Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP7126069B2 - Electromagnetic pulse acoustic non-destructive inspection method - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP7126069B2 - Electromagnetic pulse acoustic non-destructive inspection method - Google Patents

Electromagnetic pulse acoustic non-destructive inspection method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP7126069B2
JP7126069B2 JP2018167677A JP2018167677A JP7126069B2 JP 7126069 B2 JP7126069 B2 JP 7126069B2 JP 2018167677 A JP2018167677 A JP 2018167677A JP 2018167677 A JP2018167677 A JP 2018167677A JP 7126069 B2 JP7126069 B2 JP 7126069B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
elastic wave
waveform
inspection object
magnetic field
inspection
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2018167677A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2020041832A (en
Inventor
敏行 高木
博之 小助川
光男 橋本
康之 長岡
秀雄 三輪
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Tohoku University NUC
Original Assignee
Tohoku University NUC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Tohoku University NUC filed Critical Tohoku University NUC
Priority to JP2018167677A priority Critical patent/JP7126069B2/en
Publication of JP2020041832A publication Critical patent/JP2020041832A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP7126069B2 publication Critical patent/JP7126069B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02EREDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E60/00Enabling technologies; Technologies with a potential or indirect contribution to GHG emissions mitigation
    • Y02E60/30Hydrogen technology
    • Y02E60/32Hydrogen storage

Landscapes

  • Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)

Description

本発明は、検査対象物の内部欠陥の検出や、検査対象物の一部を構成する高導電性材料などの厚み測定に電磁パルスを用いた非破壊検査方法に関する。 The present invention relates to a non-destructive inspection method using electromagnetic pulses to detect internal defects in an object to be inspected and to measure the thickness of a highly conductive material constituting a part of the object to be inspected.

現在、温暖化に対処するために地球規模でのCO排出量の削減が叫ばれている。このような流れの中で、水素社会の実現が希求され、その1つとして自動車に関しては水素燃料電池車の開発・普及が試みられている。この水素燃料電池車の普及には水素ステーションの設置が全国的に網羅される必要がある。水素ステーションに設置される圧力容器は、現在では様々なタイプがある。例えば、低合金鋼製圧力容器、低合金鋼ライナーのフープラップ容器、アルミニウム合金ライナーのフルラップ容器、プラスチック・ライナーのフルラップ容器などがあり、現在では大重量の低合金鋼製圧力容器から例えば金属又はプラスチック・ライナーとFRP(繊維強化プラスチック)の複合化による軽量圧力容器への移行が進んでいる。 At present, reduction of CO 2 emissions on a global scale is called for in order to cope with global warming. In such a trend, the realization of a hydrogen society is desired, and as one of them, attempts are being made to develop and popularize hydrogen fuel cell vehicles. For the spread of this hydrogen fuel cell vehicle, it is necessary to cover the installation of hydrogen stations nationwide. There are currently various types of pressure vessels installed in hydrogen stations. For example, there are low-alloy steel pressure vessels, low-alloy steel liner hoop-wrap vessels, aluminum alloy liner full-wrap vessels, and plastic liner full-wrap vessels. The transition to lightweight pressure vessels by combining plastic liners and FRP (fiber reinforced plastic) is progressing.

軽量圧力容器の欠陥では、製造条件と運用に起因する金属又はプラスチック・ライナーとFRPとの接合面における境界剥離やFRP層内の内部剥離、水素脆化に起因する金属ライナーの疲労亀裂、或いは長期間の運用に起因する金属ライナーの減肉などがある。
圧力容器の破損は重大な事故を招くため、保守に時間と費用が掛かり水素社会実現の1つの障壁となっている。
なお、圧力容器は水素ステーションのみならず、石油精製工業、化学工業、電力工業、ガス工業及び原子力工業などの工学分野において過酷な高温・低温・高圧環境下で使用され、同様の問題を抱えている。
Defects in lightweight pressure vessels include boundary delamination at the interface between the metal or plastic liner and FRP due to manufacturing conditions and operation, internal delamination within the FRP layer, fatigue cracks in the metal liner due to hydrogen embrittlement, and long There is thinning of the metal liner due to the period of operation.
Damage to the pressure vessel can lead to serious accidents, requiring time and money for maintenance, which is one of the obstacles to the realization of a hydrogen-based society.
Pressure vessels are used not only in hydrogen stations but also in engineering fields such as oil refining industry, chemical industry, power industry, gas industry and nuclear power industry under severe high temperature/low temperature/high pressure environment and have similar problems. there is

また、CO対策の一環として、自動車や航空機のような輸送機器に対しては、その軽量化・構造の簡素化などが要求されている。この要求を満たす一つの方策として、機体や車体の構造体を鋼板のような重量材料からアルミニウムやCFRP(炭素繊維強化プラスチック)のような軽量材料に置き換えると共に、ボルト接合やリベット接合のような機械接合を接着接合に代え、接合部分の軽量化や部品点数の削減、および整備費用の低減を図る試みがなされている。 In addition, as part of CO 2 countermeasures, weight reduction and structural simplification are required for transportation equipment such as automobiles and aircraft. As one measure to meet this demand, heavy materials such as steel plates are replaced with lightweight materials such as aluminum and CFRP (Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastic) for airframe and vehicle structures, and machine parts such as bolt joints and riveted joints are used. Attempts have been made to reduce the weight of joints, reduce the number of parts, and reduce maintenance costs by replacing the joints with adhesive joints.

このような輸送機器の軽量化や構造の簡素化、圧力容器の複合化の流れの中で、接着接合の信頼性や内部欠陥を高精度で検査でき、安全性の確保を実現できる非破壊検査の重要性が増している。 In the trend of weight reduction and structural simplification of transportation equipment, and combination of pressure vessels, non-destructive inspection that can inspect the reliability of adhesive joints and internal defects with high accuracy and ensure safety. is increasing in importance.

従来から行われている非破壊検査方法には以下のようなものがある。
(a)X線発生器とフィルム間に検査対象物を設置して撮影するX線撮影法(特許文献1)
(b)検査対象物の表面に超音波発生器を当ててその反射もしくは透過超音波を検出して判断する超音波探傷法(特許文献2)
(c)ハンマーにより検査対象物の表面を叩いてその反響音から判断する打診法(特許文献3)
(d)検査対象物の表面の赤外線分布を計測する赤外線映像法(特許文献4)
(e)マイクロ波を検査対象物の表面から照射するマイクロ波法(特許文献5)
(f)パルス電磁力を用いた音響診断法(特許文献6)
Conventional non-destructive inspection methods include the following.
(a) X-ray imaging method in which an object to be inspected is placed between an X-ray generator and a film (Patent Document 1)
(b) An ultrasonic flaw detection method in which an ultrasonic generator is applied to the surface of an object to be inspected and the reflected or transmitted ultrasonic waves are detected and judged (Patent Document 2)
(c) A percussion method in which the surface of an object to be inspected is hit with a hammer and judged from the echo sound (Patent Document 3)
(d) Infrared imaging method for measuring infrared distribution on the surface of an inspection object (Patent Document 4)
(e) Microwave method for irradiating microwaves from the surface of an object to be inspected (Patent Document 5)
(f) Acoustic diagnostic method using pulsed electromagnetic force (Patent Document 6)

特許第6321878号公報Japanese Patent No. 6321878 特開2017-198663号公報JP 2017-198663 A 特開昭52-86386号公報JP-A-52-86386 特開2016-3959号公報JP 2016-3959 A 特開2004-69507号公報JP-A-2004-69507 特許第3738424号公報Japanese Patent No. 3738424

上記X線撮影法では、検査対象物をX線発生装置とフィルムの間に設置する必要があるので、検査対象物の形状、大きさ、場所等種々の制約があり簡便に使用することは困難であった。
超音波探傷法は、超音波を検査対象物の表面に照射し、背面側の金属から反射される超音波から内部欠陥を探査するものであるが、超音波を発する音源が検査対象物の表面側になるため、振動減衰が大きいFRPを用いた構造材料への適用が難しい。また、可聴域外の高周波なので内部の夾雑物により超音波が減衰・散乱されやすくその解析は非常に困難であった。
打診法は、古来、広く用いられているものの、経験と勘を要するため習熟するのにかなりの時間が必要であり、且つ定量的でなく信頼性が低い。
赤外線映像法及びマイクロ波法は、赤外線、マイクロ波が検査対象物により急激に減衰するので、検査対象物の比較的表面しか測定できない。
パルス電磁力による音響診断・測定方法は、発信コイルにパルス大電流を印加することで、パルス磁場が発生し、ローレンツ力と磁歪効果によって金属に発生した弾性波を受信・解析することにより検査対象物の欠陥を検出・評価する方法であるが、先行技術文献6に開示されている方法は、コンクリート内部に埋め込まれた鉄筋またはアンカーボルトの固着状態の非破壊的な検出を目的としており、接着接合部分、接合体内部および接合体裏面の性状(減肉)の評価はできない。
In the X-ray imaging method described above, since the object to be inspected must be placed between the X-ray generator and the film, there are various restrictions such as the shape, size, and location of the object to be inspected, making it difficult to use easily. Met.
The ultrasonic flaw detection method irradiates the surface of the object to be inspected with ultrasonic waves and searches for internal defects from the ultrasonic waves reflected from the metal on the back side. Therefore, it is difficult to apply to structural materials using FRP, which has large vibration damping. In addition, since the high frequency is out of the audible range, the ultrasonic wave is easily attenuated and scattered by internal contaminants, making its analysis very difficult.
Although the percussion method has been widely used since ancient times, it requires a considerable amount of time to master because it requires experience and intuition, and it is not quantitative and has low reliability.
In the infrared imaging method and the microwave method, infrared rays and microwaves are rapidly attenuated by the object to be inspected, so only the surface of the object to be inspected can be measured.
In the acoustic diagnosis and measurement method using pulsed electromagnetic force, a pulsed magnetic field is generated by applying a large pulsed current to the transmission coil, and the elastic wave generated in the metal by the Lorentz force and magnetostrictive effect is received and analyzed to determine the object to be inspected. Although it is a method for detecting and evaluating defects in objects, the method disclosed in Prior Art Document 6 aims at non-destructive detection of the fixed state of reinforcing bars or anchor bolts embedded in concrete. It is not possible to evaluate the properties (thickness reduction) of the bonded portion, the inside of the bonded body, and the back side of the bonded body.

しかしながら、鋭意研究の結果、発明者らはパルス電磁力による音響診断・測定方法が、検査対象物の内部、或いは背面に存在する導電体から発生する音源を用いることにより、接着接合部分或いは接合体内部の情報を有した信号の受信と解析が可能であり、二つの異種材料(高導電性材料/非(低)導電性材料や、低導電性材料/非導電性材料)を接合した接合体や、導電性を有する多数の繊維やカーボン粒子或いは金属粒子が母材中に連続的で通電可能な状態で存在する積層体の診断に対して有効であることを見出した。
本発明者らは、この知見に基づき、パルス磁場を利用する方法で、検査対象物の内部欠陥の有無や位置、裏面の性状を簡便且つ正確に探査できる非破壊検査方法を提供することを課題とする。
However, as a result of intensive research, the inventors have found that an acoustic diagnosis/measurement method using a pulsed electromagnetic force uses a sound source generated from a conductor existing inside or on the back of an object to be inspected, thereby making it possible to It is possible to receive and analyze signals with internal information, and a joint made by joining two dissimilar materials (highly conductive material/non-(low) conductive material or low conductive material/non-conductive material) Also, the present inventors have found that the method is effective for diagnosing laminates in which a large number of electrically conductive fibers, carbon particles, or metal particles exist continuously in the base material in an electrically conductive state.
Based on this finding, the inventors of the present invention aim to provide a non-destructive inspection method that can easily and accurately explore the presence or absence and position of internal defects in an inspection object and the properties of the back surface by a method using a pulse magnetic field. and

請求項1に記載の発明(電磁パルス音響非破壊検査方法)は、高導電性材料11aに非導電性材料11b又は低導電性材料11cのいずれかを接着した接合体11の第1の非破壊検査方法(コイル移動、センサ固定)である。
高導電性材料11aに非導電性材料11b又は低導電性材料11cのいずれかを接着した接合体11を検査対象物Aとし、該検査対象物Aにパルス磁場を照射して該パルス磁場によって前記高導電性材料11aに渦電流を誘起させ、該渦電流と前記パルス磁場との相互作用力により前記高導電性材料11aを励振させて前記高導電性材料11aを音源とする弾性波を発生させ、該弾性波を前記非導電性材料11b側又は低導電性材料11c側で検出し、然る後、前記弾性波の波形と予め入手した内部欠陥のない基準体Bにおける基準弾性波の波形とを比較して、該検査対象物A内部の欠陥の有無を推定する電磁パルス音響非破壊検査方法において、
前記検査対象物Aを複数の検査区画に分割し、
該検査区画において、前記検査対象物Aの測定面である表面上の固定箇所にセンサ14を設けると共に、前記検査対象物Aの測定面である表面上に配置されたパルス磁場発生用の発信コイル12を前記検査対象物Aである接合体11に対して相対的に移動させ、固定箇所に設けたセンサ14で前記弾性波を複数箇所にて検出し、然る後、前記弾性波の波形と予め入手した内部欠陥のない基準体Bにおける基準弾性波の波形とを下記(イ)~(ニ)の内の1又は複数の項目を選択し、選択された項目の結果を比較して、該検査対象物内部の欠陥の位置を推定することを特徴とする。
(イ) 前記基準弾性波の波形に現れる音の強度と、検査対象物の弾性波の波形に現れる音の強度の差
(ロ) 前記基準弾性波の波形に対する検査対象物の弾性波の波形の時間ずれ
(ハ) 前記基準弾性波の波形に対する検査対象物の弾性波の波形の減衰状態
(ニ) 前記基準弾性波の波形に対する検査対象物の弾性波の波形の周波数
The invention according to claim 1 (electromagnetic pulse acoustic nondestructive inspection method) provides a first nondestructive test method for a joined body 11 in which either a nonconductive material 11b or a low conductive material 11c is adhered to a high conductive material 11a. It is an inspection method (coil movement, sensor fixation).
A bonded body 11 in which either a non-conductive material 11b or a low-conductive material 11c is adhered to a highly conductive material 11a is used as an inspection object A. A pulsed magnetic field is applied to the inspection object A, and the pulsed magnetic field causes the above-mentioned An eddy current is induced in the highly conductive material 11a, and an interaction force between the eddy current and the pulse magnetic field excites the highly conductive material 11a to generate an elastic wave with the highly conductive material 11a as a sound source. , the elastic wave is detected on the side of the non-conductive material 11b or the side of the low-conductive material 11c, and then the waveform of the elastic wave and the waveform of the reference elastic wave in the previously obtained reference body B having no internal defects are detected. In the electromagnetic pulse acoustic non-destructive inspection method for estimating the presence or absence of defects inside the inspection object A by comparing
dividing the inspection object A into a plurality of inspection sections;
In the inspection section, a sensor 14 is provided at a fixed position on the surface of the object to be inspected A to be measured, and a transmission coil for generating a pulse magnetic field is arranged on the surface of the object to be inspected A to be measured. 12 is moved relative to the joint 11, which is the object A to be inspected, and the elastic waves are detected at a plurality of points by sensors 14 provided at fixed points. Select one or more items from the following (a) to (d) with the waveform of the reference elastic wave in the reference body B having no internal defects obtained in advance, compare the results of the selected items, and It is characterized by estimating the position of the defect inside the inspection object .
(a) difference between the intensity of the sound appearing in the waveform of the reference elastic wave and the intensity of the sound appearing in the waveform of the elastic wave of the object to be inspected; Time lag (c) Attenuation state of the waveform of the elastic wave of the inspection object with respect to the waveform of the reference elastic wave (d) Frequency of the waveform of the elastic wave of the inspection object with respect to the waveform of the reference elastic wave

請求項2に記載の発明(電磁パルス音響非破壊検査方法)は、低導電性材料11cに非導電性材料11bを接着した接合体11の第1の非破壊検査方法(コイル移動、センサ固定)である。
低導電性材料11cに非導電性材料11bを接着した接合体11を検査対象物Aとし、該検査対象物Aにパルス磁場を照射して該パルス磁場によって前記接合体11の低導電性材料11cに渦電流を誘起させ、該渦電流と前記パルス磁場との相互作用力により前記低導電性材料11cを励振させて前記低導電性材料11cを音源とする弾性波を発生させ、該弾性波を前記非導電性材料11b側で検出し、
然る後、前記弾性波の波形と予め入手した内部欠陥のない基準体Bにおける基準弾性波の波形とを比較して、該検査対象物A内部の欠陥の有無を推定する電磁パルス音響非破壊検査方法において、
前記検査対象物Aを複数の検査区画に分割し、
該検査区画において、前記検査対象物Aの測定面である表面上の固定箇所にセンサ14を設けると共に、前記検査対象物Aの測定面である表面上に配置されたパルス磁場発生用の発信コイル12を前記検査対象物である接合体11に対して相対的に移動させ、固定箇所に設けたセンサ14で前記弾性波を複数箇所にて検出し、然る後、前記弾性波の波形と予め入手した内部欠陥のない基準体Bにおける基準弾性波の波形とを下記(イ)~(ニ)の内の1又は複数の項目を選択し、選択された項目の結果を比較して、該検査対象物A内部の欠陥の位置を推定することを特徴とする。
(イ) 前記基準弾性波の波形に現れる音の強度と、検査対象物の弾性波の波形に現れる音の強度の差
(ロ) 前記基準弾性波の波形に対する検査対象物の弾性波の波形の時間ずれ
(ハ) 前記基準弾性波の波形に対する検査対象物の弾性波の波形の減衰状態
(ニ) 前記基準弾性波の波形に対する検査対象物の弾性波の波形の周波数
The invention according to claim 2 (electromagnetic pulse acoustic non-destructive inspection method) is a first non- destructive inspection method (coil movement, sensor fixation) of a joined body 11 in which a non-conductive material 11b is adhered to a low-conductive material 11c. is.
A bonded body 11 in which a non-conductive material 11b is adhered to a low-conductive material 11c is used as an inspection object A. A pulsed magnetic field is applied to the inspection object A, and the low-conductive material 11c of the bonded body 11 is generated by the pulsed magnetic field. to induce an eddy current, and the interaction force between the eddy current and the pulse magnetic field excites the low-conductivity material 11c to generate an elastic wave with the low-conductivity material 11c as a sound source, and the elastic wave is detected on the non-conductive material 11b side,
After that, the waveform of the elastic wave is compared with the waveform of the reference elastic wave in the reference body B that has no internal defect obtained in advance, and the presence or absence of the defect inside the inspection object A is estimated. In the inspection method ,
dividing the inspection object A into a plurality of inspection sections;
In the inspection section, a sensor 14 is provided at a fixed position on the surface of the object to be inspected A to be measured, and a transmission coil for generating a pulse magnetic field is arranged on the surface of the object to be inspected A to be measured. 12 is moved relative to the bonded body 11, which is the object to be inspected, and the elastic waves are detected at a plurality of points by sensors 14 provided at fixed points. Select one or more items from the following (a) to (d) with the waveform of the reference elastic wave in the obtained reference body B having no internal defects, compare the results of the selected items, and perform the inspection It is characterized by estimating the position of the defect inside the object A.
(a) difference between the intensity of the sound appearing in the waveform of the reference elastic wave and the intensity of the sound appearing in the waveform of the elastic wave of the object to be inspected; Time lag (c) Attenuation state of the waveform of the elastic wave of the inspection object with respect to the waveform of the reference elastic wave (d) Frequency of the waveform of the elastic wave of the inspection object with respect to the waveform of the reference elastic wave

請求項3に記載の発明(電磁パルス音響非破壊検査方法)は、高導電性材料11aに非導電性材料11b又は低導電性材料11cのいずれかを接着した接合体11の第2の非破壊検査方法(コイル及びセンサ移動)である。
高導電性材料11aに非導電性材料11b又は低導電性材料11cのいずれかを接着した接合体11を検査対象物Aとし、該検査対象物Aにパルス磁場を照射して該パルス磁場によって前記高導電性材料11aに渦電流を誘起させ、該渦電流と前記パルス磁場との相互作用力により前記高導電性材料11aを励振させて前記高導電性材料11aを音源とする弾性波を発生させ、該弾性波を前記非導電性材料11b側又は低導電性材料11c側で検出し、然る後、前記弾性波の波形と予め入手した内部欠陥のない基準体Bにおける基準弾性波の波形とを比較して、該検査対象物A内部の欠陥の有無を推定する電磁パルス音響非破壊検査方法において、
パルス磁場発生用の発信コイル12とセンサ14とを一定の間隔Lを保ちつつ前記検査対象物Aである接合体11に対して相対的に移動させ、前記発信コイル12と共に移動するセンサ14で前記弾性波を複数箇所にて検出し、然る後、前記弾性波の波形と予め入手した内部欠陥のない基準体Bにおける基準弾性波の波形とを下記(イ)~(ニ)の内の1又は複数の項目を選択し、選択された項目の結果を比較して、該検査対象物A内部の欠陥の位置を推定することを特徴とする。
(イ) 前記基準弾性波の波形に現れる音の強度と、検査対象物の弾性波の波形に現れる音の強度の差
(ロ) 前記基準弾性波の波形に対する検査対象物の弾性波の波形の時間ずれ
(ハ) 前記基準弾性波の波形に対する検査対象物の弾性波の波形の減衰状態
(ニ) 前記基準弾性波の波形に対する検査対象物の弾性波の波形の周波数
The invention according to claim 3 (electromagnetic pulse acoustic nondestructive inspection method) provides a second nondestructive test method for a joined body 11 in which either a nonconductive material 11b or a low conductive material 11c is adhered to a high conductive material 11a. Inspection method (coil and sensor movement).
A bonded body 11 in which either a non-conductive material 11b or a low-conductive material 11c is adhered to a highly conductive material 11a is used as an inspection object A. A pulsed magnetic field is applied to the inspection object A, and the pulsed magnetic field causes the above-mentioned An eddy current is induced in the highly conductive material 11a, and an interaction force between the eddy current and the pulse magnetic field excites the highly conductive material 11a to generate an elastic wave with the highly conductive material 11a as a sound source. , the elastic wave is detected on the side of the non-conductive material 11b or the side of the low-conductive material 11c, and then the waveform of the elastic wave and the waveform of the reference elastic wave in the previously obtained reference body B having no internal defects are detected. In the electromagnetic pulse acoustic non-destructive inspection method for estimating the presence or absence of defects inside the inspection object A by comparing
The transmitter coil 12 for generating a pulse magnetic field and the sensor 14 are moved relative to the bonded structure 11, which is the object to be inspected A, while maintaining a constant interval L, and the sensor 14 moving together with the transmitter coil 12 moves the The elastic wave is detected at a plurality of locations, and then the waveform of the elastic wave and the waveform of the reference elastic wave in the reference body B obtained in advance without internal defects are measured by one of the following (a) to (d): Alternatively, a plurality of items are selected, the results of the selected items are compared, and the position of the defect inside the inspection object A is estimated .
(a) difference between the intensity of the sound appearing in the waveform of the reference elastic wave and the intensity of the sound appearing in the waveform of the elastic wave of the object to be inspected; Time lag (c) Attenuation state of the waveform of the elastic wave of the inspection object with respect to the waveform of the reference elastic wave (d) Frequency of the waveform of the elastic wave of the inspection object with respect to the waveform of the reference elastic wave

請求項4に記載の発明(電磁パルス音響非破壊検査方法)は、低導電性材料11cに非導電性材料11bを接着した接合体11の第2の非破壊検査方法(コイル及びセンサ移動)である。
低導電性材料11cに非導電性材料11bを接着した接合体11を検査対象物Aとし、該検査対象物Aにパルス磁場を照射して該パルス磁場によって前記接合体11の低導電性材料11cに渦電流を誘起させ、該渦電流と前記パルス磁場との相互作用力により前記低導電性材料11cを励振させて前記低導電性材料11cを音源とする弾性波を発生させ、該弾性波を前記非導電性材料11b側で検出し、
然る後、前記弾性波の波形と予め入手した内部欠陥のない基準体Bにおける基準弾性波の波形とを比較して、該検査対象物A内部の欠陥の有無を推定する電磁パルス音響非破壊検査方法において、
パルス磁場発生用の発信コイル12とセンサ14とを一定の間隔Lを保ちつつ前記検査対象物Aである接合体11に対して相対的に移動させ、前記発信コイル12と共に移動するセンサ14で前記弾性波を複数箇所にて検出し、然る後、前記弾性波の波形と予め入手した内部欠陥のない基準体Bにおける基準弾性波の波形とを下記(イ)~(ニ)の内の1又は複数の項目を選択し、選択された項目の結果を比較して、該検査対象物A内部の欠陥の位置を推定することを特徴とする。
(イ) 前記基準弾性波の波形に現れる音の強度と、検査対象物の弾性波の波形に現れる音の強度の差
(ロ) 前記基準弾性波の波形に対する検査対象物の弾性波の波形の時間ずれ
(ハ) 前記基準弾性波の波形に対する検査対象物の弾性波の波形の減衰状態
(ニ) 前記基準弾性波の波形に対する検査対象物の弾性波の波形の周波数
The invention according to claim 4 (electromagnetic pulse acoustic nondestructive inspection method) is a second nondestructive inspection method (coil and sensor movement) of the joined body 11 in which the nonconductive material 11b is adhered to the low conductive material 11c. be.
A bonded body 11 in which a non-conductive material 11b is adhered to a low-conductive material 11c is used as an inspection object A. A pulsed magnetic field is applied to the inspection object A, and the low-conductive material 11c of the bonded body 11 is generated by the pulsed magnetic field. to induce an eddy current, and the interaction force between the eddy current and the pulse magnetic field excites the low-conductivity material 11c to generate an elastic wave with the low-conductivity material 11c as a sound source, and the elastic wave is detected on the non-conductive material 11b side,
After that, the waveform of the elastic wave is compared with the waveform of the reference elastic wave in the reference body B that has no internal defect obtained in advance, and the presence or absence of the defect inside the inspection object A is estimated. In the inspection method,
The transmitter coil 12 for generating a pulse magnetic field and the sensor 14 are moved relative to the bonded structure 11, which is the object to be inspected A, while maintaining a constant interval L, and the sensor 14 moving together with the transmitter coil 12 moves the The elastic wave is detected at a plurality of locations, and then the waveform of the elastic wave and the waveform of the reference elastic wave in the reference body B obtained in advance without internal defects are measured by one of the following (a) to (d): Alternatively, a plurality of items are selected, the results of the selected items are compared, and the position of the defect inside the inspection object A is estimated.
(b) The difference between the intensity of sound appearing in the waveform of the reference elastic wave and the intensity of sound appearing in the waveform of the elastic wave of the object to be inspected
(b) Time shift of the waveform of the elastic wave of the inspection object with respect to the waveform of the reference elastic wave
(c) Attenuation state of the waveform of the elastic wave of the inspection object with respect to the waveform of the reference elastic wave
(d) Frequency of the waveform of the elastic wave of the inspection object with respect to the waveform of the reference elastic wave

請求項5に記載の発明(電磁パルス音響非破壊検査方法)は、低導電性材料11bの積層体11’の内部剥離Nの有無を検査するもので、
検査対象物Aである低導電性材料11cの積層体11’にパルス磁場を照射して該パルス磁場によって前記積層体11’に渦電流を誘起させ、該渦電流と前記パルス磁場との相互作用力により前記積層体11’の全体を励振させて弾性波を発生させ、該弾性波を前記積層体11’の表面にて検出し、
然る後、前記弾性波の波形と予め入手した内部欠陥のない基準体Bにおける基準弾性波の波形とを下記(イ)~(ニ)の内の1又は複数の項目を選択し、選択された項目の結果を比較して、該検査対象物A内部の欠陥の有無を推定することを特徴とする。
(イ) 前記基準弾性波の波形に現れる音の強度と、検査対象物の弾性波の波形に現れる音の強度の差
(ロ) 前記基準弾性波の波形に対する検査対象物の弾性波の波形の時間ずれ
(ハ) 前記基準弾性波の波形に対する検査対象物の弾性波の波形の減衰状態
(ニ) 前記基準弾性波に波形に対する検査対象物の弾性波の波形の周波数
The invention according to claim 5 (electromagnetic pulse acoustic non-destructive inspection method) inspects the presence or absence of internal peeling N in the laminate 11' of the low conductive material 11b,
A pulsed magnetic field is applied to the layered body 11' of the low-conductivity material 11c, which is the inspection object A, to induce an eddy current in the layered body 11' by the pulsed magnetic field, and the interaction between the eddy current and the pulsed magnetic field. The entire laminate 11' is excited by a force to generate an elastic wave, and the elastic wave is detected on the surface of the laminate 11',
After that, one or more items from the following (a) to (d) are selected from the waveform of the elastic wave and the waveform of the reference elastic wave in the reference body B obtained in advance without internal defects, and selected. The presence or absence of a defect inside the inspection object A is estimated by comparing the results of the items selected.
(b) The difference between the intensity of sound appearing in the waveform of the reference elastic wave and the intensity of sound appearing in the waveform of the elastic wave of the object to be inspected
(b) Time shift of the waveform of the elastic wave of the inspection object with respect to the waveform of the reference elastic wave
(c) Attenuation state of the waveform of the elastic wave of the inspection object with respect to the waveform of the reference elastic wave
(d) Frequency of the waveform of the elastic wave of the inspection object with respect to the waveform of the reference elastic wave

請求項6に記載の発明は、「発信コイル移動、センサ固定による内部剥離の位置を検出に関し、請求項5に記載の電磁パルス音響非破壊検査方法において、
パルス磁場発生用の発信コイル12を前記検査対象物Aである積層体11’に対して相対的に移動させ、固定箇所に設けたセンサ14で前記弾性波を複数箇所にて検出し、然る後、前記弾性波の波形と予め入手した内部欠陥のない基準体Bにおける基準弾性波の波形とを前記(イ)~(ニ)の内の1又は複数の項目を選択し、選択された項目の結果を比較して、該検査対象物A内部の欠陥の位置を推定することを特徴とする。
The invention according to claim 6 relates to "detecting the position of internal peeling due to movement of the transmitting coil and fixing of the sensor, and in the electromagnetic pulse acoustic nondestructive inspection method according to claim 5,
A transmission coil 12 for generating a pulse magnetic field is moved relative to the laminate 11', which is the object to be inspected A, and the elastic waves are detected at a plurality of locations by sensors 14 provided at fixed locations. After that, one or more items from (a) to (d) are selected from the waveform of the elastic wave and the waveform of the reference elastic wave in the reference body B obtained in advance without internal defects, and the selected item are compared to estimate the position of the defect inside the object A to be inspected.

請求項7に記載の発明は、「発信コイル及びセンサ移動による内部剥離の位置を検出」に関し、請求項5に記載の電磁パルス音響非破壊検査方法において、
パルス磁場発生用の発信コイル12とセンサ14とを一定の間隔Lを保ちつつ前記検査対象物Aである積層体11’に対して相対的に移動させ、前記発信コイル12と共に移動するセンサ14で前記弾性波を複数箇所にて検出し、然る後、前記弾性波の波形と予め入手した内部欠陥のない基準体Bにおける基準弾性波の波形とを前記(イ)~(ニ)の内の1又は複数の項目を選択し、選択された項目の結果を比較して、該検査対象物A内部の欠陥の位置を推定することを特徴とする
The invention according to claim 7 relates to "detecting the position of internal peeling by movement of the transmission coil and the sensor", and in the electromagnetic pulse acoustic nondestructive inspection method according to claim 5,
The transmission coil 12 for generating a pulse magnetic field and the sensor 14 are moved relative to the laminate 11', which is the object to be inspected A, while maintaining a constant distance L, and the sensor 14 moves together with the transmission coil 12. The elastic waves are detected at a plurality of points, and then the waveforms of the elastic waves and the waveforms of the reference elastic waves in the reference body B obtained in advance and having no internal defects are compared with the above (a) to (d). It is characterized by selecting one or a plurality of items, comparing the results of the selected items, and estimating the position of the defect inside the inspection object A. FIG .

以上によれば、パルス磁場を検査対象物Aに照射し、生起した弾性波を基準弾性波と比較し、波形の強度、時間ずれ、振動モード、減衰、及びピーク値間隔から検査対象物A内の内部欠陥の有無、その位置、及び接合体の内層材の板厚や積層体の板厚を推測できる。更に、前記弾性波をFFT解析すれば、弾性波だけの比較の場合に比べてよりこれらの推測精度を上げることが出来る。 According to the above, a pulsed magnetic field is applied to the inspection object A, the generated elastic wave is compared with the reference elastic wave, and the intensity, time shift, vibration mode, attenuation, and peak value interval of the waveform are used to determine the It is possible to estimate the presence or absence of an internal defect, its position, and the thickness of the inner layer material of the bonded body and the thickness of the laminate. Furthermore, if the elastic waves are subjected to FFT analysis, it is possible to improve the accuracy of these estimations more than in the case of comparing only the elastic waves.

本発明のパルス電磁力による非破壊検査方法の概念図である。1 is a conceptual diagram of a non-destructive inspection method using pulsed electromagnetic force according to the present invention; FIG. 内部欠陥が存在する接合体の非破壊検査方法の概念図である。1 is a conceptual diagram of a non-destructive inspection method for a joined body having internal defects; FIG. 本発明で用いたテスト用圧力容器の断面図である。1 is a cross-sectional view of a test pressure vessel used in the present invention; FIG. 内部欠陥が存在する積層体の非破壊検査方法の概念図である。1 is a conceptual diagram of a non-destructive inspection method for a laminate having internal defects; FIG. 接合体の欠陥のない基準体と境界剥離を有する検査対象物の音響波形とそのFFTスペクトルである。FIG. 2 shows acoustic waveforms and their FFT spectra of a non-defective reference body of a joint and an inspection object having boundary peeling; FIG. (a)~(f)接合体の欠陥のない基準体と境界剥離を有する検査対象物の複数の位置での音響波形のFFTスペクトルである。(g)は接合体の欠陥のない基準体と境界剥離を有する検査対象物の複数の位置での最大ピーク周波数の折れ線グラフである。(h)は接合体の欠陥のない基準体と境界剥離を有する検査対象物の複数の位置でのAEシグナル強度折れ線グラフである。(a)-(f) are FFT spectra of acoustic waveforms at multiple locations of a defect-free reference body of a joint and a test object with boundary delamination. (g) is a line graph of maximum peak frequencies at multiple locations of a defect-free reference body of a joint and an inspection object with boundary delamination; (h) is an AE signal intensity line graph at multiple locations of a zygote defect-free reference and an inspection object with boundary delamination. (a)は接合体における基準厚を有する金属ライナーと減肉した金属ライナーのAEシグナルのピーク値のインターバル間隔を示すグラフ、(b)はそのFFTスペクトルを示すグラフである。(a) is a graph showing an interval interval between peak values of AE signals of a metal liner having a reference thickness and a metal liner with reduced thickness in a joined body, and (b) is a graph showing its FFT spectrum.

以下、図面に基づき本発明を詳細に説明する。本発明は、検査対象物Aに発生した弾性波をその表面に設置した変換子14(アコースティック・エミッション・センサ(本明細書では、AEセンサと言う。))で検出し、信号処理を行うことにより検査対象物Aの内部欠陥の有無やその厚み(板厚)、欠陥位置、或いは検査対象物Aの1つである接合体のライナーRに生じた割れ(亀裂)などを非破壊で評価する方法である。 The present invention will be described in detail below with reference to the drawings. In the present invention, the acoustic wave generated in the inspection object A is detected by the transducer 14 (acoustic emission sensor (hereinafter referred to as an AE sensor)) installed on the surface of the inspection object A, and signal processing is performed. The presence or absence of internal defects in the inspection object A, its thickness (plate thickness), defect positions, or cracks (cracks) generated in the liner R of the joint body, which is one of the inspection objects A, are evaluated non-destructively. The method.

図1において、本発明のパルス電磁力による非破壊検査装置10は、所定の隙間Hを明けて、内部欠陥のない基準体Bの表面に設けられる発信コイル12と、電源ケーブルを介してこの発信コイル12にパルス電流を印加する電源部13と、検査対象物Aの表面に取り付けたセンサ14と、信号ケーブルでこのセンサ14に接続された計測部15とで構成されている。計測部15には演算機能、表示機能が設けられている。図2及び図4の検査対象物Aも同様である。 In FIG. 1, a non-destructive inspection apparatus 10 using pulsed electromagnetic force of the present invention includes a transmission coil 12 provided on the surface of a reference body B free of internal defects with a predetermined gap H, and this transmission coil 12 through a power cable. It is composed of a power supply unit 13 for applying a pulse current to the coil 12, a sensor 14 attached to the surface of the inspection object A, and a measurement unit 15 connected to the sensor 14 by a signal cable. The measurement unit 15 is provided with an arithmetic function and a display function. The inspection object A in FIGS. 2 and 4 is the same.

発信コイル12は、螺旋状に巻かれた電線で構成された単一のコイルから構成されている。コイル内にコアを用いても良い。本発明回路は周知であり、図示しないが、直流高圧電源からコンデンサを充電し、充電されたコンデンサの電荷をメカニカルスイッチ又は半導体スイッチであるスイッチをオンすることにより、パルス電流として発信コイル12に印加するように構成されている。発信コイル12は、検査対象物Aの表面に隙間Hを設けて取り付けられる。検査時点では隙間Hは一定に保持される。 The transmitting coil 12 is composed of a single coil composed of a spirally wound electric wire. A core may be used in the coil. The circuit of the present invention is well-known, and although not shown, a capacitor is charged from a DC high-voltage power supply, and the charge of the charged capacitor is applied to the transmission coil 12 as a pulse current by turning on a mechanical switch or a semiconductor switch. is configured to The transmission coil 12 is attached to the surface of the inspection object A with a gap H provided therebetween. The gap H is kept constant at the time of inspection.

センサ14は公知のセンサであって、検査対象物Aの測定面に設置され、検査対象物Aに発生した弾性波(音響信号)を検出し、電気信号に変換する器具である。前記センサ14は、音響信号を電気信号に変換するAEセンサ、加速度センサ、光計測センサ又はマイクロホンが使われる。ここではAEセンサが採用されている。 The sensor 14 is a known sensor, and is a device that is installed on the measurement surface of the inspection object A, detects an elastic wave (acoustic signal) generated in the inspection object A, and converts it into an electric signal. The sensor 14 may be an AE sensor, an acceleration sensor, an optical measurement sensor, or a microphone that converts acoustic signals into electrical signals. An AE sensor is employed here.

電源部13は発信コイル12に電源ケーブルを介してパルス電流を印加するようになっている。 The power supply unit 13 applies a pulse current to the transmitting coil 12 through a power cable.

計測部15は、AEセンサ14の出力波形をサンプリングし、これをアンプリファイアにより増幅すると共に、不要な信号をフィルタなどにより除去した後、A/D変換し、A/D変換されたデジタルデータをメモリに記憶し、CPUを介してデジタルデータを所定の信号処理手順を有するプログラムに従い所定の演算を行い、その結果をメモリに蓄積または表示装置を介して表示する。 The measurement unit 15 samples the output waveform of the AE sensor 14, amplifies it with an amplifier, removes unnecessary signals with a filter or the like, A/D converts it, and outputs the A/D converted digital data. Digital data is stored in a memory, and digital data is subjected to a predetermined calculation according to a program having a predetermined signal processing procedure via a CPU, and the result is stored in the memory or displayed via a display device.

計測部15は、例えば音響解析装置として市販されている公知の構成のものであり、音響解析を行なうようになっている。さらに、FFT(Fast Fourier Transform)等のフーリエ変換機能を有している。
なお、計測部15は、これに限らず、センサ14からの弾性波の検出信号の波形の計測のみでよい場合には、例えばオシロスコープ等を使用してもよい。
The measurement unit 15 has a known configuration commercially available as, for example, an acoustic analysis device, and performs acoustic analysis. Furthermore, it has a Fourier transform function such as FFT (Fast Fourier Transform).
Note that the measurement unit 15 is not limited to this, and if only the waveform of the detection signal of the elastic wave from the sensor 14 needs to be measured, for example, an oscilloscope or the like may be used.

検査対象物Aの第1は、高導電性材料11aに非導電性材料11bを接着した接合体、第2は、高導電性材料11aに低導電性材料11cを接着した接合体である。以上は図1に示す。簡略化のためにこれらの組み合わせを1つの図面で表した。
図1では、ライナーR側に高導電性材料11aを設け、外殻体G側に非導電性材料11bを設けた場合、ライナーR側に高導電性材料11aを設け、外殻体G側に低導電性材料11cを設けた場合、ライナーR側に低導電性材料11cを設け、外殻体G側に非導電性材料11bを設けた場合がある。
第3は、低導電性材料11cの積層体11’である(図4)。
高導電性材料11aとは、電気伝導率が106S/mを越える素材で、一般的には合金鋼やアルミニウムなどの金属材料である。
非導電性材料11bとは、電気伝導率が10-4S/mを下回る素材で、セラミックス、GFRP(ガラス繊維強化プラスチック)、プラスチックスなどが代表例である。
低導電性材料11cとは、電気伝導率が10-4~104S/mの範囲内の素材で、CFRP(炭素繊維強化プラスチック)、CFRC(炭素繊維強化コンクリート)、CNF複合材料(カーボンナノファイバー複合材料で、カーボンナノファイバーをポリエチレンやポリプロピレンなどの高分子材料に分散させた複合体)、CNT複合材料(カーボンナノチューブ複合材料)、固体高分子電解膜などが代表例である。
The first test object A is a bonded body in which a non-conductive material 11b is adhered to a highly conductive material 11a, and the second is a bonded body in which a low conductive material 11c is adhered to a highly conductive material 11a. The above is shown in FIG. For the sake of simplification, these combinations are represented in one drawing.
In FIG. 1, when the highly conductive material 11a is provided on the liner R side and the non-conductive material 11b is provided on the outer shell G side, the highly conductive material 11a is provided on the liner R side and the outer shell G side is provided with the non-conductive material 11b. When the low-conductivity material 11c is provided, the low-conductivity material 11c may be provided on the liner R side and the non-conductive material 11b may be provided on the outer shell G side.
The third is a laminate 11' of low-conductivity material 11c (Fig. 4).
The highly conductive material 11a is a material having an electric conductivity exceeding 10 6 S/m, and is generally a metallic material such as alloy steel or aluminum.
The non-conductive material 11b is a material having an electrical conductivity of less than 10 −4 S/m, and typical examples thereof include ceramics, GFRP (glass fiber reinforced plastic), and plastics.
The low-conductivity material 11c is a material whose electric conductivity is within the range of 10 -4 to 10 4 S/m, and includes CFRP (carbon fiber reinforced plastic), CFRC (carbon fiber reinforced concrete), CNF composite material (carbon nano Typical examples of fiber composite materials include composites in which carbon nanofibers are dispersed in polymer materials such as polyethylene and polypropylene, CNT composite materials (carbon nanotube composite materials), and solid polymer electrolyte membranes.

接合体11とは、強度,剛性,軽量化などの特性向上のために,2種類以上の性質が異なる素材をそれぞれの相を保ったまま界面で強固に結合し,合体・複合した材料をいう。 ここでは、図3に示すようなライナーRとして低合金鋼や炭素鋼やステンレス鋼やアルミニウム合金、外殻体GとしてGFRPやCFRPが接着された材料、或いはライナーRとしてCFRP、外殻体GとしてGFRPが接着された材料で、例えば、代表例として圧力容器がある。また、2種類以上の性質が異なる素材を接着接合して構造体を形造るものとして、自動車や航空機のボディーなどがある。 The joined body 11 is a material in which two or more materials with different properties are strongly bonded at the interface while maintaining their respective phases to improve characteristics such as strength, rigidity, and weight reduction. . Here, the liner R as shown in FIG. A material to which GFRP is adhered, for example, there is a pressure vessel as a representative example. In addition, bodies of automobiles and aircraft are examples of structures formed by bonding two or more materials having different properties.

このような圧力容器やボディーの内部欠陥としては、内層材であるライナーRと外殻体G間の接着接合部分S、或いは異種材料構造体の接着接合部分Sの部分的な境界剥離P、外殻体G内部の層間剥離・内部剥離N、内層材であるライナーRの減肉や疲労亀裂Wなどがある。 Internal defects of such a pressure vessel or body include the adhesive joint portion S between the liner R, which is the inner layer material, and the outer shell G, or the partial boundary peeling P of the adhesive joint portion S of the dissimilar material structure, There are delamination/internal delamination N inside the shell G, thinning and fatigue crack W of the liner R which is the inner layer material.

積層体11’とは、シートやフィルム、単板などを何枚か重ね合わせて接着したものである。代表的なものは炭素繊維織物のプリプレグを、その繊維方向を違えて重ね合わせ、硬化させたCFRPがある。積層体11’の欠陥としては層間剥離Nやトランスバースクラックが挙げられる。実際の使用例としては、風力発電の巨大なタービンブレードが挙げられる。
なお、接合体11や積層体11’の接合は、接着剤を用いた接着を代表例として説明したが、融着接合でもよい。また、層間剥離Nは、例えば層間の接合部が接合後に衝撃等で剥離した部分であるが、ここでは気泡や異物の存在等により接合が不完全な融着不良部も含む。
The laminate 11' is formed by stacking and bonding several sheets, films, veneers, or the like. A typical example is CFRP, which is obtained by stacking carbon fiber woven fabric prepregs in different fiber directions and curing them. The defects of the laminate 11' include delamination N and transverse cracks. A practical example of use would be the giant turbine blades in wind farms.
Although bonding using an adhesive has been described as a typical example of bonding of the bonded body 11 and the laminated body 11', fusion bonding may also be used. The delamination N is, for example, a portion where the joint between the layers is separated due to an impact or the like after joining, but here also includes a defective fusion portion where the joint is incomplete due to the presence of air bubbles or foreign matter.

次に、本検査における発信コイル12とセンサ14の設置方法について説明する。図1は接合体11の内部欠陥のない基準体Bを用いる場合、図2は内部欠陥ある検査対象物A(接合体11)を用いる場合を模式的に表したものである。この場合、内部欠陥として接着接合部分Sに幅Kの境界剥離Pを設けた。勿論、内部欠陥は境界剥離Pに限られず、既述のようなものがある。ここでは、境界剥離Pを代表例とする。
本検査における発信コイル12とセンサ14の設置方法は、積層体11’の場合も接合体11と同じである。この場合、図示していないが、検査対象物Aと同一の構造の内部欠陥のない基準体Bと、図4に示す、内部欠陥を有する検査対象物Aとを用いる。
いずれの場合も、発信コイル12は、検査対象物Aが接合体11の場合、その測定面である非又は低導電性材料11b・11cの上面から離間させて設置し、積層体11’の場合は一方の面から離間させて設置する。離間高さをHとする。
Next, a method of installing the transmitting coil 12 and the sensor 14 in the main inspection will be described. FIG. 1 schematically shows the case of using a reference body B having no internal defect of the joined body 11, and FIG. In this case, a boundary separation P with a width K was provided in the adhesive joint portion S as an internal defect. Of course, the internal defect is not limited to boundary peeling P, and there are other defects as described above. Here, boundary separation P is taken as a representative example.
The method of installing the transmitting coil 12 and the sensor 14 in this inspection is the same for the laminate 11 ′ as for the joined body 11 . In this case, although not shown, a reference body B having the same structure as the inspection object A and having no internal defects and an inspection object A having an internal defect shown in FIG. 4 are used.
In any case, when the inspection object A is a joined body 11, the transmission coil 12 is placed away from the upper surfaces of the non- or low-conductive materials 11b and 11c, which are the measurement surfaces, and in the case of the laminate 11' be installed away from one side. Let H be the separation height.

センサ14は、検査対象物Aが接合体11の場合、非又は低導電性材料11b・11c側の表面(即ち、パルス磁場照射面)に接して設置される。検査対象物Aが積層体11’の場合、その表面(パルス磁場照射面)に接して設置される。
発信コイル12との関係では、発信コイル12から距離Lだけ離れた位置にセンサ14を設置する。
When the object A to be inspected is the joined body 11, the sensor 14 is placed in contact with the surface of the non- or low-conductivity materials 11b and 11c (that is, the pulse magnetic field irradiation surface). When the inspection object A is a laminate 11', it is placed in contact with its surface (pulse magnetic field irradiation surface).
In relation to the transmitting coil 12 , the sensor 14 is installed at a position separated by a distance L from the transmitting coil 12 .

本発明のパルス電磁力による非破壊検査装置10は検査対象物A又は基準体Bに対して前記のように設置される。基準体Bとは、検査対象物Aと同一構造のもので、欠陥のない部材である。
本検査において、発信コイル12にパルス電流を印加すると発信コイル12側から検査対象物A(又は基準体B)の内部方向にパルス磁場が発生する。
検査対象物A(又は基準体B)が、(a)ライナーR側に高導電性材料11a、外殻体G側に非導電性材料11b、又は低導電性材料11cを設けた場合、このパルス磁場が高導電性材料11aに渦電流を誘起する。
検査対象物Aが、(a)ライナーR側に低導電性材料11c、外殻体G側に非導電性材料11bを設けた場合、高導電性材料11aよりも弱いものの、このパルス磁場が低導電性材料11cに渦電流を誘起する。いずれの場合も渦電流の深さはパルス磁場の強さによるが、同じ強さのパルス磁場では、当然、低導電性材料11cの渦電流は、高導電性材料11aより小さくなる。
検査対象物A(又は基準体B)が、積層体11’の場合、検査対象物A(又は基準体B)の全体に(特に、パルス磁場照射面からパルス磁場の強度に対応する深さの範囲内において)渦電流を誘起する。接合体11では、目標値として照射面から最大30mmの深さにあるライナーRである導電性材料11aの信号が得られるようにする。
そして、この渦電流に伴う磁場とパルス磁場の磁場との相互作用力によって、高導電性材料11a(又は低導電性材料11c)が励振され、接合体11の場合は内層体(ライナーR)である高導電性材料11a(又は低導電性材料11c)、積層体11’の場合はその全体(特に、渦電流が発生する範囲内)から弾性波(アコースティックエミッション)が発せられる。
The non-destructive inspection apparatus 10 using pulsed electromagnetic force of the present invention is installed with respect to the inspection object A or the reference body B as described above. The reference body B has the same structure as the inspection object A and is a member without defects.
In this inspection, when a pulse current is applied to the transmission coil 12, a pulse magnetic field is generated from the transmission coil 12 side toward the inside of the inspection object A (or the reference body B).
When the inspection object A (or the reference body B) is provided with (a) a highly conductive material 11a on the liner R side and a non-conductive material 11b or a low conductive material 11c on the outer shell G side, this pulse The magnetic field induces eddy currents in the highly conductive material 11a.
When the inspection object A is (a) provided with the low-conductivity material 11c on the liner R side and the non-conductivity material 11b on the outer shell G side, the pulse magnetic field is weaker than the high-conductivity material 11a, but the pulse magnetic field is low. An eddy current is induced in the conductive material 11c. In either case, the depth of the eddy currents depends on the strength of the pulsed magnetic field, but for the same strength of the pulsed magnetic field, naturally the eddy currents of the low-conductivity material 11c are smaller than those of the high-conductivity material 11a.
When the inspection object A (or the reference body B) is the laminated body 11′, the entire inspection object A (or the reference body B) (in particular, the depth corresponding to the intensity of the pulse magnetic field from the pulse magnetic field irradiation surface) within range) induces eddy currents. In the joined body 11, as a target value, a signal of the conductive material 11a, which is the liner R, is obtained at a maximum depth of 30 mm from the irradiated surface.
Then, the interaction force between the magnetic field accompanying this eddy current and the magnetic field of the pulse magnetic field excites the high-conductivity material 11a (or the low-conductivity material 11c). An elastic wave (acoustic emission) is emitted from a certain high-conductivity material 11a (or low-conductivity material 11c) or, in the case of the laminate 11', the entirety (in particular, within the range where eddy currents are generated).

この弾性波は、数kHz~数十kHzという周波数成分を持つ。金属材料では主に100kHz~300kHzの周波数成分を持つ信号が多く放出される。周波数の高い信号は、空気中では減衰が大きいので、アコースティックエミッション(AE)は主に材料中に伝播する。この場合、高導電性材料11aが磁性体であれば、磁気エネルギーに伴う力も励振力に付加され強化される。 This elastic wave has a frequency component of several kHz to several tens of kHz. Metal materials mainly emit many signals having frequency components of 100 kHz to 300 kHz. Acoustic emissions (AE) mainly propagate in materials because high frequency signals are attenuated significantly in air. In this case, if the highly conductive material 11a is a magnetic material, the force associated with the magnetic energy is added to the excitation force and strengthened.

なお、上記弾性波は、弾性体中を伝わる変形波で、弾性応力波、弾性ひずみ波とも呼ばれる。体積変化を伴う「体積波」と、形状変化は生じるが体積変化を伴わない「等体積波」とに大別される。一次元物体中の圧縮波、引張り波は前者に対応し、剪断波、あるいはねじり波は後者に対応する。弾性波の伝わる速度は弾性体の弾性係数、ポアソン比と密度に依存する。 The elastic wave is a deformation wave that propagates through an elastic body, and is also called an elastic stress wave or an elastic strain wave. It is roughly divided into a "volume wave" that causes a change in volume and an "equal volume wave" that causes a change in shape but not a change in volume. Compression waves and tension waves in a one-dimensional object correspond to the former, and shear waves or torsion waves correspond to the latter. The propagation velocity of elastic waves depends on the elastic modulus, Poisson's ratio and density of the elastic body.

次に、本装置10を用いた非破壊検査方法について説明する。図1は基準となるデータを取得するために行う、欠陥のない基準体Bについての検査を示す。これに対して図2は検査対象となる検査対象物Aの検査で、接着接合部分Sに境界剥離Pを有する場合である。ライナーRとなる高導電性材料11a、又は低導電性材料11cの厚みをTで示す。
既に述べたように、検査対象物Aにパルス磁場を照射する。照射面は非又は低導電性材料(外殻体G)11b・11c側となる。照射面と発信コイル12との間には隙間Hが設けられる。
センサ14は非又は低導電性材料(外殻体G)11b・11cに接して設置される。
検査対象物Aにパルス磁場を照射して、該パルス磁場によってライナーR側である前記高導電性材料11a、又は低導電性材料11cに渦電流を誘起させ、該渦電流と前記パルス磁場との相互作用力により前記高導電性材料11a又は低導電性材料11cを励振させる。この励振により前記高導電性材料11a又は低導電性材料11cを音源とする弾性波が発生し、非又は低導電性材料(外殻体G)11b・11c内を伝達する。外殻体Gである非又は低導電性材料11b・11cの表面に設置されたセンサ14で伝達された弾性波を検出し、センサ14に接続された計測部15で所定の演算(前記弾性波の録取と、更には該弾性波のFFT解析、並びにFFTスペクトルの入手)を行うと共に必要にあわせてその波形を表示装置に表示する。
内部欠陥のない基準体Bについては上記と同じ手順で予めそのデータを入手し、記憶装置に記憶させておく。
然る後、基準データ(基準弾性波の波形、及びその基準FFTスペクトル)と検査データ(検査弾性波の波形、及びその検査FFTスペクトル)とを比較し、基準体Bのデータに対する検査データの下記(イ)~(ニ)に示す1又は複数の項目を選択し、選択された項目の結果を比較して、その特徴部分を抽出し、検査対象物Aの内部欠陥の有無を推定する。これは、接合体11、積層体11’いずれの場合も同様に行われる。
(イ)前記基準弾性波の波形に現れる音の強度と、検査対象物Aの弾性波の波形に現れる音の強度の差
(ロ)前記基準弾性波の波形に対する検査対象物Aの弾性波の波形の時間ずれ
(ハ)前記基準弾性波の波形に対する検査対象物Aの弾性波の波形の減衰状態
(ニ)前記基準弾性波の波形に対する検査対象物Aの弾性波の波形の周波数
Next, a non-destructive inspection method using this device 10 will be described. FIG. 1 shows an inspection of a defect-free reference body B to obtain reference data. On the other hand, FIG. 2 shows an inspection of an inspection object A to be inspected, in which an adhesive joint portion S has boundary peeling P. FIG. T denotes the thickness of the high-conductivity material 11a or the low-conductivity material 11c that forms the liner R. As shown in FIG.
As already described, the inspection object A is irradiated with a pulsed magnetic field. The irradiated surface is the side of the non- or low-conductivity material (outer shell G) 11b and 11c. A gap H is provided between the irradiation surface and the transmitting coil 12 .
The sensor 14 is placed in contact with the non- or low-conductivity material (shell G) 11b, 11c.
The inspection object A is irradiated with a pulsed magnetic field to induce an eddy current in the high-conductivity material 11a or the low-conductivity material 11c on the liner R side by the pulsed magnetic field, and the eddy current and the pulsed magnetic field are generated. The interaction force excites the high-conductivity material 11a or the low-conductivity material 11c. This excitation generates an elastic wave whose sound source is the high-conductivity material 11a or the low-conductivity material 11c, and propagates through the non- or low-conductivity materials (outer shells G) 11b and 11c. The sensor 14 installed on the surface of the non- or low-conductivity materials 11b and 11c, which is the outer shell G, detects the transmitted elastic wave, and the measurement unit 15 connected to the sensor 14 performs a predetermined calculation (the elastic wave , FFT analysis of the elastic wave, and acquisition of the FFT spectrum) are performed, and the waveform is displayed on a display device as required.
For the reference body B having no internal defects, the data is obtained in advance by the same procedure as described above and stored in the storage device.
After that, the reference data (reference elastic wave waveform and its reference FFT spectrum) and the inspection data (inspection elastic wave waveform and its inspection FFT spectrum) are compared, and the following inspection data for the data of the reference body B are obtained. One or a plurality of items shown in (a) to (d) are selected, the results of the selected items are compared, the characteristic portions are extracted, and the presence or absence of internal defects in the inspection object A is estimated. This is done in the same way for both the joined body 11 and the laminated body 11'.
(a) the difference between the intensity of the sound appearing in the waveform of the reference elastic wave and the intensity of the sound appearing in the waveform of the elastic wave of the inspection object A; Waveform time shift (c) Attenuation state of the waveform of the elastic wave of the inspection object A with respect to the waveform of the reference elastic wave (d) Frequency of the waveform of the elastic wave of the inspection object A with respect to the waveform of the reference elastic wave

次に、本装置10を用いた非破壊検査の結果(グラフ)を参照しながら上記(イ)~(ニ)について説明する。
図5以下のグラフに於いて、一方の基準体Bには欠陥が存在せず、他方の検査対象物Aには欠陥が存在する。実線は欠陥なし、破線は欠陥ありを示す。
第5図(a)は、検査対象物Aの外殻体Gと内層体(ライナー)Rに境界剥離Pが存在する場合のAEシグナルの検出結果で、縦軸はAEシグナルの振幅(単位:V)、横軸は時間(ms)である。そして、パルス磁場を外殻体G側から検査対象物Aに照射した。この場合のAEシグナルは、実線で示す内部剥離なしの弾性波の波形(振幅)と破線で表す内部剥離ありの弾性波の波形(振幅)とは、破線で表す内部剥離ありの弾性波の方が僅かながら大きく現れるので、AEシグナル強度の違いから内部欠陥の存在が推測できる。また、弾性波の減衰は、実線で表す内部剥離なしの方が破線で表す内部剥離ありの場合より若干早く減衰し、0に収束する。これは内部剥離の有無により振動モード(振動の仕方)が変化し、これがAE(弾性波)の波形の違いとなって現れるからである。
Next, the above (a) to (d) will be described with reference to the results (graphs) of the non-destructive inspection using the apparatus 10. FIG.
In the graphs of FIG. 5 and subsequent figures, there is no defect in the reference body B on one side, and there is a defect on the inspection object A on the other side. A solid line indicates no defect, and a dashed line indicates a defect.
FIG. 5(a) shows the detection result of the AE signal when boundary delamination P exists between the outer shell G and the inner layer (liner) R of the inspection object A. The vertical axis represents the amplitude of the AE signal (unit: V), the horizontal axis is time (ms). Then, a pulsed magnetic field was applied to the object A to be inspected from the outer shell G side. In this case, the AE signal is the waveform (amplitude) of the elastic wave without internal separation indicated by the solid line and the waveform (amplitude) of the elastic wave with internal separation indicated by the dashed line. appears slightly large, the existence of internal defects can be inferred from the difference in AE signal intensity. Also, the attenuation of the elastic wave is slightly faster in the case of no internal separation indicated by the solid line than in the case of the case with internal separation indicated by the dashed line, and converges to zero. This is because the vibration mode (the manner of vibration) changes depending on the presence or absence of internal peeling, and this appears as a difference in the waveform of AE (elastic wave).

更に同図(b)(横軸は周波数、縦軸はFFTスペクトル強度)から分かるように、同図(a)のAEシグナル(弾性波の波形)をFFT分析すると破線側(検査対象物A)のピーク周波数が実線側(基準体B)のピーク周波数より高周波数側にシフトしている。これは境界剥離部分の振動モードの変化が原因と考えられる。即ち、境界剥離に関しては、弾性波の波形の比較(振幅と時間ずれと減衰と周波数)でその違いをある程度判別できるが、FFT周波数のピーク値を比較すると境界剥離の有無がより明確に検出できる。
この検査は、接合体11の外殻体GとライナーRとの境界剥離Pのみならず、接合体11の内部剥離Nにも対応できる。また、接合体11だけでなく、積層体11’に付いても応用できる。即ち、積層体11’内部に内部剥離Nが存在する場合、同様の現象で同様の測定結果が得られる。
なお、ここでは金属ライナーRとして用いられた高導電性材料11aに非導電性材料11bが接合された接合体11の例を示したが、内部欠陥(境界剥離P,内部剥離N)を有する高導電性材料11aと低導電性材料11cの接合体11、低導電性材料11cと非導電性材料11bの接合体11、低導電性材料11cの積層体11’でも同様の傾向を示す。
Furthermore, as can be seen from the figure (b) (the horizontal axis is the frequency and the vertical axis is the FFT spectrum intensity), the FFT analysis of the AE signal (elastic wave waveform) in the figure (a) shows that the broken line side (inspection object A) is shifted to a higher frequency side than the peak frequency on the solid line side (reference body B). This is thought to be caused by a change in the vibration mode of the boundary separation portion. That is, with respect to boundary separation, the difference can be determined to some extent by comparing the waveforms of elastic waves (amplitude, time lag, attenuation, and frequency), but the presence or absence of boundary separation can be detected more clearly by comparing the peak values of FFT frequencies. .
This inspection can deal with not only boundary peeling P between the outer shell G and the liner R of the joined body 11 but also internal peeling N of the joined body 11 . Moreover, it can be applied not only to the joined body 11 but also to the laminated body 11'. That is, when the internal delamination N exists inside the laminate 11', the same phenomenon results in the same measurement result.
Here, an example of the bonded body 11 in which the non-conductive material 11b is bonded to the highly conductive material 11a used as the metal liner R is shown, but the high conductive material having internal defects (boundary peeling P, internal peeling N) A similar tendency is exhibited in the joined body 11 of the conductive material 11a and the low conductive material 11c, the joined body 11 of the low conductive material 11c and the non-conductive material 11b, and the laminated body 11' of the low conductive material 11c.

図6(a)~(h)は、図1、2において、内部欠陥の「位置」を検出する方法で、検査対象物Aは、高電導性材料11aに非電導性材料11bを接着した接合体11を使用した。
測定の第1方法としては、センサ14を一定の位置(内部欠陥から100mm離れた位置)に固定し、発信コイル12を検査対象物Aと標準体Bの検査面に沿って移動させ、各移動点(センサ14の位置をゼロとし、発信コイル12から離れた距離)において上記と同様、弾性波を録取すると共にこれをFFT解析した。
AEセンサ14を原点とし、発信コイル12を20mm間隔で内部欠陥方向に移動させた。100mmの地点で内部欠陥が設けられた位置となり、100mmを越えると、発信コイル12は内部欠陥を越えたAEセンサ14の反対側の位置に移動する。
図6(a)から(f)はAEシグナル強度のグラフ、図6(g)と図6(h)は各測定点におけるFFTスペクトルの最大ピーク周波数を結んだグラフ、AEシグナル強度を結んだグラフである。
(a)は、AEセンサ14から60mm離れた位置、(b)は80mm離れた位置、(c)は内部欠陥の中央位置に一致し、AEセンサ14から100mm離れた位置、(d)は内部欠陥を越え、AEセンサ14から120mm離れた位置、(e)は140mm離れた位置、(f)は160mm離れた位置である。
AEシグナル強度(図6(h))は、四角の点を実線で繋いだ折れ線(内部剥離なし)ではAEセンサから発信コイルが離れると次第に低下するが、丸の点を実線で繋いだ折れ線(内部剥離あり)では内部剥離を20mm超えた地点(AEセンサから120mmの位置)まではシグナル強度の低下がみられ、その後、シグナル強度の上昇がある。160mmを超えたところで急減する。欠陥位置はシグナル強度の最低位置(120mm)近辺にあることが推測される。内部欠陥の位置は、最大ピーク周波数の増減の様子からわかる。
また、最大ピーク周波数(図6(g))は、四角の点を実線で繋いだ折れ線(内部剥離なし)の場合、1~1.5kHzと低いが、丸の点を実線で繋いだ折れ線(内部剥離あり)の場合、6.6~7.5kHzと高い。これにより剥離の有無が分かる。
ただし、上記の第1方法では、センサ14の設定位置がある位置に固定であるのに対して、実際の検査対象物Aでは内部欠陥の位置は不明である。そしてセンサ14の設定位置が内部欠陥の位置から離れるに従ってAEシグナルは次第に弱くなる。(例えば、内部欠陥の位置からセンサ14の設定位置が180mm以上離れると、基準体BのAEシグナル結果に近似する。)それ故、この方法では検査対象物Aに対して細かく検査区画(例えば、180mm以下の正方形を1検査区画とする。)を設定し、それぞれにおいて検査を行うことになる。
なお、ここでは高導電性材料11aに非導電性材料11bを接着した接合体11を使用したが、高導電性材料11aに低導電性材料11cを接着した接合体11、低導電性材料11cに非導電性材料11bを接着した接合体11、低導電性材料11cの積層体11’でも同様の傾向が得られる。
測定の第2方法としては、センサ14と発信コイル12とを一定の間隔を保ちながら、センサ14と発信コイル12とを検査対象物A、標準体B上を検査面に沿って移動させ、第1方法と同じ解析を行った。
第2方法では、センサ14と発信コイル12との距離が一定であるので、その距離を保ちながら両者を測定面上を移動させれば、基準体Bの場合は、そのAEシグナル強度はほぼ一定を保つが、測定対象物Aの場合は内部欠陥の近傍でAEシグナル強度が変化する。
この点は積層体11’における内部欠陥位置の検出も同様である。
6A to 6H show a method for detecting the "position" of an internal defect in FIGS. Body 11 was used.
As a first measurement method, the sensor 14 is fixed at a fixed position (a position 100 mm away from the internal defect), the transmission coil 12 is moved along the inspection surfaces of the inspection object A and the standard body B, and each movement At a point (the position of the sensor 14 being zero and the distance away from the transmission coil 12), the elastic wave was recorded and FFT-analyzed in the same manner as described above.
Using the AE sensor 14 as the origin, the transmission coil 12 was moved in the direction of the internal defect at intervals of 20 mm. At a point of 100 mm, the internal defect is provided, and when the distance exceeds 100 mm, the transmission coil 12 moves to a position on the opposite side of the AE sensor 14 beyond the internal defect.
6 (a) to (f) are graphs of AE signal intensity, FIGS. 6 (g) and 6 (h) are graphs connecting the maximum peak frequencies of FFT spectra at each measurement point, and graphs connecting AE signal intensities is.
(a) is a position 60 mm away from the AE sensor 14, (b) is a position 80 mm away, (c) corresponds to the center position of the internal defect and is 100 mm away from the AE sensor 14, (d) is an internal Beyond the defect, the position 120 mm away from the AE sensor 14, (e) the position 140 mm away, and (f) the position 160 mm away.
The AE signal intensity (Fig. 6(h)) gradually decreases as the transmission coil moves away from the AE sensor in the polygonal line connecting the square points with a solid line (no internal peeling), but the polygonal line connecting the circle points with a solid line ( With internal peeling), a decrease in signal intensity is observed up to a point beyond the internal peeling by 20 mm (a position of 120 mm from the AE sensor), and then there is an increase in signal intensity. It sharply decreases after 160mm. It is presumed that the defect position is near the lowest signal intensity position (120 mm). The position of the internal defect can be found from the increase and decrease of the maximum peak frequency.
In addition, the maximum peak frequency (FIG. 6(g)) is as low as 1 to 1.5 kHz in the case of the polygonal line connecting the square points with a solid line (no internal peeling), but the polygonal line connecting the circle points with a solid line ( In the case of internal peeling), it is as high as 6.6 to 7.5 kHz. From this, the presence or absence of peeling can be determined.
However, in the first method, the set position of the sensor 14 is fixed at a certain position, whereas the position of the internal defect in the actual inspection object A is unknown. The AE signal gradually weakens as the set position of the sensor 14 moves away from the position of the internal defect. (For example, when the set position of the sensor 14 is separated from the position of the internal defect by 180 mm or more, the AE signal result of the reference body B is approximated.) Therefore, in this method, the inspection object A is finely inspected (for example, A square of 180 mm or less is defined as one inspection section), and inspection is performed in each section.
Here, the joined body 11 in which the non-conductive material 11b is adhered to the highly conductive material 11a is used. A similar tendency is obtained in the joined body 11 to which the non-conductive material 11b is adhered and the laminated body 11' of the low-conductive material 11c.
As a second measurement method, the sensor 14 and the transmission coil 12 are moved along the test surface over the test object A and the standard body B while maintaining a constant distance between the sensor 14 and the transmission coil 12. The same analysis as in Method 1 was performed.
In the second method, since the distance between the sensor 14 and the transmission coil 12 is constant, if both are moved on the measurement surface while maintaining the distance, the AE signal intensity is almost constant in the case of the reference object B. is maintained, but in the case of the measurement object A, the AE signal intensity changes in the vicinity of the internal defect.
This is the same for the detection of internal defect positions in the laminate 11'.

接合体11の金属ライナーRの厚み測定と同金属ライナーRの亀裂検出を次に示す。基準の板厚を有する金属ライナーRに非(又は低)導電性材料11b(11c)を接着した接合体11と、基準の板厚より薄い金属ライナーRに非(又は低)導電性材料11b(11c)を接着した接合体11とを用意し、上記のようにパルス磁場を印加してその弾性波を検出する。
図7(a)は、AEシグナルの波形であり、同図(b)はこれらをフーリエ変換して周波数領域の波形を求め、周波数領域の波形を比較したものである。
図7(a)から、板厚が小さいものほど弾性波の反射のためにAEシグナルのピーク値のインターバルが短くなる。そしてこのピーク値間隔から板厚(減肉)の程度が分かる。
図7(b)からは、最大ピークのFFTスペクトルが変化し、場合によっては半値幅が広がることが観察され、亀裂の存在が推測される。
なお、ライナーRとして低導電性材料11cを用い、外殻材Gとして非導電性材料11bを接合した接合体11も上記と同じ傾向が現れる。
Measurement of the thickness of the metal liner R of the joined body 11 and detection of cracks in the same metal liner R are described below. A joined body 11 in which a non-(or low) conductive material 11b (11c) is adhered to a metal liner R having a reference plate thickness, and a non-(or low) conductive material 11b ( 11c) are adhered to each other, and a pulsed magnetic field is applied as described above to detect the elastic wave.
FIG. 7(a) shows waveforms of AE signals, and FIG. 7(b) shows waveforms in the frequency domain obtained by Fourier transforming them and comparing the waveforms in the frequency domain.
From FIG. 7(a), the smaller the plate thickness, the shorter the interval between the peak values of the AE signal due to the reflection of the elastic wave. The degree of sheet thickness (thickness reduction) can be found from this peak value interval.
From FIG. 7(b), it is observed that the FFT spectrum of the maximum peak changes, and in some cases the half-value width widens, suggesting the presence of cracks.
The same tendency as described above also appears in the joined body 11 in which the low-conductivity material 11c is used as the liner R and the non-conductivity material 11b is joined as the shell material G.

A:検査対象物、B:基準体、G:外殻体、H:隙間、L:距離、N:内部剥離、P:境界剥離、R:内層体(ライナー)S:接着接合部分、W:疲労亀裂、10:非破壊検査装置、11:接合体、11’:積層体、11a:高導電性材料、11b:非導電性材料、11c:低導電性材料、12:発信コイル、13:電源部、14:センサ、15:計測部 A: inspection object, B: reference body, G: outer shell body, H: gap, L: distance, N: internal peeling, P: boundary peeling, R: inner layer body (liner) S: adhesive joint portion, W: Fatigue crack, 10: non-destructive inspection device, 11: joined body, 11': laminate, 11a: highly conductive material, 11b: non-conductive material, 11c: low conductive material, 12: transmission coil, 13: power supply part, 14: sensor, 15: measuring part

Claims (7)

高導電性材料に非導電性材料又は低導電性材料のいずれかを接着した接合体を検査対象物とし、該検査対象物にパルス磁場を照射して該パルス磁場によって前記高導電性材料に渦電流を誘起させ、該渦電流と前記パルス磁場との相互作用力により前記高導電性材料を励振させて前記高導電性材料を音源とする弾性波を発生させ、該弾性波を前記非導電性材料側又は低導電性材料側で検出し、然る後、前記弾性波の波形と予め入手した内部欠陥のない基準体における基準弾性波の波形とを比較して、該検査対象物内部の欠陥の有無を推定する電磁パルス音響非破壊検査方法において、
前記検査対象物を複数の検査区画に分割し、
該検査区画において、前記検査対象物の測定面である表面上の固定箇所にセンサを設けると共に、前記検査対象物の測定面である表面上に配置されたパルス磁場発生用の発信コイルを前記検査対象物である接合体に対して相対的に移動させ、固定箇所に設けたセンサで前記弾性波を複数箇所にて検出し、然る後、前記弾性波の波形と予め入手した内部欠陥のない基準体における基準弾性波の波形とを下記(イ)~(ニ)の内の1又は複数の項目を選択し、選択された項目の結果を比較して、該検査対象物内部の欠陥の位置を推定することを特徴とする電磁パルス音響非破壊検査方法。
(イ) 前記基準弾性波の波形に現れる音の強度と、検査対象物の弾性波の波形に現れる音の強度の差
(ロ) 前記基準弾性波の波形に対する検査対象物の弾性波の波形の時間ずれ
(ハ) 前記基準弾性波の波形に対する検査対象物の弾性波の波形の減衰状態
(ニ) 前記基準弾性波の波形に対する検査対象物の弾性波の波形の周波数
A bonded body in which either a non-conductive material or a low-conductivity material is adhered to a high-conductivity material is used as an inspection object, and a pulsed magnetic field is applied to the inspection object, and the high-conductivity material is vortexed by the pulsed magnetic field. An electric current is induced, the highly conductive material is excited by an interaction force between the eddy current and the pulsed magnetic field to generate an elastic wave with the highly conductive material as a sound source, and the elastic wave is transmitted to the non-conductive material. Detecting defects on the material side or on the low-conductivity material side, and then comparing the waveform of the elastic wave with the waveform of the reference elastic wave of a previously obtained reference body having no internal defects to detect defects inside the inspection object. In the electromagnetic pulse acoustic non-destructive inspection method for estimating the presence or absence of
dividing the inspection object into a plurality of inspection zones;
In the inspection section, a sensor is provided at a fixed position on the surface which is the measurement surface of the inspection object, and a transmission coil for generating a pulse magnetic field arranged on the surface which is the measurement surface of the inspection object is connected to the inspection section. It is moved relative to the joint body, which is an object, and the elastic waves are detected at a plurality of points by the sensors provided at the fixed points. Select one or more items from the following (a) to (d) for the waveform of the reference elastic wave in the reference body, compare the results of the selected items, and determine the position of the defect inside the inspection object An electromagnetic pulse acoustic non-destructive inspection method characterized by estimating
(a) difference between the intensity of the sound appearing in the waveform of the reference elastic wave and the intensity of the sound appearing in the waveform of the elastic wave of the object to be inspected; Time lag (c) Attenuation state of the waveform of the elastic wave of the inspection object with respect to the waveform of the reference elastic wave (d) Frequency of the waveform of the elastic wave of the inspection object with respect to the waveform of the reference elastic wave
低導電性材料に非導電性材料を接着した接合体を検査対象物とし、該検査対象物にパルス磁場を照射して該パルス磁場によって前記接合体の低導電性材料に渦電流を誘起させ、該渦電流と前記パルス磁場との相互作用力により前記低導電性材料を励振させて前記低導電性材料を音源とする弾性波を発生させ、該弾性波を前記非導電性材料側で検出し、
然る後、前記弾性波の波形と予め入手した内部欠陥のない基準体における基準弾性波の波形とを比較して、該検査対象物内部の欠陥の有無を推定する電磁パルス音響非破壊検査方法において、
前記検査対象物を複数の検査区画に分割し、
該検査区画において、前記検査対象物の測定面である表面上の固定箇所にセンサを設けると共に、前記検査対象物の測定面である表面上に配置されたパルス磁場発生用の発信コイルを前記検査対象物である接合体に対して相対的に移動させ、固定箇所に設けたセンサで前記弾性波を複数箇所にて検出し、然る後、前記弾性波の波形と予め入手した内部欠陥のない基準体における基準弾性波の波形とを下記(イ)~(ニ)の内の1又は複数の項目を選択し、選択された項目の結果を比較して、該検査対象物内部の欠陥の位置を推定することを特徴とする電磁パルス音響非破壊検査方法。
(イ) 前記基準弾性波の波形に現れる音の強度と、検査対象物の弾性波の波形に現れる音の強度の差
(ロ) 前記基準弾性波の波形に対する検査対象物の弾性波の波形の時間ずれ
(ハ) 前記基準弾性波の波形に対する検査対象物の弾性波の波形の減衰状態
(ニ) 前記基準弾性波の波形に対する検査対象物の弾性波の波形の周波数
A bonded body in which a non-conductive material is adhered to a low-conductive material is used as an object to be inspected, and a pulsed magnetic field is applied to the object to be inspected to induce an eddy current in the low-conductive material of the bonded body by the pulsed magnetic field, An interaction force between the eddy current and the pulse magnetic field excites the low-conductivity material to generate an elastic wave with the low-conductivity material as a sound source, and the elastic wave is detected on the non-conducting material side. ,
After that, an electromagnetic pulse acoustic non-destructive inspection method for estimating the presence or absence of defects inside the inspection object by comparing the waveform of the elastic wave with the waveform of the reference elastic wave of a reference body having no internal defects obtained in advance. in
dividing the inspection object into a plurality of inspection zones;
In the inspection section, a sensor is provided at a fixed position on the surface which is the measurement surface of the inspection object, and a transmission coil for generating a pulse magnetic field arranged on the surface which is the measurement surface of the inspection object is connected to the inspection section. It is moved relative to the joint body, which is an object, and the elastic waves are detected at a plurality of points by the sensors provided at the fixed points. Select one or more items from the following (a) to (d) for the waveform of the reference elastic wave in the reference body, compare the results of the selected items, and determine the position of the defect inside the inspection object An electromagnetic pulse acoustic non-destructive inspection method characterized by estimating
(a) difference between the intensity of the sound appearing in the waveform of the reference elastic wave and the intensity of the sound appearing in the waveform of the elastic wave of the object to be inspected; Time lag (c) Attenuation state of the waveform of the elastic wave of the inspection object with respect to the waveform of the reference elastic wave (d) Frequency of the waveform of the elastic wave of the inspection object with respect to the waveform of the reference elastic wave
高導電性材料に非導電性材料又は低導電性材料のいずれかを接着した接合体を検査対象物とし、該検査対象物にパルス磁場を照射して該パルス磁場によって前記高導電性材料に渦電流を誘起させ、該渦電流と前記パルス磁場との相互作用力により前記高導電性材料を励振させて前記高導電性材料を音源とする弾性波を発生させ、該弾性波を前記非導電性材料側又は低導電性材料側で検出し、然る後、前記弾性波の波形と予め入手した内部欠陥のない基準体における基準弾性波の波形とを比較して、該検査対象物内部の欠陥の有無を推定する電磁パルス音響非破壊検査方法において、
パルス磁場発生用の発信コイルとセンサとを一定の間隔を保ちつつ前記検査対象物である接合体に対して相対的に移動させ、前記発信コイルと共に移動するセンサで前記弾性波を複数箇所にて検出し、然る後、前記弾性波の波形と予め入手した内部欠陥のない基準体における基準弾性波の波形とを下記(イ)~(ニ)の内の1又は複数の項目を選択し、選択された項目の結果を比較して、該検査対象物内部の欠陥の位置を推定することを特徴とする電磁パルス音響非破壊検査方法。
(イ) 前記基準弾性波の波形に現れる音の強度と、検査対象物の弾性波の波形に現れる音の強度の差
(ロ) 前記基準弾性波の波形に対する検査対象物の弾性波の波形の時間ずれ
(ハ) 前記基準弾性波の波形に対する検査対象物の弾性波の波形の減衰状態
(ニ) 前記基準弾性波の波形に対する検査対象物の弾性波の波形の周波数
A bonded body in which either a non-conductive material or a low-conductivity material is adhered to a high-conductivity material is used as an inspection object, and a pulsed magnetic field is applied to the inspection object, and the high-conductivity material is vortexed by the pulsed magnetic field. An electric current is induced, the highly conductive material is excited by an interaction force between the eddy current and the pulsed magnetic field to generate an elastic wave with the highly conductive material as a sound source, and the elastic wave is transmitted to the non-conductive material. Detecting defects on the material side or on the low-conductivity material side, and then comparing the waveform of the elastic wave with the waveform of the reference elastic wave of a previously obtained reference body having no internal defects to detect defects inside the inspection object. In the electromagnetic pulse acoustic non-destructive inspection method for estimating the presence or absence of
A transmission coil for generating a pulsed magnetic field and a sensor are moved relative to the bonded body, which is the object to be inspected, while maintaining a constant interval, and the sensor moving together with the transmission coil emits the elastic waves at a plurality of locations. After that, select one or more items from the following (a) to (d) for the waveform of the elastic wave and the waveform of the reference elastic wave in a previously obtained reference body without internal defects, An electromagnetic pulse acoustic non-destructive inspection method characterized by comparing results of selected items to estimate the position of a defect inside the inspection object .
(a) difference between the intensity of the sound appearing in the waveform of the reference elastic wave and the intensity of the sound appearing in the waveform of the elastic wave of the object to be inspected; Time lag (c) Attenuation state of the waveform of the elastic wave of the inspection object with respect to the waveform of the reference elastic wave (d) Frequency of the waveform of the elastic wave of the inspection object with respect to the waveform of the reference elastic wave
低導電性材料に非導電性材料を接着した接合体を検査対象物とし、該検査対象物にパルス磁場を照射して該パルス磁場によって前記接合体の低導電性材料に渦電流を誘起させ、該渦電流と前記パルス磁場との相互作用力により前記低導電性材料を励振させて前記低導電性材料を音源とする弾性波を発生させ、該弾性波を前記非導電性材料側で検出し、A bonded body in which a non-conductive material is adhered to a low-conductive material is used as an object to be inspected, and a pulsed magnetic field is applied to the object to be inspected to induce an eddy current in the low-conductive material of the bonded body by the pulsed magnetic field, An interaction force between the eddy current and the pulse magnetic field excites the low-conductivity material to generate an elastic wave with the low-conductivity material as a sound source, and the elastic wave is detected on the non-conducting material side. ,
然る後、前記弾性波の波形と予め入手した内部欠陥のない基準体における基準弾性波の波形とを比較して、該検査対象物内部の欠陥の有無を推定する電磁パルス音響非破壊検査方法において、 After that, an electromagnetic pulse acoustic non-destructive inspection method for estimating the presence or absence of defects inside the inspection object by comparing the waveform of the elastic wave with the waveform of the reference elastic wave of a reference body having no internal defects obtained in advance. in
パルス磁場発生用の発信コイルとセンサとを一定の間隔を保ちつつ前記検査対象物である接合体に対して相対的に移動させ、前記発信コイルと共に移動するセンサで前記弾性波を複数箇所にて検出し、然る後、前記弾性波の波形と予め入手した内部欠陥のない基準体における基準弾性波の波形とを下記(イ)~(ニ)の内の1又は複数の項目を選択し、選択された項目の結果を比較して、該検査対象物A内部の欠陥の位置を推定することを特徴とする電磁パルス音響非破壊検査方法。A transmission coil for generating a pulsed magnetic field and a sensor are moved relative to the bonded body, which is the object to be inspected, while maintaining a constant interval, and the sensor moving together with the transmission coil emits the elastic waves at a plurality of locations. After that, select one or more items from the following (a) to (d) for the waveform of the elastic wave and the waveform of the reference elastic wave in a previously obtained reference body without internal defects, An electromagnetic pulse acoustic non-destructive inspection method characterized by comparing results of selected items and estimating the position of a defect inside the inspection object A.
(イ) 前記基準弾性波の波形に現れる音の強度と、検査対象物の弾性波の波形に現れる音の強度の差(b) The difference between the intensity of sound appearing in the waveform of the reference elastic wave and the intensity of sound appearing in the waveform of the elastic wave of the object to be inspected
(ロ) 前記基準弾性波の波形に対する検査対象物の弾性波の波形の時間ずれ(b) Time shift of the waveform of the elastic wave of the inspection object with respect to the waveform of the reference elastic wave
(ハ) 前記基準弾性波の波形に対する検査対象物の弾性波の波形の減衰状態(c) Attenuation state of the waveform of the elastic wave of the inspection object with respect to the waveform of the reference elastic wave
(ニ) 前記基準弾性波の波形に対する検査対象物の弾性波の波形の周波数(d) Frequency of the waveform of the elastic wave of the inspection object with respect to the waveform of the reference elastic wave
検査対象物である低導電性材料の積層体にパルス磁場を照射して該パルス磁場によって前記積層体に渦電流を誘起させ、該渦電流と前記パルス磁場との相互作用力により前記積層体の全体を励振させて弾性波を発生させ、該弾性波を前記積層体の表面にて検出し、A pulsed magnetic field is applied to a laminate of a low-conductivity material, which is an object to be inspected, and an eddy current is induced in the laminate by the pulsed magnetic field. Exciting the whole to generate an elastic wave, detecting the elastic wave on the surface of the laminate,
然る後、前記弾性波の波形と予め入手した内部欠陥のない基準体における基準弾性波の波形とを下記(イ)~(ニ)の内の1又は複数の項目を選択し、選択された項目の結果を比較して、該検査対象物内部の欠陥の有無を推定することを特徴とする電磁パルス音響非破壊検査方法。After that, the waveform of the elastic wave and the waveform of the reference elastic wave in the previously obtained reference body without internal defects are selected by selecting one or more items from the following (a) to (d) An electromagnetic pulse acoustic non-destructive inspection method, characterized by comparing the results of items and estimating the presence or absence of defects inside the inspection object.
(イ) 前記基準弾性波の波形に現れる音の強度と、検査対象物の弾性波の波形に現れる音の強度の差(b) The difference between the intensity of sound appearing in the waveform of the reference elastic wave and the intensity of sound appearing in the waveform of the elastic wave of the object to be inspected
(ロ) 前記基準弾性波の波形に対する検査対象物の弾性波の波形の時間ずれ(b) Time shift of the waveform of the elastic wave of the inspection object with respect to the waveform of the reference elastic wave
(ハ) 前記基準弾性波の波形に対する検査対象物の弾性波の波形の減衰状態(c) Attenuation state of the waveform of the elastic wave of the inspection object with respect to the waveform of the reference elastic wave
(ニ) 前記基準弾性波に波形に対する検査対象物の弾性波の波形の周波数(d) Frequency of the waveform of the elastic wave of the inspection object with respect to the waveform of the reference elastic wave
パルス磁場発生用の発信コイルを前記検査対象物である積層体に対して相対的に移動させ、固定箇所に設けたセンサで前記弾性波を複数箇所にて検出し、然る後、前記弾性波の波形と予め入手した内部欠陥のない基準体における基準弾性波の波形とを前記(イ)~(ニ)の内の1又は複数の項目を選択し、選択された項目の結果を比較して、該検査対象物内部の欠陥の位置を推定することを特徴とする請求項5に記載の電磁パルス音響非破壊検査方法。 A transmission coil for generating a pulsed magnetic field is moved relative to the laminate, which is the object to be inspected, and the elastic waves are detected at a plurality of locations by sensors provided at fixed locations. Select one or more items from the above (a) to (d) from the waveform of and the waveform of the reference elastic wave in the reference body without internal defects obtained in advance, and compare the results of the selected items. 6. The electromagnetic pulse acoustic non-destructive inspection method according to claim 5, wherein the position of the defect inside the inspection object is estimated.
パルス磁場発生用の発信コイルとセンサとを一定の間隔を保ちつつ前記検査対象物である積層体に対して相対的に移動させ、前記発信コイルと共に移動するセンサで前記弾性波を複数箇所にて検出し、然る後、前記弾性波の波形と予め入手した内部欠陥のない基準体における基準弾性波の波形とを前記(イ)~(ニ)の内の1又は複数の項目を選択し、選択された項目の結果を比較して、該検査対象物内部の欠陥の位置を推定することを特徴とする請求項5に記載の電磁パルス音響非破壊検査方法
A transmission coil for generating a pulse magnetic field and a sensor are moved relative to the laminate as the object to be inspected while maintaining a constant interval, and the sensor moving together with the transmission coil emits the elastic waves at a plurality of locations. and then selecting one or more of the items (a) to (d) for the waveform of the elastic wave and the waveform of the reference elastic wave in a previously obtained reference body having no internal defects, 6. The electromagnetic pulse acoustic non-destructive inspection method according to claim 5, wherein the results of the selected items are compared to estimate the position of the defect inside the inspection object .
JP2018167677A 2018-09-07 2018-09-07 Electromagnetic pulse acoustic non-destructive inspection method Active JP7126069B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2018167677A JP7126069B2 (en) 2018-09-07 2018-09-07 Electromagnetic pulse acoustic non-destructive inspection method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2018167677A JP7126069B2 (en) 2018-09-07 2018-09-07 Electromagnetic pulse acoustic non-destructive inspection method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2020041832A JP2020041832A (en) 2020-03-19
JP7126069B2 true JP7126069B2 (en) 2022-08-26

Family

ID=69797995

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2018167677A Active JP7126069B2 (en) 2018-09-07 2018-09-07 Electromagnetic pulse acoustic non-destructive inspection method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP7126069B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR102750253B1 (en) * 2023-11-14 2025-01-07 주식회사 파인더스 Ultrasonic inspection and method for evaluating the reinforcement status of glass fiber reinforced polymer as a replacement for rebar in concrete structures

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2004309333A (en) 2003-04-08 2004-11-04 R & D Inst Of Metals & Composites For Future Industries Lifetime monitoring of composite materials
US20040221652A1 (en) 2003-05-05 2004-11-11 Flora John H. Transducer guided wave electromagnetic acoustic
JP2005331525A (en) 2000-11-17 2005-12-02 Amikku:Kk Acoustic diagnosis/measuring apparatus by pulse electromagnetic force and diagnosis/measuring method of them
JP2005338105A (en) 2000-11-17 2005-12-08 Amikku:Kk Acoustic diagnosis/measurement device by pulse electromagnetic force and diagnosis/measurement method therefor
JP2006010709A (en) 2000-11-17 2006-01-12 Amikku:Kk Acoustic diagnosing/measuring apparatus by pulse electromagnetic force, and diagnosing/measuring method for the same
JP2006017741A (en) 2000-11-17 2006-01-19 Amikku:Kk Acoustic diagnosing using pulse electromagnetic force and measuring apparatus and its diagnosing and measuring method
JP2006242770A (en) 2005-03-03 2006-09-14 Japan Nuclear Cycle Development Inst States Of Projects Electromagnetic ultrasonic flaw detection / measurement method and apparatus
JP2006343203A (en) 2005-06-08 2006-12-21 Kobe Steel Ltd Ultrasonic measuring method and ultrasonic measuring instrument

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2005331525A (en) 2000-11-17 2005-12-02 Amikku:Kk Acoustic diagnosis/measuring apparatus by pulse electromagnetic force and diagnosis/measuring method of them
JP2005338105A (en) 2000-11-17 2005-12-08 Amikku:Kk Acoustic diagnosis/measurement device by pulse electromagnetic force and diagnosis/measurement method therefor
JP2006010709A (en) 2000-11-17 2006-01-12 Amikku:Kk Acoustic diagnosing/measuring apparatus by pulse electromagnetic force, and diagnosing/measuring method for the same
JP2006017741A (en) 2000-11-17 2006-01-19 Amikku:Kk Acoustic diagnosing using pulse electromagnetic force and measuring apparatus and its diagnosing and measuring method
JP2004309333A (en) 2003-04-08 2004-11-04 R & D Inst Of Metals & Composites For Future Industries Lifetime monitoring of composite materials
US20040221652A1 (en) 2003-05-05 2004-11-11 Flora John H. Transducer guided wave electromagnetic acoustic
JP2006242770A (en) 2005-03-03 2006-09-14 Japan Nuclear Cycle Development Inst States Of Projects Electromagnetic ultrasonic flaw detection / measurement method and apparatus
JP2006343203A (en) 2005-06-08 2006-12-21 Kobe Steel Ltd Ultrasonic measuring method and ultrasonic measuring instrument

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
古川 裕貴ほか,渦電流試験法を用いたCFRPの表面近傍及び深部の炭素繊維配向の同定,日本機械学会東北支部第52期総会・講演会論文集,2017.52巻,日本,2017年06月19日,p.129-130

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2020041832A (en) 2020-03-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Chen et al. Nondestructive testing and evaluation techniques of defects in fiber-reinforced polymer composites: A review
Caminero et al. Internal damage evaluation of composite structures using phased array ultrasonic technique: Impact damage assessment in CFRP and 3D printed reinforced composites
Zhang et al. Delamination damage imaging method of CFRP composite laminate plates based on the sensitive guided wave mode
David-West et al. A review of structural health monitoring techniques as applied to composite structures
Diamanti et al. Structural health monitoring techniques for aircraft composite structures
Bossi et al. Nondestructive testing of damage in aerospace composites
Ibrahim Nondestructive evaluation of thick-section composites and sandwich structures: A review
Kumar et al. Recent trends in industrial and other engineering applications of non destructive testing: a review
James et al. A simulative and experimental approach toward Eddy current nondestructive evaluation of manufacturing flaws and operational damage in CFRP composites
US20250116633A1 (en) Acoustic emission method to ascertain damage occurrence in impacted composites
Boopathy et al. Review on non-destructive testing of composite materials in aircraft applications
Ricci et al. Guided waves in layered plate with delaminations
Fromme Guided wave testing
Tiwari et al. Comparative analysis of non-contact ultrasonic methods for defect estimation of composites in remote areas
Segreto et al. Full-volume ultrasonic technique for 3D thickness reconstruction of CFRP aeronautical components
JP7126069B2 (en) Electromagnetic pulse acoustic non-destructive inspection method
Masurkar et al. Damage detection in hybrid metal-composite plates using ultrasonic guided waves based on outliers estimate
Sahoo et al. A novel NDE approach towards evaluating adhesive bonded interfaces
Aljets Acoustic emission source location in composite aircraft structures using modal analysis
Straß et al. Production integrated nondestructive testing of composite materials and material compounds–an overview
James Nondestructive Evaluation and Structural Health Monitoring of Manufacturing Flaws and Operational Damage in Composite Structures
Singh et al. Delamination detection and evaluation in composite laminates using guided ultrasonic waves
Sahoo et al. NDE of GFRP composite laminates using single sided NMR and acousto-ultrasonic methods
IBRAHIM Nondestructive evaluation of the integrity of thick composite structures
Girolamo et al. Automated laser-based barely visible impact damage detection in honeycomb sandwich composite structures

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20210114

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20211117

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20211124

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20220120

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20220621

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20220713

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 7126069

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150