Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP6576068B2 - Lath for exterior wall ventilation method - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP6576068B2 - Lath for exterior wall ventilation method - Google Patents

Lath for exterior wall ventilation method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP6576068B2
JP6576068B2 JP2015059725A JP2015059725A JP6576068B2 JP 6576068 B2 JP6576068 B2 JP 6576068B2 JP 2015059725 A JP2015059725 A JP 2015059725A JP 2015059725 A JP2015059725 A JP 2015059725A JP 6576068 B2 JP6576068 B2 JP 6576068B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
lath
bone
lateral force
force bone
ventilation method
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2015059725A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2016180208A (en
Inventor
航平 西村
航平 西村
亮 石丸
亮 石丸
岡田 忠義
忠義 岡田
道生 中野
道生 中野
淳平 館
淳平 館
いつき 阿部
いつき 阿部
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Steel Metal Products Co Ltd
Nikken Build Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Nippon Steel Metal Products Co Ltd
Nikken Build Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nippon Steel Metal Products Co Ltd, Nikken Build Co Ltd filed Critical Nippon Steel Metal Products Co Ltd
Priority to JP2015059725A priority Critical patent/JP6576068B2/en
Publication of JP2016180208A publication Critical patent/JP2016180208A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP6576068B2 publication Critical patent/JP6576068B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Building Environments (AREA)
  • Load-Bearing And Curtain Walls (AREA)

Description

この発明は、力骨と当該力骨よりも細径の線材とで構成したラスに防水紙を裏打ちしてなり、通気胴縁に留め付けて建物の外壁通気構造を構築するために用いられる外壁通気工法用ラスの技術分野に属する。   The present invention relates to an outer wall used for constructing an outer wall ventilation structure of a building by lining a waterproof paper on a lath composed of a strength bone and a wire rod having a diameter smaller than that of the strength bone, and fastened to a ventilation trunk edge. It belongs to the technical field of laths for ventilation methods.

建物の外壁構造の構築に際しては、近年、雨水や湿気などの水分や結露の問題を解消するため、図13に示すように、下地材(例えば、下地合板)aとモルタル外壁bとの間に通気胴縁cを介在させて通気層dを形成するモルタル塗りの外壁通気工法が多く採用されている。
この外壁通気工法では、モルタル外壁bの構築に使用するラスeに防水紙fを裏打ちして一体化された外壁通気工法用ラスgが多く使用されている。
前記通気胴縁cは、通常、455mm程度のピッチで立設された間柱hに、前記下地材aを介して取り付けられるが、モルタルb’を塗り込む際の外壁通気工法用ラスg(ラスeや防水紙f)のたわみを防ぐため、通気胴縁c以外にも、木材や樹脂材による補助胴縁iを配設するのが一般的であった。この補助胴縁iは、通常、前記通気胴縁c同士の間にバランスよく1本(又は複数本)配設される。
In the construction of the outer wall structure of a building, in recent years, in order to solve the problem of moisture and condensation such as rainwater and moisture, as shown in FIG. 13, between the base material (for example, base plywood) a and the mortar outer wall b, A mortar-coated outer wall ventilation method in which a ventilation layer d is formed by interposing a ventilation cylinder edge c is often used.
In this outer wall aeration method, a lath g for outer wall ventilation method, which is integrated by backing a waterproof paper f on a lath e used for construction of the mortar outer wall b, is often used.
The ventilator edge c is usually attached to a pillar h standing upright at a pitch of about 455 mm via the base material a, but a lath g (lass e) for outer wall ventilation when the mortar b ′ is applied. In addition to the ventilation cylinder edge c, an auxiliary cylinder edge i made of wood or a resin material is generally provided in order to prevent deflection of the waterproof paper f). In general, one (or a plurality) of auxiliary cylinder edges i are arranged in a balanced manner between the ventilation cylinder edges c.

ところで、前記外壁通気工法用ラスgについて、その重量を増大させることなく面外剛性を高めることができれば、当該ラスg(ラスeや防水紙f)のたわみを抑制できるので、モルタル塗り作業の施工性が向上し、より高品質のモルタル外壁bの構築に寄与することができる等、有益であることは明らかである。   By the way, if the out-of-plane rigidity can be increased without increasing the weight of the lath g for the outer wall ventilation method, the deflection of the lath g (the lath e or the waterproof paper f) can be suppressed. It is clear that it is advantageous in that it can improve the property and contribute to the construction of a higher quality mortar outer wall b.

前記外壁通気工法用ラスの面外剛性を高めるためには、ラスを構成する線材(線径0.8mm程度)を従来品より太い力骨(線径1.6mm以上)に代替することが考えられる。しかし、この手段では、ラス重量が著しく増大するので取り扱いづらい等、作業者に負担がかかる。従来品より間隔をあけて力骨を配置すればラス重量の増大化を防げるものの、ラス網の密度が下がるのでモルタル塗り作業の施工性悪化、ひいてはモルタル外壁の品質低下を招く虞がある。その他、線径が1.6mmを超えると、手作業ではラスの裁断が困難となり、現場合わせの必要な開口部等へのラスの貼り付けが難しくなることも留意すべき事項である。   In order to increase the out-of-plane rigidity of the lath for the outer wall ventilation method, it is considered that the wire material (wire diameter of about 0.8 mm) constituting the lath is replaced with a thicker bone (wire diameter of 1.6 mm or more) than the conventional product. It is done. However, with this means, the weight of the lath is remarkably increased, so that it is difficult to handle and burdens the operator. Although the increase in the weight of the lath can be prevented by disposing the ribs at a distance from that of the conventional product, the density of the lath net is lowered, so the workability of the mortar coating work may be deteriorated and the quality of the outer wall of the mortar may be deteriorated. In addition, if the wire diameter exceeds 1.6 mm, it is difficult to cut the lath by hand, and it is also important to note that it is difficult to attach the lath to an opening or the like that needs to be aligned on the spot.

例えば、特許文献1には、先行技術として、形態に工夫を施したエキスパンドメタル、複合ラスの2つの文献を挙げ、それぞれの課題を指摘した上で、剛性(面外剛性)を高めた外壁通気工法用ラスに関する発明が開示されている。
この特許文献1に記載された発明の特徴(構成及び効果)を箇条書きにすると以下のとおりである。
・防水シートに接合される接合部の網目を構成するラス材(エキスパンドメタル)の線材が、湾曲部の網目を構成する線材と比較して幅寸法が大きく形成されているので、接合部の剛性が大きくなる。
・そのため、剛性の大きい接合部で防水シートを支持することができるので、防水シートの支持力が向上し、撓みにくくなる。
・また、湾曲部についてはアーチ作用によって剛性が高められるので、湾曲部の網目を構成する線材の幅寸法を大きくしなくても防水シートから離間した状態を維持することができ、ラス材の重量を低減することができる。
For example, Patent Literature 1 includes two documents of expanded metal and composite lath that have been devised in the form as prior art, and pointed out the respective problems, and the outer wall ventilation with increased rigidity (out-of-plane rigidity) Inventions relating to laths for construction methods are disclosed.
The characteristics (configuration and effect) of the invention described in Patent Document 1 are listed as follows.
・ Because the lath wire (expanded metal) wire that forms the mesh of the joint to be bonded to the waterproof sheet is formed larger in width than the wire that forms the mesh of the curved portion, the rigidity of the joint Becomes larger.
-Therefore, since a waterproof sheet can be supported by a joint part with large rigidity, the support force of a waterproof sheet improves and it becomes difficult to bend.
-Also, since the rigidity of the curved portion is increased by the arch action, it is possible to maintain a state separated from the waterproof sheet without increasing the width of the wire constituting the curved portion mesh, and the weight of the lath material Can be reduced.

特開2012−97521号公報JP 2012-97521 A

前記特許文献1に係る外壁通気工法用ラスによれば、防水シートとラス材との接合部の面外剛性は確かに高まるが、当該接合部の剛性向上に偏重するあまり、ラス重量の増大化を懸念した結果、ラス材自体の剛性が蔑ろにされ、補剛バランスを欠いている。
すなわち、この外壁通気工法用ラスは、網目状に形成した接合部32(同文献1の図3参照)の範囲内のすべての線材を、他の湾曲部31の線材と比し、厚みを2.5倍程度(同図4参照)で実施している。これは過剰な補剛設計といえラス重量が著しく増大し、そのため接合部32以外の部位は一切補剛されていない。苦肉の策として、単に湾曲状に形成してアーチ効果を期待しているに過ぎない。
According to the lath for the outer wall ventilation method according to Patent Document 1, the out-of-plane rigidity of the joint portion between the waterproof sheet and the lath material is certainly increased, but the lath weight is increased too much because it is biased to improve the rigidity of the joint portion. As a result, the rigidity of the lath material itself has been reduced, and the balance of stiffening is lacking.
That is, the lath for the outer wall ventilation method compares all the wires in the range of the joint portion 32 (see FIG. 3 of the same document 1) formed in a mesh shape with the wires of the other curved portions 31, and has a thickness of 2 About 5 times (see Fig. 4). Even though this is an excessive stiffening design, the lath weight is remarkably increased, and therefore, the portions other than the joint portion 32 are not stiffened at all. As a measure of bitterness, the arch effect is merely expected by forming it in a curved shape.

しかし、ラス材(エキスパンドメタル)を何ら補強することなく湾曲状に形成したところで、アーチ効果による補剛は到底十分とはいえない。これは本出願人による解析結果からも明らかである。
すなわち、アーチ形状に形成した湾曲部31の耐力(断面係数)はさほど大きくはならず、よって、モルタル塗り作業時の押圧力に対して抵抗できる剛性を備えているとはいえず、接合部32の高い剛性も相まって当該湾曲部31が押し潰される等、変形する虞があった。
そのため、安定したモルタル塗り作業が行えず、施工性悪化、ひいてはモルタル外壁の品質低下を招く虞があった。また、湾曲部31の剛性(形状保持)が十分とは云えないので、運搬時や取り扱い時に慎重を期し煩わしいという問題もあった。もとより、運搬時に嵩張るという問題もある。
However, when the lath material (expanded metal) is formed in a curved shape without any reinforcement, the stiffening by the arch effect is not sufficient. This is also clear from the analysis results by the applicant.
That is, the yield strength (section modulus) of the curved portion 31 formed in the arch shape does not increase so much, and thus it cannot be said that the bending portion 31 has rigidity capable of resisting the pressing force during the mortar coating operation. In combination with the high rigidity, the curved portion 31 may be crushed or deformed.
Therefore, the stable mortar coating operation cannot be performed, and there is a possibility that the workability is deteriorated and the quality of the outer wall of the mortar is deteriorated. In addition, since the rigidity (shape retention) of the curved portion 31 cannot be said to be sufficient, there is a problem that it is troublesome to be careful during transportation and handling. Of course, there is also a problem of bulkiness during transportation.

本発明は、上述した背景技術の課題に鑑みて案出されたものであり、その目的とするところは、線径(線材)・重量を従来品とほとんど変えることなく、波付け加工や線材の配置を最適化することでバランスよく面外剛性を高め、モルタル塗り作業の施工性を向上させ、ひいては高強度・高剛性・高品質のモルタル外壁を構築することができる外壁通気工法用ラスを提供することにある。
具体的には、縦線材に0.8mm程度の細径の線材を配置してアーチ形状に形成してもアーチ効果はほとんど得られないという本出願人による解析結果に基づき、線材や力骨の配置、形状に工夫を施してバランスよく面外剛性を高めた結果、胴縁の長スパン化、言い換えると補助胴縁の無用化を実現できる外壁通気工法用ラスを提供することにある。
The present invention has been devised in view of the above-described problems of the background art, and the object of the present invention is to provide a corrugated process and a wire rod with almost no change in wire diameter (wire rod) / weight from a conventional product. Providing a lath for outer wall ventilation method that optimizes the arrangement to improve out-of-plane rigidity in a well-balanced manner, improve the workability of mortar coating work, and can build a high-strength, high-rigidity, high-quality mortar outer wall. There is to do.
Specifically, based on the analysis results by the applicant that the arch effect is hardly obtained even if a thin wire having a diameter of about 0.8 mm is arranged on the vertical wire to form an arch shape, As a result of improving the out-of-plane rigidity in a well-balanced manner by arranging the shape and shape, it is an object of the present invention to provide a lath for an outer wall ventilation method capable of realizing a long span of the trunk edge, in other words, no use of the auxiliary trunk edge.

上記背景技術の課題を解決するための手段として、請求項1に記載した発明に係る外壁通気工法用ラスは、力骨と当該力骨よりも細径の線材とで構成したラスに防水紙を裏打ちしてなる外壁通気工法用ラスであって、
前記力骨は、縦方向に間隔をあけて横向き方向へ配置された横力骨と、横方向に間隔をあけて縦向き方向へ配置された縦力骨とからなること、
前記横力骨は前記防水紙と接合されていること、
前記縦力骨は前記横力骨同士の間に浮き上がり部を形成して当該横力骨と接合され、防水紙とは接合されていないこと、
前記線材は、縦方向に間隔をあけて横向き方向へ配置された横線材のみで構成され、前記横力骨同士の間に配置されて前記縦力骨と接合され、横力骨とは接合されていないこと、をそれぞれ特徴とする。
As a means for solving the above-mentioned background art, the lath for an outer wall ventilation method according to the invention described in claim 1 is a waterproof paper applied to a lath composed of a strong bone and a wire rod having a diameter smaller than that of the strong bone. A lath for the outer wall ventilation method,
The force bone is composed of a lateral force bone arranged in a lateral direction with a space in the longitudinal direction and a longitudinal force bone arranged in a longitudinal direction with a space in the lateral direction;
The lateral force bone is joined to the waterproof paper;
The longitudinal force bone is joined to the lateral force bone by forming a raised portion between the lateral force bones, and is not joined to waterproof paper,
The wire is composed only of horizontal wires arranged in the horizontal direction with a space in the vertical direction, and is arranged between the lateral force bones and joined to the longitudinal force bones, and is joined to the lateral force bones. Each is characterized by not.

請求項に記載した発明は、請求項1に記載した外壁通気工法用ラスにおいて、前記浮き上がり部は、中間部が平坦なほぼ台形状、又は山形状に形成されていることを特徴とする。 According to a second aspect of the present invention, in the lath for an outer wall ventilation method according to the first aspect, the raised portion is formed in a substantially trapezoidal shape or a mountain shape with a flat middle portion .

請求項に記載した発明は、請求項1又は2に記載した外壁通気工法用ラスにおいて、前記浮き上がり部の高低差は7〜8mmであることを特徴とする。 The invention described in claim 3 is the outer wall ventilation method for Las according to claim 1 or 2, the height difference of the floating unit is characterized 7~8mm der Rukoto.

請求項に記載した発明は、請求項1〜のいずれか一に記載した外壁通気工法用ラスにおいて、水平材を構成する横力骨と横線材は、全体として、15mmのピッチで配置されていることを特徴とする。 According to a fourth aspect of the present invention, in the lath for an outer wall ventilation method according to any one of the first to third aspects, the lateral force bone and the horizontal wire constituting the horizontal member are arranged at a pitch of 15 mm as a whole. and wherein the Tei Rukoto.

請求項に記載した発明は、請求項1〜のいずれか一に記載した外壁通気工法用ラスにおいて、前記横力骨は、30〜80mmのピッチで配設され、前記縦力骨は、30〜100mmのピッチで配設されていることを特徴とする。 The invention described in claim 5 is the lath for outer wall ventilation method according to any one of claims 1 to 4 , wherein the lateral force bone is disposed at a pitch of 30 to 80 mm, and the longitudinal force bone is And 30 to 100 mm in pitch.

本発明に係る外壁通気工法用ラスによれば、以下の効果を奏する。
(1)縦力骨は、前記横力骨同士の間に浮き上がり部を形成して当該横力骨と接合され、防水紙とは接合されていない構成である。よって、モルタル塗り作業時に発生する押圧力(面外荷重)の向きを勘案すると、横力骨が縦力骨の浮き上がり部をしっかり支持する土台となり、前記押圧力を終局的には横力骨が確実に負担するので、面外剛性を向上させる
ことができる。
具体的には、ラス面に掛かる押圧力は主として横線材が負担し、当該横線材から縦力骨の浮き上がり部を経由し、終局的には当該浮き上がり部の土台となる横力骨(特には間柱にステープル等で留め付けた横力骨)へと伝わり、当該横力骨が当該押圧力を効果的に吸収するので、外壁通気工法用ラスの面外剛性を確実に向上させることができる。
(2)従来品の代表例として、図9に示すラスと比較する。
本実施例に係る外壁通気工法用ラスは、この従来品と比し、単位面積当たりの縦横に配置する力骨の本数は増えるものの、縦線材が一切ないので、総重量はほとんど変わらない。それでいて、単位面積当たりの縦力骨の浮き上がり部の数量が2倍以上に増え、且つ、横力骨が当該浮き上がり部の土台となる構成なので、縦力骨の浮き上がり部によるアーチ効果が飛躍的に向上する。加えて、単位面積当たりの横力骨及び縦力骨の本数も増加するので相乗効果により更なる面外剛性の上昇が期待できる。
(3)すなわち、本発明にかかる外壁通気工法用ラスは、縦方向については、単位面積当たりの縦力骨の本数が増え、しかも、浮き上がり部の数量も2倍以上になるので、従来品よりも至極合理的に面外剛性を向上させることができる。横方向については、単位面積当たりの横力骨1の本数が増え、しかも、前記縦力骨2の浮き上がり部2aの土台となる構成で実施するので、従来品ラスよりも至極合理的に面外剛性を向上させることができる。よって、本発明にかかる外壁通気工法用ラスは、縦横方向に実に合理的にバランスよく面外剛性向上させることができる。
(4)加えて、本発明にかかる外壁通気工法用ラスは、図9に示す従来品ラスとは異なり、縦力骨に対して横力骨を胴縁側に配設した構成で実施しているので、前記面外荷重に対する縦力骨の回転による剛性の低下を防ぐことができる。本出願人による実験及び解析によると、図9に示す従来品ラスのような横力骨に対して縦力骨を胴縁側に配設した構成と比し、スパン453mm、中央面外変位3〜4mm程度のスケールで面外剛性が約2割増になることが分かっている。
(5)まとめると、本発明に係る外壁通気工法用ラスによれば、線径(線材)・重量を従来品とほとんど変えることなく、波付け加工(浮き上がり部の形成)や線材の配置を最適化することで、モルタル層を補強、補剛する作用に縦力骨と横力骨の全長が有効に寄与してバランスよく面外剛性を高め、モルタル塗り作業の施工性を向上させ、ひいては、高強度・高剛性・高品質のモルタル外壁を構築することができる。
具体的には、縦線材に0.8mm程度の細径の線材を配置してアーチ形状に形成してもアーチ効果はほとんど得られないという本出願人による解析結果に基づき、線材や力骨の配置、形状に工夫を施してバランスよく面外剛性を高めた結果、胴縁の長スパン化、言い換えると補助胴縁の無用化を実現することができる。
The lath for an outer wall ventilation method according to the present invention has the following effects.
(1) The longitudinal force bone has a configuration in which a floating portion is formed between the lateral force bones and joined to the lateral force bone, and is not joined to the waterproof paper. Therefore, considering the direction of the pressing force (out-of-plane load) generated during mortar coating work, the lateral force bone serves as a foundation for firmly supporting the floating part of the longitudinal force bone, and eventually the lateral force bone is Since it bears with certainty, out-of-plane rigidity can be improved.
Specifically, the pressing force applied to the lath surface is mainly borne by the horizontal wire, and from the horizontal wire passes through the floating portion of the longitudinal force bone, and finally the lateral force bone (particularly the foundation of the floating portion). The lateral force bone is effectively absorbed by the lateral force bone, and the out-of-plane rigidity of the outer wall ventilation method lath can be reliably improved.
(2) As a typical example of a conventional product, a comparison is made with the lath shown in FIG.
Compared with this conventional product, the lath for the outer wall ventilation method according to the present embodiment increases the number of strength frames arranged vertically and horizontally per unit area, but there is no vertical wire, so the total weight is almost the same. Nevertheless, the number of vertical bone lifts per unit area is more than doubled, and the lateral force bone is the foundation of the lift, so the arch effect by the vertical bone lift is dramatically increased. improves. In addition, since the number of lateral force bones and longitudinal force bones per unit area also increases, a further increase in out-of-plane rigidity can be expected due to a synergistic effect.
(3) That is, the lath for the outer wall ventilation method according to the present invention increases the number of longitudinal bones per unit area in the longitudinal direction, and more than doubles the number of raised parts, so that However, the out-of-plane rigidity can be improved extremely reasonably . As for the lateral direction, the number of lateral strength bones 1 per unit area is increased, and since it is implemented as a foundation of the raised portion 2a of the longitudinal strength bone 2, it is extremely out of the plane than the conventional product lath. Stiffness can be improved. Therefore, the lath for the outer wall ventilation method according to the present invention can improve the out-of-plane rigidity in a reasonably well balanced manner in the vertical and horizontal directions.
(4) In addition, the lath for the outer wall ventilation method according to the present invention is different from the conventional lath shown in FIG. 9 in that the lateral force bone is disposed on the trunk edge side with respect to the longitudinal force bone. Therefore, it is possible to prevent a decrease in rigidity due to the rotation of the longitudinal bone with respect to the out-of-plane load. According to the experiment and analysis by the present applicant, compared with the configuration in which the longitudinal force bone is disposed on the trunk edge side with respect to the lateral force bone such as the conventional lath shown in FIG. It is known that the out-of-plane rigidity is increased by about 20% at a scale of about 4 mm.
(5) In summary, according to the lath for the outer wall ventilation method according to the present invention, the corrugation process (formation of the raised part) and the arrangement of the wire material are optimal without changing the wire diameter (wire material) and weight almost from the conventional product. By increasing the strength of the mortar layer, the total length of the longitudinal and lateral force bones effectively contributes to the action of reinforcing and stiffening, improving the out-of-plane rigidity in a well-balanced manner, improving the workability of mortar coating work, High strength, high rigidity and high quality mortar outer wall can be constructed.
Specifically, based on the analysis results by the applicant that the arch effect is hardly obtained even if a thin wire having a diameter of about 0.8 mm is arranged on the vertical wire to form an arch shape, As a result of improving the out-of-plane rigidity in a well-balanced manner by arranging the shape and shape, it is possible to realize a long span of the trunk edge, in other words, no use of the auxiliary trunk edge.

Aは、実施例1に係る外壁通気工法用ラスの一部(左上部分)を概略的に示した正面図であり、Bは、前記ラスを通気胴縁に取り付けた状態を示す平面図であり、Cは、Aの右側面図である。A is a front view schematically showing a part (upper left part) of a lath for an outer wall ventilation method according to the first embodiment, and B is a plan view showing a state in which the lath is attached to a ventilation trunk edge. , C are right side views of A. Aは、図1に係る外壁通気工法用ラスを拡大して示した斜視図であり、Bは、Aを側面方向からみた立面図である。A is an enlarged perspective view showing the outer wall ventilation method lath according to FIG. 1, and B is an elevational view of A as viewed from the side. 前記外壁通気工法用ラスのバリエーションを示した部分拡大斜視図である。It is the partial expansion perspective view which showed the variation of the lath for the said outer wall ventilation method. 前記外壁通気工法用ラスのバリエーションを示した部分拡大斜視図である。It is the partial expansion perspective view which showed the variation of the lath for the said outer wall ventilation method. 前記外壁通気工法用ラスのバリエーションを示した部分拡大斜視図である。It is the partial expansion perspective view which showed the variation of the lath for the said outer wall ventilation method. 面外変位(面外剛性)の解析に用いた解析モデルとして、実施例1に係る外壁通気工法用ラスを示す部分拡大斜視図である(ステープル留め付け部位を示す○印以外は図2Aと同一)。FIG. 3 is a partially enlarged perspective view showing an outer wall ventilation method lath according to Example 1 as an analysis model used for analysis of out-of-plane displacement (out-of-plane rigidity) (same as FIG. 2A except for a circle mark indicating a stapled portion). ). 面外変位の解析に用いた解析モデルに係るラスを示す部分拡大斜視図である。It is a partial expansion perspective view which shows the lath which concerns on the analysis model used for the analysis of an out-of-plane displacement. 面外変位の解析に用いた解析モデルに係るラスを示す部分拡大斜視図である。It is a partial expansion perspective view which shows the lath which concerns on the analysis model used for the analysis of an out-of-plane displacement. 面外変位の解析に用いた解析モデルに係るラスを示す部分拡大斜視図である。It is a partial expansion perspective view which shows the lath which concerns on the analysis model used for the analysis of an out-of-plane displacement. 前記各解析モデルの数値等を記載した表である。It is the table | surface which described the numerical value etc. of each said analysis model. 前記各解析モデルの解析結果を示した表である。It is the table | surface which showed the analysis result of each said analysis model. 前記各解析モデルに係る荷重−変位の関係をプロットしたグラフである。It is the graph which plotted the relationship of the load-displacement which concerns on each said analysis model. 従来技術に係る外壁通気構造を示した斜視図である。It is the perspective view which showed the outer wall ventilation structure which concerns on a prior art.

次に、本発明に係る外壁通気工法用ラスの実施例を図面に基づいて説明する。   Next, embodiments of the lath for the outer wall ventilation method according to the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.

本発明に係る外壁通気工法用ラスは、図1と図2に示したように、力骨1、2と当該力骨1、2よりも細径の線材3とで構成したラス4に防水紙5を裏打ちしてなる外壁通気工法用ラス10であり、以下の構成を特徴としている。
前記力骨1、2は、縦方向に間隔をあけて横向き方向へ配置された横力骨1と、横方向に間隔をあけて縦向き方向へ配置された縦力骨2とからなる。
前記横力骨1は前記防水紙5と接合されている。
前記縦力骨2は前記横力骨1、1同士の間に浮き上がり部2aを形成して当該横力骨1、1と接合され、防水紙5とは接合されていない。
前記線材3は、縦方向に間隔をあけて横向き方向へ配置された横線材3のみで構成され、前記横力骨1同士の間に配置されて前記縦力骨2と接合され、横力骨1とは接合されていない。
As shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, the lath for the outer wall ventilation method according to the present invention is waterproof paper on the lath 4 composed of the skeletons 1 and 2 and the wire 3 having a diameter smaller than the skeletons 1 and 2. 5 is an outer wall ventilation lath 10 that is lined with 5 and has the following structure.
The force bones 1 and 2 are composed of a lateral force bone 1 arranged in a lateral direction with a space in the vertical direction and a longitudinal force bone 2 arranged in a vertical direction with a space in the horizontal direction.
The lateral force bone 1 is joined to the waterproof paper 5.
The longitudinal force bone 2 forms a raised portion 2a between the lateral force bones 1 and 1 and is joined to the lateral force bones 1 and 1 and is not joined to the waterproof paper 5.
The wire 3 is composed only of the horizontal wire 3 arranged in the lateral direction with a space in the vertical direction, and is arranged between the lateral force bones 1 and joined to the longitudinal force bone 2 to obtain a lateral force bone. 1 is not joined.

要するに、この外壁通気工法用ラス10は、下記するような配置、形状等に工夫を施した横力骨1と縦力骨2とを接合することで当該ラス10の主骨格を形成し、横力骨1側には防水紙5を、縦力骨2側には線材3を接合した構成で実施されている。
以下、外壁通気工法用ラス10の構成要素を具体的に説明する。
In short, the lath 10 for the outer wall ventilation method forms a main skeleton of the lath 10 by joining the lateral force bone 1 and the longitudinal force bone 2 devised in the arrangement, shape and the like as described below. A waterproof paper 5 is bonded to the strength bone 1 side, and a wire 3 is bonded to the longitudinal strength bone 2 side.
Hereinafter, components of the outer wall ventilation method lath 10 will be described in detail.

本実施例にかかる横力骨1は、線径(φ)1.6mm程度で、縦方向(図中のX方向)に75.5mm程度のピッチ(尺モジュール又はメーターモジュールに対応)でほぼ平行に配置されている。
横力骨1のピッチはこれに限定されず、50mm程度のピッチで実施してもよい。本出願人の実験及び解析によると、30〜80mm程度のピッチであれば良好な成果が得られることが分かっている。
なお、横力骨1の線径は1.6mmに限定されないが、これを超えると現場での裁断作業に支障を来たすほか、外壁通気工法用ラス10の重量が増大するので1.6mm程度が好適とされる。
The lateral force bone 1 according to the present embodiment has a wire diameter (φ) of about 1.6 mm and is substantially parallel at a pitch of about 75.5 mm (corresponding to a scale module or a meter module) in the longitudinal direction (X direction in the figure). Is arranged.
The pitch of the lateral force bone 1 is not limited to this, and may be implemented at a pitch of about 50 mm. According to the applicant's experiments and analysis, it has been found that good results can be obtained with a pitch of about 30 to 80 mm.
In addition, although the wire diameter of the lateral force bone 1 is not limited to 1.6 mm, if it exceeds this, it will interfere with the cutting work at the site, and the weight of the lath 10 for the outer wall ventilation method will increase, so about 1.6 mm. Preferred.

一方、本実施例にかかる縦力骨2は、線径(φ)1.6mm程度で、横方向(図中のY方向)に45.3mm程度のピッチ(尺モジュール又はメーターモジュールに対応)で平行に配置されている。
縦力骨2のピッチもこれに限定されない。本出願人の実験及び解析によると、30〜100mm程度のピッチであれば良好な成果が得られることが分かっている。
なお、縦力骨2の線径は、前記横力骨1と同様の理由から1.6mm程度が好適とされる。
On the other hand, the longitudinal force bone 2 according to the present embodiment has a wire diameter (φ) of about 1.6 mm and a pitch of about 45.3 mm in the lateral direction (Y direction in the figure) (corresponding to a scale module or a meter module). They are arranged in parallel.
The pitch of the longitudinal force bone 2 is not limited to this. According to the applicant's experiments and analysis, it has been found that good results can be obtained with a pitch of about 30 to 100 mm.
The wire diameter of the longitudinal force bone 2 is preferably about 1.6 mm for the same reason as the lateral force bone 1.

前記縦力骨2はさらに、前記ピッチで配置された横力骨1、1同士の間に浮き上がり部2aを連続的に形成し、当該横力骨1、1と溶接等の接合手段で接合されている。この実施例にかかる浮き上がり部2aは、中間部がほぼ平坦な台形状に形成されている。
この台形(浮き上がり部2a)の寸法は、一例として、上面(図2Bの符号U参照)が45.3mm程度、下面(符号L参照)が75.5mm程度(=横力骨1、1のピッチ)、高さ(符号H参照)が、縦力骨2の線径を含む7〜8mm程度で実施されている。高さを7〜8mm程度で実施する意義は、主として良好なモルタル塗り厚を確保するためである。
また、前記台形(浮き上がり部2a)の傾斜部分(V字凹部)は、前記平坦部の両端縁から屈曲(又は湾曲)して形成され、当該傾斜部分の下端部と横力骨1(の天頂部)との当接部が溶接等の接合手段で接合されている。
なお、前記台形の形態は、横力骨1のピッチに応じて適宜設計変更される。
The longitudinal force bone 2 further forms a raised portion 2a between the lateral force bones 1 and 1 arranged at the pitch, and is joined to the lateral force bones 1 and 1 by joining means such as welding. ing. The raised portion 2a according to this embodiment is formed in a trapezoidal shape with a substantially flat middle portion.
The dimensions of the trapezoid (the raised portion 2a) are, for example, about 45.3 mm on the upper surface (see symbol U in FIG. 2B) and about 75.5 mm on the lower surface (see symbol L) (= pitch of the lateral strength bones 1 and 1). ), And the height (see symbol H) is about 7 to 8 mm including the wire diameter of the longitudinal bone 2. The significance of implementing the height at about 7 to 8 mm is mainly to ensure a good mortar coating thickness.
Further, the inclined portion (V-shaped concave portion) of the trapezoid (the raised portion 2a) is formed by bending (or bending) from both end edges of the flat portion, and the lower end portion of the inclined portion and the lateral strength bone 1 The contact portion with the top portion is joined by joining means such as welding.
The shape of the trapezoid is appropriately changed in design according to the pitch of the lateral force bone 1.

すなわち、この外壁通気工法用ラス10は、等間隔で配置した複数の同形同大の横力骨1と、やはり等間隔で配置した複数の同形同大の縦力骨2とがほぼ直角格子状に配置され、各交点、即ち当該縦力骨2に連続的に形成した浮き上がり部2aの傾斜部分の各下端部と各横力骨1とを接合して主骨格を形成してなる。ちなみに本実施例では、剛性が高いスポット溶接で接合されている。   That is, in the lath 10 for outer wall ventilation method, a plurality of isomorphic and laterally-stressed lateral force bones 1 arranged at equal intervals and a plurality of isomorphic and equal-sized longitudinal force bones 2 arranged at equal intervals are substantially perpendicular to each other. The main skeleton is formed by joining the lower end portions of the inclined portions of the raised portions 2a continuously formed on the intersections, that is, the longitudinal force bones 2 and the lateral force bones 1 arranged in a lattice shape. Incidentally, in the present embodiment, they are joined by spot welding having high rigidity.

前記横力骨1に接合する防水紙5は、汎用品(ターポリン紙、透湿防水紙等)が採用され、図示は省略するが、例えばホッチキス又はこれに類似の工具が打ち出す止め針により、若しくは接着剤などにより、横力骨1に留め付けて一体化した構成で実施されている。なお、防水紙5と縦力骨2とは接合されていない(図2B参照)。
前記防水紙5は、図1Aに示したように、ラス4の中心から左斜め上方へ若干ずれた位置関係で貼り合わせた構成で実施されている。もっとも、防水紙5は、ラス4の中心からいずれの方向へずらした配置でもよい。
The waterproof paper 5 to be joined to the lateral force bone 1 is a general-purpose product (tarpaulin paper, moisture-permeable waterproof paper, etc.), which is not shown in the drawings, but for example, by a staple that is launched by a stapler or a similar tool, or It is implemented by a configuration in which the lateral force bone 1 is fastened and integrated with an adhesive or the like. Note that the waterproof paper 5 and the longitudinal force bone 2 are not joined (see FIG. 2B).
As shown in FIG. 1A, the waterproof paper 5 is implemented in a configuration in which the waterproof paper 5 is bonded together in a positional relationship slightly shifted upward and leftward from the center of the lath 4. However, the waterproof paper 5 may be disposed in any direction from the center of the lath 4.

次に、本実施例1にかかる線材3は、縦方向(図中のX方向)に間隔をあけて横向き方向へ配置された横線材3のみで構成され、前記横力骨2、2同士の間にバランスよく配置され、前記縦力骨2との交点をスポット溶接等で接合して実施している。
具体的に、前記線材3は、線径(φ)0.8mm程度で実施され、縦方向に等間隔(75.5mm程度)で配置された横力骨1、1同士の間に、その約1/5に相当する15.1mm程度のピッチで平行に4本ずつ配置されている。当該4本の配置は、図2Bに示したように、前記浮き上がり部2aの平坦部の両端縁部(両脇)に2本、その間にバランスよく2本設けられている。すなわち、外壁通気工法用ラス10の水平材を構成する横力骨2と横線材3は、全体として、4本置きに横力骨2を配置した15.1mm程度のピッチで規則的に配置されている。この配置は、面外剛性を高める上で合理的かつ効果的な配置といえる。
なお、前記横線材3のピッチはこれに限定されず、尺モジュール、メーターモジュールに対応する間隔であればよいが、ラス4が形成する網目(格子目)の大きさ(密度)、ひいてはモルタル塗り作業の施工性を考慮すると15.1mm程度が好ましい。また、線径は0.8mm程度に限定されるものではなく、0.6〜1.0mm程度の細い線材であれば、良好な成果が得られることが分かっている。
Next, the wire rod 3 according to the first embodiment is composed of only the horizontal wire rods 3 arranged in the horizontal direction with a gap in the vertical direction (X direction in the drawing). They are arranged in a balanced manner, and are performed by joining the intersections with the longitudinal force bone 2 by spot welding or the like.
Specifically, the wire 3 is implemented with a wire diameter (φ) of about 0.8 mm, and between the lateral force bones 1 and 1 arranged at equal intervals (about 75.5 mm) in the longitudinal direction, Four pieces are arranged in parallel at a pitch of about 15.1 mm corresponding to 1/5. As shown in FIG. 2B, two of the four arrangements are provided at both end edges (both sides) of the flat portion of the raised portion 2a, and two in good balance are provided therebetween. That is, the lateral force bone 2 and the horizontal wire 3 constituting the horizontal material of the lath 10 for the outer wall ventilation method are arranged regularly at a pitch of about 15.1 mm in which the lateral force bones 2 are arranged every four. ing. This arrangement can be said to be a rational and effective arrangement for increasing the out-of-plane rigidity.
The pitch of the horizontal wire 3 is not limited to this, but may be any distance corresponding to the scale module and the meter module. However, the size (density) of the mesh (lattice) formed by the lath 4 and thus mortar coating In consideration of workability, about 15.1 mm is preferable. Further, the wire diameter is not limited to about 0.8 mm, and it has been found that good results can be obtained with a thin wire material of about 0.6 to 1.0 mm.

要するに、本実施例にかかる外壁通気工法用ラス10は、図1Aに示したように、15.1mm程度のピッチで規則的に配置された水平材(横力骨1および横線材3)を水平横向き方向とした天地の姿勢で、側面方向からみて横向き台形状(図1B参照)の浮き上がり部2aを有する鉛直方向の縦力骨2が水平方向に45.3mm程度のピッチで配置され、各交点がスポット溶接により接合されて成るラス4に、防水紙5が左斜め上方へ若干ずれた位置関係で当該ラス4を構成する横力骨1とホッチキス等で貼り合わせて一体化した構成で実施されている。   In short, as shown in FIG. 1A, the lath 10 for the outer wall ventilation method according to the present embodiment is a horizontal material (lateral force bone 1 and horizontal wire 3) arranged regularly at a pitch of about 15.1 mm. The vertical longitudinal bones 2 having the laterally trapezoidal raised portions 2a (see FIG. 1B) as viewed from the side in the horizontal direction are arranged at a pitch of about 45.3 mm in the horizontal direction. This is implemented by a structure in which the waterproof paper 5 is bonded to the lath 4 joined by spot welding with the lateral force bone 1 constituting the lath 4 and stapled or the like in a positional relationship slightly shifted upward to the left. ing.

上記構成の外壁通気工法用ラス10によれば、以下の効果を奏する。
(1)前記縦力骨2は、前記横力骨1、1同士の間に浮き上がり部2aを形成して当該横力骨1、1と接合され、防水紙5とは接合されていない。
よって、この構成によれば、面外荷重、即ち、モルタル塗り作業時に発生する押圧力(応力)の向きを勘案すると、横力骨1が縦力骨2の浮き上がり部2aをしっかり支持する土台(基礎)となり、前記面外荷重を終局的には横力骨1が確実に負担するので、面外剛
性を向上させることができる。
具体的に、ラス4面に掛かる前記押圧力(面外荷重)は主として横線材3が負担し、当該横線材3から縦力骨2の浮き上がり部2aを経由し、終局的には当該浮き上がり部2aの土台となる横力骨1(特には間柱にステープル等で留め付けた横力骨1)へと伝わり、当該横力骨1が当該押圧力を効果的に吸収するので、外壁通気工法用ラス10の面外剛性を確実に向上させることができる。
(2)従来品の代表例として、図9に示すラスと比較する。ちなみに網目(格子目)の大きさは、15.1×15.1mm程度である。
本実施例に係る外壁通気工法用ラス10は、この従来品と比し、単位面積当たりの縦横に配置する力骨1、2の本数は増えるものの、縦線材が一切ないので、総重量はほとんど変わらない。
それでいて、単位面積当たりの縦力骨2の浮き上がり部2aの数量が2倍に増え、且つ、横力骨1が当該浮き上がり部2aの土台となる構成なので、縦力骨2の浮き上がり部2aによるによるアーチ効果が飛躍的に向上する。加えて、単位面積当たりの横力骨1及び縦力骨2の本数も増加するので相乗効果により更なる面外剛性の上昇が期待できる。本出願人による実験及び解析によると、力骨よりも細い縦線材のアーチ効果はほとんど期待できないことが分かっているので、当該アーチ効果が期待できず、重量が嵩む縦線材を省略化したことにより、至極合理的にラスの面外剛性を高めることができる。
これに対し、図9に示す従来品ラスは、横力骨1’が縦力骨2’の浮き上がり部2a’の上側に添えるように設けられているので、前記面外荷重に対して浮き上がり部2a’の土台とはなりえず、アーチ効果はほとんど期待できない。よって、面外剛性を高める意味では、本発明にかかる外壁通気工法用ラス10と大きな隔たりがある。
(3)すなわち、本発明にかかる外壁通気工法用ラス10は、縦方向については、単位面積当たりの縦力骨2の本数が増え、しかも、浮き上がり部2aの数量も2倍になるので、従来品よりも至極合理的に面外剛性を向上させることができる。横方向については、単位面積当たりの横力骨1の本数が増え、しかも、前記縦力骨2の浮き上がり部2aの土台となる構成で実施するので、従来品ラスよりも至極合理的に面外剛性を向上させることができる。よって、本発明にかかる外壁通気工法用ラス10は、縦横方向に実に合理的にバランスよく面外剛性向上させることができる。
(4)加えて、本発明にかかる外壁通気工法用ラス10は、図9に示す従来品ラスとは異なり、縦力骨2に対して横力骨1を胴縁側に配設した構成で実施しているので、前記面外荷重に対する縦力骨2の回転による剛性の低下を防ぐことができる。本出願人による実験及び解析によると、図9に示す従来品ラスのような横力骨に対して縦力骨を胴縁側に配設した構成と比し、スパン453mm、中央面外変位3?4mm程度のスケールで面外剛性が約2割増になることが分かっている。
According to the lath 10 for the outer wall ventilation method having the above-described configuration, the following effects can be obtained.
(1) The longitudinal force bone 2 is joined to the lateral force bones 1, 1 by forming a raised portion 2 a between the lateral force bones 1, 1, and is not joined to the waterproof paper 5.
Therefore, according to this configuration, when the out-of-plane load, that is, the direction of the pressing force (stress) generated during the mortar coating operation is taken into consideration, the lateral force bone 1 firmly supports the floating portion 2a of the longitudinal force bone 2 ( Foundation), and the lateral force bone 1 surely bears the out-of-plane load eventually, so that the out-of-plane rigidity can be improved.
Specifically, the pressing force (out-of-plane load) applied to the lath 4 surface is mainly borne by the horizontal wire 3 and passes from the horizontal wire 3 through the lifted portion 2a of the longitudinal force bone 2, and finally the lifted portion. Since it is transferred to the lateral force bone 1 (especially the lateral force bone 1 fastened to the studs with staples etc.) as the foundation of 2a and the lateral force bone 1 effectively absorbs the pressing force, the outer wall ventilation method is used. The out-of-plane rigidity of the lath 10 can be reliably improved.
(2) As a typical example of a conventional product, a comparison is made with the lath shown in FIG. Incidentally, the size of the mesh (lattice) is about 15.1 × 15.1 mm.
Compared with this conventional product, the lath 10 for outer wall ventilation method according to the present embodiment increases the number of strength frames 1 and 2 per unit area, but there is no vertical wire, so the total weight is almost the same. does not change.
Still, since the number of the lifted portions 2a of the longitudinal force bone 2 per unit area is doubled and the lateral force bone 1 is the base of the lifted portion 2a, it depends on the lifted portion 2a of the longitudinal force bone 2 The arch effect is dramatically improved. In addition, since the number of lateral force bones 1 and longitudinal force bones 2 per unit area also increases, a further increase in out-of-plane rigidity can be expected due to a synergistic effect. According to the experiment and analysis by the present applicant, it is known that the arch effect of the vertical wire material thinner than the ribs can hardly be expected, so that the arch effect cannot be expected and the weight of the vertical wire material is omitted. The lath's out-of-plane rigidity can be extremely reasonably increased.
On the other hand, the conventional lath shown in FIG. 9 is provided so that the lateral force bone 1 'is attached to the upper side of the raised portion 2a' of the longitudinal force bone 2 '. It cannot be the foundation of 2a ', and almost no arch effect can be expected. Therefore, in the sense of increasing the out-of-plane rigidity, there is a large gap from the outer wall ventilation method lath 10 according to the present invention.
(3) That is, the lath 10 for the outer wall ventilation method according to the present invention increases the number of longitudinal force bones 2 per unit area in the longitudinal direction, and also doubles the number of raised portions 2a. The out-of-plane rigidity can be improved extremely rationally than the product. As for the lateral direction, the number of lateral strength bones 1 per unit area is increased, and since it is implemented as a foundation of the raised portion 2a of the longitudinal strength bone 2, it is extremely out of the plane than the conventional product lath. Stiffness can be improved. Therefore, the lath 10 for the outer wall ventilation method according to the present invention can improve the out-of-plane rigidity in a reasonably well balanced manner in the vertical and horizontal directions.
(4) In addition, the outer wall ventilation method lath 10 according to the present invention is different from the conventional product lath shown in FIG. 9 in that the lateral force bone 1 is disposed on the trunk edge side with respect to the longitudinal force bone 2. Therefore, it is possible to prevent a decrease in rigidity due to the rotation of the longitudinal bone 2 with respect to the out-of-plane load. According to the experiment and analysis by the present applicant, compared with the configuration in which the longitudinal force bone is arranged on the trunk edge side with respect to the lateral force bone like the conventional lath shown in FIG. It is known that the out-of-plane rigidity is increased by about 20% at a scale of about 4 mm.

上記構成の外壁通気工法用ラス10を用いて構築する外壁通気構造は、大要、下記する工程により実施される。
先ず、建築物の躯体を構成する柱、間柱を建て、壁用断熱材を施工する手順等で構築を進める。そして、前記柱及び間柱の外側面へ下地材を取り付ける。
次に、間柱の配置間隔(455mm程度)と対応するように、通気胴縁11(図1B参照)を下地材(図示省略)に留め付ける。前記外壁通気工法用ラス10は、上述したように面外剛性が大きく、胴縁の長スパン化を十分見込めるので、補助胴縁12は用いない。
次に、外壁通気工法用ラス10を、その横力骨2が水平横向き方向となる天地の姿勢を保って、縦力骨2が通気胴縁11の中心線(罫書き)に沿うよう当接させて位置合わせを行い、縦力骨2と横力骨1との交点部分を、ステープル等の固定具により通気胴縁11に順次固定して当該ラス10を取り付け張設する。前記固定具による固定作業は、構造設計に応じ、前記交点部分のすべてに行ってもよいし、1つ乃至複数おきに行ってもよい。
この張設作業は、後のモルタル塗着作業に必要な全範囲にわたり、特にラス4の断点(隙間)を生じさせないように、隣接する外壁通気工法用ラス10相互間の継ぎ足し処理を
順次に繰り返して行う。
ラス10の張設作業を終了した後は、通気胴縁11に張設した前記ラス10の表面側へ施工性よくモルタル塗着作業を行い、高強度・高剛性・高品質のモルタル外壁を構築することができる。モルタル層厚(15mm程度)の中央部には縦力骨2の浮き上がり部2aが配置されることとなる。そうして、防水紙5で背面を遮断されたラス10と下地材との隙間が通気層として形成される。
The outer wall ventilation structure constructed using the outer wall ventilation method lath 10 having the above-described configuration is generally implemented by the following steps.
First of all, construction is proceeded in accordance with the procedure of building the pillars and studs that make up the building frame and constructing the wall insulation. And a base material is attached to the outer surface of the said pillar and a stud.
Next, the ventilator edge 11 (see FIG. 1B) is fastened to the base material (not shown) so as to correspond to the spacing between the studs (about 455 mm). As described above, the lath 10 for the outer wall ventilation method has a large out-of-plane rigidity, and a long span of the trunk edge can be expected sufficiently. Therefore, the auxiliary trunk edge 12 is not used.
Next, the lath 10 for the outer wall ventilation method is abutted so that the vertical strength bone 2 follows the center line (ruled line) of the ventilation trunk edge 11 while maintaining the vertical posture in which the lateral strength bone 2 is in the horizontal horizontal direction. is allowed aligns with, the intersections between the vertical force bone 2 and the lateral force the bone 1, successively fixed to be stretched mounting the lath 10 to the ventilation furring strips 11 than the fixed again and again such as stapling. The fixed again and again by fixing work, depending on the structural design, may be performed on all the intersections may be performed one or more intervals.
This tensioning operation is performed over the entire range necessary for the subsequent mortar coating operation, and in particular, the addition processing between the adjacent laths 10 for the outer wall ventilation method is sequentially performed so as not to cause a break (gap) of the lath 4. Repeat.
After finishing the lath 10 tensioning work, mortar coating work is performed on the surface side of the lath 10 stretched on the ventilator rim 11 with good workability to construct a mortar outer wall with high strength, high rigidity and high quality. can do. In the central part of the mortar layer thickness (about 15 mm), the raised portion 2a of the longitudinal force bone 2 is arranged. Thus, a gap between the lath 10 whose back surface is blocked by the waterproof paper 5 and the base material is formed as a ventilation layer.

図3は、本発明に係る外壁通気工法用ラスの異なる実施例を示している。上記実施例1と同一の構成要素は同一の符号を付してその説明を適宜省略する。   FIG. 3 shows different embodiments of the lath for the outer wall ventilation method according to the present invention. The same components as those in the first embodiment are denoted by the same reference numerals, and the description thereof is omitted as appropriate.

この実施例2に係る外壁通気工法用ラスは、上記実施例1と比し、横力骨1が60.4mm程度のピッチで配設され、縦力骨2が68mm程度のピッチで配設され、横力骨1、1の間に横線材3が3本ずつ配設されていることが主に相違する。一方、縦線材がないこと、水平材(横力骨1及び横線材3)が15.1mmピッチで配設されていること等は同じである。   In the outer wall ventilation method lath according to the second embodiment, the lateral strength bones 1 are disposed at a pitch of about 60.4 mm, and the longitudinal strength bones 2 are disposed at a pitch of about 68 mm, as compared to the first embodiment. The main difference is that three horizontal wires 3 are arranged between the lateral force bones 1, 1. On the other hand, the fact that there is no vertical wire, the horizontal members (lateral force bone 1 and horizontal wire 3) are arranged at a pitch of 15.1 mm, and the like are the same.

要するに、この外壁通気工法用ラスもまた、上記実施例1と同様に、以下の構成を特徴とする。
前記力骨1、2は、縦方向に間隔をあけて横向き方向へ配置された横力骨1と、横方向に間隔をあけて縦向き方向へ配置された縦力骨2とからなる。
前記横力骨1は前記防水紙5と接合されている。
前記縦力骨2は前記横力骨1、1同士の間に浮き上がり部2aを形成して当該横力骨1、1と接合され、防水紙5とは接合されていない。
前記線材3は、縦力骨2と接合され、横力骨1とは接合されていない。
In short, this lath for the outer wall ventilation method is also characterized by the following configuration, as in the first embodiment.
The force bones 1 and 2 are composed of a lateral force bone 1 arranged in a lateral direction with a space in the vertical direction and a longitudinal force bone 2 arranged in a vertical direction with a space in the horizontal direction.
The lateral force bone 1 is joined to the waterproof paper 5.
The longitudinal force bone 2 forms a raised portion 2a between the lateral force bones 1 and 1 and is joined to the lateral force bones 1 and 1 and is not joined to the waterproof paper 5.
The wire 3 is joined to the longitudinal force bone 2 and is not joined to the lateral force bone 1.

本実施例にかかる横力骨1は、60.4mm程度のピッチで実施しているが、上述したように、30〜80mm程度のピッチの範囲内に収まっているので、良好な成果が得られることに変わりはない。
一方、本実施例にかかる縦力骨2は、68mm程度のピッチで実施しているが、上述したように、30〜100mm程度のピッチの範囲内に収まっているので、良好な成果が得られることに変わりはない。
The lateral force bone 1 according to the present embodiment is implemented at a pitch of about 60.4 mm. However, as described above, the lateral force bone 1 is within the range of a pitch of about 30 to 80 mm, so that good results are obtained. There is no change.
On the other hand, the longitudinal force bone 2 according to the present embodiment is implemented at a pitch of about 68 mm. However, as described above, the longitudinal force bone 2 is within the range of a pitch of about 30 to 100 mm. There is no change.

前記縦力骨2に形成した浮き上がり部2a(中央部が平坦なほぼ台形状)の寸法は、上面が30.2mm程度、下面が60.4mm程度(=横力骨1、1のピッチ)、高さが、縦力骨2の線径を含む7〜8mm程度で実施されている。
また、前記台形(浮き上がり部2a)の傾斜部分(V字凹部)は、前記平坦部の両端縁から屈曲(又は湾曲)して形成され、当該傾斜部分の下端部と横力骨1(の天頂部)との当接部が溶接等の接合手段で接合されている。
The dimensions of the raised portion 2a formed on the longitudinal force bone 2 (almost trapezoid with a flat central portion) are about 30.2 mm on the upper surface and about 60.4 mm on the lower surface (= pitch of the lateral force bones 1 and 1). The height is about 7 to 8 mm including the wire diameter of the longitudinal force bone 2.
Further, the inclined portion (V-shaped concave portion) of the trapezoid (the raised portion 2a) is formed by bending (or bending) from both end edges of the flat portion, and the lower end portion of the inclined portion and the lateral strength bone 1 The contact portion with the top portion is joined by joining means such as welding.

要するに、この実施例2にかかる外壁通気工法用ラスも、上記実施例1と同様に、15.1mm程度のピッチで規則的に配置された水平材(横力骨1および横線材3)を水平横向き方向とした天地の姿勢で、側面方向からみて横向き台形状の浮き上がり部2aを有する鉛直方向の縦力骨2が水平方向に等間隔に配置され、各交点がスポット溶接により接合されて成るラス4に、防水紙5が左斜め上方へ若干ずれた位置関係で当該ラス4を構成する横力骨1とホッチキス等で貼り合わせて一体化した構成で実施されている。   In short, the lath for the outer wall ventilation method according to the second embodiment also has the horizontal members (lateral force bone 1 and horizontal wire 3) arranged regularly at a pitch of about 15.1 mm in the same manner as in the first embodiment. A lath formed by vertical vertical strength bones 2 having horizontal trapezoidal raised portions 2a as viewed from the side, arranged at equal intervals in the horizontal direction, and joined at the intersections by spot welding. 4, the waterproof paper 5 is bonded and integrated with the lateral force bone 1 constituting the lath 4 with a stapler or the like in a positional relationship slightly shifted upward to the left.

よって、この実施例2にかかる外壁通気工法用ラスによれば、上記実施例1にかかるラス10と同様に、前記縦力骨2は、前記横力骨1、1同士の間に浮き上がり部2aを形成して当該横力骨1、1と接合され、防水紙5とは接合されていないので、面外剛性を確実に向上させることができる(詳しくは、前記段落[0028]の(1)参照)。
また、図9に示す従来品ラスと比し、単位面積当たりの縦横に配置する力骨1、2の本数は増えるものの、縦線材が一切ないので、総重量はほとんど変わらない。それでいて、単位面積当たりの縦力骨2の浮き上がり部2aの数量が3倍に増え、且つ、横力骨1が当該浮き上がり部2aの土台となる構成なので、縦力骨2の浮き上がり部2aによるアーチ効果が飛躍的に向上する等、至極合理的にラスの面外剛性を高めることができる(詳しくは、前記段落[0028]の(2)、(3)参照)。
さらに、縦力骨2に対して横力骨1を胴縁側に配設した構成で実施しているので、前記面外荷重に対する縦力骨2の回転による剛性の低下を防ぐこともできる(詳しくは、前記段落[0028]の(4)参照)。
したがって、この実施例2にかかる外壁通気工法用ラスも、面外剛性が大きく、胴縁の長スパン化を十分見込めるので、補助胴縁12を用いることなく、施工性よくモルタル塗着作業を行うことができ、高強度・高剛性・高品質のモルタル外壁を構築することができる。
Therefore, according to the lath for the outer wall ventilation method according to the second embodiment, the longitudinal force bone 2 is lifted between the lateral force bones 1 and 1 like the lath 10 according to the first embodiment. And is joined to the lateral force bones 1 and 1 and not joined to the waterproof paper 5, so that the out-of-plane rigidity can be reliably improved (specifically, (1) in the paragraph [0028] above). reference).
Compared with the conventional product lath shown in FIG. 9, the number of the strength frames 1 and 2 arranged vertically and horizontally per unit area is increased, but since there is no vertical wire, the total weight is hardly changed. Nevertheless, since the number of the lifted portions 2a of the longitudinal force bone 2 per unit area is tripled and the lateral force bone 1 is the base of the lifted portion 2a, the arch by the lifted portion 2a of the longitudinal force bone 2 is provided. The out-of-plane rigidity of the lath can be increased extremely rationally, such as a dramatic improvement in the effect (for details, see paragraphs [0028] (2) and (3) above).
Further, since the lateral force bone 1 is arranged on the torso side with respect to the longitudinal force bone 2, it is possible to prevent a decrease in rigidity due to the rotation of the longitudinal force bone 2 with respect to the out-of-plane load (details). (Refer to paragraph [0028] (4)).
Accordingly, the lath for the outer wall ventilation method according to the second embodiment also has a large out-of-plane rigidity and can be expected to have a long span of the trunk edge. Therefore, the mortar coating operation is performed with good workability without using the auxiliary trunk edge 12. It is possible to construct a mortar outer wall with high strength, high rigidity and high quality.

図4は、本発明に係る外壁通気工法用ラスの異なる実施例を示している。上記実施例1と同一の構成要素は同一の符号を付してその説明を適宜省略する。   FIG. 4 shows different embodiments of the lath for outer wall ventilation method according to the present invention. The same components as those in the first embodiment are denoted by the same reference numerals, and the description thereof is omitted as appropriate.

この実施例3に係る外壁通気工法用ラスは、上記実施例1と比し、横力骨1が30.2mm程度のピッチで配設され、横力骨1、1の間に横線材3が1本ずつ配設されていること、縦力骨2の浮き上がり部2aが山形状に形成していることが主に相違する。一方、縦線材がないこと、縦力骨2のピッチ、及び水平材(横力骨1及び横線材3)が15.1mmピッチで配設されていること等は同じである。   In the lath for the outer wall ventilation method according to the third embodiment, as compared with the first embodiment, the lateral force bones 1 are arranged at a pitch of about 30.2 mm, and the horizontal wire 3 is interposed between the lateral force bones 1 and 1. The main difference is that they are arranged one by one, and the raised portions 2a of the longitudinal bone 2 are formed in a mountain shape. On the other hand, the fact that there is no vertical wire, the pitch of the longitudinal force bone 2, the horizontal materials (the lateral force bone 1 and the horizontal wire 3) are arranged at a pitch of 15.1 mm, etc. are the same.

要するに、この外壁通気工法用ラスもまた、上記実施例1と同様に、以下の構成を特徴とする。
前記力骨1、2は、縦方向に間隔をあけて横向き方向へ配置された横力骨1と、横方向に間隔をあけて縦向き方向へ配置された縦力骨2とからなる。
前記横力骨1は前記防水紙5と接合されている。
前記縦力骨2は前記横力骨1、1同士の間に浮き上がり部2aを形成して当該横力骨1、1と接合され、防水紙5とは接合されていない。
前記線材3は、縦力骨2と接合され、横力骨1とは接合されていない。
In short, this lath for the outer wall ventilation method is also characterized by the following configuration, as in the first embodiment.
The force bones 1 and 2 are composed of a lateral force bone 1 arranged in a lateral direction with a space in the vertical direction and a longitudinal force bone 2 arranged in a vertical direction with a space in the horizontal direction.
The lateral force bone 1 is joined to the waterproof paper 5.
The longitudinal force bone 2 forms a raised portion 2a between the lateral force bones 1 and 1 and is joined to the lateral force bones 1 and 1 and is not joined to the waterproof paper 5.
The wire 3 is joined to the longitudinal force bone 2 and is not joined to the lateral force bone 1.

本実施例にかかる横力骨1は、30.2mm程度のピッチで実施しているが、上述したように、30〜80mm程度のピッチの範囲内に収まっているので、良好な成果が得られることに変わりはない。
一方、本実施例にかかる縦力骨2は、上記実施例1と同様、45.3mm程度のピッチで実施しており、上述したように、30〜100mm程度のピッチの範囲内に収まっているので、良好な成果が得られることに変わりはない。
The lateral force bone 1 according to the present embodiment is implemented at a pitch of about 30.2 mm. However, as described above, the lateral force bone 1 is within a range of a pitch of about 30 to 80 mm, so that good results are obtained. That is no different.
On the other hand, the longitudinal force bone 2 according to the present embodiment is implemented at a pitch of about 45.3 mm, as in the first embodiment, and as described above, it is within the range of a pitch of about 30 to 100 mm. So there is no change in obtaining good results.

前記縦力骨2に形成した山形状の浮き上がり部2aは、底面が30.3(=横力骨1、1のピッチ)で高さが、縦力骨2の線径を含む7〜8mm程度のほぼ二等辺三角形状で実施されている。
また、前記二等辺三角形状(浮き上がり部2a)の傾斜部分(V字凹部)の下端部と横力骨1(の天頂部)との当接部が溶接等の接合手段で接合されている。
The mountain-shaped floating portion 2a formed on the longitudinal force bone 2 has a bottom surface of 30.3 (= pitch of lateral force bones 1 and 1) and a height of about 7 to 8 mm including the diameter of the longitudinal force bone 2 The isosceles triangle shape is implemented.
In addition, the abutting portion between the lower end portion of the inclined portion (V-shaped concave portion) of the isosceles triangle shape (the floating portion 2a) and the lateral force bone 1 (the zenith portion thereof) is joined by a joining means such as welding.

要するに、この実施例3にかかる外壁通気工法用ラスも、上記実施例1と同様に、15.1mm程度のピッチで規則的に配置された水平材(横力骨1および横線材3)を水平横向き方向とした天地の姿勢で、側面方向からみて横向き山形状の浮き上がり部2aを有する鉛直方向の縦力骨2が水平方向に等間隔に配置され、各交点がスポット溶接により接合されて成るラス4に、防水紙5が左斜め上方へ若干ずれた位置関係で当該ラス4を構成する横力骨1とホッチキス等で貼り合わせて一体化した構成で実施されている。   In short, the lath for the outer wall ventilation method according to the third embodiment is also provided with horizontal members (lateral force bones 1 and horizontal wire members 3) arranged regularly at a pitch of about 15.1 mm as in the first embodiment. A lath formed by vertical vertical strength bones 2 having horizontal mountain-shaped raised portions 2a as viewed from the side, arranged at equal intervals in the horizontal direction, and joined at the intersections by spot welding in a horizontal orientation. 4, the waterproof paper 5 is bonded and integrated with the lateral force bone 1 constituting the lath 4 with a stapler or the like in a positional relationship slightly shifted upward to the left.

よって、この実施例3にかかる外壁通気工法用ラスによれば、上記実施例1にかかるラス10と同様に、前記縦力骨2は、前記横力骨1、1同士の間に浮き上がり部2aを形成して当該横力骨1、1と接合され、防水紙5とは接合されていないので、面外剛性を確実に向上させることができる(詳しくは、前記段落[0028]の(1)参照)。
また、図9に示す従来品ラスと比し、単位面積当たりの縦横に配置する力骨1、2の本数は増えるものの、縦線材が一切なく、横線材3の本数が大幅に低減するので、総重量はさほど増えない。それでいて、単位面積当たりの縦力骨2の浮き上がり部2aの数量が5倍に増え、且つ、横力骨1が当該浮き上がり部2aの土台となる構成なので、縦力骨2の浮き上がり部2aによるアーチ効果が飛躍的に向上する等、至極合理的にラスの面外剛性を高めることができる(詳しくは、前記段落[0028]の(2)、(3)参照)。
さらに、縦力骨2に対して横力骨1を胴縁側に配設した構成で実施しているので、前記面外荷重に対する縦力骨2の回転による剛性の低下を防ぐこともできる(詳しくは、前記段落[0028]の(4)参照)。
したがって、この実施例3にかかる外壁通気工法用ラスも、面外剛性が大きく、胴縁の長スパン化を十分見込めるので、補助胴縁12を用いることなく、施工性よくモルタル塗着作業を行うことができ、高強度・高剛性・高品質のモルタル外壁を構築することができる。
<参考例>
Therefore, according to the lath for the outer wall ventilation method according to the third embodiment, the longitudinal force bone 2 is lifted between the lateral force bones 1 and 1 like the lath 10 according to the first embodiment. And is joined to the lateral force bones 1 and 1 and not joined to the waterproof paper 5, so that the out-of-plane rigidity can be reliably improved (specifically, (1) in the paragraph [0028] above). reference).
In addition, compared with the conventional product lath shown in FIG. 9, the number of the strength frames 1, 2 arranged vertically and horizontally per unit area is increased, but there is no vertical wire, and the number of horizontal wires 3 is greatly reduced. The total weight does not increase much. Nevertheless, since the number of the lifted portions 2a of the longitudinal force bone 2 per unit area is increased five times and the lateral force bone 1 is a base of the lifted portion 2a, the arch by the lifted portion 2a of the longitudinal force bone 2 is provided. The out-of-plane rigidity of the lath can be increased extremely rationally, such as a dramatic improvement in the effect (for details, see paragraphs [0028] (2) and (3) above).
Further, since the lateral force bone 1 is arranged on the torso side with respect to the longitudinal force bone 2, it is possible to prevent a decrease in rigidity due to the rotation of the longitudinal force bone 2 with respect to the out-of-plane load (details). (Refer to paragraph [0028] (4)).
Therefore, the lath for the outer wall ventilation method according to the third embodiment also has a large out-of-plane rigidity and can be expected to have a long span of the trunk edge, so that the mortar coating operation is performed with good workability without using the auxiliary trunk edge 12. It is possible to construct a mortar outer wall with high strength, high rigidity and high quality.
<Reference example>

図5は、本発明に係る外壁通気工法用ラスの参考例を示している。上記実施例1と同一の構成要素は同一の符号を付してその説明を適宜省略する。 FIG. 5 shows a reference example of a lath for an outer wall ventilation method according to the present invention. The same components as those in the first embodiment are denoted by the same reference numerals, and the description thereof is omitted as appropriate.

この参考例に係る外壁通気工法用ラスは、上記実施例1と比し、横線材3の代わりに、力骨1、2よりも細径の線材からなるエキスパンドメタル6を用いていることが主に相違する。一方、縦線材がないこと、横力骨1のピッチ、縦力骨2のピッチ及び浮き上がり部2aの形状等は同じである。 The lath for the outer wall ventilation method according to this reference example is mainly composed of an expanded metal 6 made of a wire having a diameter smaller than that of the strength frames 1 and 2 instead of the horizontal wire 3 as compared with the first embodiment. Is different. On the other hand, the absence of the vertical wire, the pitch of the lateral force bone 1, the pitch of the longitudinal force bone 2, the shape of the raised portion 2a, and the like are the same.

要するに、この外壁通気工法用ラスもまた、上記実施例1と同様に、以下の構成を特徴とする。
前記力骨1、2は、縦方向に間隔をあけて横向き方向へ配置された横力骨1と、横方向に間隔をあけて縦向き方向へ配置された縦力骨2とからなる。
前記横力骨1は前記防水紙5と接合されている。
前記縦力骨2は前記横力骨1、1同士の間に浮き上がり部2aを形成して当該横力骨1、1と接合され、防水紙5とは接合されていない。
前記線材(エキスパンドメタル6)は、縦力骨2と交点部をスポット溶接で接合され、横力骨1とは接合されていない。
In short, this lath for the outer wall ventilation method is also characterized by the following configuration, as in the first embodiment.
The force bones 1 and 2 are composed of a lateral force bone 1 arranged in a lateral direction with a space in the vertical direction and a longitudinal force bone 2 arranged in a vertical direction with a space in the horizontal direction.
The lateral force bone 1 is joined to the waterproof paper 5.
The longitudinal force bone 2 forms a raised portion 2a between the lateral force bones 1 and 1 and is joined to the lateral force bones 1 and 1 and is not joined to the waterproof paper 5.
The wire (expanded metal 6) is joined to the longitudinal force bone 2 by spot welding at the intersection and is not joined to the lateral force bone 1.

よって、この参考例にかかる外壁通気工法用ラスによれば、上記実施例1にかかるラス10と同様に、前記縦力骨2は、前記横力骨1、1同士の間に浮き上がり部2aを形成して当該横力骨1、1と接合され、防水紙5とは接合されていないので、面外剛性を確実に向上させることができる(詳しくは、前記段落[0028]の(1)参照)。
また、図9に示す従来品ラスと比し、単位面積当たりの縦横に配置する力骨1、2の本数が増え、エキスパンドメタルラス6自体の重量は増えるものの、縦線材及び横線材3が一切ないので、総重量はさほど増えない。それでいて、単位面積当たりの縦力骨2の浮き上がり部2aの数量が2倍に増え、且つ、横力骨1が当該浮き上がり部2aの土台となる構成なので、縦力骨2の浮き上がり部2によるアーチ効果が飛躍的に向上する等、至極合
理的にラスの面外剛性を高めることができる(詳しくは、前記段落[0028]の(2)、(3)参照)。
さらに、縦力骨2に対して横力骨1を胴縁側に配設した構成で実施しているので、前記面外荷重に対する縦力骨2の回転による剛性の低下を防ぐこともできる(詳しくは、前記段落[0028]の(4)参照)。
したがって、この参考例にかかる外壁通気工法用ラスも、面外剛性が大きく、胴縁の長スパン化を十分見込めるので、補助胴縁12を用いることなく、施工性よくモルタル塗着作業を行うことができ、高強度・高剛性・高品質のモルタル外壁を構築することができる。
なお、前記エキスパンドメタルラス6の代わりにワーヤーメッシュを用いても同様に実施でき、同様の作用効果を発揮することができる。
Therefore, according to the lath for the outer wall ventilation method according to this reference example , the longitudinal force bone 2 has the raised portion 2a between the lateral force bones 1 and 1 like the lath 10 according to the first embodiment. Since it is formed and joined to the lateral force bones 1 and 1 and not joined to the waterproof paper 5, the out-of-plane rigidity can be reliably improved (for details, see (1) in paragraph [0028] above). ).
In addition, compared with the conventional lath shown in FIG. 9, the number of the strength frames 1 and 2 arranged vertically and horizontally per unit area is increased, and the weight of the expanded metal lath 6 itself is increased, but there is no vertical wire or horizontal wire 3 at all. So the total weight will not increase much. Nevertheless, since the number of the lifted portions 2a of the longitudinal force bone 2 per unit area is doubled and the lateral force bone 1 is the foundation of the lifted portion 2a, the arch by the lifted portion 2 of the longitudinal force bone 2 is provided. The out-of-plane rigidity of the lath can be increased extremely rationally, such as a dramatic improvement in the effect (for details, see paragraphs [0028] (2) and (3) above).
Further, since the lateral force bone 1 is arranged on the torso side with respect to the longitudinal force bone 2, it is possible to prevent a decrease in rigidity due to the rotation of the longitudinal force bone 2 with respect to the out-of-plane load (details). (Refer to paragraph [0028] (4)).
Therefore, the lath for the outer wall ventilation method according to this reference example also has a large out-of-plane rigidity and can be expected to have a long span of the trunk edge. Therefore, the mortar coating work should be performed with good workability without using the auxiliary trunk edge 12. It is possible to construct a mortar outer wall with high strength, high rigidity and high quality.
In addition, it can implement similarly even if it uses a wire mesh instead of the said expanded metal lath 6, and can exhibit the same effect.

上記実施例1〜に説明した本発明に係る外壁通気工法用ラスの面外剛性にかかる効果(向上)を確認するべく、上記実施例1に係る外壁通気工法用ラス10を例にとって以下に説明する。 In order to confirm the effect (improvement) on the out-of-plane rigidity of the lath for an outer wall ventilation method according to the present invention described in Examples 1 to 3 , the lath 10 for outer wall ventilation method according to the above Example 1 is taken as an example below. explain.

<上記実施例1にかかる外壁通気工法用ラス10が有する面外剛性の効果の確認>
本出願人は、上記実施例1にかかる外壁通気工法用ラス10が有する面外剛性について、解析ソフトを用いて解析した。また、従来品などの他のラスの面外剛性についても解析し、その違いを検討した。
(解析概要)
・使用する解析ソフト
FEMソルバー:Marc2012
プリポストプロセッサー:Mentat2012
・解析の種類
幾何学的非線形を考慮する大変形問題とした3次元応力解析
<Confirmation of the effect of out-of-plane rigidity of the lath 10 for outer wall ventilation method according to Example 1>
The present applicant analyzed the out-of-plane rigidity of the outer wall ventilation method lath 10 according to Example 1 using analysis software. In addition, we analyzed the out-of-plane rigidity of other laths such as conventional products and examined the difference.
(Analysis overview)
-Analysis software to be used FEM solver: Marc2012
Pre-post processor: Mentat 2012
・ Type of analysis Three-dimensional stress analysis as a large deformation problem considering geometric nonlinearity

(解析モデル)
解析モデル一覧を図10に示す。
また、解析モデルにおける基本条件を以下に示す。
・モデル化の範囲は、755mm×1359mmとする。
・ラスの波付けによる高さは、線径を含め7mmとする。
・胴縁の間隔は453mmとし、水平方向のステープル間隔も同様とする。
・横せん断力を考慮しない3次元中実断面梁要素(要素番号52)を用いて、線材をモデル化する。
・梁同士の交差する節点のうち、実際に溶接されている箇所は剛体リンク(RBE2)で結合する。
(図10に係る解析モデルの補足説明)
要するに、各解析モデルに係るラス(図6〜図9)の面外剛性を適正に評価するべく、使用する力骨1、2の線径、線材3の線径、配置ピッチ、及びステープルの留め付け部位は可能な限り一致させた。
なお、本発明に係る外壁通気工法用ラス10に係るモデルNo.4の図6(その1)とNo.5の図6(その2)との違いは、ステープルの留め付け部位の数量に基づく。前者は上下の2箇所留めの場合、後者は上中下の3箇所留めの場合である。
(Analysis model)
A list of analysis models is shown in FIG.
The basic conditions in the analysis model are shown below.
-The modeling range is 755 mm x 1359 mm.
・ The height by corrugation of the lath shall be 7 mm including the wire diameter.
・ The interval between the cylinder edges is set to 453 mm, and the same is applied to the staple interval in the horizontal direction.
A wire is modeled using a three-dimensional solid cross-section beam element (element number 52) that does not consider the transverse shear force.
-Of the nodes where the beams intersect, the parts that are actually welded are connected by a rigid link (RBE2).
(Supplementary explanation of the analysis model according to FIG. 10)
In short, in order to properly evaluate the out-of-plane rigidity of the lath (FIGS. 6 to 9) according to each analysis model, the wire diameters of the strength frames 1 and 2 to be used, the wire diameter of the wire rod 3, the arrangement pitch, and the staple fastening The attachment sites were matched as much as possible.
In addition, model No. concerning the lath 10 for the outer wall ventilation method according to the present invention. 4 (No. 1) in FIG. 5 is different from FIG. 6 (No. 2) based on the number of staple fixing portions. The former is a case with two upper and lower positions, and the latter is an upper, middle and lower three position.

(材料特性)
材料は、スチールの弾塑性体と仮定し、降伏点を235N/mm、ヤング率(E)を205000N/mm、ポアソン比を0.3、降伏後の二次剛性を2050N/mm(E/100)とする。
(境界条件)
境界条件の解析モデルの図は、出願図面上、クリアに表れないので割愛する。
・拘束条件:ステープルの留め付け部位(図中の○印参照)は、ピン支持(変位固定・回転自由)とする。通気胴縁上にあり、ステープルを留めない部位はZ方向(面外方向)固定とする。
・荷重条件:スパン(前記1359mm)を均等に3スパン(453mmずつ)に分け、その内の中央スパン部(453mm)の中心鉛直線上に面外方向全体荷重を与える。波付けによりラスに高低差がある場合は、最も背の高い線上にのみ荷重をかける。荷重の大きさは最大時で186N/mmとする。これは9mmのモルタル相当の重量である。
(Material property)
The material is assumed to be an elastoplastic material of steel, the yield point is 235 N / mm 2 , the Young's modulus (E) is 205000 N / mm 2 , the Poisson's ratio is 0.3, and the secondary stiffness after yield is 2050 N / mm 2 ( E / 100).
(boundary condition)
The illustration of the boundary condition analysis model is omitted because it does not appear clear on the application drawing.
・ Restraining conditions: Staple fastening sites (see circles in the figure) are pin-supported (displacement fixed and free to rotate). The part on the ventilator edge where the staple is not fastened is fixed in the Z direction (out-of-plane direction).
Load condition: The span (1359 mm) is equally divided into three spans (453 mm each), and the entire load in the out-of-plane direction is given on the central vertical line of the central span portion (453 mm). If there is a difference in level in the lath due to corrugation, apply the load only on the tallest line. The magnitude of the load is 186 N / mm 2 at the maximum. This is a weight equivalent to 9 mm mortar.

(面外剛性評価方法および解析結果)
各ラスの面外剛性は、前記中央スパン部(453mm)の中心鉛直線、すなわち、ラス全体の中心に位置する鉛直線の中央平均面外変位(面外変位平均値)により評価する。
図11は、各解析モデルの中央平均面外変位(mm)の結果を示す。
図12は、各解析モデルの荷重−変位の関係をプロットしたグラフである。グラフ中の符号1〜5は、図10と図11のモデルNo.に対応している。
(Out-of-plane stiffness evaluation method and analysis results)
The out-of-plane rigidity of each lath is evaluated by the central vertical line of the central span portion (453 mm), that is, the central average out-of-plane displacement (out-of-plane displacement average value) of the vertical line located at the center of the entire lath.
FIG. 11 shows the result of the center average out-of-plane displacement (mm) of each analysis model.
FIG. 12 is a graph plotting the load-displacement relationship of each analysis model. Reference numerals 1 to 5 in the graph indicate model numbers of FIGS. It corresponds to.

(考察)
図9モデルと図8モデルのラスの解析結果を対比検討すると、図11、図12から明らかなように、図8モデルの方が面外剛性が高いことが分かる。これは、図8モデルの方が、力骨の本数が多い(横力骨1が1本分、縦力骨2が2本分)ことによるものと判断される。また、縦線材3は、本数が多くても面外剛性の向上にほとんど寄与しないと判断される。
図8モデルと図7モデルのラスの解析結果を対比検討すると、図11、図12から明らかなように、図7モデルの方が面外剛性が高いことが分かる。これは、力骨1、2及び横線材3の配置、数量が同一なので、縦力骨2の波付け(浮き上がり部)によるアーチ効果が発揮されたことによるものと判断される。なお、図7モデルのラスは、本出願人がこの解析のために新規に想定したものであり、市販品等ではない。
図7モデルと図6モデル(その1)のラスの解析結果を対比検討すると、図11、図12から明らかなように、図6モデル(その1)の方が面外剛性が高いことが分かる。これは、力骨1、2及び横線材3の配置、数量が同一なので、縦力骨2の波付け(浮き上がり部)の数量が2倍に増えた分だけ大きいアーチ効果が発揮されたことによるものと判断される。
図6モデル(その1)と(その2)のラスの解析結果を対比検討すると、図11、図12から明らかなように、図6モデル(その2)の方が面外剛性が高いことが分かる。これは、ステープルの留め付け数量が増えると面外剛性が高くなると判断される。
(Discussion)
When the analysis results of the laths of the model 9 and the model 8 are compared, it can be seen from FIG. 11 and FIG. 12 that the model 8 has higher out-of-plane rigidity. It is determined that this is because the number of strength bones is larger in the model of FIG. 8 (one lateral force bone 1 and two longitudinal force bones 2). Moreover, it is judged that the vertical wire 3 hardly contributes to the improvement of the out-of-plane rigidity even if the number of the vertical wires 3 is large.
Comparing the analysis results of the laths of the FIG. 8 model and the FIG. 7 model, it can be seen that the FIG. 7 model has higher out-of-plane rigidity, as is apparent from FIG. 11 and FIG. This is determined to be due to the fact that the arch effect due to the corrugation (lifting portion) of the longitudinal force bone 2 was exhibited because the arrangement and quantity of the strength frames 1 and 2 and the horizontal wire 3 were the same. Note that the lath of the model in FIG. 7 is newly assumed by the applicant for this analysis, and is not a commercial product.
When the analysis results of the laths of the FIG. 7 model and the FIG. 6 model (part 1) are compared, it is understood from FIG. 11 and FIG. 12 that the out-of-plane rigidity is higher in the FIG. 6 model (part 1). . This is because the arrangement and quantity of the strength frames 1 and 2 and the horizontal wire 3 are the same, so that a large arch effect was exhibited by the amount that the number of corrugation (lifting part) of the longitudinal force bone 2 was doubled. Judged to be.
When the analysis results of the laths of the model (part 1) and the model (2) are compared, it is clear from FIG. 11 and FIG. 12 that the model (part 2) has higher out-of-plane rigidity. I understand. It is determined that the out-of-plane rigidity increases as the staple fastening quantity increases.

(まとめ)
本発明に係る図6モデルのラス(本発明に係る外壁通気工法用ラス10)は、他のラス(図7〜図9参照)と比し、単位面積当たりの重量(g/m)をほとんど変えることなく(図10参照)、主として縦力骨2に形成した浮き上がり部2aのアーチ効果が十分に発揮されることにより、至極合理的に面外剛性を向上させることができたと確信する。
(Summary)
The lath of the model of FIG. 6 according to the present invention (the lath 10 for the outer wall ventilation method according to the present invention) has a weight per unit area (g / m 2 ) as compared with other laths (see FIGS. 7 to 9). It is convinced that the out-of-plane rigidity can be extremely rationally improved by substantially exhibiting the arch effect of the raised portion 2a formed mainly on the longitudinal force bone 2 with almost no change (see FIG. 10).

以上、実施例を図面に基づいて説明したが、本発明は、図示例の限りではなく、その技術的思想を逸脱しない範囲において、当業者が通常に行う設計変更、応用のバリエーションの範囲を含むことを念のために言及する。
例えば、縦力骨2に形成する浮き上がり部2aの形状は、中間部が平坦なほぼ台形状、又は山形状に限定されず、円弧形状でも同様に実施でき、同様の作用効果を発揮することができる。
Although the embodiments have been described with reference to the drawings, the present invention is not limited to the illustrated examples and includes a range of design changes and application variations that are usually made by those skilled in the art without departing from the technical idea thereof. I will mention that just in case.
For example, the shape of the raised portion 2a formed on the longitudinal force bone 2 is not limited to a substantially trapezoidal shape or a mountain shape with a flat middle portion, and can be similarly implemented in an arc shape and can exhibit the same effects. it can.

1 横力骨
2 縦力骨
2a 浮き上がり部
3 横線材
4 ラス
5 防水紙
6 エキスパンドメタルラス
10 外壁通気工法用ラス
11 通気胴縁
12 補助胴縁
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Lateral strength bone 2 Longitudinal strength bone 2a Floating part 3 Horizontal wire 4 Lath 5 Waterproof paper 6 Expanded metal lath 10 Lath for outer wall ventilation method 11 Venting trunk edge 12 Auxiliary trunk edge

Claims (5)

力骨と当該力骨よりも細径の線材とで構成したラスに防水紙を裏打ちしてなる外壁通気工法用ラスであって、
前記力骨は、縦方向に間隔をあけて横向き方向へ配置された横力骨と、横方向に間隔をあけて縦向き方向へ配置された縦力骨とからなること、
前記横力骨は前記防水紙と接合されていること、
前記縦力骨は前記横力骨同士の間に浮き上がり部を形成して当該横力骨と接合され、防水紙とは接合されていないこと、
前記線材は、縦方向に間隔をあけて横向き方向へ配置された横線材のみで構成され、前記横力骨同士の間に配置されて前記縦力骨と接合され、横力骨とは接合されていないこと、をそれぞれ特徴とする、外壁通気工法用ラス。
A lath for the outer wall ventilation method, which is formed by lining a waterproof paper to a lath composed of a strong bone and a wire rod having a diameter smaller than that of the strong bone,
The force bone is composed of a lateral force bone arranged in a lateral direction with a space in the longitudinal direction and a longitudinal force bone arranged in a longitudinal direction with a space in the lateral direction;
The lateral force bone is joined to the waterproof paper;
The longitudinal force bone is joined to the lateral force bone by forming a raised portion between the lateral force bones, and is not joined to waterproof paper,
The wire is composed only of horizontal wires arranged in the horizontal direction with a space in the vertical direction, and is arranged between the lateral force bones and joined to the longitudinal force bones, and is joined to the lateral force bones. The lath for the outer wall ventilation method, characterized by the fact that they are not.
前記浮き上がり部は、中間部が平坦なほぼ台形状、又は山形状に形成されていることを特徴とする、請求項1に記載した外壁通気工法用ラス。 The lath for an outer wall ventilation method according to claim 1, wherein the raised portion is formed in a substantially trapezoidal shape or a mountain shape in which an intermediate portion is flat. 前記浮き上がり部の高低差は7〜8mmであることを特徴とする、請求項1又は2に記載した外壁通気工法用ラス。 The lath for an outer wall ventilation method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein a difference in height of the raised portion is 7 to 8 mm . 水平材を構成する横力骨と横線材は、全体として、15mmのピッチで配置されていることを特徴とする、請求項1〜3のいずれか1項に記載した外壁通気工法用ラス。The lath for an outer wall ventilation method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the horizontal force bone and the horizontal wire constituting the horizontal member are arranged at a pitch of 15 mm as a whole. 前記横力骨は、30〜80mmのピッチで配設され、前記縦力骨は、30〜100mmのピッチで配設されていることを特徴とする、請求項1〜4のいずれか一に記載した外壁通気工法用ラス。 The lateral force bone, 30 to 80 mm are arranged at a pitch of, the longitudinal force bone is characterized by being arranged at a pitch of 30 to 100 mm, according to claim 1-4 either single The lath for the outer wall ventilation method described in 1.
JP2015059725A 2015-03-23 2015-03-23 Lath for exterior wall ventilation method Active JP6576068B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2015059725A JP6576068B2 (en) 2015-03-23 2015-03-23 Lath for exterior wall ventilation method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2015059725A JP6576068B2 (en) 2015-03-23 2015-03-23 Lath for exterior wall ventilation method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2016180208A JP2016180208A (en) 2016-10-13
JP6576068B2 true JP6576068B2 (en) 2019-09-18

Family

ID=57131683

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2015059725A Active JP6576068B2 (en) 2015-03-23 2015-03-23 Lath for exterior wall ventilation method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP6576068B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP7065419B2 (en) * 2017-03-28 2022-05-12 日鉄建材株式会社 Las for outer wall ventilation method

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS547012U (en) * 1977-06-17 1979-01-18
JPS56135043U (en) * 1980-03-14 1981-10-13
JP5349856B2 (en) * 2008-07-07 2013-11-20 株式会社ニッケンビルド Lath for mortar and building wall structure
JP2014169544A (en) * 2013-03-01 2014-09-18 Nikken Build:Kk Lath for mortar substrate

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2016180208A (en) 2016-10-13

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP5723235B2 (en) Slab construction method and deck plate structure
KR101547540B1 (en) Hybrid beam having different type flange
JP6576068B2 (en) Lath for exterior wall ventilation method
KR102027813B1 (en) Built-Up Beam
JPH0978764A (en) Assembly rebar truss and manufacturing method thereof
JP2012036584A (en) Arrangement method of reinforced concrete column
JP5047060B2 (en) Synthetic floor slab and its reinforcement method
JP6832568B2 (en) Reinforcement structure of stirrup bar unit and reinforced concrete beam
KR20130050634A (en) Shear reinforcement for reinforced concrete structure
JP5054807B2 (en) Deck plate with truss
JP7065419B2 (en) Las for outer wall ventilation method
JP4895284B2 (en) Reinforcement structure of existing steel structural members
KR101080440B1 (en) Truss, deck plate structure in which this truss is installed, and construction method of deck plate structure
KR100798101B1 (en) High Rigidity Steel Formwork
KR20110088309A (en) Top panel for SR pillar
JP5729566B2 (en) Method for forming shear reinforcement of concrete slab, road slab and flat slab
JP7020046B2 (en) How to repair existing structures
JP4563872B2 (en) Seismic wall
JP3802039B2 (en) Reinforcing bar connection structure and method for manufacturing reinforcing bar unit
JP2014101654A (en) Reinforcement structure of concrete and reinforcement method
JP6679261B2 (en) Reinforcement structure of steel beam support of slab
JP5451508B2 (en) Seismic base material and seismic wall structure using this base material
JP3939686B2 (en) Formwork panel and building formwork using the same and concrete foundation
JP2017145616A (en) Lath for outer wall ventilation method
CN212336296U (en) Steel plate anchoring connection node

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20180305

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20190129

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20190212

A601 Written request for extension of time

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A601

Effective date: 20190402

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20190612

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20190813

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20190820

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 6576068

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250