Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP6597339B2 - Evaluation method for structural member and evaluation member used therefor - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP6597339B2 - Evaluation method for structural member and evaluation member used therefor - Google Patents

Evaluation method for structural member and evaluation member used therefor Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP6597339B2
JP6597339B2 JP2016011189A JP2016011189A JP6597339B2 JP 6597339 B2 JP6597339 B2 JP 6597339B2 JP 2016011189 A JP2016011189 A JP 2016011189A JP 2016011189 A JP2016011189 A JP 2016011189A JP 6597339 B2 JP6597339 B2 JP 6597339B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
evaluation
hat
structural
attached
attachment arm
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2016011189A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2017133837A (en
Inventor
泰則 伊藤
晃 堀江
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Nippon Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nippon Steel Corp filed Critical Nippon Steel Corp
Priority to JP2016011189A priority Critical patent/JP6597339B2/en
Publication of JP2017133837A publication Critical patent/JP2017133837A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP6597339B2 publication Critical patent/JP6597339B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Landscapes

  • Investigating Strength Of Materials By Application Of Mechanical Stress (AREA)

Description

本発明は、曲げと引張りを受ける構造部材の評価方法及びこれに用いる評価部材に関するものである。本発明の評価方法及び評価部材は、特に高強度鋼板からなる構造部材の評価に適したものである。   The present invention relates to a method for evaluating a structural member that receives bending and tension, and an evaluation member used for the method. The evaluation method and the evaluation member of the present invention are particularly suitable for evaluation of a structural member made of a high-strength steel plate.

自動車の衝突性能と燃費性能とを両立させるため、高強度で軽量な車体構造が求められている。最適な車体構造の設計には、実際の自動車の構造部材に働く曲げモーメントや引張り・圧縮応力を正確に再現できる評価部材を作成し、これを試験装置にセットして評価することが必要である。   In order to achieve both vehicle crash performance and fuel efficiency, a high-strength and lightweight vehicle structure is required. To design the optimal vehicle body structure, it is necessary to create an evaluation member that can accurately reproduce the bending moment and tensile / compressive stress acting on the actual structural member of an automobile, and set this in a test device for evaluation. .

一般的な構造部材の評価方法としては、3点又は4点曲げ試験方法があるが、この方法では評価対象となる断面に曲げモーメントと軸力(軸方向の引張・圧縮力)とを同時に発生させることができない。そこでこの問題を解決するために、本出願人は先に「レバー曲げ評価法」を開発し、特許文献1として提案した。   As a general structural member evaluation method, there is a three-point or four-point bending test method. In this method, bending moment and axial force (axial tensile / compressive force) are generated at the same time in the cross section to be evaluated. I can't let you. Therefore, in order to solve this problem, the present applicant has previously developed a “lever bending evaluation method” and proposed it as Patent Document 1.

この「レバー曲げ評価法」は、図1に示すように、評価しようとする構造部材である評価部材1の端部に、評価部材1の軸線に対してオフセットした着力点3を持つ着力アーム2を取付け、この着力アーム2の先端の着力点3を回動可能な支持点で支持した状態で着力点3に引張りまたは圧縮の試験力を加え、評価部材1の所定部位に座屈を発生させる構造部材の評価方法である。この例では、構造部材は図2に示すように断面ハット型のハット部材4のフランジ部5にインナー部材6を溶接した構造である。その軸線方向の両端には端板7を介して着力アーム2が端部に溶接されている。   As shown in FIG. 1, this “lever bending evaluation method” includes an application arm 2 having an application point 3 offset from the axis of the evaluation member 1 at the end of the evaluation member 1 that is a structural member to be evaluated. Is attached, and a tensile or compressive test force is applied to the force application point 3 in a state where the force application point 3 at the tip of the force application arm 2 is supported by a pivotable support point to cause buckling at a predetermined portion of the evaluation member 1. It is an evaluation method of a structural member. In this example, the structural member has a structure in which an inner member 6 is welded to a flange portion 5 of a hat member 4 having a hat-shaped cross section as shown in FIG. At the opposite ends in the axial direction, the force applying arms 2 are welded to the end portions via end plates 7.

この「レバー曲げ評価法」によれば、評価部材1の所定部位に、曲げモーメントと軸力を同時に作用させることができるので、一般的な曲げ試験方法とは異なり、実際の自動車の構造部材に働く曲げモーメントや引張り・圧縮応力を正確に再現できる利点がある。   According to this “lever bending evaluation method”, since a bending moment and an axial force can be simultaneously applied to a predetermined portion of the evaluation member 1, unlike a general bending test method, There is an advantage that the working bending moment and tensile / compressive stress can be accurately reproduced.

ところが、評価部材1の材質を高強度鋼板とした場合には、評価部材1の所定部位に座屈などの変形を発生させるより前に、図3に示すように評価部材1の端部と端板7との溶接部が破断してしまい、正しい評価が行なえないという問題が発生した。   However, when the material of the evaluation member 1 is a high-strength steel plate, before the deformation such as buckling is generated at a predetermined portion of the evaluation member 1, as shown in FIG. The welded portion with the plate 7 was broken, and there was a problem that correct evaluation could not be performed.

特開2015−108585号公報Japanese Patent Laying-Open No. 2015-108585

従って本発明の目的は上記した従来の問題点を解決し、評価部材の所定部位に曲げモーメントと軸力を同時に作用させるレバー曲げ評価法において、評価部材の端部と端板との溶接部の破断を回避し、評価部材の所定部位に安定して座屈を発生させることができる構造部材の評価方法及びこれに用いる評価部材を提供することである。   Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to solve the above-described conventional problems, and in a lever bending evaluation method in which a bending moment and an axial force are simultaneously applied to a predetermined portion of an evaluation member, the welded portion between the end portion of the evaluation member and the end plate An object of the present invention is to provide a structural member evaluation method capable of avoiding breakage and stably generating buckling at a predetermined portion of the evaluation member, and an evaluation member used therefor.

本発明者は前記した評価部材の破断原因を検討した結果、端板を溶接する際に評価部材の母材(高強度鋼板)への入熱が大きいために評価部材の端部に軟化部が発生し、試験時に評価部材の長手方向に均一に発生する軸力により、最も弱い軟化部より破断が発生することを究明した。   As a result of examining the cause of the breakage of the evaluation member described above, the inventor has a softened portion at the end portion of the evaluation member because the heat input to the base material (high strength steel plate) of the evaluation member is large when welding the end plate. It was found that the fracture occurred from the weakest softened part due to the axial force generated and uniformly generated in the longitudinal direction of the evaluation member during the test.

本発明は上記の知見に基づいて完成されたものであり、評価しようとする構造部材である評価部材の端部に、評価部材の軸線に対してオフセットした着力点を持つ着力アームを取付け、着力点を支持点で支持した状態で着力点に引張りまたは圧縮の試験力を加え、評価部材に曲げモーメントと軸力を同時に作用させる構造部材の評価方法であって、前記評価部材として、断面ハット型のハット部材とインナー部材とからなり、当該ハット部材のフランジ部と、それに相対するインナー部材の端部は曲線による蝶型であり、これらのハット部材とインナー部材とを溶接した構造のものを用いることを特徴とするものである。   The present invention has been completed on the basis of the above knowledge, and an attachment arm having an application point offset with respect to the axis of the evaluation member is attached to the end of the evaluation member which is a structural member to be evaluated. A method of evaluating a structural member in which a tensile or compressive test force is applied to an applied point while the point is supported by a supporting point, and a bending moment and an axial force are simultaneously applied to the evaluation member. The flange portion of the hat member and the end portion of the inner member opposite to the hat member have a butterfly shape with a curve, and a structure in which these hat member and the inner member are welded is used. It is characterized by this.

前記着力アームは、評価部材の一方の端部にのみ取付けたり、評価部材の両端に同一方向にオフセットさせて取付けたり、評価部材の軸線を含む平面内で非平行にオフセットさせて取付けたり、評価部材の軸線を含む平面から外れる方向にオフセットさせて取付けたりすることができる。なお、前記支持点に転がり軸受けを用いることができる。   The attachment arm is attached to only one end portion of the evaluation member, is attached to both ends of the evaluation member by being offset in the same direction, is attached to be offset in a non-parallel manner in a plane including the axis of the evaluation member, and evaluation It can be attached by being offset in a direction away from the plane including the axis of the member. In addition, a rolling bearing can be used for the support point.

また本発明の評価部材は、評価しようとする構造部材である評価部材の端部に、評価部材の軸線に対してオフセットした着力点を持つ着力アームを取付けてなる評価部材であって、断面ハット型のハット部材とインナー部材とからなり、当該ハット部材のフランジ部と、それに相対するインナー部材の端部は曲線による蝶型であり、これらのハット部材とインナー部材とが溶接された構造であることを特徴とするものである。なお、前記インナー部材の両端部を中央部よりも厚くし、かつ軟鋼板を溶接した構造とすることが好ましい。 The evaluation member of the present invention is an evaluation member in which an attachment arm having an application point offset with respect to the axis of the evaluation member is attached to the end of the evaluation member, which is a structural member to be evaluated. It consists of a hat member and an inner member of the mold, and the flange portion of the hat member and the end portion of the inner member corresponding to the hat member are curved butterfly shapes, and the hat member and the inner member are welded. It is characterized by this. In addition, it is preferable to make it the structure which made the both ends of the said inner member thicker than a center part, and welded the mild steel plate .

本発明によれば、評価部材として、断面ハット型のハット部材とインナー部材とからなり、当該ハット部材のフランジ部と、それに相対するインナー部材の端部は曲線による蝶型であり、これらのハット部材と平板状のインナー部材とを溶接した構造のものを用いるので、中央部の断面を評価断面のままとし、両端部のフランジ部の幅を広げて端部溶接個所の発生応力を緩和することができる。これにより評価部材の端部と端板との溶接部の破断を回避し、評価部材の所定部位に安定して座屈を発生させることができる。   According to the present invention, the evaluation member includes a hat member having a cross-sectional hat shape and an inner member, and the flange portion of the hat member and the end portion of the inner member corresponding to the hat member are butterfly shapes with curves, and these hats Since a member having a structure in which a member and a flat inner member are welded is used, the cross-section at the center remains the same as the evaluation cross-section, and the width of the flange at both ends is widened to alleviate the stress generated at the end welds. Can do. Thereby, the fracture of the welded portion between the end portion of the evaluation member and the end plate can be avoided, and buckling can be stably generated at a predetermined portion of the evaluation member.

従来のレバー曲げ評価法の説明図である。It is explanatory drawing of the conventional lever bending evaluation method. 従来のレバー曲げ評価法の評価部材の分解斜視図である。It is a disassembled perspective view of the evaluation member of the conventional lever bending evaluation method. 従来の問題点の説明図である。It is explanatory drawing of the conventional problem. 本発明のレバー曲げ評価法の説明図である。It is explanatory drawing of the lever bending evaluation method of this invention. 評価部材の組立工程の説明図である。It is explanatory drawing of the assembly process of an evaluation member. 着力アームを評価部材の両端に同一方向にオフセットさせて取付けた状態を示す側面図である。It is a side view which shows the state which offset and attached the attachment arm to the both ends of the evaluation member in the same direction. 着力アームを評価部材の一端に取付けた状態を示す側面図である。It is a side view which shows the state which attached the attachment arm to the end of the evaluation member. 着力アームを評価部材の軸線を含む平面内で非平行にオフセットさせて取付けた状態を示す側面図である。It is a side view which shows the state which offset the non-parallel offset arm in the plane containing the axis line of an evaluation member, and was attached.

以下に本発明の実施形態を説明する。なお本発明において、評価しようとする構造部材は、高強度鋼板からなる断面ハット型の部材である。   Embodiments of the present invention will be described below. In the present invention, the structural member to be evaluated is a cross-sectional hat-shaped member made of a high-strength steel plate.

図4に示すように、本発明の構造部材の評価方法も、評価部材10の端部にその軸線に対してオフセットした着力点を持つ着力アーム11を取付け、その先端の着力点を支持点12で支持した状態で着力点に引張りまたは圧縮の試験力を加え、評価部材10に曲げモーメントと軸力を同時に作用させることは、従来と同様である。しかし以下に説明するように、評価部材10の構造が従来とは相違している。   As shown in FIG. 4, the structural member evaluation method of the present invention also attaches an attachment arm 11 having an application point offset with respect to its axis to the end of the evaluation member 10, and uses the application point at the tip as a support point 12. As in the conventional case, a tensile or compressive test force is applied to the applied force point in a state where it is supported by, and a bending moment and an axial force are simultaneously applied to the evaluation member 10. However, as will be described below, the structure of the evaluation member 10 is different from the conventional one.

図4及び図5に示すように、評価しようとする構造部材は断面ハット型のハット部材13とインナー部材14とからなるものであるが、当該ハット部材13のフランジ部15は中央部がくびれた、なだらかな曲線による蝶型の形状となっている。またインナー部材14もこのフランジ部15の形状と同様に、中央部がくびれた曲線による蝶型の形状となっており、これらのハット部材13とインナー部材14とが溶接された構造である。このような形状の評価部材1の両端に端板16が溶接され、これらの端板16の外側に着力アーム11が取付けられる。   As shown in FIGS. 4 and 5, the structural member to be evaluated is composed of a hat-shaped hat member 13 and an inner member 14, but the flange portion 15 of the hat member 13 is constricted at the center. It has a butterfly shape with a gentle curve. Similarly to the shape of the flange portion 15, the inner member 14 has a butterfly shape with a constricted central portion, and the hat member 13 and the inner member 14 are welded. The end plates 16 are welded to both ends of the evaluation member 1 having such a shape, and the attaching arm 11 is attached to the outside of the end plates 16.

評価部材10をこのような形状とすることにより、評価部材10の中央の断面を評価しようとする断面そのままとし、端部のフランジ幅を拡げて端部溶接個所の応力を緩和することができる。さらに評価部材10をこのような形状とすることにより、評価部材10の折れ曲がり位置を断面係数が最も小さい中央付近として、安定して座屈させることができる。   By making the evaluation member 10 in such a shape, the cross section at the center of the evaluation member 10 can be left as it is, and the flange width at the end can be widened to relieve the stress at the end weld. Furthermore, by making the evaluation member 10 in such a shape, the bending position of the evaluation member 10 can be stably buckled with the center of the section coefficient being the smallest.

さらに本実施形態のように、インナー部材14の両端部を中央部よりも厚くすることが好ましい。図5ではインナー部材14の両端部に、板厚が例えば板厚3mm前後の補強板17を溶接している。溶接はレーザーなどによる突合せ溶接とすることができる。このような板厚の異なる鋼板を突き合わせ溶接する技術は、テーラードブランク溶接技術として公知である。   Further, as in the present embodiment, it is preferable that both end portions of the inner member 14 are thicker than the center portion. In FIG. 5, reinforcing plates 17 having a plate thickness of about 3 mm, for example, are welded to both ends of the inner member 14. The welding can be butt welding with a laser or the like. Such a technique of butt-welding steel plates having different thicknesses is known as a tailored blank welding technique.

この補強板17として、材質が軟質な金属、例えば軟鋼板を用いることにより、補強板17と端板16との溶接の際の熱影響による軟化が発生しないようにしている。高強度鋼板からなるハット部材13の両端は端板16に直接溶接されるために軟化部が発生することとなるが、試験時にはフランジ部15に溶接された補強板17の側から溶接部を介して荷重入力されるため、この軟化部に発生する応力は緩和される。   By using a soft metal such as a mild steel plate as the reinforcing plate 17, softening due to a thermal effect during welding of the reinforcing plate 17 and the end plate 16 is prevented. Since both ends of the hat member 13 made of a high-strength steel plate are directly welded to the end plate 16, softened portions are generated. During the test, the reinforcing plate 17 welded to the flange portion 15 is passed through the welded portion. Therefore, the stress generated in the softened portion is relieved.

このようにして、本発明の評価部材10を用いてレバー曲げ評価法を実施すれば、評価部材10の端部と端板16との溶接部に発生する応力を緩和することができる。従って従来のような評価部材10の端部と端板16との溶接部の破断を回避し、評価部材10の中央部に安定して座屈を発生させることができる。図4にその様子を示した。   Thus, if the lever bending evaluation method is implemented using the evaluation member 10 of the present invention, the stress generated in the welded portion between the end portion of the evaluation member 10 and the end plate 16 can be relaxed. Therefore, it is possible to avoid breakage of the welded portion between the end portion of the evaluation member 10 and the end plate 16 as in the prior art, and to stably generate buckling in the central portion of the evaluation member 10. This is shown in FIG.

なお図6に示すように、着力アーム11の先端の支持点12には、摩擦抵抗の小さい転がり軸受を用いることが好ましい。これにより、試験力Fを摩擦の影響を受けずに着力アーム11に伝え、精度の高い評価試験を行なうことができる。   As shown in FIG. 6, it is preferable to use a rolling bearing having a low frictional resistance at the support point 12 at the tip of the force arm 11. As a result, the test force F can be transmitted to the applied arm 11 without being affected by friction, and a highly accurate evaluation test can be performed.

図4、図6では評価部材10の両側に着力アーム11を取付けたが、図7に示すように、着力アーム11を評価部材10の一方の端部にのみ取付けることもできる。   In FIG. 4 and FIG. 6, the attachment arm 11 is attached to both sides of the evaluation member 10. However, the attachment arm 11 can be attached only to one end of the evaluation member 10 as shown in FIG. 7.

また図6のように着力アーム11を評価部材10の両端に同一方向にオフセットさせて取付けるほか、   Further, as shown in FIG. 6, the attachment arm 11 is attached to both ends of the evaluation member 10 while being offset in the same direction.

さらに図8に示すように、着力アーム11を評価部材10の軸線を含む平面内で非平行にオフセットさせて取付けたり、評価部材10の軸線を含む平面から外れる方向にオフセットさせて取付けることも可能である。   Further, as shown in FIG. 8, it is possible to attach the attachment arm 11 by offsetting it in a non-parallel manner in a plane including the axis of the evaluation member 10, or by attaching it in a direction deviating from the plane including the axis of the evaluation member 10. It is.

上記のように着力アーム11の取り付け方を様々に変化させることにより、評価部材10の試験断面に加えられる曲げモーメントや軸力の大きさや方向を様々に変化させることができるので、自動車の各部品の取付位置に応じた最適な評価条件を、それぞれ設定することが可能となる。何れの場合にも、評価部材10の構造は前述の通りである。   As described above, by changing the attachment method of the arm 11 in various ways, the bending moment applied to the test section of the evaluation member 10 and the magnitude and direction of the axial force can be changed in various ways. It is possible to set optimum evaluation conditions according to the mounting position of each. In any case, the structure of the evaluation member 10 is as described above.

以上に説明したように、本発明によれば、評価部材10の端部と端板16との溶接部の破断を回避し、評価断面を持つ評価部材10の所定部位、すなわち評価部材10の中央部位に、安定して座屈を発生させることができる利点がある。   As described above, according to the present invention, the fracture of the welded portion between the end portion of the evaluation member 10 and the end plate 16 is avoided, and a predetermined portion of the evaluation member 10 having the evaluation cross section, that is, the center of the evaluation member 10 There exists an advantage which can generate buckling stably in a site | part.

1 従来の評価部材
2 着力アーム
3 着力点
4 ハット部材
5 フランジ部
6 インナー部材
7 端板
10 本発明の評価部材
11 着力アーム
12 支持点
13 ハット部材
14 インナー部材
15 フランジ部
16 端板
17 補強板
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Conventional evaluation member 2 Applying arm 3 Applying point 4 Hat member 5 Flange part 6 Inner member 7 End plate 10 Evaluation member 11 of the present invention 11 Applying arm 12 Supporting point 13 Hat member 14 Inner member 15 Flange part 16 End plate 17 Reinforcing plate

Claims (8)

評価しようとする構造部材である評価部材の端部に、評価部材の軸線に対してオフセットした着力点を持つ着力アームを取付け、着力点を支持点で支持した状態で着力点に引張りまたは圧縮の試験力を加え、評価部材に曲げモーメントと軸力を同時に作用させる構造部材の評価方法であって、
前記評価部材として、断面ハット型のハット部材とインナー部材とからなり、当該ハット部材のフランジ部と、それに相対するインナー部材の端部は曲線による蝶型であり、これらのハット部材とインナー部材とを溶接した構造のものを用いることを特徴とする構造部材の評価方法。
An attachment arm having an application point offset from the axis of the evaluation member is attached to the end of the evaluation member, which is the structural member to be evaluated, and the application point is pulled or compressed to the application point while the application point is supported by the support point. A method for evaluating a structural member in which a test force is applied and a bending moment and an axial force are simultaneously applied to the evaluation member,
The evaluation member includes a hat-shaped hat member and an inner member, and the flange portion of the hat member and the end portion of the inner member corresponding to the hat member have a butterfly shape with a curve, and the hat member and the inner member A method for evaluating a structural member, characterized by using a structure welded to each other.
前記着力アームを、評価部材の一方の端部にのみ取付けることを特徴とする請求項1に記載の構造部材の評価方法。 The structural member evaluation method according to claim 1, wherein the attachment arm is attached only to one end of the evaluation member . 前記着力アームを、評価部材の両端に同一方向にオフセットさせて取付けることを特徴とする請求項1に記載の構造部材の評価方法。 The structural member evaluation method according to claim 1 , wherein the attachment arm is attached to both ends of the evaluation member while being offset in the same direction . 前記着力アームを、評価部材の軸線を含む平面内で非平行にオフセットさせて取付けることを特徴とする請求項3に記載の構造部材の評価方法。 The structural member evaluation method according to claim 3 , wherein the attachment arm is attached by being offset non-parallelly in a plane including an axis of the evaluation member. 前記着力アームを、評価部材の軸線を含む平面から外れる方向にオフセットさせて取付けることを特徴とする請求項3に記載の構造部材の評価方法。 4. The structural member evaluation method according to claim 3 , wherein the attachment arm is attached by being offset in a direction deviating from a plane including the axis of the evaluation member. 前記支持点に転がり軸受けを用いることを特徴とする請求項1〜5の何れかに記載の構造部材の評価方法。 6. A method for evaluating a structural member according to claim 1, wherein a rolling bearing is used as the support point . 評価しようとする構造部材である評価部材の端部に、評価部材の軸線に対してオフセットした着力点を持つ着力アームを取付けてなる評価部材であって、An evaluation member comprising an attachment arm having an application point offset with respect to the axis of the evaluation member at the end of the evaluation member, which is a structural member to be evaluated,
断面ハット型のハット部材とインナー部材とからなり、当該ハット部材のフランジ部と、それに相対するインナー部材の端部は曲線による蝶型であり、これらのハット部材とインナー部材とが溶接された構造であることを特徴とする評価部材。  Consists of a hat-shaped hat member and an inner member, and a flange portion of the hat member and an end portion of the inner member opposite to the hat member have a butterfly shape with a curve, and the hat member and the inner member are welded The evaluation member characterized by being.
前記インナー部材の両端部を中央部よりも厚くし、かつ軟鋼板を溶接した構造としたことを特徴とする請求項7に記載の評価部材。 The evaluation member according to claim 7, wherein both end portions of the inner member are thicker than the central portion, and a mild steel plate is welded .
JP2016011189A 2016-01-25 2016-01-25 Evaluation method for structural member and evaluation member used therefor Active JP6597339B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2016011189A JP6597339B2 (en) 2016-01-25 2016-01-25 Evaluation method for structural member and evaluation member used therefor

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2016011189A JP6597339B2 (en) 2016-01-25 2016-01-25 Evaluation method for structural member and evaluation member used therefor

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2017133837A JP2017133837A (en) 2017-08-03
JP6597339B2 true JP6597339B2 (en) 2019-10-30

Family

ID=59504275

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2016011189A Active JP6597339B2 (en) 2016-01-25 2016-01-25 Evaluation method for structural member and evaluation member used therefor

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP6597339B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP7309262B2 (en) * 2019-06-12 2023-07-18 日本製鉄株式会社 test equipment
JP7435569B2 (en) * 2021-09-29 2024-02-21 Jfeスチール株式会社 Punch for 3-point bending evaluation test and 3-point bending evaluation test method
JP7484861B2 (en) * 2021-09-29 2024-05-16 Jfeスチール株式会社 Three-point bending evaluation test method and three-point bending evaluation test device
JP7552558B2 (en) * 2021-11-12 2024-09-18 Jfeスチール株式会社 Punch for breakage performance evaluation test and test method for breakage performance evaluation
JP7776792B2 (en) * 2025-03-03 2025-11-27 日本製鉄株式会社 Test specimen and test method
JP7776793B2 (en) * 2025-03-03 2025-11-27 日本製鉄株式会社 Test specimen and test method

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2009294136A (en) * 2008-06-06 2009-12-17 Ihi Corp Tension bending test method of tubular test specimen and device therefor
JP5928297B2 (en) * 2012-10-24 2016-06-01 新日鐵住金株式会社 Crash performance evaluation method of compression bending part
JP2015108585A (en) * 2013-12-05 2015-06-11 新日鐵住金株式会社 Structural member evaluation method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2017133837A (en) 2017-08-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP6597339B2 (en) Evaluation method for structural member and evaluation member used therefor
JP4978821B2 (en) Lightweight structural components, particularly for aircraft, and methods of making the lightweight structural components
US7334828B2 (en) Force strut brace
CN106458120B (en) Apparatus and method for forming beams of multiple strips, and beams
JP6119844B2 (en) Structural member for automobile and manufacturing method thereof
JP6137404B2 (en) Joining structure of members
JP5772875B2 (en) Connection member, method for manufacturing connection member, and robot
US8393245B2 (en) Vehicle operation pedal
JP2014522353A (en) Fork arm manufacturing method and fork arm
WO2009110256A1 (en) Knuckle bracket
CN203528226U (en) Suspension arm
JP2015030021A (en) Aluminum alloy extruded pipe for structural member, and car body structural member
JP6570989B2 (en) Suspension control arm
US8827288B2 (en) Stabilizer and method for manufacturing the stabilizer
JP2008169455A (en) Strengthening method for members
RU2707762C1 (en) Method for improving fatigue limit of an overlapped weld joint, a method for making an overlapped weld joint and an overlapped weld joint
JP2006306211A (en) Tailored blank welded structural members
CN101001718A (en) Method for welding resistance wire to hollow tubing system and joint formed thereby
JP5960116B2 (en) Pipe-shaped reinforcing member for vehicles
KR20110054337A (en) TV board
JP2015108585A (en) Structural member evaluation method
JP2016190573A (en) Torsion beam type suspension
JP6646094B2 (en) Torsion beam suspension
JP5342225B2 (en) Axle case structure
JP5240692B2 (en) Seat frame

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20180905

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20190618

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20190619

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20190805

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20190903

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20190916

R151 Written notification of patent or utility model registration

Ref document number: 6597339

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R151