JP6448407B2 - Reliability calculation program, system, method, and apparatus - Google Patents

Description

  The disclosed technology relates to a reliability calculation program, a reliability calculation system, a reliability calculation method, and a reliability calculation apparatus.

  2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, there is an apparatus that supports revision work for keeping a check list up-to-date and optimal in response to revisions to laws and regulations.

  In addition, there is an apparatus capable of processing fine scene correction during scene playback in consideration of the situation outside the client when browsing a scenario structured document.

  In addition, there is a document search method in which an appropriate priority corresponding to the usefulness is set for a document to be searched, and a useful document can be easily confirmed.

  For the electronic program guide, there is a method of setting the priority of content according to the display frequency.

JP 2005-284889 A JP 2003-114896 A JP 2004-171535 A Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 10-506248

  In one aspect, the disclosed technique aims to present a change plan with high reliability in a distinguishable manner.

  As one aspect, the disclosed technology calculates the reliability for each of the explanation information change proposals related to the input screen, which has been changed by the changer in accordance with the change in the agreement. The reliability is based on a score determined based on the changer information of the changer and a coefficient predetermined for the combination of the changer attribute and the input screen corresponding to the change location of the change plan. ,calculate. Then, each change proposal is presented using the reliability calculated for each change proposal.

  As one aspect, there is an effect that a change plan with high reliability can be presented in a distinguishable manner.

It is the schematic which shows the system configuration | structure containing the reliability calculation apparatus which concerns on 1st Embodiment. It is a functional block diagram of the reliability calculation apparatus which concerns on 1st Embodiment. It is a figure which shows an example of a coefficient information list. It is a figure which shows an example of a clinical trial information list. It is a figure which shows an example of the operation history information list. It is a figure which shows an example of a personal attribute information list. It is a figure showing an example of a law screen information list. It is a figure which shows an example of the mapping of a law and a screen. It is a figure which shows an example of the law revision information list. It is a figure which shows an example of a correction request information list. It is a figure which shows an example of a manual information list. It is a figure which shows an example of a manual revision information list. It is a figure which shows an example of a manual screen information list. It is a figure which shows an example of the display which rearranged the correction request information. It is a figure which shows an example which transmits request confirmation information. It is a figure which shows an example in which the correction request information is selected. It is a block diagram which shows schematic structure of the computer which functions as a reliability calculation apparatus which concerns on 1st Embodiment. It is a flowchart which shows an example of the calculation process which concerns on 1st Embodiment. It is a flowchart which shows an example of a rearrangement process. It is a flowchart which shows an example of a reflection process. It is a figure which shows a specific example. It is a figure which shows a specific example. It is a figure which shows a specific example. It is a figure which shows the information of the changer used in a specific example. It is a figure which shows the coefficient used by a specific example. It is the schematic which shows the system configuration | structure containing the reliability calculation apparatus which concerns on 2nd Embodiment. It is a functional block diagram of the reliability calculation apparatus which concerns on 2nd Embodiment. It is a figure which shows an example of a confirmation information list. It is a figure which shows an example of confirmation operation of a manual. It is a figure which shows an example of a structure change information list. It is a figure which shows an example which changed the structure information of the help button. It is a figure which shows an example which changed the structure information of the help button. It is a block diagram which shows schematic structure of the computer which functions as a reliability calculation apparatus which concerns on 2nd Embodiment. It is a flowchart which shows an example of a law revision process. It is a flowchart which shows an example of a structure process. It is a flowchart which shows an example of a structure process. It is the schematic which shows the system configuration | structure containing the reliability calculation apparatus which concerns on 3rd Embodiment. It is a functional block diagram of the reliability calculation apparatus which concerns on 3rd Embodiment. It is a block diagram which shows schematic structure of the computer which functions as a reliability calculation apparatus which concerns on 3rd Embodiment. It is a flowchart which shows an example of the calculation process which concerns on 3rd Embodiment.

  Hereinafter, embodiments according to the disclosed technology will be described.

  First, before describing the details of the embodiment, the background of the system provided by the present embodiment will be described.

  When the original manual for using the system is managed in the system, when the manual is revised, the user of the system modifies the manual on the system screen for each individual and reflects it in the original manual. It is possible to do.

  Here, when multiple people make different corrections for the same part of the manual, the administrator (person in charge) of the manual, for example, confirms each correction and reflects any correction in the original. It will be judged.

  However, the operation of determining which correction contents are reflected is complicated, and the determination criteria may be left to the administrator (person in charge), and there are cases where an appropriate determination cannot be made.

  In the field of clinical trials and clinical trials, it is necessary to observe ministerial ordinances based on the Pharmaceutical Affairs Law. For example, GCP (Good Clinical Practice) that defines the clinical practice standards, GMP (Good Laboratory Practice) that defines non-clinical clinical practice standards, and GMP (Good Manufacturing Practice) that defines quality management standards such as pharmaceuticals. In the following, these ministerial ordinances are expressed as “GxP”.

  Laws (GxP, etc.) related to clinical trials, clinical trials, etc. comply with the above-mentioned laws, such as GxP, even when conducting clinical trials and clinical trials using the system because the laws and regulations are related to human life and hygiene. There is a need to. For this reason, there is a high possibility that manual revision of the system will be performed after the revision of the law. However, there is no mechanism that prompts the user to revise the manual or check the revised manual after the law is revised.

  Hereinafter, this embodiment will be described in detail with reference to the drawings. In each of the following embodiments, a case where the reliability calculation device of the disclosed technology is applied to a clinical trial system will be described. The clinical trial system has a plurality of screens, and each screen corresponds to a manual complying with laws and regulations, and the user of the system can modify the manual.

  In the first embodiment, the reliability calculation device includes a function for rearranging a plurality of corrections to the manual and a function for reflecting the selected correction among the rearranged corrections displayed in the original manual. The case will be described.

  Note that the corrector of the first embodiment is an example of a changer in the disclosed technology. Moreover, the correction location of 1st Embodiment is an example of the change location in the technique of an indication. The law of the first embodiment is an example of an agreement in the disclosed technology. The manual of the first embodiment is an example of explanatory information in the disclosed technology. Further, the corresponding screen of the first embodiment is an example of an input screen in the disclosed technology. The determination point of the first embodiment is an example of reliability in the disclosed technology. The correction of the first embodiment is an example of a change in the disclosed technology. Further, the personal attribute information and the number of uses in the first embodiment are examples of changer information in the disclosed technology. Further, the personal attribute information of the first embodiment is an example of the attribute of the changer in the disclosed technique. Moreover, the personal point of 1st Embodiment is an example of the score corresponding to the attribute of the changer in the technique of an indication. In addition, the usage points of the first embodiment are an example of scores corresponding to the usage frequency of the input screen corresponding to the change location of the changer in the disclosed technique. In addition, the clinical trial point of the first embodiment is an example of a score based on information on a trial of a changer in the disclosed technology. The legal points of the first embodiment are an example of points based on the progress information from the change of the agreement. Further, the content of the correction included in the correction request information of the first embodiment is an example of a proposed change in the disclosed technology. The period of the first embodiment is an example of progress information in the disclosed technology.

  FIG. 1 is an example of a reliability calculation system 5 according to the first embodiment. As shown in FIG. 1, the reliability calculation system 5 includes a reliability calculation device 1 and a user terminal 3 for a user. The reliability calculation apparatus 1 according to the first embodiment is connected to a user terminal 3 so as to be able to communicate with each other via a network 2 such as the Internet. 1 illustrates one case of the user terminal 3. However, the number of user terminals 3 is not limited to the illustrated example, and the reliability calculation system 5 includes an arbitrary number of user terminals 3. be able to. The user terminal 3 is an information processing device such as a personal computer, for example, and is used by a trial system user, a manual changer, and a manual administrator.

  FIG. 2 shows a functional block diagram of the reliability calculation apparatus 1 according to the first embodiment. As shown in FIG. 2, the reliability calculation apparatus 1 includes a coefficient information storage unit 32, a clinical trial information storage unit 34, an operation history information storage unit 36, a personal attribute information storage unit 38, a legal screen information storage unit 40, and a legal revision. The storage unit 30 includes the information storage unit 42. The storage unit 30 further includes a correction request information storage unit 46, a manual information storage unit 48, a manual revision information storage unit 49, and a manual screen information storage unit 50. In addition, the reliability calculation device 1 includes a calculation unit 60 including a clinical trial point calculation unit 62, a use point calculation unit 64, a personal point calculation unit 66, a law / legal point calculation unit 68, and a determination point calculation unit 70. In addition, the reliability calculation device 1 includes a registration unit 72. In addition, the reliability calculation device 1 includes an approval unit 80 including a rearrangement unit 82, a selection unit 84, and a reflection unit 86.

  In the coefficient information storage unit 32, for example, a coefficient information list 100 as shown in FIG. 3 is stored. The coefficient information list 100 in the example of FIG. 3 stores coefficient groups, item groups, items, corresponding screens, and coefficient combinations as coefficient information. Here, the coefficient group represents the type of the coefficient information. In the first embodiment, “type” is information indicating whether a coefficient included in coefficient information is used when each point is calculated by the calculation unit 60 described later. Here, “type” includes, as will be described later, the clinical trial size used when calculating the clinical trial points, the usage frequency used when calculating the usage points, the personal attributes used when calculating the personal points, and laws and regulations. Includes legal changes used in calculating points.

  The “item group” represents the type of item corresponding to the coefficient information. In the first embodiment, “item type” indicates what item of the corrector the coefficient information including the coefficient used when calculating each point by the calculation unit 60 described later is determined. Information. Here, “type of item” includes coefficient information, the type of job determined by the job type of the corrector, the length of service determined by the length of service of the corrector, the number of cases determined by the sum of the number of cases of the corrector, and laws and regulations. The period determined by the period after the change is included.

  The item represents specific contents of the “item group” of the coefficient information. The corresponding screen represents a screen to which the coefficient included in the coefficient information is applied. In the first embodiment, the “screen to be applied” corresponds to the screen corresponding to the manual corrected by the corrector in the coefficient information including the coefficient used when the calculation unit 60 described later calculates each point. It is information indicating that it is used for. The coefficient represents the value of the coefficient corresponding to the coefficient information. The coefficient is determined in advance such that the higher the relationship between the “corresponding screen” and the “item” in the coefficient information including the coefficient, the higher the determination point calculated by the calculation unit 60 described later. .

  In the coefficient information list 100 in the example of FIG. 3, the case where there are two corresponding screens for one coefficient information is described, but one or more corresponding screens may be set. In the corresponding screen field, the entire screen may be set to correspond to all screens. Further, the information stored in each column of the coefficient information included in the coefficient information list 100 is hereinafter referred to as “name of each column”. For example, when the information stored in the column of the coefficient information item to be included in the coefficient information list 100 is a doctor, and represents the information of the doctor, it is represented as “item” of the target coefficient information. . Further, when the information stored in the coefficient group column of the coefficient information is the usage frequency, when the information of the usage frequency is expressed, it is described as “coefficient group” of the target coefficient information. Furthermore, each coefficient unit included in the coefficient information list 100 is acquired by each function unit by acquiring each coefficient information list 100 by each function unit described later. The same applies to other lists described later.

  In the clinical trial information storage unit 34, for example, a clinical trial information list 102 as shown in FIG. 4 is stored. In the clinical trial information list 102 in the example of FIG. 4, each time a clinical trial is performed, a combination of the clinical trial number, the person in charge, the number of cases, and the implementation date is stored as clinical trial information via the registration unit 72. .

  In the operation history information storage unit 36, for example, an operation history information list 104 as shown in FIG. 5 is stored. The operation history information list 104 in the example of FIG. 5 stores a combination of operation date, operator, operation screen, and operation content as operation history information. By using the operation history information list 104, the reliability calculation device 1 can grasp the number of operations on a specific screen of a specific user. It is assumed that the operation history information is stored in the operation history information list 104 via the registration unit 72 for each operation of the system targeted by the user.

  For example, a personal attribute information list 106 as shown in FIG. 6 is stored in the personal attribute information storage unit 38. In the personal attribute information list 106 in the example of FIG. 6, a combination of name, job title, qualification, date of entry, and number of updates is stored as personal attribute information. Here, in the qualification column of the personal attribute information list 106 shown in FIG. 6, the number in parentheses added after the qualification name represents the point of the qualification used when calculating the personal points described later. It shall be. Further, the “update count” of the personal attribute information list 106 shown in FIG. 6 represents the number of times that the administrator reflects correction request information in which the “name” of the personal attribute information is a corrector, as will be described in detail later. The “update count” of the personal attribute information list 106 is not limited to the determination based on the “name” of the personal attribute information, but a specific individual is identified as a corrector based on information that can identify other individuals. The number of times that the modification request information is reflected by the administrator may be set as the “update count”.

  The legal screen information storage unit 40 stores a legal screen information list 108 as shown in FIG. The law screen information list 108 in the example of FIG. 7 stores a law and a combination of corresponding screens as law screen information for each provision of law. Here, the law screen information is information representing the mapping between the law and the corresponding screen. For example, as shown in FIG. 8, when the “XX screen” corresponds to “Chapter 5 □□”, the “Legal” of the legal screen information is “Chapter 5 □” and the “Supported screen” is “ XX screen ".

  The law revision information storage unit 42 stores a law revision information list 110 as shown in FIG. 9, for example. In the law revision information list 110 in the example of FIG. 9, for each law revision information, a combination of version number, revision location, and revision date is stored as law revision information.

  In the correction request information storage unit 46, for example, a correction request information list 112 as shown in FIG. 10 is stored. In the correction request information list 112 in the example of FIG. 10, a combination of a manual, a flag, a correction date, a corrector, contents, and a determination point is stored as correction request information for each correction request information. Here, the “manual” of the correction request information represents a correction portion to be corrected. Further, the “flag” of the correction request information represents the state of the correction request information. When the “flag” of the correction request information has been approved, this indicates that the correction request information has been reflected in the manual by the administrator. Further, when the “flag” of the correction request information has been confirmed, this indicates that the correction request information has been confirmed by the administrator but has not been reflected in the manual. Further, when the correction request information flag is “unconfirmed”, it indicates that the correction request information has not yet been confirmed by the administrator. Note that the initial setting of the “flag” is an unconfirmed flag. The “determination point” of the correction request information represents a determination point indicating the reliability of the correction request information calculated by the calculation unit 60 described later. In the first embodiment, the correction request information list 112 is stored in the correction request information storage unit 46 as a separate correction request information list 112 for each chapter by item in the manual. In the first embodiment, it is assumed that the manual is composed of chapter-specific units, and the manual is handled by chapter-specific units. In the following, the location of the unit by chapter of the manual is referred to as the manual location.

  In the manual information storage unit 48, for example, a manual information list 114 as shown in FIG. 11 is stored. In the manual information list 114 in the example of FIG. 11, a manual and a combination of contents are stored as manual information. Here, the “manual” of the manual information represents the target manual location. “Content” represents the content of the target manual location. In the first embodiment, the manual information list 114 is stored in the manual information storage unit 48 as a separate manual information list 114 for each chapter unit of the manual.

  For example, a manual revision information list 116 as shown in FIG. 12 is stored in the manual revision information storage unit 49. In the manual revision information list 116 in the example of FIG. 12, for each manual revision, a combination of version number, revision location, and revision date is stored as manual revision information. The manual revision information is stored in the manual revision information list 116 via the registration unit 72 every time the manual is revised.

  In the manual screen information storage unit 50, for example, a manual screen information list 118 as shown in FIG. 13 is stored. In the manual screen information list 118 in the example of FIG. 13, a combination of a manual and a corresponding screen is stored as manual screen information for each manual screen information. Here, the manual screen information is information indicating mapping between “manual” and “corresponding screen”. For example, when the manual chapter 1 item 1 and the adverse event input screen correspond to each other, the manual screen information manual becomes chapter 1 item 1 and the corresponding screen becomes the adverse event input screen. Note that “Manual” in the manual screen information represents a target manual location.

  The calculation unit 60 calculates a determination point of the correction information based on the correction information received from the user terminal 3 and various information stored in the storage unit 30. The calculation unit 60 also corrects correction request information that combines the correction information and the calculated determination point, and the correction request corresponding to the information of the correction part included in the correction information stored in the correction request information storage unit 46. Store in the information list 112. In the first embodiment, the correction information received from the user terminal 3 includes, for example, each of a correction part (manual part to be corrected), a correction date, a corrector (name of the corrector), and contents. Information shall be included.

  The clinical trial point calculation unit 62 calculates clinical trial points based on the correction information received from the user terminal 3, the coefficient information list 100, the clinical trial information list 102, and the manual screen information list 118. Here, the clinical trial point is a point calculated based on, for example, the number of clinical trial cases handled by the corrector. Specifically, the clinical trial point calculation unit 62 has a manual screen in which the information on the correction part included in the correction information received from the user terminal 3 matches the “manual” of the manual screen information included in the manual screen information list 118. Get information. Next, the clinical trial point calculation unit 62 acquires the “corresponding screen” of the acquired manual screen information as a corresponding screen corresponding to the correction information. In addition, the trial point calculation unit 62 acquires each of the trial information in which the information of the corrector included in the correction information matches the “person in charge” of the clinical trial information included in the clinical trial information list 102. Next, the clinical trial point calculation unit 62 acquires the total sum of the “number of cases” of each of the acquired clinical trial information.

  Further, the clinical trial point calculation unit 62 calculates each coefficient information from the coefficient information included in the coefficient information list 100 such that the “coefficient group” of the coefficient information is the clinical trial scale and the “item group” is the number of cases. To get. Next, the clinical trial point calculation unit 62, among each of the acquired coefficient information, the “corresponding screen” of the coefficient information matches the corresponding screen corresponding to the acquired correction information, and the number of cases acquired by “item” The coefficient information corresponding to the sum of the values is obtained as the coefficient information of the trial points. Next, the clinical trial point calculation unit 62 calculates the product of the value of “coefficient” in the coefficient information of the acquired clinical trial point and a predetermined value (for example, 1) as the clinical trial point. The trial point calculation unit 62 may use the value of the coefficient information of the obtained trial point coefficient as the trial point.

  The usage point calculation unit 64 is included in the coefficient information list 100, the operation history information list 104, the corresponding screen corresponding to the acquired correction information, the personal attribute information list 106, and the correction information received from the user terminal 3. Usage points are calculated based on the information of the corrector. Here, the usage points are points calculated based on, for example, the operation frequency of the screen that is the target of the corrector, the number of times the manual has been revised, and the like. Specifically, first, the use point calculation unit 64 includes the operation history information of the operation history information included in the operation history information list 104, in which the “operation screen” matches the corresponding screen corresponding to the acquired correction information. Get each one. Next, the usage point calculation unit 64 operates the operation history information for which the “operator” of the acquired operation history information matches the operation history information that matches the information of the corrector included in the acquired correction information. Get as. Next, the use point calculation unit 64 acquires the number of operation history information to be acquired as the number of times of use. Further, the use point calculation unit 64 selects the “job title” of the personal attribute information whose “name” matches the information of the corrector included in the acquired correction information among the personal attribute information included in the personal attribute information list 106. get. In addition, the utilization point calculation unit 64 acquires coefficient information whose coefficient coefficient is included in the coefficient information list 100 and whose coefficient group is a use frequency and whose item group is a job type. Next, the usage point calculation unit 64 matches the “corresponding screen” of the acquired coefficient information with the corresponding screen corresponding to the acquired correction information, and the “job type” acquired by the “item”. The matching coefficient information is acquired as the coefficient information of the usage points. Next, the usage point calculation unit 64 calculates the product of the “coefficient” value of the coefficient information of the acquired usage point and the acquired usage count. The usage point calculation unit 64 calculates the calculated product value as a usage count point.

  In addition, the use point calculation unit 64 includes “name of update” of the personal attribute information included in the personal attribute information list 106 whose “name” matches the information of the corrector included in the acquired correction information. Is acquired as the update count point. In addition, the use point calculation unit 64 calculates the sum of the acquired use count points and the update count points as the use points.

  The personal point calculation unit 66 corresponds to the correction information included in the correction information received from the user terminal 3, the coefficient information list 100, the personal attribute information list 106, and the correction information acquired in the clinical trial point calculation unit 62. The personal points are calculated based on the corresponding screen. Here, the individual points are points calculated based on, for example, the years of service, qualifications, and job types of the corrector. Specifically, first, the personal point calculation unit 66 corrects personal attribute information in which “name” and corrector information included in the correction information match among the personal attribute information included in the personal attribute information list 106. Acquired as personal attribute information corresponding to the information. Next, the personal point calculation unit 66 acquires the number in parentheses of “qualification” of the personal attribute information corresponding to the acquired correction information as a qualification point corresponding to the correction information. Next, the personal point calculation unit 66 calculates the number of years of service corresponding to the correction information from the “entry date” of the personal attribute information corresponding to the acquired correction information and the correction date included in the correction information. To get.

  Next, the personal point calculation unit 66 matches the corresponding screen corresponding to the correction information acquired by the “corresponding screen” in the “coefficient group” among the coefficient information included in the coefficient information list 100. Get coefficient information. Next, the individual point calculation unit 66 uses the coefficient information corresponding to the years of service in which “item group” is the service years and “item” corresponds to the correction information in the obtained coefficient information as the coefficient of the individual points. Obtain as information. Next, the personal point calculation unit 66 calculates the product of the length of service corresponding to the correction information and the value of the “coefficient” of the coefficient information of the acquired personal points. The personal point calculation unit 66 sets the calculated product value as the service years point corresponding to the correction information. Next, the individual point calculation unit 66 calculates the sum of the qualification points corresponding to the acquired correction information and the service years points corresponding to the acquired correction information as individual points.

  The law point calculation unit 68 includes information on the corrector and the correction date included in the correction information received from the user terminal 3, a corresponding screen corresponding to the correction information acquired in the clinical trial point calculation unit 62, various lists, The law points are calculated based on the above. Here, the law points are points calculated based on, for example, the number of days that have elapsed since the law was revised. Specifically, the law point calculation unit 68 first selects law screen information whose “corresponding screen” matches the corresponding screen corresponding to the acquired correction information among the law screen information included in the law screen information list 108. get. Next, the law point calculation unit 68 acquires the law corresponding to the correction information from the “law" of the law screen information that matches the corresponding screen corresponding to the acquired correction information. In addition, the law point calculation unit 68 acquires law revision information that matches the law corresponding to the correction information acquired by the “revised part” among the law revision information included in the law revision information list 110. Next, the law point calculation unit 68 acquires the law revision information having the largest “version number” among the obtained law revision information as the law revision information corresponding to the correction information. Next, the law point calculation unit 68 determines whether the law corresponding to the correction information is based on the difference between the “revision date” of the law revision information corresponding to the acquired correction information and the correction date information included in the correction information. Get the period since the last revision.

  Next, the law point calculation unit 68 matches the corresponding screen corresponding to the correction information for which the “coefficient group” is the law change among the coefficient information included in the coefficient information list 100 and the “corresponding screen” is acquired. Get coefficient information. In addition, the law point calculation unit 68 includes the coefficient corresponding to the period from the last revision of the law corresponding to the correction information acquired by the “item” in the “item group” in the acquired coefficient information. Information is acquired as coefficient information of law points. Next, the law point calculation unit 68 determines the difference (365-period) between the value of 365 (the value representing the number of days in a year) and the period from the last revision of the law corresponding to the acquired correction information. Then, the product of the coefficient information of the obtained law information of the law points is calculated as the law points. Note that in the law revision information included in the law revision information list 110, if there is no law revision information in which the information in the “revised part” column matches the law corresponding to the acquired revision information, the above-described period 365 is set. And set.

  The determination point calculation unit 70 calculates the determination point of the correction information received from the user terminal 3 based on the acquired clinical trial points, usage points, individual points, and law points. Specifically, the determination point calculation unit 70 calculates the sum of the acquired clinical trial points, use points, personal points, and law points as the determination points corresponding to the correction information. Further, the determination point calculation unit 70 corresponds to the correction location information included in the correction information stored in the correction request information storage unit 46 as the correction request information by combining the correction information and the calculated determination point. Stored in the correction request information list 112 as correction request information. Specifically, the determination point calculation unit 70 uses the correction request information “manual” and “correction date” as the information on the correction part, the correction date, the corrector, and the content included in the correction information. , “Corrector” and “content”. Further, the determination point calculation unit 70 sets the calculated determination point as the “determination point” of the correction request information. In addition, the calculation unit 60 does not confirm the “flag” of the correction request information. In the first embodiment, the determination point is higher as the reliability of the correction request information is higher.

  The approval unit 80 rearranges the correction request information stored in the correction request information list 112 in descending order of the determination points based on the request confirmation information (information for confirming the correction request information) received from the user terminal 3. The screen information is transmitted to the user terminal 3. Further, the approval unit 80 selects the correction request information to be reflected based on the selection information received from the user terminal 3 (information for selecting the correction request information displayed on the screen of the user terminal 3). Further, the approval unit 80 stores the content of the selected correction request information in the manual information storage unit 48 based on the reflection information received from the user terminal 3 (instruction information for reflecting the selected correction request information). This is reflected in the manual information list 114 corresponding to the “manual” of the correction request information. The request confirmation information includes information on the manual part to be confirmed. Further, as long as both the “content” and “determination point” of the correction request information are displayed, the screen information may not be presented without being rearranged. Hereinafter, each part of the approval part 80 is explained in full detail.

  The sorting unit 82 sorts the target correction request information in the descending order of the determination points based on the request confirmation information received from the user terminal 3, the correction request information list 112, and the law revision information list 110. The screen information representing the displayed screen is transmitted to the user terminal 3. Specifically, the rearrangement unit 82 acquires, from the correction request information storage unit 46, the correction request information list 112 corresponding to the information on the manual part to be checked included in the request confirmation information received from the user terminal 3. . In addition, the reordering unit 82 matches the information on the manual revision to be confirmed included in the request confirmation information in the law revision information included in the law revision information list 110 and the “date of revision” is displayed. Get the latest legal revision information. Next, the reordering unit 82 is newer than the “revision date” of the law revision information acquired in the “revision date” among the revision request information included in the obtained revision request information list 112, and the “flag” Each piece of correction request information that has not been confirmed is acquired.

  Next, as shown in FIG. 14, the rearrangement unit 82 rearranges each of the correction request information so that the “decision points” of the acquired correction request information are in descending order. In addition, the rearrangement unit 82 transmits screen information representing the screen of the rearranged result to the user terminal 3. As shown in FIG. 15, the request confirmation information is entered by inputting information on the manual part to be confirmed on the screen for confirming the modification request information displayed on the user terminal 3 by the logged-in administrator. Is transmitted to the reliability calculation device 1 by pressing the button. Further, it is assumed that the manager knows the chapter and section of the manual in which the correction request information exists by some method. In addition, the administrator may transmit request confirmation information for a plurality of manual locations at the same time. In that case, the process of the selection part 84 and the reflection part 86 is performed for every manual location. In the case where the law revision information is not acquired, the rearrangement unit 82 acquires each of the correction request information whose “flag” is unconfirmed among the correction request information included in the correction request information list 112.

  The selection unit 84 selects the reordered correction request information acquired in the reordering unit 82 based on the selection information received from the user terminal 3. The selected example is shown in FIG. 16, and in the example of FIG. 16, the first correction request information is selected. In the first embodiment, the correction request information selected based on the selection information is alternatively selected. Further, for example, in the screen shown in FIG. 14 displayed on the user terminal 3, when the adoption of the target correction request information is selected as shown in FIG. 16, the user terminal 3 selects the reliability calculation device 1. Selection information corresponding to the correction request information is transmitted.

  The reflection unit 86 stores the correction request information selected by the selection unit 84 based on the reflection information received from the user terminal 3, and the manual information list corresponding to the correction request information stored in the manual information storage unit 48. 114. Here, it is assumed that the reflection information includes information on the date on which the reflection information is transmitted. Specifically, first, the reflection unit 86 receives reflection information from the user terminal 3. Next, the reflection unit 86 acquires the manual information list 114 corresponding to the “manual” of the correction request information selected by the selection unit 84 from the manual information list 114 stored in the manual information storage unit 48. Next, the reflecting unit 86 stores the “content” of the manual information included in the acquired manual information list 114 to be updated with the “content” of the correction request information selected by the selection unit 84.

  Also, the reflection unit 86 acquires the manual revision information with the latest “revised date” among the manual revision information included in the manual revision information list 116. Next, the reflection unit 86 sets the “version number” as the version number obtained by adding 1 to the “version number” of the acquired manual revision information, and sets the “revised location” as the “manual” of the manual information. Information is stored in the manual revision information list 116. Further, the reflection unit 86 uses the “date of revision” of the stored manual revision information as information on the date of transmission of the reflection information included in the reflection information. Next, the reflection unit 86 changes the “flag” of the correction request information corresponding to the acquired correction request information included in the correction request information list 112 to “approved”.

  Next, the reflection unit 86 confirms each “flag” of the correction request information included in the correction request information list 112 that has been rearranged by the rearrangement unit 82 and not selected by the selection unit 84. change. Next, the reflection unit 86 sets the “update count” value of the personal attribute information whose “name” matches the information of the corrector of the acquired correction request information among the personal attribute information included in the personal attribute information list 106. Add 1 to

  The reflection information is transmitted to the reliability calculation device 1 when the user presses the reflection button in a state where correction request information as shown in FIG. 16 is selected, for example. In addition, when request confirmation information is simultaneously transmitted from the user terminal 3 for a plurality of manual locations, the reflection unit 86 includes each “version number” of the manual revision information stored for each of the plurality of manual locations, And “Date of revision” is the same.

  When the registration unit 72 receives registration information (coefficient information, clinical trial information, personal attribute information, law screen information, law revision information, manual information, manual screen information) from the user terminal 3, each registration information is stored in the storage unit. Store in each of the 30 target lists.

  Although not shown, when the reliability calculation device 1 receives from the user terminal 3 press information indicating that a display for screen transition has been pressed, the reliability calculation device 1 performs a screen transition process. Since a general screen transition process can be applied to the transition process, a detailed description is omitted here.

  The reliability calculation device 1 can be realized by a computer 200 shown in FIG. 17, for example. The computer 200 includes a CPU 202, a memory 204 as a temporary storage area, and a nonvolatile storage device 206. The computer 200 also includes an input / output interface (I / F) 210 to which an input / output device 208 is connected. The computer 200 also includes a read / write (R / W) unit 214 that controls reading and writing of data with respect to the recording medium 212 and a network I / F 216 connected to the network 2 such as the Internet. The CPU 202, the memory 204, the storage device 206, the input / output I / F 210, the R / W unit 214, and the network I / F 216 are connected to each other via a bus 218.

  The storage device 206 can be realized by a hard disk drive (HDD), a solid state drive (SSD), a flash memory, or the like. The storage device 206 as a storage medium stores a calculation program 300, a rearrangement program 320, and a reflection program 330 for causing the computer 200 to function as the reliability calculation device 1. The storage device 206 also includes a coefficient information storage area 350 in which coefficient information is stored, a clinical trial information storage area 352 in which clinical trial information is stored, an operation history information storage area 354 in which operation history information is stored, and personal attributes. And a personal attribute information storage area 356 in which information is stored. The storage device 206 further includes a legal screen information storage area 358 for storing legal screen information, a legal revision information storage area 360 for storing legal revision information, and a correction request information storage area 364 for storing correction request information. And have. The storage device 206 further includes a manual information storage area 366 for storing manual information, a manual revision information storage area 368 for storing manual revision information, and a manual screen information storage area 370 for storing manual screen information. And have.

  The CPU 202 reads the calculation program 300, the rearrangement program 320, and the reflection program 330 from the storage device 206 and expands them in the memory 204. Further, the CPU 202 sequentially executes processes included in the calculation program 300, the rearrangement program 320, and the reflection program 330. Further, the CPU 202 reads the coefficient information stored in the coefficient information storage area 350 and develops it in the memory 204 as the coefficient information list 100. Further, the CPU 202 reads out the clinical trial information stored in the clinical trial information storage area 352 and develops it in the memory 204 as the clinical trial information list 102. Further, the CPU 202 reads the operation history information stored in the operation history information storage area 354 and develops it in the memory 204 as the operation history information list 104. Further, the CPU 202 reads the personal attribute information stored in the personal attribute information storage area 356 and develops it in the memory 204 as the personal attribute information list 106. Further, the CPU 202 reads out the legal screen information stored in the legal screen information storage area 358 and develops it in the memory 204 as the legal screen information list 108. Further, the CPU 202 reads out the law revision information stored in the law revision information storage area 360 and develops it in the memory 204 as the law revision information list 110. Further, the CPU 202 reads the correction request information stored in the correction request information storage area 364 and develops it in the memory 204 as the correction request information list 112. Further, the CPU 202 reads the manual information stored in the manual information storage area 366 and expands it in the memory 204 as the manual information list 114. Further, the CPU 202 reads out the manual revision information stored in the manual revision information storage area 368 and develops it in the memory 204 as a manual revision information list 116. Further, the CPU 202 reads the manual screen information stored in the manual screen information storage area 370 and develops it in the memory 204 as a manual screen information list 118.

  The calculation program 300 includes a clinical trial point calculation process 302, a use point calculation process 304, an individual point calculation process 306, a law / legal point calculation process 308, and a determination point calculation process 310.

  The CPU 202 operates as the clinical trial point calculation unit 62 shown in FIG. 2 by executing the clinical trial point calculation process 302. The CPU 202 operates as the usage point calculation unit 64 illustrated in FIG. 2 by executing the usage point calculation process 304. The CPU 202 operates as the personal point calculation unit 66 shown in FIG. 2 by executing the personal point calculation process 306. Further, the CPU 202 operates as the legal point calculation unit 68 shown in FIG. 2 by executing the legal point calculation process 308. Further, the CPU 202 operates as the determination point calculation unit 70 illustrated in FIG. 2 by executing the determination point calculation process 310.

  The rearrangement program 320 has a rearrangement process 322.

  The CPU 202 operates as the rearrangement unit 82 illustrated in FIG. 2 by executing the rearrangement process 322.

  The reflection program 330 includes a selection process 332 and a reflection process 334.

  The CPU 202 operates as the selection unit 84 illustrated in FIG. 2 by executing the selection process 332. Further, the CPU 202 operates as the reflection unit 86 illustrated in FIG. 2 by executing the reflection process 334.

  Accordingly, the computer 200 that has executed the calculation program 300, the rearrangement program 320, and the reflection program 330 functions as the reliability calculation device 1.

  The reliability calculation device 1 can be realized by, for example, a semiconductor integrated circuit, more specifically, an ASIC (Application Specific Integrated Circuit).

  Next, the operation of the reliability calculation device 1 according to the first embodiment will be described. First, when the reliability calculation device 1 receives the correction information received from the user terminal 3, the reliability calculation device 1 executes the calculation process shown in FIG. Further, when the reliability calculation device 1 receives the correction confirmation information from the user terminal 3, the reliability calculation device 1 executes the rearrangement process shown in FIG. When the selection information is received from the user terminal 3, the reliability calculation device 1 selects the correction request information based on the received selection information. In addition, when the reliability calculation device 1 accepts the reflection information from the user terminal 3 in the state where the correction request information is selected, the reliability calculation device 1 executes the reflection process shown in FIG. Then, the manual information included in the manual information list 114 stored in the manual information storage unit 48 is changed. Note that the calculation process, the rearrangement process, and the reflection process executed by the reliability calculation apparatus 1 are examples of the reliability calculation method of the disclosed technology. Hereinafter, each process is explained in full detail.

  First, the calculation process shown in FIG. 18 will be described.

  FIG. 18 is a flowchart illustrating an example of calculation processing. In the flowchart of the calculation process shown in FIG. 18, first, the clinical trial point calculation unit 62 acquires the coefficient information list 100 from the coefficient information storage unit 32 in step S100.

  Next, in step S <b> 102, the clinical trial point calculation unit 62 acquires the clinical trial information list 102 from the clinical trial information storage unit 34.

  Next, in step S <b> 104, the clinical trial point calculation unit 62 acquires the operation history information list 104 from the operation history information storage unit 36.

  Next, in step S <b> 106, the clinical trial point calculation unit 62 acquires the personal attribute information list 106 from the personal attribute information storage unit 38.

  Next, in step S <b> 108, the clinical trial point calculation unit 62 acquires the law screen information list 108 from the law screen information storage unit 40.

  Next, in step S110, the clinical trial point calculation unit 62 acquires the law revision information list 110 from the law revision information storage unit.

  Next, in step S 112, the clinical trial point calculation unit 62 acquires the manual screen information list 118 from the manual screen information storage unit 50.

  Next, in step S114, the clinical trial point calculation unit 62 displays a corresponding screen corresponding to the correction information based on the information on the correction part included in the acquired correction information and the manual screen information list 118 acquired in step S112. get.

  Next, in step S116, the clinical trial point calculation unit 62 takes charge of the corrector based on the information on the corrector included in the correction information received from the user terminal 3 and the clinical trial information list 102 acquired in step S102. Obtain the total number of clinical trial cases.

  Next, in step S118, the clinical trial point calculation unit 62 acquires coefficient information of clinical trial points. The coefficient information of clinical trial points can be acquired based on the coefficient information list 100 acquired in step S100, the corresponding screen acquired in step S114, and the total number of cases acquired in step S116.

  Next, in step S120, the product of the value of “coefficient” and the value of 1 in the coefficient information acquired in step S118 is calculated as a clinical trial point.

  Next, in step S122, the usage point calculation unit 64 acquires each of the operation history information based on the operation history information list 104 acquired in step S104 and the corresponding screen acquired in step S114.

  Next, in step S124, the usage point calculation unit 64 acquires the usage count based on the corresponding screen acquired in step S114, each of the operation history information acquired in step S122, and the acquired information on the corrector. To do.

  Next, in step S126, the usage point calculation unit 64 acquires the coefficient information of the usage points based on the coefficient information list 100 acquired in step S100 and the corresponding screen acquired in step S114.

  Next, in step S128, the usage point calculation unit 64 calculates the product of the value of “coefficient” in the coefficient information of the usage point acquired in step S126 and the usage count acquired in step S124 as the usage count point.

  Next, in step S130, the use point calculation unit 64 acquires update count points based on the personal attribute information list 106 acquired in step S106 and the acquired information on the corrector.

  Next, in step S132, the usage point calculation unit 64 calculates, as usage points, the sum of the usage count points acquired in step S128 and the update count points acquired in step S130.

  Next, in step S134, the personal point calculation unit 66 acquires qualification points corresponding to the correction information based on the personal attribute information list 106 acquired in step S106 and the acquired information on the corrector.

  Next, in step S136, the personal point calculation unit 66 acquires the length of service corresponding to the correction information based on the personal attribute information list 106 acquired in step S106 and the acquired correction date information.

  Next, in step S138, the personal point calculation unit 66 acquires coefficient information of personal points based on the coefficient information list 100 acquired in step S100 and the corresponding screen acquired in step S114.

  Next, in step S140, the personal point calculation unit 66 determines the service years points based on the coefficient information of the personal points acquired in step S138, the corresponding screen acquired in step S114, and the years of service acquired in step S136. Is calculated.

  Next, in step S142, the personal point calculation unit 66 calculates the sum of the qualification points acquired in step S134 and the years of service acquired in step S140 as individual points.

  Next, in step S144, the law point calculation unit 68 acquires a law corresponding to the correction information based on the corresponding screen acquired in step S114 and the law screen information list 108 acquired in step S108.

  Next, in step S146, the law point calculation unit 68 converts the law information acquired in step S144, the law revision information list 110 acquired in step S110, and the acquired correction date into the correction information. Get the corresponding period.

  Next, in step S148, the law point calculation unit 68 acquires coefficient information of law points from the coefficient information list 100 acquired in step S100, the corresponding screen acquired in step S114, and the period acquired in step S146. .

  Next, in step S150, the law point calculation unit 68 calculates law points from the period corresponding to the correction information acquired in step S146 and the coefficient information of law points acquired in step S148.

  Next, in step S152, the determination point calculation unit 70 calculates the sum of the clinical trial points, individual points, usage points, and law points acquired in step S120, step S132, step S142, and step S150 as determination points. .

  Next, in step S154, the correction of the corresponding law stored in the correction request information storage unit 46, using the combination of the correction information acquired in step S152, the determination point acquired in step S152, and the unconfirmed flag as correction request information. Store in the request information list 112. Then, the determination point calculation unit 70 ends the calculation process.

  Next, the rearrangement process shown in FIG. 19 will be described.

  FIG. 19 is a flowchart illustrating an example of the rearrangement process. A flowchart of the rearrangement process shown in FIG. 19 will be described. First, in step S <b> 200, the rearrangement unit 82 receives a correction request corresponding to the request confirmation information from the correction request information storage unit 46 based on the information of the manual part to be confirmed included in the request confirmation information received at the user terminal 3. The information list 112 is acquired.

  Next, in step S <b> 202, the rearrangement unit 82 acquires the legal revision information list 110 from the legal revision information storage unit 42.

  Next, in step S204, the reordering unit 82 matches the “revised part” with the information on the manual part based on the legal revision information list 110 obtained in step S202 and the obtained manual part information. "Revision date" gets the latest legal revision information.

  Next, in step S206, the rearrangement unit 82 determines whether or not the law revision information has been acquired in step S204. When the rearrangement unit 82 acquires the law revision information in step S204, the rearrangement process proceeds to step S208. On the other hand, when the rearrangement unit 82 has not acquired the law revision information in step S204, the rearrangement process proceeds to step S209.

  Next, in step S208, the rearrangement unit 82 acquires each of the correction request information based on the correction request information list 112 acquired in step S200 and the law revision information acquired in step S204.

  In step S209, the rearrangement unit 82 acquires each of the correction request information whose “flag” is unconfirmed from the correction request information list 112 acquired in step S200.

  Next, in step S210, the rearrangement unit 82 rearranges each of the correction request information acquired in step S208 or step S209 in descending order of the “judgment point” value of the correction request information.

  Next, in step S212, the rearrangement unit 82 transmits screen information representing each of the correction request information rearranged in step S210 to the user terminal 3, and ends the rearrangement process.

  Next, the reflection process shown in FIG. 20 will be described.

  FIG. 20 is a flowchart illustrating an example of the reflection process. In the flowchart of the reflection process illustrated in FIG. 20, first, the reflection unit 86 acquires the correction request information selected by the selection unit 84 in step S300.

  Next, in step S302, the reflection unit 86 acquires a manual part that reflects the correction based on the “manual” of the correction request information acquired in step S300.

  Next, in step S304, the reflection unit 86 acquires the manual information list 114 corresponding to the manual location acquired in step S302 from the manual information storage unit 48.

  Next, in step S306, the reflection unit 86 stores the “content” of the correction request information acquired in step S300 so as to update the “content” of the manual information in the manual information list 114 acquired in step S304.

  Next, in step S308, the reflection unit 86 acquires the manual revision information list 116 from the manual revision information storage unit 49.

  Next, in step S310, the reflection unit 86 acquires the manual revision information having the latest “revised date” among the manual revision information included in the manual revision information list 116 obtained in step S308.

  Next, in step S312, the reflection unit 86 updates the manual revision information list 116 based on the manual revision information acquired in step S310, the reflection information, and the manual information list 114 updated in step S312.

  Next, in step S314, the reflection unit 86 acquires the correction request information list 112 corresponding to the correction request information acquired in step S300 from the correction request information storage unit 46.

  Next, in step S316, the reflection unit 86 changes the “flag” of the correction request information acquired in step S300 out of the correction request information acquired in step S314 to approved. In addition, the reflection unit 86 acquires correction request information corresponding to each of correction request information other than the correction request information acquired in step S300 out of the correction request information acquired in step S314 and rearranged in step S210. “Flag” is confirmed.

  Next, in step S318, the reflecting unit 86 acquires the personal attribute information list 106 stored in the personal attribute information storage unit 38.

  Next, in step S320, the reflection unit 86 matches the “name” of the personal attribute information included in the personal attribute information list 106 acquired in step S318 with the “corrector” of the correction request information acquired in step S300. Get personal attribute information. The reflection unit 86 adds 1 to the “update count” of the acquired personal attribute information and stores it, and ends the reflection process.

  As described above, according to the first embodiment, the determination point is calculated for each of the manual correction proposals related to the corresponding screen that have been corrected by the corrector in accordance with changes in laws and regulations. The determination point is calculated based on the score obtained based on the corrector information of the corrector and the coefficient predetermined for the combination of the corrector attribute and the screen corresponding to the correction location of the correction plan. Then, by presenting each of the correction plans using the determination points, it is possible to present the correction plan with high reliability in a distinguishable manner.

  For example, FIG. 21 shows a case where the coefficient is set so that the determination point becomes higher as the relevance between the target screen and the corrector is higher in the reliability calculation apparatus 1 of the first embodiment. As a comparative example, FIG. 22 shows a case where no points are calculated, and FIG. 23 shows an example where a coefficient is not used for calculating points. In the example of FIG. 21, the target screen is a screen that is input and registered by the doctor, and the screen is frequently used by the doctor because the screen is operated twice for input and registration. In this case, it is assumed that the manual correction by the doctor has a higher use point and higher reliability. However, when other conditions such as years of service are the same, regarding the correction of the manual, it is desirable to determine that the correction contents of the data manager who is in a position to check the contents of the manual are effective. Here, the information on the corrector in this example is shown in FIG. 24, and the information on the coefficient used is shown in FIG. In the example of FIG. 22, since no points are calculated, it is not known which correction request information is valid. In the example of FIG. 23, since no coefficient is used, the doctor's correction request information is more reliable than the data manager's correction request information. Therefore, the correction request information with the highest reliability corresponding to the screen and the corrector being the data manager cannot be displayed at the top. However, in the example of FIG. 21, correction request information in which the corrector is the data manager is displayed at the top. In this way, it is possible to calculate useful points by using coefficients set based on the relationship between the target screen and the corrector, and it is possible to present the reliability in accordance with the actual situation.

  Moreover, although the use point calculation part 64 demonstrated the case where the frequency | count of use was counted based on all the operation history information memorize | stored in the operation history information storage part 36, it is not limited to this. For example, the use point calculation unit 64 may count the number of uses based on operation history information for a certain period stored in the operation history information storage unit 36.

  In addition, the calculation unit 60 calculates clinical trial points, use points, individual points, law points, and determination points, but the calculation method of each point is not limited to the calculation method in the first embodiment. For example, the calculation unit 60 may calculate each point using another calculation method.

  Moreover, although the calculation part 60 demonstrated the case where a determination point was calculated from a clinical trial point, a utilization point, an individual point, and a law | law point, it is not limited to this. For example, the determination point may be calculated including at least one of a usage point or a personal point.

  Moreover, although the utilization point calculation part 64 demonstrated the case where the frequency | count that revised the manual of a corrector was used as an update frequency point, it was not limited to this. The use point calculation unit 64 may use only the number of revisions of the corrector's manual on the target screen as the update count point. In this case, it is assumed that the “update count” of the personal attribute information holds information on the update count for each screen.

  Further, although the case has been described in which the predetermined value when calculating the product of the “coefficient” value of the coefficient information of the clinical trial point and the predetermined value as the clinical trial point in the clinical trial point calculating unit 62 is 1, this is not limitative. It is not something. An appropriate predetermined value may be used in consideration of a balance with other points when calculating the determination point. As in the first embodiment, when the predetermined value is 1 and the product of the value of the “coefficient” of the coefficient information of the clinical trial point and the predetermined value is the clinical trial point, “ The value of the “coefficient” becomes the clinical trial point as it is.

  Moreover, although 1st Embodiment demonstrated the case where the reliability calculation apparatus 1 was used about a clinical trial system, it is not limited to this. For example, the reliability calculation apparatus 1 may be used in another system such as a clinical test system in which a combination of an input screen and a manual of the input screen exists.

  Moreover, although the rearrangement part 82 demonstrated the case where the correction request information was rearranged in the descending order of the determination points and presented to the user terminal 3, it is not limited to this. For example, the rearrangement unit 82 may present a combination of correction contents and determination points regardless of the arrangement order. Moreover, the rearrangement unit 82 may rearrange and present the correction request information in ascending order of determination points.

  In addition, the individual point calculation unit 66 has been described with respect to the case where the qualification point corresponding to the correction information is a number in parentheses of “qualification” of the target personal attribute information, but is not limited thereto. . For example, the number of qualifications of “qualification” in the target personal attribute information may be used as qualification points corresponding to the correction information.

  Further, the calculation unit 60 calculates the determination point using the coefficient corresponding to the corrector's attribute based on the corrector's attribute based on the corrector's attribute. May be.

  In addition, when there are a plurality of pieces of coefficient information for a specific point, the calculation unit 60 may use an average value of each “coefficient” value of the coefficient information.

  Moreover, although the calculation part 60 demonstrated the case where a determination point was calculated by the product of a coefficient and a score when calculating a determination point, it is not limited to this. For example, when calculating the determination point, the calculation unit 60 may divide the score by the corresponding coefficient.

  Moreover, although the said embodiment demonstrated the case where each list | wrist was memorize | stored in each memory | storage part, a memory | storage part is only an example of the method of storing a list | wrist, It is not limited to this. For example, as long as information included in the list can be searched and stored in a state where it can be referenced, there is no need to stick to the format of the storage unit.

  Next, a second embodiment will be described. In addition, about the part which becomes the structure and effect | action similar to 1st Embodiment, the same code | symbol is attached | subjected and description is abbreviate | omitted.

  The second embodiment is different from the first embodiment in that when there is a revision of a law or a manual, the help or link display of the screen corresponding to the law or the manual is changed. ing.

  In the second embodiment, the function included in the reliability calculation device of the first embodiment is further changed to reflect the revised law and the configuration information of the screen information transmitted to the user terminal. The case where the function to be included is included will be described. The confirmation information and the operation history information of the second embodiment are examples of user information in the disclosed technology. Further, the help button of the second embodiment is an example of a part corresponding to the description information related to the input screen in the disclosed technology.

  FIG. 26 is an example of a reliability calculation system 500 according to the second embodiment. As illustrated in FIG. 26, the reliability calculation system 500 includes a reliability calculation device 501 and a user terminal 3. A reliability calculation device 501 according to the second embodiment is connected to a user terminal 3 for users via a network 2 such as the Internet so as to be able to communicate with each other.

  FIG. 27 shows a functional block diagram of a reliability calculation apparatus 501 according to the second embodiment. As shown in FIG. 27, the reliability calculation device 501 includes a coefficient information storage unit 32, a clinical trial information storage unit 34, an operation history information storage unit 36, a personal attribute information storage unit 38, a legal screen information storage unit 40, and legal revision information. The storage unit includes a storage unit and a correction request information storage unit. Further, the storage unit 130 includes a manual information storage unit 48, a manual revision information storage unit 49, a manual screen information storage unit 50, a confirmation information storage unit 151, a configuration change information storage unit 152, a screen information storage unit 154, and a legal information storage. Part 156. In addition, the reliability calculation device 501 includes a calculation unit 60 including a clinical trial point calculation unit 62, a use point calculation unit 64, an individual point calculation unit 66, a law / legal point calculation unit 68, and a determination point calculation unit 70. In addition, the reliability calculation device 501 includes a registration unit 172. Further, the reliability calculation device 501 includes an approval unit 80 including a rearrangement unit 82, a selection unit 84, and a reflection unit 86. Further, the reliability calculation device 501 includes a law revision unit 180 including a difference acquisition unit 182 and a law reflection unit 184. In addition, the reliability calculation device 501 includes a configuration unit 190 including a determination unit 192 and a change unit 194.

  In the confirmation information storage unit 151, for example, a confirmation information list 120 as shown in FIG. 28 is stored. In the confirmation information list 120 in the example of FIG. 28, a confirmation date, a corresponding screen, and a combination of operators are stored as confirmation information for each confirmation operation of the user's manual. Here, “confirmation date” represents the date when the manual confirmation operation was performed in accordance with an instruction from the user terminal 3. In the second embodiment, the manual confirmation operation refers to, for example, an operation of displaying a manual corresponding to the screen by pressing a help button on the screen as shown in FIG. The corresponding screen represents a screen displayed on the user terminal 3 that has performed the manual confirmation operation. The confirmation information is stored in the confirmation information list 120 via the registration unit 172 every time a manual confirmation operation is performed on the user terminal 3.

  For example, a configuration change information list 122 as shown in FIG. 30 is stored in the configuration change information storage unit 152. In the configuration change information list 122 in the example of FIG. 30, a combination of a corresponding screen, a change target, a changed configuration, a reason, the number of confirmations, and priority is stored as configuration change information. Here, “change configuration” represents a configuration after change of the change target, and color information in parentheses indicates that the “change target” is changed to the color. The “reason” represents the reason for changing the “change target”. The “number of confirmations” represents the number of manual confirmations necessary for returning the changed configuration to the default configuration. The “priority” indicates which configuration change information is given priority when both the legal revision and the manual revision are applicable. FIG. 31 shows a specific example in which the display of the help button is changed.

  The screen information storage unit 154 stores screen configuration information of each screen to be displayed on the user terminal 3 as screen information (not shown).

  The law information storage unit 156 stores a combination of clauses and contents as law information (not shown) for each clause of the relevant law.

  The law revision unit 180 acquires a difference between the law information received from the user terminal 3 (hereinafter referred to as the latest law information) and the law information stored in the law information storage unit 156. Also, the law revision unit 180 updates the law information stored in the law information storage unit 156 with the content of the latest law information received from the user terminal 3. Hereinafter, each part of the legal revision part 180 will be described in detail. Note that the latest legal information includes information on the date of revision of the law.

  The difference acquisition unit 182 acquires a difference between the latest law information received from the user terminal 3 and the law information stored in the law information storage unit 156. Specifically, first, the difference acquisition unit 182 performs a conventional difference extraction method based on the latest law information received from the user terminal 3 and the law information stored in the law information storage unit 156. The difference information including the difference between the latest law information and the law information is acquired. The difference acquisition unit 182 uses a difference extraction method. For example, the difference extraction method acquires the output of the Diff command as difference information. Here, it is assumed that the acquired difference information includes a combination of clauses and contents for each clause. Next, based on each of the acquired difference information and the law revision information list 110 stored in the law revision information storage unit 42, the difference acquisition unit 182 converts the difference information into law revisions for each of the difference information. Store in the information list 110. Here, the difference acquisition unit 182 acquires the “version number” of the law revision information having the largest “version number” among the law revision information included in the law revision information list 110. Then, the difference acquisition unit 182 includes a combination of the difference information clause, information on the date of revision of the law included in the latest law information, and the “version number” obtained by adding 1 to the acquired “version number”. The law revision information including the law revision information list 110 is stored.

  The law reflection unit 184 updates the “content” of the law information stored in the law information storage unit 156 with the content of the difference information acquired by the difference acquisition unit 182. Specifically, the law reflection unit 184 converts each combination of the clauses and contents of the difference information acquired by the difference acquisition unit 182 to the corresponding clauses and contents of the law information stored in the law information storage unit 156. Replace with each of the combinations and update.

  The configuration unit 190 changes the configuration information of the screen displayed on the user terminal 3 based on the screen request information received from the user terminal 3, and transmits the changed screen information to the user terminal 3. FIG. 32 shows an example in which the configuration unit 190 changes the screen configuration information so that the color of the help button is changed. Here, the screen request information includes the user who requested the screen and information on the request screen. Further, when the user terminal 3 makes a request for transition to the target screen, the screen request information is transmitted from the user terminal 3 to the reliability calculation device 501. Hereinafter, each part of the component 190 will be described in detail.

  Based on the screen request information received from the user terminal 3, the determination unit 192 determines whether it is necessary to change the configuration information of the screen transmitted to the user terminal 3. Specifically, first, the determination unit 192 includes a request screen in which the “corresponding screen” of the configuration change information list 122 stored in the configuration change information storage unit 152 is included in the screen request information received from the user terminal 3. Configuration change information that matches this information is acquired. Next, based on the “priority” of the acquired configuration change information, the determination unit 192 determines whether the configuration change information is prioritized for legal revision.

  Here, a case where the determination unit 192 determines that the legal revision is a priority will be described. First, the determination unit 192 matches the “corresponding screen” of the legal screen information included in the legal screen information list 108 stored in the legal screen information storage unit 40 with the requested screen information included in the acquired screen request information. Get legal screen information. Next, the determination unit 192 acquires the “law” of the acquired law screen information. Next, the determination unit 192 acquires the legal revision information corresponding to the acquired “law” in the “revised part” of the legal revision information list 110 stored in the legal revision information storage unit 42. Next, the determination unit 192 acquires “revision date” of the law revision information with the latest “revise date” among the obtained law revision information. Next, the determination unit 192 is a screen in which the “operation screen” of the operation history information included in the operation history information list 104 matches the acquired request screen information, and the “operation date” is acquired. It is determined whether there is operation history information that is newer than the “revised date”. Here, when there is corresponding operation history information, it is determined that the screen information in which the configuration information is changed as the screen configuration corresponding to the law change according to the screen request information is transmitted to the user terminal 3. When there is no corresponding operation history information and when it is determined that the law revision is prioritized, the determination unit 192 performs processing when the law revision is not determined to be priority.

  On the other hand, a case where the determination unit 192 does not determine that the legal revision is a priority will be described. First, the determination unit 192 matches the “corresponding screen” of the manual screen information included in the manual screen information list 118 stored in the manual screen information storage unit 50 with the information of the request screen included in the acquired screen request information. Get manual screen information. Next, the determination unit 192 acquires the “manual” of the acquired manual screen information. Next, the determination unit 192 obtains the manual revision information corresponding to the acquired “manual” in the “revised part” of the manual revision information included in the manual revision information list 116 stored in the manual revision information storage unit 49. To do. Next, the determination unit 192 acquires “revision date” of the manual revision information having the latest “revised date” among the obtained manual revision information. Next, the determination unit 192 indicates that the “operator” of the confirmation information included in the confirmation information list 120 stored in the confirmation information storage unit 151 is the user information included in the screen request information, and “ Confirmation information whose “screen” matches the information of the request screen included in the screen request information is acquired.

  Next, the determination unit 192 acquires confirmation information in which the “confirmation date” of the acquired confirmation information is newer than the acquired “revised date”. Next, the determination unit 192 matches the “corresponding screen” of the configuration change information included in the configuration change information list 122 with the information of the request screen included in the screen request information, and “priority” is the manual revision. Get configuration change information. Next, the determination unit 192 determines whether or not the number of pieces of confirmation information acquired is greater than the “confirmation count” value of the acquired configuration change information. Here, when the number of confirmation information is equal to or less than the value of “number of confirmations”, the determination unit 192 uses the screen information in which the configuration information is changed as the screen configuration corresponding to the manual change according to the screen request information. It determines with transmitting to person terminal 3. On the other hand, when the number of pieces of confirmation information acquired is larger than the value of “number of confirmations” of the acquired configuration change information, and when it is not determined that the legal revision priority is given, the determination unit 192 192 performs processing when it is determined that the legal revision is prioritized.

  The changing unit 194 transmits screen information obtained by changing the configuration information of the screen information to be transmitted to the user terminal 3 based on the result determined by the determining unit 192. Here, a case will be described in which the determination unit 192 determines to transmit to the user terminal 3 the screen information in which the configuration information is changed as the screen configuration corresponding to the law change according to the screen request information. Specifically, first, the changing unit 194 acquires screen information corresponding to the information on the request screen included in the screen request information received from the user terminal 3 from the screen information storage unit 154. The change unit 194 includes “corresponding screen” in the screen request information received from the user terminal 3 among the configuration change information included in the configuration change information list 122 stored in the configuration change information storage unit 152. Configuration change information that matches the information on the requested screen is acquired. Next, the changing unit 194 changes the configuration of the acquired screen information based on the “change target” and the “change configuration” of the configuration change information whose “reason” is the legal revision of the acquired configuration change information. change. For example, when “target to change” is a help button and “change configuration” is blinking (yellow), the help button of the screen to be “target to be changed” of “corresponding screen” of the configuration change information is yellow. The configuration information of the screen information is changed so as to blink. Next, the changing unit 194 transmits the screen information whose configuration information has been changed to the user terminal 3.

  On the other hand, a case will be described in which the determination unit 192 determines that the screen information in which the configuration information is changed as the screen configuration corresponding to the manual change is transmitted to the user terminal 3 according to the screen request information. Specifically, first, the changing unit 194 acquires screen information corresponding to the information on the request screen included in the screen request information received from the user terminal 3 from the screen information storage unit 154. Next, the change unit 194 includes, among the configuration change information included in the configuration change information list 122 stored in the configuration change information storage unit 152, “corresponding screen” as the screen request information received from the user terminal 3. Obtain configuration change information that matches the information on the included request screen. Next, the changing unit 194 acquires the configuration information of the acquired screen information based on the “change target” and the “change configuration” of the configuration change information whose “reason” is the manual revision among the acquired configuration change information. To change. Next, the changing unit 194 transmits the screen information whose configuration information has been changed to the user terminal 3.

  Further, the case where the determination unit 192 does not determine that the screen information whose configuration information has been changed so as to have a screen configuration corresponding to the legal revision or the manual revision according to the screen request information is not determined to be transmitted to the user terminal 3 will be described. To do. Specifically, first, the changing unit 194 acquires screen information corresponding to the information on the request screen included in the screen request information received from the user terminal 3 from the screen information storage unit 154. Next, the changing unit 194 transmits the acquired screen information to the user terminal 3.

  When the registration unit 172 receives various types of registration information from the user terminal 3, the registration unit 172 stores each piece of registration information in each of the target lists in the storage unit 130.

  Although not shown, the reliability calculation device 501 performs the transition process of the screen when receiving the pressing information indicating that the display for transitioning the screen is pressed from the user terminal 3. Since a general screen transition process can be applied to the transition process, a detailed description is omitted here.

  The reliability calculation device 501 can be realized by a computer 400 shown in FIG. 33, for example. The computer 400 includes a CPU 402, a memory 404 as a temporary storage area, and a nonvolatile storage device 406. The computer 400 also includes an input / output I / F 210 to which the input / output device 208 is connected. The computer 400 also includes an R / W unit 214 that controls reading and writing of data with respect to the recording medium 212 and a network I / F 216 connected to the network 2 such as the Internet. The CPU 402, the memory 404, the storage device 406, the input / output I / F 210, the R / W unit 214, and the network I / F 216 are connected to each other via a bus 218.

  The storage device 406 can be realized by an HDD, an SSD, a flash memory, or the like. A storage device 406 as a storage medium stores a calculation program 300, a rearrangement program 320, a reflection program 330, a law revision program 440, and a configuration program 450 for causing the computer 400 to function as the reliability calculation device 501. The storage device 406 has each storage area in the first embodiment. The storage device 406 includes a confirmation information storage area 480 in which confirmation information is stored, a configuration change information storage area 482 in which configuration change information is stored, a screen information storage area 484 in which screen information is stored, and legal information. And a legal information storage area 486 for storing.

  The CPU 402 reads out the calculation program 300, the rearrangement program 320, the reflection program 330, the law revision program 440, and the configuration program from the storage device 406 and expands them in the memory 404. Further, the CPU 402 sequentially executes processes included in the calculation program 300, the rearrangement program 320, the reflection program 330, the law revision program 440, and the configuration program 450. Further, the CPU 402 reads the confirmation information stored in the confirmation information storage area 480 and develops it in the memory 404 as the confirmation information list 120. Further, the CPU 402 reads the configuration change information stored in the configuration change information storage area 482 and develops it in the memory 404 as the configuration change information list 122. The CPU 402 causes the screen information storage area 484 to function as the screen information storage unit 154 shown in FIG. Further, the CPU 402 causes the law information storage area 486 to function as the law information storage unit 156 shown in FIG. Other storage areas are the same as those in the first embodiment.

  The law revision program 440 includes a difference process 442 and a law reflection process 444.

  The CPU 402 operates as the difference acquisition unit 182 illustrated in FIG. 27 by executing the difference process 442. Further, the CPU 402 operates as the law reflecting unit 184 illustrated in FIG. 27 by executing the law reflecting process 444.

  The configuration program 450 includes a determination process 452 and a change process 454.

  The CPU 402 operates as the determination unit 192 illustrated in FIG. 27 by executing the determination process 452. The CPU 402 operates as the changing unit 194 illustrated in FIG. 27 by executing the changing process 454.

  Accordingly, the computer 400 that has executed the calculation program 300, the rearrangement program 320, the reflection program 330, the law revision program 440, and the configuration program 450 functions as the reliability calculation device 501.

  The reliability calculation device 501 can also be realized by, for example, a semiconductor integrated circuit, more specifically, an ASIC or the like.

  Next, the operation of the reliability calculation device 501 according to the second embodiment will be described. First, when the reliability calculation device 501 receives the correction information received at the user terminal 3, the reliability calculation device 501 executes the calculation process shown in FIG. Further, when the reliability calculation device 501 receives the request confirmation information received at the user terminal 3, the reliability calculation device 501 executes the rearrangement process shown in FIG. When the selection information is received from the user terminal 3, the reliability calculation device 501 selects the correction request information based on the received selection information. When the reliability calculation device 501 receives the reflection information from the user terminal 3 in the state where the correction request information is selected, the reliability calculation device 501 executes the reflection process shown in FIG. Further, when the reliability calculation device 501 receives the latest legal information received at the user terminal 3, the reliability calculation device 501 executes the legal revision process shown in FIG. When the reliability calculation device 501 receives the screen request information received at the user terminal 3, the reliability calculation device 501 executes the configuration process shown in FIGS. Note that the calculation process, the rearrangement process, the reflection process, the law revision process, and the configuration process executed by the reliability calculation apparatus 501 are examples of the reliability calculation method of the disclosed technology. Hereinafter, each process is explained in full detail.

  First, the legal revision process shown in FIG. 34 will be described.

  FIG. 34 is a flowchart illustrating an example of the legal revision process. In the flowchart of the legal revision process shown in FIG. 34, first, in step S500, the difference acquisition unit 182 acquires the legal information from the legal information storage unit 156.

  Next, in step S502, the difference acquisition unit 182 uses the difference extraction method of the prior art as the difference information to calculate the difference between the latest law information received from the user terminal 3 and the law information acquired in step S500. get.

  In step S504, the difference acquisition unit 182 acquires the law revision information list 110 from the law revision information storage unit.

  Next, in step S506, the difference acquisition unit 182 updates the law revision information list 110 acquired in step S504 based on each of the difference information acquired in step S502.

  Next, in step S508, the law information stored in the law information storage unit 156 is updated using the latest law information received from the user terminal 3 as the law information.

  Next, the configuration processing shown in FIGS. 35 and 36 will be described.

  35 and 36 are flowcharts showing an example of the configuration process. 35 and 36, first, in step S600, the determination unit 192 acquires the configuration change information list 122 from the storage in the configuration change information storage unit 152.

  Next, in step S <b> 602, the determination unit 192 acquires the manual screen information list 118 from the manual screen information storage unit 50.

  Next, in step S <b> 604, the determination unit 192 acquires the manual revision information list 116 from the manual revision information storage unit 49.

  Next, in step S606, the determination unit 192 matches the information on the request screen included in the screen request information received from the user terminal 3 in the configuration change information list 122 acquired in step S600. It is determined whether there is configuration change information. The determination unit 192 determines that, among the configuration change information acquired in step S600, the “corresponding screen” includes configuration change information that matches the information on the request screen included in the screen request information received from the user terminal 3. In the case, the configuration process proceeds to step S608. On the other hand, when the determination unit 192 determines that the “corresponding screen” in the configuration change information does not include configuration change information that matches the information on the request screen included in the screen request information received from the user terminal 3. Then, the configuration process proceeds to step S668 in FIG.

  Next, in step S608, the determination unit 192 includes “corresponding screen” in the screen request information received from the user terminal 3 among the configuration change information included in the configuration change information list 122 acquired in step S600. Get the configuration change information that matches the information on the request screen. In step S608, the determination unit 192 acquires “priority” of the acquired configuration change information.

  Next, in step S610, the determination unit 192 determines whether the “priority” of the configuration change information acquired in step S608 is a legal revision. If the determination unit 192 determines that the “priority” of the configuration change information acquired in step S608 is legal revision, the configuration processing proceeds to step S612. On the other hand, if the determination unit 192 determines that the “priority” of the configuration change information acquired in step S608 is manual revision, the configuration processing proceeds to step S650 in FIG.

  Next, in step S612, the determination unit 192 acquires the law screen information list 108 from the law screen information storage unit 40.

  Next, in step S614, the determination unit 192 includes “corresponding screen” in the screen request information received from the user terminal 3 among the legal screen information included in the legal screen information list 108 acquired in step S612. Get the legal screen information that matches the information on the request screen. In step S614, the determination unit 192 acquires the law corresponding to the screen request information received from the user terminal 3 from the “law” of the acquired law screen information.

  Next, in step S616, the determination unit 192 acquires the law revision information list 110 from the law revision information storage unit.

  Next, in step S618, the determination unit 192 determines whether or not there is a law in the “revised part” of the law revision information included in the law revision information list 110 obtained in step S616 that matches the law obtained in step S614. judge. If the determination unit 192 determines that there is a law in the “revised location” of the law revision information included in the law revision information list 110 acquired in step S616 that matches the law acquired in step S614, Then, the process proceeds to step S620. On the other hand, if the determination unit 192 determines that there is no law in the “revised part” of the law revision information included in the law revision information list 110 acquired in step S616 that matches the law acquired in step S614. The processing moves to step S672 in FIG.

  Next, in step S620, the determination unit 192 obtains the “revision” of the law revision information having the latest “date of revision” among the law revision information obtained in step S618 and the obtained law and the “revised part” match. Get "day".

  Next, in step S622, the determination unit 192 determines from the manual screen information list acquired in step S602 that the “corresponding screen” matches the information on the request screen included in the screen request information received from the user terminal 3. Get screen information. In step S <b> 622, the determination unit 192 acquires a manual location corresponding to the screen request information received from the user terminal 3 from the “manual” of the acquired manual screen information.

  Next, in step S624, the determination unit 192 determines whether or not the manual revision information list 116 acquired in step S604 has manual revision information in which “revised part” matches the manual part obtained in step S622. To do. If the determination unit 192 determines that the manual revision information list 116 acquired in step S604 includes the manual revision information in which the “revised part” matches the manual part acquired in step S622, The process moves to S626. On the other hand, if the determination unit 192 determines that the manual revision information list 116 acquired in step S604 does not include the manual revision information in which the “revised part” matches the manual part acquired in step S622, the process proceeds to step S630. Transition.

  Next, in step S626, the determination unit 192 acquires the “revision date” of the manual revision information having the latest “revise date” among the manual revision information acquired in step S624.

  Next, in step S628, the determination unit 192 determines whether the “revised date” of the law acquired in step S620 is newer than the latest “revised date” of the manual acquired in step S626. If the determination unit 192 determines that the “revised date” of the law acquired in step S620 is newer than the “revised date” of the manual acquired in step S626, the configuration processing proceeds to step S630. On the other hand, if the determination unit 192 determines that the “revised date” of the law acquired in step S620 is older than the “revised date” of the manual acquired in step S626, the configuration processing is performed in step S672 of FIG. Migrate to

  Next, in step S630, the determination unit 192 acquires the operation history information list 104 from the operation history information storage unit 36.

  Next, in step S632, the determination unit 192 matches the requested screen information included in the screen request information received from the user terminal 3 in the operation history information acquired in step S630. Get operation history information. In step S <b> 616, the determination unit 192 acquires operation history information that is user information included in the screen request information received from the user terminal 3 by the “operator” of the acquired operation history information. In step S632, the determination unit 192 determines whether there is operation history information in which the “operation date” of the acquired operation history information is newer than the “revised date” acquired in step S620. If the determination unit 192 determines that there is operation history information whose “operation date” of the acquired operation history information is newer than the “revised date” acquired in step S620, the configuration process is as shown in FIG. Control goes to step S672. On the other hand, when the determination unit 192 determines that the operation history information of the acquired operation history information does not have operation history information that is newer than the “revised date” acquired in step S620, The process proceeds to S634.

  Next, in step S634, the changing unit 194 acquires screen information corresponding to the information on the request screen included in the screen request information received from the user terminal 3 from the screen information storage unit 154.

  Next, in step S636, the changing unit 194 matches the information on the request screen included in the screen request information received from the user terminal 3 from the configuration change information acquired in step S600, and , Configuration change information whose “reason” is a legal revision is acquired. In step S636, the changing unit 194 changes the configuration information of the screen information acquired in step S634 based on the “change target” and the “change configuration” of the acquired configuration change information.

  Next, in step S638, the changing unit 194 transmits the screen information obtained by changing the configuration information acquired in step S636 to the user terminal 3, and ends the configuration process.

  In step S650 of FIG. 36, the determination unit 192 matches the information on the request screen included in the screen request information received from the user terminal 3 from the manual screen information list 118 acquired in step S602. Get manual screen information. In step S <b> 622, the determination unit 192 acquires a manual location corresponding to the screen request information received from the user terminal 3 from the “manual” of the acquired manual screen information.

  Next, in step S656, the determination unit 192 determines whether or not the manual revision information list 116 acquired in step S604 has manual revision information in which “revised location” matches the manual location obtained in step S650. To do. When the determination unit 192 determines that the manual revision information list 116 acquired in step S604 has the manual revision information in which the “revised part” matches the manual part acquired in step S650, the configuration processing is performed in step S658. Migrate to On the other hand, when the determination unit 192 determines that the manual revision information list 116 acquired in step S604 does not include the manual revision information in which “revised part” matches the manual part acquired in step S650, the configuration processing is performed in step S604. The process proceeds to S666.

  Next, in step S658, the determination unit 192 acquires the “revision date” of the manual revision information having the latest “revision date” among the manual revision information obtained in step S624.

  Next, in step S660, the determination unit 192 acquires the confirmation information list 120 from the confirmation information storage unit 151.

  Next, in step S662, the determination unit 192 includes a request screen in which “corresponding screen” is included in the screen request information received from the user terminal 3 among the confirmation information included in the confirmation information list 120 acquired in step S660. Acquire confirmation information that matches the information of. In step S 662, the determination unit 192 confirms that the “operator” of the confirmation information included in the acquired confirmation information list 120 matches the user information included in the screen request information received from the user terminal 3. Get information. In step S662, the determination unit 192 acquires confirmation information in which the “confirmation date” of the obtained confirmation information is newer than the “revised date” obtained in step S658. In step S662, the determination unit 192 acquires the number of acquired confirmation information as the number of manual confirmations.

  Next, in step S663, the determination unit 192 acquires configuration change information in which “corresponding screen” included in the configuration change information list acquired in step S600 matches the information of the request screen included in the screen request information. . Further, the determination unit 192 acquires the “confirmation count” of the acquired configuration change information.

  Next, in step S664, the determination unit 192 determines whether or not the number of manual confirmations acquired in step S640 is greater than the “number of confirmations” acquired in step S663. If the determination unit 192 determines that the number of manual confirmations acquired in step S640 is greater than the “number of confirmations” acquired in step S663, the configuration processing proceeds to step S666. On the other hand, when the determination unit 192 determines that the number of manual confirmations acquired in step S640 is equal to or less than the “number of confirmations” acquired in step S663, the configuration processing proceeds to step S674.

  Next, in step S666, the determination unit 192 determines whether the determination result of step S610 indicates that the “priority” of the configuration change information acquired in step S608 is a legal revision. If the determination result of step S610 indicates that the “priority” of the configuration change information acquired in step S608 is the law revision, the determination unit 192 proceeds to step S668. On the other hand, if the determination result of step S610 indicates that the “priority” of the configuration change information acquired in step S608 is manual revision, the determination unit 192 proceeds to step S612 in FIG.

  Next, in step S668, the changing unit 194 acquires screen information corresponding to the request screen information included in the screen request information received from the user terminal 3 from the screen information storage unit 154.

  Next, in step S670, the screen information acquired in step S668 is transmitted to the user terminal 3, and the configuration process ends.

  In step S672, the determination result in step S610 determines whether the “priority” of the configuration change information acquired in step S608 is a legal revision. When the determination result of step S610 is “priority” of the configuration change information acquired in step S608 by the determination unit 192 is a legal revision, the configuration process proceeds to step S650. On the other hand, if the determination result of step S610 indicates that the “priority” of the configuration change information acquired in step S608 is manual revision, the determination unit 192 proceeds to step S668.

  In step S674, the changing unit 194 acquires screen information corresponding to the information on the request screen included in the screen request information received from the user terminal 3 from the screen information storage unit 154.

  Next, in step S676, the changing unit 194 matches the information on the request screen included in the screen request information received from the user terminal 3 from the configuration change information acquired in step S600, and the “corresponding screen”. The configuration change information whose “reason” is the manual revision is acquired. In step S646, the changing unit 194 changes the configuration information of the screen information acquired in step S674 based on the “change target” and “change configuration” of the acquired configuration change information.

  Next, in step S678, the changing unit 194 transmits screen information obtained by changing the configuration information acquired in step S676 to the user terminal 3, and ends the configuration process.

  As described above, according to the second embodiment, when there is a revision of a law, it is possible to prompt a revision of a manual of a screen corresponding to the law. In addition, when a manual is revised, confirmation of the manual can be prompted on a screen corresponding to the manual.

  In addition, although the change part 194 demonstrated the case where a help button was made into a change location, it is not limited to this. For example, the changing unit 194 may use a link corresponding to the manual as the changed portion.

  Moreover, in 2nd Embodiment, although revision of the law was demonstrated, it is not limited to this. For example, it may be a revised version of a rule or the like.

  Next, a third embodiment will be described. In addition, about the part which becomes the structure and effect | action similar to 1st Embodiment, the same code | symbol is attached | subjected and description is abbreviate | omitted.

  In the third embodiment, the determination point calculation method is different from that of the first embodiment. Specifically, in the third embodiment, the calculation unit first calculates clinical trial points, individual points, usage points, and law points. Next, the calculation unit acquires a coefficient corresponding to each point. Next, a calculation part calculates the sum total of the product of each calculated point and the coefficient corresponding to each point as a determination point.

  FIG. 37 is an example of the reliability calculation system 805 of the third embodiment. As illustrated in FIG. 37, the reliability calculation system 800 includes a reliability calculation device 801 and a user terminal 3. A reliability calculation device 801 according to the third embodiment is connected to a user terminal 3 for users via a network 2 such as the Internet so as to be able to communicate with each other.

  FIG. 38 shows a functional block diagram of a reliability calculation apparatus 801 according to the third embodiment. As shown in FIG. 38, the reliability calculation device 801 includes a calculation unit 860 including a clinical trial point calculation unit 862, a usage point calculation unit 864, a personal point calculation unit 866, a law point calculation unit 868, and a determination point calculation unit 870. Have. In addition, the reliability calculation device 801 includes a storage unit 30, a registration unit 72, and an approval unit 80.

  The calculation unit 860 calculates a determination point of the correction information based on the correction information received from the user terminal 3 and various information stored in the storage unit 30. The calculation unit 860 also corrects correction request information that combines the correction information and the calculated determination point, and the correction request corresponding to the correction location information included in the correction information stored in the correction request information storage unit 46. Store in the information list 112.

  The clinical trial point calculation unit 862 acquires the sum of the values of “number of cases” in the same manner as the clinical trial point calculation unit 62 of the first embodiment. In addition, the clinical trial point calculation unit 862 sets the total of the acquired “number of cases” as clinical trial points. In addition, the clinical trial point calculation unit 862 acquires coefficient information of clinical trial points, similarly to the clinical trial point calculation unit 62 of the first embodiment.

  The usage point calculation unit 864 acquires the number of times of usage in the same manner as the usage point calculation unit 64 of the first embodiment. In addition, the usage point calculation unit 864 acquires coefficient information of usage points in the same manner as the usage point calculation unit 64 of the first embodiment. In addition, the usage point calculation unit 864 acquires the update count point in the same manner as the usage point calculation unit 64 of the first embodiment. In addition, the use point calculation unit 864 acquires the sum of the acquired use count and the update count point as a use point.

  The personal point calculation unit 866 acquires qualification points corresponding to the correction information, as with the personal point calculation unit 66 of the first embodiment. Also, the personal point calculation unit 866 acquires the years of service as with the personal point calculation unit 66 of the first embodiment. Also, the personal point calculation unit 866 acquires coefficient information of personal points in the same manner as the personal point calculation unit 66 of the first embodiment. Also, the personal point calculation unit 866 acquires the sum of the acquired qualification points and the acquired years of service as personal points.

  In the law point calculation unit 868, the law corresponding to the value of 365 (the value representing the number of days in a year) and the acquired correction information is revised last, as in the law point calculation unit 68 of the first embodiment. The difference (365-period) from the period from is calculated and obtained as a legal point. In addition, the law point calculation unit 868 acquires the coefficient information of the law points as in the law point calculation unit 68 of the first embodiment.

  The determination point calculation unit 870 acquires, as a determination point, the sum of products of each acquired point and the value of “coefficient” in the coefficient information of each point. Specifically, the determination point calculation unit 870 calculates the product of the acquired clinical trial point and the “coefficient” value of the coefficient information of the acquired clinical trial point. Further, the determination point calculation unit 870 calculates the product of the acquired usage point and the value of the “coefficient” of the coefficient information of the acquired usage point. Further, the determination point calculation unit 870 calculates the product of the acquired individual points and the “coefficient” value of the coefficient information of the acquired individual points. Further, the determination point calculation unit 870 calculates the product of the acquired law point and the value of “coefficient” of the coefficient information of the acquired law point. Further, the determination point calculation unit 870 acquires the sum of the acquired calculation results as a determination point.

  The reliability calculation device 801 can be realized by a computer 900 shown in FIG. 39, for example. The computer 900 includes a CPU 902, a memory 904 as a temporary storage area, and a nonvolatile storage device 906. The computer 900 also includes an input / output I / F 210 to which the input / output device 208 is connected. The computer 900 also includes an R / W unit 214 that controls reading and writing of data with respect to the recording medium 212 and a network I / F 216 connected to the network 2 such as the Internet. The CPU 902, the memory 904, the storage device 906, the input / output I / F 210, the R / W unit 214, and the network I / F 216 are connected to each other via a bus 218.

  The storage device 906 can be realized by an HDD, an SSD, a flash memory, or the like. The storage device 906 as a storage medium stores a calculation program 950, a rearrangement program 320, and a reflection program 330 for causing the computer 900 to function as the reliability calculation device 801. Further, the storage device 906 has each storage area in the first embodiment.

  The CPU 902 reads the calculation program 950, the rearrangement program 320, and the reflection program 330 from the storage device 906 and expands them in the memory 904. Further, the CPU 902 sequentially executes processes included in the calculation program 950, the rearrangement program 320, and the reflection program 330. Further, the CPU 902 reads out each piece of information as in the first embodiment, and develops it in the memory 904 as each list.

  The calculation program 950 includes a clinical trial point calculation process 952, a usage point calculation process 954, a personal point calculation process 956, a law point calculation process 958, and a determination point calculation process 960.

  The CPU 202 operates as the clinical trial point calculation unit 862 shown in FIG. 38 by executing the clinical trial point calculation process 952. Further, the CPU 902 operates as the usage point calculation unit 864 shown in FIG. 38 by executing the usage point calculation process 954. Further, the CPU 902 operates as a personal point calculation unit 866 shown in FIG. 38 by executing a personal point calculation process 956. Further, the CPU 902 operates as a law point calculation unit 868 shown in FIG. 38 by executing a law point calculation process 958. Further, the CPU 902 operates as the determination point calculation unit 870 illustrated in FIG. 38 by executing the determination point calculation process 960.

  Accordingly, the computer 900 that has executed the calculation program 950, the rearrangement program 320, and the reflection program 330 functions as the reliability calculation device 801.

  The reliability calculation device 801 can also be realized by, for example, a semiconductor integrated circuit, more specifically, an ASIC or the like.

  Next, the operation of the reliability calculation device 801 according to the third embodiment will be described. First, when the reliability calculation device 801 receives the correction information received from the user terminal 3, the reliability calculation device 801 executes the calculation process shown in FIG.

  The calculation process shown in FIG. 40 will be described.

  FIG. 40 is a flowchart illustrating an example of the calculation process. In the flowchart of the calculation process shown in FIG. 40, first, the clinical trial point calculation unit 862 acquires the coefficient information list 100 from the coefficient information storage unit 32 in step S100.

  In step S900, the clinical trial point calculation unit 862 determines the clinical trial for which the corrector was responsible based on the information on the corrector included in the correction information received from the user terminal 3 and the clinical trial information list 102 acquired in step S102. Get the total number of cases. The clinical trial point calculation unit 862 acquires the total number of clinical trial cases handled by the acquired corrector as clinical trial points.

  Next, in step S902, the usage point calculation unit 864 calculates the sum of the usage count acquired in step S124 and the update count points acquired in step S130 as a usage point.

  Next, in step S904, the personal point calculation unit 866 calculates the sum of the qualification points acquired in step S134 and the years of service acquired in step S136 as personal points.

  Next, in step S906, the law point calculation unit 868 calculates law points from the period corresponding to the correction information acquired in step S146.

  Next, in step S908, the determination point calculation unit 870 calculates the product of the clinical trial point acquired in step S900 and the “coefficient” value of the coefficient information of the clinical trial point acquired in step S118. Further, the determination point calculation unit 870 calculates the product of the use point acquired in step S902 and the value of “coefficient” of the coefficient information of the use point acquired in step S126. In addition, the determination point calculation unit 870 calculates the product of the individual point acquired in step S904 and the “coefficient” value of the coefficient information of the individual point acquired in step S138. Further, the determination point calculation unit 870 calculates the product of the law point acquired in step S906 and the value of the “coefficient” of the coefficient information of the law point acquired in step S148. Further, the determination point calculation unit 870 calculates the sum of the calculated results as a determination point.

  As described above, according to the third embodiment, a determination point is calculated for each of the manual correction proposals related to the corresponding screen, which has been corrected by the corrector in accordance with changes in laws and regulations. The determination point is calculated based on the score obtained based on the corrector information of the corrector and the coefficient predetermined for the combination of the corrector attribute and the screen corresponding to the correction location of the correction plan. Then, it is possible to present a correction plan with high reliability in a distinguishable manner by presenting each of the correction plans using the determination points.

  In the above description, the mode in which the programs according to the disclosed technology are stored (installed) in advance in the storage devices 206, 406, and 906 has been described. However, the present invention is not limited to this. Each program according to the disclosed technology can be provided in a form recorded on a recording medium such as a CD-ROM, a DVD-ROM, or a USB memory.

  Regarding the above embodiment, the following additional notes are disclosed.

(Appendix 1)
For each change plan of the explanation information regarding the input screen changed by the changer in accordance with the change of the agreement, the score obtained based on the changer information of the changer, the attribute of the changer, and the change plan Based on a predetermined coefficient for the combination of input screens corresponding to the changed part, the reliability is calculated,
Present each of the proposed changes using the reliability calculated for each of the proposed changes;
The reliability calculation program which makes a computer perform the process containing this.
(Appendix 2)
The coefficient for the combination of the input screen corresponding to the changer's attribute and the change location of the proposed change is determined in advance such that the higher the relevance between the input screen and the attribute, the higher the reliability. Reliability calculation program described in the section.
(Appendix 3)
The reliability calculation according to appendix 1 or 2, wherein the process of calculating the reliability includes calculating a reliability based on a score obtained based on the attribute of the changer and the coefficient for each of the proposed changes. program.
(Appendix 4)
The process of calculating the reliability is based on the score obtained for each change proposal based on the frequency of use of the input screen corresponding to the change location of the change proposal of the changer, and the coefficient. The reliability calculation program according to supplementary note 1 or 2 for calculating the reliability.
(Appendix 5)
The process of calculating the reliability is a plurality of scores obtained based on the changer information of the changer for each of the change proposals, the coefficient corresponding to each of the plurality of scores, and The reliability calculation program according to supplementary note 1 or 2, wherein the reliability is calculated based on the coefficient predetermined for the combination of the input screen corresponding to the attribute of the changer and the change location of the change plan.
(Appendix 6)
The reliability calculation program according to any one of supplementary notes 1 to 5, wherein the presenting process arranges and presents each of the proposed changes in the order of the reliability.
(Appendix 7)
The reliability calculation program according to any one of appendices 1 to 5, wherein the presenting process presents each of the change plans in combination with each of the reliability calculated for each of the change plans.
(Appendix 8)
The process of calculating the reliability is a combination of a score obtained based on the changer information of the changer for each of the change proposals and an input screen corresponding to the changer attribute and the change location of the change proposal. Supplementary notes 1 to 1 for calculating the reliability based on at least one of a predetermined coefficient, a score based on information on the trial of the changer, and a score based on progress information from the change of the agreement. 8. The reliability calculation program according to any one of items 7.
(Appendix 9)
Furthermore, the input screen corresponding to the explanation information that needs to be changed according to the change of the agreement is specified,
The reliability calculation program according to any one of supplementary notes 1 to 8, wherein the configuration information of the specified input screen is changed.
(Appendix 10)
Furthermore, when the change plan of the explanation information regarding the changed input screen is reflected, the input screen corresponding to the change plan of the reflected explanation information is specified,
The reliability calculation program according to any one of supplementary notes 1 to 8, wherein the configuration information of the specified input screen is changed.
(Appendix 11)
The reliability calculation program according to appendix 9 or 10, wherein the process of changing the configuration information of the input screen changes the configuration information of the input screen based on user information of the user.
(Appendix 12)
The reliability calculation program according to any one of appendices 9 to 11, wherein the process of changing the configuration information of the input screen changes the configuration information of a portion corresponding to the description information related to the input screen included in the input screen.
(Appendix 13)
For each change plan of the explanation information regarding the input screen changed by the changer in accordance with the change of the agreement, the score obtained based on the changer information of the changer, the attribute of the changer, and the change plan Based on a predetermined coefficient for the combination of input screens corresponding to the changed part, the reliability is calculated,
Present each of the proposed changes using the reliability calculated for each of the proposed changes;
The reliability calculation method including this.
(Appendix 14)
The coefficient for the combination of the input screen corresponding to the attribute of the changer and the change location of the proposed change is determined in advance such that the higher the relevance between the input screen and the attribute, the higher the reliability. The reliability calculation method described in the item.
(Appendix 15)
The reliability calculation according to appendix 13 or 14, wherein the process of calculating the reliability includes calculating a reliability based on the score obtained based on the attribute of the changer and the coefficient for each of the proposed changes. Method.
(Appendix 16)
The process of calculating the reliability is based on the score obtained for each change proposal based on the frequency of use of the input screen corresponding to the change location of the change proposal of the changer, and the coefficient. 15. The reliability calculation method according to supplementary note 13 or 14, wherein the reliability is calculated.
(Appendix 17)
The process of calculating the reliability is a plurality of scores obtained based on the changer information of the changer for each of the change proposals, the coefficient corresponding to each of the plurality of scores, and 15. The reliability calculation method according to appendix 13 or 14, wherein the reliability is calculated based on the coefficient predetermined for the combination of the input screen corresponding to the attribute of the changer and the change location of the change plan.
(Appendix 18)
The reliability calculation method according to any one of supplementary notes 13 to 17, wherein the presenting process arranges and presents each of the proposed changes in the order of the reliability.
(Appendix 19)
The reliability calculation method according to any one of appendices 13 to 17, wherein the presenting process presents each of the change plans in combination with each of the reliability levels calculated for each of the change plans.
(Appendix 20)
The process of calculating the reliability is a combination of a score obtained based on the changer information of the changer for each of the change proposals and an input screen corresponding to the changer attribute and the change location of the change proposal. Supplementary notes 13 to 13 for calculating the reliability based on at least one of a predetermined coefficient, a score based on information on the trial of the changer, and a score based on progress information from the change of the agreement. 20. The reliability calculation method according to any one of 19 above.
(Appendix 21)
Furthermore, the input screen corresponding to the explanation information that needs to be changed according to the change of the agreement is specified,
The reliability calculation method according to any one of supplementary notes 13 to 20, wherein the specified configuration information of the input screen is changed.
(Appendix 22)
Furthermore, when the change plan of the explanation information regarding the changed input screen is reflected, the input screen corresponding to the change plan of the reflected explanation information is specified,
The reliability calculation method according to any one of supplementary notes 13 to 20, wherein the specified configuration information of the input screen is changed.
(Appendix 23)
23. The reliability calculation method according to appendix 21 or 22, wherein the process of changing the configuration information of the input screen includes changing the configuration information of the input screen based on user information of the user.
(Appendix 24)
24. The reliability calculation method according to any one of appendices 21 to 23, wherein the process of changing the configuration information of the input screen includes changing the configuration information of a part corresponding to the description information related to the input screen included in the input screen.
(Appendix 25)
For each change plan of the explanation information regarding the input screen changed by the changer in accordance with the change of the agreement, the score obtained based on the changer information of the changer, the attribute of the changer, and the change plan A calculation unit that calculates reliability based on a predetermined coefficient for a combination of input screens corresponding to the changed portion;
A reordering unit that presents each of the proposed changes using the reliability calculated for each of the proposed changes;
Including a reliability calculation device.
(Appendix 26)
The coefficient for the combination of the input screen corresponding to the attribute of the changer and the change location of the change plan is determined in advance such that the higher the relevance between the input screen and the attribute, the higher the reliability. Reliability calculation apparatus according to item.
(Appendix 27)
27. The reliability calculation device according to appendix 25 or 26, wherein the reliability calculation unit calculates the reliability based on the score obtained based on the attribute of the changer and the coefficient for each of the proposed changes. .
(Appendix 28)
The reliability calculation unit, for each of the change plans, based on the score obtained based on the frequency of use of the input screen corresponding to the change location of the change plan of the changer and the coefficient, 27. The reliability calculation device according to appendix 25 or 26, which calculates a degree.
(Appendix 29)
The reliability calculation unit is, for each of the change proposals, a plurality of scores obtained based on the changer information of the changer, the coefficient corresponding to each of the plurality of scores, and the 27. The reliability calculation apparatus according to appendix 25 or 26, wherein the reliability is calculated based on the coefficient previously determined for a combination of an input screen corresponding to a changer attribute and a change location of the change plan.
(Appendix 30)
30. The reliability calculation device according to any one of supplementary notes 25 to 29, wherein the rearrangement unit rearranges and presents each of the proposed changes in the order of the reliability.
(Appendix 31)
27. The reliability calculation device according to any one of supplementary notes 25 to 26, wherein the rearrangement unit presents each of the change plans in combination with each of the reliability calculated for each of the change plans.
(Appendix 32)
The reliability calculation unit, for each of the change plans, a combination of the score obtained based on the changer information of the changer, and the input screen corresponding to the changer attribute and the change location of the change plan Supplementary notes 25 to 31 for calculating the reliability based on at least one of a predetermined coefficient, a score based on information on the trial of the changer, and a score based on progress information from the change of the agreement. The reliability calculation apparatus according to any one of the above.
(Appendix 33)
Furthermore, a determination unit that identifies the input screen corresponding to the explanation information that needs to be changed according to the change of the agreement;
33. The reliability calculation device according to any one of appendices 25 to 32, including a changing unit that changes the configuration information of the specified input screen.
(Appendix 34)
And a determination unit that identifies the input screen corresponding to the reflected description information change plan when the description information change plan related to the changed input screen is reflected;
33. The reliability calculation device according to any one of appendices 25 to 32, including a changing unit that changes the configuration information of the specified input screen.
(Appendix 35)
The reliability calculation device according to attachment 33 or 34, wherein the changing unit changes the configuration information of the input screen based on user information of the user.
(Appendix 36)
36. The reliability calculation device according to any one of appendices 33 to 35, wherein the change unit changes configuration information of a part corresponding to description information related to the input screen included in the input screen.
(Appendix 37)
For each change plan of the explanation information regarding the input screen changed by the changer in accordance with the change of the agreement, the score obtained based on the changer information of the changer, the attribute of the changer, and the change plan A calculation unit that calculates reliability based on a predetermined coefficient for a combination of input screens corresponding to the changed portion;
A reordering unit that presents each of the proposed changes using the reliability calculated for each of the proposed changes;
Including a reliability calculation device,
An information terminal that accepts a change in the explanation information by an operation of the changer, and transmits the combination to the reliability calculation device;
Including reliability calculation system.
(Appendix 38)
For each change plan of the explanation information regarding the input screen changed by the changer in accordance with the change of the agreement, the score obtained based on the changer information of the changer, the attribute of the changer, and the change plan Based on a predetermined coefficient for the combination of input screens corresponding to the changed part, the reliability is calculated,
Present each of the proposed changes using the reliability calculated for each of the proposed changes;
A storage medium storing a reliability calculation program that causes a computer to execute processing including the above.

1, 501, 801 Reliability calculation device 2 Network 3 User terminal 5, 500, 805 Reliability calculation system 30, 130 Storage unit 60, 860 Calculation unit 62, 862 Clinical trial point calculation unit 64, 864 Usage point calculation unit 66, 866 Individual point calculation unit 68, 868 Legal point calculation unit 70, 870 Determination point calculation unit 72, 172 Registration unit 80 Approval unit 82 Sorting unit 84 Selection unit 86 Reflection unit 100 Coefficient information list 102 Clinical trial information list 104 Operation history information list 106 Personal attribute information list 108 Legal screen information list 110 Legal revision information list 112 Correction request information list 114 Manual information list 116 Manual revision information list 118 Manual screen information list 120 Confirmation information list 122 Configuration change information list 172 Registration unit 1 0 law revision unit 182 difference obtaining unit 184 laws reflecting unit 190 constituting unit 192 determination unit 194 changes part 200,400,900 computer 202,402,902 CPU
204, 404, 904 Memory 206, 406, 906 Storage device 300, 950 Calculation program 302, 952 Clinical trial point calculation process 304, 954 Usage point calculation process 306, 956 Individual point calculation process 308, 958 Legal point calculation process 310, 960 Determination Point calculation process 320 Rearrangement program 322 Rearrangement process 330 Reflection program 332 Selection process 334 Reflection process 440 Legal revision program 442 Difference process 444 Legal reflection process 450 Configuration program 452 Determination process 454 Change process

Claims (15)

For each change plan of the explanation information regarding the input screen changed by the changer in accordance with the change of the agreement, the score obtained based on the changer information of the changer, the attribute of the changer, and the change plan Based on a predetermined coefficient for the combination of input screens corresponding to the changed part, the reliability is calculated,
Present each of the proposed changes using the reliability calculated for each of the proposed changes;
The reliability calculation program which makes a computer perform the process containing this.   The coefficient for the combination of input screens corresponding to the attribute of the changer and the change location of the change plan is predetermined so that the higher the relevance between the input screen and the attribute, the higher the reliability. The reliability calculation program according to item 1.   3. The reliability according to claim 1, wherein the process of calculating the reliability calculates the reliability based on a score obtained based on an attribute of the changer and the coefficient for each of the proposed changes. Calculation program.   The process of calculating the reliability is based on the score obtained for each change proposal based on the frequency of use of the input screen corresponding to the change location of the change proposal of the changer, and the coefficient. The reliability calculation program according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the reliability is calculated.   The process of calculating the reliability is a plurality of scores obtained based on the changer information of the changer for each of the change proposals, the coefficient corresponding to each of the plurality of scores, and The reliability calculation program according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the reliability is calculated based on the coefficient determined in advance for the combination of the input screen corresponding to the attribute of the changer and the change location of the change plan.   The reliability calculation program according to claim 1, wherein the presenting process arranges and presents each of the change proposals in the order of the reliability.   The reliability calculation program according to any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein the presenting process presents each of the change plans in combination with each of the reliability calculated for each of the change plans.   The process of calculating the reliability is a combination of a score obtained based on the changer information of the changer for each of the change proposals and an input screen corresponding to the changer attribute and the change location of the change proposal. The reliability is calculated on the basis of at least one of a predetermined coefficient, a score based on information relating to the trial of the changer, and a score based on progress information from the change in the agreement. The reliability calculation program of any one of -7. Furthermore, the input screen corresponding to the explanation information that needs to be changed according to the change of the agreement is specified,
The reliability calculation program according to claim 1, wherein the configuration information of the specified input screen is changed. Furthermore, when the change plan of the explanation information regarding the changed input screen is reflected, the input screen corresponding to the change plan of the reflected explanation information is specified,
The reliability calculation program according to claim 1, wherein the configuration information of the specified input screen is changed.   The reliability calculation program according to claim 9 or 10, wherein the process of changing the configuration information of the input screen changes the configuration information of the input screen based on user information of the user.   The reliability calculation program according to any one of claims 9 to 11, wherein the process of changing the configuration information of the input screen changes the configuration information of a portion corresponding to the description information related to the input screen included in the input screen. . For each change plan of the explanation information regarding the input screen changed by the changer in accordance with the change of the agreement, the score obtained based on the changer information of the changer, the attribute of the changer, and the change plan Based on a predetermined coefficient for the combination of input screens corresponding to the changed part, the reliability is calculated,
Present each of the proposed changes using the reliability calculated for each of the proposed changes;
The reliability calculation method including this. For each change plan of the explanation information regarding the input screen changed by the changer in accordance with the change of the agreement, the score obtained based on the changer information of the changer, the attribute of the changer, and the change plan A calculation unit that calculates reliability based on a predetermined coefficient for a combination of input screens corresponding to the changed portion;
A reordering unit that presents each of the proposed changes using the reliability calculated for each of the proposed changes;
Including a reliability calculation device. For each change plan of the explanation information regarding the input screen changed by the changer in accordance with the change of the agreement, the score obtained based on the changer information of the changer, the attribute of the changer, and the change plan A calculation unit that calculates reliability based on a predetermined coefficient for a combination of input screens corresponding to the changed portion;
A reordering unit that presents each of the proposed changes using the reliability calculated for each of the proposed changes;
Including a reliability calculation device,
An information terminal that accepts a change in the explanation information by an operation of the changer, and transmits the combination to the reliability calculation device;
Including reliability calculation system.