JP6468767B2 - Spot welding method - Google Patents
Spot welding method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP6468767B2 JP6468767B2 JP2014186067A JP2014186067A JP6468767B2 JP 6468767 B2 JP6468767 B2 JP 6468767B2 JP 2014186067 A JP2014186067 A JP 2014186067A JP 2014186067 A JP2014186067 A JP 2014186067A JP 6468767 B2 JP6468767 B2 JP 6468767B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- energization
- current
- nugget
- post
- current value
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Resistance Welding (AREA)
Description
本発明は、複数の金属板に一対の電極を当接させて通電することにより溶接するスポット溶接方法に関する。 The present invention relates to a spot welding method for welding by energizing a pair of electrodes in contact with a plurality of metal plates.
自動車の製造工程では、重ね合わせた複数の金属板(主に鋼板)を、スポット溶接により接合することが行われている。スポット溶接は、複数の金属板に一対の電極を当接させて通電し、このときの抵抗発熱により複数の金属板の一部を溶融させてナゲットを形成し、このナゲットを介して複数の金属板を接合するものである。 In the automobile manufacturing process, a plurality of superposed metal plates (mainly steel plates) are joined by spot welding. In spot welding, a pair of electrodes are brought into contact with a plurality of metal plates and energized, and a part of the plurality of metal plates is melted by resistance heating at this time to form a nugget. The plates are joined.
スポット溶接を施した後、ナゲットの良否を検査する方法として、たがねを用いた検査方法が行われている。この検査方法は、金属板間にたがねを打ち込み、このときに、ナゲットで剥離を生じるか否かにより、ナゲットの良否を判断するものである(例えば、下記の特許文献1参照)。 After spot welding, an inspection method using a chisel is performed as a method for inspecting the quality of the nugget. In this inspection method, a chisel is driven between metal plates, and at this time, whether or not the nugget is good is determined based on whether or not the nugget is peeled off (see, for example, Patent Document 1 below).
近年、自動車の軽量化を目的として、自動車部品に高張力鋼板(ハイテン材)や超高張力鋼板(超ハイテン材)等の高強度鋼板が用いられることがある。このような高強度鋼板同士をスポット溶接により接合した場合、ナゲットやその周辺の硬度が高いため、ナゲットに対して上記のようなたがねを用いた検査を施すと、ナゲットにクラックが生じやすいという問題が生じる。 In recent years, for the purpose of reducing the weight of automobiles, high-strength steel sheets such as high-tensile steel sheets (high-tensile steel) and ultra-high-tensile steel sheets (super-high tensile steel) are sometimes used for automobile parts. When such high-strength steel plates are joined together by spot welding, the nugget and its surroundings have high hardness, so if the nugget is inspected using the chisel as described above, the nugget is likely to crack. The problem arises.
例えば上記の特許文献2には、溶接電流を通電してナゲットを形成する第1ステップと、上記の溶接電流以下の電流値で通電する第2ステップと、溶接部を冷却する第3ステップと、上記の溶接電流よりも大きい電流値で通電し、再結晶温度域に溶接部を加熱する第4ステップとを順に行うスポット溶接方法が示されている。第2ステップで、ナゲットに溶接電流以下の電流を流すことにより、ナゲットの外側に広い軟化域を形成している。また、第3ステップで、ナゲット付近を十分に冷却することで、次の第4ステップでナゲット全体を加熱するようにしている。さらに、第4ステップにより、ナゲットを再結晶温度域まで加熱することで、等軸状の組織とし、ナゲットの強度(特に十字引張強度)を高めている。このように、ナゲットの外側に軟化域を形成すると共に、ナゲットに再結晶組織を生成することで、ナゲットおよびその周辺(熱影響部)の靱性が向上し、たがね試験によるナゲットの破損を防止できる。 For example, in the above-mentioned Patent Document 2, a first step of energizing a welding current to form a nugget, a second step of energizing at a current value equal to or lower than the welding current, a third step of cooling the welded portion, A spot welding method is shown in which a fourth step of sequentially energizing at a current value larger than the above welding current and heating the welded portion to the recrystallization temperature range is performed. In the second step, a wide softening region is formed outside the nugget by passing a current equal to or lower than the welding current through the nugget. In the third step, the entire nugget is heated in the next fourth step by sufficiently cooling the vicinity of the nugget. Further, in the fourth step, the nugget is heated to the recrystallization temperature range, thereby forming an equiaxed structure and increasing the strength of the nugget (particularly the cross tensile strength). In this way, by forming a softened zone outside the nugget and generating a recrystallized structure in the nugget, the toughness of the nugget and its surroundings (heat affected zone) is improved, and damage to the nugget due to the chisel test is improved. Can be prevented.
しかし、ナゲットに再結晶組織を生成するためには、第4ステップで非常に高い電流を流す必要がある(18.0〜24.0kA)。このため、大容量の溶接機が必要となり、設備コストが高騰する。 However, in order to generate a recrystallized structure in the nugget, it is necessary to pass a very high current in the fourth step (18.0 to 24.0 kA). For this reason, a large-capacity welding machine is required, and the equipment cost increases.
以上の事情に鑑み、本発明が解決すべき課題は、低コストな方法で、たがね試験によるナゲットの破損を可及的に防止することにある。 In view of the above circumstances, the problem to be solved by the present invention is to prevent damage to the nugget by the chisel test as much as possible by a low-cost method.
前記課題を解決するために、本発明は、複数の金属板に一対の電極を当接させて通電することによりナゲットを形成する本通電と、前記本通電の後、前記本通電の平均電流値よりも小さく、ナゲットを拡大しない大きさの電流値で通電する低電流後通電と、前記低電流後通電の後、前記本通電の平均電流値よりも大きい電流値で通電する高電流後通電とを連続して行うスポット溶接方法を提供する。 In order to solve the above problems, the present invention provides a main energization for forming a nugget by energizing a pair of electrodes in contact with a plurality of metal plates, and an average current value of the main energization after the main energization. A low current post-energization that is energized at a current value that is smaller than the nugget, and a high current post-energization that is energized at a current value greater than the average current value of the main energization after the low current post-energization. Provided is a spot welding method for continuously performing.
このように、本通電の後に、ナゲットを拡大しない電流値で低電流後通電を施すことにより、ナゲット周辺(主に熱影響部)を軟化させることができる。その後、高電流後通電を施すことにより、ナゲット内部に再結晶組織を生成させて、接合部の靱性を高めることができる。また、本発明者らの検証により、本通電と低電流後通電との間、および、低電流後通電と高電流後通電との間に通電停止期間を設けずに、本通電、低電流後通電、および高電流後通電を連続して行うことで、高電流後通電の電流値を抑えつつナゲット内部に再結晶組織を生成できることが明らかになった。これにより、比較的小さい容量の溶接機を用いて、ナゲット内部に再結晶組織を生成してナゲットを軟化させることができるため、設備コストが抑えられる。以上のように、本発明のスポット溶接方法によれば、低コストな方法で、ナゲットおよびその周辺の靱性を高めて、たがね試験による破損を可及的に防止することができる。 As described above, by applying the low current after energization at a current value that does not expand the nugget after the main energization, the periphery of the nugget (mainly the heat affected zone) can be softened. Then, by applying current after high current, a recrystallized structure can be generated inside the nugget, and the toughness of the joint can be increased. In addition, according to the verification by the present inventors, without energization stop period between main energization and low current after energization, and between low current after energization and high current after energization, It has been clarified that the recrystallized structure can be generated inside the nugget while suppressing the current value of the high current post-energization by continuously conducting the current and the high current post-energization. Thereby, since a recrystallized structure | tissue can be produced | generated inside a nugget and a nugget can be softened using the welding machine of a comparatively small capacity | capacitance, installation cost is suppressed. As described above, according to the spot welding method of the present invention, it is possible to increase the toughness of the nugget and its surroundings by a low cost method and prevent damage due to the chisel test as much as possible.
図1に、本発明の一実施形態に係るスポット溶接方法を行う様子を示す。本実施形態のスポット溶接方法は、いわゆるダイレクトスポット溶接である。具体的には、重ね合わせた複数枚(図示例では2枚)の金属板W1,W2を一対の電極10,20で挟持加圧し、この状態で通電することで、金属板W1,W2同士の当接部を抵抗発熱により溶融させ、ナゲットNを形成するものである。本実施形態では、金属板W1,W2が鋼板であり、特に、金属板W1,W2の一方又は双方が高強度鋼板、具体的には引張強度が490MPaを超える高張力鋼板や、引張強度が980MPaを超える超高張力鋼板で構成される。尚、金属板W1,W2の材質は限定されず、例えばこれらの一方又は双方に強度が490MPa以下の通常の鋼板を用いることもできる。
FIG. 1 shows how a spot welding method according to an embodiment of the present invention is performed. The spot welding method of this embodiment is what is called direct spot welding. Specifically, a plurality of stacked metal plates W1 and W2 (two in the illustrated example) are sandwiched and pressed between the pair of
上記のように、一対の電極10,20で金属板W1,W2を挟持して加圧した状態で、両電極10,20間に通電する。このときの通電パターンを図2に示す。同図において、縦軸は電流値、横軸は時間経過(時刻)を示す。具体的に、まず、両電極10,20間に流す電流値を0から電流値I1まで徐々に高める(上昇期P0)。その後、電流値I1で所定時間通電することにより、金属板W1,W2の一部を溶融してナゲットを形成する(本通電P1)。本通電P1の通電時間は、所望の大きさのナゲットが形成されるように設定され、例えば5〜30サイクル程度に設定される。尚、図示例では、本通電P1の電流値が一定である場合を示しているが、電流値を変化させながら本通電P1を行ってもよい。この場合、本通電P1を行っている間の平均電流値をI1とする。
As described above, current is passed between the
本通電P1の後、電流値を、本通電P1の平均電流値I1よりも小さい電流値I2まで低下させ、この電流値I2で所定時間通電する(低電流後通電P2)。この低電流後通電P2により、ナゲットの周囲(熱影響部)が比較的緩やかに冷却され、この部位が軟化される。本通電P1と低電流後通電P2とは連続して行われ、これらの間に通電停止期間は設けない。低電流後通電P2の電流値I2は、本通電P1で形成したナゲットを拡大しないような大きさ、すなわち、金属板W1,W2をさらに溶融させないような大きさに設定される。具体的に、低電流後通電P2における電流値I2,I4は、例えば本通電P1の平均電流値I1の80%以下、望ましくは60%以下に設定される。また、電流値I2,I4は、ナゲットの周囲を安定して軟化させるために所定以上であることが好ましく、例えば、本通電P1の平均電流値I1の25%以上、望ましくは40%以上に設定される。 After the main energization P1, the current value is decreased to a current value I2 smaller than the average current value I1 of the main energization P1, and the current value I2 is energized for a predetermined time (low-current post-energization P2). By this low current post-energization P2, the periphery of the nugget (heat-affected zone) is cooled relatively slowly, and this portion is softened. The main energization P1 and the low current post-energization P2 are performed continuously, and no energization stop period is provided between them. The current value I2 of the low current post-energization P2 is set to such a size that the nugget formed by the main energization P1 is not enlarged, that is, a size that does not further melt the metal plates W1 and W2. Specifically, the current values I2 and I4 in the low current post-energization P2 are set to 80% or less, preferably 60% or less of the average current value I1 of the main energization P1, for example. The current values I2 and I4 are preferably not less than a predetermined value in order to stably soften the periphery of the nugget. For example, the current values I2 and I4 are set to 25% or more, preferably 40% or more of the average current value I1 of the main energization P1. Is done.
低電流後通電P2の後、電流値を、本通電P1の平均電流値I1よりも大きい電流値I3まで上昇させ、この電流値I3で所定時間通電する(高電流後通電P3)。これにより、ナゲットの外周端付近においてデンドライト(樹枝状)組織が消失して、再結晶組織が現れる。具体的には、図3に示すように、ナゲットNの内部の外周部付近に、ドーナツ状の再結晶組織Mが生成され、これによりナゲット(特に外周端)が軟化される。低電流後通電P2と高電流後通電P3とは連続して行われ、これらの間に通電停止期間は設けない。高電流後通電P3の通電時間は、本通電P1や低電流後通電P2の通電時間よりも十分に短く設定され、例えば3〜5サイクル程度とされる。以上により、スポット溶接が完了する。 After the low current post-energization P2, the current value is increased to a current value I3 larger than the average current value I1 of the main energization P1, and the current value I3 is energized for a predetermined time (high current post-energization P3). As a result, the dendrite (dendritic) structure disappears near the outer peripheral edge of the nugget, and a recrystallized structure appears. Specifically, as shown in FIG. 3, a doughnut-shaped recrystallized structure M is generated in the vicinity of the inner peripheral portion of the nugget N, and thereby the nugget (particularly the outer peripheral end) is softened. The low-current post-energization P2 and the high-current post-energization P3 are performed continuously, and no energization stop period is provided between them. The energization time of the high current post-energization P3 is set to be sufficiently shorter than the energization time of the main energization P1 and the low current post-energization P2, for example, about 3 to 5 cycles. Thus, spot welding is completed.
このように、ナゲットNに再結晶組織Mを生成し、デンドライト組織を消失させることで、ナゲットN(特に外周端)を軟化させて、ナゲットNの靱性を高めることができる。特に、本実施形態では、本通電P1と低電流後通電P2との間、および低電流後通電P2と高電流後通電P3との間に通電停止期間を設けていない。すなわち、本通電P1が完了した後(すなわち、所定径のナゲットが形成された後)、後通電が完了するまでの間、電流値を0にすることなく連続的に通電を行っている。これにより、高電流後通電P3の電流値I3を比較的小さくした場合でも、ナゲットNの内部に再結晶組織Mを生成し、ナゲットの外周端を軟化させることができるため、容量の比較的小さい溶接機を用いることができ、設備コストを低減できる。電流値I3は、例えば本通電P1の平均電流値I1の2倍以下とすることができる。 Thus, the recrystallized structure M is generated in the nugget N, and the dendrite structure is eliminated, so that the nugget N (particularly the outer peripheral edge) is softened and the toughness of the nugget N can be increased. In particular, in the present embodiment, no energization stop period is provided between the main energization P1 and the low-current post-energization P2, and between the low-current post-energization P2 and the high-current post-energization P3. That is, after the main energization P1 is completed (that is, after the nugget having a predetermined diameter is formed), the energization is continuously performed without setting the current value to 0 until the post-energization is completed. Thereby, even when the current value I3 of the energization P3 after the high current is made relatively small, the recrystallized structure M can be generated inside the nugget N and the outer peripheral edge of the nugget can be softened, so the capacity is relatively small. A welding machine can be used, and equipment costs can be reduced. The current value I3 can be, for example, not more than twice the average current value I1 of the main energization P1.
本発明は、上記の実施形態に限られない。例えば、図4に示す実施形態では、図2の通電パターンの高電流後通電P3の後に、さらに低電流後通電P4を施している。具体的には、本通電P1の後、第1の低電流後通電P2、高電流後通電P3、および第2の低電流後通電P4を連続して行っている。 The present invention is not limited to the above embodiment. For example, in the embodiment shown in FIG. 4, after the high current post-energization P3 in the energization pattern of FIG. Specifically, after the main energization P1, the first low current post-energization P2, the high current post-energization P3, and the second low current post-energization P4 are continuously performed.
図5に示す実施形態では、図4の通電パターンの第2の低電流後通電P4の後に、さらに高電流後通電P5を施している。具体的には、本通電P1の後、第1の低電流後通電P2、第1の高電流後通電P3、第2の低電流後通電P4、および第2の高電流後通電P5を連続して行っている。 In the embodiment shown in FIG. 5, after the second low current energization P4 of the energization pattern of FIG. Specifically, after the main energization P1, the first low-current post-energization P2, the first high-current post-energization P3, the second low-current post-energization P4, and the second high-current post-energization P5 are continuously performed. Is going.
図6に示す実施形態では、図5の通電パターンの第2の高電流後通電P5の後に、さらに低電流後通電P6を施している。具体的には、本通電P1の後、第1の低電流後通電P2、第1の高電流後通電P3、第2の低電流後通電P4、第2の高電流後通電P5、および第3の低電流後通電P6を連続して行っている。 In the embodiment shown in FIG. 6, the low current post-energization P6 is further applied after the second high current post-energization P5 of the energization pattern of FIG. Specifically, after the main energization P1, the first low current post-energization P2, the first high current post-energization P3, the second low current post-energization P4, the second high current post-energization P5, and the third The low-current post-energization P6 is continuously performed.
尚、図4〜図6に示す実施形態では、各低電流後通電P2,P4,P6の電流値が同じ値であるが、これらの電流値を異ならせてもよい。また、これらの実施形態では、各高電流後通電P3,P5の電流値が同じ値であるが、これらの電流値を異ならせてもよい。 In the embodiment shown in FIGS. 4 to 6, the current values of the low current post-energizations P2, P4, and P6 are the same value, but these current values may be different. In these embodiments, the current values of the high current post-energizations P3 and P5 are the same, but these current values may be different.
また、上記の実施形態では、ダイレクトスポット溶接に本発明を適用した場合を示したが、本発明は他のスポット溶接、例えばインダイレクトスポット溶接やシリーズスポット溶接に適用することもできる。 Moreover, although the case where this invention was applied to direct spot welding was shown in said embodiment, this invention can also be applied to other spot welding, for example, indirect spot welding and series spot welding.
本発明のスポット溶接方法における好ましい条件を調べるため、以下のような試験を行った。 In order to investigate preferable conditions in the spot welding method of the present invention, the following tests were conducted.
まず、下記の表1に示すように、通電パターンを変えて複数の試験片にダイレクトスポット溶接を施した。具体的には、重ね合わせた2枚の高張力鋼板(共に、SPC980DU1.2t)に対し、図4に示す通電パターンで通電を行った。Y1〜Y4は、低電流後通電P2,P4の電流値I2,I4を2.0kAとし、高電流後通電P3,P5の電流値I3,I5を8.6〜10.8kAの範囲で異ならせた。Y5〜Y8は、低電流後通電P2,P4の電流値I2,I4を3.0kAとし、高電流後通電P3,P5の電流値I3,I5を8.6〜10.8kAの範囲で異ならせた。 First, as shown in Table 1 below, direct spot welding was performed on a plurality of test pieces with different energization patterns. Specifically, the two high-tensile steel plates (both SPC980DU1.2t) were energized with the energization pattern shown in FIG. Y1 to Y4 vary the current values I2 and I4 of the currents P2 and P4 after low current to 2.0 kA and the current values I3 and I5 of the currents P3 and P5 after high current in the range of 8.6 to 10.8 kA. It was. Y5 to Y8 vary the current values I2 and I4 of the currents P2 and P4 after the low current to 3.0 kA, and the current values I3 and I5 of the currents P3 and P5 after the high current in the range of 8.6 to 10.8 kA. It was.
溶接後の各試験片に対し、熱影響部の平均硬度を測定したところ、全ての試験片が概ね420HV以下であったが、低電流後通電P2,P4の電流値I2,I4を3.0kAとした試験片Y5〜Y8の方が、より安定して400HV以下の硬度を示した。このことから、低電流後通電P2,P4の電流値I2,I4は、本通電P1の平均電流値I1の25%以上、望ましくは40%以上とすることが好ましいと言える。 When the average hardness of the heat-affected zone was measured for each test piece after welding, all the test pieces were approximately 420 HV or less, but the current values I2 and I4 of the currents P2 and P4 after low current were 3.0 kA. Specimens Y5 to Y8 indicated a hardness of 400 HV or less more stably. From this, it can be said that the current values I2 and I4 of the low current post-energization P2 and P4 are preferably 25% or more, preferably 40% or more of the average current value I1 of the main energization P1.
次に、下記の表2に示すように、低電流後通電P2,P4の電流値I2,I4を3.0kAで固定し、高電流後通電P3,P5の電流値I3,I5を8.6〜10.8kAの範囲で異ならせた。尚、その他の条件は、上記と同様である。また、表2中のY9,Y11,Y13,Y15は、それぞれ表1中のY5,Y6,Y7,Y8と同じ条件である。 Next, as shown in Table 2 below, the current values I2 and I4 of the currents P2 and P4 after low current are fixed at 3.0 kA, and the current values I3 and I5 of the currents P3 and P5 after high current are 8.6. Differentiated in the range of ~ 10.8 kA. Other conditions are the same as above. Y9, Y11, Y13, and Y15 in Table 2 are the same conditions as Y5, Y6, Y7, and Y8 in Table 1, respectively.
溶接後の各試験片に対し、熱影響部の平均硬度を測定したところ、大きな差は見られなかった。一方、ナゲット外周端の硬度を測定したところ、高電流後通電P3,P5の電流値I3,I5が高いほど、ナゲット外周端の硬度が低くなることが明らかになった。また、Y9とY15のナゲット断面を観察したところ、Y9のナゲットの内部には、図3に示すように、外周部付近にドーナツ状の再結晶組織の生成が確認されたが、Y15のナゲットの内部には、上記のような再結晶組織は確認されなかった。 When the average hardness of the heat affected zone was measured for each test piece after welding, no significant difference was found. On the other hand, when the hardness of the outer periphery edge of the nugget was measured, it became clear that the hardness of the outer periphery edge of the nugget decreased as the current values I3 and I5 of the energization P3 and P5 after high current increased. Further, when the cross-section of the nugget of Y9 and Y15 was observed, the formation of a doughnut-shaped recrystallized structure was confirmed in the vicinity of the outer peripheral portion inside the nugget of Y9, as shown in FIG. The recrystallized structure as described above was not confirmed inside.
さらに、上記の試験片Y9〜Y15に、タガネ試験と同様の負荷をかけて、このときのナゲットの破損(ワレ)の有無を確認した。具体的には、各試験片の金属板間の隙間に1.2tのシムを挿入し、ナゲットとの距離が3mmのとなる位置までハンマーで押し込んだ。そして、各試験片をナゲットを横断する位置で切断し、その断面におけるワレの有無を確認した。 Furthermore, the test piece Y9 to Y15 was subjected to the same load as that of the chisel test, and the presence or absence of breakage (cracking) of the nugget at this time was confirmed. Specifically, a 1.2-t shim was inserted into the gap between the metal plates of each test piece, and pushed into the position where the distance from the nugget was 3 mm with a hammer. And each test piece was cut | disconnected in the position which crosses a nugget, and the presence or absence of the crack in the cross section was confirmed.
その結果、高電流後通電P3の電流値I3(および高電流後通電P5の電流値I5、以下同様)を10.1kA以下としたY11〜Y15では、ナゲットのワレが確認されることがあった。具体的には、Y11,12,13では、ナゲットの外周端に2mm以下の微小な亀裂が生じた(表2に△で示す)。また、Y15では、ナゲットの外周端に2mmを超える比較的大きな亀裂が生じた(表2に×で示す)。一方、高電流後通電P3,P5の電流値I3,I5を10.1kAより大きくしたY9,Y10ではナゲットのワレは確認されなかった(表2に○で示す)。 As a result, cracking of the nugget may be confirmed in Y11 to Y15 in which the current value I3 of the post-high current energization P3 (and the current value I5 of the post-high current energization P5, and so on) is 10.1 kA or less. . Specifically, in Y11, 12, and 13, minute cracks of 2 mm or less occurred at the outer peripheral edge of the nugget (indicated by Δ in Table 2). In Y15, a relatively large crack exceeding 2 mm occurred at the outer peripheral edge of the nugget (indicated by x in Table 2). On the other hand, cracking of the nugget was not confirmed in Y9 and Y10 in which the current values I3 and I5 of the energization P3 and P5 after the high current were larger than 10.1 kA (indicated by ◯ in Table 2).
表2の結果から、高電流後通電P3の電流値I3が、本通電P1の平均電流値I1の2倍以下であるY9でも、ナゲットに再結晶組織を生成させてナゲット外周端を十分に軟化させ、タガネ試験によるナゲットのワレを防止できると言える。一方、ナゲットを十分に軟化させるためには、高電流後通電P3の電流値I3を、本通電P1の平均電流値I1の1.4倍よりも大きくし、ナゲットの外周端を十分に軟化させることが好ましいと言える。 From the results shown in Table 2, even when Y9, where the current value I3 of the high current post-energization P3 is less than twice the average current value I1 of the main energization P1, the nugget is sufficiently softened by generating a recrystallized structure. In other words, it can be said that cracking of the nugget by the tage test can be prevented. On the other hand, in order to sufficiently soften the nugget, the current value I3 of the high current post-energization P3 is made larger than 1.4 times the average current value I1 of the main energization P1, thereby sufficiently softening the outer peripheral edge of the nugget. It can be said that it is preferable.
10,20 電極
M 再結晶組織
N ナゲット
W1,W2 金属板
P0 上昇期
P1 本通電
P2,P4,P6 低電流後通電
P3,P5 高電流後通電
10, 20 Electrode M Recrystallized structure N Nugget W1, W2 Metal plate P0 Ascending period P1 Main energization P2, P4, P6 Low current energization P3, P5 High current after energization
Claims (2)
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2014186067A JP6468767B2 (en) | 2014-09-12 | 2014-09-12 | Spot welding method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2014186067A JP6468767B2 (en) | 2014-09-12 | 2014-09-12 | Spot welding method |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JP2016055338A JP2016055338A (en) | 2016-04-21 |
| JP6468767B2 true JP6468767B2 (en) | 2019-02-13 |
Family
ID=55756856
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2014186067A Active JP6468767B2 (en) | 2014-09-12 | 2014-09-12 | Spot welding method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP6468767B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN112247332B (en) * | 2020-10-16 | 2022-04-26 | 东风汽车有限公司 | Resistance spot welding method for ultrahigh-strength hot-formed steel plate |
| WO2024111224A1 (en) * | 2022-11-24 | 2024-05-30 | Jfeスチール株式会社 | Resistance spot welding method |
| EP4574324A4 (en) * | 2022-11-24 | 2025-12-10 | Jfe Steel Corp | RESISTANCE SPOT WELDING PROCESS |
| JP7846078B2 (en) * | 2023-12-11 | 2026-04-14 | フタバ産業株式会社 | Resistance spot welding method and resistance spot welding apparatus |
Family Cites Families (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP5359571B2 (en) * | 2009-02-12 | 2013-12-04 | 新日鐵住金株式会社 | Resistance welding method for high strength steel sheet and manufacturing method for resistance welding joint |
| JP5332857B2 (en) * | 2009-04-20 | 2013-11-06 | 新日鐵住金株式会社 | Resistance welding method for high strength steel sheet |
-
2014
- 2014-09-12 JP JP2014186067A patent/JP6468767B2/en active Active
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP2016055338A (en) | 2016-04-21 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN103958110B (en) | Resistance spot welding joint | |
| JP5467480B2 (en) | Welded structural member and welding method | |
| TWI468246B (en) | Method of resistance spot welding of high tensile strength steel sheet and welding joint manufactured by the method | |
| CN104520052B (en) | Lap welded member, automobile component, method for welding lapped part, and method for manufacturing lap welded member | |
| TWI601588B (en) | Resistance point welding method | |
| US20160368080A1 (en) | Welding structural member and welding method | |
| JP6515299B2 (en) | Fillet arc welded joint and method of manufacturing the same | |
| JP6468767B2 (en) | Spot welding method | |
| JP5891741B2 (en) | Resistance spot welding method for high strength steel sheet | |
| JP5206448B2 (en) | Resistance spot welding method for high strength thin steel sheet | |
| CN104690404A (en) | Welding method for T22 and TP347H dissimilar steel | |
| CN115379916B (en) | Method for manufacturing resistance welded components | |
| JP7299192B2 (en) | Manufacturing method of resistance welded member | |
| JP6042074B2 (en) | Ultrasonic shock treatment method | |
| JP2020199522A (en) | Resistance-welding method for high strength steel sheet | |
| JP6589171B2 (en) | Metal resin bonding method and metal resin bonded body | |
| JP2020069525A (en) | Method for manufacturing resistance spot welded joint | |
| JP5991444B2 (en) | Resistance spot welding method | |
| JP2007098462A (en) | Flash butt welding method | |
| JP2011177794A (en) | Resistance welding method | |
| JP7565669B2 (en) | How to judge the quality of spot welding | |
| JP5626391B2 (en) | Resistance spot welded joint | |
| KR20180011320A (en) | Resistance spot welding method | |
| JP7364992B1 (en) | Manufacturing method of flash butt welding rail | |
| KR101739947B1 (en) | Spot welding control method |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20170821 |
|
| A977 | Report on retrieval |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007 Effective date: 20180611 |
|
| A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20180614 |
|
| A521 | Request for written amendment filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20180802 |
|
| TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20190115 |
|
| A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20190115 |
|
| R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Ref document number: 6468767 Country of ref document: JP Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |