Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP6140068B2 - Weld crack introduction test body and weld crack introduction method - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP6140068B2 - Weld crack introduction test body and weld crack introduction method - Google Patents

Weld crack introduction test body and weld crack introduction method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP6140068B2
JP6140068B2 JP2013264169A JP2013264169A JP6140068B2 JP 6140068 B2 JP6140068 B2 JP 6140068B2 JP 2013264169 A JP2013264169 A JP 2013264169A JP 2013264169 A JP2013264169 A JP 2013264169A JP 6140068 B2 JP6140068 B2 JP 6140068B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
crack
welding
weld metal
weld
boron
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2013264169A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2015120172A (en
Inventor
康生 村井
康生 村井
哲哉 橋本
哲哉 橋本
Original Assignee
神鋼溶接サービス株式会社
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 神鋼溶接サービス株式会社 filed Critical 神鋼溶接サービス株式会社
Priority to JP2013264169A priority Critical patent/JP6140068B2/en
Publication of JP2015120172A publication Critical patent/JP2015120172A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP6140068B2 publication Critical patent/JP6140068B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Sampling And Sample Adjustment (AREA)

Description

本発明は、鋼材の溶接部に対する非破壊試験の検出性能を検証するための溶接割れ導入試験体及び溶接割れ導入方法に関する。   The present invention relates to a weld crack introduction test body and a weld crack introduction method for verifying the detection performance of a nondestructive test for a welded portion of a steel material.

超音波探傷試験、磁粉探傷試験、浸透探傷試験等の非破壊試験の検出性能を検証するための試験体として、融合不良、溶け込み不良、高温割れ、ブローホール及びスラグ巻き込み等の種々の欠陥を導入したものが使用されている。特に、割れ状欠陥を導入した試験体は、非破壊試験技術の検出性能を検証するための主要な素材であり、そのニーズが高い。   Introduced various defects such as poor fusion, poor penetration, hot cracking, blowhole and slag entrainment as test specimens to verify the detection performance of nondestructive testing such as ultrasonic testing, magnetic particle testing, and penetration testing Is used. In particular, specimens with cracked defects are a major material for verifying the detection performance of nondestructive testing techniques, and there is a great need for them.

従来、このような試験体を製造するための割れ導入方法としては、例えば、図7(a)に示すように、母材3同士をすみ肉溶接した溶接金属2に対し、放電加工することにより、割れ1を形成したり、又は図7(b)に示すように、母材3に対して、放電加工することにより、割れ1を形成することにより、欠陥を導入したものがある。また、図8に示すように、母材3に対し、例えば、V字開先を形成し、この開先に、消耗電極式アーク溶接方法により、比較的高電流・高速溶接の条件で溶接金属2を盛りつけ、この高電流・高速溶接の条件で溶接することにより、溶接金属2に所謂梨型割れ1を発生させたものがある。また、溶接材料に、S,P及びBi等の低融点化合物を生成しやすい元素を添加して、溶接金属中に低融点化合物を生成することにより、凝固割れを発生させる方法がある。   Conventionally, as a crack introduction method for manufacturing such a test body, for example, as shown in FIG. 7A, by performing electric discharge machining on a weld metal 2 in which the base materials 3 are fillet welded to each other. In some cases, defects are introduced by forming cracks 1 or forming cracks 1 by subjecting the base material 3 to electric discharge machining as shown in FIG. 7B. Further, as shown in FIG. 8, for example, a V-shaped groove is formed on the base material 3, and a weld metal is formed on the groove under relatively high current and high-speed welding conditions by a consumable electrode arc welding method. There is one in which a so-called pear-shaped crack 1 is generated in the weld metal 2 by welding under the conditions of high current and high speed welding. In addition, there is a method in which solidification cracks are generated by adding a low melting point compound such as S, P and Bi to the welding material and generating a low melting point compound in the weld metal.

なお、溶接割れを防止する技術として、溶接金属中に溶け込んだボロンの影響を検討した技術があり、特許文献1においては、ステンレス鋼の溶接割れを防止するために、溶接材料中に積極的にボロンを添加して、溶接金属中のボロンを増加させている。   In addition, as a technique for preventing weld cracking, there is a technique for examining the influence of boron dissolved in the weld metal. In Patent Document 1, in order to prevent weld cracking of stainless steel, the welding material is actively used. Boron is added to increase boron in the weld metal.

特開平7−268564号公報JP-A-7-268564

しかしながら、図7に示す放電加工により割れ欠陥を導入する方法は、導入された欠陥が、あくまで、人工欠陥であることから、欠陥の平面寸法については、極めて高精度のものが得られるものの、欠陥の形状が、割れ面が平坦であったり、割れ状欠陥の間隙が0.25mm以上と広いものであって、自然の溶接欠陥とは異なる性状となるため、非破壊試験技術の検出性能を検証するという目的からは、好ましい試験体とはいえないという問題点がある。   However, the method of introducing a crack defect by electric discharge machining shown in FIG. 7 is that the introduced defect is an artificial defect to the last. The shape of the crack is flat and the gap between crack-like defects is as wide as 0.25 mm or more, which is different from natural weld defects, so the detection performance of nondestructive testing technology is verified. For this purpose, there is a problem that it cannot be said to be a preferable specimen.

図8に示す消耗電極式アーク溶接による梨型割れ状の欠陥発生方法は、溶接条件によっては、割れが発生しなかったり、割れ状欠陥が発生した場合であっても、割れの高さHcがばらついたりして、溶接金属2の溶け込み深さPの全体に割れが生じることがない。更に、割れ1を溶け込み深さPのどの範囲に発生されるかを制御することも困難であるため、寸法精度が優れた割れ状欠陥を導入することが困難である。   The pear-shaped crack-like defect generation method by consumable electrode arc welding shown in FIG. 8 has a crack height Hc of even when cracks do not occur or crack defects occur depending on the welding conditions. The crack does not occur in the entire penetration depth P of the weld metal 2 due to variations. Furthermore, since it is difficult to control in which range of the penetration depth P the crack 1 is generated, it is difficult to introduce a crack-like defect with excellent dimensional accuracy.

溶接材料又は溶接部に、S,P、Bi等の低融点化合物を生成しやすい元素を添加して、凝固割れを発生させる方法は、図9に示すように、割れ1が、溶接金属2の凝固組織に沿って放射状又は網目状に複数個発生するため、割れ1の方向、寸法、数量、及び発生位置を殆ど制御することができないという問題点がある。   As shown in FIG. 9, the method of adding an element that easily generates a low-melting-point compound such as S, P, Bi or the like to the welding material or welded portion to cause solidification cracking is as follows. Since a plurality of radial or mesh-like shapes are generated along the solidified structure, there is a problem that the direction, size, quantity, and generation position of the crack 1 can hardly be controlled.

このように、従来の割れ欠陥の導入方法においては、割れの寸法精度を確保しやすい方法は、得られる割れが人工欠陥であり、自然溶接欠陥ではないため、非破壊試験における検出性能の検証には不向きである。一方、自然溶接欠陥を導入する方法は、割れ状欠陥の寸法、形状、発生位置、数量、方向等を高精度で制御することができない。   In this way, in the conventional method for introducing crack defects, the method of ensuring the dimensional accuracy of cracks is to verify detection performance in nondestructive testing because the cracks obtained are artificial defects and not natural weld defects. Is unsuitable. On the other hand, the method of introducing natural weld defects cannot control the size, shape, occurrence position, quantity, direction, etc. of cracked defects with high accuracy.

本発明はかかる問題点に鑑みてなされたものであって、割れ状欠陥の寸法、形状、発生位置、数量、方向等を高精度で制御することができると共に、自然の溶接欠陥を導入することができ、非破壊試験の検出性能を高精度で検証することができる溶接割れ導入試験体及び溶接割れ導入方法を提供することを目的とする。   The present invention has been made in view of such problems, and is capable of controlling the size, shape, occurrence position, quantity, direction, etc. of cracked defects with high accuracy and introducing natural welding defects. An object of the present invention is to provide a weld crack introduction test body and a weld crack introduction method capable of verifying the detection performance of a nondestructive test with high accuracy.

本発明に係る溶接割れ導入試験体は、
ボロン含有粉末を含んで鋼材を溶接することにより、ボロン含有量が0.03乃至2質量%の溶接金属部を得ると共に、前記溶接金属部に割れ状欠陥を導入したものであることを特徴とする。
The weld crack introduction test body according to the present invention is:
By welding a steel material containing boron-containing powder, a weld metal part having a boron content of 0.03 to 2% by mass is obtained, and cracked defects are introduced into the weld metal part. To do.

この溶接割れ導入試験体は、前記割れ状欠陥を導入した溶接金属部の平均硬さが、ビッカース硬さで400乃至700Hvであることが好ましい。   In this weld crack introduction test body, it is preferable that the average hardness of the weld metal part into which the crack-like defect is introduced is 400 to 700 Hv in terms of Vickers hardness.

また、本発明に係る溶接割れ導入方法は、
鋼材の溶接対象部にボロン含有粉末を散布して、このボロン含有粉末を含む領域を、レーザ溶接法又は電子ビーム溶接法により溶接することにより、ボロン含有量が0.03乃至2質量%の溶接金属部を得ると共に、前記溶接金属部に割れ状欠陥を導入することを特徴とする。
Further, the method for introducing a weld crack according to the present invention is as follows.
Boron-containing powder is sprayed on the welding target portion of the steel material, and the region containing the boron-containing powder is welded by laser welding or electron beam welding, so that the boron content is 0.03 to 2% by mass. While obtaining a metal part, a crack-like defect is introduced into the weld metal part.

本発明によれば、レーザ溶接又は電子ビーム溶接等の溶接により割れ状欠陥を導入するので、自然溶接欠陥を導入することができる。また、本発明によれば、割れ状欠陥の寸法、形状、発生位置、数量、方向等を高精度で制御することができる。   According to the present invention, since crack-like defects are introduced by welding such as laser welding or electron beam welding, natural welding defects can be introduced. Further, according to the present invention, the size, shape, occurrence position, quantity, direction, etc. of the cracked defect can be controlled with high accuracy.

