Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP6947059B2 - Shape design method for molten metal pot - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP6947059B2 - Shape design method for molten metal pot - Google Patents

Shape design method for molten metal pot Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP6947059B2
JP6947059B2 JP2018015816A JP2018015816A JP6947059B2 JP 6947059 B2 JP6947059 B2 JP 6947059B2 JP 2018015816 A JP2018015816 A JP 2018015816A JP 2018015816 A JP2018015816 A JP 2018015816A JP 6947059 B2 JP6947059 B2 JP 6947059B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
pot
young
modulus
stress
molten metal
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2018015816A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2019130570A (en
Inventor
公基 福村
公基 福村
野口 泰隆
泰隆 野口
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Nippon Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nippon Steel Corp filed Critical Nippon Steel Corp
Priority to JP2018015816A priority Critical patent/JP6947059B2/en
Publication of JP2019130570A publication Critical patent/JP2019130570A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP6947059B2 publication Critical patent/JP6947059B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Casting Support Devices, Ladles, And Melt Control Thereby (AREA)
  • Treatment Of Steel In Its Molten State (AREA)

Description

本発明は、溶融金属用鍋の形状設計方法に関する。 The present invention relates to a method for designing the shape of a pan for molten metal.

転炉やトーピードカーからの溶銑、溶鋼を受ける溶銑鍋等の、高温の溶融金属を保持する溶融金属用鍋において、鍋の形状を変更して鍋の容積を拡大することは、製鉄プロセスの製造コストを削減するための有効な手段である。近年、溶融金属用鍋の容積を拡大するため、従来一般的に用いられている平面形状が円形の円形鍋から平面形状が楕円形の楕円鍋へと変更され、さらには平面形状が略矩形の矩形鍋への変更も提案されている(例えば、特許文献1〜3)。 In hot metal pots that hold hot molten metal, such as hot metal from converters and torpedo cars, and hot metal pots that receive molten steel, changing the shape of the pot to increase the volume of the pot is the manufacturing cost of the ironmaking process. It is an effective means to reduce. In recent years, in order to expand the volume of the molten metal pot, the plane shape that has been generally used has been changed from a circular pot with a circular shape to an elliptical pot with an elliptical shape, and the plane shape is substantially rectangular. A change to a rectangular pan has also been proposed (for example, Patent Documents 1 to 3).

特開2016−59940号公報Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2016-59940 特開2000−256728号公報Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2000-256728 特許第4506587号公報Japanese Patent No. 4506587

Specifications For Design And Use Of Ladles, AISE Technical Report No.9,1991Specifications For Design And Use Of Ladles, AISE Technical Report No.9,1991

溶融金属用鍋の形状設計における鉄皮の強度検討は、一般に、有限要素法による数値解析プログラムを用いて行われる。この際、溶融金属用鍋は、鉄皮の内面に耐火物を内張りして構成されているため、実際の操業においては、鍋内部に保持する溶融金属の熱を受けて耐火物が膨張して鉄皮に力が加わり、鍋鉄皮に応力及び変形が生じる。溶融金属用鍋の形状設計では、このように鍋に発生する応力及び変形量の推定結果に基づき、生産性や設備寿命の観点から最適な形状を模索し、最終的な鍋形状を決定する。 The strength of the iron skin in the shape design of the molten metal pot is generally examined by using a numerical analysis program by the finite element method. At this time, since the molten metal pot is configured by lining the inner surface of the iron skin with a refractory material, in actual operation, the refractory material expands due to the heat of the molten metal held inside the pot. A force is applied to the iron skin, causing stress and deformation in the pot iron skin. In the shape design of the molten metal pot, based on the estimation results of the stress and deformation amount generated in the pot in this way, the optimum shape is searched from the viewpoint of productivity and equipment life, and the final pot shape is determined.

しかし、従来の溶融金属用鍋の形状計算では、水分含有率や組成により変化する耐火物の物性については十分に考慮されておらず、鍋鉄皮に発生する応力及び変形量の推定精度は必ずしも高いものではなかった。また、通常用いられる円形鍋または楕円鍋については、非特許文献1に標準とする強度設計が規定されているが、矩形鍋といった比較的最近利用され始めた鍋についてはこのような強度設計の指針が存在しない。上記特許文献1〜3にも、溶融金属用鍋の形状設計方法については特に限定されていない。 However, in the conventional shape calculation of the molten metal pot, the physical properties of the refractory that change depending on the water content and composition are not sufficiently considered, and the estimation accuracy of the stress and the amount of deformation generated in the pot iron skin is not always accurate. It wasn't expensive. In addition, for circular pots or elliptical pots that are usually used, the standard strength design is specified in Non-Patent Document 1, but for pots that have begun to be used relatively recently, such as rectangular pots, such strength design guidelines. Does not exist. Also in Patent Documents 1 to 3 above, the shape design method of the molten metal pot is not particularly limited.

したがって、新たな形状の鍋を設計する場合には、最適な形状を決定するための明確な指針がなく、また、耐火物の物性値の変動もあるため、円形鍋あるいは楕円鍋の形状設計を行う場合と比較して、さらに鍋に発生する応力及び変形量の推定精度が低下することが懸念される。このため、生産性や設備寿命の観点から最適な形状の溶融金属用鍋を決定するための手法が望まれていた。 Therefore, when designing a new shape pot, there is no clear guideline for determining the optimum shape, and there are fluctuations in the physical characteristics of refractories. There is a concern that the estimation accuracy of the stress and the amount of deformation generated in the pot will be further reduced as compared with the case where it is performed. Therefore, a method for determining a pan for molten metal having an optimum shape from the viewpoint of productivity and equipment life has been desired.

そこで、本発明は、上記問題に鑑みてなされたものであり、本発明の目的とするところは、溶融金属用鍋に発生する応力を高精度に推定し、最適な鍋形状を決定することが可能な、新規かつ改良された溶融金属用鍋の形状設計方法を提供することにある。 Therefore, the present invention has been made in view of the above problems, and an object of the present invention is to estimate the stress generated in the molten metal pan with high accuracy and determine the optimum pan shape. It is an object of the present invention to provide a new and improved method for designing a shape of a molten metal pan.

上記課題を解決するために、本発明のある観点によれば、鉄皮の内面に耐火物を施工して構成され、溶融金属を保持する溶融金属用鍋の形状設計方法であって、稼働中の溶融金属用鍋である既設鍋について、過去の操業条件に基づき設定された耐火物のヤング率を用いて第1の応力計算を行い、既設鍋に発生する応力である計算応力値を取得する計算工程と、既設鍋に発生する応力を測定し、実測応力値を取得する測定工程と、実測応力値と計算応力値との差が許容範囲となるように、第1の応力計算で用いたヤング率を補正する補正工程と、補正されたヤング率を用いて、設計対象の溶融金属用鍋である対象鍋に発生する応力を第2の応力計算により算出し、対象鍋の最適形状を求める設計工程と、を含む、溶融金属用鍋の形状設計方法が提供される。
In order to solve the above problems, according to a certain viewpoint of the present invention, a method for designing the shape of a molten metal pot, which is constructed by constructing a fireproof material on the inner surface of an iron skin and holds molten metal, is in operation. For the existing pot, which is a pot for molten metal, the first stress calculation is performed using the Young's ratio of the refractory material set based on the past operating conditions, and the calculated stress value, which is the stress generated in the existing pot, is obtained. It was used in the first stress calculation so that the difference between the calculation step, the measurement step of measuring the stress generated in the existing pot and obtaining the measured stress value, and the measured stress value and the calculated stress value is within the allowable range. Using the correction step for correcting the Young rate and the corrected Young rate, the stress generated in the target pot, which is the hot metal pot to be designed, is calculated by the second stress calculation, and the optimum shape of the target pot is obtained. A design process and a method for designing the shape of a molten metal pot, including the design process, are provided.

ヤング率は、稼働前に溶融金属用鍋を乾燥させる乾燥工程における第1のヤング率と、乾燥工程後、溶融金属用鍋を予熱する予熱工程における第2のヤング率と、予熱工程後、溶融金属の保持と排出とを繰り返し行う稼働工程における第3のヤング率と、を含み、補正工程では、第1の応力計算で用いた第1のヤング率、第2のヤング率及び第3のヤング率をそれぞれ補正し、設計工程では、補正された第1のヤング率、補正された第2のヤング率及び補正された第3のヤング率を用いて第2の応力計算を実行してもよい。
Young's modulus is the first Young's modulus in the drying step of drying the molten metal pot before operation, the second Young's modulus in the preheating step of preheating the molten metal pot after the drying step, and melting after the preheating step. In the correction step, the first Young's modulus, the second Young's modulus and the third Young's modulus used in the first stress calculation include the third Young's modulus in the operation process in which the holding and discharging of the metal are repeated. Each rate may be corrected and a second stress calculation may be performed in the design process using the corrected first Young's modulus, the corrected second Young's modulus and the corrected third Young's modulus. ..

計工程では、第2の応力計算により算出された応力と補正されたヤング率とに基づき、対象鍋の変形量をさらに算出してもよい。
The design process, based on the stress calculated by the second stress calculation and corrected Young's modulus may further calculate the amount of deformation of the subject pot.

既設鍋と対象鍋とは、鍋内部に施工される耐火物の種類及び厚みが略同一であることが望ましい。 It is desirable that the existing pot and the target pot have substantially the same type and thickness of the refractory to be installed inside the pot.

対象鍋は、溶融金属を収容する収容部を平面視した平面形状が略矩形である矩形鍋をはじめ、その他形状であってもよい。 The target pot may have a rectangular pot having a substantially rectangular shape in a plan view of the accommodating portion for accommodating the molten metal , or any other shape.

以上説明したように本発明によれば、溶融金属用鍋に発生する応力を高精度に推定し、最適な鍋形状を決定することができる。 As described above, according to the present invention, it is possible to estimate the stress generated in the molten metal pan with high accuracy and determine the optimum pan shape.

本発明の一実施形態に係る溶融金属用鍋の形状設計方法を示すフローチャートである。It is a flowchart which shows the shape design method of the molten metal pot which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. 楕円鍋の形状を示す平面図及び側面視図である。It is a top view and a side view which show the shape of an elliptical pot. 矩形鍋の形状を示す平面図及び側面視図である。It is a top view and a side view which show the shape of a rectangular pot. 既設鍋について、実測応力値と、耐火物のヤング率補正前の計算応力値及び耐火物のヤング率補正後の計算応力値との一関係例を示すグラフである。It is a graph which shows one relation example of the measured stress value, the calculated stress value before Young's modulus correction of a refractory, and the calculated stress value after Young's modulus correction of a refractory about an existing pot. 半径方向変位と操業サイクル数との一関係例を示すグラフである。It is a graph which shows one relation example of the radial displacement and the number of operation cycles. 比較例における対象鍋の計算応力値と実測応力値とを示すグラフである。It is a graph which shows the calculated stress value and the measured stress value of the target pot in the comparative example. 実施例における対象鍋の計算応力値と実測応力値とを示すグラフである。It is a graph which shows the calculated stress value and the measured stress value of the target pot in an Example.

以下に添付図面を参照しながら、本発明の好適な実施の形態について詳細に説明する。なお、本明細書及び図面において、実質的に同一の機能構成を有する構成要素については、同一の符号を付することにより重複説明を省略する。 Hereinafter, preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. In the present specification and the drawings, components having substantially the same functional configuration are designated by the same reference numerals, so that duplicate description will be omitted.

