JP6313928B2 - Heat treatment method for steel - Google Patents
Heat treatment method for steel Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP6313928B2 JP6313928B2 JP2013018544A JP2013018544A JP6313928B2 JP 6313928 B2 JP6313928 B2 JP 6313928B2 JP 2013018544 A JP2013018544 A JP 2013018544A JP 2013018544 A JP2013018544 A JP 2013018544A JP 6313928 B2 JP6313928 B2 JP 6313928B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- steel
- steel material
- quenching
- sample
- temperature
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Classifications
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
- Y02P10/00—Technologies related to metal processing
- Y02P10/25—Process efficiency
Landscapes
- Heat Treatment Of Articles (AREA)
Description
この発明は、鋼材の熱処理方法に関する。 This invention also relates to the heat treatment method of steel.
従来から、鋼材の焼入れ、焼戻し等の各種熱処理は、金属部材の高強度化及び強靱化、表面の耐摩耗性能の改善、耐疲労強度特性の改善等を目的として行われてきた。そして、このときの熱処理方法にも、鋼材の使用目的に応じて、種々の方法が使用されてきた。 Conventionally, various heat treatments such as quenching and tempering of steel materials have been performed for the purpose of increasing the strength and toughness of metal members, improving the wear resistance performance of the surface, improving the fatigue strength characteristics, and the like. Various methods have been used for the heat treatment method at this time depending on the purpose of use of the steel material.
その鋼材の熱処理の中でも、1回の焼入れでは達成できない品質改善が出来ることから、2回の焼入れ処理を施す方法が検討されてきた。例えば、特許文献1には、「ステンレス鋳鋼と同等の強度を有し、さらに水中疲労強度と靭性に優れた高強度高耐食性マルテンサイト系ステンレス鋼の製造方法及び用途を提供」を目的とした発明が開示され、2回の焼入れ工程を備えた鋼材の熱処理方法が開示されている。 Among the heat treatment of the steel material, since quality improvement that cannot be achieved by a single quenching can be achieved, a method of performing a quenching process twice has been studied. For example, Patent Document 1 discloses an invention for the purpose of “providing a manufacturing method and use of a high-strength, high-corrosion-resistant martensitic stainless steel having the same strength as cast stainless steel and having excellent underwater fatigue strength and toughness”. Is disclosed, and a heat treatment method for a steel material including two quenching steps is disclosed.
そして、特許文献1では、「重量で、C;0.01〜0.10%,Si;0.1〜1.5%,Mn;0.1〜2.0%,Cr;12〜17%,Ni;3〜7%,Co;0.1〜3%,Mo;0.1〜2.0%,V;0.05〜0.5%を含有し、主としてマルテンサイトと残留オーステナイトから成る混合組織を有し、かつ残留オーステナイト量が容積比で35%以下、δフェライト量が面積比で15%以下からなる高強度高耐食性マルテンサイト系ステンレス鋼において、残部がFe及び不可避的不純物からなる組成物をAC3点以上の温度で焼入れする工程と、その工程に次いでAC1とAC3との間の温度で少なくとも一回中間焼入れする工程と、その工程に次いでAC1以下の温度で焼もどしする工程とを含むことを特徴とする高強度高耐食性マルテンサイト系ステンレス鋼の製造方法。」を採用している。即ち、この特許文献1では、「一定の組成の鋼材をAC3点以上の温度で焼入れする工程」、「その工程に次いでAC1とAC3との間の温度で少なくとも一回中間焼入れする工程」、「次いでAC1以下の温度で焼もどしする工程」を備えていることが分かる。 And in patent document 1, "by weight, C; 0.01-0.10%, Si; 0.1-1.5%, Mn; 0.1-2.0%, Cr; 12-17% , Ni; 3 to 7%, Co; 0.1 to 3%, Mo; 0.1 to 2.0%, V; 0.05 to 0.5%, mainly composed of martensite and retained austenite In a high strength and high corrosion resistance martensitic stainless steel having a mixed structure and a residual austenite content of 35% or less by volume and a δ ferrite content of 15% or less by area, the balance is made of Fe and inevitable impurities. A step of quenching the composition at a temperature of A C3 or higher, a step of intermediate quenching at a temperature between A C1 and A C3 at least once after that step, and a step of quenching at a temperature of A C1 or lower after that step. Including a step of returning Time employs a highly corrosion-resistant method for manufacturing a martensitic stainless steel. ". That is, in this patent document 1, “a step of quenching a steel material having a constant composition at a temperature of AC 3 point or higher”, “a step of intermediate quenching at a temperature between A C1 and A C3 at least once after that step”. "it can be seen that has a" Next step of tempering at a C1 temperature below ".
この特許文献1に開示の製造方法を採用することで、特許文献1に開示されているレベルの高強度高耐食性マルテンサイト系ステンレス鋼が得られることが分かる。 By adopting the manufacturing method disclosed in Patent Document 1, it can be seen that a high-strength, high-corrosion-resistant martensitic stainless steel of the level disclosed in Patent Document 1 can be obtained.
しかしながら、特許文献1に開示の製造方法で得られる高強度高耐食性マルテンサイト系ステンレス鋼の場合、硬さが十分でなく、製品としての使用分野に制限が生じていた。 However, in the case of a high-strength, high-corrosion-resistant martensitic stainless steel obtained by the manufacturing method disclosed in Patent Document 1, the hardness is not sufficient, and the field of use as a product is limited.
そのため、市場では、鋼材に、より高い硬さを付与することの出来る、鋼の焼入れ方法が求められていた。 Therefore, in the market, there has been a demand for a steel quenching method that can impart higher hardness to steel materials.
そこで、本件発明者等は、鋭意研究の結果、以下に述べる発明に想到したのである。以下、発明毎に分別して述べる。 Accordingly, the inventors of the present invention have come up with the invention described below as a result of intensive studies. Hereinafter, it will be described separately for each invention.
本件発明に係る鋼材の熱処理方法は、鋼種が0.1質量%〜1.5質量%の炭素含有量及び10質量%以上のCr含有量を備えるステンレス鋼である鋼材に対して2回の高周波焼入れ法を用いた焼入れ工程を含む熱処理方法において、以下に示す工程を含むことを特徴とする。 In the heat treatment method for steel according to the present invention, the steel type has a high frequency twice for a steel material that is a stainless steel having a carbon content of 0.1% by mass to 1.5% by mass and a Cr content of 10% by mass or more. A heat treatment method including a quenching step using a quenching method includes the following steps.
第1焼入れ工程: 鋼材を、1000℃〜1100℃の範囲に設定した第1加熱温度T1で加熱し、その後、室温まで冷却して焼入れ、大気中に放置する。
第2焼入れ工程: 第1焼入れ工程の終了した鋼材を、850℃〜1200℃の範囲に設定した第2加熱温度T2で加熱し、室温まで冷却して焼き入れる。
First quenching step: The steel material is heated at a first heating temperature T1 set in a range of 1000 ° C to 1100 ° C, then cooled to room temperature, quenched, and left in the atmosphere.
2nd hardening process: The steel material which the 1st hardening process was complete | finished is heated by 2nd heating temperature T2 set to the range of 850 degreeC-1200 degreeC, and it cools and quenches to room temperature.
本件発明に係る鋼材の熱処理方法において、前記第2焼入れ工程を、2回以上繰り返し行うことも好ましい。 In the steel material heat treatment method according to the present invention, it is also preferable to repeat the second quenching step twice or more.
本件発明に係る鋼材の熱処理方法において、前記焼戻し加熱温度T3は、170℃〜650℃の範囲に設定した温度であることが好ましい。 In the heat treatment method for steel according to the present invention, the tempering heating temperature T3 is preferably a temperature set in a range of 170 ° C to 650 ° C.
本件発明に係る鋼材の熱処理方法において、焼入れ後の鋼材を、鉄−炭素系状態図におけるA c1 線以下の焼戻し加熱温度T3まで昇温して加熱し、室温まで冷却する焼戻し工程を付加することが好ましい。 In the heat treatment method for steel according to the present invention, a steel after quenching, iron - that heating was heated to A c1 line below the tempering heating temperature T3 in the carbon phase diagram, adding a tempering step of cooling to room temperature Is preferred.
本件発明に係る鋼材の熱処理方法において、前記第2焼入れ工程の終了後、サブゼロ処理を行い、その後、鋼材を室温に戻るまで大気中に放置する深冷処理工程を備えることも好ましい。 In the steel material heat treatment method according to the present invention, it is preferable that a sub-zero treatment is performed after the end of the second quenching step, and then a chilling treatment step is performed in which the steel material is left in the atmosphere until the temperature returns to room temperature.
以上に述べてきたの鋼材の熱処理方法を用いて、前記鋼材の残留オーステナイト量を35%以下とすることが好ましい。 It is preferable that the amount of retained austenite of the steel material is 35% or less by using the steel material heat treatment method described above.
上述の鋼材の熱処理方法を採用することにより、鋼材の硬さを安定して向上させることが出来る。よって、従来、用途によっては使用できなかった鋼材を、本件発明に係る鋼材の熱処理方法を施すことにより、使用可能な鋼材とすることが可能となる。本件発明に係る鋼材の熱処理方法は、特に、0.1質量%以上の炭素含有量及び10質量%以上のCr含有量を備えるステンレス鋼、又は、0.6質量%以上の炭素含有量を備える炭素鋼に好適な強化方法である。 By adopting the above-described heat treatment method for steel, the hardness of the steel can be stably improved. Therefore, it becomes possible to make the steel material which could not be used depending on the application conventionally by using the steel material heat treatment method according to the present invention to be usable steel material. The steel material heat treatment method according to the present invention particularly comprises stainless steel having a carbon content of 0.1% by mass or more and a Cr content of 10% by mass or more, or a carbon content of 0.6% by mass or more. This is a strengthening method suitable for carbon steel.
以下、本件発明に係る鋼材の熱処理方法及びこの熱処理方法で得られた高硬度鋼材に関して詳細に説明する。 Hereinafter, the steel material heat treatment method according to the present invention and the high-hardness steel material obtained by this heat treatment method will be described in detail.
鋼材の熱処理方法の形態: 本件発明に係る鋼材の熱処理方法は、鋼材に対する2回以上の焼入れ工程を含む。以下、工程毎に説明するが、最初に本件発明において使用する加熱方式に関して説明する。図1には、この鋼材の熱処理方法の概念図を示している。図1において、加熱領域を符号R、保持領域を符号H、冷却領域を符号C、深冷処理領域を符号S0で示している。 Form of heat treatment method for steel material: The heat treatment method for steel material according to the present invention includes two or more quenching steps for the steel material. Hereinafter, although it demonstrates for every process, the heating system used in this invention is demonstrated first. In FIG. 1, the conceptual diagram of the heat processing method of this steel material is shown. In FIG. 1, the heating region is denoted by reference symbol R, the holding region is denoted by symbol H, the cooling region is denoted by symbol C, and the deep cooling treatment region is denoted by reference symbol S 0 .
加熱方式: 本件発明に係る鋼材の熱処理方法において、焼入れ処理を行う際の加熱には、高周波加熱方式を採用することが好ましい。高周波加熱方式による焼入れ処理は、一般的な焼入れ処理に比べて、加熱速度が速く、加熱対象である鋼材の表面を迅速に加熱することが出来るからである。即ち、以下に述べる各焼入れ工程での加熱方式は、高周波加熱方式を採用したときの条件である。なお、図1に示した昇温時間R1、R2、R3は、それぞれ{Tn(n=1、2、3)−RT(室温)}/[加熱速度]で換算される時間である。 Heating method: In the heat treatment method for steel according to the present invention, it is preferable to employ a high-frequency heating method for heating when performing the quenching treatment. This is because the quenching process by the high-frequency heating method has a higher heating rate than the general quenching process and can quickly heat the surface of the steel material to be heated. That is, the heating method in each quenching step described below is a condition when the high-frequency heating method is adopted. Note that the heating times R 1 , R 2 , and R 3 shown in FIG. 1 are times converted by {Tn (n = 1, 2, 3) −RT (room temperature)} / [heating rate], respectively. .
第1焼入れ工程: この第1焼入れ工程では、鋼材を、1000℃〜1200℃の範囲に設定した第1加熱温度T1で加熱し、H1時間保持後、室温まで冷却して焼入れ、大気中に放置する。ここで、鋼材の形状、サイズ等に関しては、特段の限定は無いが、以下で述べる加熱の際の昇温速度が達成出来ることが必要である。 First quenching step: In this first quenching step, the steel material is heated at a first heating temperature T1 set in a range of 1000 ° C. to 1200 ° C., held for H 1 hour, cooled to room temperature, quenched, and into the atmosphere. put. Here, there are no particular limitations on the shape, size, etc. of the steel material, but it is necessary to be able to achieve the heating rate during heating described below.
この第1焼入れ工程において使用する焼入れ温度は、850℃〜1200℃の範囲に設定した第1加熱温度T1を採用する。第1加熱温度T1の温度が850℃未満の場合には、完全な焼入れ組織になり難く、所望の硬さを安定して得ることが困難となる。一方、鋼材の組成によっては、第1加熱温度T1の温度を1200℃を超え、1400℃程度まで加熱する事も可能である。しかし、第1加熱温度T1の温度が1200℃を超えた場合には、残留オーステナイト量が過剰となり硬さの低下を招く傾向が顕著となる。この残留オーステナイト量の増加は、特に高炭素クロム鋼(例えば、SUJ材等)やステンレス鋼(例えば、SUS材等)を用いた場合に顕著となる。 The first heating temperature T1 set in the range of 850 ° C. to 1200 ° C. is employed as the quenching temperature used in the first quenching step. When the temperature of the 1st heating temperature T1 is less than 850 degreeC, it becomes difficult to become a perfect hardened structure | tissue and it becomes difficult to obtain desired hardness stably. On the other hand, depending on the composition of the steel material, the temperature of the first heating temperature T1 may be over 1200 ° C. and heated to about 1400 ° C. However, when the temperature of the first heating temperature T1 exceeds 1200 ° C., the amount of retained austenite becomes excessive and the tendency to cause a decrease in hardness becomes remarkable. This increase in the amount of retained austenite becomes remarkable particularly when high carbon chromium steel (for example, SUJ material or the like) or stainless steel (for example, SUS material or the like) is used.
そして、「0.1質量%以上の炭素含有量及び10質量%以上のCr含有量を備えるステンレス鋼」を用いる場合の第1加熱温度T1は、1000℃〜1200℃の範囲の温度に設定することが、安定した焼入れ組織を得るという観点から、より好ましい。一方、「0.6質量%以上の炭素含有量を備える炭素鋼」を用いる場合の第1加熱温度T1は、850℃〜1100℃の範囲の温度に設定することが、より好ましい。炭素鋼の場合、1100℃を超える温度で加熱した場合、残留オーステナイト量が過剰となり硬さの低下を招く傾向が生じやすいからである。 And the 1st heating temperature T1 in the case of using "stainless steel provided with the carbon content of 0.1 mass% or more and the Cr content of 10 mass% or more" is set to the temperature of the range of 1000 to 1200 degreeC. Is more preferable from the viewpoint of obtaining a stable quenched structure. On the other hand, it is more preferable that the first heating temperature T1 in the case of using “carbon steel having a carbon content of 0.6 mass% or more” is set to a temperature in the range of 850 ° C. to 1100 ° C. In the case of carbon steel, when heated at a temperature exceeding 1100 ° C., the amount of retained austenite becomes excessive and tends to cause a decrease in hardness.
また、ここで、加熱方法として後述する高周波加熱方式を採用し、短時間で昇温させるのは、その他の加熱方式を用いて長時間の加熱を行うのは生産性を低下させるのと、硬化が不要な部分まで硬化されてしまうため、好ましくないからである。この高周波加熱方式によって、鋼材を850℃〜1200℃の範囲に設定した第1加熱温度T1まで加熱(図1のR1)すると、第1加熱温度T1で3秒〜120秒の間、保持する(図1のH1)。この保持時間(H1)が3秒未満の場合には、如何に加熱温度を1200℃に近づけても、均一にオーステナイト化することが出来ず、十分な焼入れ効果を得ることが出来ず、製品の硬さを上昇させることが困難となる。一方、この保持時間(H1)が120秒を超える場合には、製品の表面に脱炭現象が起きて、表面硬さが低下するため好ましくない。 In addition, here, a high-frequency heating method, which will be described later, is adopted as a heating method, and the temperature is raised in a short time because heating for a long time using other heating methods reduces productivity and cures. This is because it is not preferable because it is cured to an unnecessary portion. When this steel material is heated to the first heating temperature T1 set in the range of 850 ° C. to 1200 ° C. (R 1 in FIG. 1 ), the first heating temperature T1 holds the steel material for 3 seconds to 120 seconds. (H 1 in FIG. 1 ). If this holding time (H 1 ) is less than 3 seconds, even if the heating temperature is brought close to 1200 ° C., it cannot be uniformly austenitic, and a sufficient quenching effect cannot be obtained. It becomes difficult to increase the hardness of the. On the other hand, when this holding time (H 1 ) exceeds 120 seconds, a decarburization phenomenon occurs on the surface of the product, and the surface hardness decreases, which is not preferable.
第1焼入れ工程における加熱が終了すると、室温まで冷却して焼入れ、大気中に放置する。このときの冷却方式に関しては、特段の限定は無い。 When the heating in the first quenching process is completed, it is cooled to room temperature, quenched, and left in the air. There is no particular limitation on the cooling method at this time.
第2焼入れ工程: この第2焼入れ工程では、第1焼入れ工程が終了し、一旦、室温まで冷却し、マルテンサイト化した鋼材を、再度、オーステナイト化して焼き入れる。本件発明に係る鋼材の熱処理方法は、仮に第2焼入れ工程を含まないとすると、高い硬さを得るべく加熱温度を上昇させた場合に、残留オーステナイト量が増加してしまい、所望の硬さを得ることが出来なくなる。なお、このときの第2加熱温度T2は、850℃〜1200℃の範囲に設定することが好ましい。第2加熱温度T2が850℃未満の場合には、鋼材に対して、この第2焼入れ工程で得る予定の硬さを得ることが出来なくなるため好ましくない。一方、第2加熱温度T2が1200℃を超える場合には、鋼材の表面に脱炭現象が起きて、表面硬さが低下するため好ましくない。 Second quenching step: In this second quenching step, the first quenching step is completed, and the steel material that has been once cooled to room temperature and martensite is austenitized and quenched. If the heat treatment method of the steel material according to the present invention does not include the second quenching step, the amount of retained austenite increases when the heating temperature is increased to obtain high hardness, and the desired hardness is obtained. You can't get it. In addition, it is preferable to set the 2nd heating temperature T2 at this time in the range of 850 degreeC-1200 degreeC. When the second heating temperature T2 is less than 850 ° C., it is not preferable because it is impossible to obtain the hardness that is expected to be obtained in the second quenching step for the steel material. On the other hand, when the 2nd heating temperature T2 exceeds 1200 degreeC, since the decarburization phenomenon occurs in the surface of steel materials and surface hardness falls, it is unpreferable.
このとき、第1加熱温度T1を基準として、図1に示すように「第1加熱温度T1±200℃」の範囲で設定することも好ましい。この条件を満たすことで、より安定した鋼材の硬度の上昇が行える。係る場合の第2焼入れ工程で採用する第2加熱温度T2を具体的に言えば、950℃〜1200℃の範囲の温度を採用することが好ましい。即ち、例示すると、「第1加熱温度T1に1000℃を採用した場合には、第2加熱温度T2は950℃〜1200℃の範囲の温度」、「第1加熱温度T1に1200℃を採用した場合には、第2加熱温度T2は1000℃〜1200℃の範囲の温度」である。この第1加熱温度T1と第2加熱温度T2との関係を維持することで、鋼材の硬さを向上させる効果が、より安定化する。 At this time, it is also preferable to set the first heating temperature T1 in the range of “first heating temperature T1 ± 200 ° C.” as shown in FIG. By satisfying this condition, the hardness of the steel material can be increased more stably. If the 2nd heating temperature T2 employ | adopted at the 2nd hardening process in such a case is said concretely, it is preferable to employ | adopt the temperature of the range of 950 degreeC-1200 degreeC. That is, for example, “When 1000 ° C. is adopted as the first heating temperature T1, the second heating temperature T2 is a temperature in the range of 950 ° C. to 1200 ° C.” and “1200 ° C. is adopted as the first heating temperature T1. In this case, the second heating temperature T2 is a temperature in the range of 1000 ° C. to 1200 ° C. ”. By maintaining the relationship between the first heating temperature T1 and the second heating temperature T2, the effect of improving the hardness of the steel material is further stabilized.
以上のようにして、高周波加熱方式によって、鋼材を850℃〜1200℃の範囲に設定した第2加熱温度T2まで加熱すると、第2加熱温度T2で3秒〜7秒の間、保持する(図1のH2)。この保持時間(H2)が3秒未満の場合には、如何に加熱温度を1200℃に近づけても、均一にオーステナイト化することが出来ず、十分な焼入れ効果を得ることが出来ず、製品の硬さを上昇させることが困難となる。一方、この保持時間(H2)が7秒を超える場合には、製品の硬さを上昇させる効果が飽和するため、より一層の硬さの上昇を望めない。 As described above, when the steel material is heated to the second heating temperature T2 set in the range of 850 ° C. to 1200 ° C. by the high frequency heating method, the second heating temperature T2 is maintained for 3 seconds to 7 seconds (see FIG. 1 H 2 ). If this holding time (H 2 ) is less than 3 seconds, even if the heating temperature is brought close to 1200 ° C., it cannot be uniformly austenitized, and a sufficient quenching effect cannot be obtained. It becomes difficult to increase the hardness of the. On the other hand, when the holding time (H 2 ) exceeds 7 seconds, the effect of increasing the hardness of the product is saturated, and thus a further increase in hardness cannot be expected.
そして、熱処理を施す鋼材の炭素含有量が0.77質量%以下の場合の第2加熱温度T2は「AC3+50℃」、当該炭素含有量が0.77質量%を越える場合の第2加熱温度T2は「AC1+50℃」の温度を採用することが、より安定した硬度上昇効果が得られるため好ましい。 The second heating temperature T2 when the carbon content of the steel material to be heat-treated is 0.77% by mass or less is “A C3 + 50 ° C.”, and the second heating when the carbon content exceeds 0.77% by mass. As the temperature T2, it is preferable to adopt a temperature of “ AC1 + 50 ° C.” because a more stable hardness increasing effect can be obtained.
なお、以上に述べてきた本件発明で採用する第2焼入れ工程は、2回以上繰り返し行うことが好ましい。当該第2焼入れ工程を2回以上繰り返すことで、段階的に炭素を拡散させ、本件発明に規定する熱処理条件を選択することで、より鋼材の硬さを向上させることが出来る。 In addition, it is preferable to repeat the 2nd hardening process employ | adopted by this invention described above twice or more. By repeating the second quenching process twice or more, carbon is diffused stepwise, and the heat treatment conditions specified in the present invention can be selected to further improve the hardness of the steel material.
冷却方法: 上述した第1焼入れ工程及び第2焼入れ工程における冷却においては、連続冷却変態曲線(CCT曲線)のノーズに係らない範囲の冷却速度を採用することが好ましい。従って、図1に示した冷却所要時間C1、C2、C3は、それぞれ(Tn(n=1、2、3)−RT(室温))/[冷却速度]で換算される時間である。 Cooling method: In the cooling in the first quenching step and the second quenching step described above, it is preferable to employ a cooling rate in a range not depending on the nose of the continuous cooling transformation curve (CCT curve). Accordingly, the required cooling times C 1 , C 2 , and C 3 shown in FIG. 1 are times converted by (Tn (n = 1, 2, 3) −RT (room temperature)) / [cooling rate], respectively. .
深冷処理工程: この深冷処理工程は、鋼材の性質、要求品質に応じて行う任意の工程である。 以上に述べてきた焼入れ工程が終了し、深冷処理を施す場合には、可能な限り迅速に、深冷処理工程に移行することが好ましい。ここで言う深冷処理とは、焼入れした後、ただちに液体空気やドライアイス(−40℃〜−196℃)に浸漬する操作をいい、サブゼロ処理ともいわれるものである。深冷処理によって、鋼材組織中の残留オーステナイト量が減少し、マルテンサイト量が増加するため、硬さを向上させることが出来る。 Cryogenic treatment process: This cryogenic treatment process is an arbitrary process performed according to the properties and required quality of the steel material. When the quenching process described above is completed and a deep cooling process is performed, it is preferable to move to the deep cooling process as quickly as possible. The deep cooling treatment here refers to an operation of immersing in liquid air or dry ice (−40 ° C. to −196 ° C.) immediately after quenching, and is also referred to as sub-zero treatment. Since the amount of retained austenite in the steel structure is reduced and the amount of martensite is increased by the deep cooling treatment, the hardness can be improved.
以下、本件出願に係る鋼の熱処理方法における深冷処理は、第2焼入れ工程の終了後60秒以内に、当該鋼材と液体窒素との接触を開始する。そして、液体窒素を用いて、深冷処理温度(−196℃)で、30分以上維持する(図1のS0)。この深冷処理の時間(S0)が30分未満の場合には、残留オーステナイト量が過剰になり、鋼材の硬さを十分に向上させることが困難になる。 Hereinafter, the deep cooling treatment in the heat treatment method for steel according to the present application starts contact between the steel material and liquid nitrogen within 60 seconds after the end of the second quenching step. Then, using liquid nitrogen, at a cryogenic treatment temperatures (-196 ° C.), maintained for 30 minutes or more (S 0 in Fig. 1). When the time (S 0 ) of this deep cooling treatment is less than 30 minutes, the amount of retained austenite becomes excessive, and it becomes difficult to sufficiently improve the hardness of the steel material.
深冷処理した鋼材は、その後、大気中で室温に戻るまで放置する(図1のRn)。このようにして、加熱を行うことなく室温に戻す。 The deep-cooled steel material is then left in the atmosphere until it returns to room temperature (Rn in FIG. 1). In this way, the temperature is returned to room temperature without heating.
そして、深冷処理工程を経て室温に戻した鋼材を、鉄−炭素系状態図におけるAC1線以下の焼戻し加熱温度T3まで昇温して加熱し、室温まで冷却する焼戻し工程を付加することが好ましい。本件発明の焼戻し工程について、以下に説明する。 Then, the steel was returned to room temperature through a cryogenic process, iron - heated was heated to A C1-wire following tempering heating temperature T3 in the carbon phase diagram, it is possible to add tempering step of cooling to room temperature preferable. The tempering process of this invention is demonstrated below.
焼戻し工程: この焼戻し工程も、深冷処理工程と同様に、鋼材の性質、要求品質に応じて行う任意の工程である。即ち、焼戻し工程(深冷処理工程を経た場合も含む)後の鋼材を放置して室温に戻した後は、鉄−炭素系状態図におけるAC1線以下の焼戻し加熱温度T3まで昇温して加熱する(図1のR3)。ここで、AC1線を超える温度で、焼戻し加熱を行うと、製品として十分な硬さを得ることが出来ないため好ましくない。このときの焼戻し加熱温度T3は、具体的には170℃〜650℃の範囲に設定することが好ましい。この焼戻し加熱温度T3が170℃未満の場合には、焼戻しにより得ようとする適正な結晶組織を得ることが出来ず、鋼材の硬さが安定しないため好ましくない。一方、この焼戻し加熱温度T3が650℃を超える場合には、硬度上昇に適した結晶組織が消失し始める傾向があるため好ましくない。 Tempering step: This tempering step is also an optional step performed according to the properties and required quality of the steel material in the same manner as the deep cooling treatment step. That is, after returning to room temperature on standing steel (including the case where after the cryogenic treatment process) after tempering step, the iron - and heated to the tempering heating temperature T3 below C1 line A in the carbon phase diagram Heat (R 3 in FIG. 1). Here, it is not preferable to perform tempering heating at a temperature exceeding the AC1 line because sufficient hardness cannot be obtained as a product. Specifically, the tempering heating temperature T3 at this time is preferably set in a range of 170 ° C to 650 ° C. When this tempering heating temperature T3 is less than 170 ° C., an appropriate crystal structure to be obtained by tempering cannot be obtained, and the hardness of the steel material is not stable. On the other hand, when the tempering heating temperature T3 exceeds 650 ° C., the crystal structure suitable for increasing the hardness tends to disappear, which is not preferable.
そして、鋼材をAC1線以下の焼戻し加熱温度T3まで昇温して加熱すると、焼戻し加熱温度T3で60分〜150分の間、保持する(図1のH3)。この焼戻し工程における加熱が終了すると、室温まで冷却する(図1のC3)。 When the steel is heated to heated to A C1-wire following tempering heating temperature T3, for 60 minutes to 150 minutes at the tempering heating temperature T3, it holds (H 3 in Figure 1). When the heating in this tempering process is completed, it is cooled to room temperature (C 3 in FIG. 1).
また、本件発明に係る鋼材の熱処理方法は、0.1質量%以上の炭素含有量及び10質量%以上のCr含有量を備えるステンレス鋼、又は、0.6質量%以上の炭素含有量を備える炭素鋼を鋼材として好適に用いることが出来る。本件発明に係る鋼材の熱処理方法によれば、焼入れ時に残留オーステナイト量が増加しやすいこれら高炭素クロム鋼(例えば、SUJ材等)やステンレス鋼(例えば、SUS材等)に対して焼入れ処理を行ったとしても、残留オーステナイト量の増加を抑制することが可能である。 Moreover, the heat processing method of the steel materials which concerns on this invention is equipped with stainless steel provided with carbon content of 0.1 mass% or more and Cr content of 10 mass% or more, or carbon content of 0.6 mass% or more. Carbon steel can be suitably used as a steel material. According to the heat treatment method for steel materials according to the present invention, the high carbon chromium steel (for example, SUJ material) and the stainless steel (for example, SUS material) that are likely to increase the amount of retained austenite during quenching are quenched. Even so, it is possible to suppress an increase in the amount of retained austenite.
高硬度鋼材の形態: 本件発明に係る鋼材の熱処理方法で得られる高硬度鋼材は、上述に記載の鋼材の熱処理方法で強化したマルテンサイト組織を備える高硬度の鋼材である。そして、この鋼材の結晶組織中の残留オーステナイト量が35%以下である「0.1質量%以上の炭素含有量及び10質量%以上のCr含有量を備えるステンレス鋼」、又は、「0.6質量%以上の炭素含有量を備える炭素鋼」である。ここで、当該残留オーステナイト量を35%以下と明確にすることで、十分に硬さを改善した高硬度鋼材の結晶組織の備える特徴が明らかとなる。なお、本件発明に係る上述の鋼材の熱処理方法を採用することで、焼入れ時に残留オーステナイト量が増加しやすい高炭素クロム鋼(例えば、SUJ材等)やステンレス鋼(例えば、SUS材等)に対して焼入れ処理を行ったとしても、残留オーステナイト量を35%以下にすることが出来る。 Form of high-hardness steel: The high-hardness steel obtained by the heat treatment method for steel according to the present invention is a high-hardness steel material having a martensite structure strengthened by the heat treatment method for steel described above. And the amount of retained austenite in the crystal structure of this steel material is 35% or less, “stainless steel having a carbon content of 0.1% by mass or more and a Cr content of 10% by mass or more”, or “0.6 It is “carbon steel having a carbon content of at least mass%”. Here, by clarifying the amount of retained austenite as 35% or less, the characteristics of the crystal structure of the high-hardness steel material whose hardness is sufficiently improved become clear. In addition, by adopting the above-described heat treatment method for steel materials according to the present invention, for high carbon chromium steel (for example, SUJ material) and stainless steel (for example, SUS material) in which the amount of retained austenite tends to increase during quenching. Even if quenching is performed, the amount of retained austenite can be reduced to 35% or less.
そして、結晶組織中の残留オーステナイト量が35%以下の鋼材は、ビッカース硬さ(HV0.3)が、C量硬さ曲線における最高硬さの80%以上となる。具体的には、ビッカース硬さ(HV0.3)が630以上となる場合を想定している。 A steel material having a retained austenite content of 35% or less in the crystal structure has a Vickers hardness (HV 0.3) of 80% or more of the maximum hardness in the C content hardness curve. Specifically, it is assumed that the Vickers hardness (HV 0.3) is 630 or more.
以下、実施例及び比較例を通じて、本件発明に係る鋼材の熱処理方法及び効果に関して、より具体的に述べる。これらにおいて、熱処理に使用した試料は、長さ10mm×直径3mmのロッドを用いた。 Hereinafter, the heat treatment method and effect of the steel material according to the present invention will be described more specifically through examples and comparative examples. In these, the sample used for heat processing used the rod of length 10mm x diameter 3mm.
この実施例1で用いたロッド状試料は、鉄以外の成分として、以下の表1に示す成分を含有する組成を備えている。 The rod-shaped sample used in Example 1 has a composition containing the components shown in Table 1 below as components other than iron.
以下に述べる手順で、実施例に相当する6種類の試料(実施試料1−1〜実施試料1−6)を得た。なお、以下の表、実施例と比較例との加熱条件等が対比可能なように示す。 In accordance with the procedure described below, six types of samples corresponding to the examples (Examples 1-1 to 1-6) were obtained. In addition, the following table | surface, it shows so that the heating conditions etc. of an Example and a comparative example can be compared.
加熱方式: 本件発明に係る鋼材の熱処理方法において、焼入れ処理を行う際の加熱には、高周波加熱方式を採用することが好ましい。加熱速度が速く、加熱対象である鋼材を迅速に加熱することが出来るからである。即ち、以下に述べる各工程での焼入れを行うときの加熱方式は、高周波加熱方式を採用したものであり、190℃/秒以上の加熱速度を採用した。そして、焼戻しを行うときの加熱方式は、炉内加熱を採用した。従って、図1に示した昇温時間R1、R2、R3は、それぞれ(Tn(n=1、2、3)−RT(室温))/[加熱速度]で換算される時間である。 Heating method: In the heat treatment method for steel according to the present invention, it is preferable to employ a high-frequency heating method for heating when performing the quenching treatment. This is because the heating rate is fast and the steel material to be heated can be quickly heated. That is, the heating method when performing quenching in each step described below employs a high-frequency heating method, and a heating rate of 190 ° C./second or more is employed. And the furnace heating was employ | adopted as the heating system when performing tempering. Therefore, the heating times R 1 , R 2 , and R 3 shown in FIG. 1 are times converted by (Tn (n = 1, 2, 3) −RT (room temperature)) / [heating rate], respectively. .
第1焼入れ工程: 第1焼入れ工程では、試料を、1000℃、1100℃、1200℃の3水準に設定した第1加熱温度T1に加熱した。このときの昇温時間R1は、5秒となるように、高周波加熱装置の条件を設定した。そして、所定の加熱温度に達した試料を、第1加熱温度T1で5秒間(H1)、保持した。その後、ヘリウムガスを用いて、加熱により結晶組織がオーステナイト化した試料を、室温まで急冷し、結晶組織をマルテンサイト化させた。以上に述べた焼入れが終了し、一旦、室温まで冷却し、室温に3分間放置した(図1のHRT1)。 First quenching step: In the first quenching step, the sample was heated to a first heating temperature T1 set at three levels of 1000 ° C, 1100 ° C, and 1200 ° C. Atsushi Nobori time R 1 in this case, to be 5 seconds to set the condition of the high frequency heating apparatus. Then, the sample has reached a predetermined heating temperature, the first heating temperature T1 5 seconds (H 1), and held. Thereafter, using helium gas, the sample in which the crystal structure was austenitized by heating was rapidly cooled to room temperature, thereby converting the crystal structure into martensite. The quenching described above was completed, and the mixture was once cooled to room temperature and left at room temperature for 3 minutes (H RT1 in FIG. 1).
第2焼入れ工程: この第2焼入れ工程では、第1焼入れ工程が終了し、一旦、室温まで冷却し、マルテンサイト化した鋼材を、再度、第2加熱温度T2に昇温して焼き入れた。このときの第2加熱温度T2は、表1に示すように、第1加熱温度T1を基準として、「第1加熱温度T1±200℃」の範囲の1000℃、1100℃の2水準で設定した。このときの昇温時間R2は、5秒となるように、高周波加熱装置の条件を設定した。そして、所定の加熱温度に達した試料を、第2加熱温度T2で5秒間(H2)、保持した。その後、ヘリウムガスを用いて、加熱により結晶組織がオーステナイト化した試料を、室温まで急冷し、結晶組織をマルテンサイト化させた。以上に述べた焼入れが終了し、室温までの冷却が完了すると、60秒以内(図1のHRT2)に深冷処理工程に移行した。 Second quenching step: In this second quenching step, the first quenching step was completed, and the steel material that had been once cooled to room temperature and turned into martensite was again heated to the second heating temperature T2 and quenched. As shown in Table 1, the second heating temperature T2 at this time was set at two levels of 1000 ° C. and 1100 ° C. within the range of “first heating temperature T1 ± 200 ° C.” with reference to the first heating temperature T1. . Heating time R 2 at this time is such that the 5 seconds to set the condition of the high frequency heating apparatus. The sample that reached the predetermined heating temperature was held at the second heating temperature T2 for 5 seconds (H 2 ). Thereafter, using helium gas, the sample in which the crystal structure was austenitized by heating was rapidly cooled to room temperature, thereby converting the crystal structure into martensite. When the quenching described above was completed and the cooling to room temperature was completed, the deep cooling process step was performed within 60 seconds ( HRT2 in FIG. 1).
深冷処理工程: 深冷処理工程では、第2焼入れ工程の終了した鋼材と液体窒素との接触を行い、深冷処理温度(−196℃)で、180分間維持した(図1のS0)。深冷処理した試料は、大気中で室温に戻るまで放置し(図1のRn)、徐々に室温に戻した。 Cryogenic treatment step: In the cryogenic treatment step, the steel material that has undergone the second quenching step is brought into contact with liquid nitrogen and maintained at a cryogenic treatment temperature (-196 ° C.) for 180 minutes (S 0 in FIG. 1). . The deep-cooled sample was left in the atmosphere until it returned to room temperature (Rn in FIG. 1), and gradually returned to room temperature.
焼戻し工程: 深冷処理工程を経て、室温に戻した試料は、鉄−炭素系状態図におけるAC1線以下の焼戻し加熱温度T3(170℃)まで昇温して加熱した(図1のR3)。そして、焼戻し加熱温度T3で120分の間、保持した(図1のH3)。その後、放冷し、表2に示すバリエーションの実施試料1−1〜実施試料1−6を得た。 Tempering process: deep cooling after the processing step, the sample was returned to room temperature, the iron - and heated was heated to A C1-wire following tempering heating temperature T3 (170 ° C.) in the carbon phase diagram (R 3 in FIG. 1 ). Then, for 120 minutes at the tempering heating temperature T3, and held (H 3 in Figure 1). Then, it stood to cool and the implementation sample 1-1-the implementation sample 1-6 of the variation shown in Table 2 were obtained.
そして、これらの試料を用いて各種評価を行った。この試料に対する評価方法は、実施例及び比較例の試料の全てに適用した。以下、この各種評価項目に関して述べる。 And various evaluation was performed using these samples. The evaluation method for this sample was applied to all the samples of Examples and Comparative Examples. The various evaluation items will be described below.
硬さ測定: 試料の硬さの測定は、図2に示すように、焼入れ処理を施した後のロッド状試料を縦断面で切断し、図2にM1〜M5として示した測定点における硬さ測定を行い、その平均値を硬さとした。このとき測定した硬さは、ビッカース硬さ(HV0.3)を測定した。 Hardness measurement: As shown in FIG. 2, the hardness of the sample was measured by cutting the rod-shaped sample after quenching in a longitudinal section, and the hardness at the measurement points indicated as M1 to M5 in FIG. Measurement was performed and the average value was defined as hardness. The hardness measured at this time was Vickers hardness (HV 0.3).
残留オーステナイト量の測定: 試料の残留オーステナイト量は、焼入れ処理した後の結晶組織に対して、X線回折分析法を適用して測定した。この測定には、株式会社リガク製の、検出器に1次元カウンタ(PSPC:Position Sensitive Proportional Counter)を用いた残留応力測定装置を用いた。このときの測定条件を、以下の表3に示す。 Measurement of amount of retained austenite: The amount of retained austenite of the sample was measured by applying an X-ray diffraction analysis method to the crystal structure after quenching. For this measurement, a residual stress measuring device using a one-dimensional counter (PSPC: Position Sensitive Proportional Counter) manufactured by Rigaku Corporation was used. The measurement conditions at this time are shown in Table 3 below.
結晶組織観察: 実施試料1−1〜実施試料1−6の表面を、Vilella試薬を用いてエッチングして、金属顕微鏡(倍率:400倍)で観察した。観察結果を図3に示す。 Crystal structure observation: The surface of Example 1-1 to Example 1-6 was etched using a Villela reagent and observed with a metal microscope (magnification: 400 times). The observation results are shown in FIG.
この実施例2で用いたロッド状試料は、鉄以外の成分として、以下の表4に示す成分を含有する組成を備えている。そして、この実施例2では、実施例1で行った深冷処理工程及び焼戻し工程を省略している。 The rod-shaped sample used in Example 2 has a composition containing the components shown in Table 4 below as components other than iron. In Example 2, the deep cooling process and the tempering process performed in Example 1 are omitted.
加熱方式: 実施例1と同様の高周波加熱方式を採用したものである。よって、重複した記載を避けるため、ここでの詳細な説明は省略する。 Heating method: The same high-frequency heating method as in Example 1 is adopted. Therefore, detailed description here is omitted to avoid redundant description.
第1焼入れ工程: 第1焼入れ工程では、試料を、850℃、950℃、1050℃の3水準に設定した第1加熱温度T1に加熱した。このときの昇温時間R1は、5秒となるように、高周波加熱装置の条件を設定した。そして、所定の加熱温度に達した試料を、第1加熱温度T1で5秒間(H1)、保持した。その後、ヘリウムガスを用いて、加熱により結晶組織がオーステナイト化した試料を、室温まで急冷し、結晶組織をマルテンサイト化させた。以上に述べた焼入れが終了し、一旦、室温まで冷却し、室温に3分間放置した(図1のHRT1)。 First quenching step: In the first quenching step, the sample was heated to a first heating temperature T1 set at three levels of 850 ° C, 950 ° C, and 1050 ° C. Atsushi Nobori time R 1 in this case, to be 5 seconds to set the condition of the high frequency heating apparatus. Then, the sample has reached a predetermined heating temperature, the first heating temperature T1 5 seconds (H 1), and held. Thereafter, using helium gas, the sample in which the crystal structure was austenitized by heating was rapidly cooled to room temperature, thereby converting the crystal structure into martensite. The quenching described above was completed, and the mixture was once cooled to room temperature and left at room temperature for 3 minutes (H RT1 in FIG. 1).
第2焼入れ工程: この第2焼入れ工程では、第1焼入れ工程が終了し、一旦、室温まで冷却し、マルテンサイト化した鋼材を、再度、第2加熱温度T2に昇温して焼き入れた。このときの第2加熱温度T2は、表5に示すように、850℃、950℃の2水準で設定した。このときの昇温時間R2は、5秒となるように、高周波加熱装置の条件を設定した。そして、所定の加熱温度に達した試料を、第2加熱温度T2で5秒間(H2)、保持した。その後、ヘリウムガスを用いて、加熱により結晶組織がオーステナイト化した試料を、室温まで急冷し、結晶組織をマルテンサイト化させた。以上に述べた焼入れが終了し、室温までの冷却を行った。そして、表2に示すバリエーションの実施試料2−1〜実施試料2−6を得た。 Second quenching step: In this second quenching step, the first quenching step was completed, and the steel material that had been once cooled to room temperature and turned into martensite was again heated to the second heating temperature T2 and quenched. As shown in Table 5, the second heating temperature T2 at this time was set at two levels of 850 ° C. and 950 ° C. Heating time R 2 at this time is such that the 5 seconds to set the condition of the high frequency heating apparatus. The sample that reached the predetermined heating temperature was held at the second heating temperature T2 for 5 seconds (H 2 ). Thereafter, using helium gas, the sample in which the crystal structure was austenitized by heating was rapidly cooled to room temperature, thereby converting the crystal structure into martensite. The quenching described above was completed, and cooling to room temperature was performed. And the implementation sample 2-1 to the implementation sample 2-6 of the variation shown in Table 2 were obtained.
なお、実施試料2−1〜実施試料2−6の結晶組織観察は、実施例1と同様であるため掲載を省略している。 In addition, since the crystal structure observation of Example 2-1 to Example 2-6 is the same as that of Example 1, the description is omitted.
[比較例1:実施例1との対比]
この比較例1では、実施例における第2焼入れ処理を省略したものである。よって、第1焼入れ工程の終了後、直ちに深冷処理工程を施し、焼戻し工程を施し、表6に示すバリエーションの比較試料1−A、比較試料1−B、比較試料1−Cを得た。
[Comparative Example 1: Comparison with Example 1]
In this comparative example 1, the second quenching process in the example is omitted. Therefore, after the completion of the first quenching step, a deep cooling treatment step was immediately performed, and a tempering step was performed to obtain Comparative Sample 1-A, Comparative Sample 1-B, and Comparative Sample 1-C having variations shown in Table 6.
そして、これらの試料を用いて、実施例と同様にして各種評価を行った。この試料に対する評価方法は、上述のとおりである。評価結果に関しては、表10に実施例の評価結果と共に示す。 And various evaluation was performed like these Examples using these samples. The evaluation method for this sample is as described above. The evaluation results are shown in Table 10 together with the evaluation results of the examples.
比較例1の比較試料1−A〜比較試料1−Cの結晶組織観察も、実施例1と同様にして行い、その観察結果を図4に示す。 The crystal structures of Comparative Sample 1-A to Comparative Sample 1-C of Comparative Example 1 were also observed in the same manner as in Example 1, and the observation results are shown in FIG.
[比較例2:実施例1との対比]
この比較例2では、実施例における深冷処理を省略したものである。よって、第1焼入れ工程、第2焼入れ工程の終了後、室温に戻した試料に対し、焼戻し工程を施し、表7に示すバリエーションの比較試料2−A〜比較試料2−Fを得た。
[Comparative Example 2: Comparison with Example 1]
In this comparative example 2, the deep cooling process in an Example is abbreviate | omitted. Therefore, after completion of the first quenching process and the second quenching process, the samples returned to room temperature were subjected to a tempering process, and variations of Comparative Sample 2-A to Comparative Sample 2-F shown in Table 7 were obtained.
そして、これらの試料を用いて、実施例と同様にして各種評価を行った。この試料に対する評価方法は、上述のとおりである。評価結果に関しては、表11に実施例の評価結果と共に示す。 And various evaluation was performed like these Examples using these samples. The evaluation method for this sample is as described above. The evaluation results are shown in Table 11 together with the evaluation results of the examples.
比較例2の比較試料2−A〜比較試料1−Fの結晶組織観察も、実施例1と同様にして行い、その観察結果を図5に示す。 The crystal structures of Comparative Sample 2-A to Comparative Sample 1-F of Comparative Example 2 are also observed in the same manner as in Example 1. The observation results are shown in FIG.
[比較例3:実施例1との対比]
この比較例1では、実施例における第2焼入れ処理及び深冷処理を省略したものである。よって、第1焼入れ工程の終了後、室温に戻した試料に対し、焼戻し工程を施し、表8に示すバリエーションの比較試料3−A〜比較試料3−Cを得た。
[Comparative Example 3: Comparison with Example 1]
In the comparative example 1, the second quenching process and the deep cooling process in the example are omitted. Therefore, after the completion of the first quenching process, the sample returned to room temperature was subjected to a tempering process, and Comparative Samples 3-A to 3-C of variations shown in Table 8 were obtained.
そして、これらの試料を用いて、実施例と同様にして各種評価を行った。この試料に対する評価方法は、上述のとおりである。評価結果に関しては、表12に実施例の評価結果と共に示す。 And various evaluation was performed like these Examples using these samples. The evaluation method for this sample is as described above. The evaluation results are shown in Table 12 together with the evaluation results of the examples.
比較例3の比較試料3−A〜比較試料3−Cの結晶組織観察も、実施例1と同様にして行い、その観察結果を図6に示す。 The crystal structures of Comparative Sample 3-A to Comparative Sample 3-C of Comparative Example 3 were also observed in the same manner as in Example 1, and the observation results are shown in FIG.
[比較例4:実施例2との対比]
この比較例4では、実施例2における第2焼入れ処理を省略したものである。よって、第1焼入れ工程を施し、表9に示すバリエーションの比較試料4−A、比較試料4−B、比較試料4−Cを得た。
[Comparative Example 4: Comparison with Example 2]
In Comparative Example 4, the second quenching process in Example 2 is omitted. Therefore, the 1st hardening process was performed and the comparative sample 4-A, the comparative sample 4-B, and the comparative sample 4-C of the variation shown in Table 9 were obtained.
そして、これらの試料を用いて、実施例と同様にして各種評価を行った。この試料に対する評価方法は、上述のとおりである。評価結果に関しては、表13に実施例の評価結果と共に示す。 And various evaluation was performed like these Examples using these samples. The evaluation method for this sample is as described above. The evaluation results are shown in Table 13 together with the evaluation results of the examples.
比較例4の比較試料4−A〜比較試料4−Cの結晶組織観察は、対比対象である実施例2の結晶組織の掲載を省略したため、同様に省略する。 Observation of the crystal structures of Comparative Sample 4-A to Comparative Sample 4-C of Comparative Example 4 is omitted because the crystal structure of Example 2 as a comparison target is omitted.
[実施例1と比較例1との対比]
この実施例1と比較例1との対比は、第2焼入れ工程を設けた効果を検証するためのものである。従って、比較例1では、実施例1における第2焼入れ工程を省略したものである。以下の表10に、評価結果を対比して掲載した。
[Contrast between Example 1 and Comparative Example 1]
The comparison between Example 1 and Comparative Example 1 is for verifying the effect of providing the second quenching step. Therefore, in the comparative example 1, the 2nd hardening process in Example 1 is abbreviate | omitted. Table 10 below shows the evaluation results in comparison.
この表10から分かるように、実施試料のビッカース硬さの最低値は583(HV0.3)である。比較試料1−Aと比較試料1−Cとは、この実施試料の最低値以下の値しか示していない。ところが、比較試料1−Bのビッカース硬さの値は606(HV0.3)と実施試料並の値を示している。このとき比較試料1−Bの残留オーステナイト量は、15.5%である。 As can be seen from Table 10, the minimum value of the Vickers hardness of the working sample is 583 (HV 0.3). The comparative sample 1-A and the comparative sample 1-C show only values below the minimum value of this working sample. However, the value of the Vickers hardness of the comparative sample 1-B is 606 (HV 0.3), which is the same value as the working sample. At this time, the amount of retained austenite of Comparative Sample 1-B is 15.5%.
しかし、実施試料の中で、比較試料1−Bの残留オーステナイト量と同等の試料を探すと、実施試料3が同等の残留オーステナイト量を備えている。そして、このときの実施試料3のビッカース硬さの値は637(HV0.3)と、比較試料1−Bのビッカース硬さの値は606(HV0.3)よりも、かなり高くなっている。 However, when a sample equivalent to the amount of retained austenite of Comparative Sample 1-B is searched for among the samples, Example 3 has the same amount of retained austenite. And the value of the Vickers hardness of the implementation sample 3 at this time is 637 (HV0.3), and the value of the Vickers hardness of the comparative sample 1-B is considerably higher than 606 (HV0.3).
これらのことから考えるに、結晶組織中の残留オーステナイト量が同じであれば、本件発明に係る鋼材の熱処理方法を採用する方が、鋼材の硬さを向上させるためには有用であることが分かる。 Considering these facts, if the amount of retained austenite in the crystal structure is the same, it is understood that it is more useful to improve the hardness of the steel material by adopting the heat treatment method of the steel material according to the present invention. .
[実施例1と比較例2との対比]
この実施例1と比較例2との対比は、深冷処理工程を設けた効果を検証するためのものである。従って、比較例2では、実施例1における深冷処理工程を省略したものである。以下の表11に、評価結果を対比して掲載した。
[Contrast between Example 1 and Comparative Example 2]
The comparison between Example 1 and Comparative Example 2 is for verifying the effect of providing the deep cooling process. Therefore, in Comparative Example 2, the deep cooling process in Example 1 is omitted. In Table 11 below, the evaluation results are shown in comparison.
この表11から分かるように、実施試料のビッカース硬さの最低値は583(HV0.3)である。これに対し、比較試料2−A〜比較試料2−Fのいずれの試料も、この実施試料の最低値以下の値しか示していない。比較試料2−A〜比較試料2−Fの試料は、実施試料と第1焼入れ工程及び第2焼入れ工程の条件が同じであれば、深冷処理を施していないため高い残留オーステナイト量を備えていることが分かる。 As can be seen from Table 11, the minimum value of the Vickers hardness of the working sample is 583 (HV 0.3). On the other hand, any sample of Comparative Sample 2-A to Comparative Sample 2-F shows only a value equal to or lower than the lowest value of this working sample. The samples of Comparative Sample 2-A to Comparative Sample 2-F have a high amount of retained austenite because they are not subjected to deep cooling treatment if the conditions of the first quenching step and the second quenching step are the same as those of the working sample. I understand that.
この残留オーステナイト量に着目してみると、次のことが分かる。比較試料2−A〜比較試料2−Fにおいては、残留オーステナイト量が高いほど、試料の硬さが低下する事が理解できる。但し、実施例試料1〜実施例試料6について、それぞれ残留オーステナイト量が低い比較例試料と比較した場合に、全ての実施例試料が比較例試料よりも硬さの高くなる結果となった。 When attention is paid to the amount of retained austenite, the following can be understood. In Comparative Sample 2-A to Comparative Sample 2-F, it can be understood that the hardness of the sample decreases as the amount of retained austenite increases. However, when Example Sample 1 to Example Sample 6 were each compared with a comparative sample having a low amount of retained austenite, all of the example samples were harder than the comparative sample.
これらのことを考えるに、本件発明に係る鋼材の熱処理方法において、深冷処理工程は必須の工程であると考えられる。即ち、本件発明に係る鋼材の熱処理方法の備える「第1焼入れ工程」及び「第2焼入れ工程」と、「深冷処理工程」とを組みあわせることで、結晶組織中の残留オーステナイト量が低くなり、鋼材の硬さを向上させられることが理解できる。 Considering these, the deep cooling process is considered to be an essential process in the heat treatment method for steel according to the present invention. That is, the amount of retained austenite in the crystal structure is reduced by combining the “first quenching process” and the “second quenching process” and the “deep cooling process” provided in the heat treatment method for steel according to the present invention. It can be understood that the hardness of the steel material can be improved.
[実施例1と比較例3との対比]
この実施例1と比較例3との対比は、第2焼入れ工程と深冷処理工程が存在しない場合にどのような影響が出るかを検証するためのものである。言い換えれば、1回の単純焼入れによる鋼材の硬さの向上効果と、本件発明に係る鋼材の熱処理方法による鋼材の硬さの向上効果との対比である。従って、比較例3では、実施例1における第2焼入れ工程と深冷処理工程を省略したものである。以下の表12に、評価結果を対比して掲載した。
[Contrast between Example 1 and Comparative Example 3]
This comparison between Example 1 and Comparative Example 3 is for verifying what effect is produced when the second quenching process and the deep cooling process do not exist. In other words, this is a comparison between the effect of improving the hardness of the steel material by one simple quenching and the effect of improving the hardness of the steel material by the heat treatment method of the steel material according to the present invention. Therefore, in Comparative Example 3, the second quenching process and the deep cooling process in Example 1 are omitted. Table 12 below shows the comparison of the evaluation results.
この表12から分かるように、実施試料のビッカース硬さの最低値は583(HV0.3)である。これに対し、比較試料3−A〜比較試料3−Cのいずれの試料も、この実施試料の最低値以下の値しか示していない。即ち、比較試料3−A〜比較試料3−Cの試料は、実施試料と第1焼入れ工程の条件が同じであれば、深冷処理もないため、高い残留オーステナイト量を備えていると言える。そのため、例えば600(HV0.3)程度の硬さが要求される製品に対して、比較試料3−A〜比較試料3−Cの試料と同様の熱処理を施した場合には、所望の硬さが得られず製品品質の保証が困難となり好ましくない。 As can be seen from Table 12, the minimum value of the Vickers hardness of the working sample is 583 (HV 0.3). On the other hand, any sample of Comparative Sample 3-A to Comparative Sample 3-C shows only a value equal to or lower than the lowest value of this working sample. That is, it can be said that the samples of Comparative Sample 3-A to Comparative Sample 3-C have a high amount of retained austenite because there is no deep cooling treatment if the conditions of the first quenching step are the same as those of the working sample. Therefore, for example, when a product requiring a hardness of about 600 (HV 0.3) is subjected to the same heat treatment as the samples of Comparative Sample 3-A to Comparative Sample 3-C, the desired hardness is obtained. Is not preferable because it is difficult to guarantee product quality.
これらのことを考えるに、本件発明に係る鋼材の熱処理方法において、第2焼入れ工程及び深冷処理工程は必須の工程であると考えられる。即ち、本件発明に係る鋼材の熱処理方法の備える「第1焼入れ工程」、「第2焼入れ工程」、「深冷処理工程」の3つの工程を組みあわせることで、結晶組織中の残留オーステナイト量を減少させ、安定的に鋼材の硬さを向上させられることが理解できる。 In consideration of these matters, it is considered that the second quenching process and the deep cooling process are indispensable processes in the steel material heat treatment method according to the present invention. That is, the amount of retained austenite in the crystal structure is reduced by combining the three steps of the “first quenching step”, “second quenching step”, and “deep cooling treatment step” provided in the heat treatment method for steel according to the present invention. It can be understood that the hardness of the steel material can be reduced and stably improved.
[実施例2と比較例4との対比]
この実施例2と比較例4との対比は、「0.6質量%〜1.5質量%の炭素含有量を備える炭素鋼」の熱処理において、第2焼入れ工程を設けた効果を検証するためのものである。従って、比較例4では、実施例2における第2焼入れ工程を省略したものである。以下の表13に、評価結果を対比して掲載した。
[Contrast between Example 2 and Comparative Example 4]
The comparison between Example 2 and Comparative Example 4 is to verify the effect of providing the second quenching step in the heat treatment of “carbon steel having a carbon content of 0.6 mass% to 1.5 mass%”. belongs to. Therefore, in the comparative example 4, the 2nd hardening process in Example 2 is abbreviate | omitted. Table 13 below shows the evaluation results in comparison.
この表13から分かるように、実施試料のビッカース硬さの最低値は808(HV0.3)である。これに対し、比較試料4−Aと比較試料4−Cとは、この実施試料の最低値以下の値しか示していない。ところが、比較試料4−Bのビッカース硬さの値は841(HV0.3)と実施試料と同等の値を示している。 As can be seen from Table 13, the minimum value of the Vickers hardness of the working sample is 808 (HV 0.3). On the other hand, the comparative sample 4-A and the comparative sample 4-C show only values below the lowest value of this working sample. However, the value of Vickers hardness of Comparative Sample 4-B is 841 (HV 0.3), which is the same value as that of the working sample.
このとき比較試料4−Bの残留オーステナイト量をみると、16.8%である。そこで、実施試料2−1〜実施試料2−6の中で、比較試料4−Bの残留オーステナイト量と同等の試料を探すと、完全に合致するものはないが、実施試料2−2が近い残留オーステナイト量を備えている。このときの実施試料2−2のビッカース硬さの値は862(HV0.3)であり、残留オーステナイト量が多くても、比較試料4−Bのビッカース硬さの値841(HV0.3)よりも、高くなっている。 At this time, the amount of retained austenite of Comparative Sample 4-B is 16.8%. Therefore, when a sample equivalent to the amount of retained austenite of Comparative Sample 4-B is searched for among Samples 2-1 to 2-6, there is no perfect match, but Sample 2-2 is close. Has retained austenite content. The value of Vickers hardness of the implementation sample 2-2 at this time is 862 (HV0.3), and even if the amount of retained austenite is large, the value of Vickers hardness 841 (HV0.3) of the comparative sample 4-B Even higher.
これらのことから考えるに、結晶組織中の残留オーステナイト量が同じであれば、本件発明に係る鋼材の熱処理方法を採用する方が、鋼材の硬さを向上させるためには有用であることが分かる。 Considering these facts, if the amount of retained austenite in the crystal structure is the same, it is understood that it is more useful to improve the hardness of the steel material by adopting the heat treatment method of the steel material according to the present invention. .
本件発明に係る鋼材の熱処理方法によれば、鋼材に、より高い硬さを付与することが出来る。しかも、本件発明に係る鋼材の熱処理方法を採用することで、1回の焼入れに比べて残留オーステナイト量を減少させることが出来るため、硬さの向上効果が十分に得られる。従って、本件発明に係る鋼材の熱処理方法は、例えば、ロケット用部品、航空機用部品等の高硬度が要求される部品に好適に採用することが出来る。また、本件発明に係る鋼材の熱処理方法は、既存の高周波加熱方式の熱処理装置の使用が可能であり、新たな設備投資を要さないため、経済性に優れたものとなる。 According to the heat treatment method for steel according to the present invention, higher hardness can be imparted to the steel. And since the amount of retained austenite can be reduced by employ | adopting the heat processing method of the steel material which concerns on this invention compared with one hardening, the improvement effect of hardness is fully acquired. Therefore, the steel material heat treatment method according to the present invention can be suitably used for parts requiring high hardness, such as rocket parts and aircraft parts. In addition, the steel material heat treatment method according to the present invention can be used with an existing high-frequency heating type heat treatment apparatus and does not require a new facility investment, and thus is excellent in economic efficiency.
R1,R2,R3 加熱領域
H1,H2,H3 保持領域
HRT1,HRT2 室温保持領域
C1,C2,C3 冷却領域
S0 深冷処理領域
1 ロッド状試料
2 縦断面
M1,M2,M3,M4,M5 硬さ測定点
R 1 , R 2 , R 3 heating region H 1 , H 2 , H 3 holding region H RT1 , H RT2 room temperature holding region C 1 , C 2 , C 3 cooling region S 0 deep cooling treatment region 1 rod-shaped sample 2 longitudinal section Surface M1, M2, M3, M4, M5 Hardness measurement points
Claims (6)
第1焼入れ工程: 鋼材を、1000℃〜1100℃の範囲に設定した第1加熱温度T1で加熱し、その後、室温まで冷却して焼入れ、大気中に放置する。
第2焼入れ工程: 第1焼入れ工程の終了した鋼材を、850℃〜1200℃の範囲に設定した第2加熱温度T2で加熱し、室温まで冷却して焼き入れる。 A heat treatment including a quenching process using two induction quenching methods for a steel material in which the steel type is stainless steel having a carbon content of 0.1% by mass to 1.5% by mass and a Cr content of 10% by mass or more. In the method, the heat processing method of the steel materials characterized by including the process shown below.
First quenching step: The steel material is heated at a first heating temperature T1 set in a range of 1000 ° C to 1100 ° C, then cooled to room temperature, quenched, and left in the atmosphere.
2nd hardening process: The steel material which the 1st hardening process was complete | finished is heated by 2nd heating temperature T2 set to the range of 850 degreeC-1200 degreeC, and it cools and quenches to room temperature.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2013018544A JP6313928B2 (en) | 2013-02-01 | 2013-02-01 | Heat treatment method for steel |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2013018544A JP6313928B2 (en) | 2013-02-01 | 2013-02-01 | Heat treatment method for steel |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JP2014148720A JP2014148720A (en) | 2014-08-21 |
| JP6313928B2 true JP6313928B2 (en) | 2018-04-18 |
Family
ID=51571926
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2013018544A Active JP6313928B2 (en) | 2013-02-01 | 2013-02-01 | Heat treatment method for steel |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP6313928B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (9)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN107881308B (en) * | 2017-11-01 | 2019-08-16 | 西南大学 | A kind of cryogenic treatment process improving the quenched steel toughness of 50CrVA |
| KR102043511B1 (en) * | 2017-12-12 | 2019-11-12 | 주식회사 포스코 | Quenched high carbon steel sheet and method for manufacturing the same |
| CN114085967B (en) * | 2021-11-26 | 2023-09-01 | 成都先进金属材料产业技术研究院股份有限公司 | Method for regulating and controlling thermal expansion performance of martensitic bearing steel |
| CN115558762A (en) * | 2022-10-27 | 2023-01-03 | 江苏聚源电气有限公司 | Quenching process for plate quenching and tempering and integral quenching |
| CN116179809B (en) * | 2022-12-08 | 2025-09-09 | 浙江青山钢铁有限公司 | Annealing heat treatment method for high-carbon chromium stainless steel |
| CN116497182B (en) * | 2023-05-06 | 2025-12-23 | 常州大学 | Method for reducing deformation of intermediate frequency induction quenching workpiece |
| CN117821718A (en) * | 2023-11-29 | 2024-04-05 | 重庆机床(集团)有限责任公司 | Deep Cryogenic Treatment Method for Gear Grinding Wheel Mandrel |
| CN118441132A (en) * | 2024-05-15 | 2024-08-06 | 中国航发南方工业有限公司 | Liquid-air alternate quenching method of 13Cr15Ni4Mo3N stainless steel |
| CN119614809B (en) * | 2024-11-27 | 2025-10-03 | 合肥工业大学 | A heat treatment process for AISI420 stainless steel metal powder injection molding parts |
Family Cites Families (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPH04254554A (en) * | 1991-02-04 | 1992-09-09 | Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd | Martensitic stainless steel and production thereof |
| JP2005048211A (en) * | 2003-07-30 | 2005-02-24 | Jfe Steel Kk | Manufacturing method of steel material with excellent fatigue characteristics |
| JP5167616B2 (en) * | 2005-10-31 | 2013-03-21 | Jfeスチール株式会社 | Metal bolts with excellent delayed fracture resistance |
| JP2007177256A (en) * | 2005-12-26 | 2007-07-12 | Kobe Steel Ltd | Induction hardened shaft-like part with excellent torsional fatigue strength and static torsional strength |
| JP4867638B2 (en) * | 2006-12-21 | 2012-02-01 | Jfeスチール株式会社 | High-strength bolts with excellent delayed fracture resistance and corrosion resistance |
| JP5582855B2 (en) * | 2010-04-14 | 2014-09-03 | 高周波熱錬株式会社 | Manufacturing method of machine structural parts |
-
2013
- 2013-02-01 JP JP2013018544A patent/JP6313928B2/en active Active
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP2014148720A (en) | 2014-08-21 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| JP6313928B2 (en) | Heat treatment method for steel | |
| Stickels | Carbide refining heat treatments for 52100 bearing steel | |
| JP6843612B2 (en) | Manufacturing method using high-strength steel showing good ductility and hot-dip galvanized bath downstream of in-line heat treatment | |
| JP5288259B2 (en) | Pre-quenching method and quenching method for martensitic tool steel | |
| JP2011256456A (en) | Method for manufacturing steel for cold forging | |
| WO2017120987A1 (en) | Steel material for manufacturing bearing, method for performing heat treatment thereto and formed part | |
| CN111455147A (en) | A kind of heat treatment method of Cronidur 30 stainless steel parts | |
| WO2012093506A1 (en) | Spring having excellent corrosion fatigue strength | |
| Vahdat et al. | Effect of microstructure parameters on tensile toughness of tool steel after deep cryogenic treatment | |
| CN109321867A (en) | A Vacuum Low Pressure Carburizing Process for 16Cr3NiWMoVNbE Steel | |
| JP2011149047A (en) | Heat-treatment method for martensitic stainless steel or martensite-ferritic stainless steel | |
| CN105642675B (en) | Prevent phosphorus Non-equilibrium Grain Boundary Segregation hot rolling technology control method | |
| Gutiérrez | Effect of microstructure on the impact toughness of high strength steels | |
| JP6403516B2 (en) | High-strength plate steel, manufacturing method thereof and discharge valve parts | |
| CN109680127A (en) | The hardening and tempering process of carbon alloy structure round steel in a kind of big specification | |
| JP6466152B2 (en) | Heat treatment method for boron-containing steel | |
| WO2018155588A1 (en) | Method for manufacturing bearing component | |
| Ptačinová et al. | Influence of sub-zero treatment in liquid helium and tempering on the microstructure of tool steel Vanadis 6 | |
| JP4785054B2 (en) | Method for producing high-strength steel material with excellent hydrogen embrittlement resistance | |
| JP2004323912A (en) | High strength coil spring and manufacturing method thereof | |
| Cryderman et al. | Short Time Austenitizing Effects on the Hardenability of Some 0.55 wt. pct. Carbon Steels | |
| CN103276164B (en) | High-strength and high-toughness heat treatment method of medium-carbon silicon-manganese-chromium-nickel series low alloy steel | |
| CN110628997A (en) | A heat treatment method for improving the yield-strength ratio of low-carbon martensitic precipitation hardening stainless steel | |
| JP2019077916A (en) | Steel material for carburization and carburization member | |
| Kaiser et al. | Investigation of the tempering process of martensitic AISI 4140 steel at high heating rates |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20160106 |
|
| A977 | Report on retrieval |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007 Effective date: 20161110 |
|
| A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20170111 |
|
| A521 | Request for written amendment filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20170309 |
|
| A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20170829 |
|
| A521 | Request for written amendment filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20171027 |
|
| TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20180314 |
|
| A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20180326 |
|
| R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Ref document number: 6313928 Country of ref document: JP Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |