Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP6924367B2 - Evaluation test equipment and evaluation test method for reinforcing bar corrosion associated with cracks in concrete columns - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP6924367B2 - Evaluation test equipment and evaluation test method for reinforcing bar corrosion associated with cracks in concrete columns - Google Patents

Evaluation test equipment and evaluation test method for reinforcing bar corrosion associated with cracks in concrete columns Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP6924367B2
JP6924367B2 JP2017101385A JP2017101385A JP6924367B2 JP 6924367 B2 JP6924367 B2 JP 6924367B2 JP 2017101385 A JP2017101385 A JP 2017101385A JP 2017101385 A JP2017101385 A JP 2017101385A JP 6924367 B2 JP6924367 B2 JP 6924367B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
specimen
test piece
reinforcing bar
jig
cracks
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2017101385A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2018197656A (en
Inventor
渡邊 憲一
憲一 渡邊
幹之 市場
幹之 市場
文泰 青野
文泰 青野
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Tokyo Electric Power Co Holdings Inc
Original Assignee
Tokyo Electric Power Co Inc
Tokyo Electric Power Co Holdings Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Tokyo Electric Power Co Inc, Tokyo Electric Power Co Holdings Inc filed Critical Tokyo Electric Power Co Inc
Priority to JP2017101385A priority Critical patent/JP6924367B2/en
Publication of JP2018197656A publication Critical patent/JP2018197656A/en
Priority to JP2021125239A priority patent/JP7195510B2/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP6924367B2 publication Critical patent/JP6924367B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Investigating Strength Of Materials By Application Of Mechanical Stress (AREA)
  • Testing Resistance To Weather, Investigating Materials By Mechanical Methods (AREA)

Description

本発明は、例えば配電設備等におけるコンクリート柱の亀裂(ひび割れ)の幅と鉄筋の腐食度との相関関係を解明するためのコンクリート柱の亀裂に伴う鉄筋腐食の評価試験装置及び評価試験方法に関するものである。 The present invention relates to an evaluation test apparatus and an evaluation test method for reinforcing bar corrosion associated with cracks in concrete columns for clarifying the correlation between the width of cracks (cracks) in concrete columns and the degree of corrosion of reinforcing bars in, for example, power distribution equipment. Is.

一般的に、コンクリート柱に亀裂が発生して内部の鉄筋が露出すると、鉄筋は腐食し錆びてしまい、コンクリート柱自体の性能に悪影響を与えてしまう危険性がある。 Generally, when a crack occurs in a concrete column and the internal reinforcing bar is exposed, the reinforcing bar is corroded and rusted, and there is a risk that the performance of the concrete column itself is adversely affected.

そこで、コンクリート柱の亀裂(ひび割れ)の幅と鉄筋の腐食度との相関関係を解明するために、従来では、例えば、長さ14m等の実構造物であるコンクリート柱自体を、重機を使って建てて設計荷重を掛けて亀裂(ひび割れ)を導入させ、このまま所定期間暴露し、その後、解体することで、亀裂の幅と鉄筋の腐食状況の確認を行っていた。 Therefore, in order to clarify the correlation between the width of cracks (cracks) in concrete columns and the degree of corrosion of reinforcing bars, conventionally, for example, the concrete columns themselves, which are actual structures with a length of 14 m or the like, are used with heavy machinery. By building and applying a design load to introduce cracks (cracks), exposing them for a predetermined period of time, and then disassembling them, the width of the cracks and the corrosion status of the reinforcing bars were confirmed.

また、従来では、特許文献1に開示されているように、セラミックス、コンクリート、岩石等のような脆性材料の試験片に、予亀裂を導入し、且つ、その予亀裂の長さを制御できる予亀裂導入装置及び予亀裂導入方法が提案されている。 Further, conventionally, as disclosed in Patent Document 1, a pre-crack can be introduced into a test piece of a brittle material such as ceramics, concrete, rock, etc., and the length of the pre-crack can be controlled. A crack introduction device and a pre-crack introduction method have been proposed.

即ち、この予亀裂導入装置は、試験片に引張力を負荷する引張力負荷手段と、試験片に引張力の作用方向と直交する方向に圧縮荷重を負荷することにより試験片に予亀裂を導入する予亀裂導入冶具とを有し、試験片に予亀裂を導入するに際しては、予亀裂導入手段により圧縮荷重を負荷した状態で、引張力負荷手段により試験片に引張力を負荷して予亀裂を導入するものとされ、引張力負荷手段は、倍力用ギヤ群が収容されたハウジングと、引張方向に進退する引張用ロッドを収容したロッドケースと、引張力創生用のハンドルとを有する引張力発生手段を備えたものを用いている。 That is, this pre-crack introduction device introduces a pre-crack into the test piece by applying a tensile force loading means for applying a tensile force to the test piece and a compressive load on the test piece in a direction orthogonal to the direction in which the tensile force acts. When introducing a pre-crack into a test piece, the test piece is pre-cracked by applying a tensile force to the test piece with a tensile force loading means while a compressive load is applied by the pre-crack introducing means. The tensile force loading means includes a housing containing a group of boosting gears, a rod case containing a pulling rod that moves forward and backward in the tensile direction, and a handle for creating tensile force. Those equipped with a tensile force generating means are used.

特開2007−155665号公報JP-A-2007-155665

上記した様に、従来においては、重量性のあるコンクリート柱の実構造物自体をそのままの形で暴露して解体していることから、重機を使用する等の大掛かりな工事が要求され、しかも、作業を実施すると、費やされる時間と労力が極めて大きいものとなる。 As mentioned above, in the past, since the actual structure of heavy concrete columns was exposed and dismantled as it was, large-scale construction such as using heavy machinery was required, and moreover, Performing the work can be extremely time consuming and labor intensive.

このため、コンクリート柱の亀裂幅の進展状況と、これによる内部の鉄筋の腐食状況の関係を明らかにする簡易な試験方法の確立が、不可欠なものとなっていた。 For this reason, it has become indispensable to establish a simple test method for clarifying the relationship between the progress of the crack width of the concrete column and the corrosion state of the internal reinforcing bars.

また、上記した特許文献1の場合、予亀裂導入装置は、倍力用ギヤ群が収容されたハウジングと、引張方向に進退する引張用ロッドを収容したロッドケースと、引張力創生用のハンドルとを有する引張力負荷手段によるため、構成が非常に複雑で、高価なものとなる。 Further, in the case of Patent Document 1 described above, the pre-crack introduction device includes a housing containing a booster gear group, a rod case containing a tension rod that moves forward and backward in the tensile direction, and a handle for creating tensile force. Since it depends on the tensile force loading means having the above, the configuration becomes very complicated and expensive.

しかも、特許文献1の予亀裂導入装置は、小さな試験片が圧縮力受容部材やハンドル及びロッドケース等により囲まれ障害となるため、試験片をそのまま予亀裂導入冶具にセットした状態で暴露試験を行うことは困難である。 Moreover, in the pre-cracking introduction device of Patent Document 1, a small test piece is surrounded by a compressive force receiving member, a handle, a rod case, etc. and becomes an obstacle. It's difficult to do.

また、上記した特許文献1の場合、予亀裂の長さや深さ等を制御することを発明の課題や目的としているが、亀裂幅を制御することに関しては何等開示されていない。 Further, in the case of Patent Document 1 described above, it is an object or purpose of the invention to control the length and depth of the pre-crack, but there is no disclosure regarding controlling the crack width.

即ち、荷重負荷の掛かり方(作用面積や作用位置等)により、亀裂幅の発生の態様が様々異なるものとなる。従って、評価試験の効率を向上させるためには、亀裂幅をミクロン単位で精度よく制御できるようにすることが必要不可欠であった。 That is, the mode of occurrence of the crack width varies depending on how the load is applied (acting area, acting position, etc.). Therefore, in order to improve the efficiency of the evaluation test, it is indispensable to be able to control the crack width in micron units with high accuracy.

そこで、本発明は如上のような従来存した諸事情に鑑み創出されたもので、安価で簡易な評価試験が可能となる小型の簡易試験片による試験方法が確立され、また、荷重負荷による亀裂幅をミクロン単位で精度よく制御可能にすることで、評価試験の効率を飛躍的に向上させることができるコンクリート柱亀裂に伴う鉄筋腐食の評価試験装置及び評価試験方法を提供することを目的とする。 Therefore, the present invention was created in view of the above-mentioned conventional circumstances, and a test method using a small simple test piece that enables an inexpensive and simple evaluation test has been established, and a crack due to a load load has been established. It is an object of the present invention to provide an evaluation test device and an evaluation test method for reinforcing bar corrosion associated with cracks in concrete columns, which can dramatically improve the efficiency of evaluation tests by enabling the width to be controlled accurately in micron units. ..

本発明に係る請求項1の発明は、少なくとも1本の鉄筋を含むコンクリート片を供試体(試験片)として、その両端位置を固定した状態で設置する架台を用いたコンクリート柱の亀裂に伴う鉄筋腐食の評価試験装置であり、この架台は、供試体(試験片)の裏面における中央の1点箇所を押圧する押付治具を備え、供試体(試験片)の表面に発生する亀裂幅を制御するように構成され、前記架台の押付治具は、片側フランジ面の幅方向に設けた一対のガイド片と、一対のガイド片に沿って、片側フランジ面から離れる方向に移動可能な押し当て部材を備え、片側フランジ面にネジ孔を設け、ボルトの軸部をこのネジ孔に捩じ込んで軸部の先端を押し当て部材に当接させて、押し当て部材を片側フランジ面から離れる方向に移動させるものであり、前記押付治具は、架台側から供試体(試験片)の裏面に向けてねじ込まれたボルトの回転ピッチにより、供試体(試験片)の表面に発生する亀裂幅を制御した状態で保持されることで、上述した課題を解決した。 In the invention of claim 1 according to the present invention, a concrete piece containing at least one reinforcing bar is used as a specimen (test piece), and the reinforcing bar due to a crack in a concrete column using a pedestal installed with both ends fixed. It is a corrosion evaluation test device, and this stand is equipped with a pressing jig that presses one central point on the back surface of the specimen (test piece) to control the crack width generated on the surface of the specimen (test piece). The pressing jig of the gantry is a pair of guide pieces provided in the width direction of one side flange surface and a pressing member that can move in a direction away from one side flange surface along the pair of guide pieces. Is provided, a screw hole is provided on one side flange surface, the shaft portion of the bolt is screwed into this screw hole, the tip of the shaft portion is brought into contact with the pressing member, and the pressing member is separated from the one side flange surface. The pressing jig is to be moved, and the pressing jig controls the crack width generated on the surface of the specimen (test piece) by the rotation pitch of the bolt screwed from the gantry side toward the back surface of the specimen (test piece). By holding the jig in the above-mentioned state, the above-mentioned problems were solved.

この請求項1に係るコンクリート柱亀裂に伴う鉄筋腐食の評価試験装置によれば、荷重負荷による亀裂幅をミクロン単位で精度よく制御でき、評価試験の効率を飛躍的に向上させることができる。 According to the evaluation test apparatus for reinforcing bar corrosion associated with concrete column cracks according to claim 1, the crack width due to load can be accurately controlled in micron units, and the efficiency of the evaluation test can be dramatically improved.

また、従来のように、実構造物であるコンクリート柱全体を、重機を使って建てて設計荷重を掛けて亀裂(ひび割れ)を導入させ、このまま所定期間暴露するという大掛かりな作業を必要とせずに、棒状のコンクリート片による評価試験であるので、作業上の労力が大幅に軽減できる。
更に、ボルトBの一回転のピッチで亀裂幅がコンマ何ミクロン広がったかを精度よく知ることができ、3点曲げの態様で亀裂の発生位置や発生範囲を容易に制御することができる。
即ち、供試体(試験片)の表面が膨張し且つ裏面が圧縮される3点曲げの荷重の場合において、供試体(試験片)の表面部分への亀裂(ひび割れ)を、意図的に発生させることができる。
In addition, as in the past, the entire concrete column, which is an actual structure, is built using heavy machinery, a design load is applied to introduce cracks, and it is not necessary to expose it for a predetermined period of time. Since it is an evaluation test using rod-shaped concrete pieces, the work effort can be greatly reduced.
Further, it is possible to accurately know how many microns the crack width has expanded at the pitch of one rotation of the bolt B, and it is possible to easily control the crack generation position and the crack generation range in the mode of three-point bending.
That is, in the case of a three-point bending load in which the front surface of the specimen (test piece) expands and the back surface is compressed, cracks are intentionally generated in the front surface portion of the specimen (test piece). be able to.

本発明に係る請求項2の発明は、円筒状のコンクリート柱の内周面に相当するコンクリート片による供試体(試験片)の裏面が、架台側に位置するようにして、供試体(試験片)を架台に沿うように配置したことで、上述した課題を解決した。 According to the second aspect of the present invention, the specimen (test piece) is such that the back surface of the specimen (test piece) made of a concrete piece corresponding to the inner peripheral surface of the cylindrical concrete column is located on the gantry side. ) Was placed along the gantry to solve the above-mentioned problems.

この請求項2に係るコンクリート柱亀裂に伴う鉄筋腐食の評価試験装置によれば、供試体(試験片)の表面に発生する亀裂幅の制御を可能にした、曲げ試験装置を提供することができる。 According to the evaluation test device for reinforcing bar corrosion associated with a crack in a concrete column according to claim 2, it is possible to provide a bending test device capable of controlling the crack width generated on the surface of a specimen (test piece). ..

本発明に係る請求項3の発明は、架台は、中央ウエブの両端にフランジを備えているH型鋼により構成され、片側フランジ面の長さ方向における両端部に、供試体(試験片)の両端部を挟み込むようにして固定する挟持部材を配置し、片側フランジ面の略中央部に、供試体(試験片)の裏面を押圧して表面に亀裂を発生させる押付治具を配置していることで、上述した課題を解決した。 According to the third aspect of the present invention, the gantry is made of H-shaped steel having flanges at both ends of the central web, and both ends of the specimen (test piece) are formed at both ends in the length direction of the flange surface on one side. A holding member that fixes the part by sandwiching it is placed, and a pressing jig that presses the back surface of the specimen (test piece) to generate a crack on the front surface is placed at the substantially central part of the flange surface on one side. So, the above-mentioned problem was solved.

この請求項3に係るコンクリート柱亀裂に伴う鉄筋腐食の評価試験装置によれば、安価で簡易な評価試験が可能となる小型の簡易試験片による曲げ試験装置を容易に提供することができる。 According to the evaluation test device for reinforcing bar corrosion associated with cracks in concrete columns according to claim 3, it is possible to easily provide a bending test device using a small simple test piece that enables an inexpensive and simple evaluation test.

即ち、H型鋼による架台、挟持部材、押付治具との3つの構成部材により、供試体(試験片)への亀裂の導入と暴露試験が可能となり、小型の簡易試験片による安価で簡易な評価試験が可能となる。 That is, it is possible to introduce cracks into the specimen (test piece) and perform an exposure test by using three constituent members, a frame made of H-shaped steel, a holding member, and a pressing jig, and an inexpensive and simple evaluation using a small simple test piece. The test becomes possible.

本発明に係る請求項4の発明は、架台の挟持部材は、供試体(試験片)の端部を片側フランジ面と板状の支持当て部材により挟み込み、片側フランジ面と支持当て部材がそれぞれ備えている一対の孔にボルトの軸部を貫通させ、片側フランジ面から突出している軸部にナットを宛がって締め付けるものであることで、上述した課題を解決した。 In the invention of claim 4 according to the present invention, the holding member of the gantry sandwiches the end portion of the specimen (test piece) between a flange surface on one side and a plate-shaped support contact member, and the flange surface on one side and the support support member are provided, respectively. The above-mentioned problems have been solved by penetrating the shaft portion of the bolt through the pair of holes and applying the nut to the shaft portion protruding from the flange surface on one side.

この請求項4に係るコンクリート柱亀裂に伴う鉄筋腐食の評価試験装置によれば、架台の挟持部材は、支持当て部材、ボルト、ナットの3つの構成部材により、供試体(試験片)の端部の固定が可能となり、これにより、小型の簡易試験片の安価で簡易な評価試験が可能となる。 According to the evaluation test apparatus for the corrosion of reinforcing bars associated with the cracks in the concrete column according to claim 4, the holding member of the gantry is composed of three constituent members, a support pad member, a bolt, and a nut, at the end of the specimen (test piece). This makes it possible to perform an inexpensive and simple evaluation test on a small simple test piece.

本発明に係る請求項の発明は、押付治具は、供試体(試験片)に対し面状に接する矩形の治具であり、該治具の供試体(試験片)長手方向に沿った縦幅LAは供試体(試験片)厚みの10%以上で60%以下であることで、上述した課題を解決した。 According to the fifth aspect of the present invention, the pressing jig is a rectangular jig that is in contact with the specimen (test piece) in a planar shape, and is along the longitudinal direction of the specimen (test piece) of the jig. The vertical width LA was 10% or more and 60% or less of the thickness of the specimen (test piece), thereby solving the above-mentioned problems.

この請求項に係るコンクリート柱亀裂に伴う鉄筋腐食の評価試験装置によれば、面状の荷重負荷による亀裂幅を、ミクロン単位で精度よく制御可能にする。 According to the evaluation test apparatus for reinforcing bar corrosion associated with concrete column cracks according to claim 5, the crack width due to a planar load can be accurately controlled in micron units.

本発明に係る請求項の発明は、押付治具は、供試体(試験片)に対し線状に接する円柱形の治具であり、該円柱形の治具の直径は少なくとも5mmを有することで、上述した課題を解決した。 According to the sixth aspect of the present invention, the pressing jig is a cylindrical jig that linearly contacts the specimen (test piece), and the diameter of the cylindrical jig has at least 5 mm. So, the above-mentioned problem was solved.

この請求項に係るコンクリート柱亀裂に伴う鉄筋腐食の評価試験装置によれば、線状の荷重負荷による亀裂幅を、ミクロン単位で精度よく制御可能にする。 According to the evaluation test apparatus for reinforcing bar corrosion associated with concrete column cracks according to claim 6, the crack width due to a linear load can be accurately controlled in micron units.

本発明に係る請求項の発明は、押付治具は、供試体(試験片)に対し面状に接する矩形の治具あるいは線状に接する円柱形の治具であり、該治具の供試体(試験片)幅方向に沿った横幅WAは供試体(試験片)の幅WBに比較して供試体(試験片)厚みの40%以上狭くならないものとしたことで、上述した課題を解決した。 According to the invention of claim 7 , the pressing jig is a rectangular jig that is in contact with a specimen (test piece) in a planar shape or a cylindrical jig that is in contact with a linear shape. The above-mentioned problem is solved by assuming that the width WA along the width direction of the specimen (test piece) is not narrowed by 40% or more of the thickness of the specimen (test piece) as compared with the width WB of the specimen (test piece). bottom.

この請求項に係るコンクリート柱亀裂に伴う鉄筋腐食の評価試験装置によれば、面状もしくは線状の荷重負荷による亀裂幅を、ミクロン単位で精度よく制御可能にする。 According to the evaluation test apparatus for reinforcing bar corrosion associated with concrete column cracks according to claim 7 , the crack width due to a planar or linear load can be accurately controlled in micron units.

本発明に係るコンクリート柱亀裂に伴う鉄筋腐食の評価試験装置及び評価試験方法により、安価で簡易な評価試験が可能となる小型の簡易試験片による試験方法が確立され、評価試験の効率を飛躍的に向上させることができる。 The evaluation test device and evaluation test method for reinforcing bar corrosion associated with cracks in concrete columns according to the present invention have established a test method using a small simple test piece that enables an inexpensive and simple evaluation test, dramatically improving the efficiency of the evaluation test. Can be improved.

コンクリート片(供試体)を評価試験用の架台に取付けた状態の概略を示す斜視図である。It is a perspective view which shows the outline of the state which the concrete piece (specimen) was attached to the pedestal for evaluation test. 同じくコンクリート片(供試体)を評価試験用の架台に取付けた状態の概略を示し、(a)は平面図、(b)は正面図。(c)は側面図である。Similarly, the outline of the state in which the concrete piece (specimen) is attached to the gantry for the evaluation test is shown, (a) is a plan view, and (b) is a front view. (C) is a side view. 評価試験用の架台の分解斜視図である。It is an exploded perspective view of the frame for evaluation test. 評価試験用の架台の組立状態を示す斜視図である。It is a perspective view which shows the assembled state of the gantry for evaluation test. 鉄筋コンクリート柱のコンクリート片(供試体)切出から、所定の亀裂を発生させる面以外を封止材により封止するまでの工程を示す斜視図である。It is a perspective view which shows the process from cutting out a concrete piece (specimen) of a reinforced concrete column to sealing with a sealing material other than the surface where a predetermined crack is generated. コンクリート片(供試体)を評価試験用の架台に取付ける状態の概略を示す斜視図である。It is a perspective view which shows the outline of the state which the concrete piece (specimen) is attached to the pedestal for evaluation test. コンクリート片(供試体)を評価試験用の架台に取付けた状態の概略を示す側面図である。It is a side view which shows the outline of the state which the concrete piece (specimen) was attached to the pedestal for evaluation test. 評価試験用の架台に取付けたコンクリート片(供試体)に、ボルトを介しての3点曲げ荷重による亀裂の導入状態の概略を示す側面図である。It is a side view which shows the outline of the introduction state of the crack by the three-point bending load through a bolt in the concrete piece (specimen) attached to the frame for evaluation test. 評価試験の作業手順を説明するブロック図である。It is a block diagram explaining the work procedure of an evaluation test. 3点曲げのイメージを示すもので、(a)は荷重を加える前の説明図、(b)は荷重を加えた後の説明図である。An image of three-point bending is shown, where (a) is an explanatory view before applying a load, and (b) is an explanatory view after applying a load. コンクリート片(供試体)の亀裂の発生範囲の概略を示すもので、(a)は3点曲げ、(b)は4点曲げ、(c)は片持ち3点曲げの説明図である。The outline of the crack generation range of the concrete piece (specimen) is shown. FIG. 押付治具の具体例を示すもので、(a)は押付治具が面状に接する場合の正面図及び側面図、(b)は押付治具が線状に接する場合の正面図及び側面図である。A specific example of the pressing jig is shown. FIG. Is. 同じく押付治具の具体例を示すもので、押付治具が面状あるいは線状に接する場合の正面図及び側面図である。Similarly, a specific example of the pressing jig is shown, and is a front view and a side view when the pressing jig is in contact with each other in a planar or linear manner. 押付治具の形状の比較例を示すもので、(a)は締付治具が円柱の場合の正面図及び側面図、(b)は締付治具が扁平な矩形の場合の正面図及び側面図である。A comparative example of the shapes of the pressing jigs is shown. FIG. It is a side view.

以下に、図面を参照して、本発明の一実施の形態について説明する。 Hereinafter, an embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.

<実施の形態>
本発明に係るコンクリート柱亀裂に伴う鉄筋腐食の評価試験装置(以下に本装置と称す)は、コンクリート柱から切り出したコンクリート片の少なくとも1本の鉄筋を含む供試体(試験片)Pを設置して、その両端位置を固定する架台1により構成されている。この架台1は、供試体(試験片)Pの中間部分に過重負荷を付与する押付治具3を備えている。
<Embodiment>
In the evaluation test device for reinforcing bar corrosion associated with cracks in concrete columns according to the present invention (hereinafter referred to as this device), a specimen (test piece) P containing at least one reinforcing bar of a concrete piece cut out from a concrete column is installed. It is composed of a stand 1 for fixing the positions of both ends thereof. The gantry 1 is provided with a pressing jig 3 that applies an overload to the intermediate portion of the specimen (test piece) P.

そして、本装置は、架台1側から供試体(試験片)Pの裏面に向けてねじ込まれて押付治具3を供試体(試験片)Pの裏面を押し付けるボルトBを備えている。本実施形態では、ボルトBの一般的なピッチとなる1mm〜2.5mmの回転ピッチ(ボルトの1回転による前進距離)により、供試体(試験片)Pの表面に発生する亀裂幅を制御している。 The apparatus is provided with a bolt B that is screwed from the gantry 1 side toward the back surface of the specimen (test piece) P to press the pressing jig 3 against the back surface of the specimen (test piece) P. In the present embodiment, the crack width generated on the surface of the specimen (test piece) P is controlled by a rotation pitch of 1 mm to 2.5 mm (advance distance due to one rotation of the bolt), which is a general pitch of the bolt B. ing.

<本装置の構成>
次に、本装置具体的な構成について、図1、図2、図3、図4に基づき詳述する。
<Configuration of this device>
Next, the specific configuration of this device will be described in detail with reference to FIGS. 1, 2, 3, and 4.

架台1は、中央ウエブWの両端にフランジFを備えているH型鋼により構成されている。片側フランジF面の長さ方向における両端部には、供試体(試験片)Pの両端部を挟み込むようにして固定する挟持部材2を配置している。 The gantry 1 is made of H-shaped steel having flanges F at both ends of the central web W. Holding members 2 that sandwich and fix both ends of the specimen (test piece) P are arranged at both ends of the flange F surface on one side in the length direction.

挟持部材2は、例えば、L字型板状のアングル材等により構成された支持当て部材2Aと、支持当て部材2Aを片側フランジF面に固定するためのボルトBとナットNとからなる。 The sandwiching member 2 includes, for example, a support contact member 2A made of an L-shaped plate-shaped angle member or the like, and a bolt B and a nut N for fixing the support support member 2A to the flange F surface on one side.

挟持部材2の使用においては、先ず、供試体(試験片)Pの端部を片側フランジF面と支持当て部材2Aにより挟み込み、片側フランジF面と支持当て部材2Aがそれぞれ備えている一対の孔HにボルトBの軸部を貫通させ、片側フランジF面から突出している軸部にナットNを宛がって締め付けるものである。 In using the sandwiching member 2, first, the end portion of the specimen (test piece) P is sandwiched between the flange F surface on one side and the support contact member 2A, and a pair of holes provided on the flange F surface on one side and the support contact member 2A, respectively. The shaft portion of the bolt B is passed through H, and the nut N is applied to the shaft portion protruding from the flange F surface on one side and tightened.

片側フランジF面の略中央部には、供試体(試験片)Pを押圧して亀裂Cを発生させる押付治具3を配置している。 A pressing jig 3 that presses the specimen (test piece) P to generate a crack C is arranged at a substantially central portion of the flange F surface on one side.

架台1の中央には、片側フランジF面の幅方向に沿って対向設置した略台形形板状の一対のガイド片3Aと、一対のガイド片3Aそれぞれの中央に縦溝となって形成された相対向するガイド溝3Bに跨るようにして横架され、ガイド溝3Bに沿って片側フランジF面から離れる方向に移動可能とした押付治具3を備えている。 At the center of the gantry 1, a pair of substantially trapezoidal plate-shaped guide pieces 3A installed facing each other along the width direction of the flange F surface on one side and a vertical groove formed in the center of each of the pair of guide pieces 3A. It is provided with a pressing jig 3 that is laid horizontally so as to straddle the guide grooves 3B facing each other and is movable in a direction away from the flange F surface on one side along the guide grooves 3B.

本実施形態の押付治具3は、供試体(試験片)Pの裏面中央に対し幅方向に沿って均一に当接させるための例えば円柱状の押し当てロッド3Dと、押し当てロッド3Dの後方に溶接された、後述するボルトB先端が後面に当接する矩形板状の押し当て部材3Cと、により形成されている。 The pressing jig 3 of the present embodiment includes, for example, a cylindrical pressing rod 3D for uniformly contacting the center of the back surface of the specimen (test piece) P along the width direction, and the rear of the pressing rod 3D. It is formed by a rectangular plate-shaped pressing member 3C in which the tip of a bolt B, which will be described later, is in contact with the rear surface, which is welded to the rear surface.

尚、本実施形態では、押し当てロッド3Dは押し当て部材3Cの片面に溶接されて一体となっているが、押し当てロッド3Dと押し当て部材3Cとが別体となっていても良い。 In the present embodiment, the pressing rod 3D is welded to one side of the pressing member 3C to be integrated, but the pressing rod 3D and the pressing member 3C may be separate bodies.

そして、押付治具3は、押し当て部材3Cを押圧して片側フランジF面から離れる方向に移動させるよう片側フランジF下面とウエブWとの間に形成された開口部3Eにおいて片側フランジFの中央に形成されたボルト孔3F(図3参照)に軸部B1が捩じ込められるボルトBを設けている。 Then, the pressing jig 3 presses the pressing member 3C and moves the pressing member 3C in a direction away from the one-side flange F surface in the center of the one-side flange F in the opening 3E formed between the lower surface of the one-side flange F and the web W. A bolt B into which the shaft portion B1 is screwed is provided in the bolt hole 3F (see FIG. 3) formed in.

このように、押付治具3は、片側フランジF面にボルト孔にボルトBの軸部B1を捩じ込んで軸部B1の先端を押し当て部材3Cに当接させて、押し当てロッド3Dを片側フランジF面から離れる方向に移動させるものである。 In this way, in the pressing jig 3, the shaft portion B1 of the bolt B is screwed into the bolt hole on the flange F surface on one side, the tip of the shaft portion B1 is brought into contact with the pressing member 3C, and the pressing rod 3D is pressed. It is moved in a direction away from the F surface of the flange on one side.

また、本発明に係るコンクリート柱亀裂に伴う鉄筋腐食の評価試験方法は、図9に示すように、鉄筋コンクリート柱Kから少なくとも1本の鉄筋Qを含むコンクリート片を供試体Pとして切り出す切出工程(S1)と、切り出した供試体(試験片)Pにおいて、所定の亀裂(ひび割れ)Cを発生させる面以外の部分を封止材Vにより封止する封止工程(S2)と、供試体(試験片)Pを架台1に設置し、封止材Vにより封止した部分以外の面に亀裂Cを発生させる亀裂導入工程(S3)と、供試体(試験片)Pの亀裂Cの幅(図8参照)の観察を実施しつつ、供試体(試験片)Pを所定期間暴露する暴露工程(S4)と、暴露後の供試体(試験片)Pを解体し、コンクリート材の中性化の進展度及び鉄筋の腐食状況を確認する解体確認工程(S5)と、からなる。 Further, as shown in FIG. 9, the evaluation test method for the corrosion of reinforcing bars associated with cracks in concrete columns according to the present invention is a cutting step of cutting out a concrete piece containing at least one reinforcing bar Q from a reinforced concrete column K as a specimen P. In S1) and the cut-out specimen (test piece) P, a sealing step (S2) in which a portion other than the surface where a predetermined crack (crack) C is generated is sealed with the sealing material V, and the specimen (test). Piece) The crack introduction step (S3) in which the P is installed on the gantry 1 and the crack C is generated on the surface other than the portion sealed by the sealing material V, and the width of the crack C in the specimen (test piece) P (FIG. While observing (see 8), the exposure step (S4) in which the specimen (test piece) P is exposed for a predetermined period and the specimen (test piece) P after exposure are disassembled to neutralize the concrete material. It consists of a disassembly confirmation step (S5) for confirming the degree of progress and the corrosion status of the reinforcing bar.

ここで、コンクリート材の中性化とは、本来アルカリ性を有するコンクリートが外部環境の影響として、例えば大気中の炭酸ガスや酸性雨等の影響を受けてアルカリ性を消失してゆく現象であり、この中性化により内部の鉄筋の不動態皮膜が破壊されて活性化し鉄筋の腐食が進行する。 Here, the neutralization of concrete material is a phenomenon in which concrete, which is originally alkaline, loses its alkalinity due to the influence of the external environment, such as carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and acid rain. Neutralization destroys and activates the passivation film of the internal reinforcing bars, and the corrosion of the reinforcing bars progresses.

次に、上記した架台1を使用しての鉄筋腐食の評価試験の手順について詳述する。 Next, the procedure of the evaluation test of the reinforcing bar corrosion using the above-mentioned gantry 1 will be described in detail.

<切出工程>
切出工程S1において、図5に示すように、円筒状の鉄筋コンクリート柱Kの一部を、所定の長さの円環状に切り出し、この切り出した円環状部分を、1本の鉄筋Qが略中心にくるように円筒軸方向に沿うように切り出して、断面が略台形となる棒状のコンクリート片の供試体(試験片)Pにする。
<Cutout process>
In the cutting step S1, as shown in FIG. 5, a part of the cylindrical reinforced concrete column K is cut out in an annular shape having a predetermined length, and the cut out annular portion is substantially centered on one reinforcing bar Q. It is cut out along the direction of the cylindrical axis so as to come to a rod-shaped concrete piece (test piece) P having a substantially trapezoidal cross section.

これにより、供試体(試験片)Pの裏面R3が、円筒状の鉄筋コンクリート柱Kの内周面に相当し、供試体(試験片)Pの表面R0が、円筒状の鉄筋コンクリート柱Kの外周面に相当する。 As a result, the back surface R3 of the specimen (test piece) P corresponds to the inner peripheral surface of the cylindrical reinforced concrete column K, and the surface R0 of the specimen (test piece) P is the outer peripheral surface of the cylindrical reinforced concrete column K. Corresponds to.

<封止工程>
封止工程S2において、図5に示すように、切出工程S1により切り出された供試体(試験片)Pに亀裂C(ひび割れ)を発生させる表面以外の、略台形状の上下端面R1、長方形状の左右側面R2、円筒状の鉄筋コンクリート柱Kの内周面に相当する裏面R3それぞれに、耐候性を有する封止材Vとしてエポキシ樹脂を塗布する。
<Sealing process>
In the sealing step S2, as shown in FIG. 5, a substantially trapezoidal upper and lower end surfaces R1 and a rectangle other than the surface that causes cracks C (cracks) in the specimen (test piece) P cut out in the cutting step S1. Epoxy resin is applied as a weather-resistant sealing material V to each of the left and right side surfaces R2 and the back surface R3 corresponding to the inner peripheral surface of the cylindrical reinforced concrete column K.

<亀裂導入工程>
亀裂導入工程S3において、図1、図2、図6に示すように、円筒状の鉄筋コンクリート柱Kの内周面に相当する供試体(試験片)Pの裏面R3が、架台1側の片側フランジF面に位置するようにして、供試体(試験片)Pを架台1に沿うように設置し、供試体(試験片)Pの両端部分を、挟持部材2の支持当て部材2Aと片側フランジF面により挟み込んで固定する。
<Rhagades introduction process>
In the crack introduction step S3, as shown in FIGS. 1, 2, and 6, the back surface R3 of the specimen (test piece) P corresponding to the inner peripheral surface of the cylindrical reinforced concrete column K is a flange on one side of the gantry 1. The specimen (test piece) P is installed along the gantry 1 so as to be located on the F surface, and both ends of the specimen (test piece) P are placed on the support contact member 2A of the holding member 2 and the flange F on one side. It is sandwiched between the surfaces and fixed.

そして、図7、図8に示すように、供試体(試験片)Pの裏面R3の略中央部分に、押付治具3の押し当てロッド3Dを宛がい、ウエブWにおける開口部3E側から片側フランジFのボルト孔3FにボルトBの軸部B1を捩じ込んでボルトBの軸部B1の先端で押し当て部材3Cを片側フランジF面から離れる方向に移動させて押し当てロッド3Dを供試体(試験片)Pの裏面R3に押し付けるようにして荷重を掛け、円筒状の鉄筋コンクリート柱Kの外周面に相当する供試体(試験片)Pの表面R0の略中央部分に亀裂Cを発生させる。 Then, as shown in FIGS. 7 and 8, the pressing rod 3D of the pressing jig 3 is attached to the substantially central portion of the back surface R3 of the specimen (test piece) P, and one side from the opening 3E side in the web W. The shaft portion B1 of the bolt B is screwed into the bolt hole 3F of the flange F, and the pressing member 3C is moved away from the flange F surface on one side at the tip of the shaft portion B1 of the bolt B to use the pressing rod 3D as a specimen. A load is applied so as to be pressed against the back surface R3 of the (test piece) P to generate a crack C in a substantially central portion of the surface R0 of the specimen (test piece) P corresponding to the outer peripheral surface of the cylindrical reinforced concrete column K.

ここでの曲げ荷重の加え方について、図10を参照して説明する。 The method of applying the bending load here will be described with reference to FIG.

亀裂導入工程S3において、上記切出工程S1及び封止工程S2で得られた供試体(試験片)Pの架台1に固定された両端部分と、手前方向に垂直に荷重を加える供試体(試験片)P中央の裏面R3部分との3点曲げ荷重により、供試体(試験片)Pの表面R0が膨張(表面に沿っての引張り)し且つ裏面R3が圧縮される曲げ応力が付与されて、表面R0部分に亀裂C(ひび割れ)が導入される。 In the crack introduction step S3, both ends of the specimen (test piece) P obtained in the cutting step S1 and the sealing step S2 fixed to the gantry 1 and the specimen (test) to which a load is applied perpendicularly to the front direction. One piece) Due to the three-point bending load with the back surface R3 part in the center of P, the front surface R0 of the specimen (test piece) P expands (pulls along the front surface) and the back surface R3 is compressed. , Crack C (crack) is introduced in the surface R0 portion.

<暴露工程>
暴露工程S4では、鉄筋コンクリート柱Kが現地に設置される外的環境と同一条件下で、亀裂Cの幅の進展度の観察を実施する。この場合、水平置きでは雨の影響が大きくなるため、架台1を実構造物と同様の縦置きとする。
<Exposure process>
In the exposure step S4, the degree of development of the width of the crack C is observed under the same conditions as the external environment in which the reinforced concrete column K is installed at the site. In this case, since the influence of rain is large when the gantry is placed horizontally, the gantry 1 is placed vertically in the same manner as the actual structure.

<解体確認工程>
解体確認工程S5では、上記亀裂導入工程S3により供試体(試験片)Pの表面に亀裂Cを発生させた後の、供試体(試験片)Pの内部の鉄筋Qの経時的な腐食度を測定する。このように、暴露工程S4後の解体による鉄筋腐食の評価を行うことで、実構造物の鉄筋コンクリート柱Kに亀裂Cが生じた後の鉄筋Qおよびコンクリート材の劣化状態や劣化速度の想定値を得ることができる。
<Disassembly confirmation process>
In the dismantling confirmation step S5, the degree of corrosion of the reinforcing bar Q inside the specimen (test piece) P with time after the crack C is generated on the surface of the specimen (test piece) P by the crack introduction step S3 is determined. taking measurement. In this way, by evaluating the corrosion of the reinforcing bars due to the dismantling after the exposure step S4, the estimated values of the deterioration state and the deterioration rate of the reinforcing bars Q and the concrete material after the cracks C are generated in the reinforced concrete columns K of the actual structure can be obtained. Obtainable.

<亀裂幅の検証>
ここで、試験条件を一定とするため高さ方向の亀裂の発生位置を供試体(試験片)P毎に揃える必要がある。図11(a)に示すように、3点曲げは荷重負荷位置の反対面の試験体の厚さの範囲内にひびが発生した。
<Verification of crack width>
Here, in order to keep the test conditions constant, it is necessary to align the crack generation positions in the height direction for each specimen (test piece) P. As shown in FIG. 11A, the three-point bending caused cracks within the thickness range of the test piece on the opposite surface of the load-bearing position.

また、図11(b)に示すように、4点曲げは荷重負荷位置の反対面の2か所の荷重負荷幅から更に試験体の厚さ分外れた広い範囲でひびが発生した。 Further, as shown in FIG. 11B, the four-point bending caused cracks in a wide range further deviated from the load load width at two locations on the opposite surface of the load load position by the thickness of the test piece.

更に、図11(c)に示すように、3点曲げで端部を荷重負荷位置とした片持ち3点曲げの場合は、支点となる中央の固定位置から端部の荷重負荷位置の広い範囲でひびが発生した。 Further, as shown in FIG. 11 (c), in the case of cantilever three-point bending in which the end is the load-bearing position by three-point bending, a wide range from the central fixed position serving as the fulcrum to the load-load position at the end. Cracked.

これにより、供試体(試験片)の表面に発生する荷重負荷による亀裂幅をミクロン単位で精度よく制御可能にするには、3点曲げによる方式が有効であることが判明した。 From this, it was found that the three-point bending method is effective in making it possible to accurately control the crack width due to the load generated on the surface of the specimen (test piece) in micron units.

<荷重負荷の方法>
上記したように、本実施形態における荷重負荷の方法は、ボルトBの回転による変位(ピッチ)を利用する方式としている。即ち、亀裂幅を0.01mm単位で制御するためには、ストロークを0.1mm単位で制御する必要があることが判明してボルト方式としている。
<Load-loading method>
As described above, the method of loading the load in the present embodiment is a method using the displacement (pitch) due to the rotation of the bolt B. That is, in order to control the crack width in units of 0.01 mm, it was found that it was necessary to control the stroke in units of 0.1 mm, and the bolt method was adopted.

また、ボルトBおよび押付治具3の材質はクロム(Cr)含有量が17%以上のステンレスとする。アルカリ性のコンクリートには接しているものの、試験の結果、クロム(Cr)含有量が17%未満の鋼材は屋外環境での長期使用で発錆が著しく、ボルトBが固着し試験途中での亀裂幅の調整が不可能である。 The material of the bolt B and the pressing jig 3 is stainless steel having a chromium (Cr) content of 17% or more. Although it is in contact with alkaline concrete, as a result of the test, steel materials with a chromium (Cr) content of less than 17% are significantly rusted after long-term use in an outdoor environment, and bolt B sticks to the crack width during the test. Cannot be adjusted.

<押付治具の態様>
図12(a)に示すように、押付治具3が面状に接する場合、押付治具3の試験体長手方向幅LAは、試験体厚みの10%以上〜60%以下であることが必要である。10%以下で押付部のコンクリート表面で割れが発生し、60%を超えると亀裂の発生位置のバラツキが試験体厚みを超える。
<Aspect of pressing jig>
As shown in FIG. 12A, when the pressing jig 3 is in contact with the surface, the width LA of the pressing jig 3 in the longitudinal direction of the specimen needs to be 10% or more and 60% or less of the thickness of the specimen. Is. If it is 10% or less, cracks occur on the concrete surface of the pressed portion, and if it exceeds 60%, the variation of the crack generation position exceeds the thickness of the specimen.

図12(b)に示すように、押付治具3が円柱で線状に接する場合、円柱の直径は5mm以上を要する。5mm未満で押付部のコンクリート表面で割れが発生する。 As shown in FIG. 12B, when the pressing jig 3 is linearly contacted by a cylinder, the diameter of the cylinder needs to be 5 mm or more. If it is less than 5 mm, cracks will occur on the concrete surface of the pressing part.

図13に示すように、押付治具3が面状あるいは線状に接する場合、押付治具3の試験体幅方向幅WAは試験体幅WBに比較して試験体厚さの40%以上狭くならない。即ち、試験体幅方向幅WAが試験体幅WBに比較して試験体厚さの40%以上狭くなると押付治具3の端部のコンクリート表面で割れ発生する。 As shown in FIG. 13, when the pressing jig 3 is in contact with each other in a planar or linear shape, the width WA of the pressing jig 3 in the width direction of the test body is 40% or more narrower than the width WB of the test body. It doesn't become. That is, when the width WA in the width direction of the test body is narrower than the width WB of the test body by 40% or more of the thickness of the test body, cracks occur on the concrete surface at the end of the pressing jig 3.

<治具形状の比較>
図14(a)に示すように、押付治具3がボルトB面あるいは面状に接する場合、押付治具3の試験体幅方向幅WAは試験体幅WBに比較して試験体厚さの40%%以上狭くならない。
<Comparison of jig shapes>
As shown in FIG. 14A, when the pressing jig 3 is in contact with the bolt B surface or in a planar shape, the width WA of the pressing jig 3 in the width direction of the test body has a thickness of the test body as compared with the width WB of the test body. It does not become narrower than 40%%.

図14(b)に示すように、試験体幅方向幅WAが試験体幅WBに比較して試験体厚さの40%以上狭くなると押付治具3の端部や押付面のコンクリート表面で割れが発生する。 As shown in FIG. 14 (b), when the width WA in the width direction of the test body becomes 40% or more narrower than the thickness of the test body as compared with the width WB of the test body, the end portion of the pressing jig 3 and the concrete surface of the pressing surface crack. Occurs.

その他、一々例示はしないが、本発明は、その趣旨を逸脱しない範囲内において、種々の変更が加えられて実施されるものである。 In addition, although not illustrated one by one, the present invention is carried out with various modifications within a range not deviating from the gist thereof.

本発明は、鉄筋コンクリート柱Kの亀裂C(ひび割れ)の幅と鉄筋Qの腐食度との相関関係を解明することのできる手法として、種々の作業現場において、幅広く利用されるものである。 The present invention is widely used in various work sites as a method capable of clarifying the correlation between the width of the crack C (crack) of the reinforced concrete column K and the degree of corrosion of the reinforcing bar Q.

S1…切出工程
S2…封止工程
S3…亀裂導入工程
S4…暴露工程
S5…解体確認工程
K…鉄筋コンクリート柱
W…ウエブ
F…フランジ
P…供試体(コンクリート片)
R0…表面
R1…上下端面
R2…左右側面
R3…裏面
Q…鉄筋
C…亀裂(ひび割れ)
V…封止材
B…ボルト
B1…軸部
N…ナット
H…孔
1…架台
2…挟持部材
2A…支持当て部材
3…押付治具
3A…ガイド片
3B…ガイド溝
3C…押し当て部材
3D…押し当てロッド
3E…開口部
3F…ボルト孔
S1 ... Cutting process S2 ... Sealing process S3 ... Crack introduction process S4 ... Exposure process S5 ... Disassembly confirmation process K ... Reinforced concrete column W ... Web F ... Flange P ... Specimen (concrete piece)
R0 ... front surface R1 ... upper and lower end surfaces R2 ... left and right side surfaces R3 ... back surface Q ... reinforcing bars C ... cracks (cracks)
V ... Encapsulant B ... Bolt B1 ... Shaft N ... Nut H ... Hole 1 ... Stand 2 ... Holding member 2A ... Supporting member 3 ... Pushing jig 3A ... Guide piece 3B ... Guide groove 3C ... Pushing member 3D ... Pushing rod 3E ... Opening 3F ... Bolt hole

Claims (7)

少なくとも1本の鉄筋を含むコンクリート片を供試体(試験片)として、その両端位置を固定した状態で設置する架台を用いたコンクリート柱の亀裂に伴う鉄筋腐食の評価試験装置であり、この架台は、供試体(試験片)の裏面における中央の1点箇所を押圧する押付治具を備え、供試体(試験片)の表面に発生する亀裂幅を制御するように構成され、
前記架台の押付治具は、片側フランジ面の幅方向に設けた一対のガイド片と、一対のガイド片に沿って、片側フランジ面から離れる方向に移動可能な押し当て部材を備え、片側フランジ面にネジ孔を設け、ボルトの軸部をこのネジ孔に捩じ込んで軸部の先端を押し当て部材に当接させて、押し当て部材を片側フランジ面から離れる方向に移動させるものであり、
前記押付治具は、架台側から供試体(試験片)の裏面に向けてねじ込まれたボルトの回転ピッチにより、供試体(試験片)の表面に発生する亀裂幅を制御した状態で保持されることを特徴とする、コンクリート柱の亀裂に伴う鉄筋腐食の評価試験装置。
This is an evaluation test device for reinforcing bar corrosion caused by cracks in concrete columns using a concrete piece containing at least one reinforcing bar as a specimen (test piece) and installed with the positions of both ends fixed. , Equipped with a pressing jig that presses one central point on the back surface of the specimen (test piece), and is configured to control the crack width generated on the surface of the specimen (test piece).
The gantry pressing jig includes a pair of guide pieces provided in the width direction of one side flange surface and a pressing member that can move along the pair of guide pieces in a direction away from one side flange surface, and has one side flange surface. A screw hole is provided in the bolt, and the shaft portion of the bolt is screwed into the screw hole to bring the tip of the shaft portion into contact with the pressing member, and the pressing member is moved in a direction away from the flange surface on one side.
The pressing jig is held in a state where the crack width generated on the surface of the specimen (test piece) is controlled by the rotation pitch of the bolt screwed from the gantry side toward the back surface of the specimen (test piece). An evaluation test device for reinforcing bar corrosion associated with cracks in concrete columns.
前記供試体(試験片)の裏面が、架台側に位置するようにして、供試体(試験片)を架台に沿うように配置した請求項1に記載のコンクリート柱の亀裂に伴う鉄筋腐食の評価試験装置。 Evaluation of Reinforcing Bar Corrosion Accompanying Cracks in Concrete Columns According to Claim 1, wherein the back surface of the specimen (test piece) is located on the gantry side, and the specimen (test piece) is arranged along the gantry. Test equipment. 架台は、中央ウエブの両端にフランジを備えているH型鋼により構成され、片側フランジ面の長さ方向における両端部に、供試体(試験片)の両端部を挟み込むようにして固定する挟持部材を配置し、片側フランジ面の略中央部に、供試体(試験片)の裏面を押圧して表面に亀裂を発生させる押付治具を配置している請求項1に記載のコンクリート柱の亀裂に伴う鉄筋腐食の評価試験装置。 The gantry is made of H-shaped steel having flanges at both ends of the central web, and a holding member that fixes both ends of the specimen (test piece) by sandwiching them at both ends in the length direction of the flange surface on one side is attached. Accompanied by a crack in the concrete column according to claim 1, wherein a pressing jig is arranged so as to press the back surface of the specimen (test piece) to generate a crack on the front surface at a substantially central portion of the flange surface on one side. Reinforcing bar corrosion evaluation test equipment. 架台の挟持部材は、供試体(試験片)の端部を片側フランジ面と板状の支持当て部材により挟み込み、片側フランジ面と支持当て部材がそれぞれ備えている一対の孔にボルトの軸部を貫通させ、片側フランジ面から突出している軸部にナットを宛がって締め付けるものである請求項3に記載のコンクリート柱の亀裂に伴う鉄筋腐食の評価試験装置。 The holding member of the gantry sandwiches the end of the specimen (test piece) between the flange surface on one side and the plate-shaped support pad member, and the shaft portion of the bolt is placed in the pair of holes provided by the flange surface on one side and the support pad member. The evaluation test device for reinforcing bar corrosion associated with cracks in a concrete column according to claim 3, wherein a nut is applied to a shaft portion that is penetrated and protrudes from a flange surface on one side and is tightened. 押付治具は、供試体(試験片)に対し面状に接する矩形の治具であり、該治具の供試体(試験片)長手方向に沿った縦幅LAは供試体(試験片)厚みの10%以上で60%以下である請求項1又は2に記載のコンクリート柱の亀裂に伴う鉄筋腐食の評価試験装置。 The pressing jig is a rectangular jig that is in surface contact with the specimen (test piece), and the vertical width LA along the longitudinal direction of the specimen (test piece) of the jig is the thickness of the specimen (test piece). The evaluation test apparatus for reinforcing bar corrosion associated with cracks in concrete columns according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the ratio is 10% or more and 60% or less. 押付治具は、供試体(試験片)に対し線状に接する円柱形の治具であり、該円柱形の治具の直径は少なくとも5mmを有する請求項1又は2に記載のコンクリート柱の亀裂に伴う鉄筋腐食の評価試験装置。 The crack in the concrete column according to claim 1 or 2 , wherein the pressing jig is a cylindrical jig that linearly contacts the specimen (test piece), and the diameter of the cylindrical jig is at least 5 mm. Evaluation test equipment for reinforcing bar corrosion associated with. 押付治具は、供試体(試験片)に対し面状に接する矩形の治具あるいは線状に接する円柱形の治具であり、該治具の供試体(試験片)幅方向に沿った横幅WAは供試体(試験片)の幅WBに比較して供試体(試験片)厚みの40%以上狭くならないものとした請求項1又は2に記載のコンクリート柱の亀裂に伴う鉄筋腐食の評価試験装置。 The pressing jig is a rectangular jig that contacts the specimen (test piece) in a planar shape or a cylindrical jig that contacts the specimen (test piece) in a linear shape, and has a width along the width direction of the specimen (test piece) of the jig. The evaluation test for reinforcing bar corrosion associated with cracks in a concrete column according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the WA is not narrowed by 40% or more of the thickness of the specimen (test piece) as compared with the width WB of the specimen (test piece). Device.
JP2017101385A 2017-05-23 2017-05-23 Evaluation test equipment and evaluation test method for reinforcing bar corrosion associated with cracks in concrete columns Active JP6924367B2 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2017101385A JP6924367B2 (en) 2017-05-23 2017-05-23 Evaluation test equipment and evaluation test method for reinforcing bar corrosion associated with cracks in concrete columns
JP2021125239A JP7195510B2 (en) 2017-05-23 2021-07-30 Evaluation test method for rebar corrosion associated with cracks in concrete columns

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2017101385A JP6924367B2 (en) 2017-05-23 2017-05-23 Evaluation test equipment and evaluation test method for reinforcing bar corrosion associated with cracks in concrete columns

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2021125239A Division JP7195510B2 (en) 2017-05-23 2021-07-30 Evaluation test method for rebar corrosion associated with cracks in concrete columns

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2018197656A JP2018197656A (en) 2018-12-13
JP6924367B2 true JP6924367B2 (en) 2021-08-25

Family

ID=64663247

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2017101385A Active JP6924367B2 (en) 2017-05-23 2017-05-23 Evaluation test equipment and evaluation test method for reinforcing bar corrosion associated with cracks in concrete columns
JP2021125239A Active JP7195510B2 (en) 2017-05-23 2021-07-30 Evaluation test method for rebar corrosion associated with cracks in concrete columns

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2021125239A Active JP7195510B2 (en) 2017-05-23 2021-07-30 Evaluation test method for rebar corrosion associated with cracks in concrete columns

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (2) JP6924367B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110044688B (en) * 2019-04-23 2024-04-09 浙江工业大学 A multifunctional fixture for concrete splitting tensile strength test
CN110361254B (en) * 2019-08-27 2022-02-18 内蒙古工业大学 Corrosion environment repeated load coupling device
CN111413179B (en) * 2020-05-26 2024-07-30 深圳大学 Concrete crack control device and control system thereof
CN112903497B (en) * 2021-01-15 2021-10-22 清华大学 Steel constant-load stress corrosion test device and method under periodic infiltration condition
CN113466115B (en) * 2021-06-18 2022-07-19 燕山大学 A steel corrosion monitoring device with temperature self-compensation
CN114755170B (en) * 2022-04-14 2025-06-27 燕山大学 Device and method for testing the ion corrosion resistance of cracked concrete
CN114509382B (en) * 2022-04-19 2022-06-14 交通运输部公路科学研究所 Reinforced concrete beam testing device and testing method
CN115479836A (en) * 2022-09-13 2022-12-16 中国第一汽车股份有限公司 A salt spray corrosion test evaluation method, system, equipment and storage medium
JPWO2024257174A1 (en) * 2023-06-12 2024-12-19
WO2024257171A1 (en) * 2023-06-12 2024-12-19 日本電信電話株式会社 Method for manufacturing concrete specimen
CN116773663B (en) * 2023-08-25 2023-11-03 山东省路桥集团有限公司 Ultrasonic technology crack detection system for concrete
CN117309742B (en) * 2023-12-01 2024-02-02 内蒙古工业大学 Multisource corrosion acceleration simulation device for reinforced concrete member
WO2025158544A1 (en) * 2024-01-23 2025-07-31 Ntt株式会社 Device
CN118258748B (en) * 2024-03-27 2024-10-18 青岛理工大学 Device and method for applying prestress and testing local corrosion of reinforced concrete test piece

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS6051451U (en) * 1983-09-17 1985-04-11 三菱重工業株式会社 Three-point bending test jig
JPS61279657A (en) * 1985-06-03 1986-12-10 Nippon Steel Corp Salt resistant iron reinforcing rod for preventing deterioration of concrete
US6918306B1 (en) * 2003-09-08 2005-07-19 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Adjustable flexure loading apparatus for testing long span beams
JP4763313B2 (en) * 2005-02-24 2011-08-31 倉敷紡績株式会社 Corrosion prevention method for reinforced concrete structures
JP6092575B2 (en) * 2012-11-02 2017-03-08 日本電信電話株式会社 Reinforced concrete specimen preparation method
JP2015010978A (en) * 2013-07-01 2015-01-19 日本電信電話株式会社 Method for preparing sample
JP6224542B2 (en) 2014-07-29 2017-11-01 日本電信電話株式会社 Crack detection method for reinforced concrete and crack detection system for reinforced concrete structure
JP2016038243A (en) 2014-08-06 2016-03-22 日本電信電話株式会社 Reinforced concrete specimen preparation method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2021170038A (en) 2021-10-28
JP2018197656A (en) 2018-12-13
JP7195510B2 (en) 2022-12-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP6924367B2 (en) Evaluation test equipment and evaluation test method for reinforcing bar corrosion associated with cracks in concrete columns
Makinde et al. Development of an apparatus for biaxial testing using cruciform specimens
Borri et al. A method for flexural reinforcement of old wood beams with CFRP materials
US9726657B2 (en) Pullout apparatus and system for testing of anchor bolts/bars
US20230288591A1 (en) Experimental system for out-of-plane seismic performance of masonry block wall, and experimental method using same
JP2018080923A (en) Biaxial compression and tension testing jig and biaxial compression and tension testing method
CN105445101A (en) Experiment clamp capable of being adjusted and aligned and used for determining tensile strength of rocks with splitting method and method for determining tensile strength of rocks
JP2008241530A (en) Stress test jig and stress test method
JP6092575B2 (en) Reinforced concrete specimen preparation method
Hasham et al. Section capacity of thin-walled I-section beam-columns
JP4677588B2 (en) Pre-crack introduction method and apparatus
CN103411831A (en) Intelligent detector for detecting compressive strength of concrete, and detection method thereof
KR20170079025A (en) model prestress structures test apparatus
KR101788618B1 (en) model prestress structures test methods
KR20200062755A (en) the jig for compression test
Barnat et al. Experimental analysis of lateral torsional buckling of beams with selected cross-section types
Popov et al. Capacity of columns with splice imperfections
Dessouki et al. Investigation of in-plane moment connections of I-beams to square concrete-filled steel tube columns under gravity loads
CN213749319U (en) Assembled loading device capable of fixing end and adjusting eccentricity
CN111238964B (en) Metal-cement-based material interface mechanical properties testing device
Feber et al. Austenitic Stainless Steel I‐section Beam‐column Tests and Numerical Modelling
Salem et al. Experimental testing of wood-steel-wood moment-resisting bolted connections
CN107894362B (en) Longitudinal and rotational rigidity self-restraint and self-balance test device and test method
JPH0231816B2 (en) ITAMENSENDANTOKUSEINOSOKUTEIHO
JP6571345B2 (en) Prestressing method for concrete structures

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20200312

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20210120

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20210202

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20210228

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20210701

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20210714

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 6924367

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150