JP6602237B2 - Purification treatment agent and purification treatment method - Google Patents
Purification treatment agent and purification treatment method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP6602237B2 JP6602237B2 JP2016045794A JP2016045794A JP6602237B2 JP 6602237 B2 JP6602237 B2 JP 6602237B2 JP 2016045794 A JP2016045794 A JP 2016045794A JP 2016045794 A JP2016045794 A JP 2016045794A JP 6602237 B2 JP6602237 B2 JP 6602237B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- purification treatment
- metal powder
- cadmium
- water
- treatment agent
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F1/00—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
- C02F1/58—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by removing specified dissolved compounds
- C02F1/62—Heavy metal compounds
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F1/00—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
- C02F1/28—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by sorption
- C02F1/281—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by sorption using inorganic sorbents
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B09—DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE; RECLAMATION OF CONTAMINATED SOIL
- B09C—RECLAMATION OF CONTAMINATED SOIL
- B09C1/00—Reclamation of contaminated soil
- B09C1/08—Reclamation of contaminated soil chemically
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F1/00—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
- C02F1/70—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by reduction
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F2101/00—Nature of the contaminant
- C02F2101/10—Inorganic compounds
- C02F2101/20—Heavy metals or heavy metal compounds
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
- Hydrology & Water Resources (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Soil Sciences (AREA)
- Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
- Processing Of Solid Wastes (AREA)
- Treatment Of Water By Oxidation Or Reduction (AREA)
- Water Treatment By Sorption (AREA)
- Solid-Sorbent Or Filter-Aiding Compositions (AREA)
Description
本発明は、浄化処理剤及び浄化処理方法に関する。 The present invention relates to a purification treatment agent and a purification treatment method.
ヒ素、セレン、鉛、カドミウム、クロム等の重金属などの汚染物質は、人体に対して有害であり、健康障害をもたらすことから、これらの汚染物質による環境汚染が問題となっている。重金属類は、地下水、河川水、湖沼水、各種工業排水等に含まれており、環境基準及び排水基準が定められている。水中の重金属類がこれらの水質基準を超える場合には、水中からこれらの重金属類を除去する必要がある。 Contaminants such as heavy metals such as arsenic, selenium, lead, cadmium and chromium are harmful to the human body and cause health problems. Therefore, environmental pollution caused by these pollutants is a problem. Heavy metals are contained in groundwater, river water, lake water, various industrial wastewater, etc., and environmental standards and drainage standards are established. When the heavy metals in water exceed these water quality standards, it is necessary to remove these heavy metals from the water.
これらの汚染物質に汚染された水及び土壌(以下、「汚染水」及び「汚染土壌」ともいう)を連続的に浄化処理する方法としては、吸着剤を用いて汚染物質を吸着除去する各種方法(吸着法)が提案されている。この吸着法は、吸着剤を充填した吸着塔に汚染物質を含む汚染水を連続的に通水し、汚染水を吸着剤に接触させて吸着除去するものである。 As a method of continuously purifying water and soil contaminated with these pollutants (hereinafter also referred to as “polluted water” and “contaminated soil”), various methods of adsorbing and removing pollutants using an adsorbent (Adsorption method) has been proposed. In this adsorption method, contaminated water containing contaminants is continuously passed through an adsorption tower filled with an adsorbent, and the contaminated water is brought into contact with the adsorbent to remove it by adsorption.
上記のような吸着法で用いる吸着剤としては、活性炭、活性アルミナ、ゼオライト、チタン酸、ジルコニア水和物等が知られている。これらの吸着剤を使用する方法では、汚染物質の種類に応じて吸着剤の種類を選択することによって、優れた除去効率を達成できるが、これらの吸着剤は概して高価であるため、これらの吸着剤だけで処理すれば処理コストが高くなるという欠点がある。 Known adsorbents used in the above adsorption method include activated carbon, activated alumina, zeolite, titanic acid, zirconia hydrate and the like. In the method using these adsorbents, excellent removal efficiency can be achieved by selecting the type of adsorbent according to the type of pollutant, but these adsorbents are generally expensive, so their adsorption If the treatment is carried out with only the agent, there is a disadvantage that the treatment cost becomes high.
一方で、汚染水の処理方法として、鉄粉に水中のヒ素を吸着させることが知られており、鉄粉の吸着能力を向上させるために、様々な提案がなされている。例えば特許文献1には、ヒ素の除去剤として、表面が鉄水酸化物で被覆された鉄粉が開示されている。また、特許文献2〜6には、所定量の硫黄やリンを含有する鉄粉を用いることで、鉄のアノード反応(Fe→Fe2++2e−)が硫黄やリンの添加によって促進され、その結果、カドミウム、ヒ素等の重金属類の還元反応又は不溶化反応が促進されるメカニズムで浄化性能を向上させる方法が提案されている。 On the other hand, as a method for treating contaminated water, it is known to adsorb arsenic in water to iron powder, and various proposals have been made to improve the adsorption capacity of iron powder. For example, Patent Document 1 discloses iron powder whose surface is coated with iron hydroxide as an arsenic removing agent. Further, in Patent Documents 2 to 6, by using iron powder containing a predetermined amount of sulfur and phosphorus, the anode reaction of iron (Fe → Fe 2+ + 2e − ) is promoted by addition of sulfur and phosphorus, and as a result. A method for improving the purification performance by a mechanism that promotes the reduction or insolubilization reaction of heavy metals such as cadmium and arsenic has been proposed.
これらの技術開発によって、吸着剤の重金属類に対する除去能力は改善されているが、更に高い吸着効率を発揮する技術の開発が望まれているのが実情である。 These technological developments have improved the ability of the adsorbent to remove heavy metals, but the actual situation is that it is desired to develop a technique that exhibits higher adsorption efficiency.
