JP6504129B2 - Blast furnace operation method - Google Patents
Blast furnace operation method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP6504129B2 JP6504129B2 JP2016148666A JP2016148666A JP6504129B2 JP 6504129 B2 JP6504129 B2 JP 6504129B2 JP 2016148666 A JP2016148666 A JP 2016148666A JP 2016148666 A JP2016148666 A JP 2016148666A JP 6504129 B2 JP6504129 B2 JP 6504129B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- lance
- reducing material
- blowing
- blast furnace
- pulverized coal
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Manufacture Of Iron (AREA)
Description
本発明は、高炉操業方法に関するものである。 The present invention relates to a blast furnace operation method.
近年、高炉におけるコークスの使用量を抑えるために、微粉炭や易燃性還元ガス(天然ガス、コークス炉ガスなど)などの還元材を羽口から吹き込む高炉の操業方法が実用化されている。微粉炭や易燃性還元ガスを用いた高炉の操業方法では、熱風を高炉内に供給するブローパイプを介して、微粉炭や易燃性還元ガスが熱風と共に高炉内へ供給される。 In recent years, in order to reduce the amount of coke used in a blast furnace, a method of operating a blast furnace in which a reducing material such as pulverized coal or a flammable reducing gas (natural gas, coke oven gas, etc.) is blown from a tuyere has been put into practical use. In a method of operating a blast furnace using pulverized coal or a flammable reducing gas, pulverized coal or a flammable reducing gas is supplied to the blast furnace together with the hot air through a blow pipe for supplying the hot air into the blast furnace.
このブローパイプには、ブローパイプ内に材料を吹き込むための吹き込み用ランスが設けられ、微粉炭や易燃性還元ガスは、この吹き込み用ランスを介してブローパイプ内を流れる熱風に吹き込まれる構造になっている。そして、この微粉炭や易燃性還元ガスは、ブローパイプ内および高炉内のレースウェイと呼ばれる燃焼空間で燃焼されることにより、コークスの代替として機能する。 The blow pipe is provided with a blowing lance for blowing a material into the blow pipe, and the pulverized coal and the flammable reducing gas are blown into the hot air flowing in the blow pipe through the blowing lance. It has become. The pulverized coal and the flammable reducing gas function as a substitute for coke by being burned in a combustion space called a raceway in the blow pipe and the blast furnace.
コークスの使用量を大きく削減するためには、微粉炭をレースウェイ内で効率よく燃焼・ガス化させることが重要となる。一方で微粉炭吹き込み量を増大すると、未燃焼の微粉炭が炉内に侵入して高炉の炉況悪化を招くという問題が生じる。 In order to greatly reduce the amount of coke used, efficient combustion and gasification of pulverized coal in a raceway is important. On the other hand, when the amount of pulverized coal blowing is increased, unburned pulverized coal intrudes into the furnace to cause a problem of deterioration of the blast furnace furnace condition.
このため、高炉の炉況安定を保ったまま可能な限り多量の微粉炭をレースウェイでガス化し、コークス比削減に繋げるためのさまざまな技術が開発されている。 For this reason, various technologies have been developed to gasify as much pulverized coal as possible in the raceway while keeping the furnace conditions stable in the blast furnace and to lead to the reduction of the coke ratio.
例えば、特許文献1には、レースウェイにおける微粉炭の燃焼を促進するために羽口から還元材を吹込むランスを二重管とし、二重管ランスの一方からLNGを吹込み、もう一方から微粉炭を吹込むことでレースウェイの燃焼温度を大幅に上げることができ、かつ外側管の出口速度を20〜120m/sとすることでランスの変形を防止することができる吹き込み方法が提案されている。 For example, in Patent Document 1, a lance for blowing a reducing material from a tuyere to promote combustion of pulverized coal in a raceway is a double pipe, and LNG is blown from one of the double pipe lances, and the other is A blowing method has been proposed, in which the combustion temperature of the raceway can be greatly increased by blowing pulverized coal, and the deformation of the lance can be prevented by setting the outlet speed of the outer pipe to 20 to 120 m / s. ing.
また、特許文献2には、高結晶水鉱石を使用する高炉に対し、高炉および羽口への投入水素量が適正範囲となるように羽口から気体還元材もしくは液体還元材を吹き込むことで、高結晶水鉱石の還元粉化を抑止しつつ高炉で利用できる方法が提案されている。 Further, according to Patent Document 2, a gas reducing material or a liquid reducing material is blown into the blast furnace using high-crystal water ore from the tuyere so that the amount of hydrogen input to the blast furnace and tuyere falls within an appropriate range. A method has been proposed which can be used in blast furnaces while suppressing reduction and reduction of highly crystalline water ore.
特許文献3には、高炉にタール・重質油を吹き込む際、その近傍にガス燃料を吹き込むことで、熱風温度が比較的低い条件でもタール・重質油の燃焼率を十分に高く保つことができる方法が提案されている。 According to Patent Document 3, when the tar / heavy oil is blown into the blast furnace, the burning rate of the tar / heavy oil can be kept sufficiently high even under the condition where the hot air temperature is relatively low by blowing the gas fuel into the vicinity. A method that can be done is proposed.
特許文献4には、燃焼性の異なる羽口吹き込み還元材、例えば微粉炭、C重油、コークス炉ガスに対し、燃焼性の良い補助燃料ほど炉内側から吹き込むようにすることで、羽口圧損を等しく保ち炉況悪化を抑止する方法が提案されている。 In the patent document 4, the tuyere pressure loss is reduced by blowing in the auxiliary fuel having good combustibility to the tuyere blowing reducing materials having different flammability such as pulverized coal, C heavy oil and coke oven gas from the inside of the furnace. A method has been proposed to keep the reactor condition deterioration equally.
特許文献1の方法は、微粉炭とともに易燃性還元ガスを同時に吹き込むことにより、微粉炭の昇温を促進して微粉炭の燃焼性を高位に保つことができる優れた方法であるが、一方で、この方法はランスへの熱負荷が大きく、ランスの損耗が懸念される。そこで、特許文献1では、外側管のガス流速を20m/s以上としてランスを冷却することによりランスの損耗を抑止する方法を取り入れている。
しかしながら、特許文献1の方法を施行してみたところ、条件によってはランスが熱負荷を受けることが分かった。そこで、詳しく調べたところ、微粉炭の燃焼が安定しているときはランスの損耗は無くきわめて良好であったが、微粉炭の燃焼が不安定となり火炎が揺らぐ条件のときは、瞬間的に強い熱輻射を受けて若干ながらランスの損耗が起こることが分かった。
すなわち、特許文献1の方法は、ランス損耗抑止の観点からは必ずしも十分な方法とは言えないことが判明した。
The method of Patent Document 1 is an excellent method which can promote the temperature rise of the pulverized coal and keep the combustibility of the pulverized coal at a high level by simultaneously blowing in the flammable reducing gas together with the pulverized coal. In this method, the heat load on the lance is large, and the wear of the lance is a concern. Therefore, Patent Document 1 adopts a method of suppressing the wear of the lance by cooling the lance by setting the gas flow velocity of the outer tube to 20 m / s or more.
However, when the method of Patent Document 1 was carried out, it was found that the lance receives a thermal load depending on the conditions. Then, when it investigated in detail, when combustion of the pulverized coal was stable, the lance was not worn out and was very good, but when the combustion of the pulverized coal became unstable and the flame fluctuated, it was instantaneously strong It was found that wear of the lance occurred while receiving heat radiation.
That is, it turned out that the method of patent document 1 is not necessarily a sufficient method from a viewpoint of lance wear suppression.
また、羽口吹き込み還元材として液体還元材を吹き込む方法は、特許文献2,3、4で提案されている。しかしながら、特許文献2、3、4では、微粉炭と液体還元材の同時吹き込み時における燃焼性およびランスの損耗に関しては考慮が払われてなく、また原理的にこれらの手法ではランス保護が十分に保てるとは言い難い。 Moreover, the method of blowing in a liquid reducing material as a tuyere blowing and reducing material is proposed by patent document 2, 3, 4. However, in Patent Documents 2, 3 and 4, no consideration is given to the flammability and loss of lance when co-blowing pulverized coal and liquid reducing agent, and in principle these methods have sufficient lance protection. It is difficult to say that I can keep it.
本発明は、上記の課題を解決すべく、高炉における微粉炭の燃焼状態を勘案して開発されたもので、その要旨構成は次のとおりである。 The present invention has been developed in consideration of the combustion state of pulverized coal in a blast furnace to solve the above-mentioned problems, and its summary constitution is as follows.
1.羽口吹き込みランスを有する高炉羽口から固体還元材および液体還元材を同時に高炉内に吹き込む高炉操業方法において、該ランスとして多重管ランスを用い、該多重管ランスの最内管および最外管の一方から固体還元材を、他方、該固体還元材を吹き込んでいない該多重管ランスの最内管または最外管から液体還元材をそれぞれ吹き込むことを特徴とする高炉操業方法。 1. In a blast furnace operation method in which a solid reducing material and a liquid reducing material are simultaneously blown into the blast furnace from a blast furnace tuyere having a tuyere blowing lance, a multi-tube lance is used as the lance, and innermost and outermost tubes of the multitube lance are used. A blast furnace operation method characterized in that a solid reducing material is blown from one side and a liquid reducing material is blown from the innermost pipe or the outermost pipe of the multi-tube lance which is not blowing the solid reducing material.
2.前記1において、羽口吹き込みランスとして二重管ランスを用い、内管より固体還元材を、外管より液体還元材をそれぞれ吹き込むことを特徴とする高炉操業方法。 2. 3. A blast furnace operation method comprising using a double pipe lance as the tuyere blowing lance in the above 1, and injecting a solid reducing material from the inner pipe and a liquid reducing material from the outer pipe.
3.前記1または2において、液体還元材の吹込み原単位をLR(kg/t)、固体還元材比をPCR(kg/t)、固体還元材における揮発分質量比率をVMとするとき、これらが、次式(1)
0.0060<LR/{PCR×(1−VM)}・・・(1)
の関係を満足する条件で液体還元材を吹き込むことを特徴とする高炉操業方法。
3. In 1 and 2 above, when the blow rate unit of the liquid reducing material is LR (kg / t), the solid reducing material ratio is PCR (kg / t), and the volatile matter mass ratio in the solid reducing material is VM, these are , The following equation (1)
0.0060 <LR / {PCR × (1-VM)} (1)
The blast furnace operation method characterized by blowing in a liquid reducing agent on the conditions which satisfy | fill the relationship of (1).
4.前記1、2または3において、液体還元材の吹込み原単位をLR(kg/t)、固体還元材比をPCR(kg/t)、固体還元材における揮発分質量比率をVMとするとき、これらが、次式(2)
LR+PCR・VM<110.0(kg/t)・・・(2)
の関係を満足する条件で液体還元材を吹き込むことを特徴とする高炉操業方法。
4. In 1, 2 or 3, when the blow rate unit of the liquid reducing material is LR (kg / t), the solid reducing material ratio is PCR (kg / t), and the volatile matter mass ratio in the solid reducing material is VM, These are following Formula (2)
LR + PCR VM <110.0 (kg / t) ... (2)
The blast furnace operation method characterized by blowing in a liquid reducing agent on the conditions which satisfy | fill the relationship of (1).
本発明によれば、羽口の吹き込みランスを多重管とし、この多重管ランスの最内管および最外管の一方から固体還元材を吹き込むと共に、かかる固体還元材を吹き込んでいない多重管ランスの最内管および最外管から液体還元材を吹き込むようにしたので、液体接触による強冷却効果によりランスを強力に冷却することができ、その結果、ランスの損耗を効果的に抑止することができる。
また、液体還元材は固体還元材よりも燃焼が早いので、本発明に従い、固体還元材と同時に吹き込むことで液体還元材の早期燃焼火炎によって固体還元材の昇温が促進され、その結果、固体還元材の燃焼率の向上も併せて達成することができる。
According to the present invention, the blowout lance of the tuyere is a multiple tube, and the solid reducing material is blown from one of the innermost and outermost tubes of the multitube lance, and the multiple tube lance is not blowing such solid reducing material. Since the liquid reducing material is blown in from the innermost pipe and the outermost pipe, the lance can be strongly cooled by the strong cooling effect by the liquid contact, and as a result, the wear of the lance can be effectively suppressed. .
In addition, since the liquid reducing material burns faster than the solid reducing material, the early burning flame of the liquid reducing material accelerates the temperature rise of the solid reducing material by blowing it simultaneously with the solid reducing material according to the present invention. An improvement in the burn rate of the reducing material can also be achieved.
以下、本発明を具体的に説明する。なお、多重管ランスとしては二重管ランスを、また固体還元材としては微粉炭を用いる場合について説明する。
近年、さまざまな技術開発により微粉炭の燃焼性が向上してきたため、ランスによる噴射直後から微粉炭の燃焼が起こるようになってきた。しかしながら、微粉炭の燃焼場は必ずしも安定であるとは限らず、特に高微粉炭比条件では火炎が不安定となる。このとき、微粉炭の燃焼火炎の揺らぎに応じて瞬間的に極めて大きな熱輻射が発せられることがある。
Hereinafter, the present invention will be specifically described. In addition, the case where a double pipe lance is used as a multi-tube lance, and pulverized coal is used as a solid reducing material will be described.
In recent years, the combustibility of pulverized coal has been improved by various technological developments, so combustion of pulverized coal has come to occur immediately after injection by lance. However, the combustion site of pulverized coal is not always stable, and the flame becomes unstable particularly under the condition of high pulverized coal ratio. At this time, extremely large heat radiation may be emitted instantaneously according to the fluctuation of the combustion flame of pulverized coal.
そのため、平均的な熱負荷としては十分耐え得るような冷却能を兼ね備えたランスを用いたとしても、瞬間的な巨大熱負荷によりランスの損耗が発生することがあった。
従って、高燃焼性の微粉炭吹き込み操業においてランス損耗を抑止するためには、燃焼火炎の安定性と冷却能との両面を考慮した吹き込み方法が必要となる。
Therefore, even if a lance having a cooling capacity sufficient to withstand the average heat load is used, the instantaneous large heat load may cause wear of the lance.
Therefore, in order to prevent lance wear and tear in the high-combustible pulverized coal blowing operation, a blowing method that takes into consideration both the stability of the combustion flame and the cooling capacity is required.
そこで、本発明では、吹き込みランスを二重管とし、好ましくはその外管を液体還元材が流通するようにしたのである。液体還元材は、ランス内ではまだ液体状態を保っているので、ランス壁との間の熱伝達率が高く、極めて強い冷却効果を示す。よって、特許文献1のように、ランスにガスを流すことでランス冷却能を確保する方法に比べ、良好なランス損耗抑止効果が得られる。 Therefore, in the present invention, the blowing lance is a double pipe, and preferably the liquid reducing material is allowed to flow through the outer pipe. Since the liquid reducing material is still in the liquid state in the lance, the heat transfer coefficient with the lance wall is high, and it exhibits a very strong cooling effect. Therefore, a better lance wear suppression effect can be obtained as compared with the method in which the lance cooling ability is secured by flowing a gas through the lance as in Patent Document 1.
ところで、微粉炭燃焼火炎の不安定化は、レースウェイ内で燃焼しきれなかった未燃焼のチャーやアッシュがレースウェイ末端部や炉心の通気性を悪化させることで引き起こされる。また、揮発分は比較的短時間で揮発・燃焼を起こすため、揮発分が高い微粉炭ほど未燃焼チャーが少なく、燃焼火炎は安定となる。換言すれば、羽口に吹き込まれるチャーやアッシュの量が多いほど火炎が不安定となり、瞬間的な強い熱輻射が発せられてランス損耗を引き起こしやすくなる。一方で、液体還元材はランスを冷却する効果があるので、液体還元材吹き込み量が多いほどランスの損耗は抑止される。 By the way, the destabilization of the pulverized coal combustion flame is caused by the unburned char and ash which can not be burned in the raceway deteriorating the air permeability of the raceway end and the core. In addition, since volatile matter volatilizes and burns in a relatively short time, pulverized coal with higher volatile matter content has less unburned char and the combustion flame becomes stable. In other words, as the amount of char or ash blown into the tuyere increases, the flame becomes unstable, and a strong heat radiation is generated momentarily to cause the lance wear and tear. On the other hand, since the liquid reducing agent has the effect of cooling the lance, the more the amount of the liquid reducing agent injected, the more the loss of the lance is suppressed.
羽口に吹き込まれたトータルのチャーとアッシュの量は、微粉炭比をPCR(kg/t)、微粉炭における揮発分質量比率をVMとしたとき、PCR(1−VM)[kg/t]で表される。よって、液体還元材の吹込み原単位をLR(kg/t)としたとき、PCR(1−VM)に対するLRの比、すなわちLR/{PCR×(1−VM)}の値が大きいほどランス損耗抑止効果が高いと考えることができる。
このように、LR/{PCR×(1−VM)}の値が十分大きければランス損耗は抑止できるが、LR/{PCR×(1−VM)}の値が0.0060以下となると、火炎不安定性に由来する瞬間的な輻射加熱が液体還元材の冷却効果よりも大きくなってしまうので、ランス損耗が発生するおそれがある。
従って、液体還元材の吹き込みに際しては、液体還元材の吹込み原単位をLR(kg/t)、微粉炭比をPCR(kg/t)、微粉炭における揮発分質量比率をVMとするとき、これらが、次式(1)
0.0060<LR/{PCR×(1−VM)}・・・(1)
の関係を満足する条件で吹き込むことが有利である。
The total amount of char and ash blown into the tuyere is PCR (1-VM) [kg / t], where the pulverized coal ratio is PCR (kg / t) and the volatile matter mass ratio in pulverized coal is VM. Is represented by Therefore, assuming that the blowout unit of the liquid reducing material is LR (kg / t), the larger the ratio of LR to PCR (1-VM), that is, the larger the value of LR / {PCR × (1-VM)}, the lance It can be considered that the effect of suppressing wear and tear is high.
As described above, if the value of LR / {PCR × (1-VM)} is sufficiently large, lance wear and tear can be suppressed, but if the value of LR / {PCR × (1-VM)} becomes 0.0060 or less, the flame Since the instantaneous radiant heating derived from the instability becomes larger than the cooling effect of the liquid reducing agent, there is a possibility that the lance wear may occur.
Therefore, when blowing the liquid reducing material, when the blowing unit of the liquid reducing material is LR (kg / t), the pulverized coal ratio is PCR (kg / t), and the volatile matter mass ratio in pulverized coal is VM, These are the following equation (1)
0.0060 <LR / {PCR × (1-VM)} (1)
It is advantageous to blow in the conditions which satisfy the relation of.
また、液体還元材は多量に吹き込みすぎると炉頂から煤となって出てしまい、還元材として有効に利用されないので、逆に還元材比の上昇を招く。煤は、液体還元材が燃焼する際に酸素が不足していると発生しやすくなるので、本発明のように微粉炭と同時に液体還元材を吹き込む条件では、さらに酸素欠乏が進み、煤を発生しやすい環境になる。微粉炭のチャー成分は液体還元材よりも燃焼が遅いので、液体還元材の酸素欠乏には影響しないものの、揮発分は燃焼が早いため液体還元材の燃焼と競合し、液体還元材燃焼の際の酸素欠乏を引き起こす。
従って、煤を発生させないためには、液体還元材と揮発分の総量が規定値以下となるように操業することが好ましい。
In addition, when a large amount of the liquid reducing material is blown into the furnace, it becomes a soot from the top of the furnace and is not effectively used as the reducing material, and conversely, the ratio of the reducing material is increased. Since the soot tends to be generated if oxygen is insufficient when the liquid reducing material burns, under the condition that the liquid reducing material is blown simultaneously with the pulverized coal as in the present invention, oxygen deficiency further progresses and soot is generated. It becomes an easy environment. Although the char component of pulverized coal burns slower than the liquid reducing material, it does not affect the oxygen deficiency of the liquid reducing material, but the volatile matter competes with the burning of the liquid reducing material because it burns quickly, and the liquid reducing material burns Cause oxygen deficiency.
Therefore, in order to prevent the generation of soot, it is preferable to operate so that the total amount of the liquid reducing material and the volatile matter is less than or equal to a specified value.
そこで、この点について発明者らが検討したところ、液体還元材の吹込み原単位をLR(kg/t)、微粉炭比をPCR(kg/t)、微粉炭における揮発分質量比率をVMとするとき、これらが、次式(2)
LR+PCR・VM<110.0(kg/t)・・・(2)
の関係を満足する条件で液体還元材を吹き込めば、煤の発生が回避されることが判明した。
逆に、LR+PCR・VMが110.0kg/t以上となる条件では、炉頂より煤が発生して吹き込み還元材の利用効率が悪化し、還元材比の増大を引き起こす。
Then, when the inventors examined this point, LR (kg / t), the pulverized coal ratio was PCR (kg / t), the volatile matter mass ratio in pulverized coal was VM, and the blowout unit of the liquid reducing material was LR and kg. When they are given by the following equation (2)
LR + PCR VM <110.0 (kg / t) ... (2)
It has been found that the generation of soot is avoided if the liquid reducing agent is blown in under the conditions satisfying the relationship of
On the other hand, under the condition that LR + PCR · VM is 110.0 kg / t or more, soot is generated from the top of the furnace, blowing utilization efficiency of the reducing material is deteriorated, and the reducing material ratio is increased.
本発明の多重管ランスとしては、二重管ランスの他、三重管ランスや四重管ランス等、さらには並列型ランスも含むものとする。
また、本発明において、固体還元材としては、微粉炭の他、木炭、木質廃材、廃棄物固形燃料等などが考えられる。さらに、液体還元材としては、常温で液体であり、酸素と燃焼反応を起こすものであればどんなものでも良い。例えば、重油、軽油、タール、菜種油、ガソリンなどが考えられる。
The multi-tube lance according to the present invention includes double-tube lances, triple-tube lances, quadruple-tube lances, and the like, and further includes parallel lances.
Further, in the present invention, as the solid reducing material, in addition to pulverized coal, charcoal, wood waste, solid waste fuel, etc. can be considered. Furthermore, as the liquid reducing material, any material may be used as long as it is a liquid at normal temperature and causes a combustion reaction with oxygen. For example, heavy oil, light oil, tar, rapeseed oil, gasoline etc. can be considered.
また、液体還元材は天然ガスなどの気体還元材よりは着火が遅いが、固体還元材よりは着火が早い。このため、液体還元材は、固体還元材よりも先に燃焼するので、固体還元材の昇温を促進し、固体還元材の燃焼率を向上させる効果もある。ここに、固体還元材の燃焼促進効果を引き出すためには、液体還元材は1kg/t以上吹き込むことが有利である。 In addition, the liquid reducing material is slower in ignition than the gas reducing material such as natural gas, but is faster than the solid reducing material. For this reason, since the liquid reducing material burns earlier than the solid reducing material, there is also an effect of promoting the temperature rise of the solid reducing material and improving the combustion rate of the solid reducing material. Here, in order to extract the combustion promoting effect of the solid reducing material, it is advantageous to blow in the liquid reducing material at 1 kg / t or more.
固体還元材としては微粉炭を用い、図1に示すような微粉炭燃焼実験炉を用いて、実機羽口を模擬した条件で、以下に述べる検証実験を行った。なお、実験には、多重管ランスとして二重管ランスを用いた。また、二重管ランスの内管から微粉炭を、外管から液体還元材を吹き込む場合について調査した。図2に、図1の要部を拡大して示す。図中、符号1が二重管ランスであり、2でランス内管から吹き込む微粉炭を、3でランス外管から吹き込む液体還元材を示す。また、4はブローパイプ、5はコークス充填槽であり、6で排ガスを示す。
なお、実験では、微粉炭比は180kg/t相当(実験炉では60kg/h)とした。また、液体還元材としては重油を用いた。微粉炭は揮発分率の異なる3種類を用い、以下に示す3つの実験を行った。
Using the pulverized coal as the solid reducing material, a pulverized coal combustion experimental furnace as shown in FIG. 1 was used to carry out the verification experiment described below under the conditions simulating the actual aircraft tuyere. In the experiment, a double tube lance was used as a multiple tube lance. In addition, pulverized coal was investigated from the inner pipe of the double pipe lance, and a liquid reducing agent was injected from the outer pipe. In FIG. 2, the principal part of FIG. 1 is expanded and shown. In the figure, the code | symbol 1 is a double pipe lance, 2 shows the liquid reducing material which blows in the pulverized coal which blows in from a lance inner pipe, and 3 blows out from a lance outer pipe. Further, 4 is a blow pipe, 5 is a coke filling tank, and 6 is an exhaust gas.
In the experiment, the pulverized coal ratio was equivalent to 180 kg / t (60 kg / h in the experimental furnace). In addition, heavy oil was used as the liquid reducing agent. Pulverized coal was used in three experiments shown below, using three types of volatile fraction different.
[実験1]揮発分比率0.19の微粉炭
中程度の揮発分(VM=0.19)の微粉炭を用い、表1に示すように液体還元材吹き込み量を漸次増大していく試験を行った。表1には、微粉炭比PCR(kg/t)、液体還元材比LR(kg/t)、微粉炭の揮発分比率VM(−)、および、それぞれの条件におけるLR/{PCR×(1−VM)}の値およびLR+PCR・VMの値を示す。なお、液体還元材比LRについては、実験炉流量と実機相当値を併せて示す。
この条件で微粉炭燃焼実験炉にて燃焼試験を行った結果を、表1に併記する。
[Experiment 1] Pulverized coal with a volatile content ratio of 0.19 Using a pulverized carbon with moderate volatile content (VM = 0.19), a test was conducted to gradually increase the amount of liquid reducing material blowing as shown in Table 1. went. In Table 1, pulverized coal ratio PCR (kg / t), liquid reducing agent ratio LR (kg / t), pulverized coal volatile matter ratio VM (-), and LR / {PCR × (1) in each condition -VM)} and LR + PCR · VM are shown. In addition, about liquid reduction agent ratio LR, a test furnace flow rate and an actual machine equivalent value are shown collectively.
Table 1 also shows the results of the combustion test conducted in the pulverized coal combustion experimental furnace under these conditions.
実験後のランスを調べたところ、表1に示したように、液体還元材の吹込みがない条件(LR/{PCR×(1−VM)}=0)では、ランスに大きな熱負荷を受けた損傷跡が見られたが、液体還元材をある程度以上(LR/{PCR×(1−VM)}>0.0060)吹き込んだときはランスに損傷跡は見当たらなくなった。また、さらに液体還元材の吹き込み量を増していったところ、80kg/t相当(このときLR+PCR×VM=114.2kg/t)となった時点で、コークス充填層から煤の噴き出しが観測された。 When the lance after the experiment was examined, as shown in Table 1, under the condition (LR / {PCR x (1-VM)} = 0) where the liquid reducing agent was not injected, the lance received a large heat load. Although the damage mark was seen, when the liquid reducing agent was blown in a certain amount or more (LR / {PCR x (1-VM)}> 0.0060), no damage mark was found in the lance. Further, when the blowing amount of the liquid reducing material was further increased, when the amount reached 80 kg / t (at this time, LR + PCR × VM = 114.2 kg / t), spouting of soot from the coke packed bed was observed .
[実験2]揮発分比率0.03の微粉炭
低揮発分(VM=0.03)の微粉炭を用いて同様の実験を試みた。そのときの条件および結果を表2に示す。このとき燃焼火炎はやや不安定であり、時折強い熱輻射が観測された。
[Experiment 2] Pulverized coal with a volatile content ratio of 0.03 A similar experiment was attempted using pulverized coal with low volatile content (VM = 0.03). The conditions and results at that time are shown in Table 2. At this time, the combustion flame was somewhat unstable, and strong thermal radiation was occasionally observed.
実験後ランスの状態を調べたところ、表2に示したとおり、液体還元材の吹き込み量が小さい条件(LR/{PCR×(1−VM)}=0および0.0057)では、ランスに熱負荷を受けた損傷跡が見受けられたが、液体還元材の流量を増した条件(LR/{PCR×(1−VM)}=0.0115)では、ランスの損傷は無かった。また、この実験ではどの条件も煤発生抑止の条件(LR+PCR×VM<110.0kg/t)を満たしているので、想定どおり充填層からの煤の吹き出しは観測されなかった。 When the state of lance after the experiment was examined, as shown in Table 2, under the condition (LR / {PCR x (1-VM)} = 0 and 0.0057) where the blowing amount of the liquid reducing material is small, heat was applied to the lance. Although the damage mark which received load was seen, there was no damage of lance in the conditions (LR / {PCR x (1-VM)} = 0.1115) which increased the flow rate of liquid reductant. Moreover, in this experiment, since all the conditions satisfy | fill the conditions (LR + PCRxVM <110.0 kg / t) of eyelid development suppression, the balloon's blowout from the packed bed was not observed as expected.
[実験3]高揮発分微粉炭の条件
高揮発分(VM=0.39)の微粉炭を用いて同様の実験を試みた。そのときの条件および結果を表3に示す。
[Experiment 3] Conditions of high volatile content pulverized coal A similar experiment was attempted using pulverized carbon of high volatile content (VM = 0.39). The conditions and results at that time are shown in Table 3.
この実験ではどの条件もLR/{PCR×(1−VM)}>0.0060を満たしているため、実験後ランスの状態を調べたところ、表3に示したように、すべてランスは健全であり、ランスの損耗はないことが確認された。また、液体還元材吹き込み量を増していったところ、40kg/t(このときLR+PCR・VM>110.2kg/t)の時点で充填層から煤の発生が観測された。 In this experiment, all conditions satisfied LR / {PCR x (1-VM)}> 0.0060, so when the condition of lance was examined after the experiment, as shown in Table 3, all the lances were healthy. Yes, it was confirmed that the lance did not wear out. In addition, when the liquid reducing agent blowing amount was increased, generation of soot from the packed bed was observed at 40 kg / t (at this time, LR + PCR · VM> 110.2 kg / t).
[実験4]として、二重管ランスからの微粉炭と液体還元材の吹き込みを逆にすること以外は、実験1と同様にして高炉操業を行った場合のランスの損傷および煤の発生について調査したが、この場合も実験1と同等の結果を得ることができた。 [Experiment 4] In the same manner as in Experiment 1, except that the blowing of the pulverized coal and the liquid reducing material from the double tube lance is reversed, the lance damage and the occurrence of soot in the blast furnace operation are investigated. However, even in this case, the same result as in Experiment 1 could be obtained.
以上の[実験1]−[実験4]より、本発明に従う好適条件で液体還元材と微粉炭の同時吹込みを行うことにより、ランスの損耗および煤の発生を併せて抑止できることが確認された。 From the above-mentioned [Experiment 1]-[Experiment 4], it was confirmed that by simultaneously injecting the liquid reducing material and pulverized coal under the preferable conditions according to the present invention, it is possible to suppress the wear of the lance and the generation of wrinkles together. .
1 二重管ランス
2 ランス内管から吹き込む微粉炭
3 ランス外管から吹き込む液体還元材
4 ブローパイプ
5 コークス充填槽
6 排ガス
Reference Signs List 1 double pipe lance 2 pulverized coal blown from the lance inner pipe 3 liquid reducing material blown from the lance outer pipe 4 blow pipe 5 coke filled tank 6 exhaust gas
Claims (3)
該ランスとして多重管ランスを用い、該多重管ランスの最内管および最外管の一方から揮発分比率が0.19以下の固体還元材を、他方、該固体還元材を吹き込んでいない該多重管ランスの最内管または最外管から液体還元材を、
該液体還元材の吹込み原単位をLR(kg/t)、該固体還元材比をPCR(kg/t)、該固体還元材における揮発分質量比率をVMとするとき、これらが、次式(1)
0.0060<LR/{PCR×(1−VM)}・・・(1)
の関係を満足する条件で、
それぞれ吹き込むことを特徴とする高炉操業方法。 In a blast furnace operation method in which a solid reducing material and a liquid reducing material are simultaneously blown into the blast furnace from a blast furnace tuyere having a tuyere blowing lance,
The multi-tube lance is used as the lance, and one of the innermost and outermost tubes of the multi-tube lance has a solid reducing agent having a volatile content ratio of 0.19 or less, and the other is not the solid reducing agent Liquid reductant from the innermost or outermost pipe of the pipe lance ,
Let LR (kg / t) be the blow rate unit of the liquid reducing material, PCR (kg / t) be the solid reducing material ratio, and VM be the mass ratio of volatile matter in the solid reducing material. (1)
0.0060 <LR / {PCR × (1-VM)} (1)
On the condition that satisfies
The blast furnace operation method characterized by blowing in each.
LR+PCR・VM<110.0(kg/t)・・・(2)
の関係を満足する条件で、前記固体還元材と前記液体還元材を吹き込むことを特徴とする高炉操業方法。
According to claim 1 or 2, the blowing intensity of the liquid reducing agent LR (kg / t), the solid reducing material ratio PCR (kg / t), and the volatiles mass ratio in the solid reducing material VM When these are the following equation (2)
LR + PCR VM <110.0 (kg / t) ... (2)
A blast furnace operation method comprising blowing the solid reducing material and the liquid reducing material under the condition satisfying the following relationship:
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2016148666A JP6504129B2 (en) | 2016-07-28 | 2016-07-28 | Blast furnace operation method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2016148666A JP6504129B2 (en) | 2016-07-28 | 2016-07-28 | Blast furnace operation method |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JP2018016854A JP2018016854A (en) | 2018-02-01 |
| JP6504129B2 true JP6504129B2 (en) | 2019-04-24 |
Family
ID=61075960
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2016148666A Active JP6504129B2 (en) | 2016-07-28 | 2016-07-28 | Blast furnace operation method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP6504129B2 (en) |
Family Cites Families (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPS5364602A (en) * | 1976-11-22 | 1978-06-09 | Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd | Feeding method for powdery solid fuel into blast furnace |
| JPS62142707A (en) * | 1985-12-17 | 1987-06-26 | Kawasaki Steel Corp | Method for blowing granular particle into blast furnace |
| JPS63176405A (en) * | 1987-01-12 | 1988-07-20 | Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd | Method for supplying solid fuel into blast furnace |
| JPH10306302A (en) * | 1997-04-28 | 1998-11-17 | Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd | Blast furnace operation method |
-
2016
- 2016-07-28 JP JP2016148666A patent/JP6504129B2/en active Active
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP2018016854A (en) | 2018-02-01 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| JP6229863B2 (en) | Oxygen blast furnace operation method | |
| EP2770257A1 (en) | Plasma oil-free fire lighting system in oxygen-enriched environment | |
| JP6256710B2 (en) | Oxygen blast furnace operation method | |
| JP5522325B1 (en) | Blast furnace operation method | |
| JP5200618B2 (en) | Blast furnace operation method | |
| JP6504129B2 (en) | Blast furnace operation method | |
| JP6260555B2 (en) | Reducing material blowing device | |
| JP6269532B2 (en) | Blast furnace operation method | |
| JP6269533B2 (en) | Blast furnace operation method | |
| JP2005098676A (en) | Tuyere structure of waste melting furnace and blowing method of combustible dust | |
| JP5987773B2 (en) | Blast furnace operation method | |
| WO2018180892A1 (en) | Method for operating blast furnace | |
| JP5910567B2 (en) | Blast furnace operation method | |
| JP5987772B2 (en) | Blast furnace operation method | |
| JP5987771B2 (en) | Blast furnace operation method | |
| JP6044564B2 (en) | Blast furnace operation method | |
| JP6191731B2 (en) | Blast furnace operation method | |
| JP6064933B2 (en) | Blast furnace operation method | |
| JP4714544B2 (en) | Blast furnace operation method | |
| JP6176361B2 (en) | Blast furnace operation method | |
| JP6064934B2 (en) | Blast furnace operation method | |
| JP6056794B2 (en) | Blast furnace operation method | |
| JP4742686B2 (en) | Blowing synthetic resin into blast furnace | |
| JP2003231905A (en) | Method and apparatus for blowing large amount of fuel through tuyere into co-production blast furnace | |
| JP2016153537A (en) | Blast furnace operation method |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20180221 |
|
| A977 | Report on retrieval |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007 Effective date: 20181115 |
|
| A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20181127 |
|
| A521 | Request for written amendment filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20190124 |
|
| TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20190226 |
|
| A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20190311 |
|
| R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Ref document number: 6504129 Country of ref document: JP Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |