Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP6557526B2 - Soft magnetic steel sheet, laminated steel sheet using the same, and method for producing soft magnetic steel sheet - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP6557526B2 - Soft magnetic steel sheet, laminated steel sheet using the same, and method for producing soft magnetic steel sheet - Google Patents

Soft magnetic steel sheet, laminated steel sheet using the same, and method for producing soft magnetic steel sheet Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP6557526B2
JP6557526B2 JP2015125805A JP2015125805A JP6557526B2 JP 6557526 B2 JP6557526 B2 JP 6557526B2 JP 2015125805 A JP2015125805 A JP 2015125805A JP 2015125805 A JP2015125805 A JP 2015125805A JP 6557526 B2 JP6557526 B2 JP 6557526B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
soft magnetic
steel sheet
magnetic steel
steel
magnetic
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2015125805A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2016172919A (en
Inventor
三谷 宏幸
宏幸 三谷
土田 武広
武広 土田
井上 憲一
憲一 井上
藤井 秀夫
秀夫 藤井
梶原 桂
桂 梶原
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Kobe Steel Ltd
Original Assignee
Kobe Steel Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Kobe Steel Ltd filed Critical Kobe Steel Ltd
Publication of JP2016172919A publication Critical patent/JP2016172919A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP6557526B2 publication Critical patent/JP6557526B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Landscapes

  • Soft Magnetic Materials (AREA)

Description

本発明は、自動車、電車、船舶などの電装部品において、直流で使用されるソレノイドやリレーなどのケースやカバーあるいは鉄心、交流で使用されるモータやトランスなどの電磁気部品の磁心等として有用な軟磁性部材の材料となる軟磁性鋼板に関し、例えば、プレス成形により製造され、磁気特性を必要とする軟磁性部材において、優れたプレス成形性や良好な磁気特性を発揮することのできる軟磁性鋼板およびそれを用いた積層鋼板、ならびに軟磁性鋼板の製造方法に関するものである。   INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY The present invention is an electronic component such as an automobile, a train, and a ship, and is used as a soft core useful for a case or cover such as a solenoid or a relay used for direct current, or an iron core, or a magnetic core such as a motor or transformer used for alternating current. Regarding a soft magnetic steel sheet used as a material of a magnetic member, for example, a soft magnetic steel sheet that is manufactured by press molding and can exhibit excellent press formability and good magnetic characteristics in a soft magnetic member that requires magnetic characteristics, and The present invention relates to a laminated steel plate using the same and a method for producing a soft magnetic steel plate.

近年、自動車の燃費向上に対するニーズがますます強くなり、エンジンやトランスミッションその他に使用される電装部品には、よりいっそうの性能向上、たとえば応答性、省電力化、小型化が望まれている。そのためには、磁気特性として、磁化されやすく、保磁力が小さいことが有効である。   In recent years, the need for improving the fuel efficiency of automobiles has become stronger, and electrical components used in engines, transmissions, and the like are desired to have further improved performance, such as responsiveness, power saving, and downsizing. For this purpose, it is effective that the magnetic properties are easily magnetized and the coercive force is small.

さらに製造コストの低減に対するニーズも大きい。すなわち、磁気回路を形成する部材、たとえばソレノイドの外郭を形成するケースやカバー、さらには鉄心にも、従来のように線材や棒鋼を冷間鍛造して切削する方法に代えて、鋼板をプレス成形して部材形状を作製する方法が注目されている。   Furthermore, there is a great need for a reduction in manufacturing costs. In other words, members that form magnetic circuits, such as cases and covers that form the outer shell of solenoids, and iron cores, instead of conventional methods of cold forging and cutting wires and steel bars, are pressed into steel plates. Thus, a method for producing a member shape has attracted attention.

たとえば、特許文献1には、本発明に係る軟磁性鋼板と近似した純鉄系の成分組成を有し、冷間鍛造性と電気伝導性に優れた電気部品用鋼材が開示されている。しかしながら、この電気部品用鋼材は、伸線して製造される線材に関するもので、鋼板に関する記載はない。   For example, Patent Document 1 discloses a steel material for electrical parts that has a pure iron-based component composition similar to that of the soft magnetic steel sheet according to the present invention and is excellent in cold forgeability and electrical conductivity. However, this steel material for electrical parts relates to a wire manufactured by drawing, and there is no description about a steel plate.

また、特許文献2には、成形性と磁気特性に優れた熱延鋼板が開示されている。しかしながら、熱延鋼板は表面状態が悪いため、そのまま電磁気部品に用いることはできない。また、結晶粒径が大きすぎるため、曲げ加工後の肌荒れが懸念される。   Patent Document 2 discloses a hot-rolled steel sheet excellent in formability and magnetic properties. However, the hot-rolled steel sheet cannot be used as an electromagnetic component as it is because of its poor surface condition. Moreover, since the crystal grain size is too large, there is a concern about rough skin after bending.

また、特許文献3には、磁気特性と加工性に優れたTVブラウン管マスクフレーム用冷延鋼板が開示されている。しかしながら、このTVブラウン管マスクフレーム用冷延鋼板は、Cu、Sn、Ni、Cr等の不純物元素の相当量の含有を前提とするものであり、純鉄系の成分組成を前提とする、本発明に係る軟磁性鋼板とはそもそも前提が異なる技術である。   Patent Document 3 discloses a cold-rolled steel sheet for a TV CRT mask frame having excellent magnetic properties and workability. However, this cold-rolled steel sheet for a TV CRT mask frame is premised on containing a substantial amount of impurity elements such as Cu, Sn, Ni, Cr, etc., and is premised on a pure iron-based component composition. This is a technology that is originally different from the soft magnetic steel sheet.

特開2003−226938号公報Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2003-226938 特開2010−53387号公報JP 2010-53387 A 特開平11−50207号公報Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 11-50207

本発明は、このような事情を鑑みてなされたものであり、その目的は、優れた磁気特性を有する軟磁性鋼板およびそれを用いた積層鋼板、ならびに軟磁性鋼板の製造方法を提供することにある。   This invention is made | formed in view of such a situation, The objective is to provide the soft magnetic steel plate which has the outstanding magnetic characteristic, the laminated steel plate using the same, and the manufacturing method of a soft magnetic steel plate. is there.

また、本発明の他の目的は、優れた成形性を有する軟磁性鋼板およびそれを用いた積層鋼板、ならびに軟磁性鋼板の製造方法を提供することにある。   Another object of the present invention is to provide a soft magnetic steel sheet having excellent formability, a laminated steel sheet using the same, and a method for producing a soft magnetic steel sheet.

また、本発明の他の目的は、優れた耐肌荒れ性を有する軟磁性鋼板およびそれを用いた積層鋼板、ならびに軟磁性鋼板の製造方法を提供することにある。   Another object of the present invention is to provide a soft magnetic steel sheet having excellent resistance to rough skin, a laminated steel sheet using the same, and a method for producing the soft magnetic steel sheet.

また、本発明の他の目的は、優れた被削性を有する軟磁性鋼板およびそれを用いた積層鋼板、ならびに軟磁性鋼板の製造方法を提供することにある。   Another object of the present invention is to provide a soft magnetic steel sheet having excellent machinability, a laminated steel sheet using the same, and a method for producing the soft magnetic steel sheet.

本発明の前記並びにその他の目的と新規な特徴は、本明細書の記述から明らかになるであろう。   The above and other objects and novel features of the present invention will be apparent from the description of this specification.

本発明に係る第1発明は、
成分組成が、質量%で、
C:0.001〜0.02%、
Si:0〜0.05%、
Mn:0.05〜0.5%、
P:0〜0.02%、
S:0〜0.1%、
Al:0〜0.01%、
Cr:0〜0.1%、
N:0〜0.005%
であり、残部が鉄および不可避的不純物からなる軟磁性鋼板であって、
平均結晶粒径が50μm超150μm以下であり、
さらに、当該軟磁性鋼板のKAM値Kaと、当該軟磁性鋼板を850℃で3時間焼鈍した後のKAM値Kbとの比Ka/Kbが1.0〜1.5である
ことを特徴とする軟磁性鋼板である。
ここに、「KAM値」とは、「Kernel Average Misorientation値」を意味する。
The first invention according to the present invention is:
Ingredient composition is mass%,
C: 0.001 to 0.02%,
Si: 0 to 0.05%,
Mn: 0.05 to 0.5%
P: 0 to 0.02%,
S: 0 to 0.1%,
Al: 0 to 0.01%,
Cr: 0 to 0.1%,
N: 0 to 0.005%
And the balance is a soft magnetic steel plate made of iron and inevitable impurities,
The average crystal grain size is more than 50 μm and not more than 150 μm,
Furthermore, the ratio Ka / Kb between the KAM value Ka of the soft magnetic steel sheet and the KAM value Kb after annealing the soft magnetic steel sheet at 850 ° C. for 3 hours is 1.0 to 1.5. It is a soft magnetic steel plate.
Here, the “KAM value” means a “Kernel Average Mission value”.

本発明に係る第2発明は、上記第1発明において、
板厚が0.8〜4.0mmである、軟磁性鋼板である。
According to a second aspect of the present invention, in the first aspect,
It is a soft magnetic steel plate having a plate thickness of 0.8 to 4.0 mm.

本発明に係る第3発明は、上記第1発明において、
板厚が0.3〜1.0mmである、軟磁性鋼板である。
According to a third aspect of the present invention, in the first aspect,
It is a soft magnetic steel plate having a plate thickness of 0.3 to 1.0 mm.

本発明に係る第4発明は、上記第1〜第3発明のいずれか1つの発明において、
前記Sの含有量が、S:0.015〜0.1質量%である、軟磁性鋼板である。
According to a fourth aspect of the present invention, in any one of the first to third aspects of the invention,
It is a soft magnetic steel plate in which the content of S is S: 0.015 to 0.1% by mass.

本発明に係る第5発明は、上記第1〜第3発明のいずれか1つの発明において、
前記Sの含有量が、S:0〜0.06質量%である、軟磁性鋼板である。
According to a fifth aspect of the present invention, in any one of the first to third aspects of the invention,
It is a soft magnetic steel plate in which the content of S is S: 0 to 0.06% by mass.

本発明に係る第6発明は、上記第1〜第5発明のいずれか1つの発明において、
さらに、Mn/S質量比が3〜20であり、
MnS析出物の平均粒径が0.05〜4μmで、かつ、
粒径0.2μm以上のMnS析出物の個数密度が0.02〜0.5個/μmである、
軟磁性鋼板である。
According to a sixth aspect of the present invention, in any one of the first to fifth aspects of the invention,
Furthermore, Mn / S mass ratio is 3-20,
The average particle size of the MnS precipitate is 0.05-4 μm, and
The number density of MnS precipitates having a particle size of 0.2 μm or more is 0.02 to 0.5 / μm 2 .
It is a soft magnetic steel plate.

本発明に係る第7発明は、上記第1〜第6発明の少なくとも1つの発明の軟磁性鋼板を2枚以上積層してなることを特徴とする積層鋼板である。   A seventh invention according to the present invention is a laminated steel plate, wherein two or more soft magnetic steel plates according to the first to sixth inventions are laminated.

本発明に係る第8発明は、
上記第1、第4および第5発明のいずれか1つの発明の成分組成を有する鋼材を熱間圧延して熱延板とする熱延工程と、
前記熱延板を圧下率R1:30〜70%で冷間圧延して冷延板とする粗冷延工程と、
前記冷延板を、下記式1を満足するように、軟化焼鈍温度T1℃で軟化焼鈍時間H1秒間保持して軟化焼鈍板とする軟化焼鈍工程と、
を備えたことを特徴とする、軟磁性鋼板の製造方法である。
式1:270≦[{100−R1+0.2×(273+T1)}+H1×exp{−10/(273+T1)}]1/2 ≦340
ただし、750℃≦T1≦860℃である。
The eighth aspect of the invention relates to
A hot rolling step of hot rolling a steel material having the component composition of any one of the first, fourth and fifth inventions into a hot rolled sheet;
A rough cold rolling process in which the hot-rolled sheet is cold-rolled at a reduction ratio R1: 30 to 70% to obtain a cold-rolled sheet;
A softening annealing step in which the cold-rolled sheet is held at a softening annealing temperature T1 ° C. and a softening annealing time H1 second so as to satisfy the following formula 1,
A method for producing a soft magnetic steel sheet, comprising:
Formula 1: 270 ≦ [{100−R1 + 0.2 × (273 + T1)} 2 + H1 × exp {−10 / (273 + T1)}] 1/2 ≦ 340
However, it is 750 degreeC <= T1 <= 860 degreeC.

本発明に係る第9発明は、上記第8発明において、
さらに、前記軟化焼鈍板を、圧下率R2:0.1〜3%で冷間圧延する仕上げ冷延工程と、
を備えた、軟磁性鋼板の製造方法である。
According to a ninth aspect of the present invention, in the eighth aspect,
Furthermore, a finish cold rolling step of cold rolling the softened annealed plate at a rolling reduction R2: 0.1 to 3%;
Is a method for producing a soft magnetic steel sheet.

本願において開示される発明のうち、代表的なものによって得られる効果を簡単に説明すれば以下のとおりである。   Among the inventions disclosed in the present application, effects obtained by typical ones will be briefly described as follows.

本発明の一実施の形態によれば、優れた磁気特性を有する軟磁性鋼板を提供することができる。   According to one embodiment of the present invention, a soft magnetic steel sheet having excellent magnetic properties can be provided.

軟磁性鋼板について高い磁性を得るための要件は、成分組成として添加元素や不純物を適正範囲に制御すること、磁気焼鈍後の部材において十分にひずみ(塑性変形による転位)を除去し、適正範囲の結晶粒径にすることが重要である。一方、成形性については、基本的な特性として、引張試験での伸びが大きいことが重要である。   The requirements for obtaining high magnetism for soft magnetic steel sheets are to control the additive elements and impurities in the proper range as the component composition, to sufficiently remove strain (dislocation due to plastic deformation) in the magnetically annealed member, It is important to have a crystal grain size. On the other hand, as for the moldability, it is important that the elongation in the tensile test is large as a basic characteristic.

そこで、本発明者らは、種々の成分組成の鋼板について、その製造条件と組織形態との関係、ならびにその組織形態と成形性および磁気特性との関係を詳細に検討した。その結果、鋼板の結晶粒径とひずみ量を適正化することで、成形性を向上させるとともに磁気特性も向上させることができることを見出した。上記知見に基づき、さらに検討を進め、本発明を完成するに至った。   Therefore, the present inventors have examined in detail the relationship between the manufacturing conditions and the microstructure, and the relationship between the microstructure, formability, and magnetic properties of the steel sheets having various component compositions. As a result, it has been found that by optimizing the crystal grain size and strain amount of the steel sheet, the formability can be improved and the magnetic properties can be improved. Based on the above findings, further studies have been made and the present invention has been completed.

以下、まず本発明に係る軟磁性鋼板を特徴づける組織について説明する。   Hereinafter, the structure characterizing the soft magnetic steel sheet according to the present invention will be described first.

〔軟磁性鋼板の組織〕
上述したとおり、本発明に係る軟磁性鋼板は、結晶粒径とひずみ量が制御されている点に特徴を有する。
[Structure of soft magnetic steel sheet]
As described above, the soft magnetic steel sheet according to the present invention is characterized in that the crystal grain size and strain amount are controlled.

<平均結晶粒径:50μm超150μm以下>
軟磁性鋼板の平均結晶粒径は、磁気特性に大きな影響を与え、当該平均結晶粒径が小さすぎると保磁力や透磁率が悪化するため、50μm超、好ましくは60μm以上、さらに好ましくは70μm以上とした。一方、当該平均結晶粒径が大きすぎると成形や曲げ加工後の肌荒れや打ち抜き加工後のバリが発生しやすくなり、後述の仕上げ圧延、例えばスキンパス圧延との組み合わせによっても肌荒れやバリを防止し切れなくなるため、150μm以下、好ましくは140μm以下、さらに好ましくは130μm以下とした。
<Average crystal grain size: more than 50 μm and less than 150 μm>
The average crystal grain size of the soft magnetic steel sheet has a great influence on the magnetic properties. If the average crystal grain size is too small, the coercive force and the magnetic permeability are deteriorated, so that it exceeds 50 μm, preferably 60 μm or more, more preferably 70 μm or more. It was. On the other hand, if the average crystal grain size is too large, rough skin after forming or bending and burrs after punching are likely to occur, and even when combined with finish rolling described later, for example, skin pass rolling, rough skin and burrs are prevented. Therefore, the thickness is set to 150 μm or less, preferably 140 μm or less, and more preferably 130 μm or less.

<当該軟磁性鋼板のKAM値Kaと、当該軟磁性鋼板を850℃で3時間焼鈍した後のKAM値Kbとの比Ka/Kb:1.0〜1.5>
KAM(Kernel Average Misorientation)値は、材料は塑性変形したときの塑性ひずみ量に関係する指標である。本発明においては、当該軟磁性鋼板を850℃で3時間加熱焼鈍することによって結晶粒径をある程度以上に大きくして、かつ塑性ひずみが概ねなくなった状態におけるKAM値Kbを基準として、これに対する当該軟磁性鋼板のKAM値Kaの倍率Ka/Kbを用いて、当該軟磁性鋼板のひずみ量を相対的に評価するようにした。冷間圧延後の軟化焼鈍によって十分に結晶粒を粗大化させて磁気特性を高めようとすると、曲げ加工後の肌荒れや打抜き加工後のバリが発生しやすくなるため、仕上げ圧延として低圧下率のスキンパス圧延を実施することで肌荒れやバリを抑制することができる。ただし、スキンパス圧延で導入される塑性ひずみ量が過剰になる、すなわち、KAM値が過大になると、磁気特性が劣化するため、Ka/Kbの上限は1.5、好ましくは1.4、さらに好ましくは1.3とした。一方で、加工後の肌荒れやバリを考慮すると、Ka/Kbの下限は、1.0である。
<Ratio Ka / Kb of KAM value Ka of the soft magnetic steel sheet and KAM value Kb after annealing the soft magnetic steel sheet at 850 ° C. for 3 hours: 1.0 to 1.5>
The KAM (Kernel Average Misoration) value is an index related to the amount of plastic strain when the material is plastically deformed. In the present invention, the soft magnetic steel sheet is annealed at 850 ° C. for 3 hours to increase the crystal grain size to a certain level and the KAM value Kb in the state where the plastic strain is substantially eliminated is used as a reference. The strain amount of the soft magnetic steel sheet was relatively evaluated using the magnification Ka / Kb of the KAM value Ka of the soft magnetic steel sheet. When trying to increase the magnetic properties by sufficiently coarsening the crystal grains by soft annealing after cold rolling, rough surface after bending and burrs after punching are likely to occur. By performing skin pass rolling, rough skin and burrs can be suppressed. However, if the amount of plastic strain introduced by skin pass rolling becomes excessive, that is, if the KAM value becomes excessive, the magnetic properties deteriorate, so the upper limit of Ka / Kb is 1.5, preferably 1.4, more preferably Was 1.3. On the other hand, considering the rough skin and burrs after processing, the lower limit of Ka / Kb is 1.0.

次に、本発明に係る軟磁性鋼板を構成する成分組成について説明する。以下、化学成分の単位はすべて質量%である。   Next, the component composition constituting the soft magnetic steel sheet according to the present invention will be described. Hereinafter, all the units of chemical components are mass%.

〔軟磁性鋼板の成分組成〕
C:0.001〜0.02%
Cは、鋼中に固溶して、あるいは炭化物を形成して磁気特性を劣化させるため、極力低減させるべきであるが、C含有量が0.001%を下回っても磁気特性の向上効果は小さいため、その下限を0.001%とする。一方、C含有量が0.02%を超えると急激に磁気特性が劣化するため、その上限を0.02%、好ましくは0.015%、さらに好ましくは0.01%とする。
[Component composition of soft magnetic steel sheet]
C: 0.001 to 0.02%
C should be reduced as much as possible because it dissolves in steel or forms carbides to deteriorate the magnetic properties. However, even if the C content is less than 0.001%, the effect of improving the magnetic properties is not achieved. Since it is small, the lower limit is made 0.001%. On the other hand, if the C content exceeds 0.02%, the magnetic properties deteriorate rapidly, so the upper limit is made 0.02%, preferably 0.015%, more preferably 0.01%.

Si:0〜0.05%
Siは、脱酸剤として使用されるが、伸びを低下させる作用があるため、Si含有量の上限を0.05%、好ましくは0.04%、さらに好ましくは0.03%とする。
Si: 0 to 0.05%
Si is used as a deoxidizer, but has the effect of reducing elongation, so the upper limit of Si content is 0.05%, preferably 0.04%, and more preferably 0.03%.

Mn:0.05〜0.5%
Mnは脱酸作用を有するので、本発明においては、磁気特性とプレス成形性の両立のために、C、SおよびAlの各含有量を従来鋼に比べて低めにしている代わりに、Mnが脱酸剤としての役割を果たしており、Mn含有量を0.05%以上、好ましくは0.1%以上、さらに好ましくは0.15%以上としてその効果を発揮させる。一方、Mnを過剰に含有させると伸び、および磁気特性が低下するため、Mn含有量の上限を0.5%、好ましくは0.4%、さらに好ましくは0.3%とする。
Mn: 0.05 to 0.5%
Since Mn has a deoxidizing action, in the present invention, in order to achieve both magnetic properties and press formability, instead of lowering the contents of C, S and Al as compared with conventional steel, Mn It plays a role as a deoxidizer, and exhibits its effect when the Mn content is 0.05% or more, preferably 0.1% or more, more preferably 0.15% or more. On the other hand, if Mn is contained excessively, elongation and magnetic properties are lowered, so the upper limit of the Mn content is 0.5%, preferably 0.4%, and more preferably 0.3%.

P:0〜0.02%
Pは伸び、磁気特性ともに低下させるため、P含有量の上限を0.02%、好ましくは0.015%、さらに好ましくは0.01%とする。
P: 0 to 0.02%
Since P decreases both elongation and magnetic properties, the upper limit of the P content is 0.02%, preferably 0.015%, and more preferably 0.01%.

S:0〜0.1%
Sは過剰に含まれると、伸び、および磁気特性を低下させるため、S含有量の上限を0.1%とし、高い磁気特性、または伸びが求められる場合においては、好ましくは0.06%、さらに好ましくは0.02%とする。
一方で、Sは適量含有させることにより、伸びや磁気特性を若干犠牲にしつつも、Mnとともに鋼中でMnSを形成し、打抜き加工時に応力が負荷されたときに応力集中箇所となって、被削性を向上し、打抜き時のバリ発生を抑制することができる。こうした効果を得るには、S含有量を0.015%以上、好ましくは0.04%以上とする。
S: 0 to 0.1%
When S is excessively contained, the elongation and magnetic properties are lowered. Therefore, the upper limit of the S content is set to 0.1%, and when high magnetic properties or elongation is required, preferably 0.06%, More preferably, it is 0.02%.
On the other hand, when S is contained in an appropriate amount, MnS is formed in steel together with Mn while sacrificing elongation and magnetic properties, and when stress is applied during punching, it becomes a stress concentration point. The machinability can be improved and the occurrence of burrs during punching can be suppressed. In order to obtain such an effect, the S content is 0.015% or more, preferably 0.04% or more.

Al:0〜0.01%
Alは脱酸剤として作用するため、磁気特性に有害なO、すなわち酸素と結合して無害化するために有効な元素である。しかしながら、Alを過剰に含有させるとNと結合してAlNを生成し、結晶粒を微細化して伸びを低下させたり、磁気焼鈍後にも結晶粒が微細なままとなって磁気特性も劣化させるため、Al含有量の上限を0.01%、好ましくは0.006%、さらに好ましくは0.005%とする。
Al: 0 to 0.01%
Since Al acts as a deoxidizing agent, it is an element effective for detoxifying by combining with O, which is harmful to magnetic properties, that is, oxygen. However, if Al is contained excessively, it combines with N to produce AlN, and the crystal grains are refined to reduce the elongation, or the magnetic grains remain fine even after magnetic annealing and the magnetic properties are deteriorated. The upper limit of the Al content is 0.01%, preferably 0.006%, and more preferably 0.005%.

Cr:0〜0.1%
Crは、鋼中に硫化物などの析出物を形成すると磁気特性の劣化を招くため、極力低減すべきであり、Cr含有量を0.1%以下、好ましくは0.07%以下、さらに好ましくは0.05%以下とする。
Cr: 0 to 0.1%
Cr forms a precipitate such as sulfide in the steel, which causes deterioration of magnetic properties. Therefore, Cr should be reduced as much as possible, and the Cr content is 0.1% or less, preferably 0.07% or less, and more preferably. Is 0.05% or less.

N:0〜0.005%
Nは鋼中に固溶すると磁気特性を劣化させ、またその一部がAlNを形成してもやはり結晶粒が微細化することによって磁気特性が劣化するため、N含有量を0.005%以下、好ましくは0.004%以下、さらに好ましくは0.003%以下とする。
N: 0 to 0.005%
When N dissolves in steel, the magnetic properties deteriorate, and even if some of them form AlN, the magnetic properties deteriorate due to the refinement of crystal grains, so the N content is 0.005% or less. , Preferably 0.004% or less, more preferably 0.003% or less.

さらに、本発明の軟磁性鋼板では、鋼板の被削性を改善するため、MnとSの比、およびMnSの形態を以下のように制御することも好ましい。   Furthermore, in the soft magnetic steel sheet of the present invention, in order to improve the machinability of the steel sheet, it is also preferable to control the ratio of Mn and S and the form of MnS as follows.

<Mn/S質量比:3〜20>
鋼中に含まれるMnとSが結合しMnS析出物として微細分散することで被削性が向上し、打抜き時のバリ発生が抑制される。こうした効果を得るため、Mn/Sの質量比で3以上を確保することが必要となる。Mn/S質量比のより好ましい範囲は5以上であり、上限は20である。
<Mn / S mass ratio: 3 to 20>
By combining Mn and S contained in the steel and finely dispersing as MnS precipitates, the machinability is improved and the generation of burrs during punching is suppressed. In order to obtain such an effect, it is necessary to ensure 3 or more in the mass ratio of Mn / S. A more preferable range of the Mn / S mass ratio is 5 or more, and the upper limit is 20.

MnSの形態
<MnS析出物の平均粒径:0.05〜4μm>
打抜き時のバリ高さを低減するためには、MnSを分散させることが有効であるが、粗大すぎると磁気特性を低下させてしまうため、上限は4μmとする。また、微細すぎるとバリ高さ低減効果が発揮されなくなるため、下限を0.05μmとする。
ここで、MnS粒径とは、圧延板の圧延方向に平行で板面に垂直な断面において観察されるMnSの短径と長径の平均値を意味する。
MnS morphology <MnS precipitate average particle size: 0.05 to 4 μm>
In order to reduce the burr height at the time of punching, it is effective to disperse MnS. However, if it is too coarse, the magnetic properties are deteriorated, so the upper limit is set to 4 μm. On the other hand, if it is too fine, the burr height reduction effect will not be exhibited, so the lower limit is made 0.05 μm.
Here, the MnS grain size means an average value of the minor axis and the major axis of MnS observed in a cross section parallel to the rolling direction of the rolled sheet and perpendicular to the sheet surface.

<粒径0.2μm以上のMnS析出物:0.02〜0.5個/μm
MnS析出物を微細分散させる場合の個数密度も重要であり、0.02個/μm未満では効果がなく、0.5個/μm超では成形時の割れ発生が顕著になるため、その個数密度は0.02〜0.5個/μmとする。
<MnS precipitate having a particle size of 0.2 μm or more: 0.02 to 0.5 / μm 2 >
The number density in the case of finely dispersing MnS precipitates is also important. If it is less than 0.02 / μm 2 , there is no effect, and if it exceeds 0.5 / μm 2 , cracking during molding becomes prominent. The number density is 0.02 to 0.5 / μm 2 .

本発明の軟磁性鋼板は、上記記載した以外の成分は、Feおよび不可避的不純物であることが望ましい。ただし、本発明の効果を害しない範囲内であれば、上記以外の成分の含有を拒むものではない。   In the soft magnetic steel sheet of the present invention, the components other than those described above are desirably Fe and inevitable impurities. However, as long as the effects of the present invention are not impaired, the inclusion of components other than those described above is not rejected.

<板厚>
本発明の軟磁性鋼板の板厚は、適用する部品形状やサイズに応じて選定すればよいが、本発明の対象となる自動車、電車、船舶などの電装部品のうち、直流で使用されるソレノイドやリレーなどのケースやカバーあるいは鉄心等に適用する場合では、磁気回路を形成するため、板厚が薄くなると部材を通る磁束が不足して吸引力や応答性などの部品特性が低下してしまう。また部品に必要な強度が確保できなくなるため、その下限は0.8mmとする。また、厚すぎると部品サイズの小型化ニーズに対応できなくなるため、その上限は4mmとする。
一方、交流で使用されるモータ、トランスなどの電磁気部品の磁心などに適用する場合では、渦電流損の低減や、渦電流損とヒステリシス損の和である鉄損の低減を考慮すると、薄いことが望ましく、その上限は1mm程度が好ましい。一方で薄すぎると、部品の製造が困難となるため、製造性を考慮した下限は0.3mm程度である。
<Thickness>
The thickness of the soft magnetic steel sheet of the present invention may be selected according to the shape and size of the parts to be applied. Among the electrical parts such as automobiles, trains, ships, etc. that are the subject of the present invention, the solenoid used in direct current When applied to cases and covers such as relays and relays, or iron cores, a magnetic circuit is formed. Therefore, when the plate thickness is reduced, the magnetic flux passing through the member is insufficient, and the component characteristics such as attractive force and responsiveness deteriorate. . Moreover, since the strength required for the components cannot be secured, the lower limit is set to 0.8 mm. Further, if it is too thick, it becomes impossible to meet the needs for downsizing of the component size, so the upper limit is set to 4 mm.
On the other hand, when applied to magnetic cores of electromagnetic parts such as motors and transformers used in alternating current, it is thin when considering reduction of eddy current loss and reduction of iron loss, which is the sum of eddy current loss and hysteresis loss. The upper limit is preferably about 1 mm. On the other hand, if the thickness is too thin, it becomes difficult to manufacture parts, so the lower limit in consideration of manufacturability is about 0.3 mm.

<積層鋼板>
本発明の軟磁性鋼板は、2枚以上重ね合わせてなる積層鋼板としても好適に用いることができる。特に、交流で使用される電磁気部品などに適用する場合では、板厚の薄い軟磁性鋼板を複数枚積層することにより、部品の製造性や強度を確保しつつ、渦電流損をさらに低減できるため、好ましい態様である。また、積層鋼板のさらなる磁気特性の向上や、それぞれの軟磁性鋼板間の絶縁性の確保のため、各軟磁性鋼板の間に、絶縁性の被膜を設けることも好ましい。絶縁性の被膜としては、例えば燐酸系化成被膜やシリコーン樹脂被膜などの無機被膜、無機化合物と有機樹脂とを含む半有機被膜、主に樹脂を含有する有機被膜などが適用できるが、特に制限するものではない。なお、積層鋼板の板厚は、交流で使用されるモータ、トランスなどの電磁気部品に適用する場合は、上記と同様、上限は1.0mm程度、下限は0.3mm程度とすることが好ましい。また、積層鋼板を構成する2枚以上の軟磁性鋼板としては、必ずしも、同じ成分組成で同じ組織を有する同じ板厚のものを用いることに限定されるものではなく、異なる成分組成や組織を有するものや異なる板厚のものを適宜組み合わせて用いても構わない。
<Laminated steel sheet>
The soft magnetic steel sheet of the present invention can also be suitably used as a laminated steel sheet formed by stacking two or more sheets. In particular, when applied to electromagnetic parts used in alternating current, etc., by laminating multiple soft magnetic steel sheets with thin plate thickness, eddy current loss can be further reduced while securing the manufacturability and strength of the parts. This is a preferred embodiment. In order to further improve the magnetic properties of the laminated steel sheets and to ensure the insulation between the soft magnetic steel sheets, it is also preferable to provide an insulating coating between the soft magnetic steel sheets. As the insulating film, for example, an inorganic film such as a phosphoric acid-based chemical conversion film or a silicone resin film, a semi-organic film containing an inorganic compound and an organic resin, an organic film mainly containing a resin, and the like can be applied. It is not a thing. In addition, as for the plate | board thickness of a laminated steel plate, when applying to electromagnetic components, such as a motor and a transformer used by alternating current, it is preferable that an upper limit is about 1.0 mm and a minimum is about 0.3 mm like the above. Further, the two or more soft magnetic steel plates constituting the laminated steel plate are not necessarily limited to using the same plate thickness having the same composition and the same structure, but having different component compositions and structures. Those having different plate thicknesses may be used in appropriate combination.

次に、本発明に係る軟磁性鋼板の製造方法について述べる。特に製造方法を限定するものではないが、たとえば下記のように製造することができる。   Next, a method for producing a soft magnetic steel sheet according to the present invention will be described. Although a manufacturing method in particular is not limited, For example, it can manufacture as follows.

〔軟磁性鋼板の好ましい製造方法〕
上記のような軟磁性鋼板を製造するには、まず、上記成分組成を有する鋼を溶製し、造塊または連続鋳造によりスラブとしてから熱間圧延を行い、熱延材とする。この工程を熱延工程と呼ぶ。熱間圧延時の温度条件などは特に限定する必要はないが、例えば、950℃以下の圧延終了温度で、熱間圧延を行えばよい。
次いで、この熱延材を圧下率R1:30〜70%で冷間圧延して冷延板とする。この工程を粗冷延工程と呼ぶ。その後、この冷延板を、式1:270≦[{100−R1+0.2×(273+T1)}+H1×exp{−10/(273+T1)}]1/2≦340、ただし、750℃≦T1≦860℃を満足するように、軟化焼鈍温度T1℃で軟化焼鈍時間H1秒間保持して軟化焼鈍板とする。この工程を軟化焼鈍工程と呼ぶ。そして、この軟化焼鈍板を、さらに、圧下率R2:0.1〜3%で冷間圧延することも好ましい。この工程を仕上げ冷延工程と呼ぶ。これらの工程を経ることにより軟磁性鋼板を得ることができる。
[Preferred production method of soft magnetic steel sheet]
In order to produce the soft magnetic steel sheet as described above, first, a steel having the above component composition is melted and formed into a hot-rolled material by hot rolling after forming a slab by ingot forming or continuous casting. This process is called a hot rolling process. Although the temperature conditions at the time of hot rolling need not be particularly limited, for example, hot rolling may be performed at a rolling end temperature of 950 ° C. or lower.
Next, this hot-rolled material is cold-rolled at a reduction ratio R1: 30 to 70% to obtain a cold-rolled sheet. This process is called a rough cold rolling process. Then, this cold-rolled sheet is expressed by the formula 1: 270 ≦ [{100−R1 + 0.2 × (273 + T1)} 2 + H1 × exp {−10 / (273 + T1)}] 1/2 ≦ 340, where 750 ° C. ≦ T1 In order to satisfy ≦ 860 ° C., the soft annealing temperature is T1 ° C. and the soft annealing time is maintained for H 1 second to obtain a soft annealing plate. This process is called a soft annealing process. And it is also preferable to cold-roll this softening annealing board by rolling reduction R2: 0.1 to 3%. This process is called a finish cold rolling process. A soft magnetic steel sheet can be obtained through these steps.

<圧下率R1:30〜70%>
粗冷延工程における圧下率R1は、その後の軟化焼鈍工程における平均結晶粒径の制御のために重要である。圧下率R1が30%未満では鋼板上がりの結晶粒が大きくなりすぎる一方、圧下率R1が70%を超えると結晶粒が小さすぎて、軟化焼鈍条件との組合せで所定の結晶粒径に制御することが難しくなる。このため、圧下率R1の下限は30%、より好ましくは40%、特に好ましくは50%とする。一方、圧下率R1の上限は70%、より好ましくは60%とする。
<Rolling ratio R1: 30 to 70%>
The rolling reduction R1 in the rough cold rolling process is important for controlling the average crystal grain size in the subsequent softening annealing process. When the rolling reduction R1 is less than 30%, the crystal grains on the steel sheet are too large. On the other hand, when the rolling reduction R1 exceeds 70%, the crystal grains are too small, and the crystal grain size is controlled to a predetermined crystal grain size in combination with softening annealing conditions. It becomes difficult. For this reason, the lower limit of the rolling reduction R1 is 30%, more preferably 40%, and particularly preferably 50%. On the other hand, the upper limit of the rolling reduction R1 is 70%, more preferably 60%.

<式1:270≦[{100−R1+0.2×(273+T1)}+H1×exp{−10/(273+T1)}]1/2 ≦340 ただし、750℃≦T1≦860℃ を満足するように、軟化焼鈍温度T1℃で軟化焼鈍時間H1秒間保持>
上記粗冷延工程における圧下率R1の調整と併せて軟化焼鈍条件が上記式1を満たすように組み合わせることによって平均結晶粒径を50μm超150μm以下に制御できる。 上記式1の中辺の値が270未満では平均結晶粒径が小さくなりすぎる。
なお、上記式1は以下のようにして導出したものである。すなわち、フェライト単相温度域での焼鈍時における再結晶および粒成長挙動は、冷間圧延のひずみ量と焼鈍温度と焼鈍時間の兼ね合いで決まるという一般論がある。そこで、ひずみ量が大きいほど、また焼鈍温度が低いほど再結晶粒径が小さくなり、その後の粒成長による結晶粒径を半径で表したrは、初期粒径を半径で表したrと、焼鈍温度Tと、焼鈍時間tとの関数として、r−r =k×tの関係式が成り立つと仮定した。ここで速度定数kはアレニウスの式である∝exp(−A/RT)に従うと仮定した。なお、Tの単位はKである。上記関係式は、たとえば、西沢泰二:「単相鋼と二相鋼における結晶粒成長」,鉄と鋼(1984)第15号,p.194−2020に詳しい。この一般論において、特別な粒成長抑制要因である析出物を極力減らした本発明の成分系の鋼板に対してはひずみの影響が通常より小さいとの仮説を当てはめ、粗冷延工程における圧下率R1と、軟化焼鈍条件であるT1およびH1との組合せを種々変更して実験を行い、プレス成形性と後の焼鈍後の磁気特性との関係を調査して回帰分析により上記式1を導出した。
<Formula 1: 270 ≦ [{100−R1 + 0.2 × (273 + T1)} 2 + H1 × exp {−10 / (273 + T1)}] 1/2 ≦ 340 However, 750 ° C. ≦ T1 ≦ 860 ° C. is satisfied. , Soft annealing time T1 ° C., Soft annealing time H1 sec hold>
The average crystal grain size can be controlled to be more than 50 μm and 150 μm or less by combining the softening annealing conditions so as to satisfy the above formula 1 together with the adjustment of the rolling reduction R1 in the rough cold rolling step. If the value of the middle side of the above formula 1 is less than 270, the average crystal grain size becomes too small.
The above equation 1 is derived as follows. That is, there is a general theory that the recrystallization and grain growth behavior during annealing in the ferrite single phase temperature range is determined by the balance between the strain amount of cold rolling, the annealing temperature, and the annealing time. Therefore, the larger the amount of strain and the lower the annealing temperature, the smaller the recrystallized grain size. The r representing the crystal grain size by the subsequent grain growth by the radius is r 0 representing the initial grain size by the radius, As a function of the annealing temperature T and the annealing time t, it was assumed that the relational expression r 2 −r 0 2 = k × t was established. Here, it is assumed that the rate constant k follows ア レ exp (−A / RT) which is an Arrhenius equation. The unit of T is K. For example, Nishizawa Yoji: “Grain growth in single-phase and dual-phase steels”, Iron and Steel (1984) No. 15, p. Detailed on 194-2020. In this general theory, the hypothesis that the effect of strain is smaller than usual for steel sheets of the component system of the present invention in which precipitates, which are a special grain growth inhibiting factor, are reduced as much as possible, is applied, and the rolling reduction rate in the rough cold rolling process is applied. Experiments were carried out with various combinations of R1 and soft annealing conditions T1 and H1, and the relationship between the press formability and the magnetic properties after the subsequent annealing was investigated and the above formula 1 was derived by regression analysis. .

<圧下率R2:0.1〜3%>
また、軟化焼鈍後に圧下率R2=0.1〜3%で仕上げ冷間圧延することも好ましい。仕上げ冷間圧延をすることで、曲げ加工後の肌荒れや、打抜き加工後のバリを防止することができる。これらの効果を発揮させるためには、圧下率R2を0.1%以上とする。ただし、圧下率R2が3%を超えるとひずみ量が過剰となり、磁気特性が低下する。
<Rolling ratio R2: 0.1 to 3%>
It is also preferable to perform finish cold rolling at a rolling reduction R2 of 0.1 to 3% after softening annealing. By performing finish cold rolling, rough skin after bending and burr after punching can be prevented. In order to exert these effects, the rolling reduction R2 is set to 0.1% or more. However, when the rolling reduction R2 exceeds 3%, the amount of strain becomes excessive, and the magnetic characteristics are deteriorated.

上記のようにして製造された本発明に係る軟磁性鋼板は良好な成形性を示すとともに、成形後の部材には良好な磁気特性が確保される。   The soft magnetic steel sheet according to the present invention produced as described above exhibits good formability, and good magnetic properties are ensured in the formed member.

このように、本発明に係る軟磁性鋼板をプレス成形するだけでも、成形後の部材には十分に良好な磁気特性が確保される。この工程をプレス成形工程と呼ぶ。   As described above, sufficiently good magnetic properties are ensured for the formed member simply by press-forming the soft magnetic steel sheet according to the present invention. This process is called a press molding process.

しかしながら、成形部材にさらに高い磁気特性の付与が求められる場合や、成形によって成形部材に非常に大きな塑性変形が付与され、その結果ひずみ量が増加して磁気特性が劣化するような場合などに対しては、成形後に、さらに磁気焼鈍を追加してもよい。この磁気焼鈍の推奨条件は、磁気焼鈍温度:750〜900℃、磁気焼鈍時間:3600s以上である。この工程を磁気焼鈍工程と呼ぶ。   However, for cases where even higher magnetic properties are required for the molded member, or when extremely large plastic deformation is imparted to the molded member by molding, resulting in an increase in strain and deterioration of the magnetic properties. For example, magnetic annealing may be further added after molding. The recommended conditions for this magnetic annealing are a magnetic annealing temperature: 750 to 900 ° C. and a magnetic annealing time: 3600 s or more. This process is called a magnetic annealing process.

以下、実施例を挙げて本発明をより具体的に説明するが、本発明はもとより下記実施例によって制限を受けるものではなく、前・後記の趣旨に適合し得る範囲で適当に変更を加えて実施することももちろん可能であり、それらはいずれも本発明の技術的範囲に包含される。   EXAMPLES Hereinafter, the present invention will be described more specifically with reference to examples. However, the present invention is not limited by the following examples, but may be appropriately modified within a range that can meet the purpose described above and below. Of course, it is possible to implement them, and they are all included in the technical scope of the present invention.

〔実施例1〕
下記表1に示す成分の鋼材を熱間圧延して所定厚さの熱延板とした。この熱延板を酸洗した後、下記表2に示す条件で、粗冷延、軟化焼鈍、仕上げ冷延の順に処理を施して最終板厚1.0mmの軟磁性鋼板とした。なお、表2には、上記磁気焼鈍の条件を規定する上記式1の中辺の値を併記した。
[Example 1]
The steel materials having the components shown in Table 1 below were hot-rolled to obtain hot-rolled sheets having a predetermined thickness. After this hot-rolled sheet was pickled, it was processed in the order of rough cold rolling, soft annealing, and finish cold rolling under the conditions shown in Table 2 below to obtain a soft magnetic steel sheet having a final thickness of 1.0 mm. In Table 2, the value of the middle side of the formula 1 that defines the conditions for the magnetic annealing is also shown.

この各軟磁性鋼板について、成形性を評価するために、JIS 13B試験片に加工して引張試験を実施し、伸びを測定して、それを成形性の評価指標とした。   In order to evaluate the formability of each soft magnetic steel sheet, it was processed into a JIS 13B test piece, a tensile test was performed, the elongation was measured, and this was used as an evaluation index for formability.

また、成形後の肌荒れを評価するために、曲げ試験として、内径R:2mm、曲げ角度:180°に曲げ加工してR外側の表面粗さをカットオフ0.8μm、測定長5mmで測定し、それを肌荒れの評価指標とした。   In addition, in order to evaluate the rough surface after molding, as a bending test, the inner surface R was bent at 2 mm and the bending angle was 180 °, and the surface roughness of the outer R was measured with a cutoff of 0.8 μm and a measurement length of 5 mm. This was used as an evaluation index for rough skin.

また、成形後の鋼板ままの磁気特性、および、成形後さらに磁気焼鈍を施した後の磁気特性をそれぞれ評価するために、上記各軟磁性鋼板を60mm×60mmに切断して、鋼板まま、および、850℃×3時間水素中で磁気焼鈍した後のそれぞれについて、単板測定枠を用い、JIS C2556に準じて直流磁気特性を評価した。なお、磁束密度および保磁力は印加磁場300A/mにて測定した。   In addition, in order to evaluate the magnetic properties of the steel plate after forming and the magnetic properties after further magnetic annealing after forming, the soft magnetic steel plates are cut into 60 mm × 60 mm, and the steel plates remain as they are, and Each of the samples after magnetic annealing in hydrogen at 850 ° C. for 3 hours was evaluated for DC magnetic characteristics according to JIS C2556 using a single-plate measurement frame. The magnetic flux density and coercive force were measured with an applied magnetic field of 300 A / m.

また、鋼板ままの平均結晶粒径およびKAM値、ならびに、850℃×3時間磁気焼鈍した鋼板のKAM値を、それぞれ測定した。   Further, the average crystal grain size and KAM value of the steel plate as well as the KAM value of the steel plate magnetically annealed at 850 ° C. for 3 hours were measured.

鋼板ままの平均結晶粒径については、各鋼板の縦断面をナイタール腐食した後、板厚をtとしたときのt/4位置を顕微鏡観察し、写真撮影した。そして、JIS G0551の標準図との比較法により粒度番号を求め、平均結晶粒径に換算した。   The average crystal grain size of the steel plates was photographed by observing a microscope at the t / 4 position when the plate thickness was t after corroding the longitudinal section of each steel plate. And the particle size number was calculated | required with the comparison method with the standard figure of JISG0551, and it converted into the average crystal grain size.

鋼板ままおよび磁気焼鈍後の鋼板のKAM値については、各鋼板を鏡面研磨し、走査型電子顕微鏡としてJEOL社製 JSM−5410を用いて、板厚をtとしたときのt/4位置において、1step 0.2μmで500μm×500μmの領域の電子線後方散乱回折像を測定し、それを解析ソフトとしてTSL社製 OIM analysis 6を用いて、各測定点におけるKAM値を求め、それらを算術平均してKAM値とした。   As for the KAM value of the steel plate as it is and after the magnetic annealing, each steel plate is mirror-polished, using a JEOL JSM-5410 as a scanning electron microscope, and at the t / 4 position when the plate thickness is t, Measure the electron backscatter diffraction image in the region of 500 μm × 500 μm at 1 step 0.2 μm, and use it as analysis software to obtain KAM values at each measurement point using OIM analysis 6 made by TSL, and arithmetically average them. KAM value.

下記表3に測定結果を示す。同表において、鋼板ままについて、磁気特性は、保磁力100A/m以下、磁界の強さ300A/m における磁束密度0.70T以上、伸び30%以上の3項目について、すべての基準を満たすものを、磁気特性と成形性に優れる軟磁性鋼板として、総合判定をAで表示した。同表中、鋼No.1〜4、9〜12および16は全ての基準を満たすことを確認した。   Table 3 below shows the measurement results. In the same table, the magnetic properties of the steel plates satisfying all the standards for the three items of coercive force of 100 A / m or less, magnetic flux density of 0.70 T or more at a magnetic field strength of 300 A / m 2, and elongation of 30% or more. As a soft magnetic steel sheet having excellent magnetic properties and formability, the overall judgment is indicated by A. In the table, Steel No. It was confirmed that 1-4, 9-12 and 16 satisfy all the criteria.

また、同表において、総合判定がAのもののうち、曲げ加工後のRa2.5μm以下の基準をも満たすものを、耐肌荒れ性にも優れる軟磁性鋼板として、その評価をAAで表示した。同表中において、鋼No.1〜4および9〜12は、良好な耐肌荒れ性を示していることを確認した。   Moreover, in the same table, out of the cases where the comprehensive judgment is A, those satisfying the criteria of Ra 2.5 μm or less after bending were regarded as soft magnetic steel plates having excellent skin roughness resistance, and the evaluation was indicated by AA. In the table, steel No. It confirmed that 1-4 and 9-12 showed the favorable rough skin resistance.

また、同表において、総合判定Aのもののうち、磁気焼鈍後の鋼板の磁気特性が、保磁力37A/m以下、磁界の強さ300A/m における磁束密度1.25T以上をともに満たすものを、磁気特性により優れる軟磁性鋼板として、その評価をAAAで表示した。同表中において、鋼No.1〜4、9〜12および16は、磁気焼鈍後においても、良好な磁気特性を示していることを確認した。   Moreover, in the same table, among those of comprehensive judgment A, the magnetic properties of the steel plate after magnetic annealing satisfy both the coercive force of 37 A / m or less and the magnetic flux density of 1.25 T or more at a magnetic field strength of 300 A / m 2, The evaluation was indicated by AAA as a soft magnetic steel plate having superior magnetic properties. In the table, steel No. It was confirmed that 1-4, 9-12 and 16 showed good magnetic properties even after magnetic annealing.

一方で、鋼種Eを用いた鋼No.5はC含有量が上限を外れて高く、鋼板ままでの結晶粒径が小さくなり、磁気特性が基準を満たさなかった。   On the other hand, the steel No. using the steel type E. In No. 5, the C content was high beyond the upper limit, the crystal grain size as it was in the steel plate was small, and the magnetic properties did not meet the standards.

鋼種Fを用いた鋼No.6はAl含有量が上限を外れて高く、鋼板ままでの結晶粒径が小さくなり、磁気特性が基準を満たさなかった。   Steel No. using steel type F In No. 6, the Al content was high beyond the upper limit, the crystal grain size as it was in the steel sheet was small, and the magnetic properties did not meet the standards.

鋼種Gを用いた鋼No.7はMn含有量が上限を外れて高く、磁気特性が基準を満たさなかった。   Steel No. using steel grade G In No. 7, the Mn content was high beyond the upper limit, and the magnetic properties did not meet the standards.

鋼種Hを用いた鋼No.8はN含有量が上限を外れて高く、鋼板ままでの結晶粒径が小さくなり、磁気特性が基準を満たさなかった。   Steel No. using steel type H In No. 8, the N content was high beyond the upper limit, the crystal grain size as it was in the steel plate was small, and the magnetic properties did not meet the standards.

鋼No.13は、粗冷延での圧下率R1が推奨範囲より低く、また式1の中辺の値が推奨範囲を外れて大きいため、鋼板ままでの結晶粒径が大きく、鋼板ままでの耐肌荒れ性が基準を満たさなかった。   Steel No. No. 13, the rolling reduction R1 in the rough cold rolling is lower than the recommended range, and the value of the middle side of the formula 1 is larger than the recommended range. Sex did not meet the standards.

鋼No.14は、仕上げ冷延での圧下率R2が推奨範囲より高いため、また鋼板ままでのKAM値の比Ka/Kb値も上限を超えているため、磁気特性が基準を満たさなかった。   Steel No. In No. 14, the rolling reduction R2 in the finish cold rolling was higher than the recommended range, and the ratio Ka / Kb value of the KAM value as it was in the steel sheet exceeded the upper limit, so the magnetic characteristics did not satisfy the standard.

鋼No.15は、軟化焼鈍温度が推奨範囲より低いため、鋼板ままでの結晶粒径が小さく、磁気特性が基準を満たさなかった。   Steel No. No. 15, since the softening annealing temperature was lower than the recommended range, the crystal grain size as it was in the steel sheet was small, and the magnetic properties did not meet the standards.

鋼No.16は、磁気特性および伸びは基準を満たした。一方で、仕上げ圧延をしていないため、鋼板ままでの耐肌荒れ性が基準を満たさなかった。   Steel No. No. 16 met the criteria for magnetic properties and elongation. On the other hand, since the finish rolling was not performed, the rough skin resistance as the steel plate did not satisfy the standard.

同表中において、鋼No.1〜4、9〜12および16は、磁気焼鈍後においても、良好な磁気特性を示していることを確認した。   In the table, steel No. It was confirmed that 1-4, 9-12 and 16 showed good magnetic properties even after magnetic annealing.

また、推奨の製造条件で製造することで、本発明に係る軟磁性鋼板が確実に得られることが確認された。   Moreover, it was confirmed that the soft magnetic steel sheet according to the present invention can be obtained reliably by manufacturing under the recommended manufacturing conditions.

また、推奨の磁気焼鈍条件での磁気焼鈍をさらに追加することで、磁気特性により優れる軟磁性部材が確実に得られることが確認された。   Moreover, it was confirmed that a soft magnetic member having superior magnetic properties can be obtained reliably by further adding magnetic annealing under the recommended magnetic annealing conditions.

〔実施例2〕
下記表4に示す成分の鋼材を熱間圧延して所定厚さの熱延板とした。この熱延板を酸洗した後、下記表5に示す条件で、粗冷延、軟化焼鈍、仕上げ冷延の順に処理を施して最終板厚1.0mmの軟磁性鋼板とした。
[Example 2]
The steel materials having the components shown in Table 4 below were hot-rolled to obtain hot-rolled sheets having a predetermined thickness. After this hot-rolled sheet was pickled, it was processed in the order of rough cold rolling, soft annealing, and finish cold rolling under the conditions shown in Table 5 below to obtain a soft magnetic steel sheet having a final thickness of 1.0 mm.

この各軟磁性鋼板について、成形性を評価するために、JIS 13B試験片に加工して引張試験を実施し、伸びを測定して、それを成形性の評価指標とした。   In order to evaluate the formability of each soft magnetic steel sheet, it was processed into a JIS 13B test piece, a tensile test was performed, the elongation was measured, and this was used as an evaluation index for formability.

また、打抜き加工時の打抜き性の評価として、直径10mmのパンチと、直径10.20mmでクリアランス0.10mmのダイスを用いて打抜き、穴の周囲に生成したバリの最大高さを測定した。   Further, as an evaluation of punchability at the time of punching, punching was performed using a punch having a diameter of 10 mm and a die having a diameter of 10.20 mm and a clearance of 0.10 mm, and the maximum height of the burr generated around the hole was measured.

また、磁気焼鈍後の軟磁性部材の磁気特性を評価するために、上記各軟磁性鋼板を60mm×60mmに切断して、T2:850℃×H2:3時間の条件で、水素中で磁気焼鈍した後、単板測定枠を用い、JIS C2556に準じて直流磁気特性を評価した。なお、磁束密度および保磁力は印加磁場300A/mにて測定した。   Further, in order to evaluate the magnetic properties of the soft magnetic member after the magnetic annealing, each of the soft magnetic steel sheets is cut into 60 mm × 60 mm, and magnetic annealing is performed in hydrogen under conditions of T2: 850 ° C. × H2: 3 hours. After that, DC magnetic characteristics were evaluated according to JIS C2556 using a single plate measurement frame. The magnetic flux density and coercive force were measured with an applied magnetic field of 300 A / m.

鋼板ままの平均結晶粒径については、各鋼板の縦断面をナイタール腐食した後、板厚をtとしたときのt/4位置を顕微鏡観察し、写真撮影した。そして、JIS G0551の標準図との比較法により粒度番号を求め、平均結晶粒径に換算した。一方、上記磁気焼鈍後の鋼板の平均結晶粒径については、当該軟磁性鋼板の全域での平均結晶粒径を評価するため、各鋼板の縦断面をナイタール腐食した後、最表面から200μm深さの表面部、板厚をtとしたときのt/4、およびt/2の各位置を顕微鏡観察し、写真撮影した。そして、JISG0551の標準図との比較法により粒度番号を求め、平均結晶粒径に換算し、3つの位置のうち最小の値を上記磁気焼鈍後の鋼板の平均結晶粒径とした。   The average crystal grain size of the steel plates was photographed by observing a microscope at the t / 4 position when the plate thickness was t after corroding the longitudinal section of each steel plate. And the particle size number was calculated | required with the comparison method with the standard figure of JISG0551, and it converted into the average crystal grain size. On the other hand, with respect to the average crystal grain size of the steel plate after the magnetic annealing, in order to evaluate the average crystal grain size in the entire area of the soft magnetic steel plate, the depth of 200 μm from the outermost surface is obtained after the longitudinal section of each steel plate is subjected to nital corrosion. The surface portion of each and the positions of t / 4 and t / 2 when the plate thickness is t were observed with a microscope and photographed. And the particle size number was calculated | required by the comparison method with the standard figure of JISG0551, it converted into an average crystal grain size, and let the minimum value among three positions be the average crystal grain size of the steel plate after the said magnetic annealing.

KAM値については、各鋼板を鏡面研磨し、走査型電子顕微鏡としてJEOL社製 JSM−5410を用いて、板厚をtとしたときのt/4位置において、1step 0.2μmで500μm×500μmの領域の電子線後方散乱回折像を測定し、それを解析ソフトとしてTSL社製 OIM analysis 6を用いて、各測定点におけるKAM値を求め、それらを算術平均してKAM値とした。   For the KAM value, each steel plate was mirror-polished, and JSM-5410 manufactured by JEOL was used as a scanning electron microscope. The electron backscatter diffraction image of the region was measured, and the KAM value at each measurement point was obtained using OIM analysis 6 manufactured by TSL as analysis software, and the KAM value was obtained by arithmetically averaging them.

MnS析出物の粒径は、鋼板の圧延方向に平行で板面に垂直な断面において倍率1000倍でSEM観察し、10視野について、MnSの長径と短径を測定してそれらの算術平均値を粒径と定義した。また、粒径0.2μm以上のMnS析出物の個数を測定し、個数密度を算出した   The particle size of the MnS precipitate was observed by SEM at a magnification of 1000 times in a cross section parallel to the rolling direction of the steel sheet and perpendicular to the plate surface, and the major and minor diameters of MnS were measured for 10 fields of view and their arithmetic average values were calculated. The particle size was defined. Further, the number density of MnS precipitates having a particle size of 0.2 μm or more was measured, and the number density was calculated.

下記表6に測定結果を示す。同表において、磁気特性は、保磁力100A/m以下、磁界の強さ300A/m における磁束密度0.70T以上、伸び30%以上の3項目について、すべての基準を満たすものを、磁気特性と成形性に優れる軟磁性鋼板として、総合判定をAで表示した。同表中、鋼No.101〜104、110〜113および117は、全ての基準を満たすことを確認した。   The measurement results are shown in Table 6 below. In the table, the magnetic characteristics satisfying all the criteria for the three items of the coercive force of 100 A / m or less, the magnetic flux density of 0.70 T or more and the elongation of 30% or more at a magnetic field strength of 300 A / m 2 As a soft magnetic steel sheet having excellent formability, the overall judgment is indicated by A. In the table, Steel No. 101-104, 110-113 and 117 were confirmed to meet all criteria.

また、同表において、総合判定がAのもののうち、打抜き試験後のバリ高さ1mm以下をも満たすものを、打ち抜き性にも優れる軟磁性鋼板として、その評価をAAで表示した。同表中において、鋼No.101〜104および110〜113は、良好なうち抜き性を示していることを確認した。   Moreover, in the same table, among the cases where the comprehensive judgment is A, the evaluation satisfying the burr height of 1 mm or less after the punching test is indicated as AA as a soft magnetic steel plate having excellent punchability. In the table, steel No. It was confirmed that 101 to 104 and 110 to 113 showed good pull-out properties.

また、同表において、総合判定がAのもののうち、磁気焼鈍後の鋼板の磁気特性が、保磁力37A/m以下、磁界の強さ300A/m における磁束密度1.25T以上をともに満たすものを、磁気特性により優れる軟磁性鋼板として、その評価をAAAで表示した。同表中において、鋼No.101〜104、110〜113および117は、磁気焼鈍後においても、良好な磁気特性を示していることを確認した。   Also, in the table, among the cases where the overall judgment is A, the magnetic properties of the steel sheet after magnetic annealing satisfy both the coercive force of 37 A / m or less and the magnetic flux density of 1.25 T or more at a magnetic field strength of 300 A / m 2. As a soft magnetic steel plate that is more excellent in magnetic properties, its evaluation is indicated by AAA. In the table, steel No. It was confirmed that 101-104, 110-113, and 117 showed good magnetic properties even after magnetic annealing.

一方で、鋼種AEを用いた鋼No.105はC含有量が上限を外れて高く、鋼板ままでの結晶粒径が小さくなり、磁気特性が基準を満たさなかった。   On the other hand, steel No. using steel type AE. In No. 105, the C content was high beyond the upper limit, the crystal grain size as it was in the steel plate was small, and the magnetic properties did not meet the standards.

鋼種AFを用いた鋼No.106はAl含有量が上限を外れて高く、鋼板ままでの結晶粒径が小さくなり、磁気特性が基準を満たさなかった。   Steel No. using steel grade AF No. 106 had a high Al content outside the upper limit, the crystal grain size as it was in the steel sheet was small, and the magnetic properties did not meet the standards.

鋼種AGを用いた鋼No.107はMn含有量が上限を外れて高いとともに、Mn/S質量比が推奨範囲より大きいため、MnS析出物の平均粒径が小さく、伸びと磁気特性が基準を満たさなかった。
Steel No. using steel grade AG In 107, the Mn content was higher than the upper limit and the Mn / S mass ratio was larger than the recommended range, so the average particle size of the MnS precipitate was small, and the elongation and magnetic properties did not meet the standards.

鋼種AHを用いた鋼No.108はS含有量が上限を外れて高いとともに、Mn/S質量比が推奨範囲より小さいため、MnS析出物の平均粒径および個数密度がともに大きく、磁気特性が基準を満たさなかった。   Steel No. using steel type AH. In No. 108, the S content was higher than the upper limit and the Mn / S mass ratio was smaller than the recommended range, so the average particle size and number density of the MnS precipitates were both large, and the magnetic properties did not meet the standards.

鋼種AIを用いた鋼No.109はN含有量が上限を外れて高く、磁気特性が基準を満たさなかった。   Steel No. using steel grade AI. No. 109 had a high N content exceeding the upper limit, and the magnetic characteristics did not satisfy the standard.

鋼No.114は、粗冷延での圧下率R1が推奨範囲より低いため、鋼板ままでの結晶粒径が大きくなり、磁気特性、伸び、打抜き性がいずれも基準を満たさなかった。   Steel No. In No. 114, since the rolling reduction R1 in the rough cold rolling was lower than the recommended range, the crystal grain size as it was in the steel plate was large, and the magnetic properties, elongation, and punchability did not satisfy the standards.

鋼No.115は、仕上げ冷延での圧下率R2が推奨範囲より高いため、またKAM値の比Ka/Kb値も上限を超えているため、磁気特性が基準を満たさなかった。   Steel No. In No. 115, since the rolling reduction R2 in the finish cold rolling was higher than the recommended range, and the ratio Ka / Kb value of the KAM value exceeded the upper limit, the magnetic characteristics did not satisfy the standard.

鋼No.116は、軟化焼鈍温度が推奨範囲より低いため、鋼板ままでの結晶粒径が小さく、磁気特性が基準を満たさなかった。   Steel No. In 116, the softening annealing temperature was lower than the recommended range, so the crystal grain size of the steel sheet was small, and the magnetic properties did not satisfy the standard.

鋼No.117は、磁気特性および伸びは基準を満たしたが、仕上圧延をしていないため、打抜き性が基準を満たさなかった。   Steel No. For 117, the magnetic properties and elongation met the criteria, but because the finish rolling was not performed, the punchability did not meet the criteria.

Claims (7)

成分組成が、質量%で、
C:0.001〜0.02%、
Si:0〜0.05%、
Mn:0.05〜0.5%、
P:0〜0.02%、
S:0.015〜0.10%、
Al:0〜0.010%、
Cr:0〜0.1%、
N:0〜0.005%
であり、残部が鉄および不可避的不純物からなる軟磁性鋼板であって、
平均結晶粒径が50μm超150μm以下であり、
さらに、当該軟磁性鋼板のKAM値Kaと、当該軟磁性鋼板を850℃で3時間焼鈍した後のKAM値Kbとの比Ka/Kbが1.0〜1.5である
ことを特徴とする軟磁性鋼板。
ここに、「KAM値」とは、「Kernel Average Misorientation値」を意味する。
Ingredient composition is mass%,
C: 0.001 to 0.02%,
Si: 0 to 0.05%,
Mn: 0.05 to 0.5%
P: 0 to 0.02%,
S: 0.015 to 0.10%,
Al: 0 to 0.010%,
Cr: 0 to 0.1%,
N: 0 to 0.005%
And the balance is a soft magnetic steel plate made of iron and inevitable impurities,
The average crystal grain size is more than 50 μm and not more than 150 μm,
Furthermore, the ratio Ka / Kb between the KAM value Ka of the soft magnetic steel sheet and the KAM value Kb after annealing the soft magnetic steel sheet at 850 ° C. for 3 hours is 1.0 to 1.5. Soft magnetic steel sheet.
Here, the “KAM value” means a “Kernel Average Mission value”.
板厚が0.8〜4.0mmである、請求項1に記載の軟磁性鋼板。   The soft magnetic steel plate according to claim 1, wherein the plate thickness is 0.8 to 4.0 mm. 板厚が0.3〜1.0mmである、請求項1に記載の軟磁性鋼板。   The soft magnetic steel plate according to claim 1, wherein the plate thickness is 0.3 to 1.0 mm. さらに、前記Mnの含有量と前記Sの含有量との質量比Mn/Sが3.0〜20.0であり、
MnS析出物の平均粒径が0.05〜4μmで、かつ、
粒径0.2μm以上のMnS析出物の個数密度が0.02〜0.5個/μmである、
請求項1、請求項2又は請求項3に記載の軟磁性鋼板。
Furthermore, the mass ratio Mn / S between the content of Mn and the content of S is 3.0 to 20.0,
The average particle size of the MnS precipitate is 0.05-4 μm, and
The number density of MnS precipitates having a particle size of 0.2 μm or more is 0.02 to 0.5 / μm 2 .
The soft magnetic steel sheet according to claim 1 , claim 2 or claim 3 .
請求項1〜の少なくとも1項に記載の軟磁性鋼板を2枚以上積層してなることを特徴とする積層鋼板。 Laminated steel, characterized in that formed by laminating two or more sheets of soft magnetic steel sheet according to at least one of claims 1-4. 請求項に記載の成分組成を有する鋼材を熱間圧延して熱延板とする熱延工程と、
前記熱延板を圧下率R1:30〜70%で冷間圧延して冷延板とする粗冷延工程と、
前記冷延板を、下記式1を満足するように、軟化焼鈍温度T1℃で軟化焼鈍時間H1秒間保持して軟化焼鈍板とする軟化焼鈍工程と、
を備えたことを特徴とする、請求項1〜のいずれか1項に記載の軟磁性鋼板の製造方法。
式1:270≦[{100−R1+0.2×(273+T1)}+H1×exp{−10/(273+T1)}]1/2≦340
ただし、750℃≦T1≦860℃である。
A hot rolling step of hot rolling a steel material having the component composition according to claim 1 to obtain a hot rolled sheet;
A rough cold rolling process in which the hot-rolled sheet is cold-rolled at a reduction ratio R1: 30 to 70% to obtain a cold-rolled sheet;
A softening annealing step in which the cold-rolled sheet is held at a softening annealing temperature T1 ° C. and a softening annealing time H1 second so as to satisfy the following formula 1,
The method for producing a soft magnetic steel sheet according to any one of claims 1 to 4 , further comprising:
Formula 1: 270 ≦ [{100−R1 + 0.2 × (273 + T1)} 2 + H1 × exp {−10 / (273 + T1)}] 1/2 ≦ 340
However, it is 750 degreeC <= T1 <= 860 degreeC.
さらに、前記軟化焼鈍板を、圧下率R2:0.1〜3%で冷間圧延する仕上げ冷延工程と、
を備えた、請求項に記載の軟磁性鋼板の製造方法。
Furthermore, a finish cold rolling step of cold rolling the softened annealed plate at a rolling reduction R2: 0.1 to 3%;
The manufacturing method of the soft-magnetic steel plate of Claim 6 provided with these.
JP2015125805A 2014-06-26 2015-06-23 Soft magnetic steel sheet, laminated steel sheet using the same, and method for producing soft magnetic steel sheet Active JP6557526B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2014131630 2014-06-26
JP2014131630 2014-06-26
JP2015058502 2015-03-20
JP2015058502 2015-03-20

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2016172919A JP2016172919A (en) 2016-09-29
JP6557526B2 true JP6557526B2 (en) 2019-08-07

Family

ID=57008714

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2015125805A Active JP6557526B2 (en) 2014-06-26 2015-06-23 Soft magnetic steel sheet, laminated steel sheet using the same, and method for producing soft magnetic steel sheet

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP6557526B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP6796483B2 (en) * 2016-12-28 2020-12-09 株式会社神戸製鋼所 Soft magnetic steel sheet
EP3711786A1 (en) * 2019-03-19 2020-09-23 Abiomed Europe GmbH Blood pump
JP7795954B2 (en) * 2022-03-30 2026-01-08 株式会社神戸製鋼所 Soft magnetic wire or soft magnetic steel bar

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP3775215B2 (en) * 2000-12-07 2006-05-17 住友金属建材株式会社 Magnetic shield material, steel plate for magnetic shield material and method for producing the same
JP4223701B2 (en) * 2001-08-10 2009-02-12 株式会社神戸製鋼所 Soft magnetic low carbon steel material excellent in machinability and magnetic properties and method for producing the same, and method for producing soft magnetic low carbon steel parts using the steel material
JP4826106B2 (en) * 2004-03-17 2011-11-30 Jfeスチール株式会社 Steel sheet for magnetic shield and manufacturing method thereof
JP5186753B2 (en) * 2006-02-21 2013-04-24 Jfeスチール株式会社 Damping alloy sheet and manufacturing method thereof

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2016172919A (en) 2016-09-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
TWI406957B (en) High-frequency iron loss low non-directional electromagnetic steel sheet and its manufacturing method
TWI531663B (en) Non-directional electrical steel sheet and manufacturing method thereof
JP5273235B2 (en) Method for producing non-oriented electrical steel sheet
JP2017057462A (en) Non-oriented electrical steel sheet and manufacturing method thereof
JP5671872B2 (en) Non-oriented electrical steel sheet and manufacturing method thereof
CN108368584A (en) Non-oriented electromagnetic steel sheet and its manufacturing method
KR20190093615A (en) Non-oriented electrical steel sheet and manufacturing method thereof
JPWO2020166718A1 (en) Non-oriented electrical steel sheet
WO2016152622A1 (en) Ferrite-austenite stainless steel sheet with excellent sheared end face corrosion resistance
JPWO2010104067A1 (en) Non-oriented electrical steel sheet and manufacturing method thereof
KR102264103B1 (en) Non-oriented electrical steel sheet having an excellent recyclability
JP2018066033A (en) Non-oriented electrical steel sheet
KR20230022223A (en) Soft magnetic materials, intermediates thereof, methods for producing them, alloys for soft magnetic materials
JP2010235976A (en) Soft-magnetic steel, soft magnetism steel component, and manufacturing method therefor
CN105189800B (en) The non-oriented electromagnetic steel sheet of high frequency iron loss excellent
JP6557526B2 (en) Soft magnetic steel sheet, laminated steel sheet using the same, and method for producing soft magnetic steel sheet
JP6518491B2 (en) Soft magnetic steel sheet, method of manufacturing the same, and method of manufacturing soft magnetic member
JP2008127600A (en) Non-oriented electrical steel sheet for split core
JP2018111865A (en) Nonoriented electromagnetic steel sheet
JP2017002392A (en) Soft magnetic steel sheet
JP5560923B2 (en) Method for producing non-oriented electrical steel sheet with excellent magnetic properties in rolling direction
JP4306445B2 (en) Fe-Cr-Si non-oriented electrical steel sheet excellent in high frequency magnetic characteristics and method for producing the same
JP2022107220A (en) Ferritic stainless steel sheet
JP6796483B2 (en) Soft magnetic steel sheet
JP5050459B2 (en) Cold rolled steel sheet for wound cores for automotive alternators with excellent magnetic properties and burr resistance

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
RD04 Notification of resignation of power of attorney

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A7424

Effective date: 20160713

A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20170901

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20180711

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20180731

A601 Written request for extension of time

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A601

Effective date: 20180903

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20181129

A02 Decision of refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02

Effective date: 20190319

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20190528

A911 Transfer to examiner for re-examination before appeal (zenchi)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A911

Effective date: 20190604

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20190709

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20190712

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 6557526

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150