本発明の実施形態の試験体を示す正面断面図である。It is front sectional drawing which shows the test body of embodiment of this invention. 同じくその実施形態の実施方法を示す斜視図である。It is a perspective view which similarly shows the implementation method of the embodiment. 本発明の他の実施形態の試験体の素材を示す正面断面図である。It is front sectional drawing which shows the raw material of the test body of other embodiment of this invention. 同じくその実施方法を示す正面断面図である。It is front sectional drawing which similarly shows the implementation method. 同じくその試験体を示す正面断面図である。It is front sectional drawing which similarly shows the test body. 本発明の効果を説明する図であり、(a)は溶接金属部の正面断面図、(b)は平面図、(c)は(b)の継手溶接方向に沿う縦断面図、(d)は正面断面図である。It is a figure explaining the effect of this invention, (a) is front sectional drawing of a weld metal part, (b) is a top view, (c) is a longitudinal cross-sectional view along the joint welding direction of (b), (d) Is a front sectional view. 従来の割れ導入方法を示す図であり、(a)はすみ肉溶接によるもの、(b)は放電加工によるものを示す。It is a figure which shows the conventional crack introduction method, (a) is based on fillet welding, (b) is based on electric discharge machining. V字開先に消耗電極式アーク溶接により割れを導入する従来方法を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the conventional method which introduce | transduces a crack into a V-shaped groove | channel by consumable electrode type arc welding. 従来の凝固割れを発生させる方法を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the method of generating the conventional solidification crack.

以下、本発明の実施形態について、添付の図面を参照して具体的に説明する。図1は、本発明の実施形態に係る試験体を示す模式図、図2はその割れ状欠陥の導入方法を示す模式図である。図2に示すように、母材3の上に、ボロン含有粉末4を散布し、その上から、レーザビーム6を照射して、レーザ溶接する。又は、電子ビームにより電子ビーム溶接を行う。この溶接に際し、レーザビーム6を方向7に移動させて、溶接ビード5を形成する。図1は、この溶接ビード5の長手方向に直交する断面である。溶接ビード5を構成する溶接金属2には、溶接金属2の溶け込み深さPに相当する長さの割れ1が発生する。   Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be specifically described with reference to the accompanying drawings. FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram showing a specimen according to an embodiment of the present invention, and FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram showing a method for introducing the cracked defect. As shown in FIG. 2, boron-containing powder 4 is sprayed on the base material 3, and a laser beam 6 is irradiated from thereover to perform laser welding. Alternatively, electron beam welding is performed using an electron beam. At the time of this welding, the laser beam 6 is moved in the direction 7 to form the weld bead 5. FIG. 1 is a cross section orthogonal to the longitudinal direction of the weld bead 5. In the weld metal 2 constituting the weld bead 5, a crack 1 having a length corresponding to the penetration depth P of the weld metal 2 occurs.

本願発明者等は、この溶接金属2の中のボロンの含有量が0.03乃至2質量%になるように、散布するボロン含有粉末の量を規定することにより、溶接金属2の中に割れ1を形成することができると共に、この割れ1を溶接金属2の深さ方向に延びるように形成することができ、割れ1の長さを溶接金属2の溶け込み深さPに相当する(ほぼ一致する)ものとすることができることを見出した。本発明は、このような知見にたって完成されたものである。   The inventors of the present application cracked the weld metal 2 by defining the amount of boron-containing powder to be dispersed so that the boron content in the weld metal 2 is 0.03 to 2% by mass. 1 and the crack 1 can be formed to extend in the depth direction of the weld metal 2, and the length of the crack 1 corresponds to the penetration depth P of the weld metal 2 (almost coincident). Found that it can be. The present invention has been completed based on such knowledge.

母材3の上にボロン含有粉末4を散布して、母材3の鋼材と共にボロン含有粉末を、レーザ溶接により溶解すると、溶融金属中にボロンが溶け込み、溶融金属が凝固するときに、溶接金属中のボロンの効果により、溶接金属のフェライト変態及び上部ベーナイト変態を抑制し、低い温度でのマルテンサイト変態を促進すると共に、延性が劣る溶接金属を生成することができる。これにより、溶接部(溶接金属2)の溶け込み深さ全域にわたり、縦割れ1を発生させることができる。従って、溶接条件を調節して、溶接部(溶接金属2)の溶け込み深さPを調節することにより、結果的に、縦割れ1の長さを所望のもの(溶け込み深さP)に調節することができる。   When the boron-containing powder 4 is dispersed on the base material 3 and the boron-containing powder together with the steel material of the base material 3 is melted by laser welding, the boron melts into the molten metal and the molten metal solidifies. The effect of boron in the inside suppresses the ferrite transformation and upper bainite transformation of the weld metal, promotes martensitic transformation at a low temperature, and can produce a weld metal having poor ductility. Thereby, the vertical crack 1 can be generated over the entire penetration depth of the welded portion (welded metal 2). Therefore, by adjusting the welding conditions and adjusting the penetration depth P of the welded portion (welded metal 2), as a result, the length of the vertical crack 1 is adjusted to the desired one (penetration depth P). be able to.

図6(a)は溶接金属部の正面の縦断面図、図6(b)は平面図、図6(c)は図6(a)に垂直の方向の縦断面図である。図6(a)に示すように、レーザビームを矢印方向(溶接方向)に移動させて、ボロン粉末4の存在下で溶接すると、前述の如く、溶接金属2の溶け込み深さPに対応する長さの割れ1が発生する。この割れ1がレーザビームの移動方向(溶接方向)に直線状に並んで多数形成される。この割れ1の発生位置は、溶接金属断面における中央であり、割れ1は断面全域にわたって発生する。溶接割れ導入試験体としては、図1及び図2に示すように、溶接線方向の割れが主体であるが、図6(b)に示すように、図6(a)で形成したような溶接線を、継手溶接方向に移動させていくことにより、溶接線に直交する方向に、2次元的な領域に割れ1を形成することができる。このようにして、本実施形態によれば、割れ1の長さ、発生位置、数量、方向等を、任意に調節することができる。   6A is a longitudinal sectional view of the front of the weld metal part, FIG. 6B is a plan view, and FIG. 6C is a longitudinal sectional view in a direction perpendicular to FIG. 6A. As shown in FIG. 6A, when the laser beam is moved in the arrow direction (welding direction) and welding is performed in the presence of boron powder 4, the length corresponding to the penetration depth P of the weld metal 2 as described above. Crack 1 occurs. A large number of cracks 1 are formed in a straight line in the moving direction (welding direction) of the laser beam. The generation position of the crack 1 is the center of the weld metal cross section, and the crack 1 occurs over the entire cross section. As shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, the weld crack introduction test body is mainly cracked in the weld line direction, but as shown in FIG. 6 (b), the weld formed as shown in FIG. 6 (a). By moving the wire in the joint welding direction, the crack 1 can be formed in a two-dimensional region in a direction perpendicular to the welding line. Thus, according to the present embodiment, the length, occurrence position, quantity, direction, and the like of the crack 1 can be arbitrarily adjusted.

溶け込み深さPは、レーザ溶接の場合は、レーザ出力及び溶接速度を主体として溶接条件を選定することにより、制御することができ、電子ビーム溶接の場合は、加速電圧、ビーム電流及び溶接速度を選定することにより、制御することができる。   In the case of laser welding, the penetration depth P can be controlled by selecting the welding conditions based on the laser output and the welding speed. In the case of electron beam welding, the penetration voltage, beam current, and welding speed are controlled. It can be controlled by selecting.

また、この割れ状欠陥を導入した溶接金属2は、その平均硬さが、ビッカース硬さで400乃至700Hvであることが好ましい。これは、溶接金属2の硬さが、ビッカース硬さで400Hv以上と高い方が、溶接金属2に縦割れ1が生成しやすいからである。   Moreover, it is preferable that the weld metal 2 which introduce | transduced this crack-like defect has the average hardness of 400 to 700 Hv in Vickers hardness. This is because when the hardness of the weld metal 2 is as high as 400 Hv or more in terms of Vickers hardness, the vertical crack 1 is likely to be generated in the weld metal 2.

本実施形態においては、レーザ溶接又は電子ビーム溶接等の溶接条件を適宜選定することにより、形成される溶接金属の溶け込み深さPを所望の値に制御する。このとき、溶接金属中のボロン含有量が0.03乃至2質量%となるように、母材(鋼材)の上に散布するボロン含有粉末の量を調節することにより、得られた溶接金属2は、延性が劣るものとなり、溶接金属2の深さ方向の全域、即ち、溶接金属2の溶け込み深さPの全域にわたる縦割れ1を生成することができる。これにより、割れ1の長さを所定値に制御することができ、長さが所定値に制御された自然溶接割れを鋼材に導入することができる。   In this embodiment, the penetration depth P of the weld metal to be formed is controlled to a desired value by appropriately selecting welding conditions such as laser welding or electron beam welding. At this time, the weld metal 2 obtained by adjusting the amount of the boron-containing powder sprayed on the base material (steel material) so that the boron content in the weld metal is 0.03 to 2% by mass. Becomes inferior in ductility, and can generate longitudinal cracks 1 in the entire depth direction of weld metal 2, that is, in the entire penetration depth P of weld metal 2. Thereby, the length of the crack 1 can be controlled to a predetermined value, and the natural weld crack whose length is controlled to the predetermined value can be introduced into the steel material.

溶接金属のボロン含有量が0.03質量%未満であると、溶接金属のミクロ組織が完全マルテンサイトにならず、硬さが不足して、割れを誘発しない。一方、ボロン含有量が2質量%を超えると、溶接金属の延性が極度に低下し、所謂ガラス状になるため、割れが縦方向及び横方向のランダムに発生する。よって、溶接金属のボロン含有量は、0.03乃至2質量%とする。更に、前述のごとく、溶接金属2の平均硬さを、ビッカース硬さで、400乃至700Hvにすることにより、溶接金属2に縦割れ1を形成しやすくなる。ボロン含有量とも関連するが、ビッカース硬さが400Hv未満であると、完全マルテンサイトにならず、硬さが不足して、割れを誘発しない。また、ビッカース硬さが700Hvを超えると、溶接金属の延性が極度に低下し、割れが縦横に発生する。従って、溶接金属2の平均硬さは、400乃至700Hvであることが好ましい。   When the boron content of the weld metal is less than 0.03% by mass, the microstructure of the weld metal is not completely martensite, the hardness is insufficient, and cracks are not induced. On the other hand, when the boron content exceeds 2% by mass, the ductility of the weld metal is extremely lowered and becomes a so-called glass shape, so that cracks are randomly generated in the vertical and horizontal directions. Therefore, the boron content of the weld metal is 0.03 to 2% by mass. Furthermore, as described above, the vertical crack 1 is easily formed in the weld metal 2 by setting the average hardness of the weld metal 2 to 400 to 700 Hv in terms of Vickers hardness. Although it is related to the boron content, when the Vickers hardness is less than 400 Hv, it does not become complete martensite, the hardness is insufficient, and cracks are not induced. Moreover, when Vickers hardness exceeds 700 Hv, the ductility of a weld metal will fall extremely and a crack will generate | occur | produce vertically and horizontally. Therefore, the average hardness of the weld metal 2 is preferably 400 to 700 Hv.

次に、本発明の他の実施形態について、説明する。本実施形態は、割れを鋼材(母材)の内部に形成し、内部に割れが封入されている試験体を得るものである。図3乃至図5は、この鋼材内部に割れが封入された試験体を製造する工程を示す図である。例えば、鋼種がJIS SM490の鋼材を使用し、この鋼材から、例えば、厚さが32mm、幅が200mm、長さが300mmの試験片を切り出して母材3とする。そして、図3に示すように、この母材3の表面にV字状の開先8を形成する。この開先8の開先角度は、例えば、60°、ルート間隔(開先間隙)xは6mm、開先深さyは12mmである。また、この試験体の厚さtは、例えば、32mmである。   Next, another embodiment of the present invention will be described. In this embodiment, a crack is formed inside a steel material (base material), and a test body in which the crack is enclosed is obtained. 3 to 5 are diagrams showing a process for manufacturing a test body in which cracks are enclosed in the steel material. For example, a steel material having a steel type of JIS SM490 is used. From this steel material, for example, a test piece having a thickness of 32 mm, a width of 200 mm, and a length of 300 mm is cut out as the base material 3. Then, as shown in FIG. 3, a V-shaped groove 8 is formed on the surface of the base material 3. The groove angle of the groove 8 is, for example, 60 °, the root interval (groove gap) x is 6 mm, and the groove depth y is 12 mm. Moreover, the thickness t of this test body is 32 mm, for example.

このように、母材3の片面に上述の開先を形成した上で、図4に示すように、開先ルート上にボロン含有粉末4を散布し、例えば、溶接速度が1m/分、レーザ出力が8kWの条件で、レーザビーム6を照射してレーザ溶接を行い、縦割れ1を発生させる。   Thus, after forming the above-mentioned groove on one side of the base material 3, as shown in FIG. 4, the boron-containing powder 4 is sprayed on the groove route, for example, the welding speed is 1 m / min, laser Under the condition that the output is 8 kW, the laser beam 6 is irradiated to perform laser welding, and the vertical crack 1 is generated.

その後、図5に示すように、開先8の残部に、アーク溶接によって溶融金属(溶接ビード5)を充填して、割れ1をこの開先内に封入する。このようにして、割れ1を母材3内に封入することができる。しかも、この割れ1は、溶接金属の溶け込み深さに対応する長さを有するものであり、従って、この割れ1の長さを所望の長さに制御することができる。   Thereafter, as shown in FIG. 5, the remainder of the groove 8 is filled with molten metal (weld bead 5) by arc welding, and the crack 1 is enclosed in the groove. In this way, the crack 1 can be enclosed in the base material 3. Moreover, the crack 1 has a length corresponding to the penetration depth of the weld metal, and therefore the length of the crack 1 can be controlled to a desired length.

次に、本発明の実施例について、本発明の範囲から外れる比較例と比較して、その効果を説明する。先ず、ボロン含有粉末の散布によるレーザ溶接試験の結果について説明する。母材として、JIS SM490の鋼材を使用し、厚さが25mm、幅が150mm、長さが300mmの試験片に調整した。この試験片に対し、レーザ溶接によるビードオンプレート溶接を行い、溶接金属部の割れの有無及び割れ高さを調査した。溶接に際し、溶接対象部位にボロン含有粉末を約1mmの高さに散布した実施例1と、ボロン含有粉末を散布しなかった比較例とについて、溶接を行った。溶接試験方法は、前述の図2に示すものである。ボロン含有粉末の組成は、Fe−20質量%B−残部不純物のフェロボロンである。このボロン含有粉末の粒径は、50〜150μmである。   Next, the effect of the embodiment of the present invention will be described in comparison with a comparative example that is out of the scope of the present invention. First, the result of the laser welding test by spraying boron-containing powder will be described. As a base material, a steel material of JIS SM490 was used and adjusted to a test piece having a thickness of 25 mm, a width of 150 mm, and a length of 300 mm. The test piece was subjected to bead-on-plate welding by laser welding, and the presence or absence and crack height of the weld metal part were investigated. During welding, welding was performed on Example 1 in which boron-containing powder was sprayed on a site to be welded to a height of about 1 mm and a comparative example in which boron-containing powder was not sprayed. The welding test method is shown in FIG. The composition of the boron-containing powder is Fe-20 mass% B-balance impurities ferroboron. The particle size of the boron-containing powder is 50 to 150 μm.

下記表1は、レーザ溶接条件、断面マクロ試験による溶け込み深さの測定結果、割れの有無及び割れの長さを示す。断面マクロ試験は、溶接線に垂直の方向の溶接部の断面を切断し、マクロ試験用の試料を採取した。この試料を#1200程度の研磨紙で湿式研磨した後、バフ研磨した上で、5%硝酸−アルコール溶液でエッチングした。そして、デジタル投影機で割れの有無を観察し、更に、割れの長さを観察した。   Table 1 below shows the laser welding conditions, the measurement results of the penetration depth by the cross-sectional macro test, the presence or absence of cracks, and the length of the cracks. In the cross section macro test, a cross section of the welded portion in a direction perpendicular to the weld line was cut, and a sample for the macro test was taken. This sample was wet-polished with about # 1200 abrasive paper, then buffed, and then etched with a 5% nitric acid-alcohol solution. And the presence or absence of the crack was observed with the digital projector, and also the length of the crack was observed.

Figure 0006140068
Figure 0006140068

上記表1に示すように、ボロン含有粉末を約1mmの高さに散布し、溶接金属部のボロン含有量を、0.03乃至2質量%にすることにより、割れが発生し、この割れは、その長さが、溶け込み深さとほぼ一致するものであった。この溶け込み深さは、レーザ出力等の溶接条件により制御することができるので、この表1の結果は、結果的に、割れの長さを制御することができることを示している。   As shown in Table 1 above, when boron-containing powder is dispersed to a height of about 1 mm and the boron content of the weld metal part is 0.03 to 2% by mass, cracking occurs, The length was almost the same as the penetration depth. Since the penetration depth can be controlled by welding conditions such as laser output, the results in Table 1 show that the crack length can be controlled as a result.

なお、溶接ビードの表面の浸透探傷試験の結果、割れが発生した溶接ビードにおいては、いずれも溶接割れが溶接金属部の全長にわたる1本の縦割れが発生していた。   As a result of the penetration inspection test on the surface of the weld bead, in each weld bead in which cracks occurred, one vertical crack occurred over the entire length of the weld metal part.

また、下記表2は、上記実施例(No.1〜11)及び比較例(No.12〜14)のミクロビッカース硬さ試験の測定結果を示す。この試験は試験荷重が0.5kgで、3点の平均値である。   Table 2 below shows the measurement results of the micro Vickers hardness test of the above Examples (No. 1 to 11) and Comparative Examples (No. 12 to 14). This test has a test load of 0.5 kg and an average value of three points.

Figure 0006140068
Figure 0006140068

この表2に示すように、ボロン含有粉末を散布して割れが発生した実施例(No.1〜11)は、ミクロビッカース硬さが420〜635Hvという高い値を示しており、ボロン含有粉末を散布しない比較例(No.12〜14)は、ミクロビッカース硬さが280〜305Hvと低い値を示している。換言すれば、溶接金属部の硬さが、ビッカース硬さで、400乃至700Hvに入る溶接金属においては、表1に示すように溶接金属部の溶け込み深さに対応する長さの割れが発生することがわかる。   As shown in Table 2, Examples (Nos. 1 to 11) in which cracks were generated by spraying boron-containing powder showed a high value of micro Vickers hardness of 420 to 635 Hv. The comparative example (No. 12-14) which is not spread | dispersed has shown the micro Vickers hardness as low as 280-305Hv. In other words, as shown in Table 1, cracks with a length corresponding to the penetration depth of the weld metal part occur in the weld metal in which the weld metal part has a Vickers hardness of 400 to 700 Hv. I understand that.

次に、溶接金属のボロン含有量と割れ発生との関係について試験した結果について説明する。実施例1と同様の鋼種の母材を使用して、ボロン含有粉末の散布量及びレーザ溶接条件を変化させて、ビードオンプレート溶接試験を行い、割れ発生の有無を調べ、溶接金属のボロン含有量を分析した。下記表3は、割れ発生の有無及び溶接金属のボロン含有量の分析結果を示す。   Next, the results of testing the relationship between the boron content of weld metal and the occurrence of cracks will be described. Using a base material of the same steel type as in Example 1, the amount of boron-containing powder sprayed and the laser welding conditions were changed, a bead-on-plate welding test was conducted, the presence or absence of cracks was examined, and boron contained in the weld metal The amount was analyzed. Table 3 below shows the analysis results of the presence or absence of cracking and the boron content of the weld metal.

Figure 0006140068
Figure 0006140068

この表3に示すように、溶接金属のボロン含有量が0.03乃至2質量%の範囲に入る場合は、溶接金属2に図1に示すような縦割れ1が発生し、溶接金属の溶け込み深さに対応する長さの割れ1が得られた。しかし、溶接金属のボロン含有量が上記範囲よりも少ない場合は、割れが発生せず(比較例(No.19)、ボロン含有量が上記範囲より多い場合は、縦割れ以外に横割れも多発し、所望の形態の割れが得られず、従って、割れの長さを調節することができなかった(比較例No.27,28)。   As shown in Table 3, when the boron content of the weld metal falls within the range of 0.03 to 2% by mass, the vertical crack 1 as shown in FIG. 1 occurs in the weld metal 2 and the weld metal is melted. A crack 1 with a length corresponding to the depth was obtained. However, when the boron content of the weld metal is less than the above range, cracks do not occur (Comparative Example (No. 19)), and when the boron content is greater than the above range, transverse cracks frequently occur in addition to vertical cracks. However, the desired form of crack was not obtained, and therefore the length of the crack could not be adjusted (Comparative Example No. 27, 28).

次に、電子ビーム溶接による割れ形成試験の結果について説明する。実施例1と同様の鋼種の母材を使用して、電子ビーム溶接によるビードオンプレート溶接試験を行い、溶接金属部の割れの有無及び割れ高さを調査した。溶接に際して、溶接対象部位にボロン含有粉末を高さが約1mmになるように散布したものと、散布しないものとを用意し、溶接に先立つ脱気工程で粉末が飛散しないように防護カバーを設けた。   Next, the result of the crack formation test by electron beam welding will be described. Using a base material of the same steel type as in Example 1, a bead-on-plate welding test by electron beam welding was performed, and the presence or absence of cracks in the weld metal part and the crack height were investigated. When welding, prepare a boron-containing powder with a height of about 1 mm and a non-sprayed one at the site to be welded, and provide a protective cover to prevent the powder from scattering during the deaeration process prior to welding. It was.

そして、下記表4に示す電子ビーム溶接条件で溶接を行い、断面マクロ試験による溶け込み深さの測定、割れの有無、及び割れ高さの測定を行った。その結果を表4に合わせて示す。   And it welded on the electron beam welding conditions shown in following Table 4, and measured the penetration depth by the cross-sectional macro test, the presence or absence of a crack, and the crack height. The results are also shown in Table 4.

Figure 0006140068
Figure 0006140068

この表4に示すように、電子ビーム溶接においても、ボロン含有粉末を含めて溶接することにより、溶接金属中に所定の量のボロンを含有させることによって、溶け込み深さと割れ高さとがほぼ一致する割れを、溶接金属中に形成することができた。   As shown in Table 4, also in electron beam welding, by including a boron-containing powder and including a predetermined amount of boron in the weld metal, the penetration depth and the crack height almost coincide. Cracks could be formed in the weld metal.

本発明によれば、溶接により生じた自然な割れを、母材(鋼材)に導入することができ、しかも、このとき、溶接条件により制御可能な溶接金属の溶け込み深さを調節することにより、割れの方向及び長さを制御することができるので、高精度で所望の大きさ及び形態の割れをもつ溶接割れ導入試験体を、得ることができる。このため、本発明は、超音波探傷試験,磁粉探傷試験、浸透探傷試験等の種々の非破壊試験において、機器の検出性能を検証するための高精度の試験体を、容易に提供することができる。   According to the present invention, natural cracks caused by welding can be introduced into the base material (steel material), and at this time, by adjusting the penetration depth of the weld metal that can be controlled by welding conditions, Since the direction and length of the crack can be controlled, a weld crack introduction test body having a crack of a desired size and shape with high accuracy can be obtained. For this reason, the present invention can easily provide a high-precision test body for verifying the detection performance of equipment in various nondestructive tests such as an ultrasonic flaw detection test, a magnetic particle flaw detection test, and a penetrant flaw detection test. it can.

1:割れ
2:溶接金属
3:母材
4:ボロン粉末
5:溶接ビード
6:レーザビーム
7:方向
1: Crack 2: Weld metal 3: Base material 4: Boron powder 5: Weld bead 6: Laser beam 7: Direction

Claims (3)

ボロン含有粉末を含んで鋼材を溶接することにより、ボロン含有量が0.03乃至2質量%の溶接金属部を得ると共に、前記溶接金属部に割れ状欠陥を導入したものであることを特徴とする溶接割れ導入試験体。 By welding a steel material containing boron-containing powder, a weld metal part having a boron content of 0.03 to 2% by mass is obtained, and cracked defects are introduced into the weld metal part. Weld crack introduction test body. 前記割れ状欠陥を導入した溶接金属部の平均硬さが、ビッカース硬さで400乃至700Hvであることを特徴とする請求項1に記載の溶接割れ導入試験体。 The weld crack introduction test body according to claim 1, wherein an average hardness of the weld metal part into which the crack-like defect is introduced is 400 to 700 Hv in terms of Vickers hardness. 鋼材の溶接対象部にボロン含有粉末を散布して、このボロン含有粉末を含む領域を、レーザ溶接法又は電子ビーム溶接法により溶接することにより、ボロン含有量が0.03乃至2質量%の溶接金属部を得ると共に、前記溶接金属部に割れ状欠陥を導入することを特徴とする溶接割れ導入方法。 Boron-containing powder is sprayed on the welding target portion of the steel material, and the region containing the boron-containing powder is welded by laser welding or electron beam welding, so that the boron content is 0.03 to 2% by mass. A weld crack introduction method characterized by obtaining a metal part and introducing a crack-like defect into the weld metal part.
JP2013264169A 2013-12-20 2013-12-20 Weld crack introduction test body and weld crack introduction method Active JP6140068B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2013264169A JP6140068B2 (en) 2013-12-20 2013-12-20 Weld crack introduction test body and weld crack introduction method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2013264169A JP6140068B2 (en) 2013-12-20 2013-12-20 Weld crack introduction test body and weld crack introduction method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2015120172A JP2015120172A (en) 2015-07-02
JP6140068B2 true JP6140068B2 (en) 2017-05-31

Family

ID=53532331

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2013264169A Active JP6140068B2 (en) 2013-12-20 2013-12-20 Weld crack introduction test body and weld crack introduction method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP6140068B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110722255B (en) * 2019-10-24 2021-07-06 武汉一冶钢结构有限责任公司 Method for manufacturing austenitic stainless steel welding seam defect test plate with non-fusion defect
CN120612323B (en) * 2025-06-10 2026-01-23 山东省博兴县唐盛新型材料有限公司 Galvanized sheet weld defect detection method and system based on machine vision

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS55142236A (en) * 1979-04-24 1980-11-06 Ishikawajima Harima Heavy Ind Co Ltd Manufacture of test piece or the like
JPS60128357A (en) * 1983-12-15 1985-07-09 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Manufacture of test body
JPH03177582A (en) * 1989-12-05 1991-08-01 Toyota Motor Corp Production of member having amorphous layer
JP3662482B2 (en) * 2000-07-31 2005-06-22 財団法人鉄道総合技術研究所 Calibration specimen for ultrasonic inspection of rail welds
JP2012202740A (en) * 2011-03-24 2012-10-22 Tokyo Electric Power Co Inc:The Method for manufacturing specimen with defect for nondestructive inspection

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2015120172A (en) 2015-07-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Rozmus-Górnikowska et al. Influence of weld overlaying methods on microstructure and chemical composition of Inconel 625 boiler pipe coatings
Guzman-Flores et al. Effect of torch weaving on the microstructure, tensile and impact resistances, and fracture of the HAZ and weld bead by robotic GMAW process on ASTM A36 steel
Fydrych et al. Cold cracking of underwater wet welded S355G10+ N high strength steel
Hytönen et al. Study of fusion boundary microstructure and local mismatch of SA508/alloy 52 dissimilar metal weld with buttering
JP6140068B2 (en) Weld crack introduction test body and weld crack introduction method
Buddu et al. Investigations of microstructure and mechanical properties of 60-mm-thick type 316L stainless steel welded plates by multipass tungsten inert gas welding and electron beam welding for fusion reactor applications
Yoon et al. Evaluation of ARAA steel E-beam welding characteristics for the fabrication of KO HCCR TBM
JP5402824B2 (en) Multi-electrode submerged arc welding method with excellent weldability
Hemwat et al. Welding of additively and conventionally manufactured 316L stainless steel
Gerritsen et al. Diode laser weld toe re-melting as a means of fatigue strength improvement in high strength steels
Purwaningrum et al. Effect of shielding gas mixture on gas metal arc welding (GMAW) of low carbon steel (LR grade A)
Sönmez et al. Investigation of mechanical and microstructural properties of S 235 JR (ST 37-2) steels welded joints with FCAW
Nakata et al. Re-weldability of neutron-irradiated stainless steels studied by multi-pass TIG welding
Reisgen et al. Laser beam submerged arc hybrid welding
Zhang et al. Properties of welded joint for narrow gap laser welding of austenitic stainless steels
Sánchez-Amaya et al. Fatigue behavior of 8 mm thick steel butt joints performed with hybrid laser arc welding
Mára et al. Failures of Engineering Structures Caused by Weld Imperfections
TWI597120B (en) Method of steel multi-pass temper bead welding
Sukarman et al. Welding Quality Assessment for Oil and Gas Industry by Comparison of Mechanical Testing Properties and Microstructure Analysis
Hendronursito et al. Analysis of Shielded Metal Arc Welding (SMAW) on high manganese steel Hammer-mill crusher
Purwaningrum et al. An Experimental Study on Effect of T-Joint’s Root Gap on Welding Properties
Porojan et al. VISUAL INSPECTION OF LASER WELDED NI-CR DENTAL ALLOYS.
Roopa et al. Experimental investigation of similar & dissimilar joints on stainless steel with TIG & MIG welded
Stanciu et al. Lap joint laser welding of austenitic stainless steel thin sheets
Poolperm et al. Experimental Investigation of Additive Manufacturing Using a Hot-Wire Plasma Welding Process on Titanium Parts. Materials 2021, 14, 1270

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20160630

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20170413

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20170418

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20170428

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 6140068

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

S531 Written request for registration of change of domicile

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313531

S533 Written request for registration of change of name

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250