Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP6848624B2 - Shipage estimation device, method and program - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP6848624B2 - Shipage estimation device, method and program - Google Patents

Shipage estimation device, method and program Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP6848624B2
JP6848624B2 JP2017075150A JP2017075150A JP6848624B2 JP 6848624 B2 JP6848624 B2 JP 6848624B2 JP 2017075150 A JP2017075150 A JP 2017075150A JP 2017075150 A JP2017075150 A JP 2017075150A JP 6848624 B2 JP6848624 B2 JP 6848624B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
ship
time
delivery destination
per
stagnation
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2017075150A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2018180673A (en
Inventor
敬和 小林
敬和 小林
光一郎 原田
光一郎 原田
晋太郎 三宅
晋太郎 三宅
一隆 笠間
一隆 笠間
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Nippon Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nippon Steel Corp filed Critical Nippon Steel Corp
Priority to JP2017075150A priority Critical patent/JP6848624B2/en
Publication of JP2018180673A publication Critical patent/JP2018180673A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP6848624B2 publication Critical patent/JP6848624B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Description

本発明は、船舶を使用して、工場、商業施設、在庫拠点等に原料、材料、製品、商品等を納品する際の滞船に関する指標を求めるのに利用して好適な滞船見積り装置、方法及びプログラムに関する。 The present invention is a ship stagnation estimation device suitable for use in obtaining an index regarding stagnation when delivering raw materials, materials, products, commodities, etc. to factories, commercial facilities, inventory bases, etc. using a ship. Regarding methods and programs.

大量の原料、材料、製品、商品等の物品を取り扱う産業分野や商業分野では、輸送費用を抑えるため、或いは海外から輸送するために、輸送手段として船舶を使用して、工場、商業施設、在庫拠点等に納品することが行われている。
例えば鉄鋼メーカ、化学メーカ、石油メーカ等では、鉄鉱石、石炭、石油、ガス等を、国外に存在する生産拠点(オーストラリア、ブラジル、アメリカ等の地域)から、大型の船舶を使用して、国内の工場、商業施設、在庫拠点等に輸送する。
In the industrial and commercial fields that handle a large amount of raw materials, materials, products, commodities, etc., factories, commercial facilities, and inventory are used as means of transportation in order to reduce transportation costs or to transport from overseas. It is delivered to bases, etc.
For example, steel makers, chemical makers, oil makers, etc. use large vessels to produce iron ore, coal, oil, gas, etc. from overseas production bases (regions such as Australia, Brazil, and the United States) in Japan. Transport to factories, commercial facilities, inventory bases, etc.

ここで、船舶を使用するときの輸送費用としては、船舶を雇う費用に加えて、船舶の滞船及び輸送量に応じて掛かる費用である滞船料が発生する。滞船とは、荷降しをするとき以外の待機している状態をいう。
滞船は、次のような理由で発生する。例えば船舶から荷降しするため着岸する必要があるが、岸壁の数は限られているため、多数の船舶が一度に到着すると、すぐに着岸できないことがあり、滞船の要因となる。また、船舶が着岸した後に、積載している物品を荷降しすることになるが、荷降しする物品量に応じて、荷降し時間が増大することになるため、荷降しする物品量が荷降し能力に比較して大き過ぎても、次の船舶を待たせることとなり、滞船の要因となる。更には、出荷を行う港湾、鉄道等の輸送施設として公共の施設を使用する場合や、複数企業に出荷を行うため、各企業との取引状況により、企業間の優先等様々な経済情勢が生じるような場合、予定通りに出荷されずに大幅に変動する事態が頻発して、滞船の要因になる。加えて、船舶は出荷元と工場、商業施設、在庫拠点等とを往復する場合が多く、一旦予定通りの運航ができない場合には、後々までその影響が波及する場合もあり、船舶の到着が予定から大幅に変動して、滞船の要因となる。
Here, as the transportation cost when using a ship, in addition to the cost of hiring a ship, a ship stagnation fee, which is a cost incurred according to the stagnation of the ship and the amount of transportation, is incurred. A ship stalled is a state of waiting other than when unloading.
Ship stagnation occurs for the following reasons. For example, it is necessary to berth in order to unload from a ship, but since the number of quays is limited, if a large number of ships arrive at one time, it may not be possible to berth immediately, which causes a stagnation. In addition, after the ship berths, the loaded goods will be unloaded, but the unloading time will increase according to the amount of goods to be unloaded, so the goods to be unloaded. Even if the amount is too large compared to the unloading capacity, the next vessel will be kept waiting, which will cause a stagnation. Furthermore, when public facilities are used as transportation facilities such as ports and railroads for shipping, and because shipping is carried out to multiple companies, various economic conditions such as priority between companies arise depending on the transaction status with each company. In such a case, it often happens that the ship is not shipped as scheduled and fluctuates significantly, which causes a stagnation. In addition, ships often make a round trip between the shipping source and factories, commercial facilities, inventory bases, etc., and once the operation cannot be performed as planned, the effect may spread to the future, and the ship arrives. It fluctuates significantly from the schedule and causes a stagnation.

滞船を解消するには、物品量を適正化する、或いは荷降し能力を増強することが考えられる。しかしながら、物品量を適正化することは在庫の持ち方や船舶の大きさにも影響を与え、また、荷降し能力の増強を図るには大きな投資が必要となる。そのため、滞船に関する指標として例えば滞船料を見積り、適切な滞船料の削減措置を検討することが重要となる。 In order to eliminate the stagnation, it is conceivable to optimize the amount of goods or increase the unloading capacity. However, optimizing the amount of goods also affects how to hold inventory and the size of ships, and a large investment is required to increase the unloading capacity. Therefore, it is important to estimate, for example, a ship stagnation fee as an index for stagnation, and to consider appropriate measures to reduce the stagnation fee.

特開2008−105825号公報Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2008-105825

「確率モデル入門」(尾崎俊治著)(1996年5月初版 朝倉書店)"Introduction to Probabilistic Models" (written by Shunji Osaki) (May 1996, First Edition, Asakura Shoten)

特許文献1には、長期の原料輸送配船計画を立案する配船計画立案装置と、短期の原料輸送配船計画を作成する配船計画調整装置と、各工場の工場別原料輸送配船計画を調整する工場別荷役調整装置とを備え、工場別荷役調整装置が短期の原料輸送配船計画に基づいて工場別原料輸送配船計画を修正し、配船計画調整装置が修正された工場別原料輸送配船計画に基づいて短期の原料輸送配船計画を修正し、これらの処理を繰り返して短期の原料配船計画を立案する原料輸送配船計画システム及び原料配船立案方法が開示されている。 Patent Document 1 describes a ship allocation plan planning device for formulating a long-term raw material transportation and distribution plan, a ship allocation plan adjustment device for creating a short-term raw material transportation and distribution plan, and a raw material transportation and distribution plan for each factory. The cargo handling adjustment device for each factory is equipped with a cargo handling adjustment device for each factory, and the cargo handling adjustment device for each factory amends the raw material transportation and allocation plan for each factory based on the short-term raw material transportation and allocation plan, and the ship allocation plan adjustment device is modified for each factory. A raw material transportation and distribution planning system and a raw material distribution planning method for modifying a short-term raw material transportation and distribution plan based on the raw material transportation and distribution plan and repeating these processes to formulate a short-term raw material distribution plan are disclosed. There is.

また、非特許文献1には、待ち行列理論について開示されており、平均待ち時間が、単位時間に到着する顧客の数(到着率)と単位時間に顧客を処理する数(処理率)から求められることが示されている。 Further, Non-Patent Document 1 discloses the queuing theory, and the average waiting time is obtained from the number of customers arriving in a unit time (arrival rate) and the number of customers processed in a unit time (processing rate). It has been shown to be.

特許文献1には、配船スケジュールに基づいて、各船の早出料や予定期間を超えた場合の滞船料を計算することが開示されている。しかしながら、特定の具体的な配船スケジュールの一ケース、すなわちある一断面において、その一断面に対して与えられた配船スケジュールに基づいて滞船料の計算を行っているに過ぎず、対象となる港湾の配船の傾向や荷降し能力から、滞船料が統計的にどのような傾向を示すのかを計算するものではない。例えば1ヶ月経過した後に、配船スケジュールの先の配船スケジュールを立てた場合では、ヤードにある銘柄毎の在庫量が大きく異なる等で、配船スケジュールは前回の配船スケジュールとは全く異なったものとなるが、このように変化するケースまで考慮して考えられたものではない。1日経過する毎に配船スケジュールを与え、繰り返し上記処理を実行することで統計的に滞船料を計算することも可能であるが、膨大な労力が掛かるばかりではなく、全ての統計的な状況を考慮したとは言い難い。 Patent Document 1 discloses that an early departure fee for each ship and a arrears fee when the scheduled period is exceeded are calculated based on the ship allocation schedule. However, in one case of a specific specific ship allocation schedule, that is, in a certain section, the berth fee is only calculated based on the ship allocation schedule given to that one section, and the target is It is not a calculation of the statistical tendency of the delinquency charge from the tendency of ship allocation and unloading capacity of the port. For example, if one month has passed and the ship allocation schedule is set ahead of the ship allocation schedule, the inventory amount for each brand in the yard will differ significantly, and the ship allocation schedule will be completely different from the previous ship allocation schedule. However, it was not considered in consideration of such a changing case. It is possible to calculate the arrears statistically by giving a ship allocation schedule every day and repeating the above processing, but it is not only a huge amount of labor, but also all statistical data. It is hard to say that the situation was taken into consideration.

また、非特許文献1に示された待ち行列理論では、顧客が持つ属性が検討されておらず、到着率と処理率は独立に検討されている。しかしながら、船舶による輸送では、工場、商業施設、在庫拠点等での操業を安定的に行うため、一定期間ではある程度一定量を輸送することが想定され、船舶の持つ属性である荷降し量が大きい程、一度に輸送する量が多くなることから、船舶の到着率は小さく、逆に荷降し量が小さい程、船舶の到着率は大きくなる。一方、荷降し量が大きい程、荷役に掛かる時間は長く、逆に荷降し量が小さい程、荷役に掛かる時間は短くなる。このように到着率と荷降し量、荷降し量と処理率には相関関係があり、このため到着率と処理率にも相関関係が存在する。非特許文献1では、この相関関係については議論されていない。加えて、待ち行列理論では顧客一人あたりの待ち時間の平均、待ちの長さの平均が求められているが、企業活動において費用を考える上で必要となる例えば月、年といった一定期間を対象として発生する待ち時間合計やコストに関しても検討されていない。 Further, in the queuing theory shown in Non-Patent Document 1, the attributes possessed by the customer are not examined, and the arrival rate and the processing rate are independently examined. However, in the case of transportation by ship, in order to stably operate at factories, commercial facilities, inventory bases, etc., it is assumed that a certain amount will be transported for a certain period of time, and the amount of unloading, which is an attribute of ships, will be The larger the amount, the larger the amount transported at one time, so the arrival rate of the ship is small, and conversely, the smaller the amount of unloading, the larger the arrival rate of the ship. On the other hand, the larger the unloading amount, the longer the loading and unloading time, and conversely, the smaller the unloading amount, the shorter the loading and unloading time. In this way, there is a correlation between the arrival rate and the unloading amount, and the unloading amount and the processing rate, and therefore there is also a correlation between the arrival rate and the processing rate. Non-Patent Document 1 does not discuss this correlation. In addition, queuing theory requires the average waiting time per customer and the average waiting length, but for a certain period of time, such as months and years, which is necessary when considering costs in corporate activities. The total waiting time and costs incurred have not been considered.

本発明は上記のような点に鑑みてなされたものであり、待ち行列理論を適用するにあたり到着率と処理率の相関関係を考慮した上で、一定期間を対象とした滞船に関する指標を求められるようにすることを目的とする。 The present invention has been made in view of the above points, and in applying the queuing theory, an index relating to a ship stagnation for a certain period of time is obtained in consideration of the correlation between the arrival rate and the processing rate. The purpose is to be able to.

上記の課題を解決するための本発明の要旨は、以下のとおりである。
[1] 船舶を使用して納品先に対象物品を納品する際の滞船に関する指標を求める滞船見積り装置であって、
前記納品先における各船舶の到着日時、着岸日時、離岸日時を含む実績情報をデータベースから取り込む入力手段と、
前記実績情報の到着日時に基づいて、所定の第1確率密度関数に従って前記納品先での船舶の到着間隔の分布を計算し、前記納品先での単位日時あたりに到着する船舶の隻数である船舶到着率λを計算する第1の分布計算手段と、
前記実績情報の着岸日時及び離岸日時に基づいて、所定の第2確率密度関数に従って前記納品先での1隻あたりの荷降しに掛かる時間である荷役時間の分布を計算し、1隻あたりの荷役時間の平均値α、1隻あたりの荷役時間の標準偏差σ、前記納品先での船舶処理率(=1/α)μを計算する第2の分布計算手段と、
前記第1の分布計算手段で計算した船舶の到着間隔の分布を表すパラメータである前記船舶到着率λと、前記第2の分布計算手段で計算した1隻あたりの荷役時間の分布を表すパラメータである前記平均値α、前記標準偏差σ、前記船舶処理率μ、待ち行列理論の式に代入することにより、前記納品先での1隻あたりの滞船時間を計算する1隻毎滞船時間計算手段と、
前記1隻毎滞船時間計算手段で計算した1隻あたりの滞船時間に基づいて、一定期間を対象として前記納品先で発生する滞船時間を求める指標計算手段と
前記指標計算手段で求めた前記納品先で発生する滞船時間を出力する出力手段と、を備え、
前記指標計算手段は、前記一定期間での荷降し総量を一定として扱うことを特徴とする滞船見積り装置。
[2] 前記待ち行列理論の式は、
W={λ/(μ・(μ−λ))}・{(1+(σ/α) 2 )/2}
であることを特徴とする[1]に記載の滞船見積り装置。
[3] 前記指標計算手段は、前記一定期間を対象として、1隻あたりの荷降し量と1隻あたりの滞船時間との関係、及び1隻あたりの荷降し量と1日あたりの滞船時間との関係を求めることを特徴とする[1]又は[2]に記載の滞船見積り装置。
[4] 前記指標計算手段は、単位時間あたりの滞船料の情報を用いて、前記一定期間を対象として、1隻あたりの荷降し量と1日あたりの滞船料との関係を求めることを特徴とする[]に記載の滞船見積り装置。
[5] 前記単位時間あたりの滞船料の情報は、船舶型別に設定されることを特徴とする[]に記載の滞船見積り装置。
[6] 前記指標計算手段は、前記荷降し総量を、前記第1の分布計算手段で計算した船舶の到着間隔の分布から求められる前記納品先での1日あたりに到着する船舶の隻数と、1隻あたりの荷降し量とを用いて表わすことを特徴とする[1]乃至[]のいずれか一つに記載の滞船見積り装置。
[7] 前記指標計算手段は、入港準備時間及び段取り時間のうち少なくともいずれか一方を含む実荷降し外時間を、船舶の着岸から離岸までに掛かる時間から差し引いた値を、1隻あたりの荷役時間とすることを特徴とする[1]乃至[]のいずれか一つに記載の滞船見積り装置。
[8] 前記実荷降し外時間を定数とすることを特徴とする[]に記載の滞船見積り装置。
[9] 船舶を使用して納品先に対象物品を納品する際の滞船に関する指標を求める滞船見積り方法であって、
入力手段が、前記納品先における各船舶の到着日時、着岸日時、離岸日時を含む実績情報をデータベースから取り込む入力手順と、
第1の分布計算手段が、前記実績情報の到着日時に基づいて、所定の第1確率密度関数に従って前記納品先での船舶の到着間隔の分布を計算し、前記納品先での単位日時あたりに到着する船舶の隻数である船舶到着率λを計算する第1の分布計算手順と、
第2の分布計算手段が、前記実績情報の着岸日時及び離岸日時に基づいて、所定の第2確率密度関数に従って前記納品先での1隻あたりの荷降しに掛かる時間である荷役時間の分布を計算し、1隻あたりの荷役時間の平均値α、1隻あたりの荷役時間の標準偏差σ、前記納品先での船舶処理率(=1/α)μを計算する第2の分布計算手順と、
1隻毎滞船時間計算手段が、前記第1の分布計算手順で計算した船舶の到着間隔の分布を表すパラメータである前記船舶到着率λと、前記第2の分布計算手順で計算した1隻あたりの荷役時間の分布を表すパラメータである前記平均値α、前記標準偏差σ、前記船舶処理率μ、待ち行列理論の式に代入することにより、前記納品先での1隻あたりの滞船時間を計算する1隻毎滞船時間計算手順と、
指標計算手段が、前記1隻毎滞船時間計算手順で計算した1隻あたりの滞船時間に基づいて、一定期間を対象として前記納品先で発生する滞船時間を求める指標計算手順と
出力手段が、前記指標計算手順で求めた前記納品先で発生する滞船時間を出力する出力手順と、を有し、
前記指標計算手順では、前記一定期間での荷降し総量を一定として扱うことを特徴とする滞船見積り方法。
[10] 船舶を使用して納品先に対象物品を納品する際の滞船に関する指標を求めるためのプログラムであって、
前記納品先における各船舶の到着日時、着岸日時、離岸日時を含む実績情報をデータベースから取り込む入力手段と、
前記実績情報の到着日時に基づいて、所定の第1確率密度関数に従って前記納品先での船舶の到着間隔の分布を計算し、前記納品先での単位日時あたりに到着する船舶の隻数である船舶到着率λを計算する第1の分布計算手段と、
前記実績情報の着岸日時及び離岸日時に基づいて、所定の第2確率密度関数に従って前記納品先での1隻あたりの荷降しに掛かる時間である荷役時間の分布を計算し、1隻あたりの荷役時間の平均値α、1隻あたりの荷役時間の標準偏差σ、前記納品先での船舶処理率(=1/α)μを計算する第2の分布計算手段と、
前記第1の分布計算手段で計算した船舶の到着間隔の分布を表すパラメータである前記船舶到着率λと、前記第2の分布計算手段で計算した1隻あたりの荷役時間の分布を表すパラメータである前記平均値α、前記標準偏差σ、前記船舶処理率μ、待ち行列理論の式に代入することにより、前記納品先での1隻あたりの滞船時間を計算する1隻毎滞船時間計算手段と、
前記1隻毎滞船時間計算手段で計算した1隻あたりの滞船時間に基づいて、一定期間を対象として前記納品先で発生する滞船時間を求める指標計算手段と
前記指標計算手段で求めた前記納品先で発生する滞船時間を出力する出力手段と、してコンピュータを機能させ、
前記指標計算手段は、前記一定期間での荷降し総量を一定として扱うことを特徴とするプログラム。
The gist of the present invention for solving the above problems is as follows.
[1] A ship stagnation estimation device that obtains an index related to stagnation when delivering the target goods to the delivery destination using a ship.
An input means for importing actual information including the arrival date and time, berthing date and time, and departure date and time of each ship at the delivery destination from the database.
Based on the arrival date and time of the record information, which is number of vessels of vessel vessels distribution arrival interval in the delivery destination calculated according to a predetermined first probability density function, to arrive in per unit time in the delivery destination vessels The first distribution calculation means for calculating the arrival rate λ and
Based on the berthing date and time and the berthing date and time of the actual information, the distribution of cargo handling time, which is the time required for unloading per ship at the delivery destination, is calculated according to a predetermined second probability density function , and per ship. The average value α of the cargo handling time, the standard deviation σ of the cargo handling time per ship, and the second distribution calculation means for calculating the ship processing rate (= 1 / α) μ at the delivery destination.
The ship arrival rate λ, which is a parameter representing the distribution of the arrival intervals of ships calculated by the first distribution calculation means, and the parameter representing the distribution of cargo handling time per ship calculated by the second distribution calculation means. By substituting the mean value α, the standard deviation σ, and the ship processing rate μ into the equation of the queue theory , the ship stagnation time W per ship at the delivery destination is calculated for each ship. Ship time calculation means and
An index calculation means for calculating the stagnation time generated at the delivery destination for a certain period of time based on the stagnation time W per ship calculated by the stagnation time calculation means for each ship .
It is provided with an output means for outputting the berthing time generated at the delivery destination obtained by the index calculation means.
The index calculation means is a ship detention estimation device characterized in that the total amount of unloading in a certain period is treated as constant.
[2] The formula of the queuing theory is
W = {λ / (μ ・ (μ−λ))} ・ {(1+ (σ / α) 2 ) / 2}
The ship stagnation estimation device according to [1].
[3] The index calculation means covers the fixed period, the relationship between the unloading amount per ship and the staying time per ship, and the unloading amount per ship and per day. The ship stagnation estimation device according to [1] or [2] , wherein the relationship with the stagnation time is obtained.
[4] The index calculation means obtains the relationship between the amount of unloading per vessel and the daily charge for a certain period of time by using the information on the charge for the charge per unit time. The ship stagnation estimation device according to [ 3].
[5] The ship stagnation estimation device according to [4 ], wherein the information on the stagnation fee per unit time is set for each ship type.
[6] The index calculation means calculates the total unloading amount as the number of ships arriving per day at the delivery destination, which is obtained from the distribution of the arrival intervals of the ships calculated by the first distribution calculation means. The ship detention estimation device according to any one of [1] to [5 ], which is represented by using the amount of unloading per ship.
[7] The index calculation means is a value obtained by subtracting the actual unloading time including at least one of the port entry preparation time and the setup time from the time required from the berthing to the berthing of the ship per ship. The ship arrears estimation device according to any one of [1] to [ 6 ], which comprises the cargo handling time of.
[8] The ship detention estimation device according to [7 ], wherein the actual unloading outside time is a constant.
[9] This is a method of estimating ship stagnation that obtains an index related to stagnation when delivering the target goods to the delivery destination using a ship.
The input means is an input procedure for fetching the actual information including the arrival date / time, berthing date / time, and departure date / time of each ship at the delivery destination from the database.
The first distribution calculation means calculates the distribution of the arrival interval of the ship at the delivery destination according to a predetermined first probability density function based on the arrival date and time of the actual information , and per unit date and time at the delivery destination. The first distribution calculation procedure for calculating the ship arrival rate λ, which is the number of arriving ships,
The cargo handling time, which is the time required for the second distribution calculation means to unload one vessel at the delivery destination according to a predetermined second probability density function based on the berthing date and time and the berthing date and time of the actual information. Second distribution calculation that calculates the distribution and calculates the average value α of the cargo handling time per ship α, the standard deviation σ of the cargo handling time per ship, and the ship processing rate (= 1 / α) μ at the delivery destination. Procedure and
The ship arrival time calculation means for each ship has the ship arrival rate λ, which is a parameter representing the distribution of the arrival intervals of the ships calculated in the first distribution calculation procedure, and one ship calculated in the second distribution calculation procedure. By substituting the average value α, the standard deviation σ, and the ship processing rate μ, which are parameters representing the distribution of cargo handling time per ship, into the equation of the queue theory, the stagnation per ship at the delivery destination The procedure for calculating the arrears time for each ship to calculate the ship time W,
An index calculation procedure for calculating the stagnation time generated at the delivery destination for a certain period of time based on the stagnation time W per ship calculated by the index calculation means for each ship stagnation time calculation procedure, and an index calculation procedure.
The output means has an output procedure for outputting the berthing time generated at the delivery destination obtained by the index calculation procedure .
The index calculation procedure is a method for estimating a ship stagnation, which comprises treating the total amount of unloading in a certain period as a constant.
[10] This is a program for obtaining an index related to arrears when delivering the target goods to the delivery destination using a ship.
An input means for importing actual information including the arrival date and time, berthing date and time, and departure date and time of each ship at the delivery destination from the database.
Based on the arrival date and time of the record information, which is number of vessels of vessel vessels distribution arrival interval in the delivery destination calculated according to a predetermined first probability density function, to arrive in per unit time in the delivery destination vessels The first distribution calculation means for calculating the arrival rate λ and
Based on the berthing date and time and the berthing date and time of the actual information, the distribution of cargo handling time, which is the time required for unloading per ship at the delivery destination, is calculated according to a predetermined second probability density function , and per ship. The average value α of the cargo handling time, the standard deviation σ of the cargo handling time per ship, and the second distribution calculation means for calculating the ship processing rate (= 1 / α) μ at the delivery destination.
The ship arrival rate λ, which is a parameter representing the distribution of the arrival intervals of ships calculated by the first distribution calculation means, and the parameter representing the distribution of cargo handling time per ship calculated by the second distribution calculation means. By substituting the mean value α, the standard deviation σ, and the ship processing rate μ into the equation of the queue theory , the ship stagnation time W per ship at the delivery destination is calculated for each ship. Ship time calculation means and
An index calculation means for calculating the stagnation time generated at the delivery destination for a certain period of time based on the stagnation time W per ship calculated by the stagnation time calculation means for each ship .
The computer is made to function as an output means for outputting the arrears time generated at the delivery destination obtained by the index calculation means.
The index calculation means is a program characterized in that the total amount of unloading in the fixed period is treated as constant.

本発明によれば、実績情報に基づいて、納品先での船舶の到着間隔、及び1隻あたりの荷降しに掛かる時間の傾向を把握することにより、待ち行列理論を適用するにあたり到着率と処理率の相関関係を考慮して、一定期間を対象として納品先で発生する滞船時間、更には滞船料を求めることができる。 According to the present invention, the arrival rate and the arrival rate when applying the queuing theory by grasping the tendency of the arrival interval of ships at the delivery destination and the time required for unloading per ship based on the actual information. Considering the correlation of the processing rate, it is possible to obtain the queuing time and the queuing fee generated at the delivery destination for a certain period of time.

実施形態に係る滞船見積り装置の機能構成を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the functional structure of the ship stoppage estimation device which concerns on embodiment. 実施形態に係る滞船見積り装置による滞船見積り方法を示すフローチャートである。It is a flowchart which shows the ship stagnation estimation method by the ship stagnation estimation device which concerns on embodiment. 船舶の到着間隔の度数分布の一例を示す特性図である。It is a characteristic diagram which shows an example of the frequency distribution of the arrival interval of a ship. 1隻あたりの荷役時間の度数分布の一例を示す特性図である。It is a characteristic diagram which shows an example of the frequency distribution of cargo handling time per ship. 1隻あたりの荷降し量と滞船時間との関係を示す特性図である。It is a characteristic diagram which shows the relationship between the unloading amount per ship and the staying time. 1隻あたりの荷降し量と1日あたりの滞船料との関係を示す特性図である。It is a characteristic diagram which shows the relationship between the unloading amount per ship and the arrears fee per day.

以下、添付図面を参照して、本発明の好適な実施形態について説明する。
本実施形態では、船舶を使用して、海外から対象物品として、鉄鉱石や石炭といった鉄鋼原料を輸送する場合を想定して説明する。
鉄鉱石や石炭を産出する国は、オーストラリア、ブラジル、アメリカ等多数存在し、各産出国においても複数の生産拠点が存在する。オーストラリアでは、出港してから1〜2週間程度で日本に到着するのに比べ、ブラジルの場合1.5ヶ月程度の日数を要し、そのリードタイムには大きな開きが存在する。また、国内を問わず多くの鉄鋼メーカが存在するため、産出国側の港湾は複数の鉄鋼メーカ向けの船舶が出荷作業に当たり、他社船舶の出港遅れ等の自社以外の影響を頻繁に受ける等、船舶の出港スケジュールの変動は大きい。
このように産出国の違いによるリードタイムに大きな開きがあり、かつ、産出国側の出港スケジュール変動が大きい一方で、納品先(工場、商業施設、在庫拠点等)では安定的な操業を行うために、荷降し量及び日毎の使用量の変動は少なく抑えられるような操業が実行される。
そこで、日毎の使用量の変動は大きくはないことに着目し、一定期間での荷降しについて考慮した場合、荷降しされる対象物品の総量(以下、荷降し総量と呼ぶ)は一定となると仮定し、この仮定の下で、例えば月、年といった一定期間を対象として納品先で発生する滞船料を求める。
Hereinafter, preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings.
In the present embodiment, a case where a steel raw material such as iron ore or coal is transported as a target article from overseas by using a ship will be described.
There are many countries that produce iron ore and coal, such as Australia, Brazil, and the United States, and each producing country also has multiple production bases. In Australia, it takes about 1.5 months in Brazil compared to arriving in Japan in about 1 to 2 weeks after leaving the port, and there is a big difference in the lead time. In addition, since there are many steel makers regardless of domestic, the ports on the producing country side are frequently affected by other companies such as delays in departure of other companies' ships when ships for multiple steel makers are shipped. Fluctuations in the departure schedule of vessels are large.
In this way, there is a large difference in lead time due to differences in producing countries, and while there are large fluctuations in departure schedules on the producing countries side, stable operations are carried out at delivery destinations (factories, commercial facilities, inventory bases, etc.). In addition, operations will be carried out so that fluctuations in unloading amount and daily usage amount can be kept small.
Therefore, paying attention to the fact that the daily fluctuation of the usage amount is not large, the total amount of the target goods to be unloaded (hereinafter referred to as the total amount of unloading) is constant when considering the unloading in a certain period. Under this assumption, the shipping charges incurred at the delivery destination are calculated for a certain period such as a month or a year.

図1に、本実施形態に係る滞船見積り装置100の機能構成を示す。本実施形態では、船舶を使用して、ある納品先Aに対象物品を納品する際の滞船に関する指標として、一定期間を対象として納品先Aで発生する滞船時間、更には滞船料を求める。
200はデータベースであり、実績情報が蓄積、保存されている。実績情報には、納品先Aにおける各船舶の到着日時、着岸日時、離岸日時の実績情報を含む。
FIG. 1 shows the functional configuration of the ship stoppage estimation device 100 according to the present embodiment. In the present embodiment, as an index regarding the arrears when the target article is delivered to a certain delivery destination A using a ship, the arrears time generated at the delivery destination A for a certain period of time, and the arrears fee are used. Ask.
Reference numeral 200 denotes a database, in which actual information is accumulated and stored. The actual information includes the actual information of the arrival date / time, the berthing date / time, and the departure date / time of each ship at the delivery destination A.

101は入力部であり、データベース200から実績情報を取り込む。なお、データベース200に保存されている全期間の実績情報を取り込むようにしてもよいし、ユーザが指定した解析対象期間の実績情報を取り込むようにしてもよい。 Reference numeral 101 denotes an input unit, which fetches actual information from the database 200. The actual information of the entire period stored in the database 200 may be imported, or the actual information of the analysis target period specified by the user may be imported.

102は第1の分布計算手段である到着間隔分布計算部であり、入力部101で取り込んだ実績情報に基づいて、納品先Aでの船舶の到着間隔の分布を計算する。納品先Aでの船舶の到着間隔の分布は、所定の確率密度関数、本実施形態では後述するように指数分布の確率密度関数に従って計算する。 Reference numeral 102 denotes an arrival interval distribution calculation unit which is the first distribution calculation means, and calculates the distribution of the arrival interval of the ship at the delivery destination A based on the actual information captured by the input unit 101. The distribution of the arrival intervals of ships at the delivery destination A is calculated according to a predetermined probability density function, and in this embodiment, an exponential distribution probability density function as described later.

103は第2の分布計算手段である荷役時間分布計算部であり、入力部101で取り込んだ実績情報に基づいて、納品先Aでの1隻あたりの荷降しに掛かる時間(以下、荷役時間と呼ぶ)の分布を計算する。納品先Aでの1隻あたりの荷役時間の分布は、所定の確率密度関数、本実施形態では後述するように正規分布の確率密度関数に従って計算する。 Reference numeral 103 denotes a cargo handling time distribution calculation unit which is a second distribution calculation means, and based on the actual information captured by the input unit 101, the time required for unloading one ship at the delivery destination A (hereinafter, cargo handling time). ) Calculate the distribution. The distribution of cargo handling time per ship at the delivery destination A is calculated according to a predetermined probability density function, and in this embodiment, a probability density function of a normal distribution as described later.

104は1隻毎滞船時間計算手段である1隻毎滞船時間計算部であり、到着間隔分布計算部102で計算した船舶の到着間隔の分布と、荷役時間分布計算部103で計算した1隻あたりの荷役時間の分布とに基づいて、待ち行列理論を適用することにより、納品先Aでの1隻あたりの滞船時間を計算する。 Reference numeral 104 denotes a ship-by-ship stagnation time calculation unit, which is a ship-by-ship stagnation time calculation means. The ship arrival interval distribution calculated by the arrival interval distribution calculation unit 102 and the cargo handling time distribution calculation unit 103 calculated 1 By applying the queuing theory based on the distribution of cargo handling time per vessel, the arrears time per vessel at the delivery destination A is calculated.

105は指標計算手段である滞船料計算部であり、1隻毎滞船時間計算部104で計算した1隻あたりの滞船時間に基づいて、一定期間を対象として納品先Aで発生する滞船時間、更には滞船料を求める。この場合に、滞船料計算部105は、既述したように、一定期間での荷降し総量を一定として扱う。本実施形態では、詳細は後述するが、一定期間を対象として納品先Aで発生する、1隻あたりの荷降し量と1隻あたりの滞船時間との関係、及び1隻あたりの荷降し量と1日あたりの滞船時間との関係を求める。そして、滞船料計算部105は、船舶型別に設定されている単位時間あたりの滞船料の情報を用いて、一定期間を対象として納品先Aで発生する、1隻あたりの荷降し量と1日あたりの滞船料との関係を求める。 Reference numeral 105 denotes a stagnation charge calculation unit, which is an index calculation means, and a stagnation that occurs at the delivery destination A for a certain period of time based on the stagnation time per vessel calculated by the stagnation time calculation unit 104 for each vessel. Ask for ship time and even berth charges. In this case, the detention charge calculation unit 105 treats the total amount of unloading in a certain period as a constant, as described above. In this embodiment, although details will be described later, the relationship between the amount of unloading per vessel and the arrears time per vessel, which occurs at the delivery destination A for a certain period of time, and the unloading per vessel. Find the relationship between the amount of cargo and the time spent in the ship per day. Then, the unloading charge calculation unit 105 uses the information on the arrears charge per unit time set for each ship type, and the unloading amount per ship generated at the delivery destination A for a certain period of time. And the relationship between the daily charge and the daily charge.

106は出力部であり、滞船料計算部105で求めた結果を出力する。出力とは、例えばディスプレイ108に結果を表示したり、本装置100の外部機器に結果を送出したりすることをいう。 Reference numeral 106 denotes an output unit, which outputs the result obtained by the detention charge calculation unit 105. The output means, for example, displaying the result on the display 108 or sending the result to an external device of the apparatus 100.

107はポインティングデバイスやキーボード等の入力装置、108はディスプレイである。 107 is an input device such as a pointing device or a keyboard, and 108 is a display.

図2は、実施形態に係る滞船見積り装置100による滞船見積り方法を示すフローチャートである。
ステップS1で、入力部101は、データベース200から実績情報を取り込む。本実施形態では、例えば過去10年分を解析対象期間として、納品先Aにおける各船舶の到着日時、着岸日時、離岸日時の実績情報を含む実績情報を取り込む。
FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing a ship stagnation estimation method by the ship stagnation estimation device 100 according to the embodiment.
In step S1, the input unit 101 takes in the actual information from the database 200. In the present embodiment, for example, the past 10 years are set as the analysis target period, and the actual information including the actual information of the arrival date / time, the berthing date / time, and the departure date / time of each ship at the delivery destination A is taken in.

ステップS2で、到着間隔分布計算部102は、ステップS1において取り込んだ実績情報に基づいて、納品先Aでの船舶の到着間隔の分布を計算する。
図3に、船舶の到着間隔の度数分布の一例を示す。図3の横軸は船舶の到着間隔(日)を、縦軸は割合を表わす。船舶の到着間隔は、既述したように積地出港の変動、生産拠点までのリードタイムの違いによる変動の影響が大きく、ランダム性を有することから、平均値1/λの指数分布を想定した(式1)で示す確率密度関数に良好な一致を示す。パラメータλは、最尤推定法等で求めることができる。
In step S2, the arrival interval distribution calculation unit 102 calculates the distribution of the arrival interval of the ship at the delivery destination A based on the actual information acquired in step S1.
FIG. 3 shows an example of the frequency distribution of the arrival intervals of ships. The horizontal axis of FIG. 3 represents the arrival interval (day) of the ship, and the vertical axis represents the ratio. As mentioned above, the arrival interval of vessels is greatly affected by fluctuations in departures from loading ports and differences in lead times to production bases, and has randomness. Therefore, an exponential distribution with an average value of 1 / λ was assumed. Good agreement is shown with the probability density function shown in (Equation 1). The parameter λ can be obtained by a maximum likelihood estimation method or the like.

Figure 0006848624
Figure 0006848624

ここでは、待ち行列理論を適用するために、納品先Aでの船舶到着率(1日あたりに到着する船舶の隻数)(隻/日)を計算する。平均値1/λは船舶の到着間隔であるので、その逆数λは船舶到着率(隻/日)となる。本実施形態では、船舶到着率λ(隻/日)は0.32となった。 Here, in order to apply the queuing theory, the ship arrival rate (the number of ships arriving per day) (ships / day) at the delivery destination A is calculated. Since the average value 1 / λ is the arrival interval of ships, the reciprocal λ is the ship arrival rate (ships / day). In this embodiment, the ship arrival rate λ (ship / day) was 0.32.

ステップS3で、荷役時間分布計算部103は、ステップS1において取り込んだ実績情報に基づいて、納品先Aでの1隻あたりの荷役時間の分布を計算する。
1隻あたりの荷役時間は、船舶の着岸(ETB:estimated time of berth)から離岸(ETD:estimated time of departure)までに掛かる時間として計算する。図4に、1隻あたりの荷役時間の度数分布の一例を示す。図4の横軸は1隻あたりの荷役時間(日/隻)を、縦軸は割合を表わす。荷降しに使用される設備が性能通りの能力を発揮しているので、1隻あたりの荷役時間の分布は、平均値α、標準偏差σの正規分布を想定した(式2)で示す確率密度関数に良好な一致を示す。平均値α、標準偏差σは、最尤推定法等で求めることができ、本実施形態では、平均値αは2.37、標準偏差σは1.21となった。
In step S3, the cargo handling time distribution calculation unit 103 calculates the distribution of cargo handling time per ship at the delivery destination A based on the actual information captured in step S1.
The cargo handling time per vessel is calculated as the time required from the estimated time of berth (ETB) to the estimated time of departure (ETD) of the vessel. FIG. 4 shows an example of the frequency distribution of cargo handling time per ship. The horizontal axis of FIG. 4 represents the cargo handling time (day / ship) per ship, and the vertical axis represents the ratio. Since the equipment used for unloading is performing according to its performance, the distribution of cargo handling time per ship is the probability shown by the normal distribution of mean value α and standard deviation σ (Equation 2). Shows good agreement with the density function. The mean value α and the standard deviation σ can be obtained by the maximum likelihood estimation method or the like. In the present embodiment, the mean value α is 2.37 and the standard deviation σ is 1.21.

Figure 0006848624
Figure 0006848624

ここでは、待ち行列理論を適用するために、納品先Aでの船舶処理率(1日あたりに処理される船舶の隻数)(隻/日)を計算する。平均値αの逆数が船舶処理率μ(隻/日)となる。本実施形態では、船舶処理率μ=1/α(隻/日)は0.42となった。 Here, in order to apply the queuing theory, the ship processing rate (the number of ships processed per day) (ships / day) at the delivery destination A is calculated. The reciprocal of the average value α is the ship processing rate μ (ship / day). In this embodiment, the ship processing rate μ = 1 / α (ship / day) was 0.42.

ステップS4で、1隻毎滞船時間計算部104は、ステップS2において計算した船舶到着率λと、ステップS3において計算した平均値α、標準偏差σ、船舶処理率μとに基づいて、待ち行列理論を適用することにより、納品先Aでの1隻あたりの滞船時間を計算する。
到着が指数分布、処理(サービス)が正規分布、窓口が1の待ち行列で与えられ、1隻あたりの滞船時間(1隻あたりの平均待ち時間)Wq(日/隻)は、(式3)のポラツェック・ヒンチンの公式より計算することができる。本実施形態では、1隻あたりの滞船時間Wq(日/隻)は4.8となった。
In step S4, the ship-by-ship arrears time calculation unit 104 queues based on the ship arrival rate λ calculated in step S2, the mean value α, standard deviation σ, and ship processing rate μ calculated in step S3. By applying the theory, the berth time per vessel at the delivery destination A is calculated.
Arrival is exponential distribution, processing (service) is normally distributed, window is given by 1 queue, and the time spent per ship (average waiting time per ship) W q (days / ship) is (Equation). It can be calculated from the formula of Polazek Hinchin in 3). In this embodiment, the staying time W q (days / ship) per ship is 4.8.

Figure 0006848624
Figure 0006848624

ステップS5で、滞船料計算部105は、ステップS4において計算した1隻あたりの滞船時間Wqに基づいて、一定期間を対象として納品先Aで発生する滞船時間を求める。
通常、納品先では安定的な操業を行うために、荷降し量及び日毎の使用量の変動は少なく抑えられるような操業が実行される。そのため、荷降し量と処理率には強い相関関係が存在し、一定期間での荷降しについて考慮した場合には、荷降し総量は一定になるとみなすことができる。そこで、荷降し総量は一定との仮定の下で、一定期間での荷降し総量の日割り分を定数としてunload(トン/日)と置くと、船舶到着率λ(隻/日)と、1隻あたりの荷降し量lot(トン/隻)とを用いて(式4)が成り立つ。
lot×λ=unload ・・・(式4)
In step S5, the berth charge calculation unit 105 obtains the berth time that occurs at the delivery destination A for a certain period of time based on the berth time W q per vessel calculated in step S4.
Normally, in order to carry out stable operations at the delivery destination, operations are carried out so that fluctuations in unloading amount and daily usage amount can be suppressed to a small extent. Therefore, there is a strong correlation between the unloading amount and the processing rate, and when unloading in a certain period is taken into consideration, the total unloading amount can be considered to be constant. Therefore, under the assumption that the total amount of unloading is constant, if the daily prorated amount of the total amount of unloading in a certain period is set as unload (ton / day), the ship arrival rate λ (ship / day) and (Equation 4) holds using the unloading amount lot (ton / ship) per ship.
lot × λ = unloaded ・ ・ ・ (Equation 4)

次に、1隻あたりの荷降し量lot(トン/隻)と船舶処理率μ(隻/日)との関係について検討を行う。船舶処理率μ(隻/日)は、1日あたりに処理される船舶の隻数であるので、その逆数1/μは1隻あたりの荷役時間(日/隻)となる。
ここで、荷降しの際にはターンタイム等の入港準備時間や段取り時間が掛かる。この時間(実荷降し外時間と呼ぶ)arrange(日/隻)はある程度決まった時間となるので、定数と考えることができる。このため、1隻あたりの実荷降し時間は、((1/μ)−arrange)となる。また、設備が性能通りの能力を発揮しているとして、荷降し能力ability(トン/日)は定数と考えることができる。以上より、(式5)が導かれる。
ability=lot/((1/μ)−arrange) ・・・(式5)
Next, the relationship between the unloading amount lot (ton / ship) per ship and the ship processing rate μ (ship / day) will be examined. Since the ship processing rate μ (ship / day) is the number of ships processed per day, the reciprocal 1 / μ is the cargo handling time (day / ship) per ship.
Here, when unloading, it takes time to prepare for arrival at the port such as turn time and setup time. Since this time (called the actual unloading outside time) arrival (day / ship) is a fixed time to some extent, it can be considered as a constant. Therefore, the actual unloading time per ship is ((1 / μ) -arrange). In addition, the unloading capacity (ton / day) can be considered as a constant, assuming that the equipment is performing according to its performance. From the above, (Equation 5) is derived.
Availability = lot / ((1 / μ) -arrange) ・ ・ ・ (Equation 5)

(式3)に(式4)、(式5)を組み入れると、一定期間での荷降し総量が一定であると仮定した場合の1隻あたりの滞船時間(1隻あたりの平均待ち時間)Wqは、(式6)で与えられる。(式6)から、図5の特性線501に示すように、1隻あたりの荷降し量lot(トン/隻)と、1隻あたりの滞船時間Wq(日/隻)との関係を求めることができる。 Incorporating (Equation 4) and (Equation 5) into (Equation 3), the time spent per vessel (average waiting time per vessel) assuming that the total amount of unloading in a certain period is constant. ) W q is given by (Equation 6). From (Equation 6), as shown in the characteristic line 501 of FIG. 5, the relationship between the unloading amount lot (ton / ship) per ship and the staying time W q (day / ship) per ship. Can be calculated.

Figure 0006848624
Figure 0006848624

また、1日あたりの滞船時間(1日あたりの平均待ち時間)Wq´(日/日)は、1隻あたりの滞船時間Wq(日/隻)と船舶到着率λ(隻/日)の積となり、(式7)で与えられる。したがって、図5の特性線502に示すように、1隻あたりの荷降し量lot(トン/隻)と、1日あたりの滞船時間Wq´(日/日)との関係を求めることができる。 In addition, the berth time per day (average waiting time per day) W q ´ (day / day) is the berth time W q (day / ship) per ship and the ship arrival rate λ (ship / ship / day). It is the product of (days) and is given by (Equation 7). Therefore, as shown in the characteristic line 502 of FIG. 5, the relationship between the unloading amount lot (tons / ship) per ship and the staying time W q ′ (days / day) per day is to be obtained. Can be done.

Figure 0006848624
Figure 0006848624

本実施形態では、実測の結果であるunload=38,000(トン/日)、ability=57,000(トン/日)、arrange=5(hour/隻)=0.21(日/隻)を用いて検討を行った。また、σ/αは変動率であるが、荷降し量が変動したとしても処理の分布の形は大きな変動がないと仮定して、実績から得られた平均値αと標準偏差σを用いた。
図5の特性線501に示すように、1隻あたりの滞船時間が最も短くなるのは、荷降し量が60,000(トン/隻)辺りである。しかし、特性線502に示すように、一定期間で考えた場合には、待ち時間(ここでは1日あたりの滞船時間(日/日))は、1隻あたりの荷降し量lot(トン/隻)が大きくなる方が良い結果を示す。つまり、大型船舶にて輸送する方が、1日あたりの滞船時間が少なくなることを示している。
In this embodiment, unload = 38,000 (tons / day), availability = 57,000 (tons / day), arrival = 5 (hour / ship) = 0.21 (days / ship), which are the results of actual measurement. It was examined using it. In addition, σ / α is a volatility, but assuming that the shape of the distribution of processing does not fluctuate significantly even if the amount of unloading fluctuates, the average value α and standard deviation σ obtained from the actual results are used. There was.
As shown in the characteristic line 501 of FIG. 5, the shortest staying time per vessel is when the unloading amount is around 60,000 (tons / vessel). However, as shown in the characteristic line 502, when considering a certain period of time, the waiting time (here, the staying time per day (days / day)) is the unloading amount lot (tons) per ship. The larger the / ship), the better the result. In other words, it is shown that the time spent in a ship per day is shorter when transported by a large vessel.

ステップS6で、滞船料計算部105は、単位時間あたりの滞船料の情報を用いて、一定期間を対象として納品先Aで発生する滞船料を求める。
船舶はその積載可能量により、HANDY、PMAX、CAPE、VL等の船舶型に分類される。船舶は、一隻毎に単位時間滞船した場合に発生する滞船料が決まっているが、この滞船料は船舶型別に凡そ同程度の金額となる。ここでは、過去の実績の滞船料から、表1に従って、積載可能量に応じた船舶型1〜4に分類し、その平均を取得し、その船舶型の滞船料とした。
In step S6, the berth charge calculation unit 105 uses the information on the arrears charge per unit time to obtain the arrears charge generated at the delivery destination A for a certain period of time.
Ships are classified into ship types such as HANDY, PMAX, CAPE, and VL according to their loadable capacity. For each ship, the stagnation fee incurred when the ship is stagnation for a unit time is fixed, but this stagnation fee is about the same amount for each ship type. Here, according to Table 1, the ship types 1 to 4 are classified according to the loadable capacity from the past actual ship detention charges, and the average thereof is obtained and used as the ship type detention charges.

Figure 0006848624
Figure 0006848624

船舶は、無駄な輸送を省くため、積載可能量に見合った量をほぼ満杯で輸送する。このため、1隻あたりの荷降し量と積載量は同じと仮定し、検討を行った。図5で求めた1隻あたりの荷降し量と1日あたりの滞船時間との関係に、表1の船舶型別の滞船料を適用することで、図6に示すように、1隻あたりの荷降し量lot(トン/隻)と1日あたりの滞船料(円/日)との関係を導出することができる。この例では、船舶型2(積載可能量:55以上120(千トン)未満)を使用して、積載可能量ほぼ満杯で輸送する場合に、一定期間を対象として納品先Aで発生する滞船料を抑えられることがわかる。 In order to avoid unnecessary transportation, the ship transports an almost full amount commensurate with the loadable capacity. Therefore, the examination was conducted on the assumption that the unloading amount and the loading amount per ship are the same. As shown in FIG. 6, by applying the arrears fee for each vessel type in Table 1 to the relationship between the unloading amount per vessel and the arrears time per day obtained in FIG. 5, 1 The relationship between the amount of unloading lot (ton / ship) per ship and the daily charge (yen / day) can be derived. In this example, when a ship type 2 (loadable capacity: 55 or more and less than 120 (thousand tons)) is used and the cargo is transported with the loadable capacity almost full, the ship is delinquent that occurs at the delivery destination A for a certain period of time. It turns out that the charge can be suppressed.

ステップS7で、出力部106は、ステップS5やステップS6において求めた結果を出力する。 In step S7, the output unit 106 outputs the results obtained in steps S5 and S6.

以上述べたように、納品先Aでの船舶の到着間隔、及び1隻あたりの荷役時間の傾向を把握することにより、待ち行列理論を適用するにあたり到着率と処理率の相関関係を考慮して、一定期間を対象として納品先Aで発生する滞船時間、更には滞船料を求めることができる。これにより、適切な滞船料の削減措置を検討することが可能になる。 As described above, by grasping the tendency of the arrival interval of ships at the delivery destination A and the cargo handling time per ship, the correlation between the arrival rate and the processing rate is taken into consideration when applying the queuing theory. , It is possible to obtain the queuing time that occurs at the delivery destination A for a certain period of time, and the queuing fee. This makes it possible to consider appropriate measures to reduce berth charges.

本発明は、鉄鋼メーカにおける鉄鉱石や石炭に限らず、船舶を使用して、工場、商業施設、在庫拠点等の納品先に、原料、材料、製品、商品等の対象物品を納品する際に、船舶を待たせることにより発生する滞船時間や滞船料を見積もるのに適用される。例えば化学メーカや石油メーカおける原油、電力メーカにおけるLNGや石炭も、海外から船舶を使用して国内の納品先に輸送される。一般的な契約では、輸送された対象物品が国内の納品先で荷役される際には、基準となる荷役時間が規定されており、この基準となる時間を超過した際には、ペナルティーとして滞船及び輸送量に比例して滞船料を支払うこととなる。このため、納品先で発生する滞船時間や滞船料を求めるようにした本発明は、広く適用可能である。 The present invention is not limited to iron ore and coal in a steel maker, but when a target article such as a raw material, a material, a product, or a product is delivered to a delivery destination such as a factory, a commercial facility, or an inventory base by using a ship. , It is applied to estimate the arrears time and arrears caused by making a ship wait. For example, crude oil from chemical manufacturers and oil manufacturers, and LNG and coal from electric power manufacturers are also transported from overseas to domestic delivery destinations by ship. A general contract stipulates a standard cargo handling time when the transported target goods are loaded and unloaded at a domestic delivery destination, and if this standard time is exceeded, a penalty will be delinquent. The arrears fee will be paid in proportion to the amount of ships and transportation. Therefore, the present invention in which the arrears time and the arrears fee generated at the delivery destination are obtained is widely applicable.

以上、本発明を実施形態と共に説明したが、上記実施形態は本発明を実施するにあたっての具体化の例を示したものに過ぎず、これらによって本発明の技術的範囲が限定的に解釈されてはならないものである。すなわち、本発明はその技術思想、又はその主要な特徴から逸脱することなく、様々な形で実施することができる。
本発明を適用した滞船見積り装置は、例えばCPU、ROM、RAM等を備えたコンピュータ装置により実現される。なお、図1では滞船見積り装置100を一台の装置として図示したが、例えば複数台の装置により構成される形態でもかまわない。
また、本発明は、本発明の機能を実現するソフトウェア(プログラム)を、ネットワーク又は各種記憶媒体を介してシステム或いは装置に供給し、そのシステム或いは装置のコンピュータがプログラムを読み出して実行することによっても実現可能である。
Although the present invention has been described above with the embodiments, the above-described embodiments are merely examples of embodiment of the present invention, and the technical scope of the present invention is interpreted in a limited manner by these. It must not be. That is, the present invention can be implemented in various forms without departing from the technical idea or its main features.
A ship stagnation estimation device to which the present invention is applied is realized by, for example, a computer device including a CPU, ROM, RAM, and the like. Although the ship retention estimation device 100 is shown as one device in FIG. 1, it may be configured by, for example, a plurality of devices.
The present invention also provides software (programs) that realize the functions of the present invention to a system or device via a network or various storage media, and the computer of the system or device reads and executes the program. It is feasible.

100:滞船見積り装置
101:入力部
102:到着間隔分布計算部
103:荷役時間分布計算部
104:1隻毎滞船時間計算部
105:滞船料計算部
106:出力部
107:入力装置
108:ディスプレイ
200:データベース
100: Ship lag estimation device 101: Input unit 102: Arrival interval distribution calculation unit 103: Cargo handling time distribution calculation unit 104: Ship berth time calculation unit 105: Ship lag calculation unit 106: Output unit 107: Input device 108 : Display 200: Database

Claims (10)

船舶を使用して納品先に対象物品を納品する際の滞船に関する指標を求める滞船見積り装置であって、
前記納品先における各船舶の到着日時、着岸日時、離岸日時を含む実績情報をデータベースから取り込む入力手段と、
前記実績情報の到着日時に基づいて、所定の第1確率密度関数に従って前記納品先での船舶の到着間隔の分布を計算し、前記納品先での単位日時あたりに到着する船舶の隻数である船舶到着率λを計算する第1の分布計算手段と、
前記実績情報の着岸日時及び離岸日時に基づいて、所定の第2確率密度関数に従って前記納品先での1隻あたりの荷降しに掛かる時間である荷役時間の分布を計算し、1隻あたりの荷役時間の平均値α、1隻あたりの荷役時間の標準偏差σ、前記納品先での船舶処理率(=1/α)μを計算する第2の分布計算手段と、
前記第1の分布計算手段で計算した船舶の到着間隔の分布を表すパラメータである前記船舶到着率λと、前記第2の分布計算手段で計算した1隻あたりの荷役時間の分布を表すパラメータである前記平均値α、前記標準偏差σ、前記船舶処理率μ、待ち行列理論の式に代入することにより、前記納品先での1隻あたりの滞船時間を計算する1隻毎滞船時間計算手段と、
前記1隻毎滞船時間計算手段で計算した1隻あたりの滞船時間に基づいて、一定期間を対象として前記納品先で発生する滞船時間を求める指標計算手段と
前記指標計算手段で求めた前記納品先で発生する滞船時間を出力する出力手段と、を備え、
前記指標計算手段は、前記一定期間での荷降し総量を一定として扱うことを特徴とする滞船見積り装置。
It is a ship stagnation estimation device that obtains an index related to stagnation when delivering the target goods to the delivery destination using a ship.
An input means for importing actual information including the arrival date and time, berthing date and time, and departure date and time of each ship at the delivery destination from the database.
Based on the arrival date and time of the record information, which is number of vessels of vessel vessels distribution arrival interval in the delivery destination calculated according to a predetermined first probability density function, to arrive in per unit time in the delivery destination vessels The first distribution calculation means for calculating the arrival rate λ and
Based on the berthing date and time and the berthing date and time of the actual information, the distribution of cargo handling time, which is the time required for unloading per ship at the delivery destination, is calculated according to a predetermined second probability density function , and per ship. The average value α of the cargo handling time, the standard deviation σ of the cargo handling time per ship, and the second distribution calculation means for calculating the ship processing rate (= 1 / α) μ at the delivery destination.
The ship arrival rate λ, which is a parameter representing the distribution of the arrival intervals of ships calculated by the first distribution calculation means, and the parameter representing the distribution of cargo handling time per ship calculated by the second distribution calculation means. By substituting the mean value α, the standard deviation σ, and the ship processing rate μ into the equation of the queue theory , the ship stagnation time W per ship at the delivery destination is calculated for each ship. Ship time calculation means and
An index calculation means for calculating the stagnation time generated at the delivery destination for a certain period of time based on the stagnation time W per ship calculated by the stagnation time calculation means for each ship .
It is provided with an output means for outputting the berthing time generated at the delivery destination obtained by the index calculation means.
The index calculation means is a ship detention estimation device characterized in that the total amount of unloading in a certain period is treated as constant.
前記待ち行列理論の式は、The formula of the queuing theory is
W={λ/(μ・(μ−λ))}・{(1+(σ/α)W = {λ / (μ ・ (μ−λ))} ・ {(1+ (σ / α)) 22 )/2}) / 2}
であることを特徴とする請求項1に記載の滞船見積り装置。The ship stagnation estimation device according to claim 1, wherein the ship is said to be.
前記指標計算手段は、前記一定期間を対象として、1隻あたりの荷降し量と1隻あたりの滞船時間との関係、及び1隻あたりの荷降し量と1日あたりの滞船時間との関係を求めることを特徴とする請求項1又は2に記載の滞船見積り装置。 The index calculation means covers the fixed period, the relationship between the unloading amount per ship and the staying time per ship, and the unloading amount per ship and the staying time per day. The ship stagnation estimation device according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the relationship with the ship is obtained. 前記指標計算手段は、単位時間あたりの滞船料の情報を用いて、前記一定期間を対象として、1隻あたりの荷降し量と1日あたりの滞船料との関係を求めることを特徴とする請求項に記載の滞船見積り装置。 The index calculation means is characterized in that it obtains the relationship between the amount of unloading per ship and the daily charge for a certain period of time by using the information on the charge for the charge per unit time. The ship stagnation estimation device according to claim 3. 前記単位時間あたりの滞船料の情報は、船舶型別に設定されることを特徴とする請求項に記載の滞船見積り装置。 The ship stagnation estimation device according to claim 4 , wherein the information on the stagnation fee per unit time is set for each ship type. 前記指標計算手段は、前記荷降し総量を、前記第1の分布計算手段で計算した船舶の到着間隔の分布から求められる前記納品先での1日あたりに到着する船舶の隻数と、1隻あたりの荷降し量とを用いて表わすことを特徴とする請求項1乃至のいずれか1項に記載の滞船見積り装置。 In the index calculation means, the total amount of unloading is calculated from the distribution of the arrival intervals of the ships calculated by the first distribution calculation means, and the number of ships arriving per day at the delivery destination and one ship. The arrears estimation device according to any one of claims 1 to 5 , wherein the amount of unloading per ship is used. 前記指標計算手段は、入港準備時間及び段取り時間のうち少なくともいずれか一方を含む実荷降し外時間を、船舶の着岸から離岸までに掛かる時間から差し引いた値を、1隻あたりの荷役時間とすることを特徴とする請求項1乃至のいずれか1項に記載の滞船見積り装置。 The index calculation means is the cargo handling time per ship, which is obtained by subtracting the actual unloading time including at least one of the port entry preparation time and the setup time from the time required from the berthing to the berthing of the ship. The ship stagnation estimation device according to any one of claims 1 to 6 , wherein the ship stagnation estimation device is characterized. 前記実荷降し外時間を定数とすることを特徴とする請求項に記載の滞船見積り装置。 The arrears estimation device according to claim 7 , wherein the actual unloading outside time is a constant. 船舶を使用して納品先に対象物品を納品する際の滞船に関する指標を求める滞船見積り方法であって、
入力手段が、前記納品先における各船舶の到着日時、着岸日時、離岸日時を含む実績情報をデータベースから取り込む入力手順と、
第1の分布計算手段が、前記実績情報の到着日時に基づいて、所定の第1確率密度関数に従って前記納品先での船舶の到着間隔の分布を計算し、前記納品先での単位日時あたりに到着する船舶の隻数である船舶到着率λを計算する第1の分布計算手順と、
第2の分布計算手段が、前記実績情報の着岸日時及び離岸日時に基づいて、所定の第2確率密度関数に従って前記納品先での1隻あたりの荷降しに掛かる時間である荷役時間の分布を計算し、1隻あたりの荷役時間の平均値α、1隻あたりの荷役時間の標準偏差σ、前記納品先での船舶処理率(=1/α)μを計算する第2の分布計算手順と、
1隻毎滞船時間計算手段が、前記第1の分布計算手順で計算した船舶の到着間隔の分布を表すパラメータである前記船舶到着率λと、前記第2の分布計算手順で計算した1隻あたりの荷役時間の分布を表すパラメータである前記平均値α、前記標準偏差σ、前記船舶処理率μ、待ち行列理論の式に代入することにより、前記納品先での1隻あたりの滞船時間を計算する1隻毎滞船時間計算手順と、
指標計算手段が、前記1隻毎滞船時間計算手順で計算した1隻あたりの滞船時間に基づいて、一定期間を対象として前記納品先で発生する滞船時間を求める指標計算手順と
出力手段が、前記指標計算手順で求めた前記納品先で発生する滞船時間を出力する出力手順と、を有し、
前記指標計算手順では、前記一定期間での荷降し総量を一定として扱うことを特徴とする滞船見積り方法。
It is a method of estimating ship stagnation that obtains an index related to stagnation when delivering the target goods to the delivery destination using a ship.
The input means is an input procedure for fetching the actual information including the arrival date / time, berthing date / time, and departure date / time of each ship at the delivery destination from the database.
The first distribution calculation means calculates the distribution of the arrival interval of the ship at the delivery destination according to a predetermined first probability density function based on the arrival date and time of the actual information , and per unit date and time at the delivery destination. The first distribution calculation procedure for calculating the ship arrival rate λ, which is the number of arriving ships,
The cargo handling time, which is the time required for the second distribution calculation means to unload one vessel at the delivery destination according to a predetermined second probability density function based on the berthing date and time and the berthing date and time of the actual information. Second distribution calculation that calculates the distribution and calculates the average value α of the cargo handling time per ship α, the standard deviation σ of the cargo handling time per ship, and the ship processing rate (= 1 / α) μ at the delivery destination. Procedure and
The ship arrival time calculation means for each ship has the ship arrival rate λ, which is a parameter representing the distribution of the arrival intervals of the ships calculated in the first distribution calculation procedure, and one ship calculated in the second distribution calculation procedure. By substituting the average value α, the standard deviation σ, and the ship processing rate μ, which are parameters representing the distribution of cargo handling time per ship, into the equation of the queue theory, the stagnation per ship at the delivery destination The procedure for calculating the arrears time for each ship to calculate the ship time W,
An index calculation procedure for calculating the stagnation time generated at the delivery destination for a certain period of time based on the stagnation time W per ship calculated by the index calculation means for each ship stagnation time calculation procedure, and an index calculation procedure.
The output means has an output procedure for outputting the berthing time generated at the delivery destination obtained by the index calculation procedure .
The index calculation procedure is a method for estimating a ship stagnation, which comprises treating the total amount of unloading in a certain period as a constant.
船舶を使用して納品先に対象物品を納品する際の滞船に関する指標を求めるためのプログラムであって、
前記納品先における各船舶の到着日時、着岸日時、離岸日時を含む実績情報をデータベースから取り込む入力手段と、
前記実績情報の到着日時に基づいて、所定の第1確率密度関数に従って前記納品先での船舶の到着間隔の分布を計算し、前記納品先での単位日時あたりに到着する船舶の隻数である船舶到着率λを計算する第1の分布計算手段と、
前記実績情報の着岸日時及び離岸日時に基づいて、所定の第2確率密度関数に従って前記納品先での1隻あたりの荷降しに掛かる時間である荷役時間の分布を計算し、1隻あたりの荷役時間の平均値α、1隻あたりの荷役時間の標準偏差σ、前記納品先での船舶処理率(=1/α)μを計算する第2の分布計算手段と、
前記第1の分布計算手段で計算した船舶の到着間隔の分布を表すパラメータである前記船舶到着率λと、前記第2の分布計算手段で計算した1隻あたりの荷役時間の分布を表すパラメータである前記平均値α、前記標準偏差σ、前記船舶処理率μ、待ち行列理論の式に代入することにより、前記納品先での1隻あたりの滞船時間を計算する1隻毎滞船時間計算手段と、
前記1隻毎滞船時間計算手段で計算した1隻あたりの滞船時間に基づいて、一定期間を対象として前記納品先で発生する滞船時間を求める指標計算手段と
前記指標計算手段で求めた前記納品先で発生する滞船時間を出力する出力手段と、してコンピュータを機能させ、
前記指標計算手段は、前記一定期間での荷降し総量を一定として扱うことを特徴とするプログラム。
It is a program to obtain an index related to arrears when delivering the target goods to the delivery destination using a ship.
An input means for importing actual information including the arrival date and time, berthing date and time, and departure date and time of each ship at the delivery destination from the database.
Based on the arrival date and time of the record information, which is number of vessels of vessel vessels distribution arrival interval in the delivery destination calculated according to a predetermined first probability density function, to arrive in per unit time in the delivery destination vessels The first distribution calculation means for calculating the arrival rate λ and
Based on the berthing date and time and the berthing date and time of the actual information, the distribution of cargo handling time, which is the time required for unloading per ship at the delivery destination, is calculated according to a predetermined second probability density function , and per ship. The average value α of the cargo handling time, the standard deviation σ of the cargo handling time per ship, and the second distribution calculation means for calculating the ship processing rate (= 1 / α) μ at the delivery destination.
The ship arrival rate λ, which is a parameter representing the distribution of the arrival intervals of ships calculated by the first distribution calculation means, and the parameter representing the distribution of cargo handling time per ship calculated by the second distribution calculation means. By substituting the mean value α, the standard deviation σ, and the ship processing rate μ into the equation of the queue theory , the ship stagnation time W per ship at the delivery destination is calculated for each ship. Ship time calculation means and
An index calculation means for calculating the stagnation time generated at the delivery destination for a certain period of time based on the stagnation time W per ship calculated by the stagnation time calculation means for each ship .
The computer is made to function as an output means for outputting the arrears time generated at the delivery destination obtained by the index calculation means.
The index calculation means is a program characterized in that the total amount of unloading in the fixed period is treated as constant.
JP2017075150A 2017-04-05 2017-04-05 Shipage estimation device, method and program Active JP6848624B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2017075150A JP6848624B2 (en) 2017-04-05 2017-04-05 Shipage estimation device, method and program

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2017075150A JP6848624B2 (en) 2017-04-05 2017-04-05 Shipage estimation device, method and program

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2018180673A JP2018180673A (en) 2018-11-15
JP6848624B2 true JP6848624B2 (en) 2021-03-24

Family

ID=64275531

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2017075150A Active JP6848624B2 (en) 2017-04-05 2017-04-05 Shipage estimation device, method and program

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP6848624B2 (en)

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2003036299A (en) * 2001-07-23 2003-02-07 Nec Soft Ltd System, method, and program for disclosure of ship and gate information
US20130311393A1 (en) * 2012-05-16 2013-11-21 Cls Limited Commodity Shipping Management

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2018180673A (en) 2018-11-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Minner Strategic safety stocks in supply chains
CN110348612A (en) Distribution Center goods amount prediction technique and device
Han et al. Integrated production, inventory, and outbound distribution operations with fixed departure times in a three-stage supply chain
JP6740860B2 (en) Safety stock determination device, method and program
WO2015185438A1 (en) Inventory setting system
Arda et al. Multi-period vehicle loading with stochastic release dates
Sato et al. Managing critical spare part inventories in an oil drilling company using an economic ordering quantity (EOQ) method
JP6848624B2 (en) Shipage estimation device, method and program
Emami et al. A simulation study on warehouse loading system: the case of poultry feed production factory
JP7103004B2 (en) Yard waiting time predictor, method and program
Průša et al. Using a non-parametric technique to evaluate the efficiency of a logistics company
JP6613743B2 (en) Safety stock determination device, method and program
WO2016020982A1 (en) Information processing system and information processing method
Ranjbar et al. A variable neighborhood search algorithm for transshipment scheduling of multi products at a single station
Hedenstierna et al. Inventory performance under staggered deliveries and autocorrelated demand
JP7107048B2 (en) FLEET PORTFOLIO DESIGN DEVICE, METHOD AND PROGRAM
Putri et al. Waste analysis in delivery process using the lean distribution method
Laga et al. Time and cost optimization using goal programming and priority scheduling
Febrianto et al. IMPLEMENTING PERIODIC REVIEW–VARIABLE ORDER QUANTITY SYSTEM IN INVENTORY MANAGEMENT: A CASE STUDY HEAVY EQUIPMENT COMPANIES, KUTAI BARAT
Kiesmüller A multi-item multi-echelon inventory system with quantity-based order consolidation
JP6519014B2 (en) Safety stock determination device, method and program
Werbińska-Wojciechowska On logistics service quality evaluation-case study
Urru et al. Autonomous unloading of heavy deformable goods: Market opportunities
Nze et al. Trend analysis of the productivity of Nigerian seaports
Pieńkowski Implementation of Lean Management in Non-Governmental Organisations. Wrocław Food Bank Case Study

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20191204

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20200923

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20201110

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20201221

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20210202

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20210215

R151 Written notification of patent or utility model registration

Ref document number: 6848624

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R151