JP6742005B2 - Evaluation method of "softness" in powder cosmetics - Google Patents
Evaluation method of "softness" in powder cosmetics Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP6742005B2 JP6742005B2 JP2016095176A JP2016095176A JP6742005B2 JP 6742005 B2 JP6742005 B2 JP 6742005B2 JP 2016095176 A JP2016095176 A JP 2016095176A JP 2016095176 A JP2016095176 A JP 2016095176A JP 6742005 B2 JP6742005 B2 JP 6742005B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- powder
- cosmetics
- softness
- stress
- vertical stress
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Landscapes
- Cosmetics (AREA)
Description
本願発明は、粉末化粧料、及び化粧料用粉末原料における感触特性の一因子である「柔らかさ」を客観的に評価するための方法に関する。 TECHNICAL FIELD The present invention relates to a powder cosmetic and a method for objectively evaluating “softness” which is one factor of the feel characteristics of powder raw materials for cosmetics.
スキンケアやメイクアップ化粧料は、ユーザーが容器から手にとって直接肌に塗布し使用することが一般的である。そして、化粧料は毎日使用するものであることから、化粧効果において、その機能性は勿論のこと、使用感(感触)も極めて重要な要素と言える。 Skin care and make-up cosmetics are generally used by directly applying to the skin from the container by the user. Since cosmetics are used every day, not only the functionality but also the feeling of use (feeling) are extremely important factors in the cosmetic effect.
化粧料、及び原料の感触特性の評価方法には、大きく分けて官能評価と物性評価がある。官能評価は、実使用に近い評価であるというメリットがある一方で、主観的評価であることから、評価者の感性による個人差に加えて肌状態や心理状態にも大きく影響されるものである。このため、官能試験のみに頼らず物理機器を用いた客観的指標による評価方法や表示方法等の技術が強く望まれていた。 The methods of evaluating the feel characteristics of cosmetics and raw materials are roughly classified into sensory evaluation and physical property evaluation. Sensory evaluation has the merit that it is an evaluation that is close to actual use, but it is a subjective evaluation, so it is greatly affected by the skin condition and psychological condition in addition to individual differences due to the evaluator's sensitivity. .. Therefore, there has been a strong demand for a technique such as an evaluation method and a display method using an objective index that uses a physical device without relying only on a sensory test.
クリーム等の乳化型化粧料、及び油性原料においては一般的に「のび」、「なめらかさ」、「しっとり感」といった感触特性が評価される。一方で、パウダーファンデーション等の粉末化粧料、及び化粧料用粉末原料においては、「のび」や「なめらかさ」、「しっとり感」に加えて、粉体特有の感触特性である「柔らかさ」が求められる。 In emulsified cosmetics such as creams and oil-based raw materials, tactile characteristics such as “spread”, “smoothness”, and “moist feeling” are generally evaluated. On the other hand, in powder cosmetics such as powder foundations and powder raw materials for cosmetics, in addition to "spreading", "smoothness" and "moist feeling", "softness" which is a touch characteristic peculiar to the powder is Desired.
従来、化粧料、及び原料の感触特性を評価する手法の一つとして、表面摩擦測定による客観的指標に基づいた評価方法が検討されている。例えば、「のび」、「なめらかさ」、「しっとり感」といった官能評価から得られる感触特性と、表面摩擦測定から得られる平均摩擦係数(MIU)、及び/又は平均摩擦係数の変動係数(MMD)といった摩擦特性との相関性について検討されている(特許文献1、非特許文献1、2参照)。一方、粉末化粧料においては、固形粉末化粧料の「なめらかさ」について回転式レオメーターを用いて客観的に評価した例が報告されている(特許文献2)。しかしながら、粉末化粧料、及び化粧料用粉末原料の「柔らかさ」を評価した例はない。 Conventionally, an evaluation method based on an objective index by surface friction measurement has been studied as one of the methods for evaluating the feel characteristics of cosmetics and raw materials. For example, tactile characteristics obtained from sensory evaluations such as “spread”, “smoothness”, and “moist feeling”, average friction coefficient (MIU) obtained from surface friction measurement, and/or coefficient of variation (MMD) of average friction coefficient. The correlation with such friction characteristics has been examined (see Patent Document 1, Non-Patent Documents 1 and 2). On the other hand, in powder cosmetics, an example of objectively evaluating the "smoothness" of solid powder cosmetics using a rotary rheometer has been reported (Patent Document 2). However, there is no example in which the "softness" of powder cosmetics and powder raw materials for cosmetics is evaluated.
一般に、ゴム弾性を有するシリコーンエラストマーやナイロン、ポリウレタンといった樹脂は、感触特性としての「柔らかさ」が高いことが知られている。これら粉体の「柔らかさ」は、JIS K6253に記載されているデュロメータ硬さと相関すると考えられることから、原料単体としては硬度が低いほど柔らかい粉体であることが予想される。しかしながら、実際の開発現場においては原料単体の弾力性が、官能の柔らかさと必ずしも一致しない。 It is generally known that resins such as silicone elastomers having rubber elasticity, nylon, and polyurethane have high “softness” as a touch property. Since the "softness" of these powders is considered to correlate with the durometer hardness described in JIS K6253, it is expected that the lower the hardness of the raw material, the softer the powder. However, in the actual development site, the elasticity of the raw material alone does not always match the softness of the sensory body.
一方、パウダーファンデーション等の粉末化粧料には、マイカ、タルク、セリサイト等の無機板状粉体が含有されている。これら無機板状粉体は、板状粉体特有の延展性の良さと皮膚への付着性を有することから、粉末化粧料には欠かせない成分である。しかしながら、これら無機板状粉体の多くは固い結晶構造に起因して、感触特性としての「柔らかさ」は低い。 On the other hand, powder cosmetics such as powder foundations contain inorganic plate-like powders such as mica, talc and sericite. These inorganic plate-like powders are indispensable components for powder cosmetics because they have good spreadability peculiar to the plate-like powders and adherence to the skin. However, many of these inorganic plate-like powders have low "softness" as a touch property due to their hard crystal structure.
無機板状粉体において、ゴム弾性を有する樹脂を表面処理することで「柔らかさ」を付与した例が報告されている(特許文献3参照)。 It has been reported that an inorganic plate-like powder is given "softness" by surface-treating a resin having rubber elasticity (see Patent Document 3).
また、同様に表面処理を施すことで「柔らかさ」を付与した例が報告されている(特許文献4、5参照)。このように、ゴム弾性を有さない無機板状粉体においても、表面処理剤の種類や配合量によって、「柔らかさ」を付与できることが知られている。 In addition, an example in which “softness” is imparted by similarly performing surface treatment has been reported (see Patent Documents 4 and 5). As described above, it is known that "softness" can be imparted also to the inorganic plate-like powder having no rubber elasticity, depending on the type and blending amount of the surface treatment agent.
香粧品分野において、一般に「柔らかさ」を付与した粉末化粧料、及び化粧料用粉末原料は、好ましい使用感であることから非常に市場価値が高い。 In the field of cosmetics, powder cosmetics and powder raw materials for cosmetics, which are generally imparted with "softness", have a very high market value because of their favorable feeling of use.
これらの背景に基づき、粉末化粧料、及び化粧料用粉末原料においても、物理機器を用いた「柔らかさ」の客観的指標が求められている。 Based on these backgrounds, an objective index of "softness" using a physical device is also required for powder cosmetics and powder raw materials for cosmetics.
本願発明は、上記事情に鑑みてなされたもので、粉末化粧料、及び化粧料用粉末原料における「柔らかさ」を、物理機器を用いて客観的に評価するための方法を提供することを目的とする。 The present invention has been made in view of the above circumstances, and an object thereof is to provide a method for objectively evaluating the "softness" of a powder cosmetic and a powder raw material for cosmetic using a physical device. And
かかる実情において、本願発明者らは上記課題を解決すべく鋭意研究を重ねた結果、特定の粉体層せん断力測定から得られる応力緩和率と、官能評価から得られる「柔らかさ」との間に高い相関性があることを見出し、本願発明を完成するに至った。 Under such circumstances, the inventors of the present invention have conducted extensive studies to solve the above problems, and as a result, between the stress relaxation rate obtained from the measurement of the specific powder layer shear force and the "softness" obtained from the sensory evaluation. It was found that there is a high correlation with the above, and the present invention has been completed.
すなわち本願発明は、粉末化粧料、及び化粧料用粉末原料において、感触特性の一因子である「柔らかさ」を、特定の方法による粉体層せん断力測定(初期垂直応力σ、及び応力緩和後の垂直応力σ’から応力の減衰率を得る方法)から得られる応力緩和率を物性指標として関連付けて評価する方法を提供するものである。 That is, in the present invention, in the powder cosmetics and the powder raw material for cosmetics, the "softness" which is one factor of the feel characteristics is measured by the powder layer shear force measurement by the specific method (initial vertical stress σ, and after stress relaxation). The method of evaluating the stress relaxation rate obtained from (the method of obtaining the stress attenuation rate from the normal stress σ′) of FIG.
本願発明は、ゴム弾性を有する樹脂のみならず、無機板状粉体を始めとしたあらゆる粉末原料、及びそれらを種々配合して調製される粉末化粧料の「柔らかさ」を客観的に評価するため、特定の方法による粉体層せん断力測定から得られる応力緩和率を物性指標として関連付けるものである。 INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY The present invention objectively evaluates not only the resin having rubber elasticity but also all powder raw materials including inorganic plate-like powder, and the “softness” of powder cosmetics prepared by variously mixing them. Therefore, the stress relaxation rate obtained by measuring the powder layer shear force by a specific method is associated as a physical property index.
以下本願発明の粉末化粧料、及び化粧料用粉末原料の使用感の評価方法を、その好ましい実施形態に基づいて説明する。本願発明によれば、粉末化粧料、及び化粧料用粉末原料を肌に塗布した際の使用感のひとつである「柔らかさ」を客観的に評価することが出来る。ここで、粉末化粧料、及び化粧料用粉末原料に対する「柔らかさ」とは、粉体の厚み感、肌当たりの良さといった感覚を言う。 Hereinafter, the powder cosmetic of the present invention and a method of evaluating the feeling of use of the powder raw material for cosmetic will be described based on its preferred embodiments. According to the present invention, it is possible to objectively evaluate "softness" which is one of the feelings of use when the powder cosmetics and the powder raw material for cosmetics are applied to the skin. Here, "softness" with respect to the powder cosmetics and the powder raw material for cosmetics means a feeling such as a feeling of thickness of the powder and a good feeling on the skin.
本願発明の粉末化粧料、及び化粧料用粉末原料の「柔らかさ」の評価方法は、評価の対象となる粉末を用いて粉体層せん断力測定を実施し、初期垂直応力σ、及び応力緩和後の垂直応力σ’から得られる応力緩和率(100−(σ’/σ)×100)により、前記粉末化粧料、及び化粧料用粉末原料の「柔らかさ」を評価する。 The evaluation method of the "softness" of the powder cosmetics and the powder raw material for cosmetics of the present invention is carried out by measuring the powder layer shear force using the powder to be evaluated, and the initial normal stress σ and the stress relaxation. The "softness" of the powder cosmetics and the powder raw material for cosmetics is evaluated by the stress relaxation rate (100-(σ'/σ)×100) obtained from the subsequent vertical stress σ'.
尚、粉体層せん断力測定試験とは、粉体を垂直方向に圧密することで粉体層を形成した後、一定の推進速度で水平方向にせん断を実施した際の垂直応力とせん断応力を測定し、粉体の摩擦特性や付着特性を評価する測定方法を言う。 In addition, the powder layer shear force measurement test refers to the vertical stress and shear stress when the powder layer is formed by compacting the powder in the vertical direction and then shearing in the horizontal direction at a constant propulsion speed. This is a measurement method for measuring and evaluating the frictional properties and adhesion properties of powder.
本願発明の実施形態においては、下記手順に従った粉体層せん断力測定から得られる応力緩和率を物性指標として評価する。
(1)円柱状のセル(上部固定セル、下部可動セル)内部に粉末を充填し、上杵を静かにのせた後、垂直応力を一定の速度で徐々に負荷する。
(2)垂直応力の規定値σに達した後、垂直応力の負荷を停止し定容積状態で粉体層の緩和時間を設ける。
(3)十分に応力緩和が起こった時点での垂直応力の値σ’を読み取り、規定値からの垂直応力の減衰率として応力緩和率を得る。
(4)得られた応力緩和率を相対比較して、その値が大きいほど「柔らかさ」が高いと判断する。
In the embodiment of the present invention, the stress relaxation rate obtained from the measurement of powder layer shear force according to the following procedure is evaluated as a physical property index.
(1) Powder is filled inside a cylindrical cell (upper fixed cell, lower movable cell), the upper punch is gently placed, and then vertical stress is gradually applied at a constant speed.
(2) After reaching the specified value σ of the vertical stress, the load of the vertical stress is stopped and the relaxation time of the powder layer is set in the constant volume state.
(3) The value σ′ of the vertical stress at the time when sufficient stress relaxation occurs is read, and the stress relaxation rate is obtained as the attenuation rate of the vertical stress from the specified value.
(4) The obtained stress relaxation rates are compared with each other, and the larger the value, the higher the "softness".
化粧料を指先で塗布する動作では、繊細な力が指先に加わっているので、指先の垂直応力も低いものとなっている。このため、測定を正確に行うため、粉末化粧料、及び化粧料用粉末原料の使用感の評価では、負荷する垂直応力は、実際にセル内部の粉末を押し込んだ押し込み荷重ではなく、押し込まれたことにより粉末にかかる正味の荷重である底面荷重をロードセルで制御することが好ましい。図1の底面荷重検出用ロードセルのようなセンサーを用いて荷重を検知すれば、セル壁面摩擦による圧力欠損の影響を無くし、粉体層にかかる実荷重を規定することが出来る。 In the operation of applying the cosmetics with the fingertip, delicate force is applied to the fingertip, so that the vertical stress on the fingertip is also low. Therefore, in order to perform the measurement accurately, in the evaluation of the feeling of use of the powder cosmetics and the powder raw material for the cosmetics, the vertical stress to be applied was not the indentation load in which the powder inside the cell was actually pushed, but the pushing force was pushed in. Therefore, it is preferable to control the bottom load, which is the net load applied to the powder, with the load cell. If a load such as the load cell for detecting the bottom load shown in FIG. 1 is used to detect the load, it is possible to eliminate the influence of pressure loss due to friction on the cell wall surface and to specify the actual load applied to the powder layer.
粉末化粧料、及び化粧料用粉末原料の使用感の評価において、手順(1)で負荷する垂直応力の規定値は、特に限定されないが20〜125kPaの範囲であることが好ましい。垂直応力が20kPa以下では粉体層の形成が十分でない場合があり、また125kPa以上では実際に人が粉末化粧料、及び化粧料用粉末原料を官能評価する時の指先の圧力に比べて非常に高圧力下での測定となるため、相関性が低くなる場合がある。 In the evaluation of the feeling of use of the powder cosmetics and the powder raw material for cosmetics, the specified value of the vertical stress applied in step (1) is not particularly limited, but is preferably in the range of 20 to 125 kPa. When the vertical stress is 20 kPa or less, the formation of the powder layer may not be sufficient, and when the vertical stress is 125 kPa or more, it is much higher than the pressure of the fingertip when a person actually sensory-evaluates the powder cosmetics and the powder raw material for cosmetics. Since the measurement is performed under high pressure, the correlation may be low.
粉末化粧料、及び化粧料用粉末原料の使用感の評価において、手順(2)で設ける緩和時間は、特に限定されないが50〜100秒の範囲であることが好ましい。緩和時間が50秒以下では、応力緩和が十分でない場合があり、正確な測定が出来ない場合がある。緩和時間が100秒以下であれば、効率良く十分な応力緩和を得ることが出来る。 In the evaluation of the feeling of use of the powdery cosmetics and the powdery raw material for cosmetics, the relaxation time provided in step (2) is not particularly limited, but is preferably in the range of 50 to 100 seconds. If the relaxation time is 50 seconds or less, stress relaxation may not be sufficient, and accurate measurement may not be possible. When the relaxation time is 100 seconds or less, sufficient stress relaxation can be efficiently obtained.
粉末化粧料、及び化粧料用粉末原料の使用感の評価において、円柱状セル(円柱状上部固定セル、及び円柱状下部可動セル)の内径は、特に限定されないが3〜43mmの範囲であることが好ましい。円柱状セルの内径が3mm未満では、試料間での応力緩和率の差が出にくい場合があり、43mmより大きい場合は使用するサンプル量が増える上、試料間の応力緩和率の差に関してそれ以上の効果は見込めない。 In the evaluation of the feeling of use of the powder cosmetics and the powder raw material for the cosmetics, the inner diameter of the cylindrical cells (the cylindrical upper fixed cell and the cylindrical lower movable cell) is not particularly limited, but is in the range of 3 to 43 mm. Is preferred. If the inner diameter of the columnar cell is less than 3 mm, it may be difficult to obtain a difference in stress relaxation rate between samples, and if it is greater than 43 mm, the amount of sample used increases and the difference in stress relaxation rate between samples is further increased. Cannot be expected to be effective.
応力緩和率は、図1に示すような粉体層せん断力測定装置を用いて測定出来る。この装置では、前述のように垂直応力を底面荷重で検知しているのが特徴である。本装置以外にも例えば、市販品である粉体層せん断力測定装置NS−S500(ナノシーズ社製)を用いても測定出来る。粉体層せん断力測定を実施するときの室内温度及び相対湿度は、化粧料使用時の環境を考慮すると、室温10〜35℃、及び相対湿度30〜65%が好ましい。 The stress relaxation rate can be measured using a powder layer shear force measuring device as shown in FIG. This device is characterized in that the vertical stress is detected by the bottom load as described above. In addition to this device, for example, a commercially available powder layer shear force measuring device NS-S500 (manufactured by Nanoseed) can be used for measurement. The room temperature and relative humidity when the powder layer shearing force measurement is performed are preferably room temperature 10 to 35° C. and relative humidity 30 to 65% in consideration of the environment when the cosmetic is used.
以下実施例により本願発明をさらに詳細に説明する。尚、これらは本願発明を何ら限定するものではない。 Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in more detail with reference to Examples. These do not limit the invention of the present application.
(実施例1)
[物性評価]
表1に示す化粧料用粉末原料A〜Cについて、下記のようにして粉体層せん断力測定を実施して、応力緩和率を得た。A〜Cはいずれもセリサイトであるが以下のように表面処理状態が異なる。Aは、表面処理を施していない未処理品、Bは、一般にすべり性向上の目的で処理されるシリコーン処理品(処理量3重量%)、Cは、シリコーン主鎖にアミノ基を修飾することで、しっとり感や柔らかさを付与したアミノ変性シリコーン処理品(処理量5重量%)である。
測定装置:粉体層せん断力測定装置(ナノシーズ社製 試作機)
測定条件:室内温度25℃、相対湿度50%
円柱状上部固定セル(内径43mm)
円柱状下部可動セル(深さ5mm)
粉体層せん断帯厚み0.2mm
垂直方向進行速度200μm/秒
データ取り込み速度100m秒
手順(1)で負荷した初期垂直応力60kPa
緩和時間100秒
[官能評価]
表1に示す化粧料用粉末原料A〜Cの「柔らかさ」について、専門パネル8名による使用テストを行い、パネル各人が下記絶対評価にて5段階に評価し評点を付け、サンプル毎にパネル全員の評点合計から、その平均値を官能評価値として算出した。
1:非常に低い
2:低い
3:標準
4:高い
5:非常に高い
(Example 1)
[Evaluation of the physical properties]
With respect to the powder materials A to C for cosmetics shown in Table 1, the powder layer shearing force was measured as described below to obtain the stress relaxation rate. All of A to C are sericite, but the surface treatment states are different as follows. A is an untreated product that has not been surface-treated, B is a silicone-treated product that is generally treated for the purpose of improving slipperiness (treatment amount 3% by weight), and C is a silicone main chain modified with an amino group. Thus, it is an amino-modified silicone-treated product (treatment amount 5% by weight) imparted with a moist feeling and softness.
Measuring device: Powder layer shear force measuring device (Nano Seeds prototype)
Measurement conditions: room temperature 25°C, relative humidity 50%
Cylindrical upper fixed cell (inner diameter 43mm)
Cylindrical lower movable cell (depth 5 mm)
Powder layer shear band thickness 0.2 mm
Vertical speed 200 μm/sec
Data acquisition speed 100msec
Initial vertical stress of 60 kPa loaded in step (1)
Relaxation time 100 seconds [Sensory evaluation]
Regarding the “softness” of the powdery raw materials A to C shown in Table 1, a usage test was conducted by 8 specialized panels, and each panel member gave an absolute rating on the following 5 scales and gave a rating, and for each sample The average value was calculated as a sensory evaluation value from the total score of all panel members.
1: Very low 2: Low 3: Normal 4: High 5: Very high
(表1)
(Table 1)
上記表1において、粉体層せん断力測定から得られた応力緩和率と官能評価で得られた「柔らかさ」との間に高い相関性が認められた。 In Table 1 above, a high correlation was observed between the stress relaxation rate obtained from the powder layer shear force measurement and the "softness" obtained by the sensory evaluation.
(実施例2)
[物性評価]
表2に示す粉末化粧料モデルD、及びEについて、下記のようにして粉体層せん断力測定を実施して、応力緩和率を得た。D、及びEはいずれも未処理セリサイト、ナイロン粉末、イソノナン酸イソトリデシルの混合により調製したモデルフェイスパウダーであるが、一般に柔らかい使用感であるとされるナイロン粉末の配合量が異なる。
測定装置:粉体層せん断力測定装置(ナノシーズ社製 試作機)
測定条件:室内温度25℃、相対湿度50%
円柱状上部固定セル(内径43mm)
円柱状下部可動セル(深さ5mm)
粉体層せん断帯厚み0.2mm
垂直方向進行速度200μm/秒
データ取り込み速度100m秒
手順(1)で負荷した初期垂直応力60kPa
緩和時間100秒
[官能評価]
表2に示す粉末化粧料モデルD、及びEの「柔らかさ」について、上記と同様にして専門パネル5名による使用テストを実施して官能評価値を算出した。
(Example 2)
[Evaluation of the physical properties]
With respect to the powder cosmetics models D and E shown in Table 2, the powder layer shear force measurement was performed as described below to obtain the stress relaxation rate. Each of D and E is a model face powder prepared by mixing untreated sericite, nylon powder, and isotridecyl isononanoate, but the blending amount of nylon powder, which is generally considered to be soft, is different.
Measuring device: Powder layer shear force measuring device (Nano Seeds prototype)
Measurement conditions: room temperature 25°C, relative humidity 50%
Cylindrical upper fixed cell (inner diameter 43mm)
Cylindrical lower movable cell (depth 5 mm)
Powder layer shear band thickness 0.2 mm
Vertical speed 200 μm/sec
Data acquisition speed 100msec
Initial vertical stress of 60 kPa loaded in step (1)
Relaxation time 100 seconds [Sensory evaluation]
With respect to the “softness” of the powder cosmetics models D and E shown in Table 2, a usage test was conducted by 5 expert panels in the same manner as above, and a sensory evaluation value was calculated.
(表2)
(Table 2)
上記表2においても、ナイロン粉末を多く含有する粉末化粧料モデルEの方が、「柔らかさ」が高いという官能評価結果が得られ、応力緩和率もそれに対応して高い値となった。よって、応力緩和率と「柔らかさ」との間に相関性が認められた。 Also in Table 2 above, the sensory evaluation result that the powder cosmetics model E containing a large amount of nylon powder had higher “softness” was obtained, and the stress relaxation rate was correspondingly higher. Therefore, a correlation was observed between the stress relaxation rate and "softness".
本願発明の評価方法は、粉末化粧料、及び化粧料用粉末原料における感触特性の一因子である「柔らかさ」を、粉体層せん断力測定から得られる応力緩和率を物性指標として関連付けて評価出来るものである。本願発明の評価方法を用いれば、粉末化粧料の効率的効果的な開発、好適な化粧料の提供やそのアドバイスに利用出来る。 The evaluation method of the present invention evaluates "softness", which is one factor of the feel characteristics in powder cosmetics and powder raw materials for cosmetics, by associating the stress relaxation rate obtained from powder layer shear force measurement as a physical property index. It can be done. The evaluation method of the present invention can be used for efficient and effective development of powder cosmetics, provision of suitable cosmetics, and advice thereof.
Claims (1)
(1)円柱状のセル(上部固定セル、下部可動セル)内部に粉末を充填し、上杵を静かにのせた後、垂直応力を一定の速度で徐々に負荷する。
(2)垂直応力の規定値σに達した後、垂直応力の負荷を停止し定容積状態で粉体層の緩和時間を設ける。
(3)十分に応力緩和が起こった時点での垂直応力の値σ’を読み取り、規定値からの垂直応力の減衰率として応力緩和率を得る。
(4)得られた応力緩和率を相対比較して、その値が大きいほど「柔らかさ」が高いと判断する。 Powder cosmetic powder, or in powder cosmetic powder material, which is a factor feel characteristics "softness", as a physical property index stress relaxation rate obtained from the powder layer shear force measured in accordance with the following procedure How to evaluate. The specified value of the vertical stress applied in the following procedure (1) is 20<σ<125 kPa.
(1) Powder is filled inside a cylindrical cell (upper fixed cell, lower movable cell), the upper punch is gently placed, and then vertical stress is gradually applied at a constant speed.
(2) After reaching the specified value σ of the vertical stress, the load of the vertical stress is stopped and the relaxation time of the powder layer is set in the constant volume state.
(3) The value σ′ of the vertical stress at the time when sufficient stress relaxation occurs is read, and the stress relaxation rate is obtained as the attenuation rate of the vertical stress from the specified value.
(4) The obtained stress relaxation rates are compared with each other, and the larger the value, the higher the "softness".
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2016095176A JP6742005B2 (en) | 2016-05-11 | 2016-05-11 | Evaluation method of "softness" in powder cosmetics |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2016095176A JP6742005B2 (en) | 2016-05-11 | 2016-05-11 | Evaluation method of "softness" in powder cosmetics |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JP2017203676A JP2017203676A (en) | 2017-11-16 |
| JP6742005B2 true JP6742005B2 (en) | 2020-08-19 |
Family
ID=60323207
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2016095176A Active JP6742005B2 (en) | 2016-05-11 | 2016-05-11 | Evaluation method of "softness" in powder cosmetics |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP6742005B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP7549527B2 (en) | 2020-12-25 | 2024-09-11 | 花王株式会社 | Agent characterization method |
Family Cites Families (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPS61100639A (en) * | 1984-10-23 | 1986-05-19 | Sankyo Dengiyou Kk | Shearing tester |
| US4760734A (en) * | 1986-02-07 | 1988-08-02 | Bryce Maxwell | Apparatus for measuring the rheological properties of materials |
| JPH1095712A (en) * | 1996-09-20 | 1998-04-14 | Shiseido Co Ltd | Cosmetic material for makeup |
| JP4454351B2 (en) * | 2004-03-23 | 2010-04-21 | 花王株式会社 | Method for producing compression molded body |
| CN102706774A (en) * | 2011-03-28 | 2012-10-03 | 厦门钨业股份有限公司 | Characterization method for powder macroscopic flow during compression molding process |
| JP2014197503A (en) * | 2013-03-29 | 2014-10-16 | 住友ベークライト株式会社 | Composite particle, semiconductor sealing material, and electrode material for lithium ion secondary battery |
-
2016
- 2016-05-11 JP JP2016095176A patent/JP6742005B2/en active Active
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP2017203676A (en) | 2017-11-16 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Jachowicz et al. | Indentometric analysis of in vivo skin and comparison with artificial skin models | |
| Kwiatkowska et al. | Friction and deformation behaviour of human skin | |
| Hara et al. | The relationship between the Young's modulus of the stratum corneum and age: a pilot study | |
| Shao et al. | Developing an artificial fingertip with human friction properties | |
| Flynn et al. | Measurement of the force–displacement response of in vivo human skin under a rich set of deformations | |
| Akanny et al. | Predicting tactile sensory attributes of personal care emulsions based on instrumental characterizations: A review | |
| Tiest | Tactual perception of liquid material properties | |
| Virén et al. | Accuracy and reliability of a hand‐held in vivo skin indentation device to assess skin elasticity | |
| Cyriac et al. | Tactile friction and rheological studies to objectify sensory properties of topical formulations | |
| Kim et al. | Experimental validation for the interconversion between generalized Kelvin–Voigt and Maxwell models using human skin tissues | |
| Oftadeh et al. | Poroelastic behavior and water permeability of human skin at the nanoscale | |
| JP6750932B2 (en) | Skin tactile measurement method and cosmetic performance evaluation method | |
| JP6742005B2 (en) | Evaluation method of "softness" in powder cosmetics | |
| Klaassen et al. | The static friction response of non-glabrous skin as a function of surface energy and environmental conditions | |
| Liu | Understanding the effect of skin mechanical properties on the friction of human finger-pads | |
| Sakuma et al. | Viscoelasticity measurement of softness by indentation devices for evaluation of human skin | |
| Cabibihan et al. | The conformance test for robotic/prosthetic fingertip skins | |
| JP6424122B2 (en) | Evaluation method of "moist feeling" in powder cosmetics | |
| Tomlinson | Understanding the friction between human fingers and contacting surfaces | |
| JP5072808B2 (en) | Evaluation method of lip cosmetics | |
| JP2003083873A (en) | How to evaluate the feeling of use of a stick-shaped cosmetic | |
| Sakuma | Handy-device development of softness measurement by indentation imitating palpation for evaluation of elasticity and visco-elasiticity | |
| JP6424123B2 (en) | Evaluation method of "moist feeling" in powder cosmetics | |
| Parker et al. | Multidirectional in vivo characterization of skin using wiener nonlinear stochastic system identification techniques | |
| JP2016121895A (en) | Evaluation method for milky lotion or creamy cosmetics |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A521 | Request for written amendment filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20160712 |
|
| A521 | Request for written amendment filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20160705 |
|
| A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20190404 |
|
| A521 | Request for written amendment filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20190524 |
|
| A521 | Request for written amendment filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20190523 |
|
| A977 | Report on retrieval |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007 Effective date: 20200313 |
|
| A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20200407 |
|
| A521 | Request for written amendment filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20200528 |
|
| TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20200707 |
|
| A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20200720 |
|
| R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Ref document number: 6742005 Country of ref document: JP Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |