JP6460879B2 - Regeneration method for tar-containing gas reforming catalyst - Google Patents
Regeneration method for tar-containing gas reforming catalyst Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP6460879B2 JP6460879B2 JP2015069326A JP2015069326A JP6460879B2 JP 6460879 B2 JP6460879 B2 JP 6460879B2 JP 2015069326 A JP2015069326 A JP 2015069326A JP 2015069326 A JP2015069326 A JP 2015069326A JP 6460879 B2 JP6460879 B2 JP 6460879B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- catalyst
- tar
- temperature
- reforming
- gas
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
- Y02P20/00—Technologies relating to chemical industry
- Y02P20/50—Improvements relating to the production of bulk chemicals
- Y02P20/584—Recycling of catalysts
Landscapes
- Catalysts (AREA)
- Industrial Gases (AREA)
Description
本発明は、タール含有ガス改質用触媒の再生方法に関する。 The present invention relates to a method for regenerating a tar-containing gas reforming catalyst.
鉄鋼業は我が国の総エネルギー消費量の約1割を占めるエネルギー多消費産業である。しかしながら、高炉法一貫製鉄プロセスにおける廃熱のうち約4割が未利用廃熱である。この未利用廃熱のうち、回収が比較的容易ではあるものの、従来は利用されていない熱源としてコークス炉から発生する高温の未精製COG(コークス炉ガス、以下「粗COG」と言う)の顕熱がある。この粗COGの顕熱の回収技術として、従来から間接熱回収を主体とする方法が提案されている。例えば、特許文献1および2には、コークス炉上昇管内部、又は、上昇管部と集気管部との間に伝熱管を設け、この伝熱管内部に熱媒体を循環流通させることによって、顕熱を回収する方法が開示されている。しかし、これらの方法では伝熱管外表面へ、コークス炉から発生した粗COGに随伴するタールや軽油等が付着し、付着物の炭化・凝集による緻密化が進行することによって、経時伝熱効率および熱交換効率が低下するという問題が不可避である。これら問題点を解決する技術として、特許文献3には、伝熱管外表面に結晶性アルミノシリケート、結晶性シリカ等の触媒を塗布し、これらの触媒を介して、タール等の付着物を低分子量の炭化水素に分解し、伝熱効率を安定維持する方法が開示されている。しかし、この方法も粗COG顕熱の間接熱回収技術の域を出ない。また、この方法では、タール等の重質炭化水素の分解生成物がガス燃料等として利用しやすい軽質炭化水素になるかどうかは全く考慮されていない。さらには、粗COG中に含有する高濃度の硫化水素等の触媒被毒性硫黄化合物成分による分解活性の経時劣化の影響についても検討されていない。 The steel industry is an energy-intensive industry that accounts for about 10% of Japan's total energy consumption. However, about 40% of the waste heat in the blast furnace integrated steelmaking process is unused waste heat. Of this unused waste heat, although it is relatively easy to recover, the high-temperature unrefined COG (coke oven gas, hereinafter referred to as “crude COG”) generated from the coke oven as a heat source that has not been used in the past has been revealed. Have a fever. As a technique for recovering the sensible heat of the crude COG, a method mainly using indirect heat recovery has been proposed. For example, in Patent Documents 1 and 2, a sensible heat is provided by providing a heat transfer pipe inside a coke oven riser pipe or between a riser pipe part and a gas collection pipe part, and circulating a heat medium inside the heat transfer pipe. Is disclosed. However, in these methods, tar, light oil and the like accompanying the coarse COG generated from the coke oven adhere to the outer surface of the heat transfer tube, and the densification of the deposit proceeds by carbonization / aggregation. The problem of reduced exchange efficiency is inevitable. As a technique for solving these problems, Patent Document 3 discloses that a catalyst such as crystalline aluminosilicate and crystalline silica is applied to the outer surface of the heat transfer tube, and deposits such as tar are removed through these catalysts with a low molecular weight. Is disclosed in which the heat transfer efficiency is stably maintained. However, this method also does not go beyond the indirect heat recovery technology of coarse COG sensible heat. Further, this method does not consider at all whether or not the decomposition products of heavy hydrocarbons such as tar become light hydrocarbons that can be easily used as gas fuel or the like. Furthermore, the influence of the deterioration over time of the decomposition activity due to the catalytically toxic sulfur compound components such as high-concentration hydrogen sulfide contained in the crude COG has not been studied.
従来、高温ガスの顕熱は間接的に回収されるか、若しくは全く利用されず、冷却されたガスを種々処理して利用するケースが殆どであった。なぜなら、粗COGは顕熱を有しているが、硫黄化合物の含有量が2000ppmを越えるので、上述のような、反応性ガスを触媒存在下で直接化学反応を導入して化学エネルギーに転換する技術は、タール等の重質炭化水素の分解反応に関する触媒反応設計の観点から、極めて実現が困難と考えられていたためである。したがって、これまで、高温で生成する反応性ガスを、触媒存在下で、その顕熱を利用して直接化学反応を導入し、化学エネルギーに転換する技術は殆ど報告されてない。
一部では、特許文献4に記載されているように検討はされていた。しかしながら、特許文献4に開示された触媒では、その改質活性は必ずしも十分とは言えなかった。また、エネルギー変換触媒は、一般にシリカ、アルミナなどの多孔質セラミックス担体上に活性金属種を外部から担持する担持法で製造されるが、その方法では担持金属成分の分散性をあげることが難しく、また硫黄被毒や炭素析出を受けやすい。そのため、上記高濃度硫黄化合物を含んだ雰囲気下、炭素析出を起こしやすい縮合多環芳香族主体のタールの分解反応に適する触媒を製造することが困難であった。また、一旦反応して性能劣化した後、再生のため空気燃焼した場合に、担持金属粒子のシンタリング(粗大化)が起こりやすく、再生による活性の再現を実現することも困難であった。
一方、特許文献5や非特許文献1には、ニッケル、マグネシウム及びアルミニウムを含んだ酸化物として、各金属成分を溶かした水溶液から沈殿剤により沈殿物(主にハイドロタルサイト構造を形成)を作成した後、焼成した材料について、開示されている。しかしながら、これらの材料は、改質活性が不十分で且つ炭素析出量が多く、実用化に向けて課題を有していた。
Conventionally, the sensible heat of the high temperature gas is indirectly recovered or not used at all, and in most cases, the cooled gas is used after various treatments. Because the crude COG has sensible heat, but the sulfur compound content exceeds 2000 ppm, the reactive gas as described above is directly converted into chemical energy by introducing a chemical reaction in the presence of a catalyst. This is because the technology was considered to be extremely difficult to realize from the viewpoint of catalytic reaction design related to the decomposition reaction of heavy hydrocarbons such as tar. Therefore, until now, there have been few reports on techniques for converting a reactive gas generated at a high temperature into chemical energy by directly introducing a chemical reaction using sensible heat in the presence of a catalyst.
Some have been studied as described in Patent Document 4. However, the catalyst disclosed in Patent Document 4 cannot be said to have sufficient reforming activity. In addition, the energy conversion catalyst is generally produced by a supporting method in which an active metal species is supported from the outside on a porous ceramic carrier such as silica and alumina, but it is difficult to increase the dispersibility of the supported metal component by that method. Also susceptible to sulfur poisoning and carbon deposition. For this reason, it has been difficult to produce a catalyst suitable for the cracking reaction of a condensed polycyclic aromatic-based tar that is likely to cause carbon deposition in an atmosphere containing the above-described high-concentration sulfur compound. Further, when the performance is deteriorated by reacting once and then air combustion is performed for regeneration, sintering of the supported metal particles is likely to occur, and it is difficult to reproduce the activity by regeneration.
On the other hand, in Patent Document 5 and Non-Patent Document 1, a precipitate (mainly forming a hydrotalcite structure) is formed from an aqueous solution in which each metal component is dissolved as an oxide containing nickel, magnesium and aluminum. The fired material is then disclosed. However, these materials have insufficient reforming activity and a large amount of carbon deposition, and have problems for practical use.
さらに、近年、地球温暖化問題により、二酸化炭素排出量削減の有効手段として炭素質原料の一つであるバイオマスの利用が注目されており、バイオマスの高効率エネルギー転換に関する研究が各所で行われている。また、昨今のエネルギー資源確保の観点から、過去精力的に行われてきた石炭の有効活用に関する研究も実用化に向けて見直されてきている。このような中で、特許文献6などでは、バイオマスの乾留で生成するタールをガス化して、粗ガス(未精製ガス)を生成し、その顕熱を利用する方法について、特に触媒を用いたタールの触媒改質を中心に、種々検討されている。しかしながら、上記石炭由来タールの分解反応と同様に、触媒活性や触媒再生の観点からは必ずしも十分ではない。 Furthermore, in recent years, due to the global warming problem, the use of biomass, which is one of carbonaceous raw materials, has attracted attention as an effective means of reducing carbon dioxide emissions, and research on high-efficiency energy conversion of biomass has been conducted in various places. Yes. In addition, from the viewpoint of securing energy resources in recent years, research on effective utilization of coal, which has been vigorously performed in the past, has been reviewed for practical use. Under such circumstances, in Patent Document 6 and the like, a method of gasifying tar generated by dry distillation of biomass to generate crude gas (unrefined gas) and utilizing the sensible heat, particularly tar using a catalyst. Various studies have been made focusing on the catalytic reforming. However, like the coal-derived tar decomposition reaction, it is not always sufficient from the viewpoint of catalyst activity and catalyst regeneration.
特許文献7及び8では、石炭やバイオマスなどの炭素質原料を熱分解した時に発生し、重質鎖式炭化水素や縮合多環芳香族炭化水素などを主成分とするタールを含むと共に硫化水素を高濃度で含むタール含有ガス(粗ガス又は精製ガス等)を、触媒存在下で、高価な白金族を使わずに高性能且つ安定的にメタン、一酸化炭素、水素等の軽質化学物質に変換する、タール含有ガス改質用触媒やその製造方法、タール改質方法及びタール含有ガス改質用触媒の再生方法が検討されている。具体的には、触媒活性劣化時の触媒の再生において、800℃で水蒸気あるいは空気を接触させて、炭素や硫黄を除去する方法が記載されている。
発明者らは、特許文献7及び8に記載された触媒の再生方法を、改質反応と再生とを何度も繰り返し行って、詳しく検討した。その結果、特許文献7及び8に記載された触媒の再生方法において、再生ガスとして水蒸気を用いた場合には、析出した炭素の除去に時間がかかるということがわかった。また、再生ガスとして空気を用いた場合には、炭素の燃焼による発熱が激しく、800℃で空気を導入した場合でも、炭素の燃焼により830℃以上に温度が上昇してしまうことがわかった。触媒温度が830℃程度以上になると、触媒反応器の材質が、高価な特殊合金でない限り、すなわち、通常のSUS316のような材質では、材料強度不足になる問題が生じる。そのため、触媒温度の上昇を抑えるために、空気導入流量を抑える必要があり、炭素の燃焼に時間がかかってしまうという問題があることが判った。従来は、被毒された触媒から硫黄を除去し易いという理由から、特許文献7及び8に示されるように、主に水蒸気が用いられていた。また、改質反応や還元反応と同じ温度で行うという理由から、空気を接触させる場合でも、その温度を制御することは行われていなかった。
In Patent Documents 7 and 8, it is generated when a carbonaceous raw material such as coal or biomass is thermally decomposed, and contains tar containing mainly heavy chain hydrocarbons and condensed polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons as well as hydrogen sulfide. High-concentration tar-containing gas (crude gas or refined gas, etc.) is converted into light chemicals such as methane, carbon monoxide, and hydrogen in the presence of a catalyst without using an expensive platinum group. A tar-containing gas reforming catalyst, a method for producing the same, a tar reforming method, and a method for regenerating a tar-containing gas reforming catalyst have been studied. Specifically, a method for removing carbon and sulfur by contacting water vapor or air at 800 ° C. in regeneration of the catalyst when the catalyst activity deteriorates is described.
The inventors examined the catalyst regeneration methods described in Patent Documents 7 and 8 in detail by repeatedly performing the reforming reaction and regeneration many times. As a result, it was found that in the catalyst regeneration methods described in Patent Documents 7 and 8, when steam is used as the regeneration gas, it takes time to remove the precipitated carbon. In addition, it was found that when air was used as the regeneration gas, the heat generated by carbon combustion was intense, and even when air was introduced at 800 ° C., the temperature rose to 830 ° C. or more due to carbon combustion. When the catalyst temperature is about 830 ° C. or more, unless the material of the catalyst reactor is an expensive special alloy, that is, a material such as ordinary SUS316, there is a problem that the material strength is insufficient. Therefore, it has been found that in order to suppress the increase in the catalyst temperature, it is necessary to suppress the air introduction flow rate, and there is a problem that it takes time to burn carbon. Conventionally, steam is mainly used as shown in Patent Documents 7 and 8 because sulfur is easily removed from a poisoned catalyst. In addition, for the reason that the reaction is performed at the same temperature as the reforming reaction or the reduction reaction, the temperature has not been controlled even when the air is contacted.
石炭やバイオマスなど炭素質原料の熱分解時に発生する触媒被毒物質である硫化水素を含んだタール含有ガス(未精製ガス)に含有・随伴するタールを、触媒存在下で軽質化学物質へ転換し、メタン、一酸化炭素、水素等主体の燃料構成に転換する化学エネルギー転換のための処理に用いる改質用触媒(タール含有ガス改質用触媒)は、改質を行っていると経時的に性能が劣化(活性劣化)する。本発明は、このような活性劣化した改質用触媒を再生する(触媒性能を回復させる)、タール含有ガス改質用触媒の再生方法を提供することを目的とする。 The tar contained in or accompanied by tar containing gas (unrefined gas) containing hydrogen sulfide, which is a catalyst poisoning substance generated during pyrolysis of carbonaceous raw materials such as coal and biomass, is converted into light chemicals in the presence of the catalyst. The reforming catalyst (tar-containing gas reforming catalyst) used for the treatment for chemical energy conversion that converts to a fuel composition mainly composed of methane, carbon monoxide, hydrogen, etc. Performance deteriorates (activity deterioration). It is an object of the present invention to provide a method for regenerating a tar-containing gas reforming catalyst that regenerates such a catalyst for reforming whose activity has deteriorated (recovers the catalyst performance).
本発明者らは、触媒を構成する元素やその組成、および性能劣化後の触媒と空気や水素との反応性に着目して、触媒の再生方法について鋭意検討した。炭素質原料の熱分解時に粗ガスに含有・随伴するタールをメタン、一酸化炭素、水素等主体の軽質化学物質へ転換する触媒としては、従来の担持法とは異なる、固相晶析法により製造された触媒に着眼した。この固相晶析法により製造された触媒は(1)活性種金属の微細析出が可能であるので高速反応が可能である、(2)析出した活性金属がマトリクス(母相)と強固に結合するのでシンタリング(粗大化)しにくく活性劣化を抑制可能である、(3)析出した活性種金属を焼成によりマトリクスへ再度固溶できるのでシンタリングが抑制可能な再生ができる、などの種々の特徴を有する。 The present inventors diligently studied a method for regenerating the catalyst by paying attention to the elements constituting the catalyst, the composition thereof, and the reactivity between the catalyst after performance deterioration and air or hydrogen. As a catalyst to convert tar contained in or accompanied by crude gas during pyrolysis of carbonaceous raw materials into light chemical substances mainly composed of methane, carbon monoxide, hydrogen, etc., solid phase crystallization method is different from conventional loading method We focused on the catalyst produced. The catalyst produced by this solid-phase crystallization method is capable of (1) high-speed reaction because it is possible to finely precipitate active species, and (2) the precipitated active metal is firmly bonded to the matrix (matrix). Therefore, it is difficult to sinter (coarse), and the activity deterioration can be suppressed. (3) The precipitated active species metal can be re-dissolved in the matrix by firing, so that regeneration that can suppress sintering is possible. Has characteristics.
検討の結果、本発明者らは、硫黄被毒となり得る硫黄成分の高濃度の雰囲気下、かつタール等重質炭化水素などの炭素析出を起こしやすい成分を多量に含んだ過酷な状況下で、重質炭化水素をメタン、一酸化炭素、水素等の軽質化学物質へ変換し、炭素析出及び硫黄被毒により性能劣化した上記触媒を、空気により炭素を除去し、水素による還元処理で硫黄を除去することで、再び酸化物マトリクスからニッケル金属を酸化物表面にクラスター状に微細析出できることを見出した。上記のようなニッケル金属の微細析出は、予め活性種であるニッケル元素をマトリクスとなるアルミナ、マグネシアなどと化合物化させた触媒では、反応前の還元処理で酸化物マトリクスからニッケル金属が酸化物表面にクラスター状に微細析出することによると考えられる。
また、触媒を再生させる際、触媒層温度が800℃の状態で空気を導入した場合、触媒層温度が焼成温度である1000℃以上に急激に上昇して、触媒の比表面積が低下することで、触媒劣化に繋がる。本発明者らは、空気を導入する際は触媒層温度を400〜800℃に維持し、さらに、水素による還元時には触媒層温度を600〜800℃になるように維持することが重要であることを見出した。
As a result of the study, the present inventors have a high concentration atmosphere of a sulfur component that can be sulfur poisoning, and in a severe situation including a large amount of a component that easily causes carbon deposition such as heavy hydrocarbons such as tar, Converts heavy hydrocarbons into light chemicals such as methane, carbon monoxide, hydrogen, etc., removes carbon by air from the above catalyst whose performance has deteriorated due to carbon deposition and sulfur poisoning, and removes sulfur by reduction treatment with hydrogen As a result, it has been found that nickel metal can be finely precipitated in a cluster form again on the oxide surface from the oxide matrix. The fine precipitation of nickel metal as described above is achieved by using a catalyst in which nickel element as an active species is compounded in advance with alumina, magnesia, or the like as a matrix. This is thought to be due to the fine precipitation in clusters.
In addition, when regenerating the catalyst, when air is introduced in a state where the catalyst layer temperature is 800 ° C., the catalyst layer temperature rapidly rises to 1000 ° C. or more, which is the firing temperature, and the specific surface area of the catalyst decreases. , Leading to catalyst degradation. It is important for the inventors to maintain the catalyst layer temperature at 400 to 800 ° C. when introducing air, and to maintain the catalyst layer temperature at 600 to 800 ° C. during reduction with hydrogen. I found.
本発明の要旨は、下記の通りである。
(1)硫黄被毒された、タール含有ガス改質用の触媒の再生方法であって、ニッケル化合物とマグネシウム化合物との混合溶液に沈殿剤を添加して、ニッケルとマグネシウムを共沈させて沈殿物を生成し、当該沈殿物に、アルミナ粉末と水、または、アルミナゾルを加えて混合して混合物を生成し、当該混合物を、少なくとも乾燥及び焼成する触媒製造工程で製造され、かつ、表面に析出したニッケルの少なくとも一部が水素還元された状態で硫黄を含むタール含有ガスと接触することによって炭素析出及び硫黄被毒された前記触媒に、触媒層の温度を400〜800℃に維持したまま空気を接触させる空気接触工程と、前記空気接触工程の後に行われ、かつ、前記触媒に、前記触媒層の温度を600〜800℃に維持したまま水素ガスを接触させる水素ガス接触工程とを有することを特徴とするタール含有ガス改質用触媒の再生方法。
(2)前記空気接触工程において、前記触媒層の温度を400〜750℃に維持することを特徴とする(1)に記載のタール含有ガス改質用触媒の再生方法。
(3)前記触媒製造工程において、前記沈殿物の生成後、当該沈殿物を仮焼することを特徴とする(1)または(2)に記載のタール含有ガス改質用触媒の再生方法。
(4)前記触媒が、セリウムを含有していることを特徴とする(1)〜(3)のいずれか一項に記載のタール含有ガス改質用触媒の再生方法。
The gist of the present invention is as follows.
(1) A method for regenerating a catalyst for reforming a tar-containing gas poisoned with sulfur, wherein a precipitant is added to a mixed solution of a nickel compound and a magnesium compound, and nickel and magnesium are coprecipitated and precipitated. A mixture is formed by adding alumina powder and water or alumina sol to the precipitate and mixing the mixture to produce a mixture, and the mixture is produced at least by a catalyst production process that is dried and calcined, and deposited on the surface. The catalyst which has been subjected to carbon deposition and sulfur poisoning by contacting with a tar-containing gas containing sulfur in a state in which at least a part of the nickel thus obtained has been reduced with hydrogen is maintained at a temperature of 400 to 800 ° C. while maintaining the temperature of the catalyst layer. And an air contact step for contacting the catalyst, and hydrogen gas is contacted with the catalyst while maintaining the temperature of the catalyst layer at 600 to 800 ° C. after the air contact step. The method of reproducing tar-containing gas reforming catalyst, comprising a hydrogen gas contacting step of.
(2) The method for regenerating a tar-containing gas reforming catalyst according to (1), wherein the temperature of the catalyst layer is maintained at 400 to 750 ° C. in the air contact step.
(3) The method for regenerating a tar-containing gas reforming catalyst according to (1) or (2), wherein in the catalyst production step, the precipitate is calcined after the precipitate is generated.
(4) The method for regenerating a tar-containing gas reforming catalyst according to any one of (1) to (3), wherein the catalyst contains cerium.
本発明によれば、バイオマスガス化ガスや粗COG等の高濃度の硫化水素を含有するタール含有ガスに含有・随伴するタールを、触媒存在下で軽質化学物質へ転換し、メタン、一酸化炭素、水素等主体の燃料構成に転換することのできる高活性且つ高い耐炭素析出性を有する改質用触媒が、析出炭素及び硫黄被毒によって劣化した際に、触媒中の析出炭素及び硫黄を効率的に除去することができる。その結果、触媒を繰り返し長期間にわたって用いることができるので、タール含有ガス改質設備の安定した運転が可能になる。 According to the present invention, tar contained in or associated with a tar-containing gas containing high-concentration hydrogen sulfide such as biomass gasification gas or crude COG is converted into a light chemical substance in the presence of a catalyst, and methane, carbon monoxide When a reforming catalyst with high activity and high carbon deposition resistance that can be converted into a fuel composition mainly composed of hydrogen is deteriorated by the deposited carbon and sulfur poisoning, the deposited carbon and sulfur in the catalyst are efficiently used. Can be removed. As a result, since the catalyst can be used repeatedly over a long period of time, stable operation of the tar-containing gas reforming facility becomes possible.
以下、本発明の一実施形態に係るタール含有ガス改質用触媒の再生方法について説明する。本実施形態に係るタール含有ガス改質用触媒の再生方法は、炭素質原料を熱分解した際に発生する高温のタール含有ガスを改質して、水素、一酸化炭素、メタンを中心とするガスへ変換する改質用触媒が、硫黄被毒によって性能劣化した際の、改質用触媒の再生方法に関する。 Hereinafter, a method for regenerating a tar-containing gas reforming catalyst according to an embodiment of the present invention will be described. The regeneration method of the tar-containing gas reforming catalyst according to the present embodiment reforms the high-temperature tar-containing gas generated when the carbonaceous raw material is pyrolyzed, and mainly uses hydrogen, carbon monoxide, and methane. The present invention relates to a method for regenerating a reforming catalyst when the performance of the reforming catalyst to be converted into gas deteriorates due to sulfur poisoning.
本実施形態でいう「炭素質原料」とは、熱分解してタールを生成する、炭素を含む原料のことである。具体的には、石炭並びにバイオマスやプラスチックの容器包装類など構成元素に炭素を含む広範囲なものを指す。これらのうち、「バイオマス」とは、林地残材、間伐材、未利用樹、製材残材、建設廃材、またはそれらを原料とした木質チップ、ペレット等の二次製品等の木質系バイオマス、再生紙として再利用できなくなった古紙などの製紙系バイオマス、ササやススキをはじめとして、公園や河川、道路で刈り取られる雑草類などの草本系バイオマス、厨芥類等の食品廃棄物系バイオマス、稲わら、麦わら、籾殻などの農業残渣、さとうきび等の糖質資源やとうもろこし等のでんぷん資源及び菜種等の油脂などの資源作物、汚泥、家畜排泄物などを指す。 The “carbonaceous raw material” in the present embodiment is a raw material containing carbon that is pyrolyzed to produce tar. Specifically, it refers to a wide range of carbon containing constituent elements such as coal and biomass and plastic containers and packaging. Of these, “biomass” refers to woody biomass such as forest land residue, thinned wood, unused trees, wood sawn residue, construction waste, or secondary products such as wood chips and pellets, recycled Paper biomass such as waste paper that can no longer be reused as paper, herbaceous biomass such as weeds harvested in parks, rivers, and roads, as well as Sasa and Susuki, food waste biomass such as straw, rice straw, Agricultural residues such as straw and rice husk, sugar resources such as sugarcane, starch resources such as corn, and resource crops such as oil and fat such as rapeseed, sludge, livestock excrement, etc.
また、炭素質原料を熱分解した際に発生する「タール」とは、熱分解される原料により性状が異なるが、炭素が5個以上含まれた常温で液体の有機化合物であって、鎖式炭化水素や環式炭化水素などからなる混合物を指す。具体的には、石炭の熱分解であれば、例えばナフタレン、メチルナフタレン、フェナンスレン、ピレン、アントラセンなど縮合多環芳香族などが主成分である。木質系廃棄物の熱分解であれば、例えばベンゼン、トルエン、ナフタレン、インデン、アントラセン、フェノールなどが主成分である。食品廃棄物の熱分解であれば、例えば上記以外にインドール、ピロールなどの六員環または五員環に窒素元素など異種元素を含むヘテロ化合物も含まれる。しかしながら、特にそれらに限定されるものではない。熱分解タールは、熱分解直後の高温状態ではガス状で存在する。 In addition, “tar” generated when pyrolyzing a carbonaceous raw material is an organic compound that is liquid at room temperature and contains 5 or more carbons, although the properties differ depending on the raw material to be pyrolyzed. It refers to a mixture of hydrocarbons and cyclic hydrocarbons. Specifically, in the case of pyrolysis of coal, for example, condensed polycyclic aromatics such as naphthalene, methylnaphthalene, phenanthrene, pyrene, and anthracene are the main components. In the case of thermal decomposition of woody waste, for example, benzene, toluene, naphthalene, indene, anthracene, phenol and the like are the main components. In the case of thermal decomposition of food waste, for example, in addition to the above, a hetero compound containing a different element such as nitrogen element in a 6-membered ring or 5-membered ring such as indole or pyrrole is also included. However, it is not particularly limited to them. Pyrolysis tar exists in a gaseous state at a high temperature immediately after pyrolysis.
また、タールを接触分解してガス化するタール改質反応は、重質炭化水素主体のタールからメタン、一酸化炭素、水素等の軽質化学物質へ変換する反応である。反応経路は複雑で必ずしも明らかではないが、タール含有ガス中、若しくは外部より導入する水素や水蒸気、二酸化炭素などとの間で起こりうる水素化反応やスチームリフォーミング反応、ドライリフォーミング反応などが考えられる。
これら一連の反応は吸熱反応のため、実機に適用した場合、反応器に入る高温の顕熱を有するガスが触媒層内で改質されて出口では温度が低下する。しかしながら、より高効率にタール等重質炭化水素成分を改質する場合には、必要に応じて空気若しくは酸素を触媒層内に導入することで、一部の炭化水素成分を燃焼させた燃焼熱で触媒層の温度をある程度保ちながらさらに改質反応を進めることも可能である。
Further, the tar reforming reaction in which tar is catalytically decomposed and gasified is a reaction for converting heavy hydrocarbon-based tar into light chemical substances such as methane, carbon monoxide, and hydrogen. The reaction route is complicated and not always clear, but it is possible to consider hydrogenation reaction, steam reforming reaction, dry reforming reaction, etc. that can occur in tar-containing gas or with hydrogen, water vapor, carbon dioxide, etc. introduced from outside. It is done.
Since these series of reactions are endothermic reactions, when applied to an actual machine, a gas having high sensible heat entering the reactor is reformed in the catalyst layer, and the temperature is lowered at the outlet. However, when reforming heavy hydrocarbon components such as tar with higher efficiency, the heat of combustion that burns some hydrocarbon components by introducing air or oxygen into the catalyst layer as necessary. Thus, the reforming reaction can be further advanced while maintaining the temperature of the catalyst layer to some extent.
タール含有ガスの発生方法としては、石炭を原料とする場合には一般にコークス炉が用いられ、バイオマスを原料とする場合には外熱式ロータリーキルンや移動床炉、流動床炉などを用いることができるが、特にこれらに限定されるものではない。 As a method for generating the tar-containing gas, a coke oven is generally used when coal is used as a raw material, and an externally heated rotary kiln, moving bed furnace, fluidized bed furnace, or the like can be used when biomass is used as a raw material. However, it is not particularly limited to these.
本実施形態に係るタール含有ガス改質用触媒の再生方法は、触媒製造工程によって製造された触媒が、タール含有ガスの改質において、炭素析出と硫黄被毒とによって性能劣化した際に、触媒性能を回復させる(再生する)方法に関する。
タール含有ガス改質用触媒は、図1に示すように、触媒製造工程で製造された後、酸化物化しているニッケルを水素ガスで還元(水素還元)することによって触媒活性が高められる(還元工程)。触媒活性が高められた触媒は、タール含有ガスの改質に用いられる(改質工程)。タール含有ガスの改質に用いられた触媒は、炭素析出および硫黄被毒によって性能が劣化するので、性能劣化した触媒を空気及び水素ガスと接触させて再生させる(空気接触工程及び水素ガス接触工程)。空気接触工程及び水素ガス接触工程を経た触媒は、必要に応じて還元工程を経た後、再度タール含有ガスの改質に用いられる。
The method for regenerating a tar-containing gas reforming catalyst according to the present embodiment is such that when the catalyst produced by the catalyst production process deteriorates in performance due to carbon deposition and sulfur poisoning in reforming the tar-containing gas, The present invention relates to a method for restoring (reproducing) performance.
As shown in FIG. 1, the tar-containing gas reforming catalyst is produced in the catalyst production process, and then the catalytic activity is enhanced by reducing the oxidized nickel with hydrogen gas (hydrogen reduction) (reduction). Process). The catalyst with enhanced catalytic activity is used for reforming the tar-containing gas (reforming step). Since the catalyst used for reforming the tar-containing gas deteriorates due to carbon deposition and sulfur poisoning, the catalyst with deteriorated performance is brought into contact with air and hydrogen gas to regenerate (air contact process and hydrogen gas contact process). ). The catalyst that has undergone the air contact step and the hydrogen gas contact step is used for reforming the tar-containing gas again after undergoing a reduction step as necessary.
以下、各工程について、具体例を示して詳細に説明する。 Hereinafter, each process will be described in detail with specific examples.
(A)触媒製造工程
触媒製造工程では、本実施形態に係るタール含有ガス改質用触媒の再生方法で使用するタール含有ガスの改質用触媒(以下単に触媒という場合がある)を製造する。
(A) Catalyst Production Process In the catalyst production process, a tar-containing gas reforming catalyst (hereinafter sometimes simply referred to as a catalyst) used in the method for regenerating a tar-containing gas reforming catalyst according to this embodiment is produced.
触媒製造工程では、上記触媒を、以下のような固相晶析法で製造する。
具体的には、上記触媒を、ニッケル化合物とマグネシウム化合物との混合溶液に沈殿剤を用いて沈殿物を生成し、当該沈殿物に、アルミナ粉末と水、または、アルミナゾルを加えて混合して混合物を生成し、当該混合物を乾燥及び焼成して製造する。若しくは、ニッケル化合物とマグネシウム化合物との混合溶液に沈殿剤を添加して、ニッケルとマグネシウムを共沈させて沈殿物を生成し、生成後に当該沈殿物を仮焼し、仮焼された当該沈殿物に、アルミナ粉末と水、又は、アルミナゾルを加えて混合して混合物を生成し、当該混合物を乾燥及び焼成して製造する。セリウムを含有させる場合は、セリウム化合物をニッケル化合物とマグネシウム化合物と同じタイミングで溶液に混合することが好ましいが、アルミナ粉末と水、または、アルミナゾルを加えて混合して混合物を生成した後に、セリウム化合物を含浸させてもよい。
アルミナを粉末で加える場合は可能な限り細かい粒径が好ましい。例えば平均粒径は100マイクロメートル以下が好適であり、混合時には水などを加えてスラリー状で用いる。アルミナをアルミナゾルで加える場合は、アルミナの粒子が平均で100ナノメートル以下のものを用いるのが好適である。
In the catalyst production process, the catalyst is produced by the following solid phase crystallization method.
Specifically, a precipitate is generated using a precipitant in a mixed solution of a nickel compound and a magnesium compound and the catalyst is mixed with alumina powder and water or alumina sol. And the mixture is dried and fired. Alternatively, a precipitant is added to a mixed solution of a nickel compound and a magnesium compound, and nickel and magnesium are co-precipitated to generate a precipitate. After the generation, the precipitate is calcined, and the calcined precipitate In addition, alumina powder and water or alumina sol are added and mixed to form a mixture, and the mixture is dried and fired. When cerium is included, it is preferable to mix the cerium compound into the solution at the same timing as the nickel compound and the magnesium compound, but after adding and mixing alumina powder and water or alumina sol, a cerium compound is formed. May be impregnated.
When adding alumina as a powder, the smallest possible particle size is preferred. For example, the average particle size is preferably 100 micrometers or less, and water or the like is added during mixing to be used in a slurry form. When adding alumina as an alumina sol, it is preferable to use alumina particles having an average particle size of 100 nanometers or less.
上記混合物を乾燥及び焼成する方法としては、(a)乾燥及び焼成、(b)乾燥、粉砕及び焼成、(c)乾燥、粉砕、成型及び焼成、(d)乾燥、仮焼、粉砕、成型及び焼成、または、(e)乾燥、粉砕、仮焼、粉砕、成型及び焼成する方法等が挙げられる。
ここで、上記混合物を乾燥させる方法としては、特に温度や乾燥方法を問わず、一般的な乾燥方法であればよい。乾燥後の混合物は必要に応じて粗粉砕を行った後、焼成すれば良い。ただし、流動層等の乾燥により乾燥後の沈殿物が粉状を保っている場合は、粗粉砕は不要である。
混合物の乾燥の前には、ろ過をしておくことが、好ましい。更に、ろ過後の沈殿物は、純水等で洗浄しておくことが、より好ましい。ろ過した場合、乾燥の手間を少なく且つ乾燥に要するエネルギーを低減することができる。また、純水等で洗浄した場合、不純物量を低減できる。
Methods for drying and firing the mixture include (a) drying and firing, (b) drying, grinding and firing, (c) drying, grinding, molding and firing, (d) drying, calcining, grinding, molding and Examples include firing, or (e) drying, pulverization, calcination, pulverization, molding, and firing.
Here, as a method for drying the above mixture, any general drying method may be used regardless of the temperature or the drying method. The mixture after drying may be fired after roughly pulverizing as necessary. However, coarse pulverization is not necessary when the precipitate after drying is kept in powder form by drying the fluidized bed or the like.
It is preferable to filter before drying the mixture. Furthermore, it is more preferable to wash the precipitate after filtration with pure water or the like. In the case of filtration, it is possible to reduce the labor of drying and reduce the energy required for drying. Moreover, when it wash | cleans with a pure water etc., the amount of impurities can be reduced.
上記混合物の焼成は、空気中で行うことができ、焼成温度は700〜1300℃の範囲であれば良い。より好ましくは、900〜1150℃である。焼成温度が高いと混合物の焼結が進行し、強度は上昇するが、一方で比表面積が小さくなるために触媒活性は低下する。したがって、そのバランスを考慮して決定することが望ましい。
焼成後は、そのまま触媒として使用することもできるが、プレス成型等で成型して成型物として使用することもできる。乾燥と焼成の間に、仮焼及び成型工程を加えることもできる。さらに仮焼と成型工程との間に、成型前に粉粒状にする必要があれば、粉砕後、成型すればよい。その場合、仮焼は空気中で400〜650℃程度で行えば良く、成型は、プレス成型等で行えば良い。
The mixture can be fired in air, and the firing temperature may be in the range of 700 to 1300 ° C. More preferably, it is 900-1150 degreeC. When the calcination temperature is high, sintering of the mixture proceeds and the strength increases, but on the other hand, the catalytic activity decreases because the specific surface area decreases. Therefore, it is desirable to determine the balance in consideration.
After calcination, it can be used as a catalyst as it is, but it can be molded by press molding or the like and used as a molded product. A calcining and molding process can also be added between drying and baking. Furthermore, between the calcination and the molding process, if it is necessary to form a powder before molding, it may be molded after pulverization. In that case, calcining may be performed at about 400 to 650 ° C. in the air, and molding may be performed by press molding or the like.
ここで触媒は、粉体、または成型体のいずれの形態としてもよい。成型体の場合には球状、シリンダー状、リング状、ホイール状、粒状など、さらに金属またはセラミックスのハニカム状基材へ触媒成分をコーティングしたものなどいずれでもよい。流動床で使用する場合には、噴霧乾燥などにより成形したものなどを用いるのが良い。固定床や移動床で使用する場合には、成型方法として、造粒、押出成型、プレス成型、打錠成型等が好適に用いられるが、特にこれに制限されるものではない。 Here, the catalyst may be in the form of a powder or a molded body. In the case of a molded body, any of a spherical shape, a cylindrical shape, a ring shape, a wheel shape, a granular shape, and a metal or ceramic honeycomb substrate coated with a catalyst component may be used. When used in a fluidized bed, it is preferable to use one formed by spray drying or the like. When used on a fixed bed or moving bed, granulation, extrusion molding, press molding, tableting molding, or the like is suitably used as the molding method, but is not particularly limited thereto.
上述のように、ニッケル及びマグネシウムの沈殿物にアルミナ粉末と水、あるいはアルミナゾルを湿式混合することにより、アルミナ成分を含有した水分が、ニッケル及びマグネシアの共沈物との間で高度に均質な混合物を形成することが可能となる。そのため、その混合物を乾燥及び焼成、又は乾燥、仮焼、粉砕、成型及び焼成することで、ニッケルとマグネシウムとの化合物とアルミナが均質に分布した焼結体を形成し、ニッケルマグネシア結晶相がより一層微細化され、そこから析出するNi粒が高度に微細分散することから、高活性で炭素析出量の少ない成型物を得ることができると考えられる。そのため、本実施形態に係るタール含有ガス改質用触媒の再生方法で使用するタール含有ガス改質用触媒は、単にニッケルとマグネシウムの共沈物を形成後、焼成した粉末にアルミナ粉末を物理的に混合して成型及び焼成したものとは異なる。 As described above, by mixing alumina powder and water or alumina sol with nickel and magnesium precipitates, the moisture containing the alumina component is a highly homogeneous mixture between nickel and magnesia coprecipitates. Can be formed. Therefore, the mixture is dried and fired, or dried, calcined, pulverized, molded and fired to form a sintered body in which the compound of nickel and magnesium and alumina are uniformly distributed, and the nickel magnesia crystal phase is more It is considered that a molded product having a high activity and a small amount of carbon deposition can be obtained because Ni particles that are further refined and precipitated therefrom are highly finely dispersed. For this reason, the tar-containing gas reforming catalyst used in the method for regenerating a tar-containing gas reforming catalyst according to the present embodiment simply forms alumina co-precipitate after the formation of a coprecipitate of nickel and magnesium, and physically adds alumina powder to the calcined powder. It is different from what was mixed and molded and fired.
より具体的には、ニッケル化合物とマグネシウム化合物との混合溶液を調製する際、水に対して溶解度の高い各金属化合物を用いることが適当である。例えば硝酸塩、硫酸塩、塩化物などの無機塩のみならず、酢酸塩などの有機塩も好適に用いられる。特に好ましくは、焼成後に触媒被毒になり得る不純物が残りにくいと考えられる硝酸塩または酢酸塩である。また、それらの溶液から沈殿物を形成する際に用いる沈殿剤は、上記溶液のpHをニッケル、マグネシウムが主に水酸化物として沈殿する中性〜塩基性へ変化させるものであれば何でも用いることができる。中でも、例えば炭酸カリウム水溶液や炭酸ナトリウム水溶液、アンモニア水溶液や尿素溶液などが好適に用いられる。 More specifically, when preparing a mixed solution of a nickel compound and a magnesium compound, it is appropriate to use each metal compound having high solubility in water. For example, not only inorganic salts such as nitrate, sulfate and chloride, but also organic salts such as acetate are preferably used. Particularly preferred are nitrates or acetates, which are thought to be less likely to leave impurities that may become catalyst poisoning after calcination. In addition, any precipitant used to form a precipitate from these solutions can be used as long as it changes the pH of the solution from neutral to basic, in which nickel and magnesium are mainly precipitated as hydroxides. Can do. Among these, for example, an aqueous potassium carbonate solution, an aqueous sodium carbonate solution, an aqueous ammonia solution, or a urea solution is preferably used.
上述の方法で製造された触媒は、(1)ニッケル、マグネシウム、アルミニウムを構成元素とし、好ましくはさらにセリウムを含有し、(2)アルミナ相(単独化合物としてのアルミナ)を5質量%超含まず、(3)少なくとも1種の複合酸化物(好ましくはNiMgO、MgAl2O4)、及び、セリウムを含む場合には、CeO2の結晶相を主に含有する。 The catalyst produced by the above-described method has (1) nickel, magnesium and aluminum as constituent elements, preferably further contains cerium, and (2) does not contain more than 5% by mass of alumina phase (alumina as a single compound). (3) In the case of containing at least one complex oxide (preferably NiMgO, MgAl 2 O 4 ) and cerium, it mainly contains a crystal phase of CeO 2 .
上記触媒では、ニッケルが、重質炭化水素をガス中に存在または外部より導入される水蒸気、水素、二酸化炭素との間で改質反応を進行させる主活性成分として機能する。
また、ニッケル元素と化合物化した成分のうち、マグネシアは塩基性酸化物であり、二酸化炭素を吸着する機能を保有することにより、主活性成分元素上での析出炭素と反応して一酸化炭素として酸化除去する役割を発揮する。そのため、触媒表面を清浄に保ち、触媒性能を長期間安定に保持することに寄与すると思われる。アルミナは、化合物マトリクスを安定に保つバインダー的機能を果たすとともに、ニッケル、マグネシウムを含む結晶相を細かく分断して、酸化物固相中で高度に分散させること等により、各結晶相から表面に析出する活性種のニッケル粒が小さく且つ高度な分散状態になるような機能を果たすものと考えられる。
In the above-described catalyst, nickel functions as a main active component that causes the reforming reaction to proceed with water vapor, hydrogen, and carbon dioxide that are present in the gas or introduced from outside.
Of the components compounded with nickel element, magnesia is a basic oxide and possesses the function of adsorbing carbon dioxide, so that it reacts with the precipitated carbon on the main active component element to form carbon monoxide. It plays a role in removing oxidation. Therefore, it seems that it contributes to keeping the catalyst surface clean and keeping the catalyst performance stable for a long period of time. Alumina functions as a binder that keeps the compound matrix stable, and is separated from each crystal phase on the surface by finely dividing the crystal phase containing nickel and magnesium and dispersing it in an oxide solid phase. It is considered that the active species nickel particles are small and fulfill the function of being in a highly dispersed state.
上記触媒は、上述のような金属酸化物を含有している。また、このマトリクス化合物から、還元雰囲気下で、活性金属粒子を微細クラスター状に析出させることができる。すなわち、上記触媒では、ニッケル金属が触媒表面上でクラスター状に微細分散するので表面積が大きく、且つ還元雰囲気下では反応中に活性金属粒子が被毒を受けても新たな活性金属粒子がマトリクスから微細析出するので、タール含有ガス中に高濃度の硫化水素が共存した場合でも、硫黄被毒による活性劣化の影響を受けにくいと考えられる。 The catalyst contains the metal oxide as described above. Further, from this matrix compound, active metal particles can be precipitated in a fine cluster form under a reducing atmosphere. That is, in the above catalyst, nickel metal is finely dispersed in clusters on the catalyst surface, so that the surface area is large, and even if the active metal particles are poisoned during the reaction in a reducing atmosphere, new active metal particles are removed from the matrix. Since it precipitates finely, it is considered that even when high concentration hydrogen sulfide coexists in the tar-containing gas, it is hardly affected by the activity deterioration due to sulfur poisoning.
本実施形態に係るタール含有ガス改質用触媒の再生方法で使用するタール含有ガス改質用触媒は、主活性成分であるニッケル含有量が1〜50質量%であり、マグネシウム含有量が1〜45質量%であり、アルミナの含有量が20〜80質量%であることが好ましい。触媒がセリウムを含む場合、セリウムの含有量は1〜40質量%であることが好ましい。
ここでいうアルミナはアルミナ粉末またはアルミナゾルの状態でニッケルとマグネシウムの酸化物に加える含有量であり、単独化合物として触媒に含有されている量ではない。
The tar-containing gas reforming catalyst used in the method for regenerating a tar-containing gas reforming catalyst according to the present embodiment has a nickel content of 1 to 50% by mass as a main active component and a magnesium content of 1 to 1%. It is 45 mass%, and it is preferable that content of an alumina is 20-80 mass%. When a catalyst contains cerium, it is preferable that content of cerium is 1-40 mass%.
Alumina here is the content added to the oxides of nickel and magnesium in the form of alumina powder or alumina sol, not the amount contained in the catalyst as a single compound.
上記触媒において、ニッケル含有量が1質量%以上の場合、ニッケルの改質性能を十分に発揮することができる。また、ニッケル含有量が50質量%以下の場合には、マトリクスを形成するマグネシウム、セリウム、アルミニウムの含有量を適切に保つことができ、触媒上に析出するニッケル金属の濃度が高く且つ粗大化することを回避することができる。このため、改質反応において性能が経時劣化することを抑制できる。したがって、ニッケル含有量は、1〜50質量%であることが好ましい。より好ましくは、1〜35質量%である。 In the above catalyst, when the nickel content is 1% by mass or more, the nickel reforming performance can be sufficiently exhibited. In addition, when the nickel content is 50% by mass or less, the contents of magnesium, cerium, and aluminum forming the matrix can be appropriately maintained, and the concentration of nickel metal deposited on the catalyst is high and coarse. You can avoid that. For this reason, it can suppress that performance deteriorates with time in reforming reaction. Therefore, it is preferable that nickel content is 1-50 mass%. More preferably, it is 1-35 mass%.
マグネシウム含有量が、1質量%以上の場合、マグネシアの有する塩基性酸化物の性質を活かし易い。そのため、炭化水素の炭素析出を抑制して触媒性能を長期間安定に保持し易くすることができる。マグネシウム含有量が1質量%未満である場合、マグネシウムとニッケルの固溶体中のニッケル濃度が高くなるため、固溶相から析出するニッケル粒が粗大化し易く、タール含有ガスの改質反応後での触媒上の炭素析出量が多くなり易い。また、マグネシウム含有量が45質量%以下の場合、他のニッケル、セリウム、アルミニウムの含有量を適切に保ち、触媒の改質活性を十分に発揮することができる。したがって、マグネシウム含有量は、1〜45質量%であることが好ましい。より好ましくは、1〜35質量%である。 When the magnesium content is 1% by mass or more, it is easy to take advantage of the properties of the basic oxide possessed by magnesia. Therefore, it is possible to suppress the carbon deposition of hydrocarbons and easily maintain the catalyst performance for a long period of time. When the magnesium content is less than 1% by mass, the nickel concentration in the solid solution of magnesium and nickel becomes high, so the nickel particles precipitated from the solid solution phase are likely to be coarsened, and the catalyst after the reforming reaction of the tar-containing gas The amount of carbon deposition on the top tends to increase. Further, when the magnesium content is 45% by mass or less, the contents of other nickel, cerium, and aluminum can be appropriately maintained, and the catalyst reforming activity can be sufficiently exhibited. Therefore, the magnesium content is preferably 1 to 45% by mass. More preferably, it is 1-35 mass%.
アルミナの含有量が20質量%未満では、ニッケルマグネシア(NiMgO)相主体のセラミックスとなり、MgAl2O4相の割合が少なくなって、NiMgO相が微細化せずにそこから析出するNi粒が大きくなる場合がある。この場合、活性が低くなったり、成型した際、強度が著しく低くなったりする。また、アルミナの含有量が80質量%を超える場合、主活性成分であるニッケルや炭素析出を抑制するマグネシアの割合が低くなるので、触媒の改質活性を十分発揮できなくなる恐れがある。したがって、アルミナの含有量は、20〜80質量%であることが好ましい。 When the content of alumina is less than 20% by mass, the ceramic is mainly composed of a nickel magnesia (NiMgO) phase, the proportion of the MgAl 2 O 4 phase is reduced, and the Ni MgO phase does not become finer and Ni particles precipitated therefrom are large. There is a case. In this case, the activity is lowered or the strength is remarkably lowered when molded. Moreover, when the content of alumina exceeds 80% by mass, the ratio of magnesia which suppresses nickel and carbon deposition, which are main active components, is low, and there is a possibility that the reforming activity of the catalyst cannot be sufficiently exhibited. Therefore, the content of alumina is preferably 20 to 80% by mass.
セリウムの含有量が、1質量%以上の場合、酸化セリウムの酸素吸蔵能によって、ニッケルマグネシアからのニッケルの析出が起こり難くなることを回避することができる。また、セリウムの含有量が40質量%以下の場合には、主活性成分であるニッケルや炭素析出を抑制するマグネシアの割合を適正な範囲に保つことができ、触媒の改質活性を十分発揮させることができる。そのため、セリウムを、1〜40質量%含有することが好ましい。より好ましくは、3〜35質量%である。 When the content of cerium is 1% by mass or more, it is possible to prevent nickel from being hardly precipitated from nickel magnesia due to the oxygen storage ability of cerium oxide. Moreover, when the content of cerium is 40% by mass or less, the proportion of magnesia that suppresses nickel and carbon deposition, which are main active components, can be maintained in an appropriate range, and the reforming activity of the catalyst is sufficiently exhibited. be able to. Therefore, it is preferable to contain 1-40 mass% of cerium. More preferably, it is 3-35 mass%.
各金属種の含有量を上記範囲になるように調製するためには、各出発原料を予め計算の上準備しておくことが好ましい。尚、一度触媒が狙いの成分組成となれば、それ以降はその時の配合で調製すればよい。
また、上記の元素以外に触媒製造工程等で混入する不純物や触媒性能が変わらない他成分を含んでも構わないが、できるだけ不純物が混入しないようにするのが望ましい。
In order to adjust the content of each metal species to be in the above range, it is preferable to prepare each starting material in advance by calculation. In addition, once the catalyst has the target component composition, it may be prepared by blending at that time thereafter.
Further, in addition to the above elements, impurities mixed in the catalyst manufacturing process or other components that do not change the catalyst performance may be included, but it is desirable that impurities are not mixed as much as possible.
上記触媒を構成する各金属種の含有量の測定方法は、誘導結合プラズマ法(ICP)と呼ばれる方法を用いることができる。具体的には、試料を粉砕後、アルカリ融解剤(例えば炭酸ナトリウム、ホウ酸ナトリウムなど)を加えて白金坩堝内で加熱融解し、冷却後に塩酸溶液に加温下で全量溶解させる。その溶液をICP分析装置へ挿入すると、装置内の高温プラズマ状態の中で試料溶液が原子化・熱励起し、これが基底状態に戻る際に元素固有の波長の発光スペクトルを生じるため、その発光波長及び強度から含有元素種、量を定性的及び定量的に評価することができる。 As a method for measuring the content of each metal species constituting the catalyst, a method called an inductively coupled plasma method (ICP) can be used. Specifically, after pulverizing the sample, an alkali melting agent (for example, sodium carbonate, sodium borate, etc.) is added and heated and melted in a platinum crucible. After cooling, the whole amount is dissolved in a hydrochloric acid solution under heating. When the solution is inserted into the ICP analyzer, the sample solution is atomized and thermally excited in the high-temperature plasma state in the device, and when this returns to the ground state, an emission spectrum with an element-specific wavelength is generated. In addition, the contained element type and amount can be qualitatively and quantitatively evaluated from the strength.
(B)還元工程
還元工程では、上述のような固相晶析法で製造された触媒に対し、酸化物化しているニッケルを水素で還元して金属微粒子化し、触媒活性を高める。
ここで、比較的高温で且つ還元性雰囲気であれば、触媒から活性金属であるニッケル粒子が微細クラスター状に析出するので、上記触媒を還元する場合の条件としては、特に制限されるものではない。しかしながら、例えば、水素、一酸化炭素、メタンの少なくともいずれかを含むガス雰囲気下、又はそれら還元性ガスに水蒸気を混合したガス雰囲気下、又はそれらのガスに窒素など不活性ガスを混合した雰囲気下であっても良い。還元温度は、触媒層の温度が例えば600℃〜1000℃が好適であり、700〜900℃がより好適である。触媒層温度は触媒層の中心付近にK型熱電対を挿入して計測できる。還元時間は充填する触媒量にも依存し、例えば30分〜2時間が好適であるが、充填した触媒全体が還元するのに必要な時間であればよく、特にこの条件に制限されるものではない。
原料ガス中に水素ガスが多く含まれる場合(例えば、30体積%以上)は、改質工程の初期で、還元工程を兼ねることも可能である。すなわち、原料ガス中に水素ガスが多く含まれる場合、還元工程を設けなくてもよい。
また、再生された触媒を用いて改質を行う場合には、水素ガス接触工程が還元工程を兼ねることができるので、その場合には、改質工程前に別途還元工程を設けなくてもよい。
(B) Reduction step In the reduction step, the oxidized nickel is reduced with hydrogen to form fine metal particles with respect to the catalyst produced by the solid phase crystallization method as described above, thereby enhancing the catalytic activity.
Here, in a relatively high temperature and reducing atmosphere, nickel particles that are active metals precipitate from the catalyst in the form of fine clusters. Therefore, the conditions for reducing the catalyst are not particularly limited. . However, for example, in a gas atmosphere containing at least one of hydrogen, carbon monoxide, and methane, in a gas atmosphere in which water vapor is mixed with these reducing gases, or in an atmosphere in which an inert gas such as nitrogen is mixed with those gases. It may be. The reduction temperature is preferably such that the temperature of the catalyst layer is 600 ° C to 1000 ° C, and more preferably 700 to 900 ° C. The catalyst layer temperature can be measured by inserting a K-type thermocouple near the center of the catalyst layer. The reduction time depends on the amount of catalyst to be charged, and is preferably 30 minutes to 2 hours, for example. However, it may be a time required for the entire packed catalyst to be reduced, and is not limited to this condition. Absent.
When the source gas contains a large amount of hydrogen gas (for example, 30% by volume or more), it can also serve as a reduction process at the initial stage of the reforming process. That is, when a large amount of hydrogen gas is contained in the source gas, the reduction step may not be provided.
Further, when reforming is performed using the regenerated catalyst, the hydrogen gas contact step can also serve as the reduction step. In this case, it is not necessary to provide a separate reduction step before the reforming step. .
(C)改質工程
改質工程では、触媒製造工程で製造され、必要に応じて還元工程において水素で還元された触媒を用いて、炭素質原料を熱分解した際に発生する多量の硫化水素を含んでかつ炭素析出を起こしやすい縮合多環芳香族主体のタール含有ガスに随伴するタール等の重質炭化水素を、高効率に改質して水素、一酸化炭素、メタンを主体とする軽質化学物質に変換する。
縮合多環芳香族主体のタールは、乾留直後の高温状態では反応性に富む状態であるので、微細分散して高比表面積を持った高活性なニッケル金属と接触することにより、高効率に軽質炭化水素へ変換・分解されると考えられる。
(C) Reforming process In the reforming process, a large amount of hydrogen sulfide generated when the carbonaceous raw material is pyrolyzed using the catalyst produced in the catalyst production process and reduced with hydrogen in the reduction process as necessary. Lightly composed mainly of hydrogen, carbon monoxide, and methane by highly efficiently reforming heavy hydrocarbons such as tar that accompany the condensed polycyclic aromatic-based tar-containing gas that contains carbon and easily causes carbon deposition Convert to chemical.
Since the condensed polycyclic aromatic-based tar is highly reactive at high temperatures immediately after dry distillation, it is light and highly efficient by contacting finely dispersed and highly active nickel metal having a high specific surface area. It is thought that it is converted to hydrocarbon and decomposed.
改質工程では、前記触媒の存在下、又は触媒を還元した後に、炭素質原料を熱分解した際に発生するタール含有ガスに、ガス中に存在する若しくは外部より導入する水素、二酸化炭素または水蒸気を接触させて、タール含有ガス中のタールを改質してガス化する。改質用触媒は改質工程前に還元されることが好ましいが、改質反応中に還元が進行する場合があるため、還元しなくても良い。従って、前記触媒の存在下、又は触媒を還元した後に、炭素質原料を熱分解した際に発生するタール含有ガスに、外部より導入する水蒸気及び空気若しくは酸素を加えた混合ガスを接触させて、タール含有ガス中のタールを改質してガス化する。 In the reforming step, hydrogen, carbon dioxide or steam present in the gas or introduced from the outside to the tar-containing gas generated when the carbonaceous raw material is thermally decomposed in the presence of the catalyst or after reduction of the catalyst. Is contacted to reform and gasify the tar in the tar-containing gas. The reforming catalyst is preferably reduced before the reforming step, but it may not be reduced because the reduction may proceed during the reforming reaction. Accordingly, in the presence of the catalyst, or after reducing the catalyst, a gas mixture containing the steam and air or oxygen introduced from the outside is brought into contact with the tar-containing gas generated when the carbonaceous raw material is thermally decomposed. The tar in the tar-containing gas is reformed and gasified.
改質を行う際の触媒反応器としては、固定床形式、流動床形式、移動床形式等が好適に用いられる。改質を行う際、触媒層の温度がわかるように、反応器の大きさに合わせて1点〜数点にK型熱電対等を挿入して、温度を測定することが望ましい。例えば、触媒層(反応器)が大きい場合には触媒層は均一混合層とは看做せなくなることから、触媒層入口付近、中央付近、出口付近の3ヶ所を測定することが好ましい。
改質を行う場合、その触媒層の入口温度としては、600〜950℃であることが好ましい。触媒層の入口温度が600℃未満の場合は、タールが水素、一酸化炭素、メタンを主体とする軽質炭化水素へ改質する際の触媒活性がほとんど発揮されないことが懸念される。一方、触媒層の入口温度が900℃を超える場合には、耐熱構造化が必要になるなど改質装置が高価になるため経済的に不利となる。より好ましくは、触媒層の入口温度は、650〜900℃である。
炭素質原料が石炭の場合には比較的高温で、木質系バイオマスや製紙系バイオマスまたは食品廃棄物系バイオマス等の場合には比較的低温で反応を進めることも可能である。
以下、本実施形態における触媒層温度の規定は、触媒層が大きい場合は、還元工程では触媒層の中心付近、改質工程及び、後述する空気接触工程及び水素ガス接触工程では触媒層の入口付近温度を指す。これは、還元工程では触媒と水素との反応による発熱は小さいが、改質工程では吸熱、空気接触工程及び水素ガス接触工程では発熱が大きく、触媒層が均一な温度分布になりにくいためである。一方、触媒層が小さく均一混合層と看做せる場合は、中心付近の代表点を指すこととする。
As the catalytic reactor for reforming, a fixed bed type, a fluidized bed type, a moving bed type, or the like is preferably used. When reforming, it is desirable to measure the temperature by inserting a K-type thermocouple or the like at one to several points in accordance with the size of the reactor so that the temperature of the catalyst layer can be understood. For example, when the catalyst layer (reactor) is large, the catalyst layer cannot be regarded as a homogeneous mixed layer. Therefore, it is preferable to measure three locations near the catalyst layer inlet, near the center, and near the outlet.
When reforming, the catalyst layer inlet temperature is preferably 600 to 950 ° C. When the inlet temperature of the catalyst layer is less than 600 ° C., there is a concern that the catalytic activity when tar is reformed to light hydrocarbons mainly composed of hydrogen, carbon monoxide, and methane is hardly exhibited. On the other hand, when the inlet temperature of the catalyst layer exceeds 900 ° C., the reformer becomes expensive because, for example, a heat resistant structure is required, which is economically disadvantageous. More preferably, the inlet temperature of the catalyst layer is 650 to 900 ° C.
It is possible to proceed the reaction at a relatively high temperature when the carbonaceous raw material is coal, and at a relatively low temperature when it is a woody biomass, papermaking biomass, food waste biomass, or the like.
Hereinafter, the regulation of the catalyst layer temperature in the present embodiment is that when the catalyst layer is large, in the reduction step, near the center of the catalyst layer, in the reforming step, and in the air contact step and hydrogen gas contact step described later, near the catalyst layer inlet Refers to temperature. This is because heat generated by the reaction between the catalyst and hydrogen is small in the reduction process, but heat is absorbed in the reforming process, and heat generation is large in the air contact process and the hydrogen gas contact process, and the catalyst layer is unlikely to have a uniform temperature distribution. . On the other hand, when the catalyst layer is small and can be regarded as a uniform mixed layer, the representative point near the center is indicated.
上述した触媒を用いれば、炭素質原料を熱分解又は部分酸化して生成されるタール含有ガスが、コークス炉から排出される高温のコークス炉ガスのような硫化水素濃度が非常に高いタール含有ガスであっても、タールを改質してガス化することができる。
ここで、熱分解又は部分酸化とは、具体的には乾留、又は炭素質原料をガス化のために一部のみ酸化させてタール含有ガスを製造することを言う。現在のコークス炉では、炉内に原料の石炭を充填後、加熱・乾留してコークスを製造するが、付随して発生するコークス炉ガスは炉頂部の上昇管と呼ばれる部分から安水(アンモニア水)を噴霧して冷却後、集気管であるドライメーンに集められる。しかしながら、ガス成分はコークス炉の上昇管で800℃程度の顕熱を保有しているにもかかわらず、安水噴霧後には100℃下まで急冷されてしまい、その顕熱を有効に利用できていない。そのため、このガス顕熱を有効に利用し且つタール等重質炭化水素成分を水素、一酸化炭素、メタン等軽質炭化水素などの燃料成分に転換できれば、エネルギー増幅に繋がるばかりでなく、そこで生成される還元性ガス体積が大幅に増幅されることにより、例えば鉄鉱石に適用して還元鉄を製造するプロセスが可能となれば、現在鉄鉱石をコークスにより還元する高炉プロセスで発生する二酸化炭素排出量を大幅に削減できる可能性がある。上述の触媒を用いて改質を行えば、コークス炉で発生する顕熱を保有するコークス炉ガスを改質用触媒と接触させて、ガス顕熱を有効に利用して改質を行い、水素、一酸化炭素、メタン等軽質炭化水素などの燃料成分に転換させることが可能である。
If the above-described catalyst is used, a tar-containing gas produced by pyrolyzing or partially oxidizing a carbonaceous raw material has a very high hydrogen sulfide concentration, such as a high-temperature coke oven gas discharged from a coke oven. Even so, the tar can be reformed and gasified.
Here, the thermal decomposition or partial oxidation specifically means dry distillation or producing a tar-containing gas by oxidizing only a part of a carbonaceous raw material for gasification. In the current coke oven, raw coal is filled in the furnace, and then heated and dry-distilled to produce coke. The accompanying coke oven gas is generated from the so-called riser pipe at the top of the furnace with cold water (ammonia water). ) Is sprayed and cooled, and then collected in a dry main tube. However, although the gas component has a sensible heat of about 800 ° C. in the coke oven riser pipe, it is rapidly cooled to 100 ° C. after the spraying with water, and the sensible heat can be used effectively. Absent. Therefore, if this sensible heat can be used effectively and heavy hydrocarbon components such as tar can be converted into fuel components such as light hydrocarbons such as hydrogen, carbon monoxide, and methane, it will not only lead to energy amplification but also be generated there. If the process of producing reduced iron by applying it to iron ore becomes possible, for example, if the volume of reducing gas produced is greatly amplified, carbon dioxide emissions generated in the blast furnace process that currently reduces iron ore with coke Can be significantly reduced. If reforming is performed using the above-mentioned catalyst, the coke oven gas, which has sensible heat generated in the coke oven, is brought into contact with the reforming catalyst, and reforming is performed by effectively using gas sensible heat, and hydrogen It can be converted into fuel components such as light hydrocarbons such as carbon monoxide and methane.
上述の触媒を用いた場合、硫化水素雰囲気下でも安定して改質反応が進行する。しかしながら、ガス中の硫化水素濃度は低ければ低いほど被毒されないため好ましい。特に、ガス中の硫化水素濃度は、4000ppm以下であることが好ましい。より好ましくは、3000ppm以下である。 When the above-described catalyst is used, the reforming reaction proceeds stably even in a hydrogen sulfide atmosphere. However, the lower the hydrogen sulfide concentration in the gas, the better because it is not poisoned. In particular, the hydrogen sulfide concentration in the gas is preferably 4000 ppm or less. More preferably, it is 3000 ppm or less.
触媒反応器に内蔵されるタール含有ガス改質用触媒は、タールから水素、一酸化炭素、メタンを主体とする軽質化学物質への転換時に、触媒表面上炭素が析出したり、もしくは前記熱分解工程で得られた熱分解ガス中に含まれる硫黄成分が触媒に吸着したり、触媒表面に金属微粒子として析出していたニッケルや、酸化セリウムの一部が硫化物化したりすることで、触媒が性能劣化する。触媒の性能劣化とは、タールの分解率低下や、タールが改質されて生成する水素、一酸化炭素、メタン等の軽質化学物質の生成量の低下を示す。タール分解率が30%未満と低くなったり、水素増幅率が1.2未満になったりした場合は、触媒の再生を行うことが望ましい。 The tar-containing gas reforming catalyst built into the catalytic reactor is a catalyst that deposits carbon on the catalyst surface during the conversion from tar to light chemicals mainly composed of hydrogen, carbon monoxide, and methane, or the thermal decomposition. The sulfur component contained in the pyrolysis gas obtained in the process is adsorbed on the catalyst, or nickel that has precipitated as metal fine particles on the catalyst surface or part of cerium oxide is converted to sulfide. Degraded performance. The catalyst performance deterioration refers to a reduction in the decomposition rate of tar and a reduction in the amount of light chemical substances such as hydrogen, carbon monoxide, and methane produced by reforming the tar. When the tar decomposition rate is as low as less than 30% or the hydrogen amplification rate is less than 1.2, it is desirable to regenerate the catalyst.
(D)空気接触工程及び水素ガス接触工程
空気接触工程及び水素ガス接触工程では、上述した方法で製造され、改質工程において性能劣化した触媒(タール含有ガス改質用触媒)を再生する。
再生に際しては、性能劣化した前記触媒に、触媒層の温度を400〜800℃に維持した状態で空気を接触させて触媒上の析出炭素を除去する空気接触工程と、その後に行う、前記触媒層の温度を600〜800℃に維持して、前記触媒に水素ガスを接触させて硫黄を除去する水素ガス接触工程とを行う。本実施形態に係るタール含有ガス改質用触媒の再生方法においては、空気を接触させて炭素を除去する空気接触工程と、水素ガスを接触させて硫黄を除去する水素ガス接触工程とを分けて、段階的に行うことに特徴がある。
上記再生方法によれば、ニッケルマグネシア触媒性能を回復させることができるので、長期間安定した運転が可能になる。
なお、再生方法における水素ガス接触工程は、還元工程を兼ねることもできる。
(D) Air contact step and hydrogen gas contact step In the air contact step and hydrogen gas contact step, a catalyst (tar-containing gas reforming catalyst) produced by the above-described method and having performance deteriorated in the reforming step is regenerated.
At the time of regeneration, an air contact step of removing the deposited carbon on the catalyst by bringing the catalyst having deteriorated performance into contact with air in a state where the temperature of the catalyst layer is maintained at 400 to 800 ° C., followed by the catalyst layer. And a hydrogen gas contact step in which hydrogen gas is brought into contact with the catalyst to remove sulfur. In the regeneration method of the tar-containing gas reforming catalyst according to the present embodiment, the air contact step of removing carbon by contacting air and the hydrogen gas contact step of removing sulfur by contacting hydrogen gas are separated. , It is characterized by performing step by step.
According to the regeneration method, the performance of the nickel magnesia catalyst can be recovered, so that stable operation for a long period of time becomes possible.
The hydrogen gas contact step in the regeneration method can also serve as a reduction step.
空気接触工程において、触媒と空気とを接触させる温度は、触媒層の温度で、炭素が燃焼可能な400℃以上とすることが好ましい。図2にタール改質反応後の炭素析出及び硫黄被毒した触媒に、空気を模擬した20%O2/Heバランスガスを流通させながら、触媒を5℃/minで昇温させ、脱離するガスを質量分析計で分析したプロファイルを示す。図2から、炭素が燃焼し、二酸化炭素として十分速く脱離するのに必要な温度は400℃以上であることがわかる。一方、触媒反応器や配管の材質を高価な耐熱合金にしない限り、設備保護上、触媒層温度を約830℃以上には昇温できない。そのため、空気による炭素除去は、触媒層の温度を段階的に上昇させることが好ましく、800℃以下で行うことが好ましい。より好ましくは、750℃以下である。750℃以下とすることで、エネルギー消費量も抑えつつ、反応器等の設備を保護できると共に、燃焼熱による熱暴走等も抑えることができる。この工程では炭素が除去さえできればよく、触媒層出口の二酸化炭素濃度を質量分析計、ガスクロマトグラフ、赤外線式CO2分析計等の分析装置で監視し、二酸化炭素濃度が0.5%以下になれば、炭素をほぼ除去できたと判断する。また、事前の検討により、触媒量と空気導入量から適切な時間を算出しておき、空気による再生時間をあらかじめ決定しておいてもよい。
空気を炭素が析出した触媒に接触させると、発熱反応である炭素の燃焼により、触媒層温度が急激に上昇する。触媒反応器や配管の材質を高価な耐熱合金としない限り、設備保護上、約830℃以上に上昇させることは好ましくないので、発熱により830℃以上になりそうな時は、空気導入量を減らしたり、窒素導入量を増やしたりすることが好ましい。
一方、硫黄が酸化して二酸化硫黄として脱離する温度は800℃以上必要である。しかしながら、触媒反応器や配管の材質を高価な耐熱合金にしない限り、設備保護上、触媒層温度を約830℃以上には昇温できない。そのため、空気によって硫黄を除去できるのはごくわずかである。
In the air contact step, the temperature at which the catalyst and air are brought into contact with each other is preferably 400 ° C. or higher at which the carbon can be combusted at the temperature of the catalyst layer. FIG. 2 shows that the catalyst is carbon desorbed after the tar reforming reaction and sulfur poisoned, and the catalyst is heated at 5 ° C./min and desorbed while 20% O 2 / He balance gas simulating air is circulated. The profile which analyzed gas with the mass spectrometer is shown. From FIG. 2, it can be seen that the temperature required for carbon to burn and desorb as carbon dioxide quickly enough is 400 ° C. or higher. On the other hand, unless the material of the catalyst reactor or piping is made of an expensive heat-resistant alloy, the temperature of the catalyst layer cannot be increased to about 830 ° C. or more for equipment protection. For this reason, the carbon removal by air is preferably performed in a stepwise manner, and is preferably performed at 800 ° C. or lower. More preferably, it is 750 degrees C or less. By setting it as 750 degrees C or less, while suppressing energy consumption, while protecting equipment, such as a reactor, thermal runaway etc. by combustion heat can also be suppressed. In this process, it is only necessary to remove carbon, and the carbon dioxide concentration at the outlet of the catalyst layer is monitored with an analyzer such as a mass spectrometer, gas chromatograph, infrared CO 2 analyzer, etc., so that the carbon dioxide concentration becomes 0.5% or less. If so, it is judged that the carbon has been almost removed. In addition, an appropriate time may be calculated from the amount of catalyst and the amount of air introduced in advance, and the regeneration time using air may be determined in advance.
When air is brought into contact with the catalyst on which carbon is deposited, the catalyst layer temperature rapidly rises due to the combustion of carbon, which is an exothermic reaction. As long as the material of the catalyst reactor and piping is not an expensive heat-resistant alloy, it is not preferable to raise the temperature to about 830 ° C or higher for equipment protection. It is preferable to increase the amount of nitrogen introduced.
On the other hand, the temperature at which sulfur is oxidized and desorbed as sulfur dioxide must be 800 ° C. or higher. However, unless the material of the catalyst reactor or piping is made of an expensive heat-resistant alloy, the catalyst layer temperature cannot be increased to about 830 ° C. or more for equipment protection. Therefore, very little sulfur can be removed by air.
上記の空気接触工程において触媒上の析出炭素の除去が完了し、窒素等の不活性ガスで触媒層および配管内をパージした後、水素ガスを触媒と接触させる、水素ガス接触工程を行う。水素ガス接触工程における触媒層の温度(還元温度)は、硫黄を除去可能な600℃以上で行うことが好ましい。図3に空気による燃焼後の触媒に水素を流通させながら、触媒を5℃/minで昇温させ、脱離するH2Sを質量分析計で分析したプロファイルを示す。空気による燃焼後に触媒上に残留していた硫黄は、600℃以上の温度でH2Sとして十分速く脱離できることがわかる。この水素ガス接触工程では、タール改質反応で活性種となるニッケル金属微粒子をニッケルマグネシア相から析出させる目的もあり、700℃以上で行うことがより好ましい。一方で還元温度は硫黄の除去とニッケル金属微粒子の析出とを鑑みると、800℃以下であれば十分である。 In the above air contact step, the removal of the deposited carbon on the catalyst is completed, and after purging the catalyst layer and the piping with an inert gas such as nitrogen, a hydrogen gas contact step is performed in which hydrogen gas is brought into contact with the catalyst. The temperature (reduction temperature) of the catalyst layer in the hydrogen gas contacting step is preferably 600 ° C. or higher at which sulfur can be removed. FIG. 3 shows a profile obtained by analyzing the H 2 S desorbed with a mass spectrometer by raising the temperature of the catalyst at 5 ° C./min while flowing hydrogen through the catalyst after combustion with air. It can be seen that the sulfur remaining on the catalyst after combustion with air can be desorbed sufficiently quickly as H 2 S at a temperature of 600 ° C. or higher. This hydrogen gas contact step also has the purpose of precipitating nickel metal fine particles that become active species in the tar reforming reaction from the nickel magnesia phase, and is more preferably performed at 700 ° C. or higher. On the other hand, considering the removal of sulfur and the precipitation of nickel metal fine particles, the reduction temperature is sufficient to be 800 ° C. or lower.
空気接触工程では、空気の代わりに水蒸気を導入することで、析出炭素や触媒上の硫黄を除去することも考えられる。しかしながら、図4に示すように、水蒸気によって析出炭素や触媒上の硫黄を除去する場合、CO2の脱離が750℃以上の高温でわずかにみられること、H2Sとしての脱離が高温でごく微量観られるだけである。そのため、水蒸気によって、析出炭素や触媒上の硫黄が除去される速度は、空気による燃焼と水素による還元によって除去される速度と比べ、非常に遅いと言える。したがって、空気の代わりに水蒸気を導入することで、析出炭素や触媒上の硫黄を除去することは、好ましくない。 In the air contact step, it may be possible to remove precipitated carbon and sulfur on the catalyst by introducing water vapor instead of air. However, as shown in FIG. 4, when the deposited carbon and the sulfur on the catalyst are removed by water vapor, the CO 2 desorption is slightly observed at a high temperature of 750 ° C. or higher, and the desorption as H 2 S is a high temperature. Only a very small amount can be seen. Therefore, it can be said that the rate at which the deposited carbon and the sulfur on the catalyst are removed by the water vapor is very slow compared to the rate at which it is removed by combustion with air and reduction with hydrogen. Therefore, it is not preferable to remove precipitated carbon and sulfur on the catalyst by introducing water vapor instead of air.
上述の通り、本実施形態に係るタール含有ガス改質用触媒の再生方法によれば、性能劣化した触媒を再生することができる。具体的には、触媒反応器へ空気を導入し、空気に含まれる酸素と炭素との反応により触媒表面の炭素を燃焼させ、二酸化炭素として除去し、また、触媒表面で硫化物となったニッケルや酸化セリウム中の硫黄の一部を二酸化硫黄として除去し、ニッケルはマトリクスへと戻すことが可能である。さらに、水素を触媒と接触させ還元させることで、触媒表面に残留する硫黄を還元して硫化水素として除去でき、同時に、マトリクスからニッケル金属微粒子を析出させ、触媒活性を回復させることができる。 As described above, according to the method for regenerating a tar-containing gas reforming catalyst according to the present embodiment, it is possible to regenerate a catalyst whose performance has deteriorated. Specifically, air is introduced into the catalyst reactor, the carbon on the catalyst surface is burned by the reaction of oxygen and carbon contained in the air, removed as carbon dioxide, and nickel that has become sulfide on the catalyst surface In addition, some of the sulfur in the cerium oxide can be removed as sulfur dioxide, and nickel can be returned to the matrix. Furthermore, by bringing hydrogen into contact with the catalyst and reducing it, sulfur remaining on the catalyst surface can be reduced and removed as hydrogen sulfide, and at the same time, nickel metal fine particles can be precipitated from the matrix to recover the catalytic activity.
以下、実施例により本発明をさらに詳細に説明するが、本発明はこれら実施例に限定さ
れない。
(実施例1)
まず、以下の要領で触媒を製造した。
硝酸ニッケル、硝酸マグネシウムを各金属元素のモル比(ニッケル:マグネシウム)が1:9になるように精秤して、60℃に加温した混合水溶液を調製し、この混合水溶液に、60℃に加温した炭酸カリウム水溶液を加えた。これにより、ニッケル、マグネシウムを水酸化物として共沈させ、スターラーで十分に攪拌した。水溶液の温度はアルコール温度計を水溶液中に挿入して計測した。その後、混合水溶液の温度を60℃に保持したまま一定時間攪拌を続けて熟成を行った後、吸引ろ過を行い、80℃の純水で十分に洗浄を行った。洗浄後に得られた沈殿物をビーカーに入れ、アルミナゾルを加えた。次に、攪拌羽を取り付けた混合器で十分混合したものを、ナス型フラスコに移してロータリーエバポレーターに取り付け、攪拌しながら吸引することで、水分を蒸発させた。ナス型フラスコ壁面に付着したニッケルとマグネシウムとアルミニウムとの化合物を蒸発皿に移して空気雰囲気温度120℃で乾燥、空気雰囲気温度600℃で仮焼後、粉末を打錠成形器を用いて直径15mm、内径5mm、高さ15mmのリング状に成型し、成型体を得た。その成型体を空気雰囲気中950℃で焼成を行い、Ni0.1Mg0.9Oにアルミニウムをアルミナとして50質量%混合した触媒成型体を調製した。
上記の触媒60Lを、SUS310製の固定床反応器に充填して、触媒層の入口付近、中心付近、出口付近の3ヶ所にK型熱電対を挿入した状態で、電気炉内に設置した。
改質反応を始める前に、まず反応器内を窒素雰囲気下で、触媒層の各温度を800℃まで昇温した後、水素ガスを15Nm3/h流しながら30分間還元処理を行った。
その後、コークス炉から発生したCOGを未精製のまま固定床反応器内に導入した。COG中のタール濃度は約60g/m3で、硫化水素濃度は約3000ppmであった。COG中には水蒸気も含まれているが、改質活性をさらに向上させるために、外部から水蒸気を追加した。この際、COG中のタール及び炭化水素由来の炭素のモル数に対して、2倍のモル数(水蒸気/炭素=2)となるように水蒸気を添加した。空間速度(SV:Space Velocity)を500h−1として、1回目の改質反応を6時間行った。
反応前後のガス分析を行い、タール分解率及び水素増幅率を以下の方法で求めた。
反応前後のガス分析として、触媒層の入口と出口とから分析装置に悪影響を及ぼすタールを除去するための糸巻きフィルター及び水を充填した三連式のガス洗浄瓶を通して、ガス前処理装置(島津製作所製CFP−8000)のポンプで抜き出した。この抜き出したガスを冷却器で水分を除去した後、四重極質量分析計(AMETEK製、Proline)によりH2、N2、O2、CO、CO2、CH4、C2H4、C2H6を3秒ごとに分析した。また、TCD及びFIDガスクロマトグラフ(ラウンドサイエンス製AG−1)によりH2、N2、CO、CO2、CH4、C2H4、C2H6、H2Sを12分間ごとに連続的に分析した。
また、オフラインにて触媒反応器前後のガスサンプリングを行い、ガス中のタール濃度、水分濃度、H2、CO、CO2、CH4、C2H4、C2H6、H2S、ベンゼン、トルエン、キシレンの分析を行った。ガス中のタール濃度は、触媒層の入口と出口とからガスを一定時間吸引して、ジクロロメタンを充填した五連式ガス洗浄瓶を通してガス中のタール成分を捕集した後、ジクロロメタンを除去後の成分を定量することにより評価した。そして、タール分解率は、前記手法で捕集した触媒層入口ガス中タール成分の質量に対する触媒層出口ガス中タール成分の質量の割合から求めた。H2(水素)増幅率は(式1)により算出した。
水素増幅率(−)=(改質COG中H2モル数)/(COG中H2モル数) (式1)
EXAMPLES Hereinafter, although an Example demonstrates this invention further in detail, this invention is not limited to these Examples.
Example 1
First, a catalyst was produced in the following manner.
Nickel nitrate and magnesium nitrate are precisely weighed so that the molar ratio of each metal element (nickel: magnesium) is 1: 9, and a mixed aqueous solution heated to 60 ° C. is prepared. A warm aqueous potassium carbonate solution was added. As a result, nickel and magnesium were coprecipitated as hydroxides and sufficiently stirred with a stirrer. The temperature of the aqueous solution was measured by inserting an alcohol thermometer into the aqueous solution. Thereafter, the mixture was aged by continuing stirring for a certain time while maintaining the temperature of the mixed aqueous solution at 60 ° C., and then suction filtration was performed, followed by sufficient washing with 80 ° C. pure water. The precipitate obtained after washing was placed in a beaker and alumina sol was added. Next, what was sufficiently mixed in a mixer equipped with stirring blades was transferred to an eggplant-shaped flask, attached to a rotary evaporator, and sucked with stirring to evaporate water. Transfer the nickel, magnesium, and aluminum compound adhering to the wall of the eggplant-shaped flask to an evaporating dish, dry it at an air atmosphere temperature of 120 ° C, calcine it at an air atmosphere temperature of 600 ° C, and then use a tableting machine to powder the powder to a diameter of 15 mm And molded into a ring shape having an inner diameter of 5 mm and a height of 15 mm to obtain a molded body. The molded body was fired at 950 ° C. in an air atmosphere to prepare a catalyst molded body in which 50% by mass of Ni 0.1 Mg 0.9 O was mixed with aluminum as alumina.
The above catalyst 60L was packed in a fixed bed reactor made of SUS310 and installed in an electric furnace with K-type thermocouples inserted at three locations near the inlet, near the center, and near the outlet of the catalyst layer.
Before starting the reforming reaction, each temperature of the catalyst layer was first raised to 800 ° C. in a nitrogen atmosphere in the reactor, and then subjected to a reduction treatment for 30 minutes while flowing hydrogen gas at 15 Nm 3 / h.
Thereafter, COG generated from the coke oven was introduced into the fixed bed reactor without purification. The tar concentration in COG was about 60 g / m 3 and the hydrogen sulfide concentration was about 3000 ppm. Although COG also contains water vapor, water vapor was added from the outside in order to further improve the reforming activity. At this time, water vapor was added so that the number of moles of carbon derived from tar and hydrocarbons in COG was doubled (water vapor / carbon = 2). The first reforming reaction was carried out for 6 hours at a space velocity (SV) of 500 h- 1 .
Gas analysis before and after the reaction was performed, and tar decomposition rate and hydrogen amplification rate were determined by the following methods.
For pre- and post-reaction gas analysis, gas pre-treatment equipment (Shimadzu Corporation) is passed through a triple-type gas cleaning bottle filled with water and a thread-wound filter for removing tar that adversely affects the analyzer from the inlet and outlet of the catalyst layer. It was extracted with a pump (manufactured by CFP-8000). After the moisture was removed from the extracted gas with a cooler, H 2 , N 2 , O 2 , CO, CO 2 , CH 4 , C 2 H 4 , C and the like were obtained using a quadrupole mass spectrometer (Proline, manufactured by AMETEK). 2 H 6 was analyzed every 3 seconds. In addition, H 2 , N 2 , CO, CO 2 , CH 4 , C 2 H 4 , C 2 H 6 , and H 2 S are continuously obtained every 12 minutes by TCD and FID gas chromatograph (AG-1 manufactured by Round Science). Analyzed.
Further, gas sampling before and after the catalytic reactor is performed off-line, and tar concentration, moisture concentration, H 2 , CO, CO 2 , CH 4 , C 2 H 4 , C 2 H 6 , H 2 S, and benzene in the gas , Toluene and xylene were analyzed. The tar concentration in the gas is determined by sucking the gas from the inlet and outlet of the catalyst layer for a certain period of time, collecting the tar component in the gas through a pentagonal gas washing bottle filled with dichloromethane, and then removing the dichloromethane. The components were evaluated by quantification. And the tar decomposition rate was calculated | required from the ratio of the mass of the tar component in catalyst layer exit gas with respect to the mass of the tar component in catalyst layer entrance gas collected by the said method. The H 2 (hydrogen) amplification factor was calculated by (Equation 1).
Hydrogen amplification factor (−) = (H 2 moles in reformed COG) / (H 2 moles in COG) (Formula 1)
その結果、表1に示すように改質反応1回目は、6時間平均でタール分解率が53.4%、水素増幅率が1.8であった。
6時間の改質反応後、COG及び水蒸気の導入を止め、窒素50Nm3/hでパージしながら、同時に、触媒層の各温度を500℃まで低下させた。触媒反応器や配管の中が十分パージでき、触媒層の各温度が500℃まで低下したら、触媒の再生を開始した。
まず、以下の要領で触媒を空気に接触させた。すなわち、窒素流量を20Nm3/hまで低下させ、空気を10Nm3/h導入した。触媒層入口付近の温度が上昇し始め、触媒反応器出口の質量分析計によるガス分析でCO2濃度が上昇し始めると、触媒層の炭素が燃焼し始めたことを確認できる。触媒層温度が800℃を超えそうになった場合は、空気流量を落とし、N2流量を30Nm3/hに上げた。触媒層入口付近の温度が下がってくると、次に触媒層中心付近の温度が上昇し始め、触媒層中心付近の温度が下がり始めると、さらに触媒層出口付近の温度が上昇し始める。このような調整を約1時間行っていると、空気15Nm3/h、窒素15Nm3/hとしても、触媒層の各温度が設定温度である500℃に近づくように低下してきたので、触媒層の各温度を600℃まで上昇させた。以降、触媒層の各温度を見ながら、50〜100℃ずつ750℃まで上昇させた。また、徐々に空気流量を上げ、かつ窒素流量を下げながら、最終的に空気流量30Nm3/hとした。最終的に5時間経過した時点で、触媒層出口の二酸化炭素濃度が0.4%となったことを確認して、1回目の空気の導入を停止し、窒素50Nm3/hでパージしながら、触媒層の温度を800℃に上昇させた。
続いて、以下の要領で、触媒に水素ガスを接触させて、還元処理を行った。すなわち、十分に窒素パージを行った後、水素ガスを15Nm3/h流しながら30分間還元処理を行った。
そして、上記方法で再生を行った後、1回目の改質反応と同じ条件で、2回目の改質反応を行った。その結果、改質反応2回目では、6時間平均でタール分解が51.7率%、水素増幅率が1.8となり、フレッシュな触媒で行った1回目の活性とほぼ同じ活性に回復していた。
2回目の改質反応後に、1回目の再生と同じ条件で再生を行った。そして、3回目の改質反応を1回目および2回目と同じ条件で行った、その結果、改質反応3回目では、6時間平均でタール分解率が50.4%、水素増幅率が1.8となり、フレッシュな触媒で行った1回目の活性と再びほぼ同じ活性に回復していた。以降同じ工程を繰り返したところ、表1に示すように、4〜5回目の改質反応での活性も1回目の活性とほぼ同じ性能を発現できた。すなわち、上記の触媒を用いて、上記の条件で触媒の再生を行うことで、性能劣化した触媒の活性を回復させることができ、COG中タール改質反応を長期間安定して行うことができることがわかった。
As a result, as shown in Table 1, in the first reforming reaction, the tar decomposition rate was 53.4% and the hydrogen amplification rate was 1.8 on average over 6 hours.
After the reforming reaction for 6 hours, the introduction of COG and steam was stopped, and at the same time, each temperature of the catalyst layer was lowered to 500 ° C. while purging with nitrogen of 50 Nm 3 / h. When the inside of the catalyst reactor and piping could be sufficiently purged and the temperature of the catalyst layer decreased to 500 ° C., the regeneration of the catalyst was started.
First, the catalyst was brought into contact with air in the following manner. That is, the nitrogen flow was decreased to 20 Nm 3 / h, and 10 Nm 3 / h introducing air. When the temperature near the inlet of the catalyst layer starts to rise and the CO 2 concentration starts to rise by gas analysis using a mass spectrometer at the outlet of the catalyst reactor, it can be confirmed that carbon in the catalyst layer starts to burn. When the catalyst layer temperature was likely to exceed 800 ° C., the air flow rate was decreased and the N 2 flow rate was increased to 30 Nm 3 / h. When the temperature near the catalyst layer inlet decreases, the temperature near the center of the catalyst layer starts to increase next, and when the temperature near the center of the catalyst layer starts to decrease, the temperature near the catalyst layer outlet further starts to increase. When such adjustment is performed for about 1 hour, the air temperature of 15 Nm 3 / h and nitrogen of 15 Nm 3 / h have been lowered so that each temperature of the catalyst layer approaches the set temperature of 500 ° C. Each temperature was increased to 600 ° C. Thereafter, the temperature was raised to 750 ° C. by 50 to 100 ° C. while observing each temperature of the catalyst layer. Moreover, the air flow rate was finally increased to 30 Nm 3 / h while gradually increasing the air flow rate and lowering the nitrogen flow rate. At the end of 5 hours, confirm that the carbon dioxide concentration at the outlet of the catalyst layer reached 0.4%, stop the first introduction of air, and purge with nitrogen of 50 Nm 3 / h The temperature of the catalyst layer was raised to 800 ° C.
Subsequently, reduction treatment was performed by bringing hydrogen gas into contact with the catalyst in the following manner. That is, after sufficiently purging with nitrogen, reduction treatment was performed for 30 minutes while flowing hydrogen gas at 15 Nm 3 / h.
Then, after regeneration by the above method, the second reforming reaction was performed under the same conditions as the first reforming reaction. As a result, in the second reforming reaction, tar decomposition was 51.7% and hydrogen amplification rate was 1.8 on average over 6 hours, and the activity was restored to the same activity as the first activity performed with a fresh catalyst. It was.
After the second reforming reaction, regeneration was performed under the same conditions as the first regeneration. Then, the third reforming reaction was performed under the same conditions as the first and second times. As a result, in the third reforming reaction, the tar decomposition rate was 50.4% and the hydrogen amplification rate was 1. The activity was restored to almost the same activity as the first activity performed with a fresh catalyst. Thereafter, when the same steps were repeated, as shown in Table 1, the activity in the 4th to 5th reforming reactions was also able to express almost the same performance as the first activity. In other words, by regenerating the catalyst under the above conditions using the above catalyst, the activity of the catalyst whose performance has deteriorated can be recovered, and the tar reforming reaction in COG can be performed stably for a long period of time. I understood.
(実施例2)
以下の要領で触媒を製造した。
硝酸ニッケル、硝酸セリウム、硝酸マグネシウムを各金属元素のモル比(ニッケル:セリウム:マグネシウム)が1:1:8になるように精秤して、60℃に加温した混合水溶液を調製したものに、60℃に加温した炭酸カリウム水溶液を加えた。これにより、ニッケル、マグネシウム、及び、セリウムを水酸化物として共沈させ、スターラーで十分に攪拌した。水溶液の温度はアルコール温度計を水溶液中に挿入して計測した。その後、60℃に保持したまま一定時間攪拌を続けて熟成を行った後、吸引ろ過を行い、80℃の純水で十分に洗浄を行った。洗浄後に得られた沈殿物をビーカーに入れ、アルミナゾルを加えた。次に、攪拌羽を取り付けた混合器で十分混合したものを、ナス型フラスコに移してロータリーエバポレーターに取り付け、攪拌しながら吸引することで、水分を蒸発させた。ナス型フラスコ壁面に付着したニッケルとマグネシウムとセリウムとアルミニウムの化合物を蒸発皿に移して空気雰囲気温度120℃で乾燥、空気雰囲気温度600℃で仮焼後、粉末を打錠成形器を用いて直径15mm、高さ15mm、内径5mmのリング状に成型し、成型体を得た。その成型体を空気雰囲気中950℃で焼成を行い、Ni0.1Ce0.1Mg0.8Oにアルミニウムをアルミナとして50質量%混合した触媒成型体を調製した。
上記触媒を用いて、実施例1と同様にして、改質反応と再生とを繰り返した。
改質反応(1回目〜5回目)のタール分解率及び水素増幅率を表2に示す。
(Example 2)
The catalyst was manufactured as follows.
Nickel nitrate, cerium nitrate, and magnesium nitrate were precisely weighed so that the molar ratio of each metal element (nickel: cerium: magnesium) was 1: 1: 8, and a mixed aqueous solution heated to 60 ° C. was prepared. A potassium carbonate aqueous solution heated to 60 ° C. was added. As a result, nickel, magnesium and cerium were coprecipitated as hydroxides and sufficiently stirred with a stirrer. The temperature of the aqueous solution was measured by inserting an alcohol thermometer into the aqueous solution. Thereafter, the mixture was aged for a certain period of time while being kept at 60 ° C., and then subjected to suction filtration and sufficiently washed with pure water at 80 ° C. The precipitate obtained after washing was placed in a beaker and alumina sol was added. Next, what was sufficiently mixed in a mixer equipped with stirring blades was transferred to an eggplant-shaped flask, attached to a rotary evaporator, and sucked with stirring to evaporate water. Transfer the nickel, magnesium, cerium, and aluminum compound adhering to the wall of the eggplant-shaped flask to an evaporating dish, dry it at an air atmosphere temperature of 120 ° C, calcine it at an air atmosphere temperature of 600 ° C, and then use a tableting machine to measure the powder It was molded into a ring shape having a size of 15 mm, a height of 15 mm, and an inner diameter of 5 mm to obtain a molded body. The molded body was fired at 950 ° C. in an air atmosphere to prepare a catalyst molded body in which Ni 0.1 Ce 0.1 Mg 0.8 O was mixed with 50% by mass of aluminum as alumina.
Using the catalyst, the reforming reaction and regeneration were repeated in the same manner as in Example 1.
Table 2 shows the tar decomposition rate and hydrogen amplification rate of the reforming reaction (from the first to the fifth).
表2に示すように改質反応1回目は、6時間平均でタール分解率が64.1%、水素増幅率が2.0となった。また、2〜5回目の改質反応での活性もほぼ同じ性能を発現できた。すなわち、本発明の再生方法によれば、触媒活性を回復させ、COG中タール改質反応を長期間安定的に行うことができることがわかった。
なお、実施例1に比べて、タール分解率及び水素増幅率は向上した。すなわち、触媒にセリウムが含有されている方が、タール分解率及び水素増幅率が高くなることがわかった。
As shown in Table 2, in the first reforming reaction, the tar decomposition rate was 64.1% and the hydrogen amplification rate was 2.0 on average over 6 hours. In addition, the activity in the 2nd to 5th reforming reactions could exhibit almost the same performance. That is, according to the regeneration method of the present invention, it was found that the catalytic activity can be recovered and the tar reforming reaction in COG can be performed stably for a long period of time.
In addition, compared with Example 1, the tar decomposition rate and the hydrogen amplification rate were improved. That is, it was found that the tar decomposition rate and the hydrogen amplification rate are higher when the catalyst contains cerium.
(実施例3)
実施例2で使用した触媒を用いて、実施例1と同様にして、1回目の改質反応を行った。その結果、表3に示すように、6時間平均でタール分解率が64.2%、水素増幅率が2.0で、実施例2とほぼ同じであった。
(Example 3)
Using the catalyst used in Example 2, the first reforming reaction was carried out in the same manner as in Example 1. As a result, as shown in Table 3, the tar decomposition rate was 64.2% and the hydrogen amplification rate was 2.0 on a 6 hour average, which was almost the same as in Example 2.
6時間の改質反応後、COG及び水蒸気の導入を止め、窒素50Nm3/hでパージしながら、同時に、触媒層の各温度を400℃まで低下させた。触媒反応器や配管の中が十分パージでき、触媒層の各温度が400℃まで低下したら、触媒の再生を開始した。
まず、以下の要領で触媒を空気に接触させた。すなわち、窒素流量を20Nm3/hまで低下させ、空気を10Nm3/h導入した。触媒層入口付近の温度が上昇し始め、触媒反応器出口の質量分析計によるガス分析でCO2濃度が上昇し始めると、触媒層の炭素が燃焼し始めたことを確認できる。830℃を超えそうになった場合は、空気流量を落とし、N2流量を30Nm3/hに上げた。触媒層入口付近の温度が下がってくると、次に触媒層中心付近の温度が上昇し始め、触媒層中心付近の温度が下がり始めると、さらに触媒層出口付近の温度が上昇し始める。このような調整を約1時間行っていると、空気15Nm3/h、窒素15Nm3/hとしても、触媒層の各温度が設定温度である500℃に近づくように低下してきたので、触媒層の各温度を600℃まで上昇させた。以降、触媒層の各温度を見ながら、100℃ずつ800℃まで上昇させた。また、徐々に空気流量を上げ、かつ窒素流量を下げながら、最終的に空気流量30Nm3/hとした。最終的に5時間経過した時点で、触媒層出口の二酸化炭素濃度が0.4%となったことを確認して、1回目の空気の導入を停止し、窒素50Nm3/hでパージした。
続いて、実施例1と同じ要領で、触媒に水素ガスを接触させて、還元処理を行った。
そして、上記方法で再生を行った後、1回目の改質反応と同じ条件で、2回目の改質反応を行った。その結果、改質反応2回目では、6時間平均でタール分解率が62.5%、水素増幅率が1.9となり、フレッシュな触媒で行った1回目の活性とほぼ同じ活性に回復していた。以降同じ工程を繰り返したところ、表3に示すように、3〜5回目の改質反応での活性も1回目の活性とほぼ同じ性能を発現できた。すなわち、空気接触工程で触媒層温度を400℃まで下げ、800℃までの温度で行っても、同様に触媒活性を回復させ、COG中タール改質反応を長期間安定的に行うことができることがわかった。
After the reforming reaction for 6 hours, the introduction of COG and steam was stopped, and at the same time, each temperature of the catalyst layer was lowered to 400 ° C. while purging with nitrogen of 50 Nm 3 / h. When the inside of the catalyst reactor and piping could be sufficiently purged and the temperature of the catalyst layer decreased to 400 ° C., regeneration of the catalyst was started.
First, the catalyst was brought into contact with air in the following manner. That is, the nitrogen flow was decreased to 20 Nm 3 / h, and 10 Nm 3 / h introducing air. When the temperature near the inlet of the catalyst layer starts to rise and the CO 2 concentration starts to rise by gas analysis using a mass spectrometer at the outlet of the catalyst reactor, it can be confirmed that carbon in the catalyst layer starts to burn. When it was likely to exceed 830 ° C., the air flow rate was decreased and the N 2 flow rate was increased to 30 Nm 3 / h. When the temperature near the catalyst layer inlet decreases, the temperature near the center of the catalyst layer starts to increase next, and when the temperature near the center of the catalyst layer starts to decrease, the temperature near the catalyst layer outlet further starts to increase. When such adjustment is performed for about 1 hour, the air temperature of 15 Nm 3 / h and nitrogen of 15 Nm 3 / h have been lowered so that each temperature of the catalyst layer approaches the set temperature of 500 ° C. Each temperature was increased to 600 ° C. Thereafter, the temperature was raised to 800 ° C. by 100 ° C. while observing each temperature of the catalyst layer. Moreover, the air flow rate was finally increased to 30 Nm 3 / h while gradually increasing the air flow rate and lowering the nitrogen flow rate. When 5 hours had finally passed, it was confirmed that the carbon dioxide concentration at the outlet of the catalyst layer was 0.4%, and the first introduction of air was stopped and purged with 50 Nm 3 / h of nitrogen.
Subsequently, reduction treatment was performed by bringing hydrogen gas into contact with the catalyst in the same manner as in Example 1.
Then, after regeneration by the above method, the second reforming reaction was performed under the same conditions as the first reforming reaction. As a result, in the second reforming reaction, the tar decomposition rate was 62.5% and the hydrogen amplification rate was 1.9 on average over 6 hours, and the activity was restored to the same activity as the first activity performed with a fresh catalyst. It was. Thereafter, when the same steps were repeated, as shown in Table 3, the activity in the third to fifth reforming reactions was able to develop almost the same performance as the first activity. That is, even if the temperature of the catalyst layer is lowered to 400 ° C. in the air contact step and the reaction is carried out at a temperature up to 800 ° C., the catalytic activity can be recovered and the tar reforming reaction in COG can be performed stably for a long period of time. all right.
(実施例4)
以下の要領で触媒を製造した。
硝酸ニッケル、硝酸マグネシウムを各金属元素のモル比が1:9になるようにし、ニッケルとマグネシウムとの沈殿物を空気雰囲気温度120℃で乾燥し、粗粉砕し、空気雰囲気中600℃で仮焼したものを、解砕した後にビーカーに入れ、アルミナゾルを加えた。これ以外の工程は、実施例1と同様に行った。
上記触媒を用いて、実施例1と同様にして、改質反応と再生とを繰り返した。改質反応(1回目〜5回目)のタール分解率及び水素増幅率を表4に示す。
(Example 4)
The catalyst was manufactured as follows.
Nickel nitrate and magnesium nitrate are made to have a molar ratio of each metal element of 1: 9, and a precipitate of nickel and magnesium is dried at an air atmosphere temperature of 120 ° C., coarsely pulverized, and calcined at 600 ° C. in an air atmosphere. The resulting product was crushed and placed in a beaker, and alumina sol was added. The other steps were the same as in Example 1.
Using the catalyst, the reforming reaction and regeneration were repeated in the same manner as in Example 1. Table 4 shows the tar decomposition rate and hydrogen amplification rate of the reforming reaction (from the first to the fifth).
表4に示すように改質反応1回目は、6時間平均でタール分解率が53.4%、水素増幅率が1.8であった。また、2〜5回目の改質反応での活性もほぼ同じ性能を発現できた。すなわち、触媒の調製において、アルミナを混合する前に、ニッケルとマグネシアの共沈物を乾燥・仮焼した触媒を用いても、再生によって触媒活性を回復させて、COG中タール改質反応を長期間安定して行うことができることがわかった。 As shown in Table 4, the first reforming reaction had a tar decomposition rate of 53.4% and a hydrogen amplification rate of 1.8 on average over 6 hours. In addition, the activity in the 2nd to 5th reforming reactions could exhibit almost the same performance. That is, in the preparation of the catalyst, even if a catalyst obtained by drying and calcining the coprecipitate of nickel and magnesia before mixing the alumina is used, the catalytic activity is recovered by regeneration, and the tar reforming reaction in COG is prolonged. It was found that it can be performed stably for a period.
(実施例5)
触媒調製において、硝酸ニッケル、硝酸セリウム、硝酸マグネシウムを各金属元素のモル比が1:1:8になるようにし、ニッケル、マグネシウム、及び、セリウムの沈殿物を空気雰囲気温度120℃で乾燥し粗粉砕し、空気雰囲気中600℃で仮焼したものを解砕した後にビーカーに入れ、アルミナゾルを加えるとする工程以外は、実施例1と同様に行った。
上記触媒を用いて、実施例1と同様にして、改質反応と再生とを繰り返した。改質反応(1回目〜5回目)のタール分解率及び水素増幅率を表5に示す。
(Example 5)
In the catalyst preparation, nickel nitrate, cerium nitrate, and magnesium nitrate were adjusted so that the molar ratio of each metal element was 1: 1: 8, and the precipitates of nickel, magnesium, and cerium were dried at an air atmosphere temperature of 120 ° C. to be coarse. The same procedure as in Example 1 was performed except for the step of pulverizing and calcination at 600 ° C. in an air atmosphere, crushing, putting in a beaker, and adding alumina sol.
Using the catalyst, the reforming reaction and regeneration were repeated in the same manner as in Example 1. Table 5 shows the tar decomposition rate and hydrogen amplification rate of the reforming reaction (from the first to the fifth).
表5に示すように改質反応1回目は、6時間平均でタール分解率63.2%、水素増幅率2.0となった。また、2〜5回目の改質反応での活性もほぼ同じ性能を発現できた。すなわち、触媒がセリウムを含有する場合にも、触媒の調製において、でアルミナを混合する前に、ニッケル、マグネシウム、及び、セリウムの共沈物を乾燥・仮焼していても、再生によって触媒活性を回復させて、COG中タール改質反応を長期間安定して行うことができることがわかった。 As shown in Table 5, in the first reforming reaction, the tar decomposition rate was 63.2% and the hydrogen amplification rate was 2.0 on average over 6 hours. In addition, the activity in the 2nd to 5th reforming reactions could exhibit almost the same performance. That is, even when the catalyst contains cerium, the catalyst activity can be achieved by regeneration even if the coprecipitate of nickel, magnesium, and cerium is dried and calcined before mixing the alumina in the preparation of the catalyst. It was found that the tar reforming reaction in COG can be carried out stably for a long period of time.
(実施例6)
実施例1と同じ触媒を用いて、実施例1と同じ量の触媒を同じ反応器に充填した。充填後、改質反応を始める前に、窒素雰囲気下で触媒層の各温度を800℃まで昇温した後、水素ガスを15Nm3/h流しながら30分間還元処理を行った。その後、実施例1と同様に、コークス炉から発生したCOGを未精製のまま導入した。ただし、本実施例では実施例1とは異なり、外部から水蒸気は追加しなかった。そのため、本実施例では水蒸気は、COGに含まれる水分のみであり、モル比で、水蒸気/炭素=0.8であった。このような条件で改質反応を行うと、炭素析出量が大きくなる。
上記触媒を用いて、実施例1と同様にして、改質反応と再生とを繰り返した。改質反応(1回目〜5回目)のタール分解率及び水素増幅率を表6に示す。
(Example 6)
Using the same catalyst as in Example 1, the same amount of catalyst as in Example 1 was charged to the same reactor. After filling, before starting the reforming reaction, each temperature of the catalyst layer was raised to 800 ° C. in a nitrogen atmosphere, and then reduction treatment was performed for 30 minutes while flowing hydrogen gas at 15 Nm 3 / h. Thereafter, as in Example 1, COG generated from the coke oven was introduced unpurified. However, in this example, unlike Example 1, water vapor was not added from the outside. Therefore, in the present Example, water vapor | steam was only the water | moisture content contained in COG, and it was water vapor / carbon = 0.8 by molar ratio. When the reforming reaction is performed under such conditions, the amount of carbon deposition increases.
Using the catalyst, the reforming reaction and regeneration were repeated in the same manner as in Example 1. Table 6 shows the tar decomposition rate and hydrogen amplification rate of the reforming reaction (from the first to the fifth).
表6に示すように改質反応1回目は、6時間平均でタール分解率が45.2%、水素増幅率が1.5であった。また、2〜5回目の改質反応での活性もほぼ同じ性能を発現できた。すなわち、炭素析出量が大きくなるような条件下の改質反応であっても、本発明の再生方法によれば、触媒活性を回復させて、COG中タール改質反応を長期間安定的に行うことができることがわかった。 As shown in Table 6, the first reforming reaction had a tar decomposition rate of 45.2% and a hydrogen amplification rate of 1.5 on average over 6 hours. In addition, the activity in the 2nd to 5th reforming reactions could exhibit almost the same performance. That is, even if the reforming reaction is performed under such a condition that the amount of carbon deposition becomes large, according to the regeneration method of the present invention, the catalytic activity is recovered and the tar reforming reaction in COG is performed stably for a long period of time. I found out that I could do it.
(実施例7)
実施例2と同じ触媒を用いて、実施例6と同様にして、改質反応と再生とを繰り返した。改質反応(1回目〜5回目)のタール分解率及び水素増幅率を表7に示す。
(Example 7)
Using the same catalyst as in Example 2, the reforming reaction and regeneration were repeated in the same manner as in Example 6. Table 7 shows the tar decomposition rate and hydrogen amplification rate of the reforming reaction (from the first to the fifth).
表7に示すように、改質反応1回目は、6時間平均でタール分解率55.2%、水素増幅率1.7となった。2〜5回目の改質反応での活性もほぼ同じ性能を発現できた。すなわち、炭素析出量が大きくなるような条件下の改質反応でも、本発明の再生方法によれば、触媒活性を回復させて、COG中タール改質反応を長期間安定的に行うことができることがわかった。また、炭素析出量が大きくなるような条件下の改質反応でも、セリウムが含有されている方が、タール分解率及び水素増幅率が高くなることがわかった。 As shown in Table 7, in the first reforming reaction, the tar decomposition rate was 55.2% and the hydrogen amplification rate was 1.7 on average over 6 hours. The activity in the 2nd to 5th reforming reactions was almost the same. That is, even in a reforming reaction under conditions where the amount of carbon deposition is large, according to the regeneration method of the present invention, the catalytic reforming can be recovered and the tar reforming reaction in COG can be performed stably for a long period of time. I understood. Further, it was found that even in the reforming reaction under conditions where the amount of carbon deposition increases, the tar decomposition rate and the hydrogen amplification rate increase when cerium is contained.
(実施例8)
まず、以下の要領で触媒を製造した。
硝酸ニッケル、硝酸マグネシウムを各金属元素のモル比が1:9になるように精秤して、アルコール温度計を水溶液中に挿入して温度を計測しながら、60℃に加温した混合水溶液を調製した。この混合水溶液に、60℃に加温した炭酸カリウム水溶液を加えた。これにより、ニッケル、及び、マグネシウムを水酸化物として共沈させ、スターラーで十分に攪拌した。その後、60℃に保持したまま一定時間攪拌を続けて熟成を行った後、吸引ろ過を行い、80℃の純水で十分に洗浄を行った。洗浄後に得られた沈殿物をビーカーに入れ、アルミナゾルを加えた。次に、攪拌羽を取り付けた混合器で十分混合したものを、ナス型フラスコに移してロータリーエバポレーターに取り付け、攪拌しながら吸引することで、水分を蒸発させた。ナス型フラスコ壁面に付着したニッケルとマグネシウムとアルミニウムの化合物を蒸発皿に移して空気雰囲気温度120℃で乾燥、空気雰囲気温度600℃で仮焼後、粉末を圧縮成形器を用いて直径3mmの錠剤状にプレス成型し、錠剤成型体を得た。その成型体を空気雰囲気中950℃で焼成を行い、Ni0.1Mg0.9Oにアルミニウムをアルミナとして50質量%混合した触媒成型体を調製した。
上記触媒を20mL用い、SUS316にカロライズ処理した反応管の中央に位置するよう石英ウールで固定した。また、触媒層中央位置にK型熱電対を挿入し、これら固定床反応管を所定の位置にセットした。
改質反応を始める前に、まず窒素雰囲気下で触媒層中心付近の温度を800℃まで昇温した後、水素ガスを100mL/min流しながら30分間還元処理を行った。
その後、コークス炉ガスの模擬ガスとして水素:窒素=1:1、H2Sを2,000ppm含むガスと、石炭乾留時発生タールの模擬物質として、タール中にも実際に含まれ且つ常温で粘度の低い液体物質である1−メチルナフタレン(1−MN)とを、精密ポンプで0.017g/minの流量で反応管へ導入した。また、S/C=3となるよう、純水を精密ポンプで0.1g/minの流量で反応管へ導入し、トータルで170mL/minになるよう各ガスを調整して導入し、常圧下、800℃で、空間速度(SV:Space Velocity)を500h−1として、1回目の改質反応を8時間行った。
出口から排出された生成ガスを室温トラップ、氷温トラップを経由させて、未反応の1−メチルナフタレン、ナフタレン、水分を除去した後、TCD及びFIDガスクロマトグラフ(ヒューレットパッカード製HP6890)にオンラインで注入して分析を行った。改質反応の反応度合である1−MN分解率(1−メチルナフタレンの分解率)は、メタン選択率、CO選択率、CO2選択率、触媒上に堆積した炭素析出率によって判断した。各ガスの選択率は出口ガス中の各成分濃度より、以下の(式2)〜(式4)で算出した。
CH4選択率(%)=(CH4の体積量)/(供給された1−メチルナフタレンのC量)×100 (式2)
CO選択率(%)=(COの体積量)/(供給された1−メチルナフタレンのC量)×100 (式3)
CO2選択率(%)=(CO2の体積量)/(供給された1−メチルナフタレンのC量)×100 (式4)
また、炭素析出率は、熱重量分析装置(島津製作所製TGA−50H)を用いて、空気流通下で昇温した際の重量減少量を用いて、(式5)より算出した。
炭素析出率(%)=(重量減少量)/(炭素析出した触媒重量)×100 (式5)
また、併せて入口水素ガス体積に対する出口水素ガス体積の比(水素増幅率)も併記した。
結果を表8に示す。
(Example 8)
First, a catalyst was produced in the following manner.
A mixed aqueous solution heated to 60 ° C. was prepared by accurately weighing nickel nitrate and magnesium nitrate so that the molar ratio of each metal element was 1: 9, and inserting an alcohol thermometer into the aqueous solution to measure the temperature. Prepared. To this mixed aqueous solution, an aqueous potassium carbonate solution heated to 60 ° C. was added. As a result, nickel and magnesium were coprecipitated as hydroxides and sufficiently stirred with a stirrer. Thereafter, the mixture was aged for a certain period of time while being kept at 60 ° C., and then subjected to suction filtration and sufficiently washed with pure water at 80 ° C. The precipitate obtained after washing was placed in a beaker and alumina sol was added. Next, what was sufficiently mixed in a mixer equipped with stirring blades was transferred to an eggplant-shaped flask, attached to a rotary evaporator, and sucked with stirring to evaporate water. Transfer the nickel, magnesium, and aluminum compound adhering to the wall of the eggplant-shaped flask to an evaporating dish, dry at an air atmosphere temperature of 120 ° C, calcine at an air atmosphere temperature of 600 ° C, and then use a compression molding machine to powder the tablets with a diameter of 3 mm The product was press-molded into a tablet to obtain a tablet-molded body. The molded body was fired at 950 ° C. in an air atmosphere to prepare a catalyst molded body in which 50% by mass of Ni 0.1 Mg 0.9 O was mixed with aluminum as alumina.
20 mL of the above catalyst was used and fixed with quartz wool so as to be positioned in the center of a reaction tube calorized on SUS316. Further, a K-type thermocouple was inserted at the center position of the catalyst layer, and these fixed bed reaction tubes were set at predetermined positions.
Before starting the reforming reaction, the temperature in the vicinity of the center of the catalyst layer was first raised to 800 ° C. in a nitrogen atmosphere, and then reduction treatment was performed for 30 minutes while flowing hydrogen gas at 100 mL / min.
Then, as a simulated gas for coke oven gas, a gas containing hydrogen: nitrogen = 1: 1, 2,000 ppm of H 2 S and a simulated substance of tar generated during coal dry distillation, it is actually contained in tar and has a viscosity at room temperature. 1-methylnaphthalene (1-MN), which is a low liquid substance, was introduced into the reaction tube at a flow rate of 0.017 g / min with a precision pump. In addition, pure water is introduced into the reaction tube at a flow rate of 0.1 g / min with a precision pump so that S / C = 3, and each gas is adjusted and introduced so that the total becomes 170 mL / min. The first reforming reaction was performed for 8 hours at 800 ° C. with a space velocity (SV) of 500 h −1 .
Unreacted 1-methylnaphthalene, naphthalene, and moisture are removed via the room temperature trap and ice temperature trap, and the product gas discharged from the outlet is injected online into the TCD and FID gas chromatograph (HP 6890 made by Hewlett-Packard). And analyzed. The 1-MN decomposition rate (decomposition rate of 1-methylnaphthalene), which is the degree of reaction of the reforming reaction, was judged by methane selectivity, CO selectivity, CO 2 selectivity, and the carbon deposition rate deposited on the catalyst. The selectivity of each gas was calculated by the following (Expression 2) to (Expression 4) from the concentration of each component in the outlet gas.
CH 4 selectivity (%) = (volume amount of CH 4 ) / (C amount of supplied 1-methylnaphthalene) × 100 (Formula 2)
CO selectivity (%) = (volume of CO) / (C amount of supplied 1-methylnaphthalene) × 100 (Formula 3)
CO 2 selectivity (%) = (volume amount of CO 2 ) / (C amount of supplied 1-methylnaphthalene) × 100 (Formula 4)
Moreover, the carbon deposition rate was calculated from (Formula 5) using the weight reduction amount when it heated up under air circulation using the thermogravimetric analyzer (Shimadzu Corporation TGA-50H).
Carbon deposition rate (%) = (weight reduction amount) / (carbon deposition catalyst weight) × 100 (Formula 5)
In addition, the ratio of the outlet hydrogen gas volume to the inlet hydrogen gas volume (hydrogen amplification factor) is also shown.
The results are shown in Table 8.
表8に示すように改質反応1回目では、8時間平均でタール分解率が67.8%、CH4選択率が2.6%、CO選択率が26.5%、CO2選択率が24.1%、炭素析出率が2.5%、水素増幅率が2.0であった。
8時間の改質反応後、ガスの導入を止め、窒素100mL/minでパージしながら、同時に、触媒層の温度を500℃まで低下させた。触媒反応器や配管の中が十分パージでき、触媒層温度が500℃まで低下したら、触媒の再生を開始した。
まず、以下の要領で触媒を空気に接触させた。すなわち、窒素流量を40mL/minまで低下させ、空気を10mL/min導入した。触媒層の温度が上昇し始め、触媒反応器出口のCO2分析計によるガス分析でCO2濃度が上昇し始めると、触媒層の炭素が燃焼し始めたことを確認できる。800℃を超えそうになった場合は、空気流量を落とし、N2流量を50mL/minに上げた。このような調整を約30分行っていると、空気25mL/min、窒素25mL/minとしても、触媒層温度が設定温度である500℃に近づくように低下してきたので、触媒層温度を600℃まで上昇させた。以降、触媒層温度を見ながら、50〜100℃ずつ750℃まで上昇させた。また、徐々に空気流量を上げ、かつ窒素流量を下げながら、最終的に空気流量50mL/minとした。最終的に3時間経過した時点で、触媒層出口の二酸化炭素濃度が0.4%となったことを確認して、空気の導入を停止して、1回目の触媒への空気の接触を完了し、窒素100mL/minでパージしながら、触媒層の温度を800℃に上昇させた。
続いて、以下の要領で、触媒に水素ガスを接触させて、還元処理を行った。すなわち、十分に窒素パージを行った後、水素ガスを100mL/min流しながら30分間還元処理を行った。
そして、上記の方法で再生を行った後、1回目の改質反応と同じ条件で、2回目の改質反応を行った。その結果、改質反応2回目では、8時間平均で1−MN分解率が65.3%、CH4選択率が2.5%、CO選択率が24.6%、CO2選択率が22.3%、炭素析出率が2.9%、水素増幅率が1.9であった。すなわち、フレッシュな触媒で行った1回目の活性とほぼ同じ活性に回復した。
また、2回目の改質反応後に、1回目の再生と同じ条件で再生(空気接触+水素ガスによる還元)を行った。そして、3回目の改質反応を1〜2回目と同じ条件で行った。その結果、改質反応3回目では、8時間平均で1−MN分解率が69.1%、CH4選択率が2.9%、CO選択率が25.3%、CO2選択率が23.6%、炭素析出率が2.4%、水素増幅率が2.0となり、フレッシュな触媒で行った1回目の活性と再びほぼ同じ活性を示した。
以降同じ工程を繰り返し、計5回の改質反応を行ったところ、表8に示すように、4〜5回目の改質反応でも、1回目とほぼ同じ性能を発現できた。すなわち、ラボにおけるCOGを模擬した1−MNの改質反応試験でも、実COGの反応と同様に、本発明の再生方法によれば、触媒活性を回復させて、COG中タール改質反応を長期間安定的に行うことができることがわかった。
As shown in Table 8, in the first reforming reaction, the tar decomposition rate is 67.8%, CH 4 selectivity is 2.6%, CO selectivity is 26.5%, and CO 2 selectivity is 8 hours average. The carbon deposition rate was 24.1%, the carbon deposition rate was 2.5%, and the hydrogen amplification rate was 2.0.
After the reforming reaction for 8 hours, the introduction of the gas was stopped and the temperature of the catalyst layer was lowered to 500 ° C. while purging with nitrogen at 100 mL / min. When the catalyst reactor and piping could be sufficiently purged and the catalyst layer temperature dropped to 500 ° C., regeneration of the catalyst was started.
First, the catalyst was brought into contact with air in the following manner. That is, the nitrogen flow rate was reduced to 40 mL / min, and air was introduced at 10 mL / min. When the temperature of the catalyst layer starts to rise and the CO 2 concentration starts to rise in the gas analysis by the CO 2 analyzer at the outlet of the catalyst reactor, it can be confirmed that the carbon in the catalyst layer has started to burn. When it was likely to exceed 800 ° C., the air flow rate was reduced and the N 2 flow rate was increased to 50 mL / min. When such adjustment is performed for about 30 minutes, the catalyst layer temperature has decreased to approach the set temperature of 500 ° C. even when the air is 25 mL / min and nitrogen is 25 mL / min. Was raised. Thereafter, the temperature was raised to 750 ° C. by 50-100 ° C. while observing the catalyst layer temperature. In addition, the air flow rate was finally increased to 50 mL / min while the air flow rate was gradually increased and the nitrogen flow rate was decreased. When 3 hours finally passed, confirm that the carbon dioxide concentration at the catalyst layer outlet became 0.4%, stop the introduction of air and complete the first contact of air with the catalyst The temperature of the catalyst layer was raised to 800 ° C. while purging with nitrogen at 100 mL / min.
Subsequently, reduction treatment was performed by bringing hydrogen gas into contact with the catalyst in the following manner. That is, after sufficiently purging with nitrogen, reduction treatment was performed for 30 minutes while flowing hydrogen gas at 100 mL / min.
Then, after regeneration by the above method, the second reforming reaction was performed under the same conditions as the first reforming reaction. As a result, in the second reforming reaction, the 1-MN decomposition rate was 65.3%, the CH 4 selectivity was 2.5%, the CO selectivity was 24.6%, and the CO 2 selectivity was 22 on average for 8 hours. The carbon deposition rate was 2.9%, and the hydrogen amplification rate was 1.9. That is, the activity recovered to the same activity as the first activity performed with a fresh catalyst.
Further, after the second reforming reaction, regeneration (air contact + reduction with hydrogen gas) was performed under the same conditions as the first regeneration. The third reforming reaction was performed under the same conditions as in the first and second times. As a result, in the third reforming reaction, the 1-MN decomposition rate was 69.1%, the CH 4 selectivity was 2.9%, the CO selectivity was 25.3%, and the CO 2 selectivity was 23 on average for 8 hours. The carbon deposition rate was .6%, the carbon deposition rate was 2.4%, and the hydrogen amplification rate was 2.0, indicating almost the same activity again as the first activity performed with a fresh catalyst.
Thereafter, the same process was repeated, and a total of five reforming reactions were performed. As shown in Table 8, even in the fourth to fifth reforming reactions, almost the same performance as that of the first time could be exhibited. That is, even in the 1-MN reforming reaction test simulating COG in the laboratory, like the actual COG reaction, according to the regeneration method of the present invention, the catalytic activity is recovered and the tar reforming reaction in COG is prolonged. It was found that it can be performed stably for a period.
(実施例9)
まず、以下の要領で触媒を製造した。
触媒調製において、硝酸ニッケル、硝酸セリウム、硝酸マグネシウムを各金属元素のモル比が1:1:8になるように精秤して、アルコール温度計を水溶液中に挿入して計測しながら、60℃に加温して混合水溶液を調製した。この混合水溶液に、60℃に加温した炭酸カリウム水溶液を加えた。これにより、ニッケル、マグネシウム、及び、セリウムを水酸化物として共沈させ、スターラーで十分に攪拌した。その後、60℃に保持したまま一定時間攪拌を続けて熟成を行った後、吸引ろ過を行い、80℃の純水で十分に洗浄を行った。洗浄後に得られた沈殿物をビーカーに入れ、アルミナゾルを加えた。次に、攪拌羽を取り付けた混合器で十分混合したものを、ナス型フラスコに移してロータリーエバポレーターに取り付け、攪拌しながら吸引することで、水分を蒸発させた。ナス型フラスコ壁面に付着したニッケルとマグネシウムとセリウムとアルミニウムの化合物を蒸発皿に移して空気雰囲気温度120℃で乾燥、空気雰囲気温度600℃で仮焼後、粉末を圧縮成形器を用いて直径3mmの錠剤状にプレス成型し、錠剤成型体を得た。その成型体を空気雰囲気中950℃で焼成を行い、Ni0.1Ce0.1Mg0.8Oにアルミニウムをアルミナとして50質量%混合した触媒成型体を調製した。上記触媒を用いて、実施例8と同様にして、改質反応と再生とを繰り返した。結果を表9に示す。
Example 9
First, a catalyst was produced in the following manner.
In catalyst preparation, nickel nitrate, cerium nitrate, and magnesium nitrate were precisely weighed so that the molar ratio of each metal element was 1: 1: 8, and an alcohol thermometer was inserted into the aqueous solution, and measurement was performed at 60 ° C. To prepare a mixed aqueous solution. To this mixed aqueous solution, an aqueous potassium carbonate solution heated to 60 ° C. was added. As a result, nickel, magnesium and cerium were coprecipitated as hydroxides and sufficiently stirred with a stirrer. Thereafter, the mixture was aged for a certain period of time while being kept at 60 ° C., and then subjected to suction filtration and sufficiently washed with pure water at 80 ° C. The precipitate obtained after washing was placed in a beaker and alumina sol was added. Next, what was sufficiently mixed in a mixer equipped with stirring blades was transferred to an eggplant-shaped flask, attached to a rotary evaporator, and sucked with stirring to evaporate water. Transfer the nickel, magnesium, cerium, and aluminum compound adhering to the wall of the eggplant-shaped flask to an evaporating dish, dry it at an air atmosphere temperature of 120 ° C, and calcin it at an air atmosphere temperature of 600 ° C. Was pressed into a tablet shape to obtain a tablet-molded body. The molded body was fired at 950 ° C. in an air atmosphere to prepare a catalyst molded body in which Ni 0.1 Ce 0.1 Mg 0.8 O was mixed with 50% by mass of aluminum as alumina. Using the catalyst, the reforming reaction and regeneration were repeated in the same manner as in Example 8. The results are shown in Table 9.
表9に示すように改質反応1回目では、8時間平均でタール分解率が82.1%、CH4選択率が3.3%、CO選択率が31.5%、CO2選択率が27.6%、炭素析出率が3.5%、水素増幅率が2.1であった。また、2〜5回目の改質反応での活性もほぼ同じ性能を発現できた。すなわち、ラボにおけるCOGを模擬した1−MNの改質反応試験でも、実COGの反応と同様に、触媒活性を回復させて、COG中タール改質反応を長期間安定的に行うことができることがわかった。また、ラボにおけるCOGを模擬した1−MNの改質反応試験でも、セリウムが含有されている方が、分解率及び水素増幅率が高くなることがわかった。 As shown in Table 9, in the first reforming reaction, the tar decomposition rate was 82.1%, CH 4 selectivity was 3.3%, CO selectivity was 31.5%, and CO 2 selectivity was 8 hours average. 27.6%, the carbon deposition rate was 3.5%, and the hydrogen amplification rate was 2.1. In addition, the activity in the 2nd to 5th reforming reactions could exhibit almost the same performance. That is, even in the 1-MN reforming reaction test simulating COG in the laboratory, the catalytic reforming can be recovered and the tar reforming reaction in COG can be performed stably for a long period of time as in the case of the actual COG reaction. all right. Further, even in a 1-MN reforming reaction test simulating COG in a laboratory, it was found that the decomposition rate and the hydrogen amplification rate were higher when cerium was contained.
(比較例1)
触媒として含浸担持法で調製された工業触媒の一つであるズードケミー製ナフサ一次リフォーミング触媒(SC11NK;Ni−20質量%担持アルミナ)を用いて、実施例7と同じ実験手法で改質試験を行った。結果を表10に示す。
(Comparative Example 1)
A reforming test was conducted in the same experimental manner as in Example 7, using a naphtha primary reforming catalyst (SC11NK; Ni-20 mass% supported alumina) manufactured by Sud Chemie as one of the industrial catalysts prepared by the impregnation support method. went. The results are shown in Table 10.
表10に示すように、1回目の改質反応は8時間の平均で、1−MN分解率が45.4%、メタン選択率が2.5%、CO選択率が4.2%、CO2選択率が5.9%、炭素析出率が32.8%、水素増幅率が約1.3であった。
工業触媒は、1−MNのガス成分への変換率が低い(12.6%)一方、炭素析出率が非常に高い結果となった。炭素析出率が非常に高いため、触媒寿命が短い。
また、実施例8と同様にして、改質反応と再生とを繰り返した。再生を行っても触媒活性は回復せず、改質を行うごとに性能が低くなっていった。これは、高温又は長期間酸化処理を行うことで、大きな燃焼熱により、触媒活性粒子がシンタリングを引き起こしたためであると考えられる。
As shown in Table 10, the first reforming reaction has an average of 8 hours, 1-MN decomposition rate is 45.4%, methane selectivity is 2.5%, CO selectivity is 4.2%, CO 2 The selectivity was 5.9%, the carbon deposition rate was 32.8%, and the hydrogen amplification rate was about 1.3.
The industrial catalyst had a low conversion rate of 1-MN to a gas component (12.6%), while the carbon deposition rate was very high. Since the carbon deposition rate is very high, the catalyst life is short.
Further, in the same manner as in Example 8, the reforming reaction and regeneration were repeated. The catalyst activity did not recover even after regeneration, and the performance decreased with each reforming. This is considered to be because the catalytically active particles caused sintering by large combustion heat due to high temperature or long-term oxidation treatment.
(比較例2)
実施例9と同じ触媒を用いて、実施例8と同じ条件で改質反応1回目を行った。
その後、ガスの導入を止め、触媒層の温度は800℃に維持しながら窒素100mL/minでパージした。触媒反応器や配管の中が十分パージできたら、触媒層温度には注目せず、触媒への空気の接触を開始した。窒素流量を40mL/minまで低下させ、空気を10mL/min導入したところ、触媒層温度が急激に上昇し始め、触媒層温度が1100℃を超えた。その後、1時間ほど高温の状態が続いた後、温度が900℃以下に下がってきたら、空気の比率を上げ、空気25mL/min、窒素25mL/minとして、最終的に3時間経過した時点で、触媒層出口の二酸化炭素濃度が0.3%となったことを確認して、空気の導入を停止し、1回目の空気の接触を完了した。
その後、窒素100mL/minでパージし、十分パージを行った後、水素ガスを100mL/min流しながら30分間還元処理を行った。
そして、1回目の改質反応と同じ条件で、2回目の改質反応を行った。その結果、表10に示すように改質反応2回目では、1−MN分解率が63.5%、メタン選択率が2.5%、CO選択率が21.7%、CO2選択率が16.3%、炭素析出率が5.2%、水素増幅率が約1.8となり、大きく活性が低下した。これは、炭素の燃焼熱により触媒の温度が、焼成温度よりも高温になる時間が長く、触媒の比表面積が低下したためと考えられる。
2回目の改質反応後に、1回目と同様に再生を行い、続いて3回目の改質反応を行った。その結果、表11に示すように、更に活性が低下した。また、触媒層の過熱に伴い、触媒反応器も高温になったことで、変形を起こしてしまった。
以上の結果から、空気を導入した際の触媒層の温度が高温になってしまうと、触媒が劣化し、さらに、装置への異常も引き起こすことがわかった。
(Comparative Example 2)
A first reforming reaction was performed under the same conditions as in Example 8 using the same catalyst as in Example 9.
Thereafter, the introduction of gas was stopped, and the catalyst layer was purged with nitrogen at 100 mL / min while maintaining the temperature of the catalyst layer at 800 ° C. When the catalyst reactor and piping were sufficiently purged, the catalyst layer temperature was not noticed and contact of air with the catalyst was started. When the nitrogen flow rate was reduced to 40 mL / min and air was introduced at 10 mL / min, the catalyst layer temperature began to rise rapidly and the catalyst layer temperature exceeded 1100 ° C. After that, after the high temperature state continued for about 1 hour, when the temperature dropped to 900 ° C. or lower, the ratio of air was increased, and when air was finally 25 mL / min and nitrogen was 25 mL / min, finally 3 hours passed, After confirming that the carbon dioxide concentration at the catalyst layer outlet was 0.3%, the introduction of air was stopped and the first contact with air was completed.
After purging with nitrogen at 100 mL / min and sufficiently purging, reduction treatment was performed for 30 minutes while flowing hydrogen gas at 100 mL / min.
Then, the second reforming reaction was performed under the same conditions as the first reforming reaction. As a result, as shown in Table 10, in the second reforming reaction, the 1-MN decomposition rate was 63.5%, the methane selectivity was 2.5%, the CO selectivity was 21.7%, and the CO 2 selectivity was The activity was greatly reduced to 16.3%, the carbon deposition rate was 5.2%, and the hydrogen amplification rate was about 1.8. This is considered to be because the time during which the temperature of the catalyst is higher than the firing temperature is longer due to the combustion heat of carbon, and the specific surface area of the catalyst is reduced.
After the second reforming reaction, regeneration was performed in the same manner as in the first, and then the third reforming reaction was performed. As a result, as shown in Table 11, the activity was further reduced. Moreover, the catalyst reactor also became high temperature due to overheating of the catalyst layer, which caused deformation.
From the above results, it has been found that when the temperature of the catalyst layer when air is introduced becomes high, the catalyst is deteriorated and further an abnormality is caused to the apparatus.
(実施例10)
ロータリーキルンを乾留炉とし、木質バイオマスの原料である建築廃材チップ(5cm以下に分級)を、10kg/hの速度で炉内温度を800℃に保持したロータリーキルンに供給して乾留することにより、バイオマスタール含有ガスを発生させた。
実施例5と同じ触媒を触媒反応器に45L充填し、触媒層の入口付近、中心付近、出口付近の3ヶ所にK型熱電対を挿入した状態で、電気炉に内に設置した。触媒層の各温度を800℃に保持した反応器に、上記のバイオマスタール含有ガスを10Nm3/hになるように供給し、8時間継続して改質反応を行った。なお、原料投入前に水素5Nm3/hで30分間の還元処理を行った。
触媒反応器入口と出口とからタール及びガスをサンプリングした。ガスはオンラインのTCDガスクロマトグラフで定量分析し、タールはオフラインで定量分析を行った。タール分解率及び水素増幅率は、実施例1と同様の手法で求めた。触媒入口ガス組成はコークス炉ガスに近く、水素、CO、CO2、CH4が主成分であった。また、被毒物質である硫化水素は、約25ppm含まれていることを確認した。さらに、原料の建築廃材中に約16%の水分が含まれていたので、その水分が揮発して水蒸気となって含まれていた。
結果を表12に示す。
(Example 10)
By using a rotary kiln as a dry distillation furnace, supplying waste wood chips (classified to 5 cm or less), which is a raw material of woody biomass, to a rotary kiln maintained at a furnace temperature of 800 ° C. at a rate of 10 kg / h, and biomass distillation, The contained gas was generated.
45 L of the same catalyst as in Example 5 was packed in the catalyst reactor, and installed in an electric furnace with K-type thermocouples inserted at three locations near the inlet, near the center, and near the outlet of the catalyst layer. The biomass tar-containing gas was supplied to a reactor in which each temperature of the catalyst layer was maintained at 800 ° C. so as to be 10 Nm 3 / h, and the reforming reaction was continued for 8 hours. In addition, the reduction process for 30 minutes was performed by hydrogen 5Nm < 3 > / h before raw material injection | throwing-in.
Tar and gas were sampled from the catalytic reactor inlet and outlet. Gas was quantitatively analyzed by an online TCD gas chromatograph, and tar was quantitatively analyzed offline. The tar decomposition rate and the hydrogen amplification rate were determined in the same manner as in Example 1. The catalyst inlet gas composition was close to coke oven gas, and hydrogen, CO, CO 2 and CH 4 were the main components. Moreover, it confirmed that hydrogen sulfide which is a poisonous substance was contained about 25 ppm. Furthermore, since about 16% of moisture was contained in the building waste materials, the moisture was volatilized and contained as water vapor.
The results are shown in Table 12.
表12に示すように1回目の反応は、タール分解率が93.8%、水素増幅率が6.5であった。
1回目の改質反応後、原料の供給を止め、窒素10Nm3/hでパージしながら、同時に、ロータリーキルン及び触媒層の各温度を500℃まで低下させた。ロータリーキルン、触媒反応器や配管の中が十分パージでき、触媒層の各温度が500℃まで低下したら、触媒への空気の接触を開始した。すなわち、窒素流量を5Nm3/hまで低下させ、空気を2Nm3/h導入した。触媒層入口付近の温度が上昇し始め、触媒反応器出口のガスクロマトグラフによるガス分析でCO2濃度が上昇し始めると、触媒層の炭素が燃焼し始めたことを確認できる。そのため、800℃を超えそうになった場合は、空気流量を落とし、N2流量を10Nm3/hに上げた。触媒層入口付近の温度が下がってくると、次に触媒層中心付近の温度が上昇し始め、触媒層中心付近の温度が下がり始めると、さらに触媒層出口付近の温度が上昇し始める。このような調整を約1時間行っていると、空気5Nm3/h、窒素5Nm3/hとしても、触媒層の各温度が設定温度である500℃に近づくように低下してきたので、ロータリーキルン及び触媒層の各温度を600℃まで上昇させた。以降、触媒層の各温度を見ながら、50〜100℃ずつ750℃まで上昇させた。また、徐々に空気流量を上げ、かつ窒素流量を下げながら、最終的に空気流量10Nm3/hとした。最終的に4時間経過した時点で、触媒層出口の二酸化炭素濃度が0.5%となったことを確認して、空気の導入を停止し、1回目の触媒への空気の接触を完了した。
その後、窒素30Nm3/hでパージしながら、触媒層の温度を800℃に上昇させた。十分パージを行った後、水素を5Nm3/h流しながら30分間還元処理を行った。
そして、1回目の改質反応と同じ条件で、2回目の改質反応を行った。その結果、改質反応2回目は、タール分解率が91.2%、水素増幅率が6.3となり、フレッシュな触媒で行った1回目の活性とほぼ同じ活性であった。
2回目の改質反応後に、1回目の再生と同じ条件で再生を行った。そして、3回目の改質反応を1〜2回目と同じ条件で行った。その結果、改質反応3回目では、タール分解率が88.7%、水素増幅率が6.1となり、フレッシュな触媒で行った1回目の活性とほぼ同じ活性であった。以降同じ工程を繰り返し、計5回改質反応を行ったところ、表12に示すように、4〜5回目の改質反応での活性もほぼ同じ性能を発現できた。すなわち、本発明の再生方法によれば、バイオマスタール含有ガスでの改質反応に用いた場合でも、触媒の活性を回復し、長期間安定的に改質反応を行うことができることがわかった。
As shown in Table 12, the first reaction had a tar decomposition rate of 93.8% and a hydrogen amplification rate of 6.5.
After the first reforming reaction, the temperature of the rotary kiln and the catalyst layer was simultaneously reduced to 500 ° C. while the supply of the raw material was stopped and purged with 10 Nm 3 / h of nitrogen. When the inside of the rotary kiln, the catalyst reactor, and the piping could be sufficiently purged and each temperature of the catalyst layer decreased to 500 ° C., the contact of air with the catalyst was started. That is, the nitrogen flow rate was reduced to 5 Nm 3 / h, and 2 Nm 3 / h introducing air. When the temperature in the vicinity of the catalyst layer inlet starts to increase and the CO 2 concentration starts to increase in the gas analysis by the gas chromatograph at the outlet of the catalyst reactor, it can be confirmed that the carbon in the catalyst layer starts to burn. Therefore, when it was likely to exceed 800 ° C., the air flow rate was reduced and the N 2 flow rate was increased to 10 Nm 3 / h. When the temperature near the catalyst layer inlet decreases, the temperature near the center of the catalyst layer starts to increase next, and when the temperature near the center of the catalyst layer starts to decrease, the temperature near the catalyst layer outlet further starts to increase. When such adjustment is performed for about 1 hour, the air temperature of 5 Nm 3 / h and nitrogen 5 Nm 3 / h have decreased so that each temperature of the catalyst layer approaches the set temperature of 500 ° C. Each temperature of the catalyst layer was raised to 600 ° C. Thereafter, the temperature was raised to 750 ° C. by 50 to 100 ° C. while observing each temperature of the catalyst layer. Further, the air flow rate was gradually increased and the nitrogen flow rate was lowered, and finally the air flow rate was set to 10 Nm 3 / h. When 4 hours finally passed, it was confirmed that the carbon dioxide concentration at the outlet of the catalyst layer became 0.5%, the introduction of air was stopped, and the first contact of air with the catalyst was completed. .
Then, the temperature of the catalyst layer was raised to 800 ° C. while purging with nitrogen 30 Nm 3 / h. After sufficiently purging, reduction treatment was performed for 30 minutes while flowing hydrogen at 5 Nm 3 / h.
Then, the second reforming reaction was performed under the same conditions as the first reforming reaction. As a result, the second reforming reaction had a tar decomposition rate of 91.2% and a hydrogen amplification rate of 6.3, which was almost the same activity as the first activity performed with a fresh catalyst.
After the second reforming reaction, regeneration was performed under the same conditions as the first regeneration. The third reforming reaction was performed under the same conditions as in the first and second times. As a result, in the third reforming reaction, the tar decomposition rate was 88.7% and the hydrogen amplification rate was 6.1, which was almost the same activity as the first activity performed with a fresh catalyst. Thereafter, the same process was repeated and the reforming reaction was performed 5 times in total. As shown in Table 12, the activity in the 4th to 5th reforming reactions was almost the same. That is, according to the regeneration method of the present invention, it was found that even when used in the reforming reaction with biomass tar-containing gas, the activity of the catalyst can be recovered and the reforming reaction can be performed stably for a long period of time.
(比較例3)
再生の際、触媒に空気を接触させる代わりに水蒸気を接触させた以外は、実施例8と同様の条件で、改質反応および再生を行った。結果を表13に示す。
(Comparative Example 3)
At the time of regeneration, the reforming reaction and regeneration were performed under the same conditions as in Example 8, except that water vapor was contacted instead of contacting the catalyst. The results are shown in Table 13.
表13に示すように改質反応1回目は実施例8の1回目と同じで、8時間平均で1−MN分解率が67.8%、CH4選択率が2.6%、CO選択率が26.5%、CO2選択率が24.1%、炭素析出率が2.5%、水素増幅率が2.0であった。8時間の改質反応後、ガスの導入を止め、窒素100mL/minでパージしながら、同時に、触媒層の温度を500℃まで低下させた。触媒反応器や配管の中が十分パージでき、触媒層温度が500℃まで低下したら、触媒に水蒸気を接触させた。すなわち、窒素流量を35mL/minまで低下させ、水蒸気を15mL/min導入した。触媒層の温度が上昇し始め、触媒反応器出口のCO2分析計によるガス分析でCO2濃度が上昇し始めると、触媒層の炭素が燃焼し始めたことを確認できる。水蒸気の場合、炭素の燃焼速度が遅いので、発熱量もそれほど大きくない。そのため、水蒸気25mL/min、窒素25mL/minとしても、触媒層温度が設定温度である500℃に近づくように低下してきたので、触媒層温度を600℃まで上昇させた。以降、触媒層温度を見ながら、50〜100℃ずつ750℃まで上昇させた。また、徐々に水蒸気流量を上げ、かつ窒素流量を下げながら、最終的に水蒸気流量50mL/minとした。最終的に触媒層出口の二酸化炭素濃度が0.5%となったのは、18時間経過した時点であった。ここで、水蒸気の導入を停止し、1回目の水蒸気による再生を完了した。
その後、窒素100mL/minでパージし、十分パージを行った後、水素ガスを100mL/min流しながら30分間還元処理を行った。
そして、1回目の改質反応と同じ条件で、2回目の改質反応を行った。その結果、改質反応2回目では、8時間平均で1−MN分解率が62.1%、CH4選択率が2.9%、CO選択率が25.1%、CO2選択率が21.7%、炭素析出率が3.2%、水素増幅率が1.9となり、フレッシュな触媒で行った1回目の活性に近い活性に回復した。2回目の改質反応後に、1回目の再生と同じ条件で再生(触媒への水蒸気の接触及び水素ガスによる還元)を行ったが、触媒への水蒸気の接触に19時間を要した。
3回目以降の改質反応と再生とを同様に繰り返した。その結果、表13に示すように、3〜5回目の改質反応でも9割以上の活性に回復できた。しかしながら、水蒸気を用いた場合、活性の回復度合いは空気を用いた場合より少し劣り、さらに、再生時間に長時間を要してしまうことがわかった。
As shown in Table 13, the first reforming reaction is the same as the first in Example 8, with an average of 8 hours, the 1-MN decomposition rate is 67.8%, the CH 4 selectivity is 2.6%, and the CO selectivity is Was 26.5%, the CO 2 selectivity was 24.1%, the carbon deposition rate was 2.5%, and the hydrogen amplification factor was 2.0. After the reforming reaction for 8 hours, the introduction of the gas was stopped and the temperature of the catalyst layer was lowered to 500 ° C. while purging with nitrogen at 100 mL / min. When the catalyst reactor and piping could be sufficiently purged and the catalyst layer temperature dropped to 500 ° C., the catalyst was brought into contact with water vapor. That is, the nitrogen flow rate was reduced to 35 mL / min, and water vapor was introduced at 15 mL / min. When the temperature of the catalyst layer starts to rise and the CO 2 concentration starts to rise in the gas analysis by the CO 2 analyzer at the outlet of the catalyst reactor, it can be confirmed that the carbon in the catalyst layer has started to burn. In the case of water vapor, the calorific value is not so large because the burning rate of carbon is slow. Therefore, even when the water vapor is 25 mL / min and the nitrogen is 25 mL / min, the catalyst layer temperature has been lowered to approach the set temperature of 500 ° C., so the catalyst layer temperature was increased to 600 ° C. Thereafter, the temperature was raised to 750 ° C. by 50-100 ° C. while observing the catalyst layer temperature. Further, the water vapor flow rate was gradually increased and the nitrogen flow rate was lowered, and finally the water vapor flow rate was 50 mL / min. The carbon dioxide concentration at the catalyst layer outlet finally reached 0.5% when 18 hours had passed. Here, the introduction of water vapor was stopped, and the first regeneration with water vapor was completed.
After purging with nitrogen at 100 mL / min and sufficiently purging, reduction treatment was performed for 30 minutes while flowing hydrogen gas at 100 mL / min.
Then, the second reforming reaction was performed under the same conditions as the first reforming reaction. As a result, in the second reforming reaction, the 1-MN decomposition rate was 62.1%, the CH 4 selectivity was 2.9%, the CO selectivity was 25.1%, and the CO 2 selectivity was 21 on average for 8 hours. The carbon deposition rate was 0.7%, the carbon deposition rate was 3.2%, and the hydrogen amplification rate was 1.9. The activity recovered to the activity close to that of the first activity performed with a fresh catalyst. After the second reforming reaction, regeneration (contact with steam and reduction with hydrogen gas) was performed under the same conditions as in the first regeneration, but it took 19 hours for contact with steam to the catalyst.
The reforming reaction and regeneration after the third time were repeated in the same manner. As a result, as shown in Table 13, the activity could be recovered to 90% or more even in the third to fifth reforming reactions. However, it has been found that when steam is used, the degree of recovery of activity is slightly inferior to that when air is used, and further, the regeneration time takes a long time.
(比較例4)
再生の際、空気の代わりに水蒸気を用いること以外は、実施例9と同様に行った。
結果を表14に示す。
(Comparative Example 4)
At the time of regeneration, the same procedure as in Example 9 was performed except that water vapor was used instead of air.
The results are shown in Table 14.
表14に示すように改質反応1回目では、実施例9の1回目と同じで、8時間平均でタール分解率が82.1%、CH4選択率が3.3%、CO選択率が31.5%、CO2選択率が27.6%、炭素析出率が3.5%、水素増幅率が2.1であった。また、2〜5回目の改質反応での活性もフレッシュな触媒の活性に対して9割以上の比較的高い1−MN分解率を発現できた。しかしながら、比較例3と同様に、再生に水蒸気を用いた場合は、1度の再生時間に18〜20時間を要することがわかった。そのため、水蒸気による再生では、炭素の除去に長時間が必要で、長期間の繰り返し運転(改質と再生との繰り返し)において、再生時間が占める割合が多くなる。すなわち、改質ガスを発生させられる時間が少なく、非効率であると言える。 As shown in Table 14, the first reforming reaction is the same as the first in Example 9, with an 8-hour average tar decomposition rate of 82.1%, CH 4 selectivity of 3.3%, and CO selectivity of 31.5%, CO 2 selectivity was 27.6%, carbon deposition rate was 3.5%, and hydrogen amplification rate was 2.1. In addition, the activity in the second to fifth reforming reactions was able to express a relatively high 1-MN decomposition rate of 90% or more with respect to the activity of the fresh catalyst. However, as in Comparative Example 3, it was found that 18-20 hours were required for one regeneration time when steam was used for regeneration. Therefore, regeneration with steam requires a long time for carbon removal, and the proportion of regeneration time in a long-term repeated operation (repetition of reforming and regeneration) increases. That is, it can be said that the time for generating the reformed gas is small and inefficient.
Claims (4)
ニッケル化合物とマグネシウム化合物との混合溶液に沈殿剤を添加して、ニッケルとマグネシウムを共沈させて沈殿物を生成し、当該沈殿物に、アルミナ粉末と水、または、アルミナゾルを加えて混合して混合物を生成し、当該混合物を、少なくとも乾燥及び焼成する触媒製造工程で製造され、かつ、表面に析出したニッケルの少なくとも一部が水素還元された状態で硫黄を含むタール含有ガスと接触することによって炭素析出及び硫黄被毒された前記触媒に、触媒層の温度を400〜800℃に維持したまま空気を接触させる空気接触工程と、
前記空気接触工程の後に行われ、かつ、前記触媒に、前記触媒層の温度を600〜800℃に維持したまま水素ガスを接触させる水素ガス接触工程とを有する、
ことを特徴とするタール含有ガス改質用触媒の再生方法。 A method for regenerating a sulfur-poored tar-containing gas reforming catalyst,
A precipitant is added to a mixed solution of a nickel compound and a magnesium compound, and nickel and magnesium are co-precipitated to form a precipitate. To the precipitate, alumina powder and water or alumina sol are added and mixed. By producing a mixture, and contacting the mixture with a tar-containing gas containing sulfur in a state in which at least a part of nickel deposited on the surface is hydrogen-reduced and produced by at least a drying and calcining catalyst production process An air contact step in which air is brought into contact with the carbon-deposited and sulfur-poisoned catalyst while maintaining the temperature of the catalyst layer at 400 to 800 ° C .;
A hydrogen gas contact step that is performed after the air contact step, and in which hydrogen gas is brought into contact with the catalyst while maintaining the temperature of the catalyst layer at 600 to 800 ° C.
A method for regenerating a tar-containing gas reforming catalyst, characterized in that
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2015069326A JP6460879B2 (en) | 2015-03-30 | 2015-03-30 | Regeneration method for tar-containing gas reforming catalyst |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2015069326A JP6460879B2 (en) | 2015-03-30 | 2015-03-30 | Regeneration method for tar-containing gas reforming catalyst |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JP2016187786A JP2016187786A (en) | 2016-11-04 |
| JP6460879B2 true JP6460879B2 (en) | 2019-01-30 |
Family
ID=57240133
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2015069326A Active JP6460879B2 (en) | 2015-03-30 | 2015-03-30 | Regeneration method for tar-containing gas reforming catalyst |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP6460879B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP7131004B2 (en) * | 2017-03-23 | 2022-09-06 | 日本製鉄株式会社 | Method for producing hydrogen production catalyst and method for producing hydrogen |
| JP7069946B2 (en) * | 2018-03-28 | 2022-05-18 | 日本製鉄株式会社 | A method for producing a tar-containing gas reforming catalyst, a tar-containing gas reforming catalyst, and a tar-containing gas reforming method using a tar-containing gas reforming catalyst. |
| JP7219954B2 (en) * | 2018-10-17 | 2023-02-09 | 地方独立行政法人大阪産業技術研究所 | Method for recycling Ni/γ-Al2O3-based material |
| CN115212887B (en) * | 2022-07-05 | 2023-06-06 | 南京大学 | Preparation method of reforming catalyst with high dispersity of active metal component |
| CN118179524B (en) * | 2024-02-07 | 2025-06-10 | 中集安瑞科工程科技有限公司 | Preparation method and application of coke oven gas methanation catalyst |
Family Cites Families (10)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BE789645A (en) * | 1971-10-13 | 1973-04-04 | Shell Int Research | PROCEDURE FOR REGENERATING A DEACTIVATED HYDROKRAAK CATALYST |
| JPS53105505A (en) * | 1977-02-21 | 1978-09-13 | Uop Inc | Method and catalyst for hydroo cracking of hydocarbon oils |
| US5147527A (en) * | 1989-04-03 | 1992-09-15 | Ashland Oil, Inc. | Magnetic separation of high metals containing catalysts into low, intermediate and high metals and activity catalyst |
| JP2008094681A (en) * | 2006-10-13 | 2008-04-24 | Idemitsu Kosan Co Ltd | Method for producing hydrogen-containing gas |
| BRPI0919345B1 (en) * | 2008-09-24 | 2017-12-19 | Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corporation | METHOD FOR PRODUCING A CATALYST FOR REFORMING GAS CONTAINING SCOTT, METHOD FOR REFORMING GAS CONTAINING, A METHOD FOR REGENERATING GAS CONTAINING SCOTTER. |
| US8372770B2 (en) * | 2008-12-11 | 2013-02-12 | Chevron U.S.A. Inc. | Reformer regeneration process |
| BRPI1010991B1 (en) * | 2009-05-19 | 2020-02-11 | Nippon Steel Corporation | "CATALYST TO REFORM GAS CONTAINING TAR, METHOD TO PREPARE CATALYST TO REFORM A GAS CONTAINING TAR, AND METHOD TO REGENERATE CATALYST TO REFORM A GAS CONTAINING TAR. |
| US20110039686A1 (en) * | 2009-08-14 | 2011-02-17 | Battelle Memorial Institute | Fast regeneration of sulfur deactivated Ni-based hot biomass syngas cleaning catalysts |
| EP2501787B1 (en) * | 2009-11-18 | 2015-10-07 | G4 Insights Inc. | Method for biomass hydrogasification |
| KR102329701B1 (en) * | 2013-03-28 | 2021-11-23 | 쉘 인터내셔날 리써취 마트샤피지 비.브이. | Process for rejuvenation of a used hydrotreating catalyst |
-
2015
- 2015-03-30 JP JP2015069326A patent/JP6460879B2/en active Active
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP2016187786A (en) | 2016-11-04 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| KR101203229B1 (en) | Process for production of catalyst for use in the reforming of tar-containing gas, method for reforming of tar, and method for regeneration of catalyst for use in the reforming of tar-containing gas | |
| JP5009419B2 (en) | Method for producing catalyst for reforming tar-containing gas, method for reforming tar, and method for regenerating catalyst for reforming tar-containing gas | |
| JP4897112B2 (en) | Tar-containing gas reforming catalyst, method for producing tar-containing gas reforming catalyst, tar-containing gas reforming method using tar-containing gas reforming catalyst, and method for regenerating tar-containing gas reforming catalyst | |
| JP5494135B2 (en) | Catalyst for reforming tar-containing gas, method for producing the same, and method for reforming tar-containing gas | |
| JP5659537B2 (en) | Catalyst for reforming tar-containing gas, method for producing the same, and method for reforming tar-containing gas | |
| JP5780271B2 (en) | Catalyst for reforming tar-containing gas, method for producing the same, and method for reforming tar-containing gas | |
| JP5659536B2 (en) | Catalyst for reforming tar-containing gas, method for producing the same, and method for reforming tar-containing gas | |
| JP6460879B2 (en) | Regeneration method for tar-containing gas reforming catalyst | |
| JP5659534B2 (en) | Catalyst for reforming tar-containing gas, method for producing the same, and method for reforming tar-containing gas | |
| JP5511169B2 (en) | Method for reforming tar-containing gas | |
| JP7156113B2 (en) | Catalyst for reforming tar-containing gas, method for producing catalyst for reforming tar-containing gas, and method for reforming tar-containing gas using catalyst for reforming tar-containing gas | |
| JP5720107B2 (en) | Catalyst for reforming tar-containing gas, method for producing the same, and method for reforming tar-containing gas | |
| JP5659532B2 (en) | Catalyst for reforming tar-containing gas, method for producing the same, and method for reforming tar-containing gas | |
| JP5659533B2 (en) | Catalyst for reforming tar-containing gas, method for producing the same, and method for reforming tar-containing gas | |
| JP5776737B2 (en) | Catalyst for reforming tar-containing gas, method for producing the same, and method for reforming tar-containing gas |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20171122 |
|
| A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20180717 |
|
| A521 | Request for written amendment filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20180918 |
|
| TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20181127 |
|
| A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20181225 |
|
| R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Ref document number: 6460879 Country of ref document: JP Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |
|
| S533 | Written request for registration of change of name |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533 |
|
| S533 | Written request for registration of change of name |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533 |
|
| R350 | Written notification of registration of transfer |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350 |
|
| R350 | Written notification of registration of transfer |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350 |
|
| S111 | Request for change of ownership or part of ownership |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313115 |
|
| R350 | Written notification of registration of transfer |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| S111 | Request for change of ownership or part of ownership |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313115 |
|
| R350 | Written notification of registration of transfer |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |