm2以下であるのが好ましく、磁化が1.0〜4.0emu/gであるのが好ましい。また、銅合金板材が、0.2質量%以下のSn、0.15質量%以下のMgおよび0.3質量%以下のZnからなる群から選ばれる1種以上の元素をさらに含む組成を有してもよい。さらに、銅合金板材が、Ni、Ca、Al、Si、Cr、Mn、Zr、Ag、Cd、Be、Ti、Co、S、Au、Pt、Pb、BiおよびSbからなる群から選ばれる1種以上の元素を合計0.4質量%以下の範囲でさらに含む組成を有してもよい。 In this copper alloy sheet, the density of Fe-P particles having a particle size of 1 μm or more is preferably 30 particles / mm 2 or less, and the magnetization is preferably 1.0 to 4.0 emu / g. Further, the copper alloy sheet material has a composition further including at least one element selected from the group consisting of Sn of 0.2% by mass or less, Mg of 0.15% by mass or less, and Zn of 0.3% by mass or less. May be. Further, the copper alloy sheet is one selected from the group consisting of Ni, Ca, Al, Si, Cr, Mn, Zr, Ag, Cd, Be, Ti, Co, S, Au, Pt, Pb, Bi and Sb. You may have the composition which further contains the above element in the range of 0.4 mass% or less in total.
本発明によれば、高い強度で、導電性および耐熱性に優れたCu−Fe−P系銅合金板材を製造することができる。 According to the present invention, it is possible to produce a Cu—Fe—P-based copper alloy sheet having high strength and excellent electrical conductivity and heat resistance.
本発明による銅合金板材の製造方法の実施の形態では、1.5〜3.0質量%のFeと、0.01〜0.2質量%のPを含み、残部がCuおよび不可避不純物からなる銅合金の原料を溶融して鋳造した鋳塊を1020〜1080℃まで加熱して2時間以上保持した後、1080〜750℃の温度域で圧延率(加工度)60%以上、600〜450℃の温度域で圧延率(加工度)30%以上になるように1080〜450℃で熱間圧延を行い、次いで、圧延率0〜80%で冷間圧延を行い、次いで、520〜600℃で30分〜6時間の高温時効処理を行った後に(連続して)400〜500℃で3〜20時間の低温時効処理を行う(高温時効処理と低温時効処理の2階段時効処理を行う)。 In the embodiment of the method for producing a copper alloy sheet according to the present invention, it contains 1.5 to 3.0% by mass of Fe and 0.01 to 0.2% by mass of P, with the balance being Cu and inevitable impurities. An ingot obtained by melting and casting a copper alloy raw material is heated to 1020 to 1080 ° C. and held for 2 hours or more, and then a rolling rate (working degree) is 60% or more and 600 to 450 ° C. in a temperature range of 1800 to 750 ° C. In this temperature range, hot rolling is performed at 1080 to 450 ° C. so that the rolling rate (working degree) is 30% or more, then cold rolling is performed at a rolling rate of 0 to 80%, and then at 520 to 600 ° C. After performing high temperature aging treatment for 30 minutes to 6 hours (continuously), low temperature aging treatment is performed at 400 to 500 ° C. for 3 to 20 hours (two-step aging treatment of high temperature aging treatment and low temperature aging treatment is performed).
Feは、銅合金板材の強度を向上させる作用を有するが、その含有量が1.5質量%未満では強度の向上が不十分であり、3.0質量%を超えると導電率が低下するので、Fe含有量は1.5〜3.0質量%であるのが好ましく、1.8〜2.5質量%であるのがさらに好ましい。 Fe has an effect of improving the strength of the copper alloy sheet, but if the content is less than 1.5% by mass, the strength is not sufficiently improved, and if it exceeds 3.0% by mass, the conductivity decreases. The Fe content is preferably 1.5 to 3.0 mass%, more preferably 1.8 to 2.5 mass%.
Pは、溶湯の脱酸作用を有するとともに、Feと化合物を形成して析出することによって導電率および強度を向上させる作用を有するが、その含有量が0.01質量%未満ではこれらの作用が不十分であり、0.2質量%を超えるとこれらの作用が飽和して、逆に析出物が粗大化し易いので、P含有量は0.01〜0.2質量%であるのが好ましく、0.015〜0.15質量%であるのがさらに好ましい。 P has a deoxidizing action of the molten metal and has an action of improving conductivity and strength by forming and precipitating a compound with Fe. However, when its content is less than 0.01% by mass, these actions are not achieved. When it exceeds 0.2% by mass, these actions are saturated, and the precipitate is liable to be coarsened. Therefore, the P content is preferably 0.01 to 0.2% by mass, More preferably, it is 0.015-0.15 mass%.
また、銅合金の原料が、0.2質量%以下のSn、0.15質量%以下のMgおよび0.3質量%以下のZnからなる群から選ばれる1種以上の元素をさらに含む組成を有してもよい。Snは、銅合金板材の耐熱性を向上させる作用を有するが、その含有量が0.2質量%を超えると導電率が低下するので、Snの含有量は0.2質量%以下であるのが好ましく、0.1質量%以下であるのがさらに好ましい。Mgは、銅合金板材の耐熱性を向上させる作用を有し、また、その添加による導電率の低下が比較的小さいが、その含有量が0.15質量%を超えると、生産性が低下するので、Mgの含有量は0.15質量%以下であるのが好ましく、0.1質量%以下であるのがさらに好ましい。Znは、Pと同様に溶湯の脱酸作用を有するが、その含有量が0.3質量%を超えると脱酸作用が飽和して導電率も低下するので、Zn含有量は0.3質量%以下であるのが好ましく、0.2質量%以下であるのがさらに好ましい。 The composition of the copper alloy further includes one or more elements selected from the group consisting of 0.2 mass% or less of Sn, 0.15 mass% or less of Mg, and 0.3 mass% or less of Zn. You may have. Sn has the effect of improving the heat resistance of the copper alloy sheet, but if its content exceeds 0.2% by mass, the conductivity decreases, so the Sn content is 0.2% by mass or less. Is preferable, and it is further more preferable that it is 0.1 mass% or less. Mg has the effect of improving the heat resistance of the copper alloy sheet, and the decrease in conductivity due to its addition is relatively small. However, when its content exceeds 0.15% by mass, the productivity decreases. Therefore, the Mg content is preferably 0.15% by mass or less, and more preferably 0.1% by mass or less. Zn has a deoxidizing action of the molten metal like P, but if its content exceeds 0.3% by mass, the deoxidizing action is saturated and the conductivity decreases, so the Zn content is 0.3% by mass. % Or less is preferable, and 0.2% by mass or less is more preferable.
なお、銅合金板材の原料として、電子材料のスクラップなどを使用する場合には、スクラップ中に混入した元素が原料中に不可避的に混入する可能性がある。また、多数の種類の銅合金を製造する場合、それぞれの銅合金の原料を同一の溶解炉で溶解すると、僅かではあるが、前の銅合金の成分が原料中に混入する場合がある。このような不可避不純物として、例えば、Ni、Ca、Al、Si、Cr、Mn、Zr、Ag、Cd、Be、Ti、Co、S、Au、Pt、Pb、Bi、Sbなどを、それぞれ0.1質量%以下、合計0.4質量%以下の範囲で含んでもよい。 In addition, when using the scrap of an electronic material etc. as a raw material of a copper alloy board | plate material, the element mixed in the scrap may be inevitably mixed in the raw material. Moreover, when manufacturing many types of copper alloys, if the raw materials of the respective copper alloys are melted in the same melting furnace, the components of the previous copper alloy may be mixed in the raw materials, though only slightly. As such inevitable impurities, for example, Ni, Ca, Al, Si, Cr, Mn, Zr, Ag, Cd, Be, Ti, Co, S, Au, Pt, Pb, Bi, Sb, etc. are each set to 0. It may be included in a range of 1% by mass or less and a total of 0.4% by mass or less.
本発明による銅合金板材の製造方法の実施の形態によって、銅合金の原料を溶融して鋳造する鋳塊は、通常の銅合金の連続鋳造法または半連続鋳造法により製造することができる。 According to the embodiment of the method for producing a copper alloy sheet according to the present invention, an ingot for melting and casting a copper alloy raw material can be produced by a normal copper alloy continuous casting method or semi-continuous casting method.
この鋳塊の熱間圧延は、加熱炉によって1020〜1080℃程度まで加熱して2時間以上保持した後に行う。この熱間圧延の前の加熱は、鋳造中に生じる偏析や晶出物を低減させる効果に加えて、耐熱性の低下の要因となるFe−P粒子を固溶させる効果がある。 The ingot is hot-rolled after being heated to about 1020 to 1080 ° C. by a heating furnace and held for 2 hours or more. The heating prior to the hot rolling has the effect of solid-dissolving Fe—P particles, which causes a decrease in heat resistance, in addition to the effect of reducing segregation and crystallized matter generated during casting.
なお、Cu−Fe−P系銅合金は、熱間圧延中に析出するため、比較的(動的)再結晶が生じ難い。そのため、この熱間圧延中では、1080〜750℃の高温域で強圧延を行うことにより、Cu−Fe−P系銅合金の析出を抑制して、動的再結晶を発生させることができる。この1080〜750℃の温度域の熱間圧延では、圧延率が60%以上であるのが好ましく、65%以上であるのがさらに好ましく、70%以上であるのがさらに好ましい。続いて、600〜450℃の温度域で圧延率30%以上の熱間圧延を行うことによって、銅マトリックス中に微細なFeまたはFe−P系化合物が析出すると考えられる。なお、600〜450℃の低温域の熱間圧延では、金属間化合物が動的に析出することにより、析出物の生成と微細化が起こるという効果があり、その後の時効焼鈍処理によってγFe粒子とαFe粒子の密度のバランスを調整することができる。 In addition, since a Cu-Fe-P type copper alloy precipitates during hot rolling, it is relatively difficult for (dynamic) recrystallization to occur. Therefore, during this hot rolling, by performing strong rolling at a high temperature range of 1800 to 750 ° C., it is possible to suppress the precipitation of the Cu—Fe—P-based copper alloy and generate dynamic recrystallization. In the hot rolling in the temperature range of 1,080 to 750 ° C., the rolling rate is preferably 60% or more, more preferably 65% or more, and further preferably 70% or more. Subsequently, it is considered that fine Fe or Fe—P-based compounds are precipitated in the copper matrix by performing hot rolling at a rolling rate of 30% or more in a temperature range of 600 to 450 ° C. In addition, in hot rolling in a low temperature region of 600 to 450 ° C., there is an effect that the intermetallic compound is dynamically precipitated, thereby generating precipitates and refining, and by subsequent aging annealing treatment, γFe particles and The balance of the density of the αFe particles can be adjusted.
この熱間圧延後に行う冷間圧延では、圧延率0〜80%とする。この段階の圧延率が80%を超えると、最終の仕上げ圧延の圧延率を確保することができなくなる可能性がある。また、生産性を向上させるために、この段階における冷間圧延を省略してもよい。なお、この圧延率が0%である場合は、この冷間圧延を行わずに直接時効処理を行うことを意味する。 In the cold rolling performed after the hot rolling, the rolling rate is set to 0 to 80%. If the rolling rate at this stage exceeds 80%, the rolling rate of the final finish rolling may not be ensured. In order to improve productivity, cold rolling at this stage may be omitted. In addition, when this rolling rate is 0%, it means performing an aging process directly, without performing this cold rolling.
冷間圧延後の時効処理は、固溶元素を析出させるために行う。通常の時効処理では、時効温度が比較的低い(例えば450℃)と、析出速度が遅く、所望の導電率を確保する析出量を得るために必要な時効処理時間が数十時間になり、また、析出物の粒径が小さく、その後の仕上げ圧延中に転位により切断して再固溶し易く、最終的な導電率が低下してしまう。一方、時効温度が比較的高い(例えば600℃)と、析出速度が速く、析出物も粗大化し易いため、γFe粒子とαFe粒子の密度のバランスの調整が困難になる。また、時効処理温度が中間の温度(例えば550℃)でも、一般に不均一に析出する(粒界や変形帯などで優先的に析出する)ため、γFe粒子とαFe粒子の密度の良好なバランスを得るのが困難になる。 The aging treatment after cold rolling is performed to precipitate solid solution elements. In a normal aging treatment, when the aging temperature is relatively low (for example, 450 ° C.), the precipitation rate is slow, and the aging treatment time required to obtain a precipitation amount that secures a desired conductivity is several tens of hours. Further, the particle size of the precipitate is small, and it is easy to re-dissolve by cutting by dislocation during the subsequent finish rolling, and the final conductivity is lowered. On the other hand, when the aging temperature is relatively high (for example, 600 ° C.), the precipitation rate is high and the precipitates are also easily coarsened, so that it is difficult to adjust the density balance of γFe particles and αFe particles. In addition, even when the aging treatment temperature is an intermediate temperature (for example, 550 ° C.), it generally precipitates non-uniformly (precipitates preferentially at grain boundaries, deformation bands, etc.), so a good balance between the density of γFe particles and αFe particles is achieved. It becomes difficult to obtain.
時効処理は、520〜600℃で30分〜6時間の高温時効処理と400〜500℃で3〜20時間の低温時効処理の2階段で行う。熱間圧延後の板材には、動的析出により、微細で均一な析出粒子があるが、520〜600℃で30分〜6時間の高温時効処理を行うことにより、動的析出した微細な析出物が比較的短時間でαFe粒子に成長する。この高温時効処理の温度が低過ぎたり、時間が短過ぎると、αFe粒子の密度が不十分であり、温度が高過ぎたり、時間が長過ぎると、Fe−P粒子の密度が増加してしまう。その後の400〜500℃で3〜20時間の低温時効処理では、γFe粒子の密度が増加するが、高温時効処理で生じるαFe粒子は過度に成長しない。この低温時効処理の温度が低過ぎたり、時間が短過ぎると、γFe粒子の密度が不十分になり、温度が高過ぎたり、時間が長過ぎると、αFe粒子が粗大化してしまう。 The aging treatment is performed in two steps: a high temperature aging treatment at 520 to 600 ° C. for 30 minutes to 6 hours and a low temperature aging treatment at 400 to 500 ° C. for 3 to 20 hours. The plate after hot rolling has fine and uniform precipitated particles due to dynamic precipitation, but by performing high temperature aging treatment at 520 to 600 ° C. for 30 minutes to 6 hours, Things grow into αFe particles in a relatively short time. If the temperature of this high temperature aging treatment is too low or the time is too short, the density of αFe particles is insufficient, and if the temperature is too high or too long, the density of Fe—P particles increases. . In the subsequent low temperature aging treatment at 400 to 500 ° C. for 3 to 20 hours, the density of γFe particles increases, but the αFe particles produced by the high temperature aging treatment do not grow excessively. If the temperature of this low temperature aging treatment is too low or the time is too short, the density of γFe particles will be insufficient, and if the temperature is too high or too long, the αFe particles will become coarse.
この高温時効処理と低温時効処理の2段階の時効処理は、焼鈍炉の温度を調整することによって行うことができるが、設備的に温度の調整が難しい場合には、それぞれの温度の焼鈍炉で行ってもよい。 This two-stage aging treatment, high temperature aging treatment and low temperature aging treatment, can be performed by adjusting the temperature of the annealing furnace. You may go.
この時効処理後の板材を所望の板厚にするために、仕上げ冷間圧延を行うのが好ましい。一般に、板材の圧延率(加工度)が高くなるにつれて、強度が高くなるが、導電率および耐熱性が低下すると考えられる。しかし、本実施の形態の銅合金板材の製造方法によって製造される銅合金板材は、仕上げ冷間圧延の圧延率(加工度)70%以上、好ましくは80%以上、さらに好ましくは90%以上であっても、優れた耐熱性を有する。また、要求される強度および板厚によっては、仕上げ冷間圧延後に(好ましくは250〜600℃、さらに好ましくは350〜500℃で)低温焼鈍を行う必要がある。この低温焼鈍は、歪取り焼鈍であり、また、仕上げ冷間圧延によって低下した導電率を部分的に回復することができる。 In order to obtain a desired plate thickness after the aging treatment, finish cold rolling is preferably performed. Generally, as the rolling rate (working degree) of the plate material increases, the strength increases, but the electrical conductivity and heat resistance are considered to decrease. However, the copper alloy sheet produced by the method for producing a copper alloy sheet according to the present embodiment has a finish cold rolling reduction rate (working degree) of 70% or more, preferably 80% or more, more preferably 90% or more. Even if it exists, it has the outstanding heat resistance. Further, depending on the required strength and plate thickness, it is necessary to perform low-temperature annealing after finish cold rolling (preferably at 250 to 600 ° C., more preferably at 350 to 500 ° C.). This low-temperature annealing is a strain relief annealing and can partially recover the conductivity lowered by finish cold rolling.
本発明による銅合金板材の実施の形態は、1.5〜3.0質量%のFeと、0.01〜0.2質量%のPを含み、残部がCuおよび不可避不純物である組成を有し、導電率が60%IACS以上、ビッカース硬さHVが150以上であり、500℃で30分間保持した後のビッカース硬さHVが140以上である。この銅合金板材において、粒径1μm以上のFe−P粒子の密度が30個/mm2以下であるのが好ましく、磁化が1.0〜4.0emu/gであるのが好ましい。 The embodiment of the copper alloy sheet according to the present invention has a composition containing 1.5 to 3.0 mass% Fe and 0.01 to 0.2 mass% P, with the balance being Cu and inevitable impurities. The electrical conductivity is 60% IACS or higher, the Vickers hardness HV is 150 or higher, and the Vickers hardness HV after holding at 500 ° C. for 30 minutes is 140 or higher. In this copper alloy sheet, the density of Fe-P particles having a particle size of 1 μm or more is preferably 30 particles / mm 2 or less, and the magnetization is preferably 1.0 to 4.0 emu / g.
上述したように、Cu−Fe−P系銅合金板材中のFe析出物は、大きさによって種類が異なり、数nmのFe析出物は主にγFe粒子、数十〜数百nmのFe析出物は主にαFe粒子、1μm以上のFe析出物は主にFe−P粒子である。 As described above, the types of Fe precipitates in the Cu—Fe—P-based copper alloy sheet vary depending on the size. Fe deposits of several nm are mainly γFe particles, Fe precipitates of several tens to several hundreds of nm. Are mainly αFe particles, and Fe precipitates of 1 μm or more are mainly Fe—P particles.
γFe粒子は、転位と粒界の移動のピンニング効果があり、その密度が多いほど、板材の強度と耐熱性が優れている。αFe粒子は、板材の強度と耐熱性を向上させる効果がある(但し、γFe粒子より効果が小さい)。特に、時効処理後に生じるγFe粒子は、その後に板材の強度を向上させるための仕上げ圧延中に、転位により切断されて再固溶し、板材の導電率が低下し易くなる。そのため、一定の転位により切断され難いαFe粒子が必要である。αFe粒子の密度が低過ぎると、板材の導電率の低下を抑制する効果が不十分であり、αFe粒子の密度が高過ぎると、必然的にγFe粒子の密度が低下してしまう。 The γFe particles have a pinning effect of dislocation and grain boundary movement, and the higher the density, the better the strength and heat resistance of the plate material. The αFe particles have the effect of improving the strength and heat resistance of the plate material (however, they are less effective than the γFe particles). In particular, the γFe particles generated after the aging treatment are cut by dislocation and then re-dissolved during finish rolling for improving the strength of the plate material, and the conductivity of the plate material is likely to decrease. Therefore, αFe particles that are difficult to be cut by a certain dislocation are required. If the density of the αFe particles is too low, the effect of suppressing the decrease in the conductivity of the plate material is insufficient, and if the density of the αFe particles is too high, the density of the γFe particles inevitably decreases.
γFe粒子とαFe粒子の粒子径は非常に小さく、透過型電子顕微鏡(TEM)により観察する必要があるが、TEMによる観察は局所的であり、板材全体を評価するのは困難である。また、粒子径のみでγFe粒子とαFe粒子を区別することは困難であるため、TEMによる観察に代わる測定方法が必要になる。 Although the particle diameters of γFe particles and αFe particles are very small and need to be observed with a transmission electron microscope (TEM), the observation with TEM is local, and it is difficult to evaluate the entire plate. In addition, since it is difficult to distinguish γFe particles and αFe particles only from the particle size, a measurement method that replaces observation by TEM is required.
本発明者らは、αFe粒子が強磁性であることに着目し、板材の磁化と導電率を測定することにより、γFe粒子とαFe粒子の割合を求めたが、磁化が好ましくは1.0〜4.0emu/g、さらに好ましくは1.5〜3.5emu/gになるγFe粒子とαFe粒子の割合にすれば、高い強度で、導電性および耐熱性に優れたCu−Fe−P系銅合金板材を製造することができることがわかった。 The present inventors paid attention to the fact that αFe particles are ferromagnetic and determined the ratio of γFe particles to αFe particles by measuring the magnetization and conductivity of the plate material. Cu-Fe-P copper having high strength, excellent conductivity and heat resistance when the ratio of γFe particles to αFe particles is 4.0 emu / g, more preferably 1.5 to 3.5 emu / g. It has been found that an alloy sheet can be produced.
また、粒径が1μm以上の粗大なFe−P粒子は、強度と耐熱性を向上させる効果がほとんどなく、その密度が低いほど、相対的にγFe粒子やαFe粒子の密度が増大する。したがって、粒径が1μm以上の粗大なFe−P粒子の密度が30個/mm2以下であるのが好ましく、20個/mm2以下であるのがさらに好ましい。 In addition, coarse Fe—P particles having a particle size of 1 μm or more have little effect of improving strength and heat resistance, and the density of γFe particles and αFe particles increases relatively as the density is lower. Therefore, the density of coarse Fe—P particles having a particle diameter of 1 μm or more is preferably 30 particles / mm 2 or less, and more preferably 20 particles / mm 2 or less.
以下、本発明による銅合金板材およびその製造方法の実施例について詳細に説明する。 Hereinafter, examples of the copper alloy sheet material and the manufacturing method thereof according to the present invention will be described in detail.
[実施例1]
表1に示す化学成分の銅合金(2.33質量%のFeと、0.022質量%のPと、残部がCuおよび不可避不純物からなる銅合金)を高周波溶解炉で溶解し、厚さ30mm×幅50mm×長さ150mmの鋳塊を作製した。
[Example 1]
A copper alloy having a chemical composition shown in Table 1 (2.33 mass% Fe, 0.022 mass% P, and the balance copper alloy consisting of Cu and inevitable impurities) was melted in a high-frequency melting furnace, and the thickness was 30 mm. An ingot having a width of 50 mm and a length of 150 mm was produced.
この鋳塊を加熱炉で1050℃まで加熱して3時間保持した後、750℃以上の温度域において圧延率67%で熱間圧延を6パス行って板厚10mmの圧延材を得た。なお、この熱間圧延のパス間で温度が低下するのを防止するために、950℃の加熱炉に2分間保持した。続いて、600℃の加熱炉に2分間保持した後、600〜450℃の温度域において圧延率40%で熱間圧延を2パス行って板厚6mmの圧延材を得た。 The ingot was heated to 1050 ° C. in a heating furnace and held for 3 hours, and then hot rolling was performed for 6 passes at a rolling rate of 67% in a temperature range of 750 ° C. or higher to obtain a rolled material having a plate thickness of 10 mm. In order to prevent the temperature from decreasing between passes of this hot rolling, it was kept in a heating furnace at 950 ° C. for 2 minutes. Then, after hold | maintaining for 2 minutes in a 600 degreeC heating furnace, hot rolling was performed by the rolling rate of 40% in the temperature range of 600-450 degreeC, and the rolling material with a plate | board thickness of 6 mm was obtained.
次に、得られた熱間圧延材に、焼鈍炉によって高温時効焼鈍を600℃で6時間行った後に低温時効焼鈍を450℃で4時間行った。 Next, the obtained hot-rolled material was subjected to high-temperature aging annealing at 600 ° C. for 6 hours in an annealing furnace and then low-temperature aging annealing at 450 ° C. for 4 hours.
次に、これらの高温および低温の2段階の時効焼鈍後の圧延材の表面と裏面を研磨し、板厚が0.127mmになるまで仕上げ冷間圧延(圧延率98%)を行った後、425℃の焼鈍炉内に1分間保持する低温焼鈍を行って板厚0.127mmの銅合金板材を作製した。 Next, after polishing the surface and the back surface of the rolled material after two-stage aging annealing of these high temperature and low temperature, after performing finish cold rolling (rolling rate 98%) until the plate thickness becomes 0.127 mm, A low temperature annealing was performed in a 425 ° C. annealing furnace for 1 minute to produce a copper alloy sheet having a thickness of 0.127 mm.
これらの製造条件を表2および表3に示す。 These production conditions are shown in Tables 2 and 3.
得られた銅合金板材について、Fe−P粒子の密度、磁化、導電率および硬さを求めるとともに、耐熱性の評価を行った。 About the obtained copper alloy board | plate material, while calculating the density, magnetization, electrical conductivity, and hardness of Fe-P particle | grains, heat resistance was evaluated.
Fe−P粒子の密度は、SEM−EDX(走査型電子顕微鏡(SEM)として日立ハイテクフィールディング株式会社製のS−3000、エネルギー分散型X線分析装置(EDX)として株式会社堀場製作所製のEMAX−7000を使用した装置)を用いて、加速電圧20kV、倍率500倍(観察視野180μm×260μm)として銅合金板材上の任意の20箇所を観察し、粒径1μm以上の析出物の個数を数えて、析出物の密度(単位面積当たりの個数)を求めた。なお、析出物がFe−P粒子であることは、EDXを用いて分析することによって確認した。その結果、Fe−P粒子の密度は14個/mm2であった。 The density of Fe-P particles is SEM-EDX (S-3000 manufactured by Hitachi High-Tech Fielding Co., Ltd. as a scanning electron microscope (SEM), and EMAX- manufactured by Horiba, Ltd. as an energy dispersive X-ray analyzer (EDX). 7000), an accelerating voltage of 20 kV and a magnification of 500 times (observation field of view 180 μm × 260 μm) were observed at any 20 locations on the copper alloy sheet, and the number of precipitates having a particle size of 1 μm or more was counted. The density of the precipitates (number per unit area) was determined. In addition, it confirmed that the deposit was Fe-P particle | grains by analyzing using EDX. As a result, the density of Fe—P particles was 14 particles / mm 2 .
磁化は、銅合金板材を8mm角に切断し、試料振動型磁力計(VSM)を用いて、印加磁界5kOe、振動周波数80Hzの条件で、銅合金板材の圧延方向に磁場がかかるように測定した。その結果、磁化は3.3emu/gであった。 Magnetization was measured by cutting a copper alloy sheet into 8 mm square and using a sample vibration magnetometer (VSM) so that a magnetic field was applied in the rolling direction of the copper alloy sheet under the conditions of an applied magnetic field of 5 kOe and a vibration frequency of 80 Hz. . As a result, the magnetization was 3.3 emu / g.
導電率は、JIS H0505の導電率測定方法に従って測定した。その結果、導電率は64.2%IACSであった。 The electrical conductivity was measured according to the electrical conductivity measurement method of JIS H0505. As a result, the conductivity was 64.2% IACS.
硬さは、JIS Z2244に準拠して、試験荷重500gfとしてビッカース硬さHVを測定した。その結果、ビッカース硬さHVは154であった。 Hardness measured Vickers hardness HV as test load 500gf based on JISZ2244. As a result, the Vickers hardness HV was 154.
耐熱性は、銅合金板材を500℃に加熱された(大気)炉内で30分間保持し、炉から取り出して室温まで空冷した後、ビッカース硬さHVを測定することによって評価した。その結果、500℃で30分間保持した後のビッカース硬さHVは146であった。 The heat resistance was evaluated by measuring the Vickers hardness HV after holding the copper alloy plate material in a furnace (atmosphere) heated to 500 ° C. for 30 minutes, taking it out of the furnace and cooling it to room temperature. As a result, the Vickers hardness HV after holding at 500 ° C. for 30 minutes was 146.
これらの結果を表4に示す。 These results are shown in Table 4.
[実施例2〜7]
表1に示す化学成分の銅合金(実施例2では、2.05質量%のFeと、0.034質量%のPと、0.04質量%のSnと、0.067質量%のZnと、残部がCuおよび不可避不純物からなる銅合金、実施例3では、1.68質量%のFeと、0.071質量%のPと、残部がCuおよび不可避不純物からなる銅合金、実施例4では、2.48質量%のFeと、0.018質量%のPと、0.05質量%のMgと、残部がCuおよび不可避不純物からなる銅合金、実施例5では、2.41質量%のFeと、0.028質量%のPと、0.254質量%のZnと、残部がCuおよび不可避不純物からなる銅合金、実施例6では、1.93質量%のFeと、0.048質量%のPと、0.073質量%のSnと、残部がCuおよび不可避不純物からなる銅合金、実施例7では、2.32質量%のFeと、0.032質量%のPと、0.097質量%のNiと、0.005質量%のMnと、残部がCuおよび不可避不純物からなる銅合金)から鋳塊を作製し、高温時効焼鈍を600℃で4時間、低温時効焼鈍を450℃で8時間(実施例2)、高温時効焼鈍を600℃で1時間、低温時効焼鈍を450℃で12時間(実施例3)、高温時効焼鈍を550℃で6時間、低温時効焼鈍を420℃で4時間(実施例4)、高温時効焼鈍を550℃で4時間、低温時効焼鈍を420℃で8時間(実施例5)、高温時効焼鈍を550℃で1時間、低温時効焼鈍を450℃で12時間(実施例6)、高温時効焼鈍を600℃で6時間、低温時効焼鈍を450℃で4時間(実施例7)行った以外は、実施例1と同様の方法により、銅合金板材を作製した。これらの製造条件を表2および表3に示す。
[Examples 2 to 7]
Copper alloy having chemical components shown in Table 1 (in Example 2, 2.05 mass% Fe, 0.034 mass% P, 0.04 mass% Sn, 0.067 mass% Zn, In the third example, a copper alloy consisting of Cu and inevitable impurities, in Example 3, 1.68% by mass of Fe and 0.071% by mass of P, and in the fourth example, a copper alloy consisting of Cu and inevitable impurities. 2.48% by mass of Fe, 0.018% by mass of P, 0.05% by mass of Mg, and the balance being Cu and an inevitable impurity copper alloy, in Example 5, 2.41% by mass Fe, 0.028% by mass of P, 0.254% by mass of Zn, the balance being Cu and an inevitable impurity copper alloy, in Example 6, 1.93% by mass of Fe and 0.048% by mass % P, 0.073 mass% Sn, the balance being Cu and inevitable impurities In Example 7, a copper alloy consisting of: 2.32 wt% Fe, 0.032 wt% P, 0.097 wt% Ni, 0.005 wt% Mn, the balance being Cu and An ingot is made from an inevitable impurity), high temperature aging annealing is performed at 600 ° C. for 4 hours, low temperature aging annealing is performed at 450 ° C. for 8 hours (Example 2), high temperature aging annealing is performed at 600 ° C. for 1 hour, and low temperature. Aging annealing at 450 ° C. for 12 hours (Example 3), high temperature aging annealing at 550 ° C. for 6 hours, low temperature aging annealing at 420 ° C. for 4 hours (Example 4), high temperature aging annealing at 550 ° C. for 4 hours, low temperature Aging annealing at 420 ° C. for 8 hours (Example 5), high temperature aging annealing at 550 ° C. for 1 hour, low temperature aging annealing at 450 ° C. for 12 hours (Example 6), high temperature aging annealing at 600 ° C. for 6 hours, low temperature Except for performing aging annealing at 450 ° C. for 4 hours (Example 7), In the same manner as in Example 1, to prepare a copper alloy sheet. These production conditions are shown in Tables 2 and 3.
得られた銅合金板材について、実施例1と同様の方法により、Fe−P粒子の密度、磁化、導電率および硬さを求めるとともに、耐熱性の評価を行った。その結果、Fe−P粒子の密度は、それぞれ8個/mm2(実施例2)、18個/mm2(実施例3)、13個/mm2(実施例4)、9個/mm2(実施例5)、16個/mm2(実施例6)、10個/mm2(実施例7)であった。また、磁化は、それぞれ2.9emu/g(実施例2)、3.4emu/g(実施例3)、2.2emu/g(実施例4)、2.7emu/g(実施例5)、2.1emu/g(実施例6)、3.1emu/g(実施例7)であった。また、導電率は、それぞれ62.1%IACS(実施例2)、67.9%IACS(実施例3)、65.1%IACS(実施例4)、62.8%IACS(実施例5)、66.1%IACS(実施例6)、63.2%IACS(実施例7)であった。また、ビッカース硬さHVは、それぞれ164(実施例2)、151(実施例3)、162(実施例4)、150(実施例5)、154(実施例6)、172(実施例7)であった。さらに、銅合金板材を500℃で30分間保持した後のビッカース硬さHVは、それぞれ157(実施例2)、142(実施例3)、158(実施例4)、145(実施例5)、150(実施例6)、165(実施例7)であった。これらの結果を表4に示す。 About the obtained copper alloy board | plate material, the density, magnetization, electrical conductivity, and hardness of Fe-P particle | grains were calculated | required by the method similar to Example 1, and heat resistance was evaluated. As a result, the density of Fe-P particles, respectively 8 / mm 2 (Example 2), 18 / mm 2 (Example 3), 13 / mm 2 (Example 4), 9 / mm 2 (Example 5), 16 pieces / mm 2 (Example 6), and 10 pieces / mm 2 (Example 7). The magnetizations were 2.9 emu / g (Example 2), 3.4 emu / g (Example 3), 2.2 emu / g (Example 4), 2.7 emu / g (Example 5), respectively. It was 2.1 emu / g (Example 6) and 3.1 emu / g (Example 7). In addition, the conductivity was 62.1% IACS (Example 2), 67.9% IACS (Example 3), 65.1% IACS (Example 4), and 62.8% IACS (Example 5), respectively. 66.1% IACS (Example 6) and 63.2% IACS (Example 7). The Vickers hardness HV was 164 (Example 2), 151 (Example 3), 162 (Example 4), 150 (Example 5), 154 (Example 6), and 172 (Example 7), respectively. Met. Further, the Vickers hardness HV after holding the copper alloy sheet at 500 ° C. for 30 minutes is 157 (Example 2), 142 (Example 3), 158 (Example 4), 145 (Example 5), 150 (Example 6) and 165 (Example 7). These results are shown in Table 4.
[実施例8〜10]
表1に示す化学成分の銅合金(実施例8では、2.15質量%のFeと、0.026質量%のPと、0.054質量%のCoと、0.030質量%のSiと、残部がCuおよび不可避不純物からなる銅合金、実施例9では、2.24質量%のFeと、0.024質量%のPと、0.045質量%のTiと、0.009質量%のAlと、残部がCuおよび不可避不純物からなる銅合金、実施例10では、2.06質量%のFeと、0.016質量%のPと、0.006質量%のCrと、0.005質量%のZrと、残部がCuおよび不可避不純物からなる銅合金)から鋳塊を作製し、熱間圧延と時効焼鈍の間に圧延率75%で冷間圧延を行い、仕上げ冷間圧延の圧延率92%とした以外は、実施例1と同様の方法により、銅合金板材を作製した。これらの製造条件を表2および表3に示す。
[Examples 8 to 10]
Copper alloys of chemical components shown in Table 1 (in Example 8, 2.15 mass% Fe, 0.026 mass% P, 0.054 mass% Co, 0.030 mass% Si, In Example 9, the remainder is a copper alloy consisting of Cu and inevitable impurities. In Example 9, 2.24 mass% Fe, 0.024 mass% P, 0.045 mass% Ti, and 0.009 mass% Copper alloy consisting of Al and the balance Cu and inevitable impurities, Example 10, 2.06 mass% Fe, 0.016 mass% P, 0.006 mass% Cr, 0.005 mass % Zr and the balance is a copper alloy consisting of Cu and inevitable impurities), and cold rolling is performed at a rolling rate of 75% between hot rolling and aging annealing, and the rolling rate of finish cold rolling A copper alloy sheet was produced in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the content was 92%. These production conditions are shown in Tables 2 and 3.
得られた銅合金板材について、実施例1と同様の方法により、Fe−P粒子の密度、磁化、導電率および硬さを求めるとともに、耐熱性の評価を行った。その結果、Fe−P粒子の密度は、それぞれ15個/mm2(実施例8)、10個/mm2(実施例9)、19個/mm2(実施例10)であった。また、磁化は、それぞれ3.5emu/g(実施例8)、2.5emu/g(実施例9)、1.7emu/g(実施例10)であった。また、導電率は、それぞれ66.9%IACS(実施例8)、64.2%IACS(実施例9)、63.8%IACS(実施例10)であった。また、ビッカース硬さHVは、それぞれ174(実施例8)、168(実施例9)、171(実施例10)であった。さらに、銅合金板材を500℃で30分間保持した後のビッカース硬さHVは、それぞれ162(実施例8)、163(実施例9)、167(実施例10)であった。これらの結果を表4に示す。 About the obtained copper alloy board | plate material, the density, magnetization, electrical conductivity, and hardness of Fe-P particle | grains were calculated | required by the method similar to Example 1, and heat resistance was evaluated. As a result, the density of Fe-P particles was 15 particles / mm 2 (Example 8), 10 particles / mm 2 (Example 9), and 19 particles / mm 2 (Example 10), respectively. The magnetizations were 3.5 emu / g (Example 8), 2.5 emu / g (Example 9), and 1.7 emu / g (Example 10), respectively. The electrical conductivity was 66.9% IACS (Example 8), 64.2% IACS (Example 9), and 63.8% IACS (Example 10), respectively. The Vickers hardness HV was 174 (Example 8), 168 (Example 9), and 171 (Example 10), respectively. Further, the Vickers hardness HV after holding the copper alloy sheet at 500 ° C. for 30 minutes was 162 (Example 8), 163 (Example 9), and 167 (Example 10), respectively. These results are shown in Table 4.
[実施例11〜12]
表1に示す化学成分の銅合金(実施例11では、2.34質量%のFeと、0.019質量%のPと、残部がCuおよび不可避不純物からなる銅合金、実施例12では、2.40質量%のFeと、0.030質量%のPと、残部がCuおよび不可避不純物からなる銅合金)から鋳塊を作製し、実施例11では熱間圧延の際の加熱温度を1050℃に代えて1080℃、750℃以上の温度域の圧延率を60%、600〜450℃の温度域の圧延率を50%とし、実施例12では熱間圧延の際の加熱温度を1050℃に代えて1020℃、750℃以上の温度域の圧延率を70%、600〜450℃の温度域の圧延率を33%とした以外は、実施例1と同様の方法により、銅合金板材を作製した。これらの製造条件を表2および表3に示す。
[Examples 11 to 12]
Copper alloys having chemical components shown in Table 1 (in Example 11, 2.34% by mass of Fe, 0.019% by mass of P, and the balance of Cu and inevitable impurities, in Example 12, 2 An ingot was prepared from 40 mass% Fe, 0.030 mass% P, and the balance being a copper alloy consisting of Cu and inevitable impurities. In Example 11, the heating temperature during hot rolling was 1050 ° C. Instead, the rolling rate in the temperature range of 1080 ° C. and 750 ° C. or higher is set to 60%, the rolling rate in the temperature range of 600 to 450 ° C. is set to 50%, and in Example 12, the heating temperature during hot rolling is set to 1050 ° C. Instead, a copper alloy sheet was produced in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the rolling rate in the temperature range of 1020 ° C. and 750 ° C. or higher was 70% and the rolling rate in the temperature range of 600 to 450 ° C. was 33%. did. These production conditions are shown in Tables 2 and 3.
得られた銅合金板材について、実施例1と同様の方法により、Fe−P粒子の密度、磁化、導電率および硬さを求めるとともに、耐熱性の評価を行った。その結果、Fe−P粒子の密度は、それぞれ7個/mm2(実施例11)、16個/mm2(実施例12)であった。また、磁化は、それぞれ2.8emu/g(実施例11)、1.9emu/g(実施例12)であった。また、導電率は、それぞれ65.4%IACS(実施例11)、63.3%IACS(実施例12)であった。また、ビッカース硬さHVは、それぞれ165(実施例11)、169(実施例12)であった。さらに、銅合金板材を500℃で30分間保持した後のビッカース硬さHVは、それぞれ160(実施例11)、165(実施例12)であった。これらの結果を表4に示す。 About the obtained copper alloy board | plate material, the density, magnetization, electrical conductivity, and hardness of Fe-P particle | grains were calculated | required by the method similar to Example 1, and heat resistance was evaluated. As a result, the density of Fe-P particles was 7 particles / mm 2 (Example 11) and 16 particles / mm 2 (Example 12), respectively. The magnetizations were 2.8 emu / g (Example 11) and 1.9 emu / g (Example 12), respectively. The electrical conductivity was 65.4% IACS (Example 11) and 63.3% IACS (Example 12), respectively. The Vickers hardness HV was 165 (Example 11) and 169 (Example 12), respectively. Furthermore, the Vickers hardness HV after holding the copper alloy sheet at 500 ° C. for 30 minutes was 160 (Example 11) and 165 (Example 12), respectively. These results are shown in Table 4.
[比較例1]
熱間圧延の際の加熱温度を1050℃に代えて950℃とした以外は、実施例1と同様の方法により、銅合金板材を作製した。これらの製造条件を表2および表3に示す。
[Comparative Example 1]
A copper alloy sheet was produced in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the heating temperature at the time of hot rolling was changed to 950 ° C. instead of 1050 ° C. These production conditions are shown in Tables 2 and 3.
得られた銅合金板材について、実施例1と同様の方法により、Fe−P粒子の密度、磁化、導電率および硬さを求めるとともに、耐熱性の評価を行った。その結果、Fe−P粒子の密度は63個/mm2、磁化は3.3emu/g、導電率は63.8%IACS、ビッカース硬さHVは152、銅合金板材を500℃で30分間保持した後のビッカース硬さHVは108であった。これらの結果を表4に示す。 About the obtained copper alloy board | plate material, the density, magnetization, electrical conductivity, and hardness of Fe-P particle | grains were calculated | required by the method similar to Example 1, and heat resistance was evaluated. As a result, the density of Fe—P particles is 63 particles / mm 2 , the magnetization is 3.3 emu / g, the conductivity is 63.8% IACS, the Vickers hardness HV is 152, and the copper alloy sheet is held at 500 ° C. for 30 minutes. After that, the Vickers hardness HV was 108. These results are shown in Table 4.
[比較例2]
熱間圧延の際の加熱温度を1050℃に代えて950℃とし、(実施例4と同様に)高温時効焼鈍を550℃で6時間、低温時効焼鈍を420℃で4時間行った以外は、実施例1と同様の方法により、銅合金板材を作製した。これらの製造条件を表2および表3に示す。
[Comparative Example 2]
The heating temperature at the time of hot rolling was changed to 950 ° C. instead of 1050 ° C., except that the high temperature aging annealing was performed at 550 ° C. for 6 hours and the low temperature aging annealing was performed at 420 ° C. for 4 hours (as in Example 4). A copper alloy sheet was produced in the same manner as in Example 1. These production conditions are shown in Tables 2 and 3.
得られた銅合金板材について、実施例1と同様の方法により、Fe−P粒子の密度、磁化、導電率および硬さを求めるとともに、耐熱性の評価を行った。その結果、Fe−P粒子の密度は91個/mm2、磁化は3.0emu/g、導電率は65.1%IACS、ビッカース硬さHVは157、銅合金板材を500℃で30分間保持した後のビッカース硬さHVは91であった。これらの結果を表4に示す。 About the obtained copper alloy board | plate material, the density, magnetization, electrical conductivity, and hardness of Fe-P particle | grains were calculated | required by the method similar to Example 1, and heat resistance was evaluated. As a result, the density of Fe-P particles was 91 particles / mm 2 , the magnetization was 3.0 emu / g, the conductivity was 65.1% IACS, the Vickers hardness HV was 157, and the copper alloy sheet was held at 500 ° C. for 30 minutes. After the Vickers hardness HV was 91. These results are shown in Table 4.
[比較例3〜5]
高温時効焼鈍と低温時効焼鈍の2段階の時効処理に代えて、それぞれ600℃で10時間(比較例3)、450℃で24時間(比較例4)、550℃で14時間(比較例5)の等温時効を行った以外は、実施例1と同様の方法により、銅合金板材を作製した。これらの製造条件を表2および表3に示す。
[Comparative Examples 3 to 5]
Instead of two-stage aging treatment of high temperature aging annealing and low temperature aging annealing, 600 ° C. for 10 hours (Comparative Example 3), 450 ° C. for 24 hours (Comparative Example 4), and 550 ° C. for 14 hours (Comparative Example 5) A copper alloy sheet was produced in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the isothermal aging was performed. These production conditions are shown in Tables 2 and 3.
得られた銅合金板材について、実施例1と同様の方法により、Fe−P粒子の密度、磁化、導電率および硬さを求めるとともに、耐熱性の評価を行った。その結果、Fe−P粒子の密度は、それぞれ20個/mm2(比較例3)、14個/mm2(比較例4)、10個/mm2(比較例5)であった。また、磁化は、それぞれ4.7emu/g(比較例3)、0.9emu/g(比較例4)、4.1emu/g(比較例5)であった。また、導電率は、それぞれ64.7%IACS(比較例3)、45.4%IACS(比較例4)、63.1%IACS(比較例5)であった。また、ビッカース硬さHVは、それぞれ119(比較例3)、159(比較例4)、158(比較例5)であった。さらに、銅合金板材を500℃で30分間保持した後のビッカース硬さHVは、それぞれ98(比較例3)、146(比較例4)、134(比較例5)であった。これらの結果を表4に示す。 About the obtained copper alloy board | plate material, the density, magnetization, electrical conductivity, and hardness of Fe-P particle | grains were calculated | required by the method similar to Example 1, and heat resistance was evaluated. As a result, the density of Fe-P particles was 20 particles / mm 2 (Comparative Example 3), 14 particles / mm 2 (Comparative Example 4), and 10 particles / mm 2 (Comparative Example 5), respectively. The magnetizations were 4.7 emu / g (Comparative Example 3), 0.9 emu / g (Comparative Example 4), and 4.1 emu / g (Comparative Example 5), respectively. The electrical conductivities were 64.7% IACS (Comparative Example 3), 45.4% IACS (Comparative Example 4), and 63.1% IACS (Comparative Example 5), respectively. The Vickers hardness HV was 119 (Comparative Example 3), 159 (Comparative Example 4), and 158 (Comparative Example 5), respectively. Further, the Vickers hardness HV after holding the copper alloy sheet at 500 ° C. for 30 minutes was 98 (Comparative Example 3), 146 (Comparative Example 4), and 134 (Comparative Example 5), respectively. These results are shown in Table 4.
[比較例6〜7]
比較例6では、750℃以上の温度域の圧延率を40%、600〜450℃の温度域の圧延率を44%、仕上げ冷間圧延の圧延率を99%とし、比較例7では、600〜450℃の温度域の熱間圧延を行わず、仕上げ冷間圧延の圧延率を99%とした以外は、実施例1と同様の方法により、銅合金板材を作製した。これらの製造条件を表2および表3に示す。
[Comparative Examples 6-7]
In Comparative Example 6, the rolling rate in the temperature range of 750 ° C. or higher is 40%, the rolling rate in the temperature range of 600 to 450 ° C. is 44%, and the rolling rate of finish cold rolling is 99%. A copper alloy sheet was produced in the same manner as in Example 1 except that hot rolling in a temperature range of ˜450 ° C. was not performed and the rolling rate of finish cold rolling was 99%. These production conditions are shown in Tables 2 and 3.
得られた銅合金板材について、実施例1と同様の方法により、Fe−P粒子の密度、磁化、導電率および硬さを求めるとともに、耐熱性の評価を行った。その結果、Fe−P粒子の密度は、それぞれ18個/mm2(比較例6)、12個/mm2(比較例7)であった。また、磁化は、それぞれ4.2emu/g(比較例6)、1.2emu/g(比較例7)であった。また、導電率は、それぞれ65.6%IACS(比較例6)、48.6%IACS(比較例7)であった。また、ビッカース硬さHVは、それぞれ142(比較例6)、177(比較例7)であった。さらに、銅合金板材を500℃で30分間保持した後のビッカース硬さHVは、それぞれ113(比較例6)、146(比較例7)であった。これらの結果を表4に示す。 About the obtained copper alloy board | plate material, the density, magnetization, electrical conductivity, and hardness of Fe-P particle | grains were calculated | required by the method similar to Example 1, and heat resistance was evaluated. As a result, the density of Fe-P particles was 18 particles / mm 2 (Comparative Example 6) and 12 particles / mm 2 (Comparative Example 7), respectively. The magnetizations were 4.2 emu / g (Comparative Example 6) and 1.2 emu / g (Comparative Example 7), respectively. Moreover, the electrical conductivity was 65.6% IACS (Comparative Example 6) and 48.6% IACS (Comparative Example 7), respectively. The Vickers hardness HV was 142 (Comparative Example 6) and 177 (Comparative Example 7), respectively. Further, the Vickers hardness HV after holding the copper alloy sheet at 500 ° C. for 30 minutes was 113 (Comparative Example 6) and 146 (Comparative Example 7), respectively. These results are shown in Table 4.
[比較例8〜9]
表1に示す化学成分の銅合金(比較例8では、3.48質量%のFeと、0.051質量%のPと、残部がCuおよび不可避不純物からなる銅合金、比較例9では、1.21質量%のFeと、0.044質量%のPと、残部がCuおよび不可避不純物からなる銅合金)から鋳塊を作製した以外は、実施例1と同様の方法により、銅合金板材を作製した。これらの製造条件を表2および表3に示す。
[Comparative Examples 8-9]
Copper alloys having the chemical components shown in Table 1 (in Comparative Example 8, 3.48% by mass of Fe, 0.051% by mass of P, and the balance being Cu and inevitable impurities, in Comparative Example 9, A copper alloy sheet was produced in the same manner as in Example 1 except that an ingot was produced from .21 mass% Fe, 0.044 mass% P, and the balance being a copper alloy consisting of Cu and inevitable impurities. Produced. These production conditions are shown in Tables 2 and 3.
得られた銅合金板材について、実施例1と同様の方法により、Fe−P粒子の密度、磁化、導電率および硬さを求めるとともに、耐熱性の評価を行った。その結果、Fe−P粒子の密度は、それぞれ128個/mm2(比較例8)、16個/mm2(比較例9)であった。また、磁化は、それぞれ2.6emu/g(比較例8)、3.5emu/g(比較例9)であった。また、導電率は、それぞれ46.9%IACS(比較例8)、61.9%IACS(比較例9)であった。また、ビッカース硬さHVは、それぞれ157(比較例8)、136(比較例9)であった。さらに、銅合金板材を500℃で30分間保持した後のビッカース硬さHVは、それぞれ124(比較例8)、104(比較例9)であった。これらの結果を表4に示す。 About the obtained copper alloy board | plate material, the density, magnetization, electrical conductivity, and hardness of Fe-P particle | grains were calculated | required by the method similar to Example 1, and heat resistance was evaluated. As a result, the density of Fe-P particles was 128 particles / mm 2 (Comparative Example 8) and 16 particles / mm 2 (Comparative Example 9), respectively. The magnetizations were 2.6 emu / g (Comparative Example 8) and 3.5 emu / g (Comparative Example 9), respectively. The electrical conductivity was 46.9% IACS (Comparative Example 8) and 61.9% IACS (Comparative Example 9), respectively. The Vickers hardness HV was 157 (Comparative Example 8) and 136 (Comparative Example 9), respectively. Further, the Vickers hardness HV after holding the copper alloy sheet at 500 ° C. for 30 minutes was 124 (Comparative Example 8) and 104 (Comparative Example 9), respectively. These results are shown in Table 4.
[比較例10]
熱間圧延の際の加熱温度を1050℃に代えて950℃とし、熱間圧延と時効焼鈍の間に、圧延率75%で冷間圧延を行った後に900℃で3分間溶体化処理を行って300℃以下になるまで50℃/分以上の冷却速度で水冷し、高温時効焼鈍を600℃で2時間、低温時効焼鈍を450℃で2時間行い、仕上げ冷間圧延の圧延率92%とした以外は、実施例1と同様の方法により、銅合金板材を作製した。これらの製造条件を表2および表3に示す。
[Comparative Example 10]
The heating temperature at the time of hot rolling was changed to 950 ° C. instead of 1050 ° C., and after the cold rolling at a rolling rate of 75% between hot rolling and aging annealing, solution treatment was performed at 900 ° C. for 3 minutes. Until the temperature reaches 300 ° C. or less, water cooling is performed at a cooling rate of 50 ° C./min or more, high temperature aging annealing is performed at 600 ° C. for 2 hours, and low temperature aging annealing is performed at 450 ° C. for 2 hours. A copper alloy sheet was produced in the same manner as in Example 1 except that. These production conditions are shown in Tables 2 and 3.
得られた銅合金板材について、実施例1と同様の方法により、Fe−P粒子の密度、磁化、導電率および硬さを求めるとともに、耐熱性の評価を行った。その結果、Fe−P粒子の密度は79個/mm2、磁化は3.0emu/g、導電率は47.2%IACS、ビッカース硬さHVは172、銅合金板材を500℃で30分間保持した後のビッカース硬さHVは151であった。これらの結果を表4に示す。 About the obtained copper alloy board | plate material, the density, magnetization, electrical conductivity, and hardness of Fe-P particle | grains were calculated | required by the method similar to Example 1, and heat resistance was evaluated. As a result, the density of Fe-P particles was 79 particles / mm 2 , the magnetization was 3.0 emu / g, the conductivity was 47.2% IACS, the Vickers hardness HV was 172, and the copper alloy sheet was held at 500 ° C. for 30 minutes. After that, the Vickers hardness HV was 151. These results are shown in Table 4.
[比較例11]
熱間圧延の際の加熱温度を1050℃に代えて950℃とし、熱間圧延と時効焼鈍の間に圧延率80%で冷間圧延を行い、高温時効焼鈍を600℃で23時間、低温時効焼鈍を500℃で23時間行い、仕上げ冷間圧延の圧延率89%とした以外は、実施例1と同様の方法により、銅合金板材を作製した。これらの製造条件を表2および表3に示す。
[Comparative Example 11]
The heating temperature at the time of hot rolling was changed to 950 ° C. instead of 1050 ° C., cold rolling was performed at a rolling rate of 80% between hot rolling and aging annealing, and high temperature aging annealing was performed at 600 ° C. for 23 hours, low temperature aging A copper alloy sheet was produced in the same manner as in Example 1 except that annealing was performed at 500 ° C. for 23 hours and the rolling rate of finish cold rolling was 89%. These production conditions are shown in Tables 2 and 3.
得られた銅合金板材について、実施例1と同様の方法により、Fe−P粒子の密度、磁化、導電率および硬さを求めるとともに、耐熱性の評価を行った。その結果、Fe−P粒子の密度は106個/mm2、磁化は4.6emu/g、導電率は69.0%IACS、ビッカース硬さHVは167、銅合金板材を500℃で30分間保持した後のビッカース硬さHVは101であった。これらの結果を表4に示す。 About the obtained copper alloy board | plate material, the density, magnetization, electrical conductivity, and hardness of Fe-P particle | grains were calculated | required by the method similar to Example 1, and heat resistance was evaluated. As a result, the density of Fe-P particles is 106 particles / mm 2 , the magnetization is 4.6 emu / g, the conductivity is 69.0% IACS, the Vickers hardness HV is 167, and the copper alloy sheet is held at 500 ° C. for 30 minutes. After the Vickers hardness HV was 101. These results are shown in Table 4.
表4に示すように、実施例1〜10の銅合金板材はいずれも、導電率が60%IACS以上、ビッカース硬さHVが150以上、500℃で30分間保持した後のビッカース硬さHVが140以上であった。 As shown in Table 4, all of the copper alloy sheet materials of Examples 1 to 10 have an electrical conductivity of 60% IACS or more, a Vickers hardness HV of 150 or more, and a Vickers hardness HV after being held at 500 ° C. for 30 minutes. 140 or more.
一方、比較例1および2の銅合金板材では、熱間圧延時の加熱温度が低過ぎて、Fe−P粒子が固溶できず、Fe−P粒子の密度が高過ぎるため、500℃で30分間保持した後のビッカース硬さHVが低くなり、耐熱性が低下していた。 On the other hand, in the copper alloy sheet materials of Comparative Examples 1 and 2, the heating temperature at the time of hot rolling is too low, the Fe—P particles cannot be dissolved, and the density of the Fe—P particles is too high. The Vickers hardness HV after holding for a minute was lowered, and the heat resistance was lowered.
比較例3の銅合金板材では、600℃と高い温度で長時間等温時効を行ったため、磁化が大きくなり(γFe粒子の密度が低くなって、αFe粒子とFe−P粒子の密度が高くなり)、導電率は高かったが、強度が低下し、耐熱性が低下していた。比較例4の銅合金板材では、450℃と低い温度で長時間等温時効を行ったため、磁化が小さくなり(時効後にγFe粒子の密度は高くなるものの、仕上げ圧延後に再固溶し)、導電率が低下していた。比較例5の銅合金板材では、550℃と中間の温度で長時間等温時効を行ったため、磁化が僅かに大きくなり(γFe粒子とαFe粒子のバランスが良好でなく)、耐熱性が低下していた。 In the copper alloy sheet of Comparative Example 3, since the isothermal aging was performed at a high temperature of 600 ° C. for a long time, the magnetization increased (the density of γFe particles decreased, and the density of αFe particles and Fe—P particles increased). The electrical conductivity was high, but the strength was reduced and the heat resistance was reduced. In the copper alloy sheet of Comparative Example 4, since the isothermal aging was performed for a long time at a temperature as low as 450 ° C., the magnetization decreased (the density of γFe particles increased after aging, but re-solidified after finish rolling), and the conductivity Had fallen. In the copper alloy sheet of Comparative Example 5, since the isothermal aging was performed at an intermediate temperature of 550 ° C. for a long time, the magnetization was slightly increased (the balance between γFe particles and αFe particles was not good) and the heat resistance was reduced. It was.
比較例6の銅合金板材では、1080〜750℃の温度域の熱間圧延率が40%と低過ぎたため、十分に再結晶することなく、Fe−P粒子が析出して、硬さと耐熱性のいずれも低かった。比較例7の銅合金板材では、600℃〜450℃の温度域で熱間圧延を行わなかったため、磁化が小さくなり(高温時効中のαFe粒子の生成量が少なくなり)、強度と耐熱性は良好であったが、導電率が低下していた。 In the copper alloy sheet of Comparative Example 6, since the hot rolling rate in the temperature range of 1800 to 750 ° C. was too low as 40%, Fe—P particles precipitated without sufficient recrystallization, and the hardness and heat resistance Both were low. In the copper alloy sheet of Comparative Example 7, since hot rolling was not performed in the temperature range of 600 ° C. to 450 ° C., the magnetization was reduced (the amount of αFe particles generated during high temperature aging was reduced), and the strength and heat resistance were Although it was good, the electrical conductivity was decreasing.
比較例8の銅合金板材では、Fe含有量が多過ぎたため、固溶量が高く、熱間圧延中に一部のFeが固溶できず、Fe−P粒子のままで最後まで残っており、導電率と耐熱性のいずれも低下していた。一方、比較例9の銅合金板材では、Fe量が少な過ぎて、硬さと耐熱性が低下していた。 In the copper alloy sheet of Comparative Example 8, since the Fe content was too large, the amount of solid solution was high, and part of Fe could not be dissolved during hot rolling, and remained as Fe-P particles until the end. Both conductivity and heat resistance were reduced. On the other hand, in the copper alloy sheet of Comparative Example 9, the amount of Fe was too small and the hardness and heat resistance were reduced.
比較例10の銅合金板材では、熱間圧延と時効焼鈍の間で溶体化処理を行ったため、Fe−P粒子の密度が高過ぎて、導電率が低下していた。比較例11の銅合金板材では、時効処理時間が長過ぎたため、Fe−P粒子の密度が高く、磁化が大きくなり、耐熱性が低下していた。 In the copper alloy sheet of Comparative Example 10, since the solution treatment was performed between hot rolling and aging annealing, the density of Fe-P particles was too high and the conductivity was lowered. In the copper alloy sheet of Comparative Example 11, since the aging treatment time was too long, the density of Fe—P particles was high, the magnetization was increased, and the heat resistance was reduced.
Claims (5)
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2012202292A JP5988794B2 (en) | 2012-09-14 | 2012-09-14 | Copper alloy sheet and manufacturing method thereof |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2012202292A JP5988794B2 (en) | 2012-09-14 | 2012-09-14 | Copper alloy sheet and manufacturing method thereof |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JP2014055341A JP2014055341A (en) | 2014-03-27 |
| JP5988794B2 true JP5988794B2 (en) | 2016-09-07 |
Family
ID=50612912
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2012202292A Active JP5988794B2 (en) | 2012-09-14 | 2012-09-14 | Copper alloy sheet and manufacturing method thereof |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP5988794B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2016211053A (en) * | 2015-05-12 | 2016-12-15 | 株式会社神戸製鋼所 | Copper alloy excellent in heat resistance |
| JP2018204115A (en) * | 2018-08-27 | 2018-12-27 | 株式会社神戸製鋼所 | Copper alloy having excellent heat resistance |
| CN110814305B (en) * | 2019-11-07 | 2021-06-15 | 中南大学 | A kind of Cu-Fe composite material double melt mixed casting equipment and technology |
| CN116790934B (en) * | 2023-06-29 | 2026-03-24 | 宁波金田铜业(集团)股份有限公司 | A copper-iron alloy strip for lead frames and its preparation method |
| CN121496306B (en) * | 2026-01-12 | 2026-04-03 | 中铝洛阳铜加工有限公司 | Cu-Fe-P alloy strip with high hardness and high softening resistance and preparation method thereof |
Family Cites Families (8)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPH02111829A (en) * | 1988-10-20 | 1990-04-24 | Sumitomo Metal Mining Co Ltd | Copper alloy for lead frame |
| JP3344687B2 (en) * | 1996-08-09 | 2002-11-11 | 株式会社神戸製鋼所 | Copper alloy for lead frame |
| JP3306585B2 (en) * | 1997-12-09 | 2002-07-24 | 三菱マテリアル株式会社 | Cu alloy rolled sheet with fine crystals and precipitates and low distribution ratio |
| JP5570109B2 (en) * | 2008-10-15 | 2014-08-13 | 三菱伸銅株式会社 | Copper alloy and lead frame material for electronic equipment |
| JP5297855B2 (en) * | 2009-03-26 | 2013-09-25 | Dowaメタルテック株式会社 | Copper alloy sheet and manufacturing method thereof |
| WO2011021245A1 (en) * | 2009-08-20 | 2011-02-24 | 三菱伸銅株式会社 | Copper alloy and lead frame material for electronic equipment |
| JP5610789B2 (en) * | 2010-02-25 | 2014-10-22 | Dowaメタルテック株式会社 | Copper alloy sheet and method for producing copper alloy sheet |
| EP2610358A4 (en) * | 2010-08-27 | 2017-05-03 | Furukawa Electric Co., Ltd. | Copper alloy sheet and manufacturing method for same |
-
2012
- 2012-09-14 JP JP2012202292A patent/JP5988794B2/en active Active
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP2014055341A (en) | 2014-03-27 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| JP6039999B2 (en) | Cu-Ni-Co-Si based copper alloy sheet and method for producing the same | |
| KR101576715B1 (en) | Copper alloy and method for producing copper alloy | |
| CN100510131C (en) | Copper alloy plate for electric and electronic parts having bending workability | |
| KR101161597B1 (en) | Cu-ni-si-co-base copper alloy for electronic material and process for producing the copper alloy | |
| JP5312920B2 (en) | Copper alloy plate or strip for electronic materials | |
| JP4837697B2 (en) | Cu-Ni-Si-Co-based copper alloy for electronic materials and method for producing the same | |
| JP5140045B2 (en) | Cu-Ni-Si alloy plate or strip for electronic materials | |
| TWI429768B (en) | Cu-Co-Si based copper alloy for electronic materials and method for producing the same | |
| JP6366298B2 (en) | High-strength copper alloy sheet material and manufacturing method thereof | |
| JP2008248333A (en) | Cu-Ni-Si-Co-based copper alloy for electronic materials and method for producing the same | |
| JP2012012644A (en) | Method for manufacturing copper alloy, and copper alloy | |
| JP7430502B2 (en) | Copper alloy wire and electronic equipment parts | |
| JP5988794B2 (en) | Copper alloy sheet and manufacturing method thereof | |
| KR20130109209A (en) | Cu-si-co-base copper alloy for electronic materials and method for producing same | |
| JP5297855B2 (en) | Copper alloy sheet and manufacturing method thereof | |
| JP5570109B2 (en) | Copper alloy and lead frame material for electronic equipment | |
| JP5610789B2 (en) | Copper alloy sheet and method for producing copper alloy sheet | |
| JP6730784B2 (en) | Cu-Ni-Co-Si alloy for electronic parts | |
| JP2016211053A (en) | Copper alloy excellent in heat resistance | |
| JP5638357B2 (en) | Copper alloy for electrical and electronic parts and method for producing the same | |
| JPH10265873A (en) | Copper alloy for electrical/electronic parts and its production | |
| JP5748945B2 (en) | Copper alloy material manufacturing method and copper alloy material obtained thereby | |
| US10358697B2 (en) | Cu—Co—Ni—Si alloy for electronic components | |
| WO2018235458A1 (en) | Copper alloy wire for springs and method of manufacturing the same | |
| JP2018204115A (en) | Copper alloy having excellent heat resistance |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20150706 |
|
| A977 | Report on retrieval |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007 Effective date: 20160310 |
|
| A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20160316 |
|
| A521 | Request for written amendment filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20160329 |
|
| TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20160802 |
|
| A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20160809 |
|
| R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Ref document number: 5988794 Country of ref document: JP Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |