JP7103046B2 - Ground analysis method based on multidimensional consolidation theory - Google Patents
Ground analysis method based on multidimensional consolidation theory Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP7103046B2 JP7103046B2 JP2018147632A JP2018147632A JP7103046B2 JP 7103046 B2 JP7103046 B2 JP 7103046B2 JP 2018147632 A JP2018147632 A JP 2018147632A JP 2018147632 A JP2018147632 A JP 2018147632A JP 7103046 B2 JP7103046 B2 JP 7103046B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- ground
- water
- analysis method
- analysis
- equation
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Investigation Of Foundation Soil And Reinforcement Of Foundation Soil By Compacting Or Drainage (AREA)
Description
本発明は多次元圧密理論に基づく地盤の解析方法に関する。 The present invention relates to a method for analyzing the ground based on the multidimensional consolidation theory.
砂質土地盤を主な対象とする種々の土木工事においては、浸透破壊が生じる可能性があり、これを回避することが安全に施工を行う上で重要である。開削工事や海・河川・湖沼の締切・水替工事において止水壁回りのボイリングを防止することは、その代表格と言える。さらに近年増えている大深度地下の非開削工事においても、トンネル掘進・拡幅施工等での浸透破壊の回避が技術課題となっている。 In various civil engineering works mainly targeting sandy land, seepage fracture may occur, and it is important to avoid this for safe construction. Preventing boiling around the water blocking wall in excavation work, deadlines for seas, rivers, lakes and marshes, and water replacement work is a typical example. Furthermore, even in the deep underground non-excavation work, which has been increasing in recent years, avoidance of infiltration failure in tunnel excavation and widening work has become a technical issue.
このような地盤の浸透破壊を防止することを目的として、地盤を有限要素として解析モデル化し、土の圧密を考慮して(非特許文献1)、土骨格と水の連成有限要素解析を行うことにより、地盤の挙動を把握することが従来より行われている(非特許文献2、3)。なお、土骨格と水の連成有限要素解析は、以下において、土/水連成有限要素解析とも記載する。
For the purpose of preventing such infiltration destruction of the ground, the ground is analyzed and modeled as a finite element, and the combined finite element analysis of the soil skeleton and water is performed in consideration of soil consolidation (Non-Patent Document 1). As a result, it has been conventionally practiced to grasp the behavior of the ground (
従来の有限要素解析において、地表面より上方にある水位の変化を考慮する場合、水位変動の影響を地表面の節点荷重の増減として解析時に入力する必要があった。この場合、地表面が、平面などの単純な形状の場合には、節点荷重の入力を行うことは比較的容易である。しかし、地表面の形状が複雑である場合、節点荷重を入力することは非常に困難であった。 In the conventional finite element analysis, when considering the change of the water level above the ground surface, it was necessary to input the influence of the water level change as the increase / decrease of the nodal load on the ground surface at the time of analysis. In this case, when the ground surface has a simple shape such as a flat surface, it is relatively easy to input the nodal load. However, when the shape of the ground surface is complicated, it is very difficult to input the nodal load.
上記課題を解決するため、本発明の一態様は、水圧の変動に伴う地盤の応力変化を示すベクトル{ΔWp}と、動水勾配の変動に伴う物体力の変化を示すベクトル{ΔSf}とを、時刻歴のステップごとに地盤要素に与え、多次元圧密理論に基づく土/水連成有限要素解析を適用することにより、前記地盤要素の挙動の数値解を求める解析方法を提供する。 In order to solve the above problems, in one aspect of the present invention, a vector {ΔWp} showing a change in ground stress due to a change in water pressure and a vector {ΔSf} showing a change in physical force due to a change in a hydraulic gradient are used. , Provide an analysis method for obtaining a numerical solution of the behavior of the ground element by giving it to the ground element for each step of the time history and applying the soil / water coupled finite element analysis based on the multidimensional consolidation theory.
前記地盤要素を3次元に複数個配列することによって前記地盤を3次元モデル化し、前記地盤内における前記有効応力の分布を数値解として得ることが好ましい。 It is preferable to model the ground in three dimensions by arranging a plurality of the ground elements in three dimensions and obtain the distribution of the effective stress in the ground as a numerical solution.
前記有効応力を喪失した前記地盤要素を取得することによって、前記地盤におけるボイリングの発生箇所を予測することが好ましい。 It is preferable to predict the location of boiling in the ground by acquiring the ground element that has lost the effective stress.
上記解析方法を、コンピュータ上で実施するプログラムとすることが好ましい。 It is preferable that the above analysis method is a program implemented on a computer.
本発明によれば、節点荷重の入力を必要としないため、多次元圧密理論に基づいた土/水連成有限要素解析を、地表面形状に影響されずに容易に行え、地盤の挙動を把握することができる。 According to the present invention, since it is not necessary to input a nodal load, soil / water coupled finite element analysis based on the multidimensional consolidation theory can be easily performed without being affected by the ground surface shape, and the behavior of the ground can be grasped. can do.
図1~図8を参照して、本発明の実施形態に係る土/水連成有限要素解析について、以下に説明する。 The soil / water coupled finite element analysis according to the embodiment of the present invention will be described below with reference to FIGS. 1 to 8.
<境界条件、支配方程式>
本発明の土/水連成有限要素解析は、Biotの多次元圧密理論(非特許文献1)に基づく。この理論による地盤内部(領域:V、境界:S)の支配方程式を図1に示す。なお、地盤の土の粒子が組重なって形成する構造を土の骨格または土骨格と称し、土の骨格のすき間を満たす水を間隙水と称する。
<Boundary conditions, governing equation>
The soil / water coupled finite element analysis of the present invention is based on Biot's multidimensional consolidation theory (Non-Patent Document 1). The governing equation inside the ground (region: V, boundary: S) based on this theory is shown in FIG. The structure formed by the overlapping of soil particles in the ground is called the soil skeleton or the soil skeleton, and the water that fills the gaps in the soil skeleton is called the interstitial water.
主に土骨格の変形を支配する式は、釣り合い式と構成式(図1の(1)式と(2)式)である。また間隙水の流れを支配する式は連続条件式((5)式)とDarcy則((6)式)である。ひずみと変位の関係((3)式)とTerzaghiの有効応力の原理((4)式)は、土の骨格の変形と間隙水の流れの両方に関与して相互の作用を関連付ける式である。 The equations that mainly control the deformation of the earthen skeleton are the equilibrium equation and the constitutive equation (Equations (1) and (2) in FIG. 1). The equations governing the flow of pore water are the continuous conditional equation (Equation (5)) and the Darky law (Equation (6)). The relationship between strain and displacement (Equation (3)) and Terzaghi's principle of effective stress (Equation (4)) are equations that are involved in both the deformation of the soil skeleton and the flow of pore water and correlate with each other. ..
さらに初期条件として、載荷前(t=0)の有効応力(11)式と全水頭(12)式を与える必要がある。これらの境界・初期条件のもとで、支配方程式を連立させて時間ステップを追いながら解くことにより、地盤の変位・応力、地下水の全水頭・流速の分布とその時間的変化が求められる。 Further, as initial conditions, it is necessary to give the effective stress equation (11) and the total head (12) equation before loading (t = 0). Under these boundaries and initial conditions, the displacement / stress of the ground, the distribution of the total head / flow velocity of groundwater, and their temporal changes can be obtained by solving the governing equations in a series while following the time steps.
<離散化>
有限要素解析に用いるため、支配方程式の離散化を行った。その結果得られた連立マトリックス方程式を図2、(13)式に示す。支配方程式の離散化には、非特許文献2及び3と同様の方法を用いた。詳細に述べると、弱形式化は、釣り合い式及び連続条件式((1)式及び(5)式)を領域Vにおいて部分積分し、仮想仕事式を導出することによって行った。弱形式化の過程においては、境界条件式((7)式及び(9)式)、及び、ひずみと変位の関係((3)式)と有効応力の原理((4)式)を、釣り合い式及び連続条件式に代入した。
<Discretization>
The governing equation was discretized for use in finite element analysis. The simultaneous matrix equations obtained as a result are shown in Eqs. 2 and (13). The same method as in
さらに弱形式に対して、材料特性を表す構成式((2)式)とDarcy則((6)式)を与え、つづいて全水頭の時間変化を後退差分で表すことにより、地盤/地下水連成解析の連立マトリックス方程式(図2、(13)式)を導出した。
Furthermore, for the weak form, the constitutive equation ((2) equation) and the Darky law ((6) equation) are given to express the material properties, and then the temporal change of the total head is expressed by the receding difference. The simultaneous matrix equations of synthetic analysis (
上述のように土骨格の支配方程式だけでなく、間隙水の連続条件式((5)式)とDarcy則((6)式)を考慮に加えることにより、地下水に大きく左右される地盤挙動の特殊性が表現されている。 By taking into consideration not only the governing equation of the soil skeleton but also the continuous conditional equation ((5) equation) and the Darky law ((6) equation) of the interstitial water as described above, the ground behavior that is greatly influenced by the groundwater The peculiarity is expressed.
<ベクトルの加算>
本実施の形態においては、河川等の開削工事や締切・水替を念頭に、地表面上での水位変動や揚水・注水行為を表現するため、ベクトル{ΔWp}((14)式)及び{ΔSf}((15)式)が、上述のマトリックス方程式(図2、(13)式)に加算されている。
<Addition of vectors>
In this embodiment, the vectors {ΔWp} (equation (14)) and { ΔSf} (Equation (15)) is added to the above-mentioned matrix equation (
{ΔWp}は地表上で水位変動が生じた場合の地盤の全応力の調整をはかるためのものであり、水位低下(あるいは上昇)で生じる地盤中の水圧変化量ΔPwに応じて、ΔPwと等量の応力を地盤要素から解放(または地盤要素に載荷)することにより、有効応力を一定に保つ機能を有する。 {ΔWp} is for adjusting the total stress of the ground when the water level fluctuates on the ground surface, and is equal to ΔPw according to the amount of water pressure change ΔPw in the ground caused by the water level drop (or rise). It has the function of keeping the effective stress constant by releasing the amount of stress from the ground element (or loading it on the ground element).
{ΔSf}は地盤に動水勾配の変化ΔIが生じた場合の透水力(物体力)を各要素に与える機能を有している。Biotの圧密理論では、Darcy則、及び有効応力の原理を用いており、既に透水力の効果は考慮されている。これに{ΔSf}のみを加えると透水力を重複して与えることになる。しかし本実施形態においては、{ΔSf}と{ΔWp}とを併用することによって透水力の効果の重複を避けるとともに、図3(a)に示す様な地上水位の変動(AからBへの変化)と地中の水頭変化(BからCまたはDへの変化)の過程を連続して計算できる解析方法とした。なお、図3以降の図及び以下の説明においては、地盤工学において通常用いられる定義にしたがい、圧縮側を正、伸張側を負として表示する。 {ΔSf} has a function of giving water permeability (body force) to each element when a change ΔI of the hydraulic gradient occurs in the ground. Biot's consolidation theory uses the Darky law and the principle of effective stress, and the effect of hydraulic conductivity has already been considered. If only {ΔSf} is added to this, the water permeability will be given in duplicate. However, in the present embodiment, by using {ΔSf} and {ΔWp} in combination, the effects of the water permeability can be avoided from overlapping, and the fluctuation of the ground water level (change from A to B) as shown in FIG. 3A can be avoided. ) And the process of the head change in the ground (change from B to C or D) can be calculated continuously. In the figures after FIG. 3 and the following description, the compression side is shown as positive and the decompression side is shown as negative according to the definition usually used in geotechnical engineering.
これらの水理条件での有効応力の計算結果を図3(b)に示す。図中では、図3(a)のB、C、及びDに対応する計算結果を各グラフに示している。グラフBから分かるように、地上水位の変動時に有効応力が一定に保たれる状況、及び、グラフCまたはDから分かるように、地盤底部の水頭変化に伴う上向き(または下向き)の動水勾配の発生による有効応力の減少(または増加)の状況が得られている。 The calculation results of the effective stress under these hydraulic conditions are shown in FIG. 3 (b). In the figure, the calculation results corresponding to B, C, and D in FIG. 3A are shown in each graph. As can be seen from Graph B, the situation where the effective stress is kept constant when the ground water level fluctuates, and as can be seen from Graph C or D, the upward (or downward) hydraulic gradient due to the head change at the bottom of the ground. The situation of decrease (or increase) of effective stress due to generation is obtained.
<2次元模型実験と再現解析の比較>
[2次元模型実験]
上記の解析方法の再現性を検証するため、締切・水替工事を想定した2次元模型実験とその再現解析とを行い、結果の比較を行った。以下に詳細を示す。
<Comparison between 2D model experiment and reproduction analysis>
[Two-dimensional model experiment]
In order to verify the reproducibility of the above analysis method, a two-dimensional model experiment assuming deadline / water change work and its reproducibility analysis were performed, and the results were compared. Details are shown below.
2次元模型実験において、ボイリングが発生する直前の状況を図4に示す。模型実験では、直方体形状の水槽1の中に6号珪砂を空中落下させて15cmの厚さの砂地盤2を設けた。さらに止水壁3を、砂地盤2に対する根入れ深さ5cmとして、水槽1の中央部に設置した。その後、砂地盤2を乱さないように、水槽1内に水張りを緩速で行い、実験の初期状態とした。砂地盤2の物性は、投入した珪砂の重量と撒出し体積より、間隙比は0.55、水中単位体積重量は1.06g/cm3程度と見込まれる。
FIG. 4 shows the situation immediately before the occurrence of boiling in the two-dimensional model experiment. In the model experiment, No. 6 silica sand was dropped in the air into a rectangular cuboid-shaped
実験においては、水槽1の壁面に設けた水抜き孔より排水し、図4における止水壁3の右側(内側)の水位を低下させるとともに、止水壁3の左側(外側)の水位を一定に保持した。このようにして、止水壁3の左右において水頭差ΔHを生じさせていき、これをボイリングが発生するまで継続した。止水壁3の右側における水位低下の速度は、すなわち水頭差の増加速度は、毎分1cm弱とした。ボイリングは、水頭差ΔH=15.3cmで発生した。
In the experiment, the water was drained from the drain hole provided on the wall surface of the
[2次元模型実験の再現解析]
2次元模型実験を上述の解析方法を用いて再現した。地盤要素には、1次の内挿関数を持つ、セレンディピティ族のアイソパラメトリック要素を用いた。数値積分にはガウスの求積法を用いた。また、地盤要素は弾塑性モデルとし、地盤要素の破壊の判定には、Drucker Pragerの破壊基準を用いた。地盤定数値の設定は三軸CD試験の結果に基づいて行った。せん断破壊した要素については、関連流れ則に従って剛性低下を与えた。有効応力が消失した地盤要素については、変形係数を1/10000に低減させた。解析モデルに対して水頭差ΔHを時刻歴で与えることにより、ボイリング発生までの地盤の挙動を解析した。
[Reproduction analysis of 2D model experiment]
The two-dimensional model experiment was reproduced using the above analysis method. For the ground element, an isoparametric element of the Serendipity group having a first-order interpolation function was used. Gauss's quadrature method was used for numerical integration. In addition, the ground element was an elasto-plastic model, and the fracture standard of Drucker Prager was used to determine the fracture of the ground element. The ground constant value was set based on the results of the triaxial CD test. For the elements that were sheared, the rigidity was reduced according to the related flow rule. For the ground element in which the effective stress disappeared, the deformation coefficient was reduced to 1/10000. By giving the head difference ΔH to the analysis model as a time history, the behavior of the ground until the occurrence of boiling was analyzed.
再現解析で得られた、ボイリング発生時(水頭差ΔH=15cm)の局所安全率(σv′/σvo′)コンターを、図5に示す。ここで、σv′は変化後の鉛直有効応力の値、σvo′は同応力の初期値である。有効応力が消失し、局所安全率が負値となった液状化域が、地表に達した時点をボイリング発生と定義した。図5に示すように、止水壁3右側の各位置では上向きの水の流れ(動水勾配)により局所安全率が減少している。
The contour of the local safety factor (σ v ′ / σ vo ′) at the time of occurrence of boiling (head difference ΔH = 15 cm) obtained by the reproduction analysis is shown in FIG. Here, σ v ′ is the value of the vertical effective stress after the change, and σ v ′ is the initial value of the same stress. The time when the liquefaction area where the effective stress disappeared and the local safety factor became a negative value reached the ground surface was defined as the occurrence of boiling. As shown in FIG. 5, the local safety factor is reduced due to the upward water flow (hydraulic gradient) at each position on the right side of the
ΔH=15cmでは液状化域が地表まで進展し、実験でのボイリングの発生時期と状況が良く符合した。 At ΔH = 15 cm, the liquefaction region extended to the surface of the earth, and the timing and situation of boiling in the experiment matched well.
<3次元模型実験と再現解析との比較>
さらに、締切・水替工事を想定した3次元での模型実験とその再現解析も行い、比較を行った。以下に詳細を示す。
<Comparison between 3D model experiment and reproduction analysis>
In addition, a three-dimensional model experiment assuming deadline and water change work and its reproduction analysis were also performed and compared. Details are shown below.
[3次元模型実験]
図6(a)に示すように、3次元模型実験では水槽4を用意した。水槽4の内部に6号珪砂を空中落下させて、15cm厚の砂地盤5を設けた。さらに上面視で直角に折曲がった止水壁6を設置し、水槽4の角部を囲った。止水壁6の根入深さは5cmとした。その後、水槽4の中に緩速で水張りを行い、実験の初期状態とした。なお、以下の説明において、止水壁6と水槽4の壁面とで囲われた、上面視で矩形の領域を内側と称し、それ以外の領域を外側と称する。砂地盤5の物性は、投入した珪砂の重量と撒出し体積より、間隙比は0.55、水中単位体積重量は1.06g/cm3程度と見込まれる。
[3D model experiment]
As shown in FIG. 6A, a
実験においては、水槽4の壁面に設けた水抜き孔より排水し、内側領域の水位を低下させるとともに、外側領域の水位を一定に保持した。このようにして、止水壁4の内外において水頭差ΔHを生じさせていき、これをボイリングが発生するまで継続した。水位低下の速度は、すなわち水頭差ΔHの増加速度は、毎分1cm弱とした。ボイリングが発生した状況を、図6(b)に示す。ボイリングは、水頭差ΔH=12.5cmで発生した。2次元模型実験の結果と比較すると、小さな水頭差でボイリングが生じた。
In the experiment, drainage was performed from a drain hole provided on the wall surface of the
[3次元模型実験の再現解析]
3次元模型実験を上述の解析方法を用いて再現した。3次元要素を用いて地盤の解析モデル化を行った。地盤要素には、1次の内挿関数を持つ、セレンディピティ族のアイソパラメトリック要素を用いた。数値積分にはガウスの求積法を用いた。また、地盤要素は弾塑性モデルとし、地盤要素の破壊の判定には、Drucker Pragerの破壊基準を用いた。地盤定数値の設定は三軸CD試験の結果に基づいて行った。せん断破壊した要素については、関連流れ則に従って剛性低下を与えた。有効応力が消失した地盤要素については、変形係数を1/10000に低減させた。実験と同様に、解析モデルに対して水頭差ΔHの時刻歴を与えることにより、ボイリング発生までの地盤の挙動を解析した。
[Reproduction analysis of 3D model experiment]
The 3D model experiment was reproduced using the above analysis method. The ground was analyzed and modeled using three-dimensional elements. For the ground element, an isoparametric element of the Serendipity group having a first-order interpolation function was used. Gauss's quadrature method was used for numerical integration. In addition, the ground element was an elasto-plastic model, and the fracture standard of Drucker Prager was used to determine the fracture of the ground element. The ground constant value was set based on the results of the triaxial CD test. For the elements that were sheared, the rigidity was reduced according to the related flow rule. For the ground element in which the effective stress disappeared, the deformation coefficient was reduced to 1/10000. Similar to the experiment, the behavior of the ground until the occurrence of boiling was analyzed by giving the time history of the head difference ΔH to the analysis model.
再現解析におけるボイリング発生時の局所安全率の分布を図7に示す。水位差ΔH=11cmとなる計算ステップにおいて、有効応力が消失して局所安全率が負値となった部分、すなわち液状化域が、地表に到達してボイリングが発生した。実験と同様に、止水壁6の隅角部でボイリングの発生が集中している。
FIG. 7 shows the distribution of the local safety factor when boiling occurs in the reproduction analysis. In the calculation step where the water level difference ΔH = 11 cm, the portion where the effective stress disappeared and the local safety factor became a negative value, that is, the liquefaction region reached the ground surface and boiling occurred. Similar to the experiment, the occurrence of boiling is concentrated at the corners of the
上記の2次元模型実験及び再現解析では、ボイリング発生時水頭差ΔH=15cmが得られている。一方、3次元場模型実験でのボイリング発生時水頭差ΔH=12.5cmはこれに比べて小さい。各再現解析においても、実験と同様、3次元解析では、2次元解析よりボイリング発生時の水頭差が小さいという傾向が得られた。 In the above two-dimensional model experiment and reproduction analysis, the head difference ΔH = 15 cm at the time of boiling is obtained. On the other hand, the head difference ΔH = 12.5 cm at the time of boiling in the three-dimensional field model experiment is smaller than this. In each reproduction analysis, as in the experiment, the three-dimensional analysis tended to have a smaller head difference when boiling occurred than the two-dimensional analysis.
締切・水替工事の平面形状は一般的に矩形状であるため、ボイリング対策の設計・計画では3次元場で生じる動水勾配の分布と大きさに留意する必要があることが、上記実験及び解析の結果から分かる。 Since the plane shape of the deadline / water change work is generally rectangular, it is necessary to pay attention to the distribution and magnitude of the hydrodynamic gradient that occurs in the three-dimensional field when designing and planning anti-boiling measures. It can be seen from the result of the analysis.
<従来との比較及び効果>
図8(a)に示すように、従来技術に係る有限要素解析法では、排水過程における地盤の力学・水理状態の変化をステップ計算するために、ステップ毎に施工域の地表部の節点に水理境界条件(全水頭値)を入力する必要があった。
<Comparison and effect with conventional products>
As shown in FIG. 8 (a), in the finite element analysis method according to the prior art, in order to step-calculate the changes in the dynamics and hydraulic state of the ground during the drainage process, the nodes of the ground surface of the construction area are set for each step. It was necessary to enter the hydraulic boundary condition (total head value).
加えて、水位低下による地盤の全応力の減少を与えるために、ステップ毎に施工域の地表部の節点に応力境界条件(荷重値)を入力する必要があった。具体的には、水圧の変動分と等価な節点荷重を地表節点に与えていた。この入力処理は、地盤が平坦で単純な幾何条件の場合には手間はさほど要しない。 In addition, in order to reduce the total stress of the ground due to the decrease in water level, it was necessary to input stress boundary conditions (load values) at the nodes of the ground surface of the construction area for each step. Specifically, a node load equivalent to the fluctuation of water pressure was applied to the surface node. This input process does not require much labor when the ground is flat and the geometric conditions are simple.
しかしながら、実際の工事現場を模擬した3次元解析モデルの場合には、状況が異なってくる。荷重はベクトル量であるため、図8(b)に示すように、特に斜面を有する地盤や段切された地盤の場合には、与える節点荷重が3次元の方向成分を持つことになり、荷重条件の計算と入力に多くの手間と時間を要し、土/水連成有限要素解析の迅速な実務適用は困難であった。 However, in the case of a three-dimensional analysis model that simulates an actual construction site, the situation is different. Since the load is a vector quantity, as shown in FIG. 8B, especially in the case of ground having a slope or stepped ground, the applied nodal load has a three-dimensional directional component, and the load It took a lot of time and effort to calculate and input the conditions, and it was difficult to quickly apply the soil / water coupled finite element analysis to practice.
本発明においては、ベクトル{ΔSf}と{ΔWp}とを各地盤要素に加えるため、従来のように地表面の法線方向を考慮しながら節点荷重を計算する必要がない。そのため、3次元の土/水連成有限要素解析を容易に行うことが可能となり、実際の工事案件を想定して複雑な形状を持った地盤についても、数値解を得ることが可能となる。 In the present invention, since the vectors {ΔSf} and {ΔWp} are added to the board elements, it is not necessary to calculate the nodal load while considering the normal direction of the ground surface as in the conventional case. Therefore, it is possible to easily perform a three-dimensional soil / water coupled finite element analysis, and it is possible to obtain a numerical solution even for a ground having a complicated shape assuming an actual construction project.
ベクトル{ΔWp}は、図2の式(14)に表示される通り、水圧変動分のベクトル{ΔPw}を用いて表される。また、ベクトル{ΔSf}は、動水勾配変動分のベクトル{ΔI}を用いて表される。このように、水頭変化分に相当するベクトルは、水圧及び動水勾配から導出されており、容易に算出可能である。そのため、本実施形態における解析方法は、迅速に実行することができる。 The vector {ΔWp} is represented by using the vector {ΔPw} of the water pressure fluctuation as shown in the equation (14) of FIG. Further, the vector {ΔSf} is represented by using the vector {ΔI} for the fluctuation of the hydraulic gradient. As described above, the vector corresponding to the head change is derived from the water pressure and the hydraulic gradient, and can be easily calculated. Therefore, the analysis method in the present embodiment can be executed quickly.
本発明の解析方法では、2次元だけでなく、3次元での幾何形状に対しても数値解を得ることが可能である。そのため、止水壁による囲いの隅角部におけるボイリングの発生など、2次元でのモデル化では正確な予測が難しかった条件に対しても、正確な数値解を与えることが可能となる。すなわち、本発明による解析方法では、複雑な幾何形状の考慮が必要な多数の工事案件に対して、精度の高い予測を迅速に提供することが可能である。 In the analysis method of the present invention, it is possible to obtain a numerical solution not only for a two-dimensional shape but also for a three-dimensional geometric shape. Therefore, it is possible to give an accurate numerical solution even under conditions that are difficult to predict accurately by two-dimensional modeling, such as the occurrence of boiling at the corner of the enclosure due to the water blocking wall. That is, the analysis method according to the present invention can quickly provide highly accurate predictions for a large number of construction projects that require consideration of complicated geometric shapes.
<変形例>
解析モデルに用いる要素の選択は、上記実施の形態に限定されず、解析の条件に沿って、任意に設定可能である。例えば、内挿関数に対しては任意の次数が適用可能であるし、積分点の配置、数値積分の方法についても、適宜選択可能である。
<Modification example>
The selection of the elements used in the analysis model is not limited to the above embodiment, and can be arbitrarily set according to the analysis conditions. For example, an arbitrary order can be applied to the interpolation function, and the arrangement of integration points and the method of numerical integration can be appropriately selected.
上記実施形態において、時間差分近似には後退差分が用いられたが、本発明はこれに限定されない。後退差分の代わりに、前進差分等、任意の方法が採用可能である。 In the above embodiment, the backward difference is used for the time difference approximation, but the present invention is not limited to this. An arbitrary method such as a forward difference can be adopted instead of the backward difference.
解析に用いる破壊基準はDrucker Pragerに限定されず、モール・クーロンやフォンミーゼスなど、目的、条件に応じて任意の設定が可能である。 The destruction criteria used in the analysis are not limited to the Drucker Prager, and can be arbitrarily set according to the purpose and conditions such as Mohr-Coulomb and von Mises.
なお、本発明の解析方法は、コンピュータ上で機能可能なプログラムとして構成して該コンピュータ上で機能させることとすれば、自動的かつ簡便・迅速に実行されることとなる。 If the analysis method of the present invention is configured as a program that can function on a computer and is made to function on the computer, it will be automatically, easily, and quickly executed.
以上、本発明を実施するための形態について説明したが、上記実施形態は本発明の理解を容易にするためのものであり、本発明を限定して解釈するためのものではない。また、本発明はその趣旨を逸脱することなく変更、改良され得るとともに、本発明にはその等価物も含まれる。 Although the embodiment for carrying out the present invention has been described above, the above-described embodiment is for facilitating the understanding of the present invention, and is not for limiting the interpretation of the present invention. Further, the present invention can be modified or improved without departing from the spirit thereof, and the present invention also includes an equivalent thereof.
水槽1、4
砂地盤2、5
止水壁3、6
Claims (4)
動水勾配の変動に伴う物体力の変化を示すベクトル{ΔSf}とを、時刻歴のステップごとに地盤要素に与え、
多次元圧密理論に基づく土/水連成有限要素解析を適用することにより、前記地盤要素の挙動の数値解を求める解析方法であって、
γw:水の単位体積重量
{ΔI}:動水勾配の変動ベクトル
{ΔPw}:水圧の変動ベクトル
N:形状関数
B:ひずみ―変位マトリックス
V:地盤要素の領域
m:個々の地盤要素
とすると、
前記{ΔWp}及び前記{ΔSf}は、
A vector {ΔSf} indicating the change in body force due to the change in the hydraulic gradient is given to the ground element at each step of the time history.
This is an analysis method for obtaining a numerical solution of the behavior of the ground element by applying a soil / water coupled finite element analysis based on the multidimensional consolidation theory.
γ w : Unit volume weight of water {ΔI}: Fluctuation vector of hydraulic gradient {ΔP w}: Fluctuation vector of water pressure
N: Shape function
B: Strain-Displacement Matrix
V: Area of ground element
m: As individual ground elements,
The {ΔWp} and the {ΔSf} are
前記地盤内における有効応力の分布を数値解として得ることを特徴とする、請求項1に記載の解析方法。 By arranging a plurality of the ground elements in three dimensions, the ground is modeled in three dimensions.
The analysis method according to claim 1, wherein the distribution of effective stress in the ground is obtained as a numerical solution.
A program for causing the analysis method according to any one of claims 1 to 3 to function on a computer.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2018147632A JP7103046B2 (en) | 2018-08-06 | 2018-08-06 | Ground analysis method based on multidimensional consolidation theory |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2018147632A JP7103046B2 (en) | 2018-08-06 | 2018-08-06 | Ground analysis method based on multidimensional consolidation theory |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JP2020023782A JP2020023782A (en) | 2020-02-13 |
| JP7103046B2 true JP7103046B2 (en) | 2022-07-20 |
Family
ID=69618341
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2018147632A Active JP7103046B2 (en) | 2018-08-06 | 2018-08-06 | Ground analysis method based on multidimensional consolidation theory |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP7103046B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP7749511B2 (en) * | 2022-05-12 | 2025-10-06 | 大成建設株式会社 | Method and program for analyzing saturated ground |
Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2003020649A (en) | 2001-07-10 | 2003-01-24 | Ohbayashi Corp | Method and program for predicting deformation of excavated bottom part ground |
| JP2015148105A (en) | 2014-02-07 | 2015-08-20 | 株式会社大林組 | Ground improving method and ground improving system |
-
2018
- 2018-08-06 JP JP2018147632A patent/JP7103046B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2003020649A (en) | 2001-07-10 | 2003-01-24 | Ohbayashi Corp | Method and program for predicting deformation of excavated bottom part ground |
| JP2015148105A (en) | 2014-02-07 | 2015-08-20 | 株式会社大林組 | Ground improving method and ground improving system |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
| Title |
|---|
| 寺元俊太郎,群杭基礎の水平及び鉛直力学挙動に関する研究,学位論文(博士論文),日本,京都大学学術情報リポジトリKURENAI,2015年03月23日,P21-43,http://hdl.handle.net/2433/199281 |
| 杉江茂彦,3次元地盤/地下水連成解析プログラム「GRASP-3D」の解析理論と粘土の力学挙動解析への応用,大林組技術研究所報,No.51,日本,1995年,P15-21 |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP2020023782A (en) | 2020-02-13 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Keawsawasvong et al. | Undrained basal stability of braced circular excavations in non-homogeneous clays with linear increase of strength with depth | |
| Pan et al. | The effect of pore water pressure on tunnel face stability | |
| Ko et al. | Large deformation FE analysis of driven steel pipe piles with soil plugging | |
| Soga et al. | Trends in large-deformation analysis of landslide mass movements with particular emphasis on the material point method | |
| Benmebarek et al. | Numerical studies of seepage failure of sand within a cofferdam | |
| Hassan | Application of a genetic algorithm for the optimization of a location and inclination angle of a cut-off wall for anisotropic foundations under hydraulic structures | |
| Mokhtar et al. | Lateral displacement and pile instability due to soil liquefaction using numerical model | |
| Al-Nedawi | Finite element analysis of seepage for Hemrin earth dam using Geo-Studio software | |
| Choudhary et al. | Three-dimensional analysis of uplift behaviour of square horizontal anchor plate in frictional soil | |
| Parsa-Pajouh et al. | Analyzing consolidation data to predict smear zone characteristics induced by vertical drain installation for soft soil improvement | |
| Leon Bal et al. | Two‐phase model for the excavation analysis in partially saturated soft soils using the particle finite element method | |
| Juraev et al. | Three-Dimensional Stress State of Earth Dams Under Static Loads | |
| Auvinet-Guichard et al. | Criteria for the design of friction piles subjected to negative skin friction and transient loads | |
| JP7103046B2 (en) | Ground analysis method based on multidimensional consolidation theory | |
| Vahdati | Identification of soil parameters in an embankment dam by mathematical optimization | |
| Bai et al. | Evolution of delayed water inrush in fault fracture zone considering time effect | |
| Zapata et al. | Implementation of a model of elastoviscoplastic consolidation behavior in Flac 3D | |
| Sachpazis | Experimental conceptualisation of the flow net system construction inside the body of homogeneous earth embankment dams | |
| Vahdati et al. | Inverse hardening soil parameter identification of an earth and rockfill dam by genetic algorithm optimization | |
| Tao et al. | Experimental and numerical investigation of sinkhole development and collapse in Central Florida | |
| Pratama et al. | Analysis of Sand Boiling Failure in Deep Excavations | |
| Venda Oliveira et al. | Numeric modelling of vertical drains: two-and three-dimensional analyses | |
| Yousif et al. | Optimum design of singly and doubly reinforced concrete rectangular beam sections: Artificial neural networks application | |
| Keawsawasvong et al. | Undrained Bearing Capacity of Circular Footing Above Spherical Cavity | |
| Osman et al. | A semi-analytical solution for consolidation around a spherical cavity in an elasto-plastic medium and its potential application for tunneling |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20210719 |
|
| A977 | Report on retrieval |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007 Effective date: 20220531 |
|
| TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20220607 |
|
| A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20220620 |
|
| R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Ref document number: 7103046 Country of ref document: JP Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |