Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP7109935B2 - Methods for evaluating hair damage and methods for testing compounds or compositions - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP7109935B2 - Methods for evaluating hair damage and methods for testing compounds or compositions - Google Patents

Methods for evaluating hair damage and methods for testing compounds or compositions Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP7109935B2
JP7109935B2 JP2018027799A JP2018027799A JP7109935B2 JP 7109935 B2 JP7109935 B2 JP 7109935B2 JP 2018027799 A JP2018027799 A JP 2018027799A JP 2018027799 A JP2018027799 A JP 2018027799A JP 7109935 B2 JP7109935 B2 JP 7109935B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
hair
damage
hydrolyzate
comparative
cysteic acid
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2018027799A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2019144075A (en
Inventor
紘介 渡邉
廉 伊藤
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Milbon Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Milbon Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Milbon Co Ltd filed Critical Milbon Co Ltd
Priority to JP2018027799A priority Critical patent/JP7109935B2/en
Publication of JP2019144075A publication Critical patent/JP2019144075A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP7109935B2 publication Critical patent/JP7109935B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Investigating Or Analysing Biological Materials (AREA)
  • Investigating Or Analysing Materials By Optical Means (AREA)

Description

本発明は、毛髪損傷の程度を評価する毛髪損傷の評価方法、及び、当該評価方法を使用する化合物又は組成物の試験方法に関するものである。 The present invention relates to a hair damage assessment method for assessing the degree of hair damage and a method for testing a compound or composition using the assessment method.

毛髪に対しては、日常生活の中でも、紫外線などの光、ドライヤーやヘアアイロンなどの熱、ブラッシングなどによって、毛髪は損傷する。また、酸化反応を伴う酸化染毛処理、還元反応及び酸化反応を伴うパーマネントウェーブや縮毛矯正処理においても、毛髪は損傷する。 Hair is damaged by light such as ultraviolet rays, heat from hair dryers and curling irons, brushing, and the like in daily life. Hair is also damaged in oxidative hair dyeing treatments involving oxidation reactions, reduction reactions, and permanent waving and curly hair straightening treatments involving oxidation reactions.

毛髪及び毛髪用組成物の研究開発を行うためには、毛髪の損傷評価が有用と考えられ、その評価方法が、特許文献1、2に開示されている。特許文献1が開示する方法は、損傷の指標としてブラッシング、パーマなどで生じるチオール基(SH基)に着目し、蛍光物質をそのSH基に修飾させた後に、毛髪表面の蛍光を確認するものであり(請求項1、実施例)、特許文献2が開示する方法は、損傷の指標としてパーマ処理、ブリーチ処理、酸化染毛剤処理、コーミング、熱処理、紫外線に対する暴露、プールでの次亜塩素酸に対する暴露などで生じるカルボニル基に着目し、蛍光物質をそのカルボニル基に修飾(作用・結合)させた後に、毛髪表面の蛍光を確認するものである。また、特許文献3には、紫外線による毛髪の損傷と、毛髪を溶解させた後に得られる所定のケラチンフィルムとが、紫外線から受ける損傷とに相関性があるとし、紫外線がケラチンフィルムに生じさせるカルボニル基に反応させた蛍光物質の蛍光を確認するものが開示されている(請求項1、請求項10、段落0008、0026)。 Evaluation of hair damage is considered useful for research and development of hair and hair compositions. The method disclosed in Patent Document 1 focuses on a thiol group (SH group) generated by brushing, perming, etc. as an index of damage, and after modifying the SH group with a fluorescent substance, the fluorescence on the hair surface is confirmed. Yes (claim 1, example), the method disclosed in Patent Document 2 uses permanent treatment, bleaching, oxidation hair dye treatment, combing, heat treatment, exposure to ultraviolet rays, hypochlorous acid in the pool as an indicator of damage. Focusing on the carbonyl group that is generated by exposure to chemicals, etc., the fluorescence of the hair surface is confirmed after modifying (acting and binding to) the carbonyl group with a fluorescent substance. In addition, Patent Document 3 states that there is a correlation between damage to hair caused by ultraviolet rays and a predetermined keratin film obtained after dissolving hair, and damage received from ultraviolet rays, and carbonyl rays produced in the keratin film by ultraviolet rays. A device for confirming the fluorescence of a fluorescent substance reacted with a base is disclosed (claim 1, claim 10, paragraphs 0008 and 0026).

特開平8-178920号公報JP-A-8-178920 国際公開第2005/57211号WO2005/57211 特開2008-180709号公報JP 2008-180709 A

ところで、上記の特許文献が開示する評価方法は、チオール基またはカルボニル基に着目するものであるが、他の損傷により生じる官能基を指標にできれば、毛髪及び毛髪用組成物に関する研究開発の更なる発展を期待できる。また、上記の評価方法は、毛髪又はケラチンフィルムについての表面に現れる蛍光を確認するものであるから、毛髪等の内部の損傷をも含めた評価に適するとはいえない。
By the way, the evaluation methods disclosed in the above patent documents focus on thiol groups or carbonyl groups. We can expect development. In addition, since the above-mentioned evaluation method confirms fluorescence appearing on the surface of hair or keratin film, it cannot be said to be suitable for evaluation including internal damage such as hair.

本発明は、上記事情に鑑み、毛髪の損傷においてチオール基及びカルボニル基以外の官能基を対象とでき、かつ、毛髪内部の損傷をも含めた評価に適する毛髪損傷の評価方法、及び当該方法を使用する化合物又は組成物の試験方法の提供を目的する。 In view of the above circumstances, the present invention provides a hair damage evaluation method that can target functional groups other than thiol groups and carbonyl groups in hair damage and is suitable for evaluation including damage inside the hair, and the method. It is intended to provide methods for testing compounds or compositions for use.

本発明に係る毛髪損傷の評価方法は、基準毛髪を加水分解して得られた加水分解物(I)におけるシステイン酸量(I)と、比較毛髪を加水分解して得られた加水分解物(II)におけるシステイン酸量(II)と、を比較するものである。当該比較によれば、例えば、年代別の毛髪損傷の評価、根本と毛先の損傷の評価が可能である。 The method for evaluating hair damage according to the present invention includes the amount of cysteic acid (I) in the hydrolyzate (I) obtained by hydrolyzing the reference hair, and the hydrolyzate (I) obtained by hydrolyzing the comparative hair. The amount of cysteic acid (II) in II) is compared. According to the comparison, for example, evaluation of hair damage by age, evaluation of hair root and hair tip damage can be performed.

本発明に係る毛髪損傷の評価方法において、前記基準毛髪および/又は前記比較毛髪が、損傷付与環境下に置かれたものであると良い。このような毛髪を対象とすれば、例えば、損傷付与環境下に置かれることの有無による毛髪損傷の評価、基準毛髪及び比較毛髪が置かれる損傷付与環境の条件を同一にする場合の毛髪損傷の評価、基準毛髪及び比較毛髪が置かれる損傷付与環境の条件が相違する場合の毛髪損傷の評価が可能である。 In the method for evaluating hair damage according to the present invention, it is preferable that the reference hair and/or the comparative hair are placed under a damage imparting environment. If such hair is targeted, for example, evaluation of hair damage depending on whether or not it is placed in a damage-imparting environment, and evaluation of hair damage when the conditions of the damage-imparting environment in which the reference hair and the comparative hair are placed are the same. It is possible to evaluate hair damage when the conditions of the damage-imparting environment in which the evaluation, reference hair and comparative hair are placed are different.

前記損傷付与は、例えば、光により行われる。この光の照射又は暴露により、システイン酸が毛髪表面だけではなく、毛髪内部にまで生じる。このことは、これまでには明らかにされていなかった知見である。 Said damage is performed by light, for example. By irradiation or exposure to light, cysteic acid is produced not only on the hair surface but also inside the hair. This is a finding that has not been clarified so far.

前記損傷付与環境下に置かれる前に、一種又は二種以上の化合物又は組成物を、前記基準毛髪および/又は前記比較毛髪と接触させると良い。この接触を行えば、例えば、化合物、組成物による毛髪損傷について、抑制効果の確認、抑制効果の比較が可能となる。観点を変えれば、毛髪損傷の抑制効果の有無、優劣を判断するための化合物又は組成物の試験方法となる。 One or more compounds or compositions may be contacted with the reference hair and/or the comparison hair prior to exposure to the damaging environment. This contact makes it possible, for example, to confirm and compare inhibitory effects on hair damage caused by compounds and compositions. From a different point of view, it becomes a test method for a compound or composition for judging the presence or absence of an effect of suppressing hair damage and the superiority of the composition.

本発明に係る毛髪損傷の評価方法によれば、基準毛髪と比較毛髪の夫々から得た加水分解物のシステイン酸量を比較するから、チオール基又はカルボニル基によらずとも毛髪損傷の評価を行うことができ、かつ、毛髪内部の損傷を含めた評価が可能となる。 According to the method for evaluating hair damage according to the present invention, since the amount of cysteinic acid in the hydrolyzate obtained from each of the reference hair and the comparative hair is compared, hair damage can be evaluated without using thiol groups or carbonyl groups. In addition, evaluation including damage inside the hair becomes possible.

また、本発明に係る化合物又は組成物の試験方法によれば、加水分解物(I)及び加水分解物(II)を得るための加水分解前の基準毛髪及び比較毛髪を損傷付与環境下に置くこととし、その環境下に置く前に、化合物又は組成物と基準毛髪および/又は比較毛髪とを接触させるから、その化合物又は組成物による損傷抑制効果の確認、優劣の判断ができる。 In addition, according to the test method for the compound or composition according to the present invention, reference hair and comparative hair before hydrolysis to obtain hydrolyzate (I) and hydrolyzate (II) are placed under a damaging environment. Since the compound or composition is brought into contact with reference hair and/or comparative hair before being placed in the environment, it is possible to confirm the damage-inhibiting effect of the compound or composition and judge its superiority or inferiority.

参考例Aにおける基準毛髪a(―) および比較毛髪a (…)の赤外スペクトル例。Examples of infrared spectra of reference hair a(-) and comparative hair a(...) in Reference Example A. 参考例Aにおける基準毛髪a及び比較毛髪aのI1065-1030/I1600-1470の平均値を示すグラフ。3 is a graph showing the average values of I 1065-1030 /I 1600-1470 of reference hair a and comparative hair a in Reference Example A. FIG. 参考例Aにおける基準毛髪a、比較毛髪aの径方向の各測定点におけるI1065-1030/I1600-1470の平均値を示すグラフ。A graph showing the average values of I 1065-1030 /I 1600-1470 at each measurement point in the radial direction of reference hair a and comparative hair a in Reference Example A. FIG. 参考例Aにおける基準毛髪a、比較毛髪aのシステイン酸相対強度マッピング測定結果。Results of cysteic acid relative intensity mapping measurement of reference hair a and comparative hair a in Reference Example A. FIG. 参考例Bにおける基準毛髪b、比較毛髪bのシステイン酸相対強度マッピング測定結果。Results of cysteic acid relative intensity mapping measurement of reference hair b and comparative hair b in Reference Example B. FIG.

本発明の実施形態に基づき、本発明を以下に説明する。
本実施形態の毛髪損傷の評価方法においては、基準毛髪を加水分解して得られた加水分解物(I)におけるシステイン酸量(I)と、比較毛髪を加水分解して得られた加水分解物(II)におけるシステイン酸量(II)と、を比較する。毛髪が酸化条件におかれると損傷し、毛髪の構成アミノ酸の中にシステイン酸が生じるから、システイン酸量(I)とシステイン酸量(II)の比較を行うことで、基準毛髪と比較毛髪の損傷についての評価が可能となる。
The present invention will be described below based on the embodiments of the present invention.
In the hair damage evaluation method of the present embodiment, the amount (I) of cysteic acid in the hydrolyzate (I) obtained by hydrolyzing the reference hair and the hydrolyzate obtained by hydrolyzing the comparative hair Compare with the amount of cysteic acid (II) in (II). When hair is exposed to oxidative conditions, it is damaged and cysteic acid is generated in the constituent amino acids of hair. Evaluation of damage becomes possible.

基準毛髪と比較毛髪は、比較目的となる毛髪であり、その比較目的を任意に設定するとよい。その目的は、年代別の比較(例えば、20代と50代の比較)、毛髪部位の比較(例えば、根本と毛先の比較)などである。また、基準毛髪のみ、比較毛髪のみ、又は、基準毛髪及び比較毛髪の双方を、加水分解前に、任意に損傷付与環境下に置けば、損傷付与環境下に置かれることの有無による毛髪損傷の評価、置かれる損傷付与環境の条件が相違する場合の毛髪損傷の評価、置かれる損傷付与環境の条件が同一である場合の毛髪損傷の評価(当該評価は、例えば、年代別の比較、毛髪部位の比較)を行える。 The reference hair and the comparative hair are hairs to be compared, and the purpose of comparison may be arbitrarily set. The purposes are comparison by age (for example, comparison between twenties and fifties), comparison of hair parts (for example, comparison between roots and ends), and the like. In addition, if only the reference hair, only the comparative hair, or both the reference hair and the comparative hair are arbitrarily placed in the damage imparting environment before hydrolysis, the hair damage caused by the presence or absence of being placed in the damage imparting environment can be evaluated. Evaluation, evaluation of hair damage when the conditions of the damage imparting environment to be placed are different, evaluation of hair damage when the conditions of the damage imparting environment to be placed are the same. comparison) can be performed.

毛髪を損傷付与環境に置く場合、その損傷付与は、例えば、光照射、光暴露などによる光;ドライヤーやヘアアイロンなどの熱;酸化染毛処理、パーマネントウェーブ処理、縮毛矯正処理などの組成物との接触;により行われる。その損傷付与が光により行われる場合、毛髪の内部において、構成アミノ酸におけるシステイン酸比率が予想外に高くなる知見を得ている。この知見は、毛髪の周方向切断面(毛髪の軸と略直交する切断面)について、光の一種である紫外線を照射した場合と、紫外線を照射しなかった場合とを、大型放射光施設SPring-8のBL43IRを使用して得た赤外吸収スペクトルデータなどを解析し、初めて得られたものである。 When the hair is placed in a damage-imparting environment, the damage is applied, for example, by light irradiation, light exposure, etc.; heat from a dryer or curling iron; oxidative hair dyeing treatment, permanent wave treatment, composition for hair straightening treatment, etc. contact with; It has been found that when the damage is caused by light, the ratio of cysteic acid in the constituent amino acids inside the hair unexpectedly increases. This finding is based on the results obtained by comparing the case where the cut surface of the hair in the circumferential direction (the cut surface that is substantially perpendicular to the axis of the hair) is irradiated with ultraviolet rays, which is a kind of light, and when it is not irradiated with ultraviolet rays. It was obtained for the first time by analyzing the infrared absorption spectrum data obtained using BL43IR of -8.

上記の損傷付与環境下に置かれる前に、基準毛髪のみ、比較毛髪のみ、又は、基準毛髪及び比較毛髪の双方を、一種又は二種以上の化合物又は組成物と接触させると、その化合物又は組成物による毛髪損傷の抑制効果の確認、化合物同士における毛髪損傷の抑制効果の比較、組成物同士における毛髪損傷の抑制効果の比較、化合物と組成物における毛髪損傷の抑制効果の比較が可能となる。 If the reference hair alone, the comparison hair alone, or both the reference hair and the comparison hair are contacted with one or more compounds or compositions prior to exposure to the damaging environment, the compound or composition It is possible to confirm the effect of suppressing hair damage by substances, compare the effect of suppressing hair damage between compounds, compare the effect of suppressing hair damage between compositions, and compare the effect of suppressing hair damage between compounds and compositions.

上記の通り、加水分解物(I)及び加水分解物(II)を得るためには、基準毛髪の加水分解及び比較毛髪の加水分解を行う(なお、加水分解を行う本実施形態の評価方法の利点としては、評価対象となる毛髪全体としての平均的な損傷評価を行い易くなることである。)。この加水分解の前に、通常、基準毛髪及び比較毛髪を洗浄する。 As described above, in order to obtain the hydrolyzate (I) and the hydrolyzate (II), the reference hair is hydrolyzed and the comparative hair is hydrolyzed. The advantage is that it becomes easy to perform an average damage evaluation for the entire hair to be evaluated.). Before this hydrolysis, the reference hair and the comparison hair are usually washed.

本実施形態における基準毛髪及び比較毛髪の加水分解では、毛髪を加水分解するための公知の方法が使用される。例えば、塩酸などを混合した酸性水溶液中で基準毛髪、比較毛髪を加熱する方法が挙げられ、当該方法は、加水分解物(I)及び加水分解物(II)からの塩酸除去が容易なので、好適である。また、加水分解は、突沸を防ぐため、例えば、減圧下で密閉した容器内において行うと良い。 The hydrolysis of reference hair and comparative hair in this embodiment uses known methods for hydrolyzing hair. For example, there is a method of heating reference hair and comparative hair in an acidic aqueous solution mixed with hydrochloric acid or the like, and this method is suitable because hydrochloric acid can be easily removed from hydrolyzate (I) and hydrolyzate (II). is. Moreover, in order to prevent bumping, the hydrolysis is preferably performed, for example, in a sealed container under reduced pressure.

本実施形態におけるシステイン酸量(I)及びシステイン酸量(II)の定量は、公知のシステイン酸定量方法により行われる。例えば、高速液体クロマトグラフを使用したアミノ酸分析で行われる。定量されたシステイン酸量(I)とシステイン酸量(II)とを比較し、その値が大きい方が、毛髪損傷が大きいと判断される。 The amount of cysteic acid (I) and the amount of cysteic acid (II) in the present embodiment are determined by a known cysteic acid determination method. For example, amino acid analysis using high performance liquid chromatography. The quantified amount of cysteic acid (I) and the amount of cysteic acid (II) are compared, and it is judged that the larger the value, the greater the hair damage.

以下、実施例などに基づき本発明を詳述するが、この実施例の記載に基づいて本発明が限定的に解釈されるものではない。 Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in detail based on examples, etc., but the present invention is not limitedly interpreted based on the description of these examples.

(実施例A)
基準毛髪aの加水分解aを行って得た加水分解物(Ia)におけるシステイン酸量(Ia)の定量、及び、比較毛髪aの加水分解aを行って得た加水分解物(IIa)におけるシステイン酸量(IIa)の定量を行った。比較毛髪aに対しては、加水分解前に、損傷付与環境a下に置いた。詳細は、以下の通りである。
(Example A)
Determination of cysteic acid content (Ia) in hydrolyzate (Ia) obtained by hydrolysis a of reference hair a, and cysteine in hydrolyzate (IIa) obtained by hydrolysis a of comparative hair a The amount of acid (IIa) was quantified. Comparative hair a was subjected to damaging environment a prior to hydrolysis. Details are as follows.

基準毛髪a及び比較毛髪a
20代の日本人女性4名から、酸化染毛処理などの化学的処理履歴がない黒髪を採取し、1質量%ラウリル硫酸ナトリウム水溶液に30分間浸漬してから、水洗し、乾燥させた。この水洗後の毛髪を、基準毛髪a及び比較毛髪aとした。
Reference hair a and comparison hair a
Black hair with no chemical treatment history such as oxidative hair dyeing was collected from four Japanese women in their twenties, immersed in a 1% by mass sodium lauryl sulfate aqueous solution for 30 minutes, washed with water, and dried. The washed hair was used as reference hair a and comparative hair a.

損傷付与環境a
1gの比較毛髪aに対して、紫外線照射器(スガ試験機社製「XT-750L」)を使用し、紫外線A波及びB波の総量で一日平均3,000kJ/mの光量を10日間照射した。この10日間の紫外線照射を、損傷付与環境aとした。
Damage imparting environment a
For 1 g of comparative hair a, an ultraviolet irradiator ("XT-750L" manufactured by Suga Test Instruments Co., Ltd.) is used, and the total amount of ultraviolet A and B waves is 3,000 kJ/ m2 on average per day. irradiated for days. This 10-day UV irradiation was used as a damage imparting environment a.

加水分解a
基準毛髪a及び比較毛髪aを、クロロホルムで洗浄し、乾燥させてから、細断した。細断した基準毛髪a及び比較毛髪aの夫々約3mgと、6mol/L塩酸の50μlをガラスチューブ内に入れてから、内部を減圧しつつ、封管した。そして、封管したガラスチューブを、110℃に設定した定温加熱炉内に、16時間放置し、加水分解aを行った。
hydrolysis a
Reference hair a and comparison hair a were washed with chloroform, dried and then chopped. About 3 mg each of the chopped reference hair a and comparative hair a and 50 μl of 6 mol/L hydrochloric acid were placed in a glass tube, which was then sealed while reducing the pressure inside. Then, the sealed glass tube was left in a constant temperature heating furnace set at 110° C. for 16 hours to perform hydrolysis a.

加水分解物(Ia)及び加水分解物(IIa)の回収
加水分解後にガラスチューブを開管し、ただちに塩酸を窒素ガスにて留去させてから、乾固した水分解物(Ia)及び加水分解物(IIa)を回収した。
Recovery of hydrolyzate (Ia) and hydrolyzate (IIa) After hydrolysis, the glass tube was opened, and hydrochloric acid was immediately distilled off with nitrogen gas, and then the dried hydrolyzate (Ia) and hydrolyzate were collected. Product (IIa) was recovered.

システイン酸量(Ia)及びシステイン酸量(IIa)の定量
加水分解物(Ia)及び加水分解物(IIa)の夫々を0.02mol/L塩酸で溶解し、50mLの溶液を調整した。この溶液を、0.45μmのメンブランフィルターでろ過したものを定量分析用の試料とした。定量分析は、アミノ酸分析装置(日立ハイテクノロジーズ社製高速液体クロマトグラフ「Chromasterアミノ酸(NIN法)分析システム」)を使用して行った。定量の標準試料は、L-システイン酸の塩酸溶液を使用した。
Determination of Cysteic Acid Amount (Ia) and Cysteic Acid Amount (IIa) Hydrolyzate (Ia) and hydrolyzate (IIa) were each dissolved in 0.02 mol/L hydrochloric acid to prepare 50 mL of solution. This solution was filtered through a 0.45 μm membrane filter and used as a sample for quantitative analysis. Quantitative analysis was performed using an amino acid analyzer (high-performance liquid chromatograph “Chromaster amino acid (NIN method) analysis system” manufactured by Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation). A hydrochloric acid solution of L-cysteic acid was used as a standard sample for quantitative determination.

下記表1に、加水分解物(Ia)におけるシステイン酸量(Ia)、加水分解物(IIa)におけるシステイン酸量(IIa)を示す(表1の単位は、質量%であり、数値は定量回数50回の平均値である。)。紫外線による毛髪損傷付与環境a下に置かれた比較毛髪aに基づくシステイン酸量(IIa)が、システイン酸量(Ia)よりも高い値であり、基準毛髪aよりも比較毛髪aが損傷していたと評価できた。 Table 1 below shows the amount of cysteic acid (Ia) in the hydrolyzate (Ia) and the amount of cysteic acid (IIa) in the hydrolyzate (IIa) (the unit in Table 1 is % by mass, and the numerical values are the number of times of determination. It is the average value of 50 times.). The cysteinic acid amount (IIa) based on the comparative hair a placed under the hair damage imparting environment a by ultraviolet rays is higher than the cysteinic acid amount (Ia), and the comparative hair a is damaged more than the reference hair a. I was able to evaluate it.

Figure 0007109935000001
Figure 0007109935000001

(実施例B)
損傷付与環境b下に置いた後の基準毛髪bの加水分解bを行って得た加水分解物(Ib)におけるシステイン酸量(Ib)の定量、及び、損傷付与環境b下に置いた後の比較毛髪bの加水分解bを行って得た加水分解物(IIb)におけるシステイン酸量(IIb)の定量を行った(なお、システイン酸量(Ib)は、システイン酸量(IIa)と一致するものである。)。比較毛髪bに対しては、損傷付与環境b下に置く前に、組成物bとの接触を行った。詳細は、以下の通りである。
(Example B)
Quantitation of the amount of cysteic acid (Ib) in the hydrolyzate (Ib) obtained by performing hydrolysis b of the reference hair b after placing it under the damage imparting environment b, and after placing it under the damage imparting environment b The amount of cysteic acid (IIb) in the hydrolyzate (IIb) obtained by performing hydrolysis b of comparative hair b was quantified (the amount of cysteic acid (Ib) coincides with the amount of cysteic acid (IIa). is a thing.). Comparative hair b was contacted with composition b prior to exposure to damaging environment b. Details are as follows.

基準毛髪b及び比較毛髪b
上記基準毛髪a及び比較毛髪aと同様に、基準毛髪b及び比較毛髪bを準備した。
Reference hair b and comparison hair b
Reference hair b and comparative hair b were prepared in the same manner as the reference hair a and comparative hair a.

組成物bとの接触
テトラ2-へキシルデカン酸アスコルビルが0.1質量%、イソステアリン酸が99.9質量%である組成物を、組成物bとした。組成物bとの接触については、損傷付与環境b下に置く前及び損傷付与環境b下に置いている間の1日毎に、1gの比較毛髪bに0.1gの組成物bを塗布してから、ヘアドライヤーの温風を吹き付けることで行った。その1日毎の塗布前には、比較毛髪bを1質量%ラウリル硫酸ナトリウム水溶液に30分間浸漬してから、水洗する処理を行った。
Contact with Composition b A composition containing 0.1% by weight of ascorbyl tetra-2-hexyldecanoate and 99.9% by weight of isostearic acid was designated Composition b. For contact with composition b, 0.1 g of composition b was applied to 1 g of comparative hair b prior to exposure to damaging environment b and each day during exposure to damaging environment b. Then, it was performed by blowing hot air from a hair dryer. Before the daily application, the comparative hair b was immersed in a 1% by mass sodium lauryl sulfate aqueous solution for 30 minutes and then washed with water.

損傷付与環境b
損傷付与環境bは上記損傷付与環境aと同様とし、損傷付与環境b下に基準毛髪b及び比較毛髪bを置いた。
Damage imparting environment b
The damage-imparting environment b was the same as the damage-imparting environment a, and the reference hair b and the comparative hair b were placed under the damage-imparting environment b.

加水分解b
上記加水分解aと同様に、加水分解bを行った。
hydrolysis b
Hydrolysis b was carried out in the same manner as hydrolysis a above.

加水分解物(Ib)及び加水分解物(IIb)の回収
上記加水分解物(Ia)及び加水分解物(IIa)の回収と同様に、加水分解物(Ib)及び加水分解物(IIb)を回収した。
Recovery of hydrolyzate (Ib) and hydrolyzate (IIb) Recovery of hydrolyzate (Ib) and hydrolyzate (IIb) in the same manner as in the recovery of hydrolyzate (Ia) and hydrolyzate (IIa) did.

システイン酸量(Ib)システイン酸量(IIb)の定量
上記システイン酸量(Ia)及びシステイン酸量(IIa)の定量と同様に、システイン酸量(Ib)及びシステイン酸量(IIb)の定量を行った。
Determination of Cysteic Acid Amount (Ib) and Cysteic Acid Amount (IIb) In the same manner as the determination of the cysteic acid amount (Ia) and the cysteic acid amount (IIa), the cysteic acid amount (Ib) and the cysteic acid amount (IIb) were quantified. gone.

下記表2に、加水分解物(Ib)におけるシステイン酸量(Ib)、加水分解物(IIb)におけるシステイン酸量(IIb)を示す(表2の単位は、質量%であり、数値は定量回数50回の平均値である。)。損傷付与環境b下に置く前に組成物bと接触させた比較毛髪bに基づくシステイン酸量(IIb)が、システイン酸量(Ib)よりも低い値であり、組成物bによる損傷抑制を評価できた。 Table 2 below shows the amount of cysteic acid (Ib) in the hydrolyzate (Ib) and the amount of cysteic acid (IIb) in the hydrolyzate (IIb) (the unit in Table 2 is % by mass, and the numerical values are the number of times of determination. It is the average value of 50 times.). The amount of cysteic acid (IIb) based on comparative hair b that was brought into contact with composition b before being placed under damage imparting environment b was lower than the amount of cysteic acid (Ib), and damage inhibition by composition b was evaluated. did it.

Figure 0007109935000002
Figure 0007109935000002

(参考例A)
毛髪(基準毛髪a及び損傷付与環境a下に置いた後の比較毛髪a)の周方向切断面について、赤外顕微鏡を用いて、システイン酸の分布状態を測定した。その詳細は、次の通りである。純水中で凍結させた毛髪をクライオミクロトームにて厚さ10μmに切断することで調製した。毛髪の切断面を大型放射光施設SPring-8におけるBL43IRの赤外顕微鏡(Bruker社製「Hyperion2000」)のステージにあるフッ化バリウム板上に置き、透過測定を行った。測定はマッピングステージを使用して5μm単位ステップで行い、各測定点に対して4000-600cm-1の範囲で波数分解能4cm-1にて赤外吸収スペクトルを得た。この時のアパーチャーサイズは6μm×6μmとし、積算回数は64とした。
(Reference example A)
Circumferential cut surfaces of the hair (reference hair a and comparative hair a after being placed under the damage imparting environment a) were measured for distribution of cysteic acid using an infrared microscope. The details are as follows. It was prepared by cutting hair frozen in pure water to a thickness of 10 μm with a cryomicrotome. The cut surface of the hair was placed on a barium fluoride plate on the stage of a BL43IR infrared microscope (“Hyperion 2000” manufactured by Bruker) at SPring-8, a large synchrotron radiation facility, and transmission measurement was performed. The measurement was performed in 5 μm unit steps using a mapping stage, and an infrared absorption spectrum was obtained at a wave number resolution of 4 cm −1 in the range of 4000-600 cm −1 for each measurement point. At this time, the aperture size was set to 6 μm×6 μm, and the number of accumulation times was set to 64.

図1は、基準毛髪a(―)および比較毛髪a(…)の赤外スペクトル例である。システイン酸に由来するS-Oの伸縮振動ピークは、1040cm-1付近であるので、1065-1030cm-1における吸収ピークの面積値I1065-1030を算出し、毛髪の厚みの影響を除くために1600-1470cm-1におけるアミドII(N-H)結合吸収ピークの強度面積値I1600-1470を基準としてS-Oの強度面積値を補正した(補正の算出式:I1065-1030/I1600-1470)。図2は、基準毛髪a及び比較毛髪aの全測定点におけるI1065-1030/I1600-1470の平均値である(平均値は、4サンプルの平均)。このI1065-1030/I1600-1470の平均値によれば、基準毛髪aに比べて、紫外線処理を行った比較毛髪aは高いから、システイン酸が毛髪内部に生成していると考えられる。 FIG. 1 is an infrared spectrum example of a reference hair a (-) and a comparison hair a (...). Since the S—O stretching vibration peak derived from cysteinic acid is around 1040 cm −1 , the area value I 1065-1030 of the absorption peak at 1065-1030 cm −1 was calculated, and the effect of hair thickness was removed. The intensity area value of SO was corrected based on the intensity area value I 1600-1470 of the amide II (N—H) bond absorption peak at 1600-1470 cm −1 (calculation formula for correction: I 1065-1030 / I 1600 -1470 ). FIG. 2 shows the average values of I 1065-1030 /I 1600-1470 at all measurement points of reference hair a and comparative hair a (the average value is the average of 4 samples). According to this average value of I 1065-1030 /I 1600-1470 , compared to the reference hair a, the UV-treated comparative hair a is higher, so it is considered that cysteic acid is generated inside the hair.

さらに、図3に示す結果から、システイン酸が毛髪内部に生成しているといえる。図3は、基準毛髪a、比較毛髪aの切断面径方向の各測定点におけるI1065-1030/I1600-1470の平均値を示すグラフである。I1065-1030/I1600-1470は、どの測定点においても紫外線照射後の比較毛髪aの方が基準毛髪aよりも高い値であるので、システイン酸は毛髪表面から毛髪内部にわたって生成していたと理解できる。 Furthermore, from the results shown in FIG. 3, it can be said that cysteic acid is generated inside the hair. FIG. 3 is a graph showing the average values of I 1065-1030 /I 1600-1470 at each measurement point in the radial direction of the cut surface of the reference hair a and the comparative hair a. I 1065-1030 /I 1600-1470 are higher in comparison hair a after UV irradiation than in reference hair a at any measurement point, so cysteic acid was generated from the hair surface to the inside of the hair. It can be understood.

図4は、赤外顕微鏡による基準毛髪a、比較毛髪aのシステイン酸相対強度マッピングの測定結果である。この結果においても、紫外線照射後の比較毛髪a内部は、全体にわたってシステイン酸が生成していたことを確認できる。つまり、紫外線による毛髪の損傷は、表面に留まらず、内部に至る。 FIG. 4 shows measurement results of cysteic acid relative intensity mapping of reference hair a and comparative hair a using an infrared microscope. This result also confirms that cysteic acid was generated throughout the inside of comparative hair a after ultraviolet irradiation. In other words, damage to hair caused by ultraviolet rays reaches not only the surface but also the inside.

(参考例B)
損傷付与環境b下に置いた後の基準毛髪b及び損傷付与環境b下に置いた後の比較毛髪bの周方向切断面について、上記参考例Aと同様、システイン酸の分布状態を測定した。
(Reference example B)
The distribution state of cysteic acid was measured in the same manner as in Reference Example A above for the reference hair b after being placed under the damaging environment b and the comparative hair b after being placed under the damaging environment b.

図5は、参考例Aと同様、基準毛髪b、比較毛髪bのシステイン酸相対強度マッピングの測定結果である。基準毛髪b、比較毛髪b共に紫外線照射されたものであるが、組成物bとの接触を行った比較毛髪bは、基準毛髪bよりも、毛髪損傷が抑えられていた。 FIG. 5 shows measurement results of cysteic acid relative intensity mapping of reference hair b and comparative hair b, as in Reference Example A. FIG. Although both the reference hair b and the comparative hair b were irradiated with ultraviolet rays, the comparative hair b, which was contacted with the composition b, was less damaged than the reference hair b.

なお、組成物bにおけるテトラ2-へキシルデカン酸アスコルビルは、毛髪内部にまで浸透することをSPring-8にて確認しており、図5における比較毛髪bの内部損傷の抑制結果は、上記内部浸透と相関する。 It was confirmed by SPring-8 that ascorbyl tetra-2-hexyldecanoate in composition b penetrates into the interior of the hair. correlates with

Claims (3)

基準毛髪を加水分解して得られた加水分解物(I)におけるシステイン酸量(I)と、
比較毛髪を加水分解して得られた加水分解物(II)におけるシステイン酸量(II)と、
を比較する毛髪損傷の評価方法であって、
前記基準毛髪および/又は前記比較毛髪が、光による損傷付与環境下に置かれたものであって、
前記加水分解物(I)及び前記加水分解物(II)が、細断した毛髪からの加水分解によって得られる毛髪損傷の評価方法。
The amount of cysteic acid (I) in the hydrolyzate (I) obtained by hydrolyzing the reference hair,
Cysteic acid amount (II) in hydrolyzate (II) obtained by hydrolyzing comparative hair,
A hair damage evaluation method that compares
The reference hair and/or the comparative hair are placed under an environment of light damage,
A method for evaluating hair damage, wherein said hydrolyzate (I) and said hydrolyzate (II) are obtained by hydrolysis from chopped hair.
前記損傷付与環境下に置かれる前に、一種又は二種以上の化合物又は組成物を、前記基準毛髪および/又は前記比較毛髪と接触させる請求項1に記載の毛髪損傷の評価方法。 2. A method for assessing hair damage according to claim 1, wherein one or more compounds or compositions are brought into contact with the reference hair and/or the comparison hair prior to exposure to the damaging environment. 一種又は二種以上の化合物又は組成物を接触させた基準毛髪、および、前記化合物又は組成物を接触させていない比較毛髪を用意する第1工程と、
前記基準毛髪および前記比較毛髪を光による損傷付与環境下に置く第2工程と、
前記第2工程で得られた前記基準毛髪を細断後、加水分解により加水分解物(I)を得て、前記第2工程で得られた前記比較毛髪を細断後、加水分解により加水分解物(II)を得る第3工程と、
前記加水分解物(I)におけるシステイン酸量(I)と、前記加水分解物(II)におけるシステイン酸量(II)とを比較する第4工程と、
を含む、化合物又は組成物の評価方法。
a first step of providing reference hair that has been contacted with one or more compounds or compositions and comparative hair that has not been contacted with the compound or composition ;
a second step of exposing the reference hair and the comparative hair to a light-damaging environment;
After chopping the reference hair obtained in the second step, the hydrolyzate (I) is obtained by hydrolysis, and after chopping the comparative hair obtained in the second step, the hydrolyzate is hydrolyzed. a third step of obtaining the product (II);
a fourth step of comparing the amount of cysteic acid (I) in the hydrolyzate (I) with the amount of cysteic acid (II) in the hydrolyzate (II);
A method for evaluating a compound or composition, comprising:
JP2018027799A 2018-02-20 2018-02-20 Methods for evaluating hair damage and methods for testing compounds or compositions Active JP7109935B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2018027799A JP7109935B2 (en) 2018-02-20 2018-02-20 Methods for evaluating hair damage and methods for testing compounds or compositions

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2018027799A JP7109935B2 (en) 2018-02-20 2018-02-20 Methods for evaluating hair damage and methods for testing compounds or compositions

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2019144075A JP2019144075A (en) 2019-08-29
JP7109935B2 true JP7109935B2 (en) 2022-08-01

Family

ID=67773725

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2018027799A Active JP7109935B2 (en) 2018-02-20 2018-02-20 Methods for evaluating hair damage and methods for testing compounds or compositions

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP7109935B2 (en)

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2000327538A (en) 1999-05-24 2000-11-28 Toyo Hakko:Kk Hair treatment composition
WO2005057211A1 (en) 2003-12-09 2005-06-23 Shiseido Company, Ltd. Method of rating hair damage with use of oxidized protein occurring in hair as indicator
JP2006028112A (en) 2004-07-20 2006-02-02 Kanebo Ltd Hair cosmetic
JP2007240180A (en) 2006-03-06 2007-09-20 Mandom Corp Damage evaluation method of keratin fiber
JP2009256277A (en) 2008-04-21 2009-11-05 Hoyu Co Ltd Pre-treating agent composition for hair dyeing
US20160287502A1 (en) 2013-12-12 2016-10-06 Henkel Ag & Co. Kgaa Method for straightening, conditioning and colouring hair, especially hair with substantial curl

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2000327538A (en) 1999-05-24 2000-11-28 Toyo Hakko:Kk Hair treatment composition
WO2005057211A1 (en) 2003-12-09 2005-06-23 Shiseido Company, Ltd. Method of rating hair damage with use of oxidized protein occurring in hair as indicator
JP2006028112A (en) 2004-07-20 2006-02-02 Kanebo Ltd Hair cosmetic
JP2007240180A (en) 2006-03-06 2007-09-20 Mandom Corp Damage evaluation method of keratin fiber
JP2009256277A (en) 2008-04-21 2009-11-05 Hoyu Co Ltd Pre-treating agent composition for hair dyeing
US20160287502A1 (en) 2013-12-12 2016-10-06 Henkel Ag & Co. Kgaa Method for straightening, conditioning and colouring hair, especially hair with substantial curl

Non-Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
SPring-8で毛髪内部のシステイン酸を高精度に可視化することに成功 -毛髪内のダメージ部分を高精度に測定する技術を確立- (プレスリリース),株式会社ミルボン,2014年12月16日,http://www.spring8.or.jp/ja/news_publications/press_release/2014/141215/
伊藤敦,太陽光紫外線に暴露された毛髪の酸化度のX線イメージングによる画像化,コスメトロジー研究報告,2020年09月01日,Vol.28,Page.68-72
渡邉紘介,紫外線照射による毛髪ダメージ評価,皮膚と美容,2018年03月31日,Vol.50 No.1,Page.20-26
稲益悟志,顕微IRを使用した毛髪横断面解析,日本化粧品技術者会誌,2016年09月20日,Vol.50 No.3,Page.209-217
葛原亜起夫,Best Shot 写真でひもとく未来材料 顕微分光光度法とラマン分光法による毛髪断面の構造解析,未来材料,2012年12月10日,Vol.12 No.12,Page.1-4
藤井敏弘,機能性化粧品開発のための定量化・解析の新技術 毛髪ケラチンフィルムによるパーマ処理損傷評,Fragrance Journal,2011年07月15日,Vol.39 No.7,Page.46-52

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2019144075A (en) 2019-08-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Nevin et al. Raman spectra of proteinaceous materials used in paintings: a multivariate analytical approach for classification and identification
JP5513679B2 (en) System and method for detecting and indicating hair damage by evaluation of protein fragments
Kuzuhara Analysis of structural changes in permanent waved human hair using Raman spectroscopy
Kuzuhara Analysis of structural changes in bleached keratin fibers (black and white human hair) using Raman spectroscopy
Kempson et al. ToF-SIMS analysis of elemental distributions in human hair
Essendoubi et al. Conformation changes in human hair keratin observed using confocal Raman spectroscopy after active ingredient application
JP5658866B2 (en) Evaluation method
JP4526839B2 (en) Method for evaluating the transparency and water retention of the stratum corneum using oxidized protein in the stratum corneum
Moini et al. Dating silk by capillary electrophoresis mass spectrometry
Chillè et al. An analytical evaluation of Er: YAG laser cleaning tests on a nineteenth century varnished painting
Kuzuhara Internal structural changes in keratin fibres resulting from combined hair waving and stress relaxation treatments: a Raman spectroscopic investigation
Fritz et al. p-Dimethylaminobenzaldehyde: preliminary investigations into a novel reagent for the detection of latent fingermarks on paper surfaces
JP7109935B2 (en) Methods for evaluating hair damage and methods for testing compounds or compositions
AU2016223870B2 (en) Method for examining sunscreens on the skin
Van Helmond et al. Collection of amino acids and DNA from fingerprints using hydrogels
CN1902487A (en) Method of rating hair damage with use of oxidized protein occurring in hair as indicator
Şahiner et al. Impact of different mechanical pre-treatment to the EPR signals of human fingernails towards studying dose response and fading subjected to UV exposure or beta irradiation
JP2004340935A (en) Method for evaluating oxidized protein in horny layer
Taddei et al. Vibrational study on the interactions between yak keratin fibres and glyoxylic acid
Fujii Hair keratin film as a substitute device for human hair Application in hair care science
JP4673771B2 (en) Keratin fiber damage assessment method
Popescu et al. Spectral characterization of natural resins used in conservation
JP2013061284A (en) Method for evaluating molecule association structure of intercellular lipid
EP2984488B1 (en) Sample preparation for reduced variability in raman spectroscopy
Dolgin et al. A complex analytical method for parchment characterization

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20210218

RD03 Notification of appointment of power of attorney

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A7423

Effective date: 20210219

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20211208

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20211214

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20220210

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20220315

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20220512

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20220712

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20220720

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 7109935

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250