JP6133898B2 - Inspection method for vehicle seat drive mechanism - Google Patents
Inspection method for vehicle seat drive mechanism Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP6133898B2 JP6133898B2 JP2014552024A JP2014552024A JP6133898B2 JP 6133898 B2 JP6133898 B2 JP 6133898B2 JP 2014552024 A JP2014552024 A JP 2014552024A JP 2014552024 A JP2014552024 A JP 2014552024A JP 6133898 B2 JP6133898 B2 JP 6133898B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- drive mechanism
- absence
- vibration
- vehicle seat
- product
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 title claims description 43
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 15
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 title claims description 14
- 230000002159 abnormal effect Effects 0.000 claims description 35
- 230000001788 irregular Effects 0.000 claims description 28
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 claims description 17
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 claims description 10
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 18
- 230000001953 sensory effect Effects 0.000 description 17
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 15
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 13
- 230000002950 deficient Effects 0.000 description 10
- 230000033001 locomotion Effects 0.000 description 9
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000009530 blood pressure measurement Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000001845 vibrational spectrum Methods 0.000 description 3
- 241000282320 Panthera leo Species 0.000 description 2
- 230000001133 acceleration Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000020169 heat generation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010977 unit operation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910000859 α-Fe Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01M—TESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G01M7/00—Vibration-testing of structures; Shock-testing of structures
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01H—MEASUREMENT OF MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS OR ULTRASONIC, SONIC OR INFRASONIC WAVES
- G01H1/00—Measuring characteristics of vibrations in solids by using direct conduction to the detector
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Testing Of Devices, Machine Parts, Or Other Structures Thereof (AREA)
- Seats For Vehicles (AREA)
- Measurement Of Mechanical Vibrations Or Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)
Description
本発明は、自動車等の乗物用シートの駆動機構、特に、電動パワーシートを駆動するためのパワーユニットの品質を判定する乗物用シートの駆動機構用検査装置及びコンピュータプログラムに関する。 The present invention relates to a drive mechanism for a vehicle seat such as an automobile, and more particularly to a vehicle seat drive mechanism inspection apparatus and a computer program for determining the quality of a power unit for driving an electric power seat.
特許文献1では、乗物用シートの駆動機構の一つであるシートスライダの異音を検出する異音の判定方法が開示されている。シートスライダの動作時の動作音をセンサで検出し、動作音の単位時間当たりの変化量を算出し、その変化量を閾値と比較して、異音の有無を判定する技術である。 Patent Document 1 discloses a method for determining an abnormal noise that detects an abnormal noise of a seat slider that is one of vehicle drive mechanisms. This is a technique for detecting the operation sound during operation of the seat slider with a sensor, calculating the change amount of the operation sound per unit time, and comparing the change amount with a threshold value to determine the presence or absence of abnormal noise.
しかし、特許文献1は、シートスライダの動作音をセンサによって検出する構成であるため、動作音を検出するに適する所定の防音環境でなければ正確な測定は困難である。従って、乗物用シートを実際に組み立てている現場での検査には不向きであり、乗物用シートの組立現場において正確かつ簡易に異音を測定できる技術の開発が望まれていた。 However, since Patent Document 1 is configured to detect the operation sound of the seat slider with a sensor, accurate measurement is difficult unless a predetermined soundproof environment suitable for detecting the operation sound. Therefore, it is unsuitable for inspection at the site where the vehicle seat is actually assembled, and development of a technique capable of accurately and simply measuring abnormal noise at the vehicle seat assembly site has been desired.
本発明は上記に鑑みなされたものであり、乗物用シートの駆動機構の品質を、その動作音を検出することなくより正確に行い、それにより良品・不良品の判別をより正確に行うことができる乗物用シートの駆動機構用検査装置及びコンピュータプログラムを提供することを課題とする。 The present invention has been made in view of the above, and it is possible to more accurately perform the quality of the drive mechanism of the vehicle seat without detecting the operation sound, thereby more accurately determining the non-defective product / defective product. It is an object of the present invention to provide a vehicle seat drive mechanism inspection apparatus and a computer program that can be used.
上記課題を解決するため本発明の乗物用シートの駆動機構用検査装置は、乗物用シートの駆動機構の品質を判定する乗物用シートの駆動機構用検査装置であって、前記駆動機構の所定の測定点に取り付けられる振動センサと、前記駆動機構を駆動させた際に前記振動センサによって検出された検出信号を解析して異音の有無を判定し、この異音の有無により前記駆動機構の品質を判定する解析判定部とを有することを特徴とする。 In order to solve the above problems, a vehicle seat drive mechanism inspection device according to the present invention is a vehicle seat drive mechanism inspection device that determines the quality of a vehicle seat drive mechanism, and includes a predetermined mechanism of the drive mechanism. The vibration sensor attached to the measurement point and the detection signal detected by the vibration sensor when the drive mechanism is driven are analyzed to determine the presence or absence of abnormal noise. The quality of the drive mechanism is determined based on the presence or absence of the abnormal noise. And an analysis determination unit that determines whether or not
前記解析判定部は、前記振動センサから得られる検出信号を周波数解析し、不規則振動の有無により前記異音の有無を判定する構成であることが好ましい。前記解析判定部は、前記周波数解析結果において、基本周波数の高調波成分のパワースペクトルを比較して前記不規則振動の有無を判定する構成であることが好ましい。前記解析判定部は、前記周波数解析結果において、さらに、所定の特徴的な周波数成分の有無も加味して前記不規則振動の有無を判定する構成であることが好ましい。前記駆動機構が電動パワーシートのパワーユニットである場合に好適に利用できる。 It is preferable that the analysis determination unit is configured to frequency-analyze a detection signal obtained from the vibration sensor and determine the presence / absence of the abnormal noise based on the presence / absence of irregular vibration. It is preferable that the analysis determination unit is configured to determine the presence or absence of the irregular vibration by comparing power spectra of harmonic components of the fundamental frequency in the frequency analysis result. It is preferable that the analysis determination unit is configured to determine the presence / absence of the irregular vibration in addition to the presence / absence of a predetermined characteristic frequency component in the frequency analysis result. It can be suitably used when the drive mechanism is a power unit of an electric power seat.
また、本発明のコンピュータプログラムは、乗物用シートの駆動機構の品質を判定する乗物用シートの駆動機構用検査装置の解析判定部として用いられるコンピュータに、前記駆動機構の所定の測定点に取り付けられた振動センサによって検出された検出信号を解析して異音の有無を判定し、この異音の有無により前記駆動機構の品質を判定する解析判定手順を実行させることを特徴とする。 The computer program of the present invention is attached to a predetermined measurement point of the drive mechanism in a computer used as an analysis determination unit of a vehicle seat drive mechanism inspection device that determines the quality of the vehicle seat drive mechanism. The detection signal detected by the vibration sensor is analyzed to determine the presence or absence of abnormal noise, and an analysis determination procedure is performed to determine the quality of the drive mechanism based on the presence or absence of this abnormal noise.
前記解析判定手順は、前記振動センサから得られる検出信号を周波数解析し、不規則振動の有無により前記異音の有無を判定することが好ましい。前記解析判定手順は、前記周波数解析結果において、基本周波数の高調波成分のパワースペクトルを比較して前記不規則振動の有無を判定することが好ましい。前記解析判定手順は、前記周波数解析結果において、さらに、所定の特徴的な周波数成分の有無も加味して前記不規則振動の有無を判定することが好ましい。前記駆動機構として電動パワーシートのパワーユニットの品質判定に好適に用いることができる。 In the analysis determination procedure, it is preferable that the detection signal obtained from the vibration sensor is frequency-analyzed and the presence or absence of the abnormal noise is determined based on the presence or absence of irregular vibration. The analysis determination procedure preferably determines the presence or absence of the irregular vibration by comparing power spectra of harmonic components of the fundamental frequency in the frequency analysis result. In the analysis determination procedure, it is preferable that the presence or absence of the irregular vibration is determined in consideration of the presence or absence of a predetermined characteristic frequency component in the frequency analysis result. The drive mechanism can be suitably used for quality determination of a power unit of an electric power seat.
本発明では、乗物用シートの駆動機構、特に電動パワーシートのパワーユニットの所定の測定点に振動センサを取り付け、振動センサの振動波形を解析して異音の有無を判定する構成である。好ましくは、検出信号である振動波形の周波数解析を行って不規則振動の重畳の有無を判定して異音の有無を検出する構成である。そのため、異音の有無を用いて電動パワーシートのパワーユニット等の駆動機構の品質検査を行う技術において、防音環境がなくても従来より正確かつ簡易に判定を行うことができる。 In the present invention, a vibration sensor is attached to a predetermined measurement point of a vehicle seat drive mechanism, particularly a power unit of an electric power seat, and the presence or absence of abnormal noise is determined by analyzing the vibration waveform of the vibration sensor. Preferably, the configuration is such that frequency analysis of a vibration waveform that is a detection signal is performed to determine whether or not irregular vibrations are superimposed, thereby detecting the presence or absence of abnormal noise. For this reason, in the technology for inspecting the quality of a drive mechanism such as a power unit of an electric power seat using the presence or absence of abnormal noise, it is possible to make a determination more accurately and easily than before without a soundproof environment.
以下、図面に示した本発明の実施形態に基づき、本発明をさらに詳細に説明する。図1に示したように、本実施形態の乗物用シートの駆動機構用検査装置1は、振動センサ2と、解析判定部3とを備えて構成される。 Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in more detail based on the embodiments of the present invention shown in the drawings. As shown in FIG. 1, the vehicle seat drive mechanism inspection apparatus 1 according to this embodiment includes a vibration sensor 2 and an analysis determination unit 3.
振動センサ2は、検査対象である乗物用シートの駆動機構の任意の測定点にそれらを取り付けて使用される。ここでいう乗物用シートの駆動機構は、スライダ機構、リフタ機構、リクライニング機構等を構成する各種部品を含むものである。これらは電動で動作させる電動パワーシートにおいては、パワーユニットとして位置づけられるものである。 The vibration sensor 2 is used by attaching them to arbitrary measurement points of the drive mechanism of the vehicle seat to be inspected. The vehicle seat drive mechanism here includes various components that constitute a slider mechanism, a lifter mechanism, a reclining mechanism, and the like. These are positioned as power units in an electric power seat that is operated electrically.
解析判定部3は、コンピュータからなり、コンピュータプログラムとしての解析判定手順によって解析判定処理が実行される。具体的には、駆動機構(パワーユニット)を駆動させた際に振動センサ2によって検出された検出信号を解析して異音の有無を判定し、この異音の有無により駆動機構の品質を判定する。 The analysis determination unit 3 includes a computer, and analysis determination processing is executed by an analysis determination procedure as a computer program. Specifically, the detection signal detected by the vibration sensor 2 when the drive mechanism (power unit) is driven is analyzed to determine the presence or absence of abnormal noise, and the quality of the drive mechanism is determined based on the presence or absence of this abnormal noise. .
解析判定部3は、振動センサ2の検出信号である振動波形を周波数解析するが、それによって不規則振動の有無を検出し、不規則振動が発生している場合に「異音有り」すなわち「不良品」と判定し、不規則振動が発生しない場合に「異音無し」すなわち「良品」と判定する。判定結果は、モニタなどに出力される。 The analysis determination unit 3 performs frequency analysis on the vibration waveform that is the detection signal of the vibration sensor 2, thereby detecting the presence or absence of irregular vibration, and when the irregular vibration occurs, “abnormal noise”, that is, “ If it is determined as “defective product” and no irregular vibration occurs, it is determined as “no abnormal noise”, that is, “good product”. The determination result is output to a monitor or the like.
(実験例1)
(振動計測による良品・不良品判定)
(実験方法)
図2に示した電動パワーシートのスライダ機構を構成するパワーユニット10を検査対象として実験を行った。このパワーユニット10は、左右1対のスライドアジャスタ11,11と、それらを連結するスライドプレート12とを有する構造であり、外形寸法は、幅:490mm、長さ:500mmで、前後方向のストロークは260mmである。また、スライドプレート12には、モータ13等の駆動系の部品が配置されている。すなわち、長手方向の一端付近にモータ(直流フェライト、定格電圧:12V、無負荷時回転速度3600±500rpm、定格負荷時回転速度(負荷:9.8±0.9N・cm):2850±600rpm)13が配設され、このモータ13の回転をケーブル14、ミッション15を介して、左右のスライドアジャスタ11,11へ伝達する構造となっている。ケーブル14はアウターケーブルと撚り線からなるインナーケーブルとの二重構造となっている。また、ケーブル14はスライドプレート12に係止部材14aを介して固定されている。(Experimental example 1)
(Determination of non-defective / defective products by vibration measurement)
(experimental method)
An experiment was conducted with the power unit 10 constituting the slider mechanism of the electric power seat shown in FIG. This power unit 10 has a structure having a pair of left and right slide adjusters 11 and 11 and a slide plate 12 for connecting them. The external dimensions are width: 490 mm, length: 500 mm, and the stroke in the front-rear direction is 260 mm. It is. In addition, drive system components such as a motor 13 are arranged on the slide plate 12. That is, a motor (DC ferrite, rated voltage: 12 V, no-load rotation speed 3600 ± 500 rpm, rated load rotation speed (load: 9.8 ± 0.9 N · cm): 2850 ± 600 rpm) near one end in the longitudinal direction 13 is arranged, and the rotation of the motor 13 is transmitted to the left and right slide adjusters 11 and 11 via the cable 14 and the transmission 15. The cable 14 has a double structure of an outer cable and an inner cable made of a stranded wire. The cable 14 is fixed to the slide plate 12 via a locking member 14a.
試験は、スライドプレート12を、スライドアジャスタ11,11の長手方向に前端から後端へ動作させた場合(後進)と、後端から前端へ動作させた場合(前進)の2方向で測定した。振動センサとして、圧電型加速度ピックアップ(リオン製 PV−85)を、図3に示したスライドプレートの点A〜Jの10箇所に取り付けて行った。同時に音圧計測を騒音計(リオン製 NL−14)で行った。また、ユニットを10往復させ、サーモトレーサ(NEC三栄 TH7102MX)で摺動抵抗による発熱を調べた。 The test was performed in two directions: when the slide plate 12 was moved from the front end to the rear end in the longitudinal direction of the slide adjusters 11 and 11 (reverse movement) and when operated from the rear end to the front end (forward movement). As a vibration sensor, a piezoelectric acceleration pickup (PV-85 manufactured by Rion) was attached to 10 points A to J of the slide plate shown in FIG. At the same time, sound pressure was measured with a sound level meter (NL-14 manufactured by Lion). Further, the unit was reciprocated 10 times, and heat generation due to sliding resistance was examined with a thermotracer (NEC Sanei TH7102MX).
検査対象のパワーユニット10は、官能評価で正常と認められた6製品(良品(OK製品))と、異音が認められた2製品(不良品(NG製品))の計8ユニット(No.1〜No.8)について行った。官能評価は、40dB(A)程度の暗騒音環境下で行い、パワーユニット作動音の官能評価については、「とても良い」(1点)、「良い」(2点)、「やや良い」(3点)、「やや悪い」(4点)、「悪い」(5点)、「とても悪い」(6点)の6段階で評価し、1〜3を快音、4〜6点を不快音とそれぞれ定義した。 The power unit 10 to be inspected is a total of 8 units (No. 1) of 6 products (non-defective product (OK product)) recognized as normal by sensory evaluation and 2 products (non-defective product (NG product)) recognized as abnormal noise. To No. 8). The sensory evaluation is performed in a dark noise environment of about 40 dB (A), and the power unit operation sound sensory evaluation is “very good” (1 point), “good” (2 points), “slightly good” (3 points) ), “Slightly bad” (4 points), “Bad” (5 points), “Very bad” (6 points) are evaluated in 6 levels, 1 to 3 are defined as pleasant sounds, and 4 to 6 points are defined as unpleasant sounds. did.
図4(a)にパワーユニット作動音の官能評価で採点した結果を示す。8台のパワーユニット(No.1〜8)のうち、「快音」と評価されたパワーユニットは6台(No.1,3,4,5,7,8)で、「不快音」と評価されたパワーユニットは2台(No.2,6)であった。前・後進の平均値の内訳は、1点:3台、2.5点:1台、3点:2台、5点:1台、6点:1台であった。図4(b)はパワーユニットの前・後進時の音圧特性を示す。官能評価で「快音」と評価されたパワーユニットの音圧特性は、51〜55dB(A)となり、「不快音」と評価されたパワーユニットの音圧特性は、61〜72dB(A)となった。音圧特性が55dB(A)以上になると、「不快音」と感じる可能性が高い。 FIG. 4A shows the result of scoring by sensory evaluation of the power unit operating sound. Of the eight power units (No. 1 to 8), six (No. 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8) were rated as “quiet sounds” and were rated as “unpleasant sounds”. There were two power units (No. 2, 6). The breakdown of the average values of forward and reverse was 1 point: 3 units, 2.5 points: 1 unit, 3 points: 2 units, 5 points: 1 unit, 6 points: 1 unit. FIG. 4B shows the sound pressure characteristics when the power unit is moving forward and backward. The sound pressure characteristic of the power unit evaluated as “quiet” by the sensory evaluation was 51 to 55 dB (A), and the sound pressure characteristic of the power unit evaluated as “unpleasant sound” was 61 to 72 dB (A). When the sound pressure characteristic is 55 dB (A) or more, there is a high possibility that the user feels “uncomfortable sound”.
(実験結果)
A〜Jの各測定点の振動を測定してFFT解析した結果、NG品は200〜400Hzの振動がインナーケーブル近傍(点A・E・G)で顕著に現れることが確認できた。また、ユニット温度を比較して、NG品にはケーブル内で局所的に発熱があることがわかった。OK品と判定されたNo.1と、NG品と判定されたNo.2について、G点で測定した原波形の比較を図5(a)(前→後(F→R)),図5(b)(後→前(R→F))に示す。いずれも振動の振幅には明確な差が見られず、振幅の大小で良否は判定できなかった。(Experimental result)
As a result of measuring the vibration at each of the measurement points A to J and performing the FFT analysis, it was confirmed that the vibration of 200 to 400 Hz appears remarkably in the vicinity of the inner cable (points A, E, and G). Further, comparing the unit temperatures, it was found that the NG product generated heat locally in the cable. No. determined as an OK product. 1 and No. determined as an NG product. Comparison of the original waveforms measured at point G is shown in FIG. 5A (front → rear (F → R)) and FIG. 5B (rear → front (R → F)). In all cases, there was no clear difference in the amplitude of vibration, and it was not possible to judge whether the amplitude was large or small.
ケーブルが高温になっている点の近傍で200〜400Hzの振動スペクトルが高く現れたことから、点Gでの振動の比較を行った。図6(a),(b)は点Gで測定したNo.1とNo.2の前→後、後→前の振動をFFT解析し比較したものである。NG品は基本周波数に様々な不規則振動が重畳されており、300〜400Hzで振動スペクトルのピークが見られた。100〜300Hzの振動は、インナーケーブルとアウターケーブルの相対運動による接触により発生したものであると考えられる。インナーケーブルの動きのイメージを図6(a),(b)内に示す。400Hz付近の振動はウォームギヤの減速比から勘案して、ギヤ同士の歯打音によるものであると考えられる。インナーケーブルで不規則なふれ回り運動が発生し、それに起因する振動がギヤやモータに伝わり、ミスアライメントの状態となって、異音が発生しているものと思われる。従って、このパワーユニットの異音の主原因はインナーケーブルが発する振動であると考えられる。以上のことから、300〜400Hzでの振動スペクトルの差により異音の評価が可能であることがわかる。 Since a high vibration spectrum of 200 to 400 Hz appeared in the vicinity of the point where the cable was hot, the vibration at the point G was compared. 6 (a) and 6 (b) are Nos. Measured at point G. 1 and No. The vibrations before and after 2 and after and before are compared by FFT analysis. In the NG product, various irregular vibrations were superimposed on the fundamental frequency, and a peak of the vibration spectrum was observed at 300 to 400 Hz. The vibration of 100 to 300 Hz is considered to be generated by contact due to the relative movement of the inner cable and the outer cable. Images of the movement of the inner cable are shown in FIGS. 6 (a) and 6 (b). Considering the reduction ratio of the worm gear, the vibration around 400 Hz is considered to be caused by the rattling noise between the gears. Irregular whirling motion occurs in the inner cable, and the resulting vibration is transmitted to the gear and motor, resulting in misalignment and abnormal noise. Therefore, it is considered that the main cause of the noise of the power unit is vibration generated by the inner cable. From the above, it can be seen that abnormal noise can be evaluated by the difference in vibration spectrum at 300 to 400 Hz.
なお、官能評価でNG品と認められたその他のパワーユニットNo.6、OK品と認められたその他のパワーユニット5品についても同様の結果が得られ、No.6では不規則振動の重畳が検出され、異音が発生していると特定できた。 In addition, other power unit No. recognized as NG product by sensory evaluation. 6. Similar results were obtained for other 5 power unit products that were recognized as OK products. In No. 6, superposition of irregular vibrations was detected, and it was possible to identify that abnormal noise was generated.
(音圧計測による検証)
上記した振動計測と同時に、騒音計(リオン製 NL−14)をスライドプレート中央の上方450mmの位置に設置して音圧を計測した。図7(a)はパワーユニットNo.1(OK品)及びNo.2(NG品)の前進時における音圧の時間軸波形を示す。官能評価で「快音」と評価されたパワーユニットNo.1と比較して、「不快音」と評価されたパワーユニットNo.2の波形は、振幅の大きい波形となり、この時間軸波形では、「快音」と評価されたパワーユニットと、「不快音」と評価されたパワーユニットに明確な差が確認できる。(Verification by sound pressure measurement)
Simultaneously with the vibration measurement described above, a sound level meter (NL-14 NL-14) was installed at a position 450 mm above the center of the slide plate to measure the sound pressure. FIG. 7A shows the power unit no. 1 (OK product) and No. 1 2 shows a time-axis waveform of sound pressure during forward movement of 2 (NG product). The power unit No. evaluated as “quiet” by sensory evaluation. Compared with No. 1, the power unit No. evaluated as “uncomfortable noise”. The waveform of No. 2 has a large amplitude, and in this time-axis waveform, a clear difference can be confirmed between the power unit evaluated as “quiet sound” and the power unit evaluated as “unpleasant sound”.
図7(b)はパワーユニットNo.1(OK品)及びNo.2(NG品)の前進時の音圧変動の1/3オクターブバンド周波数解析特性を示す。官能評価で「快音」と評価されたパワーユニットNo.1と比較して、官能評価で「不快音」と評価されたパワーユニットNo.2の1/3オクターブバンド周波数解析特性は、特に、2〜5kHzの音圧が高くなっており、この周波数帯域で、駆動系の部品から不快音が発生していると推測できる。 FIG. 7B shows the power unit no. 1 (OK product) and No. 1 2 (NG product) shows a 1/3 octave band frequency analysis characteristic of sound pressure fluctuation during forward movement. The power unit No. evaluated as “quiet” by sensory evaluation. Power unit No. 1 evaluated as “uncomfortable sound” in sensory evaluation as compared with No. 1. The 1/3 octave band frequency analysis characteristic of 2 has a particularly high sound pressure of 2 to 5 kHz, and it can be estimated that unpleasant noise is generated from the components of the drive system in this frequency band.
図8(a),(b)は2〜5kHzでのパワーユニットの前・後進時の音圧変動の周波数解析特性を示す。但し、図8(a),(b)では全てのパワーユニットの周波数解析特性を示すと煩雑になり見にくくなるため、No.2及びNo.6のNG品のほかは、6台のOK品中、No.1及びNo.3の特性のみを示す。なお、残り4台のOK品(No.4、No.5、No.7及びNo.8)も、No.1及びNo.3と同様の傾向を示している。図8(a),(b)より、官能評価で「不快音」と評価されたパワーユニットNo.2及びNo.6のパワースペクトルは、「快音」と評価されたNo.1及びNo.3のパワースペクトルより増大しており、明確な優位差が確認できる。 FIGS. 8A and 8B show frequency analysis characteristics of sound pressure fluctuations when the power unit is moving forward and backward at 2 to 5 kHz. However, in FIGS. 8A and 8B, the frequency analysis characteristics of all power units are complicated and difficult to see. 2 and no. Other than 6 NG products, No. 6 out of 6 OK products. 1 and no. Only characteristic 3 is shown. The remaining four OK products (No. 4, No. 5, No. 7 and No. 8) are also No. 1 and no. 3 shows the same tendency. 8A and 8B, the power unit No. evaluated as “uncomfortable sound” by sensory evaluation. 2 and no. The power spectrum of No. 6 was evaluated as “No. 1 and no. The power spectrum is higher than that of No. 3, and a clear superior difference can be confirmed.
次に、人の音に対する感度は、音圧(Pa)の対数とほぼ比例していることから、パワースペクトル−周波数の両対数グラフからの異音判定を行った。図9(a),(b)は、パワーユニットの前・後進時の音圧変動の周波数特性からパワースペクトル−周波数の両対数グラフを作図した時の傾きを示す。但し、図9(a),(b)も、図8と同様の理由から、No.2及びNo.6のNG品のほかは、6台のOK品中、No.1及びNo.3の特性のみを示す。
官能評価で「快音」と評価されたパワーユニットの傾きは、前進時で「−0.08〜−1.29」、後進時で「−0.36〜−1.03」であった(なお、この傾きの範囲は、OK品6台の最小値と最大値を示している)。一方、「不快音」と評価されたNo.2及びNo.6の2台のパワーユニットの2〜5kHzの傾きは、前進時で「−1.49〜−1.75」、後進時で「−1.34〜−1.90」であった。前進時及び後進時を共に含めて考慮すると、「快音」と評価されたOK品6台中、傾きの最大値は「−1.29」であり、「不快音」と評価されたNG品2台中、傾きの最小値は「−1.34」であり、それらの間の「−1.30」付近に、OK品とNG品を区別する判定基準を設定可能である。このことから、パワーユニット作動時の周波数解析特性の両対数グラフを作図し、駆動系部品から不快音が発生していると推測できる周波数帯である2〜5kHzの傾きと官能評価との間には相関があり、これによって、異音発生の有無を判定できることがわかる。Next, since the sensitivity to human sound is almost proportional to the logarithm of sound pressure (Pa), abnormal noise was determined from a logarithmic graph of power spectrum-frequency. FIGS. 9A and 9B show slopes when a logarithmic graph of power spectrum-frequency is drawn from the frequency characteristics of sound pressure fluctuations when the power unit moves forward and backward. However, for the same reason as FIG. 2 and no. Other than 6 NG products, No. 6 out of 6 OK products. 1 and no. Only characteristic 3 is shown.
The inclination of the power unit evaluated as “quiet” in the sensory evaluation was “−0.08 to −1.29” when traveling forward, and “−0.36 to −1.03” when traveling backward (note that This range of inclination shows the minimum and maximum values of 6 OK products). On the other hand, No. evaluated as “unpleasant sound”. 2 and no. The inclination of 2 to 5 kHz of the two power units of 6 was “−1.49 to −1.75” when moving forward, and “−1.34 to −1.90” when moving backward. When considering both forward and reverse travel, the OK value of 6 OK products rated as “quiet” was the maximum value of “−1.29”, and 2 out of NG products rated as “uncomfortable sound”. The minimum value of the inclination is “−1.34”, and a criterion for distinguishing between an OK product and an NG product can be set near “−1.30” therebetween. From this, a logarithmic graph of frequency analysis characteristics when the power unit is activated is drawn, and between the inclination of 2 to 5 kHz which is a frequency band where it can be estimated that unpleasant noise is generated from the drive system parts, and sensory evaluation It can be seen that there is a correlation, and this makes it possible to determine whether or not abnormal noise has occurred.
以上のことから、本発明の振動計測によって、不規則振動が検出されたパワーユニットNo.2、No.6は、音圧計測においていずれも官能評価の「不快音」に相当するものとして判定され、不規則振動が検出されなかったパワーユニットNo.1、No.3〜5、No.7、No.8は、音圧計測においてはいずれも官能評価の「快音」に相当するものとして判定されている。これにより、本発明の振動計測によって異音を評価し、異音評価の有無によって、良品(OK品)・不良品(NG品)の別を判定することが有効であることがわかる。 From the above, the power unit No. in which irregular vibration is detected by the vibration measurement of the present invention. 2, no. No. 6 is a power unit No. 6 that was determined to correspond to “uncomfortable sound” of sensory evaluation in sound pressure measurement, and no irregular vibration was detected. 1, no. 3-5, no. 7, no. In the sound pressure measurement, 8 is determined to be equivalent to “quiet sound” of sensory evaluation. Thereby, it is understood that it is effective to evaluate abnormal noise by vibration measurement according to the present invention, and to determine whether the product is good (OK product) or defective (NG product) based on the presence or absence of abnormal noise evaluation.
(実験例2)
(実験方法)
電動パワーシートのスライダ機構を構成するパワーユニット10を60台準備し、各パワーユニット10間で差が現れやすい図3の点B(裏面)の箇所に振動センサである圧電型加速度ピックアップ(リオン製 PV−85)を取り付けて、実験例1と同様に、スライドプレート12を、スライドアジャスタ11,11の長手方向に前端から後端へ動作させた場合(後進)と、後端から前端へ動作させた場合(前進)の2方向について振動を測定した。同時に騒音計(リオン製 NL−14)を高さ約40cmに設置し、40dB程度の暗騒音環境下で音圧計測を行った。なお、各パワーユニット10に付設されたモータ13の仕様は実験例1と同じであった。また、スライドプレート12の固有振動数は約750Hzであった。また、60台のパワーユニット10は、実験例1と同様の官能評価により、正常と認められた良品(OK製品)と、異音が認められた不良品(NG品)に区別してデータをまとめた。(Experimental example 2)
(experimental method)
60 power units 10 constituting the slider mechanism of the electric power seat are prepared, and a piezoelectric acceleration pickup (Rion PV-) which is a vibration sensor is provided at a point B (back surface) in FIG. 85), and when the slide plate 12 is operated from the front end to the rear end in the longitudinal direction of the slide adjusters 11 and 11 (reverse) and from the rear end to the front end in the same manner as in Experimental Example 1. Vibration was measured in two directions (forward). At the same time, a sound level meter (NL-14 manufactured by Lion) was installed at a height of about 40 cm, and sound pressure was measured in a background noise environment of about 40 dB. The specifications of the motor 13 attached to each power unit 10 were the same as those in Experimental Example 1. The natural frequency of the slide plate 12 was about 750 Hz. In addition, the 60 power units 10 compiled the data by distinguishing between a non-defective product (OK product) recognized as normal and a defective product (NG product) recognized as abnormal noise by the same sensory evaluation as in Experimental Example 1. .
(実験結果)
前進後進それぞれフルストローク動作させ収録した振動センサのデータを基に周波数解析(FFT解析)を行った(FFT解析条件・・・サンプリング周波数:5000Hz、解析データ長:8192、ウィンドウ関数:ハニング窓、平均化処理:加算平均、オーバーラップ量90%)。(Experimental result)
Frequency analysis (FFT analysis) was performed based on the vibration sensor data recorded by performing full stroke operation for each of the forward and backward movements (FFT analysis conditions: sampling frequency: 5000 Hz, analysis data length: 8192, window function: Hanning window, average Processing: addition average, overlap amount 90%).
図10は、OK品及びNG品の代表事例のFFT解析結果である。OK品及びNG品共に1次のピークが90Hz付近に認められ、丸印で示したように、それぞれ2次、3次成分等の高調波成分が発生している。但し、各周波数成分のパワースペクトルのピーク値は、NG品の値がOK品の値を遙かに上回っている。これに加え、NG品には、黒色の三角印で示したように、OK品では認められない140Hz付近に特有のピークがあり、さらにその2次成分、3次成分に高い強度のスペクトルが発生している。また、320Hz付近に四角印で示したような特有の周波数成分もある。
従って、NG品には、基本周波数に様々な不規則振動が重畳されていることがわかる。これは、スライドプレート12の前後フルストロークの動作中に生じる速度変化、ケーブルの不規則な振動など複数の要因によるものと考えられる。また、NG品のみに見られた140Hz付近の振動は異音の起点となっていると考えられる。これらのことから、不規則振動の有無により、異音の有無を判定することが妥当であると言える。FIG. 10 shows the FFT analysis results of representative cases of OK and NG products. In both the OK product and the NG product, a first order peak is recognized in the vicinity of 90 Hz, and as indicated by a circle, harmonic components such as second order and third order components are generated. However, as for the peak value of the power spectrum of each frequency component, the value of the NG product far exceeds the value of the OK product. In addition to this, as shown by the black triangle mark, the NG product has a peculiar peak in the vicinity of 140 Hz that is not recognized in the OK product, and a high-intensity spectrum is generated in the secondary and tertiary components. doing. There is also a unique frequency component as indicated by a square mark in the vicinity of 320 Hz.
Therefore, it can be seen that various irregular vibrations are superimposed on the fundamental frequency in the NG product. This is considered to be due to a plurality of factors such as a speed change that occurs during the full stroke operation of the slide plate 12 and irregular vibration of the cable. Moreover, it is thought that the vibration near 140 Hz seen only in the NG product is the starting point of abnormal noise. From these facts, it can be said that it is appropriate to determine the presence or absence of abnormal noise based on the presence or absence of irregular vibration.
次に、異音の定量化のため、OK品のユニット群とNG品のユニット群との各パワースペクトルを比較し、両者を区別する基準線を図11に示したグラフ上に設定した。この基準線は、OK品におけるパワースペクトルのピークの多く(例えば、図11のような所定の周波数帯域におけるOK品のピークの60%以上)がこれを下回る位置となるように、あるいはOK品におけるパワースペクトルのピークの全てがこれを下回る位置となるように設定される。また、図11では250〜500Hzの周波数帯域において基準線を設定しているが、この周波数帯域は、上記したNG品特有の140Hzの高調波成分及びOK品と共通の90Hzの高調波成分が共に所定の強度で出現し、さらに、320Hz付近の特有の周波数成分が出現するなど、様々な周波数成分が出現しやすく、OK品及びNG品の判別がしやすいことによる。もちろん、250〜500Hzは一例であり、例えばその前後100Hz程度の周波数帯まで含んで判定するようにしてもよい。このような領域で基準線を設定し、基準線を上回る範囲に描かれたパワースペクトルの線で取り囲まれた部分の面積を求めたところ、その面積の大きさと異音の官能評価との間で相関が得られた。従って、基準線を上回る範囲のパワースペクトルの線で取り囲まれた部分の面積の大きさにより、異音の発生の有無を判定できる。なお、面積は、上記の基準線を上回った範囲に限らず、例えば、パワースペクトルの最小値に相当するラインを引き、そのラインを基準として面積を求めることもできる。 Next, in order to quantify abnormal noise, the power spectra of the OK product unit group and the NG product unit group were compared, and a reference line for distinguishing between them was set on the graph shown in FIG. This reference line is such that most of the peak of the power spectrum in the OK product (for example, 60% or more of the peak of the OK product in a predetermined frequency band as shown in FIG. 11) is below this position, or in the OK product. It is set so that all the peaks of the power spectrum are in positions below this. In FIG. 11, the reference line is set in the frequency band of 250 to 500 Hz. In this frequency band, both the 140 Hz harmonic component unique to the NG product and the 90 Hz harmonic component common to the OK product are both present. This is because various frequency components are likely to appear, such as appearing at a predetermined intensity, and a specific frequency component in the vicinity of 320 Hz, making it easy to distinguish between OK and NG products. Of course, 250 to 500 Hz is an example, and for example, determination may be made including a frequency band of about 100 Hz before and after that. A reference line was set in such a region, and when the area of the part surrounded by the line of the power spectrum drawn in a range exceeding the reference line was obtained, between the size of the area and sensory evaluation of abnormal noise, Correlation was obtained. Therefore, the presence or absence of abnormal noise can be determined based on the size of the area surrounded by the power spectrum line in a range exceeding the reference line. The area is not limited to the range exceeding the reference line, and for example, the area corresponding to the minimum value of the power spectrum can be drawn and the area can be obtained using the line as a reference.
以上より、解析判定手順を実行する解析判定部3は、振動センサ2の検出信号である振動波形の周波数数解析結果において、基本周波数の高調波成分のパワースペクトル(OK品及びNG品共通の基本周波数成分及びNG品特有の周波数成分の両方の高調波成分のパワースペクトル)を比較して不規則振動の有無を判定すること、すなわち、上記の基準線を上回るパワースペクトルの頻度(例えば上記のように面積で判定)が所定以上の場合に不規則振動有りと判定することが好ましい。また、周波数解析結果において、さらに、所定の特徴的な基本周波数成分の有無も、例えば上記のようにNG品特有の140Hzの周波数成分の存在を確認したならば、当該周波数成分の有無を加味して判定することが好ましい。 As described above, the analysis determination unit 3 that executes the analysis determination procedure uses the power spectrum of the harmonic component of the fundamental frequency in the frequency number analysis result of the vibration waveform that is the detection signal of the vibration sensor 2 (basic common to OK and NG products). The presence of irregular vibrations by comparing the frequency components and the harmonic components of the frequency component specific to the NG product), that is, the frequency of the power spectrum exceeding the reference line (for example, as described above) It is preferable to determine that there is irregular vibration when the (determined by area) is greater than or equal to a predetermined value. In addition, in the frequency analysis result, the presence or absence of a predetermined characteristic fundamental frequency component is also considered, for example, if the existence of a 140 Hz frequency component peculiar to the NG product is confirmed as described above. It is preferable to make a judgment.
(実験例3)
実験例1及び実験例2では、左右一対のスライドアジャスタ11,11間に掛け渡したスライドプレート12に、モータ13の回転を伝達するケーブル14を掛け渡している。そのため、上記のようにケーブル14において不規則振動が発生しやすい構造である。(Experimental example 3)
In Experimental Example 1 and Experimental Example 2, a cable 14 for transmitting the rotation of the motor 13 is stretched over the slide plate 12 spanned between the pair of left and right slide adjusters 11, 11. For this reason, the cable 14 is likely to generate irregular vibrations as described above.
一方、図12に示したスライド機構を構成するパワーユニット100は、片側のスライドアジャスタ110のロアレール111にラック210が付設され、このラック210に噛み合うピニオン220がアッパーレール112に軸支され、ピニオン220がモータ130によって回転せしめられる。このラック210が設けられたスライドアジャスタ110と反対側のスライドアジャスタ(図12において図示せず)とは連結軸230により連結され、モータ130の回転によってピニオン220がラック210に噛み合って回転することで、アッパーレール112が片側駆動で前後動する。従って、左右一対のスライドアジャスタ110,110間には不規則振動の発生源となりやすいケーブルが配設されていない。 On the other hand, in the power unit 100 constituting the slide mechanism shown in FIG. 12, a rack 210 is attached to the lower rail 111 of the slide adjuster 110 on one side, and a pinion 220 that meshes with the rack 210 is pivotally supported by the upper rail 112, and the pinion 220 is It is rotated by the motor 130. A slide adjuster 110 (not shown in FIG. 12) opposite to the slide adjuster 110 provided with the rack 210 is connected by a connecting shaft 230, and the pinion 220 is engaged with the rack 210 and rotated by the rotation of the motor 130. The upper rail 112 moves back and forth by one-side drive. Therefore, a cable that tends to be a source of irregular vibration is not provided between the pair of left and right slide adjusters 110, 110.
そこで、かかるパワーユニット100において、ピニオン220が支持されたブラケット150に上記実験例と同じ振動センサを取り付け、前後にフルストローク駆動させ、振動を測定し、異音の有無を判定可能か否か検証した。その結果を図13に示す。 Therefore, in such a power unit 100, the same vibration sensor as that in the above-mentioned experimental example is attached to the bracket 150 on which the pinion 220 is supported, the full-stroke drive is performed in the front and rear directions, the vibration is measured, and it is verified whether the presence or absence of abnormal noise can be determined. . The result is shown in FIG.
図13において「閾値」は、実験例2のOK品及びNG品の各パワースペクトルを比較し、OK品とNG品との境界となるパワースペクトルを描いたものである。図13から明らかなように、実験例3のパワーユニットは、前進(図13(a))、後進(図13(b))共に、上記「閾値」を下回っており、上下の不規則な振動が生じておらず、異音の発生が極めて低いことがわかる。従って、本発明の振動センサを用いた異音の発生の判定手法は、実験例1、実験例2のような不規則振動を生じやすいケーブルを備えたパワーユニットに限らず、実験例3のようなケーブルを備えていないパワーユニットを初め、種々の形式の駆動機構の異音判定に適用可能である。 In FIG. 13, “threshold value” is obtained by comparing the power spectra of the OK product and the NG product of Experimental Example 2 and drawing the power spectrum that becomes the boundary between the OK product and the NG product. As is clear from FIG. 13, the power unit of Experimental Example 3 is below the “threshold value” both in the forward direction (FIG. 13A) and in the reverse direction (FIG. 13B), and irregular vibrations up and down are observed. It does not occur, and it can be seen that the occurrence of abnormal noise is extremely low. Therefore, the method for determining the occurrence of abnormal noise using the vibration sensor of the present invention is not limited to the power unit having a cable that easily generates irregular vibration as in Experimental Example 1 and Experimental Example 2, but as in Experimental Example 3. The present invention can be applied to noise detection of various types of drive mechanisms including power units that do not include a cable.
1 駆動機構用検査装置
2 振動センサ
3 解析判定部DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Drive mechanism inspection apparatus 2 Vibration sensor 3 Analysis determination part
Claims (3)
検査対象の前記駆動機構が、左右一対のスライドアジャスタと、前記左右一対のスライドアジャスタを連結するスライドプレートと、前記スライドプレートに支持されるモータと、前記モータの回転を前記左右一対のスライドアジャスタにミッションを介して伝達するため、前記スライドプレートに支持され、アウターケーブルとインナーケーブルの二重構造となっているケーブルとを有し、前記乗物用シートのスライダ機構を構成するパワーユニットであり、
前記スライドプレートに振動センサを取り付け、
前記パワーユニットを駆動させた際の前記振動センサから検出される検出信号を周波数解析し、周波数解析の結果から不規則振動の有無を判定し、前記不規則振動の有無により異音の有無を判定して前記パワーユニットの品質を判定する
ことを特徴とする乗物用シートの駆動機構の検査方法。 A vehicle seat drive mechanism inspection method for determining the quality of a vehicle seat drive mechanism,
The drive mechanism to be inspected includes a pair of left and right slide adjusters, a slide plate connecting the pair of left and right slide adjusters, a motor supported by the slide plate, and rotation of the motor to the pair of left and right slide adjusters. A power unit that is supported by the slide plate and has a double structure of an outer cable and an inner cable for transmission via a mission, and constitutes a slider mechanism of the vehicle seat ,
A vibration sensor is attached to the slide plate,
A frequency analysis is performed on a detection signal detected from the vibration sensor when the power unit is driven, the presence or absence of irregular vibration is determined from the result of the frequency analysis, and the presence or absence of abnormal noise is determined based on the presence or absence of the irregular vibration. A method for inspecting a vehicle seat drive mechanism, wherein the quality of the power unit is determined .
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2012274105 | 2012-12-14 | ||
| JP2012274105 | 2012-12-14 | ||
| PCT/JP2013/082894 WO2014092032A1 (en) | 2012-12-14 | 2013-12-07 | Device for inspecting drive mechanism for vehicle seat, and computer program |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPWO2014092032A1 JPWO2014092032A1 (en) | 2017-01-12 |
| JP6133898B2 true JP6133898B2 (en) | 2017-05-24 |
Family
ID=50934322
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2014552024A Expired - Fee Related JP6133898B2 (en) | 2012-12-14 | 2013-12-07 | Inspection method for vehicle seat drive mechanism |
Country Status (2)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP6133898B2 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2014092032A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN113138011A (en) * | 2021-03-17 | 2021-07-20 | 江苏中科君达物联网股份有限公司 | Novel vibration noise testing method |
Family Cites Families (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPH01153919A (en) * | 1987-12-10 | 1989-06-16 | Kiki Kaihatsu Kogyo:Kk | Noise evaluating method for motor-driven sheet adjuster |
| JP5018415B2 (en) * | 2007-11-14 | 2012-09-05 | トヨタ紡織株式会社 | Inspection method for parts |
| JP5056466B2 (en) * | 2008-02-21 | 2012-10-24 | トヨタ紡織株式会社 | Method for judging abnormal noise |
-
2013
- 2013-12-07 JP JP2014552024A patent/JP6133898B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2013-12-07 WO PCT/JP2013/082894 patent/WO2014092032A1/en not_active Ceased
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JPWO2014092032A1 (en) | 2017-01-12 |
| WO2014092032A1 (en) | 2014-06-19 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| ES2800319T3 (en) | Fault detection system and associated method | |
| Wang et al. | Autoregressive model-based gear shaft fault diagnosis using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test | |
| ES2802775T3 (en) | Fault detection system and associated procedure | |
| JP5146008B2 (en) | Abnormality diagnosis apparatus and abnormality diagnosis method | |
| Sharma et al. | Frequency domain averaging based experimental evaluation of gear fault without tachometer for fluctuating speed conditions | |
| Öztürk et al. | Early detection of pitting damage in gears using mean frequency of scalogram | |
| WO2011081085A1 (en) | Abnormality diagnosis device for rolling bearing, wind power generator, and abnormality diagnosis system | |
| JP2007205885A (en) | Sound or vibration abnormality diagnosis method and sound or vibration abnormality diagnosis device | |
| JP6133898B2 (en) | Inspection method for vehicle seat drive mechanism | |
| Alshammari et al. | Fault diagnosis of helical gear through various vibration techniques in automotive gearbox | |
| JP2003085157A (en) | Frequency analysis device, abnormality determination device and abnormality determination system applying FFT algorithm | |
| JP4942353B2 (en) | Sound or vibration analysis method and sound or vibration analysis apparatus | |
| JP4328722B2 (en) | Method for assessing disturbing noise | |
| JP2010071866A (en) | Method and apparatus for inspection of electric motor | |
| JPH0843258A (en) | Gear inspection equipment | |
| Haram et al. | Electrical motor current signal analysis using a modulation signal bispectrum for the fault diagnosis of a gearbox downstream | |
| TWI594907B (en) | Wiper quality estimating system and cars with wiper quality estimating capability | |
| CN102830177B (en) | Abnormality checking method and abnormality checking apparatus | |
| JP5056466B2 (en) | Method for judging abnormal noise | |
| Wirtz et al. | Frequency-based damage detection of spur gear using wavelet analysis | |
| JP3688607B2 (en) | Turbine oil deterioration degree evaluation method and deterioration degree evaluation apparatus | |
| Szydło et al. | Diagnostics of the Passenger Lift Winch | |
| CN119782972B (en) | Variable working condition abnormal data processing system and method for electric wheel speed reducer of mine car | |
| JP7619974B2 (en) | Abnormality prediction diagnostic system, abnormality prediction diagnostic device and diagnostic method | |
| El Morsy et al. | Determination of roller bearing inner race defect width based on vibration signal |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20161124 |
|
| A521 | Request for written amendment filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20170123 |
|
| TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20170329 |
|
| A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20170420 |
|
| R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Ref document number: 6133898 Country of ref document: JP Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| LAPS | Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees |