Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP6987651B2 - High hardness precipitation hardening stainless steel with excellent hot workability and no sub-zero treatment required - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP6987651B2 - High hardness precipitation hardening stainless steel with excellent hot workability and no sub-zero treatment required - Google Patents

High hardness precipitation hardening stainless steel with excellent hot workability and no sub-zero treatment required Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP6987651B2
JP6987651B2 JP2018008811A JP2018008811A JP6987651B2 JP 6987651 B2 JP6987651 B2 JP 6987651B2 JP 2018008811 A JP2018008811 A JP 2018008811A JP 2018008811 A JP2018008811 A JP 2018008811A JP 6987651 B2 JP6987651 B2 JP 6987651B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
less
present
hot workability
mass
content
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2018008811A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2019127613A (en
Inventor
太一 渕上
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Sanyo Special Steel Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Sanyo Special Steel Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sanyo Special Steel Co Ltd filed Critical Sanyo Special Steel Co Ltd
Priority to JP2018008811A priority Critical patent/JP6987651B2/en
Publication of JP2019127613A publication Critical patent/JP2019127613A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP6987651B2 publication Critical patent/JP6987651B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Landscapes

  • Heat Treatment Of Sheet Steel (AREA)

Description

この出願は、プロペラシャフト、ドライブシャフト、軸受およびロールなどの高硬度、高耐食性が求められる部材として使用するためのステンレス鋼に関し、特に熱間加工性に優れ、サブゼロ処理を要しない高硬度析出硬化型ステンレス鋼に関する。 This application relates to stainless steel for use as members that require high hardness and high corrosion resistance such as propeller shafts, drive shafts, bearings and rolls, and has particularly excellent hot workability and high hardness precipitation hardening that does not require sub-zero treatment. Regarding type stainless steel.

析出硬化型ステンレス鋼は、ステンレス鋼としての耐食性に加えて、析出硬化による強度を付与したものであり、基質組織によってマルテンサイト系、セミマルテンサイト系、オーステナイト系に分類される。オーステナイト系は非磁性用途に使用できる。マルテンサイト系、セミマルテンサイト系は、オーステナイトに固溶し、マルテンサイトにはほとんど溶解度をもたない金属または化合物をマルテンサイト変態後にマルテンサイト地より析出させるものである。マルテンサイト変態と析出硬化とを組み合わせて利用する点に特長がある。 Precipitation-hardened stainless steel has corrosion resistance as stainless steel and strength due to precipitation hardening, and is classified into martensitic, semi-martensite, and austenite according to the substrate structure. Austenitic stainless steels can be used for non-magnetic applications. The martensitic and semi-martensite systems are those that dissolve in austenite and precipitate a metal or compound that has almost no solubility in martensite from the martensitic region after transformation of martensite. It is characterized in that it is used in combination with martensitic transformation and precipitation hardening.

析出硬化型ステンレス鋼としては、C≦0.05mass%、0.5≦Si<2.0mass%、Mn≦1.50mass%、2.0≦Cu≦5.0mass%、2.0≦Ni<7.0mass%、10.0≦Cr≦15.0mass%、1.0≦Co≦5.0mass%、2.0<Mo≦5.0mass%、0.5<Ti≦3.0mass%、及び、N≦0.05mass%を含み、残部がFe及び不可避的不純物からなり、Si+Ti+Co≧4.5及びSi/Mo≦0.7を満たす析出硬化型ステンレス鋼が提案されている(例えば、特許文献1参照。)。
この特許文献1は、所定の元素を含む鋼中に、Cuを添加すると、固溶化熱処理および時効処理によりε−Cu相およびG相を析出させることにより硬度を増し、さらに質量比でSi/Mo比を最適化することにより熱間加工性を向上させようとしている。もっとも、この特許は、鋼の成分としてCoが必須元素とされている。またSi/Mo≦0.7を満足させることにより、熱間加工性を改善しようとしているが、さらに一層の熱間加工性の向上を図った析出硬化型ステンレス鋼の開発や、またCoやMoなどの高価な元素の使用をできるだけ減らすことが求められている。
As precipitation hardening stainless steel, C ≦ 0.05 mass%, 0.5 ≦ Si <2.0 mass%, Mn ≦ 1.50 mass%, 2.0 ≦ Cu ≦ 5.0 mass%, 2.0 ≦ Ni < 7.0 mass%, 10.0 ≤ Cr ≤ 15.0 mass%, 1.0 ≤ Co ≤ 5.0 mass%, 2.0 <Mo ≤ 5.0 mass%, 0.5 <Ti ≤ 3.0 mass%, and , N ≦ 0.05 mass%, the balance consisting of Fe and unavoidable impurities, and precipitation hardening stainless steel satisfying Si + Ti + Co ≧ 4.5 and Si / Mo ≦ 0.7 have been proposed (eg, Patent Documents). See 1.).
According to Patent Document 1, when Cu is added to steel containing a predetermined element, the hardness is increased by precipitating the ε-Cu phase and the G phase by solidification heat treatment and aging treatment, and Si / Mo in terms of mass ratio. We are trying to improve hot workability by optimizing the ratio. However, in this patent, Co is an essential element as a component of steel. We are also trying to improve hot workability by satisfying Si / Mo ≤ 0.7, but we have also developed precipitation hardening stainless steel with further improvement in hot workability, and Co and Mo. It is required to reduce the use of expensive elements such as as much as possible.

一方、本願の出願人は、質量%で、C:0.01〜0.10%、Si:0.30〜2.00%、Mn:0.01〜1.00%、P:0.040%以下、S:0.030%以下、Ni:4.0〜9.0%、Cr:13.0〜22.0%、Mo:0.20〜2.00%、Cu:0.60〜4.00%、Ti:0.50〜3.50%、Nb:0.01〜2.00%、N:0.050%以下を含有し、残部Feおよび不可避不純物からなる、耐食性および製造性に優れた高硬度ステンレス鋼に関する特許出願をしている(特許文献2参照。)。この特許文献2には、高硬度および高耐食性を両立させ、かつ、高硬度が得られる熱処理範囲が広いことに着目した記載があり、耐食性を向上させるためにCrを13.0%以上必要としている。しかしながら、この特許文献2では、残留オーステナイトをマルテンサイト変態させるために、−20℃ないし−90℃に10分以上保持したサブゼロ処理を要しており、製造にコストが掛かるものであった。 On the other hand, the applicant of the present application has C: 0.01 to 0.10%, Si: 0.30 to 2.00%, Mn: 0.01 to 1.00%, P: 0.040 in mass%. % Or less, S: 0.030% or less, Ni: 4.0 to 9.0%, Cr: 13.0 to 22.0%, Mo: 0.20 to 2.00%, Cu: 0.60 to 0 Corrosion resistance and manufacturability containing 4.00%, Ti: 0.50 to 3.50%, Nb: 0.01 to 2.00%, N: 0.050% or less, and consisting of the balance Fe and unavoidable impurities. Has filed a patent application for excellent high-hardness stainless steel (see Patent Document 2). This Patent Document 2 describes that both high hardness and high corrosion resistance are compatible and that the heat treatment range in which high hardness can be obtained is wide, and Cr of 13.0% or more is required to improve the corrosion resistance. There is. However, in Patent Document 2, in order to transform the retained austenite into martensitic transformation, a sub-zero treatment in which the retained austenite is kept at −20 ° C. to −90 ° C. for 10 minutes or more is required, which is costly to manufacture.

特許第5887896号公報Japanese Patent No. 5878896 特開2017−78195号公報Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2017-78195

高硬度材が必要とされる用途では、マルテンサイト系ステンレス鋼であるSUS420などが用いられている。ところがマルテンサイト系ステンレス鋼はC含有量が相対的に多く、耐食性が低い。それに比べて、SUS630などの析出硬化型ステンレス鋼は、耐食性に優れているものの、硬度が低いという問題がある。そこで、従来これを両立させるための調整が試みられてきたが十分ではなく、さらなる熱間加工性の向上や、またCoやMoなどの高価な元素をできるだけ減らすことが求められている。また、Ms点(マルテンサイト変態開始温度)が低いと残留オーステナイトが生成して硬さが低くなるため、それを回避するべくサブゼロ処理を用いることもある。しかし、サブゼロ処理ではドライアイスや液体窒素などの冷却剤を用いて冷却することから、非常にコストが掛かるという問題がある。 For applications where a high hardness material is required, martensitic stainless steel such as SUS420 is used. However, martensitic stainless steel has a relatively high C content and low corrosion resistance. In comparison, precipitation hardening stainless steels such as SUS630 have excellent corrosion resistance but have a problem of low hardness. Therefore, adjustments have been made in the past to achieve both of these, but they are not sufficient, and there is a demand for further improvement in hot workability and reduction of expensive elements such as Co and Mo as much as possible. Further, when the Ms point (martensite transformation start temperature) is low, retained austenite is generated and the hardness becomes low, so that subzero treatment may be used to avoid it. However, the sub-zero treatment has a problem that it is very costly because it is cooled by using a cooling agent such as dry ice or liquid nitrogen.

そこで、本願が解決しようとする課題は、上記のようなサブゼロ処理を不要とし、かつ熱間加工性を向上させることで、製造性に優れた、高硬度析出硬化型のステンレス鋼を提供することである。 Therefore, the problem to be solved by the present application is to provide a high hardness precipitation hardening stainless steel having excellent manufacturability by eliminating the above-mentioned sub-zero treatment and improving hot workability. Is.

上記の課題を解決するための手段の、第1の手段では、質量%で、C:0.01〜0.10%、Si:0.30〜2.00%、Mn:0.01〜1.00%、Ni:4.00〜9.00%、Cr:8.00〜14.50%、Mo:0.10〜2.00%、Cu:0.50〜4.00%、Ti:0.50〜3.50%を含有し、残部Feおよび不可避不純物からなり、下記の式(1)および式(2)を満足し、硬さが55HRC以上、残留オーステナイト量が1%以下、熱間引張試験(グリーブル試験)における絞り(RA)が60%以上となる温度の範囲が100℃以上であることを特徴とする製造性に優れた高硬度析出硬化型ステンレス鋼である。
5.00≦Nieq≦<9.50・・・式(1)
Nieq≦−0.83×Creq+25.5・・・式(2)
ただし、Nieq=[%Ni]+30×([%C]+[%N])+0.5×[%Mn]+0.3×[%Cu]であり、Creq=[%Cr]+[%Mo]+1.5×[%Si]+0.5×[%Nb]である。
なお、上記の[%M]には、いずれも対応する元素の含有量の数値(質量%)が代入される。
In the first means for solving the above problems, in terms of mass%, C: 0.01 to 0.10%, Si: 0.30 to 2.00%, Mn: 0.01 to 1 .00%, Ni: 4.00 to 9.00%, Cr: 8.01 to 14.50%, Mo: 0.10 to 2.00%, Cu: 0.50 to 4.00%, Ti: It contains 0.50 to 3.50%, is composed of the balance Fe and unavoidable impurities, satisfies the following formulas (1) and (2), has a hardness of 55HRC or more, a residual austenite amount of 1% or less, and heat. It is a high hardness precipitation hardening stainless steel having excellent manufacturability, characterized in that the temperature range in which the drawing (RA) is 60% or more in the intertensile test (greeble test) is 100 ° C. or more.
5.00 ≤ Ni eq ≤ <9.50 ... Equation (1)
Ni eq ≤ -0.83 x Cr eq + 25.5 ... Equation (2)
However, Ni eq = [% Ni] +30 × ([% C] + [% N]) +0.5 × [% Mn] +0.3 × [% Cu], and Cr eq = [% Cr] + [ % Mo] + 1.5 × [% Si] + 0.5 × [% Nb].
In each of the above [% M], the numerical value (mass%) of the content of the corresponding element is substituted.

第2の手段では、第1の手段の化学成分に加えて、質量%で、Al:0.001〜0.150%、Nb:0.01〜2.00%、N:0.002〜0.050%、およびS:0.001〜0.100%から選択したいずれか1種または2種以上を含有し、ただし、第1の手段の化学成分の中のCrについては、Cr:8.00〜13.00%未満とし、残部Feおよび不可避不純物からなり、下記の式(1)および式(2)を満足し、硬さが55HRC以上、残留オーステナイト量が1%以下、熱間引張試験(グリーブル試験)における絞り(RA)が60%以上となる温度の範囲が100℃以上であることを特徴とする製造性に優れた高硬度析出硬化型ステンレス鋼である。
5.00≦Nieq≦9.50・・・式(1)
Nieq≦−0.83×Creq+25.5・・・式(2)
ただし、Nieq=[%Ni]+30×([%C]+[%N])+0.5×[%Mn]+0.3×[%Cu]であり、Creq=[%Cr]+[%Mo]+1.5×[%Si]+0.5×[%Nb]である。
なお、上記の[%M]には、いずれも対応する元素の含有量の数値(質量%)が代入される。
In the second means, in addition to the chemical components of the first means, in mass%, Al: 0.001 to 0.150%, Nb: 0.01 to 2.00%, N: 0.002 to 0. .050% and S: any one or more selected from 0.001 to 0.100%, except for Cr in the chemical composition of the first means, Cr: 8. It is set to less than 00 to 13.00%, consists of the balance Fe and unavoidable impurities, satisfies the following formulas (1) and (2), has a hardness of 55HRC or more, a residual austenite amount of 1% or less, and a hot tensile test. It is a high hardness precipitation hardening stainless steel having excellent manufacturability, characterized in that the temperature range in which the drawing (RA) is 60% or more in (Greble test) is 100 ° C. or more.
5.00 ≤ Ni eq ≤ 9.50 ... Equation (1)
Ni eq ≤ -0.83 x Cr eq + 25.5 ... Equation (2)
However, Ni eq = [% Ni] + 30 × ([% C] + [% N]) + 0.5 × [% Mn] + 0.3 × [% Cu], and Cr eq = [% Cr] + [ % Mo] + 1.5 × [% Si] + 0.5 × [% Nb].
In each of the above [% M], the numerical value (mass%) of the content of the corresponding element is substituted.

第3の手段では、第1の手段の化学成分に加えて、質量%で、Ca:0.0001〜0.0250%、Mg:0.0001〜0.0250%、B:0.0001〜0.0250%から選択したいずれか1種または2種以上を含有し、残部Feおよび不可避不純物からなり、下記に記載の式(1)および式(2)を満足し、硬さが55HRC以上、残留オーステナイト量が1%以下、熱間引張試験(グリーブル試験)における絞り(RA)が60%以上となる温度の範囲が100℃以上であることを特徴とする製造性に優れた高硬度析出硬化型ステンレス鋼である。
5.00≦Nieq≦9.50・・・式(1)
Nieq≦−0.83×Creq+25.5・・・式(2)
ただし、Nieq=[%Ni]+30×([%C]+[%N])+0.5×[%Mn]+0.3×[%Cu]であり、Creq=[%Cr]+[%Mo]+1.5×[%Si]+0.5×[%Nb]である。
なお、上記の[%M]には、いずれも対応する元素の含有量の数値(質量%)が代入される。
In the third means, in addition to the chemical components of the first means, Ca: 0.0001 to 0.0250%, Mg: 0.0001 to 0.0250%, B: 0.0001 to 0 in mass%. It contains any one or more selected from .0250%, consists of the balance Fe and unavoidable impurities, satisfies the formulas (1) and (2) described below, has a hardness of 55HRC or more, and remains. High hardness precipitation hardening type with excellent manufacturability, characterized in that the amount of austenite is 1% or less and the temperature range in which the drawing (RA) in the hot tensile test (greeble test) is 60% or more is 100 ° C. or more. It is stainless steel.
5.00 ≤ Ni eq ≤ 9.50 ... Equation (1)
Ni eq ≤ -0.83 x Cr eq + 25.5 ... Equation (2)
However, Ni eq = [% Ni] +30 × ([% C] + [% N]) +0.5 × [% Mn] +0.3 × [% Cu], and Cr eq = [% Cr] + [ % Mo] + 1.5 × [% Si] + 0.5 × [% Nb].
In each of the above [% M], the numerical value (mass%) of the content of the corresponding element is substituted.

第4の手段では、第1の手段の化学成分に加えて、質量%で、Al:0.001〜0.150%、Nb:0.01〜2.00%、N:0.002〜0.050%、S:0.001〜0.100%から選択したいずれか1種または2種以上を含有し、さらに、質量%で、Ca:0.0001〜0.0250%、Mg:0.0001〜0.0250%、B:0.0001〜0.0250%から選択したいずれか1種または2種以上を含有し、残部Feおよび不可避不純物からなり、下記に記載の式(1)および式(2)を満足し、硬さが55HRC以上、残留オーステナイト量が1%以下、熱間引張試験(グリーブル試験)における絞り(RA)が60%以上となる温度の範囲が100℃以上であることを特徴とする製造性に優れた高硬度析出硬化型ステンレス鋼である。
5.00≦Nieq≦9.50・・・式(1)
Nieq≦−0.83×Creq+25.5・・・式(2)
ただし、Nieq=[%Ni]+30×([%C]+[%N])+0.5×[%Mn]+0.3×[%Cu]であり、Creq=[%Cr]+[%Mo]+1.5×[%Si]+0.5×[%Nb]である。
なお、上記の[%M]には、いずれも対応する元素の含有量の数値(質量%)が代入される。
In the fourth means, in addition to the chemical components of the first means, Al: 0.001 to 0.150%, Nb: 0.01 to 2.00%, N: 0.002 to 0 in% by mass. It contains any one or more selected from 050% and S: 0.001 to 0.100%, and further, in terms of mass%, Ca: 0.0001 to 0.0250%, Mg: 0. It contains any one or more selected from 0001 to 0.0250% and B: 0.0001 to 0.0250%, and consists of the balance Fe and unavoidable impurities, and is composed of the formula (1) and the formula described below. Satisfying (2), the hardness is 55HRC or more, the amount of retained austenite is 1% or less, and the temperature range in which the drawing (RA) in the hot tensile test (greeble test) is 60% or more is 100 ° C. or more. It is a high hardness precipitation hardening type stainless steel having excellent manufacturability.
5.00 ≤ Ni eq ≤ 9.50 ... Equation (1)
Ni eq ≤ -0.83 x Cr eq + 25.5 ... Equation (2)
However, Ni eq = [% Ni] +30 × ([% C] + [% N]) +0.5 × [% Mn] +0.3 × [% Cu], and Cr eq = [% Cr] + [ % Mo] + 1.5 × [% Si] + 0.5 × [% Nb].
In each of the above [% M], the numerical value (mass%) of the content of the corresponding element is substituted.

本願の発明は、上記した手段とすることで、硬さが55HRC以上であり、耐候性があるので発銹し難く、残留オーステナイト量が1%以下であり、熱間引張試験の絞り(RA)が60%以上となる温度の範囲が100℃以上であり、熱間加工性に優れ、サブゼロ処理を要しない製造性に優れた、高硬度析出硬化型ステンレス鋼を製造することができる。 According to the above-mentioned means, the present invention has a hardness of 55 HRC or more, weather resistance, which makes it difficult to stirrate, a residual austenite amount of 1% or less, and a hot tensile test drawing (RA). It is possible to produce high hardness precipitation hardening stainless steel having a temperature range of 60% or more of 100 ° C. or higher, excellent hot workability, and excellent manufacturability that does not require sub-zero treatment.

本願の発明を実施するための形態について記載するに先立って、本願の上記の各手段におけるFeを除く化学成分の限定理由および式(1)および式(2)について以下に説明する。なお、化学成分の%は質量%である。 Prior to describing the embodiment for carrying out the invention of the present application, the reasons for limiting the chemical components other than Fe in each of the above-mentioned means of the present application and the formulas (1) and (2) will be described below. The% of the chemical component is mass%.

C:0.01〜0.10%
Cは、鋼の強度および耐食性を維持するために必要な元素である。Cが0.01%より少ないと強度不足となる。一方、Cが0.10%より多いと耐食性が低下する。そこで、Cは0.01〜0.10%とする。
C: 0.01 to 0.10%
C is an element required to maintain the strength and corrosion resistance of steel. If C is less than 0.01%, the strength will be insufficient. On the other hand, if C is more than 0.10%, the corrosion resistance is lowered. Therefore, C is set to 0.01 to 0.10%.

Si:0.30〜2.00%
Siは、鋼の製錬時の脱酸材であり、かつ鋼の析出強化に寄与するために必要な元素である。Siが0.30%より少ないと製錬時に脱酸剤として不足し、かつ鋼の析出強化元素として不足となる。一方、Siが2.00%より多いと、鋼の熱間加工性が低下する。そこで、Siは0.30〜2.00%とする。
Si: 0.30 to 2.00%
Si is a deoxidizing material during steel smelting and is an element necessary for contributing to the precipitation strengthening of steel. If Si is less than 0.30%, it will be insufficient as a deoxidizing agent during smelting and will be insufficient as a precipitation strengthening element of steel. On the other hand, when Si is more than 2.00%, the hot workability of the steel is lowered. Therefore, Si is set to 0.30 to 2.00%.

Mn:0.01〜1.00%
Mnは、鋼の製錬時の脱酸材として必要な元素である。Mnが0.01%より少ないと製錬時に脱酸剤として不足する。一方、Mnが1.00%より多いと、鋼の熱間加工性が低下する。そこで、Mnは0.01〜1.00%とする。
Mn: 0.01-1.00%
Mn is an element required as a deoxidizing material during steel smelting. If Mn is less than 0.01%, it will be insufficient as a deoxidizing agent during smelting. On the other hand, if Mn is more than 1.00%, the hot workability of the steel is lowered. Therefore, Mn is set to 0.01 to 1.00%.

Ni:4.00〜9.00%
Niは、鋼の析出強化に寄与する元素である。Niが4.00%より少ないと鋼の析出強化元素として不足する。一方、Niは高価な元素であるので、9.00%より多いとコストの増加となる。そこで、Niは4.00〜9.00%とする。
Ni: 4.00-900%
Ni is an element that contributes to the precipitation strengthening of steel. If Ni is less than 4.00%, it will be insufficient as a precipitation strengthening element for steel. On the other hand, Ni is an expensive element, so if it is more than 9.00%, the cost will increase. Therefore, Ni is set to 4.00 to 9.00%.

Cr:8.00〜14.50%
Crは、鋼の耐食性に寄与する元素である。Crが8.00%より少ないと耐食性が低下する。一方、Crが14.50%より多いと、熱間加工性が低下し、かつCrは高価な元素であるのでコストの増加となる。そこで、Crは8.00〜14.50%とし、好ましくは8.00〜13.00未満とする。
Cr: 8.00 to 14.50%
Cr is an element that contributes to the corrosion resistance of steel. If Cr is less than 8.00%, the corrosion resistance is lowered. On the other hand, if Cr is more than 14.50%, the hot workability is lowered and Cr is an expensive element, which increases the cost. Therefore, Cr is set to 8.00 to 14.50%, preferably less than 8.00 to 13.00.

Mo:0.10〜2.00%
Moは、鋼の耐食性に寄与する元素である。Moが0.10%より少ないと耐食性が低下する。一方、Moが2.00より多いと熱間加工性が低下しかつ高価な元素であるのでコストの増加となる。そこで、Moは0.10〜2.00%とする。
Mo: 0.10 to 2.00%
Mo is an element that contributes to the corrosion resistance of steel. If Mo is less than 0.10%, the corrosion resistance is lowered. On the other hand, if the amount of Mo is more than 2.00, the hot workability is lowered and the element is expensive, so that the cost is increased. Therefore, Mo is set to 0.10 to 2.00%.

Cu:0.50〜4.00%
Cuは、鋼の耐食性に寄与し、かつ析出強化に寄与する元素である。Cuが0.50%より少ないと鋼の耐食性が低下し、析出強化に寄与する元素として不足する。一方、Cuが4.00%より多いと熱間加工性が低下する。そこで、Cuは0.50〜4.00%とする。
Cu: 0.50 to 4.00%
Cu is an element that contributes to the corrosion resistance of steel and also contributes to precipitation strengthening. If the amount of Cu is less than 0.50%, the corrosion resistance of the steel is lowered, and it is insufficient as an element that contributes to precipitation strengthening. On the other hand, if the amount of Cu is more than 4.00%, the hot workability is deteriorated. Therefore, Cu is set to 0.50 to 4.00%.

Ti:0.50〜3.50%
Tiは、鋼の析出強化に寄与する元素である。Tiが0.50%より少ないと鋼の析出強化元素として不足する。一方、Tiが3.50%より多いと熱間加工性が低下しかつコストの増加となる。そこで、Tiは0.50〜3.50%とする。
Ti: 0.50 to 3.50%
Ti is an element that contributes to the precipitation strengthening of steel. If Ti is less than 0.50%, it is insufficient as a precipitation strengthening element for steel. On the other hand, if Ti is more than 3.50%, the hot workability is lowered and the cost is increased. Therefore, Ti is set to 0.50 to 3.50%.

次に、本発明に用いる選択的な化学成分の元素について以下に説明する。 Next, the elements of the selective chemical composition used in the present invention will be described below.

Al:0.001〜0.150%
Alは、鋼の耐食性を低下させ、また、熱間加工性も低下させる成分である。そこで、0.150%を上限とする。他方、Alを無理に低減しようとすると、かえってコスト高を招くため、経済的観点から0.001%以上としてもよい。
Al: 0.001 to 0.150%
Al is a component that lowers the corrosion resistance of steel and also lowers the hot workability. Therefore, the upper limit is 0.150%. On the other hand, if Al is forcibly reduced, the cost will be high, and therefore, it may be 0.001% or more from an economic point of view.

Nb:0.01〜2.00%
Nbは、鋼の結晶粒粗大化を抑制する成分として添加しうる。もっとも、0.01%より少ないと、結晶粒粗大化抑制の効果が得られない。他方、2.00%を超えると、熱間加工性が低下し、コストが増加することとなる。そこで、Nbは、0.01〜2.00%とする。
Nb: 0.01 to 2.00%
Nb can be added as a component that suppresses grain grain coarsening of steel. However, if it is less than 0.01%, the effect of suppressing grain grain coarsening cannot be obtained. On the other hand, if it exceeds 2.00%, the hot workability is lowered and the cost is increased. Therefore, Nb is set to 0.01 to 2.00%.

N:0.002〜0.050%
Nは、鋼の熱間加工性を低下させる成分である。また、0.050%を超えると、フェライトが不安定となる。そこで、0.050%を上限とする。他方、Nを無理に低減しようとすると、かえってコスト高を招くため、経済的観点から0.002%以上としてもよい。
N: 0.002 to 0.050%
N is a component that lowers the hot workability of steel. If it exceeds 0.050%, the ferrite becomes unstable. Therefore, the upper limit is 0.050%. On the other hand, if N is forcibly reduced, the cost will be high, so it may be 0.002% or more from an economic point of view.

S:0.001〜0.100%
Sは、鋼の被削性向上のために添加しうる化学成分である。もっとも、0.001%未満であると、少なすぎてその効果が得られない。他方、0.100%を超えると、熱間加工性が低下する。そこで、Sは、0.001〜0.100%とする。
S: 0.001 to 0.100%
S is a chemical component that can be added to improve the machinability of steel. However, if it is less than 0.001%, it is too small to obtain the effect. On the other hand, if it exceeds 0.100%, the hot workability is lowered. Therefore, S is set to 0.001 to 0.100%.

なお、上記のAl、Nb、N、およびSの化学成分は、選択的に1種または2種以上が添加できる。 The above chemical components of Al, Nb, N, and S can be selectively added by one or more.

さらに、本発明に用いる上記以外の選択的な化学成分について以下に説明する。 Further, selective chemical components other than the above used in the present invention will be described below.

Mg:0.0001〜0.0250%
Mgは、鋼の熱間加工性に寄与するために添加しうる化学成分である。もっとも、0.0001%未満では、熱間加工性への寄与がみられない。他方、0.0250%を超えて過剰であると、かえって熱間加工性が低下する。そこで、0.0001〜0.0250%とする。
Mg: 0.0001 to 0.0250%
Mg is a chemical component that can be added to contribute to the hot workability of steel. However, if it is less than 0.0001%, no contribution to hot workability is observed. On the other hand, if it exceeds 0.0250% and is excessive, the hot workability is rather lowered. Therefore, it is set to 0.0001 to 0.0250%.

Ca:0.0001〜0.0250%
Caは、鋼の熱間加工性に寄与するために添加しうる化学成分である。もっとも、0.0001%未満では、熱間加工性への寄与がみられない。他方、0.0250%を超えて過剰であると、かえって熱間加工性が低下する。そこで、0.0001〜0.0250%とする。
Ca: 0.0001 to 0.0250%
Ca is a chemical component that can be added to contribute to the hot workability of steel. However, if it is less than 0.0001%, no contribution to hot workability is observed. On the other hand, if it exceeds 0.0250% and is excessive, the hot workability is rather lowered. Therefore, it is set to 0.0001 to 0.0250%.

B:0.0001〜0.0250%
Bは、鋼の熱間加工性に寄与するために添加しうる化学成分である。もっとも、0.0001%未満では、熱間加工性への寄与がみられない。他方、0.0250%を超えて過剰であると、かえって熱間加工性が低下する。そこで、0.0001〜0.0250%とする。
B: 0.0001 to 0.0250%
B is a chemical component that can be added to contribute to the hot workability of steel. However, if it is less than 0.0001%, no contribution to hot workability is observed. On the other hand, if it exceeds 0.0250% and is excessive, the hot workability is rather lowered. Therefore, it is set to 0.0001 to 0.0250%.

なお、上記のMg、Ca、およびBの化学成分は、選択的に1種または2種以上が添加できる。 The above chemical components of Mg, Ca, and B can be selectively added by one or more.

式(1):5.00≦Nieq≦9.50
式(1)のNieqの値は、5.00以上の大きさ、かつ9.50以下であることが必要である。式(1)が上記の条件を満足しないときは、鋼の熱間加工性が低下する。そこで、式(1)は、5.00≦Nieq≦9.50とする。
ただし、上記式(1)におけるNieq=[%Ni]+30×([%C]+[%N])+0.5×[%Mn]+0.3×[%Cu]である。
Equation (1): 5.00 ≤ Ni eq ≤ 9.50
The value of Ni eq in the formula (1) needs to be 5.00 or more and 9.50 or less. When the formula (1) does not satisfy the above conditions, the hot workability of the steel is lowered. Therefore, the equation (1) is set to 5.00 ≤ Ni eq ≤ 9.50.
However, Ni eq in the above formula (1) = [% Ni] + 30 × ([% C] + [% N]) + 0.5 × [% Mn] + 0.3 × [% Cu].

式(2):Nieq≦−0.83×Creq+25.5
式(2)に示すように、Nieqの値は、−0.83×Creq+25.5の値以下であることが必要である。式(2)が上記の条件を満足しないときは、残留オーステナイト量が大きくなるからである。そこで、式(2)は、Nieq≦−0.83×Creq+25.5とする。
ただし、Nieqは、Nieq=[%Ni]+30×([%C]+[%N])+0.5×[%Mn]+0.3×[%Cu]であり、さらに、Creq=[%Cr]+[%Mo]+1.5×[%Si]+0.5×[%Nb]である。
なお、(1)式および(2)式における[%M](「M」は化学成分を示す。)の値はいずれも、質量%の数値の大きさ、すなわち、対応する元素の含有量の数値(質量%)が代入される。
Equation (2): Ni eq ≤ −0.83 × Cr eq + 25.5
As shown in the formula (2), the value of Ni eq needs to be equal to or less than the value of −0.83 × Cr eq + 25.5. This is because when the formula (2) does not satisfy the above conditions, the amount of retained austenite increases. Therefore, the formula (2) is Ni eq ≤ −0.83 × Cr eq + 25.5.
However, Ni eq is Ni eq = [% Ni] + 30 × ([% C] + [% N]) + 0.5 × [% Mn] + 0.3 × [% Cu], and further, Cr eq = [% Cr] + [% Mo] + 1.5 × [% Si] + 0.5 × [% Nb].
In addition, the value of [% M] (“M” indicates a chemical component) in the equations (1) and (2) is the magnitude of the numerical value of mass%, that is, the content of the corresponding element. A numerical value (mass%) is substituted.

次いで、本願の発明を実施するための形態について、実施例に基いて以下に説明する。 Next, a mode for carrying out the invention of the present application will be described below based on examples.

表1に示す第1の手段の発明鋼の化学成分、表2に示す第2の手段の発明鋼の化学成分、表3に示す第3の手段の発明鋼および第4の手段の発明鋼の各化学成分の実施例鋼と、さらに、表4に示す比較鋼1(第1の手段に対する比較鋼)および比較鋼2(第2の手段に対する比較鋼)の各化学成分の比較例と、表5に示す比較鋼3(第3の手段に対する比較鋼)および比較鋼4(第4の手段に対する比較鋼)の各化学成分の比較例をそれぞれ有し、かつ、それぞれの残部であるFeおよび不可避不純物からなる実施例および比較例の各鋼を、それぞれ100kgVIM(真空誘導溶解炉)にて溶解して、インゴットに鋳造した。
これらのインゴットを1150℃で径20mmの棒鋼に鍛伸した。さらに、これらの棒鋼を900〜1200℃に1時間保持した後、水冷して固溶化熱処理を行った。さらに、これらの固溶化熱処理した棒鋼を300〜800℃で1時間保持した後、空冷して時効熱処理を行った。
The chemical composition of the invention steel of the first means shown in Table 1, the chemical composition of the invention steel of the second means shown in Table 2, the invention steel of the third means and the invention steel of the fourth means shown in Table 3. Example steels of each chemical component, and comparative examples of each chemical component of comparative steel 1 (comparative steel for the first means) and comparative steel 2 (comparative steel for the second means) shown in Table 4 and a table. Each of the comparative examples of the chemical components of the comparative steel 3 (comparative steel for the third means) and the comparative steel 4 (comparative steel for the fourth means) shown in 5 is provided, and the balance of Fe and unavoidable. Each of the steels of Examples and Comparative Examples composed of impurities was melted in a 100 kg VIM (vacuum induction melting furnace) and cast into an ingot.
These ingots were forged into steel bars having a diameter of 20 mm at 1150 ° C. Further, these steel bars were kept at 900 to 1200 ° C. for 1 hour, then cooled with water and subjected to a solidification heat treatment. Further, these solid solution heat-treated steel bars were held at 300 to 800 ° C. for 1 hour, then air-cooled and subjected to aging heat treatment.

上記の時効熱処理後にそれぞれのサイズに調整した各素材から以下の試験を実施した。試験の結果は、それぞれの表1、表2、および表3の各請求鋼の発明鋼の化学成分と合せてそれら発明鋼の特性を示し、さらに、表4および表5に第1〜第4の手段の発明の比較例である比較鋼の化学成分と合わせてそれらの各特性を示す。
なお、各特性としては、(1)式、(2)式を満足するものは○、満足しないものは×とし、表1、表2、および表3、並びに表4および表5に表記した。また、耐候性試験では発銹したものを×、発銹しなかったものを○とし、表1、表2、および表3、並びに表4および表5に表記した。なお、表4および表5の下線部は本発明の範囲外であることを示している。
The following tests were carried out from each material adjusted to each size after the above aging heat treatment. The results of the test show the characteristics of the invention steels in Table 1, Table 2, and Table 3 together with the chemical composition of the invention steels of the claimed steels, and further, Tables 4 and 5 show the first to fourth items. Each of these properties is shown together with the chemical composition of the comparative steel, which is a comparative example of the invention of the means.
As for each characteristic, those satisfying the formulas (1) and (2) were marked with ◯, those not satisfying the formulas (2) were marked with x, and are shown in Table 1, Table 2, and Table 3, and Tables 4 and 5. In the weather resistance test, those that were rusted were marked with x, those that were not rusted were marked with ◯, and are shown in Tables 1, 2, and 3, and Tables 4 and 5. The underlined parts in Tables 4 and 5 indicate that they are outside the scope of the present invention.

Figure 0006987651
Figure 0006987651

Figure 0006987651
Figure 0006987651

Figure 0006987651
Figure 0006987651

Figure 0006987651
Figure 0006987651

Figure 0006987651
Figure 0006987651

評価項目は、各発明鋼および各比較鋼のNieqとCreq、並びに、時効のピーク硬さ(HRC)、耐候性(塩水噴霧試験で、50ppmNaClを35℃で16時間噴霧による発銹無しを○、発銹有りを×)、残留オーステナイト量(%)、および熱間加工性(グリーブル試験)の絞り(RA)が60%以上となる温度(℃)とした。 The evaluation items were Ni eq and Cr eq of each invention steel and each comparative steel, as well as peak hardness (HRC) and weather resistance of aging (in a salt spray test, 50 ppm Nickel was sprayed at 35 ° C for 16 hours without rusting. ◯, with rusting was ×), the amount of retained austenite (%), and the temperature (° C.) at which the throttle (RA) of hot workability (greeble test) was 60% or more.

評価方法は、Nieq(すなわちNi当量)、Creq(すなわちCr当量)、マルテンサイト開始温度であるMs点(℃)、式(1)および式(2)の各値の大きさと、これらの値に関連する、時効熱処理を行った時効硬さにおけるピーク硬さ、耐候性、残留オーステナイト量である残留γ量、および熱間加工性における絞りすなわちRA60%以上となる温度をそれぞれ以下に示す手段により測定した。 The evaluation method is Ni eq (that is, Ni equivalent), Cr eq (that is, Cr equivalent), the Ms point (° C) which is the martensite starting temperature, the magnitude of each value of the formulas (1) and (2), and these. Means showing the peak hardness, weather resistance, residual austenite amount, residual γ amount, and hot workability drawing, that is, the temperature at which RA is 60% or more, which are related to the values. Measured by.

すなわち、時効硬さにおけるピーク硬さでは、上記の種々の時効処理を施した丸棒を用い、鍛伸方向に垂直な断面の中周部におけるロックウェル硬さを測定し、得られた硬さのうち最も大きな値のものをピーク硬さとし、その値がHRC55以上であるものを良好であると判断した。 That is, for the peak hardness in the aging hardness, the Rockwell hardness in the middle circumference of the cross section perpendicular to the forging direction was measured using the round bar subjected to the above-mentioned various aging treatments, and the obtained hardness was obtained. Among them, the one with the largest value was regarded as the peak hardness, and the one having the value of HRC55 or more was judged to be good.

耐候性(塩水噴霧試験で、50ppmNaClを35℃で16時間噴霧による)では、上記の種々の時効処理を施した丸棒を径12mm、長さ21mmのサイズに調整し、耐候性試験を実施した。具体的には、試験片の表面に所定の濃度および温度の塩水を所定の時間噴霧し続け、試験後に、洗浄した試験片の表面の発銹の有無を調査した。 For weather resistance (in a salt spray test, 50 ppm NaCl was sprayed at 35 ° C. for 16 hours), the above-mentioned round bars subjected to various aging treatments were adjusted to a size of 12 mm in diameter and 21 mm in length, and a weather resistance test was carried out. .. Specifically, salt water having a predetermined concentration and temperature was continuously sprayed on the surface of the test piece for a predetermined time, and after the test, the presence or absence of rusting on the surface of the washed test piece was investigated.

残留オーステナイト量すなわち残留γ量では、上記の種々の時効処理を施した丸棒を用い、鍛伸方向に垂直な断面の中周部における残留オーステナイト量を測定した。測定には、湾曲IPX線回折装置RINT RAPID II(株式会社リガク、日本)を用いた。 For the residual austenite amount, that is, the residual γ amount, the residual austenite amount in the middle peripheral portion of the cross section perpendicular to the forging direction was measured using the round bar subjected to the above-mentioned various aging treatments. A curved IPX-ray diffractometer RINT RAPID II (Rigaku Co., Ltd., Japan) was used for the measurement.

熱間加工性(グリーブル試験)における絞りすなわちRA60%以上の得られる温度では、上記の種々の時効処理を施した丸棒を、径8mm、長さ100mmのサイズの試験片に調整し、通電加熱による熱間引張試験(グリーブル試験)を実施した。試験温度は800〜1350℃まで25℃毎とし、破断後の試験片の熱間加工性における絞りRAが60%以上である温度域を算出した。その温度域が100℃以上のものを良好であると判断した。 At a drawing in hot workability (gleeble test), that is, at a temperature at which RA of 60% or more can be obtained, the round bar subjected to the above-mentioned various aging treatments is adjusted to a test piece having a diameter of 8 mm and a length of 100 mm, and is heated by energization. A hot tensile test (gleeble test) was carried out. The test temperature was set every 25 ° C. from 800 to 1350 ° C., and the temperature range in which the drawing RA in the hot workability of the test piece after fracture was 60% or more was calculated. Those having a temperature range of 100 ° C. or higher were judged to be good.

表1、表2および表3に示すように、本願の第1〜第4の手段の各No.の発明鋼は、表中の式(1)の欄には、式(1)を満足する場合を○として評価した。
なお、式(1)とは、5.00≦Nieq≦9.50である。
さらに、表中の式(2)の列には、式(2)を満足する場合を○として評価した。
式(2)とは、Nieq≦−0.83×Creq+25.5である。
なお、Nieq=[%Ni]+30×([%C]+[%N])+0.5×[%Mn]+0.3×[%Cu]であり、Creq=[%Cr]+[%Mo]+1.5×[%Si]+0.5×[%Nb]である。
As shown in Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3, each No. 1 of the first to fourth means of the present application. In the column of the formula (1) in the table, the case where the formula (1) was satisfied was evaluated as ◯.
The equation (1) is 5.00 ≦ Ni eq ≦ 9.50.
Further, in the column of the formula (2) in the table, the case where the formula (2) was satisfied was evaluated as ◯.
Equation (2) is Ni eq ≤ −0.83 × Cr eq + 25.5.
In addition, Ni eq = [% Ni] + 30 × ([% C] + [% N]) + 0.5 × [% Mn] + 0.3 × [% Cu], and Cr eq = [% Cr] + [ % Mo] + 1.5 × [% Si] + 0.5 × [% Nb].

本願の第1〜第4の手段の各No.の発明鋼の特性について
表1、表2、および表3における、Nieqの値はいずれも5.00以上9.50以下である。さらに、Creqの値は、Nieqの値に応じて変動し、9.4〜15.7である。
また、Ms点(マルテンサイト変態開始温度)は106〜262℃である。さらに、式(1)および、式(2)を満足するものは○と表示しているとおり、いずれも双方の式を満足する値となっている。
No. 1 of the first to fourth means of the present application. About the characteristics of the invention steel of the above, the value of Ni eq in Table 1, Table 2, and Table 3 is 5.00 or more and 9.50 or less. Further, the value of Cr eq varies depending on the value of Ni eq and is 9.4 to 15.7.
The Ms point (martensite transformation start temperature) is 106 to 262 ° C. Further, those satisfying the equations (1) and (2) are indicated by ◯, and both have values satisfying both equations.

そして、これらを満足する表1、表2、および表3の第1〜第4の手段の各発明鋼では、以下の様な特性を備えている。時効熱処理を行った時効硬さにおけるピーク硬さは55HRC以上であり、耐候性は塩水噴霧試験において発銹が無く、これらを○で示し、残留オーステナイト量すなわち残留γ量は1.0%以下であり、さらに熱間引張試験(グリーブル試験)における絞り(RA)が60%以上となる温度は100℃以上である。 The steels of the inventions of the first to fourth means of Tables 1, 2 and 3 that satisfy these characteristics have the following characteristics. The peak hardness in the aging hardness after the aging heat treatment was 55HRC or more, the weather resistance was not rusted in the salt spray test, and these are indicated by ○, and the residual austenite amount, that is, the residual γ amount was 1.0% or less. Further, the temperature at which the drawing (RA) in the hot tensile test (greeble test) is 60% or more is 100 ° C. or more.

以上の表1、表2、および表3の第1〜第4の手段の各発明鋼に対して、表4および表5に示す、これらと同順で対応する比較鋼1、比較鋼2、比較鋼3、比較鋼4の各No.についての上記試験の評価として、第1〜第4の手段の各発明の有する特性の範囲から外れる特性について以下に順次記載する。 For each of the invention steels of the first to fourth means of Tables 1, 2 and 3 above, the comparative steels 1 and the comparative steels 2 are shown in Tables 4 and 5 and corresponding in the same order as these. No. of Comparative Steel 3 and Comparative Steel 4. As an evaluation of the above-mentioned test, the characteristics outside the range of the characteristics of each of the inventions of the first to fourth means are sequentially described below.

先ず、第1の手段に対応する比較鋼1のNo.1〜15について、以下に説明する。
No.1は、マルテンサイト開始温度であるMs点が61℃と100℃未満の低さであるので、残留オーステナイト量(すなわち表1の残留γ量)が2.4%で、本願発明の規定の1.0%より多く、熱間加工性の絞りRAは60%以上となる温度の下限値の100℃に満たず、25℃と極めて低い。
No.2は、Cの含有量が0.12%と本願発明の範囲より多く、Nieqが本願発明の9.50より高い10.58で、Ms点が69℃と100℃未満の低さで、式(1)を満たしていないので×で、耐候性も×で、残留オーステナイト量(残留γ量)が2.8%で本願発明に規定の1.0%より多く、熱間加工性の絞りRAが60%以上となる温度範囲が100℃未満の75℃と低い。
No.3は、Siの含有量が0.20%と本願発明の範囲より少なく、時効処理のピーク硬さが53.8HRCと本願発明の55HRCより低い。
No.4は、Siの含有量が2.16%と本願発明の範囲より多く、Nieqが本願発明の9.50より高い10.34で、式(1)を満たしておらず×で、熱間加工性の絞りRAは60%以上となる温度範囲の下限値の100℃に満たず50℃と低い。
No.5は、Mnの含有量が1.17%と本願発明の範囲より多く、Nieqが本願発明における9.50より高く9.80であり、式(1)を満たしておらず×で、熱間加工性の絞りRAは60%以上となる温度範囲の下限値である100℃に満たず50℃と低い。
No.6は、Niの含有量が3.61%と本願発明の範囲の4.00%より少なく、時効処理のピーク硬さが52.6HRCと本願発明における55HRCより低い。
No.7は、Niの含有量が9.52%と本願発明の範囲の9.00%より多く、Nieqが本願発明における9.50より高く、12.10で、Ms点が52℃と100℃未満の低さで、式(1)を満たして織らず×で、残留オーステナイト量(残留γ量)が5.2%で本願発明の規定の1.0%より多く、熱間加工性の絞りRAは60%以上となる温度範囲の下限値の100℃に満たず75℃と低い。
No.8は、Crの含有量が4.03%と本願発明の範囲の8.00%より少なく、耐候性が×である。
No.9は、Crの含有量が14.88%と本願発明の範囲の14.50%より多く、熱間加工性が低く、コスト増となる。
No.10は、Moの含有量が0.04%と本願発明の範囲の0.10%より少なく、Nieqが9.51と、本願発明の9.50よりやや高い値で式(1)を満たしておらず×で、耐候性も×で、熱間加工性の絞りRAが60%以上となる温度範囲が100℃未満で75℃と低い。
No.11は、Moの含有量が2.19%と本願発明の2.00%より多く、コスト高で、Nieqが11.01と本願発明の9.50より高く、式(1)を満たしていないので×であり、熱間加工性の絞りRAは60%以上となる温度範囲の下限値である100℃に満たず、50℃と低い。
No.12は、Cuの含有量が0.32%と本願発明の0.50%より少なく、時効処理のピーク硬さが53.2HRCと本願発明における55HRCより低い。
No.13は、Cuの含有量が0.43%と本願発明の4.00%より多く、Nieqが9.85と本願発明の9.50より高く、式(1)を満たしておらず×で、熱間加工性の絞りRAは60%以上となる温度の下限値である100℃に満たず、75℃と低い。
No.14は、Tiの含有量が0.12%と本願発明の下限値の0.50%より少なく、Nieqが10.31と本願発明の9.50より高く、式(1)を満たしておらず×で、時効処理のピーク硬さが52.9HRCと本願発明における55HRCより低く、熱間加工性の絞りRAは60%以上となる温度範囲の下限値である100℃に満たず50℃と低い。
No.15は、Tiの含有量が3.80%と本願発明の上限値の3.50%より多く、Nieqが10.00と本願発明における9.50より高く、式(1)を満たしておらず×で、熱間加工性の絞りRAは60%以上となる温度範囲の下限値である100℃に満たず、75℃と低い。
First, No. 1 of the comparative steel 1 corresponding to the first means. 1 to 15 will be described below.
No. In No. 1, since the Ms point, which is the martensite starting temperature, is as low as 61 ° C. and less than 100 ° C., the residual austenite amount (that is, the residual γ amount in Table 1) is 2.4%, which is the one specified in the present invention. The drawing RA, which is more than 0.0% and has hot workability, is less than 100 ° C., which is the lower limit of the temperature of 60% or more, and is extremely low at 25 ° C.
No. In No. 2, the C content was 0.12%, which was higher than the range of the present invention, the Ni eq was 10.58, which was higher than 9.50 of the present invention, and the Ms point was 69 ° C., which was lower than 100 ° C. Since it does not satisfy the formula (1), it is ×, the weather resistance is also ×, the residual austenite amount (residual γ amount) is 2.8%, which is more than 1.0% specified in the present invention, and the drawing is hot workability. The temperature range in which RA is 60% or more is as low as 75 ° C, which is less than 100 ° C.
No. In No. 3, the Si content is 0.20%, which is less than the range of the present invention, and the peak hardness of the aging treatment is 53.8 HRC, which is lower than the 55 HRC of the present invention.
No. In No. 4, the Si content is 2.16%, which is higher than the range of the present invention, and the Ni eq is 10.34, which is higher than 9.50 of the present invention. The workability of the throttle RA is as low as 50 ° C., which is less than the lower limit of 100 ° C. in the temperature range of 60% or more.
No. In No. 5, the Mn content was 1.17%, which was higher than the range of the present invention, and the Ni eq was 9.80, which was higher than 9.50 in the present invention. The workability drawing RA is as low as 50 ° C., which is less than 100 ° C., which is the lower limit of the temperature range of 60% or more.
No. In No. 6, the Ni content is 3.61%, which is less than 4.00% of the range of the present invention, and the peak hardness of the aging treatment is 52.6 HRC, which is lower than 55 HRC in the present invention.
No. In 7, the Ni content was 9.52%, which was more than 9.00% of the range of the present invention, Ni eq was higher than 9.50 in the present invention, 12.10, and the Ms points were 52 ° C and 100 ° C. It is less than low, does not satisfy the formula (1) and is not woven, and has a residual austenite amount (residual γ amount) of 5.2%, which is more than 1.0% specified in the present invention, and is a hot workability drawing. RA is as low as 75 ° C., which is less than the lower limit of 100 ° C. in the temperature range of 60% or more.
No. In No. 8, the Cr content is 4.03%, which is less than 8.00% of the range of the present invention, and the weather resistance is ×.
No. In No. 9, the Cr content is 14.88%, which is more than 14.50% of the range of the present invention, the hot workability is low, and the cost is increased.
No. In No. 10, the Mo content was 0.04%, which was less than 0.10% of the range of the present invention, and the Ni eq was 9.51, which was slightly higher than 9.50 of the present invention, satisfying the formula (1). The temperature range in which the hot workability drawing RA is 60% or more is less than 100 ° C. and the temperature range is as low as 75 ° C.
No. In No. 11, the Mo content is 2.19%, which is higher than 2.00% of the present invention, the cost is high, the Ni eq is 11.01, which is higher than 9.50 of the present invention, and the formula (1) is satisfied. Since there is no such thing, it is x, and the hot workability drawing RA is less than 100 ° C., which is the lower limit of the temperature range of 60% or more, and is as low as 50 ° C.
No. In No. 12, the Cu content is 0.32%, which is less than 0.50% of the present invention, and the peak hardness of the aging treatment is 53.2 HRC, which is lower than 55 HRC in the present invention.
No. In No. 13, the Cu content was 0.43%, which was higher than 4.00% of the present invention, and the Ni eq was 9.85, which was higher than 9.50 of the present invention. The hot workability drawing RA is less than 100 ° C., which is the lower limit of the temperature at which it is 60% or more, and is as low as 75 ° C.
No. In No. 14, the Ti content is 0.12%, which is less than the lower limit of 0.50% of the present invention, and the Ni eq is 10.31, which is higher than 9.50 of the present invention, and the formula (1) is satisfied. The peak hardness of the aging treatment is 52.9 HRC, which is lower than 55 HRC in the present invention, and the hot workability drawing RA is 50 ° C, which is less than the lower limit of the temperature range of 60% or more. Low.
No. In No. 15, the Ti content is 3.80%, which is higher than the upper limit of 3.50% of the present invention, and the Ni eq is 10.00, which is higher than 9.50 in the present invention, and the formula (1) is satisfied. The hot workability of the throttle RA is less than 100 ° C., which is the lower limit of the temperature range of 60% or more, and is as low as 75 ° C.

次いで、第2の手段に対応する比較鋼2のNo.16〜21について以下に説明する。
No.16は、Alの含有量が0.186%と本願発明の上限値の0.150%より多い。しかしながら、Al以外の元素は規定の範囲内であるので、Nieq、Creq、Ms点、式(1)、式(2)、時効硬さ(ピーク硬さ)、耐候性、残留オ−ステナイト量(残留γ量)、および熱間加工性の絞りRAに格別に影響は見られない。
No.17は、Nbの含有量が2.09%と本願発明の上限値の2.00%より多い。そこで、Nieqが9.52で本願発明の9.50よりやや高い値であり、式(1)を満たしておらず×で、熱間加工性の絞りRAは60%以上となる温度範囲の下限値である100℃に満たず、75℃と低い。
No.18は、Nの含有量が0.084%と本願発明の上限の0.050%より多い。そこで、Nieqが10.25と本願発明における9.50より高く、式(1)を満たしておらず×で、熱間加工性の絞りRAは60%以上となる温度範囲の下限値である100℃に満たず、75℃と低い。
No.19は、Sの含有量が0.145%と本願の上限の0.100%より多い。そこで、熱間加工性の絞りRAは60%以上となる温度範囲の下限値である100℃に満たず、25℃と極めて低い。
No.20は、Nbの含有量が2.14%と本願発明の上限値の2.00%より多い。一方、Nを含有しているが、その含有量は本願発明の上限の0.050%以下の範囲内である。そこで、Nieqが9.67と本願発明の9.50より高く、式(1)を満たしておらず×で、熱間加工性の絞りRAは60%以上となる温度範囲の下限値である100℃に満たず、75℃と低い。
No.21は、Sの含有量が0.122%と本願発明の上限の0.100%より多く、Nbを含有しているが、その含有量は1.69%と本願発明の0.01〜2.00%の範囲内で、さらにNを含有しているが、その含有量は本願の上限の0.050%より多い。そこで、Nieqは9.80と本願発明の9.50より高く、式(1)を満たしておらず×であり、熱間加工性の絞りRAは60%以上となる温度範囲の下限値である100℃に満たず、25℃と極めて低い。
Next, No. 2 of the comparative steel 2 corresponding to the second means. 16 to 21 will be described below.
No. In No. 16, the Al content is 0.186%, which is higher than the upper limit of 0.150% of the present invention. However, since the elements other than Al are within the specified range, Ni eq , Cr eq , Ms point, formula (1), formula (2), aging hardness (peak hardness), weather resistance, retained austenite. No particular effect was observed on the amount (residual γ amount) and the hot workability of the throttle RA.
No. In No. 17, the content of Nb is 2.09%, which is higher than the upper limit of 2.00% of the present invention. Therefore, Ni eq is 9.52, which is slightly higher than 9.50 of the present invention, does not satisfy the formula (1), is ×, and the hot workability drawing RA is in the temperature range of 60% or more. It is less than the lower limit of 100 ° C and is as low as 75 ° C.
No. In No. 18, the content of N is 0.084%, which is higher than the upper limit of 0.050% of the present invention. Therefore, Ni eq is 10.25, which is higher than 9.50 in the present invention, does not satisfy the formula (1), and is ×, and the hot workability throttle RA is the lower limit of the temperature range of 60% or more. It is less than 100 ° C and as low as 75 ° C.
No. In No. 19, the S content is 0.145%, which is higher than the upper limit of 0.100% in the present application. Therefore, the hot workability drawing RA is less than 100 ° C., which is the lower limit of the temperature range of 60% or more, and is extremely low at 25 ° C.
No. No. 20 has an Nb content of 2.14%, which is higher than the upper limit of 2.00% of the present invention. On the other hand, although it contains N, its content is within the range of 0.050% or less of the upper limit of the present invention. Therefore, Ni eq is 9.67, which is higher than 9.50 of the present invention, does not satisfy the formula (1), is ×, and the hot workability throttle RA is the lower limit of the temperature range of 60% or more. It is less than 100 ° C and as low as 75 ° C.
No. In No. 21, the S content is 0.122%, which is more than the upper limit of 0.100% of the present invention, and Nb is contained, but the content is 1.69%, which is 0.01 to 2 of the present invention. In the range of .00%, N is further contained, but the content is more than 0.050%, which is the upper limit of the present application. Therefore, Ni eq is 9.80, which is higher than 9.50 of the present invention, does not satisfy the formula (1), and is ×, and the hot workability throttle RA is at the lower limit of the temperature range of 60% or more. It is less than a certain 100 ° C and is extremely low at 25 ° C.

次いで、第3の手段に対応する比較鋼3のNo.22〜24について説明する。
No.22は、Caの含有量が0.0312%と本願発明の上限値の0.0250%より多く、Bの含有量が0.0340%と本願発明の上限の0.0250%より多い。そこで、熱間加工性の絞りRAは60%以上となる温度範囲の下限値である100℃に満たず、75℃と低い。
No.23は、Mgの含有量が0.0289%と本願発明の上限値の0.0250%より多い。そこで、熱間加工性の絞りRAは60%以上となる温度範囲の下限値である100℃に満たず、75℃と低い。
No.24は、Mgの含有量が0.0274%と本願発明の上限値の0.0250%より多く、さらにBの含有量が0.0340%と本願発明の上限値の0.0250%より多い。そこで、Nieqは11.39と本願発明の上限値の9.50より高く、Ms点が106℃よりも低い92℃の低さであり、式(1)を満たしておらず×であり、残留オーステナイト量(残留γ量)が2.7%で本願発明の規定の1.0%を超えており、熱間加工性の絞りRAは60%以上となる温度範囲の下限値である100℃に満たず、50℃と低い。
Next, No. 1 of the comparative steel 3 corresponding to the third means. 22 to 24 will be described.
No. In No. 22, the Ca content is 0.0312%, which is higher than the upper limit of 0.0250% of the present invention, and the B content is 0.0340%, which is higher than the upper limit of 0.0250% of the present invention. Therefore, the hot workability drawing RA is less than 100 ° C., which is the lower limit of the temperature range of 60% or more, and is as low as 75 ° C.
No. In No. 23, the Mg content is 0.0289%, which is higher than the upper limit of 0.0250% of the present invention. Therefore, the hot workability drawing RA is less than 100 ° C., which is the lower limit of the temperature range of 60% or more, and is as low as 75 ° C.
No. In No. 24, the Mg content is 0.0274%, which is higher than the upper limit of 0.0250% of the present invention, and the B content is 0.0340%, which is higher than the upper limit of 0.0250% of the present invention. Therefore, Ni eq is 11.39, which is higher than the upper limit of 9.50 of the present invention, and the Ms point is as low as 92 ° C, which is lower than 106 ° C. The residual austenite amount (residual γ amount) is 2.7%, which exceeds 1.0% specified in the present invention, and the hot workability drawing RA is 100 ° C., which is the lower limit of the temperature range of 60% or more. It is less than 50 ° C and as low as 50 ° C.

最後に、第4の手段に対応する比較鋼4のNo.25〜30について説明する。
No.25は、Alの含有量が0.099%と本願発明の上限値の0.150%以下の範囲内で、Nbの含有量が0.92%と本願発明の上限値の2.00%以下の範囲内で、Bの含有量が、0.0401%と本願発明の上限値の0.0250%を超えており、Nieqは12.12と本願発明の上限値の9.50より高く、式(1)を満たしておらず×で、熱間加工性の絞りRAは60%以上となる温度範囲の下限値である100℃に満たず、75℃と低い。
No.26は、Alを含有しておらず、Caは0.0052%と本願発明の0.0001〜0.0250%の範囲内であるが、Mgは0.0290%と本願発明の上限値の0.0250%より多く、熱間加工性の絞りRAは60%以上となる温度範囲の下限値である100℃に満たず、75℃と低い。
No.27は、Alの含有量が0.083%と本願発明の上限値の0.150%の範囲内で、Nは0.041%と本願発明の0.002〜0.050%の範囲内であるが、Mgは0.0267%で本願発明の上限値の0.0250%より多いので、熱間加工性の絞りRAは60%以上となる温度範囲の下限値である100℃に満たず、50℃と低い。
No.28は、S含有量は0.089%と本願発明の0.001〜0.100%の範囲内で、Alの含有量は0.041%と本願発明の0.001〜0.150%の範囲内であるが、Caは0.0361%と本願発明の上限値の0.0250%より多い。したがって、Nieqは11.21と本願発明の上限値の9.50より高く、式(1)を満たしておらず×で、熱間加工性の絞りRAは60%以上となる温度範囲の下限値である100℃に満たず、50℃と低い。
No.29は、S含有量は0.026%と本願発明の0.001〜0.100%の範囲内で、Alの含有量は無く、Nbの含有量は0.20%と本願発明の0.01〜2.00%の範囲内で、さらにMgは0.0213%と本願発明の0.01〜2.00%の範囲内で、Bは0.0274%で本願発明の上限値の0.0250%より多い。そこで、Nieqは11.90と本願発明の上限値の9.50より高く、式(1)を満たしておらず×で、熱間加工性の絞りRAは60%以上となる温度範囲の下限値である100℃に満たず、75℃と低い。
No.30は、S含有量は0.047%と本願発明の0.001〜0.100%で、Alは0.186%と本願発明の0.001〜0.150%で、Caは0.0284%で本願発明の上限値の0.0250%より多く、さらに、Mgは0.0316%と本願発明の上限値の2.00%より多いが、Bは0.0034%と本願発明の0.0001〜0.0250%の範囲内である。そこで、熱間加工性の絞りRAは60%以上となる温度範囲の下限値である100℃に満たず、25℃と極めて低い。
Finally, No. 1 of the comparative steel 4 corresponding to the fourth means. 25 to 30 will be described.
No. In 25, the Al content is 0.099%, which is within the range of 0.150% or less of the upper limit of the present invention, and the Nb content is 0.92%, which is 2.00% or less of the upper limit of the present invention. Within the range of, the content of B is 0.0401%, which exceeds the upper limit of 0.0250% of the present invention, and Ni eq is 12.12, which is higher than the upper limit of 9.50 of the present invention. It does not satisfy the formula (1) and is ×, and the hot workability drawing RA is less than 100 ° C., which is the lower limit of the temperature range of 60% or more, and is as low as 75 ° C.
No. No. 26 does not contain Al, Ca is 0.0052%, which is in the range of 0.0001 to 0.0250% of the present invention, but Mg is 0.0290%, which is the upper limit of 0 of the present invention. More than .0250%, the hot workability drawing RA is less than 100 ° C, which is the lower limit of the temperature range of 60% or more, and is as low as 75 ° C.
No. In 27, the Al content is 0.083%, which is within the range of 0.150% of the upper limit of the present invention, and N is 0.041%, which is within the range of 0.002 to 0.050% of the present invention. However, since Mg is 0.0267%, which is higher than the upper limit of 0.0250% of the present invention, the hot workability drawing RA is less than 100 ° C., which is the lower limit of the temperature range of 60% or more. It is as low as 50 ° C.
No. No. 28 has an S content of 0.089%, which is in the range of 0.001 to 0.100% of the present invention, and an Al content of 0.041%, which is 0.001 to 0.150% of the present invention. Although within the range, Ca is 0.0361%, which is higher than the upper limit of 0.0250% of the present invention. Therefore, Ni eq is 11.21, which is higher than the upper limit of 9.50 of the present invention, does not satisfy the formula (1), is ×, and the hot workability throttle RA is the lower limit of the temperature range of 60% or more. It is less than 100 ° C, which is a value, and is as low as 50 ° C.
No. In No. 29, the S content was 0.026%, which was in the range of 0.001 to 0.100% of the present invention, the Al content was not, and the Nb content was 0.20%, which was 0. Within the range of 01 to 2.00%, Mg is 0.0213% and 0.01 to 2.00% of the present invention, and B is 0.0274%, which is the upper limit of the present invention. More than 0250%. Therefore, Ni eq is 11.90, which is higher than the upper limit of 9.50 of the present invention, does not satisfy the formula (1), is ×, and the hot workability throttle RA is the lower limit of the temperature range of 60% or more. It is less than the value of 100 ° C and is as low as 75 ° C.
No. In No. 30, the S content was 0.047% and 0.001 to 0.100% of the present invention, Al was 0.186% and 0.001 to 0.150% of the present invention, and Ca was 0.0284. % Is more than 0.0250% of the upper limit of the present invention, and Mg is 0.0316%, which is more than 2.00% of the upper limit of the present invention, but B is 0.0034%, which is 0. It is in the range of 0001 to 0.0250%. Therefore, the hot workability drawing RA is less than 100 ° C., which is the lower limit of the temperature range of 60% or more, and is extremely low at 25 ° C.

Claims (4)

質量%で、C:0.01〜0.10%、Si:0.30〜2.00%、Mn:0.01〜1.00%、Ni:4.00〜9.00%、Cr:8.00〜14.50%、Mo:0.10〜2.00%、Cu:0.50〜4.00%、Ti:0.50〜3.50%を含有し、残部Feおよび不可避不純物からなり、下記の式(1)および式(2)を満足し、硬さが55HRC以上、残留オーステナイト量が1%以下、熱間引張試験(グリーブル試験)における絞り60%以上となる温度が100℃以上であることを特徴とする製造性に優れた高硬度析出硬化型ステンレス鋼。
5.00≦Nieq≦9.50・・・式(1)
Nieq≦−0.83×Creq+25.5・・・式(2)
ただし、Nieq=[%Ni]+30×([%C]+[%N])+0.5×[%Mn]+0.3×[%Cu]で、Creq=[%Cr]+[%Mo]+1.5×[%Si]+0.5×[%Nb]でる。
なお、上記の[%M]には、いずれも対応する元素の含有量の数値(質量%)が代入される。
By mass%, C: 0.01 to 0.10%, Si: 0.30 to 2.00%, Mn: 0.01 to 1.00%, Ni: 4.00 to 9.00%, Cr: It contains 8.01 to 14.50%, Mo: 0.10 to 2.00%, Cu: 0.50 to 4.00%, Ti: 0.50 to 3.50%, and the balance Fe and unavoidable impurities. The temperature at which the hardness is 55 HRC or more, the residual austenite amount is 1% or less, and the drawing is 60% or more in the hot tensile test (greeble test) is 100, which satisfies the following formulas (1) and (2). High hardness precipitation hardening stainless steel with excellent manufacturability, which is characterized by a temperature of ℃ or higher.
5.00 ≤ Ni eq ≤ 9.50 ... Equation (1)
Ni eq ≤ -0.83 x Cr eq + 25.5 ... Equation (2)
However, Ni eq = [% Ni] + 30 × ([% C] + [% N]) + 0.5 × [% Mn] + 0.3 × [% Cu], and Cr eq = [% Cr] + [% Mo] +1.5 x [% Si] +0.5 x [% Nb].
In each of the above [% M], the numerical value (mass%) of the content of the corresponding element is substituted.
請求項1の化学成分に加えて、質量%で、Al:0.001〜0.150%、Nb:0.01〜2.00%、N:0.002〜0.050%、およびS:0.001〜0.100%から選択したいずれか1種または2種以上を含有し、ただし、請求項1の化学成分の中のCrについては、Cr:8.00〜13.00%未満とし、残部Feおよび不可避不純物からなり、下記の式(1)および式(2)を満足し、硬さが55HRC以上、残留オーステナイト量が1%以下、熱間引張試験(グリーブル試験)における絞り60%以上となる温度が100℃以上であることを特徴とする製造性に優れた高硬度析出硬化型ステンレス鋼。
5.00≦Nieq≦9.50・・・式(1)
Nieq≦−0.83×Creq+25.5・・・式(2)
ただし、Nieq=[%Ni]+30×([%C]+[%N])+0.5×[%Mn]+0.3×[%Cu]で、Creq=[%Cr]+[%Mo]+1.5×[%Si]+0.5×[%Nb]である。
なお、上記の[%M]には、いずれも対応する元素の含有量の数値(質量%)が代入される。
In addition to the chemical composition of claim 1, by mass%, Al: 0.001 to 0.150%, Nb: 0.01 to 2.00%, N: 0.002 to 0.050%, and S :. It contains any one or more selected from 0.001 to 0.100%, but the Cr in the chemical component of claim 1 is Cr: 8.00 to less than 13.00%. , Remaining Fe and unavoidable impurities, satisfying the following formulas (1) and (2), hardness is 55HRC or more, residual austenite amount is 1% or less, and drawing 60% in hot tensile test (greeble test). A high-hardness precipitation-hardened stainless steel with excellent manufacturability, characterized in that the above temperature is 100 ° C. or higher.
5.00 ≤ Ni eq ≤ 9.50 ... Equation (1)
Ni eq ≤ -0.83 x Cr eq + 25.5 ... Equation (2)
However, Ni eq = [% Ni] + 30 × ([% C] + [% N]) + 0.5 × [% Mn] + 0.3 × [% Cu], and Cr eq = [% Cr] + [% Mo] +1.5 × [% Si] +0.5 × [% Nb].
In each of the above [% M], the numerical value (mass%) of the content of the corresponding element is substituted.
請求項1の化学成分に加えて、質量%で、Ca:0.0001〜0.0250%、Mg:0.0001〜0.0250%、B:0.0001〜0.0250%から選択したいずれか1種または2種以上を含有し、残部Feおよび不可避不純物からなり、下記の式(1)および式(2)を満足し、硬さが55HRC以上、残留オーステナイト量が1%以下、熱間引張試験(グリーブル試験)における絞り60%以上となる温度が100℃以上であることを特徴とする製造性に優れた高硬度析出硬化型ステンレス鋼。
5.00≦Nieq≦9.50・・・式(1)
Nieq≦−0.83×Creq+25.5・・・式(2)
ただし、Nieq=[%Ni]+30×([%C]+[%N])+0.5×[%Mn]+0.3×[%Cu]で、Creq=[%Cr]+[%Mo]+1.5×[%Si]+0.5×[%Nb]である。
なお、上記の[%M]には、いずれも対応する元素の含有量の数値(質量%)が代入される。
Any one selected from Ca: 0.0001 to 0.0250%, Mg: 0.0001 to 0.0250%, and B: 0.0001 to 0.0250% in mass% in addition to the chemical component of claim 1. It contains one or more kinds of steel, and consists of the balance Fe and unavoidable impurities, which satisfies the following formulas (1) and (2), has a hardness of 55HRC or more, a residual austenite amount of 1% or less, and is hot. High hardness precipitation hardening stainless steel with excellent manufacturability, characterized in that the temperature at which the drawing is 60% or more in the tensile test (greeble test) is 100 ° C. or higher.
5.00 ≤ Ni eq ≤ 9.50 ... Equation (1)
Ni eq ≤ -0.83 x Cr eq + 25.5 ... Equation (2)
However, Ni eq = [% Ni] + 30 × ([% C] + [% N]) + 0.5 × [% Mn] + 0.3 × [% Cu], and Cr eq = [% Cr] + [% Mo] +1.5 × [% Si] +0.5 × [% Nb].
In each of the above [% M], the numerical value (mass%) of the content of the corresponding element is substituted.
請求項1の化学成分に加えて、質量%で、Al:0.001〜0.150%、Nb:0.01〜2.00%、N:0.002〜0.050%、S:0.001〜0.100%から選択したいずれか1種または2種以上を含有し、さらに、Ca:0.0001〜0.0250%、Mg:0.0001〜0.0250%、B:0.0001〜0.0250%から選択したいずれか1種または2種以上を含有し、残部Feおよび不可避不純物からなり、下記に記載の式(1)および式(2)を満足し、硬さが55HRC以上、残留オーステナイト量が1%以下、熱間引張試験(グリーブル試験)における絞り60%以上となる温度が100℃以上であることを特徴とする製造性に優れた高硬度析出硬化型ステンレス鋼。
5.00≦Nieq≦9.50・・・式(1)
Nieq≦−0.83×Creq+25.5・・・式(2)
ただし、Nieq=[%Ni]+30×([%C]+[%N])+0.5×[%Mn]+0.3×[%Cu]で、Creq=[%Cr]+[%Mo]+1.5×[%Si]+0.5×[%Nb]である。
なお、上記の[%M]には、対応する元素の含有量の数値(質量%)が代入される。
In addition to the chemical component of claim 1, in mass%, Al: 0.001 to 0.150%, Nb: 0.01 to 2.00%, N: 0.002 to 0.050%, S: 0. It contains any one or more selected from 001 to 0.100%, and further, Ca: 0.0001 to 0.0250%, Mg: 0.0001 to 0.0250%, B: 0. It contains any one or more selected from 0001 to 0.0250%, consists of the balance Fe and unavoidable impurities, satisfies the formulas (1) and (2) described below, and has a hardness of 55HRC. As described above, a high hardness precipitation hardening stainless steel having excellent manufacturability, characterized in that the amount of retained austenite is 1% or less and the temperature at which the drawing is 60% or more in the hot tensile test (greeble test) is 100 ° C. or more.
5.00 ≤ Ni eq ≤ 9.50 ... Equation (1)
Ni eq ≤ -0.83 x Cr eq + 25.5 ... Equation (2)
However, Ni eq = [% Ni] + 30 × ([% C] + [% N]) + 0.5 × [% Mn] + 0.3 × [% Cu], and Cr eq = [% Cr] + [% Mo] +1.5 × [% Si] +0.5 × [% Nb].
The numerical value (mass%) of the content of the corresponding element is substituted into the above [% M].
JP2018008811A 2018-01-23 2018-01-23 High hardness precipitation hardening stainless steel with excellent hot workability and no sub-zero treatment required Active JP6987651B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2018008811A JP6987651B2 (en) 2018-01-23 2018-01-23 High hardness precipitation hardening stainless steel with excellent hot workability and no sub-zero treatment required

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2018008811A JP6987651B2 (en) 2018-01-23 2018-01-23 High hardness precipitation hardening stainless steel with excellent hot workability and no sub-zero treatment required

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2019127613A JP2019127613A (en) 2019-08-01
JP6987651B2 true JP6987651B2 (en) 2022-01-05

Family

ID=67471953

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2018008811A Active JP6987651B2 (en) 2018-01-23 2018-01-23 High hardness precipitation hardening stainless steel with excellent hot workability and no sub-zero treatment required

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP6987651B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP6776467B1 (en) * 2020-02-27 2020-10-28 日本冶金工業株式会社 Precipitation hardening martensitic stainless steel

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS63171857A (en) * 1987-01-10 1988-07-15 Nippon Yakin Kogyo Co Ltd Stainless steel strip with excellent fatigue properties
JPH0830253B2 (en) * 1991-04-26 1996-03-27 新日本製鐵株式会社 Precipitation hardening type martensitic stainless steel with excellent workability
JP2688392B2 (en) * 1991-11-22 1997-12-10 新日本製鐵株式会社 Method for producing martensitic stainless steel with low cracking susceptibility
JP4200473B2 (en) * 2000-11-20 2008-12-24 日立金属株式会社 High strength precipitation hardening martensitic stainless steel with excellent corrosion resistance
JP6583885B2 (en) * 2015-10-20 2019-10-02 山陽特殊製鋼株式会社 High hardness stainless steel with excellent corrosion resistance and manufacturability

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2019127613A (en) 2019-08-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7081173B2 (en) Super-austenitic stainless steel
EP2770076B1 (en) Duplex stainless steel, duplex stainless steel slab, and duplex stainless steel material
KR101539520B1 (en) Duplex stainless steel sheet
EP3960881A1 (en) Austenitic stainless steel
CN120138519A (en) Martensitic Stainless Steel Alloys
JP5729827B2 (en) High strength non-magnetic steel
JP5291479B2 (en) Duplex stainless steel and steel and steel products using the same
JP4207137B2 (en) High hardness and high corrosion resistance stainless steel
JP2019501286A (en) Lean duplex stainless steel with improved corrosion resistance and workability and method for producing the same
JP2018178144A (en) Precipitation hardening stainless steel having excellent hot workability
JP6987651B2 (en) High hardness precipitation hardening stainless steel with excellent hot workability and no sub-zero treatment required
JP6583885B2 (en) High hardness stainless steel with excellent corrosion resistance and manufacturability
JP2020041208A (en) Precipitation-hardening martensitic stainless steel
JP3328967B2 (en) Manufacturing method of martensitic stainless steel seamless steel pipe excellent in toughness and stress corrosion cracking resistance
JP2002309349A (en) Martensitic stainless steel with excellent strength stability
EP4279628A1 (en) Non-magnetic austenitic stainless steel material and production method therefor
JP6501652B2 (en) Martensitic stainless steel with excellent precipitation hardenability
JP2000282182A (en) High fatigue life and high corrosion resistance martensitic stainless steel with excellent cold workability
JP7735778B2 (en) Martensitic stainless steel
JPH10245656A (en) Martensitic stainless steel excellent in cold forgeability
JP2672437B2 (en) Manufacturing method of martensitic stainless steel seamless steel pipe with excellent corrosion resistance
JPH06212358A (en) Nonmagnetic pc steel wire and its production
JP4184860B2 (en) Stainless steel and structures
JP2537679B2 (en) High-strength stainless steel and its steel material
JP3587271B2 (en) Semi-austenite precipitation hardened stainless steel with excellent cold workability

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20201116

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20210915

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20211013

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20211201

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 6987651

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250