JP6730104B2 - Information processing terminal - Google Patents

Description

The present invention relates to an information processing terminal used to activate a user's brain.

In Japan, the elderly population is increasing, and the number of people with dementia is expected to increase accordingly. Brain activation has become necessary as a preventive measure against dementia. Therefore, a method of activating the brain through game software has come out. Game software has usually been sold to young people by children, but due to this background, the demand for elderly people is gradually increasing. As a brain activation game, it is common to solve problems for the elderly. For example, Patent Document 1 discloses a dementia prevention system that presents problems to be used in training for preventing dementia.

On the other hand, there are various factors of dementia, and it is considered that not only the lack of stimulation to the brain, but also the degree of stress and social participation, and whether proper exercise and diet are performed. It is thought that a combination of many factors cause dementia.

JP, 2005-45143, A

The conventional prevention and countermeasures for dementia have merely provided countermeasures against various factors of dementia. For example, the example of Patent Document 1 is a coping method of stimulating the brain with respect to a factor of a decrease in stimulation of the brain. Most of the other measures against dementia have been individually addressed such as improving eating habits and exercising. Those related to general health improvement measures such as food and exercise are often provided as combination improvement measures. However, for many factors that cause dementia, we have not provided preventive measures such as stimulation to the brain in combination with other preventive measures, or motivated to take these preventive measures.

An object of the present invention is to provide a preventive measure for dementia caused by brain stimulation in combination with other preventive measures.

The information processing terminal according to the present invention is provided with an acquisition unit that acquires activity information based on a user's activity in association with the time when the activity is performed, and an indication at a predetermined position from the display screen or a predetermined position on the display screen. Application software having at least one game that accepts an answer or operation input by a target moving operation and adds a game score by determining a correct answer based on the input, and an execution time of the game by the application software are measured. The time between the activity time and the execution time is predetermined by comparing the activity time of performing the activity associated with the activity information with the measurement unit with the execution time of the game measured by the measurement side unit. A comparison unit that determines whether the time is within a time period, and an evaluation unit that adds an evaluation score when the comparison unit determines that the time between the activity time and the execution time is within a predetermined time period. ..

According to the present invention, when providing a game in which the effect of activating the brain is provided, it is motivated to take a composite of other preventive measures such as the user's exercise condition and eating condition. By doing so, it is possible to promote not only the activation effect of the brain by itself but also the combined efforts to maximize the effect of the activation of the brain by the game. It can be further enhanced.

The block diagram explaining the functional composition of the information processing terminal of this Embodiment. It is a display screen showing a step count screen. It is a display screen which shows a meal item. It is a display screen which shows the addition screen of an evaluation score. It is a flow chart explaining activity evaluation processing of this embodiment. It is a flowchart explaining the evaluation process with respect to exercise information. It is a flow chart explaining the evaluation processing to meal information.

Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. However, the embodiments described below are merely examples, and are not intended to exclude various modifications and application of techniques not explicitly shown below. That is, the present invention can be implemented by being variously modified without departing from the spirit thereof. Further, in the following description of the drawings, the same or similar parts are denoted by the same or similar reference numerals. The drawings are schematic and do not necessarily match actual dimensions and proportions. The drawings may include portions having different dimensional relationships and ratios.

This embodiment is realized in an information processing terminal such as a mobile phone, a smart phone, and a tablet terminal. The present invention is not limited to the above, and can be applied to general information processing apparatuses having various computer functions, but the description will be given assuming that it is applied to the above-described small information processing terminal.

Although not shown, the information processing terminal according to the present embodiment includes a CPU (Central Processing Unit), a ROM (Read Only Memory), a RAM (Random Access Memory), an image processing unit, and a memory. The CPU, ROM, RAM, image processing unit, and memory are connected to each other via a bus.

The CPU executes various processes according to a program recorded in the ROM or a program loaded from the memory to the RAM. The RAM also stores data and the like necessary for the CPU to execute various processes.

The image processing unit includes a DSP (Digital Signal Processor), a VRAM (Video Random Access Memory), and the like, and performs various image processes on image data in cooperation with the CPU.

The memory may be any storage medium such as DRAM, cache memory, magnetic disk, optical disk, magneto-optical disk, or semiconductor memory. The memory includes not only those connected by a bus but also those read and written via a drive. The data stored in this embodiment will be described as temporarily stored in this memory both in the case of temporary storage and long-term storage by a non-volatile memory.

An input/output interface is connected to the information processing terminal. The imaging unit, the input unit, and the communication unit are connected via the input/output interface. The input unit includes various buttons and receives a user's instruction operation. The communication unit controls communication with another device via a network including the Internet. By configuring the information processing terminal to have a built-in acceleration sensor and gyro (angular velocity) sensor, outputs are provided to the above various configurations.

The information processing terminal has the above-described respective configurations, and the functional configurations will be described later. Each functional configuration is functionally realized by the cooperative operation of the CPU, ROM, RAM, image processing unit, and memory. The function of each of these units is a module configuration provided by an electronic circuit or a program, and the program is stored in the ROM and executed by cooperating with each unit while being read by the CPU as appropriate. Each functional configuration shown in FIG. 1 will be described with reference to each of FIGS.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating the functional configuration of the information processing terminal according to the present embodiment. The information processing terminal according to the present embodiment includes an application storage unit 10, an acquisition unit 20, a control unit 30, and a display unit 40. The functional configurations of the application storage unit 10, the acquisition unit 20, the control unit 30, and the display unit 40 are functional configurations realized by the above hardware configuration. The display unit 40 has a display screen 41.

(Regarding activity information of the acquisition unit 10 and users)
The acquisition unit 10 acquires the activity information based on the activity of the user in association with the time when the activity is performed. The activities of users include various activities that are mainly useful for preventing dementia. Meal, exercise, stress relief, social participation, etc. useful for dementia. The activity information is information that enables the activities of these users to be quantified or identified. Regarding the activities of the users, the exercise and meals of the users will be mainly explained. Specific types of diet and exercise include activities that themselves help prevent dementia.

There are many types of exercise for users, but as the age increases, the types of exercise that can actually be performed are limited. There are few more that can be started more easily. The exercises that can be performed easily include walking by walking, fast walking, and jogging. In the case of walking, it can be measured by the number of steps, and in the case of fast walking and jogging, it can be measured by the heart rate. And exercise time is an important factor.

In particular, while the act of walking is a simple exercise, it is often easier to achieve results by thinking while walking rather than simply thinking and thinking at the desk. It has been confirmed that the act of walking has a positive effect on the brain. Compared to strenuous exercise, there is an advantage that how effective walking is to health is relatively easy to manage, especially for users who do not exercise daily.

When the exercise of the user is walking, the acquisition unit 10 may be a pedometer. In this case, the acquisition unit 10 acquires the step count information of the user as the activity information. The acquisition unit 10 combines the step count information output from the pedometer with the walking time, and sets the step count information from the count start time to the count end time of the acquired step count information as the activity time, and the step count information. Get in association.

FIG. 2 is a display screen showing a step count screen. FIG. 2 shows a display screen 41 when the acquisition unit 10 is a pedometer. The display screen 41 of FIG. 2 can be displayed by the operation of the user. When the automatic determination function of walking is used, the acquisition unit 10 displays the screen of FIG. 2 on the display screen 41 according to an instruction to the display unit 40 when it is determined that the user has started walking.

During walking, the number of steps during walking is displayed as shown in FIG. The display unit 40 may display the number of steps taken during the walking period, but in FIG. 2, the cumulative number of steps taken is displayed. In addition to this, it is also possible to display the target number of steps of the user, the fraction to the target, the cumulative number of steps from past walking, and the like. Further, various menu items can be displayed under the display screen 41 to return to other menus during display.

The start and end of walking are set by the user inputting into the information processing terminal. On the other hand, it may be configured to automatically determine the start and end of walking. By configuring the information processing terminal to include, for example, an acceleration sensor and a gyro (angular velocity) sensor, it is possible to acquire information regarding whether or not the user has walked from the output. By determining whether the walking continues, the start and end of the time when the walking continues are acquired as the walking time and the time when the activity is performed.

In this way, by automatically deciding the start and end of walking, not only the user can input the activity information of the user but also the input of arbitrary or inaccurate walking information. Can be prevented. By accurately grasping the exercise state of the user, it becomes possible to accurately give an evaluation score in a training game or the like described later. It becomes possible to avoid the inaccurate operation of simply inputting “exercise”, it is possible to appropriately prompt the interlocking motion of the exercise and the training game, and the effect of the present embodiment described later. You will be able to get it properly.

In addition, the acquisition unit 10 may determine that the user has exercised when the number of steps exceeds a predetermined number in a certain period. In this case, the acquisition unit 10 sets the reference number of steps in advance, and when counting the set reference number of steps or more, sets the start of the walking as the exercise start. For example, if the user walks after walking 50 steps, the time of the first step can be set to start walking. When the walking is not counted for 3 minutes or more, it is determined that the walking is finished when the time of the last walking is reached.

It is common in daily life to simply take a few steps, and with the above configuration, it can be determined that the person has walked and exercised with a certain number of steps or more. In particular, if the start and end of walking are automatically determined as described above, it means that the person has just moved a little in the house and exercised, and noise is included. Therefore, prevent the generation of such noise. You can

(About meals as activity information)
Although we explained exercise, especially walking, as a user activity, dietary management is also important from the perspective of preventing dementia. FIG. 3 is a display screen showing meal items. As shown in FIG. 3, the meals eaten on that day are classified into items and displayed as icons by the display unit 40. For example, specific items such as "beans,""sesame,""eggs,""cheese,""seaweed,""vegetables,""fish,""shiitake," and "potatoes" are displayed on the screen as icons. After eating, the contents of the actually eaten meal are input by selecting the icon together with the time zone of the meal. In this way, the acquisition unit 10 accepts the elements that constitute the user's meal by selective input, and acquires the elements in association with the information regarding the meal time of the user. As an element that constitutes the user's meal, information regarding the type of ingredients of the user's meal is selectively input by displaying a plurality of items for each type on the display screen 41 and accepting an instruction input on the display screen 41. It

Then, the acquisition unit 10 determines that the activity is performed when the element received by the selection input satisfies the criteria, and acquires the information regarding the meal time of the user as the time when the activity is performed. Specifically, it can be determined that the criterion is satisfied when 5 out of 9 items shown in FIG. 3 are satisfied. Or, if you take "fish" and "vegetables", "sesame" and "vegetables", "eggs" and "beans", "potato" and "beans", etc. Can be used as a reference depending on whether or not a predetermined combination of a plurality of items is satisfied.

(About application storage unit 20 and training game)
The application storage unit 20 stores a plurality of application software, particularly games 21 to 23. Although three games 21 to 23 are shown as an example for illustration, the number may be more or less. Also, application software that is not game software may be stored. Hereinafter, the games 21 to 23 and other software will be collectively described as application software.

Games 21 to 23 are prepared in advance from training games that are useful for preventing dementia and that stimulate the brain. Training games include calculation games, quiz games, and error-finding games. Further, from the aspect of recognition of social participation for the prevention of dementia, it is possible to further enhance the effect by playing a competitive game. As the training games of the games 21 to 23, those which have been confirmed to have a certain effect on the demand for dementia by themselves are selected.

Regarding training games, it has been confirmed that a game in which a correct answer exists and whether or not the correct answer is reached can be confirmed to be more effective in preventing dementia (Higher Brain Function Research 34(3) ):335-341, 2014, "Can the Brain Training(R) game improve cognitive function?"). Rather than just spending your head just playing the game, you can play a game that is effective in preventing dementia at regular times in a timely manner in relation to exercise and eating, thereby making the training game another action. The effect of combining with can be further enhanced.

Specific examples of the games 21 to 23 include a question-and-answer game and a quiz game, each of which includes a plurality of question-and-answer combinations in which choices of questions and answers are displayed and a correct answer is determined based on an answer input from a user. In addition, when a plurality of objects displayed on the display screen 41 are operated by input, the objects are moved on the display screen 41 in some cases, and as a result of the operation, the arrangement of the plurality of objects satisfies the requirements. For example, there is a puzzle game in which the correct state is set when the placement of the moved object matches the requirements. Further, there is a calculation game in which the calculation formula is displayed on the display screen 41, and the input of a number is accepted, and when the calculation result of the calculation formula and the input number are matched and brought into a correct state, a correct state is obtained.

As described above, the games 21 to 23 stored in the application storage unit 20 accept an input of an answer or an operation by a pointing operation at a predetermined position or a moving operation of an object at a predetermined position on the display screen from the display screen 41, and input the input. There is at least one game in which the game score is added by determining the correct answer based on the game.

It is considered that the training game is effective in preventing dementia by setting the correct game as described above. It is considered that the cognitive function is improved by the correct work and repeated answers. As for the game in which there is no correct answer, the game progresses without confirmation of correctness, so no feedback is given to the recognition.

Research on games that are useful for improving cognitive function is still ongoing. For example, according to Higher Brain Function Research 34(3):335-341, 2014, "Can Brain Training (registered trademark) game improve cognitive function?", it seems that there are correct answers such as calculation and reading aloud. It has been confirmed that there is an effect of improving the cognitive function in a game in which the work is performed correctly.

In the case of a normal game, even if the score is raised or the effect on the screen is produced by the operation, there is not always a correct answer. It is considered that the person appropriately exerts the reflection ability and the judgment ability without the correct answer. Although it may improve the reflexes, it is not currently studied to improve cognitive ability and thus prevent dementia.

In this way, it is important for the user to derive an answer to a correct answer, and as an input method for that, the user points out a predetermined position from the display screen 41 or an object at a predetermined position on the display screen. Enter the answer or operation by the moving action of. In this embodiment, dementia is prevented by repeating the feedback of correctness determination as a result.

(About control unit 30)
The control unit 30 includes a measurement unit 31, a comparison unit 32, and an evaluation unit 33 as a functional configuration. The control unit 30 includes information processing including control processing based on the activity information acquired from the acquisition unit 10, execution control of the games 21 to 23 stored in the application storage unit 20, data management, display control, and control processing for the network. It is a processing unit that executes overall control of the terminal.

The measuring unit 31 measures the execution time of the game by the application software. The execution time of the game can be from the start time to the end time of the game. For example, it can be the time from when the user inputs the game start button to when the user inputs the end button. However, since some application software in recent years continues to operate in the background, the time from displaying the screen on the display screen 41 on the information processing terminal to deleting the screen may be used as the game execution time. .. The execution time is the start/end information based on the date of year, month, day, hour, minute, and second. Furthermore, the duration of game execution is included.

The comparison unit 32 compares the activity time of performing the activity associated with the activity information with the execution time of the game measured by the measurement side unit, and the activity time is within a predetermined time. Or not. For example, suppose that the activity time is exercise such as walking from 2:00 pm to 2:30 pm on June 1. On the other hand, for example, it is assumed that the game 21 is played from 15:00 to 5:30 on June 1. Since the end time of the exercise is 2:30 pm and the start time of the game 21 is 5:00 pm on June 1, the activity time and the execution time are 2 hours and 30 minutes.

On the other hand, in the comparison unit 32, the set time to be compared is set in advance. The set time can be set to 3 hours, for example. Since the time between the activity time and the execution time is 2 hours and 30 minutes and is within 3 hours this time, the comparison unit 32 determines that it is within the predetermined time. In addition, when the set time here is 1 hour, the 2 hours and 30 minutes between the activity time and the execution time exceeds 1 hour, and therefore the comparison unit 32 does not operate within a predetermined time. It is determined not to.

The evaluation unit 33 adds the evaluation score when the comparison unit 32 determines that the time between the activity time and the execution time is within the predetermined time. The evaluation score may be a score set particularly for this application software, or a score used in other software may be used as it is.

Or, the evaluation score is not limited to mere points, but it can be used by providing points for purchase that can be redeemed financially or economic points such as giving some kind of privilege when certain points are accumulated. Incentives for persons may be further increased.

FIG. 4 is a display screen showing an evaluation score addition screen. FIG. 4 shows an example of the display screen 41 indicating that the “brain health maintenance activity star bonus” is adopted as the evaluation score and the evaluation score is added. By displaying this display screen 41 at the end of the training game, it is possible to provide an incentive for the user.

Through the above incentives, the user is motivated to execute the training game within a predetermined time. Since the user originally owns the training game and plays the training game at a certain frequency, the user is more likely to execute the training game at the timing motivated by the incentive. For example, it is expected that a particularly high effect will be brought about by motivating the user to play at a time when the walking time and the time of the training game are close to each other.

The evaluation unit 33 may add a uniform value as an evaluation score when they match each other. For example, not only whether the walking time zone and the training game time zone are close to each other, but how many minutes the walking time is It may be set whether or not the score is added.

On the other hand, when the comparison unit 32 determines that the time between the activity time and the execution time is not within the predetermined time, the evaluation unit 33 notifies the user that it is outside the time. For example, the display unit 40 displays a warning. A warning sound may be emitted from the information processing terminal. By making it possible for the user to confirm whether the application software is in time or out of time, it is possible to encourage the user to use the application software at a predetermined time.

In addition, as one function, the comparison unit 32 may compare the activity time and the execution time to determine whether or not duplication occurs. Specifically, this is a case where the game is started while walking. It is extremely dangerous to execute application software such as games 21 to 23 while moving. Therefore, when the execution of the application software is operated during the movement, the control unit 30 can suspend the execution of the application software. Alternatively, forced termination by interruption or a warning screen can be displayed on the display unit 40. With this configuration, it is possible to avoid a dangerous state of being absorbed in a game while walking.

(Effects of this embodiment)
As described above, when the user plays the training game, the exercise data is referred to, and if it is within a predetermined period such as one hour from the time when the exercise is performed, the evaluation points are added. , The incentive to play a training game within the set time increases.

Also, if you enter the meal time and the content of the meal and the meal that meets the requirements is set within the specified time, the evaluation points will be added again, so the training game will be completed within the specified time. Be motivated to do. Also, those who play games are motivated to have a regular diet.

In this way, it is expected that a training game is motivated to be performed within a fixed time after eating or exercising and that the training game is performed at an appropriate timing, so that a composite effect for preventing dementia is enhanced. Although the effect of preventing dementia by each action is not necessarily high at present, synergistic effects are exerted by motivating them to combine these actions.

In addition, research on dementia prevention has just begun, and the effects of individual actions have not always been confirmed, but those that have been confirmed to be effective by combining them will be incorporated as dementia prevention measures. It is also possible. In particular, actions taken to prevent dementia are lifestyle-related, and it is thought that many of them will only produce results if they are repeated. One method is to force the game to be performed under the control of a doctor, but it is more rational to habitually combine it with a training game by motivation in view of cost.

In addition, with regard to lifestyle-related improvement measures by repetition, it is easier for the person to be motivated if they have a visible effect at an early stage. By being motivated to perform multiple actions in combination, it is expected that multiple actions will be effective as a result. It is expected that the effect will be motivating for users, and as a result, a good cycle will be created.

Also, even though we know that it is important to eat a healthy diet, exercise appropriately, and regularly obtain appropriate stimulation of the brain, we still have the opportunity to motivate the combination. If you don't get one, it's more likely that one will fall out. In addition, it may be stressful or motivated by being forcibly given by being forced. Even though it's a game that's easy to play, it's possible to get sick of it.

In this embodiment, since it is only added to the evaluation score, there is no need to force the game even if it is busy, and even if you forget it today, you can do it tomorrow, and it will be a stressful force. It is thought that it is difficult to become. On the other hand, it is confirmed that the score is hard to increase because the game is not played within the stipulated time. Therefore, it is predicted that if this is not the case, it will lead to motivation thereafter. As a result, it is expected that the results will be easier to produce.

(flowchart)
With respect to the above configuration, the flow of processing will be described with reference to the flowchart. In the present embodiment, the flow of processing will be described with reference to the flowcharts, but the order is not limited to the order shown in each figure, and the processing may be performed before or after the processing within a range that does not hinder the execution of the corresponding processing. Good.

FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating the activity evaluation process of this embodiment. First, the evaluation unit 33 performs initialization and evaluation data acquisition processing (step 100). Here, initialization of variable data and acquisition processing of star data as evaluation data are performed. The evaluation data will be added to the already accumulated data.

Next, the measurement unit 31 acquires training data from the application storage unit 20 (step 110). That is, since the application storage unit 20 stores the games 21 to 23, the game score as the execution result thereof, and the date and time when the application software is executed, these training data are acquired.

Then, the measurement unit 31 determines whether or not the training data has been acquired (step 120). If there is no training data, the evaluation score is not added, and therefore the process relating to the addition of the evaluation score is omitted and the process proceeds to step 160 to shift to another output process.

If there is training data, the acquisition unit 10 acquires activity data within 24 hours from the date and time indicated in the training data (step 130). Although steps 130 to 150 are described as a flow of processing targeting only a single piece of activity information, as described above, the activity information includes a wide variety of information such as exercise information, walking information, and meal information. Is included. Therefore, in steps 130 to 150, the processing is looped for each type of activity information. For example, the walking evaluation process (steps 130 to 150) may be first executed, and then the exercise evaluation process and the meal evaluation process may be similarly executed. After these processes are completed, the process proceeds to step 160 to shift to another output process.

Next, the acquisition unit 10 determines whether the activity information has been acquired (step 140). If the activity information cannot be obtained, the process related to the activity is ended. When the activity information can be acquired, the process moves to the activity evaluation process (step 150). The activity evaluation process will be described with reference to the flowcharts of FIGS. 6 and 7.

When the evaluation score is acquired in the activity evaluation process of step 150 or the process relating to the evaluation score is not executed, the evaluation unit 33 executes the output process of the evaluation score and the advice (step 160). The display process of the evaluation score is shown in FIG.

FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating an evaluation process for exercise information. Of the activity evaluation processing of step 150 in FIG. 5, the exercise information evaluation processing will be described. Initially, the evaluation process regarding walking is executed. First, the acquisition unit 10 acquires step count data one hour before the start of the game (step 200). Then, the acquisition unit 10 determines whether or not the walking of the acquired step count data has continued for 30 minutes or more (step 210).

If the exercise has continued for 30 minutes or more, the evaluation unit 33 adds +2 to the evaluation score as the exercise targeted for the evaluation score (step 220). If the exercise does not continue for 30 minutes or more, it is not the exercise targeted for the evaluation score, and therefore the display unit 40 displays a message recommending the activity (step 225).

Since the evaluation process related to walking has been executed, the evaluation process related to fast walking is executed next. The acquisition unit 10 acquires fast walking time data 24 hours before the start of the game (step 230). Then, the acquisition unit 10 determines whether or not the walking for the acquired fast walking time data has continued for 30 minutes or more (step 240).

If the exercise has continued for 30 minutes or more, the evaluation unit 33 adds +2 to the evaluation score as the exercise targeted for the evaluation score (step 250). If the exercise has not continued for 30 minutes or more, it is not the exercise targeted for the evaluation score, and therefore a message recommending the activity is displayed on the display unit 40 (step 255). With the above, the evaluation process for the exercise information is completed.

FIG. 7 is a flowchart illustrating an evaluation process for meal information. First, the acquisition unit 10 determines whether or not fish and vegetables have been selected via the display screen 41 (step 310). If selected, the evaluation score is incremented by +2 (step 320). If it is not selected, the display unit 40 displays a message recommending the activity (step 325). With the above, the evaluation process for the exercise information is completed.

Next, the acquisition unit 10 determines whether sesame and vegetables are selected via the display screen 41 (step 330). If selected, the evaluation score is incremented by +2 (step 340). If it is not selected, the display unit 40 displays a message recommending the activity (step 345). With the above, the evaluation process for the exercise information is completed.

Similarly, the acquisition unit 10 determines whether eggs and beans have been selected via the display screen 41 (step 350). If selected, the evaluation score is incremented by +2 (step 360). If it is not selected, the display unit 40 displays a message recommending the activity (step 365). With the above, the evaluation process for the exercise information is completed.

Similarly, the acquisition unit 10 determines whether potatoes and beans have been selected via the display screen 41 (step 370). If selected, the evaluation score is incremented by +2 (step 380). If not selected, a message recommending the activity is displayed on the display unit 40 (step 385). With the above, the evaluation process for the exercise information is completed.

Although the present invention has been described above using the embodiments, the technical scope of the present invention is not limited to the scope described in the above embodiments. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and improvements can be added to the above embodiment. It is clear from the scope of the claims that the embodiments added with such changes or improvements can be included in the technical scope of the present invention.

Application storage unit 10, acquisition unit 20, control unit 30, measurement unit 31, comparison unit 32, evaluation unit 33, display unit 40, display screen 41.

Claims (5)

An acquisition unit that acquires activity information based on the activity of the user in association with the time when the activity is performed,
It has at least one game that accepts an input of an answer or an operation by a pointing operation at a predetermined position on the display screen or a movement operation of an object located at a predetermined position on the display screen, and determines a correct answer based on the input to add a game score. Application software,
A measuring unit for measuring the execution time of the game by the application software,
By comparing the activity time of performing the activity associated with the activity information with the execution time of the game measured by the measurement side unit, the interval between the activity time and the execution time is within a predetermined time. A comparison unit that determines whether or not
An evaluation unit that adds an evaluation score when it is determined by the comparison unit that the time between the activity time and the execution time is within a predetermined time,
The acquisition unit acquires the step count information of the user as the activity information and associates the step count count start time to the count end time of the acquired step count information with the step count information as the time when the activity is performed. To get
Information processing terminal. An acquisition unit that acquires activity information based on the activity of the user in association with the time when the activity is performed,
It has at least one game that accepts an input of an answer or an operation by a pointing operation at a predetermined position on the display screen or a movement operation of an object located at a predetermined position on the display screen, and determines a correct answer based on the input to add a game score. Application software,
A measuring unit for measuring the execution time of the game by the application software,
By comparing the activity time of performing the activity associated with the activity information with the execution time of the game measured by the measurement side unit, the interval between the activity time and the execution time is within a predetermined time. A comparison unit that determines whether or not
An evaluation unit that adds an evaluation score when it is determined by the comparison unit that the time between the activity time and the execution time is within a predetermined time,
The acquisition unit receives an element that constitutes the user's meal by selection input, acquires the information in association with information regarding the time of the user's meal, and when the element received by the selection input satisfies a criterion, It is determined that the activity has been performed, and information regarding the meal time of the user is acquired as the time when the activity is performed,
Information processing terminal. The element constituting the user's meal is selected by displaying information on the type of ingredients of the user's meal by displaying a plurality of items for each type on the display screen and receiving an instruction input on the display screen. Entered,
The criterion is whether or not a predetermined combination of the plurality of items is satisfied,
The information processing terminal according to claim 2 . The application software has a plurality of the games, and the plurality of games include
A question-and-answer game consisting of a plurality of combinations of questions and answers, which displays choices of questions and answers and makes a correct answer decision based on an answer input from the user,
A puzzle game in which a plurality of objects displayed on the display screen are operated by input, and when the arrangement of the plurality of objects satisfies a requirement as a result of the operation, a correct answer state is set,
By displaying a calculation formula on the display screen and receiving the input of a number, a calculation game in which the correct answer state is obtained when the calculation result of the calculation formula and the input number match each other,
The information processing terminal according to any one of claims 1 to 3 including at least one of. If the comparison unit determines that the time between the activity time and the execution time is not within the predetermined time, the evaluation unit notifies the user that it is outside the time,
The information processing terminal according to any one of claims 1-4.