<1.概要>
本発明の一実施形態に係る溶融金属用鍋の形状設計方法は、設計対象の溶融金属用鍋について生産性や設備寿命の観点から最適な形状を決定するための手法である。かかる方法では、まず、稼働中の既設鍋について、既設鍋に発生する応力(実測応力値)を測定するとともに、当該既設鍋について、過去の操業条件に基づき設定された耐火物のヤング率を用いて応力計算を行い既設鍋に発生する応力(計算応力値)を算出し、実測応力値と計算応力値との差が許容範囲となるように、ヤング率を補正する。そして、補正されたヤング率を用いて、設計対象である対象鍋に発生する応力を応力計算により算出し、対象鍋の最適形状を求める。
<1. Overview>
The method for designing the shape of a molten metal pan according to an embodiment of the present invention is a method for determining the optimum shape of a molten metal pan to be designed from the viewpoint of productivity and equipment life. In this method, first, the stress (measured stress value) generated in the existing pot is measured for the existing pot in operation, and the Young's modulus of the fireproof material set based on the past operating conditions is used for the existing pot. The stress is calculated, the stress generated in the existing pot (calculated stress value) is calculated, and Young's modulus is corrected so that the difference between the measured stress value and the calculated stress value is within the allowable range. Then, using the corrected Young's modulus, the stress generated in the target pot, which is the design target, is calculated by stress calculation, and the optimum shape of the target pot is obtained.

このように、適正な耐火物のヤング率を設定し、応力計算の精度を高めることで、検討している鍋の形状としたときに、鍋の応力集中する箇所の有無、応力から算出される操業1サイクル毎の鍋の塑性変形量から複数サイクル後に鍋に蓄積された塑性変形量の大きさをより正確に求めることができるようになり、現状の手法に比べてより最適な形状の溶融金属用鍋の形状を決定することができる。以下、本実施形態に係る溶融金属用鍋の形状設計方法について詳細に説明する。 In this way, by setting an appropriate Young's modulus of the fireproof material and improving the accuracy of stress calculation, it is calculated from the presence or absence of stress concentration points in the pot and the stress when the shape of the pot under consideration is used. It has become possible to more accurately determine the amount of plastic deformation accumulated in the pot after multiple cycles from the amount of plastic deformation of the pot in each operation cycle, and the molten metal with a more optimal shape compared to the current method. The shape of the pot can be determined. Hereinafter, the shape design method of the molten metal pan according to the present embodiment will be described in detail.

<2.溶融金属用鍋の形状設計方法>
図1に基づいて、本実施形態に係る溶融金属用鍋の形状設計方法について詳細に説明する。図1は、本実施形態に係る溶融金属用鍋の形状設計方法を示すフローチャートである。
<2. Shape design method for molten metal pot>
The shape design method of the molten metal pan according to the present embodiment will be described in detail with reference to FIG. FIG. 1 is a flowchart showing a method for designing the shape of a molten metal pan according to the present embodiment.

本実施形態では、溶融金属用鍋として溶鋼を保持する溶鋼鍋について説明する。また、本実施形態では、図2に示す楕円鍋を既設鍋とし、図3に示す矩形鍋を対象鍋として説明する。楕円鍋10は、図2に示すように、溶鋼を収容する収容部の形状が平面から見て楕円形となっている。楕円鍋10は、鉄皮11の内部に耐火物13を施工して構成されている。楕円鍋10は、軸15を中心として傾動可能に構成されている。矩形鍋20も、図3に示すように、楕円鍋10と同様、鉄皮21の内部に耐火物23が施工され、軸25を中心として傾動可能に構成されるものとする。 In this embodiment, a molten steel pot that holds molten steel as a pot for molten metal will be described. Further, in the present embodiment, the elliptical pot shown in FIG. 2 will be used as an existing pot, and the rectangular pot shown in FIG. 3 will be used as a target pot. As shown in FIG. 2, the elliptical pan 10 has an elliptical shape of the accommodating portion for accommodating molten steel when viewed from a plane. The elliptical pot 10 is constructed by constructing a refractory material 13 inside the iron skin 11. The elliptical pan 10 is configured to be tiltable about the axis 15. As shown in FIG. 3, the rectangular pot 20 also has a refractory material 23 installed inside the iron skin 21 and is configured to be tiltable about the shaft 25, as in the elliptical pot 10.

なお、本発明はかかる例に限定されず、既設鍋は、実測応力値を取得可能な鍋であればその形状は問わない。また、対象鍋についてもその形状は限定されるものでなく、形状設計時に利用するヤング率を得た既設鍋と、少なくとも施工される耐火物の種類及び厚みが略同一であればよい。耐火物の種類及び厚みが近い鍋ほど、設計対象である対象鍋のヤング率を精度よく設定することができる。 The present invention is not limited to such an example, and the shape of the existing pot does not matter as long as the pot can obtain the measured stress value. Further, the shape of the target pot is not limited, and it is sufficient that at least the type and thickness of the refractory to be constructed are substantially the same as the existing pot having the Young's modulus used at the time of shape design. The closer the type and thickness of the refractory to the pot, the more accurately the Young's modulus of the target pot to be designed can be set.

(S100:計算工程)
本実施形態に係る溶融金属用鍋の形状設計方法では、図1に示すように、既設鍋について、鍋に発生する応力を算出する(S100)。応力の計算は、例えば有限要素法(Finite Element Method;FEM)による汎用の数値解析プログラムを用いて行われる。この際、実際の操業条件に基づき、例えば鉄皮及び耐火物のヤング率をはじめ各種物性値と温度境界条件等が設定され、解析が行われる。かかる計算工程により得られた応力は、計算応力値として、後述するヤング率を補正するための情報として用いられる。
(S100: calculation process)
In the method for designing the shape of the molten metal pot according to the present embodiment, as shown in FIG. 1, the stress generated in the pot is calculated for the existing pot (S100). The stress is calculated using, for example, a general-purpose numerical analysis program by the Finite Element Method (FEM) method. At this time, based on the actual operating conditions, for example, various physical property values such as Young's modulus of iron skin and refractory, temperature boundary conditions, and the like are set and analyzed. The stress obtained by such a calculation step is used as a calculated stress value as information for correcting Young's modulus, which will be described later.

(S110:測定工程)
また、既設鍋について、鍋に発生する応力を測定し、実測応力値を取得する(S110)。実測応力値は、例えば、既設鍋の鉄皮表面にひずみゲージを設置し、当該ひずみゲージによって測定される鍋のひずみに基づき得ることができる。応力は、ひずみとヤング率との積により求めることができる。
(S110: Measurement process)
Further, with respect to the existing pot, the stress generated in the pot is measured and the measured stress value is acquired (S110). The measured stress value can be obtained, for example, based on the strain of the pot measured by the strain gauge installed on the iron skin surface of the existing pot. The stress can be determined by the product of the strain and Young's modulus.

ひずみゲージは、当該既設鍋について行った応力計算の結果より、応力が特に大きくなる箇所に設置するのがよい。例えば、本実施形態では、図2に示すように、楕円鍋10の鉄皮11の表面にひずみゲージ31〜34を設置し、周方向及び高さ方向の複数位置で鍋のひずみを測定する。各ひずみゲージ31〜34にて測定されたひずみは、例えばデータロガー等の記憶装置に連続的に記録される。ひずみは、例えば、鍋の稼働前に当該鍋を乾燥させる乾燥工程、乾燥工程後に鍋を予熱する予熱工程、予熱工程後に1操業サイクル毎に受鋼、鋳造、排滓を繰り返す稼働工程において測定される。なお、稼働工程においては、少なくとも初回の操業サイクルが完了するまでのひずみが取得できればよい。 The strain gauge should be installed at a place where the stress is particularly large, based on the result of the stress calculation performed on the existing pot. For example, in the present embodiment, as shown in FIG. 2, strain gauges 31 to 34 are installed on the surface of the iron skin 11 of the elliptical pot 10, and the strain of the pot is measured at a plurality of positions in the circumferential direction and the height direction. The strains measured by the strain gauges 31 to 34 are continuously recorded in a storage device such as a data logger. The strain is measured, for example, in a drying step of drying the pot before the operation of the pot, a preheating step of preheating the pot after the drying step, and an operation process of repeating steel receiving, casting, and scavenging every one operation cycle after the preheating process. NS. In the operation process, it is sufficient that at least the strain until the first operation cycle is completed can be acquired.

ひずみゲージ31〜34により稼働する既設鍋のひずみが測定されると、当該ひずみとヤング率とからひずみゲージ31〜34の設置位置における応力を算出する。算出された応力は実測応力値として、後述する耐火物のヤング率を補正するための情報として用いられる。 When the strain of the existing pot operated by the strain gauges 31 to 34 is measured, the stress at the installation position of the strain gauges 31 to 34 is calculated from the strain and Young's modulus. The calculated stress is used as the measured stress value and as information for correcting the Young's modulus of the refractory, which will be described later.

(S120:補正工程)
既設鍋の計算応力値及び実測応力値が取得されると、これらの値が近付くように、ヤング率を調整する(S120)。ヤング率は、耐火物の水分含有量や温度等に基づき大きく変化することが知られている。また、ヤング率は、応力計算の結果に大きく影響するパラメータであり、ヤング率を適切に設定することで応力計算結果の精度を向上させることができる。
(S120: Correction step)
When the calculated stress value and the measured stress value of the existing pot are acquired, Young's modulus is adjusted so that these values approach each other (S120). It is known that Young's modulus changes greatly based on the water content and temperature of refractories. In addition, Young's modulus is a parameter that greatly affects the result of stress calculation, and the accuracy of the stress calculation result can be improved by appropriately setting Young's modulus.

ヤング率の調整は、まず実測応力値を測定したときの既設鍋の鉄皮温度と、計算応力値を取得する応力計算で設定した鉄皮温度との温度レベルが合致するように、乾燥工程及び予熱工程で鍋内面に与える熱流束を調整し、応力計算において設定する温度条件を決定する。次いで、応力計算においてヤング率を変化させ、得られた計算応力値と実測応力値との差が許容範囲となるように、応力計算で用いるヤング率を決定する。例えば、計算応力値が実測応力値の±10%の範囲内となるように、応力計算で用いるヤング率を決定してもよい。 To adjust Young's modulus, first, the drying process and the drying process and so that the temperature level of the iron skin temperature of the existing pot when the measured stress value is measured and the iron skin temperature set in the stress calculation to obtain the calculated stress value match. The heat flux applied to the inner surface of the pot in the preheating process is adjusted to determine the temperature conditions to be set in the stress calculation. Next, the Young's modulus is changed in the stress calculation, and the Young's modulus used in the stress calculation is determined so that the difference between the obtained calculated stress value and the actually measured stress value is within the allowable range. For example, Young's modulus used in the stress calculation may be determined so that the calculated stress value is within the range of ± 10% of the measured stress value.

ここで、耐火物の水分含有量による物性変化や、煉瓦及び不定形耐火物の熱膨張等は、稼働工程までの鍋の状態により大きく変化する。このため、耐火物のヤング率も、乾燥工程、予熱工程、稼働工程では変化する。そこで、応力計算の精度をさらに高めるため、工程毎にヤング率を補正し設定してもよい。例えば、耐火物の水分含有量の違いから、乾燥工程でのヤング率(第1のヤング率)、予熱工程でのヤング率(第2のヤング率)及び稼働工程でのヤング率(第3のヤング率)を設定してもよい。 Here, changes in physical properties due to the water content of the refractory, thermal expansion of bricks and amorphous refractories, and the like greatly change depending on the state of the pot until the operation process. Therefore, the Young's modulus of the refractory also changes in the drying process, the preheating process, and the operating process. Therefore, in order to further improve the accuracy of stress calculation, Young's modulus may be corrected and set for each process. For example, due to the difference in the water content of the fireproof material, the Young's modulus in the drying process (first Young's modulus), the Young's modulus in the preheating process (second Young's modulus), and the Young's modulus in the operating process (third Young's modulus). Young's modulus) may be set.

図4に、既設鍋について、5つの操業条件におけるステップS110にて取得した実測応力値と、ステップS100にて算出された計算応力値及びS120による耐火物のヤング率補正後の計算応力値との関係を示す。図4上側には耐火物のヤング率補正前の計算応力値を示し、図4下側には耐火物のヤング率補正後の計算応力値を示している。なお、図4のグラフの横軸に示す時間及び縦軸に示す応力は、正規化した値を示している。図4上側に示すように、ヤング率を補正する前は、実測応力値に比べて計算応力値がはるかに大きいものとなった。すなわち、当初の応力計算で設定された操業条件は、鉄皮の応力を高く評価する条件であり、実際の鍋の寿命は、解析の結果得られた鍋の寿命より長いものであったと考えられる。 FIG. 4 shows the actually measured stress values acquired in step S110 under five operating conditions, the calculated stress values calculated in step S100, and the calculated stress values after correcting the Young's modulus of the refractory in S120 for the existing pot. Show the relationship. The upper side of FIG. 4 shows the calculated stress value before the Young's modulus correction of the refractory, and the lower side of FIG. 4 shows the calculated stress value after the Young's modulus correction of the refractory. The time shown on the horizontal axis and the stress shown on the vertical axis of the graph of FIG. 4 show normalized values. As shown on the upper side of FIG. 4, before the Young's modulus was corrected, the calculated stress value was much larger than the measured stress value. That is, it is probable that the operating conditions set in the initial stress calculation were the conditions for highly evaluating the stress of the iron skin, and the actual life of the pot was longer than the life of the pot obtained as a result of the analysis.

そこで、ステップS120にて耐火物のヤング率を、乾燥工程、予熱工程、稼働工程それぞれについて調整し、図4下側に示すように、計算応力値が実績応力値に近づくようにした。計算応力値と実績応力値との差が許容範囲となったとき、乾燥工程の耐火物のヤング率(第1のヤング率)は当初設定していたヤング率よりも5%大きい値となり、予熱工程の耐火物のヤング率(第2のヤング率)は当初設定していたヤング率よりも5〜20%連続的に増加させる値を設定する結果となった。 Therefore, in step S120, the Young's modulus of the refractory was adjusted for each of the drying step, the preheating step, and the operating step so that the calculated stress value approaches the actual stress value as shown in the lower part of FIG. When the difference between the calculated stress value and the actual stress value is within the permissible range, the Young's modulus (first Young's modulus) of the refractory in the drying process becomes a value 5% larger than the initially set Young's modulus, and preheating. The Young's modulus of the refractory in the process (second Young's modulus) was set to a value continuously increased by 5 to 20% from the initially set Young's modulus.

このように、ステップS120では、計算応力値が実績応力値に近づくように耐火物のヤング率を変化させ、応力計算に際して設定する耐火物のヤング率を、計算応力値と実績応力値との差が許容範囲となったときの値に補正する。 As described above, in step S120, the Young's modulus of the refractory material is changed so that the calculated stress value approaches the actual stress value, and the Young's modulus of the refractory material set at the time of stress calculation is the difference between the calculated stress value and the actual stress value. Is corrected to the value when is within the allowable range.

(S130:設計工程)
その後、ステップS120で得られた耐火物のヤング率に基づき、設計対象である対象鍋に発生する応力を算出し、対象鍋の形状を決定する(S130)。ステップS130では、まず、容積増加や既存設備との取り合い等を考慮して鍋の形状を仮設定し、過去の操業条件に基づき、当該鍋に発生する応力を応力計算により算出する。算出された応力より、対象鍋に応力が集中して発生している箇所が存在するか否かが判定され、所定値を超える応力が発生する箇所が存在すれば、このときの鍋の形状は不採用とする。そして、応力の集中が緩和されるように新たな鍋の形状を設定し、再度応力計算を実行する。
(S130: Design process)
Then, based on the Young's modulus of the refractory obtained in step S120, the stress generated in the target pot to be designed is calculated, and the shape of the target pot is determined (S130). In step S130, first, the shape of the pot is tentatively set in consideration of the increase in volume, the connection with the existing equipment, and the like, and the stress generated in the pot is calculated by stress calculation based on the past operating conditions. From the calculated stress, it is determined whether or not there is a place where stress is concentrated in the target pot, and if there is a place where stress exceeding a predetermined value is generated, the shape of the pot at this time is Not adopted. Then, a new pot shape is set so that the stress concentration is relaxed, and the stress calculation is executed again.

また、応力計算により算出された応力と補正されたヤング率とに基づき、鍋に発生する変形量を算出し、鍋を継続して使用することにより蓄積される変形量を求め、蓄積される変形量からその寿命を算出する。具体的には、例えば鍋の中腹部における半径方向変位を変形量として考える。そして、まず、稼働工程の1操業サイクル目から8操業サイクル目までの鋳造完了後における鍋の中腹部の半径方向変位を、応力計算により算出された応力とヤング率とから算出する。次いで、各操業サイクルにおける半径方向変位の増加量を求め、当該半径方向変位の増加量と操業サイクル数との関係を表す近似式を得る。そして、かかる近似式を用いて、所定時間経過後の半径方向変位の累積値を求める。 Further, based on the stress calculated by the stress calculation and the corrected Young's modulus, the amount of deformation generated in the pot is calculated, the amount of deformation accumulated by continuously using the pot is obtained, and the accumulated deformation is obtained. Calculate its life from the quantity. Specifically, for example, the radial displacement in the middle abdomen of the pot is considered as the amount of deformation. Then, first, the radial displacement of the middle abdomen of the pot after the completion of casting from the first operation cycle to the eighth operation cycle of the operation process is calculated from the stress calculated by the stress calculation and Young's modulus. Next, the amount of increase in radial displacement in each operation cycle is obtained, and an approximate expression representing the relationship between the amount of increase in radial displacement and the number of operation cycles is obtained. Then, using such an approximate expression, the cumulative value of the radial displacement after a lapse of a predetermined time is obtained.

図5に、半径方向変位と操業サイクル数との一関係例を示す。図5では、既設鍋として図2に示した楕円鍋と、対象鍋として図3に示した矩形鍋とについて、算出した結果を示す。なお、図5のグラフの縦軸に示す半径方向変位は、正規化した値を示している。図5は、1操業サイクル目から8操業サイクル目までの鋳造完了後における鍋の中腹部の半径方向変位を、応力計算により算出された応力とヤング率とから算出した結果である。このような半径方向変位と操業サイクル数との関係を得ることで、鍋の寿命とする半径方向変位の累積値が規定値を超えたときの操業サイクル数を計算することができる。 FIG. 5 shows an example of the relationship between the radial displacement and the number of operation cycles. FIG. 5 shows the calculated results of the elliptical pot shown in FIG. 2 as the existing pot and the rectangular pot shown in FIG. 3 as the target pot. The radial displacement shown on the vertical axis of the graph of FIG. 5 shows a normalized value. FIG. 5 shows the result of calculating the radial displacement of the middle abdomen of the pot after the completion of casting from the 1st operation cycle to the 8th operation cycle from the stress calculated by the stress calculation and Young's modulus. By obtaining the relationship between the radial displacement and the number of operating cycles, it is possible to calculate the number of operating cycles when the cumulative value of the radial displacement, which is the life of the pot, exceeds the specified value.

仮設定した鍋形状毎に算出された鍋の寿命に基づき、対象鍋に要求する寿命を満たすか否かが判定される。鍋の寿命を判定するために設定される半径方向変位の累積値の規定値は、例えば既設鍋と同様としてもよい。判定の結果、仮設定した鍋の形状の寿命が、鍋に要求される寿命を満たさない場合には、かかる鍋の形状は不採用とする。そして、応力の集中が緩和されるように新たな鍋の形状を設定し、再度応力計算を実行する。このように、対象鍋の設計では、鍋の形状の設定と、かかる形状とした場合の応力の集中の有無及び寿命の算出とを繰り返し、なるべく容積が大きく、かつ、要求される寿命を満たす最適な鍋の形状を決定する。 Based on the pot life calculated for each tentatively set pot shape, it is determined whether or not the life required for the target pot is satisfied. The specified value of the cumulative value of the radial displacement set for determining the life of the pot may be the same as that of the existing pot, for example. As a result of the determination, if the life of the temporarily set pot shape does not meet the life required for the pot, the pot shape is not adopted. Then, a new pot shape is set so that the stress concentration is relaxed, and the stress calculation is executed again. In this way, in the design of the target pot, the shape of the pot is set, the presence or absence of stress concentration and the calculation of the life are repeated in the case of such a shape, and the volume is as large as possible and the required life is satisfied. Determine the shape of the pot.

以上、本実施形態に係る溶融金属用鍋の形状設計方法について説明した。本実施形態によれば、既設鍋について取得した計算応力値と実測応力値とに基づいて、これらの値が近付くようにヤング率を補正し、補正されたヤング率を用いて対象鍋の応力を算出する。ヤング率を補正することで、溶融金属用鍋の耐火物の状態をより適切に反映した状態で応力計算が行われるため、応力の算出精度を高めることができる。高精度に応力を算出できるため、鍋の変形量もより正確に求めることが可能となる。その結果、新たな溶融金属用鍋の設計においても、生産性や設備寿命の観点から最適な鍋の形状を決定することができる。 The method of designing the shape of the molten metal pan according to the present embodiment has been described above. According to the present embodiment, the Young's modulus is corrected so that these values approach each other based on the calculated stress value and the measured stress value acquired for the existing pot, and the stress of the target pot is calculated using the corrected Young's modulus. calculate. By correcting the Young's modulus, the stress calculation is performed in a state in which the state of the refractory of the molten metal pot is more appropriately reflected, so that the stress calculation accuracy can be improved. Since the stress can be calculated with high accuracy, the amount of deformation of the pot can be calculated more accurately. As a result, even in the design of a new pot for molten metal, the optimum pot shape can be determined from the viewpoint of productivity and equipment life.

実施例として、本発明の溶融金属用鍋の形状設計方法に基づき、設計対象である矩形鍋の形状を決定するため、既設鍋である楕円鍋の計算応力値及び実績応力値に基づき補正したヤング率を用いて、応力計算により矩形鍋に発生する応力を算出した。既設鍋には、対象鍋とは鍋の形状は異なるが、鍋内部に施工される耐火物の種類及び厚みは同一とみなせるものを用いた。ヤング率は、乾燥工程、予熱工程及び稼働工程についてそれぞれ設定した。一方、比較例として、ヤング率の補正は行わず、既設鍋の応力計算に用いたヤング率と同一のヤング率を用いて応力計算を行い、対象鍋の応力を算出した。図6に、比較例における対象鍋の計算応力値と実測応力値とを示し、図7に、実施例における対象鍋の計算応力値と実測応力値とを示す。なお、図6及び図7のグラフの横軸に示す時間及び縦軸に示す応力は、正規化した値を示している。 As an example, in order to determine the shape of the rectangular pot to be designed based on the shape design method of the molten metal pot of the present invention, Young corrected based on the calculated stress value and the actual stress value of the existing pot, the elliptical pot. Using the rate, the stress generated in the rectangular pan was calculated by stress calculation. For the existing pot, the shape of the pot was different from that of the target pot, but the type and thickness of the refractory to be installed inside the pot could be regarded as the same. Young's modulus was set for each of the drying process, the preheating process, and the operating process. On the other hand, as a comparative example, the Young's modulus was not corrected, and the stress was calculated using the same Young's modulus as the Young's modulus used for the stress calculation of the existing pot, and the stress of the target pot was calculated. FIG. 6 shows the calculated stress value and the measured stress value of the target pot in the comparative example, and FIG. 7 shows the calculated stress value and the measured stress value of the target pot in the example. The time shown on the horizontal axis and the stress shown on the vertical axis of the graphs of FIGS. 6 and 7 show normalized values.

比較例では、図6に示すように、実測応力値と計算応力値とは大きく乖離しており、計算応力値が大きい値を示していた。かかる計算応力値を用いて鍋の形状を設計した場合、容積を十分に大きくすることができなかったり、熱間使用時の変形量を大きく見積もる結果、寿命を短く想定してしまったりすることになる。一方、実施例では、図7に示すように、比較例と比べて実測応力値と計算応力値とに大きな差はなかった。これより、本発明の溶融金属用鍋の形状設計方法を用いることで、鍋に発生する応力をより正確に推定することが可能となり、最適な鍋の形状の決定を行うことが可能となる。 In the comparative example, as shown in FIG. 6, the actually measured stress value and the calculated stress value deviate greatly, and the calculated stress value shows a large value. When the shape of the pot is designed using such calculated stress values, the volume cannot be increased sufficiently, and as a result of estimating the amount of deformation during hot use, the life is assumed to be short. Become. On the other hand, in the example, as shown in FIG. 7, there was no significant difference between the measured stress value and the calculated stress value as compared with the comparative example. From this, by using the shape design method for the molten metal pot of the present invention, the stress generated in the pot can be estimated more accurately, and the optimum pot shape can be determined.

以上、添付図面を参照しながら本発明の好適な実施形態について詳細に説明したが、本発明はかかる例に限定されない。本発明の属する技術の分野における通常の知識を有する者であれば、特許請求の範囲に記載された技術的思想の範疇内において、各種の変更例または修正例に想到し得ることは明らかであり、これらについても、当然に本発明の技術的範囲に属するものと了解される。 Although the preferred embodiments of the present invention have been described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, the present invention is not limited to such examples. It is clear that a person having ordinary knowledge in the field of technology to which the present invention belongs can come up with various modifications or modifications within the scope of the technical ideas described in the claims. , These are also naturally understood to belong to the technical scope of the present invention.

例えば、上記実施形態では、応力計算のパラメータのうち、耐火物の状態が反映されるヤング率を補正としたが、本発明はかかる例に限定されない。例えば、ヤング率以外のパラメータについて、計算応力値と実測応力値とを近付けるように補正してもよい。 For example, in the above embodiment, the Young's modulus that reflects the state of the refractory is corrected among the parameters of the stress calculation, but the present invention is not limited to such an example. For example, for parameters other than Young's modulus, the calculated stress value and the measured stress value may be corrected so as to be close to each other.

10 楕円鍋
11、21 鉄皮
13、23 耐火物
15、25 軸
20 矩形鍋
10 Elliptical pot 11, 21 Iron skin 13, 23 Refractory 15, 25 Axis 20 Rectangular pot

Claims (5)

鉄皮の内面に耐火物を施工して構成され、溶融金属を保持する溶融金属用鍋の形状設計方法であって、
稼働中の溶融金属用鍋である既設鍋について、過去の操業条件に基づき設定された前記耐火物のヤング率を用いて第1の応力計算を行い、前記既設鍋に発生する応力である計算応力値を取得する計算工程と、
前記既設鍋に発生する応力を測定し、実測応力値を取得する測定工程と、
前記実測応力値と前記計算応力値との差が許容範囲となるように、前記第1の応力計算で用いたヤング率を補正する補正工程と、
補正された前記ヤング率を用いて、設計対象の溶融金属用鍋である対象鍋に発生する応力を第2の応力計算により算出し、前記対象鍋の最適形状を求める設計工程と、
を含む、溶融金属用鍋の形状設計方法。
It is a method of designing the shape of a molten metal pot that holds refractory metal by constructing a refractory material on the inner surface of the iron skin.
For the existing pot, which is a pot for molten metal in operation, the first stress calculation is performed using the Young's modulus of the refractory set based on the past operating conditions, and the calculated stress, which is the stress generated in the existing pot, is calculated. The calculation process to get the value and
A measurement process for measuring the stress generated in the existing pot and acquiring the measured stress value,
A correction step for correcting Young's modulus used in the first stress calculation so that the difference between the measured stress value and the calculated stress value is within an allowable range.
Using the corrected Young's modulus, the stress generated in the target pot, which is the pot for molten metal to be designed, is calculated by the second stress calculation, and the design process for obtaining the optimum shape of the target pot, and the design process.
How to design the shape of a pan for molten metal, including.
前記ヤング率は、
稼働前に前記溶融金属用鍋を乾燥させる乾燥工程における第1のヤング率と、
前記乾燥工程後、前記溶融金属用鍋を予熱する予熱工程における第2のヤング率と、
前記予熱工程後、前記溶融金属の保持と排出とを繰り返し行う稼働工程における第3のヤング率と、
を含み、
前記補正工程では、前記第1の応力計算で用いた前記第1のヤング率、前記第2のヤング率及び前記第3のヤング率をそれぞれ補正し、
前記設計工程では、補正された前記第1のヤング率、補正された前記第2のヤング率及び補正された前記第3のヤング率を用いて前記第2の応力計算を実行する、請求項1に記載の溶融金属用鍋の形状設計方法。
The Young's modulus is
The first Young's modulus in the drying step of drying the molten metal pot before operation, and
After the drying step, the second Young's modulus in the preheating step of preheating the molten metal pot,
After the preheating step, the third Young's modulus in the operation process in which the holding and discharging of the molten metal are repeated, and
Including
In the correction step, the first Young's modulus, the second Young's modulus, and the third Young's modulus used in the first stress calculation are corrected, respectively.
In the design step, the second stress calculation is performed using the corrected first Young's modulus, the corrected second Young's modulus, and the corrected third Young's modulus. The method for designing the shape of a pan for molten metal described in 1.
記設計工程では、前記第2の応力計算により算出された応力と前記補正されたヤング率とに基づき、前記対象鍋の変形量をさらに算出する、請求項1または2に記載の溶融金属用鍋の形状設計方法。 Prior SL design process based on the said stress calculated by the second stress calculation and the corrected Young's modulus, and calculates the amount of deformation of the object pan, for molten metal according to claim 1 or 2 How to design the shape of the pot. 前記既設鍋と前記対象鍋とは、鍋内部に施工される耐火物の種類及び厚みが略同一である、請求項1〜3のいずれか1項に記載の溶融金属用鍋の形状設計方法。 The method for designing the shape of a molten metal pot according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the existing pot and the target pot have substantially the same type and thickness of the refractory material installed inside the pot. 前記対象鍋は、溶融金属を収容する収容部を平面視した平面形状が略矩形である、請求項1〜4のいずれか1項に記載の溶融金属用鍋の形状設計方法。
The method for designing the shape of a pot for molten metal according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the target pot has a substantially rectangular plane shape in a plan view of a storage portion for accommodating the molten metal.
JP2018015816A 2018-01-31 2018-01-31 Shape design method for molten metal pot Active JP6947059B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2018015816A JP6947059B2 (en) 2018-01-31 2018-01-31 Shape design method for molten metal pot

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2018015816A JP6947059B2 (en) 2018-01-31 2018-01-31 Shape design method for molten metal pot

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2019130570A JP2019130570A (en) 2019-08-08
JP6947059B2 true JP6947059B2 (en) 2021-10-13

Family

ID=67545373

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2018015816A Active JP6947059B2 (en) 2018-01-31 2018-01-31 Shape design method for molten metal pot

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP6947059B2 (en)

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2007262546A (en) * 2006-03-30 2007-10-11 Jfe Steel Kk Slag removing device
JP6398512B2 (en) * 2014-09-18 2018-10-03 新日鐵住金株式会社 Ladle for molten metal

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2019130570A (en) 2019-08-08

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP5839582B2 (en) Mold design method and mold
KR20160102043A (en) Method, device and program for determining casting state in continuous casting
RU2015104030A (en) METHOD AND DEVICE FOR MEASURING LEVELS OF IRON AND SLAG IN A BLAST FURNACE
JP5482615B2 (en) Blowing control method in converter
JP6947059B2 (en) Shape design method for molten metal pot
JP3978090B2 (en) Hot water surface position detection method, computer program, and computer-readable storage medium
KR101516623B1 (en) Method for predicting thickness of slag
JP5007945B2 (en) Estimation method of electric furnace slag coating thickness by unsteady heat transfer analysis
JP5064433B2 (en) Method, apparatus and program for estimating heat flux on inner surface of container
JP6015914B2 (en) Beam blank casting slab continuous casting mold design method
JP2002266011A (en) Method of estimating furnace interior of blast furnace
KR102531803B1 (en) Method for monitoring wear of refractory linings of blast furnaces
KR101185300B1 (en) Method for estimating position bordered to furnace wall of softening zone
JP2012137242A (en) Temperature estimation method and life determination method of high-temperature member
JP6435988B2 (en) Breakout prediction method, breakout prevention method, solidified shell thickness measurement method, breakout prediction device and breakout prevention device in continuous casting
JP5381892B2 (en) Estimation method of bottom erosion line and bottom structure
JP4478074B2 (en) Method for continuous casting of molten metal
JP4478073B2 (en) Continuous casting mold design method
JP7722610B1 (en) Blast furnace control method and control device
RU2773869C1 (en) Method for assessing the residual life of setting, taking into account operating conditions
JP5363792B2 (en) Design method of raw material in hot ring rolling process
JP2002363619A (en) Control method of blast furnace lower part
JP6060946B2 (en) Temperature estimation method in degassing process
KR101060954B1 (en) Rolling Load Prediction Method in Steel Sheet Rolling Process
KR101246461B1 (en) Judgment method for central area of blast furnace

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
RD04 Notification of resignation of power of attorney

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A7424

Effective date: 20190208

RD02 Notification of acceptance of power of attorney

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A7422

Effective date: 20190419

RD04 Notification of resignation of power of attorney

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A7424

Effective date: 20190422

RD04 Notification of resignation of power of attorney

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A7424

Effective date: 20190426

A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20200903

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20210526

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20210601

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20210728

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20210817

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20210830

R151 Written notification of patent or utility model registration

Ref document number: 6947059

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R151