JP6429810B2 - Train line selection device, operation plan creation system, operation management system, and train line selection method - Google Patents

Description

  The present invention relates to a train line selection device, an operation plan creation system, an operation management system, and a train line selection method for selecting a desired train line from a plurality of train lines displayed on a screen.

  The commander who manages the train operation selects the train stripe displayed on the screen with a pointing device such as a mouse or screen touch in the operation planning system or the operation management system, and changes the train schedule of the selected train stripe Perform operations such as. Conventionally, in an operation plan creation system or an operation management system, which train line is selected is determined based on the distance between the position of the pointer at the time of clicking or the touched position and the train line. A train streak becomes extremely congested on the screen when the ups and downs intersect, and when the diamonds are set at high density. Therefore, there is a problem that it is difficult for the commander to accurately select the desired train line. That is, in the operation plan creation system or the operation management system, a train line different from the train line desired by the commander may be selected.

  In order to select a desired train line, Patent Document 1 discloses a technique for specifying two train points that are different from each other on the screen and selecting a train line that intersects a line segment that connects the two specified points. Moreover, in Patent Document 2, a train that is selected every time a click is repeated at the same place, such as clicking on a certain point selects the nearest train streak and clicking again without moving selects the second closest train streak. A technique for switching between the two according to the distance is disclosed.

JP 2001-206225 A JP 2004-230959 A

  However, according to the above-described conventional technique, there is a problem in that it is highly likely that the commander operates a plurality of times in order to select a desired train line. In addition, when the commander selects a desired train line, there is a problem that an intuitive operation and a deviation occur.

  This invention is made | formed in view of the above, Comprising: It aims at obtaining the train stripe selection apparatus which can improve the probability of selecting a desired train stripe by one operation.

In order to solve the above-described problems and achieve the object, the train line selection device of the present invention includes an operation information acquisition unit that acquires information on a specified position specified on a screen on which a plurality of train lines are displayed. . In addition, the train line selection device includes a display train line storage unit that stores information on the train lines displayed on the screen. In addition, the train line selection device includes an operation history storage unit that stores past operation histories for a plurality of train lines. In addition, the train line selection device includes a selection unit that selects one train line based on the distance between the designated position and the plurality of train lines and the operation history . The selection unit evaluates each train line for the distance between the specified position and a plurality of train lines, obtains an evaluation value, evaluates the operation history for each train line, obtains an evaluation value, and evaluates each evaluation item. One train streak is selected on the basis of the total value obtained by adding up the two .

  According to the present invention, it is possible to improve the probability of selecting a desired train line by a single operation.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a configuration example of a train line selection device according to a first embodiment. The figure which shows the example of the train stripe memorize | stored in the display train stripe DB concerning Embodiment 1 The flowchart which shows the train stripe selection process of the train stripe selection apparatus concerning Embodiment 1. FIG. The figure which shows the position where the commander clicked the mouse | mouth in the train stripe selection apparatus concerning Embodiment 1. FIG. The flowchart which shows the evaluation process of each train streak which the selection part concerning Embodiment 1 performs. The figure which shows the evaluation value which is an evaluation result about the correlation with the train of the train number 2002 which operated the train line immediately before in the selection part concerning Embodiment 1, and each train. The figure which shows the evaluation value which is an evaluation result about the relationship of the distance of a click position and a train stripe in the selection part concerning Embodiment 1. FIG. The figure which shows the total value of the evaluation value which totaled the evaluation value about the train stripe of each train number in the selection part concerning Embodiment 1. FIG. The figure which shows the example of the train stripe displayed by the operation plan creation system or the operation management system containing the train stripe selection apparatus concerning Embodiment 1 The figure which shows the example in the case of comprising the selection part concerning Embodiment 1 with exclusive hardware. The figure which shows the example in the case of comprising the selection part concerning Embodiment 1 with CPU and memory. The flowchart which shows the evaluation process of each train streak which the selection part concerning Embodiment 2 performs. A block diagram showing a configuration example of an operation plan creation system according to the fourth embodiment. Block diagram showing a configuration example of an operation management system according to the fourth embodiment.

  Hereinafter, a train line selection device, an operation plan creation system, an operation management system, and a train line selection method according to an embodiment of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings. Note that the present invention is not limited to the embodiments.

Embodiment 1 FIG.
FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a configuration example of a train stripe selection device 10 according to the first exemplary embodiment of the present invention. The train line selection device 10 includes an operation information acquisition unit 1, a display train line database (hereinafter referred to as a display train line DB) 2, an operation history database (hereinafter referred to as an operation history DB) 3, and a selection unit 4. . The train line selection device 10 is a device used in an operation plan creation system or an operation management system. The configuration of the operation plan creation system and the operation management system including the train line selection device 10 will be described in a fourth embodiment to be described later.

  The operation information acquisition unit 1 is a designated position that is designated by a commander who operates a train by operating a pointing device such as a mouse on a display screen (not shown) connected to the operation plan creation system or the operation management system. The information on the designated position is output to the selection unit 4. A pointing device other than a mouse may be used. When the display is a touch panel, the operation information acquisition unit 1 takes in information on a designated position that is a position designated by a commander by a touch operation, and outputs the information on the designated position to the selection unit 4. In the following description, a case where a mouse is used as a pointing device and the commander clicks the mouse to select a train line will be described as an example. In addition, since the operation information acquisition part 1 is a structure required by an operation plan preparation system or an operation management system, you may share the operation information acquisition part 1 with an operation plan preparation system or an operation management system.

  The display train line DB 2 is a display train line storage unit that stores information on a plurality of train lines displayed on the screen of the display. The train line information stored in the displayed train line DB2 includes the train line where the train line is drawn, the train number for the train line, the trouble state of each train, the presence / absence of the return relationship of each train, Information. For train streaks, the operation plan creation system or the operation management system performs schedule information on each train's plan, prediction diagram information based on the results of running prediction for each train, actual schedule information based on actual operation information, station It is generated using the route information such as the position and the track structure. In addition, since the display train line DB2 is a configuration necessary for the operation plan creation system or the operation management system, the display train line DB2 may be shared with the operation plan creation system or the operation management system.

  FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating an example of train lines stored in the display train line DB 2 according to the first embodiment. The train line shown in FIG. 2 is a part of the entire train line stored in the displayed train line DB2, and ranges from 13:00 to 13:20 as a time zone, from A station to C station as a section. The part including the range between is shown. Here, train stripes for four trains with train numbers 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004 are displayed as express trains, and five train numbers 1001, 1003, 1004, 1005, and 1006 are stopped at each station. Train streaks are displayed.

  The operation history DB 3 is an operation history storage unit that stores information on train lines that have been operated by the commander in the past, specifically, information on train numbers corresponding to train lines that have been operated by the commander.

  When the commander clicks the mouse to select a train line on the screen of the display display, and the plurality of train lines are assumed as the train line desired by the commander, Each train line is evaluated, and the train line having the highest evaluation is selected as the train line desired by the commander. The selection unit 4 outputs information on the selected train line to the above-described operation plan creation system or operation management system. The operation plan creation system or the operation management system displays the selected train streak on the screen of the connected display display by highlighting so as to be different from other train streaks.

  Next, in the train line selection device 10, when a plurality of train lines are assumed as train lines desired by the instructor, a process for evaluating each train line and selecting a train line will be described.

  FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating a train stripe selection process of the train stripe selection apparatus 10 according to the first embodiment. First, in the train line selection device 10, the operation information acquisition unit 1 obtains mouse operation information by the commander, specifically, information on the click position that is the designated position where the commander clicked the mouse on the display screen. Obtain (step S1). FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating a position where the commander clicks the mouse in the train stripe selection device 10 according to the first exemplary embodiment. Each train streak is the same as that in FIG. 2, and the train streak is not yet selected. Here, it is assumed that the commander clicks at a position indicated by “x” in FIG.

  When the information on the click position shown in FIG. 4 is input from the operation information acquisition unit 1, the selection unit 4 is a threshold value that defines the distance between the click position and the train line as the train line desired by the commander from the click position. The train streak within is evaluated (step S2). The threshold may be set in the selection unit 4 by the train line overcrowded state. FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating the evaluation process of each train streak performed by the selection unit 4 according to the first embodiment.

  The selection unit 4 confirms the operation history DB 3 and evaluates the correlation between each train and the train corresponding to the train streak operated immediately before by the commander (step S11). Here, a case where the train line operated immediately before by the commander is the train number 2002 will be described as an example. The train with the train number 2003 has a “turnback” relationship in which the train with the train number 2002 is turned back at the station A. In addition, the train with the train number 1004 has a “passing” relationship overtaken at the station C with respect to the train with the train number 2002. In addition, the train with the train number 1003 has a relationship of “departure and arrival trouble” that departs before the arrival of the train number 2002 at the station A with respect to the train with the train number 2002. Here, the evaluation value of “turnback” is “4”, the evaluation value of “passing” is “2”, and the evaluation value of “departure / arrival trouble” is “3”. In this case, the correlation between the train with the train number 2002 and each train is as shown in FIG.

  FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating an evaluation value that is an evaluation result of the correlation between the train with the train number 2002 that has operated the train line immediately before in the selection unit 4 according to the first embodiment and each train. As described above, since the train with the train number 2003 has a “turnback” relationship with the train with the train number 2002, the evaluation value x1 as the evaluation result is “4”. Further, since the train with the train number 1004 is in a “passing” relationship with the train with the train number 2002, the evaluation value x1 is “2”. In addition, since the train with the train number 1003 is in a “departure / arrival trouble” relationship with the train with the train number 2002, the evaluation value x1 is “3”. In addition, although the selection part 4 demonstrated the method of calculating | requiring the evaluation value about the correlation with each train only for the train which operated the train line immediately before, you may make it object to a some train. The selection unit 4 obtains an evaluation value for the correlation with each train for two or more trains that have recently operated a train line, and obtains an evaluation value for each train of the same train number for which the evaluation value is obtained. The correlation may be determined by addition. In this case, in the selection unit 4, for example, the evaluation value obtained for the train that operated the train line just before is used as it is, and the evaluation value obtained for the train that operated the train line two times before is “0.8”. The evaluation value obtained for the train that operated the train line three times before is multiplied by a coefficient of “0.6”, and the weight of the evaluation value is changed by decreasing the weight of the old train that was operated. May be.

  Next, the selection unit 4 confirms the displayed train streak DB 2 based on the information on the click position input from the operation information acquisition unit 1, and evaluates the distance relationship between the click position and the surrounding train streak (step S12). ). The train line target evaluated by the selection unit 4 is, for example, a train line within a range defined from the click position. The selection part 4 calculates | requires the distance with the train stripe of each train number from a click position using the information memorize | stored in the information of a click position and display train stripe DB2. About distance, since the relative distance from a click position to the train stripe of each train number should just be known, there may not be units, such as millimeter. Here, the distance between the click position and the train line with the train number 2003 is “20”, the distance between the click position and the train line with the train number 2004 is “18”, and the distance between the click position and the train line with the train number 1003 is “21”, and the distance between the click position and the train line with the train number 1006 is “35”. As a result, the train line of the train number 2004, the train line of the train number 2003, the train line of the train number 1003, and the train line of the train number 1006 are closer to the click position. Here, evaluation values “4”, “3”, “2”, and “1” are given in the order closest to the click position. In this case, the relationship between the click position and the distance between each train streak is as shown in FIG.

  FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating an evaluation value that is an evaluation result of the relationship between the click position and the distance between train lines in the selection unit 4 according to the first embodiment. As described above, since the distance between the click position and the train line having the train number 2003 is the second closest, the evaluation value x2 that is the evaluation result is “3”. Further, since the distance between the click position and the train line having the train number 2004 is the first, the evaluation value x2 is “4”. In addition, since the distance between the click position and the train line having the train number 1003 is the third closest, the evaluation value x2 is “2”. Further, since the distance between the click position and the train line having the train number 1006 is the fourth closest, the evaluation value x2 is “1”. In addition, since the process of step S11 and step S12 is independent, you may change order and may process in parallel.

  The selection unit 4 adds up the evaluation values evaluated in the evaluation items in step S11 and step S12 for each train line to obtain a total value of the evaluation values (step S13). Here, the equation for obtaining the total value of the evaluation values is defined as the following equation (1).

    Total value of evaluation values = w1 × x1 + w2 × x2 (1)

  As described above, x1 and x2 are evaluation values for each evaluation item. w1 is a weighting coefficient for the evaluation value x1 of the evaluation item of the correlation with the train with the train number 2002 that operated the train line immediately before. Further, w2 is a weighting coefficient for the evaluation value x2 of the evaluation item of the distance relationship between the click position and the train stripe. When the evaluation value of any evaluation item is to be emphasized, the value of the weighting coefficient for the evaluation value to be emphasized is set larger than the weighting coefficient for the other evaluation values. Here, both w1 and w2 are set to “1”. In addition, in the selection part 4, it is good also considering the value which added the value of x1 and x2 as a total value of an evaluation value, without using w1 and w2.

  FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating the total value of the evaluation values obtained by adding the evaluation values for the train lines of each train number in the selection unit 4 according to the first embodiment. From the above-described equation (1) and each evaluation value, the total value of the evaluation values for the train line having the train number 2003 is “1 × 4 + 1 × 3 = 7”. Further, the total value of the evaluation values for the train line having the train number 1004 is “1 × 2 + 1 × 0 = 2”. The total value of the evaluation values for the train line with the train number 1003 is “1 × 3 + 1 × 2 = 5”. Further, the total value of the evaluation values for the train line having the train number 2004 is “1 × 0 + 1 × 4 = 4”. Further, the total value of the evaluation values for the train line having the train number 1006 is “1 × 0 + 1 × 1 = 1”.

Returning to the flowchart of FIG. 3, the selection unit 4 selects a train line desired by the commander based on the evaluation result for each train line, that is, the total value of the calculated evaluation values (step S <b> 3). Here, from the evaluation result of FIG. 8, the train line having the largest total evaluation value is that of the train number 2003. Therefore, the selection part 4 selects the train line of the train number 2003 with the largest total value of evaluation values as the train line desired by the commander. The selection part 4 outputs the information of the train line of the selected train number 2003 to the above-mentioned operation plan creation system or operation management system.

  In the operation plan creation system or the operation management system, the train line of the train number 2003 selected by the train line selection device 10 is highlighted. FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating an example of a train line displayed on an operation plan creation system or an operation management system including the train line selection device 10 according to the first embodiment. FIG. 4 shows a state where a train line is selected. When the position shown in FIG. 4 is clicked by the commander, the train stripe selection device 10 takes into account that the train line operated immediately before by the commander is that of the train number 2002, and the commander wants The train line with the train number 2003 is selected as the train line that is being used. In FIG. 9, unlike other train lines, the train line of the train number 2003 is highlighted.

  In the train line selection device 10, when the train line operated immediately before is the train number 2002, the train line to be selected and operated next has a high probability that the train line has a correlation with the train number 2002. It is expected to be. Therefore, when selecting a train stripe, the train stripe selection device 10 uses information on the train number corresponding to the train stripe operated immediately before, in addition to the information on the click position by the operation of the commander. Thereby, the train line selection device 10 uses the information on the train number corresponding to the train line operated immediately before, so that the information on one click position clicked by the commander on the display display on which the train line is displayed. Therefore, the probability of selecting the train line desired by the commander can be improved as compared with the conventional case.

  It continues and the hardware constitutions of the train stripe selection apparatus 10 are demonstrated. In the train line selection device 10, the display train line DB 2 and the operation history DB 3 are realized by a memory. The operation information acquisition unit 1 is realized by an interface circuit that acquires operation information from a pointing device such as a mouse. The selection unit 4 is realized by a processing circuit. That is, the train line selection device 10 includes a processing circuit for evaluating a plurality of train lines and selecting one train line from the evaluation result. The processing circuit may be dedicated hardware, or a CPU (Central Processing Unit) that executes a program stored in the memory and a memory.

  FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an example in which the selection unit 4 according to the first embodiment is configured with dedicated hardware. When the processing circuit is dedicated hardware, the processing circuit 91 illustrated in FIG. 10 includes, for example, a single circuit, a composite circuit, a programmed processor, a parallel programmed processor, an ASIC (Application Specific Integrated Circuit), and an FPGA (FPGA). Field Programmable Gate Array) or a combination of these. Each function of the selection unit 4 may be realized by the processing circuit 91 for each function, or each function may be realized by the processing circuit 91 collectively.

  FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating an example in which the selection unit 4 according to the first embodiment is configured by a CPU and a memory. When the processing circuit includes the CPU 92 and the memory 93, the function of the selection unit 4 is realized by software, firmware, or a combination of software and firmware. Software or firmware is described as a program and stored in the memory 93. In the processing circuit, each function is realized by the CPU 92 reading and executing the program stored in the memory 93. That is, when the selection unit 4 is executed by the processing circuit, the train line selection device 10 results in the step of evaluating a plurality of train lines and the step of selecting one train line from the evaluation result as a result. A memory 93 is provided for storing the program to be. It can also be said that these programs cause the computer to execute the procedure and method of the selection unit 4. Here, the CPU 92 may be a processing device, an arithmetic device, a microprocessor, a microcomputer, a processor, a DSP (Digital Signal Processor), or the like. The memory 93 is, for example, a nonvolatile or volatile semiconductor memory such as a RAM (Random Access Memory), a ROM (Read Only Memory), a flash memory, an EPROM (Erasable Programmable ROM), an EEPROM (Electrically EPROM), A magnetic disk, a flexible disk, an optical disk, a compact disk, a mini disk, a DVD (Digital Versatile Disc), or the like is applicable.

  In addition, about each function of the selection part 4, a part is implement | achieved by exclusive hardware and a part may be implement | achieved by software or firmware. For example, the function for evaluating a plurality of train lines is realized by the processing circuit 91 as dedicated hardware, and the function for selecting one train line from the evaluation result is a program stored in the memory 93 by the CPU 92. The function can be realized by reading out and executing.

  As described above, the processing circuit can realize the above-described functions by dedicated hardware, software, firmware, or a combination thereof.

  As described above, according to the present embodiment, in the train line selection device 10, the distance relationship between the click position designated by the commander and the plurality of train lines on the screen on which the plurality of train lines are displayed. In addition, the correlation between the train stripes operated immediately before by the commander and a plurality of train stripes is evaluated, and the commander desires a larger total sum of the evaluation values of each evaluation item. It was decided to select it as a train streak. Thereby, when the pointing device is operated once by the commander, the train line selection device 10 can improve the probability that the commander selects the train line desired by the commander.

Embodiment 2. FIG.
In Embodiment 1, the selection part 4 of the train stripe selection apparatus 10 selected the train stripe which a commander desires based on the evaluation result of two evaluation items. In the second embodiment, a process in which the selection unit 4 of the train line selection device 10 selects a train line desired by the instructor using other evaluation items will be described.

  The configuration of the train stripe selection device 10 according to the second embodiment is the same as the configuration of the first embodiment shown in FIG. In the first embodiment, the selection unit 4 uses two evaluation items of the correlation with the train corresponding to the train line that has been operated immediately before, and the distance relationship between the click position clicked by the commander and the train line. Each train streak was evaluated and a train streak was selected from the evaluation result. However, the evaluation items for evaluating train lines are not limited to these, and the following items can also be targeted.

  Evaluation item for constraint violation. When a commander selects a train line, it is highly likely that a train line having a train number with many violations of constraints will be selected at that time. The violation of the constraint is, for example, that the vehicle is too close to the preceding train due to a relationship with another train or the like, and that there is not enough time to pass another train. Therefore, the selection unit 4 performs an evaluation such as increasing the evaluation value as the train has more constraint violations, or increasing the evaluation value as the content of the constraint violation becomes more serious. About the information on constraint violation, the selection part 4 may acquire directly from an operation plan creation system or an operation management system, and may acquire via display train line DB2.

  Evaluation items for train occupancy rate. In the operation management system provided with the train line selection device 10, in the operation arrangement when a train delay occurs, the train line having a lower boarding rate is preferentially selected using the actual boarding rate of each train. Is expected to be corrected. Therefore, the selection part 4 enlarges the evaluation value of the train stripe of a train with a low boarding rate. In addition, in an operation plan creation system provided with the train stripe selection apparatus 10, the estimated boarding rate of the train corresponding to each train stripe is calculated | required. The selection part 4 enlarges the evaluation value of the train stripe of a train with a low estimated boarding rate. About the estimated boarding rate or the information on the boarding rate, the selection unit 4 may acquire directly from the operation plan creation system or the operation management system, or may acquire it via the display train line DB2.

  Evaluation items for disturbance of train schedules. When the commander selects a train line, it is highly likely that a train having a large delay at the present time or a train line having a train number of a train that is expected to have a large delay when a future travel is predicted. For this reason, the selection unit 4 increases the evaluation value as the train schedule is disturbed, that is, the train has a longer delay. About the information of disturbance of a train schedule, the selection part 4 may acquire directly from an operation plan creation system or an operation management system, and may acquire via display train line DB2.

  Evaluation items for train types. In general, train types include limited express trains, express trains, and each stop train that stops at each station. As described above, if a delay occurs due to disturbance of the train schedule, etc., it is assumed that the commander will take measures to eliminate the delay as soon as an excellent train such as an express train. Is expected to be selected. For this reason, the selection unit 4 increases the evaluation value for the honor train. In addition, since it may be considered that the evaluation value of which train type is increased depending on the railway company, the commander may be able to set an evaluation value for each train type with respect to the selection unit 4. About the train type of each train, since the relationship between the train number and the train type is determined at the time of creating a diagram, it may be stored in the display train line DB2.

  Here, the evaluation value for the constraint violation is x3, the weighting coefficient for x3 is w3, the evaluation value for the train boarding rate is x4, the weighting coefficient for x4 is w4, and the evaluation value for disturbance of the train diagram is x5, The weighting coefficient for x5 is w5, the evaluation value for the train type is x6, and the weighting coefficient for x6 is w6. The selection unit 4 can obtain the total value of the evaluation values from the equation (2) together with the two evaluation items of the first embodiment.

    Evaluation value total value = w1 × x1 + w2 × x2 + w3 × x3 + w4 × x4 + w5 × x5 + w6 × x6 (2)

  For the evaluation values x3, x4, x5, and x6, the selection unit 4 creates a table similar to that in FIGS. 6 and 7 and evaluates the evaluation value from the total value of the evaluation values obtained by adding the values obtained by multiplying the evaluation values by the weighting coefficients. The train line of the train number having the largest total value is selected as the train line desired by the commander. In addition, in the selection part 4, it is good also considering the value which added the value of x1 to x6 as a total value of an evaluation value, without using w1 to w6. The operation of the train stripe selection device 10 in the second embodiment is the same as the flowchart shown in FIG. 3 of the first embodiment. FIG. 12 is a flowchart illustrating the evaluation process of each train streak performed by the selection unit 4 according to the second embodiment. Steps S11 and S12 are the same as those in the first embodiment. The selection unit 4 confirms the displayed train line DB2 and evaluates the constraint violation of each train (step S21). Moreover, the selection part 4 evaluates about the boarding rate of each train using the information of the boarding rate of each train managed by the operation management system (step S22). Moreover, the selection part 4 evaluates the disturbance of the train schedule of each train (step S23). Moreover, the selection part 4 evaluates the train classification of each train (step S24). And the selection part 4 calculates | requires the total value of an evaluation value by adding the evaluation value evaluated by each evaluation item about each train streak similarly to Embodiment 1 (step S13). In the second embodiment, the selection unit 4 obtains the total value of the evaluation values using Expression (2).

  In addition, the selection part 4 does not need to use all the above-mentioned six evaluation items, and may evaluate each train streak using only some items. In this case, the weight coefficient of the evaluation value corresponding to the evaluation item that is not used may be set to “0”.

  As described above, according to the present embodiment, the train streak selection device 10 uses a plurality of evaluation items, and assigns a command having a large total value of the evaluation values obtained by summing up the evaluation values of the respective evaluation items. Was selected as the desired train line. Thereby, the train stripe selection device 10 can improve the probability of selecting the train stripe desired by the instructor by selecting and using several evaluation items as compared with the first embodiment. .

Embodiment 3 FIG.
In Embodiments 1 and 2, the train streak selection device 10 can improve the probability of selecting a train streak desired by the commander, but cannot select the train streak desired by the commander. Cases are also expected.

  If the commander cannot select the desired train stripe, the selection unit 4 of the train stripe selection device 10 does not change the clicked position, that is, the designated position when the commander uses the mouse as the pointing device. When the commander rotates the wheel of the mouse, or performs an operation such as clicking or right-clicking the wheel portion, the train line having the next highest train number may be selected. Further, in the selection unit 4 of the train stripe selection device 10, the commander rotates the wheel of the mouse, or clicks the wheel part or performs an operation such as right-clicking without changing the clicked position, that is, the designated position. Alternatively, the train stripes may be switched and selected in descending order of the total evaluation value.

  In addition, when the commander cannot select a desired train line, the selection unit 4 of the train line selection device 10 can change the clicked position, that is, the designated position when the commander uses the mouse as a pointing device. If the commander rotates the mouse wheel or clicks or right-clicks the wheel, the weighting coefficient for the evaluation value of each evaluation item is changed and the total value of the evaluation values is recalculated. May be.

  Thereby, in the selection part 4 of the train stripe selection apparatus 10, the situation which cannot select the train stripe which a commander desires forever can be avoided.

Embodiment 4 FIG.
As described above, the train line selection device 10 according to the first to third embodiments is actually used by being incorporated in an operation plan creation system or an operation management system. Here, an example of a specific configuration of the operation plan creation system and the operation management system will be described.

  FIG. 13 is a block diagram of a configuration example of the operation plan creation system 20 according to the fourth embodiment. The operation plan creation system 20 includes a train line selection device 10, an operation information acquisition unit 21, an operation processing unit 22, a generation diagram database (hereinafter referred to as generation diagram DB) 23, a route database (hereinafter referred to as route DB). 24), a train line generation unit 25, a display train line database (hereinafter referred to as a display route line DB) 26, and a display processing unit 27. The operation plan creation system 20 is connected to a pointing device 30, a keyboard 40, and a display display 50.

  The train stripe selection device 10 is the same as the train stripe selection device 10 described in the first to third embodiments. However, as described above, since the operation information acquisition unit 1 and the display train line DB 2 of the train line selection device 10 may be shared with the operation plan creation system 20, the operation information acquisition unit 21 and When there is the display train line DB 26, the operation information acquisition unit 1 and the display train line DB 2 on the train line selection device 10 side may be omitted.

  The operation information acquisition unit 21 acquires information input by the commander operating the pointing device 30 such as a mouse and the keyboard 40 on the display 50 and outputs the information to the train stripe selection device 10 and the operation processing unit 22. As the pointing device 30, a device other than a mouse may be used. When the display 50 is a touch panel, the operation information acquisition unit 21 acquires information input by the commander through a touch operation, and outputs the information to the train stripe selection device 10 and the operation processing unit 22. In the following description, a case where a mouse is used as the pointing device 30 will be described as an example.

  The operation processing unit 22 receives a commander's operation on the train line selected by the train line selection device 10 and performs a change process such as a change of a train diagram, a GUI (Graphical User Interface) process, and the like.

  The generation diagram DB 23 is a storage unit that stores train diagram information about train lines generated or changed by the operation of the commander in the operation processing unit 22. The generation diagram DB 23 also stores the train diagrams in the editing process when the commander generates or changes train diagrams for a plurality of train lines.

  The route DB 24 is a storage unit that stores information such as position information of a station on a route on which the train travels, overtaking presence / absence, or a signal arrangement line structure.

  The train line generation unit 25 obtains the information of the train line by calculation using the information of the train diagram stored in the generation diagram DB 23 and the information such as the station and the track structure stored in the route DB 24. The train stripe information obtained by the train stripe generation unit 25 by calculation is, for example, a train stripe as shown in FIG. When the train streak generating unit 25 generates a train streak as shown in FIG. 2, the train streak generating unit 25 performs trouble determination and travel prediction for each train.

  The display train line DB 26 is a display train line storage unit that stores information on the train lines generated by the train line generation unit 25. The display train line DB 26 stores results such as trouble determination and travel prediction in the train line generation unit 25.

  The display processing unit 27 performs display processing for displaying the train lines stored in the display train line DB 26 on the screen of the display display 50 as shown in FIG. In addition, the display processing unit 27 performs display processing for highlighting the train stripe selected in the train stripe selection device 10.

  In the operation plan creation system 20, the train line selection device 10 is used when the trainer selects a train line to be created or edited when creating an operation plan.

  FIG. 14 is a block diagram of a configuration example of the operation management system 60 according to the fourth embodiment. The operation management system 60 includes a train line selection device 10, an operation information acquisition unit 21, an operation processing unit 22, a change diagram database (hereinafter referred to as a change diagram DB) 61, a change content output unit 62, and operation information. Receiving unit 63, track record database (hereinafter referred to as track diagram DB) 64, implementation diagram database (hereinafter referred to as track diagram DB) 65, route DB 24, train line generation unit 66, and display train line DB 26 And a display processing unit 27. The operation management system 60 is connected to the pointing device 30, the keyboard 40, and the display display 50.

  The change diagram DB 61 is a storage unit that stores information of a change diagram for a train line that has been changed by the operation of the commander in the operation processing unit 22.

  The change content output unit 62 notifies the related department of information on the change content such as the train schedule after the change stored in the change diagram DB 61.

  The operation information receiving unit 63 receives actual operation information from each train. The actual operation information is different from the planned schedule when the train is operated in a delayed state.

  The record diagram DB 64 is a storage unit that stores record diagram information based on the actual operation information of each train received by the operation information receiving unit 63.

  The implementation diagram DB 65 is a storage unit that stores information on implementation schedules for each train generated in advance.

  The train line generation unit 66 is stored in the change diagram DB 61, the information of the changed schedule stored in the change diagram DB 61, the information of the actual schedule based on the actual operation information of each train stored in the result diamond DB 64, and the execution diagram DB 65. Train streak information is obtained by calculation using the schedule information on the schedule of each train and the station and track structure information stored in the route DB 24. Moreover, when the train streak generation part 66 produces | generates a train streak as shown in FIG. 2, it performs trouble determination about each train, traveling prediction, etc.

  The display train line DB 26 is a display train line storage unit that stores information on the train lines generated by the train line generation unit 66. The display train line DB 26 stores results such as trouble determination and travel prediction in the train line generation unit 66.

  In the operation management system 60, the train line selection device 10 is used when the trainer selects a target train line when changing the schedule of each train.

  As described above, the train line selection device 10 is specifically a device used when the commander selects a target train line in the operation plan creation system 20 or the operation management system 60. As a result, in the operation plan creation system 20 and the operation management system 60 provided with the train line selection device 10, the instruction person is determined from the information of the single click position where the instruction person clicks on the display 50 on which the train line is displayed. The probability of selecting a desired train line can be improved as compared with the conventional case.

  The configuration described in the above embodiment shows an example of the contents of the present invention, and can be combined with another known technique, and can be combined with other configurations without departing from the gist of the present invention. It is also possible to omit or change the part.

  1,21 operation information acquisition unit, 2,26 display train line DB, 3 operation history DB, 4 selection unit, 10 train line selection device, 20 operation plan creation system, 22 operation processing unit, 23 generation diagram DB, 24 route DB , 25, 66 Train line generation unit, 27 display processing unit, 30 pointing device, 40 keyboard, 50 display display, 60 operation management system, 61 change diagram DB, 62 change content output unit, 63 operation information reception unit, 64 results diagram DB, 65 Implementation diamond DB.

Claims (18)

An operation information acquisition unit for acquiring information of a specified position specified on a screen on which a plurality of train lines are displayed;
A display train streak storage unit for storing information of train streaks displayed on the screen;
An operation history storage unit for storing past operation histories for the plurality of train lines;
A selection unit that selects one train line based on the distance between the designated position and the plurality of train lines, and the operation history;
Equipped with a,
The selection unit evaluates the distance between the designated position and the plurality of train lines for each train line to obtain an evaluation value, evaluates the operation history for each train line, obtains an evaluation value, and evaluates each evaluation value. Select one train streak based on the total sum of the evaluation values of the items.
A train streak selection device characterized by that. The selection unit further evaluates the constraint violation for each train line to obtain an evaluation value, and selects one train line based on the total value obtained by adding the evaluation values of each evaluation item.
The train streak selection device according to claim 1 , wherein: The selection unit further evaluates the boarding rate of the corresponding train for each train line, obtains an evaluation value, and selects one train line based on the total value obtained by adding the evaluation values of the evaluation items.
The train streak selection device according to claim 1 or 2 , wherein The selection unit further evaluates the degree of turbulence of the corresponding train diagram for each train line, obtains an evaluation value, and selects one train line based on the total value obtained by adding the evaluation values of each evaluation item To
The train streak selection device according to any one of claims 1 to 3 , wherein The selection unit further evaluates the train type of the corresponding train for each train line to obtain an evaluation value, and selects one train line based on a total value obtained by adding the evaluation values of the evaluation items.
The train streak selecting device according to any one of claims 1 to 4 , wherein the train streak selecting device is provided. The selection unit selects one train line based on a total value obtained by adding a value obtained by multiplying an evaluation value of each evaluation item by a weighting coefficient defined for each evaluation item.
The train streak selection device according to any one of claims 1 to 5 , wherein The selection unit changes the weighting coefficient when a new operation is received at the same position as the specified position specified in the operation information acquisition unit.
The train streak selection device according to claim 6 . When a new operation is received at the same position as the specified position specified in the operation information acquisition unit, the selection unit selects a train streak having a large total value, and then selects the total value. Choose a large train streak,
The train streak selection device according to any one of claims 1 to 6 , wherein An operation plan creation system comprising the train line selection device according to any one of claims 1 to 8 . An operation management system comprising the train line selection device according to any one of claims 1 to 8 . A train stripe selection method in a train stripe selection device,
An operation information acquisition step in which an operation information acquisition unit acquires information on a specified position specified on a screen on which a plurality of train lines are displayed;
The selection unit evaluates for each train line about the distance between the designated position and the plurality of train lines, obtains an evaluation value, evaluates the operation history for each train line, obtains an evaluation value, An evaluation step for obtaining a total value obtained by adding the evaluation values;
A selection step in which the selection unit selects one train line based on the total value;
A train streak selection method comprising: In the evaluation step, the selection unit further evaluates the constraint violation for each train streak to obtain an evaluation value, and obtains a total value obtained by adding the evaluation values of the respective evaluation items,
In the selection step, the selection unit selects one train line based on the total value.
Train line selection method of claim 1 1, wherein the. In the evaluation step, the selection unit further evaluates the boarding rate of the corresponding train for each train line to obtain an evaluation value, and obtains a total value obtained by adding the evaluation values of the respective evaluation items,
In the selection step, the selection unit selects one train line based on the total value.
Train line selection method according to claim 1 1 or 1 2, characterized in that. In the evaluation step, the selection unit further evaluates the degree of disturbance of the corresponding train diagram for each train line to obtain an evaluation value, and obtains a total value obtained by adding the evaluation values of the respective evaluation items,
In the selection step, the selection unit selects one train line based on the total value.
Train line selection method according to any one of claims 1 1 to 1 3, characterized in that. In the evaluation step, the selection unit further evaluates the train type of the corresponding train for each train line to obtain an evaluation value, and obtains a total value obtained by adding the evaluation values of the respective evaluation items,
In the selection step, the selection unit selects one train line based on the total value.
Train line selection method according to any one of claims 1 1 to 1 4, characterized in that. In the evaluation step, the selection unit obtains a total value obtained by adding a value obtained by multiplying an evaluation value of each evaluation item by a weighting coefficient defined for each evaluation item,
In the selection step, the selection unit selects one train line based on the total value.
The train stripe selection method according to any one of claims 11 to 15 , wherein the train stripe selection method is provided. In the evaluation step, when the selection unit receives a new operation at the same position as the specified position specified in the operation information acquisition step, the weighting coefficient is changed.
The train stripe selection method according to claim 16 , wherein: In the selection step, when a new operation is received at the same position as the specified position specified in the operation information acquisition step, the selection unit has selected a train line having a large total value, Next, select a train streak with a large total value.
The train streak selection method according to any one of claims 11 to 16 , characterized by:

Images