また、鉄粉を用いたカドミウムの除去方法として、特許文献7があげられる。これは、金属系還元剤としてFeSの他に少なくともFeを含有する純度30〜80%の硫化鉄粉末を汚染水と接触させ6価のセレンを還元し、水酸化鉄のコロイドと共沈させると共に重金属類を硫化物として析出させ、さらに硫化物を生成しない重金属を水酸化物として沈殿させることによりこれらを水中から除去する技術である。しかし、この技術ではFeSの使用量が多く、経済的に成り立たせる事が難しいと予想される。また、この技術では、カドミウム濃度を0.05ppm(0.05mg/L)以下にできたと記載されているが、直近の「水質汚濁防止法施行規則などの一部を改正する省令」におけるカドミウム規制値は0.03ppm(0.03mg/L)であり、これを達成できるとは言えない。事実、発明者らが鉄粉にFeSを混合しカドミウム残留濃度を調べたところ、開始濃度1ppm(1mg/L)に対して0.54ppm(0.54mg/L)までしか濃度を低下させられない事が判明した。つまり、FeSと鉄粉との混合だけでは、カドミウムの除去性能は十分とならない。 Moreover, patent document 7 is mention | raise | lifted as a removal method of cadmium using iron powder. This is because iron sulfide powder containing 30 to 80% purity containing at least Fe in addition to FeS as a metallic reducing agent is brought into contact with contaminated water to reduce hexavalent selenium and coprecipitate with iron hydroxide colloid. In this technique, heavy metals are precipitated as sulfides, and heavy metals that do not generate sulfides are precipitated as hydroxides to remove them from the water. However, with this technology, the amount of FeS used is large, and it is expected that it is difficult to make it economically viable. In addition, this technology describes that the cadmium concentration has been reduced to 0.05 ppm (0.05 mg / L) or less. However, the cadmium regulations in the latest “Ministerial Ordinance to Amend Some of the Enforcement Rules for the Water Pollution Control Law” The value is 0.03 ppm (0.03 mg / L), and it cannot be said that this can be achieved. In fact, when the inventors mixed FeS with iron powder and examined the residual concentration of cadmium, the concentration could be reduced only to 0.54 ppm (0.54 mg / L) with respect to the starting concentration of 1 ppm (1 mg / L). Things turned out. That is, the cadmium removal performance is not sufficient only by mixing FeS and iron powder.
本発明は、上述のような事情に基づいてなされたものであり、カドミウムを主とする重金属の除去性能に優れる浄化処理剤及び浄化処理方法を提供することを目的とする。 This invention is made | formed based on the above situations, and it aims at providing the purification processing agent and purification processing method which are excellent in the removal performance of heavy metals which have cadmium as a main.
上記課題を解決するためになされた発明は、汚染水又は汚染土壌からカドミウムを除去する浄化処理剤であって、鉄又はその合金製の金属粉と非金属系還元剤とを含有することを特徴とする。 The invention made to solve the above-mentioned problems is a purification treatment agent that removes cadmium from contaminated water or soil, and contains a metal powder made of iron or an alloy thereof and a nonmetallic reducing agent. And
本発明者らは、鋭意検討した結果、浄化処理剤として鉄又はその合金製の金属粉に非金属系還元剤を加えることで、カドミウムをはじめとする重金属の除去が格段に向上することを見出した。このメカニズムは定かではないが、上記金属粉に加えて非金属系還元剤が存在することで、重金属を含む汚染水又は汚染土壌内の重金属イオンの還元が促進されて金属粉に吸着するためと推測される。つまり、当該浄化処理剤によれば、カドミウムを主とする重金属を効率的に除去することができる。 As a result of intensive studies, the present inventors have found that removal of heavy metals such as cadmium is remarkably improved by adding a non-metallic reducing agent to a metal powder made of iron or an alloy thereof as a purification treatment agent. It was. Although this mechanism is not clear, the presence of a non-metallic reducing agent in addition to the metal powder promotes the reduction of heavy metal ions in the contaminated water or soil containing heavy metals and adsorbs to the metal powder. Guessed. That is, according to the said purification processing agent, the heavy metal which has cadmium as a main can be removed efficiently.
上記非金属系還元剤の素材が、チオ硫酸ナトリウム、アスコルビン酸、尿素、アニソール又はこれらの組み合わせであるとよい。非金属系還元剤として、このような素材を用いることで、重金属の除去効果を促進できる。 The material of the non-metallic reducing agent may be sodium thiosulfate, ascorbic acid, urea, anisole, or a combination thereof. By using such a material as the nonmetallic reducing agent, the effect of removing heavy metals can be promoted.
上記金属粉がアトマイズ粉であるとよい。このように金属粉としてアトマイズ粉を用いることで、浄化処理剤の均質性を向上しつつ、コストを低減することができる。 The metal powder is preferably atomized powder. Thus, by using atomized powder as the metal powder, it is possible to reduce costs while improving the homogeneity of the purification treatment agent.
上記金属粉が硫黄を含有するとよい。このように金属粉が硫黄を含有することで、重金属の除去効果を促進できる。 The metal powder may contain sulfur. Thus, the removal effect of a heavy metal can be accelerated | stimulated because metal powder contains sulfur.
上記金属粉の硫黄含有量としては0.05質量%以上5質量%以下が好ましい。このように金属粉の硫黄含有量を上記範囲とすることで、コストを抑えつつ重金属の除去効果をさらに促進できる。 The sulfur content of the metal powder is preferably 0.05% by mass or more and 5% by mass or less. Thus, the removal effect of heavy metal can be further accelerated | stimulated, suppressing cost by making sulfur content of metal powder into the said range.
上記金属粉に対する非金属系還元剤の含有量の質量比としては0.01以上4以下が好ましい。このように非金属系還元剤の含有量を上記範囲とすることで、コストを抑えつつ重金属の除去効果を促進できる。 The mass ratio of the content of the nonmetallic reducing agent to the metal powder is preferably 0.01 or more and 4 or less. Thus, the removal effect of heavy metal can be accelerated | stimulated, suppressing cost by making content of a nonmetallic type reducing agent into the said range.
上記汚染水又は汚染土壌がヒ素、セレン、鉛、クロム又はこれらの組合せをさらに含み、これらの元素をも除去するとよい。当該浄化処理剤は、金属粉と上記元素のイオンとの反応性にも優れるため、これらの重金属等の除去も効果的に行うことができる。 The contaminated water or soil may further contain arsenic, selenium, lead, chromium, or a combination thereof, and these elements may also be removed. Since the said purification treatment agent is excellent also in the reactivity of metal powder and the ion of the said element, removal of these heavy metals etc. can also be performed effectively.
また、上記課題を解決するためになされた別の発明は、汚染水又は汚染土壌からカドミウムを除去する浄化処理方法であって、当該浄化処理剤を上記汚染水又は上記汚染土壌と接触させる工程を備えることを特徴とする。 Moreover, another invention made | formed in order to solve the said subject is a purification treatment method which removes cadmium from contaminated water or contaminated soil, Comprising: The process which makes the said purification treatment agent contact with the said contaminated water or the said contaminated soil It is characterized by providing.
当該浄化処理方法は上記金属粉と非金属系還元剤とを含む浄化処理剤を汚染水又は汚染土壌に接触させるので、カドミウムを主とする重金属を効率的に除去することができる。 Since the said purification processing method makes the purification processing agent containing the said metal powder and a nonmetallic type reducing agent contact contaminated water or contaminated soil, the heavy metal which has cadmium as a main can be removed efficiently.
ここで、「重金属」とは、25℃における比重が4.5以上の金属種である。「硫黄の含有量」とは、燃焼法による炭素・硫黄分析装置を用いて測定される値である。 Here, the “heavy metal” is a metal species having a specific gravity of 4.5 or more at 25 ° C. The “sulfur content” is a value measured using a carbon / sulfur analyzer by a combustion method.
以上説明したように、本発明の浄化処理剤及び浄化処理方法は、カドミウムを主とする重金属の除去性能に優れる。 As described above, the purification treatment agent and the purification treatment method of the present invention are excellent in the removal performance of heavy metals mainly containing cadmium.
以下、本発明に係る浄化処理方法及び浄化処理剤の実施形態について説明する。 Hereinafter, embodiments of a purification treatment method and a purification treatment agent according to the present invention will be described.
[浄化処理剤]
本発明の浄化処理剤は、重金属を含む汚染水又は汚染土壌から少なくともカドミウムを除去するために用いられ、鉄又はその合金製の金属粉と非金属系還元剤とを含有する。当該浄化処理剤は金属粉及び非金属系還元剤の他に、発明の効果を妨げない範囲で、溶媒等のその他の成分を含有してもよい。また、pH調整剤等の添加剤を含んでもよい。
[Purification treatment agent]
The purification treatment agent of the present invention is used to remove at least cadmium from contaminated water or contaminated soil containing heavy metals, and contains metal powder made of iron or an alloy thereof and a nonmetallic reducing agent. In addition to the metal powder and the nonmetallic reducing agent, the purification treatment agent may contain other components such as a solvent as long as the effects of the invention are not hindered. Moreover, you may contain additives, such as a pH adjuster.
<金属粉>
上記金属粉は、その表面にカドミウムをはじめとする重金属を吸着する。重金属は水中で重金属イオンとして存在しており、これらのイオンと金属粉とを反応させることで重金属が不溶化して金属粉の表面付近に析出する。その結果、金属粉はその表面に重金属を吸着できる。
<Metal powder>
The metal powder adsorbs heavy metals such as cadmium on its surface. Heavy metal exists as heavy metal ions in water, and by reacting these ions with metal powder, the heavy metal is insolubilized and deposited near the surface of the metal powder. As a result, the metal powder can adsorb heavy metals on its surface.
上記金属粉としては、鉄又はその合金を主成分とする粉体であれば特に限定されず、工業的に入手可能なあらゆる金属粉を用いることができる。金属粉の種類としては、例えばアトマイズ鉄粉、鋳鉄粉、スポンジ鉄粉等の鉄基完全金属粉(プレアロイ合金粉)又は部分金属粉(プレミックス合金粉)が挙げられる。また、上記合金が含有する鉄以外の元素としては、例えば炭素、硫黄、ニッケル、銅、亜鉛、アルミニウム、コバルト等が挙げられる。ここで「主成分」とは、金属粉を構成する成分のうち質量基準で最も多く含まれる成分(例えば50質量%以上)を指す。 The metal powder is not particularly limited as long as it is a powder mainly composed of iron or an alloy thereof, and any metal powder that is industrially available can be used. Examples of the metal powder include iron-based complete metal powder (pre-alloy alloy powder) or partial metal powder (pre-mix alloy powder) such as atomized iron powder, cast iron powder, and sponge iron powder. Moreover, as elements other than iron which the said alloy contains, carbon, sulfur, nickel, copper, zinc, aluminum, cobalt etc. are mentioned, for example. Here, the “main component” refers to a component (for example, 50% by mass or more) that is contained most on a mass basis among the components constituting the metal powder.
金属粉としては、アトマイズ法により製造されたアトマイズ金属粉が好ましい。アトマイズ金属粉は大量生産が可能であるため、当該浄化処理剤を処理施設等における大規模な処理に用いることができる。また、アトマイズ金属粉は、成分や粒径を揃えやすい。このアトマイズ金属粉としては、鉄合金をアトマイズした完全金属粉でもよく、鉄粉をアトマイズした後金属粉を付着させた部分合金化粉でもよい。 As a metal powder, the atomized metal powder manufactured by the atomizing method is preferable. Since the atomized metal powder can be mass-produced, the purification treatment agent can be used for large-scale treatment in a treatment facility or the like. Moreover, atomized metal powder is easy to arrange components and particle sizes. The atomized metal powder may be a complete metal powder obtained by atomizing an iron alloy, or a partially alloyed powder obtained by attaching a metal powder after atomizing the iron powder.
上記金属粉の平均粒径の上限としては、1000μmが好ましく、500μmがより好ましく、100μmがさらに好ましい。一方、金属粉の平均粒径の下限としては、1μmが好ましい。上記平均粒径が上記上限を超えると、金属粉の表面積が小さくなり重金属等の除去速度が低下するおそれがある。逆に、上記平均粒径が上記下限未満の場合、歩留まりが低くなり取り扱い性が低下するおそれがある。ここで「平均粒径」とは、JIS−Z−8801(2006)に規定されるふるいを用いた乾式ふるい分け試験により粒子径分布を求め、この粒子径分布において累積質量が50%となる粒径をいう。 The upper limit of the average particle size of the metal powder is preferably 1000 μm, more preferably 500 μm, and still more preferably 100 μm. On the other hand, the lower limit of the average particle size of the metal powder is preferably 1 μm. If the average particle size exceeds the upper limit, the surface area of the metal powder may be reduced and the removal rate of heavy metals and the like may be reduced. On the other hand, when the average particle size is less than the lower limit, the yield may be lowered and the handleability may be lowered. Here, the “average particle size” means a particle size distribution obtained by a dry sieving test using a sieve specified in JIS-Z-8801 (2006), and a particle size at which the cumulative mass becomes 50% in this particle size distribution. Say.
上記金属粉は、硫黄を合金元素として含むとよい。硫黄の存在により金属粉の重金属の除去性能が向上する。金属粉に硫黄を含有させることによって重金属類の除去性能が向上する理由としては以下のように考えられる。つまり、硫黄の作用で金属粉表面の酸化が促進され(鉄のアノード反応:Fe→Fe2++2e−)、金属粉表面で効率良く生成する鉄イオン、急速に成長する鉄の酸化物や水酸化物等によって、汚染水中や汚染土壌中に金属イオンや化合物イオンの形態で存在する重金属類の金属粉への吸着が促進され、それに伴って重金属類の除去が効率良く進行するものと考えられる。 The metal powder may contain sulfur as an alloy element. The presence of sulfur improves the heavy metal removal performance of the metal powder. The reason why the removal performance of heavy metals is improved by adding sulfur to the metal powder is considered as follows. In other words, oxidation of the metal powder surface is promoted by the action of sulfur (iron anodic reaction: Fe → Fe 2+ + 2e − ), iron ions generated efficiently on the metal powder surface, rapidly growing iron oxide and hydroxylation. It is considered that the adsorption of heavy metals present in the form of metal ions or compound ions in the contaminated water or the contaminated soil is promoted by the object, etc., and the removal of heavy metals proceeds efficiently.
金属粉中における硫黄分の含有量の上限としては、5質量%が好ましく、4質量%がより好ましく、3質量%がさらに好ましい。一方、上記含有量の下限としては、0.05質量%が好ましく、0.1質量%がより好ましく、0.8質量%がさらに好ましい。上記含有量が上記上限を超える場合、金属粉の重金属の吸着効率が低下するおそれがある。また、当該浄化処理剤のコストが不必要に増加するおそれがある。逆に、上記含有量が上記下限未満の場合、上述の硫黄による重金属の除去性能の向上作用が不十分となるおそれがある。 As an upper limit of content of the sulfur content in metal powder, 5 mass% is preferable, 4 mass% is more preferable, and 3 mass% is further more preferable. On the other hand, as a minimum of the above-mentioned content, 0.05 mass% is preferred, 0.1 mass% is more preferred, and 0.8 mass% is still more preferred. When the said content exceeds the said upper limit, there exists a possibility that the adsorption | suction efficiency of the heavy metal of metal powder may fall. In addition, the cost of the purification treatment agent may increase unnecessarily. On the other hand, when the content is less than the lower limit, there is a possibility that the effect of improving the removal performance of heavy metal by the above-described sulfur may be insufficient.
<非金属系還元剤>
非金属系還元剤としては、重金属イオンやその化合物のイオンを還元できるものであれば特に限定されないが、その素材としては例えばチオ硫酸ナトリウム、アスコルビン酸、尿素、ハイドロサルファイトナトリウム、二酸化チオ尿素、アニソール等が挙げられる。これらの中でも、チオ硫酸ナトリウム、アスコルビン酸、尿素、アニソール及びこれらの組み合わせが好ましい。このような素材の非金属系還元剤を用いることで、コストを抑えつつ、重金属の除去性能を向上できる。
<Non-metallic reducing agent>
The non-metallic reducing agent is not particularly limited as long as it can reduce heavy metal ions or ions of the compound, but as the material, for example, sodium thiosulfate, ascorbic acid, urea, sodium hydrosulfite, thiourea dioxide, Anisole etc. are mentioned. Among these, sodium thiosulfate, ascorbic acid, urea, anisole and combinations thereof are preferable. By using a non-metallic reducing agent of such a material, it is possible to improve heavy metal removal performance while suppressing costs.
金属粉に対する非金属系還元剤の含有量の質量比の下限としては、0.01が好ましく、0.2がより好ましい。一方、上記質量比の上限としては、4が好ましく、2がより好ましく、1がさらに好ましい。上記質量比が上記下限未満の場合、金属粉との混合が不十分となり重金属の除去性能が不十分となるおそれがある。逆に、上記質量比が上記上限を超えると、重金属の除去性能が頭打ちとなる一方でコストが増大するおそれがある。 As a minimum of mass ratio of content of nonmetallic reducing agent to metal powder, 0.01 is preferred and 0.2 is more preferred. On the other hand, the upper limit of the mass ratio is preferably 4, more preferably 2, and even more preferably 1. When the said mass ratio is less than the said minimum, mixing with a metal powder may become inadequate and there exists a possibility that the removal performance of heavy metal may become inadequate. On the other hand, if the mass ratio exceeds the upper limit, the heavy metal removal performance reaches its peak while the cost may increase.
<汚染水又は汚染土壌>
当該浄化処理剤が浄化する汚染水又は汚染土壌はカドミウムを含む。この汚染水又は汚染土壌は、カドミウム以外の重金属又は重金属含有化合物やフッ化物をさらに含んでもよい。汚染土壌では、土壌中に存在する水分(化学水、吸湿水、毛管水、重力水、雨水等)へ土壌中の重金属等が溶出するので、この溶出液を汚染水と同様に当該浄化処理剤で浄化することができる。なお、汚染土壌が水分を含まない場合は、汚染土壌に水を添加し汚染土壌中の水溶性成分を溶出した溶液を作ることで浄化処理ができる。
<Contaminated water or contaminated soil>
The contaminated water or contaminated soil purified by the purification treatment agent contains cadmium. This contaminated water or contaminated soil may further contain a heavy metal other than cadmium, a heavy metal-containing compound or a fluoride. In contaminated soil, heavy metals in the soil elute into the water (chemical water, hygroscopic water, capillary water, gravity water, rainwater, etc.) present in the soil. Can be purified. When the contaminated soil does not contain water, purification treatment can be performed by adding water to the contaminated soil and making a solution that elutes water-soluble components in the contaminated soil.
(重金属又は重金属化合物)
上記重金属又は重金属化合物は、汚染水又は汚染土壌中では重金属イオン又は重金属化合物イオンとして存在し、汚染水又は汚染土壌中に溶解している。このような重金属又は重金属含有化合物中の重金属のうち、特に除去されることが望ましいものとして、カドミウム、ヒ素、セレン、鉛、クロム及びこれらの組合せが挙げられる。
(Heavy metal or heavy metal compound)
The heavy metal or heavy metal compound exists as heavy metal ions or heavy metal compound ions in the contaminated water or contaminated soil, and is dissolved in the contaminated water or contaminated soil. Of the heavy metals in such heavy metals or heavy metal-containing compounds, those that are particularly desired to be removed include cadmium, arsenic, selenium, lead, chromium, and combinations thereof.
上記重金属化合物としては、例えば硝酸カドミウム、ヒ酸水素ナトリウム、セレン酸ナトリウム、二クロム酸カリウム等が挙げられる。上記重金属イオン又は重金属化合物としては、例えばカドミウムイオン(Cd2+)、ヒ酸イオン(AsO4 3−)、セレン酸イオン(SeO4 2−)、鉛イオン(Pb2+)、クロムイオン(Cr6+)等が挙げられる。 Examples of the heavy metal compound include cadmium nitrate, sodium hydrogen arsenate, sodium selenate, potassium dichromate, and the like. Examples of the heavy metal ions or heavy metal compounds include cadmium ions (Cd 2+ ), arsenate ions (AsO 4 3− ), selenate ions (SeO 4 2− ), lead ions (Pb 2+ ), and chromium ions (Cr 6+ ). Etc.
重金属が当該浄化処理剤の金属粉に吸着される基本的な推定メカニズムは次のように考えることができる。 The basic estimation mechanism by which heavy metals are adsorbed by the metal powder of the purification treatment agent can be considered as follows.
カドミウム及びセレンは、それぞれカドミウムイオン(Cd2+)及びセレンイオン(Se2−)の形態で水中に溶解している。当該浄化処理剤では鉄のアノード反応が促進されるので、カドミウムイオンやセレンイオンがそれぞれ金属カドミウムや金属セレンに効率良く還元され、金属粉表面に析出する。その結果、カドミウムイオンやセレンイオンを水中から効率良く除去することができる。 Cadmium and selenium are dissolved in water in the form of cadmium ions (Cd 2+ ) and selenium ions (Se 2− ), respectively. Since the anodic reaction of iron is promoted in the purification treatment agent, cadmium ions and selenium ions are efficiently reduced to metal cadmium and metal selenium, respectively, and are deposited on the surface of the metal powder. As a result, cadmium ions and selenium ions can be efficiently removed from the water.
ヒ素は、水中でヒ酸イオン(AsO4 3−)の形態で溶解している。このヒ酸イオンを除去するためには、このイオンと鉄イオンを反応させて化合物を生成させれば良い。そして、非金属系還元剤と金属粉とを用いることによって、鉄イオンを水中に効率良く放出することができる。その結果、不溶性のヒ酸鉄(ヒ酸と鉄との化合物)を金属粉表面に析出させて(即ち、重金属を金属粉に吸着させて)、水中からヒ酸イオンを効率良く除去することができる。 Arsenic is dissolved in water in the form of arsenate ions (AsO 4 3− ). In order to remove the arsenate ion, a compound may be generated by reacting the ion with iron ion. And an iron ion can be efficiently discharge | released in water by using a nonmetallic reducing agent and metal powder. As a result, insoluble iron arsenate (compound of arsenic acid and iron) is deposited on the surface of the metal powder (that is, heavy metal is adsorbed to the metal powder) to efficiently remove arsenate ions from water. it can.
クロムイオン及び鉛含有イオンは、金属粉に含まれる鉄イオンと反応し鉄化合物を形成するので、金属粉表面に不溶性の化合物として析出させることができる。その結果、クロムイオン及び鉛含有イオンを水中から効率良く除去することができる。 Since chromium ions and lead-containing ions react with iron ions contained in the metal powder to form iron compounds, they can be precipitated as insoluble compounds on the surface of the metal powder. As a result, chromium ions and lead-containing ions can be efficiently removed from the water.
[浄化処理方法]
次に、本発明の浄化処理方法の実施形態について詳説する。
[Purification treatment method]
Next, an embodiment of the purification treatment method of the present invention will be described in detail.
当該浄化処理方法は、重金属を含む汚染水又は汚染土壌から少なくともカドミウムを除去する。当該浄化処理方法は、当該浄化処理剤を汚染水又は汚染土壌と接触させる工程(接触工程)を主に備える。 The purification treatment method removes at least cadmium from contaminated water or soil containing heavy metals. The purification treatment method mainly includes a step (contact step) of bringing the purification treatment agent into contact with contaminated water or contaminated soil.
<接触工程>
本工程では、当該浄化処理剤と汚染水又は汚染土壌とを接触させる。この接触方法には特に限定は無く、例えば当該浄化処理剤を適当な容器に充填し、この容器中に汚染水又は汚染土壌を連続的に通過させる方法、当該浄化処理剤を汚染水又は汚染土壌に添加し撹拌等する方法等が挙げられる。
<Contact process>
In this step, the purification treatment agent is brought into contact with contaminated water or contaminated soil. There is no particular limitation on the contact method, for example, a method in which the purification treatment agent is filled in an appropriate container and contaminated water or contaminated soil is continuously passed through the container, and the purification treatment agent is contaminated water or contaminated soil. And the like, and the like.
汚染水又は汚染土壌に接触させる浄化処理剤の量は特に制約はないが、浄化処理剤に含まれる金属粉を基準とした接触量の下限としては、汚染水又は汚染土壌溶出液1000mLに対し、0.1gが好ましく、0.2gがより好ましい。一方、上記接触量の上限としては、100gが好ましく、10gがより好ましい。上記接触量が上記下限未満であると、金属粉の性能のバラツキによる浄化効果のバラツキが発生するおそれがある。逆に、上記接触量が上記上限を超えると、効果が飽和するため、金属粉の量に見合った効果が得られない。 The amount of the purification agent to be brought into contact with the contaminated water or the contaminated soil is not particularly limited, but as the lower limit of the contact amount based on the metal powder contained in the purification agent, with respect to 1000 mL of the contaminated water or the contaminated soil eluate, 0.1g is preferable and 0.2g is more preferable. On the other hand, the upper limit of the contact amount is preferably 100 g, and more preferably 10 g. If the contact amount is less than the lower limit, there may be a variation in purification effect due to variations in the performance of the metal powder. On the contrary, when the contact amount exceeds the upper limit, the effect is saturated, so that an effect commensurate with the amount of the metal powder cannot be obtained.
また、当該浄化処理剤を汚染水又は汚染土壌に添加する場合の当該浄化処理剤の添加量の上限としては、汚染水又は汚染土壌中のカドミウム1mgに対する金属粉の質量で4gが好ましく、2gがより好ましい。一方、上記添加量の下限としては、汚染水又は汚染土壌中のカドミウム1mgに対する金属粉の質量で0.1gが好ましく、0.3gがより好ましい。 Moreover, as an upper limit of the addition amount of the purification treatment agent when the purification treatment agent is added to contaminated water or contaminated soil, 4 g is preferable in terms of the mass of metal powder with respect to 1 mg of cadmium in the contaminated water or contaminated soil, and 2 g More preferred. On the other hand, the lower limit of the amount added is preferably 0.1 g, more preferably 0.3 g in terms of the mass of metal powder with respect to 1 mg of cadmium in the contaminated water or contaminated soil.
当該浄化処理剤を汚染水又は汚染土壌に添加する場合の攪拌時間の上限としては、72時間が好ましく、36時間がより好ましい。一方、上記攪拌時間の下限としては、10分が好ましく、30分がより好ましい。上記攪拌時間が上記上限を超えると、攪拌時間に比してカドミウム等の除去量が向上し難くなり除去効率が低下するおそれがある。逆に、上記攪拌時間が上記下限未満の場合、カドミウム等が十分に除去できないおそれがある。 As the upper limit of the stirring time when the purification agent is added to contaminated water or contaminated soil, 72 hours is preferable, and 36 hours is more preferable. On the other hand, the lower limit of the stirring time is preferably 10 minutes, and more preferably 30 minutes. When the above stirring time exceeds the above upper limit, the removal amount of cadmium or the like is difficult to improve as compared with the stirring time, and the removal efficiency may be reduced. Conversely, when the stirring time is less than the lower limit, cadmium or the like may not be sufficiently removed.
なお、当該浄化処理剤を添加した直後の汚染水又は汚染土壌溶出液のpHの下限としては、2が好ましく、3がより好ましい。一方、pHの上限としては、10が好ましく、9がより好ましい。pHが上記下限より小さいと、水素が発生し易くなり金属粉の吸着性能が低下するおそれがある。逆に、pHが上記上限を超えると、水酸化鉄の形成が顕著になり金属粉の吸着性能が低下するおそれがある。また特に、非金属系還元剤としてチオ硫酸ナトリウムを用いる場合、上記pHを2以上4以下又は8以上10以下とすることが好ましい。pHの調整は、例えば非金属系還元剤の添加量の調整、水等の溶媒やpH調整剤の添加等により行うことができる。pH調整剤としては、例えば塩酸、硫酸、硝酸、リン酸等の無機酸、蟻酸、酢酸、シュウ酸等の有機酸などが挙げられる。 In addition, as a minimum of the pH of the contaminated water or contaminated soil eluate immediately after adding the said purification process agent, 2 are preferable and 3 is more preferable. On the other hand, the upper limit of pH is preferably 10, and more preferably 9. If the pH is smaller than the above lower limit, hydrogen is likely to be generated and the metal powder adsorption performance may be reduced. On the other hand, when the pH exceeds the above upper limit, the formation of iron hydroxide becomes remarkable and the adsorption performance of the metal powder may be lowered. In particular, when sodium thiosulfate is used as the nonmetallic reducing agent, the pH is preferably 2 or more and 4 or less, or 8 or more and 10 or less. The pH can be adjusted, for example, by adjusting the amount of nonmetallic reducing agent added, adding a solvent such as water, or a pH adjusting agent. Examples of the pH adjuster include inorganic acids such as hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid, nitric acid and phosphoric acid, and organic acids such as formic acid, acetic acid and oxalic acid.
当該浄化処理方法は、鉄又はその合金製の金属粉と非金属系還元剤とを含む浄化処理剤を汚染水又は汚染土壌に接触させるので、カドミウムを主とする重金属を効率的に除去することができる。 In the purification treatment method, a purification treatment agent containing metal powder made of iron or an alloy thereof and a nonmetallic reducing agent is brought into contact with contaminated water or contaminated soil, so that heavy metals mainly including cadmium are efficiently removed. Can do.
以下、実施例を挙げて本発明をより具体的に説明するが、本発明はこれらに限定されるものではない。 EXAMPLES Hereinafter, although an Example is given and this invention is demonstrated more concretely, this invention is not limited to these.
[実施例1、2及び比較例1〜3]
内容積500mLのポリエチレン製容器に、硝酸カドミウムをイオン交換水でカドミウム濃度が1mg/Lとなるよう調整した水溶液250mLを汚染水として投入した。この溶液に固体/液体比(g/mL)が表1に示す値となるよう金属粉と非金属系還元剤又はFeSとを含む浄化処理剤を添加した。ここで「固体/液体比」とは、上記浄化処理剤と汚染水との混合物における全固体量(g)の全液体量(mL)に対する比である。ただし、比較例2はFeSのみを浄化処理剤として用い、比較例3は非金属系還元剤のみを浄化処理剤として用いた。各実施例及び比較例で用いた金属粉の種類は後述の通りである。その後、混合物のpH及び酸化還元電位(ORP)を測定後、水平振とう機を用い、温度25℃、回転数140rpm、振とう幅4cmの条件下で、上記浄化処理剤と汚染水との混合物を1時間振とうし、攪拌した。振とう後、pH及び酸化還元電位を測定した後、混合液を孔径0.45μmのメンブレンフィルタで吸引ろ過し、処理後汚染水の残留カドミウム濃度をJIS−K0102(2013)の55.3に記載されるICP発光分光分析法にて測定した。この結果を表1に示す。なお、上記混合物のpHは、塩酸によって調整した。
A:純鉄粉(アトマイズ鉄粉、平均粒径70μm、硫黄含有量0.009質量%)
B:鉄合金粉(アトマイズ鉄粉、平均粒径70μm、硫黄含有量1質量%)
[Examples 1 and 2 and Comparative Examples 1 to 3]
In a polyethylene container having an internal volume of 500 mL, 250 mL of an aqueous solution prepared by adjusting cadmium nitrate with ion-exchanged water to a cadmium concentration of 1 mg / L was charged as contaminated water. A purification treatment containing metal powder and a nonmetallic reducing agent or FeS was added to this solution so that the solid / liquid ratio (g / mL) was a value shown in Table 1. Here, the “solid / liquid ratio” is a ratio of the total solid amount (g) to the total liquid amount (mL) in the mixture of the purification agent and the contaminated water. However, Comparative Example 2 used only FeS as a purification treatment agent, and Comparative Example 3 used only a nonmetallic reducing agent as a purification treatment agent. The types of metal powder used in each example and comparative example are as described below. Then, after measuring the pH and oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) of the mixture, using a horizontal shaker, the mixture of the purification agent and contaminated water under the conditions of a temperature of 25 ° C., a rotation speed of 140 rpm, and a shaking width of 4 cm. The mixture was shaken for 1 hour and stirred. After shaking, the pH and oxidation-reduction potential were measured, and the mixed solution was suction filtered with a membrane filter having a pore size of 0.45 μm. The residual cadmium concentration in the contaminated water after treatment was described in 55.3 of JIS-K0102 (2013). Measured by ICP emission spectroscopy. The results are shown in Table 1. The pH of the above mixture was adjusted with hydrochloric acid.
A: Pure iron powder (atomized iron powder, average particle size 70 μm, sulfur content 0.009 mass%)
B: Iron alloy powder (atomized iron powder, average particle size 70 μm, sulfur content 1 mass%)
表1から、金属粉と非金属系還元剤(チオ硫酸ナトリウム)とを混合した浄化処理剤を用いることで、金属粉をFeSと併用した比較例1に比べてカドミウム濃度を大きく低減できることがわかる。一方、FeS単体又はチオ硫酸ナトリウム単体を用いた比較例2、3ではカドミウム除去効果はかなり低かった。 From Table 1, it is understood that the cadmium concentration can be greatly reduced by using the purification agent in which the metal powder and the nonmetallic reducing agent (sodium thiosulfate) are mixed, as compared with Comparative Example 1 in which the metal powder is used in combination with FeS. . On the other hand, in Comparative Examples 2 and 3 using FeS alone or sodium thiosulfate alone, the effect of removing cadmium was considerably low.
[実施例3〜13]
金属粉と非金属系還元剤との混合比、固体/液体比及びpHを表2に示す値とした以外は、実施例2と同様の条件で撹拌、濾過及び各測定を行った。この結果を表2に示す。なお、表中「<0.001」は、計測の下限値(0.001mg/L)よりも小さいことを示す。
[Examples 3 to 13]
Agitation, filtration, and measurements were performed under the same conditions as in Example 2 except that the mixing ratio of the metal powder and the nonmetallic reducing agent, the solid / liquid ratio, and the pH were set to the values shown in Table 2. The results are shown in Table 2. In addition, "<0.001" in a table | surface shows that it is smaller than the lower limit (0.001 mg / L) of a measurement.
表2から、金属粉に対する非金属系還元剤の混合質量比を0.04よりも大きくすることでカドミウム除去性能が高くなることがわかる。また、混合物の処理前(撹拌前)のpHを2以上10以下、好ましくは3以上10以下とすることで、効果的にカドミウムを除去できることがわかる。 From Table 2, it can be seen that the cadmium removal performance is enhanced by making the mixing mass ratio of the nonmetallic reducing agent to the metal powder larger than 0.04. It can also be seen that cadmium can be effectively removed by adjusting the pH of the mixture before treatment (before stirring) to 2 to 10, preferably 3 to 10.
[実施例14〜19]
非金属系還元剤として表3に示すものを用いた以外は、実施例2と同様の条件で撹拌、濾過及び各測定を行った。この結果を表3に示す。なお、実施例16、19については、アニソールが一部溶け残った。
[Examples 14 to 19]
Stirring, filtration, and measurements were performed under the same conditions as in Example 2 except that the nonmetallic reducing agents shown in Table 3 were used. The results are shown in Table 3. In Examples 16 and 19, a part of anisole remained undissolved.
表3から、チオ硫酸ナトリウム以外の非金属系還元剤を用いてもカドミウムを効率的に除去することができることがわかる。また、尿素を用いることで、pHに関係なく効果的にカドミウムを除去できることがわかる。 Table 3 shows that cadmium can be efficiently removed even if a nonmetallic reducing agent other than sodium thiosulfate is used. Moreover, it turns out that cadmium can be removed effectively irrespective of pH by using urea.
[実施例20〜23]
イオン交換水で、カドミウム濃度及び以下に示す化合物に含まれる追加重金属の濃度がそれぞれ1mg/Lとなるよう調整した水溶液250mLを汚染水として投入した以外は、実施例2と同様の条件で撹拌、濾過及び各測定を行った。この結果を表4に示す。なお、各実施例で用いた重金属化合物は以下のとおりである。
実施例20:ヒ酸水素二ナトリウム
実施例21:セレン酸ナトリウム
実施例22:二クロム酸カリウム
実施例23:硝酸鉛
[Examples 20 to 23]
With ion-exchanged water, stirring was performed under the same conditions as in Example 2 except that 250 mL of an aqueous solution prepared so that the cadmium concentration and the concentration of additional heavy metal contained in the compound shown below were each 1 mg / L was added as contaminated water. Filtration and each measurement were performed. The results are shown in Table 4. In addition, the heavy metal compound used in each Example is as follows.
Example 20: Disodium hydrogen arsenate Example 21: Sodium selenate Example 22: Potassium dichromate Example 23: Lead nitrate
表4から、カドミウム以外の重金属等を含む汚染水に対し、当該浄化処理剤及び浄化処理方法により、カドミウムとその他の重金属とを効果的に除去できることがわかる。 From Table 4, it can be seen that cadmium and other heavy metals can be effectively removed from contaminated water containing heavy metals other than cadmium by the purification treatment agent and the purification treatment method.
以上説明したように、本発明の浄化処理剤及び浄化処理方法は、カドミウムを主とする重金属の除去性能に優れる。 As described above, the purification treatment agent and the purification treatment method of the present invention are excellent in the removal performance of heavy metals mainly containing cadmium.
Claims (6)
鉄又はその合金製の金属粉と非金属系還元剤とを含有し、
上記非金属系還元剤の素材が、アスコルビン酸、尿素、アニソール又はこれらの組み合わせであり、
上記金属粉に対する非金属系還元剤の含有量の質量比が0.01以上4以下であることを特徴とする浄化処理剤。 A purification agent that removes cadmium from contaminated water or soil,
Containing a metal powder made of iron or an alloy thereof and a non-metallic reducing agent ,
The material of the nonmetallic reducing agent is ascorbic acid, urea, anisole or a combination thereof,
A purification treatment agent, wherein a mass ratio of the content of the nonmetallic reducing agent to the metal powder is 0.01 or more and 4 or less .
請求項1から請求項4のいずれか1項に記載の浄化処理剤を上記汚染水又は上記汚染土壌と接触させる工程
を備えることを特徴とする浄化処理方法。
A purification method for removing cadmium from contaminated water or soil,
A purification treatment method comprising the step of bringing the purification treatment agent according to any one of claims 1 to 4 into contact with the contaminated water or the contaminated soil.
Priority Applications (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2016045794A JP6602237B2 (en) | 2016-03-09 | 2016-03-09 | Purification treatment agent and purification treatment method |
| KR1020170010139A KR101896825B1 (en) | 2016-03-09 | 2017-01-23 | Purification treatment agent and purification treatment method |
| CN201710123141.6A CN107176644A (en) | 2016-03-09 | 2017-03-03 | Purifying agent and purifying treatment method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2016045794A JP6602237B2 (en) | 2016-03-09 | 2016-03-09 | Purification treatment agent and purification treatment method |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JP2017159237A JP2017159237A (en) | 2017-09-14 |
| JP6602237B2 true JP6602237B2 (en) | 2019-11-06 |
Family
ID=59829774
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2016045794A Active JP6602237B2 (en) | 2016-03-09 | 2016-03-09 | Purification treatment agent and purification treatment method |
Country Status (3)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP6602237B2 (en) |
| KR (1) | KR101896825B1 (en) |
| CN (1) | CN107176644A (en) |
Families Citing this family (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP6776184B2 (en) * | 2017-06-08 | 2020-10-28 | 株式会社神戸製鋼所 | How to remove perchlorate, chlorate, chlorite or hypochlorite and removal treatment agent |
| CN108298609A (en) * | 2018-03-07 | 2018-07-20 | 吉林大学 | A kind of efficient hexavalent chromium removal agent and preparation method thereof |
| JP2019195762A (en) * | 2018-05-09 | 2019-11-14 | 株式会社神戸製鋼所 | Decontamination treatment method |
| JP7263097B2 (en) * | 2019-04-25 | 2023-04-24 | 株式会社神戸製鋼所 | Selenium removal method |
| CN110144224A (en) * | 2019-05-22 | 2019-08-20 | 大连理工大学 | An iron-sulfur compound passivation agent suitable for repairing arsenic and cadmium compound pollution in farmland soil and its application |
| CN112872002A (en) * | 2021-02-02 | 2021-06-01 | 华中农业大学 | Application of selenium combined pseudomonas aeruginosa in strengthening phytoremediation of cadmium-nonylphenol composite contaminated soil |
| CN116899168A (en) * | 2023-06-07 | 2023-10-20 | 江西盖亚环保科技有限公司 | Fly ash composite medicament for effectively removing selenium and arsenic and preparation method thereof |
Family Cites Families (24)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FR2218844A1 (en) | 1973-02-28 | 1974-09-20 | Loeb Carl | Free-flowing cold-ground peanut powder - pref. used for prodn. of non-sticky peanut butter |
| US5951457A (en) * | 1997-06-26 | 1999-09-14 | Chemical Land Holdings. Inc. | Method to reduce hexavelant chromium in soils, sediments, industrial waste and other contaminated materials using ascorbic acid |
| US5975798A (en) * | 1997-09-02 | 1999-11-02 | Ars Technologies, Inc. | In-situ decontamination of subsurface waste using distributed iron powder |
| JP3246661B1 (en) * | 2001-02-15 | 2002-01-15 | 有限会社アルファグリーン | Anti-elution agent for contaminants in fly ash |
| AU2002332868A1 (en) * | 2001-09-06 | 2003-03-24 | Gannett Fleming, Inc. | In-situ process for detoxifying hexavalent chromium in soil and groundwater |
| JP2003334568A (en) * | 2002-05-16 | 2003-11-25 | Taiheiyo Cement Corp | Method for treating drain containing heavy metal |
| JP4264226B2 (en) | 2002-05-30 | 2009-05-13 | メタウォーター株式会社 | Purification of wastewater, groundwater or soil leachate |
| JP2004290768A (en) * | 2003-03-26 | 2004-10-21 | Ataka Construction & Engineering Co Ltd | How to purify soil and groundwater contaminated with organochlorine compounds |
| JP3777380B2 (en) * | 2004-03-11 | 2006-05-24 | 株木建設株式会社 | Treatment method for complex heavy metal contaminated soil |
| JP4702874B2 (en) * | 2004-10-08 | 2011-06-15 | ミヨシ油脂株式会社 | Heavy metal-containing waste treatment agent and heavy metal-containing waste treatment method |
| JP4557666B2 (en) * | 2004-10-12 | 2010-10-06 | 新日本製鐵株式会社 | Method for reducing elution of heavy metals |
| JP4530824B2 (en) * | 2004-12-03 | 2010-08-25 | 株式会社間組 | Soil purification agent and soil purification method |
| JP4527584B2 (en) | 2005-03-30 | 2010-08-18 | 株式会社神戸製鋼所 | Preparation of arsenic remover in contaminated water |
| JP4676898B2 (en) | 2005-04-07 | 2011-04-27 | 株式会社神戸製鋼所 | Arsenic removal method and arsenic removal treatment agent in contaminated water |
| JP2008043921A (en) | 2006-08-21 | 2008-02-28 | Kobe Steel Ltd | Method for removing arsenic in polluted water and arsenic-removing treatment agent |
| JP4755159B2 (en) * | 2007-09-28 | 2011-08-24 | 株式会社神戸製鋼所 | Treatment agent and treatment method for contaminated water containing heavy metals |
| CN101811792B (en) * | 2009-02-24 | 2012-02-15 | 宝山钢铁股份有限公司 | Processing method of stainless steel cold rolling pickling wastewater |
| CN101947381B (en) * | 2009-07-08 | 2015-01-28 | 东曹株式会社 | heavy metal treating agent and heavy metal pollutants treating method |
| CN101961635B (en) * | 2009-07-24 | 2014-06-11 | 株式会社神户制钢所 | Treating agent of a polluted water containing a heavy metal and treating method |
| CN102240667B (en) * | 2011-04-01 | 2013-02-13 | 重庆大学 | Chromium-contaminated soil and groundwater electric remediation and reduction detoxification method |
| JP5827829B2 (en) * | 2011-07-01 | 2015-12-02 | 水ing株式会社 | Method for producing ferrous heavy metal immobilizing agent |
| JP6118571B2 (en) * | 2012-02-07 | 2017-04-19 | 株式会社神戸製鋼所 | Treatment method of contaminated soil |
| JP6242743B2 (en) * | 2014-05-09 | 2017-12-06 | 株式会社神戸製鋼所 | Purification treatment agent and purification treatment method |
| CN105060561B (en) * | 2015-08-12 | 2017-04-12 | 太仓中化环保化工有限公司 | Method for removing heavy metal ions in wastewater |
-
2016
- 2016-03-09 JP JP2016045794A patent/JP6602237B2/en active Active
-
2017
- 2017-01-23 KR KR1020170010139A patent/KR101896825B1/en active Active
- 2017-03-03 CN CN201710123141.6A patent/CN107176644A/en active Pending
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP2017159237A (en) | 2017-09-14 |
| KR101896825B1 (en) | 2018-09-07 |
| KR20170105408A (en) | 2017-09-19 |
| CN107176644A (en) | 2017-09-19 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| JP6602237B2 (en) | Purification treatment agent and purification treatment method | |
| JP4755159B2 (en) | Treatment agent and treatment method for contaminated water containing heavy metals | |
| JP6118571B2 (en) | Treatment method of contaminated soil | |
| JP5700651B2 (en) | Treatment agent and treatment method for contaminated water containing heavy metals | |
| JP2013075252A (en) | Treatment method removing cesium and heavy metal from wastewater | |
| JP6242743B2 (en) | Purification treatment agent and purification treatment method | |
| Yoon et al. | Sulfur-anchored palm shell waste-based activated carbon for ultrahigh sorption of Hg (II) for in-situ groundwater treatment | |
| CN106517570B (en) | Purification treatment method and purification treatment agent | |
| JP5046853B2 (en) | Treatment agent and treatment method for contaminated water containing heavy metals | |
| KR102113144B1 (en) | Purification treatment agents and purification treatment methods | |
| WO2016183947A1 (en) | Deep treatment method for polluted wastewater containing thallium and other heavy metal | |
| CN116161834A (en) | Heavy metal wastewater treatment method based on zero-valent iron packed bed system | |
| JP6208648B2 (en) | Treatment agent and treatment method for contaminated water or soil | |
| KR102421952B1 (en) | Removal method of selenium | |
| JP2019195762A (en) | Decontamination treatment method | |
| JP2023163151A (en) | Purification treatment agent and purification treatment method | |
| JP6776184B2 (en) | How to remove perchlorate, chlorate, chlorite or hypochlorite and removal treatment agent | |
| US10526215B2 (en) | Selenium and other contaminants removal process | |
| JP4808093B2 (en) | Recycling method of iron powder for arsenic removal | |
| JP2007054818A (en) | Method for treating contaminated water containing selenium and water treatment agent | |
| Anfaresi et al. | Bangka’s Tin Sea Sand-Fe3O4 as A Removal of Heavy Metals in By-Product of Tin Ore Processing | |
| JP2009220102A (en) | Method for treating selenium-containing waste water using iron powder | |
| JP2010194507A (en) | Method of producing iron hydroxide adsorbent, and method of cleaning waste water using the adsorbent |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20181203 |
|
| A977 | Report on retrieval |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007 Effective date: 20190705 |
|
| A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20190716 |
|
| A521 | Request for written amendment filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20190912 |
|
| TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20191001 |
|
| A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20191008 |
|
| R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Ref document number: 6602237 Country of ref document: JP Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |