Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP6364280B2 - Evaluation method of thread defect - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP6364280B2 - Evaluation method of thread defect - Google Patents

Evaluation method of thread defect Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP6364280B2
JP6364280B2 JP2014171769A JP2014171769A JP6364280B2 JP 6364280 B2 JP6364280 B2 JP 6364280B2 JP 2014171769 A JP2014171769 A JP 2014171769A JP 2014171769 A JP2014171769 A JP 2014171769A JP 6364280 B2 JP6364280 B2 JP 6364280B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
screw
defect
echo intensity
thread
measured
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2014171769A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2016045169A (en
Inventor
孝浩 中山
孝浩 中山
吉郎 金築
吉郎 金築
茂雄 藤井
茂雄 藤井
幸夫 三▲崎▼
幸夫 三▲崎▼
邦彦 篠田
邦彦 篠田
重行 松原
重行 松原
純一 北阪
純一 北阪
賢 遠藤
賢 遠藤
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Chugoku Electric Power Co Inc
Non Destructive Inspection Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Chugoku Electric Power Co Inc
Non Destructive Inspection Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Chugoku Electric Power Co Inc, Non Destructive Inspection Co Ltd filed Critical Chugoku Electric Power Co Inc
Priority to JP2014171769A priority Critical patent/JP6364280B2/en
Publication of JP2016045169A publication Critical patent/JP2016045169A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP6364280B2 publication Critical patent/JP6364280B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Landscapes

  • Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)

Description

本発明は、螺合されているねじ部の欠損評価方法に関する。   The present invention relates to a method for evaluating a defect of a screwed portion.

従来より、レーザ光のねじ山への照射及びその反射光の検出を行うレーザセンサと、レーザセンサを昇降させる昇降機構と、レーザセンサから送られてくる信号に基づいてねじ山の欠けの有無を判定する判別部とからなるねじ山の欠け検出装置が知られている(例えば、特許文献1参照)。   Conventionally, a laser sensor for irradiating a laser beam to a screw thread and detecting its reflected light, an elevating mechanism for raising and lowering the laser sensor, and checking for the presence or absence of a thread chip based on a signal sent from the laser sensor. 2. Description of the Related Art There is known a thread missing detection device that includes a determination unit for determination (see, for example, Patent Document 1).

特開2006−71303号公報JP 2006-71303 A

上記ねじ山の欠け検出装置は、レーザ光を直接ねじ山に照射するものであるため、対象となるねじ山は外部に露出していなければならない。このため、欠けの検出対象となるねじが螺合されている場合には、ねじを外さなければならない。   Since the above-described chipping detection device for a thread is intended to directly irradiate the thread with laser light, the target thread must be exposed to the outside. For this reason, when the screw used as the detection object of a chip | tip is screwed together, you have to remove a screw.

また、内部蒸気が高温高圧であり、経年により劣化しやすい蒸気タービン主要弁などの弁室に用いられる植え込みボルト及び植え込み部のねじ部は、高温高圧蒸気が漏洩しないように、その健全性を確認する必要があるが、上記のねじ山の欠け検出装置を使用する場合には、螺合されているねじ部を外して露出させた雌ねじ部の再取り付け後の安全性確認に多大な時間と労力を費やさなければならないという課題がある。   In addition, the internal steam is high temperature and high pressure, and the integrity of the studs used in valve chambers such as main valves of steam turbines, which tend to deteriorate over time, and the threaded parts of the implant parts are checked so that high temperature and high pressure steam does not leak. However, when using the above-mentioned chipping detection device for a thread, it takes a lot of time and labor to confirm the safety after reattaching the exposed female screw part by removing the screwed part. There is a problem that must be spent.

本発明は、このような事情に鑑みてなされたものであり、その目的は、螺合した状態のねじ部の欠損を評価することが可能な雌ねじ部の欠損評価方法を提供することにある。   This invention is made | formed in view of such a situation, The objective is to provide the defect | deletion evaluation method of the internal thread part which can evaluate the defect | deletion of the threaded part of the screwed state.

前記目的を達成するため、本発明のねじ部の欠損評価方法は、評価対象となるねじ部を備えた螺合部材内を伝搬し、当該螺合部材のねじ部の表面で反射した超音波によりエコー強度を測定した対象ねじ部エコー強度と、欠損度合いが互いに異なる複数のねじ部を示すエコー強度と前記欠損度合いとが対応付けられたグラフが示すマスターカーブと、に基づいてねじ部の欠損を評価するねじ部の欠損評価方法であって、前記マスターカーブは、欠損度合いが互いに異なる複数種類のねじ山の断面が各々直線状に連なるように形成された模擬ねじ部を測定した模擬ねじ部エコー強度と各々の前記模擬ねじ部の欠損度合いとを対応付けた模擬ねじグラフ、および、互いにサイズが異なり欠損のない健全な前記ねじ部のエコー強度を測定した健全ねじ部エコー強度に基づいて求められ、前記模擬ねじグラフをねじ部の曲率に基づいて補正する補正係数、に基づいて生成されることを特徴とするねじ部の欠損評価方法である。 In order to achieve the above-described object, the screw part defect evaluation method of the present invention propagates through a threaded member provided with a threaded part to be evaluated, and is reflected by the ultrasonic waves reflected on the surface of the threaded part of the threaded member. Based on the target screw part echo intensity for which the echo intensity was measured, and the master curve indicated by the graph in which the echo intensity indicating the plurality of screw parts having different defect degrees and the defect degree are associated with each other, the defect of the screw part is determined. A method for evaluating a defect of a screw part to be evaluated, wherein the master curve is a simulated screw part echo obtained by measuring a simulated screw part formed so that cross sections of a plurality of types of screw threads having different defect degrees are connected in a straight line. A simulated screw graph that correlates the strength with the degree of defect of each simulated screw part, and a healthy screw that measures the echo intensity of the healthy thread part that is different in size and has no defect Obtained based on the echo intensity is a correction factor, defect evaluation method of the threaded portion, characterized in that it is generated based on correcting the simulated screw graph based on the curvature of the threads.

このようなねじ部の欠損評価方法によれば、エコー強度の測定に用いる超音波は、螺合部材と外部、例えば空間や、隣接する他の部材との境界となるねじ部の表面で反射するので、螺合部材内を伝搬し、評価対象となるねじ部の表面にて反射した超音波により対象ねじ部エコー強度を測定することにより、評価対象となるねじ部を外部に露出させることなく、より正確にエコー強度を測定することが可能である。このため、螺合した状態のねじ部であっても螺合を外すことなく対象ねじ部エコー強度を測定できるので、容易に、かつ短時間に測定することが可能である。   According to such a defect evaluation method for a threaded portion, the ultrasonic wave used for measuring the echo intensity is reflected on the surface of the threaded portion that becomes a boundary between the screwing member and the outside, for example, a space or another adjacent member. Therefore, by propagating through the screwing member and measuring the target screw part echo intensity with the ultrasonic wave reflected on the surface of the screw part to be evaluated, without exposing the screw part to be evaluated to the outside, It is possible to measure the echo intensity more accurately. For this reason, even if it is the screw part of the screwed state, since the target screw part echo intensity can be measured without removing the screwing, it is possible to measure easily and in a short time.

また、欠損度合いが互いに異なる複数のねじ部を示すエコー強度と欠損度合いとが対応付けられたグラフが示すマスターカーブと、対象ねじ部エコー強度と、に基づいてねじ部の欠損を評価するので、評価対象となるねじ部のエコー強度を測定するだけで、評価対象となるねじ部の欠損を容易に評価することが可能である。   Further, since the master curve indicated by the graph in which the echo intensity indicating the plurality of screw parts having different degrees of defect and the degree of the defect are associated with each other and the target screw part echo intensity are evaluated, the defect of the screw part is evaluated. By simply measuring the echo intensity of the thread part to be evaluated, it is possible to easily evaluate the defect of the thread part to be evaluated.

このようなねじ部の欠損評価方法によれば、模擬ねじは、欠損度合いが互いに異なるねじ山の断面が直線状に連なるように形成されているので、欠損度合いが互いに異なるねじ山をより正確に形成することが容易である。そして欠損度合いをより正確に、互いに異ならせて形成された模擬ねじ部のエコー強度を測定するので、湾曲したねじ山が欠損した状態を測定する場合より安定した数値が得られやすい。このため、欠損度合いが互いに異なるねじ山のエコー強度をより正確に測定することが可能である。   According to such a defect evaluation method for a threaded portion, the simulated screw is formed so that the cross sections of the threads having different degrees of defect are connected in a straight line, so that the threads having different degrees of defect can be more accurately identified. It is easy to form. Then, since the echo intensity of the simulated screw portions formed with different degrees of defects more accurately is measured, a more stable value can be obtained more easily than when measuring a state where a curved thread is missing. For this reason, it is possible to more accurately measure the echo intensity of threads having different degrees of defect.

また、サイズが互いに異なるねじ部は、欠損のない健全な状態でエコー強度を測定するので、サイズによるエコー強度の相違がさらに正確に現れる。このため、サイズの相違、すなわち曲率の相違によるエコー強度への影響をより明確に把握することが可能であり、より正確な補正係数を求めることが可能である。
そして、より正確な補正係数によりグラフとねじ部の曲率とが対応づけられたマスターカーブを用いてねじ部の欠損が評価されるので、より正確な評価結果を得ることが可能である。
In addition, the screw portions having different sizes measure the echo intensity in a healthy state with no defect, so that the difference in echo intensity depending on the size appears more accurately. For this reason, it is possible to more clearly grasp the influence on the echo intensity due to the difference in size, that is, the difference in curvature, and it is possible to obtain a more accurate correction coefficient.
And since the defect | deletion of a thread part is evaluated using the master curve with which the graph and the curvature of the thread part were matched by the more exact correction coefficient, it is possible to obtain a more exact evaluation result.

かかるねじ部の欠損評価方法であって、前記エコー強度は、アレイ探触子を用いて測定することが望ましい。
このようなねじ部の欠損評価方法によれば、アレイ探触子により一度に広い範囲のエコー強度を測定できるので、より早くねじ部の欠損を評価することが可能である。
In this method for evaluating a defect in a threaded portion, it is preferable that the echo intensity is measured using an array probe.
According to such a defect evaluation method for a threaded portion, since the echo intensity in a wide range can be measured at once by the array probe, it is possible to evaluate the threaded portion defect earlier.

かかるねじ部の欠損評価方法であって、前記エコー強度は、測定対象となる前記ねじ部の、欠損のない健全な状態における表面と直交する方向から伝搬された前記超音波により測定されることが望ましい。   In this thread portion defect evaluation method, the echo intensity is measured by the ultrasonic wave propagated from a direction orthogonal to the surface of the thread portion to be measured in a healthy state without a defect. desirable.

このようなねじ部の欠損評価方法によれば、欠損のない健全な状態におけるエコー強度を最大値として欠損したねじ部のエコー強度を比較することができるので、より明確な評価をすることが可能である。   According to such a defect evaluation method for a screw part, the echo intensity of a screw part that has been lost can be compared with a maximum value of the echo intensity in a healthy state with no defect, so that a clearer evaluation can be performed. It is.

かかるねじ部の欠損評価方法であって、評価対象となる前記ねじ部は、雌ねじである。 このようなねじ部の欠損評価方法は、孔などの内側に形成されて表面側からは測定および確認がし難い雌ねじに特に適している。   In this thread portion defect evaluation method, the thread portion to be evaluated is a female screw. Such a defect evaluation method for a threaded portion is particularly suitable for a female screw that is formed inside a hole or the like and is difficult to measure and confirm from the surface side.

本発明によれば、螺合した状態のねじ部の欠損を評価することが可能な雌ねじ部の欠損評価方法を提供することが可能である。   ADVANTAGE OF THE INVENTION According to this invention, it is possible to provide the defect | deletion evaluation method of the internal thread part which can evaluate the defect | deletion of the screw part of the screwed state.

本発明に係るねじ部の評価方法において対象ねじ部エコー強度を測定する状態を示す斜視図である。It is a perspective view which shows the state which measures object thread part echo intensity in the evaluation method of the thread part which concerns on this invention. アレイ探触子の取付面の相違によるエコー強度への影響を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the influence on the echo intensity by the difference in the attachment surface of an array probe. 健全なねじ部と欠損したねじ部とのエコーの反射状態の相違を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the difference in the reflective state of the echo of the healthy screw part and the missing screw part. 健全なねじ部と欠損したねじ部のエコー強度がマッピングされて示された例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the example by which the echo intensity of the healthy screw part and the missing screw part was mapped and shown. 試験片の欠損状態とエコー強度との関係を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the relationship between the defect | deletion state of a test piece, and echo intensity. ねじ部の曲率とエコー強度との関係を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the relationship between the curvature of a thread part, and echo intensity. 生成されたマスターカーブを示す図である。It is a figure which shows the produced | generated master curve.

以下、本発明の一実施形態について図を用いて説明する。
本実施形態では、蒸気タービン主要弁などに用いられる植え込みボルトが螺合されているねじ部の欠損を評価するねじ部の欠損評価方法をについて説明する。
Hereinafter, an embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.
In the present embodiment, a description will be given of a thread portion defect evaluation method for evaluating a thread portion defect in which a stud bolt used for a steam turbine main valve or the like is screwed.

本実施形態のねじ部の欠損評価方法は、植え込みボルトが螺合されているねじ部としての雌ねじに対して、発信した超音波が雌ねじにおいて外部との境界にて反射した超音波の強さを示す対象ねじ部エコー強度を測定した測定値と、予め生成しておいたマスターカーブとに基づいてねじ部の欠損を評価する。ここで、植え込みボルトが螺合されている雌ねじが評価対象となるねじ部であり、この雌ねじを備えた部材が螺合部材に相当する。   The thread portion defect evaluation method of the present embodiment is based on the strength of the ultrasonic wave transmitted from the external boundary of the female screw with respect to the female screw as the screw portion into which the implanted bolt is screwed. The deficiency of the thread portion is evaluated based on the measured value of the target thread portion echo intensity to be shown and the master curve generated in advance. Here, the internal thread into which the implanted bolt is screwed is a threaded portion to be evaluated, and the member provided with this internal thread corresponds to the threaded member.

雌ねじの対象ねじ部エコー強度は、図1に示すように、植え込みボルト1が螺合されている雌ねじ2aを備えた螺合孔2bを有する本体2(螺合部材)の、螺合孔2bの近傍に、複数の振動子が配列されたアレイ探触子3を取り付けて測定する。尚、図1においては、評価対象となる雌ねじが植え込みボルト1により隠れているため、隣接する螺合孔2bの雌ねじ2aに符号を付している。   As shown in FIG. 1, the target thread portion echo intensity of the female screw is that of the main body 2 (screwing member) having the screwing hole 2 b provided with the female screw 2 a into which the stud bolt 1 is screwed. An array probe 3 in which a plurality of transducers are arranged in the vicinity is attached and measured. In addition, in FIG. 1, since the female screw used as evaluation object is hidden by the implantation bolt 1, the code | symbol is attached | subjected to the female screw 2a of the adjacent screwing hole 2b.

アレイ探触子を用いた測定は、超音波を用いて物体内部の傷等を検査する、所謂、超音波探傷試験のフェイズドアレイ法と同じ原理である。具体的には、振動子により発信され、アレイ探触子3が取り付けられた本体2内を伝搬し、雌ねじ2aの表面(外部との境界)にて反射した超音波のエコーをアレイ探触子3にて受信し電気信号に変換して、コンピュータ等により演算することにより、雌ねじ2aの欠損状態に応じた値として対象ねじ部エコー強度が測定され、また、その結果が表示される。   The measurement using the array probe is based on the same principle as the phased array method of the so-called ultrasonic flaw detection test in which a flaw inside the object is inspected using ultrasonic waves. More specifically, an ultrasonic echo transmitted from the transducer, propagated in the main body 2 to which the array probe 3 is attached, and reflected by the surface of the female screw 2a (boundary with the outside) is converted into the array probe. 3 is received and converted into an electrical signal, and is calculated by a computer or the like, whereby the target screw portion echo intensity is measured as a value corresponding to the missing state of the female screw 2a, and the result is displayed.

このとき、欠損がない健全な雌ねじの表面(フランク)にて反射したエコーのエコー強度が最大となるように、表面に対して直交する方向から超音波を発信する。また、アレイ探触子3の取り付け面には錆が発生している場合があり、図2に示すように、取り付け面に研磨を施す前のエコー強度が研磨後のエコー高さより低いことから、アレイ探触子を取り付ける際には、取り付け面の錆やスケールなどを除去すべく研磨などの表面処理を施すことが望ましい。   At this time, ultrasonic waves are transmitted from a direction orthogonal to the surface so that the echo intensity of the echo reflected on the surface (flank) of a healthy female screw without a defect is maximized. Also, rust may have occurred on the mounting surface of the array probe 3, and as shown in FIG. 2, the echo intensity before polishing the mounting surface is lower than the echo height after polishing. When the array probe is attached, it is desirable to perform a surface treatment such as polishing to remove rust and scale on the attachment surface.

より具体的には、取り付けたアレイ探触子から、欠損のない健全な状態の雌ねじの表面と直交する方向から超音波を発信することにより、図3に示すように、健全な雌ねじ部では発信したアレイ探触子に跳ね返すようにエコーが反射し、欠損部では欠損状態に合わせて、発信したアレイ探触子の方向と異なる方向にエコーが反射する。ここで、雌ねじの一般的なねじ山の角度は60度(フランク角30度)であり、雌ねじが形成されている螺合孔が形成されている面等に垂直にねじ加工されていることから、加工されている孔の貫通方向に対し入射角度を30度にすると測定面(フランク)に垂直に超音波を入射出する事が可能である。   More specifically, by transmitting ultrasonic waves from the attached array probe in a direction perpendicular to the surface of the female screw in a healthy state without any defect, as shown in FIG. The echo is reflected so as to bounce back to the array probe, and the echo is reflected in a direction different from the direction of the transmitted array probe in accordance with the defect state in the defect portion. Here, the general screw thread angle of the female screw is 60 degrees (flank angle 30 degrees), and the threading is performed perpendicularly to the surface or the like on which the female screw is formed. When the incident angle is set to 30 degrees with respect to the penetration direction of the processed hole, it is possible to emit ultrasonic waves perpendicular to the measurement surface (flank).

このときアレイ探触子を用いることにより、瞬時に幅広い領域、すなわち複数のねじ山のエコー強度を測定することが可能であり、また、演算処理して、より早くマッピングし色の相違として表示することが可能である。図4は、健全なねじ部および欠損したねじ部にて測定したエコー強度をマッピングして示しており、図4の例では、エコー強度の相違が、色の濃淡により表されている。図4に示す反射エコー図は、上段が健全な雌ねじの複数のねじ山における反射エコー強度をマッピングして示しており、各ねじ山の頂部に相当する位置の色が淡く、ねじ山の谷部に相当する位置の色が濃くなっている。このように濃度の変化が現れていることからねじ山が高く突出していることが把握できる。一方、下段は、欠損させた試験片(雌ねじ)の複数のねじ山における反射エコー強度をマッピングして示しており、頂部に相当する位置であっても色が濃く現れている。このように濃度の変化が現れていないことからねじ山の高さが低く、頂部が欠損していることが視覚的に把握できる。このような濃度の相違により測定した雌ねじの、健全な雌ねじに対する欠損度合いを把握することができる。   At this time, by using an array probe, it is possible to instantaneously measure the echo intensity of a wide area, that is, a plurality of screw threads, and perform arithmetic processing to map faster and display as a color difference. It is possible. FIG. 4 shows a mapping of echo intensities measured at a healthy screw portion and a missing screw portion, and in the example of FIG. 4, the difference in echo intensity is represented by shading of colors. The reflection echo diagram shown in FIG. 4 shows the mapping of the reflection echo intensity at a plurality of threads of a female thread whose upper stage is healthy, and the color corresponding to the top of each thread is light, and the valley of the thread The color corresponding to is darker. Thus, since the change of density | concentration appears, it can grasp | ascertain that the thread protrudes highly. On the other hand, the lower row shows the reflected echo intensity at a plurality of threads of the deficient test piece (female screw), and the color appears dark even at the position corresponding to the top. Thus, since the change of density | concentration does not appear, the height of a screw thread is low and it can grasp | ascertain visually that the top part is missing. It is possible to grasp the degree of deficiency of a female screw measured with such a difference in density with respect to a healthy female screw.

測定した対象ねじ部エコー強度は、前述したようにマスターカーブに基づいて定量的に評価される。ここでマスターカーブは、以下のようにして予め生成されている。   The measured target screw part echo intensity is quantitatively evaluated based on the master curve as described above. Here, the master curve is generated in advance as follows.

マスターカーブを生成するには、まず、評価対象となるねじの健全な状態と同じフランク角度をなす試験片および評価対象となるねじの欠損度合いが互いに相違する複数の試験片(模擬ねじ)を形成する。このとき形成する試験片は、円柱状の部材の外周や孔の内周に設けるような螺旋状をなすものではなく、健全なねじ山や欠損したねじ山の断面が直線状に連なるように形成されている。   In order to generate a master curve, first, a test piece having the same flank angle as the sound state of the screw to be evaluated and a plurality of test pieces (simulated screws) having different degrees of defect of the screw to be evaluated are formed. To do. The test piece to be formed at this time does not have a spiral shape provided on the outer periphery of the cylindrical member or the inner periphery of the hole, and is formed so that the cross section of the healthy screw thread or the missing screw thread is linearly connected. Has been.

これらの試験片に対し、前述したアレイ探触子を用いて各々の模擬ねじ部エコー強度を測定する。本実施形態においては、欠損のない健全なねじ山を残ねじ山率100%とし、残ねじ山率62%および残ねじ山率28%の試験片を用いて模擬ねじ部エコー強度を測定している。エコー入射角30度にて測定した試験片の模擬ねじ部エコー強度は、図5に示す通りである。   With respect to these test pieces, each simulated screw portion echo intensity is measured using the above-described array probe. In the present embodiment, a sound thread having no defect is assumed to have a residual thread thread ratio of 100%, and a simulated screw part echo intensity is measured using a specimen having a residual thread thread ratio of 62% and a residual thread thread ratio of 28%. Yes. The simulated thread portion echo intensity of the test piece measured at an echo incident angle of 30 degrees is as shown in FIG.

試験片は、ねじ山の断面が直線状に連なるように形成されており、実際の雄ねじや雌ねじのように湾曲していない。これに対し、アレイ探触子から発信される超音波は3次元的に広がっていくので、同一の残ねじ山率のねじ部であっても、試験片を測定した模擬ねじ部エコー強度と実際の雄ねじや雌ねじを測定した対象ねじ部エコー強度とは測定値が相違する。   The test piece is formed so that the cross section of the thread is continuous in a straight line, and is not curved like an actual male screw or female screw. On the other hand, since the ultrasonic wave transmitted from the array probe spreads three-dimensionally, even if the thread part has the same remaining thread rate, the simulated thread part echo intensity measured by the test piece and the actual The measured value is different from the echo intensity of the target screw portion measured for the male screw and the female screw.

また、雄ねじ及び雌ねじはサイズによって湾曲率が相違する。すなわち、雄ねじや雌ねじは、健全な状態であっても、雄ねじが形成されているボルト等の外径または雌ねじが形成されている孔の内径によってエコー強度が相違する。このため、試験片を測定した模擬ねじ部エコー強度に基づいてねじ部の欠損を評価すると誤差が生じて正確な評価結果が得られない。   The curvature of the male screw and the female screw differs depending on the size. That is, even if the male screw and the female screw are healthy, the echo intensity differs depending on the outer diameter of a bolt or the like in which the male screw is formed or the inner diameter of the hole in which the female screw is formed. For this reason, if the defect | deletion of a thread part is evaluated based on the simulated thread part echo intensity | strength which measured the test piece, an error will arise and an exact evaluation result will not be obtained.

そこで、試験片を測定した模擬ねじ部エコー強度を、螺旋状に形成される雄ねじ及び雌ねじに対応させるために、互いにサイズが異なる健全なねじ部のエコー強度(健全ねじ部エコー強度)を測定し、サイズすなわち曲率と健全ねじ部エコー強度との相関を調べ、試験片を測定した模擬ねじ部エコー強度を雄ねじ及び雌ねじのエコー強度に対応させるための補正係数yを求めることとした。   Therefore, in order to make the simulated screw part echo intensity measured on the test piece correspond to the male screw and female screw formed in a spiral shape, the echo intensity of healthy screw parts of different sizes (healthy screw part echo intensity) was measured. Then, the correlation between the size, that is, the curvature and the sound screw part echo intensity was examined, and the correction coefficient y for making the simulated screw part echo intensity measured for the test piece correspond to the echo intensity of the male screw and the female screw was determined.

補正係数yの求め方は、まず、ねじ山が健全な試験片、及び、呼び径がM80、M52、M24を用い、各々の健全ねじ部エコー強度を測定してグラフ化する。グラフ化した結果を図6に示している。このグラフを示す関数(補正式)を求めることにより、曲率による補正係数yが(式1)のように求められる。
y:補正係数
r:ねじ半径[m]
求められた補正係数yを、試験片を測定した模擬ねじ部エコー強度に加味することにより、ボルトサイズまたは雌ねじ孔の径に対する曲率による誤差が補正される。
The correction coefficient y is obtained by first graphing the sound thread echo intensity of each thread using a test piece having a sound thread and nominal diameters M80, M52, and M24. The graphed result is shown in FIG. By obtaining a function (correction formula) indicating this graph, a correction coefficient y based on curvature is obtained as shown in (Formula 1).
y: Correction coefficient
r: Screw radius [m]
The error due to the curvature with respect to the bolt size or the diameter of the female screw hole is corrected by adding the obtained correction coefficient y to the simulated screw portion echo intensity obtained by measuring the test piece.

次に、蒸気タービン車室に用いられている複数の植え込みボルトについて、エコー強度を測定し、図7に示すように横軸を欠損度合い、縦軸をエコー強度とするグラフを生成する。図7に示すように、実機において欠損度合いとエコー強度とに相関が認められ、信頼性も確保された。   Next, the echo intensity is measured for a plurality of studs used in the steam turbine casing, and a graph with the horizontal axis representing the degree of defect and the vertical axis representing the echo intensity is generated as shown in FIG. As shown in FIG. 7, in the actual machine, a correlation was observed between the defect level and the echo intensity, and the reliability was ensured.

次に、図7のグラフを評価の基準となるマスターカーブとし、雌ねじ部の欠損を評価する。たとえば、評価対象の植え込みボルトにおける製造メーカの取り替え推奨値として、「残ねじ山率70%」が示されている場合には、マスターカーブから残ねじ山率70%のときの、ねじ山のエコー強度を読み取る。図7の場合には、残ねじ山率70%のときに、ねじ山のエコー強度が約55%となることが示されている。すなわち、評価対象の雌ねじの対象ねじ部エコー強度を測定した際に、55%より大きな値であった場合には、製造メーカの取り換え推奨値に達していないことが確認でき、55%以下の値であった場合には、製造メーカの取り換え推奨値に達していることが確認できる。   Next, the graph of FIG. 7 is used as a master curve as a reference for evaluation, and the defect of the female screw portion is evaluated. For example, when “remaining screw thread ratio 70%” is indicated as the recommended replacement value for the manufacturer of the implanted bolt to be evaluated, the echo of the screw thread when the remaining screw thread ratio is 70% from the master curve. Read the intensity. In the case of FIG. 7, it is shown that the echo intensity of the thread is about 55% when the remaining thread ratio is 70%. That is, when the target screw part echo intensity of the female thread to be evaluated is a value greater than 55%, it can be confirmed that the recommended replacement value of the manufacturer has not been reached, and a value of 55% or less. If it is, it can be confirmed that the replacement recommended value of the manufacturer has been reached.

また、上記評価結果に基づいて、植え込みボルトを継続して使用するか否かの判定基準を設定することも可能である。例えば、測定した対象ねじ部エコー強度が55%より大きい場合には継続して使用可能と判断し、対象ねじ部エコー強度が40%より大きく55%以下の場合には、経過観察と判断し、40%未満の場合には抜き取って検査すべきとの判断する、等の基準を設定することが可能である。   It is also possible to set a criterion for determining whether or not to use the implanted bolt based on the evaluation result. For example, when the measured target screw part echo intensity is greater than 55%, it is determined that it can be used continuously, and when the target screw part echo intensity is greater than 40% and less than 55%, it is determined to be a follow-up observation. If it is less than 40%, it is possible to set a standard such as judging that it should be extracted and inspected.

本実施形態のねじ部の欠損評価方法によれば、欠損の評価に用いるエコー強度は、螺合部材内を伝搬し、評価対象となるねじ部において外部との境界にて反射したエコーにより測定するので、外部に露出していないねじ部であっても評価することが可能である。すなわち、螺合した状態のねじ部であっても対象ねじ部エコー強度を測定できるので、螺合されている部位を外すことなく評価することが可能である。このため、容易に、かつ短時間に対象ねじ部エコー強度を測定して評価することが可能である。このとき、超音波は、測定対象の螺合部材と外部、例えば空間や、隣接する他の部材との境界で反射するので、正確にねじ部の欠損状態を測定することが可能である。   According to the thread defect evaluation method of the present embodiment, the echo intensity used for the defect evaluation is measured by an echo that propagates through the screwing member and is reflected at the boundary with the outside in the thread part to be evaluated. Therefore, even a screw portion that is not exposed to the outside can be evaluated. That is, since the target screw portion echo intensity can be measured even in a screwed screw portion, it is possible to evaluate without removing the screwed portion. For this reason, it is possible to measure and evaluate the target screw portion echo intensity easily and in a short time. At this time, since the ultrasonic wave is reflected at the boundary between the threaded member to be measured and the outside, for example, a space or another adjacent member, it is possible to accurately measure the defect state of the threaded portion.

また、欠損度合いを互いに異ならせて形成した複数の模擬ねじ部の模擬ねじ部エコー強度と欠損度合いとを対応付けたマスターカーブと、対象ねじ部エコー強度と、に基づいてねじ部の欠損を評価するので、評価対象となるねじ部のエコー強度を測定するだけで、評価対象となるねじ部の欠損状態を容易に把握することが可能である。   Evaluate screw thread defects based on the master curve that correlates the simulated screw part echo intensity and defect degree of multiple simulated screw parts formed with different defect degrees, and the target screw part echo intensity. Therefore, it is possible to easily grasp the defect state of the screw portion to be evaluated only by measuring the echo intensity of the screw portion to be evaluated.

また、マスターカーブは、欠損度合いが互いに異なるねじ山の断面が各々直線状に連なるように形成された試験片のエコー強度を測定して得られた模擬ねじ部エコー強度なので、欠損度合いが互いに異なるねじ山を容易にかつより正確に形成することが可能である。すなわち、直線状に連なるねじ山でなる試験片のエコー強度を測定するので、湾曲したねじ山が欠損した状態を測定するより安定した数値が得られやすいため、より正確に測定することが可能である。   In addition, the master curve is a simulated screw part echo intensity obtained by measuring the echo intensity of the test piece formed so that the cross-sections of the threads having different defect degrees are connected in a straight line. It is possible to form the thread easily and more accurately. In other words, since the echo intensity of a test piece consisting of threads that are connected in a straight line is measured, a more stable value can be obtained more easily when measuring the state in which a curved thread is missing. is there.

また、サイズが互いに異なるねじ部は、欠損のない健全な状態でエコー強度を測定するので、サイズによるエコー強度の相違がより正確に現れる。このため、サイズの相違、すなわち曲率の相違によるエコー強度への影響をより明確に把握することが可能であり、より正確な補正係数を求めることが可能である。そして、より正確な補正係数により図5に示すグラフとねじ部の曲率とが対応づけられた、図7に示すマスターカーブを用いてねじ部の欠損が評価されるので、より正確な評価結果を得ることが可能である。   In addition, the screw portions having different sizes measure the echo intensity in a healthy state with no defect, so that the difference in echo intensity depending on the size appears more accurately. For this reason, it is possible to more clearly grasp the influence on the echo intensity due to the difference in size, that is, the difference in curvature, and it is possible to obtain a more accurate correction coefficient. Since the master curve shown in FIG. 7 in which the graph shown in FIG. 5 and the curvature of the screw portion are associated with each other by a more accurate correction coefficient is evaluated, a more accurate evaluation result is obtained. It is possible to obtain.

上記実施形態においては、評価対象となるねじ部を、孔の内周側に設けられ、表面側からは測定および確認がしにくい雌ねじとしたが、これに限るものではない。例えば、ボルト内を伝搬した超音波により雄ねじの表面にて反射した反射エコーの強度を測定して、雄ねじの欠損を評価しても構わない。また、上記実施形態においては、螺合している螺合部材を例に挙げて説明したが、必ずしも螺合していなくとも良い。   In the above embodiment, the screw portion to be evaluated is a female screw that is provided on the inner peripheral side of the hole and is difficult to measure and confirm from the surface side. However, the present invention is not limited to this. For example, the defect of the male screw may be evaluated by measuring the intensity of the reflected echo reflected from the surface of the male screw by the ultrasonic wave propagated in the bolt. Moreover, in the said embodiment, although it demonstrated taking the case of the screwing member currently screwed together, it does not necessarily need to screw.

上記実施形態は、本発明の理解を容易にするためのものであり、本発明を限定して解釈するためのものではない。本発明は、その趣旨を逸脱することなく、変更、改良され得ると共に、本発明にはその等価物が含まれることはいうまでもない。   The above embodiment is for facilitating the understanding of the present invention, and is not intended to limit the present invention. The present invention can be changed and improved without departing from the gist thereof, and it is needless to say that the present invention includes equivalents thereof.

1 植え込みボルト
2 本体(螺合部材)
2a 雌ねじ
2b 螺合孔
3 アレイ探触子


1 Stud Bolt 2 Body (Screw member)
2a Female thread 2b Screw hole 3 Array probe


Claims (4)

評価対象となるねじ部を備えた螺合部材内を伝搬し、当該螺合部材のねじ部の表面で反射した超音波によりエコー強度を測定した対象ねじ部エコー強度と、
欠損度合いが互いに異なる複数のねじ部を示すエコー強度と前記欠損度合いとが対応付けられたグラフが示すマスターカーブと、
に基づいてねじ部の欠損を評価するねじ部の欠損評価方法であって、
前記マスターカーブは、
欠損度合いが互いに異なる複数種類のねじ山の断面が各々直線状に連なるように形成された模擬ねじ部を測定した模擬ねじ部エコー強度と各々の前記模擬ねじ部の欠損度合いとを対応付けた模擬ねじグラフ、および、
互いにサイズが異なり欠損のない健全な前記ねじ部のエコー強度を測定した健全ねじ部エコー強度に基づいて求められ、前記模擬ねじグラフをねじ部の曲率に基づいて補正する補正係数、
に基づいて生成されることを特徴とするねじ部の欠損評価方法。
The target screw portion echo intensity, which is propagated through the screwing member provided with the screw portion to be evaluated, and the echo intensity is measured by the ultrasonic wave reflected from the surface of the screw portion of the screwing member,
A master curve indicated by a graph in which the echo intensity indicating a plurality of screw portions having different defect degrees and the defect degree are associated with each other,
A method for evaluating the defect of a screw part for evaluating the defect of the screw part based on
The master curve is
Simulation in which simulated screw part echo intensity measured for simulated screw parts formed such that cross sections of plural types of screw threads having different defect degrees are connected in a straight line are associated with the degree of defect of each simulated screw part Screw graph, and
A correction coefficient that is obtained based on the sound screw part echo intensity measured by measuring the echo intensity of the healthy screw part that is different from each other in size, and that corrects the simulated screw graph based on the curvature of the screw part,
A defect evaluation method for a threaded portion, which is generated based on the above .
前記エコー強度は、アレイ探触子を用いて測定することを特徴とする請求項1に記載のねじ部の欠損評価方法。 2. The thread defect evaluation method according to claim 1, wherein the echo intensity is measured using an array probe. 前記エコー強度は、測定対象となる前記ねじ部の、欠損のない健全な状態における表面と直交する方向から伝搬された前記超音波により測定されることを特徴とする請求項1又は2に記載のねじ部の欠損評価方法。 The echo intensity of the threaded portion to be measured, according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that it is measured by the ultrasonic wave propagated in a direction perpendicular to the surface in a healthy state without defect Defect evaluation method of screw part. 評価対象となる前記ねじ部は、雌ねじであることを特徴とする請求項1乃至のいずれかに記載のねじ部の欠損評価方法。 The thread part evaluation method according to any one of claims 1 to 3 , wherein the thread part to be evaluated is a female thread.
JP2014171769A 2014-08-26 2014-08-26 Evaluation method of thread defect Active JP6364280B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2014171769A JP6364280B2 (en) 2014-08-26 2014-08-26 Evaluation method of thread defect

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2014171769A JP6364280B2 (en) 2014-08-26 2014-08-26 Evaluation method of thread defect

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2016045169A JP2016045169A (en) 2016-04-04
JP6364280B2 true JP6364280B2 (en) 2018-07-25

Family

ID=55635852

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2014171769A Active JP6364280B2 (en) 2014-08-26 2014-08-26 Evaluation method of thread defect

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP6364280B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP7057196B2 (en) * 2018-04-10 2022-04-19 日立Geニュークリア・エナジー株式会社 Ultrasonic flaw detection method and equipment
CN118010847B (en) * 2024-04-08 2024-06-25 常州润来科技有限公司 Method and system for detecting defects of internal thread pipe blank

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH01269051A (en) * 1988-04-20 1989-10-26 Chubu Electric Power Co Inc Ultrasonic flow detector for connecting bolt
JPH09304355A (en) * 1996-05-14 1997-11-28 Sumitomo Light Metal Ind Ltd Ultrasonic flaw detector for thin metal plates
JP4215934B2 (en) * 2000-06-20 2009-01-28 三菱重工業株式会社 Ultrasonic flaw detector
JP2003344370A (en) * 2002-05-27 2003-12-03 Nuclear Fuel Ind Ltd Ultrasonic inspection method
JP3616620B2 (en) * 2002-08-14 2005-02-02 株式会社ニチゾウテック Anchor bolt corrosion diagnosis method and apparatus
JP2007132908A (en) * 2005-11-14 2007-05-31 Ishikawajima Harima Heavy Ind Co Ltd Inspection method of bolt screw part in use
JP6192973B2 (en) * 2013-04-16 2017-09-06 日立Geニュークリア・エナジー株式会社 Ultrasonic inspection method and ultrasonic inspection apparatus

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2016045169A (en) 2016-04-04

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
KR101104889B1 (en) Ultrasonic Calibration Specimen with Taper and Curvature
KR101478465B1 (en) Mechanized Ultrasonic Testing Method for Curved Pipe Welding Zone
KR101833467B1 (en) Method for detecting and characterizing defects in a heterogeneous material via ultrasound
Pavlović et al. Probability of detection as a function of multiple influencing parameters
CN106461615B (en) Simulation-Based Flaw Analysis Using Ultrasonics
CN108802181B (en) Defect detection method and device
JP6364280B2 (en) Evaluation method of thread defect
CN109765296B (en) Three-dimensional positioning method for ultrasonic detection of internal defects of thick-wall pipe
US10416123B2 (en) Flaw detection sensitivity adjustment method and abnormality diagnosis method for ultrasonic probe
CN118914366A (en) Nuclear power station main steam pipeline defect detection method and device, storage medium and electronic equipment
JP2014206518A (en) Ultrasonic inspection method, and ultrasonic inspection apparatus
RU2705765C2 (en) Instrumentation for calibration of ultrasonic testing device
JP5414559B2 (en) Ultrasonic inspection method
KR200406096Y1 (en) Calibration specimen for phased array ultrasonic nondestructive testing
JP5150302B2 (en) Ultrasonic inspection data evaluation apparatus and ultrasonic inspection data evaluation method
JP5750066B2 (en) Non-destructive inspection method using guided waves
CN105116057B (en) Small-bore pipe rolling defect ultrasonic probe and matching used test block
Yamamoto et al. Phased array ultrasonic inspection technique for cast austenitic stainless steel parts of nuclear power plants
CN115420762A (en) Method for evaluating capability of detecting internal micro defects of metal parts by industrial CT
RU2721162C1 (en) Stand for testing, calibration and calibration of in-line inspection instruments
JP2010151667A (en) Diagnosis device of tube body, and method therefor
JP2011047655A (en) Defect recognition method and defect recognition device using ultrasonic wave
JP6109061B2 (en) Inspection method for remaining life of welded parts of heat-resistant materials
JP2007322350A (en) Ultrasonic flaw detection apparatus and method
JPH0727751A (en) Standard test piece for nondestructive inspection of pipe

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20170601

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20180405

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20180417

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20180529

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20180612

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20180702

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 6364280

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250