JP6121764B2 - Air electrode used in solid oxide fuel cell - Google Patents
Air electrode used in solid oxide fuel cell Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP6121764B2 JP6121764B2 JP2013059806A JP2013059806A JP6121764B2 JP 6121764 B2 JP6121764 B2 JP 6121764B2 JP 2013059806 A JP2013059806 A JP 2013059806A JP 2013059806 A JP2013059806 A JP 2013059806A JP 6121764 B2 JP6121764 B2 JP 6121764B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- air electrode
- average
- length
- microstructure
- reaction
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
Classifications
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E60/00—Enabling technologies; Technologies with a potential or indirect contribution to GHG emissions mitigation
- Y02E60/30—Hydrogen technology
- Y02E60/50—Fuel cells
Landscapes
- Inert Electrodes (AREA)
- Fuel Cell (AREA)
Description
本発明は、固体酸化物型燃料電池において用いられる空気極に関するものである。 The present invention relates to an air electrode used in a solid oxide fuel cell.
固体酸化物型燃料電池(以下、SOFCということがある)が次世代の高効率燃料電池として注目されている。SOFCは、現在広く使用されている固体高分子型燃料電池(以下、PEFCという)と比べて、システムコストを低く抑えながら、PEFCと同等以上の発電効率が得られるとの利点がある。特に、SOFCの低温動作、高効率化及び低コスト化を実現する上で、空気極の性能を向上させることが求められている。 Solid oxide fuel cells (hereinafter, sometimes referred to as SOFC) are attracting attention as next-generation high-efficiency fuel cells. The SOFC has an advantage that a power generation efficiency equal to or higher than that of the PEFC can be obtained while keeping the system cost low as compared with a polymer electrolyte fuel cell (hereinafter referred to as PEFC) which is widely used at present. In particular, it is required to improve the performance of the air electrode in order to realize low temperature operation, high efficiency and low cost of the SOFC.
この点、現行の空気極材料である(La,Sr)(Co,Fe)O3(以下、LSCFという)で表される組成の113系ペロブスカイト材料は、熱膨張係数が高く、そのためSOFCセル共焼成時にクラックが発生しやすいという問題がある。 In this regard, 113-based perovskite materials having a composition represented by (La, Sr) (Co, Fe) O 3 (hereinafter referred to as LSCF), which is the current air electrode material, have a high coefficient of thermal expansion. There is a problem that cracks are likely to occur during firing.
これに対し、比較的低い熱膨張係数を有する空気極材料として、一般式A2BO4(式中、AはLa等であり、BはNi等である)で表される214系ペロブスカイト材料が知られており、SOFC用の空気極として、セルへの焼付け温度と反応抵抗の関係が報告されている。 On the other hand, as an air electrode material having a relatively low coefficient of thermal expansion, a 214 series perovskite material represented by a general formula A 2 BO 4 (where A is La or the like, B is Ni or the like) is As a known SOFC air electrode, the relationship between the baking temperature on the cell and the reaction resistance has been reported.
例えば、非特許文献1(Lihua Lu et al., 「Electrochemical performance of La2NiO4+δ-La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3-δ composite cathodes for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells」, Materials Research Bulletin 45 (2010) 1135-1140)には、La2NiO4+δ(当該文献中、LNと称される)及び(La、Sr)(Co、Fe)O3−δ(当該文献中、LSCFと称される)の複合空気極材料を1050℃〜1150℃の焼付け温度で作製し、反応抵抗を測定したことが開示されている。この文献では、214系材料のみで構成されるLN電極では、1050℃での焼付けでは0.63Ωcm2と反応抵抗が高いのに対し、1100℃及び1150℃での焼付けでは0.21Ωcm2及び0.22Ωcm2と低い反応抵抗が得られたことが報告されている。 For example, Non-Patent Document 1 (Lihua Lu et al., “Electrochemical performance of La 2 NiO 4 + δ -La 0.6 Sr 0.4 Co 0.2 Fe 0.8 O 3-δ composite cathodes for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells”, Materials Research Bulletin 45 (2010) 1135-1140) include La 2 NiO 4 + δ (referred to as LN in the document) and (La, Sr) (Co, Fe) O 3-δ (referred to as LSCF in the document). The composite air electrode material was manufactured at a baking temperature of 1050 ° C. to 1150 ° C., and the reaction resistance was measured. In this document, an LN electrode composed only of a 214-based material has a high reaction resistance of 0.63 Ωcm 2 when baked at 1050 ° C., whereas it is 0.21 Ωcm 2 and 0 when baked at 1100 ° C. and 1150 ° C. It has been reported that reaction resistance as low as .22Ωcm 2 was obtained.
非特許文献2(Yue Cao et al., 「Preparation and characterization of Nd2-χSrχCoO4+δ cathodes for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cell」, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 35 (2010) 5594-5600)には、Nd2−xSrxCoO4+δ空気極材料において、1000〜1200℃の範囲内で焼付け温度を変化させて、反応抵抗を測定したことが開示されている。この文献には、焼付け温度が1000℃では粒子の焼結性が悪いため反応抵抗が高く、焼付け温度が1200℃では粒子サイズが大きくなり、1100℃での焼付けよりも性能が下がったことが報告されている。すなわち、1100℃の焼付け温度が最も反応抵抗低くなるという結果が示されている。 Non-Patent Document 2 (Yue Cao et al., “Preparation and characterization of Nd 2-χ Sr χ CoO 4 + δ cathodes for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cell”, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 35 (2010) 5594-5600) Discloses that the reaction resistance was measured by changing the baking temperature in the range of 1000 to 1200 ° C. in the Nd 2−x Sr x CoO 4 + δ air electrode material. This document reports that when the baking temperature is 1000 ° C., the sinterability of the particles is poor, so the reaction resistance is high, and when the baking temperature is 1200 ° C., the particle size increases and the performance is lower than the baking at 1100 ° C. Has been. That is, the results show that the baking resistance of 1100 ° C. has the lowest reaction resistance.
非特許文献3(C. Lalannea et al., 「Neodymium-deficient nickelate oxide Nd1.95NiO4+δ as cathode material for anode-supported intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells」, Journal of Power Sources 185 (2008) 1218-1224)には、Nd1.95NiO4+δ空気極材料において、1000〜1200℃の範囲内で焼付け温度を変化させて、反応抵抗を測定したことが開示されている。この文献には、焼付け温度が1100℃の場合の反応抵抗が0.183Ωcm2と最も低かったことが報告されている。 Non-Patent Document 3 (C. Lalannea et al., “Neodymium-deficient nickelate oxide Nd 1.95 NiO 4 + δ as cathode material for anode-supported intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells”, Journal of Power Sources 185 (2008) 1218-1224 ) Discloses that the reaction resistance was measured by changing the baking temperature in the range of 1000 to 1200 ° C. in the Nd 1.95 NiO 4 + δ air electrode material. This document reports that the reaction resistance at the baking temperature of 1100 ° C. was the lowest at 0.183 Ωcm 2 .
このように、214系ペロブスカイト材料は、LSCFと同等の焼付け温度であっても焼結性が悪く反応抵抗が高くなりやすく、本来の性能を十分に発揮しきれていないのが現状である。 Thus, the present situation is that 214-type perovskite materials have poor sintering properties and high reaction resistance even at a baking temperature equivalent to that of LSCF, and have not fully exhibited their original performance.
本発明者らは、今般、比較的低い熱膨張係数を有する特定組成の214系ペロブスカイト材料を含む空気極において、ある種の微構造が固体酸化物型燃料電池において反応抵抗の低減に大きく寄与しているとの知見を得た。 In the air electrode containing a 214-type perovskite material having a specific composition having a relatively low coefficient of thermal expansion, the present inventors have recently made a certain microstructure that contributes greatly to reducing the reaction resistance in a solid oxide fuel cell. I got the knowledge that.
したがって、本発明の目的は、比較的低い熱膨張係数を有しながらも、固体酸化物型燃料電池において低減された反応抵抗を呈することが可能な空気極を提供することである。 Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to provide an air electrode that can exhibit a reduced reaction resistance in a solid oxide fuel cell while having a relatively low coefficient of thermal expansion.
本発明の一態様によれば、固体酸化物型燃料電池において固体電解質層及び/又は反応防止層を接合させて用いられる空気極であって、
前記空気極が、一般式:A2BO4±δ(式中、AはLa、Pr及びNdから選択される少なくとも一種の希土類元素であり、BはNi、Cu、並びにFe、Ga及びAlから選択される少なくとも一種の元素であり、δは酸素過剰量又は酸素欠損量を示すが0でありうる)で表される組成の層状ペロブスカイト酸化物を含んでなり、
固体電解質層及び/又は反応防止層と接合された場合に形成される接合界面における導電パスの平均長さが0.5μm以上である微構造を有する、空気極が提供される。
According to one aspect of the present invention, there is provided an air electrode used by bonding a solid electrolyte layer and / or a reaction preventing layer in a solid oxide fuel cell,
The air electrode has a general formula: A 2 BO 4 ± δ (wherein A is at least one rare earth element selected from La, Pr and Nd, and B is from Ni, Cu, and Fe, Ga and Al). A layered perovskite oxide having a composition represented by: at least one element selected, wherein δ represents an oxygen excess or oxygen deficiency but may be 0),
Provided is an air electrode having a microstructure in which an average length of a conductive path at a bonding interface formed when bonded to a solid electrolyte layer and / or a reaction preventing layer is 0.5 μm or more.
本発明の他の態様によれば、本発明の空気極と、前記空気極の一面側に設けられる固体電解質層及び/又は反応防止層とを備えた、固体酸化物型燃料電池用の空気極複合体が提供される。 According to another aspect of the present invention, an air electrode for a solid oxide fuel cell comprising the air electrode of the present invention and a solid electrolyte layer and / or a reaction preventing layer provided on one surface side of the air electrode. A complex is provided.
空気極
本発明は、固体酸化物型燃料電池(SOFC)において固体電解質層及び/又は反応防止層を接合させて用いられる空気極に関する。空気極は、一般式:A2BO4±δ(式中、AはLa、Pr及びNdから選択される少なくとも一種の希土類元素であり、BはNi、Cu、並びにFe、Ga及びAlから選択される少なくとも一種の元素であり、δは酸素過剰量又は酸素欠損量を示すが0でありうる)で表される組成の層状ペロブスカイト酸化物を含んでなる。そして、この空気極は、固体電解質層及び/又は反応防止層と接合された場合に形成される接合界面における導電パスの平均長さが0.5μm以上である微構造を有する。本発明者らの今般の知見によれば、このような特有の微構造が、固体酸化物型燃料電池において反応抵抗の低減に寄与しうる。
Air electrode present invention relates to an air electrode to be used by bonding the solid electrolyte layer and / or the reaction-preventing layer in the solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC). The air electrode has a general formula: A 2 BO 4 ± δ (where A is at least one rare earth element selected from La, Pr, and Nd, and B is selected from Ni, Cu, and Fe, Ga, and Al) A layered perovskite oxide having a composition represented by: δ represents an oxygen excess or oxygen deficiency, but may be 0). The air electrode has a microstructure in which the average length of the conductive path at the bonding interface formed when bonded to the solid electrolyte layer and / or the reaction preventing layer is 0.5 μm or more. According to the present knowledge of the present inventors, such a unique microstructure can contribute to a reduction in reaction resistance in a solid oxide fuel cell.
特に、上記一般式の組成の層状ぺロブスカイトは、現行の空気極材料であるLSCF(114系ペロブスカイト材料)よりも熱膨張係数が比較的低い214系ペロブスカイト材料であり、SOFCセル共焼成時にクラックが発生しにくいとの利点を有する。その一方、この材料は、LSCFと同等の焼付け温度であっても焼結性が悪く反応抵抗が高くなりやすく、本来の性能を十分に発揮しきれていないのが現状であった。この点、本発明によれば、反応抵抗の低減に寄与しうる構造が特定されたため、固体酸化物燃料電池用の空気極における課題であった反応抵抗と熱膨張率の両立を実現することができ、固体酸化物燃料電池の性能向上を図ることができる。その上、本発明者らの試算によれば、反応抵抗が30%低減すると、固体酸化物燃料電池のセル抵抗が10%低減し(これはセル出力が10%増大することを意味する)、それに伴いセルの材料費が10%低減するため、固体酸化物燃料電池のコスト低減も可能となる。 In particular, the layered perovskite having the composition of the above general formula is a 214-based perovskite material whose thermal expansion coefficient is relatively lower than that of LSCF (114-based perovskite material), which is the current air electrode material, and cracks are generated when the SOFC cell is co-fired. It has the advantage that it does not easily occur. On the other hand, the present condition is that this material has a poor sintering property and a high reaction resistance even at a baking temperature equivalent to that of LSCF, and the original performance is not fully exhibited. In this regard, according to the present invention, since a structure that can contribute to the reduction of the reaction resistance has been specified, it is possible to realize both the reaction resistance and the thermal expansion coefficient, which are problems in the air electrode for the solid oxide fuel cell. Thus, the performance of the solid oxide fuel cell can be improved. In addition, according to the calculations by the present inventors, when the reaction resistance is reduced by 30%, the cell resistance of the solid oxide fuel cell is reduced by 10% (this means that the cell output is increased by 10%), Accordingly, the material cost of the cell is reduced by 10%, so that the cost of the solid oxide fuel cell can be reduced.
空気極は、層状ペロブスカイト酸化物を含んでなり、この層状ペロブスカイト酸化物は一般式:A2BO4±δで表される。上記一般式中、AはLa、Pr及びNdから選択される少なくとも一種の希土類元素であり、好ましくはNdである。BはNi、Cu、並びにFe、Ga及びAlから選択される少なくとも一種の元素であり、好ましくはNi、Cu及びGaの組合せである。δは酸素過剰量又は酸素欠損量を示すが0でありうる。上記一般式で表される基本組成は化学量論組成及び非化学量論組成のいずれも包含するものであるが、最新の装置を用いても酸素過剰量又は酸素欠損量(δ)を分析及び定量できない実情に照らして、慣習上A2BO4と略記されてもよいものである。いずれにせよ0≦δ<0.4であれば問題無いものと考えられる。本発明の空気極は特有の微構造に特徴を有しているが、その微構造が反応抵抗の低減に寄与する前提として、A2BO4±δなる組成の層状ペロブスカイト酸化物が上記のとおり入念に選択された特定の元素で構成されることが必要である。 The air electrode includes a layered perovskite oxide, and the layered perovskite oxide is represented by a general formula: A 2 BO 4 ± δ . In the above general formula, A is at least one rare earth element selected from La, Pr and Nd, preferably Nd. B is Ni, Cu, and at least one element selected from Fe, Ga, and Al, and preferably a combination of Ni, Cu, and Ga. δ represents an oxygen excess amount or an oxygen deficiency amount, but may be 0. The basic composition represented by the above general formula includes both a stoichiometric composition and a non-stoichiometric composition. However, even if the latest apparatus is used, oxygen excess amount or oxygen deficiency (δ) is analyzed and In light of the fact that cannot be quantified, it may be abbreviated as A 2 BO 4 conventionally. In any case, it is considered that there is no problem if 0 ≦ δ <0.4. The air electrode of the present invention is characterized by a unique microstructure. As a premise that the microstructure contributes to a reduction in reaction resistance, the layered perovskite oxide having a composition of A 2 BO 4 ± δ is as described above. It is necessary to be composed of specific elements carefully selected.
本発明の空気極は、固体電解質層及び/又は反応防止層と接合された場合に形成される接合界面における導電パスの平均長さが0.5μm以上、好ましくは0.5〜2.0μmであり、より好ましくは0.7〜1.5μmである微構造を有する。「接合界面における導電パスの平均長さ」とは、図1に示されるように、空気極の粒子が固体電解質層及び/又は反応防止層に接続している箇所における、界面に対して平行方向の長さの平均を指す。この長さは、走査型電子顕微鏡用のパソコンモニターで測定することができ、その際、SEMのソフトウェアの測長機能や画像解析ソフト(例えばAdobe Photoshop)等を好ましく用いることができる。数値の客観性を高めるために、1視野において導電パスの平均長さを測定し、これを合計5視野において行い、5視野分の平均値を導電パスの平均長さとして採用するのが好ましい。もっとも、本発明の空気極は、固体電解質層及び/又は反応防止層と接合させた場合に上記範囲内の導電パスの平均長さが実現される微構造を有するものであればよく、固体電解質層及び/又は反応防止層を備えていない単独の形態であってよいのは言うまでもない。 In the air electrode of the present invention, the average length of the conductive path at the bonding interface formed when bonded to the solid electrolyte layer and / or the reaction preventing layer is 0.5 μm or more, preferably 0.5 to 2.0 μm. More preferably, it has a microstructure that is 0.7 to 1.5 μm. As shown in FIG. 1, the “average length of the conductive path at the bonding interface” means the direction parallel to the interface at the location where the air electrode particles are connected to the solid electrolyte layer and / or the reaction preventing layer. Refers to the average length of This length can be measured with a personal computer monitor for a scanning electron microscope. In this case, a length measurement function of SEM software, image analysis software (for example, Adobe Photoshop), or the like can be preferably used. In order to improve the objectivity of the numerical value, it is preferable to measure the average length of the conductive path in one visual field, perform this for a total of five visual fields, and adopt the average value for the five visual fields as the average length of the conductive path. However, the air electrode of the present invention may have any microstructure that can realize the average length of the conductive path within the above range when bonded to the solid electrolyte layer and / or the reaction preventing layer. Needless to say, it may be in a single form without the layer and / or the reaction preventing layer.
また、上記接合界面を顕微鏡観察した場合に、得られる微構造画像の1視野の長さに占める導電パスの長さの平均割合が30%以上であるのが好ましく、より好ましくは30〜60%であり、さらに好ましくは35〜57%である。このような範囲であると反応抵抗の低減に寄与する。「微構造画像の一視野の長さに占める導電パスの長さの平均割合」とは、図2に示されるように、前述した手法で求めた導電パスの長さの1視野分の合計値を、その視野における反応防止層表面の全長(すなわち1視野の横方向の長さ)で割ることにより得られる値である。この長さは、走査型電子顕微鏡用のパソコンモニターで測定することができ、その際、SEMのソフトウェアの測長機能や画像解析ソフト(例えばAdobe Photoshop)等を好ましく用いることができる。数値の客観性を高めるために、1視野において導電パスの長さの平均割合を求め、これを合計5視野において行い、5視野分の平均値を導電パスの長さの平均割合として採用するのが好ましい。 In addition, when the bonding interface is observed with a microscope, the average ratio of the length of the conductive path in the length of one visual field of the obtained microstructure image is preferably 30% or more, more preferably 30 to 60%. More preferably, it is 35 to 57%. Within such a range, the reaction resistance is reduced. “The average ratio of the length of the conductive path to the length of one visual field of the microstructure image” is the total value of the length of the conductive path obtained by the above-described method for one visual field as shown in FIG. Is obtained by dividing the total length of the reaction preventing layer surface in the visual field (that is, the horizontal length of one visual field). This length can be measured with a personal computer monitor for a scanning electron microscope. In this case, a length measurement function of SEM software, image analysis software (for example, Adobe Photoshop), or the like can be preferably used. In order to increase the objectivity of the numerical value, the average ratio of the length of the conductive path is obtained for one field of view, and this is performed for a total of five fields of view, and the average value for the five fields of view is adopted as the average ratio of the length of the conductive path. Is preferred.
空気極は35%以下の平均気孔率を有するのが好ましく、より好ましくは20〜35%、さらに好ましくは25〜32%である。このような範囲であると反応抵抗の低減に寄与する。気孔率は、例えば、以下の手順:
‐空気極の厚み方向における断面の電子顕微鏡(SEM)画像を取得すること、
‐この画像(視野)において気孔を特定すること、
‐この画像における空気極の面積を取得すること、
‐この画像における気孔の面積の総和を取得すること、及び
‐この画像における[気孔面積の総和/空気極の総面積]を算出すること、
によって求めることができる。断面画像の取得にはSEM及びFE−SEM等を用いることができ、その後の気孔の面積の数値化等には画像解析ソフト(例えばAdobe Photoshop)等を用いることができる。数値の客観性を高めるために、画像編集ソフトを用いて図3に示されるように断面画像を白黒に2値化し、得られた2値画像の黒い部分が占める割合を読み取り、この読み取りを10視野について行い、読み取った10視野分の値の平均値を平均気孔率として採用するのが好ましい。
The air electrode preferably has an average porosity of 35% or less, more preferably 20 to 35%, and still more preferably 25 to 32%. Within such a range, the reaction resistance is reduced. The porosity can be determined, for example, by the following procedure:
-Obtaining an electron microscope (SEM) image of a cross section in the thickness direction of the air electrode;
-Identifying pores in this image (field of view),
-Obtaining the area of the cathode in this image,
-Obtaining the total area of the pores in this image; and-calculating [total pore area / total area of the air electrode] in this image,
Can be obtained. SEM, FE-SEM, etc. can be used for acquisition of a cross-sectional image, and image analysis software (for example, Adobe Photoshop) etc. can be used for quantification of the area of the pores thereafter. In order to improve the objectivity of the numerical values, the cross-sectional image is binarized into black and white as shown in FIG. 3 using image editing software, and the ratio of the black portion of the obtained binary image is read. It is preferable to adopt the average value of the values for the 10 visual fields that have been read and read as the average porosity.
空気極を構成する粒子は、インターセプト法により測定した場合に、0.8μm以上の平均粒子径を有するのが好ましく、より好ましくは0.8〜2.0μmであり、より好ましくは0.9〜1.6μmである。このような範囲であると反応抵抗の低減に寄与する。インターセプト法とは、図4に示されるように、微構造画像に引いた直線を通る粒子の長さを測り平均値を取る方法であり、具体的には、微構造画像上に任意に6本の直線を引き、これらの直線上にかかる粒子の境界間の長さを求め、微構造画像の縮尺の値を基に粒子径を算出することにより行う。この作業は、画像解析ソフト(例えばAdobe Photoshop)等を好ましく用いることができる。数値の客観性を高めるために、1視野において得られた全ての粒子径をサイズ順に並べて、それらの平均値に照らして上位25点及び下位25点の合計50点の粒子径データを採取し、このデータ採取を合計3視野において行い、3視野分の粒子径の平均値を平均粒子径として採用するのが好ましい。 The particles constituting the air electrode preferably have an average particle diameter of 0.8 μm or more, more preferably 0.8 to 2.0 μm, more preferably 0.9 to 0, when measured by the intercept method. 1.6 μm. Within such a range, the reaction resistance is reduced. As shown in FIG. 4, the intercept method is a method in which the length of particles passing through a straight line drawn on a microstructure image is measured and an average value is obtained. The straight line is drawn, the length between the boundaries of the particles on the straight line is obtained, and the particle diameter is calculated based on the scale value of the microstructure image. For this operation, image analysis software (for example, Adobe Photoshop) or the like can be preferably used. In order to increase the objectivity of the numerical values, all the particle sizes obtained in one field of view are arranged in order of size, and the particle size data of a total of 50 points of the upper 25 points and the lower 25 points are collected in light of their average values, It is preferable to collect this data in a total of three fields and adopt the average value of the particle diameters for the three fields as the average particle diameter.
本発明の好ましい態様によれば、空気極を構成する粒子は0.35μm以上の平均ネック径を有し、好ましくは0.35〜1.0μmであり、より好ましくは0.5〜0.9μmである。このような範囲であると反応抵抗の低減に寄与する。「ネック」とは、粒子間の接触面を指し、「ネック径」とは、図5に直線で明示されるように、粒子間の接触面の最短距離を指す。ネック径は、走査型電子顕微鏡用のパソコンモニターで測定することができ、その際、SEMのソフトウェアの測長機能や画像解析ソフト(例えばAdobe Photoshop)等を好ましく用いることができる。「平均ネック径」はこうして測定された1視野当たり30個のネック径の平均値として定義される。数値の客観性を高めるために、1視野において得られた全てのネック径をサイズ順に並べて、それらの平均値に照らして上位15点及び下位15点の合計30点のネック径データを採取し、このデータ採取を合計3視野において行い、3視野分のネック径の平均値を平均ネック径として採用するのが好ましい。 According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the particles constituting the air electrode have an average neck diameter of 0.35 μm or more, preferably 0.35 to 1.0 μm, more preferably 0.5 to 0.9 μm. It is. Within such a range, the reaction resistance is reduced. “Neck” refers to the contact surface between the particles, and “neck diameter” refers to the shortest distance of the contact surface between the particles, as clearly shown in FIG. The neck diameter can be measured with a personal computer monitor for a scanning electron microscope. In this case, a length measurement function of SEM software, image analysis software (for example, Adobe Photoshop), or the like can be preferably used. “Average neck diameter” is defined as the average value of 30 neck diameters per field of view thus measured. In order to increase the objectivity of the numerical values, all neck diameters obtained in one field of view are arranged in order of size, and the neck diameter data of a total of 30 points of the top 15 points and the bottom 15 points is collected in light of their average value, It is preferable that this data collection is performed for a total of three fields of view, and an average value of neck diameters for the three fields of view is adopted as the average neck diameter.
空気極は、12.5〜13.5ppm/Kの熱膨張係数を有するのが好ましく、より好ましくは12.5〜13.4ppm/Kである。このような熱膨張係数は、現行の空気極材料であるLSCFの熱膨張係数よりも低く、SOFCセル共焼成時のクラックの発生確率の低減につながる。 The air electrode preferably has a thermal expansion coefficient of 12.5 to 13.5 ppm / K, more preferably 12.5 to 13.4 ppm / K. Such a thermal expansion coefficient is lower than the thermal expansion coefficient of LSCF, which is the current air electrode material, and leads to a reduction in the probability of occurrence of cracks during cofiring of SOFC cells.
空気極は、その一面側に固体電解質層及び/又は反応防止層をさらに備えた複合構造体として製造されることができ、好ましくは空気極−反応防止層複合体又は空気極−固体電解質複合体として製造されうる。反応防止層は、燃料電池セルとして構成された場合に、空気極と固体電解質との間に介在して、空気極と固体電解質との間で界面反応により高抵抗な層が形成されるのを防止するための層であり、セルの内部抵抗を低減して電池特性を向上することができる。もっとも、空気極と固体電解質との間で界面反応により高抵抗な層が形成されない場合には反応防止層を設けずに空気極と固体電解質層とを直接接合させてもよい。好ましい反応防止層はセリウムを含む材料からなり、より好ましくはセリア及びセリアに固溶した希土類金属酸化物を含むセリア系材料が挙げられる。セリア系材料における希土類金属の濃度は、好ましくは5〜20mol%である。そのようなセリア系材料の例としては、GDC((Ce,Gd)O2:ガドリニウムドープセリア)、SDC((Ce,Sm)O2:サマリウムドープセリア)等が挙げられる。特に好ましくは、反応防止層はガドリニウムドープセリア(GDC)で構成されるものであり、その組成をGdαCe1−αO2と表した場合、Gdの好ましいドープ量αは0.05〜0.20である。反応防止層は、セリア系材料の他に添加剤を含んでいてもよい。反応防止層の形状及び大きさは適用される燃料電池の設計に応じて適宜決定すればよいが、典型的なSOFCに適用される場合には、厚さ30μm以下の層状又は板状に形成されるのが好ましい。一方、固体電解質層の材質は燃料電池セルに一般的に使用される各種固体電解質であることができるが、好ましくはジルコニウムを含む固体電解質であり、より好ましくはジルコニア(ZrO2)を主成分として含む材料である。固体電解質は、ジルコニアの他に、Y2O3及び/又はSc2O3等の添加剤を含んでいてもよく、これらの添加剤は安定剤として機能することができる。固体電解質層における添加剤の添加量は3〜20mol%程度である。特に好ましい固体電解質としては、3YSZ、8YSZ及び10YSZ等のイットリア安定化ジルコニア、並びにScSZ(スカンジア安定化ジルコニア)等のジルコニア系材料が挙げられる。反応防止層の形状及び大きさは適用される燃料電池の設計に応じて適宜決定すればよいが、典型的なSOFCに適用される場合には、厚さ30μm以下の層状又は板状に形成されるのが好ましい。 The air electrode can be manufactured as a composite structure further provided with a solid electrolyte layer and / or a reaction preventing layer on one surface side thereof, preferably an air electrode-reaction preventing layer composite or an air electrode-solid electrolyte composite. Can be manufactured. When the reaction preventing layer is configured as a fuel cell, it is interposed between the air electrode and the solid electrolyte, and a high resistance layer is formed by an interfacial reaction between the air electrode and the solid electrolyte. It is a layer for preventing, and the battery resistance can be improved by reducing the internal resistance of the cell. However, when a high resistance layer is not formed between the air electrode and the solid electrolyte by an interface reaction, the air electrode and the solid electrolyte layer may be directly joined without providing a reaction preventing layer. A preferable reaction preventing layer is made of a material containing cerium, more preferably ceria and a ceria-based material containing a rare earth metal oxide solid-dissolved in ceria. The concentration of the rare earth metal in the ceria-based material is preferably 5 to 20 mol%. Examples of such ceria-based materials include GDC ((Ce, Gd) O 2 : Gadolinium-doped ceria), SDC ((Ce, Sm) O 2 : samarium-doped ceria), and the like. Particularly preferably, the reaction preventing layer is composed of gadolinium-doped ceria (GDC), and when the composition is expressed as Gd α Ce 1-α O 2 , the preferable doping amount α of Gd is 0.05 to 0. .20. The reaction preventing layer may contain an additive in addition to the ceria-based material. The shape and size of the reaction preventing layer may be appropriately determined according to the design of the applied fuel cell, but when applied to a typical SOFC, it is formed in a layered or plate shape with a thickness of 30 μm or less. It is preferable. On the other hand, the material of the solid electrolyte layer can be various solid electrolytes generally used for fuel cells, but is preferably a solid electrolyte containing zirconium, more preferably zirconia (ZrO 2 ) as a main component. It is a material that contains. The solid electrolyte may contain additives such as Y 2 O 3 and / or Sc 2 O 3 in addition to zirconia, and these additives can function as a stabilizer. The addition amount of the additive in the solid electrolyte layer is about 3 to 20 mol%. Particularly preferred solid electrolytes include yttria stabilized zirconia such as 3YSZ, 8YSZ and 10YSZ, and zirconia based materials such as ScSZ (scandia stabilized zirconia). The shape and size of the reaction preventing layer may be appropriately determined according to the design of the applied fuel cell, but when applied to a typical SOFC, it is formed in a layered or plate shape with a thickness of 30 μm or less. It is preferable.
製造方法
本発明の空気極は、前述した一般式:A2BO4±δで表される組成を与える配合比で各構成元素を含有する原料粉末混合物を、所定の基材(典型的には固体電解質層及び/又は反応防止層)上に塗布して焼き付けることに作製することができる。最終的に所望の微構造を実現できるかぎり製造方法は特に限定されるものではないが、原料粉末を含むスラリーを、乾燥、仮焼、粉砕及び乾燥に付して前駆体粉末とし、この前駆体粉末を含むペーストを基材上に塗布して所定の温度条件(好ましくは1050〜1150℃)で焼付けるのが好ましい。本発明の微構造の制御は、後述の実施例に示されるように焼付け時の温度条件を適宜調整することにより行うことができる。
Production Method The air electrode of the present invention comprises a raw material powder mixture containing each constituent element at a blending ratio giving a composition represented by the general formula: A 2 BO 4 ± δ , and a predetermined base material (typically It can be produced by applying and baking on a solid electrolyte layer and / or a reaction preventing layer. The production method is not particularly limited as long as the desired microstructure can be finally realized, but the slurry containing the raw material powder is dried, calcined, pulverized and dried to obtain a precursor powder. It is preferable to apply a paste containing powder onto a substrate and bake it under a predetermined temperature condition (preferably 1050 to 1150 ° C.). The microstructure of the present invention can be controlled by appropriately adjusting the temperature conditions during baking as shown in the examples described later.
本発明を以下の例によってさらに具体的に説明する。 The present invention is more specifically described by the following examples.
例1:粉末試料の作製
空気極を構成するための214系層状ペロブスカイト酸化物材料として、例1と同様の以下の3種類の組成の粉末試料を作製した。
- Nd2Ni0.75Cu0.2Ga0.05O4(以下、NNCGと略す)
- Nd2Ni0.75Cu0.2Al0.05O4(以下、NNCAと略す)
- Nd2Ni0.75Cu0.2Fe0.05O4(以下、NNCFと略す)
Example 1 : Preparation of powder sample As 214 type layered perovskite oxide material for constituting an air electrode, powder samples having the following three compositions similar to Example 1 were prepared.
- Nd 2 Ni 0.75 Cu 0.2 Ga 0.05 O 4 ( hereinafter, abbreviated as NNCG)
- Nd 2 Ni 0.75 Cu 0.2 Al 0.05 O 4 ( hereinafter, abbreviated as NNCA)
-Nd 2 Ni 0.75 Cu 0.2 Fe 0.05 O 4 (hereinafter abbreviated as NNCF)
具体的には、約1kgのジルコニア玉石(直径3mm)を入れた500mlポットに、Nd2O3、NiO、CuO、Ga2O3、Al2O3及びFe2O3の各原料粉末を、NNCG、NNCA及びNNCFの各組成比となるように合計50g秤量して入れた。このポット中に、溶媒としてイソプロピルアルコール(IPA)を玉石が浸漬する程度の量(具体的には約100ml)入れて蓋を締め、ポットミル荷台を用いて100rpmの回転速度で4時間混合してスラリーを得た。このスラリーをN2乾燥機でN2雰囲気中、110℃、16時間の条件で乾燥させ、100メッシュで篩通しして粉末を得た。この粉末を坩堝に入れて、その坩堝を鞘に入れて二重鞘の状態にし、電気炉で大気雰囲気中、1300℃で20時間、昇温速度200℃/h及び降温速度300℃/hの条件で仮焼した。得られた仮焼粉末を乳鉢で粉砕した。ジルコニアの玉石(直径5mm)を約1kg入れた500mlポットに上記粉砕粉末と溶媒としてのイソプロピルアルコール(IPA)を玉石が浸漬する程度(100ml程度)に入れて、ポットミルで120rpmの回転速度にて24時間粉砕して、スラリーを得た。このスラリーをN2乾燥機でN2雰囲気中、110℃で16時間乾燥させ、100メッシュで篩通しして、として、NNCG、NNCA及びNNCFの各粉末試料を得た。 Specifically, each raw material powder of Nd 2 O 3 , NiO, CuO, Ga 2 O 3 , Al 2 O 3 and Fe 2 O 3 is put into a 500 ml pot containing about 1 kg of zirconia cobblestone (diameter 3 mm), A total of 50 g was weighed and put in such a manner that each composition ratio of NNCG, NNCA and NNCF was obtained. In this pot, isopropyl alcohol (IPA) as a solvent is put in an amount (specifically, about 100 ml) to which the cobblestone is immersed, the lid is closed, and the slurry is mixed for 4 hours at a rotation speed of 100 rpm using a pot mill carrier. Got. The slurry was dried with an N 2 dryer in an N 2 atmosphere at 110 ° C. for 16 hours, and sieved with 100 mesh to obtain a powder. This powder is put in a crucible, the crucible is put in a sheath to form a double sheath, and is heated in an electric furnace in an air atmosphere at 1300 ° C. for 20 hours at a heating rate of 200 ° C./h and a cooling rate of 300 ° C./h. Calcination was performed under conditions. The obtained calcined powder was pulverized in a mortar. In a 500 ml pot containing about 1 kg of zirconia cobblestone (diameter 5 mm), the above pulverized powder and isopropyl alcohol (IPA) as a solvent are placed so that the cobblestone is immersed (about 100 ml), and the pot mill rotates at a rotational speed of 120 rpm. By grinding for a time, a slurry was obtained. The slurry was dried with an N 2 dryer in an N 2 atmosphere at 110 ° C. for 16 hours, and sieved with 100 mesh to obtain NNCG, NNCA, and NNCF powder samples.
例2:熱膨張係数の測定
例1で得されたNNCG、NNCA及びNNCFの各粉末試料を用いて、試料長が20mmの各空気極材料の角棒を作製した。この角棒と、参照としてのアルミナとを使用して、40〜1000℃の温度域で大気中にて昇降温させることにより熱膨張係数の測定を行った。また、比較のため、(La0.6Sr0.4)(Co0.2Fe0.8)O3(以下、LSCFと略す)の熱膨張係数の測定も同様に行った。表1に、降温時の1000℃時点での各材料の熱膨張係数を示す。
Example 2 : Measurement of coefficient of thermal expansion Using each powder sample of NNCG, NNCA, and NNCF obtained in Example 1, a square bar of each cathode material having a sample length of 20 mm was prepared. Using this square bar and alumina as a reference, the coefficient of thermal expansion was measured by raising and lowering the temperature in the atmosphere in the temperature range of 40 to 1000 ° C. For comparison, the thermal expansion coefficient of (La 0.6 Sr 0.4 ) (Co 0.2 Fe 0.8 ) O 3 (hereinafter abbreviated as LSCF) was also measured. Table 1 shows the coefficient of thermal expansion of each material at 1000 ° C. when the temperature is lowered.
表1に示される結果から、214系材料の熱膨張係数は12.9〜13.1ppm/Kであり、現行の空気極材料であるLSCFの15.1ppm/Kと比較して、低い熱膨張係数を有することが分かる。熱膨張係数が低くなることは、SOFCセル共焼成時のクラックの発生確率の低減につながる。 From the results shown in Table 1, the thermal expansion coefficient of the 214 series material is 12.9 to 13.1 ppm / K, which is lower than that of 15.1 ppm / K of the current air electrode material LSCF. It can be seen that it has a coefficient. Lowering the thermal expansion coefficient leads to a reduction in the probability of occurrence of cracks during cofiring of SOFC cells.
例3:反応抵抗の測定
例1で得られた粉末試料を用いて空気極材料を作製し、コインセルへの焼付け温度との関係における反応抵抗の変化を調べた。具体的には以下のとおりである。
Example 3 : Measurement of reaction resistance An air electrode material was prepared using the powder sample obtained in Example 1, and the change in reaction resistance in relation to the baking temperature on the coin cell was examined. Specifically, it is as follows.
(1)空気極の作製
例1で得られたNNCG、NNCA及びNNCFの各粉末試料を用いて、空気極印刷用のペーストを以下のようにして作製した。すなわち、蒸発皿に、PVA系樹脂0.7gと溶剤としてBCA(ブチルカルビトールアセテート(Butyl carbitol acetate))1.6gを加えた。BCAが蒸発しないように蒸発皿にアルミホイルで蓋をし、樹脂をBCAに溶かすために、乾燥機にて120℃で30分間、大気雰囲気中で加熱した。放冷後、粉末試料10gを蒸発皿に入れ、ペンディングナイフで混合した。その後、トリロールを用いてペーストの粘度が一定になるまで混合して空気極用ペースト試料を得た。
(1) Preparation of air electrode Using the powder samples of NNCG, NNCA and NNCF obtained in Example 1, a paste for air electrode printing was prepared as follows. That is, 0.7 g of PVA resin and 1.6 g of BCA (Butyl carbitol acetate) as a solvent were added to the evaporating dish. The evaporating dish was covered with aluminum foil so that BCA would not evaporate, and was heated in an air atmosphere at 120 ° C. for 30 minutes in a dryer in order to dissolve the resin in BCA. After allowing to cool, 10 g of a powder sample was placed in an evaporating dish and mixed with a pending knife. Then, it mixed until the viscosity of the paste became constant using tri-roll, and the paste sample for air electrodes was obtained.
(2)コインセルの作製
直径12mm及び厚さ1mmのコインセルを以下のようにして作製した。すなわち、図6に示されるように、コインセル10を形成すべく、燃料極12(酸化ニッケル‐イットリア安定化ジルコニア(NiO−YSZ))、活性層14(酸化ニッケル‐イットリア安定化ジルコニア(NiO−YSZ))、電解質16(イットリア安定化ジルコニア(YSZ))及び反応防止層18(ガドリニウムドープセリア(GDC))で構成される積層体20の反応防止層18上に、空気極用ペースト試料を直径6mmの円形に印刷して、大気雰囲気中で1時間焼付けを行って空気極22を形成した。この焼付けは、空気極22の微構造を制御できるように、1000℃、1050℃、1100℃及び1150℃のいずれかの温度を適宜選択して行った(なお、現行の空気極材料であるLSCFの焼付け温度は1000℃である)。燃料極12側の表面にNiOペーストを、空気極22側の表面にAgペーストをそれぞれ電極端子24,26とすべく塗布した。
(2) Production of coin cell A coin cell having a diameter of 12 mm and a thickness of 1 mm was produced as follows. That is, as shown in FIG. 6, in order to form a coin cell 10, an anode 12 (nickel oxide-yttria stabilized zirconia (NiO-YSZ)), an active layer 14 (nickel oxide-yttria stabilized zirconia (NiO-YSZ)). )), An air electrode paste sample is 6 mm in diameter on the reaction preventing layer 18 of the laminate 20 composed of the electrolyte 16 (yttria stabilized zirconia (YSZ)) and the reaction preventing layer 18 (gadolinium-doped ceria (GDC)). The air electrode 22 was formed by printing in a circle and baking in an air atmosphere for 1 hour. This baking was performed by appropriately selecting any one of the temperatures of 1000 ° C., 1050 ° C., 1100 ° C. and 1150 ° C. so that the microstructure of the air electrode 22 can be controlled. The baking temperature is 1000 ° C.). NiO paste was applied to the surface on the fuel electrode 12 side, and Ag paste was applied to the surface on the air electrode 22 side to form electrode terminals 24 and 26, respectively.
(3)反応抵抗測定系の作製
こうして得られたコインセル試料10を用いて図7に示されるような反応抵抗測定径30を作製した。具体的には、コインセル試料10をアルミナ製ホルダー(図示せず)にセットして、測定装置のアルミナチューブ34でアルミナ製ホルダーを挟んで固定した。また、アルミナ製ホルダー32から水素ガスが漏れないようにガラス(PYREX)で各隙間のシールを行った。さらに、コインセル試料10の上下に空気又は水素を供給するための石英管36を配置し、その際、集電効率の向上のために、コインセル試料の上下の石英管との間にPtメッシュ38を挟み込んだ。こうしてコインセル試料が組み込まれた反応抵抗測定系30を得た。
(3) Production of reaction resistance measurement system A reaction resistance measurement diameter 30 as shown in FIG. 7 was produced using the coin cell sample 10 thus obtained. Specifically, the coin cell sample 10 was set in an alumina holder (not shown), and the alumina tube 34 of the measuring apparatus was sandwiched and fixed. Further, each gap was sealed with glass (PYREX) so that hydrogen gas did not leak from the alumina holder 32. Further, quartz tubes 36 for supplying air or hydrogen are arranged above and below the coin cell sample 10, and at that time, in order to improve current collection efficiency, a Pt mesh 38 is provided between the quartz cells above and below the coin cell sample. I caught it. Thus, a reaction resistance measuring system 30 in which a coin cell sample was incorporated was obtained.
(4)反応抵抗の測定
得られた測定系30において、空気極側から合成空気を、燃料極側から水素をそれぞれ供給しながら、セル全体の反応抵抗の測定を行った。この測定は、ポテンシオ/ガルバノスタット(Sorlartron 1287型)やFRA(Sorlatron 1260型)を用いて、電流−電圧測定や交流インピーダンス測定により以下の条件で行った。
・測定温度:750℃
・電流−電圧測定時の電流値範囲:0〜0.53A/cm2
・交流インピーダンス測定時の条件:OCV(無負荷時)、0.3A/cm2
・交流インピーダンス測定の周波数範囲:106〜0.1Hz
(4) Measurement of reaction resistance In the obtained measurement system 30, the reaction resistance of the entire cell was measured while supplying synthetic air from the air electrode side and hydrogen from the fuel electrode side. This measurement was performed using a potentio / galvanostat (Sorlartron 1287 type) or FRA (Sorlatron 1260 type) under the following conditions by current-voltage measurement or AC impedance measurement.
・ Measurement temperature: 750 ℃
-Current value range during current-voltage measurement: 0-0.53 A / cm 2
AC impedance measurement conditions: OCV (no load), 0.3 A / cm 2
・ Frequency range of AC impedance measurement: 10 6 to 0.1 Hz
得られた測定値から反応抵抗の算出を下記式に基づいて行った。
反応抵抗(Ω/cm2)=((実測電圧−OCV)−RohmI)/J
すなわち、電流−電圧測定で得られた電圧から開放電圧(OCV)を差し引いて実際にセルに印加された電圧値を算出した。この電圧値から、交流インピーダンス測定(OCV時)から求めた試料のオーミック抵抗(Rohm)を除いた、反応抵抗によるセルの電圧降下(過電圧)を算出した。この電圧降下を電流密度(J)で割ることにより、反応抵抗を決定した。
The reaction resistance was calculated from the obtained measured value based on the following formula.
Reaction resistance (Ω / cm 2 ) = ((measured voltage−OCV) −R ohm I) / J
That is, the voltage value actually applied to the cell was calculated by subtracting the open circuit voltage (OCV) from the voltage obtained by the current-voltage measurement. From this voltage value, the voltage drop (overvoltage) of the cell due to the reaction resistance was calculated by removing the ohmic resistance (R ohm ) of the sample obtained from AC impedance measurement (at the time of OCV). The reaction resistance was determined by dividing this voltage drop by the current density (J).
SOFC装置の稼動電流である0.3A/cm2の点での反応抵抗の値を、焼き付け温度との関係において図8に示す。図8に示される結果から、焼付け温度を高くすることにより反応抵抗が低減することが分かる。 The value of the reaction resistance at the point of 0.3 A / cm 2 , which is the operating current of the SOFC device, is shown in FIG. 8 in relation to the baking temperature. From the results shown in FIG. 8, it can be seen that the reaction resistance is reduced by increasing the baking temperature.
例4:微構造の観察及び評価
例3で作製されたコインセルにおける空気極の微構造を観察及び評価した。具体的には以下のとおりである。
Example 4 : Observation and evaluation of microstructure The microstructure of the air electrode in the coin cell produced in Example 3 was observed and evaluated. Specifically, it is as follows.
(1)微構造の観察
例3で作製されたコインセルを樹脂包埋処理した後、イオンミリング法により試料断面を研磨した。イオンミリングは、イオンミリング装置(IM4000、(株)日立ハイテク社製)を用いて以下の条件で行った。
・加速電圧:5kV
・加工時間:1.5時間
・雰囲気:Ar
ただし、後述する粒子径の算出の際には、研磨面では粒界が判別しにくいため、研磨面ではなく破断面を用いた。
(1) Observation of microstructure After the coin cell produced in Example 3 was resin-embedded, the sample cross section was polished by an ion milling method. Ion milling was performed under the following conditions using an ion milling device (IM4000, manufactured by Hitachi High-Tech Co., Ltd.).
・ Acceleration voltage: 5 kV
・ Processing time: 1.5 hours ・ Atmosphere: Ar
However, when calculating the particle diameter, which will be described later, since the grain boundary is difficult to distinguish on the polished surface, the fracture surface was used instead of the polished surface.
研磨面の微構造の観察は、走査型電子顕微鏡(SEM)(JSM-6610LV Scanning Electron Microscope、日本電子(株)社製)を用いて以下の条件で行った。
・加速電圧:5kV(粒子径観察以外)又は20kV(粒子径観察)
・ワーキングディスタンス:9〜10mm
・スポットサイズ:30
The microstructure of the polished surface was observed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) (JSM-6610LV Scanning Electron Microscope, manufactured by JEOL Ltd.) under the following conditions.
・ Acceleration voltage: 5 kV (other than particle diameter observation) or 20 kV (particle diameter observation)
・ Working distance: 9-10mm
・ Spot size: 30
(2)微構造の評価
SEMで観察された空気極の微構造画像に基づいて、接合界面における導電パスの平均長さ、接合界面における導電パスの長さの平均割合、平均気孔率、平均粒子径、及び平均ネック径の5つの観点から評価し、それらの評価結果と反応抵抗との関係を調べた。
(2) Evaluation of microstructure Based on the microstructure image of the air electrode observed by SEM, the average length of the conductive path at the bonding interface, the average ratio of the length of the conductive path at the bonding interface, the average porosity, and the average particle Evaluation was made from five viewpoints of diameter and average neck diameter, and the relationship between the evaluation results and reaction resistance was examined.
<接合界面における導電パスの平均長さ>
空気極と反応防止層の接合界面の微構造画像に基づいて、空気極の粒子が反応防止層に接続している箇所における、界面に対して平行方向の長さを測定して接合界面における導電パスの平均長さを求めた。用いた微構造画像は8000〜10000倍程度で、測長には、画像解析ソフト(Adobe Photoshop)を用いた。具体的には、1視野において導電パスの平均長さを測定し、これを合計5視野において行い、5視野分の平均値を導電パスの平均長さとした。図9に接合界面における導電パスの平均長さと反応抵抗との関係を示す。図9に示される結果は、接合界面における導電パスの平均長さが0.5μm以上の微構造であると反応抵抗が低減することを示している。
<Average length of conductive path at bonding interface>
Based on the microstructure image of the bonding interface between the air electrode and the reaction preventing layer, the length of the air electrode particles connected to the reaction preventing layer is measured in the direction parallel to the interface to conduct electricity at the bonding interface. The average length of the path was determined. The microstructure image used was about 8000 to 10,000 times, and image analysis software (Adobe Photoshop) was used for length measurement. Specifically, the average length of the conductive path was measured in one field of view, and this was performed for a total of five fields of view, and the average value for the five fields of view was taken as the average length of the conductive path. FIG. 9 shows the relationship between the average length of the conductive path at the bonding interface and the reaction resistance. The results shown in FIG. 9 indicate that the reaction resistance is reduced when the average length of the conductive path at the bonding interface is 0.5 μm or more.
<接合界面における導電パスの長さの平均割合>
空気極と反応防止層の接合界面の微構造画像に基づいて、上記手法で求めた導電パスの長さの1視野分の合計値を、その視野における反応防止層表面の全長(すなわち1視野の横方向の長さ)で割ることにより、接合界面における導電パスの長さの平均割合を求めた。用いた微構造画像は8000〜10000倍程度で、測長には、画像解析ソフト(Adobe Photoshop)を用いた。具体的には、1視野において導電パスの長さの平均割合を求め、これを合計5視野において行い、5視野分の平均値を導電パスの長さの平均割合とした。図10に接合界面における導電パスの長さの平均割合と反応抵抗との関係を示す。図10に示される結果は、接合界面における導電パスの長さの平均割合が30%以上の微構造であると反応抵抗が低減することを示している。
<Average ratio of length of conductive path at bonding interface>
Based on the microstructure image of the bonding interface between the air electrode and the reaction preventing layer, the total value for one field of the length of the conductive path obtained by the above method is calculated as the total length of the surface of the reaction preventing layer in that field (ie The average ratio of the length of the conductive path at the bonding interface was determined by dividing by the (length in the lateral direction). The microstructure image used was about 8000 to 10,000 times, and image analysis software (Adobe Photoshop) was used for length measurement. Specifically, the average ratio of the length of the conductive path in one field of view was obtained, and this was performed for a total of five fields of view, and the average value for the five fields of view was taken as the average ratio of the length of the conductive path. FIG. 10 shows the relationship between the average ratio of the length of the conductive path at the bonding interface and the reaction resistance. The results shown in FIG. 10 indicate that the reaction resistance is reduced when the microstructure has a conductive path length average ratio of 30% or more at the bonding interface.
<平均気孔率>
空気極の微構造画像を画像処理することにより空気極の気孔率を求めた。具体的には、まず、空気極試料を樹脂包埋し、イオン研磨処理をして空気極の厚み方向における断面を出したコインセル試料を準備した。次いで、空気極の厚み方向における断面の電子顕微鏡(SEM)画像を倍率3000倍で取得した(n=10視野)。画像解析ソフト(Adobe Photoshop)でグレースケールのSEM画像を読み込み、[イメージ]→[色調補正]→[2階調化]の手順でヒストグラムの閾値を適度に調整し、白黒の2値画像を作成した。2値画像の黒い部分が占める割合を読み取り、この読み取りを10視野について行った。読み取った10視野分の値の平均値を平均気孔率とした。図11に平均気孔率と反応抵抗との関係を示す。図11に示される結果は、平均気孔率が35%以下の微構造であると反応抵抗が低減することを示している。
<Average porosity>
The porosity of the air electrode was obtained by image processing of the microstructure image of the air electrode. Specifically, first, a coin cell sample in which a cross section in the thickness direction of the air electrode was obtained by embedding the air electrode sample in a resin and performing ion polishing treatment was prepared. Next, an electron microscope (SEM) image of a cross section in the thickness direction of the air electrode was acquired at a magnification of 3000 times (n = 10 fields of view). Read grayscale SEM image with image analysis software (Adobe Photoshop), and adjust the threshold of histogram appropriately by the procedure of [Image] → [Tonal Correction] → [Turn Tone] to create a monochrome binary image did. The ratio occupied by the black portion of the binary image was read, and this reading was performed for 10 fields of view. The average value of the values read for 10 fields of view was defined as the average porosity. FIG. 11 shows the relationship between the average porosity and the reaction resistance. The results shown in FIG. 11 indicate that the reaction resistance is reduced when the microstructure has an average porosity of 35% or less.
<平均粒子径>
空気極の微構造画像に基づいて、インターセプト法により空気極の平均粒子径を求めた。すなわち、微構造画像上に任意に6本の直線を引き、直線上にかかる粒子の境界間の長さを求め、微構造画像の縮尺の値を基に粒子径を算出した。用いた微構造画像の倍率は8000〜10000倍程度で、測長には画像解析ソフト(Adobe Photoshop)を用いた。具体的には、1視野において得られた全ての粒子径をサイズ順に並べて、それらの平均値に照らして上位25点及び下位25点の合計50点の粒子径データを採取し、このデータ採取を合計3視野において行い、3視野分の粒子径の平均値を算出して平均粒子径とした。図12に平均粒子径と反応抵抗との関係を示す。図12に示される結果は、平均粒子径が0.8μm以上の微構造であると反応抵抗が低減することを示している。
<Average particle size>
Based on the microstructure image of the air electrode, the average particle diameter of the air electrode was determined by the intercept method. That is, six straight lines were arbitrarily drawn on the microstructure image, the length between the boundaries of the particles on the straight line was obtained, and the particle diameter was calculated based on the scale value of the microstructure image. The magnification of the microstructure image used was about 8000 to 10,000 times, and image analysis software (Adobe Photoshop) was used for length measurement. Specifically, all the particle sizes obtained in one field of view are arranged in order of size, and the particle size data of a total of 50 points of the upper 25 points and the lower 25 points are collected in light of the average value thereof. The measurement was performed for a total of three fields of view, and the average value of the particle diameters for the three fields of view was calculated as the average particle size. FIG. 12 shows the relationship between the average particle diameter and the reaction resistance. The results shown in FIG. 12 indicate that the reaction resistance decreases when the microstructure has an average particle diameter of 0.8 μm or more.
<平均ネック径>
空気極の微構造画像に基づいて、粒子間の接触面(ネック)の最短距離を測定して平均ネック径を求めた。用いた微構造画像の倍率は8000〜10000倍程度で、測長には画像解析ソフト(Adobe Photoshop)を用いた。具体的には、1視野において得られた全てのネック径をサイズ順に並べて、それらの平均値に照らして上位15点及び下位15点の合計30点のネック径データを採取し、このデータ採取を合計3視野において行い、3視野分のネック径の平均値を算出して平均ネック径とした。図13に平均ネック径と反応抵抗との関係を示す。図13に示される結果は、平均ネック径が0.35μm以上の微構造であると反応抵抗が低減することを示している。
<Average neck diameter>
Based on the microstructure image of the air electrode, the shortest distance of the contact surface (neck) between the particles was measured to obtain the average neck diameter. The magnification of the microstructure image used was about 8000 to 10,000 times, and image analysis software (Adobe Photoshop) was used for length measurement. Specifically, all the neck diameters obtained in one field of view are arranged in order of size, and the neck diameter data of a total of 30 points of the top 15 points and the bottom 15 points is collected in light of the average value thereof. The measurement was performed for a total of three visual fields, and the average value of the neck diameters for the three visual fields was calculated as the average neck diameter. FIG. 13 shows the relationship between the average neck diameter and the reaction resistance. The results shown in FIG. 13 indicate that the reaction resistance decreases when the microstructure has an average neck diameter of 0.35 μm or more.
<微構造と反応抵抗の関係>
微構造の5つの要素と反応抵抗の関係を表2に示す。
<Relationship between microstructure and reaction resistance>
Table 2 shows the relationship between the five elements of the microstructure and the reaction resistance.
<多変量解析(重回帰分析)>
空気極の微構造のいずれの要素が反応抵抗に大きく寄与しているかを調べるために、多変量解析(重回帰分析)を行った。多変量解析は表計算ソフト(エクセル、マイクロソフト社製)で行い、微構造における5つの要素(導電パス平均長さ、導電パス平均割合、平均気孔率、平均粒子径、及び平均ネック径)を説明変数(予測するのに使う変数)、反応抵抗値を目的変数(予測したい変数)として重回帰分析を行った。ここで、NNCF(1000℃)の値は特異点であると考え、計算には含めなかった。また、重回帰分析は、5つの要素の中でも相関が高い平均気孔率と平均粒径、導電パスの平均割合と平均ネック径、並びに平均ネック径と平均粒子径の組み合わせを除く、導電パスの平均割合、平均気孔率、導電パスの平均長さ(界面接続)の3つの変数に絞り、重回帰分析を行った。その結果、上記5つの要素の中でも、界面における導電パスの割合と導電パスの長さが反応抵抗への寄与率が高く、反応防止層と空気極の間の導電パスの影響が最も大きいことが判明した。これは、導電パスが太くなることで、酸素透過やキャリアの移動がより効率的に行われるためではないかと考えられる。
<Multivariate analysis (multiple regression analysis)>
Multivariate analysis (multiple regression analysis) was performed to examine which elements of the air electrode microstructure contributed greatly to the reaction resistance. Multivariate analysis is performed with spreadsheet software (Excel, manufactured by Microsoft) and explains the five elements in the microstructure (average length of conductive path, average ratio of conductive path, average porosity, average particle diameter, and average neck diameter). Multiple regression analysis was performed using variables (variables used for prediction) and reaction resistance values as objective variables (variables to be predicted). Here, the value of NNCF (1000 ° C.) was considered a singular point and was not included in the calculation. In addition, the multiple regression analysis is the average of the conductive path excluding the combination of the average porosity and average particle diameter, the average ratio of the conductive path and the average neck diameter, and the combination of the average neck diameter and the average particle diameter among the five elements. A multiple regression analysis was performed by limiting to three variables: ratio, average porosity, and average length of the conductive path (interface connection). As a result, among the above five elements, the ratio of the conductive path at the interface and the length of the conductive path have a high contribution rate to the reaction resistance, and the influence of the conductive path between the reaction preventing layer and the air electrode is the largest. found. This is considered to be because oxygen permeation and carrier movement are performed more efficiently by increasing the conductive path.
なお、上記実施例は空気極に反応防止層を接合された構成に関するものであるが、反応防止層を介さずに固体電解質層と直接接合する構成の燃料電池セルにも上記知見は同様に当てはまる。これは、反応防止層も固体電解質層も固体電解質としての性能を有する点においては共通であるためである。
In addition, although the said Example is related to the structure by which the reaction prevention layer was joined to the air electrode, the said knowledge is similarly applied also to the fuel cell of the structure directly joined to a solid electrolyte layer not via a reaction prevention layer. . This is because the reaction preventing layer and the solid electrolyte layer are common in that they have performance as a solid electrolyte.
Claims (5)
前記空気極が、一般式:A2BO4±δ(式中、AはLa、Pr及びNdから選択される少なくとも一種の希土類元素であり、BはNi、Cu、並びにFe、Ga及びAlから選択される少なくとも一種の元素であり、δは酸素過剰量又は酸素欠損量を示すが0でありうる)で表される組成の層状ペロブスカイト酸化物を含んでなり、
前記空気極と固体電解質層及び/又は反応防止層の接合界面における導電パスの平均長さが0.5〜2.0μmである微構造を有し、
前記空気極を構成する粒子が0.35〜1.0μmの平均ネック径を有する、空気極複合体。 An air electrode composite for a solid oxide fuel cell, comprising: an air electrode; and a solid electrolyte layer and / or a reaction prevention layer provided to be joined to one side of the air electrode ,
The air electrode has a general formula: A 2 BO 4 ± δ (wherein A is at least one rare earth element selected from La, Pr and Nd, and B is from Ni, Cu, and Fe, Ga and Al). A layered perovskite oxide having a composition represented by: at least one element selected, wherein δ represents an oxygen excess or oxygen deficiency but may be 0),
The average length of the conductive paths at a joint interface of the air electrode and the solid electrolyte layer and / or the reaction preventing layer have a microstructure which is a 0.5 to 2.0 [mu] m,
Particles constituting the air electrode has an average neck diameter of 0.35~1.0Myuemu, cathode composite.
The air electrode composite according to any one of claims 1 to 4 , wherein the air electrode has a thermal expansion coefficient of 12.5 to 13.5 ppm / K.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2013059806A JP6121764B2 (en) | 2013-03-22 | 2013-03-22 | Air electrode used in solid oxide fuel cell |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2013059806A JP6121764B2 (en) | 2013-03-22 | 2013-03-22 | Air electrode used in solid oxide fuel cell |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JP2014186818A JP2014186818A (en) | 2014-10-02 |
| JP6121764B2 true JP6121764B2 (en) | 2017-04-26 |
Family
ID=51834229
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2013059806A Expired - Fee Related JP6121764B2 (en) | 2013-03-22 | 2013-03-22 | Air electrode used in solid oxide fuel cell |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP6121764B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA2956069A1 (en) | 2014-07-21 | 2016-01-28 | Lg Fuel Cell Systems, Inc. | Composition for fuel cell electrode |
| JP6377535B2 (en) * | 2015-01-13 | 2018-08-22 | 東邦瓦斯株式会社 | Proton conducting fuel cell |
| US10115974B2 (en) * | 2015-10-28 | 2018-10-30 | Lg Fuel Cell Systems Inc. | Composition of a nickelate composite cathode for a fuel cell |
| WO2017205660A1 (en) * | 2016-05-25 | 2017-11-30 | Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc. | Electrode comprising heavily-doped ceria |
Family Cites Families (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP3827209B2 (en) * | 2001-12-19 | 2006-09-27 | 日本電信電話株式会社 | Method for producing composite air electrode for solid oxide fuel cell |
| JP5290870B2 (en) * | 2009-05-29 | 2013-09-18 | 日本電信電話株式会社 | Solid oxide fuel cell |
| FR2948821B1 (en) * | 2009-08-03 | 2011-12-09 | Commissariat Energie Atomique | ELECTROCHEMICAL METAL SUPPORT CELL AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME |
| JP5454434B2 (en) * | 2009-09-30 | 2014-03-26 | 大日本印刷株式会社 | Single-chamber solid oxide fuel cell |
| JP5023250B1 (en) * | 2011-07-19 | 2012-09-12 | 日本碍子株式会社 | Fuel cell |
-
2013
- 2013-03-22 JP JP2013059806A patent/JP6121764B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP2014186818A (en) | 2014-10-02 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| JP5560381B1 (en) | Fuel cell | |
| EP3021393B1 (en) | Solid oxide fuel cell, manufacturing method therefor, fuel-cell stack, and solid oxide fuel-cell device | |
| Qiao et al. | Ni/YSZ and Ni–CeO2/YSZ anodes prepared by impregnation for solid oxide fuel cells | |
| Dong et al. | Sintering and ionic conductivity of 8YSZ and CGO10 electrolytes with small addition of Fe2O3: a comparative study | |
| JP5097865B1 (en) | Fuel cell | |
| JPWO2014168071A1 (en) | Air electrode material and fuel cell | |
| Choi et al. | Development of solid oxide cells by co-sintering of GDC diffusion barriers with LSCF air electrode | |
| Bi et al. | Effect of MgO addition and grain size on the electrical properties of Ce0. 9Gd0. 1O1. 95 electrolyte for IT-SOFCs | |
| Song et al. | Effects of monovalent alkali metals on grain boundary conductivity and electrochemical properties of gadolinia-doped ceria electrolyte | |
| JP5097867B1 (en) | Fuel cell | |
| Bi et al. | Behavior of lanthanum-doped ceria and Sr-, Mg-doped LaGaO3 electrolytes in an anode-supported solid oxide fuel cell with a La0. 6Sr0. 4CoO3 cathode | |
| JP6121764B2 (en) | Air electrode used in solid oxide fuel cell | |
| Zhang et al. | High-performance low-temperature solid oxide fuel cells using thin proton-conducting electrolyte with novel cathode | |
| Solovyev et al. | Effect of sintering temperature on the performance of composite La0. 6Sr0. 4Co0. 2Fe0. 8O3–Ce0. 9Gd0. 1O2 cathode for solid oxide fuel cells | |
| Wang et al. | Effects of NiO on the conductivity of Ce0. 85Sm0. 15O1. 925 and on electrochemical properties of the cathode/electrolyte interface | |
| Su et al. | Effects of interlayer thickness on the electrochemical and mechanical properties of bi-layer cathodes for solid oxide fuel cells | |
| JP5502180B2 (en) | Solid oxide fuel cell | |
| Kobayashi et al. | Effect of current density and operating temperature on degradation of protonic ceramic fuel cells containing BaZr0. 8Yb0. 2O3-δ electrolyte during long-term operation | |
| Baek et al. | Electrochemical properties of composite cathodes using Sm doped layered perovskite for intermediate temperature-operating solid oxide fuel cell | |
| JP5636520B1 (en) | Fuel cell | |
| JP5638687B1 (en) | Air electrode material | |
| JP5159938B1 (en) | Fuel cell | |
| Ning et al. | Fabrication and characterization of anode support low-temperature solid oxide fuel cell based on the samaria-doped ceria electrolyte | |
| KR101806441B1 (en) | Zirconia-bismuth oxide sintered compound and manufacturing methods thereof | |
| Ni et al. | Effect of anode calcination on the performance and redox stability of low-temperature solid oxide fuel cells prepared via impregnation |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20151118 |
|
| A977 | Report on retrieval |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007 Effective date: 20160805 |
|
| A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20160818 |
|
| A521 | Request for written amendment filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20161007 |
|
| TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20170328 |
|
| A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20170330 |
|
| R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Ref document number: 6121764 Country of ref document: JP Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |
|
| LAPS | Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees |